51
|
Jaumdally H, Kwok M, Jama Z, Hesse‐Lamptey R, McKendry R, Galvez O, Daniel Y, Santos AF. Basophil activation test has high reproducibility and is feasible in the clinical setting. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2022; 33:e13870. [PMID: 36433860 PMCID: PMC9828203 DOI: 10.1111/pai.13870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The basophil activation test (BAT) has high accuracy to diagnose peanut allergy and can reduce the need for oral food challenges (OFC); however, so far it has not been incorporated in clinical practice. METHODS We assessed the reproducibility of BAT within the same laboratory and between two different laboratories and the feasibility of using BAT in the clinical setting. RESULTS One hundred and two children being assessed for peanut allergy were tested on BAT (72 allergic, 30 sensitized tolerant). There was little internal variation (coefficient of variation <15%) in the BAT and a very strong correlation (Rs > .95) between BAT performed across laboratories. The 2 BAT methods were strongly correlated but not interchangeable. In the cases of discrepancy, our in house BAT method was 100% accurate. BAT was feasible and well-accepted by clinicians: no patient with positive BAT was referred for OFC, leading to reduction in the number of OFC required. Twenty one percent of patients who underwent OFC reacted to peanut. A negative BAT also encouraged the performance of OFC in sensitized children who would otherwise be considered allergic, 50% of whom did not react and incorporated peanut in the diet. CONCLUSIONS The BAT is a robust test that can reliably be transferred between laboratories; however, different BAT methods are not interchangeable. BAT was well integrated in the clinical decision-making process in a specialized center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Jaumdally
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial SciencesKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's HospitalGuy's and St Thomas' HospitalLondonUK
| | - Matthew Kwok
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial SciencesKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of AsthmaLondonUK
| | - Zainab Jama
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial SciencesKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of AsthmaLondonUK
| | - Rochelle Hesse‐Lamptey
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial SciencesKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Richard McKendry
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial SciencesKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of AsthmaLondonUK
| | | | | | - Alexandra F. Santos
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial SciencesKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's HospitalGuy's and St Thomas' HospitalLondonUK
- Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of AsthmaLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Zhu H, Tang K, Chen G, Liu Z. Biomarkers in oral immunotherapy. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2022; 23:705-731. [PMID: 36111569 PMCID: PMC9483607 DOI: 10.1631/jzus.b2200047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Food allergy (FA) is a global health problem that affects a large population, and thus effective treatment is highly desirable. Oral immunotherapy (OIT) has been showing reasonable efficacy and favorable safety in most FA subjects. Dependable biomarkers are needed for treatment assessment and outcome prediction during OIT. Several immunological indicators have been used as biomarkers in OIT, such as skin prick tests, basophil and mast cell reactivity, T cell and B cell responses, allergen-specific antibody levels, and cytokines. Other novel indicators also could be potential biomarkers. In this review, we discuss and assess the application of various immunological indicators as biomarkers for OIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haitao Zhu
- Department of Pediatrics (No. 3 Ward), Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xi'an 710061, China
| | - Kaifa Tang
- Department of Urology, the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China
| | - Guoqiang Chen
- Department of Pediatrics (No. 3 Ward), Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xi'an 710061, China
| | - Zhongwei Liu
- Department of Cardiology, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an 710068, China.
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Turner PJ, Arasi S, Ballmer‐Weber B, Baseggio Conrado A, Deschildre A, Gerdts J, Halken S, Muraro A, Patel N, Van Ree R, de Silva D, Worm M, Zuberbier T, Roberts G. Risk factors for severe reactions in food allergy: Rapid evidence review with meta-analysis. Allergy 2022; 77:2634-2652. [PMID: 35441718 PMCID: PMC9544052 DOI: 10.1111/all.15318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
This rapid review summarizes the most up to date evidence about the risk factors for severe food-induced allergic reactions. We searched three bibliographic databases for studies published between January 2010 and August 2021. We included 88 studies and synthesized the evidence narratively, undertaking meta-analysis where appropriate. Significant uncertainties remain with respect to the prediction of severe reactions, both anaphylaxis and/or severe anaphylaxis refractory to treatment. Prior anaphylaxis, an asthma diagnosis, IgE sensitization or basophil activation tests are not good predictors. Some molecular allergology markers may be helpful. Hospital presentations for anaphylaxis are highest in young children, yet this age group appears at lower risk of severe outcomes. Risk of severe outcomes is greatest in adolescence and young adulthood, but the contribution of risk taking behaviour in contributing to severe outcomes is unclear. Evidence for an impact of cofactors on severity is lacking, although food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis may be an exception. Some medications such as beta-blockers or ACE inhibitors may increase severity, but appear less important than age as a factor in life-threatening reactions. The relationship between dose of exposure and severity is unclear. Delays in symptom recognition and anaphylaxis treatment have been associated with more severe outcomes. An absence of prior anaphylaxis does not exclude its future risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul J. Turner
- National Heart & Lung InstituteImperial College LondonLondonUK
| | - Stefania Arasi
- Translational Research in Paediatric Specialities AreaDivision of AllergyBambino Gesù Children's HospitalIRCCSRomeItaly
| | - Barbara Ballmer‐Weber
- Clinic for Dermatology and AllergologyKantonsspital St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland,Department of DermatologyUniversity Hospital ZürichZürichSwitzerland
| | | | - Antoine Deschildre
- CHU Lille, Univ. LillePediatric Pulmonology and Allergy DepartmentHôpital Jeanne de FlandreLilleFrance
| | | | - Susanne Halken
- Hans Christian Andersen Children’s HospitalOdense University HospitalOdenseDenmark
| | | | - Nandinee Patel
- National Heart & Lung InstituteImperial College LondonLondonUK
| | - Ronald Van Ree
- Departments of Experimental Immunology and of OtorhinolaryngologyAmsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - Margitta Worm
- Division of Allergy and ImmunologyDepartment of Dermatology, Venerology and AllergyCharité, Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Torsten Zuberbier
- Division of Allergy and ImmunologyDepartment of Dermatology, Venerology and AllergyCharité, Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Graham Roberts
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research CentreUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustFaculty of MedicineUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK,The David Hide Asthma and Allergy Research CentreSt Mary's HospitalIsle of WightUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
54
|
Klueber J, Czolk R, Codreanu-Morel F, Montamat G, Revets D, Konstantinou M, Cosma A, Hunewald O, Skov PS, Ammerlaan W, Hilger C, Bindslev-Jensen C, Ollert M, Kuehn A. High-dimensional immune profiles correlate with phenotypes of peanut allergy during food-allergic reactions. Allergy 2022; 78:1020-1035. [PMID: 35700055 DOI: 10.1111/all.15408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Food challenges carry a burden of safety, effort and resources. Clinical reactivity and presentation, such as thresholds and symptoms, are considered challenging to predict ex vivo. AIMS To identify changes of peripheral immune signatures during oral food challenges (OFC) that correlate with the clinical outcome in patients with peanut allergy (PA). METHODS Children with a positive (OFC+ , n = 16) or a negative (OFC- , n = 10) OFC-outcome were included (controls, n = 7). Single-cell mass cytometry/unsupervised analysis allowed unbiased immunophenotyping during OFC. RESULTS Peripheral immune profiles correlated with OFC outcome. OFC+ -profiles revealed mainly decreased Th2 cells, memory Treg and activated NK cells, which had an increased homing marker expression signifying immune cell migration into effector tissues along with symptom onset. OFC- -profiles had also signs of ongoing inflammation, but with a signature of a controlled response, lacking homing marker expression and featuring a concomitant increase of Th2-shifted CD4+ T cells and Treg cells. Low versus high threshold reactivity-groups had differential frequencies of intermediate monocytes and myeloid dendritic cells at baseline. Low threshold was associated with increased CD8+ T cells and reduced memory cells (central memory [CM] CD4+ [Th2] T cells, CM CD8+ T cells, Treg). Immune signatures also discriminated patients with preferential skin versus gastrointestinal symptoms, whereby skin signs correlated with increased expression of CCR4, a molecule enabling skin trafficking, on various immune cell types. CONCLUSION We showed that peripheral immune signatures reflected dynamics of clinical outcome during OFC with peanut. Those immune alterations hold promise as a basis for predictive OFC biomarker discovery to monitor disease outcome and therapy of PA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Klueber
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.,Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Rebecca Czolk
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.,Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Françoise Codreanu-Morel
- Department of Allergology and Immunology, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg-Kanner Klinik, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Guillem Montamat
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.,Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Dominique Revets
- National Cytometry Platform, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg
| | - Maria Konstantinou
- National Cytometry Platform, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg
| | - Antonio Cosma
- National Cytometry Platform, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg
| | - Oliver Hunewald
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Per Stahl Skov
- RefLab ApS, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Institute of Immunology, National University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Wim Ammerlaan
- Integrated BioBank of Luxembourg, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Dudelange, Luxembourg
| | - Christiane Hilger
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Carsten Bindslev-Jensen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Markus Ollert
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.,Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Annette Kuehn
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Alexandre L, Bendali A, Pereiro I, Azimani M, Dumas S, Malaquin L, Mai TD, Descroix S. Modular microfluidic system for on-chip extraction, preconcentration and detection of the cytokine biomarker IL-6 in biofluid. Sci Rep 2022; 12:9468. [PMID: 35676309 PMCID: PMC9176165 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13304-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The cytokine interleukin 6 (IL-6) is involved in the pathogenesis of different inflammatory diseases, including cancer, and its monitoring could help diagnosis, prognosis of relapse-free survival and recurrence. Here, we report an innovative microfluidic approach that uses the fluidization of magnetic beads to specifically extract, preconcentrate and fluorescently detect IL-6 directly on-chip. We assess how the physical properties of the beads can be tuned to improve assay performance by enhancing mass transport, reduce non-specific binding and multiply the detection signal threefold by transitioning between packed and fluidization states. With the integration of a full ELISA protocol in a single microfluidic chamber, we show a twofold reduction in LOD compared to conventional methods along with a large dynamic range (10 pg/mL to 2 ng/mL). We additionally demonstrate its application to IL-6 detection in undiluted serum samples.
Collapse
|
56
|
Arasi S, Cafarotti A, Fiocchi A. Cow's milk allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2022; 22:181-187. [PMID: 35266897 DOI: 10.1097/aci.0000000000000823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To highlight the most recent insights on cow's milk allergy (CMA), its treatment, and management. RECENT FINDINGS CMA is one of the most common food allergies among children. Burdened by the risk for fatal reaction, CMA may imply also a severe impairment of health-related quality of life at individual and family level as well as well as individual and societal costs. The updated Diagnosis and Rationale for Action against Cow's Milk Allergy series is going to provide a series of manuscripts that will offer a comprehensive state-of-the-art specifically on CMA, including international evidence-based recommendations. The current results from randomized clinical trials highlight that oral immunotherapy may be effective by itself in providing desensitization. Preliminary data suggest that biologicals such as omalizumab may be able to increase the threshold of reactivity to milk or several foods (if multiple food allergies) without requiring allergen exposure. Breastfeeding is the first choice for infants with CMA. Extensively hydrolyzed formula and amino-acid formula are valid alternatives and may be particularly helpful when eliminating multiple foods, with severe complex gastrointestinal food allergies, eosinophilic esophagitis, severe eczema, or symptoms while exclusively breastfeeding. Heed is needed to ensure the formula is nutritionally sufficient. Due to a high degree of cross-reactivity with cow's milk proteins and risk for allergic reactions, goats' milk or other mammals' milk should not be used. SUMMARY The adoption and implementation of evidence-based recommendations may guide a proper diagnostics and management and awaited advances in knowledge will allow the development of a personalized treatment tailored on the specific CMA patient's profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefania Arasi
- Translational Research in Pediatric Specialities Area, Division of Allergy, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
57
|
O'Rourke E, Tang H, Chin A, Long A, Sindher S, Chinthrajah RS. Current insights: a systemic review of therapeutic options for peanut allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2022; 22:188-193. [PMID: 35660711 PMCID: PMC9178908 DOI: 10.1097/aci.0000000000000824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW With increasing prevalence of peanut allergy (PA) globally and the greater risk of potential reactions occurring due to the leading role of nuts in food products, PA has become a significant public health concern over the past decade, affecting up to 5 million of the US adult population. This review details updates and advances in prevalence, diagnosis, and immunotherapies that have occurred over the past year. RECENT FINDINGS Therapeutic and diagnostic advances remain at the forefront of research and have continued to push the food allergy (FA) field forward to provide a promising role in the detection and treatment of PA. The FA field has researched significant advances in peanut immunotherapy, biomarker diagnosis, and quality of life (QoL) improvement. SUMMARY Given the burden and consequences for individuals with PA, these advances delivered in clinical practice can significantly improve the QoL of individuals with PA and their caregivers. Ongoing studies will continue to investigate long-term outcome measures of desensitisation and effective management plans tailored to the families' needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eimear O'Rourke
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
58
|
Ruinemans-Koerts J, Brouwer ML, Schmidt-Hieltjes Y, Stevens P, Merkus PJFM, Doggen CMJ, Savelkoul HFJ, van Setten PA. The Indirect Basophil Activation Test Is a Safe, Reliable, and Accessible Tool to Diagnose a Peanut Allergy in Children. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2022; 10:1305-1311.e3. [PMID: 35074603 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.12.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The gold standard for the diagnosis of a peanut allergy is an oral food challenge (OFC), but it is a time-consuming, patient-unfriendly, and expensive test. The in vitro direct basophil activation test (BAT) for peanuts was shown to be a promising diagnostic tool for replacing the OFC. OBJECTIVE To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the indirect (passive) BAT. Compared with the direct BAT, the timing of the indirect BAT is more flexible, and the problem of nonresponding basophils (unresponsive to IgE receptor-mediated signaling) is circumvented. METHODS In 74 children, suspected of peanut allergy and eligible for an OFC, indirect BAT results for peanut extract, Ara h2, and Ara h6 were compared with the results of a double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge. The reactivity and sensitivity of the basophils in the BAT were correlated to both the allergy status and the threshold dose in the OFC. RESULTS The combined basophil reactivity for Ara h2 and Ara h6 showed the highest accuracy (94%) for the diagnosis of a peanut allergy, with positive and negative predictive values of 96% and 89%, respectively. The sensitivity of the basophils for Ara h2 significantly discriminates between patients who tolerated up to 0.4 g of peanut protein in the OFC and those who did not. CONCLUSIONS Because the indirect BAT showed a high diagnostic accuracy for peanut allergy, it is a promising alternative to the classical direct BAT and could lead to a reduction in OFC use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janneke Ruinemans-Koerts
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Cell Biology and Immunology Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Marianne L Brouwer
- Department of Paediatrics, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne Schmidt-Hieltjes
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Petra Stevens
- Department of Paediatrics, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Peter J F M Merkus
- Department of Paediatrics, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Carine M J Doggen
- Rijnstate Research Centre, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem; Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Huub F J Savelkoul
- Cell Biology and Immunology Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Petra A van Setten
- Department of Paediatrics, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Paediatrics, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Flow-based allergen testing: can mast cells beat basophils? Clin Chim Acta 2022; 532:64-71. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2022.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
60
|
Datema MR, Lyons SA, Fernández-Rivas M, Ballmer-Weber B, Knulst AC, Asero R, Barreales L, Belohlavkova S, de Blay F, Clausen M, Dubakiene R, Fernández-Perez C, Fritsche P, Gislason D, Hoffmann-Sommergruber K, Jedrzejczak-Czechowicz M, Jongejan L, Kowalski ML, Kralimarkova TZ, Lidholm J, Papadopoulos NG, Popov TA, Del Prado N, Purohit A, Reig I, Seneviratne SL, Sinaniotis A, Vassilopoulou E, Versteeg SA, Vieths S, Welsing PMJ, Mills ENC, Le TM, Zwinderman AH, van Ree R. Estimating the Risk of Severe Peanut Allergy Using Clinical Background and IgE Sensitization Profiles. FRONTIERS IN ALLERGY 2022; 2:670789. [PMID: 35386994 PMCID: PMC8974676 DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2021.670789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: It is not well-understood why symptom severity varies between patients with peanut allergy (PA). Objective: To gain insight into the clinical profile of subjects with mild-to-moderate and severe PA, and investigate individual and collective predictive accuracy of clinical background and IgE to peanut extract and components for PA severity. Methods: Data on demographics, patient history and sensitization at extract and component level of 393 patients with probable PA (symptoms ≤ 2 h + IgE sensitization) from 12 EuroPrevall centers were analyzed. Univariable and penalized multivariable regression analyses were used to evaluate risk factors and biomarkers for severity. Results: Female sex, age at onset of PA, symptoms elicited by skin contact with peanut, family atopy, atopic dermatitis, house dust mite and latex allergy were independently associated with severe PA; birch pollen allergy with mild-to-moderate PA. The cross-validated AUC of all clinical background determinants combined (0.74) was significantly larger than the AUC of tests for sensitization to extract (0.63) or peanut components (0.54-0.64). Although larger skin prick test wheal size, and higher IgE to peanut extract, Ara h 1 and Ara h 2/6, were associated with severe PA, and higher IgE to Ara h 8 with mild-to-moderate PA, addition of these measurements of sensitization to the clinical background model did not significantly improve the AUC. Conclusions: Models combining clinical characteristics and IgE sensitization patterns can help establish the risk of severe reactions for peanut allergic patients, but clinical background determinants are most valuable for predicting severity of probable PA in an individual patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mareen R Datema
- Department of Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sarah A Lyons
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Montserrat Fernández-Rivas
- Allergy Department, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Barbara Ballmer-Weber
- Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Clinic for Dermatology and Allergology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - André C Knulst
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Riccardo Asero
- Ambulatorio di Allergologia, Clinica San Carlo, Paderno Dugnano, Italy
| | - Laura Barreales
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Preventive Medicine Department, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Simona Belohlavkova
- Department of Allergology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
| | - Frédéric de Blay
- Allergy Division, Chest Disease Department, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Michael Clausen
- Faculty of Medicine, Landspitali University Hospital, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | | | - Cristina Fernández-Perez
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Preventive Medicine Department, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Philipp Fritsche
- Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - David Gislason
- Faculty of Medicine, Landspitali University Hospital, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | | | | | - Laurian Jongejan
- Department of Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marek L Kowalski
- Department of Immunology, Rheumatology and Allergy, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | | | | | - Nikolaos G Papadopoulos
- Allergy Department, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.,Division of Infection, Immunity & Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Todor A Popov
- Clinic of Occupational Diseases, University Hospital Sv. Ivan Rilski, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Nayade Del Prado
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Preventive Medicine Department, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ashok Purohit
- Allergy Division, Chest Disease Department, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Isabel Reig
- Allergy Department, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Suranjith L Seneviratne
- Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Emilia Vassilopoulou
- Department of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, International Hellenic University, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Serge A Versteeg
- Department of Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Stefan Vieths
- Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines, Langen, Germany
| | - Paco M J Welsing
- Division of Internal Medicine and Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - E N Clare Mills
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Thuy-My Le
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Aeilko H Zwinderman
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ronald van Ree
- Department of Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Is oral food challenge useful to avoid complete elimination in Japanese patients diagnosed with or suspected of having IgE-dependent hen's egg allergy? A systematic review. Allergol Int 2022; 71:221-229. [PMID: 34663557 DOI: 10.1016/j.alit.2021.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Revised: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND IgE-mediated egg allergy is a common food allergy worldwide. Patients with egg allergy are known to easily achieve tolerance compared to other allergens such as nuts. Oral food challenge (OFC) is often performed on patients diagnosed with or suspected of having IgE-mediated food allergy, but whether hen's egg OFC is useful in IgE-dependent egg allergy patients to avoid complete elimination remains unknown. METHODS We identified articles in which OFCs were performed in Japanese patients diagnosed with or suspected of having IgE-mediated egg allergy. We evaluated whether the OFCs were useful to avoid the complete elimination of eggs by assessing the following: (1) the number of patients who could avoid complete elimination; (2) the number of patients who experienced serious adverse events (SAEs); or (3) adverse events (AEs); (4) improvement in quality of life (QOL); and (5) immunological changes. RESULTS Fifty-nine articles were selected in the study; all the references were case series or case studies in which OFC was compared to pre-challenge conditions. The overall negative ratio against egg OFC was 62.7%, but an additional 71.9% of OFC-positive patients could take eggs when expanded to partial elimination. Of the 4182 cases, 1146 showed AEs in the OFC, and two cases reached an SAE. Two reports showed an improvement in QOL and immunological changes, although the evidence was weak. CONCLUSIONS OFCs against eggs may be useful to avoid complete elimination, but medical professionals should proceed with the test safely and carefully.
Collapse
|
62
|
Life-threatening anaphylaxis to peanut - impossible to predict? J Allergy Clin Immunol 2022; 149:1128-1129. [PMID: 35000773 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.12.767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
63
|
Jones SM, Kim EH, Nadeau KC, Nowak-Wegrzyn A, Wood RA, Sampson HA, Scurlock AM, Chinthrajah S, Wang J, Pesek RD, Sindher SB, Kulis M, Johnson J, Spain K, Babineau DC, Chin H, Laurienzo-Panza J, Yan R, Larson D, Qin T, Whitehouse D, Sever ML, Sanda S, Plaut M, Wheatley LM, Burks AW. Efficacy and safety of oral immunotherapy in children aged 1-3 years with peanut allergy (the Immune Tolerance Network IMPACT trial): a randomised placebo-controlled study. Lancet 2022; 399:359-371. [PMID: 35065784 PMCID: PMC9119642 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02390-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 67.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Revised: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For young children with peanut allergy, dietary avoidance is the current standard of care. We aimed to assess whether peanut oral immunotherapy can induce desensitisation (an increased allergic reaction threshold while on therapy) or remission (a state of non-responsiveness after discontinuation of immunotherapy) in this population. METHODS We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in five US academic medical centres. Eligible participants were children aged 12 to younger than 48 months who were reactive to 500 mg or less of peanut protein during a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). Participants were randomly assigned by use of a computer, in a 2:1 allocation ratio, to receive peanut oral immunotherapy or placebo for 134 weeks (2000 mg peanut protein per day) followed by 26 weeks of avoidance, with participants and study staff and investigators masked to group treatment assignment. The primary outcome was desensitisation at the end of treatment (week 134), and remission after avoidance (week 160), as the key secondary outcome, were assessed by DBPCFC to 5000 mg in the intention-to-treat population. Safety and immunological parameters were assessed in the same population. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03345160. FINDINGS Between Aug 13, 2013, and Oct 1, 2015, 146 children, with a median age of 39·3 months (IQR 30·8-44·7), were randomly assigned to receive peanut oral immunotherapy (96 participants) or placebo (50 participants). At week 134, 68 (71%, 95% CI 61-80) of 96 participants who received peanut oral immunotherapy compared with one (2%, 0·05-11) of 50 who received placebo met the primary outcome of desensitisation (risk difference [RD] 69%, 95% CI 59-79; p<0·0001). The median cumulative tolerated dose during the week 134 DBPCFC was 5005 mg (IQR 3755-5005) for peanut oral immunotherapy versus 5 mg (0-105) for placebo (p<0·0001). After avoidance, 20 (21%, 95% CI 13-30) of 96 participants receiving peanut oral immunotherapy compared with one (2%, 0·05-11) of 50 receiving placebo met remission criteria (RD 19%, 95% CI 10-28; p=0·0021). The median cumulative tolerated dose during the week 160 DBPCFC was 755 mg (IQR 0-2755) for peanut oral immunotherapy and 0 mg (0-55) for placebo (p<0·0001). A significant proportion of participants receiving peanut oral immunotherapy who passed the 5000 mg DBPCFC at week 134 could no longer tolerate 5000 mg at week 160 (p<0·001). The participant receiving placebo who was desensitised at week 134 also achieved remission at week 160. Compared with placebo, peanut oral immunotherapy decreased peanut-specific and Ara h2-specific IgE, skin prick test, and basophil activation, and increased peanut-specific and Ara h2-specific IgG4 at weeks 134 and 160. By use of multivariable regression analysis of participants receiving peanut oral immunotherapy, younger age and lower baseline peanut-specific IgE was predictive of remission. Most participants (98% with peanut oral immunotherapy vs 80% with placebo) had at least one oral immunotherapy dosing reaction, predominantly mild to moderate and occurring more frequently in participants receiving peanut oral immunotherapy. 35 oral immunotherapy dosing events with moderate symptoms were treated with epinephrine in 21 participants receiving peanut oral immunotherapy. INTERPRETATION In children with a peanut allergy, initiation of peanut oral immunotherapy before age 4 years was associated with an increase in both desensitisation and remission. Development of remission correlated with immunological biomarkers. The outcomes suggest a window of opportunity at a young age for intervention to induce remission of peanut allergy. FUNDING National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, Immune Tolerance Network.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacie M Jones
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, AR, USA.
| | - Edwin H Kim
- Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kari C Nadeau
- Department of Pediatrics and Sean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn
- Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Department of Pediatrics, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert A Wood
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hugh A Sampson
- Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amy M Scurlock
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Sharon Chinthrajah
- Department of Pediatrics and Sean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Julie Wang
- Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert D Pesek
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Sayantani B Sindher
- Department of Pediatrics and Sean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Mike Kulis
- Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Joy Laurienzo-Panza
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Rachel Yan
- The Immune Tolerance Network, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Tielin Qin
- The Immune Tolerance Network, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Srinath Sanda
- The Immune Tolerance Network, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Marshall Plaut
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lisa M Wheatley
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - A Wesley Burks
- Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Santos AF, Evans E, O'Rourke C, Bahnson HT, Lack G. Reply. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2022; 149:1129-1131. [PMID: 35000772 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.12.766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra F Santos
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Children's Allergy Service, Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | - Henry T Bahnson
- Benaroya Research Institute, Seattle, Wash; Immune Tolerance Network, Seattle, Wash
| | - Gideon Lack
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Children's Allergy Service, Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
World Allergy Organization (WAO) Diagnosis and Rationale for Action against Cow's Milk Allergy (DRACMA) Guidelines update – I – Plan and definitions. World Allergy Organ J 2022; 15:100609. [PMID: 35145603 PMCID: PMC8818560 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Since the World Allergy Organization (WAO) Diagnosis and Rationale against Cow's Milk Allergy (DRACMA) Guidelines were published 10 years ago, new evidence has accumulated about the diagnosis, therapy, and specific immunotherapy for cow's milk allergy (CMA). For this reason, WAO has felt the need to update the guidelines. We introduce here this update. The new DRACMA guidelines aim to comprehensively address the guidance on diagnosis and therapy of both IgE non-IgE-mediated forms of cow's milk allergy in children and adults. They will be divided into 18 chapters, each of which will be dedicated to an aspect. The focus will be on the meta-analyzes and recommendations that will be expressed for the 3 most relevant clinical aspects: (a) the diagnostic identification of the condition; (b) the choice of the replacement formula in case of CMA in infancy when the mother is not able to breastfeed, and (c) the use of specific immunotherapy for cow's milk protein allergy.
Collapse
|
66
|
Arkwright PD, Koplin JJ. Striving for Evidence-Based Management of Food Allergies. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2022; 10:56-58. [PMID: 35000740 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.09.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Revised: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Peter D Arkwright
- Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology and Inflammation, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - Jennifer J Koplin
- Centre for Food & Allergy Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Paediatrics and School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Harnik E, Jama Z, Kwok M, Fox AT, Santos AF. Egusi seed allergy confirmed using the basophil activation test. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2022; 33:e13716. [PMID: 34927761 DOI: 10.1111/pai.13716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Revised: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Erika Harnik
- Children's Allergies Department, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Zainab Jama
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Paediatric Allergy, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.,Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.,MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK
| | - Matthew Kwok
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Paediatric Allergy, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.,Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.,MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK
| | - Adam T Fox
- Children's Allergies Department, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Women and Children's Health (Paediatric Allergy, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Alexandra F Santos
- Children's Allergies Department, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Women and Children's Health (Paediatric Allergy, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.,Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.,MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
de Weger WW, Sprikkelman AB, Herpertz CEM, van der Meulen GN, Vonk JM, Kamps AWA, Koppelman GH. The dilemma of open or double-blind food challenges in diagnosing food allergy in children: Design of the ALDORADO trial. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2022; 33:e13654. [PMID: 34435396 PMCID: PMC9293118 DOI: 10.1111/pai.13654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is of major importance to diagnose food allergy accurately. Current guidelines support the use of oral food challenges to do so. The double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) has been regarded as the 'gold standard' for decades. However, DBPCFCs are costly, and time- and resource-intensive procedures. Structural implementation of less demanding open food challenges will only find support if research demonstrates that their outcome is comparable to DBPCFC, yet this has been proven difficult to investigate. METHODS We performed a literature review to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of oral food challenges and interviewed 19 parents of children with proven or suspected food allergy about the design of a trial to study this. RESULTS An overview of the dilemma of diagnosing food allergy using oral food challenges, and the methodological issues and parents' opinions to study this. No comparative studies have been performed using the latest guidelines on oral food challenges. CONCLUSIONS There is an urgent need to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of different oral food challenge protocols. We present the rationale and design of the ALDORADO trial (ALlergy Diagnosed by Open oR DOuble-blind food challenge) that has been set up to investigate whether the outcome of the open food challenge is comparable to DBPCFC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter W. de Weger
- Department of PediatricsMartini HospitalGroningenThe Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric Pulmonology and Pediatric AllergologyUniversity Medical Center GroningenUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
- University Medical Center GroningenGRIAC Research InstituteUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Aline B. Sprikkelman
- Department of Pediatric Pulmonology and Pediatric AllergologyUniversity Medical Center GroningenUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
- University Medical Center GroningenGRIAC Research InstituteUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | | | | | - Judith M. Vonk
- University Medical Center GroningenGRIAC Research InstituteUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
- Department of EpidemiologyUniversity Medical Center GroningenUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | | | - Gerard H. Koppelman
- Department of Pediatric Pulmonology and Pediatric AllergologyUniversity Medical Center GroningenUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
- University Medical Center GroningenGRIAC Research InstituteUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Genuneit J, Jayasinghe S, Riggioni C, Peters RL, Chu DK, Munblit D, Boyle RJ, Du Toit G, Skypala I, Santos AF. Protocol for a systematic review of the diagnostic test accuracy of tests for IgE-mediated food allergy. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2022; 33:e13684. [PMID: 34674299 DOI: 10.1111/pai.13684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) is in the process of updating the guidelines on the diagnosis and management of food allergy. The existing guidelines are based on a systematic review of the literature until 30 September 2012. Therefore, a new systematic review must be undertaken to inform the new guidelines. This systematic review aims to assess the accuracy of index tests to support the diagnosis of IgE-mediated food allergy. METHODS The databases Cochrane CENTRAL (Trials), MEDLINE (OVID) and Embase (OVID) will be searched for diagnostic test accuracy studies from 1 October 2012 to 30 June 2021. Inclusion and exclusion criteria will be used to select appropriate studies. Data from these studies will be extracted and tabulated, and then reviewed for risk of bias and applicability using the QUADAS-2 tool. All evaluations will be done in duplicate. Studies with a high risk of bias and low applicability will be excluded. Meta-analysis will be performed if there are three or more studies of the same index test and food. RESULTS A protocol for the systematic review and meta-analyses is presented and was registered using Prospero prior to commencing the literature search. DISCUSSION Oral food challenges are the reference standard for diagnosis but involve considerable risks and resources. This protocol for systematic review aims to assess the accuracy of various tests to diagnose food allergy, which can be useful in both clinical and research settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jon Genuneit
- Pediatric Epidemiology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Sashini Jayasinghe
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Carmen Riggioni
- Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore city, Singapore
| | - Rachel Louise Peters
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Derek K Chu
- Department of Medicine and Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel Munblit
- Department of Paediatrics and Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Institute of Child's Health, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.,Inflammation, Repair and Development Section, National Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Robert J Boyle
- Inflammation, Repair and Development Section, National Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - George Du Toit
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.,Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.,Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Isabel Skypala
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alexandra F Santos
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.,Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.,Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.,Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
70
|
Röntynen P, Kukkonen K, Savinko T, Mäkelä MJ. Optimizing tools for evaluating challenge outcomes in children with cashew nut allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2021; 128:270-278. [PMID: 34896310 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of cashew nut anaphylaxis is increasing and there is a need for accurate diagnostic tests. Age-specific cutoffs in children are lacking. Changes in serum tryptase levels are not well documented in pediatric food allergy, except in anaphylaxis. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the ability of various tests to diagnose cashew nut allergy and to predict reaction severity. We also investigated changes in tryptase and their correlation to reaction severity. METHODS We performed an open cashew nut challenge on 106 children (aged 1-16 years), who were sensitized to cashew nut with either previous allergic reaction to cashew nut or no known exposure. We analyzed the accuracy of Ana o 3 immunoglobulin E (IgE), cashew nut IgE, skin prick test, basophil activation test (BAT), and combinations thereof to diagnose cashew nut allergy and to predict reaction severity. Tryptase level was measured at the baseline and during an allergic reaction. RESULTS A total of 72 children had positive challenge outcomes. Ana o 3 IgE seemed to be the best single test to diagnose cashew allergy, with a 0.97 kU/L cutoff exhibiting 94.1% specificity and 61.1% sensitivity. Though BAT values of at least 22.8% best predicted reaction severity, with 91.7% specificity and 60.7% sensitivity, the cutoffs were age-specific. Tryptase levels increased substantially 1 to 2 hours after the first allergic symptoms compared with baseline. CONCLUSION Ana o 3 IgE seems to be the best diagnostic test in pediatric cashew nut allergy, and test combinations do not seem to improve the diagnostics. Cutoffs are age-specific. BAT is promising in predicting reaction severity. Tryptase levels should be measured 1 to 2 hours after initiation of an allergic reaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petteri Röntynen
- Skin and Allergy Hospital, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Kaarina Kukkonen
- Children's Hospital and Pediatric Research Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Terhi Savinko
- Skin and Allergy Hospital, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mika J Mäkelä
- Skin and Allergy Hospital, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Barber D, Diaz‐Perales A, Escribese MM, Kleine‐Tebbe J, Matricardi PM, Ollert M, Santos AF, Sastre J. Molecular allergology and its impact in specific allergy diagnosis and therapy. Allergy 2021; 76:3642-3658. [PMID: 34057744 DOI: 10.1111/all.14969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Progressive knowledge of allergenic structures resulted in a broad availability of allergenic molecules for diagnosis. Component-resolved diagnosis allowed a better understanding of patient sensitization patterns, facilitating allergen immunotherapy decisions. In parallel to the discovery of allergenic molecules, there was a progressive development of a regulation framework that affected both in vitro diagnostics and Allergen Immunotherapy products. With a progressive understanding of underlying mechanisms associated to Allergen immunotherapy and an increasing experience of application of molecular diagnosis in daily life, we focus in analyzing the evidences of the value provided by molecular allergology in daily clinical practice, with a focus on Allergen Immunotherapy decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domingo Barber
- Departamento de Ciencias Médicas Básicas Facultad de Medicina IMMA, Universidad San Pablo CEU, CEU Universities Madrid Spain
- ARADyAL‐RD16/0006/0015 RD16/0006/0003 Thematic Network and Cooperative Research Centers ISCIII Madrid Spain
| | - Araceli Diaz‐Perales
- ARADyAL‐RD16/0006/0015 RD16/0006/0003 Thematic Network and Cooperative Research Centers ISCIII Madrid Spain
- Center for Plant Biotechnology and Genomic Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Pozuelo de Alarcon Spain
| | - Maria M. Escribese
- Departamento de Ciencias Médicas Básicas Facultad de Medicina IMMA, Universidad San Pablo CEU, CEU Universities Madrid Spain
- ARADyAL‐RD16/0006/0015 RD16/0006/0003 Thematic Network and Cooperative Research Centers ISCIII Madrid Spain
| | | | - Paolo M. Matricardi
- Department of Pediatric Pneumology and Immunology Charitè Medical University of Berlin Berlin Germany
| | - Markus Ollert
- Department of Infection and Immunity Luxembourg Institute of Health Esch‐sur‐Alzette Luxembourg
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark
| | - Alexandra F. Santos
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy School of Life Course Sciences Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine King's College London London UK
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences King's College London London UK
- Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma London UK
- Children's Allergy Service Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital London UK
| | - Joaquin Sastre
- Fundación Jiménez Diaz AllergyDepartment Universidad Autonomade Madrid, CIBERES, Instituto de Salud Carlos III Madrid Spain
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Ukleja-Sokołowska N, Lis K, Żbikowska-Gotz M, Adamczak R, Bartuzi Z. IgE, IgG, TSLP, Il 25 and IL 33 in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients sensitized to shrimp allergens. FOOD AGR IMMUNOL 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/09540105.2021.2005545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Ukleja-Sokołowska
- Department of Allergology, Clinical Immunology and Internal Medicine, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Kinga Lis
- Department of Allergology, Clinical Immunology and Internal Medicine, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Magdalena Żbikowska-Gotz
- Department of Allergology, Clinical Immunology and Internal Medicine, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Rafał Adamczak
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Zbigniew Bartuzi
- Department of Allergology, Clinical Immunology and Internal Medicine, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Briceno Noriega D, Teodorowicz M, Savelkoul H, Ruinemans-Koerts J. The Basophil Activation Test for Clinical Management of Food Allergies: Recent Advances and Future Directions. J Asthma Allergy 2021; 14:1335-1348. [PMID: 34754200 PMCID: PMC8572092 DOI: 10.2147/jaa.s237759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The basophil activation test (BAT) is an ex vivo functional assay that measures by flow cytometry the degree of basophil degranulation after stimulation with an allergen. In recent years, there has been an increased interest in the diagnostic value of the BAT as it has the potential to mimic the clinical phenotype of sIgE sensitized patients, in contrast to allergen-specific IgE levels. This diagnostic potential would be of particular interest for food allergies present early in life such as peanut, cow’s milk and eggs, which require an expensive, time-consuming and patient unfriendly oral food challenge (OFC) for diagnosis. However, routine applications of the BAT for clinical use are not yet feasible due to the lack of standardized protocols and large clinical validation studies. This review will summarize the current data regarding the application of the BAT in food allergy (FA) for cow’s milk, egg and peanut, being the most common causes of FA in children. Additionally, it will discuss the hurdles for widespread clinical use of the BAT and possible future directions for this diagnostic procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Briceno Noriega
- Cell Biology and Immunology Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Malgorzata Teodorowicz
- Cell Biology and Immunology Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Huub Savelkoul
- Cell Biology and Immunology Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Janneke Ruinemans-Koerts
- Cell Biology and Immunology Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.,Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Storage Proteins Are Driving Pediatric Hazelnut Allergy in a Lipid Transfer Protein-Rich Area. Foods 2021; 10:foods10102463. [PMID: 34681512 PMCID: PMC8535272 DOI: 10.3390/foods10102463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Oral food challenge (OFC) remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of food allergies. However, this test is not without risks, given that severe allergic reactions can be triggered while it is conducted. The purpose of this study is to identify potential demographic variables, clinical characteristics of the patients and biomarkers that may be associated with severe reactions during the hazelnut oral challenge test. The sample included 22 children allergic to hazelnut who underwent a tree nut skin prick test (SPT), specific IgE (sIgE) to hazelnut, component-resolved diagnosis (CRD) with different hazelnut allergens (Cor a 1, Cor a 8, Cor a 9, Cor a 11, Cor a 14), and a single-blind placebo-controlled challenge with hazelnut. A statistically significant relationship was found between the severity of the reaction and the highest values of sIgE to hazelnut, Cor a 11 and Cor a 14, cumulative symptom-triggering dose and sunflower seed sensitization. The use of the CRD is a useful tool to identify patients at higher risk of developing a severe reaction. In this pediatric population sample from Spain, storage proteins were confirmed to be most involved in hazelnut allergy and the development of severe reactions.
Collapse
|
75
|
Clinical Manifestations of Pediatric Food Allergy: a Contemporary Review. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2021; 62:180-199. [PMID: 34519995 DOI: 10.1007/s12016-021-08895-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Food allergies (FAs) are an emerging health care issue, and a "second wave of the allergy epidemic" was named. There are extensive data that documented the prevalence rate as high as approximately 10%. FAs are immunological adverse reactions, including IgE-mediated mechanisms, cell-mediated mechanisms, or mixed IgE- and cell-mediated mechanisms. A diagnosis of FA is made by specific symptoms encounter with food, detailed past history, sensitization tests, and oral food challenges (OFCs) if necessary. The component-resolved diagnostics (CRD) test can distinguish true or cross-reaction. "Minimal elimination" from the results of CRD and OFC could avoid unnecessary food restriction. Strict food limitation is harsh and stressful on patients and their families. Children with FAs experience a higher rate of post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and bullying than others. In the last 20 years, oral immunotherapy (OIT), sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), and epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) are treatment strategies. OIT and EPIT are the most two encouraging treatments for FA. This review aims to introduce FAs in diverse clinical disorders, new perspectives, and their practical implications in diagnosing and treating FA.
Collapse
|
76
|
Bringing the Next Generation of Food Allergy Diagnostics into the Clinic. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2021; 10:1-9. [PMID: 34530176 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Food allergy diagnosis has a massive impact on the lives of patients and their families. Despite recent developments with specific IgE to component allergens, a significant proportion of patients assessed for possible food allergy require oral food challenge to ensure an accurate diagnosis. More precise diagnostic methods are required to reduce the need for oral food challenges. Bead-based epitope assays and cellular tests, such as basophil activation and mast cell tests are the most novel and promising tests on the horizon. There is a pathway to pursue to enable their incorporation in clinical practice, including standardization, technical validation, clinical validation, external validation, overcoming practical and logistical issues, and regulatory approval. Valuable clinical application of these tests goes beyond diagnosis and includes risk assessment to identify allergic patients who are most sensitive and at risk for severe allergic reactions, and to define prognosis and assess clinical response to immunomodulatory treatments.
Collapse
|
77
|
Hemmings O, Niazi U, Kwok M, Radulovic S, Du Toit G, Lack G, Santos AF. Combining Allergen Components Improves the Accuracy of Peanut Allergy Diagnosis. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2021; 10:189-199. [PMID: 34492400 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.08.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND IgE to peanut often occurs in the absence of peanut allergy. Detection of allergen component specific IgE (sIgE) has improved diagnosis and birthed molecular allergen component arrays, in which sensitization to multiple allergen components can be measured simultaneously. OBJECTIVE To improve the diagnostic utility of serology for peanut allergy, by mapping interactions of sIgE to multiple components and IgE functional characteristics. METHODS A cohort of 100 children was studied, with a 60-children cohort employed for external validation. Levels of total IgE, sIgE to peanut, and peanut components were measured using singleplex ImmunoCAP and multiplex immuno solid-phase allergen chip (ISAC). Peanut IgE specific activity, avidity, and diversity were determined. Diagnostic modeling was performed using a Bayesian hierarchical model. RESULTS Sensitization to the 112 allergens on ISAC (model 1) demonstrated the highest accuracy to diagnose peanut allergy (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.92). Sensitization to peanut components on ISAC (model 2) reported an AUC of 0.86 and on singleplex (model 3) an AUC of 0.92, which was greater than that of Ara h 2 sIgE alone (AUC = 0.90). Functional characteristics of peanut sIgE (model 4) reported an AUC of 0.89, which was greater than that of peanut sIgE (AUC = 0.75). Model 3 offered the highest predictive value and the second highest overall diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSIONS sIgE to a combination of allergen components (Ara h 1, 2, 3, and 6) is highly predictive of peanut allergy and superior to individual markers. Combining the functional characteristics of IgE was superior to peanut sIgE levels alone. These models can be applied in real time during clinical consultations using online calculators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Hemmings
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, United Kingdom
| | - Umar Niazi
- Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust and King's College London National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre Translational Bioinformatics Platform, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Kwok
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, United Kingdom
| | - Suzana Radulovic
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - George Du Toit
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gideon Lack
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, United Kingdom; Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alexandra F Santos
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, United Kingdom; Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
78
|
Santos AF, Alpan O, Hoffmann H. Basophil activation test: Mechanisms and considerations for use in clinical trials and clinical practice. Allergy 2021; 76:2420-2432. [PMID: 33475181 DOI: 10.1111/all.14747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 11/15/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The basophil activation test (BAT) is a functional assay that measures the degree of degranulation following stimulation with allergen or controls by flow cytometry. It correlates directly with histamine release. From the dose-response curve resulting from BAT in allergic patients, basophil reactivity (%CD63+ basophils) and basophil sensitivity (EC50 or similar) are the main outcomes of the test. BAT takes into account all characteristics of IgE and allergen and thus can be more specific than sensitization tests in the diagnosis of allergic disease. BAT reduces the need for in vivo procedures, such as intradermal tests and allergen challenges, which can cause allergic reactions of unpredictable severity. As it closely reflects the patients' phenotype in most cases, it may be used to support the diagnosis of food, venom and drug allergies and chronic urticaria, to monitor the natural resolution of food allergies and to predict and monitor clinical the response to immunomodulatory treatments, such as allergen-specific immunotherapy and biologicals. Clinical application of BAT requires analytical validation, clinical validation, standardization of procedures and quality assurance to ensure reproducibility and reliability of results. Currently, efforts are ongoing to establish a platform that could be used by laboratories in Europe and in the USA for quality assurance and certification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra F. Santos
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy) School of Life Course Sciences Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine King's College London London UK
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences King's College London London UK
- Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma London UK
- Children's Allergy ServiceEvelina London Children's HospitalGuy's and St Thomas' Hospital London UK
| | | | - Hans‐Jürgen Hoffmann
- Department of Clinical Medicine Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Sicherer SH, Abrams EM, Nowak-Wegrzyn A, Hourihane JO. Managing Food Allergy When the Patient Is Not Highly Allergic. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2021; 10:46-55. [PMID: 34098164 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Few patients with food allergy are "highly allergic," meaning they always have severe reactions and always react to very small amounts of allergen. Standard medical approaches for allergy management have focused on the safety and lifestyle modifications this group truly needs, but consequently families with food allergy are typically advised to strictly avoid any exposure to their implicated allergens. Most food-allergic subjects are actually not reactive to very low doses, and many never experience severe reactions. There are also notable conditions where a different care plan is already commonly offered: patients with pollen-related food allergy syndrome, with food-associated exercise-induced anaphylaxis, and with resolving or mild milk or egg allergy might be advised to ingest the allergens in specific circumstances with detailed instructions. Because oral immunotherapy and allergy prevention by early exposure have emphasized alternatives to strict avoidance, there is increasing interest in prospects to forego strict avoidance in those with food allergy. For patients with a high threshold of reactivity (low-dose tolerant, high-dose mildly reactive), there may be options such as allowing the ingestion of products with precautionary allergen labels, allowing dietary indiscretions with small amounts of the allergen, or even encouraging ingestion of subthreshold amounts with therapeutic intent. These practices have not been extensively studied and could be considered controversial. If these approaches are considered, shared decision making is needed in discussing them with patients and families. This review considers the potential approaches to those who are "not highly allergic": the risks, benefits, shared decision making, and research needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott H Sicherer
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Kravis Children's Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
| | - Elissa M Abrams
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, Allergy and Immunology, Hassenfeld Children's Hospital, New York, NY; Department of Pediatrics, Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
| | - Jonathan O'B Hourihane
- Paediatrics and Child Health, Royal College of Surgeons in Irerland, Dublin, Ireland; Childrens Health Ireland Temple St, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
80
|
Patel N, Adelman DC, Anagnostou K, Baumert JL, Blom WM, Campbell DE, Chinthrajah RS, Mills ENC, Javed B, Purington N, Remington BC, Sampson HA, Smith AD, Yarham RAR, Turner PJ. Using data from food challenges to inform management of consumers with food allergy: A systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2021; 147:2249-2262.e7. [PMID: 33571537 PMCID: PMC8168954 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.01.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2020] [Revised: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eliciting doses (EDs) (eg, ED01 or ED05 values, which are the amounts of allergen expected to cause objective symptoms in 1% and 5% of the population with an allergy, respectively) are increasingly being used to inform allergen labeling and clinical management. These values are generated from food challenge, but the frequency of anaphylaxis in response to these low levels of allergen exposure and their reproducibility are unknown. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to determine (1) the rate of anaphylaxis in response to low-level peanut exposure and (2) the reproducibility of reaction thresholds (and anaphylaxis) at food challenge. METHODS We conducted a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of studies that reported at least 50 individuals with peanut allergy reacting to peanut at double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) and were published between January 2010 and September 2020. Risk of bias was assessed by using National Institute for Clinical Excellence methodologic checklists. RESULTS A total of 19 studies were included (covering a total of 3151 participants, 534 of whom subsequently underwent further peanut challenge). At individual participant data meta-analysis, 4.5% (95% CI, 1.9% to 10.1%) of individuals reacted to 5 mg or less of peanut protein with anaphylaxis (moderate heterogeneity [I2 = 57%]). Intraindividual thresholds varied by up to 3 logs, although this variation was limited to a half-log change in 71.2% (95% CI, 56.2% to 82.6%) of individuals. In all, 2.4% (95% CI, 1.1% to 5.0%) of patients initially tolerated 5 mg of peanut protein but then reacted to this dose at subsequent challenge (low heterogeneity [I2 = 16%]); none developed anaphylaxis. CONCLUSION Around 5% of individuals reacting to an ED01 or ED05 level of exposure to peanut might develop anaphylaxis in response to that dose. This equates to 1 and 6 anaphylaxis events per 2500 patients exposed to an ED01 or ED05 dose, respectively, in the broader population of individuals with peanut allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nandinee Patel
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Katherine Anagnostou
- Section of Allergy and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; Section of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Tex
| | - Joseph L Baumert
- Food Allergy Research and Resource Program, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Neb
| | - W Marty Blom
- The Netherlands Organisation of Applied Scientific Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Dianne E Campbell
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia; DBV Technologies, Montrouge, France
| | - R Sharon Chinthrajah
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford, Calif; Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif
| | - E N Clare Mills
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Bushra Javed
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Natasha Purington
- Department of Medicine, Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif
| | - Benjamin C Remington
- Food Allergy Research and Resource Program, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Neb
| | - Hugh A Sampson
- DBV Technologies, Montrouge, France; Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Paul J Turner
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
Foong RX, Dantzer JA, Wood RA, Santos AF. Improving Diagnostic Accuracy in Food Allergy. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2021; 9:71-80. [PMID: 33429723 PMCID: PMC7794657 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.09.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Revised: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The diagnosis of food allergy can have a major impact on the lives of patients and families, imposing dietary restrictions and limitations on social activities. On the other hand, misdiagnosis can place the patient at risk of a potentially severe allergic reaction. Therefore, an accurate diagnosis of food allergy is of utmost importance. The diagnosis of food allergy is often established by the combination of the clinical history and allergen-specific IgE; however, without a clear history of an allergic reaction, the interpretation of IgE sensitization tests can be difficult. There are also rare cases of clinical food allergy in the absence of IgE sensitization. For that reason, testing for suspected food allergy ideally requires access to oral food challenges (OFCs), which are currently the gold standard tests to diagnose food allergy. As OFCs are time consuming and involve the risk of acute allergic reactions of unpredictable severity, the question remains: how can we improve the accuracy of diagnosis before referring the patient for an OFC? Herein, we review the predictive value of different tests used to support the diagnosis of food allergy, discuss implications for therapy and prognosis, and propose a diagnostic approach to be applied in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ru-Xin Foong
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Department of Women and Children's Health (Paediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer A Dantzer
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md
| | - Robert A Wood
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md
| | - Alexandra F Santos
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Department of Women and Children's Health (Paediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Asthma UK Centre for Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Kopač P, Custovic A, Zidarn M, Šilar M, Šelb J, Bajrović N, Eržen R, Košnik M, Korošec P. Biomarkers of the Severity of Honeybee Sting Reactions and the Severity and Threshold of Systemic Adverse Events During Immunotherapy. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2021; 9:3157-3163.e5. [PMID: 33962066 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.04.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A biomarker that could identify individuals at high risk for severe honeybee sting allergic reaction and/or systemic adverse events (SAEs) during venom immunotherapy (VIT) would improve the management of patients with honeybee (HB) venom allergy. OBJECTIVE To identify biomarkers for risk of severe sting reactions or SAEs during VIT. METHODS We recruited 332 patients undergoing HB VIT. We ascertained predictors of the severity of the field-sting reaction and the severity and threshold of SAEs during VIT. We assessed the use of cardiovascular medications; baseline serum tryptase (BST) levels; specific IgEs to HB venom, rApi m 1, and rApi m 10; and basophil activation test (BAT) response. RESULTS Significant and independent predictors of a severe HB field-sting reaction were age (P = .008), an absence of skin symptoms (P = .001), BST (P = .014), and BAT response at an HB venom concentration of 0.1 μg/mL (P = .001). Predictors of severe SAEs during HB VIT were age (P = .025), BST (P = .006), and BAT response (P = .001). BAT response was also an individual and significant predictor of any SAEs and SAEs at a low cumulative allergen dose (median, 55 μg) during VIT build-up (P < .001). The use of β-blockers and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and specific IgE levels were not associated with the severity of HB field-sting reactions or VIT SAEs. CONCLUSIONS BST and basophil activation are independent risk factors for severe HB sting anaphylaxis and SAEs during HB VIT. BAT response was the best biomarker for any SAEs and a lower threshold of SAEs during HB VIT. These risk factors can help guide recommendations for VIT and overcome systemic reactions to HB VIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Kopač
- University Hospital of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Golnik, Slovenia; Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
| | - Adnan Custovic
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mihaela Zidarn
- University Hospital of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Golnik, Slovenia; Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Mira Šilar
- University Hospital of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Golnik, Slovenia
| | - Julij Šelb
- University Hospital of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Golnik, Slovenia; Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Nissera Bajrović
- University Hospital of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Golnik, Slovenia; Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Renato Eržen
- University Hospital of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Golnik, Slovenia; Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Mitja Košnik
- University Hospital of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Golnik, Slovenia; Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Peter Korošec
- University Hospital of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Golnik, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Bahna SL, Assa'ad AH. Food Allergy: Catering for the Needs of the Clinician. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2021; 41:331-345. [PMID: 33863487 DOI: 10.1016/j.iac.2021.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
The practice of food allergy (FA) for clinicians has boomed, with a dramatic rise in the number of patients and families seeking care and with many advances on several fronts. The practice itself sometimes is evidence-based science and sometimes an art of pattern and phenotype recognition. This article examines the tools for diagnosis and management and therapy options available to physicians providing care for patients with FA. The article touches on pressing needs of clinicians and highlights the rapid and important movements in national and international support and advances that will have a positive impact on the field of FA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sami L Bahna
- Allergy and Immunology Section, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway Rm 5-323 Shreveport, Louisiana 71130-3832, USA
| | - Amal H Assa'ad
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229.
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Peters RL, Krawiec M, Koplin JJ, Santos AF. Update on food allergy. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2021; 32:647-657. [PMID: 33370488 PMCID: PMC8247869 DOI: 10.1111/pai.13443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Revised: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Food allergy is a major public health issue with growing prevalence in the urbanized world and significant impact on the lives of allergic patients and their families. Research into the risk factors that have contributed to this increase and their underlying immune mechanisms could lead us to definitive ways for treatment and prevention of food allergy. For the time being, introduction of peanut and other allergenic foods in the diet at the time of weaning seems to be an effective way to prevent the development of food allergy. Improved diagnosis and appropriate management and support of food allergic patients are central to patient care with food immunotherapy and biologics making the transition to clinical practice. With the new available treatments, it is becoming increasingly important to include patients' and family preferences to provide a management plan tailored to their needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel L Peters
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Marta Krawiec
- Children's Allergy Service, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Women and Children's Health (Paediatric Allergy), Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.,Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jennifer J Koplin
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Alexandra F Santos
- Children's Allergy Service, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Women and Children's Health (Paediatric Allergy), Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.,Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.,Asthma UK Centre for Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
85
|
Ebo DG, Bridts CH, Mertens CH, Sabato V. Principles, potential, and limitations of ex vivo basophil activation by flow cytometry in allergology: A narrative review. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2021; 147:1143-1153. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.10.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2020] [Revised: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
86
|
Arasi S, Nurmatov U, Dunn-Galvin A, Daher S, Roberts G, Turner PJ, Shinder SB, Gupta R, Eigenmann P, Nowak-Wegrzyn A, Sánchez Borges MA, Ansotegui IJ, Fernandez-Rivas M, Petrou S, Tanno LK, Vazquez-Ortiz M, Vickery BP, Wong GWK, Ebisawa M, Fiocchi A. Consensus on DEfinition of Food Allergy SEverity (DEFASE) an integrated mixed methods systematic review. World Allergy Organ J 2021; 14:100503. [PMID: 33767801 PMCID: PMC7966874 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The term "Food Allergy" refers to a complex global health problem with a wide spectrum of severity. However, a uniform definition of severe food allergy is currently missing. This systematic review is the preliminary step towards a state-of-the-art synopsis of the current evidence relating to the severity of IgE-mediated food allergy; it will inform attempts to develop a consensus to define food allergy severity by clinicians and other stakeholders. METHODS We undertook a mixed-methods systematic review, which involved searching 11 international biomedical databases for published studies from inception to 31 December 2019. Studies were independently screened against pre-defined eligibility criteria and critically appraised by established instruments. The substantial heterogeneity of included studies precluded meta-analyses and, therefore, narrative synthesis of quantitative and qualitative data was performed. RESULTS We found 23 studies providing eligible primary data on symptom-specific severity of food allergic reactions, and 31 previously published symptom-severity scoring systems referred to food allergic reactions. There were seven studies which assessed quality-of-life measures in patients (and family members) with different food allergy severity and two studies that investigated the economic burden of food allergy severity. Overall, the quality and the global rating of all included studies were judged as being moderate. CONCLUSIONS There is heterogeneity among severity scoring systems used and even outcomes considered in the context of severity of food allergy. No score has been validated. Our results will be used to inform the development of an international consensus to define the severity of food allergy. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION A protocol was prospectively registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database with the registration number CRD42020183103 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefania Arasi
- Allergy Unit - Area of Translational Research in Pediatric Specialities, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Ulugbek Nurmatov
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Wales, UK
| | - Audrey Dunn-Galvin
- Applied Psychology and Paediatrics and Child Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Shahd Daher
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, England, UK
| | - Graham Roberts
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Clinical and Experimental Sciences and Human Development in Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- The David Hide Asthma and Allergy Research Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Isle of Wight, UK
| | - Paul J. Turner
- National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sayantani B. Shinder
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ruchi Gupta
- Center for Food Allergy and Asthma Research (CFAAR), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics & Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, USA
| | - Philippe Eigenmann
- Pediatric Allergy Unit, Department of Women-Children-Teenagers Pediatrics, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn
- Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, New York University School of Medicine, Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
| | - Mario A. Sánchez Borges
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Centro Médico Docente La Trinidad, Caracas, Venezuela
| | | | | | - Stavros Petrou
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, England, UK
| | - Luciana Kase Tanno
- Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
- University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Gary Wing-Kin Wong
- Department of Paediatrics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, China
| | - Motohiro Ebisawa
- Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization, Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Alessandro Fiocchi
- Allergy Unit - Area of Translational Research in Pediatric Specialities, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
Porebski G, Kwitniewski M, Reshef A. Biomarkers in Hereditary Angioedema. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2021; 60:404-415. [PMID: 33560480 PMCID: PMC8272698 DOI: 10.1007/s12016-021-08845-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
A biomarker is a defined characteristic measured as an indicator of normal, biologic, pathogenic processes, or biological responses to an exposure or intervention. Diagnostic biomarkers are used to detect a disease or a subtype of a disease; monitoring biomarkers are measured serially to assess a medical condition; response biomarkers are used to check biologic response following a medical intervention; predictive biomarkers are used to identify patients who are more likely to respond to a medical intervention; and prognostic biomarkers are used to assess the future likelihood of a clinical event. Although biomarkers have been extensively investigated and validated in many diseases and pathologies, very few are currently useful for the diagnosis, evaluation of disease activity, and treatment of hereditary angioedema (HAE). Pathophysiologic pathways involved in HAE reveal a plethora of molecules from the complement, coagulation, and fibrinolysis systems or from the vascular endothelium, which may serve as biomarkers. The most promising candidates, together with their laboratory readout systems, should be evaluated with regard to their analytical and clinical validity and utility. To be highly specific, such biomarkers should be linked to the pathomechanisms of HAE, particularly the bradykinin-generating cascade. Additionally, major advances in high-throughput omics-based technologies may facilitate the discovery of new candidate biomarkers in the future. This review will cover the existing as well as future potential biomarkers that will support the diagnosis, monitor disease activity, and can be used to assess the efficacy of new avenues of therapy of HAE and other forms of angioedema.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grzegorz Porebski
- Department of Clinical and Environmental Allergology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
| | - Mateusz Kwitniewski
- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | - Avner Reshef
- Barzilai University Medical Centre, Ashkelon, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Foong RX, Santos AF. Biomarkers of diagnosis and resolution of food allergy. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2021; 32:223-233. [PMID: 33020989 DOI: 10.1111/pai.13389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2020] [Revised: 08/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Food allergy is increasing in prevalence, affecting up to 10% of children in developed countries. Food allergy can significantly affect the quality of life and well-being of patients and their families; therefore, an accurate diagnosis is of extreme importance. Some food allergies can spontaneously resolve in 50%-60% of cow's milk and egg-allergic, 20% of peanut-allergic and 9% of tree nut-allergic children by school age. For that reason, food-allergic status should be monitored over time to determine when to reintroduce the food back into the child's diet. The gold-standard to confirm the diagnosis and the resolution of food allergy is an oral food challenge; however, this involves the risk of causing an acute-allergic reaction and requires clinical experience and resources to treat allergic reactions of any degree of severity. In the clinical setting, biomarkers have been used and validated to enable an accurate diagnosis when combined with the clinical history, deferring the oral food challenge, whenever possible. In this review, we cover the tools available to support the diagnosis of food allergies and to predict food allergy resolution over time. We review the latest evidence on different testing modalities and how effective they are in guiding clinical decision making in practice. We also evaluate predictive test cut-offs for the more common food allergens to try and provide guidance on when challenges might be most successful in determining oral tolerance in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ru-Xin Foong
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Paediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.,Children's Allergy Service, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alexandra F Santos
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Paediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.,Children's Allergy Service, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.,Asthma UK Centre for Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Czolk R, Klueber J, Sørensen M, Wilmes P, Codreanu-Morel F, Skov PS, Hilger C, Bindslev-Jensen C, Ollert M, Kuehn A. IgE-Mediated Peanut Allergy: Current and Novel Predictive Biomarkers for Clinical Phenotypes Using Multi-Omics Approaches. Front Immunol 2021; 11:594350. [PMID: 33584660 PMCID: PMC7876438 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.594350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Food allergy is a collective term for several immune-mediated responses to food. IgE-mediated food allergy is the best-known subtype. The patients present with a marked diversity of clinical profiles including symptomatic manifestations, threshold reactivity and reaction kinetics. In-vitro predictors of these clinical phenotypes are evasive and considered as knowledge gaps in food allergy diagnosis and risk management. Peanut allergy is a relevant disease model where pioneer discoveries were made in diagnosis, immunotherapy and prevention. This review provides an overview on the immune basis for phenotype variations in peanut-allergic individuals, in the light of future patient stratification along emerging omic-areas. Beyond specific IgE-signatures and basophil reactivity profiles with established correlation to clinical outcome, allergenomics, mass spectrometric resolution of peripheral allergen tracing, might be a fundamental approach to understand disease pathophysiology underlying biomarker discovery. Deep immune phenotyping is thought to reveal differential cell responses but also, gene expression and gene methylation profiles (eg, peanut severity genes) are promising areas for biomarker research. Finally, the study of microbiome-host interactions with a focus on the immune system modulation might hold the key to understand tissue-specific responses and symptoms. The immune mechanism underlying acute food-allergic events remains elusive until today. Deciphering this immunological response shall enable to identify novel biomarker for stratification of patients into reaction endotypes. The availability of powerful multi-omics technologies, together with integrated data analysis, network-based approaches and unbiased machine learning holds out the prospect of providing clinically useful biomarkers or biomarker signatures being predictive for reaction phenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Czolk
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
- Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Julia Klueber
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Martin Sørensen
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Pediatric Research Group, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Paul Wilmes
- Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Françoise Codreanu-Morel
- Department of Allergology and Immunology, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg-Kanner Klinik, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Per Stahl Skov
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- RefLab ApS, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Institute of Immunology, National University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christiane Hilger
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Carsten Bindslev-Jensen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Markus Ollert
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Annette Kuehn
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| |
Collapse
|
90
|
A Prospective Validation of the NUT CRACKER Diagnostic Algorithm for Walnut and Pecan Allergy with Prediction of Severity. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2021; 9:265-274.e6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.09.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2020] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
|
91
|
Prevention of food allergy: can we stop the rise of IgE mediated food allergies? Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2020; 21:195-201. [PMID: 33394703 DOI: 10.1097/aci.0000000000000719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Food allergy has become more prevalent in recent decades. Without a curative treatment for food allergy, prevention is key. Can we intervene and halt the food allergy epidemic? RECENT FINDINGS There are three main hypotheses to explain the rise in food allergy: the dual-allergen exposure hypothesis, the hygiene hypothesis and the vitamin D hypothesis. In a recent systematic review of randomized controlled trials, only introduction of allergenic foods, namely egg and peanut, in the diet at the time of weaning and avoidance of temporary supplementation with cow's milk formula in the first few days of life showed low to moderate evidence of a preventive effect. SUMMARY For primary prevention, introduction of allergenic foods at the time of weaning and avoidance of temporary supplementation with cow's milk formula in the first few days of life has been recommended. Introduction of foods once allergy has been excluded may be beneficial for sensitized subjects (secondary prevention). Once food allergy has been established, it is important to minimise complications (tertiary prevention) through allergen avoidance, timely treatment of allergic reactions, control of atopic co-morbidities and dietetic and psychological support, as appropriate. Immunomodulatory treatments can potentially be disease-modifying and require further research.
Collapse
|
92
|
Santos AF, Bergmann M, Brough HA, Couto-Francisco N, Kwok M, Panetta V, Haddad D, Lack G, Eigenmann P, Caubet JC. Basophil Activation Test Reduces Oral Food Challenges to Nuts and Sesame. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2020; 9:2016-2027.e6. [PMID: 33385591 PMCID: PMC8110244 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.12.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2020] [Revised: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nut allergic patients are often IgE sensitized to other nuts/seeds and need multiple oral food challenges (OFCs) before the safe nuts can be introduced in the diet. However, OFCs are time-consuming and risky procedures. OBJECTIVE To assess the utility of the basophil activation test (BAT) to predict the allergic status and reduce the need for an OFC in children with 1 or more nut or seed allergies. METHODS Participants in the Pronuts study recruited at the Geneva and the London centers were tested on the BAT to hazelnut, cashew nut, sesame, almond, and peanut, Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 6, using FlowCAST, a commercially available BAT kit, and flow cytometry. RESULTS The BAT to hazelnut, cashew nut, sesame, almond, and peanut discriminated between allergic and nonallergic children, to the respective nut or seed. The optimal allergen concentration and their optimal, positive, and negative cutoffs were identified for the BAT and the other tests, for each nut and seed. Using the BAT as a second step in the diagnostic process, after equivocal skin prick test and IgE to extracts and components, reduced the number of total OFCs by 5% to 15% and positive OFCs by 33% to 75% (except for hazelnut) with 0% false-negatives and a diagnostic accuracy of 96% to 100%. CONCLUSION The BAT proved to be a useful diagnostic tool, used in a stepwise approach, to predict the allergic status and reduce the number of OFCs in the Pronuts study participants with at least 1 nut allergy willing to consume selected nuts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra F Santos
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Marcel Bergmann
- Pediatric Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Helen A Brough
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Natália Couto-Francisco
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Kwok
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, United Kingdom
| | - Valentina Panetta
- L'altrastatistica srl, Consultancy & Training, Biostatistics Office, Rome, Italy
| | - Diab Haddad
- Department of Pediatrics, St Peters' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gideon Lack
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, United Kingdom
| | - Philippe Eigenmann
- Pediatric Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jean-Christoph Caubet
- Pediatric Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
93
|
Üzülmez Ö, Kalic T, Breiteneder H. Advances and novel developments in molecular allergology. Allergy 2020; 75:3027-3038. [PMID: 32882057 PMCID: PMC7756543 DOI: 10.1111/all.14579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Revised: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The continuous search for new allergens and the design of allergen derivatives improves the understanding of their allergenicity and aids the design of novel diagnostic and immunotherapy approaches. This article discusses the recent developments in allergen and epitope discovery, allergy diagnostics and immunotherapy. Structural information is crucial for the elucidation of cross-reactivity of marker allergens such as the walnut Jug r 6 or that of nonhomologous allergens, as shown for the peanut allergens Ara h 1 and 2. High-throughput sequencing, liposomal nanoallergen display, bead-based assays, and protein chimeras have been used in epitope discovery. The binding of natural ligands by the birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 or the mold allergen Alt a 1 increased the stability of these allergens, which is directly linked to their allergenicity. We also report recent findings on the use of component-resolved approaches, basophil activation test, and novel technologies for improvement of diagnostics. New strategies in allergen-specific immunotherapy have also emerged, such as the use of virus-like particles, biologics or novel adjuvants. The identification of dectin-1 as a key player in allergy to tropomyosins and the formyl peptide receptor 3 in allergy to lipocalins are outstanding examples of research into the mechanism of allergic sensitization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Öykü Üzülmez
- Institute of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
| | - Tanja Kalic
- Institute of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
| | - Heimo Breiteneder
- Institute of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
| |
Collapse
|
94
|
Buyuktiryaki B, Santos AF. Food allergy severity predictions based on cellular in vitro tests. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2020; 20:679-692. [PMID: 32536279 DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2020.1782192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Food allergy is increasing in prevalence and the severity of allergic reactions is unpredictable. Identifying food-allergic patients at high risk of severe reactions would allow us to offer a personalized and improved management for these patients. AREAS COVERED We review the evidence for using the levels of specific IgE, the nature of the allergen, and cellular tests to identify patients at high risk of developing severe allergic reactions to foods. EXPERT OPINION The evidence about whether the quantity of allergen-specific IgE reflects the severity of allergic reactions to foods is conflicting, with some positive and some negative studies. For some foods, specific IgE to individual components (e.g. Ara h 2 in peanut) can provide additional information. However, more important than the quantity of IgE is possibly the quality of IgE, which can be captured by individual measurements of affinity/avidity, diversity, and specific activity, but is best measured overall using the basophil and mast cell activation tests, which assess the function of IgE in its ability to induce cell activation, degranulation, and mediator release. Biomarkers look at a single aspect of the allergic response and should be interpreted in the broader clinical context for each individual patient assessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Betul Buyuktiryaki
- Division of Pediatric Allergy, Koc University Hospital , İstanbul, Turkey.,Department of Paediatric Allergy, Evelina London, Guy's and ST Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , London, UK
| | - Alexandra F Santos
- Department of Paediatric Allergy, Evelina London, Guy's and ST Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , London, UK.,Department of Women and Children's Health (Paediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London , London, UK.,Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London , London, UK.,Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma , London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra F Santos
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Paediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London , London, UK.,Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London , London, UK.,Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital , London, UK.,Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma , London, UK
| |
Collapse
|