Prevalence of bone attrition on knee radiographs and MRI in a community-based cohort

Responsiveness and reliability of MRI in knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of published evidence

OBJECTIVE

To summarize literature on the responsiveness and reliability of MRI-based measures of knee osteoarthritis (OA) structural change.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using articles published up to the time of the search, April 2009. 1338 abstracts obtained with this search were preliminarily screened for relevance and of these, 243 were selected for data extraction. For this analysis we extracted data on reliability and responsiveness for every reported synovial joint tissue as it relates to MRI measurement in knee OA. Reliability was defined by inter- and intra-reader intra-class correlation (ICC), or coefficient of variation, or kappa statistics. Responsiveness was defined as standardized response mean (SRM) - ratio of mean of change over time divided by standard deviation of change. Random-effects models were used to pool data from multiple studies.

RESULTS

The reliability analysis included data from 84 manuscripts. The inter-reader and intra-reader ICC were excellent (range 0.8-0.94) and the inter-reader and intra-reader kappa values for quantitative and semi-quantitative measures were all moderate to excellent (range 0.52-0.88). The lowest value (kappa=0.52) corresponded to semi-quantitative synovial scoring intra-reader reliability and the highest value (ICC=0.94) for semi-quantitative cartilage morphology. The responsiveness analysis included data from 42 manuscripts. The pooled SRM for quantitative measures of cartilage morphometry for the medial tibiofemoral joint was -0.86 (95% confidence intervals (CI) -1.26 to -0.46). The pooled SRM for the semi-quantitative measurement of cartilage morphology for the medial tibiofemoral joint was 0.55 (95% CI 0.47-0.64). For the quantitative analysis, SRMs are negative because the quantitative value, indicating a loss of cartilage, goes down. For the semi-quantitative analysis, SRMs indicating a loss in cartilage are positive (increase in score).

CONCLUSION

MRI has evolved substantially over the last decade and its strengths include the ability to visualize individual tissue pathologies, which can be measured reliably and with good responsiveness using both quantitative and semi-quantitative techniques.

Detectable threshold of knee effusion by ultrasonography in osteoarthritis patients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify the detectable threshold of knee effusion by ultrasonography while infusing saline.

DESIGN

Forty knee osteoarthritis patients were allocated randomly to either the midline or the lateral group. Intra-articular injection of 20 ml normal saline was performed under ultrasonographic guidance with the transducer fixated at the midline longitudinal or lateral longitudinal scan in the midline and lateral groups, respectively. We obtained ultrasonography images after infusing each milliliter and measured the maximum depth of effusion.

RESULTS

The smallest amount of infusion detected by ultrasonography was 4.37 ± 2.11 ml in the midline group and 4.13 ± 1.71 ml in the lateral group. An effusion more than 2 mm deep was observed after infusing 7.84 ± 3.85 ml and 7.38 ± 3.01 ml in the midline and lateral groups, respectively. To obtain a 4-mm depth, infusions of 11.58 ± 5.68 ml and 13.13 ± 4.88 ml were needed in the midline and lateral groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

To detect knee effusion by ultrasonography, infusion of 4.26 ml (SD, 1.92 ml) of solution is needed. We think that a depth of 2 mm is more appropriate than 4 mm as the definition of knee effusion using ultrasonography.

Association of bone attrition with knee pain, stiffness and disability: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

Bone pathologies as detected on MRI are associated with the presence of pain in knee osteoarthritis (OA). The authors examined whether bone attrition assessed on x-rays was associated with pain, stiffness and disability.

METHODS

The authors analysed x-rays of 1326 knees with OA from 783 individuals participating in the cross-sectional population-based Somerset and Avon Survey of Health. The diagnosis of OA was defined by the presence of osteophytes in anteroposterior (AP) or lateral views. Bone attrition was graded from 0 (no attrition) to 3 (severe attrition >10 mm) and Kellgren and Lawrence (K/L) scores were assigned on AP views. Logistic regression models adjusted for gender, age, body mass index, effusion and K/L scores were used to determine whether bone attrition was associated with pain, stiffness and disability.

RESULTS

Pain was reported in 84 knees (74%) with radiographic bone attrition compared with 505 (42%) without bone attrition (adjusted OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.29 to 3.80). The adjusted OR was increased for day pain but not for night pain (p for interaction <0.001). Stiffness was reported for 85 knees with bone attrition (75%) and 437 knees without (36%) (adjusted OR 3.23, 95% CI 1.85 to 5.64). Disability was reported by 40 individuals with bone attrition (50%) and 140 individuals without (24%) (adjusted OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.19 to 3.68).

CONCLUSIONS

Bone attrition detected on conventional x-rays using a simple cheap technique is strongly associated with the presence of day pain, stiffness and disability in knee OA.

Pharmacologic therapy for osteoarthritis--the era of disease modification

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent and disabling condition for which few safe and effective therapeutic options are available. Current approaches are largely palliative and in an effort to mitigate the rising tide of increasing OA prevalence and disease impact, modifying the structural progression of OA has become a focus of drug development. This Review describes disease modification and discusses some of the challenges involved in the discovery and development of disease-modifying OA drugs (DMOADs). A variety of targeted agents are in mature phases of development; specific agents that are beyond preclinical development in phase II and III trials and show promise as potential DMOADs are discussed. A research agenda with respect to disease modification in OA is also provided, and some of the future challenges we face in this field are discussed.

Subchondral bone attrition may be a reflection of compartment-specific mechanical load: the MOST Study

INTRODUCTION

Subchondral bone attrition (SBA), a feature of osteoarthritis, may be caused by excess focal load to bone, and/or inadequate bone quality to withstand loads through the joint. This study evaluated the effects of malalignment, which can cause focal excessive load, and systemic bone density on the presence and incidence of SBA.

METHODS

The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study is a cohort of individuals who have or are at high risk of knee osteoarthritis. Baseline alignment and bone mineral density (BMD) measures were assessed. Baseline and 30-month knee magnetic resonance images were graded for SBA (grade 0-3) using the whole-organ magnetic resonance imaging score. The study evaluated the association of alignment in medial and lateral compartments, respectively, and systemic BMD with baseline presence of SBA and incident SBA using logistic regression and adjusting for age, sex and body mass index.

RESULTS

Of 1253 participants (mean age 62 years, mean BMI 30, 61% women), 33% had baseline SBA and 44% had knee osteoarthritis. Associations between the presence and incidence of SBA with malalignment in both compartments were noted (odds ratios (95% CI) 2.9 (2.1 to 4.0) and 1.9 (1.2 to 2.9), respectively, for varus knees in the medial compartment; 4.5 (2.8 to 7.1) and 2.1 (1.1 to 4.1), respectively, for valgus knees in the lateral compartment). Low BMD was not associated with SBA.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence and incidence of SBA are associated with malalignment in a compartment-specific manner, but not with low BMD. SBA may be a marker of increased load experienced by overlying cartilage, which may contribute to increased forces transmitted to the cartilage due to alteration in subchondral bone.

Magnetic resonance imaging-based semiquantitative and quantitative assessment in osteoarthritis

Whole organ magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based semiquantitative (SQ) assessment of knee osteoarthritis (OA), based on reliable scoring methods and expert reading, has become a powerful research tool in OA. SQ morphologic scoring has been applied to large observational cross-sectional and longitudinal epidemiologic studies as well as interventional clinical trials. SQ whole organ scoring analyzes all joint structures that are potentially relevant as surrogate outcome measures of OA and potential disease modification, including cartilage, subchondral bone, osteophytes, intra- and periarticular ligaments, menisci, synovial lining, cysts, and bursae. Resources needed for SQ scoring rely on the MRI protocol, image quality, experience of the expert readers, method of documentation, and the individual scoring system that will be applied. The first part of this article discusses the different available OA whole organ scoring systems, focusing on MRI of the knee, and also reviews alternative approaches. Rheumatologists are made aware of artifacts and differential diagnoses when applying any of the SQ scoring systems. The second part focuses on quantitative approaches in OA, particularly measurement of (subregional) cartilage loss. This approach allows one to determine minute changes that occur relatively homogeneously across cartilage structures and that are not apparent to the naked eye. To this end, the cartilage surfaces need to be segmented by trained users using specialized software. Measurements of knee cartilage loss based on water-excitation spoiled gradient recalled echo acquisition in the steady state, fast low-angle shot, or double-echo steady-state imaging sequences reported a 1% to 2% decrease in cartilage thickness annually, and a high degree of spatial heterogeneity of cartilage thickness changes in femorotibial subregions between subjects. Risk factors identified by quantitative measurement technology included a high body mass index, meniscal extrusion and meniscal tears, knee malalignment, advanced radiographic OA grade, bone marrow alterations, and focal cartilage lesions.

Cartilage loss occurs in the same subregions as subchondral bone attrition: a within-knee subregion-matched approach from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study

OBJECTIVE

By magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), subchondral bone attrition (SBA) can be seen in early osteoarthritis (OA), but the significance of this is unknown. We therefore evaluated whether SBA was associated with cartilage loss within the same subregion of the knee.

METHODS

The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study is a cohort of individuals who have or are at high risk for knee OA. At baseline and 30 months, participants' knee MRIs were graded using the Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score in the 10 subregions of the tibiofemoral joint for cartilage morphology and SBA. We conducted analyses within a knee to eliminate between-person confounding, using an M:N (cases:controls) matched case-control approach with the 10 subregions of a person's knee forming a matched set. Cases within a knee were defined as subregions with cartilage loss, while controls were subregions in that same knee without cartilage loss. We evaluated the association of cartilage loss over 30 months with the presence of baseline SBA in the same subregion within that knee using conditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

SBA was associated with an odds ratio of 7.5 (95% confidence interval 5.6-9.9, P < 0.0001) for cartilage loss in the same subregion compared with subregions without any baseline SBA in our sample of 459 knees from participants, 64% of whom were women, with a mean age of 63 years and a mean body mass index of 30.5 kg/m(2).

CONCLUSION

SBA is strongly associated with cartilage loss within the same subregion of a knee. SBA may directly influence overlying cartilage loss or serve as a marker of an area undergoing great compressive stress and in which cartilage loss is inevitable.

Subchondral bone marrow lesions are highly associated with, and predict subchondral bone attrition longitudinally: the MOST study

OBJECTIVE

Subchondral bone attrition (SBA) is defined as flattening or depression of the osseous articular surface. The causes of attrition are unknown, but remodeling processes due to chronic overload that are reflected as bone marrow edema-like lesions (BMLs) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) might predispose the subchondral bone to subsequent attrition. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cross-sectional and longitudinal association of BMLs with SBA in the same subregion of the knee.

DESIGN

The Multicenter Osteoarthritis (MOST) study is a longitudinal observational study of individuals who have or are at high risk for knee osteoarthritis. Subjects with available baseline and 30-months follow-up MRI were included. Patients with a recent history of trauma or findings suggestive of post-traumatic bone marrow changes were excluded. Subchondral BMLs and SBA were scored semiquantitatively from 0 to 3 in 10 tibiofemoral subregions. We evaluated the association of prevalent BMLs at baseline with the presence of prevalent and incident SBA on a per-subregion basis using logistic regression. We also cross-sectionally evaluated the association of BML grade severity and presence of baseline SBA.

RESULTS

One thousand and twenty-five knees were included. 8.9% of the analyzed knee subregions showed SBA present at baseline and 9.2% of subregions exhibited prevalent subchondral BMLs. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for prevalent SBA for subregions with prevalent BMLs was 18.8 [95% confidence intervals (CI) 15.9-22.4]. A larger BML size was directly associated with an increased risk of prevalent SBA. 195 (2.2%) subregions exhibited incident SBA at follow-up. The adjusted OR for incident SBA was 5.3 [95% CI 3.6-7.7] when compared to subregions without BMLs as the reference.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalent and incident SBA is strongly associated with subchondral BMLs in the same subregion. One explanation for the presence and development of SBA is subchondral remodeling due to increased stress, which is reflected as BMLs on MRI.

MR imaging-based semiquantitative assessment in osteoarthritis

Whole-organ semiquantitative (SQ) assessment by expert readers has become a powerful research tool in understanding the natural history of osteoarthritis (OA). SQ morphologic scoring has been applied to observational large cross-sectional and longitudinal epidemiologic studies in addition to interventional clinical trials. In comparison to quantitative and biochemical assessment of cartilage, SQ whole-organ scoring also analyzes additional joint structures that are potentially relevant as surrogate outcome measures for interventional approaches. Resources needed for SQ scoring rely on the MR imaging protocol, image quality, experience of the expert readers, method of documentation, and individual scoring system that is applied. This article discusses the different available OA whole-organ scoring systems, focusing on MR imaging of the knee, and also reviews alternative approaches.

MR imaging of intra- and periarticular soft tissues and subchondral bone in knee osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis of the knee has to be considered a disease of the whole joint. Magnetic resonance imaging allows superior assessment of all joint tissues that may be involved in the disease process, such as the subchondral bone, synovium, ligaments, and periarticular soft tissues. Reliable MR imaging-based scoring systems are available to assess and quantify these structures and associated pathology. Cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluation has enabled us to understand their relevance in explaining pain and structural progression.

Insights from imaging on the epidemiology and pathophysiology of osteoarthritis

This article highlights recent studies, particularly those with an emphasis on MR imaging, that are providing unique insights into the relation between structures identified on imaging and symptoms and disease genesis. It is becoming increasingly apparent that the subchondral bone, periosteum, periarticular ligaments, periarticular muscle spasm, synovium, and joint capsule are all richly innervated and are the likely source of nociception in osteoarthritis. It is also apparent that local tissue alterations in the bone and meniscus and alignment of the lower extremity are important in terms of disease genesis. This article represents the literature in that much of the focus and understanding is knee centric with less focus on the hip and hand.

Quantitative MR imaging evaluation of the cartilage thickness and subchondral bone area in patients with ACL-reconstructions 7 years after surgery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cartilage thickness (ThC) and subchondral bone area (tAB) of the operated and contra-lateral non-operated (healthy) knees in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-reconstruction 7 years after surgery using a quantitative and regional cartilage MR imaging (qMRI) technique.

METHODS

Charts of 410 patients with ACL-reconstructions were retrospectively reviewed. Fifty-two patients (male/female, 28/24; mean age, 33.3 years) were included. Patients underwent KT-1000 testing and qMRI of both knees using coronal fat-saturated 3D spoiled gradient-recalled echo (SPGR) sequences (TR/TE, 44/4 ms) at 1.5 T. Quantitative analyses of ThC and tAB in the femoro-tibial cartilage plates were performed using a subregional approach. In addition, qualitative and quantitative assessment of femoral condyle shapes was performed. t tests with Bonferroni corrections were used for statistical analysis of side-to-side differences between the operated and non-operated knees.

RESULTS

KT-1000 testing was abnormal in 3/52 patients (6%). Lateral femoral tAB was significantly lower (-9.2%), and medial tibial tAB was significantly larger (+2%) in the operated vs non-operated knee (P<0.001). Regional and subregional ThC side-to-side differences were less than 0.1mm and, except for the external lateral femoral subregion, they were not statistically significant. Flattened and broader shapes of medial femoral condyles (P<0.001) were found in operated knees. No significant association of presence of cartilage or meniscus lesions at surgery with ThC 7 years post-operatively was found (P=0.06-0.98).

CONCLUSION

There is evidence for changes in the tAB and femoral shape 7 years post-ACL-reconstruction, but no side-to-side differences in subregional ThC were found between the operated and contra-lateral non-operated knees.

Imaging the painful osteoarthritic knee joint: what have we learned?

Pain in the peripheral joints is an increasingly common problem, resulting in significant patient disability and health-care expenditure. Osteoarthritis (OA), a syndrome of joint pain with associated structural changes, is the most prevalent joint disease, yet the etiology of pain in OA is not entirely clear. Traditional assessment of the structure-pain relationship in knee OA has relied on conventional radiography, which has several limitations, not least the discrepancy between symptoms and radiographic findings. MRI has the capability to visualize all the structures within the knee joint, and there is a growing body of work using MRI to examine the correlation between structural findings and symptoms. In large cohort studies, synovial hypertrophy, synovial effusions, and abnormalities in the subchondral bone have been associated with knee pain. Advances in our understanding of the etiology of pain in OA will assist in the identification of further targets for treatment of this common and painful disease.

Plain radiography and magnetic resonance imaging diagnostics in osteoarthritis: validated staging and scoring

Osteoarthritis is the most common joint disorder worldwide, and it has an enormous socioeconomic impact both in the United States and throughout the world. Conventional radiography is the simplest and least expensive imaging method for assessing osteoarthritis of the knee. Radiography is able to directly visualize osseous features of osteoarthritis, including marginal osteophytes, subchondral sclerosis, and subchondral cysts, and it is used in clinical practice to confirm the diagnosis of osteoarthritis and to monitor progression of the disease. However, the assessment of joint-space width provides only an indirect estimate of cartilage thickness and meniscal integrity. Magnetic resonance imaging, with its unique ability to examine the joint as a whole organ, holds great promise with regard to the rapid advancement of knowledge about the disease and the evaluation of novel treatment approaches. Magnetic resonance imaging has been applied widely in quantitative morphometric cartilage assessment, and compositional measures have been introduced that evaluate chondral integrity. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging-based validated semiquantitative whole-organ scoring methods have been applied for cross-sectional and longitudinal joint evaluation. This review describes currently applied radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging staging and scoring methods for the assessment of osteoarthritis of the knee and focuses on the strengths and weaknesses of the two modalities with regard to their use in clinical trials and epidemiologic studies.

Focusing osteoarthritis management on modifiable risk factors and future therapeutic prospects

The pathogenesis of osteoarthritis (OA) appears to be the result of a complex interplay between mechanical, cellular, and biochemical forces. Obesity is the strongest risk factor for disease onset and mechanical factors dominate the risk for disease progression. This narrative review focuses on the influence of biomechanics and obesity on the etiology of OA and its symptomatic presentation. We need to revisit the way we currently manage the disease and focus on the modifiable, primarily through nonpharmacologic intervention. Greater therapeutic attention to the important role of mechanical factors and obesity in OA etiopathogenesis is required if we are to find ways of reducing the public health impact of this condition.

Developments in the clinical understanding of osteoarthritis

With the recognition that osteoarthritis is a disease of the whole joint, attention has focused increasingly on features in the joint environment which cause ongoing joint damage and are likely sources of pain. This article reviews current ways of assessing osteoarthritis progression and what factors potentiate it, structural abnormalities that probably produce pain, new understandings of the genetics of osteoarthritis, and evaluations of new and old treatments.

Role of bone in osteoarthritis pathogenesis

Much of the attention in developing diagnostic tools and therapeutic interventions for the management of osteoarthritis (OA) has focused on the preservation or repair of articular cartilage. It is clear that all of the joint components, including the ligaments, tendons, capsule, synovial lining, and periarticular bone, undergo structural and functional alterations during the course of OA progression. This article focuses on the specific skeletal features of OA and the putative mechanisms involved in their pathogenesis.