Efficacy of gemcitabine plus platinum chemotherapy compared with other platinum containing regimens in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of survival outcomes

Comparison of demographics, treatment patterns, health care utilization, and costs among elderly patients with extensive-stage small cell and metastatic non-small cell lung cancers

Background

Limited data exist regarding real-world treatment patterns, resource utilization, and costs of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (esSCLC) among elderly patients in the United States. While abundant data are available on treatment patterns in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), to our knowledge no data exist comparing costs and resource use between patients with esSCLC or mNSCLC.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed administrative claims data (2000–2008) of patients aged ≥65 years from the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Patients were selected on the basis of having newly diagnosed esSCLC (n=5,855) or mNSCLC (n=24,090) during 1/1/2000-12/31/2005, and were required to have received cancer-directed therapy. Survival and other measures were compared between esSCLC and mNSCLC patients using Kaplan-Meier log-rank and univariate chi-square and t-tests. Study measures were followed from first diagnosis date of either esSCLC or mNSCLC until the earlier of death or end of the database.

Results

Survival between the cohorts did not differ significantly: mean of 10.4 months for esSCLC patients versus 11.1 months for mNSCLC; median survival was 7.4 months versus 5.9 months. A higher percentage of mNSCLC patients (vs. esSCLC) received radiation therapy (75.6% vs. 65.4%; P < 0.001) and surgery (13.6% vs. 7.8%; P < 0.001) during the metastatic disease period. Conversely, a higher percentage of esSCLC patients than mNSCLC patients received chemotherapy (85.5% vs. 60.3%; P < 0.001), red blood-cell transfusion (20.7% vs. 10.9%; P < 0.001), platelet transfusion (5.6% vs. 1.8%; P < 0.001), and growth-factor support (59.0% vs. 39.5%; P < 0.001). esSCLC patients incurred higher lifetime disease-related costs ($44,167 vs. $37,932; P < 0.001) and all-cause costs ($70,549 vs. $67,176; P < 0.001) than mNSCLC patients.

Conclusions

Lifetime total and disease-related costs per patient were high. Increased use of chemotherapy, supportive care therapies (including growth factors), and disease-related hospitalizations were observed in esSCLC patients as compared with mNSCLC patients. Disease-related and all-cause costs for esSCLC also exceeded those of mNSCLC, except for hospice and skilled nursing services. Survival and per-patient costs for both groups underscore the unmet medical need for more effective therapies in patients with esSCLC or mNSCLC.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-014-0555-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A prospective study of biomarker-guided chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To assess the therapeutic value of biomarker-guided chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Eighty-five NSCLC patients at stage IIIb or IV were divided into two groups based on the feasibility of biomarker analysis. Group A included patients with biomarker data (n = 41); Group B were patients without biomarker results (n = 44). Tumor samples obtained by fiberoptic bronchoscopy and computerized tomography-guided needle biopsy were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for intratumoral level of excision repair cross-complementing gene 1 (ERCC1), ribonucleotide reductase M1 (RRM1), and β-tubulin III. Chemotherapy regimens in Group A were determined according to the status of molecular signatures, whereas a standard gemcitabine plus cisplatin regimen was used for Group B. Tumor response, patient survival, and adverse effects were monitored for both groups.

RESULTS

The overall response rate, defined as complete response plus partial response, was 56.1% for Group A, significantly higher than that in Group B (31.8%; P = 0.024). The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 5.2 months for Group A, significantly longer than that of Group B (4.1 months; P = 0.026). The 1-year survival rate of Group A was 65.9%, significantly higher than that of Group B (40.9%; P = 0.021), whereas the median overall survival times were 13.5 versus 12.5 months for Groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.483). The adverse effects in the two groups were essentially the same.

CONCLUSIONS

Biomarker-tailored chemotherapy based on ERCC1, RRM1, and β-tubulin III expression showed significantly increased response rate, median PFS time, and 1-year survival rate in patients with NSCLC.

A phase II randomized study evaluating the addition of iniparib to gemcitabine plus cisplatin as first-line therapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Iniparib is a novel anticancer agent initially considered a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, but subsequently shown to act via non-selective protein modification through cysteine adducts. This randomized phase II study investigated the addition of iniparib to gemcitabine-cisplatin in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed stage IV NSCLC were randomized 2 : 1 to receive gemcitabine (1250 mg/m(2), days 1/8) and cisplatin (75 mg/m(2), day 1) with [gemcitabine/cisplatin/iniparib (GCI)] or without [gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC)] iniparib (5.6 mg/kg, days 1/4/8/11) every 3 weeks for six cycles. The primary end point was the overall response rate (ORR). Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. The study was not designed for formal efficacy comparison, the control arm being to benchmark results against the literature.

RESULTS

One hundred and nineteen patients were randomized (39 GC and 80 GCI). More GCI patients were male (80% GCI and 67% GC) and had PS 0 (61% GCI and 49% GC). The ORR was 25.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 13.0%-42.1%] with GC versus 20.0% (95% CI 11.9%-30.4%) with GCI, which did not allow rejection of the null hypothesis (ORR with GCI ≤20%; P = 0.545). Median PFS was 4.3 (95% CI 2.8-5.6) months with GC and 5.7 (95% CI 4.6-6.6) months with GCI (hazard ratio 0.89, 95% CI 0.56-1.40). Median OS was 8.5 (95% CI 5.5 to not reached) months with GC, and 12.0 (95% CI 8.9-17.1) months with GCI (hazard ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.48-1.27). More GCI patients received second-line treatment (51% GC and 68% GCI). Toxicity was similar in the two arms. Grade 3-4 toxicities included asthenia (28% GC and 8% GCI), nausea (3% GC and 14% GCI), and decreased appetite (10% in each).

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of iniparib to GC did not improve ORR over GC alone. The GCI safety profile was comparable to GC alone. Imbalances in PS and gender distribution may have impacted study results regarding PFS and OS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier NCT01086254.

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer beyond Biomarkers: The Evolving Landscape of Clinical Trial Design

The approval of EGFR and ALK directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors materialized the concept of tailoring therapy on the basis of specific biomarkers for treating patients with NSCLC. Research for other biologics, although demonstrating clinical benefit, has been less successful so far for producing biomarkers that predict response. Blocking angiogenesis is the prototype for the agents that belong in the latter group that target specific molecules, yet they are currently approved for relatively unselected groups of patients. In order to meet the goal of personalizing care in the various settings of NSCLC, a wealth of biologics and compounds are currently being tested in clinical trials in different phases of clinical development. In a subset of the relevant studies, a biomarker perspective is appreciated. This review summarizes the clinical rationale of the major ongoing phase II and III NSCLC studies that employ targeting specific molecules with novel agents, as well as innovative strategies, and includes a comparative discussion of the different designs.

Replication-competent adenovirus expressing TRAIL synergistically potentiates the antitumor effect of gemcitabine in bladder cancer cells

Replication-competent adenovirus armed with therapeutic tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) gene has been shown to sensitize cancer cells to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. However, the synergistic antitumor effect of replication-competent adenovirus expressing TRAIL and the cytotoxic chemotherapy in bladder cancer remains to be determined. Bladder cancer T24 cells or mouse tumor xenografts were infected with replication-competent adenovirus armed with human TRAIL (ZD55-TRAIL) alone or in combination with gemcitabine. The mRNA and protein levels of TRAIL were determined by "Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction" and Western blotting, respectively. Cell viability was tested by CCK8 assay. Tumor growth in the mice was monitored every week by measuring tumor size. Cell apoptosis was detected by Annexin V-FITC staining and TUNEL assay. We found that adenovirus ZD55-TRAIL efficiently replicated both in cultured bladder cancer T24 cells and T24 mouse tumor xenograft as demonstrated by the overexpression of TRAIL and E1A. Gemcitabine did not affect the expression of TRAIL. In cultured T24 cells, ZD55-TRAIL enhanced the growth inhibitory effects of gemcitabine, accompanied by increased apoptosis. Similarly, ZD55-TRAIL synergistically enhanced the antitumor effect and induction of apoptosis following gemcitabine treatment in mouse T24 xenografts. In conclusion, replicative adenovirus armed with TRAIL synergistically potentiates the antitumor effect of gemcitabine in human bladder cancer. Our study provides the basis for the development of ZD55-TRAIL in combination with conventional chemotherapy for the treatment of bladder cancer.

Shifting patterns in the interpretation of phase III clinical trial outcomes in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the bar is dropping

PURPOSE

Despite multiple trials of new agents in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), outcomes remain poor. This study explores how the design and interpretation of randomized trials in advanced NSCLC has changed over time.

METHODS

Phase III randomized controlled trials of systemic therapy for advanced NSCLC between 1980 and 2010 were identified, and their primary end point, outcome, statistical significance, and conclusions were recorded.

RESULTS

Of 245 trials identified, 203 were eligible for study inclusion. Although overall survival remains the most common primary end point of phase III trials, more trials from the last decade have used progression-free survival instead (none in 1980 to 1990, 13% in 2001 to 2010; P = .002). The percentage of trials meeting their primary statistical end points remained stable over time; however, the percentage of trials reporting a positive outcome without meeting that end point increased (30% in 1980 to 1990, 53% in 2001 to 2010; P < .001). A trend toward decreasing magnitude of survival gain in positive trials was seen over time (3.9 months in 1980 to 1990, 2.5 months in 2001 to 2010; P = .11), with a concomitant increase in the sample size of clinical trials over the same time period (median: 152 patients in 1980 to 1990, 413 in 2001 to 2010; P < .001). Only studies predating 1990 reported negative results as a result of insufficient magnitude of survival benefit despite statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

A significant shift has occurred over the past three decades in the design and interpretation of phase III trials in advanced NSCLC. The use of survival as the primary measure of benefit is declining, as is the magnitude of benefit deemed clinically relevant.

Systemic inflammatory status at baseline predicts bevacizumab benefit in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients

Bevacizumab is a humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody able to produce clinical benefit in advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients when combined to chemotherapy. At present, while there is a rising attention to bevacizumab-related adverse events and costs, no clinical or biological markers have been identified and validated for baseline patient selection. Preclinical findings suggest an important role for myeloid-derived inflammatory cells, such as neutrophils and monocytes, in the development of VEGF-independent angiogenesis. We conducted a retrospective analysis to investigate the role of peripheral blood cells count and of an inflammatory index, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), as predictors of clinical outcome in NSCLC patients treated with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. One hundred and twelve NSCLC patients treated with chemotherapy ± bevacizumab were retrospectively evaluated for the predictive value of clinical or laboratory parameters correlated with inflammatory status. Univariate analysis revealed that a high number of circulating neutrophils and monocytes as well as a high NLR were associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in bevacizumab-treated patients only. We have thus developed a model based on the absence or the presence of at least one of the above-mentioned inflammatory parameters. We found that the absence of all variables strongly correlated with longer PFS and OS (9.0 vs. 7.0 mo, HR: 0.39, p = 0.002; and 20.0 vs. 12.0 mo, HR: 0.29, p < 0.001 respectively) only in NSCLC patients treated with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. Our results suggest that a baseline systemic inflammatory status is marker of resistance to bevacizumab treatment in NSCLC patients.

Extending survival of stage IV non-small cell lung cancer

Most of patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with locally advanced or metastatic disease. In this setting the goal of treatment is to prolong survival and to control disease- and treatment-related symptoms. Currently systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the first-line treatment for most patients with stage IV NSCLC, but preferred treatments are now defined by histology and based on the presence of specific molecular abnormalities. In first-line the combination of platinum plus pemetrexed with or without bevacizumab is a reasonable choice in patients with non-squamous NSCLC. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line therapy are the recommended for patients with EGFR-sensitizing mutations. A small-molecule TKI of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), crizotinib, showed pronounced clinical activity in the treatment of patients with NSCLC positive for EML4-ALK and it has rapidly entered into daily clinical practice. Currently no agents are specifically approved for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Second-line treatments include docetaxel, pemetrexed, or erlotinib as single agents. There is a growing evidence that cytotoxics are better than EGFR-TKIs in EGFR wild-type patients. In the setting of the third line, the only approved agent is erlotinib. In elderly patients with good performance status (PS), doublet chemotherapy including platinum should not be excluded, especially for those patients 70-75 years of age without comorbidities. The better selection of patients, the identification of specific predictive biomarkers, a reasonable sequencing of all active and available treatments, including targeted therapies and cytotoxic, may significantly contribute to extend the natural history of stage IV NSCLC.

Tumor cell expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 is an adverse prognostic factor in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the lung

A robust immunohistochemical (IHC) assay for VEGFR2 was developed to investigate its utility for patient tailoring in clinical trials. The sensitivity, specificity, and selectivity of the IHC assay were established by siRNA knockdown, immunoblotting, mass spectrometry, and pre-absorption experiments. Characterization of the assay included screening a panel of multiple human cancer tissues and an independent cohort of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC, n = 118) characterized by TTF-1, p63, CK5/6, and CK7 IHC. VEGFR2 immunoreactivity was interpreted qualitatively (VEGFR2 positive/negative) in blood vessels and by semi-quantitative evaluation using H-scores in tumor cells (0-300). Associations were determined among combinations of VEGFR2 expression in blood vessels and tumor cells, and clinico-pathologic characteristics (age, sex, race, histologic subtype, disease stage) and overall survival using Kaplan-Meier analyses and appropriate statistical models. VEGFR2 expression both in blood vessels and in tumor cells in carcinomas of the lung, cervix, larynx, breast, and others was demonstrated. In the validation cohort, 99/118 (83.9%) NSCLC tissues expressed VEGFR2 in the blood vessels and 46/118 (39.0%) showed high tumor cell positivity (H-score ≥10). Vascular and tumor cell expression were inversely correlated (p = 0.0175). High tumor cell expression of VEGFR2 was associated with a 3.7-fold reduction in median overall survival in lung squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC, n = 25, p = 0.0134). The inverse correlation between vascular and tumor cell expression of VEGFR2 and the adverse prognosis associated with high VEGFR2 expression in immunohistochemically characterized pulmonary SCC are new findings with potential therapeutic implications. The robustness of this novel IHC assay will support further evaluation of its utility for patient tailoring in clinical trials of antiangiogenic agents.

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism predicts response and time to progression to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in a Chinese Han population

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) genetic polymorphisms and the clinical efficacy of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A total of 135 chemonaive patients with unresectable advanced NSCLC were treated with gemcitabine/platinum regimens. The polymorphisms of MTHFR C677T, ERCC1 C8092A, and ERCC1 C118T were genotyped using the TaqMan methods.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 28.9%. Patients with MTHFR CC genotype had a higher rate of objective response than patients with variant genotype (TT or CT) (41.2% versus 19.1%, P=0.01). Median time to progression (TTP) of patients with MTHFR CC genotype was longer than that of patients with variant genotype (7.6 months versus 5.0 months, P=0.003). No significant associations were obtained between ERCC1 C118T and C8092A polymorphisms and both response and survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest the value of MTHFR C677T polymorphism as a possible predictive marker of response and TTP in advanced NSCLC patients treated with gemcitabine/platinum.

Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in the Treatment of Elderly Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Impact of Comorbidities on Safety and Efficacy Outcome

The aim of the study was to describe in detail the impact of aging and comorbidities on safety and efficacy of gemcitabine-cisplatin in the subset of elderly with advanced NSCLC. We report the results of our study which enrolled patients aged over 65 years or older. This study included 46 patients consecutively admitted to our Department. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 2, of a 21-day cycle. The Charlson score method was chosen to evaluate the conditions of comorbidity. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 44 for activity. A total of 128 courses were administered, with a median of 3 courses per patient and a dose-intensity of 93% and 88% for gemcitabine and cisplatin, respectively. Grade 3-4 neutropenia (22% of patients) and grade 3 asthenia (4.5%), emesis (4.5%) and nephrotoxicity (4.5%) were the most severe adverse events. Univariate analysis of toxicity did not show any significant difference among all groups. The overall response rate was 45.6% (95% CI, 31.3-60). At a median follow up of 13 months, the median and progression-free survival were 15 and 8 months, respectively. The multivariate analysis resulted in objective response and disease control being predictive of longer survival. The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin appears to be an effective and tolerated regimen for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC, regardless of aging and condition of comorbidities. Prospective randomized trials based on specific geriatric assessment are required to obtain compelling information for the optimal management of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.

Comparative study analyzing survival and safety of bevacizumab/carboplatin/paclitaxel and cisplatin/pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non-squamous bronchogenic carcinoma not harboring EGFR mutation

Purpose

The majority of Egyptian patients with lung cancer present at a late stage of the disease. Bevacizumab/carboplatin/paclitaxel, as well as cisplatin plus pemetrexed, are both standard regimens for advanced non-squamous bronchogenic cancer. This study compares both regimens, in terms of efficacy and toxicity profile, in Egyptian patients.

Patients and methods

This is a randomized Phase II study comparing toxicity profile and survival in 41 chemotherapy-naïve patients with stage IIIB or IV non-squamous NSCLC, with an ECOG performance status of 0 to 2. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation detection was performed prior to treatment of all patients. Patients in the first group received: bevacizumab 7.5 mg/m² on Day 1 and Day 15; carboplatin area under the curve-5 on Day 1; and paclitaxel 60 mg/m² on Day 1, Day 8, and Day 15 every 4 weeks. In the second group, patients received cisplatin 75 mg/m² and pemetrexed 500 mg/m² every 3 weeks.

Results

The combination of bevacizumab/carboplatin/paclitaxel demonstrated higher Grade III–IV toxicity than cisplatin/pemetrexed regarding sensory/motor neuropathy (P = 0.06), DVT (P = 0.23), proteinuria (P = 0.23), and hypertension (P = 0.11), as well as Grade II alopecia (P = 0.001); however, no significant difference in toxicities between both arms was recorded regarding nausea and vomiting (P = 0.66), hematological toxicity, febrile neutropenia (P = 1) and fatigue (P = 0.66). Progression-free survival was similar for both treatment arms with a median of 6 months (P = 0.978). Overall median survival was comparable in both arms, 16.07 months versus 16.01 months (P = 0.89).

Conclusion

Bevacizumab/carboplatin/paclitaxel and cisplatin/pemetrexed provided meaningful and comparable efficacy in advanced non-squamous bronchogenic carcinoma not harboring EGFR mutation. No significant difference in toxicity was observed between both treatment arms, apart from bevacizumab/carboplatin/paclitaxel-related risks as DVT, hypertension, proteinuria, sensory/motor neuropathy, and alopecia.

Triplet chemotherapy combination with cisplatin, gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with chemotherapy-naive advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The synergistic effects of new generation chemotherapeutics when combined with cisplatin have encouraged the development of new triplet combination regimens in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of triplet chemotherapy using weekly cisplatin-gemcitabine-docetaxel (CGD) for patients with chemotherapy-naive NSCLC. Twenty-seven patients with stage IIIB/IV disease and performance status of 0 to 2 were included in this prospective trial. A combination of gemcitabine 750 mg/m², cisplatin 25 mg/m² and docetaxel 25 mg/m² was administered on days 1, 8 and 15, with cycles repeated every 3 weeks. Leucopenia and/or neutropenia and to a lesser extent thrombocytopenia were the main dose-limiting toxicities. Grade III–IV neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 26 and 7% of the patients, respectively. Only one patient developed febrile neutropenia. Dose reductions were required in 26% of patients, delays in 44% of patients and early treatment discontinuation in 15% of patients. The overall response rate was 52% and all of them experienced a partial response. The median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times were 6 and 13 months, respectively. The one-year survival rate was 46%. In conclusion, weekly administration of CGD is an active first-line therapy with acceptable toxicity in advanced NSCLC patients.

Real-world effectiveness of systemic agents approved for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a SEER-Medicare analysis

OBJECTIVES

Disparity exists between patients with lung cancer enrolled in clinical trials and patients treated in the community setting. This study assessed the real-world effectiveness of cytotoxic agents that became available for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the last 2 decades.

METHODS

We employed the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database for patients diagnosed with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC between 1988 and 2005 to assess the effectiveness of newly approved agents. Effectiveness of specific agents was assessed at time periods immediately following the approval of the agent for NSCLC: baseline, 1988-1994; platinum, 1995-1999; docetaxel, 1999-2003; pemetrexed and bevacizumab, 2004-2005. Significant associations between specific drug treatment and survival improvement were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method, Cox proportional hazard model, and propensity score analyses. Significant differences were established by log-rank test.

RESULTS

This analysis employed data from 143,548 patients by sex (58% male, 42% female), cancer stage (35% stage IIIB, 65% stage IV), and age (12% 20-64 years, 22% 65-69 years, 45% 70-79 years, 22% 80 years and older). There was temporal improvement in survival for patients treated with newly approved chemotherapy (1-year survival rates: 32.41% in 1988-1994, 32.95% in 1995-1998, 37.40% in 1999-2003, and 39.55% in 2004-2005). Patients treated with a newly approved drug during the relevant treatment era had a significant reduction in the risk of death when compared with patients treated with chemotherapy other than the newly approved agent (hazard ratios [95% confidence interval] were 0.76 [0.71-0.81] for platinum, 0.73 [0.70-0.75] for docetaxel, 0.40 [0.37-0.44] for pemetrexed, and 0.33 [0.27-0.40] for bevacizumab; p < .001). Propensity score adjustment did not significantly alter these results.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently approved drugs for the treatment of advanced NSCLC are associated with improved survival in the U.S. Medicare patient population. Our findings support the effectiveness of these agents in the real-world oncology practice.

Efficacy of third-generation chemotherapeutic agents combined with cisplatin or carboplatin in 3100 Chinese patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Recently, differences in tumor biology have been observed between Asian and Caucasian lung cancer patients, resulting in different sensitivities to targeted therapy. To date, all registered third-generation chemotherapeutic agents have been investigated mainly in Caucasians, but little is known whether this data can be transferred to an Asian population. The aim of this study was to provide evidence about the efficacy of chemotherapy in a Chinese population.

METHODS

Three thousand one hundred patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer NSCLC, treated between 2002 and 2009 with a platinum-based doublet first-line chemotherapy, including vinorelbine, gemcitabine, docetaxel or paclitaxel, were included for retrospective survival analysis.

RESULTS

Overall survival (OS) was 12.1 months and progression free survival (PFS) was four months for all patients. No advantage in OS was seen for any of the four compounds. Gemcitabine was associated with a better PFS compared to the other three (P < 0.001). Docetaxel led to higher response rates, but this finding didn't reach statistical significance (P = 0,054). Chinese patients appear to have longer survival times compared to historical data in Caucasians.

CONCLUSION

Our retrospective analysis suggests, that there is no difference in efficacy of third-generation chemotherapy between Asians and Caucasians.

Prediction of survival benefits from progression-free survival benefits in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis of 2334 patients from 5 randomised trials

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether progression-free survival (PFS) can be considered a surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

DESIGN

Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials.

SETTING

Five randomised controlled trials comparing docetaxel-based chemotherapy with vinorelbine-based chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of NSCLC.

PARTICIPANTS

2331 patients with advanced NSCLC.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Surrogacy of PFS for OS was assessed through the association between these endpoints and between the treatment effects on these endpoints. The surrogate threshold effect was the minimum treatment effect on PFS required to predict a non-zero treatment effect on OS.

RESULTS

The median follow-up of patients still alive was 23.4 months. Median OS was 10 months and median PFS was 5.5 months. The treatment effects on PFS and OS were correlated, whether using centres (R&sup2;=0.62, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.72) or prognostic strata (R&sup2;=0.72, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.84) as units of analysis. The surrogate threshold effect was a PFS hazard ratio (HR) of 0.49 using centres or 0.53 using prognostic strata.

CONCLUSIONS

These analyses provide only modest support for considering PFS as an acceptable surrogate for OS in patients with advanced NSCLC. Only treatments that have a major impact on PFS (risk reduction of at least 50%) would be expected to also have a significant effect on OS. Whether these results also apply to targeted therapies is an open question that requires independent evaluation.

Randomized Phase II trial of paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by gemcitabine switch-maintenance therapy versus gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by gemcitabine continuation-maintenance therapy in previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Background

In recent years, maintenance chemotherapy is increasingly being recognized as a new treatment strategy to improve the outcome of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the optimal maintenance strategy is still controversial. Gemcitabine is a promising candidate for single-agent maintenance therapy because of little toxicity and good tolerability. We have conducted a randomized phase II study to evaluate the validity of single-agent maintenance chemotherapy of gemcitabine and to compare continuation- and switch-maintenance.

Methods

Chemonaïve patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were randomly assigned 1:1 to either arm A or B. Patients received paclitaxel (200 mg/m², day 1) plus carboplatin (AUC 6 mg/mL/min, day 1) every 3 weeks in arm A, or gemcitabine (1000 mg/m², days 1 and 8) plus carboplatin (AUC 5 mg/mL/min, day1) every 3 weeks in arm B. Non-progressive patients following 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy received maintenance gemcitabine (1000 mg/m², days 1 and 8) every 3 weeks. (Trial registration: UMIN000008252)

Results

The study was stopped because of delayed accrual at interim analysis. Of the randomly assigned 50 patients, 49 except for one in arm B were evaluable. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.6 months for arm A vs. 3.5 months for arm B (HR = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.45–2.27; p = 0.95) and median overall survival (OS) was 15.0 months for arm A vs. 14.8 months for arm B (HR = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.40–1.51; p = 0.60), showing no difference between the two arms. The response rate, disease control rate, and the transit rate to maintenance phase were 36.0% (9/25), 64.0% (16/25), and 48% (12/25) for arm A vs. 16.7% (4/24), 50.0% (12/24), and 33% (8/24) for arm B, which were also statistically similar between the two arms (p = 0.13, p = 0.32, and p = 0.30, respectively). Both induction regimens were tolerable, except that more patients experienced peripheral neuropathy in arm A. Toxicities during the maintenance phase were also minimal.

Conclusion

Survival and overall response were not significantly different between the two arms. Gemcitabine may be well-tolerable and feasible for maintenance therapy.

Influence of histology and biomarkers on first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in routine care setting: baseline results of an observational study (FRAME)

FRAME is a prospective observational study of first-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This interim analysis examines the influence of histology and biomarkers on therapeutic decisions. Baseline characteristic, treatment, and diagnostic procedure data were collected on European patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC who were treated with any first-line platinum-based doublet, with or without targeted agents, in routine clinical practice. A total of 1567 patients were observed in 11 countries between April 2009 and February 2011. Patients were mostly non-Asian (96.4%), male (71.5%), smokers (84.4%) with stage IV NSCLC (76.6%) and a performance status of 0-1 (82.2%). Median age was 64 years (range, 33-87). First-line treatments were platinum-based combinations with pemetrexed (36.3%), gemcitabine (23.0%), vinorelbine (19.2%), taxanes (18.9%), or other (2.6%), with concurrent targeted agents in 8.4% of patients (mainly bevacizumab, 7.3%). Diagnosis was based on histology in 70.6%, cytology in 20.3%, and both in 9.1% of patients. The final diagnosis was nonsquamous in 72.2% (including 'not otherwise specified [NOS]' in 11.0%), squamous in 24.4%, and other in 3.4% of patients, with the most common reasons for NOS diagnosis being 'subtyping not technically possible' (42.9%) and 'not important for treatment decision' (40.5%). Only 1.1% (6 patients) in the pemetrexed cohort and 0.9% (1 patient) of patients who received bevacizumab had squamous cell carcinoma. At least one immunohistochemical (IHC) marker was used in 53.5% of patients (thyroid transcription factor-1 [TTF-1]: 47.5%, cytokeratin 7 [CK7]: 38.6%, cytokeratin 5/6 [CK5/6]: 17.9%, p63: 8.8%, cluster of differentiation 56 [CD56]: 4.2%, cytokeratin 14 [CK14]: 1.9%, and other: 24.2%). Testing for additional biomarkers was less common, with the most common being for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status (26.0%). Physician-reported key factors influencing treatment choice were 'histopathological/cytological diagnosis' (77.4%), 'performance status' (63.2%), and 'age' (52.8%). Similar factors were identified using logistic regression models. Frequent histological testing was observed, likely resulting in few NOS diagnoses. In addition, IHC and predictive biomarkers were routinely assessed. Histology, performance status, and age were key factors influencing first-line treatment choice in the routine care of patients with advanced NSCLC. Clinical Trials. gov registry identifier number: NCT01067794.

Issues surrounding clinical trial endpoints in solid malignancies with a focus on metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Relative to best supportive care alone, cytotoxic chemotherapy has an established role in prolonging overall survival (OS) in patients with or without previous treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). OS has been the principal endpoint influencing regulatory decisions regarding targeted therapies for metastatic NSCLC, including the vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody bevacizumab in the frontline setting and the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib in patients after prior treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS), another common endpoint in oncology clinical trials, has been discussed as a potential surrogate for OS in metastatic NSCLC. A number of phase III clinical trials of investigational targeted agents for treatment of metastatic NSCLC are ongoing, with OS designated as the primary endpoint in some cases and PFS in others. Both endpoints have been developed largely to evaluate outcomes in unselected populations in which a fraction of patients are anticipated to derive significant benefit. New approaches are being considered for the evaluation of targeted agents. Recent high profile trials have been designed to assess PFS using a randomized discontinuation design and disease control rate after 8 weeks of treatment. With a series of recent advances toward increasingly personalized biomarker-directed anticancer therapies, the appropriateness of the traditional regulatory approach has been questioned.

Phase I/II trial of custirsen (OGX-011), an inhibitor of clusterin, in combination with a gemcitabine and platinum regimen in patients with previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Clusterin (CLU), an antiapoptotic, stress-associated protein, confers resistance to therapy when overexpressed. This trial tested custirsen (OGX-011), an inhibitor of CLU protein production, combined with gemcitabine/platinum in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a single-arm, multicenter, phase I/II study in chemotherapy-naive stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. Custirsen was infused during a loading dose period and weekly in combination with gemcitabine (1250 mg/m) on days 1 and 8 and with cisplatin (75 mg/m) or carboplatin (area under the curve 5) on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Ten patients were treated in a phase I lead-in and 71 in the phase II component. The primary efficacy endpoint was response rate, with exploratory analyses of other efficacy outcomes and biomarker relationships.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients received custirsen and were included in the primary analysis. The median age was 61 years; 82% had stage IV disease. Overall response was 25 of 81 (31%; 95% confidence interval 21-42). The 1- and 2-year survivals were 54 and 30%, respectively. Toxicity of the combination was not appreciably different from what is reported for gemcitabine/platinum combinations. Custirsen treatment decreased serum CLU levels in 95% of patients evaluated. Patients who achieved a minimum median CLU level for the population of ≤38 μg/ml during treatment had a median survival of 27.1 compared with 16.1 months for patients who did not (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Based on the above results, a randomized phase 3 trial to evaluate the survival benefit of custirsen in patients with NSCLC is warranted.

Triplets versus doublets, with or without cisplatin, in the first-line treatment of stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients: a multicenter randomised factorial trial (FAST)

Background:

The FAST is a 2 × 2 factorial trial addressing two questions: (1) the role of replacing cisplatin (P) with a non-platinum agent, vinorelbine (N), and (2) the role of adding a third agent, ifosfamide (I), in a doublet based on gemcitabine (G).

Methods:

A total of 433 stage IIIB–IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were randomised to one of four arms: gemcitabine–cisplatin (GP), gemcitabine–vinorelbine, gemcitabine–ifosfamide-cisplatin or gemcitabine–ifosfamide–vinorelbine. Two comparisons were performed: N- vs P-containing regimens and I-triplets vs non-I doublets.

Results:

For N- vs P-containing regimens, adjusted overall survival was 9.7 vs 11.3 months (P=0.044), progression-free survival was 4.9 vs 6.4 months (P=0.020) and response rate was 24% vs 31% (P=0.124), respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed between doublets and triplets. Grade 3–4 haematological toxicity was significantly more frequent in P-containing therapy; grade 3–4 leucopenia was significantly more common in triplets. Concerning non-haematological toxicity, grade 3–4 nausea-vomiting was significantly increased in P-containing regimens.

Conclusions:

This trial provides evidence of a slight survival superiority of GP-containing regimens over platinum-free N-containing chemotherapy. This trial also confirms that the addition of a third chemotherapy agent (I) to a standard G-based doublet does not improve treatment outcome.

A meta-analysis of paclitaxel-based chemotherapies administered once every week compared with once every 3 weeks first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

The published data on the curative effects of comparing the once weekly paclitaxel-based chemotherapies (W-paclitaxel) with the standard every 3 weeks paclitaxel-based chemotherapies (S-paclitaxel) in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were still controversial. To derive a more precise estimation of the two regimens, a meta-analysis was performed.

METHODS

Medical databases and conference proceedings were searched for randomized controlled trials which compared W-paclitaxel with S-paclitaxel in patients with first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. The following keywords were used: "paclitaxel", "weekly schedule" and "non-small cell lung cancer". Reference lists of original articles and review articles were also examined. The published languages and years were not limited. Endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and adverse events. Statistical tests for heterogeneity were one-sided; statistical tests for effect estimates were two-sided.

RESULTS

Five eligible trials involved 940 patients were identified. They were all published as full-text articles. The intention to treatment (ITT) analysis demonstrated that the ORR of W-paclitaxel regimens patients was 30.89% (143/463), whereas the ORR of S-paclitaxel regimens patients was 27.09% (123/454). The overall pooled relative ratio (RR) for ORR was 1.24 (95% confidence intervals (CI)=0.93-1.66; P=0.14) when W-paclitaxel regimens patients were compared with S-paclitaxel regimens patients. Although the patients with W-paclitaxel regimens had an similar OS and PFS in comparison with S-paclitaxel regimens (median OS was 9.8 versus 10.7 months; hazard ratio (HR)=1.00; 95%CI=0.86-1.17; P=0.99; median PFS was 5.2 versus 4.7 months; HR=0.90; 95%CI=0.79-1.03; P=0.13, respectively), the W-paclitaxel regimens led to significantly less frequent adverse events of hematological toxicities and nonhematological toxicities.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the W-paclitaxel is not superior than S-paclitaxel regimens. The paclitaxel-based chemotherapies given by every 3 weeks are still standard regimens. For patients, especially for the elder or the people with poor conditions who cannot tolerate the standard regimen, the weekly schedule can be considered.

Aerosolized gemcitabine in patients with carcinoma of the lung: feasibility and safety study

BACKGROUND

We investigated the biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, safety profile, and feasibility of aerosolized gemcitabine (GCB) in patients with lung carcinoma.

METHOD

Eleven patients with carcinoma localized in the lungs were studied in a dose escalation study of aerosolized GCB administered 1 day/week for 9 consecutive weeks. Safety data, scintigraphic assessment of the delivered dose and pharmacokinetic monitoring were analyzed. Patients were treated with doses of between 1 mg/kg and 4 mg/kg (dose in the nebulizer), using a new inhaler device (Aeroneb Pro with an Idehaler Chamber).

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The total dose of GCB delivered to the patient's lung was 42±16% of the initial amount of dose in the nebulizer. Safety data showed no hematologic toxicity, nephrotoxicity or neurotoxicity. At 4 mg/kg, one patient experienced grade 4 pulmonary toxicity (bronchospasm), which was the dose-limiting toxicity. Grade 2 and 3 toxic effects included fatigue, vomiting, dyspnea, and cough. Overall response: minor response in one patient, stable disease in four patients, progressive disease in four patients. Pharmacokinetic data showed very low plasma GCB levels. Maximal plasma concentration was observed at the end of nebulization. Aerosolized gemcitabin was safe, with minimal toxicity, for patients with lung carcinoma.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the lung in an autistic child who has never smoked

Primary bronchogenic carcinoma of the lung is extremely rare in childhood, particularly the squamous cell type. Only 13 cases have been reported in the literature. We report a case of squamous cell carcinoma in an autistic, 16-year-old boy who presented with a productive cough. Interestingly, he was a never-smoker, but had been exposed to environmental tobacco smoking by his father for 13 years. The diagnosis was delayed by approximately 1 month due to his young age. He was diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the lung by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, and chemotherapy was arranged. Considering his age, autism, and good performance status, a combined chemotherapeutic regimen with gemcitabine plus carboplatin was planned. After the second cycle of chemotherapy, the cough resolved and a computed tomography scan showed a partial response of the central conglomerated mass with the absence of the malignant pleural effusion.

Optimizing the management of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a personal view

The management of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (a-nsclc) is currently undergoing one of its rare paradigm shifts. Just as the nihilism of the 1970s gave way to the empiricism of the 1980s and 1990s, so the current decade has seen the first truly rational therapies based on informed design. In addition, molecular markers and traditional parameters can now be combined to provide a framework of knowledge that will guide the application of not just the new therapies, but also the older ones that remain effective. This framework—as important a component of the rational paradigm as the new drugs themselves are—is necessary to decide who should and, crucially, who should not receive the various components of this rapidly expanding armamentarium. Here, I have provided a historical overview of the drug treatment of a-nsclc, a mini-review of important new data, and an integrative approach that tries to ensure that patients receive the optimal treatment choice at the appropriate time.

The speed at which new knowledge now arrives, coupled with the persistent high level of unmet medical need, suggests that the traditional pace of evidence-based review needs to be accelerated. Indeed, the increased scope for personalized management constitutes something of a challenge to “business as usual” evidence-based medicine. As a result, substantial investment on the part of payers, which may or may not be possible, will be required. In the meantime, some patients may wish and may be financially able to take advantage of modern developments before they have been fully digested by the public-payer system. Responsive clinicians face difficult tradeoffs as they try to balance the pros and cons of early adoption versus excessive conservatism.

The present article is my personal view of how to navigate these waters, and although it is written especially for patients who like to be the captain of their own ship, there is good reason to believe that all patients will eventually be managed by similar, if not identical, means. Nonetheless, the recommendations herein should not be construed as appropriately reviewed provincial or national guidelines. Finally, if appropriate, a clinical trial should always be offered.

Gemcitabine: efficacy in the treatment of advanced stage nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in many countries. Approximately half of the patients with non-small cell lung cancer have advanced disease and systemic chemotherapy, especially platinum-based doublets, is currently the standard treatment. Several trials have recently indicated the importance of histological subtype for treatment with molecular target chemotherapy and pemetrexed. Over the last decade, gemcitabine, a pyrimidine nucleoside antimetabolite, has been one of the most effective agents for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. It is unknown whether histological type is a predictor of the outcome of treatment with this agent. This is a review of the past trials and reviews of first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC, focusing on efficacy and safety of treatment with gemcitabine according to histological subtype.

Gene polymorphisms, pharmacokinetics, and hematological toxicity in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients receiving cisplatin/gemcitabine

BACKGROUND

This study quantified the impact of drug pathway-associated genetic variants on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with advanced NSCLC were sampled for plasma concentrations of gemcitabine, difluoro-deoxy uridine (dFdU), intracellular gemcitabine triphosphates (dFdCTP), and unbound platinum concentrations after gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) i.v. followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m(2). We analyzed 13 germline single nucleotide polymorphisms and one deletion-glutathione S-transferase (GST) M1-within six drug pathway-associated genes (GSTM1, GSTP1, cytidine deaminase (CDA), solute carrier (SLC) 28A1, SLC28A2, and deoxycytidine kinase). PK models were fitted to the data using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling, and genetic data were tested on drug PK and hematological toxicity.

RESULTS

Patients carrying the nonsynonymous CDA SNP 79A >C (CDA*2) had a 21% lower gemcitabine clearance as compared to wild-type patients (outcomes and complications.0.0009), but the risk for chemotherapy-associated neutropenia (61% vs. 32%, P = 0.07) and severe neutropenia (17% vs. 5%, P = 0.26) was not significantly higher. Other gene polymorphisms were not associated with drug PK parameters or hematological toxicity. The known functional mutant variant CDA*3 was not found in any of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the mutant CDA*2 allele results in an increased exposure to gemcitabine in Caucasian patients, this study gives no definite conclusion on the clinical relevance of this finding. Further studies should look into the relationship between CDA genotypes, plasmatic CDA activity, and clinical outcome in patients receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.

Toxicity profile and adherence to the pharmacotherapeutic regimen of gemcitabine-carboplatin in non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the relationship between doses of gemcitabine-carboplatin (GEM-CARBO) administered and incidence and level of haematological and renal toxicity, and the adherence to the treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Retrospective study which lasted for 37 months. We were able to obtain the minimum set of data needed to carry out the follow-up with the help of Farmis-Oncofarm(®) software and the medical and pharmacotherapeutic records. The haematological toxicity was assessed in accordance with the Common Toxicity Criteria 3.0. Renal toxicity was evaluated using serum creatinine levels and creatinine clearance.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were included in the study who were administered a total of 122 cycles. There was a 34.0% and 30.8% incidence of anaemia and grade 3 neutropaenia, respectively. There was also a 3.8% and 7.7% incidence of grade 3 and grade 4 thrombocytopaenia, respectively. No cases of renal toxicity were found. 65.0% of patients received more than 85.0% of the planned theoretical dosage of carboplatin and 58% of patients received more than 85.0% of the planned theoretical dosage of gemcitabine. Administration was delayed in 18.0% of the cycles prescribed.

CONCLUSIONS

The indication and prescription of the GEM-CARBO regimen was adjusted in accordance with solid scientific evidence, but its haematological toxicity limited its use and made it difficult to maintain the dose intensity foreseen in the study. This compromised the effectiveness of the treatment.

Tubulin, BRCA1, ERCC1, Abraxas, RAP80 mRNA expression, p53/p21 immunohistochemistry and clinical outcome in patients with advanced non small-cell lung cancer receiving first-line platinum-gemcitabine chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of tumor expression of nine genes on clinical outcome in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving platinum-gemcitabine chemotherapy.

METHODS

Quantitative PCR or immunohistochemistry were used to analyze the expression of β-tubuline IIA (TUBB2A), β-tubuline III (TUBB3), BRCA1, ERCC1, Abraxas (ABRX) and RAP80 in mRNA isolated from paraffin-embedded tumor biopsies of 45 NSCLC patients treated as part of a larger observational trial. All patients received first-line platinum-gemcitabine chemotherapy for stage IIIB or IV NSCLC.

RESULTS

Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7 months, overall survival (OS) 12 months. A partial treatment response was found in 14 patients (33%). Patients with low ERCC1 or ABRX expression had a significantly better response to chemotherapy (R=-0.45, p<0.01 for ERCC1; R=-0.40, p=0.016 for ABRX). A significant correlation was found between the individual time for PFS and the expression of both ERCC1 (R=-0.36, p=0.015) and ABRX (R=-0.46, p=0.001). Patients with low ERCC1 expression had a longer OS as compared to patients with high ERCC1 expression (HR=0.26, log-rank p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirms tumor expression of ERCC1 as a predictor for clinical outcome in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving platinum-based chemotherapy, and found ABRX expression to be similarly predictive of clinical outcome. Prospective validation is warranted and - if confirmed - non platinum-containing chemotherapy should be explored as the preferred treatment in patients with high ERCC1 or ABRX expression and no activating mutations of EGFR.

The search for improved systemic therapy of non-small cell lung cancer--what are today's options?

Although stage IV non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains an incurable disease and drug resistance ultimately develops, important steps forward have been made within the last few years. The number of new active agents is rapidly increasing and the area of personalized medicine has definitively arrived. Treatment choices are starting to be made upon tumour characteristics, and more effective and better tolerated agents are now available. In the molecular era we are facing many new challenges: The availability of sufficient tissue, which is often not easily accessible in a tumour arising from an internal organ, sensitivity and specificity of biomarker testing, heterogeneity of marker profiles between primary tumour and metastases or even within a single tumour mass, application and reproducibility of the correct biomarker test method and the differentiation of the predictive vs. the prognostic value of biomarkers. Unfortunately, the development of new targeted agents frequently continues to be performed in unselected patient populations, lacking the early identification of relevant predictive molecular biomarkers. Consequently, thousands of patients are enrolled into clinical trials with a low probability of success. This overview will focus on the most recent new systemic treatment options in NSCLC, including the role of pemetrexed, bevacizumab, cetuximab, maintenance therapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with an activating epidermal growth factor receptor mutation. In addition, emerging treatment strategies will be described.

Laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on oncologic adequacy of resection and long-term oncologic outcomes

BACKGROUND

Whether laparoscopic-assisted surgery (LS) can achieve the same oncologic outcomes compared with open surgery (OS) for rectal cancer remains controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is to compare oncologic adequacy of resection and long-term oncologic outcomes of LS with OS in the treatment of rectal cancer.

METHODS

Literature searches of electronic databases (Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) and manual searches were performed to identify RCTs comparing values of oncologic adequacy of resection, recurrence, and survival following LS and OS.

RESULTS

Six RCTs enrolling 1,033 participants were included in the meta-analysis. LS was associated with similar number of lymph nodes harvested and a similar distal tumor-free margin. LS was associated with a slightly high circumferential resection margin (CRM) positive rate with no significant difference (7.94% vs. 5.37%; risk ratio [RR], 1.13; P = 0.63). There was no significant difference between the two groups in local recurrence (RR, 0.55; P = 0.21). The 3-year overall survival advantage for LS over OS was not statistically significantly different (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; P = 0.11). The 3-year disease-free survival was not significantly different between the two groups (HR, 1.16; P = 0.64).

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis suggests that there are no differences between laparoscopic-assisted and open surgery in terms of number of lymph nodes harvested, involvement of CRM, local recurrence, 3-year overall survival, and disease-free survival for rectal cancer. However, more high-quality studies are needed for further analysis due to the small number of included studies.

A phase II first-line study of gemcitabine, carboplatin, and bevacizumab in advanced stage nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Bevacizumab improves responses and progression-free survival when added to first-line paclitaxel/carboplatin or cisplatin/gemcitabine for patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer. This study was designed to evaluate toxicities and efficacy of gemcitabine/carboplatin/bevacizumab.

METHODS

Patients with untreated advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer, with no evidence of brain metastases and not on anticoagulation were eligible. Patients received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m on days 1 and 8; carboplatin area under the curve 5 day 1; and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg day 1 every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. Bevacizumab was then continued every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

From July 2006 to December 2008, 48 patients were enrolled: 23 (48%) men, 25 (52%) women, and 19 (40%) never smokers. One patient never received therapy and is not included in the analysis. Median cycle number was 8 (1-42) with 37 patients (78.7%) completing ≥4 cycles of three drugs. Dose reductions occurred in 34 (72.3%) patients. Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (47%/15%), thrombocytopenia (11%/15%), anemia (6%/0%), dyspnea (6%/2%), bacterial pneumonia (4%/0%), and hypertension (4%/2%). No neutropenic fevers occurred. One patient died of hemoptysis. Grade 3 bleeding occurred in three other patients. There were seven (14.9%) partial responses. Median time to first event (progression/death/toxicity requiring discontinuation) was 6.4 months (95% confidence interval: 4.8-7.9 months). The median overall survival (OS) was 12.8 months (95% confidence interval: 10.0-16.5). The OS is 57% at 1 year and 10% at 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Although perhaps skewed by a high proportion of nonsmokers and women, treatment with gemcitabine/carboplatin/bevacizumab has an acceptable toxicity profile with promising median OS despite a low response rate.

Safety and resource utilization by non-small cell lung cancer histology: results from the randomized phase III study of pemetrexed plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin in chemonaïve patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

A prespecified analysis of the large, randomized, phase III study in advanced non-small cell lung cancer showed significant improvement in survival for nonsquamous patients treated with pemetrexed/cisplatin versus gemcitabine/cisplatin. Selected grade 3/4 toxicities and resource utilization favored pemetrexed in the overall population, but detailed safety results by histology have not been reported.

METHODS

Treated patients were included in this analysis of safety by histology. At each cycle, adverse events were assessed, and concomitant medications, transfusions, and hospitalizations were recorded. Measures were summarized by histology and compared between arms with Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

When analyzed by squamous and nonsquamous histology, safety and resource utilization for each treatment arm paralleled those of the overall population. Selected toxicities did not vary by histology. Concomitant medication use and hospitalizations were also very similar to the patterns observed in the overall population.

CONCLUSIONS

Although previous efficacy analyses showed a significant pemetrexed treatment advantage for nonsquamous patients, results of this analysis indicate that safety and resource utilization do not vary by histology and are consistent with the overall population. The safety and resource utilization of patients treated with pemetrexed/cisplatin are predictable, reproducible, and consistent with the established favorable safety profile of pemetrexed, regardless of histology.

Circulating endothelial and endothelial progenitor cells in non-small-cell lung cancer

New treatments have recently been introduced for treating non-small-cell lung cancer. Chemotherapeutic agents, such as pemetrexed, and targeted therapies, such as bevacizumab, erlotinib or gefitinib, have extended treatment options for selected histological subgroups. Antiangiogenic treatments, either associated with conventional chemotherapeutic drugs or given alone as maintenance therapy, constitute an active clinical research field. However, not all lung cancer patients benefit from antiangiogenic compounds. Moreover, tumour response assessment is often difficult when using these drugs, since targeted therapies generally do not cause rapid and measurable tumour shrinkage but, rather, long stabilisations and slight density changes on imaging tests. The finding of clinical or biological factors that might identify patients who will better benefit from these treatments, as well as identifying surrogate markers of tumour response and prognosis, is an issue of great interest. In that sense, different research lines have investigated the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) pathways. Circulating endothelial (CECs) and endothelial progenitor cells (CEPCs) are of prognostic value in different types of cancers, and relevant data are published about their potential usefulness as predictors of response to chemotherapy and antiangiogenic treatments. In this review, we discuss the data available on the role of CECs and CEPCs as prognostic factors and as surrogate markers of treatment response in non-small-cell lung cancer.