Obliterative portal venopathy: portal hypertension is not always present at diagnosis

Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension in an ankylosing spondylitis patient

Idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH) is a disease with an uncertain etiology consisting of non-cirrhotic portal hypertension and portal pressure increase in the absence of liver cirrhosis. In INCPH, patients exhibit normal liver functions and structures. The factors associated with INCPH include the following: Umbilical/portal pyremia, bacterial diseases, prothrombic states, chronic exposure to arsenic, vinyl chloride monomers, genetic disorders, and autoimmune diseases. Approximately 70% of patients present a history of major variceal bleeding, and treatment relies on the prevention of complications related to portal hypertension. Autoimmune disorders associated with INCPH are mainly systemic sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. To the best of our knowledge, a case of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) associated with INCPH has not been reported thus far. Therfore, we report our experience of a patient with AS accompanied by INCPH, who showed perisplenic varices with patent spleno-portal axis and hepatic veins along with no evidence of cirrhosis on liver biopsy, and provide a brief literature review.

Hepatocellular nodules in vascular liver diseases

Hepatocellular nodules have been recognized in vascular liver diseases for a long time and mostly described and studied in the imaging literature. Some confusions in their identification and overlap in their definitions exist, especially in this specific clinical context. Pathology descriptions report the development of nodular regenerative hyperplasia, large regenerative nodule, and focal nodular hyperplasia, as adaptive responses of the liver parenchyma to the modified blood flow. True neoplastic hepatocellular nodules such as hepatocellular adenoma and hepatocellular carcinoma can also appear, mainly in Budd-Chiari syndrome, and have to be correctly diagnosed. This is more difficult for the radiologist in these diseased livers, leading more frequently to perform liver biopsies. We describe the histology of each type of well-differentiated hepatocellular nodules and provide some clues for their differential diagnosis. A review of the literature gives an historical perspective of the problem and enlightens the frequency and the subtypes of hepatocellular nodules found in the most common vascular liver diseases.

Vascular liver diseases on the clinical side: definitions and diagnosis, new concepts

The components of the hepatic vascular system (hepatic arteries, portal and hepatic veins, sinusoids, and lymphatics) can be damaged by various types of injury. Each of the resulting conditions is rare, which has limited knowledge and awareness. In the last two decades, international collaborations have allowed to reach critical masses of data, which has driven significant progresses in understanding and management of vascular disorders of the liver. The present paper discusses definitions, denominations, and diagnosis of such vascular disorders with the exception of those affecting hepatic arteries. Evolving pathogenic or pathophysiologic views relevant to the clinical aspects are also overviewed.

Idiopathic portal hypertension and extrahepatic portal venous obstruction

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic portal hypertension (IPH) and extrahepatic portal venous obstruction (EHPVO) are non-cirrhotic vascular causes of portal hypertension (PHT). Variceal bleed and splenomegaly are the commonest presentations.

AIM

The present review is intended to provide the existing literature on etiopathogenesis, clinical profile, diagnosis, natural history and management of IPH and EHPVO.

RESULTS

IPH and EHPVO are both characterized by normal hepatic venous pressure gradient, moderate to massive splenomegaly with preserved liver synthetic functions. While the level of block in IPH is presinusoidal, in EHPVO it is at prehepatic level. Infections, autoimmunity, drugs, immunodeficiency and prothrombotic states are possible etiological agents in IPH. Contrastingly in EHPVO, prothrombotic disorders and local factors around the portal vein are the incriminating factors. Diagnosis is often clinical, supported by simple radiological tools. Natural history is defined by episodes of variceal bleed and symptoms related to enlarged spleen. Growth failure, portal biliopathy and minimal hepatic encephalopathy are additional concerns in EHPVO. Long-term survival is reasonably good with endoscopic surveillance; however, parenchymal extinction leading to decompensation is seen in a minority of patients in both the disorders. Surgical shunts revert the complications secondary to PHT. Meso-Rex shunt has become the standard surgery in children with EHPVO.

CONCLUSION

This review gives a detailed summary of these two vascular conditions of liver-IPH and EHPVO. Further research is needed to understand the pathogenesis and natural history of these disorders.

[Role of splenectomy in the treatment of non-cirrhotic portal hypertension: about 3 cases]

L’hypertension portale non cirrhotique est une affection décrite pour la première fois par Guido BANTI en 1898 comme une affection associant une hypertension portale avec splénomégalie et anémie sur foie sain. Le diagnostic repose sur l’échographie abdominale, la splénoportographie et la biopsie hépatique. Le but de notre travail est d’évaluer la place de la splénectomie dans l’hypertension portale non cirrhotique à travers une étude rétrospective portant sur 3 malades dont 2 femmes et un homme pris en charge dans notre formation entre Janvier 2010 et Septembre 2016. Le diagnostic de l’hypertension portale idiopathique a été basé sur les critères suivants : une hypertension portale, la présence des varices oesophagiènnes avec une splénomégalie, l’absence de cirrhose ou d’autres affections hépatiques responsables de l’hypertension portale. La splénectomie a été réalisée chez les 3 malades. L’évolution après la splénectomie était marquée par la normalisation des signes cliniques, radiologiques et biologiques de cette affection, avec absence de récidive des varices œsophagiennes. La splénectomie associée à la ligature des varices œsophagiennes pourraient être suffisantes pour traiter ce syndrome et surtout ses conséquences sans avoir recours à une dérivation spléno-rénale.

Prevalence of histological features of idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension in general population: a retrospective study of incidental liver biopsies

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH) is associated with histologic changes secondary to obliterative portal venopathy without cirrhosis. We studied the prevalence of individual histological features of INCPH in liver biopsies obtained incidentally during unrelated elective procedures and in elective liver biopsies with the diagnosis of fatty liver disease.

METHODS

A total of 53 incidental liver biopsies obtained intraoperatively during unrelated elective procedures and an additional 28 elective biopsies with the diagnosis of fatty liver disease without portal hypertension and cirrhosis were studied. Various histologic features of INCPH were evaluated.

RESULTS

Shunt vessel (30%), phlebosclerosis (27%), increased number of portal vessels (19%) and incomplete septa (17%) were common in these liver biopsies after confounding factors such as co-existing fatty liver disease or fibrosis were excluded. At least one feature of INCPH was noted in 90% of the biopsies. Eight (10%) biopsies showed 5-6 features of INCPH. In total, 11 (14%) of 81 patients had risk factors associated with INCPH, including hypercoagulability, autoimmune disease, exposure to drugs, and infections. No patient had portal hypertension at the end of the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The histologic features of INCPH are seen in incidental liver biopsies and fatty liver disease without portal hypertension. Ten percent of the biopsies show 5-6 features of INCPH without portal hypertension. Interpreting histologic features in the right clinical context is important for proper patient care.

Noncirrhotic Portal Fibrosis in Pediatric Population

OBJECTIVES

Noncirrhotic portal fibrosis (NCPF) has been classically described as a disease of young to middle age with limited literature regarding its occurrence, onset, or clinical presentation in children. We hereby present a series of 19 patients diagnosed and managed as NCPF in pediatric age group.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all the patients presenting to the pediatric hepatology department (age <18 years) and diagnosed as NCPF was done and data were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 19 patients were diagnosed as NCPF with median age at onset of symptoms and diagnosis as 10 years and 13.8 years respectively. Majority presented with left upper quadrant discomfort or mass. Laboratory parameters showed hypersplenism in majority with preserved liver synthetic functions. Median values for hepatic venous pressure gradient and liver stiffness measurement were 13.5 mmHg and 10.6 kPa, respectively. Classical hepatic histopathological features seen were maintained lobular architecture, atretic portal tracts, approximation of portal-portal and portal-central areas, and aberrant peripheral portal channels. During follow-up, majority of the patients did not show disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

NCPF is not an uncommon entity in pediatric population with age of onset in early second decade. Hepatic histopathology must be used to exclude cirrhosis and to confirm the diagnosis. Hepatic venous pressure gradient and liver stiffness measurement values, in some cases, may overlap with those in patients with cirrhosis and may not be diagnostic in isolation. Any patient presenting with evidence of portal hypertension with preserved hepatic functions, irrespective of the age, should be evaluated for possible NCPF.

Outcomes of partial splenic embolization in patients with massive splenomegaly due to idiopathic portal hypertension

AIM

To determine the outcomes of partial splenic embolization (PSE) for massive splenomegaly due to idiopathic portal hypertension (IPH).

METHODS

In this prospective study, we evaluated the characteristics and prognosis of consecutive patients with IPH who underwent PSE for all indications at a single medical center between June 2009 and January 2015. The inclusion criteria were: presence of hypersplenism, massive splenomegaly, and resultant pancytopenia. The exclusion criteria were: presence of other diseases causing portal hypertension. During the post-PSE period, the patients were hospitalized. All patients underwent abdominal computed tomography imaging 4 wk post-PSE to determine total splenic and non-infarcted splenic volumes.

RESULTS

A total of 11 patients, with median age of 33.27 ± 4.8 years, were included in the study. Mean spleen size was 22.9 cm (21-28 cm), and severe hypersplenism was diagnosed in all patients before PSE. Post-PSE, leukocyte and platelet counts increased significantly, reaching peak levels in the second week with gradual decreases thereafter. Liver function tests did not exhibit significant changes during post-intervention follow-up. All patients developed post-embolization syndrome, and one patient experienced serious complications; all complications were successfully treated with conservative therapy and no death occurred.

CONCLUSION

Our findings showed that PSE has a lower complication rate than previously-reported surgical complication rates, which supports this intervention as a viable alternative for high-risk operable patients with severe hypersplenism.

Idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension: current perspectives

The term idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH) has been recently proposed to replace terms, such as hepatoportal sclerosis, idiopathic portal hypertension, incomplete septal cirrhosis, and nodular regenerative hyperplasia, used to describe patients with a hepatic presinusoidal cause of portal hypertension of unknown etiology, characterized by features of portal hypertension (esophageal varices, nonmalignant ascites, porto-venous collaterals), splenomegaly, patent portal, and hepatic veins and no clinical and histological signs of cirrhosis. Physicians should learn to look for this condition in a number of clinical settings, including cryptogenic cirrhosis, a disease known to be associated with INCPH, drug administration, and even chronic alterations in liver function tests. Once INCPH is clinically suspected, liver histology becomes mandatory for the correct diagnosis. However, pathologists should be familiar with the histological features of INCPH, especially in cases in which histology is not only requested to exclude liver cirrhosis.

Prevalence and clinical significance of nodular regenerative hyperplasia in liver biopsies

BACKGROUND

Nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) is a rare histological disorder associated with a wide variety of systemic diseases.

AIMS

We aimed (i) to report the prevalence of NRH in a database of liver biopsies (LBs) and the frequency of portal hypertension (PHT) at diagnosis, and (ii) to investigate whether associated diseases and/or specific histological lesions, including abnormalities of the microvasculature, were related to PHT.

METHODS

Patients with a histological diagnosis of NRH, referred by seven clinical departments, were retrospectively selected. Clinical, biological, radiological, haemodynamic and endoscopic data at diagnosis were recorded. LBs were reassessed for microvascular abnormalities.

RESULTS

NRH was diagnosed in 4.4% of LBs (n = 159, male: 52%, mean age: 54). Among patients referred for unexplained liver enzyme abnormalities, 15% had NRH. PHT was present at diagnosis in 45 patients (38%), including 13 with portal thrombosis; 65% of patients had an associated disorder. Obliteration of portal vein branches, observed in the LBs of 17 patients (11%), was significantly associated with PHT (P = 0.02). Periportal angiomatosis, observed in 101 patients (63%), was associated with the absence of PHT (P < 10(-4) ).

CONCLUSION

We suggest that NRH is a frequent histological lesion in the setting of unexplained liver enzyme abnormalities. PHT is present at the time of diagnosis in 1/3 of patients regardless of the presence of associated disease. The frequency of periportal angiomatosis in NRH without obliteration of portal vein branches, and its association with the absence of PHT suggest that obstructive portal venopathy would not represent the most frequent mechanism involved in NRH.

Role of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the management of severe complications of portal hypertension in idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension

Idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension is a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by portal hypertension in the absence of cirrhosis. The efficacy and safety of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in this population are unknown. The charts of patients with idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension undergoing TIPS in seven centers between 2000 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-one patients were included. Indications for TIPS were recurrent variceal bleeding (n = 25) and refractory ascites (n = 16). Patients were categorized according to the presence (n = 27) or absence (n = 14) of significant extrahepatic comorbidities. Associated conditions were hematologic, prothrombotic, neoplastic, immune, and exposure to toxins. During follow-up (mean 27 ± 29 months), variceal rebleeding occurred in 7/25 (28%), including three with early thrombosis of the stent. Post-TIPS overt hepatic encephalopathy was present in 14 patients (34%). Eleven patients died, five due the liver disease or complications of the procedure and six because of the associated comorbidities. The procedure was complicated by hemoperitoneum in four patients (10%), which was fatal in one case. Serum creatinine (P = 0.005), ascites as indication for TIPS (P = 0.04), and the presence of significant comorbidities (P = 0.01) at the time of the procedure were associated with death. Mortality was higher in patients with significant comorbidities and creatinine ≥100 μmol/L (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In patients with idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension who have normal kidney function or do not have severe extrahepatic conditions, TIPS is an excellent option to treat severe complications of portal hypertension. (Hepatology 2016;64:224-231).

Obliterative portal venopathy without portal hypertension: an underestimated condition

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Obliterative portal venopathy without portal hypertension has been described by a single study in a limited number of patients, thus very little is known about this clinical condition. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of obliterative portal venopathy and its clinical-pathological correlations in patients with cryptogenic chronic liver test abnormalities without clinical signs of portal hypertension.

METHODS

We analysed 482 liver biopsies from adults with non-cirrhotic cryptogenic chronic liver disorders and without any clinical signs of portal hypertension, consecutively enrolled in a 5-year period. Twenty cases of idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension diagnosed in the same period, were included for comparison. Histological findings were matched with clinical and laboratory features.

RESULTS

Obliterative portal venopathy was identified in 94 (19.5%) of 482 subjects and in all 20 cases of idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension: both groups shared the entire spectrum of histological changes described in the latter condition. The prevalence of incomplete fibrous septa and nodular regenerative hyperplasia was higher in the biopsies of idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (P = 0.006 and P = 0.002), a possible hint of a more advanced stage of the disease. The two groups also shared several clinical laboratory features, including a similar liver function test profile, concomitant prothrombotic conditions and extrahepatic autoimmune disorders.

CONCLUSION

Obliterative portal venopathy occurs in a substantial proportion of patients with unexplained chronic abnormal liver function tests without portal hypertension. The clinical-pathological profile of these subjects suggests that they may be in an early (non-symptomatic) stage of idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension.

Idiopathic Noncirrhotic Portal Hypertension: An Appraisal

Idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension is a poorly defined clinical condition of unknown etiology. Patients present with signs and symptoms of portal hypertension without evidence of cirrhosis. The disease course appears to be indolent and benign with an overall better outcome than cirrhosis, as long as the complications of portal hypertension are properly managed. This condition has been recognized in different parts of the world in diverse ethnic groups with variable risk factors, resulting in numerous terminologies and lack of standardized diagnostic criteria. Therefore, although the diagnosis of idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension requires clinical exclusion of other conditions that can cause portal hypertension and histopathologic confirmation, this entity is under-recognized clinically as well as pathologically. Recent studies have demonstrated that variable histopathologic entities with different terms likely represent a histologic spectrum of a single entity of which obliterative portal venopathy might be an underlying pathogenesis. This perception calls for standardization of the nomenclature and formulation of widely accepted diagnostic criteria, which will facilitate easier recognition of this disorder and will highlight awareness of this entity.

[Idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension: An update]

Idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension is an under-estimated cause of portal hypertension. The diagnosis requires the exclusion of cirrhosis, common causes of chronic liver disease and venous obstruction of the portal and hepatic veins. It has been associated with various extra-hepatic conditions that are most frequently immunologic, prothrombotic, hematologic and toxic. The most frequent clinical complications are variceal hemorrhage and portal vein thrombosis. Complications of portal hypertension should be managed as in patients with cirrhosis.

The significance of nonobstructive sinusoidal dilatation of the liver: Impaired portal perfusion or inflammatory reaction syndrome

Sinusoidal dilatation found in the absence of an impaired sinusoidal blood outflow has been so far of unclear significance. Sinusoidal dilatation may actually be a nonspecific feature of impaired portal venous blood inflow, whatever the cause, or a feature of severe systemic inflammatory reaction syndrome, whatever the cause. Sinusoidal dilatation is mainly located in the centrilobular area even in the absence of an outflow block. A predominantly periportal location is specifically found in oral contraceptive users, associated with an inflammatory condition. There is strong evidence for the association of sinusoidal dilatation and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy but not for estroprogestative steroids or thiopurine derivatives. Exposure to anabolic androgen steroids appears to cause sinusoidal changes different from a mere sinusoidal dilatation.

CONCLUSION

There is evidence of activation of the interleukin-6 and vascular endothelial growth factor pathways in sinusoidal dilatation, but the mechanisms linking the activation of these pathways with the microvascular changes must be identified.

Idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension: a review

Idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH) is a rare disease characterized of intrahepatic portal hypertension in the absence of cirrhosis or other causes of liver disease and splanchnic venous thrombosis. The etiology of INCPH can be classified in five categories: 1) immunological disorders (i.e. association with common variable immunodeficiency syndrome, connective tissue diseases, Crohn’s disease, etc.), 2) chronic infections, 3) exposure to medications or toxins (e.g. azathioprine, 6- thioguanine, arsenic), 4) genetic predisposition (i.e. familial aggregation and association with Adams-Oliver syndrome and Turner disease) and 5) prothrombotic conditions (e.g. inherited thrombophilias myeloproliferative neoplasm antiphospholipid syndrome). Roughly, INCPH diagnosis is based on clinical criteria and the formal exclusion of any other causes of portal hypertension. A formal diagnosis is based on the following criteria: 1) presence of unequivocal signs of portal hypertension, 2) absence of cirrhosis, advanced fibrosis or other causes of chronic liver diseases, and 3) absence of thrombosis of the hepatic veins or of the portal vein at imaging. Patients with INCPH usually present with signs or symptoms of portal hypertension such as gastro-esophageal varices, variceal bleeding or splenomegaly. Ascites and/or liver failure can occur in the context of precipitating factors. The development of portal vein thrombosis is common. Survival is manly limited by concomitant disorders. Currently, treatment of INCPH relies on the prevention of complications related to portal hypertension, following current guidelines of cirrhotic portal hypertension. No treatment has been studied aimed to modify the natural history of the disease. Anticoagulation therapy can be considered in patients who develop portal vein thrombosis.

Hepatic proliferation and angiogenesis markers are increased after portal deprivation in rats: a study of molecular, histological and radiological changes

Background & Aims

To determine the pathogenesis of liver nodules, and lesions similar to obliterative portal venopathy, observed after portosystemic shunts or portal vein thrombosis in humans.

Methods

We conducted an experimental study comparing portacaval shunt (PCS), total portal vein ligation (PVL), and sham (S) operated rats. Each group were either sacrificed at 6 weeks (early) or 6 months (late). Arterial liver perfusion was studied in vivo using CT, and histopathological changes were noted. Liver mRNA levels were quantified by RT-QPCR for markers of inflammation (Il10, Tnfa), proliferation (Il6st, Mki67, Hgf, Hnf4a), angiogenesis: (Vegfa, Vegfr 1, 2 and 3; Pgf), oxidative stress (Nos2, and 3, Hif1a), and fibrosis (Tgfb). PCS and PVL were compared to the S group.

Results

Periportal fibrosis and arterial proliferation was observed in late PCS and PVL groups. CT imaging demonstrated increased arterial liver perfusion in the PCS group. RT-QPCR showed increased inflammatory markers in PCS and PVL early groups. Tnfa and Il10 were increased in PCS and PVL late groups respectively. All proliferative markers increased in the PCS, and Hnf4a in the PVL early groups. Mki67 and Hnf4a were increased in the PCS late group. Nos3 was increased in the early and late PCS groups, and Hif1a was decreased in the PVL groups. Markers of angiogenesis were all increased in the early PCS group, and Vegfr3 and Pgf in the late PCS group. Only Vegfr3 was increased in the PVL groups. Tgf was increased in the PCS groups.

Conclusions

Portal deprivation in rats induces a sustained increase in intrahepatic markers of inflammation, angiogenesis, proliferation, and fibrosis.

Portal vein thrombosis

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a rare event in the general medical setting that commonly complicates cirrhosis with portal hypertension, and can also occur with liver tumors. The diagnosis is often incidental when a thrombus is found in the portal vein on imaging tests. However, PVT may also present with clinical symptoms and can progress to life-threatening complications of ischemic hepatitis, liver failure, and/or small intestinal infarction. This article reviews the pathophysiology of this disorder, with a major focus on PVT in patients with cirrhosis, and presents detailed guidelines on optimal diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension--concept, diagnosis and clinical management

Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH) is mainly related to vascular disorders in the portal system, granuloma formation with periportal fibrosis or genetic alterations affecting the hepatobiliary system. For the diagnosis of the so-called idiopathic NCPH, it is essential to rule out chronic liver diseases associated with progression to cirrhosis as viral hepatitis B and C, alcoholic and non-alcoholic fatty liver, autoimmune disease, hereditary hemochromatosis, Wilson's disease as well as primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholagitis. This mini review will focus on the most common types of NCPH, excluding the idiopathic NCPH. Primary Budd-Chiari syndrome, characterized by obstruction of hepatic venous outflow, must be distinguished from sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, a cause of portal hypertension associated with exposure to toxic plants or therapeutic agents. Noninvasive imaging methods usually help the diagnosis of both Budd-Chiari syndrome and portal thrombosis, the later a relatively frequent cause NCPH. Clinical presentation and management of these vascular disorders are evaluated. Schistosomiasis, a worldwide spread endemic parasitic disease, may evolve to severe forms of the disease with huge spleen and gastroesophageal varices due to presinusoidal portal hypertension. Although management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding is similar to that of cirrhosis, prevention of rebleeding differs. Instead of portosystemic shunt procedures, the esophagogastric devascularization with splenectomy is the accepted surgical alternative. Its association with endoscopic therapy is suggested to be the best option for PH due to schistosomiasis. In conclusion, the prompt diagnosis of the disorder leading to non-cirrhotic portal hypertension is essential for its correct management.

Idiopathic Non-Cirrhotic Intrahepatic Portal Hypertension (NCIPH)-Newer Insights into Pathogenesis and Emerging Newer Treatment Options

Chronic microangiopathy of portal venules results in idiopathic non-cirrhotic intrahepatic portal hypertension (NCIPH). Recent data suggest a role for vasoactive factors of portal venous origin in the pathogenesis of this 'pure' vasculopathy of the liver. Enteropathies (often silent), are an important 'driver' of this disease. NCIPH is under-recognized and often mis-labeled as cryptogenic cirrhosis. Liver biopsy is needed to prove the diagnosis of NCIPH. In these patients, with advancing disease and increased porto-systemic shunting, the portal venous vasoactive factors bypass the liver filter and contribute to the development of pulmonary vascular endothelial disorders-porto-pulmonary hypertension and hepato-pulmonary syndrome as well as mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis. Prognosis in NCIPH patients is determined by presence, recognition and management of associated disorders. With better understanding of the pathogenesis of NCIPH, newer treatment options are being explored. Imbalance in ADAMTS 13 (a disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13): vWF (von-Willebrand factor) ratio is documented in NCIPH patients and may have a pathogenic role. Therapeutic interventions to correct this imbalance may prove to be important in the management of NCIPH.

Intrahepatic portal venous systems in children with noncirrhotic prehepatic portal hypertension: anatomy and clinical relevance

BACKGROUND

Children with extrahepatic portal hypertension typically present with cavernomatous transformation of the portal vein and a poorly defined intrahepatic portal vein system on conventional imaging. With the Meso-Rex Bypass becoming the gold-standard intervention for a cure, a precise assessment of the intrahepatic portal vein system provides helpful data for deciding whether a Meso-Rex Bypass is feasible or not.

METHODS

All children with extrahepatic portal hypertension were prospectively assessed by wedged hepatic venous portography. Venous anatomy was categorized into five subtypes (A to E), depending on the presence of thrombosis in the Rex recessus, or not, and its extension within the intrahepatic portal venous system.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine children entered the study. Previous umbilical vein catheterization is usually associated with Rex thrombosis, while the Rex recessus and the intrahepatic portal venous system are patent in idiopathic cases, thus allowing for the performance of a Meso-Rex Bypass with a good outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Wedged hepatic venous portography is a very effective tool for detailed preoperative assessment and identification of children being considered for Meso-Rex Bypass surgery. An anatomic-radiological classification is useful in selecting patients for Meso-Rex Bypass with anticipation of a high rate of success.

Idiopathic portal hypertension: natural history and long-term outcome

Idiopathic portal hypertension (IPH) is a rare cause of intrahepatic portal hypertension. Data on natural history and prognosis of IPH are limited. We sought to describe the complications and long-tem outcome of IPH by retrospectively studying 69 biopsy-proven cases of IPH. Mean duration of follow-up was 6.7 ± 4.6 years. All patients had evidence of portal hypertension (PH) at diagnosis, and 42% were symptomatic. Variceal bleeding (VB) was the most common manifestation. In those without bleeding at diagnosis, 74% had varices at first endoscopy. In those with large varices, the 1-year probability of first bleeding despite primary prophylaxis was 9%. The 1-year probability of rebleeding was 22%. Ascites and hepatic encephalopathy was documented in 26% and 7% of patients, respectively, at least once during the clinical course. The 1-year probability of developing portal vein thrombosis (PVT) was 9%, and 53% of patients receiving anticoagulation achieved recanalization. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and VB at diagnosis were the independent predictors of PVT. Seven patients died (6 as a result of an IPH-related cause) and 2 were transplanted. Probability of liver transplantation-free survival was 82% at 10 years. Presence of a severe associated disorder and ascites as a presenting symptom were associated with poor survival.

CONCLUSION

Variceal bleeding is a major complication of IPH. Using, in IPH patients, the same management approach for PH as in cirrhosis is safe and maintains a low incidence of first bleeding and rebleeding in IPH patients. PVT is a frequent complication, particularly in those with HIV infection. Despite several complications, overall survival of patients with IPH is considerably good.

Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension

Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH) encompasses a wide range of disorders, primarily vascular in origin, presenting with portal hypertension (PHT), but with preserved liver synthetic functions and near normal hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). Non-cirrhotic portal fibrosis/Idiopathic PHT (NCPF/IPH) and extrahepatic portal venous obstruction (EHPVO) are two prototype disorders in the category. Etiopathogenesis in both of them centers on infections and prothrombotic states. Presentation and management strategies focus on repeated well tolerated episodes of variceal bleed and moderate to massive splenomegaly and other features of PHT. While the long-term prognosis is generally good in NCPF, portal biliopathy and parenchymal extinction after prolonged PHT makes outcome somewhat less favorable in EHPVO. While hepatic schistosomiasis, congenital hepatic fibrosis and nodular regenerative hyperplasia have their distinctive features, they often present with NCPH.

Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension - diagnosis and management

NCPH is a heterogeneous group of liver disorders of vascular origin, leading to PHT with near normal HVPG. NCPF/IPH is a disorder of young adults or middle aged women, whereas EHPVO is a disorder of childhood. Early age acute or recurrent infections in an individual with thrombotic predisposition constitute the likely pathogenesis. Both disorders present with clinically significant PHT with preserved liver functions. Diagnosis is easy and can often be made clinically with support from imaging modalities. Management centers on control and prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. In EHPVO, there are additional concerns of growth faltering, portal biliopathy, MHE and parenchymal dysfunction. Surgical shunts are indicated in patients with failure of endotherapy, bleeding from sites not amenable to endotherapy, symptomatic hypersplenism or symptomatic biliopathy. Persistent growth failure, symptomatic and recurrent hepatic encephalopathy, impaired quality of life or massive splenomegaly that interferes with daily activities are other surgical indications. Rex-shunt or MLPVB is the recommended shunt for EHPVO, but needs proper pre-operative radiological assessment and surgical expertise. Both disorders have otherwise a fairly good prognosis, but need regular and careful surveillance. Hepatic schistosomiasis, CHF and NRH have similar presentation and comparable prognosis.

Histopathologic manifestations of drug-induced hepatotoxicity

Drug-induced hepatotoxicity is underrecognized but increasingly identified as causing acute and chronic liver disease. Several prescription drugs, over-the-counter medications, dietary and/or supplementary agents, and herbal products are hepatotoxic. Drug-induced liver injury mimics other primary acute and chronic liver diseases and it should be considered in patients with hepatobiliary disease. Certain drugs result in specific histopathologic patterns of liver injury, which may help in sorting out the responsible drug. The diagnosis of drug-induced hepatotoxicity is challenging. It involves excluding other possible causes, careful medication history, the latent period between drug exposure and symptom onset and/or abnormal liver tests, and histopathologic findings.

Review article: the association between nodular regenerative hyperplasia, inflammatory bowel disease and thiopurine therapy

BACKGROUND

Nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) is increasingly being recognised in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, the pathogenesis and incidence of NRH in IBD, and the putative roles played by azathioprine (AZA), mercaptopurine (MP), or tioguanine (TG) remain unclear.

AIMS

To summarise the data on the association between NRH and thiopurine therapy in patients with IBD.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in PubMed and MEDLINE databases using the keywords 'nodular regenerative hyperplasia AND (inflammatory bowel disease OR Crohn's disease OR ulcerative colitis) AND (azathioprine OR mercaptopurine OR tioguanine OR thioguanine).' No time limit was placed on studies included.

RESULTS

Inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with AZA have a cumulative incidence of NRH of approximately 0.6% and 1.28% at 5 and 10 years, respectively, whereas those treated with high-dose TG (>40 mg/day) have a frequency of NRH of up to 62%, which is higher in patients with elevated liver enzymes and/or thrombocytopaenia than those without these abnormalities (frequency 76% vs. 33%). Conversely, low-dose TG therapy (<20 mg/day) is relatively safe, with no cases of NRH observed. NRH has also been found in 6% of operated thiopurine-naïve IBD patients. Male gender, older age, and stricturing disease/small bowel resection have been consistently identified as high-risk factors for NRH.

CONCLUSIONS

The pathogenesis of nodular regenerative hyperplasia in patients with IBD is complex and multifactorial involving disease-specific, genetic and iatrogenic risk factors. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for diagnosing nodular regenerative hyperplasia, especially in IBD patients with high-risk factors on thiopurine therapy, regardless of the presence of laboratory abnormalities.

Obliterative portal venopathy: a clinical and histopathological review

Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH) is characterized by the elevation of the portal pressure in the absence of cirrhosis. Obliterative portal venopathy (OPV) as a cause of NCPH is being increasingly diagnosed, especially after recent reports of its occurrence in patients with HIV using didanosine. Patients usually present with episodes of variceal hemorrhage and other features of portal hypertension including jaundice, ascites, encephalopathy and hepatopulmonary syndrome. Hepatic synthetic function is typically well preserved and the laboratory evaluation in OPV patients typically reveals only mild nonspecific hematological abnormalities chiefly related to hypersplenism. Its diagnosis remains a challenge and patients are often mistakenly diagnosed as having cirrhosis. Despite the increasing recognition of OPV, its etiology and pathogenesis are still unclear. A number of etiologies have been proposed including genetic predisposition, recurrent bacterial infections, HIV infection and highly active antiretroviral therapy, an altered immune response, hypercoagulability, and exposure to chemicals and certain medications. Histopathological evaluation remains critical in excluding cirrhosis and other causes of portal hypertension, and is the only way of definitively establishing the diagnosis of OPV. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for OPV in patients who present with variceal bleeding and splenomegaly and who do not have other features of cirrhosis. The purpose of this review is to summarize the known etiologies for OPV and its associated clinical aspects and correlations, and to also provide ample histophotomicrographs of OPV to aid in the diagnosis. It will also help raise awareness of this entity amongst pathologists and clinicians alike.

Hepatoportal sclerosis (obliterative portal venopathy) and nodular regenerative hyperplasia in a patient with myasthenia gravis: A case report and review of the published work

Nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) and hepatoportal sclerosis, also known as obliterative portal venopathy (OPV), are two causes of non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH). NCPH is an increasingly recognized entity that can be seen in association with collagen vascular diseases and with the use of medications such as azathioprine and didanosine, but oftentimes the etiology remains unidentified. We herein report a case of NCPH occurring due to OPV and NRH in a 64-year-old woman with myasthenia gravis (MG), status post-thymectomy. Portal hypertension was diagnosed incidentally on computed tomography in the absence of predisposing factors. Extensive work-up to determine the etiology of any underlying liver disease was unrevealing. NRH and OPV were identified on liver biopsy. Subsequently, the patient had variceal bleeding that necessitated transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement. A few similar cases of NCPH occurring in the setting of MG have been previously reported, suggesting that the immunological mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of myasthenia may also have contributed to the development of NCPH.

The current clinical aspects of idiopathic portal hypertension

IDIOPATHIC PORTAL HYPERTENSION (IPH) COMPRISES DISORDERS DEVELOPING INCREASED PORTAL PRESSURE IN THE ABSENCE OF CIRRHOSIS: the clear mechanisms to explain this disease are still not well recognized. IPH usually suggests a benign prognosis, but sometimes is complicated with severe hemorrhage due to ruptured esophageal varices, or massive splenomegaly. Conventional treatments for those complications for patients with cirrhosis usually works when diverted to patients with IPH, although some of those patients might require liver transplantation if the treatment fails. However, there are few consistent treatment strategies for IPH itself, its complications or the indications for liver transplantation. In this mini review, we summarize the clinical manifestations and several potential theories to explain the etiology, as well as the current treatment options for IPH.

Metabolomics discloses potential biomarkers for the noninvasive diagnosis of idiopathic portal hypertension

OBJECTIVES

Idiopathic portal hypertension (IPH) is a rare cause of portal hypertension that lacks a specific diagnostic test. Requiring ruling-out other causes of portal hypertension it is frequently misdiagnosed. This study evaluates whether using high-throughput techniques there is a metabolomic profile allowing a noninvasive diagnosis of IPH.

METHODS

Thirty-three IPH patients were included. Matched patients with cirrhosis (CH) and healthy volunteers (HV) were included as controls. Metabolomic analysis of plasma samples was performed using UPLC-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry. We computed Student's P-values, corrected by multiple comparison and VIP score (Variable Importance in the Projection). The metabolites were selected with an adjusted Benjamini Hochberg P value <0.05. We use markers with a greater VIP score, to build partial least squares projection to latent structures regression with discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) representative models to discriminate IPH from CH and from HV. The performance of the PLS-DA model was evaluated using R(2) and Q(2) parameter. An additional internal cross-validation was done.

RESULTS

PLS-DA analysis showed a clear separation of IPH from CH with a model involving 28 metabolites (Q(2)=0.67, area under the curve (AUC)=0.99) and a clear separation of IPH from healthy subjects with a model including 31 metabolites (Q(2)=0.75, AUC=0.98). After cross-validation, both models showed high rates of sensitivity (94.8 and 97.5), specificity (89.1 and 89.7), and AUC (0.98 and 0.98), reinforcing the strength of our findings.

CONCLUSIONS

A metabolomic profile clearly differentiating patients with IPH from CH and healthy subjects has been identified using subsets of 28 and 31 metabolites, respectively. Therefore, metabolomic analysis appears to be a valuable tool for the noninvasive diagnosis of IPH.

Histological features in western patients with idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension

AIMS

In the western world, idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH) is a rare disease. This study aimed to investigate the histopathological features in western INCPH patients and to assess pathological differences between liver specimens of INCPH with and without HIV.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Biopsies of 70 INCPH patients (of which 15 were HIV-infected) were compared to 23 patients with non-cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis (PVT), which served as a control group for non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. Phlebosclerosis, nodular regeneration (NR), sinusoidal dilatation, paraportal shunting vessels, perisinusoidal fibrosis and portal tract remnants were the most prevalent morphological features of INCPH. There were significant (P < 0.01) morphological differences between INCPH and PVT liver specimens with regard to portal tract remnants (46% versus 0%), phlebosclerosis (95% versus 65%), portal vein dilatation (34% versus 78%) and NR (56% versus 22%). The degree of NR correlated with the severity of phlebosclerosis (P < 0.01). NR was seen more frequently in the HIV-INCPH group, compared to the non-HIV-infected patients (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Portal tract remnants, phlebosclerosis and nodular regeneration are typical features of INCPH. Sinusoidal dilatation, paraportal shunting vessels and increased portal and parenchymal vessels might represent pressure-related morphological signs of portal hypertension. Finally, more nodular regeneration was observed in HIV-associated INCPH.

Role of anticoagulant therapy in liver disease

Anticoagulant therapy is a cornerstone in the treatment of different liver diseases. In Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS), survival rates have increased considerably since the introduction of a treatment strategy in which anticoagulation is the treatment of first choice. In all patients diagnosed with acute portal vein thrombosis (PVT), anticoagulant therapy for at least 3 months is indicated. Anticoagulation should also be considered in patients with chronic PVT and a concurrent prothrombotic risk factor. Current evidence suggests that patients with PVT in cirrhosis will benefit from treatment with anticoagulation as well. In severe chronic liver disease the levels of both pro- and anticoagulant factors are decreased, resetting the coagulant balance in an individual patient and making it more prone to deviate to a hypo- or hypercoagulable state. An increased activity of the coagulation cascade is not solely a feature of chronic liver disease; it influences the development of liver fibrosis as well. Several studies in animals and humans have shown that anticoagulation could prevent or improve fibrogenesis and even disease progression in cirrhosis. Anticoagulation is therefore a promising antifibrotic treatment modality.

Risk factors and outcome of HIV-associated idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH) has been reported increasingly in patients with HIV infection.

AIM

To evaluate the number of nationwide diagnosed HIV-associated INCPH cases and to assess its clinical features, risk factors and outcome.

METHODS

All HIV centres in the Netherlands were contacted and requested to notify INCPH cases diagnosed in their population. A case–control study was performed to identify the risk factors of INCPH. The cases were group-matched for duration of follow-up after HIV diagnosis to controls. Controls were selected from a database of HIV patients with negative screening for signs of portal hypertension on abdominal ultrasound. Univariate and multivariate conditional logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

On 1st of July 2011, 18.085 individuals were infected with HIV in the Netherlands. Within this population, sixteen patients with clinically overt INCPH were identified. At the time of INCPH diagnosis, cases had a lower platelet count and a higher ALT level. In univariate and multivariate analyses, didanosine [OR: 1.9 (1.3–2.8)], concomitant didanosine and stavudine treatment [OR: 6.3 (2.1–19.1)] and concomitant didanosine and tenofovir treatment [OR: 5.1 (1.2–22.6)] were independently associated INCPH. During follow-up, 4 patients died [malignancy (n = 3), liver failure (n = 1)]. A significant decline in platelets was observed after didanosine discontinuation (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

HIV-associated clinically relevant idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension appears to be a rarely diagnosed disease. Long-term exposure to didanosine and short-term combination of didanosine and stavudine or tenofovir exposure are associated with idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension. Mortality in HIV-associated idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension is mainly related to HIV-associated disorders. Portal hypertension continues despite didanosine discontinuation

Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension in HIV mono-infected patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Unexplained liver injury including fibrosis and portal hypertension has rarely been reported among patients with HIV in the absence of co-infection with hepatitis B (HBV) or hepatitis C (HCV). We describe a series of HIV mono-infected patients with evidence of non-cirrhotic portal hypertension.

METHODS

HIV-infected patients with evidence of portal hypertension who were anti-HBV and anti-HCV negative and HBV and HCV RNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) negative were identified from patients managed by the Victorian statewide HIV referral service located at The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne. Portal hypertension was defined as either radiological or endoscopic evidence of varices, portal vein flow obstruction, or elevated hepatic venous pressure gradient (HPVG).

RESULTS

Five patients were found to have portal hypertension. These patients were male, aged 41 to 65 years, with known duration of HIV infection between 11 to 25 years. All had been treated with antiretroviral therapy, including didanosine. Tests for metabolic, autoimmune, and hereditary causes of liver disease failed to establish an etiology for the liver injury. All had radiological or endoscopic findings of varices, and four patients had radiological features of portal vein obstruction or flow reversal. Only one patient underwent HPVG measurement, which was elevated. Non-invasive fibrosis assessment revealed increased liver stiffness in three (out of four) patients, and no cirrhotic features were found on those who underwent liver biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the largest published series of non-cirrhotic portal hypertension in HIV mono-infected patients in Australia. Further research is needed to understand what relationship, if any, HIV or its treatments might have on liver injury over time.

Management of hepatic vascular diseases

Primary damage to hepatic vessels is rare. (i) Hepatic arterial disorders, related mostly to iatrogenic injury and occasionally to systemic diseases, lead to ischemic cholangiopathy. (ii) Hepatic vein or inferior vena cava thrombosis, causing primary Budd-Chiari syndrome, is related typically to a combination of underlying prothrombotic conditions, particularly myeloproliferative neoplasms, factor V Leiden, and oral contraceptive use. The outcome of Budd-Chiari syndrome has markedly improved with anticoagulation therapy and, when needed, angioplasty, stenting, TIPS, or liver transplantation. (iii) Extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis is related to local causes (advanced cirrhosis, surgery, malignant or inflammatory conditions), or general prothrombotic conditions (mostly myeloproliferative neoplasms or factor II gene mutation), often in combination. Anticoagulation at the early stage prevents thrombus extension and, in 40% of the cases, allows for recanalization. At the late stage, gastrointestinal bleeding related to portal hypertension can be prevented in the same way as in cirrhosis. (iv) Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (or venoocclusive disease), caused by agents toxic to bone marrow progenitors and to sinusoidal endothelial cells, induces portal hypertension and liver dysfunction. Decreasing the intensity of myeloablative regimens reduces the incidence of sinusoidal toxicity. (v) Obstruction of intrahepatic portal veins (obliterative portal venopathy) can be associated with autoimmune diseases, prothrombotic conditions, or HIV infection. The disease can eventually be complicated with end-stage liver disease. Extrahepatic portal vein obstruction is common. Anticoagulation should be considered. (vi) Nodular regenerative hyperplasia is induced by the uneven perfusion due to obstructed sinusoids, or portal or hepatic venules. It causes pure portal hypertension.

Obliterative portal venopathy: findings at CT imaging

PURPOSE

To retrospectively analyze the computed tomographic (CT) findings in a single-center series of adult patients with biopsy-proved obliterative portal venopathy (OPV) and to compare them with those observed in patients with cirrhosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The requirement for informed consent was waived. This institutional review board-approved study included 42 consecutive patients with a histologically proved diagnosis of OPV who underwent CT at diagnosis. The clinical characteristics at diagnosis were recorded, and CT examination results were reviewed. Two radiologists evaluated portal vein patency and intrahepatic portal branches, the morphologic changes in the liver, the presence of hepatic nodules, and signs of portal hypertension in consensus. The control group consisted of 42 patients who had histologically proved cirrhosis. CT findings were compared between the OPV patient group and the cirrhotic group and also among the conditions associated with patients with OPV. The Fisher exact test was used. P values of .05 or less were considered to indicate significant differences.

RESULTS

The following CT findings were observed significantly more frequently in OPV than in cirrhosis: extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis (18 [43%] of 42 vs five [12%] of 42); intrahepatic portal abnormalities (18 [58%] of 31 vs one [2%] of 42) such as reduced caliber, occlusive thrombosis, and lack of visibility; focal nodular hyperplasia-like nodules (six [14%] of 42 vs 0 [0%] of 42); and perfusion disorders (15 [36%] of 42 vs six [14%] of 42). Conversely, the combination of hypertrophy of the caudate lobe and atrophy of segment IV (27 [64%] of 42 vs 10 [24%] of 42) and nodular surface (37 [88%] of 42 vs seven [17%] of 42) were seen significantly more often in cirrhosis.

CONCLUSION

Characteristic CT findings in patients with OPV that differ from those in patients with cirrhosis were shown, the most common being the presence of intra- or extrahepatic portal abnormalities.