Bone mineral density in adolescent females using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate

Bone mineral density in adolescent females using injectable or oral contraceptives: a 24-month prospective study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether bone mineral density (BMD) is lower in hormonal-contraceptive users than in an untreated comparison group.

DESIGN

Observational, prospective cohort; 24-month duration.

SETTING

Adolescent clinics in a metropolitan Midwestern setting.

PATIENT(S)

Four hundred thirty-three postmenarcheal girls, 12-18 years of age, who were on depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA; n = 58), were on oral contraceptives (OCs; n = 187), or were untreated (n = 188).

INTERVENTION(S)

Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and OCs containing 100 microg of levonorgestrel and 20 microg of ethinyl E(2).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Measurements of BMD at spine and femoral neck were obtained by using dual x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and 6-month intervals.

RESULT(S)

Over 24 months, mean percentage change in spine BMD was as follows: DMPA, -1.5%; OC, +4.2%; and untreated, +6.3%. Mean percentage change in femoral neck BMD was as follows: DMPA, -5.2%; OC, +3.0%; and untreated, +3.8%. Statistical significance was found between the DMPA group and the other two groups. In the DMPA group, mean percentage change in spine BMD over the first 12 months was -1.4%; the rate of change slowed to -0.1% over the second 12 months. No bone density loss reached the level of osteopenia.

CONCLUSION(S)

Adolescent girls receiving DMPA had significant loss in BMD, compared with bone gain in the OC and untreated group. However, the clinical significance of this finding is mitigated by slowed loss after the 1st year of DMPA use and general maintenance of bone density values within the normal range in the DMPA group.

Suppression of menstruation in adolescents with severe learning disabilities

As girls with severe cognitive developmental delay progress into puberty and become young women with learning disabilities, concerns about menstruation are common amongst carers and health care professionals are often consulted for advice. Very little, however, has been published on this area to guide the practitioner and studies are almost exclusively confined to the gynaecological literature. We aim to give an account of the various therapeutic options available and current practice within the paediatric endocrinology unit at our institution.

Bone mineral density in adolescents using norethisterone enanthate, depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate or combined oral contraceptives for contraception

PURPOSE

Most studies have shown a negative effect of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) on the bone mineral density (BMD) of adolescents. There is no information available on the effect of norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN) on BMD in adolescents and the effect of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) on adolescent BMD is inconclusive. The aim of this longitudinal study was to investigate BMD in adolescent (aged 15-19 years) new users of hormonal contraception (DMPA, NET-EN and COCs).

METHOD

New users of DMPA (n=115), NET-EN (n=115), COCs (n=116) and 144 nonuser controls were recruited. BMD was measured at the distal radius and midshaft of the ulna using dual X-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

In total, 275 women were included in this interim analysis and total follow-up time was 553 person-years. There was no significant difference in radius BMD between users of different contraceptive methods at baseline (p=.40). Overall, an increase in radius BMD of 0.00522 per person-year was observed. This result was similar when adjusting for BMI in the random effects regression model (p=.88). The regression model showed that BMI was significantly associated with radius BMD, with each unit increase in BMI corresponding to an increase of 0.0029 g/cm2 in BMD (95% CI 0.0023 to 0.0036, p<.001). Interaction between contraceptive method and follow-up time adjusted for BMI was not significant (p=.07). The increase in BMD for NET-EN users of 0.0013 g/cm2 per person-year (95% CI -0.0017 to 0.0043) was significantly lower than that of nonusers (p=.017). For DMPA and COC users, the increase in BMD was not significantly different compared to the nonusers. This study suggests that NET-EN users had lower increase in BMD over time compared to the other user groups.

Hormonal contraception in adolescents: special considerations

With the rates of unintended pregnancies in teenagers remaining high, it is crucial to present adolescents with all of the contraceptive options available to them. While barrier methods, for example, male condoms, are easily accessible and do not have adverse effects, their use must be consistent and correct with each act of intercourse. Hormonal contraception affords much better efficacy in preventing pregnancy when used with full compliance. Oral contraceptives are a popular method of contraception among adolescents and offer many non-contraceptive benefits along with the prevention of pregnancy. They have very few significant adverse effects, which are outweighed by the significant morbidity associated with teenage pregnancies, and can be used by most adolescent females. However, their minor bothersome effects do contribute to the high discontinuation rates seen. In addition, many girls find it difficult to remember to take a pill every day, leading to higher failure rates in teenagers than in adult women. The advent of long-acting, progestogen (progestin)-only methods, such as injectables and implantables, has been generally accepted by adolescents and these methods have proven to be more efficacious by avoiding the need for daily compliance. However, progestogen-only methods cause irregular bleeding and amenorrhea, which is not acceptable to many teenagers. In addition, the most widely used implant was taken off the market a few years ago and newer forms are not yet widely accessible. Other novel methods are currently available, including the transdermal patch and the vaginal ring. Both are combinations of estrogen and progestogen and have similar efficacy and adverse effect profiles to oral contraceptives. Their use may be associated with greater compliance by adolescents because they also do not require adherence to a daily regimen. However, there may be some drawbacks with these newer methods, for example, visibility of the patch and difficulty with insertion of the vaginal ring. When regular contraceptive modalities fail, emergency contraception is available. Choices include combination oral contraceptives, progestogen-only pills, mifepristone, or placement of a copper-releasing intrauterine device. These methods can be very useful for preventing pregnancy in adolescents as long as adolescents are aware of their existence and have easy access to them.

Endométriose et adolescente

Endometriosis has long been considered as a disease of women over 30 years old. However, recent data from the literature demonstrated its high incidence in teenagers. Endometriosis in teenagers is generally associated with chronic pelvic pains and cyclical signs are less common than in adults. The persistence of the pain despite an estroprogestative contraception associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is a strong argument for the diagnosis and justifies a laparoscopic exploration. During this laparoscopy, the search for atypical lesions, which are much more common than typical ones, is essential. Biopsies of these lesions is mandatory in every patient to rule out false positives and false negatives which are common in atypical lesions. The aim of the treatment is to improve the pain. The first line of medical treatment is based on the estroprogestative contraception and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The prescription of GnRH should be the ultimate solution because the bone reserve increases until the age of 18 to 20. The laparoscopic treatment, when required, should be as complete as possible. Early diagnosis and medical management may prevent the development of the disease. However, further studies in the teenager are essential to improve the current empirical management.

Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and bone mineral density in adolescents--the Black Box Warning: a Position Paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine

The purpose of this Position Paper is to review the published Black Box Warning regarding depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and bone loss as it relates to adolescent girls. The scientific findings that prompted the Food and Drug Administration to issue the warning are reviewed and the following additional issues are considered: (1) likely low risk of fracture related to DMPA use, (2) evidence of at least partial recovery after discontinuation of the method, and (3) the need to balance the physical, social and economic cost of adolescent pregnancy versus the immediate and long-term impact of DMPA on bone. A list of clinical guidelines is included, the main recommendation of which is to continue prescription of DMPA, with counseling about the risks and benefits, in most of the adolescent population desiring to use this contraceptive method.

Bone mineral density in women aged 25–35 years receiving depot medroxyprogesterone acetate: recovery following discontinuation

INTRODUCTION

This 7-year, prospective, matched-cohort, clinical study evaluated the effects of intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) (150 mg/mL) on bone mineral density (BMD) in women aged 25-35 years.

METHODS

Bone mineral density changes in new DMPA-IM users (n=248) were compared with those in women using nonhormonal contraception (n=360) for up to 240 weeks of treatment and 96 weeks of posttreatment follow-up (in subjects receiving >or=1 dose).

RESULTS

At week 240 of treatment, mean percentage changes from baseline in DMPA-IM vs. nonhormonal subjects were: -5.16% (n=21) vs. +0.19% (n=65), total hip (p<.001); -5.38% (n=33) vs. +0.43% (n=105), lumbar spine (p<.001). At week 96 posttreatment, these values were: -0.20% (n=25) vs. +0.84% (n=43), total hip (p=.047); -1.19% (n=41) vs. +0.47% (n=66), lumbar spine (p=.017).

CONCLUSIONS

These results show BMD declines during DMPA-IM use; following discontinuation, significant increases in BMD occur through 96 weeks posttreatment.

Contraceptive care for the adolescent

Despite recent improvements in rates of teen pregnancy, abortion, birth,and contraceptive use, effective contraceptive counseling for adolescents should be a high priority for the primary care provider in the office setting. Adolescent psychosocial risk screening and appropriate counseling about sexual decision-making is necessary. Contraceptive services visits include, relevant history, limited physical examination, provision of information, anticipatory guidance about sexual behaviors, and the provision of contraceptive methods. Teens should always be encouraged to use a male condom during sex to reduce STI risk. A variety of barrier and hormonal contraceptive methods are available for the adolescent population. Education about and provision of EC is effective in reducing the rate of unintended pregnancy and abortion in the United States. Contraceptive care for adolescents is a rewarding experience for primary care providers.

Progestogen-only contraception and bone mineral density: a systematic review

Questions have been raised about the effects of progestogen-only contraceptive use on bone health, particularly among young women who have not yet reached peak bone mass and perimenopausal women who may be starting to lose bone mass. We conducted a systematic review that evaluated the association between progestogen-only contraceptive use and fracture risk or bone mineral density (BMD). We identified 39 articles from MEDLINE and EMBASE, published through July 2005. One study reported that depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) users were more likely to experience stress fractures than nonusers; this association was not statistically significant after controlling for baseline bone density. In cross-sectional studies, the mean BMD in DMPA users was usually below that of nonusers, but within 1 SD. In longitudinal studies, BMD generally decreased more over time among DMPA users than among nonusers, but women gained BMD upon discontinuation of DMPA. Limited evidence suggested that use of progestogen-only contraceptives other than DMPA did not affect BMD.

Bone mineral density and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate

INTRODUCTION

Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) suppresses pituitary gonadotrophin output, thus, suppressing ovulation. Estrogen production from the ovary is also strongly inhibited, and the resulting estrogen deficiency has a detrimental impact on bone. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate may be particularly detrimental in young women, as it may impede attainment of peak bone mass, and switching to a different contraceptive is recommended. However, the effect of sequential use of DMPA with other contraceptives in this age group has not been investigated.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional analysis of 218 DMPA users who were 20 years or older (mean, 31 years, +/-8.9 SD) at the time of bone mineral density (BMD) estimation. The majority of women had used one or more contraceptive beside DMPA. The most commonly used alternative contraceptive was the oral combined pill (OCP). It was used by 65% of women (n=143) and for an average duration of 6 years. A logistic regression model was used to estimate the association between potential risk factors and low bone mass.

RESULTS

The prevalence of low bone mass at either hip or spine (T< or =1) was 41%. The prevalence of a T score below -2.5 was 5%, and 45% of women had already sustained one fracture. Younger age was associated with higher BMD [odds ratios (ORs), 0.054; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.007-0.431]. However, this protective effect of age was lost once the interaction between the duration of both DMPA and OCP was introduced into the model (OR for low BMD, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.09-1.8). The use of DMPA first before ever use of OCP was particularly detrimental to BMD (OR, 3.94; 95% CI, 1.08-14.0). On the contrary, body mass index was positively associated with BMD (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.8-0.9). No other demographic or anamnestic variables significantly predicted the presence of low BMD in this group of young women. This group of DMPA users appear to be at a very high risk of both low BMD and fractures, possibly independently of DMPA use. This needs to be considered when writing guidelines for risk assessment.

CONCLUSION

The use of DMPA before achievement of peak bone mass may be particularly detrimental to bone, but switching DMPA with the OCP in these women does not seem to confer specific benefit in terms of bone density. This needs to be taken into consideration when a change in contraceptive is considered purely for the sake of bone protection.

Combined hormonal contraception and bone health: a systematic review

This systematic review examined whether women who use combined hormonal contraception experience changes in risk of fracture or bone mineral density (BMD) that differ from nonusers. We identified 86 articles from PubMed and EMBASE (published 1966 to August 2005) that reported on fracture or BMD outcomes by use of combined hormonal contraceptives. The evidence relating to combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and fracture is inconclusive, as results from the available studies conflict. Studies of adolescent and young adult women generally found lower BMD among COC users than nonusers. Evidence for premenopausal adult women suggested no differences in BMD between COC users and nonusers. COC use in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women preserved bone mass, while nonusers lost BMD, but BMD among former COC users in this age group was the same as for never-users. Evidence for other combined hormonal methods was very limited, with one study indicating no effect of combined hormonal injectable use among premenopausal women on BMD and one study suggesting lower BMD among premenopausal users of the NuvaRing than in nonusers.

Effect of oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy on bone mineral density in premenopausal and perimenopausal women: a systematic review

Seventy five articles on the effect of oral contraceptives and other hormone replacement on bone density in premenopausal and perimenopausal women were reviewed. The evidence was appraised using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine levels of evidence. There is good evidence for a positive effect of oral contraceptives on bone density in perimenopausal women, and fair evidence for a positive effect in "hypothalamic" oligo/amenorrhoeic premenopausal women. There is limited evidence for a positive effect in healthy and anorexic premenopausal women. In hypothalamic oligo/amenorrhoeic women, baseline bone density has been shown to be significantly lower than that in healthy controls, therefore the decision to treat is clinically more important. The ideal formulation(s) and duration of treatment remain to be determined by further longitudinal and prospective randomised controlled trials in larger subject populations.

Menorrhagia, mechanisms and targeted therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Efficient treatment options for the increasing complaint of heavy menstrual bleeding are required to avoid the morbidity associated with major surgery. This review summarizes recent developments in the nonsurgical approach to treating menorrhagia.

RECENT FINDINGS

Even though the mechanism of menstruation has still not been fully elucidated, there have been promising developments in the attempt to reduce menstrual blood loss. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system has proven very efficient, and there is a frameless device suitable for enlarged uterine cavities. The side effect of breakthrough bleeding has been the main reason for discontinuing treatment. Recent studies have investigated options of concomitant therapy with antiprogestogens to counter this effect. Another group of novel compounds are selective progesterone receptor modulators, which thus far have been shown to reduce menstrual bleeding without the unwanted effect of unscheduled bleeding episodes.

SUMMARY

As menorrhagia is largely a subjective complaint, it is important for successful therapy to be based on an informed patient's choice. Currently, lack of evidence-based practice, poor compliance and unpleasant side effects limit the success of medical therapies contributing to the amount of major surgery performed for this indication. If concomitant therapies succeeded in minimizing the episodes of breakthrough bleeding with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, its recommendation as a first choice treatment may be confounded. Further research is needed into efficiency and safety of selective progesterone receptor modulators, which appear to have great potential in reducing menstrual blood loss.

Menstrual and contraceptive issues among young women with developmental delay: a retrospective review of cases at the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto

OBJECTIVES

To define the clinical characteristics of, and management options offered to, young women with developmental delay referred to The Hospital for Sick Children gynecology clinic in Toronto for menstrual suppression and contraception. To review the primary caregiver concerns and preferences with regards to menstruation and contraception.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of hospital records of young women with developmental delay referred to the gynecology clinic at The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto from 1998 to 2003.

RESULTS

A total of 72 charts were reviewed from clinic visits between 1998 to 2003. Ages range from 8 to 17 years with an unknown cause of their cognitive disability in 44% and medium to high support needs in the majority. Forty-three percent were still premenarcheal when first brought to the gynecology clinic by their families or caregivers. The main reason for consult was menstrual-related in 90%, with concerns related to hygiene and problems coping.

CONCLUSIONS

Caregivers often approach physicians for menstrual suppression prior to menarche with a primary concern of personal hygiene. Medical suppression of menstruation can be successfully achieved. Depo-Provera was the most commonly prescribed and accepted method of menstrual suppression within our population.

Double-blinded randomized controlled trial of estrogen supplementation in adolescent girls who receive depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this clinical trial was to evaluate the effect of estrogen supplementation on bone mineral density in adolescent girls who received depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception.

STUDY DESIGN

One hundred twenty-three adolescents who began receiving depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injections every 12 weeks were assigned randomly to receive monthly injections of estradiol cypionate or placebo. The main outcome was bone mineral density that was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry for 12 (n = 69) to 24 (n = 36) months. Participants, technicians, and physicians were blinded to estrogen treatment.

RESULTS

Over the 24-month period, the percentage of change from baseline bone mineral density at the lumbar spine was 2.8% in the estradiol cypionate group versus -1.8% in the placebo group ( P <.001). At the femoral neck, the percentage of change from baseline bone mineral density was 4.7% in the estradiol cypionate group versus -5.1% in the placebo group ( P <.001).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that estrogen supplementation is protective of bone in adolescent girls who receive depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injections.

Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, oral contraceptives and bone mineral density in a cohort of adolescent girls

PURPOSE

To conduct a longitudinal comparison of bone mineral density (BMD) in 370 adolescent girls, aged 12-18, who self-selected depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) or an oral contraceptive (OC) containing 20 microg ethinyl estradiol/100 microg levonorgestrel with that in girls who received no hormonal treatment (control group).

METHODS

Lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD measurements were obtained by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and 12 months. Data were analyzed with repeated measures analysis of covariance methods.

RESULTS

Over 12 months, lumbar spine BMD decreased in the DMPA group (n = 29), with a mean percent change of -1.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] -2.73, -0.10), and increased by a mean of 3.8% (95% CI 3.11, 4.57) in the control group [n = 107 (p < .001)]. The increase in mean percent change in lumbar spine BMD in the OC group (n = 79), 2.3% (95% CI 1.49, 3.18), was significantly smaller than in the control group (p = .03). Over 12 months, the mean percent change in femoral neck BMD was -2.2% (95% CI -3.95, -0.39) in the DMPA group, but increased 2.3% (95% CI 1.29, 3.27) in the control group (p < .001). The increase in mean percent change at the femoral neck in the OC group, 0.3% (95% CI -0.87, 1.41), was significantly lower than in the control group (p = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study contributes to an increasing body of knowledge indicating a negative impact of DMPA on bone health in young women. Additional findings suggest a potential adverse effect of an OC containing 20 microg ethinyl estradiol/100 microg levonorgestrel on bone health in adolescents.