Enteral nutrition prolongs delayed gastric emptying in patients after Whipple resection

Enteral nutrition reduces delayed gastric emptying after standard pancreaticoduodenectomy with child reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is a common complication following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Our retrospective study aimed to evaluate the influence of enteral nutrition (EN) on DGE incidence after standard PD with antrectomy and Child reconstruction.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 275 consecutive patients who underwent standard PD between January 2000 and September 2009. Patients operated on after January 2005 received EN (EN group, n = 152) until total oral alimentation. Patients operated on prior to 2005 did not receive EN (control group, n = 123) and were orally fed after removing the nasogastric tube. Primary endpoint was the incidence of DGE according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery criteria. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of any other complications.

RESULTS

The incidence of DGE was 26% vs. 38% (p = 0.04) in the EN and control groups, respectively, with 17% vs. 19% for grade B DGE (NS) and 9% vs. 19% for grade C DGE (p = 0.02). The differences in DGE did not significantly decrease the duration of stay (18 ± 11 vs. 19 ± 13 days; NS). Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage was significantly reduced in the EN group (8% vs. 20%, p = 0.008), with the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula being similar in both groups (15% vs. 12%; NS). Using multivariate analysis, EN (p = 0.047, OR = 0.559 [0.315; 0.994]), operative time (p < 0.001, OR = 1.007 [1.003; 1.010]), and patient age (p = 0.014, OR = 1.031 [1.006; 1.057]) were independent factors affecting the incidence of DGE.

CONCLUSIONS

EN reduces DGE and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage after PD.

Postoperative nutritional effects of early enteral feeding compared with total parental nutrition in pancreaticoduodectomy patients: a prosepective, randomized study

The benefits of early enteral feeding (EEN) have been demonstrated in gastrointestinal surgery. But, the impact of EEN has not been elucidated yet. We assessed the postoperative nutritional status of patients who had undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) according to the postoperative nutritional method and compared the clinical outcomes of two methods. A prospective randomized trial was undertaken following PD. Patients were randomly divided into two groups; the EEN group received the postoperative enteral feed and the control group received the postoperative total parenteral nutrition (TPN) management. Thirty-eight patients were included in our analyses. The first day of bowel movement and time to take a normal soft diet was significantly shorter in EEN group than in TPN group. Prealbumin and transferrin were significantly reduced on post-operative day (POD) 7 and were slowly recovered until POD 90 in the TPN group than in the EEN group. EEN group rapidly recovered weight after POD 21 whereas it was gradually decreased in TPN group until POD 90. EEN after PD is associated with preservation of weight compared with TPN and impact on recovery of digestive function after PD.

Efficacy and complications of nasojejunal, jejunostomy and parenteral feeding after pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

European nutritional guidelines recommend routine use of enteral feeding after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) whereas American guidelines do not. Data on the efficacy and, especially, complications of the various feeding strategies after PD are scarce.

METHODS

Retrospective monocenter cohort study in 144 consecutive patients who underwent PD during a period wherein the routine post-PD feeding strategy changed twice. Patients not receiving nutritional support (n=15) were excluded. Complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification and the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definitions. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Primary endpoint was the time to resumption of normal oral intake.

RESULTS

129 patients undergoing PD (111 pylorus preserving) were included. 44 patients (34%) received enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube (NJT), 48 patients (37%) via jejunostomy tube (JT) and 37 patients (29%) received total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Groups were comparable with respect to baseline characteristics, Clavien ≥II complications (P=0.99), in-hospital stay (P=0.83) and mortality (P=0.21). There were no differences in time to resumption of normal oral intake (primary endpoint; NJT/JT/TPN: median 13, 16 and 14 days, P=0.15) and incidence of delayed gastric emptying (P=0.30). Duration of enteral nutrition was shorter in the NJT- compared to the JT- group (median 8 vs. 12 days, P=0.02). Tube related complications occurred mainly in the NJT-group (34% dislodgement). In the JT-group, relaparotomy was performed in three patients (6%) because of JT-leakage or strangulation leading to death in one patient (2%). Wound infections were most common in the TPN group (NJT/JT/TPN: 16%, 6% and 30%, P=0.02).

CONCLUSION

None of the analysed feeding strategies was found superior with respect to time to resumption of normal oral intake, morbidity and mortality. Each strategy was associated with specific complications. Nasojejunal tubes dislodged in a third of patients, jejunostomy tubes caused few but potentially life-threatening bowel strangulation and TPN doubled the risk of infections.

Delayed gastric emptying improved by straight stomach reconstruction with twisted anastomosis to the jejunum after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) in 118 consecutive patients at a single institution

PURPOSE

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is a leading cause of complication after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD). Its incidence has been reported to range from 5 to 57%. We describe a modified reconstruction method, which resulted in a low rate of DGE.

METHODS

Between April 2003 and March 2008, we performed PPPD and reconstruction using an antecolic method in 118 consecutive patients. After PPPD, reconstruction was done using conventional Child procedure in 12 patients (PPPD group) and with the following modifications in the remaining 106 patients (PPPDR group): duodenojejunostomy was performed using the straight method and the jejunum was anastomosed with a 30° counterclockwise twist. We evaluated the incidence of DGE based on the grading system defined by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS).

RESULTS

The PPPDR group had a lower incidence of DGE than the PPPD group (PPPD), occurring in 7 patients (7%) versus 4 patients (33%), respectively. However, the overall morbidity rates and postoperative hospital stays of the two groups did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Straight stomach reconstruction with a twisted anastomosis could reduce the incidence of DGE after PPPD reconstruction.

Analysis of risk factors for delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after 387 pancreaticoduodenectomies with usage of 70 stapled reconstructions

BACKGROUND

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is one of the most troublesome complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2009, 387 patients underwent PD and of these, 302 patients (78%) underwent pylorus-preserving PD. The stapled reconstruction of duodeno- or gastrojejunostomy was introduced in 2006, and 70 patients (18%) underwent stapled Roux-en-Y reconstruction. Postoperative DGE was defined based on the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery classification, and grade B or C DGE was considered to be clinically relevant. Risk factors for DGE were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Four patients died in the hospital (1.0%). Postoperative DGE was found in 70 patients (18%). DGE was less frequently seen in stapled reconstruction than in hand-sewn reconstruction (7.2% vs. 21%, P < 0.001), and in single-layer anastomosis than in double-layer anastomosis (12% vs. 24%, P = 0.02). The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the independent risk factors for DGE were postoperative pancreatic fistula (risk ratio [RR] 2.4, P = 0.002), hand-sewn reconstruction (RR 2.9, P = 0.03) and male (RR 2.2, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The method of alimentary reconstruction affected the occurrence of DGE. The incidence of DGE was less in stapled reconstruction than in hand-sewn reconstruction.

Analysis of clinical trials evaluating complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a new era of pancreatic surgery

Pancreatic fistula and delayed gastric emptying (DGE) are the major postoperative complications of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Pancreatic fistula is life-threatening and DGE, while not life-threatening, prolongs the hospital stay, increasing costs and compromising quality of life. To establish the current consensus of pancreatic fistula and DGE after PD, we analyzed the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) designed to prevent these postoperative complications. Five RCTs comparing PD with pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PpPD) performed for periampullary tumors showed that the two procedures were equally effective with respect to morbidity, mortality, and survival. We reviewed 15 RCTs, 2 prospective nonrandomized studies, and 2 meta-analyses of operative techniques and postoperative management designed to prevent pancreatic fistula. The results of the RCTs designed to prevent pancreatic fistula recommended duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy or one-layer end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy, equally. We also reviewed five RCTs of operative techniques and postoperative management designed to prevent DGE, which revealed that the antecolic route for duodenojejunostomy significantly reduced the incidence of DGE. Further RCTs to study innovative approaches to prevent postoperative complications after PD are warranted.

[Survival, mortality and quality of life after pylorus-preserving or classical Whipple operation. A systematic review with meta-analysis]

BACKGROUND

Two surgical procedures are mainly performed for the treatment of pancreatic head cancer and periampullary carcinoma: the classical Whipple operation and the pylorus-preserving Whipple operation.

METHODS

This manuscript represents an extension of a systematic review and meta-analysis previously published in the Annals of Surgery. A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library (central) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. A meta-analysis based on a random-effects model was performed for the hazard ratios (HR) of survival and the odds ratios (OR) of postoperative mortality. The results of the different studies on quality of life (QoL) could not be summarized quantitatively in a meta-analysis and were therefore summarized qualitatively. Subgroup analyses were performed by study type, RCTs, prospective cohort studies (PSs), retrospective cohort studies (RSs), study quality and tumor localization (pancreatic head cancer versus periampullary carcinoma).

RESULTS

The systematic literature search retrieved 4,503 studies of which 4,460 did not fulfill the inclusion criteria. The remaining 43 studies (6 RCTs, 12 PSs and 25 RSs) representing 3,893 patients were finally included in the review. There was neither a significant survival difference for patients with pancreatic head cancer in the pooled estimate of the RCTs (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.53-1.22; p=0.16) nor in the pooled estimate of the PSs (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.7-1.0; p=0.95) or the RSs (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.7-1.01; p=0.21). Survival of patients with periampullary carcinoma was not significantly different in the RCTs (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.49-2.13; p=0.3), the PSs (HR 1.26; 95% CI 0.46-3.42; p=0.65) or the RSs (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.6-1.24; p=0.33). Postoperative mortality was not significantly different after both types of operations (RCTs: HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.17-1.4; p=0.18; PSs: HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.34-1.18; p=0.15; RSs: HR 0.7; 95% CI 0.37-1.31; p=0.27). QoL was reported as either the same in both groups or in favor of the pylorus-preserving Whipple operation.

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality, survival and QoL were not significantly different between the classical Whipple and the pylorus-preserving Whipple operations. Given the poor quality of the underlying trials a pragmatic RCT is recommended to prove the findings of this systematic review.

Evaluation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definition of delayed gastric emptying after pancreatoduodenectomy in a high-volume centre

Background

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is a common complication after pancreatoduodenectomy. The International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition of DGE has not been evaluated and validated in a high-volume centre.

Methods

Complete data sets including assessment of gastric emptying were identified from a database of patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy between 2001 and 2008. Factors associated with DGE (grades A, B and C) were assessed by univariable and multivariable analyses.

Results

DGE occurred in 340 (44·5 per cent) of 764 patients. Median hospital stay was significantly prolonged in patients with DGE: 13, 21 and 40 days for grades A, B and C respectively versus 11 days for patients without DGE. DGE was associated with prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) admission (at least 2 days): 20·6, 28·6 and 61·8 per cent of those with grades A, B and C respectively versus 9·4 per cent of patients without DGE. Factors independently influencing DGE grade A were female sex, preoperative heart failure and major complications (grade III–V). Validation of the DGE definition revealed that DGE grades A and B were associated with interventional treatment in 20·1 and 44·4 per cent of patients.

Conclusion

The ISGPS DGE definition is feasible and applicable in patients with an uneventful postoperative course. Major postoperative complications and ICU treatment, however, might limit its usefulness. The identified risk factors for DGE are not amenable to perioperative improvement.

A reduction in delayed gastric emptying by classic pancreaticoduodenectomy with an antecolic gastrojejunal anastomosis and a retrogastric omental patch

BACKGROUND

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) continues to be a major cause of morbidity following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). A change in the method of reconstruction following PD was instituted in an attempt to reduce the incidence DGE.

METHODS

Patients undergoing PD from January 2002 to December 2008 were reviewed and outcomes determined. Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) with a retrocolic duodenojejunal anastomosis (n = 79) or a classic PD with a retrocolic gastrojejunostomy (n = 36) was performed prior to January 2008. Thereafter, a classic PD with an antecolic gastrojejunal anastomosis and placement of a retrogastric vascular omental patch was undertaken (n = 36).

RESULTS

A statistically significant decrease in DGE was noted in the antecolic group compared to the entire retrocolic group (14% vs 40%; p = 0.004) and compared to patients treated by classic PD with a retrocolic anastomosis alone (14% vs 39%; p = 0.016). On multivariate analysis, the only modifiable factor associated with reduced DGE was the antecolic technique with an omental patch, odds ratio (OR) 0.3 (confidence interval (CI) 0.1-0.8) p = 0.022. Male gender was associated with an increased risk of DGE with OR 2.3 (CI 1.1-4.8) p = 0.026.

CONCLUSION

A classic PD combined with an antecolic anastomosis and retrogastric vascular omental patch results in a significant reduction in DGE.

Clinical validation and risk factors for delayed gastric emptying based on the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) Classification

BACKGROUND

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is one of the most common complications after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Because an objective, universally accepted definition of DGE does not yet exist, it is impossible to compare complication rates and outcomes of new operative approaches, operative techniques, and clinical trials. The International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) has proposed a universal classification for DGE based on clinical outcomes, but this classification has not been tested rigorously and applied to clinical data. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze our experience and to identify predictive factors for DGE by applying the ISGPS classification at a high-volume hospital.

METHODS

From October 2002 to December 2007, 129 consecutive patients underwent PD at the Department of Surgery, Yonsei University Medical Center. The severity of DGE was determined according to the ISGPS classification, and risk factors were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of DGE was 33.3%, with 16 (12.4%) patients having grade A, 14 (10.9%) grade B, and 13 (10.1%) grade C. Clinical outcomes worsened progressively as clinical relevant DGE increased. In multivariate analysis, clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (grade B/C) and patients with benign pathology were identified as independent factors for DGE.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic leakage is a serious complication after PD and is also associated with DGE. The ISGPS classification is a clear and useful tool to assess clinical outcomes.

Enteral nutrition and biliopancreatic diversion effectively minimize impacts of gastroparesis after pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Since gastroparesis is unavoidable in a certain proportion of patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy, measures to avoid its occurrence or at least minimize its impact are needed. A prospective randomized trial was performed to test the effectiveness of biliopancreatic diversion with modified Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy reconstruction and of enteral feeding to minimize impacts of gastroparesis after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

METHODS

In total, 247 patients with periampullary tumors were randomized at the time of pancreaticoduodenectomy to have either (1) modified Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy reconstruction (by creating a side-to-side jejunojejunostomy between afferent and efferent loop and closing the afferent loop with a TA-30-3.5 stapler) and insertion of a jejunostomy feeding tube (modified group) or (2) conventional gastric bypass (control group). Outcomes including complications, duration of nasogastric tube placement, and length of hospital stay were followed prospectively.

RESULTS

Gastroparesis occurred in 20 patients (16.3%) in the modified group and 27 patients in the control group (21.7%, P = 0.27). However, the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery grades of gastroparesis were significantly lower in the modified group (10A, 5B, 5C) than in the control group (4A, 5B, 18C, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Modified procedure does not reduce the risk of gastroparesis but appears to reduce the severity when it occurs.

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS)

BACKGROUND

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is one of the most common complications after pancreatic resection. In the literature, the reported incidence of DGE after pancreatic surgery varies considerably between different surgical centers, primarily because an internationally accepted consensus definition of DGE is not available. Several surgical centers use a different definition of DGE. Hence, a valid comparison of different study reports and operative techniques is not possible.

METHODS

After a literature review on DGE after pancreatic resection, the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) developed an objective and generally applicable definition with grades of DGE based primarily on severity and clinical impact.

RESULTS

DGE represents the inability to return to a standard diet by the end of the first postoperative week and includes prolonged nasogastric intubation of the patient. Three different grades (A, B, and C) were defined based on the impact on the clinical course and on postoperative management.

CONCLUSION

The proposed definition, which includes a clinical grading of DGE, should allow objective and accurate comparison of the results of future clinical trials and will facilitate the objective evaluation of novel interventions and surgical modalities in the field of pancreatic surgery.

Risk factors of pancreatic fistula and delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic fistula (PF) and delayed gastric emptying (DGE) are, respectively, the most frightening and most frequent complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This study was undertaken to determine which independent factors influence the development of PF and DGE after PD.

STUDY DESIGN

Between January 1996 and December 2005, 131 consecutive patients underwent a PD with pancreaticogastrostomy. A total of 22 items, entered prospectively, were examined with univariate and multivariate analysis. PF was defined as amylase-rich fluid collected by needle aspiration from an intraabdominal collection or from the drainage placed intraoperatively from day 3. DGE was defined as the need for nasogastric decompression beyond the 10(th) postoperative day.

RESULTS

PF occurred in 14 patients (10.7%), with a mean length of hospital stay of 40.1+/-16.6 days. DGE occurred in 41 patients (31.3%), with a mean length of hospital stay of 35.5+/-13.6 days. PF and DGE increased postoperative length of stay. Multivariate analysis identified two independent factors for PF: heart disease as a risk factor and arterial hypertension as a protective factor. According to these two predictive factors, the observed rates of PF ranged from 4.1% to 66.6%. Age and early enteral feeding with nasojejunal tube were independent risk factors for DGE. DGE was statistically more frequent when surgical complications occurred or when an intraabdominal collection was present.

CONCLUSIONS

Heart disease was a risk factor and arterial hypertension was a protective factor of PF. Age and early enteral feeding were independent risk factors for DGE. DGE is linked to the occurrence of other postoperative intraabdominal complications.

Predictive factors for complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Knowledge of the risk factors for complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is sparse and there is not a consensus regarding the criteria to define the complications. The objective of this study was to determine the predictive risk factors for this surgery using the international study group definition.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between October 1999 and September 2005, data from 295 consecutive patients who underwent a PD in the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital were recorded prospectively. Medical records and specific charts from surgical procedures, histopathology reports, and intensive care units were continually scrutinized. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to estimate relative risks and their 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Among 295 patients undergoing PD, 103 (34.9%) experienced at least one complication. Operations by low-volume surgeons (<50 PD surgeries across their lifetime) were followed by more abdominal complications (odds ratio [OR] 45.2). End-to-end pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) resulted in more complications than end-to-side PJ (OR 2.7). Diabetes mellitus, increased estimated blood loss, and soft gland texture significantly increased the risks of abdominal complications. Systemic morbidity (OR 9.9) was the only independent predictive factor for mortality.

CONCLUSION

High-volume surgeons and end-to-side PJ greatly reduce the risk of abdominal complications in patients undergoing PD. The higher abdominal complications rate in patients with soft gland texture was similar to those found in previous reports. Moreover, PD should be performed with considerable attention in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Type of gastrointestinal reconstruction affects postoperative recovery after pancreatic head resection

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The postoperative recovery of gastric motility with various reconstructions after pancreatic head resection has been reported. However, little is known about this recovery after pancreatic head resection with segmental duodenectomy (PHRSD). Some have attributed gastric stasis after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD) to tube gastrostomy, but its effect on gastric motility has not been investigated. In this study, the postoperative recovery after PHRSD and PPPD, and gastric motility with and without gastrostomy after PPPD were investigated.

METHODS

We analyzed the first appearance of gastric phase III motility, postoperative systemic status, and body weight (BW; n = 32). The Imanaga PPPD and PHRSD were compared because the procedures differ only in the length of the remaining duodenum. Traverso and Roux-en-Y PPPDs were compared because the two procedures are similar except for the creation of gastrostomy.

RESULTS

(1) Times to first appearance of gastric phase III motility and BW recovery were significantly better after PHRSD than after the Imanaga PPPD (P < 0.05). (2) Times to first gastric phase III motility and resumption of a regular diet as well as periods of gastric sump tube use and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter after the Roux-en-Y than after the Traverso PPPD (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Preservation of as long a portion of the duodenum as possible, the choice of a Roux-en-Y duodenojejunostomy, and the avoidance of peritoneal fixation of the gastric wall may be factors that improve the recovery of gastric motility and BW after pancreatic head resection.

Gastrointestinal function and quality of life after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy

The pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD) has taken the place of the conventional Whipple pancreatoduodenectomy as the standard procedure for various periampullary disease. With recent advances in surgical techniques and improvements in perioperative management, the number of long-term survivors after PPPD is increasing. As a result, surgeons should pay more attention to the patients' postoperative gastrointestinal function, nutrition, and quality of life (QOL). Gastric stasis, which is a frequent complication during the early postoperative period after PPPD, prolongs the hospital stay and impairs the QOL in the intermediate term. Several possible pathogeneses for this gastric stasis have been postulated; however, the precise mechanism remains unclear. The gastric emptying function gradually recovers to the preoperative level by 6 months after PPPD. Pancreatic functions are likely to be maintained for at least 1 year after PPPD; however, in some cases, they tend to gradually deteriorate over time after the operation, depending on the type of pancreatic reconstruction or the preoperative condition of the pancreas. It is important to note that preoperative and postoperative pancreatic exocrine function strongly influence the postoperative outcome regarding such factors as pancreatic fistula, body weight maintenance, nutrition, and the QOL. The QOL, as assessed by questionnaire, normally returns to the preoperative level within 6 months after PPPD, and this correlates with the changes in gastrointestinal function and nutritional status. It still remains an unresolved question, however, whether the Billroth-I PPPD really leads to better long-term nutritional status, but worse early gastric emptying function, than the Billroth-II type of reconstruction.

Delayed gastric emptying is associated with pylorus-preserving but not classical Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy: A review of the literature and critical reappraisal of the implicated pathomechanism

Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) is nowadays considered the treatment of choice for periampullary tumors, namely carcinoma of the head, neck, or uncinate process of the pancreas, the ampulla of Vater, distal common bile duct or carcinoma of the peri-Vaterian duodenum. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) comprises one of the most troublesome complications of this procedure. A search of the literature using Pubmed/Medline was performed to identify clinical trials examining the incidence rate of DGE following standard Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) vs PPPD. Additionally we performed a thorough in-depth analysis of the implicated pathomechanism underlying the occurrence of DGE after PPPD. In contrast to early studies, the majority of recently performed clinical trials demonstrated no significant association between the occurrence of DGE with either PD or PPPD. PD and PPPD procedures are equally effective operations regarding the postoperative occurrence of DGE. Further randomized trials are required to investigate the efficacy of a recently reported (but not yet tested in large-scale studies) modification, that is, PPPD with antecolic duodenojejunostomy.

Therapeutic strategies for the management of delayed gastric emptying after pancreatic resection

BACKGROUND

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is one of the most troublesome postoperative complications following pancreatic resection. Not only does it contribute considerably to prolonged hospitalization, but it is also associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

We performed an electronic and manual search of the international literature for studies dealing with the treatment of DGE following pancreatic resection using the Medline database. The search items used were "delayed gastric emptying," "pancreaticoduodenectomy," "Whipple procedure," "pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy," and "complications following pancreatic resection" in various combinations.

RESULTS

A number of studies were identified regarding possible therapeutic alternatives for the treatment of DGE. From the class of prokinetic regimens, most studies seem to support the use of erythromycin. However, its use has not gained wide acceptance. Regarding the operative technique, both standard Whipple and pylorus-preserving pancreatic resection carry similar rates of DGE. Billroth II type-like gastrointestinal reconstruction is the most widely accepted method and is associated with lower rates of DGE. Reoperations for managing severe DGE were very rarely reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of DGE in high-volume centers specialized in pancreatic surgery is well below 20%, thus following the improved rates that have been reported in the last decade regarding mortality and length of hospital stay after pancreatic surgery. DGE mandates a uniform definition and method of evaluation to achieve homogeneity among studies. Standardization of the operative technique, as well as "centralizing" pancreatic resections in high-volume centers, should aid to improve the occurrence of this bothersome postoperative complication.

Complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the problem of current definitions

Pancreaticoduodenectomy nowadays represents a complex procedure and a challenge for the surgeon. Even though mortality is reported to be below 5% for experienced surgeons, morbidity is still around 30%-50%, often leading to prolongation of hospital stay, demanding postoperative investigations and procedures, and outpatient monitoring of the patients with complications. In the literature there is no agreement on the definitions of postoperative complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy, leading to a wide range of complication rates in different specialist units, particularly regarding the source of every complication, postoperative pancreatic fistula, and others such as delayed gastric emptying. Some authors have demonstrated that applying different definitions in homogeneous, single-center series, the incidence of a complication varied with statistical significance, implying the impossibility of correctly comparing different experiences. It seems essential to organize a Consensus Meeting among expert surgeons to prepare world-wide accepted definitions. The aim of this article is to review the current controversial definitions and to suggest a new clinical-based approach to the problem of the feasibility and reliability of the definitions themselves.

ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Surgery including organ transplantation

Enhanced recovery of patients after surgery ("ERAS") has become an important focus of perioperative management. From a metabolic and nutritional point of view, the key aspects of perioperative care include: Enteral nutrition (EN) by means of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) and if necessary tube feeding (TF) offers the possibility of increasing or ensuring nutrient intake in cases where food intake is inadequate. These guidelines are intended to give evidence-based recommendations for the use of ONS and TF in surgical patients. They were developed by an interdisciplinary expert group in accordance with officially accepted standards and are based on all relevant publications since 1980. The guideline was discussed and accepted in a consensus conference. EN is indicated even in patients without obvious undernutrition, if it is anticipated that the patient will be unable to eat for more than 7 days perioperatively. It is also indicated in patients who cannot maintain oral intake above 60% of recommended intake for more than 10 days. In these situations nutritional support should be initiated without delay. Delay of surgery for preoperative EN is recommended for patients at severe nutritional risk, defined by the presence of at least one of the following criteria: weight loss >10-15% within 6 months, BMI<18.5 kg/m(2), Subjective Global Assessment Grade C, serum albumin <30 g/l (with no evidence of hepatic or renal dysfunction). Altogether, it is strongly recommended not to wait until severe undernutrition has developed, but to start EN therapy early, as soon as a nutritional risk becomes apparent.

Benefits of early postoperative jejunal feeding in patients undergoing duodenohemipancreatectomy

AIM: To study whether early postoperative enteral nutrition reduces the incidence of complications and/or improves nutritional status following duodenohemipancreatectomy (DHP).

METHODS: We studied 39 patients who underwent DHP for a peri-ampullary mass. Twenty-three patients received total parental nutrition and then started to have an oral intake of nutrition between postoperative day (POD) 7 and 14 [late postoperative enteral nutrition (LPEN) group]. Sixteen patients started to have enteral feeding through a jejunostomy catheter the day after the operation [early postoperative enteral nutrition (EPEN) group]. The incidence of complications and laboratory data at the early postoperative stage were studied in comparison between LPEN and EPEN groups.

RESULTS: Serum levels of albumin and total protein in the EPEN group were significantly higher than those in the LPEN group. The loss of body mass index was significantly suppressed in the EPEN group as compared to the LPEN group. The lymphocyte count decreased immediately after the operation was restored significantly faster in the EPEN group than in the LPEN group. The EPEN group showed significantly fewer incidences of postoperative pancreatic fistulas, as well as a significantly shorter length of hospitalization than the LPEN group. There were no significant differences in the incidences of other postoperative complications between the two groups, such as delayed gastric emptying, surgical site infection, cholangitis, and small bowel obstruction.

CONCLUSION: EPEN is a safe and beneficial opportunity for patients who have undergone DHP for a peri-ampullary mass.

Gastric decompression and enteral feeding through a double-lumen gastrojejunostomy tube improves outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of inserting a double-lumen gastrojejunostomy tube (GJT) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and to evaluate associated outcomes.

BACKGROUND

Gastroparesis is a frequent postoperative event following PD. This often necessitates prolonged gastric decompression and nutritional support. A double-lumen GJT may be particularly useful in this situation: gastric decompression may be achieved through the gastric port without a nasogastric tube; enteral feeding may be administered through the jejunal port.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with periampullary tumors were randomized at the time of PD to insertion of GJT or to the routine care of the operating surgeon. Outcomes, including length of stay, complications, and costs, were followed prospectively.

RESULTS

The 2 groups had similar characteristics. Prolonged gastroparesis occurred in 4 controls (25%) and in none of the patients who had a GJT (P = 0.03). Complication rates were similar in each group. Mean postoperative length of stay was significantly longer in controls compared with patients who had a GJT (15.8 +/- 7.8 days versus 11.5 +/- 2.9 days, respectively; P = 0.01). Hospital charges were 82,151 +/- 56,632 dollars in controls and 52,589 +/- 15,964 dollars in the GJT group (P = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing PD, insertion of a GJT is safe. Moreover, insertion of a GJT improves average length of stay. At the time of resection of periampullary tumors, GJT insertion should be considered, especially given this is a patient population in which weight loss and cachexia are frequent.

Treatment of Post-pancreaticoduodenectomy Complications

Pancreaticoduodenectomy is a complex operation that is becoming more common as treatment for both malignant and benign diseases. While postoperative mortality has improved over the last two decades, morbidity continues to remain high. The improvement in mortality is attributed to better perioperative care, including aggressive early diagnosis of complications and a multidisciplinary approach to their treatment. In addition to a high clinical suspicion for postoperative complications, ready access to state of the art diagnostic radiology and endoscopy are essential for the early and accurate diagnosis of complications. After the diagnosis of a complication is made, the patient should have expertise available in interventional radiology, gastroenterology, and hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery. Optimal treatment may involve any one of these specialties or an orchestrated effort from them all. The need for a critical mass of expertise in many specialties and subspecialties has prompted the development of new tertiary centers devoted to hepaticopancreaticobiliary (HPB) diseases. These HPB centers are becoming more prevalent in the United States as the value of this subspecialty is becoming more recognized. These HPB centers should continue to show improvements in quality and cost of care in treating complex liver, pancreatic, and biliary diseases that have rapidly evolving treatment options.

Delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy is strongly related to other postoperative complications

Patients undergoing pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenenectomy (PPPD) have a risk of up to 50% for developing delayed gastric emptying (DGE) in the early postoperative course. From 1994 to August 2002, a total of 204 patients underwent PPPD for pancreatic or periampullary cancer (50%), chronic pancreatitis (42%), and other indications (8%). Retrocolic end-to-side duodenojejunostomy was performed below the mesocolon. DGE was defined by the inability to tolerate a regular diet after day 10 (DGE10) or day 14 (DGE14) postoperatively, as well as the need for a nasogastric tube at or beyond day 10 (DGE10GT). Postoperative morbidity was 38%, 30-day mortality was 2.9%, and median postoperative length of stay was 15 days. DGE occurred in 14.7% (DGE10), 5.9% (DGE14), and 6.4% (DGE10GT), respectively. After further exclusion of 21 patients (10.3%) with major complications and no possible oral intake (because of death, reoperation, or mechanical ventilation), the frequencies of DGE10, DGE14, and DGE10GT in the remaining group of 183 patients were 9%, 2%, and 2%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed postoperative complications (P<0.001), the presence of portalvenous hypertension (P<0.01), and tumors as indications for surgery (P<0.01) as independent risk factors for DGE10. The overall incidence of DGE was low after PPPD. In those patients experiencing DGE, however, other postoperative complications were the most important factor associated with its occurrence.

Risk factors for complications after pancreatic head resection

BACKGROUND

Postoperative morbidity is high after pancreatic head resections. Data about risk factors are controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for complications after pancreatic head resection and to assess whether the complication rate changed during the study period.

METHODS

Data of 301 patients undergoing pancreatic head resection were recorded prospectively. Risk factors were assessed by multivariate analysis. The first and second part of the study period were compared.

RESULTS

Mortality was 3%. Overall and surgery-related complications occurred in 42% and 28%, respectively. Independent risk factors for postoperative morbidity were impaired renal function (odds ratio [OR] 2.7), absence of preoperative biliary drainage (OR 1.9), and resection of other organs (OR 3.2). Complication rate, duration of surgery, amount of blood transfused, and length of hospital stay decreased during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing hospital experience decreased complication rates. Patients with risk factors should be considered for transferal to specialized centers.

Benefits and limitations of enteral nutrition in the early postoperative period

BACKGROUND

Preexisting malnutrition has been shown to be a major clinical problem in surgical patients. Surgical stress itself increases the energy expenditure and protein loss making necessary the early nutritional support. Although there is strong evidence that "nil by mouth" is not justified, the data are still conflicting over the role of early enteral nutrition compared with the traditional methods of postoperative feeding including total parenteral nutrition support.

METHODS AND FOCUS

This paper deals with the various trials related to early enteral feeding. It also compares this with the possible advantages of total parenteral nutrition as a method of perioperative nutritional support in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.