Emergency contraception with Multiload Cu-375 SL IUD: a multicenter clinical trial

Current issues in emergency contraception: an overview for providers

Emergency contraception has the potential to greatly reduce the number of unintended pregnancies occurring each year in the United States. Emergency contraception is a safe and effective intervention to which all women should have easy access in the event of an act of unprotected intercourse. Methods of emergency contraception include combined hormone oral contraceptive pills, progestin-only oral contraceptive pills, a dedicated progestin-only emergency contraceptive product, and insertion of a copper intrauterine device. Barriers exist to the increased use of emergency contraception, including the prescription-only status of all of the methods and lack of accurate knowledge on the part of health care providers and consumers. This article provides an overview of the clinical management of emergency contraception.

[Update on contraception]

Since the introduction of hormonal contraceptives in the 1960s, great advances have been achieved in contraception. Biological effects of sexual steroids as well as risks and benefits of oral contraception are better estimated. After the development of a new hormone-containing intra-uterine system, new hormone delivery systems offer women safe and effective contraceptive options. These new options that combine high efficacy and ease of use should allow better acceptance and compliance than daily pill ingestion and should then reduce the high rate of unintended pregnancies terminated by elective abortion. Transdermal contraceptive system and vaginal ring offer a promising innovative approach in pregnancy prevention. Subdermal implants give women the choice of a highly effective contraceptive system in spite of significant side effects. New hormonal delivery systems such as injectables are under development. Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization is now also available and is a very effective procedure. This wide variety of new contraceptive methods offers a marked improvement from previous medications for users by providing better efficacy and tolerability.

Emergency contraception: the politics of post-coital contraception

The literature and events related to the politicization of emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs) in the United States is reviewed. The basis of opposition to the regimen, rooted in the mode of action of ECPs, the confusion with mifepristone, and the challenges this presents for ECP advocates is also discussed. Legislative actions that impact availability of ECPs are described, as well as efforts to increase access and availability through innovate programs, legislation, and changes in medical practice. Recommendations for future research, service delivery, and public policy are also presented.

Luteal phase treatment with mifepristone and misoprostol for fertility regulation

Emergency contraception (EC) with 10 mg mifepristone can prevent pregnancy up to 5 days after a single act of unprotected intercourse. No methods have been shown to be effective when treatment is administered more than 5 days after a single unprotected act or after several unprotected acts. Therefore, we tested, among 699 Chinese women requesting EC and exposed to the risk of pregnancy described, the potential of 100 mg mifepristone followed 2 days later by 0.4 mg misoprostol orally, when administered in the luteal phase of the cycle. At the time of treatment urinary pregnancy test had to be negative. Despite treatment, 25 women (2.7%) became pregnant. Among women with treatment delayed more than 5 days, the pregnancy rate was related to the number of acts of intercourse before treatment, being 1.4% with one episode and increasing to 6.5% when the number of episodes was two or more (relative risk = 4.62, 95% CI: 1.06-20.18). Side effects within a week after treatment were mild, and most women (57.2%) had menstruation within 3 days as expected. An occasional treatment with mifepristone in combination with misoprostol could provide an option for preventing unwanted pregnancies in women who are late for EC.

Female sexual health

Many aspects of sexual health relate to either preventative medicine (contraception) or managing normal physiological states (pregnancy, menopause). This article looks at some of the emergency aspects of female sexual health including genital tract trauma and genital infections.

How safe is emergency contraception?

Emergency contraception is used to prevent pregnancy after unprotected sex but before pregnancy begins. Currently, women can use emergency contraception by taking higher doses of the active ingredients found in ordinary oral contraceptive pills [either combined estrogen-progestogen (progestin) or progestogen-only formulations], or by having providers insert copper-bearing intrauterine devices (IUDs). The antiprogestogen mifepristone also has an excellent efficacy and safety profile as emergency contraception, but it is currently available for this indication only in China. Many studies have documented providers' and women's fears about the individual and public health safety risks of emergency contraception. Some of these concerns include potentially increased risks of cardiovascular events (including arterial and venous disease), worries about possible effects on future fertility, feared teratogenic consequences following method failure or inadvertent use during pregnancy, exaggerated or extreme fears of adverse tolerability, and concerns about drug interactions with other medications. Wider public health questions include feared reductions in the use of ongoing, more effective contraception, possible 'abuse' of emergency contraception through overly frequent use, and potential increases in risky sexual encounters (owing to the existence of a back-up, postcoital method) and therefore in rates of sexually transmitted infections, including HIV/AIDS. These fears can each be generally allayed. Direct and indirect investigations of emergency contraception in the biomedical and social science literature, the extensively documented safety profile of ordinary oral contraceptives, and more than 30 years of clinical experience since hormonal emergency contraception was first described, give strong evidence for its safety. This review confirms declarations by the World Health Organization and the US Food and Drug Administration, and shows that emergency contraception has an excellent safety profile in nearly all women. Finally, emergency contraception allows women a second chance to avoid unwanted pregnancies. Whether pregnancy is carried to term or terminated, the condition has inherent risks that are greater than any posed by emergency contraception.

Intrauterine devices

The aim of this chapter is to review the worldwide use of intrauterine devices (IUDs) for contraception and the long-term contraceptive efficacy and safety of copper-bearing IUDs. The TCu380A and Multiload Cu375 have a very low failure rate (0.2-0.5%) over 10 years. The main concerns of the use of IUDs are risk of pelvic inflammatory diseases and increased menstrual blood loss and irregular bleeding. Factors associated with an increase in risk of pelvic inflammatory diseases are discussed. Preventive measures can be taken with careful screening of eligible IUD users, technical training and adequate service facilities for provision of IUDs. Levonorgestrel-releasing IUDs have the benefit of reducing menstrual blood loss in addition to high contraceptive efficacy. The copper IUD is the most effective method for emergency contraception. It can prevent over 95% of unwanted pregnancies within 5 days of unprotected intercourse.