Facial and neck erythema associated with dupilumab treatment: A systematic review

[Modern systemic therapies for atopic dermatitis : Which factors determine the choice of therapy?]

For the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD), two groups of modern systemic therapies with a total of five drugs are currently approved in Germany: biologics (dupilumab, tralokinumab) and "small molecules" (abrocitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib). The growing armamentarium of therapy options, especially with more than one drug per substance group, makes it challenging for practitioners to select the appropriate treatment for the individual patient. In this review article, the preconditions and requirements of each drug group as well as the corresponding substances are presented comparatively. On the one hand, direct therapeutic effects on the severity of the disease are considered and, on the other hand, the spectrum of potential adverse drug reactions are discussed. In particular, short- and long-term effects, the safety profile and the patient's concomitant diseases represent key factors for shared decision-making with regard to select the optimum personalized therapy option.

Phase 3 Efficacy and Safety of Abrocitinib in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis After Switching from Dupilumab (JADE EXTEND)

BACKGROUND

Abrocitinib efficacy by prior dupilumab response status in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) has not previously been assessed in phase 3 studies.

OBJECTIVE

Examine efficacy and safety of abrocitinib among patients who received prior dupilumab.

METHODS

Patients with moderate-to-severe AD received abrocitinib 200 mg or 100 mg once-daily in JADE EXTEND (phase 3 extension) after dupilumab in double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 JADE COMPARE.

RESULTS

Among prior dupilumab responders, ≥75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) was achieved in 93.5% and 90.2% of patients who received 12 weeks of abrocitinib 200 mg and 100 mg, respectively; ≥4-point improvement in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS4) was achieved in 89.7% and 81.6%, respectively. Among prior dupilumab nonresponders, EASI-75 was achieved with abrocitinib 200 mg and 100 mg in 80.0% and 67.7% and PP-NRS4 in 77.3% and 37.8%, respectively. Most common adverse events among abrocitinib-treated patients were nasopharyngitis, nausea, acne, and headache. Conjunctivitis occurred less frequently with abrocitinib in comparison to prior dupilumab.

LIMITATIONS

Short-term, 12-week analysis; no placebo arm.

CONCLUSION

Efficacy and safety profile of abrocitinib in JADE EXTEND supports the role of abrocitinib as a treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe AD, regardless of prior dupilumab response status.

Characterization of Residual Facial Dermatitis during Dupilumab Therapy: A Retrospective Chart Review to Delineate the Potential Role of Expanded Series Patch Testing

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the incidence of RFDD in patients receiving dupilumab and the rate of resolution of RFDD after expanded series patch testing (ESPT) and allergen avoidance.

METHODS

This is a retrospective chart review of 80 patients with atopic dermatitis who were evaluated for RFDD after treatment with dupilumab. Expanded series patch testing findings and response to allergen avoidance were assessed in the subset of patients with RFDD who subsequently underwent ESPT while continuing to receive dupilumab.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients (61.3%) experienced facial dermatitis before initiating dupilumab. Thirty-five patients (43.8%) experienced RFDD after starting dupilumab. Of the 14 patients with RFDD who received ESPT, 92.9% had 1 or more relevant positive patch test results, with 50% of such patients being mostly to completely clear of facial dermatitis after allergen avoidance. Importantly, 50.6% of the positive reactions to allergens were not included on the North American Contact Dermatitis Group Core 80.

CONCLUSIONS

Many patients with RFDD benefit from patch testing and subsequent allergen avoidance. Expanded series patch testing should be offered to patients who experience RFDD after beginning dupilumab therapy to ensure that such patients have eliminated any exogenous component of their dermatitis, such as concomitant allergic contact dermatitis.

Dupilumab Facial Redness/Dupilumab Facial Dermatitis: A Guide for Clinicians

Dupilumab facial redness (DFR), or the development of an eczematous rash of the face and neck with dupilumab use, has been observed in recent case reports. It is estimated to impact between 4 and 43.8% of dupilumab users, including children and adults. Aside from reviewing the pathogenesis and clinical presentation, we present potential diagnostic steps (such as skin scraping, serologies, biopsy, and patch testing) and management options for DFR ranging from allergen avoidance to dupilumab interruption. It is hoped that this article will serve as a means for clinicians to familiarize themselves with DFR regarding the differential diagnosis, diagnostic tools, and treatment options associated with this phenomenon.

Dupilumab with Topical Corticosteroids Provides Rapid and Sustained Improvement in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Across Anatomic Regions Over 52 Weeks

INTRODUCTION

In a 52-week, phase 3 clinical trial (LIBERTY AD CHRONOS) in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), dupilumab in combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS) resulted in a significant improvement in overall Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) compared with placebo plus TCS. In a post hoc analysis, dupilumab significantly improved the overall extent and severity of AD across four anatomic regions (head and neck, trunk, upper extremities, lower extremities) over 16 weeks. However, as AD severity and presentation may vary by body region, this analysis sought to determine whether there are regional variations in dupilumab efficacy.

METHODS

Using data from the LIBERTY AD CHRONOS study, we performed a post hoc analysis of the mean percentage change in individual EASI signs (erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriation, lichenification) from baseline through week 52 across four anatomic regions (head and neck, trunk, upper extremities, lower extremities).

RESULTS

Dupilumab plus TCS, compared with placebo plus TCS, significantly improved the severity of all individual AD signs to a similar extent across the four anatomic regions. Significant improvements in each sign were seen early, within the first 2-4 weeks of treatment, and were sustained through week 52 across all regions.

CONCLUSIONS

In adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD, treatment with dupilumab resulted in rapid and sustained improvement in the signs of AD across all anatomic regions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

LIBERTY AD CHRONOS (NCT02260986).

Dupilumab facial redness: histologic characterization on a series of four cases

Dupilumab-related head and neck dermatitis is an increasingly reported clinical manifestation occurring in 4-10% of patients on dupilumab that was apparently not reported in clinical trials. Out of 62 adult patients treated with dupilumab for atopic dermatitis in the authors' center, four cases (6%) of head and neck dermatitis were observed, for which a skin biopsy was obtained. Onset occurred between 8 and 24 weeks after initiation of dupilumab, and the reaction resolved after 8-12 weeks. Histopathology and immunohistochemical findings support the authors' hypothesis that facial redness may be a toxic effect induced by dupilumab, although its pathogenesis still requires further investigation.

A Literature Review of Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Dupilumab for Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with pruritus, characterized by recurrent eczema with exacerbations and remissions. AD impairs patients’ QOL and places a heavy burden on patients. Recently, dupilumab, an anti–IL-4Rα antibody, was approved for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe AD who are refractory to topical agents and/or conventional systemic therapy. Clinical trials of dupilumab for AD demonstrated high efficacy and tolerable safety profiles. Furthermore, real-world evidence of dupilumab for AD is accumulating. Most of these data show favorable effectiveness and safety profile; however, they also clarified issues, including conjunctivitis and facial redness. There are still a certain number of patients with significant failure. In this article, we review real-world evidence of dupilumab for AD, identify concerns specific to dupilumab, and discuss unmet needs and issues to be addressed in the future.

Practical Management of Patients with Atopic Dermatitis on Dupilumab

INTRODUCTION

Dupilumab is approved to treat moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in several countries in patients as young as 6 years of age. Since its approval, practical issues related to the use of dupilumab for AD have arisen, with particular interest in transitioning from current therapies and managing medication overlap, considerations for special populations of patients with AD, and management of potential adverse events.

METHODS

This article aims to review the literature addressing several practical management issues related to dupilumab use for AD and to provide a framework for clinical decision-making in these circumstances and sub-populations. Each statement was reviewed, revised and voted on by authors to provide their level of agreement and degree of uncertainty for each statement.

RESULTS

An agreement level > 80% was achieved for all of the statements.

CONCLUSION

The expert panel provides statements considering the practical management of patients with AD taking dupilumab to inform clinical decision-making in specific but frequently encountered clinical situations.

Exosomes derived from human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of dupilumab-related facial redness in patients with atopic dermatitis: A report of two cases

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic, pruritic, and inflammatory dermatosis that affects approximately 20% of children and 10% of adults worldwide. Dupilumab facial redness is gaining attention as additional cases are coming to light in the medical literature.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS

Exosomes are nano-sized vesicles that are constantly released by almost all cells. They can travel between cells and transport their cargo (lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids), making them a possible cell-free therapeutic option for various diseases. Herein, we investigated whether topical application of human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes could reduce dupilumab facial redness in patients with severe atopic dermatitis.

RESULTS

Two patients with atopic dermatitis and refractory dupilumab facial redness were successfully treated with electroporation-assisted topical application of human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes. Six repeated sessions of treatment, with an interval of 1 week between each session, led to marked improvement in erythematous facial lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes may serve as an effective agent in the management of dupilumab facial redness. However, further controlled studies with a larger number of patients are necessary to confirm the efficacy and safety of this agent, as well as the optimal treatment protocol.