52
|
Walsh KT, Boring BL, Nanavaty N, Guzman H, Mathur VA. Sociocultural context and pre-clinical pain facilitation: Multiple dimensions of racialized discrimination experienced by Latinx Americans are associated with enhanced temporal summation of pain. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2022; 23:1885-1893. [PMID: 35753661 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The experiences of injustice and their impacts on pain among Latinx Americans are overlooked and understudied. Multidimensional and consequential experiences of racialized discrimination are common for Latinx Americans but have not been considered as factors relevant for enhanced pain experience or risk. In this study, we focused on the experiences of Latinx Americans living in Texas by assessing multiple dimensions of racialized discrimination (total lifetime discrimination, racialized exclusion, stigmatization, discrimination in the workplace or school, and racism-related threat and aggression) and a laboratory marker of central sensitization of pain (temporal summation of mechanical pain, MTS). Among 120 adults who did not have chronic pain, nearly all (94.2%) experienced racialized discrimination. Accumulated lifetime experience of racialized discrimination, as well as the frequency of each dimension of discrimination assessed, was associated with greater MTS. Results suggest that a process of discrimination-related central sensitization may start early, and may reflect enhanced pain experiences and pre-clinical chronic pain risk. Though replication is needed, results also indicate the discrimination and pain burden among Latinx Texans, and Latinx Americans broadly, are likely under-represented in the scientific literature. PERSPECTIVE: : Racialized discrimination is multidimensional. Latinx Texans experience frequent discrimination that is associated with enhanced temporal summation of pain in the laboratory. Results indicate the importance of societal factors in pain processing and may reflect a mechanism of racism-related pre-clinical central sensitization observable before chronic pain onset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlyn T Walsh
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
| | - Brandon L Boring
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
| | - Namrata Nanavaty
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
| | - Hanan Guzman
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas; Diversity Science Research Cluster, College Station, Texas
| | - Vani A Mathur
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas; Texas A&M Institute for Neuroscience, College Station, Texas; Diversity Science Research Cluster, College Station, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Over-rating pain is overrated: A fundamental self-other bias in pain reporting behavior. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2022; 23:1779-1789. [PMID: 35724938 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Wide-spread cultural beliefs influence personal experiences and clinical treatment of pain, yet are often unexamined and unchallenged in the pain literature. The common cultural belief that people generally over-report or exaggerate pain is familiar, reflected in discordant patient-provider pain assessments, and compounded in the context of disparities in pain treatment. However, no studies have directly measured the prevalence of this belief among the general population, nor challenged the validity of this assumption by assessing normative pain reporting in clinical settings. Results of an initial and replication study suggest that reporting pain accurately "as-is" is the norm, yet most people still believe that others normatively over-report pain. We refer to the phenomenon by which most people report their pain as they experience it while paradoxically believing that others over-report their pain as the fundamental pain bias, and suggest this false perception may contribute to larger scale pain stigma and poor outcomes for people in pain. We also identify counter-stereotypical patterns of pain reporting among groups (i.e., women, Latinx Americans) that face more disparate care. Results reinforce the need for respecting patient pain reports, and suggest that distrust surrounding others' pain experiences is prevalent in society.
Collapse
|
54
|
Confronting Racism in All Forms of Pain Research: Reframing Study Designs. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2022; 23:893-912. [PMID: 35296390 PMCID: PMC9472383 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
This second paper in a 3-part series on antiracism in pain research across the translational spectrum focuses on study design factors. Although objectivity is a cornerstone value of science, subjectivity is embedded in every step of the research process as investigators make choices about who they collaborate with, which research questions they ask, how they recruit participants, which research tools they use, and how they analyze and interpret data. We present theory and evidence from disciplines such as sociology, medical anthropology, statistics, and public health to discuss 4 common study design factors, including 1) the dominant biomedical narrative of pain that restricts funding and exploration of social indicators of pain, 2) low diversity and inclusion in pain research enrollment that restricts generalizability to racialized groups, 3) the use of "race" or "ethnicity" as a statistical variable and proxy for lived experiences (eg, racism, resilience), and 4) limited modeling in preclinical research for the impact of social factors on pain physiology. The information presented in this article is intended to start conversations across stakeholders in the pain field to explore how we can come together to adopt antiracism practices in our work at large to achieve equity for racialized groups. PERSPECTIVE: This is the second paper in a 3-part series on antiracism in pain research. This part identifies common study design factors that risk hindering progress toward pain care equity. We suggest reframes using an antiracism framework for these factors to encourage all pain investigators to collectively make strides toward equity.
Collapse
|
55
|
Confronting Racism in Pain Research: A Call to Action. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2022; 23:878-892. [PMID: 35292201 PMCID: PMC9472374 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Racism is an established health determinant across the world. In this 3-part series, we argue that a disregard of how racism manifests in pain research practices perpetuates pain inequities and slows the progression of the field. Our goal in part-1 is to provide a historical and theoretical background of racism as a foundation for understanding how an antiracism pain research framework - which focuses on the impact of racism, rather than "race," on pain outcomes - can be incorporated across the continuum of pain research. We also describe cultural humility as a lifelong self-awareness process critical to ending generalizations and successfully applying antiracism research practices through the pain research continuum. In part-2 of the series, we describe research designs that perpetuate racism and provide reframes. Finally, in part-3, we emphasize the implications of an antiracism framework for research dissemination, community-engagement practices and diversity in research teams. Through this series, we invite the pain research community to share our commitment to the active process of antiracism, which involves both self-examination and re-evaluation of research practices shifting our collective work towards eliminating racialized injustices in our approach to pain research. PERSPECTIVE: We call on the pain community to dismantle racism in our research practices. As the first paper of the 3-part series, we introduce dimensions of racism and its effect on pain inequities. We also describe the imperative role of cultural humility in adopting antiracism pain research practices.
Collapse
|
56
|
Hood AM, Booker SQ, Morais CA, Goodin BR, Letzen JE, Campbell LC, Merriwether EN, Aroke EN, Campbell CM, Mathur VA, Janevic MR. Confronting Racism in All Forms of Pain Research: A Shared Commitment for Engagement, Diversity, and Dissemination. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2022; 23:913-928. [PMID: 35288029 PMCID: PMC9415432 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
This third paper in the "Confronting Racism in All Forms of Pain Research" series discusses adopting an antiracism framework across all pain research disciplines and highlights the significant benefits of doing so. We build upon the previous call to action and the proposed reframing of study designs articulated in the other papers in the series and seek to confront and eradicate racism through a shared commitment to change current research practices. Specifically, we emphasize the systematic disadvantage created by racialization (ie, the Eurocentric social and political process of ascribing racialized identities to a relationship, social practice, or group) and discuss how engaging communities in partnership can increase the participation of racialized groups in research studies and enrich the knowledge gained. Alongside this critical work, we indicate why diversifying the research environment (ie, research teams, labs, departments, and culture) enriches our scientific discovery and promotes recruitment and retention of participants from racialized groups. Finally, we recommend changes in reporting and dissemination practices so that we do not stigmatize or reproduce oppressive forms of power for racialized groups. Although this shift may be challenging in some cases, the increase in equity, generalizability, and credibility of the data produced will expand our knowledge and reflect the pain experiences of all communities more accurately. PERSPECTIVE: In this third paper in our series, we advocate for a shared commitment toward an antiracism framework in pain research. We identify community partnerships, diversification of research environments, and changes to our dissemination practices as areas where oppressive forms of power can be reduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna M Hood
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - Staja Q Booker
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Pain Research and Intervention Center of Excellence, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Calia A Morais
- Department of Community Dentistry and Behavioral Sciences, Pain Research and Intervention Center of Excellence, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Burel R Goodin
- Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Janelle E Letzen
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lisa C Campbell
- Department of Psychology, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina
| | - Ericka N Merriwether
- Department of Physical Therapy, Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, New York
| | - Edwin N Aroke
- School of Nursing, Nurse Anesthesia Program, Department of Acute, Chronic, and Continuing Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Claudia M Campbell
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Vani A Mathur
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas; Texas A&M Institute for Neuroscience, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
| | - Mary R Janevic
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|