Pembrolizumab in combination with ipilimumab as second-line or later therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: KEYNOTE-021 cohorts D and H

m6 A transferase METTL3-induced lncRNA ABHD11-AS1 promotes the Warburg effect of non-small-cell lung cancer

N⁶ -methyladenosine (m⁶ A) and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are both crucial regulators in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumorigenesis. However, the pathological roles of m⁶ A and lncRNAs in NSCLC progression are still limited and undefined. Here, lncRNA ABHD11-AS1 was upregulated in NSCLC tissue specimens and cells and the ectopic overexpression was closely correlated with unfavorable prognosis of NSCLC patients. Functionally, ABHD11-AS1 promoted the proliferation and Warburg effect of NSCLC. Mechanistically, m⁶ A profile was analyzed by methylated RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (MeRIP-Seq). MeRIP-Seq presented that there was m⁶ A modification site in ABHD11-AS1. m⁶ A methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3) installed the m⁶ A modification and enhanced ABHD11-AS1 transcript stability to increase its expression. In conclusion, our findings highlight the function and mechanism of METTL3-induced ABHD11-AS1 in NSCLC and inspire the understanding of m⁶ A and lncRNA in cancer biology.

Ophthalmic adverse effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors: the Mayo Clinic experience

Background/Aims

To investigate immune-related ophthalmic side effects of systemic checkpoint inhibitors and compare side effect frequency and requirement for cessation of immunotherapy by checkpoint target.

Methods

Patients taking immune checkpoint inhibitors at a single centre from January 1, 2010 to February 29, 2020 were retrospectively reviewed for clinical characteristics, treatments and concurrent systemic adverse effects.

Results

Of 996 patients, 28 (2.8%) experienced an ophthalmic side effect that came to the attention of an eye care provider. Mean age at presentation of the side effect was 63 years (median 64, range 25–88). The checkpoint inhibitor most often preceding side effects was pembrolizumab in 12 (43%). The most common side effect was dry eye in 16 (57%), followed by uveitis in 4 (14%) patients, and singular cases of ptosis and binocular diplopia, among others. Ocular surface adverse effects occurred more frequently with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) targeting therapy. There were no significant differences in the frequency of orbit/ocular adnexa and uveitis or retinal side effects based on checkpoint targets. Follow-up was available in 13 (46%) patients, with mean duration of 20 months (median 16, range 2–52 months). Of these patients, the ophthalmic side effects were controlled without discontinuing therapy in 12 (92%). Checkpoint inhibitor cessation was required in one patient with panuveitis.

Conclusion

Ophthalmic immune-related adverse events are rare but could be more common than previously estimated. PD-L1-directed checkpoint inhibitors may have a slight predilection for ocular surface adverse effects. Most ophthalmic events can be treated with targeted therapy without discontinuation of life-prolonging immunotherapy.

Correlation of PD-L1 expression with immunohistochemically determined molecular profile in endometrial carcinomas

Endometrial carcinoma programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in tumor cells (TCs) and tumor-associated inflammatory cells (ICs) have recently been reported in several studies which vary in terms of their cohort size, design, and methodology. We aimed to assess PD-L1 staining in endometrial carcinomas and correlate this with clinical and pathological factors and PTEN, ARID1A, p53, and MMR protein expression. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry was performed on whole tissue sections of all tumor blocks of 59 consecutive unselected endometrial carcinomas between November 2018 and September 2019. TC and IC PD-L1 positivity with a 1% cut-off value was observed in 10.2% and 67.8% of cases, respectively, and with a 5% cut-off value in 3.4% and 42.4% of cases, respectively. TC PD-L1 positivity with both 1% and 5% cut-off values was significantly related to ARID1A loss (p = 0.001 and p = 0.046, respectively). IC PD-L1 positivity with 1% and 5% cut-off values and combined score were significantly associated with MMR protein deficiency (p = 0.041, p = 0.031, and p = 0.028, respectively). Advanced stage tumors exhibited more frequent PD-L1 expression in ICs (p = 0.039). MELF-type myometrial invasion pattern was more common in tumors with ARID1A loss (p = 0.047). We observed higher rates of IC PD-L1 positivity in endometrial carcinomas than documented in prior studies; this may be related to our usage of "recent" paraffin blocks and whole tissue sections of all tumor blocks. There was a much higher PD-L1 expression in the ICs compared to TCs in our cases. We confirm a previously documented association between MMR deficiency and PD-L1 expression and show a novel association between ARID1A loss and PD-L1 expression in endometrial carcinomas. ARID1A loss represents a potential biomarker of immune checkpoint inhibitor response in endometrial carcinoma.

Application of immune checkpoint inhibitors in EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: from bed to bench

Targeted therapies are efficient in the context of oncogenic driver mutations. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung cancers represent a distinct subset of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with marked sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Despite the high response rate to EGFR TKIs in EGFR-mutant lung cancer, resistance and tumor recurrence are unavoidable. Therapeutic options are restricted in patients after exhaustion of targeted therapies. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent a novel therapeutic option for advanced NSCLC with significant overall survival benefit in registration trials. No superiority in terms of long-term survival was observed in the EGFR mutation subgroup when ICIs were given as monotherapy in second-line treatment in earlier studies. Thus, the appropriate application of ICIs to patients harboring EGFR mutations remains an important field of ongoing research. Here, we discuss different immune checkpoint blockade strategies, including ICIs alone and in combination with TKIs, chemotherapy, radiation, and antiangiogenic agents in EGFR-mutant NSCLC as first-line and subsequent treatments. We also summarize the evidence concerning the heterogeneous molecular features and immune signatures of EGFR mutations and their associations with ICI therapy outcomes. This study was performed to improve our understanding of the optimal mode of immune-based treatment approaches in EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lung Cancer: Role of Biomarkers and Combination Therapies

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, with a poor prognosis. Despite aggressive treatment, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival are limited. Recently, various kinds of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged for several cancers, targeting PD1, PDL1, and CTLA-4. ICIs have made a significant breakthrough in cancer and revolutionized the management of cancer including lung cancer. However, there are a lot of controversies regarding which group of patients is most suitable to be treated with ICIs in terms of monotherapy, combination, and predictive biomarkers. We reviewed various kinds of studies, such as meta-analysis, randomized control trials, multi-center cohort studies, and case-control studies from PubMed written in English from the last five years. ICIs have significant benefits in the overall survival compared with traditional chemotherapy. Patients with a higher level of PDL1 expression and high tumor mutational burden (TMB) have a higher response rate, and those with EGFR-/ALK- were better than those with EGFR+/ALK+. The patient who responded to immunotherapy completely can still maintain the efficacy after two years of treatment. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer resulted in a 45% major pathology response (MPR) and 40% downstaging. Combined therapy (ICIs + chemotherapy) was better than chemotherapy alone, irrespective of PD-L1 expression. A combination of ICIs such as CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 improved PFS as well. Radiochemotherapy ahead of ICIs is promising as well. However, ICIs combined with EGFR/ALK-TKI (tyrosine kinase inhibitor) are not suggested for the time being. PDL1 expression, TMB, and EGFR/ALK mutations are promising predictive biomarkers. Gut microbiota, galectin-3, and intensity of CD8 cell infiltration are other potential predictive biomarkers. These are very important in the future management of lung cancers as they can prevent unnecessary toxicities and cost of treatment.

Simultaneous inhibition of CXCR1/2, TGF-β, and PD-L1 remodels the tumor and its microenvironment to drive antitumor immunity

BACKGROUND

Despite the success of immune checkpoint blockade therapy in the treatment of certain cancer types, only a small percentage of patients with solid malignancies achieve a durable response. Consequently, there is a need to develop novel approaches that could overcome mechanisms of tumor resistance to checkpoint inhibition. Emerging evidence has implicated the phenomenon of cancer plasticity or acquisition of mesenchymal features by epithelial tumor cells, as an immune resistance mechanism.

METHODS

Two soluble factors that mediate tumor cell plasticity in the context of epithelial-mesenchymal transition are interleukin 8 (IL-8) and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β). In an attempt to overcome escape mechanisms mediated by these cytokines, here we investigated the use of a small molecule inhibitor of the IL-8 receptors CXCR1/2, and a bifunctional agent that simultaneously blocks programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and traps soluble TGF-β.

RESULTS

We demonstrate that simultaneous inhibition of CXCR1/2, TGF-β, and PD-L1 signaling synergizes to reduce mesenchymal tumor features in murine models of breast and lung cancer, and to markedly increase expression of tumor epithelial E-cadherin while reducing infiltration with suppressive granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells, significantly enhancing T-cell infiltration and activation in tumors, and leading to improved antitumor activity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the potential benefit of combined blockade of CXCR1/2 and TGF-β signaling for modulation of tumor plasticity and potential enhancement of tumor responses to PD-L1 blockade. The data provide rationale for the evaluation of this novel approach in the clinic.

Frontiers of ctDNA, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a main subtype of lung cancer, is one of the most common causes of cancer death in men and women worldwide. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immunotherapy have revolutionized both our understanding of NSCLC, from its diagnosis to targeted NSCLC therapies, and its treatment. ctDNA quantification confers convenience and precision to clinical decision making. Furthermore, the implementation of TKI-based targeted therapy and immunotherapy has significantly improved NSCLC patient quality of life. This review provides an update on the methods of ctDNA detection and its impact on therapeutic strategies; therapies that target epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) using TKIs such as osimertinib and lorlatinib; the rise of various resistant mechanisms; and the control of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in immunotherapy; blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB) calculated by ctDNA assay as a novel biomarker for immunotherapy. However, NSCLC patients still face many challenges. Further studies and trials are needed to develop more effective drugs or therapies to treat NSCLC.

The progress and confusion of anti-PD1/PD-L1 immunotherapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Recently, immunotherapy has evolved into a true treatment modality with the approval of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors as the standard care for first-line treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Until now, for patients with advanced NSCLC, treatment of targeting immune checkpoints reveals a promising survival benefit, and some patients even get long term survive, which creates a paradigm shift in NSCLC treatment. However, many issues or problems are also appearing in clinical practice, such as the lower overall efficacy rate (20-40%), treatment modes, populations choice of immunotherapy, drug resistance, and safety, etc. Thus, in this review, we will mainly summarize and discuss the recent development and confusion of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for advanced NSCLC patients based on current clinical studies.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated pituitary-adrenal dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

With the growing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), case reports of rare yet life-threatening pituitary-adrenal dysfunctions, particularly for hypopituitarism, are increasingly being published. In this analysis, we focus on these events by including the most recent publications and reports from early phase I/II and phase III clinical trials and comparing the incidence and risks across different ICI regimens. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception to April 2019 for clinical trials that reported on pituitary-adrenal dysfunction. The rates of events, odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained using random effects meta-analysis. The analyses included data from 160 trials involving 40 432 participants. The rate was 2.43% (95% CI, 1.73%-3.22%) for all-grade adrenal insufficiency and 3.25% (95% CI, 2.15%-4.51%) for hypophysitis. Compared with the placebo or other therapeutic regimens, ICI agents were associated with a higher incidence of serious-grade adrenal insufficiency (OR 3.19, 95% CI, 1.84 to 5.54) and hypophysitis (OR 4.77, 95% CI, 2.60 to 8.78). Among 71 serious-grade hypopituitarism instances in 12 336 patients, there was a significant association between ICIs and hypopituitarism (OR 3.62, 95% CI, 1.86 to 7.03). Substantial heterogeneity was noted across the studies for the rates of these events, which in part was attributable to the different types of ICIs and varied phases of the clinical trials. Although the rates of these events were low, the risk was increased following ICI-based treatment, particularly for CTLA-4 inhibitors, which were associated with a higher incidence of pituitary-adrenal dysfunction than PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

New options for combination therapy for advanced non-squamous NSCLC

Introduction: Nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is divided in oncogene-addicted subgroups, highly expressed programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1 ≥ 50%) subgroup, and 'negative' subgroup. The latter represents the most common group comprising about 50% of all new diagnoses of nonsquamous NSCLC. For this group, chemotherapy was the standard approach with pemetrexed- and/or bevacizumab-based regimens reaching an overall survival of about 12-17 months. Areas covered: This review will focus on the new options for combination therapies, which have already recently arrived or are going to arrive in the clinical practice, mainly through registrative trials, for the management of advanced nonsquamous non oncogene-addicted NSCLC. A structured search of bibliographic databases for peer-reviewed research literature and of main meetings using a focused review question was undertaken in order to discuss this topic. Expert opinion: In the 'negative' nonsquamous NSCLC patients, first-line combinations of pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1, or atezolizumab, an anti-PD-L1, plus chemotherapy are already available in the clinical practice, regardless of PD-L1 expression. In this group of patients, the combinations of antiangiogenic agents, such as ramucirumab and nintedanib, in combination with docetaxel, become new options for second-line treatment. More studies are needed to investigate new combinations for the treatment of these patients.

Metastasis manners and the underlying mechanisms of ALK and ROS1 rearrangement lung cancer and current possible therapeutic strategies

The rearrangements of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and the c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) have both been important driving factors in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). They have already been defined in 3-5% of NSCLC patients. ALK and ROS1 rearrangements are associated with unique clinical and pathological features, especially patients are usually younger, with milder or never smoking history, and adenocarcinoma histology. Also, they have both been found to contribute to the metastasis of NSCLC by cell migration and invasion. It has recently been recognized that the brain can be considered as a primary site for metastasis in cancers with ALK or ROS1 rearrangements. The present review summarizes the current status of NSCLC metastasis and possible mechanisms based on available evidence, and then we list possible therapeutic strategies so that an increase in control of ALK and ROS1 rearrangement of NSCLC metastases by combination therapy can be translated in an increase in overall survival and prognosis.