Importance of high radiation doses (72 Gy or greater) in the treatment of stage T1-T3 adenocarcinoma of the prostate

Association of percent positive prostate biopsies and perineural invasion with biochemical outcome after external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Few studies have evaluated the significance of the percentage of positive biopsies (PPB) and perineural invasion (PNI) for patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer. Our goal was to investigate the value of these factors in predicting biochemical control (bNED) after EBRT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The study cohort consisted of 331 patients who received EBRT between 1993 and 1999 for clinically localized prostate cancer. The median follow-up was 4.4 years (range, 3 months to 9.6 years). The distribution by clinical T stage was as follows: T1 in 55 (17%), T2a in 94 (28%), T2b in 76 (23%), T2c in 74 (22%), T3a in 27 (8%), and T3b in 5 (2%). The pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (iPSA) level was < or =10 ng/mL in 224 patients, 10.1-20 ng/mL in 72 patients, and >20 ng/mL in 35 patients. The biopsy Gleason score was < or =6 in 216 patients and > or =7 in 115 patients. On the basis of the pathology report, the PPB was calculated for 239 patients and was < or =33% in 109, 34-66% in 72, and > or =67% in 58 patients. PNI was present in 30 patients. The median dose of EBRT was 68.4 Gy (range, 64-71 Gy). Patients were categorized into three risk groups: 142 patients were low risk (T1-T2, iPSA < or =10 ng/mL, and Gleason score < or =6), 137 were intermediate risk (increase in the value of one of the risk factors); and 52 patients were high risk (increase in value of two or more of the risk factors). Biochemical failure was defined as three consecutive rises in the PSA level.

RESULTS

The 5-year bNED rate for the entire cohort was 62%. The 5-year bNED rate for the low-, intermediate, and high-risk group was 79%, 51%, and 47%, respectively (p <0.0001). On univariate analysis (log-rank test), clinical stage (p = 0.0073), grade (p <0.0001), iPSA (p = 0.0043), risk group (p <0.0001), PPB (p = 0.0193), and presence of PNI (p = 0.0137) correlated with bNED. For T1-T2a, T2b-T2c, and T3 patients, the 5-year bNED rate was 71%, 59%, and 40%, respectively. The 5-year bNED rate was 68% for those with an iPSA level of < or =10 ng/mL and 49% for those with an iPSA level of >10 ng/mL. For patients with PPB < or =33%, 34-66%, and > or =67%, the 5-year bNED rate was 75%, 67%, and 51%, respectively. Within the intermediate-risk group, the PPB was significantly associated with the bNED rate: 67%, 52%, and 30% for those with PPB < or =33%, 34-66%, and > or =67%, respectively (p = 0.0046). This association was not seen in the low- or high-risk group. The 5-year bNED rate was 64% for patients without PNI and 48% for those with PNI. On multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazards model), the statistically significant predictive factors for bNED were risk group (p = 0.0032) and PPB (p = 0.044). Using the chi-square test, statistically significant associations between T stage, PSA level, Gleason score, and risk group with PPB were found; PNI was significantly associated with T stage and PSA level only.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that PPB and PNI have a statistically significant impact on the bNED rate in patients treated with conventional dose of EBRT (< or =71 Gy). Within the intermediate-risk group, the PPB was predictive of bNED, suggesting that patients with < or =33% PPB had a statistically significant better treatment outcome compared with those with a greater PPB. PNI was not significant for bNED in multivariate analysis. The effects of these two prognostic factors in patients who have been treated with higher doses of RT (> or =75.6 Gy) should be studied.

High-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer

The trend in prostate cancer radiation over the past several years has been to increase the dose to the gland while minimizing the dose to normal tissues. Intensity modulated radiation therapy is a computer-driven treatment planning and delivery system that has shown promise in improving disease-free outcome while decreasing the associated gastrointestinal and urinary complication rates. This technique continues to evolve, working toward image-guided radiation therapy, which is adjusted daily for positional and architectural changes of the gland.

Changing trends in national practice for external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: 1999 patterns of care survey for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To report changing trends in external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) delivery practice for clinically localized prostate cancer as determined from the 1999 survey from the American College of Radiology National Patterns of Care Study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The 1999 survey included a weighted sample of 36,496 patient records obtained from a stratified two-stage sample of 554 patient records. Patients were surveyed from 58 institutions and were treated between January 1999 and December 1999. Of these, 36% (weighted sample size, 13,293; unweighted sample size, 162) were treated with brachytherapy with or without EBRT and 64% (weighted sample size, 23,203; unweighted sample size, 392) were treated with EBRT only. The latter group is the subject of this report. The following trends in clinical practice were analyzed according to prognostic risk groups and other variables and compared with the results of the prior surveys: use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in combination with EBRT, higher prescription dose levels, and administration of elective whole pelvic RT (WPRT).

RESULTS

The incidence of ADT use for favorable, intermediate, and unfavorable-risk groups was 31%, 54%, and 79%, respectively. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a statistically significantly increased likelihood of intermediate (p = 0.001) and unfavorable (p <0.0001) risk groups treated with ADT in conjunction with EBRT compared with favorable-risk patients. ADT use was more prevalent among treated patients in the 1999 survey than in the 1994 survey (51% vs. 8%, p <0.0001). Compared with the prior survey, a greater percentage of patients were treated with higher radiation doses in the 1999 survey (> or =72 Gy, 45% in 1999 vs. 3% in 1994, p <0.0001). In the 1999 survey, the proportion of patients with favorable, intermediate, and unfavorable tumors treated to doses > or =72 Gy was 43%, 38%, and 60%, respectively, compared with 4%, 3%, and 1%, respectively, in the 1994 survey. Compared with the 1994 survey, a large increase in the number of patients treated with brachytherapy (36% vs. 3%, p <0.0001). The frequency of WPRT use decreased from 92% in 1989 to 52% in 1994 to 23% in 1999. For the 1999 survey, a multivariate analysis indicated that unfavorable-risk patients (p = 0.016) and intermediate-risk patients (p = 0.018) were more likely to be treated with WPRT compared with favorable-risk patients. Nevertheless, even among unfavorable-risk patients, a substantial decline had occurred in the use of WPRT for the 1999 survey (70% for the 1994 survey compared with the 31% for the current survey; p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The significantly increased use of ADT for high-risk patients and higher radiation doses, especially for intermediate- and high-risk patients, reflects the penetration and growing acceptance of clinical trial results that have demonstrated the efficacy of these treatment approaches. The relatively high proportion of favorable-risk patients treated with high radiation dose levels was greater than expected. A large increase in brachytherapy was observed compared with prior surveys. Most treated patients with high-risk disease did not undergo elective WPRT, which likely reflects the influences of prior trials, stage migration, and the commonly held belief that WPRT provides minimal benefit in the setting of higher radiation doses.

A comparison of the single and double factor high-risk models for risk assignment of prostate cancer treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Two models for stratification of prostate cancer aggressiveness predominate for the purposes of daily treatment decision making. This study investigates the relationships between these two clinically popular models.

METHODS

Both risk stratification models use the same definition for low risk: Gleason score (GS) <or=6, pretreatment initial prostate specific antigen (iPSA) <or=10 ng/mL, and stage T1c-T2c. For the single factor high risk model (SF), intermediate risk (IR) is defined as the presence of GS 7 or PSA > 10-20 ng/mL, without the presence of any high-risk feature; high risk (HR) was defined as the presence of GS 8-10, iPSA >20, or palpation stage T3. For the double factor high risk (DF) model, IR and HR were defined as one and more than one of the following: GS >or=7, iPSA >10, or stage T3. Between April 1989 and October 2001, 1,597 patients were treated definitively with 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) alone for prostate cancer at our institution. The main clinical endpoint was freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF).

RESULTS

The 5-year actuarial FFBF rate for the low-risk group was 83%. The SF model resulted in FFBF rates of 76% and 47% for IR and HR patients respectively. The DF model resulted in FFBF rates of 70% and 52% for IR and HR patients, respectively. The FFBF rate for patients defined as IR and HR by both models was 76% and 40%, respectively. Those classified as IR by the DF model and then further subdivided into IR and HR by the SF model had a 76% and 52% 5-year FFBF rate (p = 0.0004). Those classified as HR by the DF model and then further subdivided into IR and HR by the SF model had a 71% and 40% 5-year FFBF (p = 0.0014).

CONCLUSIONS

The SF model created prognostic groups with a greater internal consistency than the DF model. The SF was also better at identifying patients with high-risk prostate cancer who may benefit from a more aggressive approach.

Prostate cancer radiotherapy dose response: an update of the fox chase experience

PURPOSE

The effectiveness of increasing radiotherapy dose for men with prostate cancer was evaluated with reference to prognostic groups as defined by pretreatment serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, T stage and perineural invasion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

There were 839 men treated between April 1989 and December 1997 with conformal radiotherapy alone. Cox multivariate analysis was used to establish important predictors of biochemical failure (BF) separately for patients with an initial pretreatment PSA (iPSA) of less than 10, 10 to 19.9, or 20 or greater ng/ml. Radiotherapy (RT) dose was evaluated as a continuous and categorical (dose groups of less than 72, 72 to 75.9 and 76 Gy or greater) variable.

RESULTS

At a median 63-month followup multivariate analysis demonstrated that iPSA and radiotherapy (RP) dose were the most significant predictors of BF, followed by Gleason score and T stage. Perineural invasion was not an independent correlate of outcome. RT dose was significant in all iPSA groups (less than 10, 10 to 19.9 and 20 or greater ng/ml). Gleason score was significant when iPSA was less than 10 ng/ml. T stage was significant when iPSA was 20 ng/ml or greater and it was borderline when iPSA was 10 to 19.9 ng/ml (p = 0.08). Prognostic subgroups were derived from these results and tested for an effect of RT dose on univariate analysis. Radiation dose was not a correlate of BF in the most favorable (PSA less than 10 ng/ml and Gleason score 2 to 6) and the most unfavorable (PSA 20 ng/ml or greater and stage T3-T4) prognostic groups but it was otherwise an influential determinant of outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

RT dose escalation to 76 Gy or greater improved patient outcome for all prognostic groups except those at the favorable and unfavorable extremes.

Hazards of dose escalation in prostate cancer radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To assess the benefit of escalating the dose in definitive prostate cancer radiotherapy vs. the associated risk of complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1987 and 1999, 1087 patients with clinical Stage T1b-T3 adenocarcinoma of the prostate were definitively irradiated without hormonal therapy and had a pretreatment serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and Gleason score recorded. The median follow-up was 65 months. Doses ranged from 64 to 78 Gy, with the treatment techniques corresponding to the year of therapy and the prescribed dose. A total of 301 patients were treated on a randomized protocol to either 70 or 78 Gy. Also, 163 patients were treated with three-dimensional conformal therapy and had dose-volume histograms available for review.

RESULTS

Tumor stage, grade, pretreatment PSA level, and radiation dose were all independent predictors of PSA disease-free survival (PSA-DFS) in multivariate analysis. The hazard rate for biochemical failure peaked at 1.5-3 years after radiotherapy. Although a statistically significant dose effect on PSA-DFS was found in the pretreatment PSA levels of those with both < or =10 ng/mL and >10 ng/mL, in those with a pretreatment PSA < or =10 ng/mL, the improvement in outcome was only seen going from a dose level of 64-66 Gy to 68-70 Gy with a 5-year PSA-DFS rate of 66% vs. 81% (p <0.0001). This was also confirmed by the data from the randomized patients who showed no difference in outcome whether treated to 70 Gy or 78 Gy. In patients with a pretreatment PSA level >10 ng/mL, a statistically significant improvement was found in disease-free outcome among the 64-66-Gy, 68-70-Gy, and 78-Gy levels. PSA-DFS was approximately 50% better at each higher dose level at 5 and 8 years after treatment. The dose had a statistically significant impact in both intermediate- and high-risk groups. Rectal morbidity was both dose and volume related. Although at 5 years after therapy, the Grade 2-3 rectal complication rate was twice as high for patients treated to 78 Gy than to 70 Gy, 26% vs. 12%, this risk could be markedly diminished by adhering to dose-volume constraints.

CONCLUSIONS

In intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients, although it appears that radiation-dose escalation may improve PSA-DF outcome, the price paid in treatment morbidity can be high without adequate attention to dose-volume constraints of normal tissue. Care must be taken to consider not only the hazard of tumor recurrence but also that of complications.

Treatment outcomes of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for localized prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The current study documented the implementation of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and assessed the tumor control and toxicity of such treatment in a large, multisite community practice.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed their first 222 consecutive patients with clinically localized (N0) prostate carcinoma treated with a 6-field conformal technique from October 1993 through March 2000. Standardized target definitions, dose planning constraints, and gantry angles were utilized to develop the treatment plan. Patients were categorized by low, intermediate, and high risk. Low risk was defined as T1a-T2a disease, a Gleason score < 7, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level </= 10.0 ng/mL (n = 47 [21%]). Intermediate risk was defined as T2b disease, a Gleason score > 6, or PSA level > 10.01 ng/mL (n = 60 [27%]). High risk was defined as 2 of the above risk factors or as T3 disease, a Gleason score > 7, or a PSA level > 20 (n = 115 [52%]). Biochemical disease recurrence was defined in accordance with the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition. Urinary and bowel toxicity were graded using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group morbidity scoring system.

RESULTS

The median follow-up after radiotherapy for surviving patients was 47 months (range, 0-99 months). The 2 and 5-year actuarial biochemical control rates for all patients were 84% and 78%, respectively. Using logistic regression analysis, lower dose (< 75.6 gray [Gy] vs. 75.6 Gy; P = 0.006), higher risk group (P = 0.033), higher stage (P = 0.045), and higher PSA level (P = 0.001) were significantly associated with biochemical disease recurrence. Toxicity was not significantly correlated with a higher radiotherapy dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose escalation to 75.6 Gy using a 6-field conformal technique was feasible in the authors' community practice and resulted in acceptable toxicity and early biochemical outcomes.

The relationship of increasing radiotherapy dose to reduced distant metastases and mortality in men with prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

The association of increasing radiotherapy (RT) dose with reduced biochemical failure (BF) is accepted widely. However, there is little direct evidence that dose escalation has an impact on distant metastasis (DM) or overall mortality (OM). These associations were examined in the current study.

METHODS

The outcome of 835 patients who were treated at the Fox Chase Cancer Center (Philadelphia, PA) between 1989 and 1997 using 3-dimensional, conformal RT alone (median dose, 74 Gray [Gy]) was analyzed. Stepwise multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses (MVAs) were performed with RT dose included as a covariate along with log-transformed initial pretreatment PSA level, Gleason score, palpation T status, age, and year of treatment (YOT), where indicated. To minimize the effect of YOT, an analysis was performed on a subgroup of 363 patients who were treated prior to 1994.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 64 months, there were 220 PSA failures, 44 distant metastases, and 162 deaths. In MVA, RT dose (as a continuous variable) was a significant predictor for BF, DM, and OM. When YOT was included as a covariate, it was related strongly to all endpoints, and the correlations of RT dose with DM and OM were lost. When the effect of YOT was minimized by limiting the MVA to patients who were treated prior to 1994, RT dose again emerged as a significant predictor of DM.

CONCLUSIONS

Escalation of RT dose reduced the rates of BF, DM, and OM significantly in patients with prostate cancer. The inclusion of YOT had a pronounced effect on these correlations that may confound interpretation.

Hypofractionated conformal radiotherapy in carcinoma of the prostate: five-year outcome analysis

PURPOSE

Recent publications have indicated that the alpha/beta ratios for carcinoma of the prostate are much lower than had originally been thought, suggesting that prostate cancer may be highly sensitive to fraction size. We have reviewed our unique experience of the use of 3.13 Gy fractions in a large cohort of men treated homogeneously in a single institute.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The outcome for 705 men with T1-T4, N0, M0 prostate cancer who received conformal radiotherapy between 1995 and 1998 at this center was analyzed. No patient received hormonal manipulation. Mean age was 68 years (range: 49-84 years). Median pretreatment PSA was 13 ng/mL (range: 0.6-270 ng/mL). Disease characteristics were as follows: Stage T1, 125 (18%); T2, 365 (52%); T3/4, 215 (30%); Gleason 2-6, 463 (66%); Gleason 7-10, 242 (34%); pretreatment PSA < or =10 ng/mL, 291 (41%); 10 to < or =20, 228 (32%); >20, 186 (27%). Median follow-up was 48 months (range: 1-82 months). Biochemical-free survival (bNED) was defined by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition. Radiotherapy was delivered to a planning target volume (prostate plus all/base of the seminal vesicles dependent on risk criteria with a 1-cm margin) with a 4-field conformal technique to a dose of 50 Gy in 16 daily fractions over 22 days.

RESULTS

The 5-year bNED survival was significantly associated (p < 0.001) with pretreatment PSA, stage, and Gleason score. Five-year bNED rates with respect to pretreatment characteristics were as follows: 73% (PSA < or =10), 52% (>10-20), 35% (>20), 64% (Stage T1/2), 38% (T3/4), 61% (Gleason score 2-6), and 46% (Gleason > or =7). When patients were grouped into good (Stage T1/2, PSA < or =10 ng/mL, and Gleason score <7) (n = 181), intermediate (1 raised value) (n = 247), or poor (2 or more raised values) (n = 277) prognostic groups, the bNED was, respectively, 82%, 56%, and 39%. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade > or =2 bowel toxicity was 5% and bladder 9%.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that the delivery of a relatively low total dose using a hypofractionated regime results in similar tumor control and normal-tissue toxicity to 65-70 Gy delivered in 1.8-2 Gy fractions. These data suggest that this is an acceptable regime for good-prognosis patients. However, because of the evidence for a dose effect at doses above 70 Gy with "conventional fractionation," we are now treating intermediate- and poor-risk patients within a hypofractionated dose escalation trial to 60 Gy in 20 fractions using intensity- modulated radiotherapy.

Improvement in relapse-free survival throughout the PSA era in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy: Year of treatment an independent predictor of outcome

PURPOSE

In patients treated with radical prostatectomy in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) era, it has been demonstrated that the year of treatment in the PSA era is associated with better pathologic parameters and outcomes, independently of other well-recognized parameters such as clinical stage, pretreatment PSA level, or Gleason score. The purpose of the present study was to study a similar phenomenon with definitive radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The inclusion criteria were as follows: clinical Stage T1-T2, available pretreatment PSA level and biopsy Gleason score, treatment delivered before January 2000 with standard fractionation external beam radiotherapy to at least 70 Gy, no adjuvant androgen deprivation (AD), all neoadjuvant AD limited to < or =6 months, and a minimum of 3 years of PSA follow-up. A total of 467 cases treated between January 1986 and December 1999 were included. Short-course AD in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting for < or =6 months was given in 124 cases (27%). The median radiation dose was 74 Gy (range 70.0-78.0). A conformal technique was used in 293 cases (63%). The median follow-up was 62 months (range 37-189). A total of 4931 follow-up PSA levels were available for analysis (average 11 per patient). A multivariate analysis for factors affecting biochemical relapse-free survival rates using the proportional hazards model was performed for all cases using the following variables: age (continuous variable), race (black vs. white), clinical T stage (T1-T2a vs. T2b-T2c), pretreatment PSA (continuous variable), biopsy Gleason score (continuous variable), use of AD (yes vs. no), radiation dose (continuous variable), and year of treatment (continuous variable: 1986-1999).

RESULTS

The projected 8-year biochemical relapse-free survival rate was 74%. The projected 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival rate for the 143 patients treated in the 1986-1995 period was 58% vs. 82% for the 324 patients treated in the 1996-1999 period (p <0.001). The difference was attributable to a multitude of factors (earlier stage cancer, higher radiation doses, shorter follow-up). To study the confounding effects of these factors on the year of therapy, a multivariate analysis was performed. The multivariate analysis revealed the initial PSA level (p <0.001), Gleason score (p <0.001), RT dose (p = 0.045), and year of treatment (p <0.001) to be independent predictors of outcome. Age (p = 0.41), race (p = 0.14), T stage (p = 0.10), and use of AD (p = 0.58) were not.

CONCLUSION

When controlling for tumor, treatment, and follow-up parameters, the year in which RT was performed was still an independent predictor of outcome, consistent with observations made for radical prostatectomy patients. This indicates a more favorable presentation of localized prostate in current years probably related to a combination of factors such as screening and increased patient awareness leading to earlier diagnosis. Outcome predictions should be based on contemporaneous series.

Improved Biochemical Disease-Free Survival of Men Younger Than 60 Years With Prostate Cancer Treated With High Dose Conformal External Beam Radiotherapy

PURPOSE

We report the long-term prostate specific antigen relapse-free survival rates and predictors of biochemical outcome for patients 60 years or younger with prostate cancer treated with high dose conformal external beam radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 740 patients with prostate cancer treated with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy or intensity modulated external beam radiotherapy. Patients who also received androgen deprivation therapy were excluded from this analysis. Median radiation dose was 75.6 Gy and median followup was 88 months with a minimum followup of 24 months. Median followup for patients 60 years or younger in this report was 54 months (range 24 to 132). Biochemical failure was defined according to the criteria recommended by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel.

RESULTS

Biochemical failure developed in 20 (21%) of the 96 men 60 years or younger, which was similar to the 22% failure rate observed in 644 patients older than 60. The 5 and 7-year biochemical disease-free survival rates were 82% and 79% in younger men, and 79% and 78% in older men, respectively (p = 0.48). For younger patients who received 81 Gy or greater, the 7-year prostate specific antigen relapse-free survival rates for favorable, intermediate and unfavorable risk patients were 96%, 87% and 50%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that among patients 60 years or younger the most important predictor of biochemical relapse was radiation doses less than 75.6 Gy followed by Gleason score greater than 7.

CONCLUSIONS

Men with prostate cancer 60 years or younger treated with high dose radiotherapy have an excellent biochemical outcome and fare as well as older patients. The use of conventional dose levels in patients 60 years or younger was associated with an 8-fold increase in the biochemical relapse rate and these doses should not be considered appropriate for the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Long-term multi-institutional analysis of stage T1–T2 prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy in the PSA era

PURPOSE

To report the long-term outcome for patients with Stage T1-T2 adenocarcinoma of the prostate definitively irradiated in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) era.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Nine institutions combined data on 4839 patients with Stage T1b, T1c, and T2 adenocarcinoma of the prostate who had a pretreatment PSA level and had received >or=60 Gy as definitive external beam radiotherapy. No patient had hormonal therapy before treatment failure. The median follow-up was 6.3 years. The end point for outcome analysis was PSA disease-free survival at 5 and 8 years after therapy using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) failure definition.

RESULTS

The PSA disease-free survival rate for the entire group of patients was 59% at 5 years and 53% at 8 years after treatment. For patients who had received >or=70 Gy, these percentages were 61% and 55%. Of the 4839 patients, 1582 had failure by the PSA criteria, 416 had local failure, and 329 had distant failure. The greatest risk of failure was at 1.5-3.5 years after treatment. The failure rate was 3.5-4.5% annually after 5 years, except in patients with Gleason score 8-10 tumors for whom it was 6%. In multivariate analysis for biochemical failure, pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, radiation dose, tumor stage, and treatment year were all significant prognostic factors. The length of follow-up and the effect of backdating as required by the ASTRO failure definition also significantly affected the outcome results. Dose effects were most significant in the intermediate-risk group and to a lesser degree in the high-risk group. No dose effect was seen at 70 or 72 Gy in the low-risk group.

CONCLUSION

As follow-up lengthens and outcome data accumulate in the PSA era, we continue to evaluate the efficacy and durability of radiotherapy as definitive therapy for early-stage prostate cancer. Similar studies with higher doses and more contemporary techniques will be necessary to explore more fully the potential of this therapeutic modality.

Four-year biochemical outcome after radioimmunoguided transperineal brachytherapy for patients with prostate adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate 4-year biochemical outcomes for patients with prostate adenocarcinoma who underwent radioimmunoguided (Prostascint) permanent prostate brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eighty patients with clinical T1C-T3A NxM0 prostate cancer underwent ProstaScint-guided prostate brachytherapy using either (103)Pd or (125)I between February 1997 and December 2000. Sixty-seven patients underwent prostate brachytherapy alone, whereas 13 patients received neoadjuvant hormonal manipulation before implantation. Risk factors (RF) included PSA >10, Stage >or=T2b, and Gleason grade >or=7. Sixty patients had low-risk disease (0 RF), 17 were intermediate risk (1 RF), and 3 were high risk (2 RF). Biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) was calculated using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) consensus criteria, a PSA cutoff of 1.0 ng/mL, and a PSA cutoff of 0.5 ng/mL.

RESULTS

Four-year bDFS for the entire cohort was 97.4% using the ASTRO consensus criteria. Low-risk patients (60) had a 4-year bDFS of 100%; intermediate- and high-risk patients (20 patients) were 89.2%. The hormonally naïve group (67 patients) had a 4-year bDFS of 96.9% and a median PSA nadir of 0.2 ng/mL. Median time to nadir was 19.8 months (range: 1.9-53.2 months). For the neoadjuvant hormonal therapy group (13 patients), ASTRO-defined bDFS was 100%. Overall, 85.2% of patients had a posttreatment PSA <or=1.0 ng/mL, and 75.9% had a PSA <or=0.5 ng/mL at a median follow-up of 36 months.

CONCLUSIONS

At a median follow-up of 36 months, ProstaScint-guided transperineal brachytherapy results in a high probability of actuarial 4-year biochemical disease-free survival for patients with localized prostate cancer.

Use of portal images and BAT ultrasonography to measure setup error and organ motion for prostate IMRT: implications for treatment margins

PURPOSE

Traditionally, portal images have been used for verification of patient setup. More recently, direct prostate localization using ultrasound imaging has become available. The aim of this study was to use both modalities to measure daily setup error and prostate organ motion and their respective contributions to the overall uncertainty of prostate target localization.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-five patients treated for prostate cancer with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) between February 6 and July 2, 2001 underwent daily B-mode acquisition and targeting (BAT) ultrasound localization and weekly orthogonal portal imaging.

RESULTS

A total of 243 pairs of orthogonal portal films and the corresponding daily BAT images were reviewed. The mean shift +/- standard deviation in the right-left (RL), AP, and superinferior (SI) directions was 0.035 +/- 2.8 mm, -0.23 +/- 3.0 mm, and -0.013 +/- 2.0 mm, respectively, for portal films and -0.82 +/- 3.2 mm, -1.4 +/- 6.4 mm and -1.7 +/- 6.4 mm, respectively, for BAT images taken on the same day as the portal films. The mean prostate organ motion measurements were -0.89 +/- 3.3 mm (RL), -1.3 +/- 5.7 mm (AP), and -1.6 +/- 6.4 mm (SI). Without BAT localization, organ motion would have caused the clinical target volume to move outside the planning target volume margin in 23.3-41.8% of the treatments. Margins necessary to achieve complete coverage of the clinical target volume > 95% of the time without BAT would have been 5.3, 10.4 and 10.4 mm in the RL, AP, and SI dimensions, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Prostate organ motion appears to predominate over setup error as the major component of variation in target localization. Without the use of BAT ultrasound prostate imaging, misses of the prostate can occur in a high percentage of treatments, despite patient setup verification with portal images. Relatively large planning target volume margins in the AP and SI dimensions may be necessary to overcome this.

Mindless or mindful? Radiation oncologists' perspectives on the evolution of prostate cancer treatment

The evolution of radiation therapy treatment for prostate cancer has been striking over the last 10 years. Advances in brachytherapy (BT), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and the combination of EBRT + BT have led to improved biochemical and clinical results. This article describes these advances in the context of the treatment decision process. Key to this process is the assignment of patient risk, which is based on the results of conventional radiation dose and techniques. Using the 1992 AJCC palpation staging system, Gleason score, and pretreatment prostate-specific antigen, two different risk assessment algorithms were compared. Both gave comparable approximations of risk, although the single factor high-risk model was superior in differentiating those patients with the highest probability of failing treatment after radiotherapy. Such criteria are the foundation for treatment selection. Objective findings support BT alone or EBRT alone for low-risk patients, high-dose EBRT or EBRT + BT for intermediate-risk patients, and EBRT + androgen deprivation for high-risk patients. In summary, advances in radiation oncology have led to significant gains in prostate cancer control. Clinical prognostic factor-based patient selection is central to the optimization of outcome.

A structured literature review to determine the use of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition of biochemical failure

OBJECTIVES

The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition (ACD) of biochemical failure after radiotherapy for prostate cancer requires three consecutive prostate-specific antigen increases from a nadir value. The members of the Consensus Panel recognized that the timing and frequency of prostate-specific antigen determinations could affect the comparability among different reports if this definition was used. For this reason, the Consensus Panel members recommended three guidelines for studies presented for publication (publication guidelines [PGs]). The present analysis examined the extent to which the ACD has been used in the peer-reviewed published literature and how frequently the PGs have been followed.

METHODS

A structured literature review of 10 relevant journals was done. The inclusion criteria for the literature review required publication in calendar year 1999 or 2000; treatment with external beam radiotherapy and/or brachytherapy for previously untreated, nonmetastatic prostate cancer; and the use of a prostate-specific antigen-defined disease-free endpoint. A standardized checklist was created and completed by both of the authors. We independently reviewed each publication to determine whether the ACD of biochemical failure was used and whether the PGs were followed. Discrepancies between us were resolved by joint review of each publication in question to achieve a consensus.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria. The median number of patients in the articles reviewed was 302 (range 22 to 2222). The ACD was followed in 37 (64.9%) of 57 articles. None of the reviewed articles followed all three PGs. In five articles (8.7%), two of the three PGs were followed. The vast majority of the articles reviewed (52 of 57, 91.3%) followed one or none of the PGs recommended by the Consensus Panel.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACD was used in two thirds of peer-reviewed published articles. The PGs were followed much less frequently. Consistent standards of reporting have not been uniformly applied to peer-reviewed manuscripts.

Factors affecting recurrence rates after prostatectomy or radiotherapy in localized prostate carcinoma patients with biopsy Gleason score 8 or above

BACKGROUND

To review the biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) rates of treatment with either external beam radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy Gleason score 8 or above in the prostate specific antigen (PSA) era.

METHODS

A total of 297 localized prostate carcinoma patients diagnosed with biopsy Gleason score 8 or above were treated between 1987 and 2000 at the Cleveland Clinic with either prostatectomy or radiotherapy (RT). All patients had pretreatment PSA (iPSA) levels. Androgen deprivation was given as part of the initial treatment in 154 patients (52%). Radical prostatectomy (RP) was the primary treatment in 115 patients (39%) and 182 patients (61%) received RT. The median radiation dose was 70.2 Gy (range, 60.0-78.0 Gy). The median follow-up time was 42 months (range, 1-153 months).

RESULTS

For the 297 patients, the 5 and 8-year bRFS rates were 45% (95% confidence interval [CI] 38-52%) and 31% (95% CI 20-42%), respectively. The 5-year bRFS rates for iPSA 10 or less versus. iPSA above10 were 66% (95% CI 54-78%) versus 31% (95% CI 22-40%), respectively (P < 0.001). The 5-year bRFS rates for use of androgen deprivation versus no androgen deprivation were 62% (95% CI 52-72%) versus 35% (95% CI 27-42%), respectively (P < 0.001). The 5-year bRFS rates for RT patients versus RP patients were 47% (95% CI 38-57%) versus 42% (95% CI 31-53%), respectively (P = 0.051). For RT patients, the 5-year bRFS rates for use of androgen deprivation versus no androgen deprivation were 71% versus 29%, respectively (P < 0.001). For RP patients, the 5-year bRFS rates for use of androgen deprivation versus no androgen deprivation were 39% versus 43%, respectively (P = 0.90). Multivariate time-to-failure analysis using the proportional hazards model showed iPSA level (P < 0.001) and the use of androgen deprivation (P = 0.001) to be the only independent predictors of biochemical recurrence. Age (P = 0.44), race (P = 0.80), clinical T stage (P = 0.10), biopsy Gleason scores (P = 0.39), and treatment modality (P = 0.13) were not independent predictors of biochemical failure. A total of 104 patients had Stage T1 or T2 disease, low iPSA levels (</= 10 ng/mL), and a high Gleason score (>/= 8). For all 104 patients, the 5-year bRFS rate was 64%. For 52 of the 104 patients who received 6 months of androgen deprivation or less, the 5-year bRFS rate was 78%.

CONCLUSION

Patients with localized prostate carcinoma with a biopsy Gleason score 8 or less have lower recurrence rates if iPSA levels are 10 or less. Biochemical control rates were encouraging for patients with biopsy Gleason score 8 or above, clinical Stage T1-T2, and iPSA levels less than or equal to 10 ng/mL treated with adjuvant androgen deprivation given only for 6 months or less. If longer follow-up confirms these findings, these patients might not need prolonged androgen deprivation for periods exceeding 6 months following local therapy.

Stage T1c prostate cancer: a heterogeneous category with widely varying prognosis

PURPOSE

Stage T1c prostate cancer is defined as nonpalpable disease diagnosed by needle biopsy. As more patients are being diagnosed early because of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, the distribution of patients by stage has shifted dramatically. Although this group has traditionally been characterized as having early-stage disease and the best prognosis, on review of these patients, we instead found a very heterogeneous group with a wide spectrum of outcomes that depend on both patient (Gleason grade and pretreatment PSA) and treatment (dose) factors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 353 patients with stage T1c prostate adenocarcinoma who were referred for radiation therapy from 1989-1999. All patients underwent central review of pathology. Patients were treated with external-beam radiation to doses of 60-78 Gy; 66% of the patients were treated with a dose of 70 Gy or higher. Clinical local recurrence, nodal recurrence, distant metastases, and PSA relapse were recorded. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to determine survival. For evaluation of prognostic variables, the patients were grouped by Gleason score (2-6, 7, 8-10), pretreatment PSA level (< 10, 10-20, > 20 ng/mL), and dose delivered to the prostate (< or = 70 Gy, > 70 Gy). The log-rank test was used for univariate analysis, and Cox-regression was used for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The median age was 69 years, and the median follow-up of surviving patients was 47 months. As a percentage of all patients with prostate cancer, stage T1c continually increased from 6% in 1989 to 47% in 1999. Of the 353 patients with T1c, 66% of the patients were in the Gleason group of 2-6, 27% had a Gleason score of 7, and 7% had a Gleason score of 8-10. Sixty-five percent of the group had a pretreatment PSA level of < 10 ng/ mL, 31% had a PSA level of 10-20 ng/mL, and 5% had a PSA level of > 20 ng/mL. For the entire group, the 8-year overall survival was 86%, and PSA relapse-free survival was 78%. By univariate analysis, Gleason score and pretreatment PSA were significant predictors of overall survival and PSA relapse-free survival. For PSA relapse-free survival, a radiation dose of more than 70 Gy was also a significant factor. By multivariate analysis, Gleason score, pretreatment PSA level, and radiation dose over 70 Gy were significant predictors of PSA relapse-free survival. As expected, patients with Gleason score < or = 6 and pretreatment PSA < 10 had an 8-year RFS of 90%, whereas patients with Gleason score of 8-9 and pretreatment PSA > 20 had a relapse-free survival of zero percent.

DISCUSSION

Contrary to general assumption, stage T1c prostate cancer is composed of a very heterogeneous group of patients with varying outcomes. When treatment modalities and institutional data are evaluated, the spectrum of disease must be accounted for by additional prognostic factors and subset analysis. Improvement in prostate imaging and multiple core biopsies may be helpful in better defining the extent of disease in the individual patient.

Treatment of prostate cancer with radiotherapy: should the entire seminal vesicles be included in the clinical target volume?

PURPOSE

When treating high-risk prostate cancer with radiation therapy, inclusion of the seminal vesicles (SVs) within the clinical target volume (CTV) can dramatically increase the volume of radiated normal tissues and hinder dose escalation. Because cancer may involve only the proximal portion of the frequently lengthy SVs, we performed a complete pathology review of prostatectomy specimens to determine the appropriate length of SV to include within the CTV when SV treatment is indicated.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A detailed pathologic analysis was performed for 344 radical prostatectomy specimens (1987-2000). All slides from each case were reviewed by a single pathologist (N.S.G.). Factors recorded for each case included length of each SV (cm), length of cancer involvement in each SV (cm) measured from the prostate-SV junction, and percentage of SV length involved.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients (15%) demonstrated SV involvement in 81 SVs (21 unilateral, 30 bilateral SV involvement). The median SV length was 3.5 cm (range: 0.7-8.5 cm). Factors associated with SV involvement included the pretreatment PSA level, biopsy Gleason score, and clinical T classification. The commonly used risk group stratification was very effective at predicting SV positivity. Only 1% of low-risk patients (PSA <10 ng/mL, Gleason <or=6, and clinical stage <or=T2a) demonstrated SV involvement vs. 27% of high-risk patients. Patients with only one high-risk feature still demonstrated a 15% risk of SV involvement, whereas 58% of patients with all three high-risk features had positive SVs. The median length of SV involvement was 1.0 cm (90th percentile: 2.0 cm, range: 0.2-3.8 cm). A median of 25% of each SV was involved with adenocarcinoma (90th percentile: 54%, range: 4%-75%). For the 81 positive SVs, no factor was associated with a greater length or percentage of SV involvement. In the entire population, 7% had SV involvement beyond 1.0 cm. There was an approximate 1% risk of SV involvement beyond 2.0 cm or 60% of the SV. In addition, this risk was less than 4% for all subgroups, including high-risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A portion of the SV should be included in the CTV only for higher-risk patients (PSA >or=10 ng/mL, biopsy Gleason >or=7, or clinical T stage >or=T2b). When treating the SV for prostate cancer, only the proximal 2.0-2.5 cm (approximately 60%) of the SV should be included within the CTV.

Pathologic evidence of dose-response and dose-volume relationships for prostate cancer treated with combined external beam radiotherapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

The clinical significance of postradiotherapy (RT) prostate biopsy characteristics is not well understood relative to the known prognostic factors. We performed a detailed pathologic review of posttreatment biopsy specimens in an attempt to clarify their relationship with clinical outcome and radiation dose.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1991 and 1998, 78 patients with locally advanced prostate cancer were prospectively treated with external beam RT in combination with high-dose-rate brachytherapy at William Beaumont Hospital and had post-RT biopsy material available for a complete pathologic review. Patients with any of the following characteristics were eligible for study entry: pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level > or =10.0 ng/mL, Gleason score > or =7, or clinical Stage T2b-T3cN0M0. Pelvic external beam RT (46.0 Gy) was supplemented with three (1991-1995) or two (1995-1998) ultrasound-guided transperineal interstitial (192)Ir high-dose-rate implants. The brachytherapy dose was escalated from 5.50 to 10.50 Gy per implant. Post-RT prostate biopsies were performed per protocol at a median interval of 1.5 years after RT. All pre- and post-RT biopsy specimen slides from each case were reviewed by a single pathologist (N.S.G.). The presence and amount of residual cancer, most common RT-effect score, and least amount RT-effect score were analyzed. The median follow-up was 5.7 years. Biochemical failure was defined as three consecutive prostate-specific antigen rises.

RESULTS

Forty patients (51%) had residual cancer in the post-RT biopsies. The 7-year biochemical control rate was 79% for patients with negative biopsies vs. 62% for those with positive biopsies with marked RT damage vs. 33% for those with positive biopsies with no or minimal RT damage. A greater percentage of positive pre-RT biopsy cores (p = 0.01), lower total RT dose (p = 0.001), lower dose per implant (p = 0.001), and greater percentage of positive post-RT biopsy cores (p = 0.01) were each associated with biochemical failure (Cox regression, univariate analysis). For patients with <25% positive post-RT biopsy cores, the 7-year biochemical control rate was 81% vs. a 62% biochemical control rate for those with 25-49% positive cores and only 32% for those with > or =50% positive cores (p = 0.01). On Cox multiple regression analysis, only the percentage of positive pre-RT biopsy cores and RT dose remained significantly associated with biochemical failure. Of all the factors analyzed, only the pretreatment cancer volume and lower RT dose were significantly associated with residual cancer and/or residual cancer with no or minimal RT damage. A greater percentage of positive pre-RT biopsy cores was associated with both a positive post-RT biopsy (p = 0.08) and a greater percentage of positive post-RT biopsy cores (p = 0.04). A lower total RT dose was associated with both a positive post-RT biopsy (p = 0.08) and a greater percentage of positive post-RT biopsy cores (p = 0.02). For patients who received <80 Gy (equivalent in 2-Gy fractions), 73% had positive post-RT biopsies vs. a 56% biopsy positivity rate for those who received 84-90 Gy and only 39% for those who received > or =92 Gy (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Patients with positive post-RT biopsies are more likely to experience biochemical failure, especially when the RT damage is minimal. Patients who have a larger pretreatment tumor volume or receive a lower RT dose are more likely to demonstrate post-RT biopsy positivity and biochemical failure.

Comparison of the efficacy of local therapies for localized prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen era: a large single-institution experience with radical prostatectomy and external-beam radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To review biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) rates after either external-beam radiotherapy (RT) or radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All 1,682 patients had pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and biopsy Gleason scores (bGS) assigned. No adjuvant therapy was administered after local treatment. RP was the treatment in 1,054 patients (63%) and RT in 628 patients (37%). Median follow-up was 51 months (range, 1 to 134). The median follow-up for RP versus RT patients was 50.5 v 51.0 months. Biochemical relapse was considered detectable PSA levels (> 0.2 ng/mL) in RP patients and three consecutive rising PSA levels in RT patients. The analysis was repeated with a more stringent definition of biochemical control after either RP or RT-namely, reaching and maintaining a PSA level < or = 0.5 ng/mL-and excluding patients receiving any androgen deprivation (AD).

RESULTS

Eight-year bRFS rates for RP versus RT were 72% and 70%, respectively (P =.010). Multivariate analysis indicated T stage (P <.001), pretreatment PSA (P <.001), bGS (P <.001), year of therapy (P <.001), and neoadjuvant AD (P =.019) to be the only independent predictors of relapse. Age (P =.78), race (P =.29), prior transurethral resection of prostate (P =.81), and treatment modality (P =.96) were not independent predictors of treatment failure. Fifty-one percent of RP patients had favorable tumors (T1 to T2A, pretreatment PSA < or = 10 ng/mL, bGS < or = 7), compared with only 34% of RT patients (P <.001). Repeat analysis with a stringent definition of biochemical failure and excluding patients receiving AD indicated no impact of treatment modality on outcome.

CONCLUSION

Eight-year biochemical failure rates were identical between RT and RP in any subgroup. Outcome is determined mainly by pretreatment PSA levels, bGS, clinical T stage, and, for RT patients, radiation dose.

Prostate cancer radiation dose response: results of the M. D. Anderson phase III randomized trial

PURPOSE

A randomized radiotherapy dose escalation trial was undertaken between 1993 and 1998 to compare the efficacy of 70 vs. 78 Gy in controlling prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 305 Stage T1-T3 patients were entered into the trial and, of these, 301 with a median follow-up of 60 months, were assessable. Of the 301 patients, 150 were in the 70 Gy arm and 151 were in the 78 Gy arm. The primary end point was freedom from failure (FFF), including biochemical failure, which was defined as 3 rises in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were calculated from the completion of radiotherapy. The log-rank test was used to compare the groups. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to examine the independence of study randomization in multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

There was an even distribution of patients by randomization arm and stage, Gleason score, and pretreatment PSA level. The FFF rates for the 70- and 78 Gy arms at 6 years were 64% and 70%, respectively (p = 0.03). Dose escalation to 78 Gy preferentially benefited those with a pretreatment PSA >10 ng/mL; the FFF rate was 62% for the 78 Gy arm vs. 43% for those who received 70 Gy (p = 0.01). For patients with a pretreatment PSA <or=10 ng/mL, no significant dose response was found, with an average 6-year FFF rate of about 75%. Although no difference occurred in overall survival, the freedom from distant metastasis rate was higher for those with PSA levels >10 ng/mL who were treated to 78 Gy (98% vs. 88% at 6 years, p = 0.056). Rectal side effects were also significantly greater in the 78 Gy group. Grade 2 or higher toxicity rates at 6 years were 12% and 26% for the 70 Gy and 78 Gy arms, respectively (p = 0.001). Grade 2 or higher bladder complications were similar at 10%. For patients in the 78 Gy arm, Grade 2 or higher rectal toxicity correlated highly with the proportion of the rectum treated to >70 Gy.

CONCLUSION

An increase of 8 Gy resulted in a highly significant improvement in FFF for patients at intermediate-to-high risk, although the rectal reactions were also increased. Dose escalation techniques that limit the rectal volume that receives >or=70 Gy to <25% should be used.

High-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: early toxicity and biochemical outcome in 772 patients

PURPOSE

To report the acute and late toxicity and preliminary biochemical outcomes in 772 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between April 1996 and January 2001, 772 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with IMRT. Treatment was planned using an inverse-planning approach, and the desired beam intensity profiles were delivered by dynamic multileaf collimation. A total of 698 patients (90%) were treated to 81.0 Gy, and 74 patients (10%) were treated to 86.4 Gy. Acute and late toxicities were scored by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group morbidity grading scales. PSA relapse was defined according to The American Society of Therapeutic Radiation Oncology Consensus Statement. The median follow-up time was 24 months (range: 6-60 months).

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients (4.5%) developed acute Grade 2 rectal toxicity, and no patient experienced acute Grade 3 or higher rectal symptoms. Two hundred seventeen patients (28%) developed acute Grade 2 urinary symptoms, and one experienced urinary retention (Grade 3). Eleven patients (1.5%) developed late Grade 2 rectal bleeding. Four patients (0.1%) experienced Grade 3 rectal toxicity requiring either one or more transfusions or a laser cauterization procedure. No Grade 4 rectal complications have been observed. The 3-year actuarial likelihood of >/= late Grade 2 rectal toxicity was 4%. Seventy-two patients (9%) experienced late Grade 2 urinary toxicity, and five (0.5%) developed Grade 3 urinary toxicity (urethral stricture). The 3-year actuarial likelihood of >/= late Grade 2 urinary toxicity was 15%. The 3-year actuarial PSA relapse-free survival rates for favorable, intermediate, and unfavorable risk group patients were 92%, 86%, and 81%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate the feasibility of high-dose IMRT in a large number of patients. Acute and late rectal toxicities seem to be significantly reduced compared with what has been observed with conventional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy techniques. Short-term PSA control rates seem to be at least comparable to those achieved with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy at similar dose levels. Based on this favorable risk:benefit ratio, IMRT has become the standard mode of conformal treatment delivery for localized prostate cancer at our institution.

Preliminary observations on biochemical relapse-free survival rates after short-course intensity-modulated radiotherapy (70 Gy at 2.5 Gy/fraction) for localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To compare the preliminary biochemical relapse-free survival rates between short-course intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SCIM-RT) delivering 70 Gy in 28 fractions and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) delivering 78 Gy in 39 fractions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 1998 and December 1999, 166 patients were treated with SCIM-RT and 116 with 3D-CRT. The SCIM-RT cases were treated to 70 Gy (2.5 Gy/fraction) using 5 intensity-modulated fields using a dynamic multileaf collimator. The BAT transabdominal ultrasound system was used for localization of the prostate gland in all SCIM-RT cases. The 116 3D-CRT cases were treated to 78.0 Gy (2.0 Gy/fraction). The study sample therefore comprised 282 cases; 70 Gy in 28 fractions is equivalent to 78 Gy in 39 fractions for late-reacting tissues, according to the linear-quadratic model. The median follow-up for all cases was 25 months (range 3-42). The median follow-up was 21 months for the SCIM-RT cases (range 3-31) and 32 months for the 3D-CRT cases (range 3-42). The follow-up period was shorter for the SCIM-RT cases, because SCIM-RT was started only in October 1998. Biochemical relapse was defined as 3 consecutive rising prostate-specific antigen levels after reaching a nadir. The analysis was then repeated with a more stringent definition of biochemical control: reaching and maintaining a prostate-specific antigen level of < or =0.5 ng/mL. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group toxicity scores were used to assess complications.

RESULTS

For the 282 patients, the biochemical relapse-free survival rate at 30 months was 91% (95% confidence interval 88-95%). The biochemical relapse-free survival rate at 30 months for 3D-CRT vs. SCIM-RT was 88% (95% confidence interval 82-94%) vs. 94% (95% confidence interval 91-98%), respectively. The difference was not statistically significant between the two treatment arms (p = 0.084). The multivariate time-to-failure analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model for clinical parameters showed the pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level (p <0.001) and biopsy Gleason score (p <0.001) to be the only independent predictors of biochemical relapse. Clinical T stage (p = 0.66), age (p = 0.15), race (p = 0.25), and neoadjuvant androgen deprivation (p = 0.66) were not independent predictors of biochemical failure. SCIM-RT showed only a trend toward a better outcome on multivariate analysis (p = 0.058). Late rectal toxicity was limited; the actuarial combined Grade 2 and 3 late rectal toxicity rate at 30 months was 5% for SCIM-RT vs. 12% for 3D-CRT (p = 0.24). Grade 3 late rectal toxicity (rectal bleeding requiring cauterization) occurred in a total of 10 patients. The actuarial Grade 3 late rectal toxicity rate at 30 months was 2% for the SCIM-RT cases and 8% for the 3D-CRT cases (p = 0.059). Late urinary toxicity was rare in both groups.

CONCLUSION

With the currently available follow-up period (< or =30 months), the hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy schedule of 70.0 Gy delivered at 2.5 Gy/fraction had a comparable biochemical relapse profile with the prior 3D-CRT schedule delivering 78.0 at 2.0 Gy/fraction. The late rectal toxicity profile has been extremely favorable. If longer follow-up confirms the favorable biochemical failure and low late toxicity rates, SCIM-RT will be an alternative and more convenient way of providing dose escalation in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) represents a new paradigm in radiation treatment planning and delivery for treatment of prostate cancer with enormous potential. Preliminary data indicate that this highly conformal treatment technique can effectively reduce acute and late-occurring toxicities, improving the quality of life of the treated patient and serving as the optimal dose escalation tool. IMRT produces radiation distributions capable of delivering different dose prescriptions to multiple target sites, providing a new opportunity for differential dose painting to increase the dose selectively to specific, image-defined regions within the prostate. Clinical trials will be necessary to define more clearly the true extent of improved tumor control and reduction in normal tissue complications with IMRT in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Impact of biochemical failure on overall survival after radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer in the PSA era

PURPOSE

To study the impact of biochemical failure on overall survival rates during the first 10 years after definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The analysis was performed on 936 cases treated at a single institution between 1986 and 1998 with definitive radiotherapy. The median age of treatment was 69 years (range: 46-86 years). Pretreatment PSA levels (iPSA) and biopsy Gleason scores (bGS) were available for all cases. The clinical stage was T1/T2A in 63%, T2B/C in 27%, and T3 in 10%. The median iPSA level was 9.6 ng/mL (range: 0.4-692.9 ng/mL). The iPSA was < or =10 in 53% and >10 in 47%. The bGS was < or =6 in 59% and > or =7 in 41%. Androgen deprivation (AD) was administered in 181 cases (19%) for a median duration of 6 months (range: 1-6 months). All 181 cases received AD neoadjuvantly, i.e., before and/or during the radiotherapy. No AD was delivered after the completion of radiation. The median radiation dose was 70 Gy (range: 60-78 Gy). The radiotherapy technique was conformal in 376 (40%) cases. The American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition of biochemical failure (bF) was used; 316 cases (34%) had failed biochemically, and 620 (66%) had not. The end point was overall survival (OS). Time to death was determined from the time of definitive radiotherapy. The median PSA follow-up was 58 months. The median follow-up times for bF vs. no-bF cases were 77 and 49 months, respectively. A multivariate analysis of factors affecting OS using the proportional hazards model was performed for all cases using the following variables: age (>65 vs. < or =65 years), race (African-American vs. Caucasian), clinical T stage (T1-2A vs. T2B-C vs. T3), bGS (< or =6 vs. 7 vs. > or =8), iPSA (continuous variable), use of AD (yes vs. no), year of therapy (continuous variable), radiation dose (continuous variable), radiation technique (conformal vs. standard), and biochemical failure (yes vs. no).

RESULTS

The 5-year OS rate for the entire group was 89% (95% CI [confidence interval]: 86-91%). The 5-year OS rates for bF vs. no-bF patients were 89% (95% CI: 86-93%) and 89% (95% CI: 86-92%), respectively. The 10-year OS rate for the entire group was 68% (95% CI: 61-75%). The 10-year OS rates for bF vs. no-bF patients were 65% (95% CI: 56-74%) and 77% (95% CI: 69-84%), respectively. The difference between bF and no bF was not significant in predicting overall survival in univariate analysis (log-rank test, p = 0.68). On multivariate analysis, bGS (p < 0.001), T stage (p = 0.003), radiation dose (p = 0.017), year of therapy (p = 0.031), and age (p = 0.020) were independent predictors of death. iPSA levels (p = 0.33), race (p = 0.80), radiation technique (p = 0.16), and use of AD (p = 0.09) were not predictive of OS. Biochemical failure (p = 0.052) showed only a trend for independently predicting overall survival on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Biochemical failure after definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer is not associated with increased mortality within the first 10 years after initial therapy, although a trend toward worse outcome was observed at 10 years. Longer follow-up from initial therapy is needed to fully understand the impact of biochemical failure on overall survival. With longer follow-up, significant differences might be observed at 15 or 20 years after therapy.

Dose/volume relationship of late rectal bleeding after external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: absolute or relative rectal volume?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyze predictors of late rectal bleeding after external-beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer, with a focus on the volume of rectum irradiated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred twenty-eight patients were treated with external-beam radiotherapy at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation between January 1998 and June 1999. Conformal radiotherapy (CRT) was used to deliver 78 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction in 76 cases, and short-course intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SCIM-RT) was used to deliver 70 Gy at 2.5 Gy per fraction in 52 cases. All contours were determined by one physician. The rectum was outlined from 1 cm above the target structures to 1 cm below the target structures. The entire volume of the rectum, along with the outer rectal wall, was included. All cases had detailed planning parameters that specifically determined the rectal volume receiving the prescription dose (VrPr), that is, 78 Gy for CRT and 70 Gy for SCIM-RT, and the percent of rectal volume receiving the prescription dose (%VrPr). The RTOG scales were used to evaluate late toxicity. The median follow-up was 24 months for all cases (range, 3-34 months), 21 months for SCIM-RT cases (range, 11-26 months), and 28 months for CRT cases (range, 3-34 months).

RESULTS

To date, five patients have had grade 1 late rectal toxicity (one CRT case and four SCIM-RT cases), one patient had grade 2 late rectal toxicity (CRT), and three patients had grade 3 late rectal toxicity (all CRT cases). Because of the low number of events, the analysis was performed with all patients experiencing rectal bleeding grouped together. The actuarial rectal bleeding rates at 18 and 24 months were 6% and 8%, respectively. The actuarial rectal bleeding rates at 24 months were identical (8%) for both SCIM-RT and CRT. A multivariate analysis of the following parameters was performed to determine independent predictors of rectal bleeding: age (continuous variable), race (Caucasian vs African American), coverage of seminal vesicles (yes vs no), adjuvant androgen deprivation (yes vs no), technique (CRT vs SCIM-RT), Radiation Therapy Oncology Group acute rectal toxicity score (continuous variable), VrPr (continuous variable in cubic centimeters), and %VrPr (continuous variable). Only the VrPr (cubic centimeter) was an independent predictor of rectal bleeding; %VrPr was not. With different cut-off levels being used, a VrPr of 15 cm3 was significant on univariate analysis; the actuarial rectal bleeding rates at 24 months for patients with a VrPr < or = 15 cm3 versus a VrPr > 15 cm3 were 5% versus 22%, respectively. CONCLUSION> In our study sample, which included both conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy patients, the volume of rectum receiving the prescribed radiation dose (the equivalent of 78 Gy) was an independent predictor of late rectal bleeding. The percent of rectal volume receivingthe full dose was not. Using actual volume rather than percent volume also avoids the dependence on the extent of rectal volume contours. We recommend 15 cm3 as the cut-off of the rectal volume not to exceed the prescription dose. The rectal bleeding rate at 2 years for cases with < 15 cm3 receiving the full dose was only 5%.

Defining a dose-response relationship with radiotherapy for prostate cancer: is more really better?

PURPOSE

Data were reviewed addressing the association between radiation therapy (RT) dose and treatment outcome for localized prostate cancer to help clarify the existence of a potential dose-response relationship.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Articles were identified through the MEDLINE database, CancerLit database, and reference lists of relevant articles. Studies were categorized into four groups based upon the endpoint analyzed, including biochemical control (BC), local control (LC), pathologic control (PC), and cause-specific survival (CSS). The impact of increasing RT dose with each endpoint was recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-two trials involving a total of 11,297 patients were identified. Of the 11 trials addressing the association of RT dose with LC, 9 showed statistically significant improvements. Of the 12 trials that reported BC with RT dose, all showed statistically significant improvements. Two out of 4 studies analyzing PC with increasing dose showed a positive correlation. Finally, 3 out of 9 studies addressing RT dose with CSS showed statistically significant improvements. Despite inconclusive results, patients with poor risk features (e.g., prostate-specific antigen [PSA] > or = 10, Gleason score [GS] > or = 7, or tumor stage > or = T2b) were most likely to benefit from increasing dose with respect to each endpoint. However, the optimal RT dose and the magnitude of benefit of dose escalation could not be identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Although RT dose appears to correlate with various measures of treatment outcome, objective, high-quality data addressing this critical issue are still lacking. At the present time, the absolute improvement in outcome due to dose escalation, the subset of patients benefitting most, and the optimal dose remain to be defined.

Short-course intensity-modulated radiotherapy (70 GY at 2.5 GY per fraction) for localized prostate cancer: preliminary results on late toxicity and quality of life

PURPOSE

To present our preliminary observations on the late toxicity and quality of life (QOL) of patients treated with short-course intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SCIM-RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifty-one patients were treated with SCIM-RT at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation between October 1998 and May 1999. The technique consisted of intensity-modulated radiotherapy using 5 static fields (anterior, 2 laterals, and 2 anterior obliques). Inverse plans were generated by the Corvus treatment-planning system. The treatment delivery was performed with a dynamic multileaf collimator. A total of 70.0 Gy was prescribed in all cases at 2.5 Gy per fraction to be delivered in 28 fractions over 5 and a half weeks. The location of the prostate gland was verified and adjusted daily with the BAT transabdominal ultrasound system. The median follow-up was 18 months (range: 11 to 26 months). The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scales were used to evaluate late toxicity. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) was used to evaluate QOL. A total of 24 patients completed the EPIC questionnaire at approximately 2 years after therapy (median time from treatment to questionnaire administration: 24 months; range: 21 to 26 months). The results from the EPIC questionnaires were compared to scores from 46 patients treated during the same time period with conformal radiotherapy (CRT) to 78 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction.

RESULTS

The dose was prescribed to an isodose line ranging from 82.0% to 90.0% (mean: 87.2%). The range of the individual prostate mean doses was 73.5 to 78.5 Gy (average: 75.3 Gy). To date, only 1 patient had Grade 1 late urinary toxicity. To date, only 4 patients had Grade 1 late rectal toxicity. No Grade 2 or 3 late urinary or rectal complications have occurred. The actuarial rectal bleeding rate observed at 18 months was 7%. There were no differences in scores from the urinary, bowel, hormonal, and overall QOL domains between SCIM-RT patients and patients treated with CRT. The overall physical and mental QOL scores were also nearly identical to scores reported for the general U.S. population.

CONCLUSION

Preliminary late toxicity results up to 2 years after SCIM-RT are encouraging, with a median follow-up of 18 months (range 11 to 26 months). Late toxicity assessed by the physicians using RTOG late toxicity scores has been excellent. QOL reported by the patients using the EPIC questionnaire reveals no difference between patients treated with high-dose CRT at standard fractionation and patients treated with SCIM-RT. SCIM-RT is an alternative method of dose escalation in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The proposed schedule significantly increases convenience to patients due to the decrease in overall treatment time.

The treatment of prostate cancer: an overview of current options

PURPOSE

The purpose of this report is to discuss the current treatment options available to the patient with prostate cancer in all stages of the disease.

OVERVIEW

With the exception of skin cancer, prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men in the United States. Most patients in the current era will present with organ-confined disease, amenable to curative treatment. Treatment for organ-confined disease includes watchful waiting, radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, and cryosurgery in selective cases. Hormone therapy is the cornerstone of treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer. There is no curative treatment for hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The availability of several therapeutic options for localized prostate cancer warrants careful consideration when planning treatment with curative intent. Patients need to be active participants in decision making, and they must be aware of the benefits and possible complications of the different types of treatment. Patients with advanced prostate cancer need to be aware that hormone treatment will provide temporization and palliation in the majority of cases. Hormone-resistant prostate cancer is refractory to most forms of conventional and experimental therapy.

External-beam radiotherapy in the management of carcinoma of the prostate

BACKGROUND

External-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) has been used in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland for more than 30 years. Well-documented clinical series have demonstrated the effectiveness of EBRT in achieving both cause-specific survival and freedom from biochemical (prostate-specific antigen [PSA]) progression.

METHODS

The indications and expected treatment results for treatment by EBRT in the management of adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland are reviewed. The treatment of early-stage disease definitively by EBRT alone or as complement to radioactive seed implant is emphasized. In the management of locally advanced disease, the use of EBRT with combined androgen ablation is discussed as definitive therapy and also as indicated in the postoperative adjuvant management of surgically identified pathologic stage T3 disease.

RESULTS

The relative clinical benefit of EBRT compared with the mostly predictable and well-defined moderate side effects, which are manageable in most instances by conservative measures treatment, is well established. Advances in defining radiation-beam parameters have led to more effective and safer treatment for prostate cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

EBRT has historically been a mainstay in the management of prostate cancer. It remains a useful and indicated treatment modality in patients with early-stage, locally advanced, and metastatic disease.

Radiation dose response in patients with favorable localized prostate cancer (Stage T1-T2, biopsy Gleason < or = 6, and pretreatment prostate-specific antigen < or = 10)

PURPOSE

To study the radiation dose response as determined by biochemical relapse-free survival in patients with favorable localized prostate cancers, i.e., Stage T1-T2, biopsy Gleason score (bGS) < or = 6, and pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (iPSA) < or = 10 ng/mL.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 292 patients with favorable localized prostate cancer were treated with radiotherapy alone between 1986 and 1999. The median age was 69 years. Sixteen percent of cases (n = 46) were African-American. The distribution by clinical T stage was as follows: T1/T2A, 243 (83%); and T2B/T2C, 49 (17%). The distribution by iPSA was as follows: < or = 4 ng/mL, 49 (17%); and > 4 ng/mL, 243 (83%). The mean iPSA level was 6.2 (median, 6.4). The distribution by bGS was as follows: or = 5 in 89 cases (30%) and 6 in 203 cases (70%). The median radiation dose was 70.0 Gy (range, 63.0-78.0 Gy). Doses of < or = 70.0 Gy were delivered in 175 cases, 70.2-72.0 Gy in 24 cases, 74 Gy in 30 cases, and 78 Gy in 63 cases. For patients receiving < 72 Gy, the median dose was 68 Gy, vs. 78 Gy for patients receiving > or = 72 Gy. A conformal technique was used in 129 (44%) of cases. The median follow-up was 43 months (range, 3-153).

RESULTS

For the entire cohort, the projected 5- and 8-year biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) rates were both 81%. For patients receiving > or = 72 Gy, the 5- and 8-year bRFS rates were both 95% vs. only 77% for patients receiving < 72 Gy, p = 0.010. For patients receiving 74 Gy, the 4-year bRFS rate was 94% vs. 96% for patients receiving 78 Gy, p = 0.90. A multivariate analysis for factors affecting bRFS rates using Cox proportional hazards was performed for all cases using the following variables: age (continuous variable), race (black vs. white), iPSA (continuous variable), bGS (< or = 5 vs. 6), Stage (T1-2A vs. T2B-C), radiation dose (continuous variable), and radiation technique (conformal vs. standard). From the multivariate analysis, only iPSA (p = 0.017, chi(2) = 5.7), and radiation dose (p = 0.021, chi(2) = 5.3) were independent predictors of outcome. Age (p = 0.94), race (p = 0.89), stage (p = 0.45), biopsy GS (p = 0.40), and radiation technique (p = 0.45) were not.

CONCLUSION

There is a clear radiation dose response in patients with favorable localized prostate cancers (i.e., Stage T1-T2, biopsy Gleason score < or = 6, and iPSA < or = 10 ng/mL). At least 74 Gy should be delivered to the prostate and periprostatic tissues. With our cohort of patients, longer follow-up will be needed to assess the importance of doses exceeding 74 Gy.

An update on prostate cancer

Consideration of the number of prostate biopsy samples found to be positive for cancer may add clinically useful information to T stage, Gleason score, and prostate-specific antigen level in predicting outcome after radical prostatectomy. Higher radiation doses and neoadjuvant hormone therapy has been applied successfully to patients with higher risk disease. Brachytherapy has emerged as a modality for localized prostate cancer with outcomes and toxicity being further defined. Efforts to measure and improve quality of life are an important part of prostate cancer research. Standard management of metastatic disease remains androgen ablation, with long-term side effects being recognized. Newer hormonal and chemotherapeutic agents are being explored for patients with metastatic disease.

Preliminary results of a randomized radiotherapy dose-escalation study comparing 70 Gy with 78 Gy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of radiotherapy dose on prostate cancer patient outcome and biopsy positivity in a phase III trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 305 stage T1 through T3 patients were randomized to receive 70 Gy or 78 Gy of external-beam radiotherapy between 1993 and 1998. Of these, 301 were assessable; stratification was based on pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level (PSA). Dose was prescribed to the isocenter at 2 Gy per fraction. All patients underwent planning pelvic computed tomography scan to confirm prostate position. Treatment failure was defined as an increasing PSA on three consecutive follow-up visits or the initiation of salvage treatment. Median follow-up was 40 months.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty patients were randomized to the 70-Gy arm and 151 to the 78-Gy arm. The difference in freedom from biochemical and/or disease failure (FFF) rates of 69% and 79% for the 70-Gy and 78-Gy groups, respectively, at 5 years was marginally significant (log-rank P: =.058). Multiple-covariate Cox proportional hazards regression showed that the study randomization was an independent correlate of FFF, along with pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, and stage. The patients who benefited most from the 8-Gy dose escalation were those with a pretreatment PSA of more than 10 ng/mL; 5-year FFF rates were 48% and 75% (P: =.011) for the 70-Gy and 78-Gy arms, respectively. There was no difference between the arms ( approximately 80% 5-year FFF) when the pretreatment PSA was < or = 10 ng/mL.

CONCLUSION

A modest dose increase of 8 Gy using conformal radiotherapy resulted in a substantial improvement in prostate cancer FFF rates for patients with a pretreatment PSA of more than 10 ng/mL. These findings document that local persistence of prostate cancer in intermediate- to high-risk patients is a major problem when doses of 70 Gy or less are used.