Aspirin response evaluated by the VerifyNow™ Aspirin System and Light Transmission Aggregometry

Aspirin's effect on platelet inhibition in migraineurs

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of aspirin on platelet reactivity in migraineurs.

BACKGROUND

Migraineurs, particularly women with aura and high monthly migraine frequency, are at risk for ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction (MI). High on-aspirin platelet reactivity (HAPR), or aspirin resistance, has been reported in females and patients with coronary artery disease, and is associated with adverse outcomes.

METHODS

Using a single group, pretest/posttest design, 50 migraineurs without prior history of stroke or MI were prospectively treated for 14 to 21 consecutive days with 325 mg generic enteric-coated aspirin, after undergoing a 14-day aspirin washout. Platelet reactivity was measured after aspirin washout and following aspirin treatment. Subjects were screened for HAPR using the VerifyNow™ Aspirin Assay (Accumetrics, San Diego, CA, USA). HAPR was defined as ≥ 460 Aspirin Reaction Units (ARU; primary endpoint).

RESULTS

Fifty subjects, 44 (88%) female, aged (mean ± standard deviation) 43 ± 12 years were enrolled. Twelve (24%; 95% CI 12-36%) subjects, all female, had HAPR and were classified as aspirin resistant. Subjects with HAPR had lower baseline hemoglobin levels than those without HAPR (P = .03). Baseline hemoglobin was significantly correlated with final ARU (r = -0.39, P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings of this exploratory study suggest that migraineurs have a higher prevalence of HAPR than healthy volunteers or patients with coronary artery disease taking aspirin 325 mg. The clinical implications of HAPR in migraine warrant further exploration due to the risk of stroke and MI and the potential need for antiplatelet therapy in this population.

Antiplatelet resistance and thromboembolic complications in neurointerventional procedures

Antiplatelet resistance is emerging as a significant factor in effective secondary stroke prevention. Prevalence of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance is dependent upon laboratory test and remains contentious. Large studies in cardiovascular disease populations have demonstrated worse ischemic outcomes in patients with antiplatelet resistance, particularly in patients with coronary stents. Thromboembolism is a complication of neurointerventional procedures that leads to stroke. Stroke rates related to aneurysm coiling range from 2 to 10% and may be higher when considering silent ischemia. Stroke associated with carotid stenting is a major cause of morbidity. Antiplatelet use in the periprocedure setting varies among different centers. No guidelines exist for use of antiplatelet regimens in neurointerventional procedures. Incidence of stroke in patients post procedure may be partly explained by resistance to antiplatelet agents. Further research is required to establish the incidence of stroke in patients with antiplatelet resistance undergoing neurointerventional procedures.

Effect of gender difference on platelet reactivity

Background

Previous studies have suggested that women do not accrue equal therapeutic benefit from antiplatelet medication as compared with men. The physiological mechanism and clinical implications behind this gender disparity have yet to be established.

Methods

On-treatment platelet reactivity was determined in 717 men and 234 women on dual antiplatelet therapy, undergoing elective coronary stent implantation. Platelet function testing was performed using arachidonic acid and adenosine diphosphate-induced light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) and the VerifyNow P2Y12 and Aspirin assays. Also the incidence of all-cause death, non-fatal acute myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and ischaemic stroke was evaluated.

Results

Women had higher baseline platelet counts than men. Women exhibited a higher magnitude of on-aspirin platelet reactivity using LTA, but not using the VerifyNow Aspirin assay. The magnitude of on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity was significantly higher in women as compared with men with both tests used. The cut-off value to identify patients at risk as well as the incidence of clinical endpoints was similar between women and men (16/234[6.8%] vs. 62/717[8.6%], p = 0.38).

Conclusion

Although the magnitude of platelet reactivity was higher in women, the absolute difference between genders was small and both the cut-off value to identify patients at risk and the incidence of the composite endpoint were similar between genders. Thus, it is unlikely that the difference in platelet reactivity accounts for a worse prognosis in women.

Genetic determinants of platelet reactivity during acetylsalicylic acid therapy in diabetic patients: evaluation of 27 polymorphisms within candidate genes

AIMS

Decreased platelet responsiveness to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) reported previously in diabetic patients could be attributed to patient-based, clinical, genetic and cellular factors. The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of the genomic polymorphism on the platelet reactivity in diabetic patients treated with ASA.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of 295 Caucasians with diabetes type 2 who had been taking ASA tablets at the dose of 75 mg per day for at least 3 months for primary or secondary prevention of myocardial infarction (MI). Platelet reactivity analyzes were performed using VerifyNow ASA and PFA-100 assays. Genotyping for the selected 27 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within 19 genes was performed using a Sequenom iPLEX platform. The results indicate that the statistically significant differences in platelet reactivity were observed in the PFA-100 assay for SNPs in following genes: TXBA2R (rs1131882), ADRA2A (rs4311994), PLA2G7 (rs7756935) and 9p21.3 (rs10120688) (P = 0.02, P = 0.03, P = 0.02, P = 0.03, respectively, all significance levels corrected for multiple comparisons). When using the VerifyNow ASA test, a weak nominal statistical significance (i.e. before multiple comparison testing) was observed for two SNPs in the GPVI gene: rs1671152 and rs1613662 [P = 0.025 (0.5) for both SNPs, corrected for multiple comparisons test].

CONCLUSIONS

The results from the present study suggest that the four analyzed genes may contribute to platelet reactivity measured with the PFA-100 assay in the diabetic population treated with ASA.

Advanced assessment of platelet function during adult donor care

Abnormal platelet function may complicate the assessment and treatment of continuing blood loss, hypotension, and coagulation disorders during adult donor care. Antiplatelet drugs, such as aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, clopidogrel (Plavix), ticlopidine (Ticlid), prasugrel (Effient), abciximab (ReoPro), eptifibatide (Integrilin), and tirofiban (Aggrastat) are commonly prescribed for older patients. These medications may be part of home therapy or may be given during acute cardiac or cerebrovascular crises that may lead to brain death and organ donation. This discussion reviews normal platelet formation and function, drug actions, methods to evaluate medication effects, pharmacological characteristics, treatment recommendations for platelet transfusion, and risks attendant with those infusions.

Personalized vascular medicine: individualizing drug therapy

Personalized medicine refers to the application of an individual's biological fingerprint - the comprehensive dataset of unique biological information - to optimize medical care. While the principle itself is straightforward, its implementation remains challenging. Advances in pharmacogenomics as well as functional assays of vascular biology now permit improved characterization of an individual's response to medical therapy for vascular disease. This review describes novel strategies designed to permit tailoring of four major pharmacotherapeutic drug classes within vascular medicine: antiplatelet therapy, antihypertensive therapy, lipid-lowering therapy, and antithrombotic therapy. Translation to routine clinical practice awaits the results of ongoing randomized clinical trials comparing personalized approaches with standard of care management.

Platelet aggregation is dependent on platelet count in patients with coronary artery disease

INTRODUCTION

Platelet function testing in whole blood is widely used to evaluate the effect of antiplatelet agents, but it is not known whether results are affected by whole blood parameters. This study investigated the importance of platelet count, haematocrit, red blood cells (RBC), and white blood cells in whole blood platelet aggregometry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 417 patients with coronary artery disease on aspirin mono-therapy and 21 aspirin-naïve healthy individuals. Blood sampling was performed one hour after aspirin ingestion. The antiplatelet effect of aspirin was evaluated using the VerifyNow® Aspirin assay and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA, Multiplate®) induced by collagen (1.0 μg/mL) and arachidonic acid (1.0 or 0.75 mmol/L). Measurements of whole blood parameters were performed to evaluate the three major cell lines in circulating blood.

RESULTS

In patients, platelet count correlated significantly with platelet aggregation (MEA(collagen), p<0.0001; MEA(arachidonic acid), p<0.0001; VerifyNow®, p=0.03). Haematocrit and RBC correlated inversely with MEA induced by collagen (p(haematocrit)<0.001; p(RBC)=0.07) and with VerifyNow® (p(haematocrit)<0.0001; p(RBC)<0.0001), but not with MEA induced by arachidonic acid (p(haematocrit)=1; p(RBC)=0.87). White blood cells correlated significantly with platelet aggregation (MEA(collagen), p<0.001; MEA(arachidonic acid), p<0.0001; VerifyNow®, p=0.05). Similar associations were observed in aspirin-naïve healthy individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

Whole blood aggregometry is dependent on all major cell lines in whole blood. Importantly, platelet aggregation is significantly associated with platelet count even within the normal range.

Effect of platelet turnover on whole blood platelet aggregation in patients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated considerable variation in the antiplatelet effect of aspirin.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the impact of platelet turnover on the antiplatelet effect of aspirin in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and to identify determinants of platelet turnover.

METHODS

Platelet turnover was evaluated by measurements of immature platelets and thrombopoietin in 177 stable CAD patients on aspirin monotherapy, including 85 type 2 diabetics and 92 non-diabetics. Whole blood platelet aggregation was determined using the VerifyNow(®) Aspirin test and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA, Multiplate(®) ) induced by arachidonic acid (AA) (1.0 mm), adenosine diphosphate (ADP) (10 μm) and collagen (1.0 μg mL(-1) ).

RESULTS

Immature platelet levels significantly correlated with MEA (r = 0.31-0.36, P-values < 0.0001) and the platelet activation marker sP-selectin (r = 0.19, P = 0.014). Contrary to the VerifyNow(®) test, MEA significantly correlated with variations in platelet count (r = 0.45-0.68, P-values < 0.0001). Among patients with residual platelet reactivity according to AA, there were significantly more diabetics (61% vs. 41%, P = 0.027) and higher levels of sP-selectin (77.7 ± 29 vs. 70.2 ± 25 ng mL(-1) , P = 0.070) and serum thromboxane B(2) (0.81 [0.46; 1.70] vs. 0.56 [0.31; 1.12] ng mL(-1) , P = 0.034). In a multivariate regression analysis, immature platelet levels were determined by thrombopoietin levels (P < 0.001), smoking (P = 0.020) and type 2 diabetes (P = 0.042).

CONCLUSIONS

The antiplatelet effect of aspirin was reduced in CAD patients with an increased platelet turnover. Once-daily dosing of aspirin might not suffice to adequately inhibit platelet aggregation in patients with an increased platelet turnover.

Platelet function testing in clinical diagnostics

Although the utility of platelet function testing is still under debate, the necessity to inhibit platelets in patients suffering from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease is undoubted and well proven. The wide variety of available platelet function tests often using different methodologies, the apparent lack of standardization, and finally the emerging evidence on the clinical value of platelet function testing are resulting in a considerable uncertainty in the clinical practice, how to deal with the issue of platelet function testing. Platelet function testing might not only yield clinical benefits for the patients but also economical advantages by identifying the right drug at the right dose for the right patient. This article intends to provide an overview of the current platelet function tests such as light transmittance aggregometry, whole blood impedance aggregometry, the PFA-1001 system, the VerifyNow2 system, flow cytometry, as well as other promising technologies like Plateletworks3, IMPACT-R4, PADA, thromboelastography, and the mean platelet component (MPC), briefly addressing strengths, weaknesses and clinical utility of these tests.

High on-aspirin platelet reactivity as measured with aggregation-based, cyclooxygenase-1 inhibition sensitive platelet function tests is associated with the occurrence of atherothrombotic events

BACKGROUND

 High on-aspirin platelet reactivity (HAPR) is associated with atherothrombotic events following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of the present study was to identify the platelet function test sensitive for platelet cyclooxygenase-1 inhibition that best predicts atherothrombotic events.

METHODS AND RESULTS

 Nine hundred and fifty-one consecutive patients on dual antiplatelet therapy undergoing elective PCI were enrolled. On-aspirin platelet reactivity was measured in parallel by arachidonic acid (AA)-induced light transmittance aggregometry (AA-induced LTA), the VerifyNow® Aspirin Assay (VerifyNow® Aspirin Assay), the arachidonic acid prestimulated IMPACT-R (IMPACT-R AA) and the PFA-100 collagen/epinephrine cartridge (PFA COL/EPI). Cut-offs for HAPR were established by receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis. At 1-year follow-up, the composite of all-cause death, non-fatal acute myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and ischemic stroke occurred more frequently in patients with HAPR when assessed by LTA [10.1% vs. 6.0%, P=0.020 (n=925)] and VerifyNow(®) [13.3% vs. 5.9%, P=0.015 (n=422)]. The VerifyNow(®) ASA assay (AUC=0.78) and, to a lesser extent, AA-induced LTA (AUC=0.73) added significantly to a model consisting of clinical and procedural risk factors in predicting atherothrombotic events. In contrast, the IMPACT-R (n=791) and the PFA Collagen/Epinephrine (n=719) were unable to discriminate between patients with and without primary endpoint at 1-year follow-up. None of the platelet function tests was able to identify patients at risk for bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

 AA-induced LTA and the VerifyNow(®) ASA test were able to identify aspirin-treated patients undergoing PCI with stenting at risk for atherothrombotic events. The VerifyNow(®) Aspirin Assay had the highest predictive accuracy. None of the tests was able to identify patients at higher risk of bleeding.

Reduced platelet response to aspirin in patients with coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes mellitus is complicated by accelerated atherosclerosis, resulting in an increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) and thrombosis. Despite the proven benefits of aspirin, previous studies indicate a reduced cardiovascular protection from aspirin in diabetic patients. We aimed to investigate whether diabetes mellitus influenced the platelet response to aspirin in patients with CAD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Platelet aggregation and activation were evaluated during aspirin treatment in 85 diabetic and 92 non-diabetic patients with CAD. Adherence to aspirin was carefully controlled. All patients had CAD verified by coronary angiography and were taking 75 mg non-enteric coated aspirin daily.

RESULTS

Diabetic patients showed significantly higher levels of platelet aggregation compared to non-diabetic patients evaluated by VerifyNow® Aspirin (p=0.03) and Multiplate® aggregometry using arachidonic acid (AA) 0.5 mM (p=0.005) and 1.0 mM (p=0.009). In addition, platelet activation determined by soluble P-selectin was significantly higher in diabetics compared to non-diabetics (p=0.005). The higher AA-induced aggregation was associated with higher levels of HbA(1c). Compliance was confirmed by low levels of serum thromboxane B(2) (below 7.2 ng/mL). Diabetics had significantly higher levels of serum thromboxane B(2) (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetic patients with CAD had significantly higher levels of both platelet aggregation and activation compared to non-diabetic patients with CAD despite treatment with the same dosage of aspirin. These findings may partly explain the reduced cardiovascular protection from aspirin in diabetic patients.

Aspirin resistance

The development of adverse cardiovascular events despite aspirin use has established an interest in a possible resistance to the drug. Several definitions have been set and various laboratory testing modalities are available. This has led to a wide range of prevalence reports in different clinical entities. The etiologic mechanism has been related to clinical, genetic, and other miscellaneous factors. The clinical implications of this phenomenon are significant and warrant concern. Management strategies are currently limited to dosing alteration and introduction of other anitplatelet agents. However, these measures have not met the expected efficacy or safety.

[Variable platelet response to aspirin and new therapeutic targets]

Aspirin is the first-line oral antiplatelet drug to prevent thromboembolic arterial occlusions. Aspirin irreversibly inhibits cyclooxygenase (COX) 1 involved in the platelet production of thromboxane (TX) A(2), an inducer of vasoconstriction and a platelet activating agent. Recurrent vascular events despite aspirin intake, combined with laboratory evidence of poor antiplatelet effect, suggested what has been called "aspirin resistance". For clarity's sake a real aspirin resistance would be the absence of COX1 inhibition due to intrinsic platelet factors (which has never been reported). What has been described is (expected) variability. COX1 inhibition can be insufficient to modify TX-dependent platelet behaviour. Other agonists, the production of which does not involve COX1, can stimulate TX-receptors. The antiplatelet effect of aspirin can be insufficient for pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic reasons, the latter being further classified as TX-dependent or not. If platelets are so reactive that responses are more TX-independent than normally, then neither aspirin nor any drugs acting on this pathway can do the job. These mechanisms should be better understood and diagnosed, and this is the prerequisite for the development of newer antiplatelet agents.