The role of unconscious bias in surgical safety and outcomes

Discrimination and Health Inequities

In 1999, only 20 studies in the public health literature employed instruments to measure self-reported experiences of discrimination. Fifteen years later, the number of empirical investigations on discrimination and health easily exceeds 500, with these studies increasingly global in scope and focused on major types of discrimination variously involving race/ethnicity, indigenous status, immigrant status, gender, sexuality, disability, and age, separately and in combination. And yet, as I also document, even as the number of investigations has dramatically expanded, the scope remains narrow: studies remain focused primarily on interpersonal discrimination, and scant research investigates the health impacts of structural discrimination, a gap consonant with the limited epidemiologic research on political systems and population health. Accordingly, to help advance the state of the field, this updated review article: ( a) briefly reviews definitions of discrimination, illustrated with examples from the United States; ( b) discusses theoretical insights useful for conceptualizing how discrimination can become embodied and produce health inequities, including via distortion of scientific knowledge; ( c) concisely summarizes extant evidence—both robust and inconsistent—linking discrimination and health; and ( d) addresses several key methodological controversies and challenges, including the need for careful attention to domains, pathways, level, and spatiotemporal scale, in historical context.

The refinement of a cultural standardized patient examination for a general surgery residency program

BACKGROUND

Recent articles have documented the importance of cultural competency in surgery. Surgical residency programs have used the Objective Structured Clinical Examinations or cultural standardized patient examinations as a training tool. Past studies evaluating cultural competency have noted the importance of including an observational (control) arm, which would allow for a more objective assessment of a resident's competency in this area. The purpose of our article is to present the results of a follow-up study to a pilot cultural standardized patient examination for surgery residents.

METHODS

All first-year surgery residents were required to participate in the videotaped cultural SP examination as part of the general surgery residency curriculum. Two measures were used to assess resident performance. On the day of the examination, the Cross-Cultural Care Survey was administered. The examination was assessed by the residents themselves, faculty observers, and standardized patients, using a written checklist that was developed to evaluate residents on all 6 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competencies.

RESULTS

The current study includes 20 first-year surgery residents from academic years 2011 to 2012 and 2012 to 2013. The examination of pretest differences in groups found that students born outside of the United States had significantly higher scores on attitude (t = -2.68, df = 18, p = 0.02), but no statistically significant differences were found in skillfulness or knowledge or in the overall rating scale. For the overall rating scale, change from pretest to posttest was statistically significant (t = -2.25, df = 18, p = 0.04). Further analysis revealed that students who were born in the United States demonstrated a significant increase in ratings (t = -3.08, df = 10, p = 0.01) whereas students who were not born in the United States showed little change (t = -0.35, df = 7, p = 0.74). These results show that the means in attitude scales changed little for all groups, but both white and US-born students showed greater improvement on skillfulness and knowledge.

CONCLUSIONS

Training and measurement of cross-cultural health care skills remains challenging. However, studies like these provide a good starting point from which to build.

The impact of Hispanic ethnicity and race on post-surgical complications in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Surgery for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is common and represents a large portion of the cost of IBD treatment. There are multiple risk factors for post-operative complications after IBD surgery, but the role of ethnicity remains unclear. The aim of our study was to compare the rate of post-operative complications in Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients with equal access to health care.

METHODS

We designed a case-control study including patients enrolled in a health plan available to uninsured patients at Jackson Memorial Hospital (Miami, FL, USA) who had access to health care for at least 24 consecutive months prior to surgery. Sixty-seven Hispanic patients (cases) and 75 non-Hispanic patients (controls) met criteria and were compared with respect to demographics, type of surgery, disease phenotype, and laboratory markers. Primary outcome was the development of a medical or surgical complication.

RESULTS

A slight numerical increase in post-operative complications was seen in Hispanic patients; this did not reach statistical significance [1.06 (95 % CI 0.48-2.36; p = 0.88)]. Factors independently associated with post-operative complications included diagnosis of ulcerative colitis [OR 5.4 (95 % CI 1.67-20.58; p = 0.004)], pre-operative albumin levels <3 mg/dL [OR: 8.2 (95 % CI 2.3-35.5; p < 0.001)], smoking [OR 15.7 (95 % CI 4.2-72.35; p < 0.001)], and use of ≥20 mg of prednisone [OR 6.7 (95 % CI 2.15-24.62; p < 0.001)].

CONCLUSIONS

In a group of patients with equal access to medical care and follow-up, Hispanics and non-Hispanics with IBD that underwent surgery had no significant differences in types of IBD surgeries or post-surgical outcomes.

Reported racial discrimination, trust in physicians, and medication adherence among inner-city African Americans with hypertension

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine if reported racial discrimination was associated with medication nonadherence among African Americans with hypertension and if distrust of physicians was a contributing factor.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the TRUST project conducted in Birmingham, Alabama, 2006 to 2008. All participants were African Americans diagnosed with hypertension and receiving care at an inner city, safety net setting. Three categories of increasing adherence were defined based on the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale. Trust in physicians was measured with the Hall General Trust Scale, and discrimination was measured with the Experiences of Discrimination Scale. Associations were quantified by ordinal logistic regression, adjusting for gender, age, education, and income.

RESULTS

The analytic sample consisted of 227 African American men and 553 African American women, with a mean age of 53.7 ± 9.9 years. Mean discrimination scores decreased monotonically across increasing category of medication adherence (4.1, 3.6, 2.9; P = .025), though the opposite was found for trust scores (36.5, 38.5, 40.8; P < .001). Trust mediated 39% (95% confidence interval = 17%, 100%) of the association between discrimination and medication adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

Within our sample of inner city African Americans with hypertension, racial discrimination was associated with lower medication adherence, and this association was partially mediated by trust in physicians. Patient, physician and system approaches to increase "earned" trust may enhance existing interventions for promoting medication adherence.

Contemporary trends in necrotizing soft-tissue infections in the United States

BACKGROUND

Necrotizing soft-tissue infections (NSTI) are rare, potentially fatal, operative emergencies. We studied a national cohort of patients to determine recent trends in incidence, treatment, and outcomes for NSTI.

METHODS

We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (1998-2010) for patients with a primary diagnosis of NSTI. Temporal trends in patient characteristics, treatment (debridement, amputation, hyperbaric oxygen therapy [HBOT]), and outcomes were determined with Cochran-Armitage trend tests and linear regression. To account for trends in case mix (age, sex, race, insurance, Elixhauser index) or receipt of HBOT on outcomes, multivariable analyses were conducted to determine the independent effect of year of treatment on mortality, any major complication, and hospital length of stay (LOS) for NSTI.

RESULTS

We identified 56,527 weighted NSTI admissions, with an incidence ranging from approximately 3,800-5,800 cases annually. The number of cases peaked in 2004 and then decreased between 1998 and 2010 (P < .0001). The percentage of female patients decreased slightly over time (38.6-34.1%, P < .0001). Patients were increasingly in the 18- to 34-year-old (8.8-14.6%, P < .0001) and 50- to 64-year-old age groups (33.2-43.5, P < .0001), Hispanic (6.8-10.5%, P < .0001), obese (8.9-24.6%, P < .0001), and admitted with >3 comorbidities (14.5-39.7%, P < .0001). The percentage of patients requiring only one operative debridement increased somewhat (43.2-46.2%, P < .0001), whereas the use of HBOT was rare and decreasing (1.6-0.8%, P < .0001). The percentage of patients requiring operative wound closure decreased somewhat (23.5-20.8%, P < .0001). Although major complication rates increased (30.9-48.2%, P < .0001), hospital LOS remained stable (18-19 days) and mortality decreased (9.0-4.9%, P < .0001) on univariate analyses. On multivariable analyses each 1-year incremental increase in year was associated with a 5% increased odds of complication (odds ratio 1.05), 0.4 times decrease in hospital LOS (coefficient -0.41), and 11% decreased odds of mortality (odds ratio 0.89).

CONCLUSION

There were potentially important national trends in patient characteristics and treatment patterns for NSTI between 1998 and 2010. Importantly, though patient acuity worsened and complication rates increased, but LOS remained relatively stable and mortality decreased. Improvements in early diagnosis, wound care, and critical care delivery may be the cause.