Overall assessment of regeneration in peripheral nerve lesion repair using fibrin glue, suture, or a combination of the 2 techniques in a rat model. Which is the ideal choice?

Platelet rich plasma may enhance peripheral nerve regeneration after cyanoacrylate reanastomosis: a controlled blind study on rats

The aim of this study was to explore the ability of platelet rich plasma (PRP) to promote peripheral nerve regeneration after cyanoacrylate reanastomosis in rats. A total of 18 rats were used in this study. Bilateral sciatic neurotomies were performed in 15 rats, and then immediately reanastomosed with cyanoacrylate glue. On one side (G1), the anastomosed nerves were treated with prepared autologous PRP gel; on the contralateral side (G2) the nerves received no additional treatment. Sham surgery was undertaken on the remaining 3 rats (6 cases) where bilateral sciatic nerves were surgically approached but not cut (passive control group, (G3). Biopsies were harvested 12 weeks postoperatively and examined under the light microscope using osmic acid stain. The number of nerve fibers in the distal and proximal nerve segments of G1 and G2 as well as in G3 were counted and the results analyzed and compared. Animals in G1 and G2 showed some weakness and ulceration in their right and left feet for a few weeks postoperatively, which gradually improved during the follow-up period. The histomorphometric assessment showed a higher axon count in the distal segment of G1 (291.7 axons) compared with that of G2 (280.5 axons) (P=0.001). Similar results were noticed when the proximal segments of both groups were compared (P=0.040). These results were reflected in the values of the neurotization indices of G1 (91.9%) and G2 (89.5%) (P=0.008). The number of nerve fibers in G1 and G2 remained lower than in G3 (P=0.0001). The authors conclude that PRP may enhance the number of regenerating nerve fibers after cyanoacrylate neruoanastomosis.

An evaluation using techniques to assess muscle and nerve regeneration of a flexible glass wrap in the repair of peripheral nerves

In this study a flexible biodegradable wrap is compared with microsurgical epineurial suturing in the repair of cleanly divided peripheral nerves. Five groups of twelve sheep were used; one control group and four neurotmesis and repair groups. The four repair groups were; (1) Epineurial suture repair using a microscope and 9/0 polyamide; (2) Wrap secured by Tisseel glue; (3) Wrap secured by polycaprolactone glue; (4) Wrap secured by suturing. Regeneration of the median nerve was assessed by electromyography, nerve conduction studies, wet muscle mass measurements, and morphometry. The results suggested that nerve regeneration in the wrap+Tisseel glue group was as good as that in the epineurial repair group. The use of polycaprolactone glue is not recommended in nerve repair. Placement of the wrap was easy to learn and quick to carry out under direct vision. The wrap used in this study could prove to be a useful alternative to epineurial suturing to repair peripheral nerves and may have a particularly unique role in the developing world and battlefield.

Peripheral nerve repair by means of a flexible biodegradable glass fibre wrap: a comparison with microsurgical epineurial repair

In this study, a new technique for the repair of divided peripheral nerves using a flexible controlled-release glass wrap is described and its successful use is reported. Corglaes is a biodegradable and biocompatible glass which, when used as a solid glass tube form as a nerve conduit, allows nerve regeneration. It is now produced as a flexible, porous wrap (CRG-wrap). In this study, the CRG-wrap was used to repair divided median nerves in the upper forelimb of sheep. The wrap was secured in place around the divided nerve ends using fibrin glue or 6/0 polyglactin sutures. Microsurgical epineurial suturing was used to repair the same injury in another group. Twelve sheep were used in each group. A control group of sheep, on which no operations had been carried out, was also examined. The outcome of each repair was assessed at 7 months by measuring transcutaneous stimulated jitter (TSJ), maximum conduction velocity (CVmax), wet muscle mass and morphometric measurements. Testing was carried out on the limb that had been operated upon and the normal contralateral forelimb. The ratio of the measurements taken in the operated and the normal limb (the right and left forelimbs in the control group) was used when carrying out statistical analyses on the results. The mean and variance of the ratios of each of the measured variables in the three repair groups were similar suggesting that nerve regeneration had occurred to a similar degree in all the repair groups (analyses were carried out using one-way ANOVA and Scheffé's test, with statistical significance assumed at p<0.05). The repair of peripheral nerves using the CRG-wrap is easy to learn, quicker and cheaper than microsurgical epineurial suturing, and can be carried out by any surgeon with basic surgical skills. It was concluded that CRG-wrap is a useful alternative to microsurgical epineurial suturing for the repair of peripheral nerves.

Skin-derived stem cells transplanted into resorbable guides provide functional nerve regeneration after sciatic nerve resection

The regeneration in the peripheral nervous system is often incomplete and the treatment of severe lesions with nerve tissue loss is primarily aimed at recreating nerve continuity. Guide tubes of various types, filled with Schwann cells, stem cells, or nerve growth factors are attractive as an alternative therapy to nerve grafts. In this study, we evaluated whether skin-derived stem cells (SDSCs) can improve peripheral nerve regeneration after transplantation into nerve guides. We compared peripheral nerve regeneration in adult rats with sciatic nerve gaps of 16 mm after autologous transplantation of GFP-labeled SDSCs into two different types of guides: a synthetic guide, obtained by dip coating with a L-lactide and trimethylene carbonate (PLA-TMC) copolymer and a collagen-based guide. The sciatic function index and the recovery rates of the compound muscle action potential were significantly higher in the animals that received SDSCs transplantation, in particular, into the collagen guide, compared to the control guides filled only with PBS. For these guides the morphological and immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated an increased number of myelinated axons expressing S100 and Neurofilament 70, suggesting the presence of regenerating nerve fibers along the gap. GFP positive cells were found around regenerating nerve fibers and few of them were positive for the expression of glial markers as S-100 and glial fibrillary acidic protein. RT-PCR analysis confirmed the expression of S100 and myelin basic protein in the animals treated with the collagen guide filled with SDSCs. These data support the hypothesis that SDSCs could represent a tool for future cell therapy applications in peripheral nerve regeneration.