Pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of a full dose sofosbuvir-based regimen given daily in hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C

Hepatitis C therapy with direct antiviral agents in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: real-world experience of the German Hepatitis C-Registry (Deutsches Hepatitis C-Register)

BACKGROUND

Direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have revolutionized treatment of chronic hepatitis C in patients with normal glomerular filtration rate (GFR). However, patients with impaired kidney function have been excluded from several clinical trials. We, therefore, investigated the use, effectiveness, and tolerability of DAAs in patients with GFR less than 30 ml/min in the real-world setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An analysis was done within the German Hepatitis C-Registry on 5733 patients including 46 individuals with a baseline GFR less than 30 ml/min treated with sofosbuvir-based (61%) or paritaprevir/ritonavir-based (39%) regimens.

RESULTS

Sustained virological response 12 rates did not differ significantly between patients with baseline GFR less than 30 versus more than 30 ml/min (91 vs. 96%). Nine individuals with a baseline GFR more than 30 ml/min presented with a GFR less than 30 ml/min at the end of treatment. GFR improvement from less than 30 ml/min to more than 30 ml/min was observed in 9/46 cases. Adverse events did not differ in patients with GFR less than 30 versus more than 30 ml/min. However, serious adverse events were significantly more frequent in individuals with GFR less than 30 ml/min and associated with ribavirin.

CONCLUSION

Different DAA therapies can be safely used with high sustained virological response rates in patients with GFR less than 30 ml/min. Ribavirin has to be avoided because of poor tolerability.

High rate of acute kidney injury in patients with chronic kidney disease and hepatitis C virus genotype 4 treated with direct-acting antiviral agents

BACKGROUND

Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have significantly improved the efficacy and safety of treating chronic hepatitis C (CHC), but their effectiveness and safety among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains poorly understood. Sofosbuvir/daclatasvir regimen is supposed to be used for patients with creatinine clearance more than 30 mL/min, while ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir regimen is used for patients with creatinine clearance less than 30 mL/min.

AIM

The aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of DAAs among patients with CKD.

METHODS

Eighteen CKD stage 2-3b patients received sofosbuvir for 3 months. In addition, 42 CKD stage-4 patients received ritonavir-boosted paritaprevir plus ombitasvir for 3 months. Finally, ribavirin was added for 30 of them.

RESULTS

The patients'age was 49.2 ± 12 years. Baseline serum creatinine was 3.76 ± 1.67 mg/dL. Fifty patients were HCV genotype 4. A 3-month sustained viral response was achieved in 56 patients and 49 patients achieved a 6-month viral response. There were 11 relapsers. Acute kidney injury (AKI) upon CKD (AKI/CKD) occurred in 28 patients, of which 20 needed hemodialysis. Fifteen/28 recovered from AKI, whereas 13 were maintained on hemodialysis. In multivariate analysis, there were only two independent risk factors for developing AKI/CKD, i.e., being cirrhotic as defined by baseline abdominal ultrasound findings [odds ratio 4.15 (1.33-12.97); p = 0.013] and having had as DAA therapy OMV/PTV/RTV [odds ratio 7.35 (1.84-29.35); p = 0.001].

CONCLUSION

Treatment of HCV among stage 2, 3a, and 3b patients was achieved safely with a sofosbuvir-based regimen. We recommend that stage-4 patients wait until starting hemodialysis or transplantation.

[Chronic hepatitis C : Standard treatment and remaining challenges]

BACKGROUND

Among patients with chronic hepatitis C, 20-30% develop cirrhosis and its complications within 30 years. The antiviral treatment of hepatitis C has become interferon-free, with resulting improvements in sustained virological response rates, safety and tolerability and a shorter duration of treatment.

OBJECTIVE

The mechanism of action of available drugs and current treatment recommendations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This review is based on relevant publications retrieved by a selective literature search and particularly on studies and reviews concerning the course and treatment of hepatitis C.

RESULTS

The available drugs for interferon-free antiviral treatment of hepatitis C include inhibitors of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, NS3/4A protease, and NS5A protein of the hepatitis C virus (HCV), and ribavirin. Typically, two specific inhibitors are given in combination and the usual duration of treatment is 8-12 weeks. The antiviral drugs differ in their genotypic effectiveness and resistance barriers. The appropriate drug(s) should be chosen in consideration of the patient's hepatic and renal function and potential drug-drug interactions. All approved anti-HCV drugs are safe and well-tolerated and result in sustained virological response rates above 95%.

CONCLUSION

All patients with hepatitis C, whatever their disease stage, can achieve a sustained eradication of HCV using a combination of drugs with direct antiviral activity. Viral eradication is associated with a better quality of life and with lower morbidity and mortality.

International Liver Transplantation Society Asian Consensus on the Management of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Resource Limited Setting-From Noncirrhotic to Decompensated Disease and After Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The population of Asia exceeds 4.4 billion people. Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in Asia is characterized by specific distribution of genotypes, lack of access to specific therapeutic agents, relatively high cost of treatment, and lack of experienced healthcare providers. Clear consensus on the diagnosis, management, and monitoring of HCV infection specific to the Asian region is a major unmet need. The consensus guidelines documents that have been published to date by major medical societies presume access to an array of direct acting antiviral agents and diagnostic tests that are not broadly applicable to resource limited settings, including Asia.

METHODS

To address the lack of an Asia-specific set of HCV treatment guidelines, we assembled a panel of 15 HCV experts in the field of hepatology from India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Vietnam, Pakistan, Philippines, and Mongolia convened in April 2017 to review the updated literature and provide recommendations on the diagnosis and management of chronic HCV infection that reflects local conditions.

RESULTS

An evidence-based comprehensive compilation of the literature supported by the graded recommendations from the expert panel for the optimization of the diagnosis, pretreatment, on treatment, and posttreatment assessments, and management of chronic HCV infection has been presented in this article.

CONCLUSIONS

With the evolving treatment landscape and addition of several new direct-acting antiviral agents and combination regimens into the therapeutic armamentarium, the current article may serve as a guide to the clinicians in optimizing the diagnosis and treatment selection for the management of chronic HCV infection in resource-limited settings.

Consensus on management of hepatitis C virus infection in resource-limited Ukraine and Commonwealth of Independent States regions

Globally, 69.6 million individuals were infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in 2016. Of the six major HCV genotypes (GT), the most predominant one is GT1, worldwide. The prevalence of HCV in Central Asia, which includes most of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), has been estimated to be 5.8% of the total global burden. The predominant genotype in the CIS and Ukraine regions has been reported to be GT1, followed by GT3. Inadequate HCV epidemiological data, multiple socio-economic barriers, and the lack of region-specific guidelines have impeded the optimal management of HCV infection in this region. In this regard, a panel of regional experts in the field of hepatology convened to discuss and provide recommendations on the diagnosis, treatment, and pre-, on-, and posttreatment assessment of chronic HCV infection and to ensure the optimal use of cost-effective antiviral regimens in the region. A comprehensive evaluation of the literature along with expert recommendations for the management of GT1-GT6 HCV infection with the antiviral agents available in the region has been provided in this review. This consensus document will help guide clinical decision-making during the management of HCV infection, further optimizing treatment outcomes in these regions.

Recurrent hyperkalemia in patients with chronic kidney disease and hepatitis C treated with direct antiviral agents

Background

Sofosbuvir is the keystone of direct antiviral agents for the chronic hepatitis C (CHC). The safety of sofosbuvir in patients with stage 4–5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) needs further observation in real world.

Case presentation

Thirty-three patients with stage 5 CKD and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection from 2 hemodialysis centers accepted sofosbuvir based treatment as we reported previously. Serum potassium concentrations were tested every 4 weeks or on demand. Ten of 33 patients showed recurrence of hyperkalemia. We summarized the characteristics of hyperkalemia occurrence in these 10 patients. Overall, 24 episodes of hyperkalemia were observed in these 10 patients, 21 were under treatment and 3 were after treatment. Patients with or without hyperkalemia before sofosbuvir treatment didn’t show significantly differences in the median frequencies of hyperkalemia episodes during the observation period (3.5 vs. 2, p = 0.264).

Conclusions

Patients with stage 5 CKD and HCV infection treated with sofosbuvir based regimens, even halved sofosbuvir, should be taken caution and closely monitoring serum potassium and renal function is necessary.

Successful Treatment With Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents of Hepatitis C in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease and Kidney Transplant Recipients

OBJECTIVES

The introduction of direct-acting antiviral agents has allowed significant chances for treatment for difficult-to-treat populations. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of these therapies in both patients with end-stage renal disease and kidney transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis with prospective follow-up of patients. The antiviral combination of ombitasvir 25 mg, paritaprevir 75 mg, ritonavir 50 mg, and dasabuvir 50 mg was prescribed to patients with end-stage renal disease or kidney transplant recipients with noncirrhotic or compensated cirrhotic liver disease. The other antiviral combination consisted of sofosbuvir 400 mg and ledipasvir 90 mg, which was recommended to patients with decompensated cirrhosis or those who could not tolerate the first combination regimen. Ribavirin was given to all patients with genotype 1a hepatitis C virus infection. All clinical and laboratory data were recorded at week 4, at end of the treatment, and at 12 weeks after completion of treatment.

RESULTS

In terms of efficacy, sustained virologic response at 12 weeks was achieved in 94% of patients in the end-stage renal disease group and 92% of patients in the kidney transplant group. In terms of tolerability, antiviral treatment was well tolerated in both groups. Cardiac arrest and cerebrovascular accident were seen in the end-stage renal disease group; severe mucositis and glossitis were seen in the kidney transplant group. Hospitalization was needed in 2 patients for treatment of drug interactions with tacrolimus and sirolimus. Renal allograft function worsened in 2 patients, with 1 patient having biopsyproven antibody-mediated rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed great efficacy and safety in both kidney transplant recipients and patients with end-stage renal disease with these agents in treatment of chronic hepatitis C. However, clinicians should remain aware of drug interactions and adverse events in this fragile patient population.

High sustained virologic response rates of sofosbuvir-based regimens in Chinese patients with HCV genotype 3a infection in a real-world setting

BACKGROUND

Patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 3 infection remain a difficult-to-cure population. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir-based regimen in genotype 3 patients in a real-world setting.

METHODS

HCV genotype 3a-infected adults with compensated liver disease were treated with sofosbuvir (SOF)/velpatasvir (VEL) or SOF/daclatasvir (DCV) with or without ribavirin (RBV) for 12 or 24 weeks, respectively. Efficacy was measured by sustained virologic response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12). Adverse events were evaluated throughout the treatment and follow-up course.

RESULTS

A total of 41 genotype 3a-infected patients were included. Of them, 10 patients (24%) had cirrhosis, 3 (7%) had renal impairment, and 2 (5%) failed previous treatment. Nine patients (22%) were treated with SOF/VEL and 32 (78%) with SOF/DCV with or without RBV. SVR 12 was achieved in 100% (9/9) of patients treated with SOF/VEL for 12 weeks and in 97% (31/32) of those treated with SOF/DCV for 12 or 24 weeks. RBV addition and extension of treatment duration did not improve the SVR of SOF/DCV (RR: 1.04; P = 0.99 and RR: 1.09; P = 0.375, respectively). Ten patients with cirrhosis, 1 on hemodialysis and 2 with treatment-experience achieved SVR12. One treatment-naïve non-cirrhotic patient on hemodialysis treated with SOF/DCV for 24 weeks relapsed at week 8 post-treatment. No serious adverse events and relevant laboratory abnormalities were observed.

CONCLUSION

SOF/VEL and SOF/DCV are highly efficacious and well tolerated in genotype 3a-infected patients with or without cirrhosis. RBV coadministration and extension of SOF/DCV treatment appear to add no improvement for efficacy.

Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C: Efficacy, Side Effects and Complications

Background

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection can lead to liver cirrhosis and its complications. Viral eradication is essential to prevent disease progression and reduces liver-related mortality and morbidity. Since the availability of direct-acting antivirals (DAA), HCV treatment has changed significantly. Current treatment strategies for different groups of patients as well as potential risks and caveats will be discussed in this review.

Summary

Interferon-free (IFN-free) treatment not only shortens treatment duration, but also achieves high rates of viral clearance and is overall well tolerated. Genotype-restricted but also pangenotypic combinations are available. Usually two DAA of different drug classes are combined. For the majority of the patients, treatment duration ranges from 8 to 12 weeks. Liver and kidney function as well as prior treatment experience and potential drug-drug interactions influence substance choices and treatment duration. However, modern IFN-free treatment is not only safer, but also overall far more simplified and effective. Global HCV eradication might be an ambitious but not completely unrealistic goal to pursue.

Key Messages

IFN-free antiviral treatment is safe and well tolerated. Patients can be treated almost independently of liver function or concomitant disease. Viral eradication is associated with reduced morbidity and mortality and better quality of life.

Pharmacokinetics and drug interactions of medications used to treat hepatitis C virus infection in the setting of chronic kidney disease and kidney transplantation

Hepatitis C infection in patients with chronic kidney disease or kidney transplant carries higher morbidity and mortality compared to noninfected patients. Historically, patients with advanced kidney disease and kidney transplant recipients were undertreated given the multiple adverse effects and limited efficacy of interferon-based therapies for chronic hepatitis C. The development of direct-acting antivirals in the past few years has opened an unprecedented opportunity for treating these populations. However, the impaired renal clearance of some of these medications in patients with kidney disease, and the potential interactions of antiviral therapies with immunosuppressants after kidney transplantation, present some challenges in choosing the proper regimen. This review provides an overview of the essential pharmacokinetics and drug interactions of relevant antiviral therapies in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in patients with advanced kidney disease and after kidney transplantation.

Eradication of HCV Infection with the Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy in Renal Allograft Recipients

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection unfavorably affects the survival of both renal patients undergoing hemodialysis and renal transplant recipients. In this subset of patients, the effectiveness and safety of different combinations of interferon-free direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have been analyzed in several small studies. Despite fragmentary, the available data demonstrate that DAA treatment is safe and effective in eradicating HCV infection, with a sustained virologic response (SVR) rates nearly 95% and without an increased risk of allograft rejection. This review article analyzes the results of most published studies on this topic to favor more in-depth knowledge of the readers on the subject. We suggest, however, perseverating in this update as the optimal DAA regimen may not be proposed yet, because of the expected arrival of newer DAAs and of the lack of data from large multicenter randomized controlled trials.

Sofosbuvir-based regimen is safe and effective for hepatitis C infected patients with stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether sofosbuvir is suitable for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infected patients with severe renal impairment is inconclusive. This systematic review aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of SOF-based regimen in the setting of stage 4 and 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE and Google Scholar with searching strategy: (sofosbuvir OR Sovaldi OR Harvoni OR Epclusa OR Vosevi) AND (severe kidney impairment OR severe renal impairment OR end-stage renal disease OR dialysis OR renal failure OR ESRD OR renal insufficiency OR hepatorenal syndrome OR HRS). Sustained virological response (SVR12/24) rate and serious adverse event (SAE) rate with 95% confidence intervals were aggregated. Subgroup analysis was implemented to evaluate the impact of treatment strategy and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies met inclusion criteria, totaling 717 HCV infected patients with CKD stage 4 or 5 (58.4% on dialysis). Pooled SVR12/24 was 97.1% (95% CI 93.9-99.3%), and SAE rate was 4.8% (95% CI 2.1-10.3%). There was no significant difference at SVR12/24 (97.1% vs 96.2%, p = 0.72) or SAE rate (8.8% vs 2.9%, p = 0.13) between subgroups applying full or decreased dose of sofosbuvir. Cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients achieved comparable sustained virological response (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.85-1.02). Four studies reported eGFR/serum creatinine pre- and post- treatment, with no significant modification.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests SOF-based regimen might be used safely and effectively in patients living with HCV infection/stage 4-5 CKD, with normal and reduced dose of sofosbuvir. Prospective and well-controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42018107440 .

Renal transplantation from seropositive hepatitis C virus donors to seronegative recipients in Spain: a prospective study

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive donors are identified in Spain by antibody detection (HCV-Ab) techniques while a HCV nuclear acid-testing (HCV-NAT) is not mandatory. Since it has been shown that HCV-Ab positive HCV-NAT negative donors do not universally transmit the infection, we designed a protocol based on the identification of viremia in HCV-Ab positive donors to start treatment if needed. HCV-Ab-positive donors were identified and we performed HCV-NAT immediately. Donors coinfected with HIV were excluded. Recipients with a low chance to receive a transplant, with no history of liver disease and who were negative for HCV-Ab were selected after informed consent was signed. Kidney recipients from HCV-NAT-positive donors received glecaprevir and pibrentasvir from 6 h before the transplant until 8 weeks after. Recipients from HCV-NAT-negative donors were not treated. Regular monitoring by HCV-NAT was performed to initiate antiviral treatment. We included 11 recipients from six deceased donors Four recipients received grafts from HCV-NAT-positive donors and seven patients received grafts from HCV-NAT-negative donors. None of our recipients exhibited HCV-NAT positivity during the minimum follow-up period of 6 months. Recipients from HCV-NAT-positive donors exhibited sustained virologic response at 12 weeks. One recipient from an HCV-NAT-negative donor lost his graft via a process thought to be unrelated to HCV. The remaining 10 patients had a stable functioning graft at the end of the follow-up period. Our preliminary data suggest that renal transplantation from HCV-Ab- positive donors to HCV-Ab negative recipients is safe when only the recipients of organs from HCV-NAT-positive donors are treated.

Pharmacokinetics of Daclatasvir, Sofosbuvir, and GS-331007 in a Prospective Cohort of Hepatitis C Virus-Positive Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist on the pharmacokinetic profile of novel direct-acting antivirals in kidney transplant recipients. Daclatasvir is primarily eliminated through the biliary route and sofosbuvir through the renal route; here, we report the pharmacokinetic profile of combined treatment with these compounds in a prospective study of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive kidney transplant recipients (EudraCT: 2014-004551-32).

METHODS

In this study, plasma samples of 16 HCV-positive kidney transplant recipients receiving daclatasvir and sofosbuvir were collected at 4 time points at days 1, 7, 14, 21, 56, and 84 after start of treatment. Inclusion criteria were stable graft function and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >30 mL/min/1.73 m. Daclatasvir, sofosbuvir, and GS-331007 (inactive metabolite of sofosbuvir) plasma concentrations were determined using ultra-performance liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

All patients showed a rapid virological response with HCV RNA below the detection limit 21 days after the start of therapy (medium time to viral clearance). No difference of the areas under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of daclatasvir, sofosbuvir, and GS-331007 was observed between patients with an eGFR below or ≥60 mL/min. For GS-331007, no relevant changes of trough levels were observed over time. Mean GS-331007 trough levels were 339.5 ± 174.9 ng/mL in patients with an eGFR ≥60 mL/min and 404.3 ± 226 ng/mL in patients with an eGFR <60 mL/min at day 7 (P = 0.52). At day 84, GS-331007 trough levels were 357.8 ± 200.8 and 404.2 ± 70.2 ng/mL in patients with an eGFR ≥60 mL/min and in patients with an eGFR <60 mL/min, respectively (P = 0.51). The accumulation ratios of renally eliminated GS-331007 for AUC and Cmax did not significantly differ between the 2 eGFR groups at day 7.

CONCLUSIONS

An impaired eGFR (30-60 mL/min) does not lead to a dose accumulation of daclatasvir, sofosbuvir, and GS-331007. This study provides the rationale for future studies investigating the pharmacokinetic profile of sofosbuvir-based HCV treatment in kidney transplant recipients with an eGFR <30 mL/min.

The evolution of antiviral nucleoside analogues: A review for chemists and non-chemists. Part II: Complex modifications to the nucleoside scaffold

This is the second of two invited articles reviewing the development of nucleoside analogue antiviral drugs, written for a target audience of virologists and other non-chemists, as well as chemists who may not be familiar with the field. As with the first paper, rather than providing a chronological account, we have chosen to examine particular examples of structural modifications made to nucleoside analogues that have proven fruitful as various antiviral, anticancer, and other therapeutics. The first review covered the more common, and in most cases, single modifications to the sugar and base moieties of the nucleoside scaffold. This paper focuses on more recent developments, especially nucleoside analogues that contain more than one modification to the nucleoside scaffold. We hope that these two articles will provide an informative historical perspective of some of the successfully designed analogues, as well as many candidate compounds that encountered obstacles.

Real life experiences in HCV management in 2018

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major cause of chronic liver disease, with approximately 71 million chronically infected individuals worldwide. Treatment of chronic hepatitis C has considerably improved in the last few years thanks to the introduction of direct-acting antivirals able to achieve sustained virological response in more than 95% of patients. Successful anti-HCV treatment can halt liver disease progression and solve the HCV-related extra-hepatic manifestations, eventually reducing liver-related and overall mortality. Areas covered: With the aim to respond to unmet needs in patient's identification, universal access to antiviral therapy and treatment optimization in specific setting of HCV-infected patients, a group of Italian experts met in Stresa in May 2018. The summary of the considerations arising from this meeting and the final statements are reported in this paper. Expert commentary: All the advances on HCV cure may have a real clinical impact not only in individual patients but also at the social health level if they are applied to all infected patients, independently from the stage of liver disease. Further improvements are needed in order to attain HCV elimination, such as the development of an enhanced screening program working in parallel to the present treatment options.

Pharmacokinetics and important drug-drug interactions to remember when treating advanced chronic kidney disease patients with hepatitis C direct acting anti-viral therapy

Hepatitis C direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapy has evolved so that infected patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) can now anticipate the opportunity for sustained virologic response equivalent to that of the broader population of patients with hepatitis C. This has revolutionized the field of transplantation as it relates to renal transplant candidates with hepatitis C and the use of grafts from hepatitis C virus (HCV) viremic donors. In treating this population of patients, special consideration must be given to the timing of anti-viral therapy and drug-drug interactions. Herein we review the pharmacokinetics of HCV DAA therapy in the setting of CKD and chronic renal replacement therapy. Highlighted are drug/drug interactions with special attention to therapies utilized in advanced CKD and immunosuppressants.

Generic sofosbuvir-based direct-acting antivirals in hepatitis C virus-infected patients with chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There is scant data on use of sofosbuvir containing directly acting antiviral (DAA) regimens in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Recently generic versions of DAAs have become available in low-income countries including India. The aim of this study was to study the efficacy and safety of generic sofosbuvir in combination with generic ribavirin, ledipasvir or daclatasvir in HCV-infected patients with CKD including patients with advanced CKD (CKD stage 4 or 5 with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <30 mL/min or those on dialysis).

METHODS

Seventy-one CKD patients (76% male, 84.5% on maintenance haemodialysis, 23.9% cirrhosis) with HCV infection were included in the study. Full-dose sofosbuvir was used in combination with ribavirin (n = 26, for 24 weeks, 69.2% genotype 1, 30.8% genotype 3), ledipasvir (n = 26, for 12 weeks, all genotype 1) and daclatasvir (n = 19, for 12 weeks, all genotype 3).

RESULTS

Sustained virological response (SVR) (HCV RNA <12 IU/mL) at 12 weeks after stopping treatment was seen in 100% of the patients in all the 3 groups. At 24-week follow-up after end of therapy, 1 patient in sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir group relapsed. At 48-week follow-up after end of therapy, 1 more patient in sofosbuvir plus ribavirin group relapsed.

CONCLUSION

Full-dose sofosbuvir-based DAA therapy using generics is highly effective for individuals with HCV infection and CKD including advanced CKD (CKD stage 4 or 5 with an e-GFR <30 mL/min or those on dialysis).

Sofosbuvir with NS5A inhibitors in hepatitis C virus infection with severe renal insufficiency

Treatment of Hepatitis C virus (HCV) in patients with severe renal insufficiency is cumbersome as sofosbuvir is mainly excreted by the kidneys. There is paucity of data on the use of sofosbuvir and NS5A inhibitors in these patients. We hereby report our experience of treating chronic hepatitis C in patients with severe renal insufficiency with full dose sofosbuvir and NS5A inhibitors. Forty-seven patients with severe renal insufficiency (on dialysis n = 39, predialysis n = 8) with HCV infection were treated between December 2015-August 2017 with full dose sofosbuvir with ledipasvir or daclatasvir for 12/24 weeks depending on the genotype and the presence or absence of cirrhosis. The distribution of HCV genotype was genotype 1 in 32 (68.1%), genotype 3 in 13 (27.7%) and 4 in 2 (4.3%) patients. Among 12 (25.5%) patients with cirrhosis, 7 (14.9%) were decompensated with ascites. All patients had end of treatment response, and sustained viral response at 12 weeks was achieved in 45 (95.7%) patients. There was significant improvement in liver stiffness at 3 months after treatment (8.8 (3.8-42) to 7.1 (3.3-24.1) kPa; (P = 0.047)). There was no change in haemoglobin and eGFR with treatment in predialysis group (haemoglobin- 10.2 ± 1.5 g/dL vs 9.6 ± 1.3 g/dL, P = 0.44; eGFR- 19.8 ± 9.4 mL/min vs 17.9 ± 8.5 mL/min, P = 0.67). Therapy was very well accepted. Full dose sofosbuvir with NS5A inhibitors is a well tolerated and effective therapy for HCV infection in severe renal insufficiency.

Successful treatment of genotype 3 hepatitis C infection in a noncirrhotic HIV infected patient on chronic dialysis with the combination of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir: A case report

RATIONALE

Data on anti-HCV therapy in patients on dialysis is still evolving. Sofosbuvir is mainly eliminated through the renal route and there is controversy about its use in these patients.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We describe a 53-year-old male patient with HCV genotype 3 and human immunodeficiency type 1 (HIV) infection on chronic dialysis. HIV infection was diagnosed in 1987 and since July 2007 the patient was compliant with his antiretroviral therapy (ART) and had an undetectable plasma HIV viral load on all follow-up measurements. The patient was known to have HCV infection since 1997 but has never been treated for chronic hepatitis C. Because of progressive renal impairment dialysis started in 2005.

DIAGNOSIS

Before anti-HCV treatment commenced the patient liver transient elastography (FibroScan) indicated F3 fibrosis (stiffness, 11.6 kPa) and his HCV RNA viral load was 320,798 IU/mL (Abbott RealTime HCV assay).

INTERVENTION

Fixed dose combination of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (400 mg/100 mg) for 11 weeks.

OUTCOMES

Twelve weeks after treatment cessation HCV RNA was undetectable, hence the patient achieved a sustained virologic response. The drugs were well tolerated and the patient did not report any side effects.

LESSONS

Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir may be an option for HCV genotype 3 infection in patients coinfected with HIV on long-term dialysis.

Evaluation of histological dynamics, kidney function and diabetes in liver transplant patients after antiviral treatment with direct-acting antivirals: Therapy of HCV-recurrence

BACKGROUND

Direct-acting antivirals allow efficient and safe treatment of hepatitis C (HCV) before and after liver transplantation (LT). However, the impact of sofosbuvir on the graft, diabetes, and on kidney function is not answered yet. Primary endpoint of this analysis was the evaluation of kidney function after antiviral treatment (AVT). Secondary endpoints were the assessment of extrahepatic manifestation of HCV-infection by diabetes mellitus and the histopathological changes in terms of inflammation, content of fat, and fibrosis stage.

METHODS

From 2014 to 4/2015, 100 patients with HCV-recurrence after LT were successfully treated with AVT. Ninety-eight received a sofosbuvir-based regimen. Indication was based on genotype, transplant fibrosis stage, and urgency. Biopsies were evaluated before and after treatment. Renal function and diabetes were assessed before, during, and after AVT.

RESULTS

All patients achieved sustained virological response. A significant improvement of inflammation (P = 0.001) and fibrosis stage (P = 0.031) were observed. Significantly less insulin was required in 32 patients with diabetes (P < 0.001) to keep Hb1Ac unchanged after AVT. Kidney function was stable during, 12 weeks after and 48 weeks after antiviral therapy. Stages of renal insufficiency were comparable before and after AVT.

CONCLUSION

Successful sofosbuvir-based AVT leads to a variety of positive development in transplant patients including a significant improvement of inflammation, fat content and fibrosis, a significant decrease in daily insulin dose and no significant impairment of kidney function.

Treating hepatitis C virus in dialysis patients: How, when, and why?

The identification of hepatitis C virus (HCV) occurred in 1989, and soon thereafter, it was recognized that there was a higher prevalence of anti-HCV seropositivity in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) when compared to the general population. Multiple extrahepatic manifestations have been associated with HCV infection in patients with ESRD; these include an increased prevalence and risk of cardiovascular complications, insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus, and lymphoproliferative disorders. Infection with HCV has also been associated with an increased relative risk of mortality in the ESRD patient when contrasted to those patients without infection. The availability of second-generation direct-acting antiviral agents has revolutionized the treatment of HCV in both the general population as well as those patients with advanced chronic kidney disease and receiving dialysis. These new treatment protocols are very well tolerated with limited side effects and manageable drug-drug interactions while achieving remarkable sustained viral response rates. It is important that nephrologists become familiar with the differing strategies available for HCV-infected ESRD patients so that the appropriate decision of when and who to treat can be made for each patient.

Drug-Drug Interactions Potential of Direct-Acting Antivirals for the treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Virus infection

The advent of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) has transformed the hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapeutic landscape in terms of efficacy and safety, with a cure rate of more than 90%. However, an important potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is expected with these combinations, particularly in patients with other comorbidities (e.g. HIV co-infection, cardiovascular diseases). Each DAA can be a substrate, an inhibitor and/or an inducer of metabolic enzymes and drug efflux transporters. DAAs can act as both victims and perpetrators of DDIs and can sometimes increase the risk and/or intensity of side effects or limit the efficacy of treatment. Therefore, knowledge and management of DDIs with DAAs should be considered a key issue of HCV therapy. This review describes the pharmacokinetic profile of currently used and recommended DAA regimens and summarizes available data regarding DDIs to optimize HCV treatment in clinical practice.

Sofosbuvir-based treatment is safe and effective in Indian hepatitis C patients on maintenance haemodialysis: A retrospective study

AIM

This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) including sofosbuvir, ledipasvir and daclatasvir in patients with hepatitis C viraemia who were on maintenance haemodialysis.

METHODS

Data on patients who received sofosbuvir and ribavirin were analysed. Patients who experienced treatment failure with the above regimen received sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1. Those having HCV genotype 3 infection received sofosbuvir and daclatasvir. All treatment regimens were of 12 weeks duration. Side-effects were investigated. The HCV viral load was determined by RT-PCR at 4,16 and 24 weeks after the initiation of therapy; haemoglobin levels and liver function tests were monitored at regular intervals during therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 22 subjects initially treated with sofosbuvir and ribavirin, 72.72% attained sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR12). Four patients experienced treatment failure and received genotype specific therapy. Patients with HCV genotype one received sofosbuvir with ledipasvir. One patient with HCV genotype 3 infection received sofosbuvir and daclatasvir. All of them attained SVR12. A statistically significant reduction in the median serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) and Serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) were observed from the baseline until the end of treatment. Anaemia was observed in 45% of patients receiving ribavirin.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that sofosbuvir-based therapy is efficacious for HCV viraemia in patients on maintenance haemodialysis. The therapy was found to be reasonably safe with no major adverse effects noted with the use of sofosbuvir, ledipasvir or daclatasvir. However, larger studies are needed to validate our results.

Hepatitis C and renal transplantation in era of new antiviral agents

Data from World Health Organization estimates that the hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence is 3% and approximately 71 million persons are infected worldwide. HCV infection is particularly frequent among patients affected by renal diseases and among those in dialysis treatment. In addition to produce a higher rate of any cause of death, HCV in renal patients and in renal transplanted patients produce a deterioration of liver disease and is a recognized cause of transplant glomerulopathy, new onset diabetes mellitus and lymphoproliferative disorders. Treatment of HCV infection with interferon alpha and/or ribavirin had a poor efficacy. The treatment was toxic, expensive and with limited efficacy. In the post-transplant period was also cause of severe humoral rejection. In this review we have highlighted the new direct antiviral agents that have revolutionized the treatment of HCV both in the general population and in the renal patients. Patients on dialysis or with low glomerular filtration rate were particularly resistant to the old therapies, while the direct antiviral agents allowed achieving a sustained viral response in 90%-100% of patients with a short period of treatment. This fact to date allows HCV patients to enter the waiting list for transplantation easier than before. These new agents may be also used in renal transplant patients HCV-positive without relevant clinical risks and achieving a sustained viral response in almost all patients. New drug appears in the pipeline with increased profile of efficacy and safety. These drugs are now the object of several phases II, III clinical trials.

Sofosbuvir-based antiviral therapy in hepatitis C virus patients with severe renal failure

Background

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the most common chronic liver disease in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Over the last few years, second-generation direct-acting antivirals have been revolutionary in the treatment of hepatitis C, and sofosbuvir (SOF) is the backbone of most modern treatment strategies. Since SOF is eliminated through the kidney, the aim of this multicentre retrospective study was to assess its antiviral efficacy and safety in HCV-infected patients with severe renal failure [including haemodialysis (HD) patients].

Methods

Fifty patients (36 males, mean age ± standard deviation 60.5 ± 7.5 years) with chronic HCV infection (G1: 28/56%, cirrhosis: 27/54%) and severe renal failure [i.e. MDRD estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <35 mL/min], including 35 on HD, were enrolled. Antiviral treatment consisted of SOF/ribavirin (RBV) (n = 7), SOF/RBV/pegylated interferon (n = 2), SOF/daclatasvir ± RBV (n = 30) or SOF/simeprevir ± RBV (n = 11) for 12 or 24 weeks. A reduced dose of SOF (400 mg three times a week or 400 mg every other day) was given to all HD patients. Initial dose of RBV (n = 12) ranged from 400 to 4200 mg/week.

Results

On an intent-to-treat-based analysis, sustained virological response rate was 86% at 12 weeks. During therapy, haemoglobin levels were not significantly modified, but recombinant erythropoietin (rEPO) dose significantly increased in patients treated with RBV. Two patients (4%) required blood transfusion. No patient had treatment discontinuation due to side effects. Dose of RBV was reduced in two patients (16.7%) during antiviral therapy. Dose of SOF was reduced in two non-HD patients because of side effects. In non-HD patients, median eGFR was not significantly modified during treatment.

Conclusions

Our results strongly suggest that SOF-based antiviral therapy, with a reduced dose of SOF, is safe and effective for the treatment of HCV patients with ESRD, including HD patients.

Sofosbuvir Based Regimen in Management of Hepatitis C for Patients With End Stage Renal Disease on Hemodialysis: A Single Center Experience from India

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C infection is known to increase the morbidity in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD). Interferon based treatment is poorly tolerated and has limited cure rates in these patients. In limited available data, sofosbuvir based regimens have been shown to have favorable outcomes in these patients.

METHODS

We treated 7 patients with ESRD on hemodialysis, 6 with chronic hepatitis C and one with acute hepatitis C. Two of them were cirrhotic of which one was decompensated. All patients were treated with sofosbuvir 200 mg with daclatasvir 60 mg or ribavirin 200 mg once daily. Patients with evidence of cirrhosis were treated for 24 weeks, others were treated for 12 weeks. HCV RNA quantitative PCR was monitored at weeks 2, 4, 12, end of therapy and after 12 weeks of end of treatment (SVR12).

RESULTS

The study cohort included five males and two females, aged (48.4 ± 14.5 years). Four patients had genotype 1 and three had genotype 3. One patient was treated with sofosbuvir and ribavirin while others were treated with sofosbuvir and daclatasvir. One patient died of unrelated cause during the therapy. One patient who received sofosbuvir and daclatasvir, could not complete the therapy beyond 20 weeks because she developed recurrent hypoglycemia, which improved after stopping the therapy, all the other patients had SVR 12. There was no change in Hb levels or erythropoietin requirement in the patients receiving sofosbuvir and daclatasvir.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that sofosbuvir based therapy is effective in patients with ESRD and hepatitis C, including those with liver cirrhosis. Its use may be recommended especially in countries where other drugs are not available. Due to limited experience however, patients should be closely monitored for adverse effects. Hypoglycemia may be a potential adverse effect of sofosbuvir and daclatasvir therapy.

Hepatitis C: Current Controversies and Future Potential in Solid Organ Transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To highlight the changing landscape of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the context of organ transplantation. This focuses on areas of controversy and future potential in the era of highly effective direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents.

RECENT FINDINGS

Since the advent of safe and highly effective DAA therapy, HCV infection is now curable in virtually all cases, including organ transplant recipients. Excellent drug tolerability and safety combined with high cure rates across all organ groups means that HCV is no longer a barrier to transplantation or its outcomes. Mounting data demonstrate the safety of using organs from HCV-infected donors with subsequent treatment of HCV in the recipient and a potential to expand the donor pool. Historical data demonstrating inferior survival in transplant recipients with HCV is of limited relevance in the DAA era. Virtually all transplant recipients with HCV infection can be cured, while early data also suggest excellent outcomes in recipients of organs from HCV viremic donors. The optimal timing of HCV therapy in relation to transplantation and the optimal use of organs from HCV viremic donors remain areas of controversy and ongoing research efforts.

Treatment of hepatitis C in special populations

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is one of the primary causes of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. In hemodialysis patients, the rate of HCV infection is high and is moreover associated with a poor prognosis. In liver transplantation patients with HCV infection, recurrent HCV infection is universal, and re-infected HCV causes rapid progression of liver fibrosis and graft loss. Additionally, in patients with HCV and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection, liver fibrosis progresses rapidly. Thus, there is an acute need for prompt treatment of HCV infection in these special populations (i.e., hemodialysis, liver transplantation, HIV co-infection). However, until recently, the standard anti-HCV treatment involved the use of interferon-based therapy. In these special populations, interferon-based therapies could not achieve a high rate of sustained viral response and moreover were associated with a higher rate of adverse events. With the development of novel direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), the landscape of anti-HCV therapy for special populations has changed dramatically. Indeed, in special populations treated with interferon-free DAAs, the sustained viral response rate was above 90%, with a lower incidence and severity of adverse events.

Paritaprevir/Ritonavir/Ombitasvir Plus Dasabuvir Regimen in the Treatment of Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Infection in Patients with Severe Renal Impairment and End-Stage Renal Disease: a Real-Life Cohort

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Chronic hepatitis C (HCV) virus infection reactivates under immunosuppressive drugs and therefore has a negative impact on long-term survival of kidney transplant recipients. Treatment-induced clearance of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in kidney transplant candidates prevents virus reactivation after transplantation. Paritaprevir/Ritonavir/Ombitasvir with Dasabuvir (PrOD) represents a highly effective treatment regimen for HCV genotype 1 (GT1), also suitable for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Serious drug-drug interactions may represent a limiting factor of this regimen. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate safety, efficacy and drug-drug interactions management associated with PrOD treatment in the Czech real-world cohort.

METHODS

Emphasizing concomitant medication adjustment, we described the treatment course with PrOD regimen in 23 patients (4 with CKD4 and 19 on maintenance haemodialysis) infected with HCV GT1 (21 GT1b, 2 GT1a), 18 males and 5 females with an average age of 53.7 years. Six patients had compensated liver cirrhosis and 3 of them were liver transplant recipients.

RESULTS

All 23 patients completed the 12-week treatment and achieved sustained virological response 12 weeks after the treatment (SVR12 rate 100%). None of the patients presented with a significant decrease in haemoglobin level, white blood cell and platelet count during the treatment period. The most frequent adverse events were nausea, hypotension, diarrhoea, and hyperkalemia. Four patients presented with a serious adverse event unrelated to the antiviral drugs (salmonellosis, non-functional kidney graft rejection, early gastric cancer, renal cyst infection, initiation of haemodialysis). Concomitant medication had to be modified with the treatment initiation in 10 out of 23 (43.5%) patients (calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, statins, diuretics, tacrolimus); four patients required further adjustment of antihypertensive drugs or tacrolimus dosage on-treatment.

CONCLUSION

PrOD regimen demonstrated an excellent efficacy and good tolerability. Both prospective adjustment of concomitant medication and further on-treatment adjustment allowed for a safe treatment course.

Efficacy and safety of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C patients with moderate renal impairment

BACKGROUND/AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir therapy for genotype 1b in chronic hepatitis C patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3.

METHODS

In a multicenter collaborative retrospective study, 706 patients who have received ledipasvir which is NS5A inhibitor, and sofosbuvir 400 mg which is NS5B nucleoside polymerase inhibitor daily for 12 weeks between September 2015 and January 2017 were subjected to this analysis. Virologic response and adverse events in patients with CKD stage 3 were compared with those in patients with CKD stages 1 and 2.

RESULTS

The rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) were 97.0% in patients with CKD stage 1, 97.1% in patients with CKD stage 2, and 94.7% in patients with CKD stage 3, respectively. There were no significant differences in the SVR rates between CKD stages 1 and 2, and CKD stage 1 and stage 3. The incidence of adverse events over than grade 2 was 0% in patients with CKD stage 1, 0.5% in patients with CKD stage 2, and 3.0% in patients with CKD stage 3, respectively. For treatment and follow-up period, eGFR levels in the patients with CKD stage 3 were not worsened compared to those at baseline.

CONCLUSION

This study suggested that the virologic response of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir in patients with CKD stage 3 was not inferior to those with CKD stages 1 and 2. In addition, administration of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir did not affect eGFR levels in the patients with CKD stage 3.

'Real-life' experience with direct-acting antiviral agents for hepatitis C virus in end-stage renal disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The advent of direct-acting antiviral agents promises to change the management of hepatitis C in patients with end-stage renal disease, a patient group where the treatment of hepatitis C was historically challenging. We investigated the safety and efficacy of all-oral, interferon-free direct-acting antiviral agents for the treatment of hepatitis C in a 'real-world' group of patients with end-stage renal disease.

METHODS

We performed a single-arm, multi-centre study in a cohort (n=30) of patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (mostly on dialysis) who underwent antiviral therapy with direct-acting antiviral agents. The primary end-point was sustained virologic response (serum hepatitis C virus RNA < 15 mIU/mL, 12 weeks after treatment ended). We collected data on on-treatment adverse events, serious adverse events and laboratory abnormalities.

RESULTS

In total, 23 (77%) and 7 (23%) patients underwent regular dialysis and had chronic kidney disease at pre-dialysis stage, respectively. Six regimens were adopted: elbasvir/grazoprevir ( n = 6), ledipasvir/sofosbuvir ± ribavirin ( n = 4), PrOD regimens ± ribavirin ( n = 10), simeprevir + daclatasvir ( n = 3), sofosbuvir + daclatasvir ± ribavirin ( n = 3), sofosbuvir + ribavirin ( n = 4). The SVR12 rate was 90% (95% confidence interval, 74%; 96%). A total of 27 (90%) patients achieved SVR12; there were three virologic failures - two were non-responders and one had a viral breakthrough while on therapy. Adverse events occurred in 53% (16/30) (95% confidence interval, 0.39; 0.73) of patients and were managed clinically without discontinuation of therapy or hospitalization. The most common adverse event was anaemia ( n = 12) that required blood transfusions in seven individuals; deterioration of kidney function occurred in one (14%).

CONCLUSION

All-oral, interferon-free therapy with direct-acting antiviral agents for chronic hepatitis C virus in advanced chronic kidney disease was effective and well tolerated in a 'real-life' clinical setting. Careful monitoring of haemoglobin and serum creatinine during therapy with direct-acting antiviral agents is suggested. Studies are under way to address whether sustained viral response translates into better survival in this population.

Management of hepatitis C viral infection in chronic kidney disease patients on hemodialysis in the era of direct-acting antivirals

The advent of novel, direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has revolutionized its treatment by producing a sustained virologic response of more than 95% with few side effects and no comorbidities in the general population. Until recently, ideal DAA regimens have not been available to patients with severe renal impairment and end-stage renal disease because there are limited data on the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of treatment in this unique population. In a hemodialysis context, identifying patients in need of treatment and preventing HCV transmission may also be a matter of concern. Recently published studies suggest that a combination of paritaprevir/ ritonavir/ombitasvir and dasabuvir, elbasvir/grazoprevir, or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir successfully treats HCV infection in chronic kidney disease stage 4 or 5 patients with or without hemodialysis.

Safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir-based treatment of acute hepatitis C in end-stage renal disease patients undergoing haemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in patients undergoing haemodialysis is prevalent and aggressive. The treatment of chronic hepatitis C has been revolutionised by the advent of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). However, the safety, efficacy, and tolerance of DAAs in the treatment of acute HCV infection in patients with end-stage renal disease who are on haemodialysis are unknown.

AIM

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir in this specific, difficult-to-treat population.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective and observational study of end-stage renal disease patients who were undergoing haemodialysis and were acutely infected with HCV. Patients received a half dose of sofosbuvir (200 mg) and a full dose of daclatasvir (60 mg) daily. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with sustained virological responses (SVRs); the other primary outcomes were safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were enrolled in the study. The median HCV RNA viral load at baseline was 6.8 log₁₀ IU/mL. Twenty-four patients were infected with HCV genotype 2a, seven patients with 1b, and two patients with 2a+1b. All patients achieved a SVR at 12 weeks after the end of treatment. The treatment was well tolerated, and there were no drug-related serious adverse events.

CONCLUSION

A half dose of sofosbuvir (200 mg once daily) plus a full dose of daclatasvir (60 mg once daily) were suitable for the treatment of acute HCV-infected patients who were undergoing end-stage renal disease and were on haemodialysis.

Treatment of hepatitis C: the use of the new pangenotypic direct-acting antivirals in "special populations"

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The recommended combination of pangenotypic direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) associates the co-formulation of 2 or 3 second-generation DAAs. In the so-called "special populations" defined as patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), HCV/HIV co-infection, HCV/HBV co-infection and an unsuccessful previous DAA regimen, these combinations have a high antiviral potency (sustained virologic response (SVR) > 95%), fair tolerance and a reduced pill burden.

METHODS

We have taken into account the scientific evidence on the treatment of "special populations", in particular from the RUBY 1-2 trials, EXPEDITION 2-4 study, C-WORTHY trial, ASTRAL 5, POLARIS 1-4 studies, MAGELLAN 1 and REVENGE study.

RESULTS

CKD and HCV/HIV co-infection are not predictors of a non-viral response. The glecaprevir/pibentrasvir (Maviret) combination appears to be the first-line therapy for CKD patients while the sofosbuvir/vlpatasvir/voxaliprevir (Sovesi) combination is the first-line option for DAAs failures. Both are effective in patients with HIV-or HBV-HCV co-infection and should be chosen according to the potential drug-drug interaction profile.

CONCLUSIONS

The notion of "special populations" is no longer pertinent with pangenotypic DAAs combinations. International guidelines recommend treating all infected patients and the next challenge is not the therapeutic choice, but to improve the limitations for screening and access to care in HCV infection.

Managing hepatitis C in patients with the complications of cirrhosis

Direct acting antivirals (DAA) have revolutionized the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV). Sustained virological response rates of nearly 100% have become common in the general population. However, physicians face the growing problem of managing HCV in patients with the complications of cirrhosis, eg hepatic decompensation or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Safety and efficacy remain a clinical challenge in these difficult-to-treat patients. This review focuses on the current state of knowledge and treatment regimens in patients with decompensated cirrhosis as well as the potential risk of the development of HCC following DAA therapy.

Effectiveness of current and future regimens for treating genotype 3 hepatitis C virus infection: a large-scale systematic review

BACKGROUND

Six distinct genetic variants (genotypes 1 - 6) of hepatitis C virus (HCV) exist globally. Certain genotypes are more prevalent in particular countries or regions than in others but, globally, genotype 3 (GT3) is the second most common. Patients infected with HCV GT1, 2, 4, 5 or 6 recover to a greater extent, as measured by sustained virological response (SVR), following treatment with regimens based on direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) than after treatment with older regimens based on pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN). GT3, however, is regarded as being more difficult to treat as it is a relatively aggressive genotype, associated with greater liver damage and cancer risk; some subgroups of patients with GT3 infection are less responsive to current licensed DAA treatments. Newer DAAs have become available or are in development.

METHODS

According to PRISMA guidance, we conducted a systematic review (and descriptive statistical analysis) of data in the public domain from relevant clinical trial or observational (real-world) study publications within a 5-year period (February 2011 to May 2016) identified by PubMed, Medline In-Process, and Embase searches. This was supplemented with a search of five non-indexed literature sources, comprising annual conferences of the AASLD, APASL, CROI, EASL, and WHO, restricted to a 1-year period (April 2015 to May 2016).

RESULTS

Of the all-oral regimens, the efficacy (SVR12 ≥ 90%) of sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir- and velpatasvir-based regimens in clinical trials supports and reinforces their recommendation by guidelines. Other promising regimens comprise grazoprevir + elbasvir + sofosbuvir, and ombitasvir + paritaprevir/ribavirin + sofosbuvir. Newer regimens incorporating pibrentasvir + glecaprevir or grazoprevir + ruzasvir + MK-3682 (uprifosbuvir), offer all-oral, ribavirin-free SVR12 rates consistently greater than 95%. Observational studies report slightly lower overall SVR rates but reflect corresponding clinical trial data in terms of treatments most likely to achieve good responses.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of SVR12, we established that for treating GT3 infections (i) regimens incorporating newer DAAs are more effective than those comprising older DAAs, and (ii) ribavirin may be of less benefit in newer DAA regimens than in older DAA regimens. The analysis provides evidence that DAA regimens can replace Peg-IFN-based regimens for GT3 infection.

Recommendations for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in chronic kidney disease: a position statement by the Spanish association of the liver and the kidney

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is one of the main causes of liver cirrhosis worldwide. The long-term impact of HCV infection is highly variable, ranging from minimal histological changes to extensive fibrosis with hepatocellular carcinoma. The development of HCV drugs has increased dramatically in recent years, even in special populations such as chronic kidney disease patients. Classical treatment of chronic hepatitis C was based on the administration of interferon and ribavirin for 24-48 weeks, which was associated with a poor viral response and a high rate of side effects, especially in patients with a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate. The current high availability of the new direct-acting antivirals renders the classification of these agents for this special population necessary. The Spanish Association of the Liver and the Kidney has produced a position statement on the treatment of HCV infection in chronic kidney disease patients since the evidence to guide this treatment is scant and what evidence does exist is weak. The recommendations are based on the results of clinical trials and controlled studies conducted to date, with data published hitherto by the authors of these studies. Since the indications for treatment have been evaluated by other societies or are dependent on internal clinical protocols, the main goal of this position statement is to assist in decision-making when choosing a therapeutic option.

Outcomes after sofosbuvir-containing regimens for hepatitis C virus in patients with decompensated cirrhosis: a real-world study

Background

Direct-acting antivirals have been used for decompensated cirrhotic patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, the benefits in Chinese patients with decompensated cirrhosis are unclear.

Methods

Thirty patients with HCV infection and decompensated cirrhosis were administered sofosbuvir-containing regimens at our hospital between April and December 2015. The efficacy and safety of the treatments was determined by sustained virological response at week 12 (SVR 12), change of liver function and adverse events.

Results

The cohort included 13 treatment-experienced and 17 treatment-naïve patients. A total of 27 patients (90%) achieved SVR 12. No baseline characteristics (sex, age, treatment-experience, genotype, viral load, liver function or splenectomy) was association with achievement of SVR 12. Patients achieved SVR 12 had significantly improved liver function by post-treatment week 12 (P < 0.05). Of the 30 patients, six developed anemia, one developed hepatic decompensation, two developed impaired renal function and one developed a severe upper respiratory tract infection during the treatment. There was no death or HCC development during 12 months of follow-up off-therapy. Two patients (7.4%) with SVR 12 experienced new decompensated episodes during the follow-up.

Conclusion

Sofosbuvir-containing regimens are effective in Chinese HCV patients with decompensated cirrhosis, regardless of baseline characteristics, as demonstrated by a high rate of SVR 12, as well as improvement in liver function. Although antiviral therapy is generally well tolerated, a vigilant monitoring of anemia and renal function should be mandatory.