The effect of metastasectomy: fact or fiction?

Pulmonary metastasectomy in colorectal cancer

Surgeons need to do difficult trials

Is there an oligometastatic state in non-small cell lung cancer? A systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVES

Long-term survival has been observed in patients with oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with locally ablative therapies to all sites of metastatic disease. We performed a systematic review of the evidence for the oligometastatic state in NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE and conference abstracts was undertaken to identify survival outcomes and prognostic factors for NSCLC patients with 1-5 metastases treated with surgical metastatectomy, Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR), or Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS), according to PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

Forty-nine studies reporting on 2176 patients met eligibility criteria. The majority of patients (82%) had a controlled primary tumor and 60% of studies included patients with brain metastases only. Overall survival (OS) outcomes were heterogeneous: 1 year OS: 15-100%, 2 year OS: 18-90% and 5 year OS: 8.3-86%. The median OS range was 5.9-52 months (overall median 14.8 months; for patients with controlled primary, 19 months). The median time to any progression was 4.5-23.7 months (overall median 12 months). Highly significant prognostic factors on multivariable analyses were: definitive treatment of the primary tumor, N-stage and disease-free interval of at least 6-12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival outcomes for patients with oligometastatic NSCLC are highly variable, and half of patients progress within approximately 12 months; however, long-term survivors do exist. Definitive treatment of the primary lung tumor and low-burden thoracic tumors are strongly associated with improved long-term survival. The only randomized data to guide management of oligometastatic NSCLC pertains to patients with brain metastases. For other oligometastatic NSCLC patients, randomized trials are needed, and we propose that these prognostic factors be utilized to guide clinical decision making and design of clinical trials.

Radical treatment of synchronous oligometastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC): patient outcomes and prognostic factors

OBJECTIVES

Metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) generally carries a poor prognosis, and systemic therapy is the mainstay of treatment. However, extended survival has been reported in patients presenting with a limited number of metastases, termed oligometastatic disease. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of such patients treated at two centers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From September 1999-July 2012, a total of 61 patients with 1-3 synchronous metastases, who were treated with radical intent to all sites of disease, were identified from records of two cancer centers. Treatment was considered radical if it involved surgical resection and/or delivery of radiation doses ≥13 × 3 Gy.

RESULTS

Besides the primary tumor, 50 patients had a solitary metastasis, 9 had two metastases, and 2 had three metastases. Locations of metastases included the brain (n = 36), bone (n = 11), adrenal (n = 4), contralateral lung (n = 4), extra-thoracic lymph nodes (n = 4), skin (n = 2) and colon (n = 1). Only one patient had metastases in two different organs. Median follow-up was 26.1 months (m), median overall survival (OS) was 13.5m, median progression free survival (PFS) was 6.6m and median survival after first progression (SAFP) was 8.3m. The 1- and 2-year OS were, 54% and 38%, respectively. Significant predictors of improved OS were: smaller radiotherapy planning target volume (PTV) (p = 0.004) and surgery for the primary lung tumor (p < 0.001). Factors associated with improved SAFP included surgery for the primary lung tumor, presence of brain metastases, and absence of bone metastases. No significant differences in outcomes were observed between the two centers.

CONCLUSION

Radical treatment of selected NSCLC patients presenting with 1-3 synchronous metastases can result in favorable 2-year survivals. Favorable outcomes were associated with intra-thoracic disease status: patients with small radiotherapy treatment volumes or resected disease had the best OS. Future prospective clinical trials, ideally randomized, should evaluate radical treatment strategies in such patients.

Pulmonary metastasectomy in colorectal cancer: a prospective study of demography and clinical characteristics of 543 patients in the Spanish colorectal metastasectomy registry (GECMP-CCR)

OBJECTIVES

To capture an accurate contemporary description of the practice of pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal carcinoma in one national healthcare system.

DESIGN

A national registry set up in Spain by Grupo Español de Cirugía Metástasis Pulmonares de Carcinoma Colo-Rectal (GECMP-CCR).

SETTING

32 Spanish thoracic units.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients with one or more histologically proven lung metastasis removed by surgery between March 2008 and February 2010.

INTERVENTIONS

Pulmonary metastasectomy for one or more pulmonary nodules proven to be metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The age and sex of the patients having this surgery were recorded with the number of metastases removed, the interval between the primary colorectal cancer operation and the pulmonary metastasectomy, and the carcinoembryonic antigen level. Also recorded were the practices with respect to mediastinal lymphadenopathy and coexisting liver metastases.

RESULTS

Data were available on 543 patients from 32 units (6-43/unit). They were aged 32-88 (mean 65) years, and 65% were men. In 55% of patients, there was a solitary metastasis. The median interval between the primary cancer resection and metastasectomy was 28 months and the serum carcinoembryonic antigen was low/normal in the majority. Liver metastatic disease was present in 29% of patients at some point prior to pulmonary metastasectomy. Mediastinal lymphadenectomy varied from 9% to 100% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The data represent a prospective comprehensive national data collection on pulmonary metastasectomy. The practice is more conservative than the impression gained when members of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons were surveyed in 2006/2007 but is more inclusive than would be recommended on the basis of recent outcome analyses. Further analyses on the morbidity associated with this surgery and the correlation between imaging studies and pathological findings are being published separately by GECMP-CCR.

The influence of pulmonary metastasectomy on survival in osteosarcoma and soft-tissue sarcomas: a retrospective analysis of survival outcomes, hospitalizations and requirements of home oxygen therapy

OBJECTIVES

Pulmonary metastasectomy for sarcoma is a widely accepted practice. Nevertheless, no previous studies has been reported the outcomes following metastasectomy compared with chemotherapy for patients with resectable and isolated pulmonary metastases. Our aim is to compare these modalities for the subset of patients with resectable metastases. Furthermore, the outcomes for patients with unresectable lung metastases are reported.

METHODS

Sarcoma patients with isolated lung metastases were identified and their computed axial tomography scans were reviewed by a thoracic surgeons' committee. Patients were divided into three groups: A: patients with resectable metastases treated with metastasectomy (n=29), B: patients with resectable metastases who received systemic therapy (n=17) and C: patients with unresectable metastases (n=25). Survival outcomes were plotted and compared through log-rank test for osteosarcoma and non-osteosarcoma patients.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients (32 with osteosarcoma and 39 with non-osteosarcoma) were eligible. Progression-free survival (PFS) was superior in patients who belonged to Group A compared with Groups B and C (8.0, 4.3 and 2.2 months, respectively, P=0.0002). Furthermore, overall survival (OS) was superior in patients who belonged to Group A compared with Groups B and C (39.6, 20.0 and 7.8 months, respectively, P<0.0001). A subanalysis for osteosarcoma patients showed superior PFS and OS for Group A vs B (median PFS 21.6 and 3.65 months, respectively, P=0.011 and median OS 34.0 and 12.4 months, respectively, P=0.0044). For non-osteosarcoma patients, there were no such significant survival differences between Groups A and B. Overall, patients who belonged to Group A had significantly lower mean percentage of their follow-up time spent admitted at hospital, and a trend towards lower requirements for home oxygen therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Pulmonary metastasectomy is associated with improved survival of osteosarcoma patients with resectable lung metastases. For non-osteosarcoma patients, the survival benefit of metastasectomy over chemotherapy is uncertain and warrants further evaluation. Patients with unresectable metastases have poor prognosis.

Should mediastinal lymphadenectomy be performed during lung metastasectomy of renal cell carcinoma?

A best evidence topic was constructed according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy should be performed during lung metastasectomy of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Of the 13 papers found through a report search, seven represent the best evidence to answer this clinical question. The authors, journal, date, country of publication, study type, group studied, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are given. We conclude that on the whole, the seven-retrieved studies support the realization of systematic radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy. The published literature showed a prevalence of lymph node involvement (LNI) that approaches 30%. The majority of the studies conclude that LNI is a significant, independent prognostic of survival. Indeed, some authors did not report any 5-year survival in the case of LNI. On the contrary, however, a 5-year survival of ~50% was reported when no LNI was present. To date, the published data do not allow conclusions to be drawn regarding the prognosis of hilar vs mediastinal LNI: only one paper focused on the difference between hilar and mediastinal location and showed no difference. In addition, only one study has compared the survival of patients with or without lymphadenectomy, showing greater survival when mediastinal lymphadenectomy was performed. Despite the poor prognosis of patients with LNI, surgery seems to be the best treatment for potentially curative RCC with metastases. It is known that RCC metastases do not respond well to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Indeed, reported 5-year survival rate ranged between 3 and 11% for non-operated patients. Consequently, resection must be as complete as possible and include a systematic total mediastinal lymphadenectomy, which will probably yield better loco-regional control and evaluation of prognostic factor. However, the published evidence remains quite limited and mainly based on retrospective studies on highly selected patients, with a low level of evidence. Indeed, most patients referred to surgery are younger, fitter, and have fewer metastases. Consequently, the survival gain could be biased, related more to the resectability and the good performance status rather to the resection itself. Consequently, although these preliminary results are interesting, they must be interpreted with caution.

The history of adoption of hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: 1984-95

BACKGROUND

Liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer became established without randomized trials. Proponents of surgical resection point out 5-year survival approaching 50% whilst critics question how much of the apparent effect is due to patient selection.

METHOD

A 2006 systematic review of reported outcomes provided the starting point for citation analysis followed by thematic analysis of the texts of the most cited papers.

RESULTS

54 reports from 1988 to 2002 cited 709 unique publications a total of 1714 times. The 15 most cited papers were explored in detail, and showed clear examples of duplicate reporting and overlapping data sets. Textual analysis revealed proposals for a randomized controlled trial, but this was argued to be unethical by others, and no trial was undertaken.

CONCLUSIONS

This critical review reveals how the case for this surgery was made, and examines the arguments that influenced acceptance and adoption of this surgery.

Pulmonary metastasectomy for sarcoma: a systematic review of reported outcomes in the context of Thames Cancer Registry data

OBJECTIVES

Sarcoma has a predilection to metastasis to the lungs. Surgical excision of these metastases (pulmonary metastasectomy) when possible has become standard practice. We reviewed the published selection and outcome data.

DESIGN

Systematic review of published reports that include survival rates or any other outcome data. Survival data were put in the context of those in a cancer registry.

SETTING

Specialist thoracic surgical centres reporting the selection and outcome for pulmonary metastasectomy in 18 follow-up studies published 1991-2010.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients having one or more of 1357 pulmonary metastasectomy operations performed between 1980 and 2006.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients had surgical pulmonary metastasectomy. A first operation was reported in 1196 patients. Of 1357 patients, 43% had subsequent metastasectomy, some having 10 or more thoracotomies. Three studies were confined to patients having repeated pulmonary metastasectomy.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Survival data to various time points usually 5 years and sometimes 3 or 10 years. No symptomatic or quality of life data were reported.

RESULTS

About 34% and 25% of patients were alive 5 years after a first metastasectomy operation for bone or soft tissues sarcoma respectively. Better survival was reported with fewer metastases and longer intervals between diagnosis and the appearance of metastases. In the Thames Cancer Registry for 1985-1994 and 1995-2004 5 year survival rates for all patients with metastatic sarcoma were 20% and 25% for bone, and for soft tissue sarcoma 13% and 15%.

CONCLUSIONS

The 5 year survival rate among sarcoma patients who are selected to have pulmonary metastasectomy is higher than that observed among unselected registry data for patients with any metastatic disease at diagnosis. There is no evidence that survival difference is attributable to metastasectomy. No data were found on respiratory or any other symptomatic benefit. Given the certain harm associated with thoracotomy, often repeated, better evidence is required.

Clinical reports of pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer: a citation network analysis

Introduction:

Pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer is a commonly performed and well-established practice of ∼50 years standing. However, there have been no controlled studies, randomised or otherwise. We sought to investigate the evidence base that has been used in establishing its status as a standard of care.

Methods:

Among 51 papers used in a recent systematic review and quantitative synthesis, a citation network analysis was performed. A total of 344 publications (the 51 index papers and a further 293 cited in them) constitute the citation network.

Results:

The pattern of citation is that of a citation cascade. Specific analyses show the frequent use of historical or landmark papers, which add authority. Papers expressing an opposing viewpoint are rarely cited.

Conclusions:

The citation network for this common and well-established practice provides an example of selective citation. This pattern of citation tends to escalate belief in a clinical practice even when it lacks a high-quality evidence base and may create an impression of more authority than is warranted.

Pulmonary metastasectomy for melanoma

After primary tumor treatment, 30% of patients with malignant melanoma develop metastatic disease, usually associated with a poor prognosis. Effective chemotherapeutic regimens for metastatic melanoma are not currently available. Surgical treatment of pulmonary metastases remains controversial because of the dismal survival rates reported in several studies. However, for patients with good performance status, long disease-free interval, limited metastatic disease, and less aggressive tumor biology, it remains an option. The authors have analyzed their experience in 26 patients operated on between 2000 and 2008 alongside a review of the large series in the literature.

Lung metastasectomy in colorectal cancer: is this surgery effective in prolonging life?

The commonest context in which pulmonary metastasectomy is performed is for recurrent colorectal cancer. With a more active policy of surveillance among cancer teams, ready access to ever faster CT scans and a willingness to perform further surgery to control recurrent cancer, the practice of pulmonary metastasectomy is increasing. In this pro/con debate the issues are explored. It is recognized by both sides that there is no randomized trial evidence on which to base the practice. The difference of opinion is whether there is sufficient evidence from very many case series of both pulmonary and hepatic metastasectomy on which to base current practice. The surgeon's view is that the weight of evidence from many follow-up studies is in favour of continuing this practice. The mathematician's view is that case selection could account for nearly all the observed results.

Pulmonary metastasectomy in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and quantitative synthesis

OBJECTIVES

Surgical removal of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer is undertaken increasingly but the practice is variable. There have been no randomized trials of effectiveness. We needed evidence from a systematic review to plan a randomized controlled trial.

DESIGN

A formal search for all studies concerning the practice of pulmonary metastasectomy was undertaken including all published articles using pre-specified keywords. Abstracts were screened, reviewed and data extracted by at least two of the authors. Information across studies was collated in a quantitative synthesis.

RESULTS

Of 101 articles identified, 51 contained sufficient quantitative information to be included in the synthesis. The reports were published between 1971 and 2007, and reported on 3504 patients. There was little change over time in patient characteristics such as age, sex, the time elapsed since resection of the primary cancer, its site or stage. The proportion with multiple metastases or elevated carcinoma embryonic antigen (CEA) did not change over time but there was an apparent increase in the proportion of patients who also had hepatic metastasectomy. Differences in 5-year survival between groups defined by CEA or by single versus multiple metastases persisted over time. Few data were available concerning postoperative morbidity, postoperative lung function or change in symptoms.

CONCLUSION

The quality of evidence available concerning pulmonary metastasectomy in colorectal cancer is not sufficient to draw inferences concerning the effectiveness of this surgery. There is great variety in what was reported and its utility. Given the burdensome nature of the surgery involved, better evidence, ideally in the form of a randomized trial, is required for the continuance of this practice.

Pulmonary metastasectomy in colorectal cancer: time for a trial

Pulmonary metastasectomy is undertaken for a range of cancers. The questions we raise here are specifically related to colorectal cancer, the commonest tumour for which pulmonary metastasectomy is undertaken. The primary objective of metastasectomy is to increase survival. There are no randomised trials in support of this practice nor are there any other forms of controlled studies. We present a critical look at the assumption of efficacy for this surgery and propose that a trial is needed and suggest a trial design.

Surgical resection of lung metastases: results from 529 patients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to determine clinical, pathological, and treatment-relevant variables associated with long-term (90-month) overall survival in patients with lung metastases undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of patients who were admitted with lung metastases, and who underwent thoracotomy for resection, after treatment of a primary tumor. Data were collected regarding demographics, tumor features, treatment, and outcome.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 529) were submitted to a total of 776 thoracotomies. Median follow-up time across all patients was 21.6 months (range: 0-192 months). The postoperative complication rate was 9.3%, and the 30-day mortality rate was 0.2%. The ninety-month overall survival rate for all patients was 30.4%. Multivariate analysis identified the number of pulmonary nodules detected on preoperative CT-scan, the number of malignant nodules resected, and complete resection as the independent prognostic factors for overall survival.

CONCLUSION

These results confirm that lung metastasectomy is a safe and potentially curative procedure for patients with treated primary tumors. A select group of patients can achieve long-term survival after resection.

Pulmonary metastasectomy: a common practice based on weak evidence

The resection of secondary metastases from the lungs is a wide-spread surgical practice. Patients are referred from coloproctology teams to thoracic surgeons specifically for this surgery. What is the expected benefit? I have explored the rationale and searched the literature in order to present these patients with a well-informed opinion for their consideration. I find only weak evidence based on uncontrolled retrospective series which have been interpreted as showing a survival benefit. This has been extrapolated to policy and practice that do not stand up to scrutiny. The practice has never been subjected to randomised trial and I will argue that the present evidence is insufficient to justify the uncontrolled use of an intervention with inescapable short-term morbidity, permanent loss of function, and major cost implications. I propose ways in which the evidence may be improved, including a trial in the areas of most uncertainty.

Surgery for lung metastases from colorectal cancer: the practice examined

Operations to remove metastases in the lung have become commonplace. In this article, I give a highly critical perspective of a practice that has grown without a secure evidence base, notwithstanding more than 500 articles on the subject. The objectives are mixed and sometimes unclear. The reports are generally in the form of Kaplan-Meier survival analyses but, when challenged on the expected benefit for individuals, clinicians tend to retreat to claims for palliation rather than for 'cure'. Yet the reports include no symptom checklists, quality-of-life measures or patient-reported outcomes. I see at least four distinguishable contexts, defined by cancer types, which deserve to be considered separately: sarcoma; testicular and germ cell tumors; cancers traditionally seen as having an 'oligometastatic' pattern of behavior, such as kidney and thyroid; and the more common solid cancers, such as colorectal and breast cancer. Most surgical series group them together with a tail of one, two or three instances of the less common cancers. The inclusion in these series of all cancer types operated upon adds nothing to knowledge on cancers with low numbers and complicates the analysis for the more common ones. In this article, I will confine the discussion for the main part to colorectal cancer, which is the most common cancer in which pulmonary metastasectomy is practiced.

Surgical resection of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer: a systematic review of published series

The treatment of patients with pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer continues to evolve. Recently the use of novel agents as a first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal disease has generated cautious optimism in the oncological community. However, pulmonary metastasectomy remains a mainstay in a multidisciplinary concept for a highly selected subset of patients. A selected group of patients with metastases limited to the lungs may benefit from pulmonary metastasectomy with a 5-year survival rate of up to more than 50%. This review evaluates the current status of surgical resection in pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer, with special emphasis on prognostic factors that influence survival, as well as on surgical approach and lymph node dissection and its impact on the management of patients with metastatic colorectal disease.

Clinical trials for pulmonary metastasectomy

There remains great controversy as to the indications and true benefits for pulmonary metastasectomy. The number of metastatic lesions, length of disease-free interval, and unilaterality has shown to be important prognostic factors on overall survival. In this review, we evaluate a number of clinical trials and critically assess the rational to perform pulmonary metastasectomy, which is a local treatment for a systemic disease process.

Sequential thoracic metastasectomy prolongs survival by re-establishing local control within the chest

OBJECTIVE

The value of sequential thoracic metastasectomies is unknown. We evaluate repeat metastasectomy for limited recurrences within the thorax.

METHODS

From July 1988 to September 1998, 54 patients underwent 2 to 6 separate sequential procedures to excise metastases after recurrence isolated to the thorax. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox modeling determined prognostic variables.

RESULTS

Thirty-three men and 21 women, 22 to 76 years underwent 2 (100%, n = 54), 3 (50%), 4 (22%), or 5 to 6 (11%) metastasectomies. Fifty-four percent of patients had carcinoma, 35% sarcoma, 9% germ cell, and 2% melanoma. There were no operative deaths; all late deaths occurred from cancer. Median follow-up was 48 months. Cumulative 5-year survival from the second procedure was 57%. After the second, third, fourth, and fifth procedures, respectively, permanent control was achieved in 15 (27%) of 54 patients, 5 (19%) of 27, 1 (8%) of 12, and 0 of 7. Recurrence amenable to additional surgery occurred in 27 (50%) of 54, 12 (44%) of 27, 6 (50%) of 12, and 1 (17%) of 6. Mean hazard for the development of unresectable recurrence increased from 0.21 after the second procedure to 0.91 after the fifth procedure. The 5-year survival for the 27 patients undergoing only 2 metastasectomies was 60% (median not yet reached), 33% for the 15 patients undergoing only 3 metastasectomies (median 34.7 months), and 38% for the 12 patients undergoing 4 or more (median 45.6 months). From the time a recurrence was declared unresectable, patients had a 19% 2-year survival (median 8 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple attempts to re-establish intrathoracic control of metastatic disease is justified in carefully selected patients, but the magnitude of benefit decays with each subsequent attempt.

Factors influencing long-term survival after lung metastasectomy

BACKGROUND

Disease-free interval, histology of primary tumor, and number and size of metastases resected (at first metastasectomy) were studied after resection of pulmonary metastases.

METHODS

Between 1980 and 1993, 276 consecutive patients underwent lung resections for curative removal of metastatic disease. At subsequent relapse, 63 patients had a second-stage metastasectomy, 12 went on to a third phase, and 2 patients had four stages.

RESULTS

The primary tumor was sarcoma in 126 cases (46%), teratoma in 88 (32%), carcinoma in 53 (19%), melanoma in 5, and miscellaneous in 4. Actuarial survival was 69% at 2 years (95% confidence interval 62% to 74%), 48% at 5 years (40% to 55%), and 35% at 10 years (23% to 44%).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival was not related to disease-free interval. Multivariate analysis showed that nearly all predictive information can be obtained through histologic studies (p < 0.0001); inclusion of the number of metastases resected contributed to a lesser degree (p = 0.032). Short disease-free intervals, numerous lung metastases, or even deposits recurring after a first or second metastasectomy should not preclude patients from operation.

Value of resection of pulmonary metastases in head and neck cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Literature shows no data about a complete cohort of head and neck cancer patients who developed pulmonary metastases. In this study, we investigate factors related to survival, with emphasis on the role of a pulmonary metastasectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 138 patients who developed pulmonary metastases (5.5% of all head and neck cancer patients) in the period 1978 to 1994 is presented. In a stepwise regression analysis (Cox), factors were identified related to survival. Also investigated was whether the prognostic value of potential prognosticators differed between the group that underwent metastasectomy and the group that did not.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-eight patients had metastases originating from head and neck cancer. The 5-year survival rate for all these patients was 13%. Younger patients (P = .011), patients with a longer disease-free interval (DFI) (P = .011), patients with a longer disease-free interval (DFI) (P = .016), and patients with a nonsquamous cell carcinoma (P = .038) did better. No evidence of a relationship between survival and sex or survival and number of metastases was found. Twenty-one patients underwent surgical resection of their pulmonary metastases. In 18 patients the resection was complete. The 5-year survival rate for patients who underwent a metastasectomy was 59%, compared with 4% in the nonmetastasectomy group (P = .0033).

CONCLUSION

Isolated pulmonary metastases from head and neck cancer are potentially curable by surgical resection. Preconditions for this approach are locoregional control of the primary lesion and technical resectability of the pulmonary metastases. Patients with a long interval between primary treatment and the diagnosis of pulmonary metastases may benefit more from resection therapy.

Surgical resection of pulmonary metastases from nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), unlike other head and neck cancers,is known for its propensity for distant metastases. Chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment because of this and the chemosensitivity of the tumour, but long-term control is rare. The surgical management of pulmonary metastases of other extrathoracic malignancies prompted this review of surgical management of patients with NPC.

METHODS

Thirteen thoracotomies were performed in 12 patients with pulmonary metastases as the first and only site of relapse of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Postoperative chemotherapy was given in four patients, radiotherapy to the mediastinum in one patient and both chemotherapy and radiotherapy in two patients. The survival pattern of this group of 12 patients was compared with a historical control group consisting of 65 patients without surgical resection.

RESULTS

Lymph node involvement was documented in four patients during operation. Four patients relapsed after surgical resection, two of them were from the group of three patients with lymph node involvement. The site of subsequent relapse was the lung for three patients and the skeletal system for the fourth. The 2 year actuarial survival of the surgically resected group compared favourably with the historical control group (80% and 24.1%, respectively; P=0.0002 by Mantel-Cox text).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection of pulmonary metastases from NPC seems to be a promising approach thought the effect of case selection cannot be excluded and further studies are indicated. The importance of exploration and dissection of mediastinal nodes in the surgical management of pulmonary metastases from NPC was demonstrated.

Pulmonary metastasectomy for soft tissue sarcomas: is it justified?

The role of pulmonary metastasectomy for metastatic soft tissue sarcomas is examined by reviewing the recent (1978-1994) English language literature. There are no prospective studies that contain an appropriate control group, and only one retrospective study contains a matched control group. In those few studies that provide greater than 5-year survival data, the survival curve still has a steep slope and few patients are alive at 7 years. In most studies only one or two patients are at risk at 5 years or more. Projected survival is therefore statistically questionable. It is currently impossible to know what is the impact of the surgical procedure over and above the natural history (biology) of the tumor. A randomized, prospective study, as suggested a decade ago, is still needed. While there may be some merit to pulmonary metastasectomy in highly selected patients, aggressive pulmonary metastasectomy does not seem justified by the available data.

Resection of colorectal liver metastases

From 1960 to 1992 a total of 1718 patients with liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma were recorded. Of these patients, 469 (27.3%) underwent hepatic resection, which was performed with curative intent in 434 patients (25.3%). Operative mortality in this group was 4.4%, being 1.8% (2 of 114) during the last 3 years. Significant morbidity was observed in 16% of patients with a decrease to 5% (6 of 112) for the last 3 years. A 99.8% follow-up until November 1, 1993 was achieved. Excluding operative mortality, there are 350 patients with "potentially curative" resection and 65 corresponding patients with minimal macroscopic (n = 19) or microscopic (n = 46) residual disease. The latter group demonstrated a poor prognosis, with median and maximum survival times of 14.4 and 56.0 months, respectively. Among the 350 patients having potentially curative resection, the actuarial 5-, 10-, and 20-year survivals were 39.3%, 23.6%, and 17.7%, respectively. Tumor-free survival was 33.6% at 5 years. In the univariate analysis, the following factors were associated with decreased crude survival: presence and extent of mesenteric lymph node involvement (p = 0.0001); grade III/IV primary tumor (p = 0.013); synchronous diagnosis of metastases (p = 0.014); satellite metastases (p = 0.00001); metastasis diameter of > 5 cm (p = 0.003); preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) elevation (p = 0.03); limited resection margins (p = 0.009); extrahepatic disease (p = 0.009); and nonanatomic procedures (p = 0.008). With respect to disease-free survival, extrahepatic disease (p = 0.09) failed to achieve statistical significance, whereas patients with primary tumors in the colon did significantly better than those with rectal cancer (p = 0.04). The presence of five or more independent metastases adversely affected resectability (p < 0.05). However, once a radical excision of all detectable disease was achieved, no significant predictive value of an increasing number of metastases (1-3 versus > or = 4) on either overall (p = 0.40) or disease-free (p = 0.64) survival was found. Using Cox's multivariate regression analysis, the presence of satellite metastases, primary tumor grade, the time of metastasis diagnosis, diameter of the largest metastasis, anatomic versus nonanatomic approach, year of resection, and mesenteric lymph node involvement each independently affected both crude and tumor-free survival.

Surgery for pulmonary metastases. Who are the 10-year survivors?

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection of pulmonary metastases (PMs) has been shown to produce approximately a 35% 5-year survival rate, but specific data about late survival are not available in the literature.

METHODS

A retrospective review and survival analysis of 186 adult patients who underwent surgery for PMs at a single center before June 1984 is presented.

RESULTS

Of the 186 patients who had surgery, of whom 34 (18%) had an incomplete resection, the 10-year survival rate (Kaplan-Meier) was 23% (95% CI, 16-30%), and 36 patients, with PMs from nine different primary sites, were still at risk at 10 years. Two patients died of their primary disease more than 10 years after the first thoracotomy, and two are alive with uncontrolled disease. Thirty-one patients are currently alive and disease free. Comparison between the 36 10-year survivors and the 150 nonsurvivors revealed that only the percentage of incomplete resections and the mean number of resections per patient were significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.001); the histologic type of the primary tumor, the disease-free interval, and the number of resected PMs at the first thoracotomy were not found to be statistically significant prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The 23% 10-year survival and the high rate of disease free 10-year survivors in this study constitute support for complete resection as an efficient therapeutic approach in patients with isolated PMs. Relevant criteria to select more precisely those patients who will benefit from resection remain to be developed.

Recent advances in surgery for colon and rectal cancer

Surgery is the mainstay of therapy for colon and rectal cancer. Over the past several decades, there have been important advances both in the understanding of the biology of colon and rectal cancer and in the preoperative and operative techniques for treating this disease. Although it appears in some studies that we have made a difference in the survival rates in the treatment of colon and rectal cancer, in actual fact, this phenomenon may only be secondary to better staging and, therefore, a greater ability to prognosticate a particular patient's chance of cure. What has been learned in the past 20 to 30 years is that most colon and rectal carcinomas start as polyps of the colon and rectum. Most often, polyps are sporadic, but there are certain high-risk groups that produce polyps and, consequently, colon and rectal cancer at a much higher rate. The goal of a practicing physician is to identify these high-risk individuals and to recommend frequent screenings so as to intervene before a polyp has had a chance to become a deeply invasive cancer. These high-risk groups are best typified by familial adenomatous polyposis, which if left untreated will, in 100% of cases, lead to the death of a patient from colon or rectal cancer. Other diseases that lead to an increase in colon and rectal cancer but may not go through the usual adenoma-to-carcinoma sequence include inflammatory bowel disease such as Crohn's colitis and ulcerative colitis. Most patients with colorectal carcinoma are asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis. This phenomenon has led to efforts to screen the general population for polyps and for cancer. Screening techniques such as the detection of occult blood in the stool and endoscopic procedures are currently the most popular. It is unclear at this time exactly what the efficacy of these techniques is in improving the survival of the general population from colorectal carcinoma. The surgical techniques to remove colon and rectal carcinomas have recently expanded to include a more aggressive local excision policy for small tumors of the rectum and the application of laparoscopic techniques, new stapling techniques, and new anastomosing techniques for tumors of the colon and rectum. These techniques have become possible in part through advances in surgical instrumentation and also in part from our increasing understanding of the biology of the disease. Both have allowed for more creative approaches to diagnosing and treating colon and rectal cancer.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Surgical treatment of pulmonary metastases. 127 cases

— The Authors analyse the success of surgical treatment for pulmonary metastasis on the basis of survival rate. The case histories of 127 patients are analysed and compared to those in literature.

Management of solitary pulmonary nodules

The solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN), a single intrapulmonary spherical lesion that is fairly well circumscribed, is a common clinical problem. About half of SPNs seen in clinical practice are malignant, usually bronchogenic carcinomas. Some nodules are primary tumors of other kinds or metastatic. Virtually all benign SPNs are tuberculous or fungal granulomas. The standard management of the SPN of unknown cause is prompt surgical removal unless benignity is established by prior chest roentgenograms showing that the nodule has been stable (i.e., showing no growth) for 2 years or by the presence of a "benign" pattern of calcification. Less universally accepted criteria for benignity include (1) transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy (TNAB) showing a specific benign process, and (2) patient's age under 30 to 35 years. Bronchoscopy has a low diagnostic yield, particularly for benign nodules. SPNs usually grow at constant rates, expressed as the "doubling time" (DT). A nodule with a DT between 20 and 400 days is usually malignant. Benign nodules usually have a DT greater than 400 days. The prospective determination of DT by serial chest roentgenograms (the "wait and watch" strategy) is widely criticized but has clinical utility in special circumstances, particularly if the likelihood of malignancy is low and/or the anticipated surgical mortality is high. The presence and pattern of calcification are best shown by high-resolution thin-section computed tomography (CT). Diffuse, laminated, central or "popcorn" patterns of calcification indicate benignity. An eccentric calcium deposit or a stippled pattern does not rule out malignancy. CT densitometry will often show "occult" calcification in nodules that show no direct visual evidence of calcium deposition. The characteristics of the edge of the nodule correlate with the likelihood of malignancy. Nodules with irregular or spiculated margins are almost always malignant. The probability that the nodule is malignant (pCA) is related to the age of the patient, the diameter of the nodule, the amount of tobacco smoke inhalation, the overall prevalence of malignancy in SPNs, the nature of the edge of the lesion, and the presence or absence of occult calcification. It is possible by Bayesian techniques to combine these factors to calculate a more precise and comprehensive prediction of pCA in any given nodule. The 5-year survival after nodule resection depends on the size of the nodule at the time of surgery; it may be as high as 80% with nodules that are 1 cm in diameter. Lymph node involvement is uncommon with small tumors, and many authorities question the need for CT staging in such cases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Second-look surgery for recurrent colorectal carcinoma: is it worthwhile?

Second-look surgery for recurrent colorectal carcinoma has been advocated for over four decades. Routine follow-up procedures gave way to clinically directed or carcinoembryonic (CEA)-directed procedures in the mid-1970's. In this paper, we review the results of second-look surgery for recurrent colorectal carcinoma and ask the question, "Is it worthwhile?" Excluding surgery for symptomatic patients, we conclude that second-look surgery should only be performed for recurrent colorectal carcinoma with the intent of rendering the patient disease-free. Without effective systemic therapy, "palliative" or "debulking" procedures probably do not increase survival. The most likely candidates for such a curative approach with second-look surgery are those with isolated liver, pulmonary, and, less frequently, regional recurrences.

Hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma: impact of surgical resection on the natural history

From 1960 to 1987, 1209 patients with colorectal liver metastases were recorded, and followed until 1 January 1990. In 242 cases the diagnosis was based on external imaging, whereas 967 patients had operative confirmation and staging of their liver disease. Three groups of patients were analysed: group 1 involved 921 cases, of whom 902 were deemed non-resectable whereas 19 could not be unequivocally classified. Only 21 patients lived for longer than 3 years, seven survived for 4 years, but there were no 5-year survivors. Group 2 comprised 62 highly selected patients who at laparotomy demonstrated resectable metastatic spread confined to the liver, but this was not treated mainly because of a formerly different therapeutic approach. These patients had a significantly longer median survival time (14.2 versus 6.9 months), but also failed to achieve 5-year survival. The 226 patients forming group 3 underwent hepatic resection with intent to cure. Nine of them had minimal macroscopic disease left, and 34 with all gross tumour removed had positive margins. Survival of patients with these 43 eventually non-radical resections followed an identical course as in group 2 (median survival 13.3 months, maximum 42 months). Of the 183 patients with potentially curative resection ten died after surgery (5.5 per cent). Actuarial 5 and 10-year survival rates in the remaining 173 patients were 40 and 27 per cent with 25 and seven patients alive at respective periods of time. Until 1 January 1990, 64 patients remained free from recurrent disease for up to 24 years. In three patients the tumour status at death was unclear. The other 106 patients developed definite cancer relapse. Nevertheless they demonstrated a prolongation of survival time by a median of 1 year when compared with the 43 non-radically resected patients or the 62 untreated patients with resectable liver-only metastases, and accomplished a maximum survival time of 8 years. Radical excision of colorectal secondaries to the liver therefore offers effective palliation, and in a small number the chance of a cure.

Surgical removal of pulmonary metastases from renal cell carcinoma

Thirty-three patients operated on for pulmonary metastases from renal cancer were followed up for a minimum of 5 years or to death. The 5-year survival was 21%. There was a tendency to better survival in patients operated by lobectomy rather than limited resection. Extended operations carried a grave prognosis. Manifest metastatic disease within one year after the primary operation showed shortened survival. Repeated operations were possible, with good results. It is concluded that operations for pulmonary metastases can be performed with good results. However, the effect is a palliative one as the ultimate cause of death in all instances was the spread of the cancer disease.

Survival following aggressive resection of pulmonary metastases from osteogenic sarcoma: analysis of prognostic factors

Between 1975 and 1982, 80 patients with osteogenic sarcoma were entered into prospective trials in the Surgery Branch of the National Cancer Institute. In 43 of these patients, pulmonary metastases developed as the initial site of recurrence, and 39 underwent one or more thoracotomies for resection of the disease. The actuarial five-year survival for the group of 43 patients with pulmonary metastases was 40%. Various prognostic factors were analyzed for their influence on survival after thoracotomy. Age, sex, location of primary tumor, tumor doubling time, and involvement of one or both lungs (bilaterality) were not significant in predicting survival. Prognostic factors that influenced survival, calculated by regression analysis, included the number of nodules on preoperative lung tomograms (negative correlation, p = 0.0004), disease-free interval (positive correlation, p = 0.0136), resectability (positive correlation, p = 0.002), and the number of metastases resected at thoracotomy (negative correlation, p = 0.0032). The presence of 3 nodules or less on preoperative full-lung linear tomography was found to be the single most useful preoperative prognostic factor. The application of these prognostic factors preoperatively may identify patients who will benefit optimally from thoracotomy.