Selection of a hepatitis B virus strain resistant to adefovir in a liver transplantation patient

KASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B

The guideline on the management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) was first developed in 2004 and revised in 2007 by the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver (KASL). Since then there have been many developments, including the introduction of new antiviral agents and the publications of many novel research results from both Korea and other countries. In particular, a large amount of knowledge on antiviral resistance--which is a serious issue in Korea--has accumulated, which has led to new strategies being suggested. This prompted the new guideline discussed herein to be developed based on recent evidence and expert opinion.

TARGET POPULATION

The main targets of this guideline comprise patients who are newly diagnosed with CHB and those who are followed or treated for known CHB. This guideline is also intended to provide guidance for the management of patients under the following special circumstances: malignancy, transplantation, dialysis, coinfection with other viruses, pregnancy, and children.

Immunoprophylaxis against and prevention of recurrent viral hepatitis after liver transplantation

The reinfection of the hepatic allograft with hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus can have important sequelae that result in poor long-term patient and graft survival. Although a response to treatment with antiviral medications can improve these outcomes, not all patients tolerate these medications or experience viral eradication. Avoiding reinfection of the graft is the most effective means of improving the long-term outcomes for these patient populations. This review is focused on the prevention of viral hepatitis reinfection after liver transplantation.

Antiviral therapies: focus on hepatitis B reverse transcriptase

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the etiologic agent of mankind's most serious liver disease. While the availability of a vaccine has reduced the number of new HBV infections, the vaccine does not benefit the approximately 350 million people already chronically infected by the virus. Most of the drugs approved by the FDA for the treatment of hepatitis B target the reverse transcriptase (RT or P gene product) and are nucleoside RT inhibitors (NRTIs) that suppress viral replication. However, prolonged monotherapies directed against a single target result in the emergence of viral resistance. HBV genotypic differences affect NRTI resistance, and because the reading frames of the S (surface antigen) and P genes partially overlap, genomic differences that affect the surface of the virus may also alter the viral polymerase sequence, function and drug susceptibility. The scope of this review is to assess the effects of HBV genotypic variation on the development of drug resistance to NRTIs. Some RT residues that vary among different genotypes are in the vicinity of residues that mutate and give rise to NRTI resistance. Interactions between these amino acids can help explain the effect of HBV genotype on the development of NRTI resistance during antiviral therapies, and might help in the design of improved therapeutic strategies.

rtL180M mutation of hepatitis B virus is closely associated with frequent virological resistance to adefovir dipivoxil therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

We intended to investigate the effects of pre-existing mutations at reverse transcriptase region of hepatitis B virus (HBV) on the occurrence of virological breakthrough (VB) to adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) in patients with lamivudine (LAM)-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

Ninety-seven patients with LAM-resistant CHB were treated with ADV at a dose of 10 mg daily, and were followed for a median period of 13 months. Just before the initiation of ADV therapy, the whole length of reverse transcriptase region of serum HBV-DNA was sequenced using direct sequencing.

RESULTS

All patients had genotype C HBV and mutations in the YMDD motif, specifically, YIDD (65%), YVDD (28%), or both (7%). The rtL180M and rtL80V/I mutations were identified in 68% and 69%, respectively. The cumulative probability of VB was 19% and 27% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. There was no difference in the occurrence of VB with regard to types of YMDD mutation or rtL80V/I. However, interestingly, patients carrying rtL180M experienced VB during ADV monotherapy more frequently than those not carrying rtL180M (2-year cumulative probability of VB: 37% vs 3% at 2 years, P < 0.01). On multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, rtL180M (hazard ratio [HR]: 8.62, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-69.09, P = 0.042) and decrease in HBV-DNA for 1 year of treatment (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.51-0.95, P = 0.024) are independently associated with VB.

CONCLUSIONS

The rtL180M mutation of HBV, as well as a small decrease in HBV-DNA after 1 year of treatment might be closely associated with frequent occurrence of virological resistance to ADV in patients with LAM-resistant CHB.

Hepatitis B virus infection: pathogenesis, reactivation and management in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a partially double stranded DNA virus that can integrate into host cell chromosomes as covalently closed circular DNA forms. HBV reactivation following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in recipients with evidence of past HBV exposure, as well as exacerbation of a current HBV infection in HBV carrier recipients, secondary to chemotherapy and post-transplant immunosuppression that affect both humoral and cell-mediated control of HBV infection, are well documented in the literature. Management options include HBV-DNA screening and antiviral prophylaxis. Nucleos(t)ide analogues have been used at the start of chemotherapy and pretransplantation, with the course continuing for 6 months. However, depending on the serum HBV-DNA level, the antiviral agent might be given until a therapeutic end point is reached.

De novo combination therapy with lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil in chronic hepatitis B patients

AIM: To investigate the appropriate time for combination therapy in HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

METHODS: Thirty HBeAg positive CHB patients with decompensated cirrhosis were enrolled in the study. All of the patients were given 48 wk combination therapy with lamivudine (LAM) and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV). Briefly, 10 patients were given the de novo combination therapy with LAM and ADV, whereas the other 20 patients received ADV in addition to LAM after hepatitis B virus (HBV) genetic mutation.

RESULTS: Serum alanine aminotransferase and total bilirubin were both improved in the two groups at 4, 12, 24 and 48 wk after treatment. Serum albumin was also improved at 24 and 48 wk after combination therapy in both groups. The serum HBV DNA level was still detectable in every patient in the two groups at 4 and 12 wk after combination treatment. However, in the de novo combination group, serum HBV DNA levels in 4 (40%) and 9 (90%) patients was decreased to below 1×10³ copies/mL at 24 and 48 wk after the combination treatment, respectively. In parallel, serum HBV DNA levels in 2 (20%) and 8 (40%) patients in the add-on combination group became undetectable at 24 and 48 wk after combination treatment, respectively. Furthermore, 6 (60%) patients in the de novo combination group achieved HBeAg seroconversion after 48 wk treatment, whereas only 4 (20%) patients in the add-on combination group achieved seroconversion. Child-Pugh score of patients in the de novo combination group was better than that of patients in the add-on combination group after 48 wk treatment. Moreover, patients in the de novo combination group had a significantly decreased serum creatinine level and elevated red blood cell counts.

CONCLUSION: De novo combination therapy with LAM and ADV was better than add-on combination therapy in terms of Child-Pugh score, virus inhibition and renal function.

Phenotypic assay of a hepatitis B virus strain carrying an rtS246T variant using a new strategy

Phenotypic assays of hepatitis B virus (HBV) play an important role in research related to the problem of drug resistance that emerges during long-term nucleot(s)ide therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Most of the phenotypic assay systems that are available currently rely on the transfection of recombinant replication-competent HBV DNA into hepatoma cell lines. Cloning clinical HBV isolates using conventional digestion-and-ligation techniques to generate replication-competent recombinants can be very difficult because of the sequence heterogeneity and unique structure of the HBV genome. In this study, a new strategy for constructing an HBV 1.1× recombinant was developed. The core of this strategy is the "fragment substitution reaction" (FSR). FSR allows PCR fragments to be cloned without digestion or ligation, providing a new tool for cloning fragments or genomes amplified from serum HBV DNA, and therefore making the assay of HBV phenotypes more convenient. Using this strategy, a phenotypic assay was performed on an HBV strain carrying an rtS246T variant isolated from a patient with chronic hepatitis B that was only responsive partially to entecavir therapy. The results indicated that this strain is sensitive to entecavir in vitro.

Hepatitis B virus drug resistance to current nucleos(t)ide analogs: Mechanisms and mutation sites

Nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) have become the mainstream drugs for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Drug resistance to NAs, however, has posed a major obstacle in obtaining sustained viral suppression. Standardized definitions of terms and nomenclature in discussing NAs resistance have been proposed. Drug resistance to NAs is produced by a combination of viral, host and antiviral drug factors. A detailed understanding of the mechanisms and effects of mutation sites that cause resistance to NAs is important for the design of rational treatment and management of patients with existing drug resistance.

The efficacy of entecavir therapy in chronic hepatitis B patients with suboptimal response to adevofir

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) have experienced treatment failure to adefovir (ADV) and their management poses a growing challenge. Very limited data are available on the efficacy of entecavir (ETV) in patients previously treated with ADV.

AIM

To examine the effect of ETV monotherapy on HBV DNA and ALT levels in CHB patients previously treated with ADV, but switched to ETV due to suboptimal response.

METHODS

Study candidates were enrolled from five community gastroenterology clinics in the U.S. Each completed at least 12 months of ETV treatment after being previously treated with ADV and experiencing suboptimal response. Primary and secondary outcome measurements were complete viral suppression (CVS, HBV DNA <100 IU/mL) and biochemical response (BR, ALT < 40 U/L), respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients were included in this analysis. Twelve were lamivudine (LAM)-experienced and none were LAM-resistant. At time of switch to ETV, no patients had experienced CVS. The CVS rate was 68% after 12 months of ETV therapy. The BR rate was 67% at switch to ETV and 80% after 12 months. There was no significant difference in response rates between LAM-experienced and naïve patients. Among the eight patients with ADV resistance, each achieved CVS after 12 months of ETV therapy and seven achieved BR.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with suboptimal response to adefovir, complete viral suppression and biochemical response can be achieved in the majority by 12 months after switching to entecavir, including patients with prior exposure to lamivudine and those with adefovir resistance.

Current Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis B

Although the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B has decreased considerably in recent years due to widespread use of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine, its prevalence still remains high in adults, and this can place a significant burden on health care in areas with endemic HBV. Since the introduction of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs), there has been marked improvement in the care of patients with chronic hepatitis B, resulting in increased survival. However, the emergence of drug resistance in patients treated with NUCs is a major concern. The number of multi-drug resistant patients is increasing, and many patients may not respond to the currently available drugs. In this review, we describe the current status of NUC therapy for antiviral-naïve and -resistant patients.

Virological response to adefovir monotherapy and the risk of adefovir resistance

AIM: To evaluate virological response to adefovir (ADV) monotherapy and emergence of ADV-resistant mutations in lamivudine (LAM)-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients.

METHODS: Seventy-seven patients with documented LAM resistance who were treated with 10 mg/d ADV for > 96 wk were analyzed for ADV resistance.

RESULTS: At week 48 and 96, eight (10%) and 14 (18%) of 77 LAM-resistant patients developed the ADV-resistant strain (rtA181V/T and/or rtN236T mutations), respectively. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels during therapy were significantly higher in patients who developed ADV resistance than in those who did not. Incidence of ADV resistance at week 96 was 11%, 8% and 6% among patients with complete virological response (HBV DNA level < 60 IU/mL); 0%, 5% and 19% among patients with partial virological response (HBV DNA level ≥ 60 to 2000 IU/mL); and 32%, 34% and 33% among patients with inadequate virological response (HBV DNA levels > 2000 IU/mL) at week 12, week 24 and week 48, respectively. HBV DNA levels > 2000 IU/mL at week 24 showed best performance characteristics in predicting ADV resistance.

CONCLUSION: Development of ADV resistance mutations was associated with HBV DNA levels, which could identify patients with LAM resistance who are likely to respond to ADV monotherapy.

Entecavir treatment for chronic hepatitis B: adaptation is not needed for the majority of naïve patients with a partial virological response

Entecavir (ETV) is a potent inhibitor of viral replication in nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-naïve chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the long term efficacy and safety of ETV in NA-naïve CHB patients, particularly in those with detectable hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA after 48 weeks, in whom treatment adaptation is suggested by current guidelines. In a multicenter cohort study, we investigated 333 CHB patients treated with entecavir monotherapy. The NA-naïve population consisted of 243 patients, whereas 90 were NA-experienced. Virological response (VR) (HBV DNA<80 IU/mL) was achieved in 48%, 76%, and 90% of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and in 89%, 98%, and 99% of HBeAg-negative NA-naïve patients at weeks 48, 96, and 144, respectively. Thirty-six of 175 (21%) NA-naïve patients with at least 48 weeks of follow-up had a detectable load at week 48 (partial virological response [PVR]). Twenty-nine (81%) patients with PVR reached VR during prolonged ETV monotherapy, and none of them developed ETV-resistance. Among 22 patients with HBV DNA<1,000 IU/mL at week 48, VR was achieved in 21 (95%) patients, compared with eight of 14 (57%) patients with HBV DNA≥1,000 IU/mL. Continuous HBV DNA decline was observed in most patients without VR during follow-up, and in three patients adherence was suboptimal according to the treating physician. ETV was safe and did not affect renal function or cause lactic acidosis.

CONCLUSION

ETV monotherapy can be continued in NA-naïve patients with detectable HBV DNA at week 48, particularly in those with a low viral load because long-term ETV leads to a virological response in the vast majority of patients.

Evolutionary pattern of full hepatitis B virus genome during sequential nucleos(t)ide analog therapy

The evolutionary and mutational pattern of full hepatitis B virus (HBV) quasispecies during sequential nucleos(t)ide analog (NUC) therapy remains unclear. In this study, full-length HBV clones were generated from serial serum samples of five chronic hepatitis B patients who received sequential NUC therapies (treated patients) and two untreated patients with acute flares. The evolutionary and mutational patterns of full HBV quasispecies were studied. In the three treated patients who received lamivudine as initial antiviral therapy, nucleotide polymorphism and nonsynonymous divergence all decreased at lamivudine breakthrough but increased after rescue therapies. Conversely, two other treated patients showed a distinct change in divergence during adefovir-telbivudine sequential therapies. Untreated subjects exhibited increased polymorphism and divergence in the preC/C region at ALT flare. Four of the treated patients presented amino acid changes in the "a" determinant during NUC therapy. All of the treated subjects showed amino acid changes within the known T-cell or B-cell epitopes in the surface or core antigen, most of which were accompanied by mutations in reverse transcriptase (RT) region. Co-variations in the core promoter, the preC region and in the known epitopes of the preS gene accompanied by RT mutations, were common. In untreated patients, most of these co-variations located in the preC/C gene. In conclusion, the distribution of genetic variability of HBV shows remarkably different patterns between the treated and untreated subjects and the quasispecies divergence of different regions of HBV may vary remarkably even within a single host.

Four-year study of lamivudine and adefovir combination therapy in lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B patients: influence of hepatitis B virus genotype and resistance mutation pattern

To investigate the efficacy of long-term lamivudine (3TC) and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) combination therapy in 3TC-resistant chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infected patients, we analysed 28 3TC-resistant patients treated with the combination therapy during 47 months (range, 9-75). At 12, 24, 36, and 48 months, the rates of virological response with undetectable HBV DNA (≤ 2.6 log copies/mL) were 56, 80, 86, and 92%, respectively. Among 17 hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients, HBeAg disappeared in 24% at 12 months, 25% at 24 months, 62% at 36 months, and 88% at 48 months. When HBV genotypes were compared, patients with genotype B achieved virological response significantly more rapidly than those with genotype C (P=0.0496). One patient developed virological breakthrough after 54 months, and sequence analysis of HBV obtained from the patient was performed. An rtA200V mutation was present in the majority of HBV clones, in addition to the 3TC-resistant mutations of rtL180M+M204V. The rtN236T ADV-resistant mutation was observed in only 25% clones. In vitro analysis showed that the rtA200V mutation recovered the impaired replication capacity of the clone with the rtL180M+M204V mutations and induced resistance to ADV. Moreover, rtT184S and rtS202C, which are known entecavir-resistant mutations, emerged in some rtL180M+M204V clones without rtA200V or rtN236T. In conclusion, 3TC+ADV combination therapy was effective for most 3TC-resistant patients, especially with genotype B HBV, but the risk of emergence of multiple drug-resistant strains with long-term therapy should be considered. The mutation rtA200V with rtL180M+M204V may be sufficient for failure of 3TC+ADV therapy.

Th1 and Th2 immune response in chronic hepatitis B patients during a long-term treatment with adefovir dipivoxil

Adefovir dipivoxil treatment has significantly improved the outcome of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. However, it remains largely unknown how immune system responds to the treatment. Chronic HBV patients were treated with adefovir dipivoxil and examined for serum HBV DNA loads, cytokines, and T helper (Th1) and 2 (Th2) cytokine producing T cells during 104 weeks of the treatment. Th1/Th2 cytokines producing T cells were significantly lower in chronic HBV patients as compared to normal individuals. Adefovir dipivoxil treatment led to the increase of Th1/Th2 cytokines producing T cells and serum cytokine levels in association with the decline of HVB DNA load. In contrast, Th1/Th2 cytokines producing T cells remained lower in one patient detected with adefovir dipivoxil resistant HBV A181T/V mutation. This study has established inverse correlation of the increase of Th1/Th2 immunity and the decline of HBV DNA load in chronic HBV patients during adefovir dipivoxil treatment.

Antiviral drug resistance: mechanisms and clinical implications

Antiviral drug resistance is an increasing concern in immunocompromised patient populations, where ongoing viral replication and prolonged drug exposure lead to the selection of resistant strains. Rapid diagnosis of resistance can be made by associating characteristic viral mutations with resistance to various drugs as determined by phenotypic assays. Management of drug resistance includes optimization of host factors and drug delivery, selection of alternative therapies based on knowledge of mechanisms of resistance, and the development of new antivirals. This article discusses drug resistance in herpesviruses and hepatitis B.

Characterization of hepatitis virus B isolated from a multi-drug refractory patient

Prolonged treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) with nucleoside analogues (NAs) almost invariably engenders viral resistance, and sequential NAs monotherapy can promote multi-drug resistance. This study aimed to investigate the molecular characteristics and the mutation profile of multi-drug resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV). The complete genome of HBV isolated from a multi-drug refractory patient was amplified and cloned, and 22 clones were selected for sequencing. The homology of the full-length genome between clones ranged from 98.7% to 99.9%. A precore stop codon mutation of G1896A and basic core promoter (BCP) mutations A1762T/G1764A were detected in a majority of clones. A phylogenetic analysis showed that all clones were classified as subgenotype B2. Three mutations in the surface (S) antigen region, sC76Y, sP120T and sI195M, were detected in 100%, 100% and 77.3% of the clones, respectively. In the core (C) antigen region, a mutation at codon 135 (cP135Q) was detected in 100% of clones. Lamivudine (LAM)-resistant mutations, rtL180M and rtM204V/I were detected in 86.4% of clones. Adefovir (ADV) or entecavir (ETV)-resistant mutations were not detected. Several novel mutations, such as rtT128N, rtA222T, rtS256G, rtL271M, rtS332R, and rtN/T337D, were present in a majority of clones. Furthermore, six pairs of mutations in the overlapping reverse transcriptase (RT) gene and S gene were detected. In conclusion, the complex HBV mutation profile detected in the multi-drug refractory patient highlights the problems associated with the ongoing selection of mutations, including further compensatory mutations as well as potential cross-resistance mutations.

Fitness and infectivity of drug-resistant and cross-resistant hepatitis B virus mutants: why and how is it studied?

The emergence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) drug-resistant (and multidrug-resistant) strains during long-term therapy with nucleoside/nucleotide analogues is associated with treatment failure and, therefore, represents a clinical challenge. For clinicians, the close monitoring and management of resistance has become a key issue in clinical practice. For HBV virologists, the understanding of the mechanism of emergence of specific mutant strains in the viral quasispecies during treatment is also an important issue. If a particular viral strain can emerge in the quasispecies within a particular environment, it is probably because its fitness is superior to other strains. The present review focuses on viral fitness as well as viral infectivity, and in particular on technical means that are available to study this viral fitness in vitro and in animal models.

Lamivudine plus adefovir or entecavir for patients with chronic hepatitis B resistant to lamivudine and adefovir

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Little is known about the optimal management of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who developed multiple-drug resistance.

METHODS

We assessed 91 patients with compensated CHB who developed adefovir-resistant mutations during adefovir monotherapy for lamivudine-resistant CHB. Of these, 41 were treated with a combination of lamivudine plus adefovir (LAM+ADV group) and 50 were treated with entecavir monotherapy (ETV group).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups in baseline characteristics, including serum HBV DNA levels (p>0.05). The rate of virologic non-response (HBV DNA reduction <1 log(10) IU/ml at 6 months) was significantly greater in the LAM+ADV than in the ETV group (51.2% vs. 16.0%, p<0.01). At 12 months, HBV DNA declined less in the LAM+ADV than in the ETV group (-1.49+/-1.78 vs. -3.47+/-2.13 log(10) IU/ml, p<0.01). Only 12.2% and 22.0% of patients in the LAM+ADV and ETV groups, respectively, achieved complete virologic response (HBV DNA <60 IU/ml) at 12 months. Multivariable analysis showed that LAM+ADV group (OR=0.08, CI=0.02-0.28) and the presence of the rtA181V/T mutation (OR=0.21, CI=0.05-0.91) were independently associated with a decreased rate of virologic response (HBV DNA <2000 IU/ml) at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CHB resistant to lamivudine and adefovir, combination therapy with these two drugs was not effective and was inferior to entecavir monotherapy in suppressing HBV DNA. However, the response to entecavir monotherapy was also not optimal. These results emphasize the importance of preventing the development of multidrug-resistant HBV and of exploration for adequate combination therapy in treatment of multidrug-resistant CHB.

New pharmacologic therapies in chronic hepatitis B

Approximately 350 million persons worldwide are chronically infected with hepatitis B, which can result in cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Currently, 2 interferons and 5 nucleos(t)ide analogues have been approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This article discusses the mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, optimal dose, clinical efficacy, and side effects of medications used for the treatment of CHB.

Antiviral drug resistance: mechanisms and clinical implications

Antiviral drug resistance is an increasing concern in immunocompromised patient populations, where ongoing viral replication and prolonged drug exposure lead to the selection of resistant strains. Rapid diagnosis of resistance can be made by associating characteristic viral mutations with resistance to various drugs as determined by phenotypic assays. Management of drug resistance includes optimization of host factors and drug delivery, selection of alternative therapies based on knowledge of mechanisms of resistance, and the development of new antivirals. This article discusses drug resistance in herpesviruses and hepatitis B.

A Review of Oral Antiretroviral Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B

Objective:

To describe the current evidence for the use of oral antiretroviral (ARV) agents in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

Data Sources:

A search from 1950 to April 2010 was conducted using the databases PubMed and MEDLINE with the search terms chronic hepatitis B, lamivudine, entecavir, adefovir, telbivudine, tenofovir, emtricitabine, clevudine, and pradefovir. The search was limited to trials conducted in humans that were published in the English language.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Studies were included if they evaluated the use of oral ARVs in patients with CHB infection who were not coinfected with hepatitis C, hepatitis D, or HIV.

Data Synthesis:

Oral ARVs have revolutionized the treatment of CHB. Studies conducted comparing ARVs have favored entecavir and tenofovir with respect to their ability to decrease hepatitis B virus DNA viral load while minimizing the development of resistance. However, low seroconversion rates, recurrent viremia when ARV therapy is discontinued, and increased resistance rates with longer treatment durations limit the benefit of oral ARVs in the treatment of CHB. Combination therapy has been a suggested solution; however, studies have yet to prove additional benefit over currently recommended monotherapy.

Conclusions:

Oral ARVs should continue to be used in the treatment of CHB; however, research is needed to define the optimal duration of therapy, evaluate the utility of combination therapy, and explore novel targets within the hepatitis B life cycle.

Virologic response at 12 months of treatment predicts sustained antiviral efficacy in patients with adefovir-treated Lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The aim of our study was to define the potential role of virologic response at 12 months of treatment (VR12) in predicting subsequent virologic and clinical outcomes in adefovir (ADV)-treated lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B.

METHODS

Two hundred and four patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) treated with ADV monotherapy were included. Serum HBV DNA was quantified by real-time polymerase chain reactions. VR12 was defined as a HBV DNA level of less than 4 log(10) copies/mL after 12 months of ADV treatment.

RESULTS

VR12 was observed in 110 of the 204 patients (54%). The mean HBV DNA reductions from baseline after 12 months of ADV treatment were 3.8 and 1.9 log(10) copies/mL in patients with and without VR12, respectively (p<0.001). The hepatitis B "e" antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion rates in patients with and without VR12 were 32% and 14% at 12 months treatment, respectively (p=0.018), and 40% and 27% at 24 months of treatment (p=0.032). The genotypic mutation rates to ADV in patients with and without VR12 were 0% and 6% at 12 months of treatment, respectively (p=0.033), and 21% and 42% at 24 months (p=0.012). The rates of viral breakthrough in patients with and without VR12 were 0% and 7% at 12 months of treatment, respectively (p=0.072), and 9% and 25% at 24 months (p=0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients without VR12 may need to switch to or add on other potent antiviral drugs in their medical regimens.

Monitoring of therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to evaluate therapy with lamivudine (LAM) and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) monotherapy in chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients with frequent measurements of DNA levels, to characterize HBV genotypes, and to determine the emergence of nucleos(t)ide analogue mutants before and during the therapy by direct-sequencing the reverse transcriptase region and by INNO-LiPA HBV DR v3.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 15 chronic HBV patients were analysed: 11 were treated with ADV and four were treated with LAM.

RESULTS

Viral genotype was determined, showing the presence of genotype D (73%) in 11 patients and genotype A (27%) in four patients. In the viral response to treatment, three patients developed substitutions at rtM204I associated with LAM resistance and one of these patients presented rtM204V/I plus rtL180M mutation. In contrast, of the 11 patients treated with ADV, three patients developed mutations (rtN236T; rtA181V; rtA181V plus rtN236T). With regard to this case, the same results were observed by INNO-LiPA HBV DR v3 and direct sequencing, but by direct sequencing we detected an extra mutation rtQ215S that was present in two patients: one patient who was on treatment with LAM had an rtQ215S mutation in addition to an rtM204I, and the second patient treated with ADV had rtA181V.

CONCLUSION

Direct sequence analysis is an essential tool to optimize therapeutic management of HBV chronic infection in clinical practice to choose the appropriate nucleos(t)ide analogues and to detect extra mutations that are not included in the commercial kit.

Antiviral treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections

While 25 compounds have been formally licensed for the treatment of HIV infection (AIDS), only seven licensed products are currently available for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection: interferon-α, pegylated interferon-α, lamivudine, adefovir (dipivoxil), entecavir, telbivudine and tenofovir (disoproxil fumarate). In contrast to the treatment of HIV infections where the individual drugs are routinely used in combination, for the treatment of chronic HBV infection the individual drugs are generally used in monotherapy. In principle, combination drug therapy should allow reducing the likelihood of drug-resistant development.

Antiviral effect of entecavir in chronic hepatitis B: influence of prior exposure to nucleos(t)ide analogues

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Entecavir is a potent inhibitor of viral replication in nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients, but data on the efficacy in NA-experienced subjects are limited.

METHODS

In a multi-center cohort study we investigated 161 chronic hepatitis B patients (34% NA-experienced) treated with entecavir monotherapy.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 11 (3-23)months, 82 (79%) of 104 NA-naïve patients achieved virologic response (VR), defined as HBV DNA <80IU/ml, and none of the patients (0%) developed genotypic entecavir-resistance. VR was demonstrated in 31 (54%) of 57 NA-experienced patients during a median follow-up of 12 (3-31)months. Patients with lamivudine-resistant mutations at the start of entecavir monotherapy had a reduced probability of achieving VR compared to lamivudine-naïve patients (HR 0.14; 95% CI 0.04-0.58; p=0.007). Antiviral efficacy was not decreased by prior treatment with lamivudine when lamivudine-resistance had never developed (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.43-1.52; p=0.52). Prior adefovir therapy without development of adefovir-resistance (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.43-1.64; p=0.61) and presence of adefovir-resistance (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.27-2.71; p=0.80) did not influence antiviral response to entecavir. Switching to a tenofovir-containing treatment regimen resulted in viral load decline in patients with entecavir-resistance associated mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

Entecavir proved to be efficacious in NA-naïve patients. The antiviral efficacy of entecavir was not influenced by prior treatment with adefovir or presence of adefovir-resistance. Entecavir should not be used in patients with previous lamivudine-resistance, yet it may still be an option in lamivudine-experienced patients in case lamivudine-resistance never developed.

Drug delivery systems and liver targeting for the improved pharmacotherapy of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection

In spite of the progress made in vaccine and antiviral therapy development, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is still the most common cause of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, with more than 400 million people chronically infected worldwide. Antiviral therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogues and/or immunomodulating peptides is the only option to control and prevent the progression of the disease in chronic hepatitis B (CHB)-infected patients. So far, the current antiviral monotherapy remains unsatisfactory because of the low efficacy and the development of drug resistance mutants. Moreover, viral rebound is frequently observed following therapy cessation, since covalent closed circular DNA (cccDNA) is not removed from hepatocytes by antiviral therapy. First, this review describes the current pharmacotherapy for the management of CHB and the new drug candidates being investigated. Then, the challenges in the development of drug delivery systems for the targeting of antiviral drugs to the liver parenchyma are discussed. Finally, perspectives in the design of a more efficient pharmacotherapy to eradicate the virus from the host are addressed.

Low efficacy of entecavir therapy in adefovir-refractory hepatitis B patients with prior lamivudine resistance

We determined the virologic response, incidence of entecavir resistance, and evolution of lamivudine and adefovir-resistant mutants during entecavir (ETV) therapy in adefovir-refractory patients with prior lamivudine resistance. Forty adefovir-refractory chronic hepatitis B patients with prior lamivudine resistance who had received entecavir for > or = 6 months were included and monitored for virologic response and entecavir resistance. Ten per cent of patients achieved HBV DNA < 50 copies/mL by PCR after 24 weeks of ETV therapy, and an initial virologic response was observed in 12 of 40 patients (30%). Higher pretreatment ALT (P = 0.039) and the presence of the rtL180M mutation (P = 0.038) were associated with an initial virologic response. During a mean follow-up of 11.4 months, four patients (10%) experienced virologic breakthrough, while ETV-resistant mutants were detected in six patients (15%). YMDD and adefovir-resistant mutants were detected in 57 and 35% of patients at baseline, respectively. At 48 weeks of therapy, 96 and 4% of patients had YMDD and adefovir-resistant mutants, respectively. These data suggest an early development of ETV resistance and low antiviral response during ETV therapy in adefovir-refractory patients with prior lamivudine resistance.

rtE218G, a novel hepatitis B virus mutation with resistance to adefovir dipivoxil in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Antiviral therapy is a potentially successful approach for the treatment of patients with Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. One antiviral agent is the nucleoside analogue adefovir dipivoxil (ADV). Its efficiency is compromised by the emergence of drug-resistant HBV mutants. Although three major ADV-resistant mutations of HBV are known, rtA181T/V and rtN236T, HBV mutations associated with ADV resistance have not been fully identified. We analyzed DNA sequences that covered a 244 base pair region of the HBV polymerase gene from patients with clinical manifestations of ADV resistance. A novel pattern of amino acid substitutions in HBV polymerase was detected in 26 out of 86 patients. This mutant exhibited a substitution of glycine for glutamic acid at residue 218 (rtE218G). Transient transfection of the HBV replication-competent construct including the rtE218G mutation was performed in HepG2 cells in order to determine the relevance of this mutation to ADV resistance. Phenotypic analyses demonstrated that the rtE218G mutation could independently confer resistance to ADV in vitro, with a 50% inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) 5.5-fold higher than wild-type HBV. RtE218G-mutated HBV also showed a decreased replication capacity in vitro, equal to 87% of wild-type HBV. The present study showed that the rtE218G mutation may be a novel ADV-resistant mutation. Further work will focus on resistance surveillance and cross-resistance analyses, and the molecular mechanisms involved.

Does RNA interference provide new hope for control of chronic hepatitis B infection?

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a global human health problem, with an estimated 350 million people having chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection worldwide. The majority of infections acquired during adulthood are resolved without intervention; however, infections acquired at birth or during early childhood have a 90% chance of progressing to CHB, leading to a host of adverse effects on the liver, including cirrhosis and cancer. CHB is currently treated with a combination of cytokines and/or nucleoside/nucleotide analogues; however, adverse side effects to cytokine therapy and the selection of resistance mutations to nucleoside analogues often abrogate the efficacy of treatment. The recent discovery that small interfering RNA and microRNA are active in mammalian cells suggests it might be possible to supplement existing HBV therapies with small RNA-based therapeutic(s).

HBV and HCV therapy

One year of interferon therapy inhibits HBV replication in one third of the patients whereas long-term administration of oral nucleos(t)ide analogues is efficient in most of them, as long as early treatment adaptation in patients with partial virological response and resistance is provided. Following the demonstration of a more potent antiviral effect in terms of sustained virological response (SVR) rates, Pegylated-IFN coupled with Ribavirin has become the standard treatment for chronic hepatitis C, with nearly 65% of all treated patients achieving a SVR. Long-term suppression of HBV and eradication of HCV would halt the progression of chronic hepatitis to cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and liver decompensation.

Hepatitis B virus resistance to nucleos(t)ide analogues

Patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) can be successfully treated using nucleos(t)ide analogs (NA), but drug-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) mutants frequently arise, leading to treatment failure and progression to liver disease. There has been much research into the mechanisms of resistance to NA and selection of these mutants. Five NA have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of CHB; it is unlikely that any more NA will be developed in the near future, so it is important to better understand mechanisms of cross-resistance (when a mutation that mediates resistance to one NA also confers resistance to another) and design more effective therapeutic strategies for these 5 agents. The genes that encode the polymerase and envelope proteins of HBV overlap, so resistance mutations in polymerase usually affect the hepatitis B surface antigen; these alterations affect infectivity, vaccine efficacy, pathogenesis of liver disease, and transmission throughout the population. Associations between HBV genotype and resistance phenotype have allowed cross-resistance profiles to be determined for many commonly detected mutants, so genotyping assays can be used to adapt therapy. Patients that experience virologic breakthrough or partial response to their primary therapy can often be successfully treated with a second NA, if this drug is given at early stages of these events. However, best strategies for preventing NA resistance include first-line use of the most potent antivirals with a high barrier to resistance. It is important to continue basic research into HBV replication and pathogenic mechanisms to identify new therapeutic targets, develop novel antiviral agents, design combination therapies that prevent drug resistance, and decrease the incidence of complications of CHB.

Efficacy of entecavir in patients with chronic hepatitis B resistant to both lamivudine and adefovir or to lamivudine alone

Entecavir (ETV) is currently recommended as a rescue therapy purely for adefovir (ADV)-resistant chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections. We evaluated the efficacy of ETV in patients who were resistant to lamivudine (LAM)/ADV sequential therapy and in those resistant to LAM monotherapy. Fifty LAM/ADV-resistant and 38 LAM-resistant patients who received ETV 1 mg/day for at least 48 weeks were enrolled. Mean baseline serum HBV DNA and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were significantly lower in the LAM/ADV-resistant group, compared with the LAM-resistant group (6.90 versus 7.62 log(10) copies/mL and 102.6 versus 160.2 IU/L; both P < 0.05); hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) status and LAM-resistant mutation patterns were similar in the two groups. At week 48, mean reductions in HBV DNA and ALT levels were significantly less in the LAM/ADV-resistant group (-2.96 versus -4.86 log(10) copies/mL and -68.3 versus -128.9 IU/L; both P < 0.05). Achievement of undetectable HBV DNA was also less common in the LAM/ADV-resistant group (10.0% versus 34.2%; P = 0.006), although the rates of HBeAg loss and ALT normalization did not differ between the two groups. Resistance to both LAM and ADV was an independent risk factor for failure of HBV DNA negativity at week 48 (odds ratio, 0.138; P = 0.019). In both LAM/ADV-resistant and LAM-resistant groups, primary responders (> or =1 log decline in HBV DNA at week 12) achieved a significantly greater decrease in HBV DNA levels over the 48-week period, compared with primary nonresponders (-4.18 versus -0.97 and -5.37 versus -2.15 log(10) copies/mL, respectively; both P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The 48-week ETV treatment was less effective in LAM/ADV-resistant than in LAM-resistant patients. Continuing ETV monotherapy could be determined based on the virological response at 12 weeks in LAM/ADV-resistant patients.

Hepatitis B virus variants

HBV replicates through reverse transcription of an RNA intermediate; the inherent lack of proofreading causes a high mutation frequency. Mutations in the precore and core promoter regions that abolish or reduce the production of hepatitis B e antigen occur most commonly. Patients with these HBV variants remain viremic and can develop progressive liver disease. Mutations in the core promoter region are associated with an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Exogenous selection pressure might favor certain mutations. Mutations in the HBV polymerase that confer resistance to nucleoside and nucleotide analog treatments are a major barrier to the success of therapy for hepatitis B. The development of antiviral drug resistance negates the initial treatment response and can lead to hepatitis flares and hepatic decompensation. Prompt addition of another drug to which the virus is not cross-resistant is required. Mutations in the HBV surface protein that facilitate escape from host immunity are responsible for the failure of immune prophylaxis in infants who received HBV vaccine and in liver transplant recipients who received hepatitis B immune globulin.

Profound antiviral effect of oral administration of MIV-210 on chronic hepadnaviral infection in a woodchuck model of hepatitis B

MIV-210 is a prodrug of 3'-fluoro-2',3'-dideoxyguanosine with high oral bioavailability in humans and potent activity against hepatitis B virus (HBV). Woodchucks infected with woodchuck hepatitis virus (WHV) represent an accurate model of HBV infection that is utilized for evaluation of the efficacy and safety of novel anti-HBV agents. Oral administration of MIV-210 at 20 or 60 mg/kg of body weight/day induced a rapid virological response in chronically infected woodchucks, reducing serum WHV DNA levels by 4.75 log10 and 5.72 log10, respectively, in 2 weeks. A progressive decline in WHV viremia occurred throughout the 10-week therapy, giving final reductions of 7.23 log10 and 7.68 log10 in the 20- and 60-mg/kg/day groups, respectively. Further, a daily dose of 10 mg/kg decreased the serum WHV load 400-fold after 4 weeks of treatment, and a dose of 5 mg/kg/day was sufficient to maintain this antiviral effect during the following 6-week period. MIV-210 at 20 or 60 mg/kg/day reduced the liver WHV DNA load 200- to 2,500-fold from pretreatment levels and, importantly, led to a 2.0 log10 drop in the hepatic content of WHV covalently closed circular DNA. The treatment with 60 mg/kg/day was well tolerated. Liver biopsy specimens obtained after the 10-week treatment with 20 or 60 mg/kg/day and after the 10-week follow-up showed hepatocyte and mitochondrial ultrastructures comparable to those in the placebo-treated group. It was concluded that MIV-210 is highly effective against chronic WHV infection. These findings, together with the previously demonstrated inhibitory activity of MIV-210 against lamivudine-, adefovir-, and entecavir-resistant HBV variants, make MIV-210 a highly valuable candidate for further testing as an agent against chronic hepatitis B.

[Resistance in hepatitis B virus]

The development hepatitis B virus (HBV) polymerase inhibitors has revolutionised the treatment of chronic HBV infection. However, the emergence of resistance mutations can compromise their clinical efficacy and it is mandatory to know the mechanisms of these resistances, its clinical implications, strategies for prevention and how to deal with the rescue. Since HBV has a high degree of replication and a high error rate, during their life cycle it will produce a large number of punctual mutations in individuals with active replication. Due to the large size of the HBV genome, all the possible changes may occur daily and should be screened before starting any antiviral therapy. Therefore, in individuals infected with HBV there is a mixture of similar viruses that evolves over time (quasispecies), some of which are carriers of resistance mutations to antivirals, which explains why they can be selected quickly after exposure to drug. Of the five drugs approved in Europe for the treatment of hepatitis B, three of them (lamivudine, adefovir and entecavir) are likely to be affected directly by these mutations, as well as other active drugs, such as telbivudine, tenofovir and the emtricitabine. The characterization of the resistance mutations is helpful for the prevention and the optimization of antiviral therapies.

A new strategy for constructing in vitro replication-competent 1.3 copies of hepatitis B virus genome

In the absence of a robust infectable cell culture system, assays related to replication of clinical HBV isolates are based on the transfection of replication-competent HBV DNA into hepatoma cell lines that are able to replicate and secrete HBV virions. Current methods for constructing HBV 1.1 genomes work well for drug susceptibility assays, but are not very suitable for research on HBV replication capacity or regulation since a heterogeneous promoter is required to drive pgRNA transcription. A new strategy for constructing HBV 1.3 genomes that contain HBV intrinsic promoter necessary for pgRNA transcription is reported in this paper. Using this strategy, three HBV 1.3 genomes from isolates of three patients were constructed. When the three HBV 1.3 genomes were transfected into the HepG2 cell line, replicative intermediates were detectable by Southern blotting with digoxigenin-labeled DNA probe in two of the three constructs. Using overlap extension PCR and avoiding as much as possible the digestion-and-ligation process, this strategy could be applied to constructing longer-than-genome units for most genotypes of HBV strains.

Evolution of hepatitis B virus polymerase mutations in a patient with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B virus treated with sequential monotherapy and add-on nucleoside/nucleotide analogues

BACKGROUND

Nucleoside/nucleotide analogues are a fundamental tool for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV). Sequential anti-HBV treatment might lead to the selection of mutations.

OBJECTIVE

This report aimed to analyze the genetic evolution of the reverse-transcriptase (RT) gene of viral quasispecies in a patient with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic HBV who received, sequentially, lamivudine (LAM), adefovir dipivoxil (ADV), and ADV + telbivudine (LDT) combination treatment over a total of 108 weeks.

METHODS

A 20-year-old Chinese man presented to Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, with hepatitis B surface antigen-positive and HBeAg-positive chronic HBV and was sequentially treated with LAM 100 mg/d for 18weeks,ADV 10mg/d for 68weeks, and ADV 10mg/d + LDT 600 mg/d combination treatment for 22 weeks. Compliance was monitored every 4 weeks using a pill count. For genotypic analysis, the RT region of the polymerase gene from the serum of this patient was amplified, cloned, and sequenced. Fifty clones with HBV insert were selected for sequencing at weeks 0 (baseline), 18, 22, 60, 70, 86, and 108.

RESULTS

The rtM204V/L LAM-resistance mutation was detected in 4.4% (2/45) of clones prior to LAM treatment. At week 18 during LAM treatment, the rtM204I mutation became predominant, being present in 79.5% (35/44) of clones. The rtM204I mutation was associated with compensatory mutations (rtL180M and rtT184L). A total of 9.1% (4/44) of the clones harbored the rtL180M + rtT184L + rtM204I mutations. Two new mutations, rtL229V and rtV191I, were detected in 75.0% (33/44) and 11.4% (5/44) of clones, respectively. At week 22 during ADV treatment, LAM-resistance mutations (rtL180M, rtT184L, rtM204I, rtV191I, and rtL229V) were not detected. At week 86 during ADV therapy, the rtN236T ADV-resistance mutation was detected in 58.8% (20/34) of clones. A total of 20.6% (7/34) of the clones harbored the rtK212T + rtM250L mutation, and rtA181V was found in 2.9% (1/34) of the clones. At week 108, after the patient had been receiving ADV + LDT combination therapy for 22 weeks, rtS202G and rtI269T had emerged, representing 28.9% (13/45) and 8.9% (4/45), respectively, of the viral population during ADV + LDT combination treatment. We also detected several polymorphic sites,including rtF221Y, rtS223A, rtI224V, rtN238H, rtL267Q, and rtQ271M, during the sequential treatment. After 22 weeks of combination treatment, HBV DNA count was decreased to less than the lower limit of quantitation (<200 copies/mL).

CONCLUSIONS

This report identified HBV mutations that escaped the antiviral pressure of LAM, ADV, and ADV + LDT in this patient and provided insight into the process of mutation selection through genotypic analysis during antiviral treatment. Mutations selected under sequential treatments of LAM, ADV, and ADV + LDT can lead to a series of compensatory mutations, which partially restore the level of viral replication. ADV administered in combination with LDT appeared to be effective in this selected case with clinical or virologic resistance to sequential treatment with LAM and ADV.

Prevention and management of drug resistance for antihepatitis B treatment

Emergence of drug resistance in antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B negates treatment benefits. There is a lower chance for emergence of resistance for drugs with rapid and potent viral suppression and a high genetic barrier for resistant mutations. Measurement of viral load at 24 weeks' treatment to aid decision making is mandatory for patients receiving drugs that are associated with a higher resistance rate. Combination treatment with drugs that belong to different groups is associated with a lower chance of resistance. To ensure better control of viral replication in patients with drug resistance, the addition of another drug without an overlapping resistance profile should be given as early as possible, preferably at the time when genotypic resistance emerges. With such strategies, most patients can be maintained in clinical remission. However, because of the mechanism of viral persistence, research efforts should continue to anticipate and prevent the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains.

Benefits and risks of combination therapy for hepatitis B

In successful antiviral therapy of hepatitis B, drug combinations, particularly combinations without cross-resistance, can delay or prevent the emergence of drug-resistant mutants. Because drug-resistant mutants are archived and may limit future therapeutic options, prevention is important for long-term therapeutic efficacy. Additionally, combining drugs may achieve synergistic or additive antiviral effects compared with single drug therapy. Undesirable aspects of combination therapy include higher treatment costs and possibly lower adherence rates (due to pill number or complexity of regimen). Potentially harmful effects of combination therapy include higher rates of side effects, reduced efficacy due to drug competition, and the risk of multidrug-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) if combination therapy is insufficient to prevent resistance. Combination therapy has been shown to reduce the rate of drug resistance in chronic hepatitis B, but only when drugs with a low barrier to resistance are used (lamivudine, adefovir). Combination therapies may achieve greater degrees of HBV DNA suppression, but this has not been associated with higher rates of seroconversion (hepatitis B e antigen or hepatitis B surface antigen) compared to single drug therapy. The benefit of combination therapy has yet to be demonstrated with agents that are associated with a high barrier to resistance (tenofovir, entecavir). The use of combination therapy is recommended in specific patient groups: those with decompensated cirrhosis, those coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus and HBV who are on antiretroviral therapy, those who have undergone liver transplantation, and those with drug-resistant HBV infection. There is insufficient evidence to recommend combination therapy as first-line therapy for all patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Antiviral resistance and hepatitis B therapy

The management of chronic hepatitis B currently rests with long-term therapy using oral nucleoside analogs. The major limitation of long-term therapy is antiviral resistance. Antiviral resistance is due to the high rate of mutations that can occur during hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication and the selection of these mutants due to a replication advantage in the presence of the antiviral agent. Indeed, high rates of antiviral resistance have been found with long-term use of lamivudine, in up to 76% of patients treated for 5 years or more. Rates of antiviral resistance are lower with adefovir therapy, approximately 30% at 5 years. Newer more potent nucleoside analogs (tenofovir and entecavir) have proven to have much lower rates of antiviral resistance (<1% after 2 years in treatment-naïve subjects), but the long-term rates of resistance have yet to be fully defined. The appearance of these viral mutations (genotypic resistance) is usually followed by rises in HBV DNA levels (virological breakthrough) and then by rises in serum aminotransferase levels (biochemical breakthrough). The appearance of antiviral resistance can be accompanied by a transient but occasionally severe exacerbation of the underlying liver disease which in some instances has led to acute liver failure. Combinations of nucleoside analogs may offer an approach to preventing antiviral resistance, but the efficacy and safety of this approach have yet to be shown. A future research priority is to identify new agents active against HBV that target different steps in the viral life-cycle and might provide effective means to circumvent the antiviral resistance of nucleoside analogs.

Adefovir dipivoxil resistance patterns in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B

Background

Lamivudine (3TC)-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients demonstrated a higher rate of adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) resistance compared with nucleoside-naive patients. This study describes ADV mutation patterns in 3TC-resistant patients treated with ADV+3TC or ADV monotherapy, investigating whether mutations selected during 3TC therapy predispose to ADV resistance. Risk factors for ADV resistance were also evaluated.

Methods

A total of 60 3TC-experienced patients were treated with (or switched to) ADV monotherapy (30 patients) or ADV+3TC combination therapy (30 patients), and followed for at least 12 months. In all patients the hepatitis B virus reverse transcriptase (RT) region was amplified and directly sequenced before initiating ADV. The RT sequence was reevaluated for virological breakthrough patients and phenotypic analysis was performed for several patients.

Results

In total, 14 (23%) patients showed virological breakthrough (10/30 on ADV monotherapy and 4/30 on ADV+3TC). ADV resistance mutations (rtA181V/T and rtN236T) were detected alone or in combination for 11/14 patients, whereas novel substitutions were present in 3 patients. Before ADV treatment, apart from 3TC resistance signature mutations, additional changes were found, including the rtA181T mutation, which was already present in 2/14 ADV-resistant patients.

Conclusions

Although most patients showed virological breakthrough because of the well known rtA181V/T and rtN236T substitutions, more complex patterns were also found. ADV monotherapy, dose reduction and suboptimal virological response after 48 weeks of therapy were significantly associated with ADV resistance.

Entecavir shows limited efficacy in HBeAg-positive hepatitis B patients with a partial virologic response to adefovir therapy

BACKGROUND/AIMS

We investigated the efficacy of entecavir in lamivudine-experienced and -naïve patients with persistently high HBV DNA during adefovir treatment.

METHODS

Fourteen chronic hepatitis B patients (57% lamivudine-experienced) with a viral load above 5log(10)copies/mL after 12months of adefovir therapy and thereafter were treated with entecavir 1mg daily.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 15months (range: 8-23months) one of six lamivudine-naïve and none of the eight lamivudine-experienced patients achieved undetectable HBV DNA (<373copies/mL). HBeAg loss occurred in none of the subjects. Two lamivudine-experienced patients demonstrated the rtM204I mutation; no other entecavir-resistant substitutions were detected (rtI169, rtT184, rtS202, and rtM250). Two of three patients with genotypic adefovir resistance at baseline demonstrated a rapid virologic response to entecavir, but undetectable HBV DNA was not achieved. To attain a better antiviral response the dosage of entecavir was increased to 2mg daily in two patients, resulting in further viral load decline for both of them.

CONCLUSIONS

Entecavir monotherapy dosed at 1mg resulted in a slow reduction of viral load in both lamivudine-experienced and -naïve patients with persistently high HBV DNA during adefovir therapy. Increasing the dosage of entecavir led to further HBV DNA decline.

[Hepatitis B virus genetic diversity and mutant]

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a partially double stranded DNA virus with genetic diversity represented by eight genotypes (A to H). Natural course and response to treatment could be affected by HBV genotypes. HBV shows high rates of turn over in the absence of proof-reading ability. As a result, large amounts of quasispecies are produced naturally or antiviral-associated. HBV consists of four open reading frames, namely preS/S gene, precore/core gene, polymerase gene, and X gene. Mutations on preS gene can result in undetectable HBsAg even in case that HBV is replicating. Surface gene mutation leads to decreased binding affinity to anti-HBs, which is associated with a vaccine escape mutant. Precore mutation abolishes HBeAg whereas mutations on basal core promoter gene down-regulate the HBeAg production. Mutations on basal core promoter are associated with increased HBV replication and high incidence of progressive liver diseases such as liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Mutations on polymerase genes are often induced by antiviral therapy. Emergence of antiviral-resistant mutation is the major cause of treatment failure. Furthermore, existence of prior antiviral-resistant mutations limits the options of subsequent antiviral agents. Therefore, judicious use of antivirals and selection of the most potent drug with the lowest resistance rate are of the utmost importance for the prevention of antiviral-associated mutants. Detailed knowledge and understanding of HBV genetic diversity and mutant would be critical to establish strategies for the diagnosis and management of HBV infection.

Adefovir dipivoxil is effective for the treatment of cirrhotic patients with lamivudine failure

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Data on the efficacy of adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) in elderly and cirrhotic patients with lamivudine-resistant (LAM-R) chronic hepatitis B are scarce. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the safety and efficacy of ADV in this specific patient population.

METHODS

Sixty-eight cirrhotic LAM-R patients, of whom 19 (27.9%) were elderly (>or=65 years of age) and nine had severe disease (two post-orthotopic liver transplantation, four pre-orthotopic liver transplantation and three decompensated), with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection received ADV. Virological and biochemical responses to the addition of ADV were analysed.

RESULTS

At inclusion, all patients were receiving LAM; ADV was added. 75.4% of patients received a combination of LAM and ADV throughout this study for a median treatment duration of 12.6 months; the remainder received ADV with an overlap with LAM treatment for a median duration of 7.9 months. At the end of follow-up, 41.2% of patients had undetectable HBV DNA (<or=2000 copies/ml) with a median reduction of 3.4 log(10) copies/ml. Time to reach undetectable HBV DNA was dependent on baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and HBeAg status. Normalization of serum ALT levels was observed in 55.2% (32/58) of patients. In patients who were HBeAg positive at baseline, HBeAg loss and seroconversion occurred in 23% (9/39) and 10% (4/39) respectively. No resistance mutations and no significant side effects were observed during the study period.

CONCLUSION

Adefovir dipivoxil provides effective and safe treatment in cirrhotic and elderly patients who failed LAM therapy.

On-treatment monitoring of adefovir therapy in chronic hepatitis B: virologic response can be assessed at 24 weeks

Patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who will and those who will not respond to adefovir (ADV) monotherapy need to be identified at an early stage in order to adjust treatment and prevent future development of antiviral resistance. In a single-centre cohort study, we investigated 76 CHB patients [50% hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive] treated with long-term ADV monotherapy. During a median follow-up of 122 (24-185) weeks, 42 (55%) patients achieved virologic response (VR), defined as HBV-DNA levels <10(3) copies/mL, and 10 patients (13%) developed genotypic ADV resistance. Independent baseline predictors of VR were HBeAg negativity [hazard ratio (HR) 2.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24-7.19; P = 0.02], high alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels (HR 1.11; 95% CI 1.05-1.18; P = 0.001), and low HBV-DNA levels (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.41-0.75; P < 0.001). HBV-DNA at week 24 demonstrated a higher predictive value for VR than HBV-DNA at week 48. Important predictors of genotypic resistance were presence of cirrhosis (HR 6.54; 95% CI 1.39-30.9; P = 0.018), and not achieving VR during treatment (HR 6.60; 95% CI 1.35-32.4; P = 0.008). Patients without VR at week 24 already demonstrated a trend towards the emergence of ADV resistance (P = 0.07). HBV-DNA at week 24 was a better on-treatment predictor of VR than HBV-DNA at week 48, and ADV-resistant mutations developed more frequently in patients without VR at week 24. Therefore, our study suggests that virologic response to ADV therapy can be assessed at 24 weeks, instead of the generally recommended 48 weeks.

In vitro characterization of viral fitness of therapy-resistant hepatitis B variants

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Because of the overlapping of polymerase and envelope genes in the hepatitis B virus (HBV) genome, nucleoside analog therapy can lead to the emergence of complex HBV variants that harbor mutations in both the reverse transcriptase and the envelope proteins. To understand the selection process of HBV variants during antiviral therapy, we analyzed the in vitro fitness (the ability to produce infectious progeny) of 4 mutant viral genomes isolated from one patient who developed resistance to a triple therapy (lamivudine, adefovir, and anti-HBV immunoglobulins).

METHODS

The 4 mutant and the wild-type forms of HBV were expressed from vectors in hepatoma cell lines; replication and viral particle secretion capacities then were analyzed. The impact of envelope gene mutations on infectivity was tested in HepaRG cells using the hepatitis delta virus (HDV) model as a reporter for infection.

RESULTS

The dominant HBV variant characterized from the therapy-resistant patient was found to have the best replicative capacity in vitro in the presence of high concentrations of lamivudine and adefovir. The expression of envelope proteins and secretion of subviral and Dane particles by this mutant was comparable with that of wild-type HBV. HDV particles enveloped by surface proteins from the selected mutant had the highest rates of infection in HepaRG cells compared with other mutants.

CONCLUSIONS

These results illustrate the importance of viral fitness and infectivity as a major determinant of antiviral therapy resistance in patients. Understanding HBV mutant selection in vivo will help to optimize new anti-HBV therapeutic strategies.