51
|
Waters MR, Andruska N, Fischer-Valuck BW, Agabalogun T, Brenneman RJ, Gay H, Michalski JM, Baumann B. The Association of Radiation Dose With Overall Survival for Patients Treated With Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Cureus 2023; 15:e34351. [PMID: 36874706 PMCID: PMC9977074 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.34351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate adenocarcinoma (PCa) has demonstrated excellent biochemical recurrence-free survival, with studies showing improved BRFS with higher-dose SBRT. However, current studies have been underpowered to evaluate the relationship of SBRT dose to overall survival (OS). In this retrospective study using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we hypothesize that, given the low alpha/beta ratio of PCa, a relatively small increase in the dose-per-fraction would be associated with improved survival outcomes for intermediate-risk PCa (IR-PCa) comparing 36.25 Gy/5 fx [biologically equivalent dose (BEDα/β = 1.5 = 211.46 Gy vs. 35 Gy (BED1.5 = 198.33 Gy)]. Materials and methods We queried records from the NCDB from 2005 to 2015 for men receiving prostate SBRT for IR-PCa (n=2673). 82% were treated using either 35 Gy/5 fx or 36.25 Gy/5 fx. We compared OS in men receiving 35 Gy versus 36.25 Gy. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for covariable imbalances. Unweighted- and weighted-multivariable analysis (MVA) using Cox regression was used to compare OS hazard ratios, accounting for age, race, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score, treatment facility type, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), clinical T-stage, Gleason Score, and use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed. Results Seven hundred and eighty men (35%) were treated with 35 Gy/5 fx and 1434 men (65%) were treated with 36.25 Gy/5 fx (n=2214). Compared to 35 Gy, treatment with 36.25 Gy was associated with significantly improved OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.61 [95% CI: 0.43-0.89], P=0.009) on MVA. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, 36.25 Gy was associated with improved survival (p=0.034), with a five-year OS of 92% and 88%, respectively. Conclusions In a multi-institutional retrospective database of 2,214 IR patients treated with prostate SBRT, a prescription dose of 36.25 Gy/5 fx was associated with improved OS vs. 35 Gy/5 fx. Results are hypothesis-generating but do lend support to the current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines that the minimum recommended dose for prostate SBRT is 36.25 Gy/5 fx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R Waters
- Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
| | - Neal Andruska
- Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
| | | | | | - Randall J Brenneman
- Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
| | - Hiram Gay
- Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
| | - Jeff M Michalski
- Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
| | - Brian Baumann
- Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Li X, Bagher-Ebadian H, Gardner S, Kim J, Elshaikh M, Movsas B, Zhu D, Chetty IJ. An uncertainty-aware deep learning architecture with outlier mitigation for prostate gland segmentation in radiotherapy treatment planning. Med Phys 2023; 50:311-322. [PMID: 36112996 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Task automation is essential for efficient and consistent image segmentation in radiation oncology. We report on a deep learning architecture, comprising a U-Net and a variational autoencoder (VAE) for automatic contouring of the prostate gland incorporating interobserver variation for radiotherapy treatment planning. The U-Net/VAE generates an ensemble set of segmentations for each image CT slice. A novel outlier mitigation (OM) technique was implemented to enhance the model segmentation accuracy. METHODS The primary source dataset (source_prim) consisted of 19 200 CT slices (from 300 patient planning CT image datasets) with manually contoured prostate glands. A smaller secondary source dataset (source_sec) comprised 640 CT slices (from 10 patient CT datasets), where prostate glands were segmented by 5 independent physicians on each dataset to account for interobserver variability. Data augmentation via random rotation (<5 degrees), cropping, and horizontal flipping was applied to each dataset to increase sample size by a factor of 100. A probabilistic hierarchical U-Net with VAE was implemented and pretrained using the augmented source_prim dataset for 30 epochs. Model parameters of the U-Net/VAE were fine-tuned using the augmented source_sec dataset for 100 epochs. After the first round of training, outlier contours in the training dataset were automatically detected and replaced by the most accurate contours (based on Dice similarity coefficient, DSC) generated by the model. The U-Net/OM-VAE was retrained using the revised training dataset. Metrics for comparison included DSC, Hausdorff distance (HD, mm), normalized cross-correlation (NCC) coefficient, and center-of-mass (COM) distance (mm). RESULTS Results for U-Net/OM-VAE with outliers replaced in the training dataset versus U-Net/VAE without OM were as follows: DSC = 0.82 ± 0.01 versus 0.80 ± 0.02 (p = 0.019), HD = 9.18 ± 1.22 versus 10.18 ± 1.35 mm (p = 0.043), NCC = 0.59 ± 0.07 versus 0.62 ± 0.06, and COM = 3.36 ± 0.81 versus 4.77 ± 0.96 mm over the average of 15 contours. For the average of 15 highest accuracy contours, values were as follows: DSC = 0.90 ± 0.02 versus 0.85 ± 0.02, HD = 5.47 ± 0.02 versus 7.54 ± 1.36 mm, and COM = 1.03 ± 0.58 versus 1.46 ± 0.68 mm (p < 0.03 for all metrics). Results for the U-Net/OM-VAE with outliers removed were as follows: DSC = 0.78 ± 0.01, HD = 10.65 ± 1.95 mm, NCC = 0.46 ± 0.10, COM = 4.17 ± 0.79 mm for the average of 15 contours, and DSC = 0.88 ± 0.02, HD = 7.00 ± 1.17 mm, COM = 1.58 ± 0.63 mm for the average of 15 highest accuracy contours. All metrics for U-Net/VAE trained on the source_prim and source_sec datasets via pretraining, followed by fine-tuning, show statistically significant improvement over that trained on the source_sec dataset only. Finally, all metrics for U-Net/VAE with or without OM showed statistically significant improvement over those for the standard U-Net. CONCLUSIONS A VAE combined with a hierarchical U-Net and an OM strategy (U-Net/OM-VAE) demonstrates promise toward capturing interobserver variability and produces accurate prostate auto-contours for radiotherapy planning. The availability of multiple contours for each CT slice enables clinicians to determine trade-offs in selecting the "best fitting" contour on each CT slice. Mitigation of outlier contours in the training dataset improves prediction accuracy, but one must be wary of reduction in variability in the training dataset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Li
- Department of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Hassan Bagher-Ebadian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Stephen Gardner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Joshua Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Mohamed Elshaikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Benjamin Movsas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Dongxiao Zhu
- Department of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Indrin J Chetty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Belliveau C, Barkati M, Delouya G, Taussky D, Beauchemin MC, Lambert C, Beaulieu L, Beliveau-Nadeau D, Nicolas B, Carrier JF, Vigneault E, Ménard C. Focal HDR brachytherapy boost to stereotactic radiotherapy (fBTsRT) for prostate cancer: a phase II randomized controlled trial. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:203. [PMID: 36494834 PMCID: PMC9733116 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02173-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients with a higher burden of localized prostate cancer, radiation dose escalation with brachytherapy boosts have improved cancer control outcomes at the cost of urinary toxicity. We hypothesize that a focal approach to brachytherapy boosts targeting only grossly visualized tumor volumes (GTV) combined with stereotactic radiotherapy will improve quality of life (QoL) outcomes without compromising cancer control. METHODS 150 patients with intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer will be enrolled and randomized 1:1 in a cohort multiple randomized clinical trial phase 2 design. Patients are eligible if planned for standard-of-care (SOC) high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost to radiotherapy (RT) with GTVs encompassing < 50% of the prostate gland. Those randomly selected will be offered the experimental treatment, consisting of focal HDR brachytherapy boost (fBT) of 13-15 Gy in 1 fraction followed by stereotactic radiotherapy (sRT) 36.25-40 Gy in 5 fractions to the prostate (+/- 25 Gy to the elective pelvis) delivered every other day. The primary endpoint is to determine if fBTsRT is superior to SOC by having fewer patients experience a minimally important decline (MID) in urinary function as measured by EPIC-26 at 1 and 2 years. Secondary endpoints include rates of toxicity measured by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), and failure-free survival outcomes. DISCUSSION This study will determine whether a novel approach for the treatment of localized prostate cancer, fBTsRT, improves QoL and merits further evaluation. Trial registration This trial was prospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT04100174 as a companion to registry NCT03378856 on September 24, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. Belliveau
- grid.410559.c0000 0001 0743 2111Radiation Oncology, CHUM - Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, 900 Saint Denis St, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9 Canada
| | - M. Barkati
- grid.410559.c0000 0001 0743 2111Radiation Oncology, CHUM - Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, 900 Saint Denis St, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9 Canada
| | - G. Delouya
- grid.410559.c0000 0001 0743 2111Radiation Oncology, CHUM - Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, 900 Saint Denis St, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9 Canada
| | - D. Taussky
- grid.410559.c0000 0001 0743 2111Radiation Oncology, CHUM - Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, 900 Saint Denis St, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9 Canada
| | - M. C. Beauchemin
- grid.410559.c0000 0001 0743 2111Radiation Oncology, CHUM - Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, 900 Saint Denis St, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9 Canada
| | - C. Lambert
- grid.410559.c0000 0001 0743 2111Radiation Oncology, CHUM - Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, 900 Saint Denis St, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9 Canada
| | - L. Beaulieu
- grid.23856.3a0000 0004 1936 8390Radiation Oncology, Centre universitaire de Québec, Université Laval, 2705 Laurier Boulevard, Quebec City, QC G1V 4G2 Canada
| | - D. Beliveau-Nadeau
- grid.410559.c0000 0001 0743 2111Radiation Oncology, CHUM - Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, 900 Saint Denis St, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9 Canada
| | - B. Nicolas
- grid.410559.c0000 0001 0743 2111Radiation Oncology, CHUM - Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, 900 Saint Denis St, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9 Canada
| | - J. F. Carrier
- grid.410559.c0000 0001 0743 2111Radiation Oncology, CHUM - Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, 900 Saint Denis St, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9 Canada
| | - E. Vigneault
- grid.23856.3a0000 0004 1936 8390Radiation Oncology, Centre universitaire de Québec, Université Laval, 2705 Laurier Boulevard, Quebec City, QC G1V 4G2 Canada
| | - C. Ménard
- grid.410559.c0000 0001 0743 2111Radiation Oncology, CHUM - Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, 900 Saint Denis St, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Mechanisms, mitigation, and management of urinary toxicity from prostate radiotherapy. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:e534-e543. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00544-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
55
|
Hu W, Li P, Hong Z, Guo X, Pei Y, Zhang Z, Zhang Q. Functional imaging-guided carbon ion irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost for localized prostate cancer: study protocol for a phase II randomized controlled clinical trial. Trials 2022; 23:934. [PMID: 36348363 PMCID: PMC9644615 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06798-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Due to the physical dose distribution characteristic of “Bragg peak” and the biological effect as a kind of high linear energy transfer ray, heavy ion therapy has advantages over conventional photon therapy in both efficacy and safety. Based on the evidence that prostate cancer lesions before treatment are the most common sites of tumor residual or recurrence after treatment, simultaneous integrated boost radiation therapy for prostate cancer has been proven to have the advantage of improving efficacy without increasing toxicities. Methods This study is a prospective phase II randomized controlled clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of functional imaging-guided carbon ion irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost for localized prostate cancer. One hundred and forty patients with localized prostate cancer will be randomized into carbon ion radiotherapy group and simultaneous integrated boost carbon ion radiotherapy group at a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint is to compare the incidence of treatment-related grade 2 and higher acute toxicities between the two groups according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03. Secondary endpoints are late toxicities, biochemical relapse-free survival, overall survival, progression-free survival, and quality of life. Discussion This study adopts functional imaging-guided simultaneous integrated boost of carbon ion radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer, aiming to evaluate the differences in the severity and incidence of acute toxicities in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with carbon ion radiotherapy and simultaneous integrated boost carbon ion radiotherapy, in order to optimize the carbon ion treatment strategy for localized prostate cancer. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05010343. Retrospectively registered on 18 August 2021
Collapse
|
56
|
Tan JSH, Teh JYH, Tan LLY, Tan SXF, Li YQ, Tan TWK, Wang MLC, Kanesvaran R, Ong EHW, Tay KJ, Lee LS, Tuan JKL, Tan DYH, Chua MLK. Efficacy, toxicity, and quality-of-life outcomes of ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy in patients with localized prostate cancer: A single-arm phase 2 trial from Asia. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2022; 18:e346-e355. [PMID: 34908240 PMCID: PMC10946613 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy (UHF-RT) is widely utilized in men with localized prostate cancer (PCa). There are limited data in Asian cohorts. We report the outcomes of a single-arm, phase II trial of UHF-RT from an Asian center. METHODS We recruited men with histologically confirmed, nonmetastatic localized PCa. UHF-RT regimens were 36.25 Gy (Cohort A) and 37.5 Gy (Cohort B) delivered in five fractions every other day over 1.5-2.5 weeks. Primary endpoint was physician-scored late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs). Quality-of-life (QoL) was assessed by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) at baseline, 1- and 2-year post-UHF-RT. RESULTS Between March 2014 and August 2019, 105 men were recruited; four were subsequently excluded from analysis. Median age was 68.0 (Interquartile range (IQR): 63.8-73.0) years. 26 (24.8%) and 68 (64.8%) men had NCCN-defined low-and intermediate-risk PCa, respectively. No late ≥G3 GU or GI toxicities were reported in both cohorts. Peak incidence of acute ≥G2 GU AEs at 14 days post-UHF-RT was 23.6% (17/72) and 24.0% (6/25) in Cohorts A and B, respectively; ≥G2 GI AEs were observed in 9.7% (7/72) and 36.0% (9/25), respectively. Late ≥G2 GU and GI AEs occurred in 4.7% and 3.1% of Cohort A patients, and 5.0% in Cohort B at 12 months, with no AEs at 24 months. EPIC scores changed minimally across all domains. At a median follow-up of 44.9 months, we recorded one (1.3%) biochemical relapse by the Phoenix criteria (Cohort A). CONCLUSION UHF-RT is well tolerated in Asian men and can be a recommended fractionation schema for localized PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janice S. H. Tan
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingapore
| | - Jonathan Y. H. Teh
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingapore
- Asian Alliance Radiation Oncology CentreSingapore
| | | | - Sheena X. F. Tan
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingapore
| | - You Quan Li
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingapore
| | - Terence W. K. Tan
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingapore
- Duke University and National University of Singapore (Duke‐NUS) Medical SchoolSingapore
| | - Michael L. C. Wang
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingapore
- Duke University and National University of Singapore (Duke‐NUS) Medical SchoolSingapore
| | - Ravindran Kanesvaran
- Duke University and National University of Singapore (Duke‐NUS) Medical SchoolSingapore
- Division of Medical OncologyNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingapore
| | - Enya H. W. Ong
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingapore
- Division of Medical SciencesNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingapore
| | - Kae Jack Tay
- Duke University and National University of Singapore (Duke‐NUS) Medical SchoolSingapore
- Department of UrologySingapore General HospitalSingapore
| | - Lui Shiong Lee
- Duke University and National University of Singapore (Duke‐NUS) Medical SchoolSingapore
- Department of UrologySeng Kang General HospitalSingapore
| | - Jeffrey K. L. Tuan
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingapore
- Duke University and National University of Singapore (Duke‐NUS) Medical SchoolSingapore
| | - Daniel Y. H. Tan
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingapore
- Asian Alliance Radiation Oncology CentreSingapore
| | - Melvin L. K. Chua
- Division of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingapore
- Duke University and National University of Singapore (Duke‐NUS) Medical SchoolSingapore
- Division of Medical SciencesNational Cancer Centre SingaporeSingapore
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Magnetic Resonance Imaging–guided Focal Boost to Intraprostatic Lesions Using External Beam Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
58
|
Correa RJM, Morton G, Loblaw A. Can a FLAME forge a stronger SABRe? Let's await the evidence for focal boost with Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2022; 174:173-174. [PMID: 35817321 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.06.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rohann J M Correa
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada; Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada
| | - Gerard Morton
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Health Policy, Measurement and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Dose-escalation in prostate cancer: Results of randomized trials. Cancer Radiother 2022; 26:899-904. [PMID: 36030191 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
In 1998, an editorial from the International Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics (IJROBP) on the occasion of the publication of Phase I by Zelefsky et al. on 3D radiotherapy dose escalation asked the question: "will more prove better?". More than 20 years later, several prospective studies have supported the authors' conclusions, making dose escalation a new standard in prostate cancer. The data from prospective randomized studies were ultimately disappointing in that they failed to show an overall survival benefit from dose escalation. However, there is a clear and consistent benefit in biochemical recurrence-free survival, which must be weighed on an individual patient basis against the potential additional toxicity of dose escalation. Techniques and concepts have become more and more precise, such as intensity modulated irradiation, simultaneous integrated boost, hypofractionated dose-escalation, pelvic irradiation with involved node boost or focal dose-escalation on gross recurrence after prostatectomy. The objective here was to summarize the prospective data on dose escalation in prostate cancer and in particular on recent advances in the field. In 2022, can we finally say that more has proven better?
Collapse
|
60
|
MRI-guided Radiotherapy (MRgRT) for treatment of Oligometastases: Review of clinical applications and challenges. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:950-967. [PMID: 35901978 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Early clinical results on the application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) coupled with a linear accelerator to deliver MR-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) have demonstrated feasibility for safe delivery of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in treatment of oligometastatic disease. Here we set out to review the clinical evidence and challenges associated with MRgRT in this setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS We performed a systematic review of the literature pertaining to clinical experiences and trials on the use of MRgRT primarily for the treatment of oligometastatic cancers. We reviewed the opportunities and challenges associated with the use of MRgRT. RESULTS Benefits of MRgRT pertaining to superior soft-tissue contrast, real-time imaging and gating, and online adaptive radiotherapy facilitate safe and effective dose escalation to oligometastatic tumors while simultaneously sparing surrounding healthy tissues. Challenges concerning further need for clinical evidence and technical considerations related to planning, delivery, quality assurance (QA) of hypofractionated doses, and safety in the MRI environment must be considered. CONCLUSIONS The promising early indications of safety and effectiveness of MRgRT for SBRT-based treatment of oligometastatic disease in multiple treatment locations should lead to further clinical evidence to demonstrate the benefit of this technology.
Collapse
|
61
|
Poon DMC, Yuan J, Yang B, Wong OL, Chiu ST, Chiu G, Cheung KY, Yu SK, Yung RWH. A Prospective Study of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) with Concomitant Whole-Pelvic Radiotherapy (WPRT) for High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer Patients Using 1.5 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Guidance: The Preliminary Clinical Outcome. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14143484. [PMID: 35884553 PMCID: PMC9321843 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2022] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Conventionally fractionated whole-pelvic nodal radiotherapy (WPRT) improves clinical outcome compared to prostate-only RT in high-risk prostate cancer (HR-PC). MR-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (MRgSBRT) with concomitant WPRT represents a novel radiotherapy (RT) paradigm for HR-PC, potentially improving online image guidance and clinical outcomes. This study aims to report the preliminary clinical experiences and treatment outcome of 1.5 Tesla adaptive MRgSBRT with concomitant WPRT in HR-PC patients. Materials and methods: Forty-two consecutive HR-PC patients (72.5 ± 6.8 years) were prospectively enrolled, treated by online adaptive MRgSBRT (8 Gy(prostate)/5 Gy(WPRT) × 5 fractions) combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and followed up (median: 251 days, range: 20−609 days). Clinical outcomes were measured by gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Scale v. 5.0, patient-reported quality of life (QoL) with EPIC (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite) questionnaire, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses. Results: All MRgSBRT fractions achieved planning objectives and dose specifications of the targets and organs at risk, and they were successfully delivered. The maximum cumulative acute GI/GU grade 1 and 2 toxicity rates were 19.0%/81.0% and 2.4%/7.1%, respectively. The subacute (>30 days) GI/GU grade 1 and 2 toxicity rates were 21.4%/64.3% and 2.4%/2.4%, respectively. No grade 3 toxicities were reported. QoL showed insignificant changes in urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal domain scores during the follow-up period. All patients had early post-MRgSBRT biochemical responses, while biochemical recurrence (PSA nadir + 2 ng/mL) occurred in one patient at month 18. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study that showed the clinical outcomes of MRgSBRT with concomitant WPRT in HR-PC patients. The early results suggested favorable treatment-related toxicities and encouraging patient-reported QoLs, but long-term follow-up is needed to confirm our early results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren M C Poon
- Comprehensive Oncology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Jing Yuan
- Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Bin Yang
- Medical Physics Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Oi-Lei Wong
- Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Sin-Ting Chiu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - George Chiu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Kin-Yin Cheung
- Medical Physics Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Siu-Ki Yu
- Medical Physics Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Raymond W H Yung
- Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Correa RJM, Loblaw A. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Hitting Harder, Faster, and Smarter in High-Risk Prostate Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:889132. [PMID: 35875062 PMCID: PMC9301671 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.889132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a technologically sophisticated form of radiotherapy that holds significant potential to effectively treat high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC). Prostate SBRT has been the subject of intense investigation in the context of low- and intermediate-risk disease, but less so for HRPC. However, emerging data are demonstrating its potential to safely and efficiently delivery curative doses of radiotherapy, both to the prostate and elective lymph nodes. SBRT theoretically hits harder through radiobiological dose escalation facilitated by ultra-hypofractionation (UHRT), faster with only five treatment fractions, and smarter by using targeted, focal dose escalation to maximally ablate the dominant intraprostatic lesion (while maximally protecting normal tissues). To achieve this, advanced imaging modalities like magnetic resonance imaging and prostate specific membrane antigen positron emmission tomography (PSMA-PET) are leveraged in combination with cutting-edge radiotherapy planning and delivery technology. In this focused narrative review, we discuss key evidence and upcoming clinical trials evaluating SBRT for HRPC with a focus on dose escalation, elective nodal irradiation, and focal boost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohann J. M. Correa
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Health Policy, Measurement and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- *Correspondence: Andrew Loblaw,
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Nigogosyan Z, Ippolito JE, Collins SP, Wang EC. Prostate MRI in Stereotactic Body Radiation Treatment Planning and Delivery for Localized Prostate Cancer. Radiographics 2022; 42:1251-1264. [PMID: 35714039 DOI: 10.1148/rg.210114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Prostate MRI is increasingly being used to make diagnoses and guide management for patients receiving definitive radiation treatment for prostate cancer. Radiologists should be familiar with the potential uses of prostate MRI in radiation therapy planning and delivery. Radiation therapy is an established option for the definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an external-beam radiation therapy method used to deliver a high dose of radiation to an extracranial target in the body, often in five or fewer fractions. SBRT is increasingly being used for prostate cancer treatment and has been recognized by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network as an acceptable definitive treatment regimen for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancer. MRI is commonly used to aid in prostate radiation therapy. The authors review the uses of prostate MRI in SBRT treatment planning and delivery. Specific topics discussed include the use of prostate MRI for identification of and dose reduction to the membranous and prostatic urethra, which can decrease the risk of acute and late toxicities. MRI is also useful for identification and appropriate dose coverage of the prostate apex and areas of extraprostatic extension or seminal vesicle invasion. In prospective studies, prostate MRI is being validated for identification of and dose intensification to dominant intraprostatic lesions, which potentially can improve oncologic outcomes. It also can be used to evaluate the placement of fiducial markers and hydrogel spacers for radiation therapy planning and delivery. ©RSNA, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zack Nigogosyan
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO (Z.N., J.E.I.); and Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, DC 20007 (S.P.C., E.C.W.)
| | - Joseph E Ippolito
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO (Z.N., J.E.I.); and Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, DC 20007 (S.P.C., E.C.W.)
| | - Sean P Collins
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO (Z.N., J.E.I.); and Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, DC 20007 (S.P.C., E.C.W.)
| | - Edina C Wang
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO (Z.N., J.E.I.); and Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, DC 20007 (S.P.C., E.C.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Zelefsky MJ. Are We Ready for Focal Dose Radio-Ablation in the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 113:302-304. [PMID: 35569475 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.02.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Zelefsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Liu W, Loblaw A, Laidley D, Fakir H, Mendez L, Davidson M, Kassam Z, Lee TY, Ward A, Thiessen J, Bayani J, Conyngham J, Bailey L, Andrews JD, Bauman G. Imaging Biomarkers in Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: A Review and Clinical Trial Protocol. Front Oncol 2022; 12:863848. [PMID: 35494042 PMCID: PMC9043802 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.863848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in imaging have changed prostate radiotherapy through improved biochemical control from focal boost and improved detection of recurrence. These advances are reviewed in the context of prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and the ARGOS/CLIMBER trial protocol. ARGOS/CLIMBER will evaluate 1) the safety and feasibility of SBRT with focal boost guided by multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET and 2) imaging and laboratory biomarkers for response to SBRT. To date, response to prostate SBRT is most commonly evaluated using the Phoenix Criteria for biochemical failure. The drawbacks of this approach include lack of lesion identification, a high false-positive rate, and delay in identifying treatment failure. Patients in ARGOS/CLIMBER will receive dynamic 18F-PSMA-1007 PET and mpMRI prior to SBRT for treatment planning and at 6 and 24 months after SBRT to assess response. Imaging findings will be correlated with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and biopsy results, with the goal of early, non-invasive, and accurate identification of treatment failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Liu
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre and Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David Laidley
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, St. Joseph's Health Centre and Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Hatim Fakir
- Department of Oncology and Department of Medical Biophysics, London Health Sciences Centre and Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Lucas Mendez
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre and Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Melanie Davidson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Zahra Kassam
- Department of Medical Imaging, St. Joseph's Health Care and Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Ting-Yim Lee
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University and Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
| | - Aaron Ward
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University and Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
| | - Jonathan Thiessen
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University and Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
| | - Jane Bayani
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Laura Bailey
- Clinical Research Unit, London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada
| | - Joseph D Andrews
- Clinical Research Unit, London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada
| | - Glenn Bauman
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre and Western University, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Kissel M, Créhange G, Graff P. Stereotactic Radiation Therapy versus Brachytherapy: Relative Strengths of Two Highly Efficient Options for the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2226. [PMID: 35565355 PMCID: PMC9105931 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become a valid option for the treatment of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. In randomized trials, it was found not inferior to conventionally fractionated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). It also compares favorably to brachytherapy (BT) even if level 1 evidence is lacking. However, BT remains a strong competitor, especially for young patients, as series with 10-15 years of median follow-up have proven its efficacy over time. SBRT will thus have to confirm its effectiveness over the long-term as well. SBRT has the advantage over BT of less acute urinary toxicity and, more hypothetically, less sexual impairment. Data are limited regarding SBRT for high-risk disease while BT, as a boost after EBRT, has demonstrated superiority against EBRT alone in randomized trials. However, patients should be informed of significant urinary toxicity. SBRT is under investigation in strategies of treatment intensification such as combination of EBRT plus SBRT boost or focal dose escalation to the tumor site within the prostate. Our goal was to examine respective levels of evidence of SBRT and BT for the treatment of localized prostate cancer in terms of oncologic outcomes, toxicity and quality of life, and to discuss strategies of treatment intensification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Pierre Graff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France; (M.K.); (G.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Repka MC, Creswell M, Lischalk JW, Carrasquilla M, Forsthoefel M, Lee J, Lei S, Aghdam N, Kataria S, Obayomi-Davies O, Collins BT, Suy S, Hankins RA, Collins SP. Rationale for Utilization of Hydrogel Rectal Spacers in Dose Escalated SBRT for the Treatment of Unfavorable Risk Prostate Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:860848. [PMID: 35433457 PMCID: PMC9008358 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.860848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In this review we outline the current evidence for the use of hydrogel rectal spacers in the treatment paradigm for prostate cancer with external beam radiation therapy. We review their development, summarize clinical evidence, risk of adverse events, best practices for placement, treatment planning considerations and finally we outline a framework and rationale for the utilization of rectal spacers when treating unfavorable risk prostate cancer with dose escalated Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C Repka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Michael Creswell
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Jonathan W Lischalk
- Department of Radiation Oncology at New York University (NYU) Long Island School of Medicine, Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYCyberKnife, New York, NY, United States
| | - Michael Carrasquilla
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Matthew Forsthoefel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiotherapy Centers of Kentuckiana, Louisville, KY, United States
| | - Jacqueline Lee
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Siyuan Lei
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Nima Aghdam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Shaan Kataria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Arlington & Reston Radiation Oncology, Arlington, VA, United States
| | - Olusola Obayomi-Davies
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wellstar Kennestone Hospital, Marietta, GA, United States
| | - Brian T Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Simeng Suy
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Ryan A Hankins
- Department of Urology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Sean P Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Ristau J, Hörner-Rieber J, Buchele C, Klüter S, Jäkel C, Baumann L, Andratschke N, Garcia Schüler H, Guckenberger M, Li M, Niyazi M, Belka C, Herfarth K, Debus J, Koerber SA. Stereotactic MRI-guided radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer (SMILE): a prospective, multicentric phase-II-trial. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:75. [PMID: 35428327 PMCID: PMC9011377 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02047-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Normofractionated radiation regimes for definitive prostate cancer treatment usually extend over 7–8 weeks. Recently, moderate hypofractionation with doses per fraction between 2.2 and 4 Gy has been shown to be safe and feasible with oncologic non-inferiority compared to normofractionation. Radiobiologic considerations lead to the assumption that prostate cancer might benefit in particular from hypofractionation in terms of tumor control and toxicity. First data related to ultrahypofractionation demonstrate that the overall treatment time can be reduced to 5–7 fractions with single doses > 6 Gy safely, even with simultaneous focal boosting of macroscopic tumor(s). With MR-guided linear accelerators (MR-linacs) entering clinical routine, invasive fiducial implantations become unnecessary. The aim of the multicentric SMILE study is to evaluate the use of MRI-guided stereotactic radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer in 5 fractions regarding safety and feasibility. Methods The study is designed as a prospective, one-armed, two-stage, multi-center phase-II-trial with 68 patients planned. Low- and intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer patients will be eligible for the study as well as early high-risk patients (cT3a and/or Gleason Score ≤ 8 and/or PSA ≤ 20 ng/ml) according to d’Amico. All patients will receive definitive MRI-guided stereotactic radiation therapy with a total dose of 37.5 Gy in 5 fractions (single dose 7.5 Gy) on alternating days. A focal simultaneous integrated boost to MRI-defined tumor(s) up to 40 Gy can optionally be applied. The primary composite endpoint includes the assessment of urogenital or gastrointestinal toxicity ≥ grade 2 or treatment-related discontinuation of therapy. The use of MRI-guided radiotherapy enables online plan adaptation and intrafractional gating to ensure optimal target volume coverage and protection of organs at risk. Discussion With moderate hypofractionation being the standard in definitive radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer at many institutions, ultrahypofractionation could be the next step towards reducing treatment time without compromising oncologic outcomes and toxicities. MRI-guided radiotherapy could qualify as an advantageous tool as no invasive procedures have to precede in therapeutic workflows. Furthermore, MRI guidance combined with gating and plan adaptation might be essential in order to increase treatment effectivity and reduce toxicity at the same time.
Collapse
|
69
|
Muurholm CG, Ravkilde T, De Roover R, Skouboe S, Hansen R, Crijns W, Depuydt T, Poulsen PR. Experimental investigation of dynamic real-time rotation-including dose reconstruction during prostate tracking radiotherapy. Med Phys 2022; 49:3574-3584. [PMID: 35395104 PMCID: PMC9322296 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2021] [Revised: 02/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hypofractionation in prostate radiotherapy is of increasing interest. Steep dose gradients and a large weight on each individual fraction emphasize the need for motion management. Real-time motion management techniques such as multi-leaf collimator (MLC) tracking or couch tracking typically adjust for translational motion while rotations remain uncompensated with unknown dosimetric impact. PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to demonstrate and validate dynamic real-time rotation-including dose reconstruction during radiotherapy experiments with and without MLC and couch tracking. METHODS Real-time dose reconstruction was performed using the in-house developed software DoseTracker. DoseTracker receives streamed target positions and accelerator parameters during treatment delivery and uses a pencil beam algorithm with water density assumption to reconstruct the dose in a moving target. DoseTracker's ability to reconstruct motion-induced dose errors in a dynamically rotating and translating target was investigated during three different scenarios: (1) no motion compensation and translational motion correction with (2) MLC tracking and (3) couch tracking. In each scenario, dose reconstruction was performed online and in real-time during delivery of two dual-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) prostate plans with a prescribed fraction dose of 7 Gy to the prostate and simultaneous intraprostatic lesion boosts with doses of at least 8 Gy, but up to 10 Gy as long as the organs-at-risk dose constraints were fulfilled. The plans were delivered to a pelvis phantom that replicated three patient-measured motion traces using a rotational insert with 21 layers of EBT3 film spaced 2.5 mm apart. DoseTracker repeatedly calculated the actual motion-including dose increment and the planned static dose increment since the last calculation in 84500 points in the film stack. The experiments were performed with a TrueBeam accelerator with MLC and couch tracking based on electromagnetic transponders embedded in the film stack. The motion-induced dose error was quantified as the difference between the final cumulative dose with motion and without motion using the 2D 2%/2mm γ-failure rate and the difference in dose to 95% of the clinical target volume (CTV ΔD95% ) and the gross target volume (GTV ΔD95% ) as well as the difference in dose to 0.1 cm3 of the urethra, bladder, and rectum (ΔD0.1CC ). The motion-induced errors were compared between dose reconstructions and film measurements. RESULTS The dose was reconstructed in all calculation points at a mean frequency of 4.7 Hz. The root-mean-square difference between real-time reconstructed and film measured motion-induced errors was 3.1%-points (γ-failure rate), 0.13 Gy (CTV ΔD95% ), 0.23 Gy (GTV ΔD95% ), 0.19 Gy (urethra ΔD0.1CC ), 0.09 Gy (bladder ΔD0.1CC ), and 0.07 Gy (rectum ΔD0.1CC ). CONCLUSIONS In a series of phantom experiments, online real-time rotation-including dose reconstruction was performed for the first time. The calculated motion-induced errors agreed well with film measurements. The dose reconstruction provides a valuable tool for monitoring dose delivery and investigating the efficacy of advanced motion-compensation techniques in the presence of translational and rotational motion. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas Ravkilde
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Robin De Roover
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Simon Skouboe
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Rune Hansen
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Wouter Crijns
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tom Depuydt
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Per R Poulsen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Zamboglou DC, Spohn DSK, Ruf PJ, Benndorf DM, Gainey DM, Kamps DM, Jilg PC, Gratzke PC, Adebahr DS, Schmidtmayer-Zamboglou B, Mix PM, Bamberg PF, Zschaeck DS, Ghadjar PP, Baltas PD, Grosu PAL. PSMA-PET- and MRI-based focal dose escalated radiotherapy of primary prostate cancer: planned safety analysis of a non-randomized 2-armed phase II trial (ARO2020-01). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 113:1025-1035. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
71
|
Spohn SKB, Adebahr S, Huber M, Jenkner C, Wiehle R, Nagavci B, Schmucker C, Carl EG, Chen RC, Weber WA, Mix M, Rühle A, Sprave T, Nicolay NH, Gratzke C, Benndorf M, Wiegel T, Weis J, Baltas D, Grosu AL, Zamboglou C. Feasibility, pitfalls and results of a structured concept-development phase for a randomized controlled phase III trial on radiotherapy in primary prostate cancer patients. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:337. [PMID: 35351058 PMCID: PMC8960686 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09434-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Failure rate in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is > 50%, includes safety-problems, underpowered statistics, lack of efficacy, lack of funding or insufficient patient recruitment and is even more pronounced in oncology trials. We present results of a structured concept-development phase (CDP) for a phase III RCT on personalized radiotherapy (RT) in primary prostate cancer (PCa) patients implementing prostate specific membrane antigen targeting positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET). Materials and methods The 1 yr process of the CDP contained five main working packages: (i) literature search and scoping review, (ii) involvement of individual patients, patients’ representatives and patients’ self-help groups addressing the patients’ willingness to participate in the preparation process and the conduct of RCTs as well as the patient informed consent (PIC), (iii) involvement of national and international experts and expert panels (iv) a phase II pilot study investigating the safety of implementation of PSMA-PET for focal dose escalation RT and (v) in-silico RT planning studies assessing feasibility of envisaged dose regimens and effects of urethral sparing in focal dose escalation. Results (i) Systematic literature searches confirmed the high clinical relevance for more evidence on advanced RT approaches, in particular stereotactic body RT, in high-risk PCa patients. (ii) Involvement of patients, patient representatives and randomly selected males relevantly changed the PIC and initiated a patient empowerment project for training of bladder preparation. (iii) Discussion with national and international experts led to adaptions of inclusion and exclusion criteria. (iv) Fifty patients were treated in the pilot trial and in- and exclusion criteria as well as enrollment calculations were adapted accordingly. Parallel conduction of the pilot trial revealed pitfalls on practicability and broadened the horizon for translational projects. (v) In-silico planning studies confirmed feasibility of envisaged dose prescription. Despite large prostate- and boost-volumes of up to 66% of the prostate, adherence to stringent anorectal dose constraints was feasible. Urethral sparing increased the therapeutic ratio. Conclusion The dynamic framework of interdisciplinary working programs in CDPs enhances robustness of RCT protocols and may be associated with decreased failure rates. Structured recommendations are warranted to further define the process of such CDPs in radiation oncology trials. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09434-2.
Collapse
|
72
|
Ménard C, Young S, Zukotynski K, Hamilton RJ, Bénard F, Yip S, McCabe C, Saad F, Brundage M, Nitulescu R, Bauman G. PSMA PET/CT guided intensification of therapy in patients at risk of advanced prostate cancer (PATRON): a pragmatic phase III randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:251. [PMID: 35260100 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09283-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Positron emission tomography targeting the prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA PET/CT) has demonstrated unparalleled performance as a staging examination for prostate cancer resulting in substantial changes in management. However, the impact of altered management on patient outcomes is largely unknown. This study aims to assess the impact of intensified radiotherapy or surgery guided by PSMA PET/CT in patients at risk of advanced prostate cancer. METHODS This pan-Canadian phase III randomized controlled trial will enroll 776 men with either untreated high risk prostate cancer (CAPRA score 6-10 or stage cN1) or biochemically recurrent prostate cancer post radical prostatectomy (PSA > 0.1 ng/mL). Patients will be randomized 1:1 to either receive conventional imaging or conventional plus PSMA PET imaging, with intensification of radiotherapy or surgery to newly identified disease sites. The primary endpoint is failure free survival at 5 years. Secondary endpoints include rates of adverse events, time to next-line therapy, as well as impact on health-related quality of life and cost effectiveness as measured by incremental cost per Quality Adjusted Life Years gained. DISCUSSION This study will help create level 1 evidence needed to demonstrate whether or not intensification of radiotherapy or surgery based on PSMA PET findings improves outcomes of patients at risk of advanced prostate cancer in a manner that is cost-effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial was prospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT04557501 on September 21, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia Ménard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| | - Sympascho Young
- Department of Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Katherine Zukotynski
- Departments of Medicine and Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Medical Imaging, Western University, London, ON, Canada.,Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Robert J Hamilton
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - François Bénard
- Department of Radiology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Steven Yip
- Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Christopher McCabe
- Institute for Health Economics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Michael Brundage
- Department of Oncology, Kingston Regional Cancer Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Roy Nitulescu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,CHUM Center for the Integration and Analysis of Medical Data (CITADEL), Quebec, Canada
| | - Glenn Bauman
- Department of Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Leeman JE, Cagney DN, Mak RH, Huynh MA, Tanguturi SK, Singer L, Catalano P, Martin NE, D'Amico AV, Mouw KW, Nguyen PL, King MT, Han Z, Williams C, Huynh E. MR-guided prostate SBRT with daily online plan adaptation: Results of a prospective phase I trial and supplemental cohort. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100934. [PMID: 35847547 PMCID: PMC9280019 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Stereotactic magnetic resonance (MR)–guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) for prostate cancer allows for MR-based contouring, real-time MR motion management, and daily plan adaptation. The clinical and dosimetric benefits associated with prostate SMART remain largely unknown. Methods and Materials A phase 1 trial of prostate SMART was conducted with primary endpoints of safety and feasibility. An additional cohort of patients similarly treated with prostate SMART were included in the analysis. SMART was delivered to 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions to the prostate ± seminal vesicles using the MRIdian linear accelerator system (ViewRay, Inc). Rates of urinary and gastrointestinal toxic effects and patient-reported outcome measures were assessed. Dosimetric analyses were conducted to evaluate the specific benefits of daily plan adaptation. Results The cohort included 22 patients (n = 10 phase 1, n = 12 supplemental) treated in 110 fractions. Median follow-up was 7.9 months. Acute grade 2 urinary and gastrointestinal toxic effects were observed in 22.7% and 4.5%, respectively, and 4.5% and 0%, respectively, at last follow-up. No grade 3+ events were observed. Expanded Prostate Cancer Index-26 urinary obstructive scores decreased during SMART (mean, 9.3 points; P = .03) and returned to baseline by 3 months. No other significant changes in patient-reported outcome measures were observed. One-hundred percent of fractions required plan adaptation owing to exceeding organ-at-risk metrics (68%) or suboptimal target coverage (33%) resulting from anatomic changes. Minimum acceptable planning target volume, rectal, bladder, and urethra/bladder neck metrics were violated in 24%, 20%, 24%, and 33% of predicted plans, respectively; 0% of reoptimized plans violated metrics. Underlying causes for deficient dosimetry before reoptimization included changes in bladder filling, seminal vesicle position, prostate volume (median 4.7% increase by fraction 3; range, 0%-56%), and hotspots shifting into urethra/bladder neck. Conclusions Prostate SMART results in low risk of acute toxic effects with improvements in target and organ-at-risk dosimetry. The clinical benefits resulting from daily plan adaptation, including urethra/bladder neck protection, warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan E. Leeman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Corresponding author: Jonathan E. Leeman, MD
| | - Daniel N. Cagney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Raymond H. Mak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mai Anh Huynh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shyam K. Tanguturi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lisa Singer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Paul Catalano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Neil E. Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anthony V. D'Amico
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kent W. Mouw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Paul L. Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Martin T. King
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Zhaohui Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Christopher Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elizabeth Huynh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Wahlstedt I, Andratschke N, Behrens CP, Ehrbar S, Gabryś HS, Schüler HG, Guckenberger M, Smith AG, Tanadini-Lang S, Tascón-Vidarte JD, Vogelius IR, van Timmeren JE. Gating has a negligible impact on dose delivered in MRI-guided online adaptive radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2022; 170:205-212. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
75
|
Osman SOS, Fairmichael C, Whitten G, Lundy GS, Wesselman R, Wilson ML, Hounsell AR, Prise KM, Irvine D, McGarry CK, Jain S. Simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to dominant intra-prostatic lesions during extreme hypofractionation for prostate cancer: the impact of rectal spacers. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:38. [PMID: 35193630 PMCID: PMC8862253 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02003-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Boosting dominant intra-prostatic lesions (DILs) has the potential to increase the therapeutic ratio in prostate cancer radiotherapy. In this study, employing 5-fraction stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to deliver 40 Gy to the prostate clinical target volume (CTV) while boosting the DIL up to 50 Gy was evaluated for patients before and after rectal spacer insertion.
Materials and methods
24 Computed Tomography (CT) scans of 12 prostate cancer patients with unfavourable intermediate or high risk prostate cancer were employed in this study. At least two treatment plans were generated for each patient to compare pre- and post-spacer insertion plans. Plans were evaluated for target coverage, organs-at-risk doses, and the achievable boost dose level.
Results
The CTV coverage was significantly better in plans with a spacer, V40Gy 98.4% versus 97.0% (p = 0.012). Using spacers significantly reduced rectal dose in all 12 patients in this study. It was possible to boost DIL to 50 Gy to without violating dose constraints in 6 of 12 patients and to 47.5 Gy in 3 patients post-spacer insertion. For 3 patients (25%) it was not possible to boost DIL above 45 Gy even with a spacer in situ. Without a spacer, for 6 patient (50%) clinically acceptable plan were only achieved when the DIL dose was lowered to 45 Gy. In five of these 6 patients the dose limiting structure was the urethra (urethra planning risk volume V45Gy [cc] ≤ 0.1 cc constraint).
Conclusions
Clinically acceptable plans for 5 fraction SABR, 40 Gy to the prostate CTV, with a SIB to DIL (45–50 Gy) were achieved. The boost dose achieved was DIL location dependent and primarily affected by DIL’s proximity to the urethra. Compared to plans before spacer insertion, higher DIL dose were achieved with spacer in situ for 25% of the patients. Moreover, significant reduction in rectal dose and better target coverage were also achieved for all patients with spacers in situ.
Collapse
|
76
|
Greco C, Pares O, Pimentel N, Louro V, Nunes B, Kociolek J, Marques J, Fuks Z. Early PSA density kinetics predicts biochemical and local failure following extreme hypofractionated radiotherapy in intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2022; 169:35-42. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Revised: 02/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
77
|
Gross A, Yuan J, Spratt D, Fredman E. Case Report: Role of an Iodinated Rectal Hydrogel Spacer, SpaceOAR Vue™, in the Context of Low-Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy, for Enhanced Post-Operative Contouring to Aid in Accurate Implant Evaluation and Dosimetry. Front Oncol 2022; 11:810955. [PMID: 35004333 PMCID: PMC8727764 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.810955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
We present a case series of 13 consecutive patients with prostate cancer treated with low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy, utilizing SpaceOAR Vue™, the recent iodinated iteration of the SpaceOAR™ hydrogel rectal spacer. Low- and favorable intermediate-risk patients receiving monotherapy and unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk patients undergoing a brachytherapy boost were included. Permanent brachytherapy can result in subacute and late rectal toxicity, and precise contouring of the anterior rectal wall and posterior aspect of the prostate is essential for accurate dosimetry to confirm a safe implant. Clearly visible on non-contrast CT imaging, SpaceOAR Vue™ can substantially aid in post-implant contouring and analysis. Not previously described in the literature in the context of LDR brachytherapy, we demonstrate the added clinical benefit of placing a well-visualized rectal spacer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Gross
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Jiankui Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Daniel Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Elisha Fredman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
78
|
Kuisma A, Wright P, Suilamo S, Seppälä J, Koivisto M, Lindholm P, Minn H. Long-term outcome of biologically guided dose-escalated radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:97-103. [PMID: 34772320 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1998613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biologically created subvolumes enable non-uniform dose distributions in prostate cancer radiotherapy (RT) thus potentially improving therapeutic ratio and reducing toxicity. We present the long-term outcome of men receiving focal boosting of carbon-11 acetate (ACE) PET-CT metabolically active areas in prostate carcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS Thirty men with hormone naïve localized prostate carcinoma underwent ACE PET/CT for RT planning. There were five low-, 17 intermediate-, and eight high-risk patients. Based on thresholding of the standardized uptake values (SUVs) metabolic target volumes (MTVs) corresponding to intraprostatic lesions (IPLs) were contoured. Two planning target volumes (PTVs) were applied i.e., PTVlow-risk for the whole prostate with 8-10 mm margin and PTVhigh-risk for the MTV. Pelvic nodes were not irradiated. Late toxicity of biologically guided RT was reviewed after a median of 63 months and outcome after a median follow-up of 124 months. RESULTS Median doses to PTVlow-risk, PTVhigh-risk, prostate, and MTV were 72.9 Gy, 79.4 Gy, 76.6 Gy, and 80.4 Gy, respectively, in 38 fractions. The 10-year cancer-specific survival was 86% and the biochemical failure-free ratio 68%, respectively. The median biochemical progression-free survival (PFS) was 37, 108, and 119 months in the high, intermediate, and low-risk groups, respectively, the difference being significant between high and intermediate-risk groups (p = 0.02). One patient (3%) presented with locoregional and 5 (17%) with distant nodal metastases. Five patients (17%) had a biochemical relapse. A larger MTV was associated with shorter PFS (r = -0.41, p = 0.02), but had no influence on OS. No other statistically significant differences in the dose painting parameters were observed between recurrence-free and recurring patients. CONCLUSIONS Biological guidance for dose-escalated prostate RT is feasible with ACE PET/CT. Since a larger MTV may be associated with a higher risk for progression, we encourage further study of dose-escalation to ACE-positive lesions considering the low toxicity of our protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Kuisma
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Pauliina Wright
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
- Department of Medical Physics, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Sami Suilamo
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
- Department of Medical Physics, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Jan Seppälä
- Cancer Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Mari Koivisto
- Department of biostatistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Paula Lindholm
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Heikki Minn
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
- Turku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Groen VH, van Schie M, Zuithoff NPA, Monninkhof EM, Kunze-Busch M, de Boer JCJ, van der Voort van Zijp J, Pos FJ, Smeenk RJ, Haustermans K, Isebaert S, Draulans C, Depuydt T, Verkooijen HM, van der Heide UA, Kerkmeijer LGW. Urethral and bladder dose-effect relations for late genitourinary toxicity following external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer in the FLAME trial. Radiother Oncol 2021; 167:127-132. [PMID: 34968470 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE or objectives The FLAME trial (NCT01168479) showed that by adding a focal boost to conventional fractionated EBRT in the treatment of localized prostate cancer, the five-year biochemical disease-free survival increased, without significantly increasing toxicity. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between radiation dose to the bladder and urethra and genitourinary (GU) toxicity grade ≥2 in the entire cohort. MATERIAL AND METHODS The dose-effect relations of the urethra and bladder dose, separately, and GU toxicity grade ≥2 (CTCAE 3.0) up to five years after treatment were assessed. A mixed model analysis for repeated measurements was used, adjusting for age, diabetes mellitus, T-stage, baseline GU toxicity grade ≥1 and institute. Additionally, the association between the dose and separate GU toxicity subdomains were investigated. RESULTS Dose-effect relations were observed for the dose (Gy) to the bladder D2cm3 and urethra D0.1cm3, with adjusted odds ratios of 1.14 (95% CI 1.12-1.16, p<0.0001) and 1.12 (95% CI 1.11-1.14, p<0.0001), respectively. Additionally, associations between the dose to the urethra and bladder and the subdomains urinary frequency, urinary retention and urinary incontinence were observed. CONCLUSION Further increasing the dose to the bladder and urethra will result in a significant increase in GU toxicity following EBRT. Focal boost treatment plans should incorporate a urethral dose-constraint. Further treatment optimization to increase the focal boost dose without increasing the dose to the urethra and other organs at risk should be a focus for future research, as we have shown that a focal boost is beneficial in the treatment of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veerle H Groen
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel van Schie
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolaas P A Zuithoff
- University Medical Center, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Evelyn M Monninkhof
- University Medical Center, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martina Kunze-Busch
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Floris J Pos
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Jan Smeenk
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sofie Isebaert
- University Hospitals Leuven, Radiation Oncology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Cédric Draulans
- University Hospitals Leuven, Radiation Oncology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tom Depuydt
- University Hospitals Leuven, Radiation Oncology, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - Linda G W Kerkmeijer
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Radboud University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
80
|
Groen VH, Haustermans K, Pos FJ, Draulans C, Isebaert S, Monninkhof EM, Smeenk RJ, Kunze-Busch M, de Boer JCJ, van der Voort van Zijp J, Kerkmeijer LGW, van der Heide UA. Patterns of Failure Following External Beam Radiotherapy With or Without an Additional Focal Boost in the Randomized Controlled FLAME Trial for Localized Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2021; 82:252-257. [PMID: 34953603 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Focal dose escalation in external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) showed an increase in 5-yr biochemical disease-free survival in the Focal Lesion Ablative Microboost in Prostate Cancer (FLAME) trial. OBJECTIVE To analyze the effect of a focal boost to intraprostatic lesions on local failure-free survival (LFS) and regional + distant metastasis-free survival (rdMFS). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Patients with intermediate- or high-risk localized prostate cancer were included in FLAME, a phase 3, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. INTERVENTION Standard treatment of 77 Gy to the entire prostate in 35 fractions was compared to an additional boost to the macroscopic tumor of up to 95 Gy during EBRT. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS LFS and rdMFS, measured via any type of imaging, were compared between the treatment arms using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Dose-response curves were created for local failure (LF) and regional + distant metastatic failure (rdMF) using logistic regression. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 571 patients were included in the FLAME trial. Over median follow-up of 72 mo (interquartile range 58-86), focal boosting decreased LF (hazard ratio [HR] 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14-0.78) and rdMF (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35-0.93). Dose-response curves showed that a greater dose to the tumor resulted in lower LF and rdMF rates. CONCLUSIONS A clear dose-response relation for LF and rdMF was observed, suggesting that adequate focal dose escalation to intraprostatic lesions prevents undertreatment of the primary tumor, resulting in an improvement rdMF. PATIENT SUMMARY Radiotherapy is a treatment option for high-risk prostate cancer. The FLAME trial has shown that a high dose specifically targeted at the tumor within the prostate will result in better disease outcome, with less likelihood of regional and distant disease spread. The FLAME trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01168479.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veerle H Groen
- Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Floris J Pos
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cédric Draulans
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sofie Isebaert
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Evelyn M Monninkhof
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J Smeenk
- Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Martina Kunze-Busch
- Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Linda G W Kerkmeijer
- Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
81
|
Zamboglou C, Spohn SKB, Adebahr S, Huber M, Kirste S, Sprave T, Gratzke C, Chen RC, Carl EG, Weber WA, Mix M, Benndorf M, Wiegel T, Baltas D, Jenkner C, Grosu AL. PSMA-PET/MRI-Based Focal Dose Escalation in Patients with Primary Prostate Cancer Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (HypoFocal-SBRT): Study Protocol of a Randomized, Multicentric Phase III Trial. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13225795. [PMID: 34830950 PMCID: PMC8616152 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Technical advances in radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning and delivery have substantially changed RT concepts for primary prostate cancer (PCa) by (i) enabling a reduction of treatment time, and by (ii) enabling safe delivery of high RT doses. Several studies proposed a dose-response relationship for patients with primary PCa and especially in patients with high-risk features, as dose escalation leads to improved tumor control. In parallel to the improvements in RT techniques, diagnostic imaging techniques like multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and positron-emission tomography targeting prostate-specific-membrane antigen (PSMA-PET) evolved and enable an accurate depiction of the intraprostatic tumor mass for the first time. The HypoFocal-SBRT study combines ultra-hypofractionated RT/stereotactic body RT, with focal RT dose escalation on intraprostatic tumor sides by applying state of the art diagnostic imaging and most modern RT concepts. This novel strategy will be compared with moderate hypofractionated RT (MHRT), one option for the curative primary treatment of PCa, which has been proven by several prospective trials and is recommended and carried out worldwide. We suspect an increase in relapse-free survival (RFS), and we will assess quality of life in order to detect potential changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (C.Z.); (S.A.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (A.L.G.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
- Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany
- German Oncology Center, European University of Cyprus, Limassol 4108, Cyprus
| | - Simon K. B. Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (C.Z.); (S.A.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (A.L.G.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
- Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Sonja Adebahr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (C.Z.); (S.A.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (A.L.G.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maria Huber
- Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany; (M.H.); (C.J.)
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (C.Z.); (S.A.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (A.L.G.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tanja Sprave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (C.Z.); (S.A.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (A.L.G.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christian Gratzke
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany;
| | - Ronald C. Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA;
| | | | - Wolfgang A. Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany;
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany;
| | - Matthias Benndorf
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany;
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany;
| | - Dimos Baltas
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany;
| | - Carolin Jenkner
- Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany; (M.H.); (C.J.)
| | - Anca L. Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (C.Z.); (S.A.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (A.L.G.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Hannan R, Salamekh S, Desai NB, Garant A, Folkert MR, Costa DN, Mannala S, Ahn C, Mohamad O, Laine A, Kim DWN, Dickinson T, Raj GV, Shah RB, Wang J, Jia X, Choy H, Roehrborn CG, Lotan Y, Timmerman RD. SAbR for High-Risk Prostate Cancer-A Prospective Multilevel MRI-Based Dose Escalation Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 113:290-301. [PMID: 34774676 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.10.137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiation dose intensification improves outcome in men with high-risk prostate cancer (HR-PCa). A prospective trial was conducted to determine safety, feasibility, and maximal tolerated dose of multilevel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based 5-fraction SAbR in patients with HR-PCa. METHODS AND MATERIALS This phase I clinical trial enrolled patients with HR-PCa with grade group ≥4, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥20 ng/mL, or radiographic ≥T3, and well-defined prostatic lesions on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) into 4 dose-escalation cohorts. The initial cohort received 47.5 Gy to the prostate, 50 Gy to mpMRI-defined intraprostatic lesion(s), and 22.5 Gy to pelvic lymph nodes in 5 fractions. Radiation doses were escalated for pelvic nodes to 25 Gy and mpMRI lesion(s) to 52.5 Gy and then 55 Gy. Escalation was performed sequentially according to rule-based trial design with 7 to 15 patients per cohort and a 90-day observation period. All men received peri-rectal hydrogel spacer, intraprostatic fiducial placement, and 2 years of androgen deprivation. The primary endpoint was maximal tolerated dose according to a 90-day acute dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate <33%. DLT was defined as National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events ≥grade 3 treatment-related toxicity. Secondary outcomes included acute and delayed gastrointestinal (GI)/genitourinary (GU) toxicity graded with Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events. RESULTS Fifty-five of the 62 enrolled patients were included in the analysis. Dose was escalated through all 4 cohorts without observing any DLTs. Median overall follow-up was 18 months, with a median follow-up of 42, 24, 12, and 7.5 months for cohorts 1 to 4 respectively. Acute and late grade 2 GU toxicities were 25% and 20%, while GI were 13% and 7%, respectively. Late grade 3 GU and GI toxicities were 2% and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS SAbR dose for HR-PCa was safely escalated with multilevel dose painting of 47.5 Gy to prostate, 55 Gy to mpMRI-defined intraprostatic lesions, and 25 Gy to pelvic nodal region in 5 fractions. Longer and ongoing follow-up will be required to assess late toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Chul Ahn
- Population and Data Science, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas at Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Osama Mohamad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Aaron Laine
- The Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Fort Worth, Texas
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Xun Jia
- Departments of Radiation Oncology
| | - Hak Choy
- Departments of Radiation Oncology
| | | | | | - Robert D Timmerman
- Departments of Radiation Oncology; Neurosurgery, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas at Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Ferjančič P, van der Heide UA, Ménard C, Jeraj R. Probabilistic target definition and planning in patients with prostate cancer. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 34644696 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac2f8a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Intro.Current radiation therapy (RT) planning guidelines handle uncertainties in RT using geometric margins. This approach is simple to use but oversimplifies complex underlying processes and is cumbersome for non-homogeneous dose prescriptions. In this work, we characterize the performance of a novel probabilistic target definition and planning (PTP) approach, which uses voxel-level tumor likelihood information in treatment plan optimization.Methods.We expanded a treatment planning system with probabilistic therapy planning functionality that utilizes non-binary target maps (TM) as voxel-level input to dose plan optimization. Different dose plans were calculated and compared for twelve prostate cancer patients with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging derived TMs. Dose plans were created using both classical and PTP approaches for uniform and integrated dose boost prescriptions. Dose performance between the different approaches was compared using dose benchmarks on target and organ-at-risk (OAR) volumes.Results.Over all dose metrics, PTP was shown to be comparable to classical planning. For plans of uniform dose prescription, the PTP approach created plans within 1 Gy of the classical planning approach across all dose metrics, with no significant differences (p > 0.2). For plans with the integrated dose boost, PTP plans exhibited higher dose heterogeneity, but still showed target doses comparable to the classical approach, without increasing doses to OAR.Conclusion.In this work we introduce direct incorporation of probabilistic target definition into treatment planning. This treatment planning approach can produce both uniform dose plans and plans with integrated dose boosts that are comparable to ones created using classical dose planning. PTP is a flexible way to optimize external beam radiotherapy, as it is not limited by the use of margins. PTP can produce dose plans equivalent to classical planning, while also allows for greater versatility in dose prescription and direct incorporation of patient target definition uncertainty into treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Ferjančič
- Department of Medical Physics, Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, 1111 Highland Ave, Room 7033, Madison, WI 53705, United States of America
| | | | - Cynthia Ménard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Canada
| | - Robert Jeraj
- Department of Medical Physics, Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, 1111 Highland Ave, Room 7033, Madison, WI 53705, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Her EJ, Haworth A, Sun Y, Williams S, Reynolds HM, Kennedy A, Ebert MA. Biologically Targeted Radiation Therapy: Incorporating Patient-Specific Hypoxia Data Derived from Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4897. [PMID: 34638382 PMCID: PMC8507789 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Hypoxia has been linked to radioresistance. Strategies to safely dose escalate dominant intraprostatic lesions have shown promising results, but further dose escalation to overcome the effects of hypoxia require a novel approach to constrain the dose in normal tissue.to safe levels. In this study, we demonstrate a biologically targeted radiotherapy (BiRT) approach that can utilise multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to target hypoxia for favourable treatment outcomes. METHODS mpMRI-derived tumour biology maps, developed via a radiogenomics study, were used to generate individualised, hypoxia-targeting prostate IMRT plans using an ultra- hypofractionation schedule. The spatial distribution of mpMRI textural features associated with hypoxia-related genetic profiles was used as a surrogate of tumour hypoxia. The effectiveness of the proposed approach was assessed by quantifying the potential benefit of a general focal boost approach on tumour control probability, and also by comparing the dose to organs at risk (OARs) with hypoxia-guided focal dose escalation (DE) plans generated for five patients. RESULTS Applying an appropriately guided focal boost can greatly mitigate the impact of hypoxia. Statistically significant reductions in rectal and bladder dose were observed for hypoxia-targeting, biologically optimised plans compared to isoeffective focal DE plans. CONCLUSION Results of this study suggest the use of mpMRI for voxel-level targeting of hypoxia, along with biological optimisation, can provide a mechanism for guiding focal DE that is considerably more efficient than application of a general, dose-based optimisation, focal boost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily J. Her
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia; (E.J.H.); (M.A.E.)
| | - Annette Haworth
- Institute of Medical Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia;
| | - Yu Sun
- Institute of Medical Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia;
| | - Scott Williams
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Hayley M. Reynolds
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand;
| | - Angel Kennedy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA 6009, Australia;
| | - Martin A. Ebert
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia; (E.J.H.); (M.A.E.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA 6009, Australia;
- 5D Clinics, Perth, WA 6010, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
85
|
Kerkmeijer LGW, Pos FJ, Haustermans K, van der Heide UA. Reply to I. R. Vogelius et al. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:3086-3087. [PMID: 34086505 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.00789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Linda G W Kerkmeijer
- Linda G. W. Kerkmeijer, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands, Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Floris J. Pos, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Karin Haustermans, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; and Uulke A. van der Heide, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Floris J Pos
- Linda G. W. Kerkmeijer, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands, Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Floris J. Pos, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Karin Haustermans, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; and Uulke A. van der Heide, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Linda G. W. Kerkmeijer, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands, Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Floris J. Pos, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Karin Haustermans, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; and Uulke A. van der Heide, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Linda G. W. Kerkmeijer, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands, Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Floris J. Pos, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Karin Haustermans, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; and Uulke A. van der Heide, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
86
|
Cuccia F, Alongi F, Belka C, Boldrini L, Hörner-Rieber J, McNair H, Rigo M, Schoenmakers M, Niyazi M, Slagter J, Votta C, Corradini S. Patient positioning and immobilization procedures for hybrid MR-Linac systems. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:183. [PMID: 34544481 PMCID: PMC8454038 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01910-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Hybrid magnetic resonance (MR)-guided linear accelerators represent a new horizon in the field of radiation oncology. By harnessing the favorable combination of on-board MR-imaging with the possibility to daily recalculate the treatment plan based on real-time anatomy, the accuracy in target and organs-at-risk identification is expected to be improved, with the aim to provide the best tailored treatment. To date, two main MR-linac hybrid machines are available, Elekta Unity and Viewray MRIdian. Of note, compared to conventional linacs, these devices raise practical issues due to the positioning phase for the need to include the coil in the immobilization procedure and in order to perform the best reproducible positioning, also in light of the potentially longer treatment time. Given the relative novelty of this technology, there are few literature data regarding the procedures and the workflows for patient positioning and immobilization for MR-guided daily adaptive radiotherapy. In the present narrative review, we resume the currently available literature and provide an overview of the positioning and setup procedures for all the anatomical districts for hybrid MR-linac systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cuccia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar Di Valpolicella, VR, Italy.
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar Di Valpolicella, VR, Italy
- University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Luca Boldrini
- Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Hematology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Helen McNair
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, and Institute of Cancer Research Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - Michele Rigo
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar Di Valpolicella, VR, Italy
| | - Maartje Schoenmakers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Judith Slagter
- Department of Radiation Oncology - Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Claudio Votta
- Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Hematology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
Bhangoo RS, Petersen MM, Bulman GF, Vargas CE, Thorpe CS, Shen J, Wong WW, Rwigema JCM, Daniels TB, Keole SR, Schild SE, Rong Y, DeWees TA. Biologically Effective Dose and Rectal Bleeding in Definitive Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:37-46. [PMID: 35530190 PMCID: PMC9009455 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-21-00007.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose and Objectives With increasing use of hypofractionation and extreme hypofractionation for prostate cancer, rectal dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters that apply across dose fractionations may be helpful for treatment planning in clinical practice. We present an exploratory analysis of biologically effective rectal dose (BED) and equivalent rectal dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) for rectal bleeding in patients treated with proton therapy across dose fractionations. Materials and Methods From 2016 to 2018, 243 patients with prostate cancer were treated with definitive proton therapy. Rectal DVH parameters were obtained from treatment plans, and rectal bleeding events were recorded. The BED and EQD2 transformations were applied to each rectal DVH parameter. Univariate analysis using logistic regression was used to determine DVH parameters that were significant predictors of grade ≥ 2 rectal bleeding. Youden index was used to determine optimum cutoffs for clinically meaningful DVH constraints. Stepwise model-selection criteria were then applied to fit a “best” multivariate logistic model for predicting Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥ 2 rectal bleeding. Results Conventional fractionation, hypofractionation, and extreme hypofractionation were prescribed to 117 (48%), 84 (34%), and 42 (17.3%) patients, respectively. With a median follow-up of 20 (2.5-40) months, 10 (4.1%) patients experienced rectal bleeding. On univariate analysis, multiple rectal DVH parameters were significantly associated with rectal bleeding across BED, EQD2, and nominal doses. The BED volume receiving 55 Gy > 13.91% was found to be statistically and clinically significant. The BED volume receiving 55 Gy remained statistically significant for an association with rectal bleeding in the multivariate model (odds ratio, 9.81; 95% confidence interval, 2.4-40.5; P = .002). Conclusion In patients undergoing definitive proton therapy for prostate cancer, dose to the rectum and volume of the rectum receiving the dose were significantly associated with rectal bleeding across conventional fractionation, hypofractionation, and extreme hypofractionation when using BED and EQD2 transformations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Molly M. Petersen
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jason Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - William W. Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | | | - Sameer R. Keole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Yi Rong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Todd A. DeWees
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Richardson M, Skehan K, Wilton L, Sams J, Samuels J, Goodwin J, Greer P, Sridharan S, Martin J. Visualising the urethra for prostate radiotherapy planning. J Med Radiat Sci 2021; 68:282-288. [PMID: 34028976 PMCID: PMC8424315 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The prostatic urethra is an organ at risk for prostate radiotherapy with genitourinary toxicities a common side effect. Many external beam radiation therapy protocols call for urethral sparing, and with modulated radiotherapy techniques, the radiation dose distribution can be controlled so that maximum doses do not fall within the prostatic urethral volume. Whilst traditional diagnostic MRI sequences provide excellent delineation of the prostate, uncertainty often remains as to the true path of the urethra within the gland. This study aims to assess if a high-resolution isotropic 3D T2 MRI series can reduce inter-observer variability in urethral delineation for radiotherapy planning. METHODS Five independent observers contoured the prostatic urethra for ten patients on three data sets; a 2 mm axial CT, a diagnostic 3 mm axial T2 TSE MRI and a 0.9 mm isotropic 3D T2 SPACE MRI. The observers were blinded from each other's contours. A Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) score was calculated using the intersection and union of the five observer contours vs an expert reference contour for each data set. RESULTS The mean DSC of the observer vs reference contours was 0.47 for CT, 0.62 for T2 TSE and 0.78 for T2 SPACE (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The introduction of a 0.9 mm isotropic 3D T2 SPACE MRI for treatment planning provides improved urethral visualisation and can lead to a significant reduction in inter-observer variation in prostatic urethral contouring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Richardson
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Kate Skehan
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Lee Wilton
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Joshua Sams
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Justin Samuels
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Jonathan Goodwin
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
- School of Mathematical and Physical ScienceUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Peter Greer
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
- School of Mathematical and Physical ScienceUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Swetha Sridharan
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Jarad Martin
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
- School of Medicine and Public HealthUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Marvaso G, Corrao G, Zaffaroni M, Pepa M, Augugliaro M, Volpe S, Musi G, Luzzago S, Mistretta FA, Verri E, Cossu Rocca M, Ferro M, Petralia G, Nolè F, De Cobelli O, Orecchia R, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Therapeutic Sequences in the Treatment of High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Paving the Way Towards Multimodal Tailored Approaches. Front Oncol 2021; 11:732766. [PMID: 34422672 PMCID: PMC8371196 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.732766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Various definitions are currently in use to describe high-risk prostate cancer. This variety in definitions is important for patient counseling, since predicted outcomes depend on which classification is applied to identify patient’s prostate cancer risk category. Historically, strategies for the treatment of localized high-risk prostate cancer comprise local approaches such as surgery and radiotherapy, as well as systemic approaches such as hormonal therapy. Nevertheless, since high-risk prostate cancer patients remain the group with higher-risk of treatment failure and mortality rates, nowadays, novel treatment strategies, comprising hypofractionated-radiotherapy, second-generation antiandrogens, and hadrontherapy, are being explored in order to improve their long-term oncological outcomes. This narrative review aims to report the current management of high-risk prostate cancer and to explore the future perspectives in this clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Corrao
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Pepa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Augugliaro
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Volpe
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Luzzago
- Department of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Elena Verri
- Department of Medical Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Cossu Rocca
- Department of Medical Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Franco Nolè
- Medical Oncology Division of Urogenital & Head & Neck Tumors, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
90
|
Draulans C, Pos F, Smeenk RJ, Kerkmeijer L, Vogel WV, Nagarajah J, Janssen M, Mai C, Heijmink S, van der Leest M, Zámecnik P, Oyen R, Isebaert S, Maes F, Joniau S, Kunze-Busch M, De Roover R, Defraene G, van der Heide UA, Goffin K, Haustermans K. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET, 18F-PSMA-1007 PET, and MRI for Gross Tumor Volume Delineation in Primary Prostate Cancer: Intermodality and Intertracer Variability. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 11:202-211. [PMID: 33941347 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2018] [Revised: 10/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the intermodality and intertracer variability of gallium-68 (68Ga)- or fluorine-18 (18F)-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) and biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI)-based gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation for focal boosting in primary prostate cancer. METHODS Nineteen prospectively enrolled patients with prostate cancer underwent a PSMA PET/MRI scan, divided into a 1:1 ratio between 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-PSMA-1007, before radical prostatectomy (IWT140193). Four delineation teams performed manual contouring of the GTV based on bpMRI and PSMA PET imaging, separately. Index lesion coverage (overlap%) and interobserver variability were assessed. Furthermore, the distribution of the voxelwise normalized standardized uptake values (SUV%) was determined for the majority-voted (>50%) GTV (GTVmajority) and whole prostate gland to investigate intertracer variability. The median patientwise SUV% contrast ratio (SUV%-CR, calculated as median GTVmajority SUV% / median prostate gland without GTVmajority SUV%) was calculated according to the tracer used. RESULTS A significant difference in overlap% favoring PSMA PET compared with bpMRI was found in the 18F subgroup (median, 63.0% vs 53.1%; P = .004) but was not present in the 68Ga subgroup (32.5% vs 50.6%; P = .100). Regarding interobserver variability, measured Sørensen-Dice coefficients (0.58 vs 0.72) and calculated mean distances to agreement (2.44 mm vs 1.22 mm) were statistically significantly lower and higher, respectively, for the 18F cohort compared with the 68Ga cohort. For the bpMRI-based delineations, the median Sørensen-Dice coefficient and mean distance to agreement were 0.63 and 1.76 mm, respectively. Median patientwise SUV%-CRs of 1.8 (interquartile range [IQR], 1.6-2.7) for 18F-PSMA and 3.3 (IQR, 2.7-5.9) for 68Ga-PSMA PET images were found. CONCLUSIONS Both MRI and PSMA PET provided consistent intraprostatic GTV lesion detection. However, the PSMA tracer seems to have a major influence on the contour characteristics, owing to an apparent difference in SUV% distribution in the prostate gland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cédric Draulans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Floris Pos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Kerkmeijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter V Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - James Nagarajah
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel Janssen
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Cindy Mai
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stijn Heijmink
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marloes van der Leest
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Patrik Zámecnik
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Raymond Oyen
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sofie Isebaert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Frederik Maes
- Department of Electrical Engineering, ESAT/PSI, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Imaging Research Centre, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Martina Kunze-Busch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Robin De Roover
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gilles Defraene
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karolien Goffin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
91
|
Eckl M, Sarria GR, Springer S, Willam M, Ruder AM, Steil V, Ehmann M, Wenz F, Fleckenstein J. Dosimetric benefits of daily treatment plan adaptation for prostate cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:145. [PMID: 34348765 PMCID: PMC8335467 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01872-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hypofractionation is increasingly being applied in radiotherapy for prostate cancer, requiring higher accuracy of daily treatment deliveries than in conventional image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). Different adaptive radiotherapy (ART) strategies were evaluated with regard to dosimetric benefits. METHODS Treatments plans for 32 patients were retrospectively generated and analyzed according to the PACE-C trial treatment scheme (40 Gy in 5 fractions). Using a previously trained cycle-generative adversarial network algorithm, synthetic CT (sCT) were generated out of five daily cone-beam CT. Dose calculation on sCT was performed for four different adaptation approaches: IGRT without adaptation, adaptation via segment aperture morphing (SAM) and segment weight optimization (ART1) or additional shape optimization (ART2) as well as a full re-optimization (ART3). Dose distributions were evaluated regarding dose-volume parameters and a penalty score. RESULTS Compared to the IGRT approach, the ART1, ART2 and ART3 approaches substantially reduced the V37Gy(bladder) and V36Gy(rectum) from a mean of 7.4cm3 and 2.0cm3 to (5.9cm3, 6.1cm3, 5.2cm3) as well as to (1.4cm3, 1.4cm3, 1.0cm3), respectively. Plan adaptation required on average 2.6 min for the ART1 approach and yielded doses to the rectum being insignificantly different from the ART2 approach. Based on an accumulation over the total patient collective, a penalty score revealed dosimetric violations reduced by 79.2%, 75.7% and 93.2% through adaptation. CONCLUSION Treatment plan adaptation was demonstrated to adequately restore relevant dose criteria on a daily basis. While for SAM adaptation approaches dosimetric benefits were realized through ensuring sufficient target coverage, a full re-optimization mainly improved OAR sparing which helps to guide the decision of when to apply which adaptation strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Eckl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
| | - Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Sandra Springer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Marvin Willam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Arne M Ruder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Volker Steil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Michael Ehmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Frederik Wenz
- University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Jens Fleckenstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
92
|
De Roover R, Crijns W, Poels K, Dewit B, Draulans C, Haustermans K, Depuydt T. Automated treatment planning of prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy with focal boosting on a fast-rotating O-ring linac: Plan quality comparison with C-arm linacs. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:59-72. [PMID: 34318996 PMCID: PMC8425873 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The integration of auto‐segmentation and automated treatment planning methods on a fast‐rotating O‐ring linac may improve the time efficiency of online adaptive radiotherapy workflows. This study investigates whether automated treatment planning of prostate SBRT with focal boosting on the O‐ring linac could generate plans that are of similar quality as those obtained through manual planning on clinical C‐arm linacs. Methods For 20 men with prostate cancer, reference treatment plans were generated on a TrueBeam STx C‐arm linac with HD120 MLC and a TrueBeam C‐arm linac with Millennium 120 MLC using 6 MV flattened dual arc VMAT. Manual planning on the Halcyon fast‐rotating O‐ring linac was performed using 6 MV FFF dual arc VMAT (HA2‐DL10) and triple arc VMAT (HA3‐DL10) to investigate the performance of the dual‐layer MLC system. Automated planning was performed for triple arc VMAT on the Halcyon linac (ET3‐DL10) using the automated planning algorithms of Ethos Treatment Planning. The prescribed dose was 35 Gy to the prostate and 30 Gy to the seminal vesicles in five fractions. The iso‐toxic focal boost to the intraprostatic tumor nodule(s) was aimed to receive up to 50 Gy. Plan deliverability was verified using portal image dosimetry measurements. Results Compared to the C‐arm linacs, ET3‐DL10 shows increased seminal vesicles PTV coverage (D99%) and reduced high‐dose spillage to the bladder (V37Gy) and urethra (D0.035cc) but this came at the cost of increased high‐dose spillage to the rectum (V38Gy) and a higher intermediate dose spillage (D2cm). No statistically significant differences were found when benchmarking HA2‐DL10 and HA3‐DL10 with the C‐arm linacs. All plans passed the patient‐specific QA tolerance limit. Conclusions Automated planning of prostate SBRT with focal boosting on the fast‐rotating O‐ring linac is feasible and achieves similar plan quality as those obtained on clinical C‐arm linacs using manual planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin De Roover
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Wouter Crijns
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kenneth Poels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bertrand Dewit
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Cédric Draulans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tom Depuydt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
93
|
Graff P, Crehange G. [Ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: Results, limits and prospects]. Cancer Radiother 2021; 25:684-691. [PMID: 34274223 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.06.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Still an emerging approach a few years ago, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has ranked as a valid option for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Inherent properties of prostatic adenocarcinoma (low α/β) make it the perfect candidate. We propose a critical review of the literature trying to put results into perspective to identify their strengths, limits and axes of development. Technically sophisticated, the stereotactic irradiation of the prostate is well tolerated. Despite the fact that median follow-up of published data is still limited, ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy seems very efficient for the treatment of low and intermediate risk prostate cancers. Data seem satisfying for high-risk cancers as well. New developments are being studied with a main interest in treatment intensification for unfavorable intermediate risk and high-risk cancers. Advantage is taken of the sharp dose gradient of stereotactic radiotherapy to offer safe reirradiation to patients with local recurrence in a previously irradiated area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Graff
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, Institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France.
| | - G Crehange
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, Institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
94
|
Spohn SKB, Sachpazidis I, Wiehle R, Thomann B, Sigle A, Bronsert P, Ruf J, Benndorf M, Nicolay NH, Sprave T, Grosu AL, Baltas D, Zamboglou C. Influence of Urethra Sparing on Tumor Control Probability and Normal Tissue Complication Probability in Focal Dose Escalated Hypofractionated Radiotherapy: A Planning Study Based on Histopathology Reference. Front Oncol 2021; 11:652678. [PMID: 34055621 PMCID: PMC8160377 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.652678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Multiparametric magnetic resonance tomography (mpMRI) and prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) are used to guide focal radiotherapy (RT) dose escalation concepts. Besides improvements of treatment effectiveness, maintenance of a good quality of life is essential. Therefore, this planning study investigates whether urethral sparing in moderately hypofractionated RT with focal RT dose escalation influences tumour control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). Patients and Methods 10 patients with primary prostate cancer (PCa), who underwent 68Ga PSMA-PET/CT and mpMRI followed by radical prostatectomy were enrolled. Intraprostatic tumour volumes (gross tumor volume, GTV) based on both imaging techniques (GTV-MRI and -PET) were contoured manually using validated contouring techniques and GTV-Union was created by summing both. For each patient three IMRT plans were generated with 60 Gy to the whole prostate and a simultaneous integrated boost up to 70 Gy to GTV-Union in 20 fractions by (Plan 1) not respecting and (Plan 2) respecting dose constraints for urethra as well as (Plan 3) respecting dose constraints for planning organ at risk volume for urethra (PRV = urethra + 2mm expansion). NTCP for urethra was calculated applying a Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model. TCP-Histo was calculated based on PCa distribution in co-registered histology (GTV-Histo). Complication free tumour control probability (P+) was calculated. Furthermore, the intrafractional movement was considered. Results Median overlap of GTV-Union and PRV-Urethra was 1.6% (IQR 0-7%). Median minimum distance of GTV-Histo to urethra was 3.6 mm (IQR 2 - 7 mm) and of GTV-Union to urethra was 1.8 mm (IQR 0.0 - 5.0 mm). The respective prescription doses and dose constraints were reached in all plans. Urethra-sparing in Plans 2 and 3 reached significantly lower NTCP-Urethra (p = 0.002) without significantly affecting TCP-GTV-Histo (p = p > 0.28), NTCP-Bladder (p > 0.85) or NTCP-Rectum (p = 0.85), resulting in better P+ (p = 0.006). Simulation of intrafractional movement yielded even higher P+ values for Plans 2 and 3 compared to Plan 1. Conclusion Urethral sparing may increase the therapeutic ratio and should be implemented in focal RT dose escalation concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon K B Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ilias Sachpazidis
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Rolf Wiehle
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Thomann
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - August Sigle
- Department of Urology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Peter Bronsert
- Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Juri Ruf
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Benndorf
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tanja Sprave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dimos Baltas
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
Greco C, Stroom J, Vieira S, Mateus D, Cardoso MJ, Soares A, Pares O, Pimentel N, Louro V, Nunes B, Kociolek J, Fuks Z. Reproducibility and accuracy of a target motion mitigation technique for dose-escalated prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2021; 160:240-249. [PMID: 33992627 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To quantitate the accuracy, reproducibility and prostate motion mitigation efficacy rendered by a target immobilization method used in an intermediate-risk prostate cancer dose-escalated 5×9Gy SBRT study. MATERIAL AND METHODS An air-inflated (150 cm3) endorectal balloon and Foley catheter with three electromagnetic beacon transponders (EBT) were used to mitigate and track intra-fractional target motion. A 2 mm margin was used for PTV expansion, reduced to 0 mm at the interface with critical OARs. EBT-detected ≥ 2 mm/5 s motions mandated treatment interruption and target realignment prior to completion of planned dose delivery. Geometrical uncertainties were measured with an in-house ESAPI script. RESULTS Quantitative data were obtained in 886 sessions from 189 patients. Mean PTV dose was 45.8 ± 0.4 Gy (D95 = 40.5 ± 0.4 Gy). A mean of 3.7 ± 1.7 CBCTs were acquired to reach reference position. Mean treatment time was 19.5 ± 12 min, 14.1 ± 11 and 5.4 ± 5.9 min for preparation and treatment delivery, respectively. Target motion of 0, 1-2 and >2 mm/10 min were observed in 59%, 30% and 11% of sessions, respectively. Temporary beam-on hold occurred in 7.4% of sessions, while in 6% a new reference CBCT was required to correct deviations. Hence, all sessions were completed with application of the planned dose. Treatment preparation time > 15 min was significantly associated with the need of a second reference CBCT. Overall systematic and random geometrical errors were in the order of 1 mm. CONCLUSION The prostate immobilization technique explored here affords excellent accuracy and reproducibility, enabling normal tissue dose sculpting with tight PTV margins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Greco
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Joep Stroom
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Sandra Vieira
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Dalila Mateus
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Ana Soares
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Oriol Pares
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Nuno Pimentel
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Vasco Louro
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Beatriz Nunes
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Zvi Fuks
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
96
|
Holmes JA, Zamboglou C, Chen RC. The Impact of Imaging Advances on Prostate Cancer Management: Many Unanswered Questions Remain. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 11:212-214. [PMID: 33941348 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan A Holmes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ronald C Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| |
Collapse
|
97
|
MR-Guided Hypofractionated Radiotherapy: Current Emerging Data and Promising Perspectives for Localized Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13081791. [PMID: 33918650 PMCID: PMC8070332 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13081791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The biological features of prostate cancer as a tumor with a low alpha beta ratio have led clinicians to consider the use of higher doses per fraction, thus gaining an advantage both in terms of clinical outcomes and of logistic opportunities. To date, moderate hypofractionated schedules are supported by several international clinical guidelines. The subsequent step was represented by the adoption of extreme hypofractionated schedules, for which recent literature data report non-inferiority results for the five-fractions regimens. In this scenario, the recent introduction of MR-guided daily adaptive radiotherapy is a potential paradigm shift, given the ability to increase the resolution of the pelvis anatomy and to take into account of the daily variations in shape and size of the nearby healthy structures. Abstract In this review we summarize the currently available evidence about the role of hybrid machines for MR-guided radiotherapy for prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy. Given the novelty of this technology, to date few data are accessible, but they all report very promising results in terms of tolerability and preliminary clinical outcomes. Most of the studies highlight the favorable impact of on-board magnetic resonance imaging as a means to improve target and organs at risk identification with a consequent advantage in terms of dosimetric results, which is expected to relate to a more favorable toxicity pattern. Still, the longer treatment time per session may potentially affect the patient’s compliance to the treatment, although first quality of life assessment studies have reported substantial tolerability and no major impact on quality of life. Finally, in this review we hypothesize some future scenarios of further investigation, based on the possibility to explore the superior anatomy visualization and the role of daily adapted treatments provided by hybrid MR-Linacs.
Collapse
|
98
|
Speight R, Tyyger M, Schmidt MA, Liney G, Johnstone R, Eccles CL, Dubec M, George B, Henry A, Herbert T, Nyholm T, Mahmood F, Korhonen J, Sims R, Tijssen RHN, Vanhoutte F, Busoni S, Lacornerie T, McCallum H. IPEM Topical Report: an international IPEM survey of MRI use for external beam radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66:075007. [PMID: 33631729 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abe9f7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Introduction/Background. Despite growing interest in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), integration in external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) treatment planning uptake varies globally. In order to understand the current international landscape of MRI in EBRT a survey has been performed in 11 countries. This work reports on differences and common themes identified.Methods. A multi-disciplinary Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine working party modified a survey previously used in the UK to understand current practice using MRI for EBRT treatment planning, investigate how MRI is currently used and managed as well as identify knowledge gaps. It was distributed electronically within 11 countries: Australia, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Italy, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, the UK and the USA.Results. The survey response rate within the USA was <1% and hence these results omitted from the analysis. In the other 10 countries the survey had a median response rate of 77% per country. Direct MRI access, defined as either having a dedicated MRI scanner for radiotherapy (RT) or access to a radiology MRI scanner, varied between countries. France, Italy and the UK reported the lowest direct MRI access rates and all other countries reported direct access in ≥82% of centres. Whilst ≥83% of centres in Denmark and Sweden reported having dedicated MRI scanners for EBRT, all other countries reported ≤29%. Anatomical sites receiving MRI for EBRT varied between countries with brain, prostate, head and neck being most common. Commissioning and QA of image registration and MRI scanners varied greatly, as did MRI sequences performed, staffing models and training given to different staff groups. The lack of financial reimbursement for MR was a consistent barrier for MRI implementation for RT for all countries and MR access was a reported important barrier for all countries except Sweden and Denmark.Conclusion. No country has a comprehensive approach for MR in EBRT adoption and financial barriers are present worldwide. Variations between countries in practice, equipment, staffing models, training, QA and MRI sequences have been identified, and are likely to be due to differences in funding as well as a lack of consensus or guidelines in the literature. Access to dedicated MR for EBRT is limited in all but Sweden and Denmark, but in all countries there are financial challenges with ongoing per patient costs. Despite these challenges, significant interest exists in increasing MR guided EBRT planning over the next 5 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Speight
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Marcus Tyyger
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Maria A Schmidt
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gary Liney
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research & Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, Sydney, NSW 2170, Australia
| | - Robert Johnstone
- Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cynthia L Eccles
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Dubec
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Ben George
- University of Oxford and GenesisCare, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Ann Henry
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Trina Herbert
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tufve Nyholm
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, Sweden
| | - Faisal Mahmood
- Odense University Hospital, Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense, Denmark and University of Southern Denmark, Department of Clinical Research, Denmark
| | - Juha Korhonen
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy, Kymenlaakso Central Hospital, Kotka, Finland
| | - Rick Sims
- Auckland Radiation Oncology, Epsom, Auckland, New Zealand and Icon Cancer Centres, Cairns, QLD, Australia
| | - Rob H N Tijssen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Simone Busoni
- Department of Health Physics, AOU Careggi (Firenze University Hospital), Firenze, Italy
| | | | - Hazel McCallum
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University and Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
99
|
Koerber SA, Beuthien-Baumann B. [Modern radiation therapy planning and image-guided radiotherapy using the example of prostate cancer]. Radiologe 2021; 61:28-35. [PMID: 33057736 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-020-00763-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE Optimizing radiotherapy demands precise delineation of the target structure, not only before but also during the course of radiotherapy. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS For many years, planning of external radiation treatment planning has been based on computer tomography data. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS With the advent of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional hybrid imaging are increasingly being integrated into radiation treatment planning. The development of the MR-linac can be seen as an innovation. PERFORMANCE The integration of MRI and hybrid imaging (positron emission tomography [PET]/CT, PET/MRI) in the treatment planning process enables more precise treatment planning due to the better morphological and functional information. The integration of MRI data on the MR-linac in daily position control enables adaptation of the irradiation plan to the current conditions. ACHIEVEMENTS Technical innovation such as the MR-linac as well as increasing use of hybrid imaging contribute to the objective of further individualization within (radio)oncology. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS Using the example of prostate cancer, the application of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands and hybrid imaging offers great potential for individualized strategic treatment decisions. The MR-linac appears to be particularly suitable for radiation therapy of prostate cancer. Special attention must be paid to the technical aspects of positioning and data acquisition for the purpose of radiation treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan A Koerber
- Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland. .,Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT), Heidelberg, Deutschland. .,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Deutschland.
| | | |
Collapse
|
100
|
Zelefsky MJ, Goldman DA, Hopkins M, Pinitpatcharalert A, McBride S, Gorovets D, Ehdaie B, Fine SW, Reuter VE, Tyagi N, Happersett L, Teyateeti A, Zhang Z, Kollmeier MA. Predictors for post-treatment biopsy outcomes after prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2021; 159:33-38. [PMID: 33587971 PMCID: PMC10187562 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate predictors associated with post-treatment biopsy outcomes after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS 257 patients treated with prostate SBRT to dose levels of 32.5 Gy to >40 Gy in 5-6 fractions underwent a post-treatment biopsy performed approximately two years after treatment to evaluate local control status. 73 had% intermediate-risk disease (n = 187) and the remaining 17% (n = 43) and 10% (n = 27) had low-risk and high-risk disease, respectively. RESULTS The incidence of positive, negative, and treatment-effect post-treatment biopsies were 15.6%, 57.6%, and 26.8%, respectively. The incidence of a positive biopsy according to dose was 37.5% (n = 9/24), 21.4% (n = 6/28), 19.4% (n = 6/31), and 10.9% (n = 19/174) for 32.5 Gy, 35 Gy, 37.5 Gy, and >40 Gy, respectively. In a multivariable model, patients treated with SBRT doses of <40 Gy and those with unfavorable-intermediate-risk or high-risk disease had higher likelihood of a positive post-treatment biopsy. A positive post-SBRT biopsy was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of subsequent PSA relapse at five years (Positive biopsy: 57%, 95% CI: 29-77% compared to negative biopsy: 7%, 95% CI: 3-14%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Based on two-year post-SBRT biopsies, excellent tumor control was achieved when dose levels of 40 Gy or higher were used. Standard SBRT dose levels of 35-37.5 Gy were associated with a higher likelihood of a positive post-treatment biopsy. Two-year positive post-treatment biopsies pre-dated the development of PSA failure in the majority of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Zelefsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
| | - Debra A Goldman
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Margaret Hopkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | | | - Sean McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Daniel Gorovets
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Behfar Ehdaie
- Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Samson W Fine
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Victor E Reuter
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Neelam Tyagi
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Laura Happersett
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Achiraya Teyateeti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
| | - Marisa A Kollmeier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|