1
|
Sosa AJ, Thames HD, Sanders JW, Choi SL, Nguyen QN, Mok H, Ron Zhu X, Shah S, Mayo LL, Hoffman KE, Tang C, Lee AK, Pugh TJ, Kudchadker R, Frank SJ. Proton therapy for the management of localized prostate cancer: Long-term clinical outcomes at a comprehensive cancer center. Radiother Oncol 2023; 188:109854. [PMID: 37597805 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Proton therapy (PT) has emerged as a standard-of-care treatment option for localized prostate cancer at our comprehensive cancer center. However, there are few large-scale analyses examining the long-term clinical outcomes. Therefore, this article aims to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and toxicity of PT in patients with localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Review of 2772 patients treated from May 2006 through January 2020. Disease risk was stratified according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines as low [LR, n = 640]; favorable-intermediate [F-IR, n = 850]; unfavorable-intermediate [U-IR, n = 851]; high [HR, n = 315]; or very high [VHR, n = 116]. Biochemical failure and toxicity were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariate models. RESULTS The median patient age was 66 years; the median follow-up time was 7.0 years. Pelvic lymph node irradiation was prescribed to 28 patients (1%) (2 [0.2%] U-IR, 11 [3.5%] HR, and 15 [12.9%] VHR). The median dose was 78 Gy in 1.8-2.0 Gy(RBE) fractions. Freedom from biochemical relapse (FFBR) rates at 5 years and 10 years were 98.2% and 96.8% for the LR group; 98.3% and 93.6%, F-IR; 94.2% and 90.2%, U-IR; 94.3% and 85.2%, HR; and 86.1% and 68.5%, VHR. Two patients died of prostate cancer. Overall rates of late grade ≥ 3 GU and GI toxicity were 0.87% and 1.01%. CONCLUSIONS Proton therapy for localized prostate cancer demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes in this large cohort, even among higher-risk groups with historically poor outcomes despite aggressive therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan J Sosa
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Howard D Thames
- Departments of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeremiah W Sanders
- Departments of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Seungtaek L Choi
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Quynh-Nhu Nguyen
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Henry Mok
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - X Ron Zhu
- Departments of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shalin Shah
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lauren L Mayo
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Karen E Hoffman
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chad Tang
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew K Lee
- Texas Center for Proton Therapy, Irving, TX, USA
| | | | - Reena Kudchadker
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sanders JW, Tang C, Kudchadker RJ, Venkatesan AM, Mok H, Hanania AN, Thames HD, Bruno TL, Starks C, Santiago E, Cunningham M, Frank SJ. Uncertainty in magnetic resonance imaging-based prostate postimplant dosimetry: Results of a 10-person human observer study, and comparisons with automatic postimplant dosimetry. Brachytherapy 2023; 22:822-832. [PMID: 37716820 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Uncertainties in postimplant quality assessment (QA) for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDRPBT) are introduced at two steps: seed localization and contouring. We quantified how interobserver variability (IoV) introduced in both steps impacts dose-volume-histogram (DVH) parameters for MRI-based LDRPBT, and compared it with automatically derived DVH parameters. METHODS AND MATERIALS Twenty-five patients received MRI-based LDRPBT. Seven clinical observers contoured the prostate and four organs at risk, and 4 dosimetrists performed seed localization, on each MRI. Twenty-eight unique manual postimplant QAs were created for each patient from unique observer pairs. Reference QA and automatic QA were also performed for each patient. IoV of prostate, rectum, and external urinary sphincter (EUS) DVH parameters owing to seed localization and contouring was quantified with coefficients of variation. Automatically derived DVH parameters were compared with those of the reference plans. RESULTS Coefficients of variation (CoVs) owing to contouring variability (CoVcontours) were significantly higher than those due to seed localization variability (CoVseeds) (median CoVcontours vs. median CoVseeds: prostate D90-15.12% vs. 0.65%, p < 0.001; prostate V100-5.36% vs. 0.37%, p < 0.001; rectum V100-79.23% vs. 8.69%, p < 0.001; EUS V200-107.74% vs. 21.18%, p < 0.001). CoVcontours were lower when the contouring observers were restricted to the 3 radiation oncologists, but were still markedly higher than CoVseeds. Median differences in prostate D90, prostate V100, rectum V100, and EUS V200 between automatically computed and reference dosimetry parameters were 3.16%, 1.63%, -0.00 mL, and -0.00 mL, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Seed localization introduces substantially less variability in postimplant QA than does contouring for MRI-based LDRPBT. While automatic seed localization may potentially help improve workflow efficiency, it has limited potential for improving the consistency and quality of postimplant dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremiah W Sanders
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| | - Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Rajat J Kudchadker
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Aradhana M Venkatesan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Henry Mok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Howard D Thames
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Teresa L Bruno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Christine Starks
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Edwin Santiago
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Mandy Cunningham
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Molkentine DP, Molkentine JM, Bridges KA, Valdecanas DR, Dhawan A, Bahri R, Hefner AJ, Kumar M, Yang L, Abdelhakiem M, Pifer PM, Sandulache V, Sheth A, Beadle BM, Thames HD, Mason KA, Pickering CR, Meyn RE, Skinner HD. p16 Represses DNA Damage Repair via a Novel Ubiquitin-Dependent Signaling Cascade. Cancer Res 2022; 82:916-928. [PMID: 34965932 PMCID: PMC9136619 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-21-2101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Squamous cell carcinoma driven by human papillomavirus (HPV) is more sensitive to DNA-damaging therapies than its HPV-negative counterpart. Here, we show that p16, the clinically used surrogate for HPV positivity, renders cells more sensitive to radiotherapy via a ubiquitin-dependent signaling pathway, linking high levels of this protein to increased activity of the transcription factor SP1, increased HUWE1 transcription, and degradation of ubiquitin-specific protease 7 (USP7) and TRIP12. Activation of this pathway in HPV-positive disease led to decreased homologous recombination and improved response to radiotherapy, a phenomenon that can be recapitulated in HPV-negative disease using USP7 inhibitors in clinical development. This p16-driven axis induced sensitivity to PARP inhibition and potentially leads to "BRCAness" in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cells. Thus, these findings support a functional role for p16 in HPV-positive tumors in driving response to DNA damage, which can be exploited to improve outcomes in both patients with HPV-positive and HPV-negative HNSCC. SIGNIFICANCE In HPV-positive tumors, a previously undiscovered pathway directly links p16 to DNA damage repair and sensitivity to radiotherapy via a clinically relevant and pharmacologically targetable ubiquitin-mediated degradation pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David P. Molkentine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jessica M. Molkentine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kathleen A. Bridges
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David R. Valdecanas
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Annika Dhawan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Reshub Bahri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Andrew J. Hefner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Manish Kumar
- Department of Biochemistry, AIMS, Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh, India
| | - Liangpeng Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mohamed Abdelhakiem
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Phillip M. Pifer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Vlad Sandulache
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston Texas
| | - Aakash Sheth
- Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston Texas
| | - Beth M. Beadle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford California
| | - Howard D. Thames
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kathryn A. Mason
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Curtis R. Pickering
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Raymond E. Meyn
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Heath D. Skinner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sanders JW, Kudchadker RJ, Tang C, Mok H, Venkatesan AM, Thames HD, Frank SJ. Prospective Evaluation of Prostate and Organs at Risk Segmentation Software for MRI-based Prostate Radiation Therapy. Radiol Artif Intell 2022; 4:e210151. [PMID: 35391775 DOI: 10.1148/ryai.210151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The segmentation of the prostate and surrounding organs at risk (OARs) is a necessary workflow step for performing dose-volume histogram analyses of prostate radiation therapy procedures. Low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDRPBT) is a curative prostate radiation therapy treatment that delivers a single fraction of radiation over a period of days. Prior studies have demonstrated the feasibility of fully convolutional networks to segment the prostate and surrounding OARs for LDRPBT dose-volume histogram analyses. However, performance evaluations have been limited to measures of global similarity between algorithm predictions and a reference. To date, the clinical use of automatic segmentation algorithms for LDRPBT has not been evaluated, to the authors' knowledge. The purpose of this work was to assess the performance of fully convolutional networks for prostate and OAR delineation on a prospectively identified cohort of patients who underwent LDRPBT by using clinically relevant metrics. Thirty patients underwent LDRPBT and were imaged with fully balanced steady-state free precession MRI after implantation. Custom automatic segmentation software was used to segment the prostate and four OARs. Dose-volume histogram analyses were performed by using both the original automatically generated contours and the physician-refined contours. Dosimetry parameters of the prostate, external urinary sphincter, and rectum were compared without and with the physician refinements. This study observed that physician refinements to the automatic contours did not significantly affect dosimetry parameters. Keywords: MRI, Neural Networks, Radiation Therapy, Radiation Therapy/Oncology, Genital/Reproductive, Prostate, Segmentation, Dosimetry Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremiah W Sanders
- Departments of Imaging Physics (J.W.S.), Radiation Physics (R.J.K.), Radiation Oncology (C.T., H.M., S.J.F.), Diagnostic Radiology (A.M.V.), and Biostatistics (H.D.T.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Rajat J Kudchadker
- Departments of Imaging Physics (J.W.S.), Radiation Physics (R.J.K.), Radiation Oncology (C.T., H.M., S.J.F.), Diagnostic Radiology (A.M.V.), and Biostatistics (H.D.T.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Chad Tang
- Departments of Imaging Physics (J.W.S.), Radiation Physics (R.J.K.), Radiation Oncology (C.T., H.M., S.J.F.), Diagnostic Radiology (A.M.V.), and Biostatistics (H.D.T.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Henry Mok
- Departments of Imaging Physics (J.W.S.), Radiation Physics (R.J.K.), Radiation Oncology (C.T., H.M., S.J.F.), Diagnostic Radiology (A.M.V.), and Biostatistics (H.D.T.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Aradhana M Venkatesan
- Departments of Imaging Physics (J.W.S.), Radiation Physics (R.J.K.), Radiation Oncology (C.T., H.M., S.J.F.), Diagnostic Radiology (A.M.V.), and Biostatistics (H.D.T.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Howard D Thames
- Departments of Imaging Physics (J.W.S.), Radiation Physics (R.J.K.), Radiation Oncology (C.T., H.M., S.J.F.), Diagnostic Radiology (A.M.V.), and Biostatistics (H.D.T.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Steven J Frank
- Departments of Imaging Physics (J.W.S.), Radiation Physics (R.J.K.), Radiation Oncology (C.T., H.M., S.J.F.), Diagnostic Radiology (A.M.V.), and Biostatistics (H.D.T.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sanders JW, Mok H, Hanania AN, Venkatesan AM, Tang C, Bruno TL, Thames HD, Kudchadker RJ, Frank SJ. Computer-aided segmentation on MRI for prostate radiotherapy, part II: Comparing human and computer observer populations and the influence of annotator variability on algorithm variability. Radiother Oncol 2021; 169:132-139. [PMID: 34979213 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Comparing deep learning (DL) algorithms to human interobserver variability, one of the largest sources of noise in human-performed annotations, is necessary to inform the clinical application, use, and quality assurance of DL for prostate radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred fourteen DL algorithms were developed on 295 prostate MRIs to segment the prostate, external urinary sphincter (EUS), seminal vesicles (SV), rectum, and bladder. Fifty prostate MRIs of 25 patients undergoing MRI-based low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy were acquired as an independent test set. Groups of DL algorithms were created based on the loss functions used to train them, and the spatial entropy (SE) of their predictions on the 50 test MRIs was computed. Five human observers contoured the 50 test MRIs, and SE maps of their contours were compared with those of the groups of the DL algorithms. Additionally, similarity metrics were computed between DL algorithm predictions and consensus annotations of the 5 human observers' contours of the 50 test MRIs. RESULTS A DL algorithm yielded statistically significantly higher similarity metrics for the prostate than did the human observers (H) (prostate Matthew's correlation coefficient, DL vs. H: planning-0.931 vs. 0.903, p < 0.001; postimplant-0.925 vs. 0.892, p < 0.001); the same was true for the 4 organs at risk. The SE maps revealed that the DL algorithms and human annotators were most variable in similar anatomical regions: the prostate-EUS, prostate-SV, prostate-rectum, and prostate-bladder junctions. CONCLUSIONS Annotation quality is an important consideration when developing, evaluating, and using DL algorithms clinically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremiah W Sanders
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States.
| | - Henry Mok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Alexander N Hanania
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
| | - Aradhana M Venkatesan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Teresa L Bruno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Howard D Thames
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Rajat J Kudchadker
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sanders JW, Mok H, Hanania AN, Venkatesan AM, Tang C, Bruno TL, Thames HD, Kudchadker RJ, Frank SJ. Computer-aided segmentation on MRI for prostate radiotherapy, Part I: Quantifying human interobserver variability of the prostate and organs at risk and its impact on radiation dosimetry. Radiother Oncol 2021; 169:124-131. [PMID: 34921895 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 11/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Quantifying the interobserver variability (IoV) of prostate and periprostatic anatomy delineation on prostate MRI is necessary to inform its use for treatment planning, treatment delivery, and treatment quality assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty five prostate cancer patients underwent MRI-based low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDRPBT). The patients were scanned with a 3D T2-weighted sequence for treatment planning and a 3D T2/T1-weighted sequence for quality assessment. Seven observers involved with the LDRPBT workflow delineated the prostate, external urinary sphincter (EUS), seminal vesicles, rectum, and bladder on all 50 MRIs. IoV was assessed by measuring contour similarity metrics, differences in organ volumes, and differences in dosimetry parameters between unique observer pairs. Measurements from a group of 3 radiation oncologists (G1) were compared against those from a group consisting of the other 4 clinical observers (G2). RESULTS IoV of the prostate was lower for G1 than G2 (Matthew's correlation coefficient [MCC], G1 vs. G2: planning-0.906 vs. 0.870, p < 0.001; postimplant-0.899 vs. 0.861, p < 0.001). IoV of the EUS was highest of all the organs for both groups, but was lower for G1 (MCC, G1 vs. G2: planning-0.659 vs. 0.402, p < 0.001; postimplant-0.684 vs. 0.398, p < 0.001). Large differences in prostate dosimetry parameters were observed (G1 maximum absolute prostate ΔD90: planning-76.223 Gy, postimplant-36.545 Gy; G1 maximum absolute prostate ΔV100: planning-13.927%, postimplant-8.860%). CONCLUSIONS While MRI is optimal in the management of prostate cancer with radiation therapy, significant interobserver variability of the prostate and external urinary sphincter still exist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremiah W Sanders
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
| | - Henry Mok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | | | - Aradhana M Venkatesan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Teresa L Bruno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Howard D Thames
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
| | - Rajat J Kudchadker
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sanders J, Mok H, Hanania AN, Venkatesan AM, Tang C, Bruno TL, Thames HD, Kudchadker RJ, Frank SJ. PRSOR03 Presentation Time: 12:10 PM. Brachytherapy 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.06.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
8
|
Ciecior W, Ebert N, Borgeaud N, Thames HD, Baumann M, Krause M, Löck S. Sample-size calculation for preclinical dose-response experiments using heterogeneous tumour models. Radiother Oncol 2021; 158:262-267. [PMID: 33667590 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.02.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In preclinical radio-oncological research, local tumour control is considered the most relevant endpoint as it reflects the inactivation of cancer stem cells. Preclinical tumour-control assays may compare dose-response curves between different radiotherapy strategies, e.g., assessing additional targeted drugs and immunotherapeutic interventions, or between different radiation modalities. To mimic the biological heterogeneity of human tumour populations and to accommodate for approaches of personalized oncology, preclinical studies are increasingly performed combining larger panels of tumour models. For designing the study protocols and to obtain reliable results, prospective sample-size planning has to be developed that accounts for such heterogeneous cohorts. METHODS A Monte-Carlo-based method was developed to estimate the sample size of a comparative 1:1 two-arm prospective tumour-control assay. Based on repeated logistic regression analysis, pre-defined dose levels, assumptions on the dose-response curves of the included tumour models and on the dose-modifying factors (DMF), the power is calculated for a given number of animals per dose group. RESULTS Two applications are presented: (i) For a simple tumour-control assay with the head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) model FaDu, 10 animals would be required for each of 7 dose levels per arm to reveal a DMF of 1.25 with a power of 0.82 without drop out (total: 140 animals). (ii) In a more complex experiment combining six different lung tumour models to a heterogeneous population, 21 animals would be required for each of 11 dose levels per arm to reveal a DMF of 1.25 with a power of 0.81 without drop out (total: 462 animals). Analyzing the heterogeneous cohort reduces the required animal number by more than 50% compared to six individual tumour-control assays. CONCLUSION An approach for estimating the required animal number for comparative tumour-control assays in a heterogeneous population is presented, allowing also the inclusion of different treatments as a personalized approach in the experimental arm. The software is publicly available and can be applied to plan comparisons of sigmoidal dose-response curves based on logistic regression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willy Ciecior
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Nadja Ebert
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nathalie Borgeaud
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany
| | - Howard D Thames
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Michael Baumann
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Ruprecht-Karls-University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association / Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sanders JW, Lewis GD, Thames HD, Kudchadker RJ, Venkatesan AM, Bruno TL, Ma J, Pagel MD, Frank SJ. Machine Segmentation of Pelvic Anatomy in MRI-Assisted Radiosurgery (MARS) for Prostate Cancer Brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 108:1292-1303. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.06.076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 06/28/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
10
|
Hammer J, Geinitz H, Nieder C, Track C, Thames HD, Seewald DH, Petzer AL, Helfgott R, Spiegl KJ, Heck D, Bräutigam E. Risk Factors for Local Relapse and Inferior Disease-free Survival After Breast-conserving Management of Breast Cancer: Recursive Partitioning Analysis of 2161 Patients. Clin Breast Cancer 2019; 19:58-62. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2018] [Revised: 08/01/2018] [Accepted: 08/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
11
|
Abstract
The contents of the lab notebooks of H.R. Withers have been digitized and stored as 23 excel files, a total of approximately 45 megabytes. A procedure is described whereby those interested may gain access to the data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Howard D Thames
- Departments of Biostatistics, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
| | - N R Hunter
- Experimental Radiation Oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - Kathy A Mason
- Experimental Radiation Oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Thames HD, Hunter NR, Mason KA. The Withers Archive: Online Availability of H. Rodney Withers' Data. Radiat Res 2016; 186:659-661. [PMID: 27925862 DOI: 10.1667/rr4638.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- H D Thames
- Department of a Biostatistics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - N R Hunter
- b Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - K A Mason
- b Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
White A, Tolman M, Thames HD, Withers HR, Mason KA, Transtrum MK. The Limitations of Model-Based Experimental Design and Parameter Estimation in Sloppy Systems. PLoS Comput Biol 2016; 12:e1005227. [PMID: 27923060 PMCID: PMC5140062 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2016] [Accepted: 10/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
We explore the relationship among experimental design, parameter estimation, and systematic error in sloppy models. We show that the approximate nature of mathematical models poses challenges for experimental design in sloppy models. In many models of complex biological processes it is unknown what are the relevant physical mechanisms that must be included to explain system behaviors. As a consequence, models are often overly complex, with many practically unidentifiable parameters. Furthermore, which mechanisms are relevant/irrelevant vary among experiments. By selecting complementary experiments, experimental design may inadvertently make details that were ommitted from the model become relevant. When this occurs, the model will have a large systematic error and fail to give a good fit to the data. We use a simple hyper-model of model error to quantify a model’s discrepancy and apply it to two models of complex biological processes (EGFR signaling and DNA repair) with optimally selected experiments. We find that although parameters may be accurately estimated, the discrepancy in the model renders it less predictive than it was in the sloppy regime where systematic error is small. We introduce the concept of a sloppy system–a sequence of models of increasing complexity that become sloppy in the limit of microscopic accuracy. We explore the limits of accurate parameter estimation in sloppy systems and argue that identifying underlying mechanisms controlling system behavior is better approached by considering a hierarchy of models of varying detail rather than focusing on parameter estimation in a single model. Sloppy models are often unidentifiable, i.e., characterized by many parameters that are poorly constrained by experimental data. Many models of complex biological systems are sloppy, which has prompted considerable debate about the identifiability of parameters and methods of selecting optimal experiments to infer parameter values. We explore how the approximate nature of models affects the prospect for accurate parameter estimates and model predictivity in sloppy models when using optimal experimental design. We find that sloppy models may no longer give a good fit to data generated from “optimal” experiments. In this case, the model has much less predictive power than it did before optimal experimental selection. We use a simple hyper-model of model error to quantify the model’s discrepancy from the physical system and discuss the potential limits of accurate parameter estimation in sloppy systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew White
- Department of Physics & Astronomy, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America
| | - Malachi Tolman
- Department of Physics & Astronomy, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America
| | - Howard D. Thames
- Department of Biostatistics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Hubert Rodney Withers
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Kathy A. Mason
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Mark K. Transtrum
- Department of Physics & Astronomy, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Linge A, Lohaus F, Löck S, Nowak A, Gudziol V, Valentini C, von Neubeck C, Jütz M, Tinhofer I, Budach V, Sak A, Stuschke M, Balermpas P, Rödel C, Grosu AL, Abdollahi A, Debus J, Ganswindt U, Belka C, Pigorsch S, Combs SE, Mönnich D, Zips D, Buchholz F, Aust DE, Baretton GB, Thames HD, Dubrovska A, Alsner J, Overgaard J, Krause M, Baumann M. HPV status, cancer stem cell marker expression, hypoxia gene signatures and tumour volume identify good prognosis subgroups in patients with HNSCC after primary radiochemotherapy: A multicentre retrospective study of the German Cancer Consortium Radiation Oncology Group (DKTK-ROG). Radiother Oncol 2016; 121:364-373. [PMID: 27913065 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2016] [Revised: 11/07/2016] [Accepted: 11/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the impact of the tumour volume, HPV status, cancer stem cell (CSC) marker expression and hypoxia gene signatures, as potential markers of radiobiological mechanisms of radioresistance, in a contemporary cohort of patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), who received primary radiochemotherapy (RCTx). MATERIALS AND METHODS For 158 patients with locally advanced HNSCC of the oral cavity, oropharynx or hypopharynx who were treated at six DKTK partner sites, the impact of tumour volume, HPV DNA, p16 overexpression, p53 expression, CSC marker expression and hypoxia-associated gene signatures on outcome of primary RCTx was retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint of this study was loco-regional control (LRC). RESULTS Univariate Cox regression revealed a significant impact of tumour volume, p16 overexpression, and SLC3A2 and CD44 protein expression on LRC. The tumour hypoxia classification showed a significant impact only for small tumours. In multivariate analyses an independent correlation of tumour volume, SLC3A2 expression, and the 15-gene hypoxia signature with LRC was identified (CD44 protein n/a because of no event in the CD44-negative group). Logistic modelling showed that inclusion of CD44 protein expression and p16 overexpression significantly improved the performance to predict LRC at 2years compared to the model with tumour volume alone. CONCLUSIONS Tumour volume, HPV status, CSC marker expression and hypoxia gene signatures are potential prognostic biomarkers for patients with locally advanced HNSCC, who were treated by primary RCTx. The study also supports that the individual tumour volumes should generally be included in biomarker studies and that panels of biomarkers are superior to individual parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annett Linge
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany
| | - Fabian Lohaus
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany
| | - Alexander Nowak
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Volker Gudziol
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Chiara Valentini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany
| | - Cläre von Neubeck
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany
| | - Martin Jütz
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany
| | - Inge Tinhofer
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany; Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany; Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ali Sak
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Stuschke
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Frankfurt, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Claus Rödel
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Frankfurt, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Freiburg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany; Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany; Translational Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany; Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany
| | - Ute Ganswindt
- Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Group, Personalized Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer, Helmholtz Zentrum, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany; Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Group, Personalized Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer, Helmholtz Zentrum, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffi Pigorsch
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München, Germany; Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Oberschleißheim, Germany
| | - David Mönnich
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Tübingen, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Tübingen, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Germany
| | - Frank Buchholz
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany; Medical Systems Biology, University Cancer Center (UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Daniela E Aust
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; Tumour- and Normal Tissue Bank, University Cancer Center (UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Gustavo B Baretton
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; Tumour- and Normal Tissue Bank, University Cancer Center (UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Howard D Thames
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Anna Dubrovska
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology, Germany
| | - Jan Alsner
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Jens Overgaard
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Mechthild Krause
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kaufman K, Beale BS, Thames HD, Saunders WB. Articular cartilage scores in cranial cruciate ligament-deficient dogs with or without bucket handle tears of the medial meniscus. Vet Surg 2016; 46:120-129. [DOI: 10.1111/vsu.12584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2015] [Revised: 07/10/2016] [Accepted: 07/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Kaufman
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences; Texas A&M University; College Station Texas
| | | | - Howard D. Thames
- Department of Biostatistics; MD Andersen Cancer Center, University of Texas; Houston Texas
| | - W. Brian Saunders
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences; Texas A&M University; College Station Texas
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Thames HD, Hunter NR, Mason KA. The Withers Archive: online availability of H. Rodney Withers' data. Int J Radiat Biol 2016; 92:855-857. [PMID: 27807995 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1243271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
We have collected lab notebooks from Rod Wither's many years of experimentation, from laboratories in Houston and Los Angeles, as well as from several of his collaborators in the USA and overseas. The contents have been digitized, and in this note we explain the mechanism that has been set up to make the 'Withers Archive' available online.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Howard D Thames
- a Department of Biostatistics , MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Nancy R Hunter
- b Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology , MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Kathryn A Mason
- b Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology , MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Holliday EB, Kirsner SM, Thames HD, Mason BE, Nelson CL, Bloom ES. Lower mean heart dose with deep inspiration breath hold-whole breast irradiation compared with brachytherapy-based accelerated partial breast irradiation for women with left-sided tumors. Pract Radiat Oncol 2016; 7:80-85. [PMID: 28274398 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2016.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2016] [Revised: 07/21/2016] [Accepted: 07/25/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE For left-sided breast cancer, radiation to the heart is a concern. We present a comparison of mean heart and coronary artery biologically effective dose (BED) between accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) and whole breast irradiation with deep inspiration breath-hold technique (DIBH-WBI). METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 100 patients with left-sided, early-stage breast cancer were identified. Fifty underwent single-entry catheter-based APBI and 50 underwent DIBH-WBI. The heart, left anterior descending/interventricular branch, left main, and right coronary artery were delineated. BEDs were calculated from APBI treatment plans (34 Gy in 3.4 Gy twice daily fractions) and for 4 separate plans generated for each DIBH-WBI patient: 50 Gy in 25 fractions (50/25), 50/25 + 10/5 boost, 40/15, and 40/15 + 10/5 boost. RESULTS BED to the heart and coronary vessels were statistically significantly higher with APBI than with any of the DIBH-WBI dose/fractionation schedules. CONCLUSIONS For women with left-sided early-stage breast cancer, DIBH-WBI resulted in statistically significantly lower mean BED to the heart and coronary vessels compared with APBI. This is likely due to increased physical separation between the heart and tumor bed afforded by the DIBH-WBI technique. Long-term assessment of late effects in these tissues will be required to determine whether these differences are clinically significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma B Holliday
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Steve M Kirsner
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Howard D Thames
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bryan E Mason
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Christopher L Nelson
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elizabeth S Bloom
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wang L, Zhang P, Molkentine DP, Chen C, Molkentine JM, Piao H, Raju U, Zhang J, Valdecanas DR, Tailor RC, Thames HD, Buchholz TA, Chen J, Ma L, Mason KA, Ang KK, Meyn RE, Skinner HD. TRIP12 as a mediator of human papillomavirus/p16-related radiation enhancement effects. Oncogene 2016; 36:820-828. [PMID: 27425591 DOI: 10.1038/onc.2016.250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2015] [Revised: 05/16/2016] [Accepted: 06/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) have better responses to radiotherapy and higher overall survival rates than do patients with HPV-negative HNSCC, but the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are unknown. p16 is used as a surrogate marker for HPV infection. Our goal was to examine the role of p16 in HPV-related favorable treatment outcomes and to investigate the mechanisms by which p16 may regulate radiosensitivity. HNSCC cells and xenografts (HPV/p16-positive and -negative) were used. p16-overexpressing and small hairpin RNA-knockdown cells were generated, and the effect of p16 on radiosensitivity was determined by clonogenic cell survival and tumor growth delay assays. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) were assessed by immunofluorescence analysis of 53BP1 foci; DSB levels were determined by neutral comet assay; western blotting was used to evaluate protein changes; changes in protein half-life were tested with a cycloheximide assay; gene expression was examined by real-time polymerase chain reaction; and data from The Cancer Genome Atlas HNSCC project were analyzed. p16 overexpression led to downregulation of TRIP12, which in turn led to increased RNF168 levels, repressed DNA damage repair (DDR), increased 53BP1 foci and enhanced radioresponsiveness. Inhibition of TRIP12 expression further led to radiosensitization, and overexpression of TRIP12 was associated with poor survival in patients with HPV-positive HNSCC. These findings reveal that p16 participates in radiosensitization through influencing DDR and support the rationale of blocking TRIP12 to improve radiotherapy outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Wang
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - P Zhang
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - D P Molkentine
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - C Chen
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - J M Molkentine
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - H Piao
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Division of Biotechnology, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian, China
| | - U Raju
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - J Zhang
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - D R Valdecanas
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - R C Tailor
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - H D Thames
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - T A Buchholz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - J Chen
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - L Ma
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - K A Mason
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - K-K Ang
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - R E Meyn
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - H D Skinner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Smith DL, Debeb BG, Thames HD, Woodward WA. Computational Modeling of Micrometastatic Breast Cancer Radiation Dose Response. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 96:179-87. [PMID: 27511855 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2015] [Revised: 03/21/2016] [Accepted: 04/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) involves giving radiation to the entire brain with the goals of reducing the incidence of brain metastasis and improving overall survival. Experimentally, we have demonstrated that PCI prevents brain metastases in a breast cancer mouse model. We developed a computational model to expand on and aid in the interpretation of our experimental results. METHODS AND MATERIALS MATLAB was used to develop a computational model of brain metastasis and PCI in mice. Model input parameters were optimized such that the model output would match the experimental number of metastases per mouse from the unirradiated group. An independent in vivo-limiting dilution experiment was performed to validate the model. The effect of whole brain irradiation at different measurement points after tumor cells were injected was evaluated in terms of the incidence, number of metastases, and tumor burden and was then compared with the corresponding experimental data. RESULTS In the optimized model, the correlation between the number of metastases per mouse and the experimental fits was >95. Our attempt to validate the model with a limiting dilution assay produced 99.9% correlation with respect to the incidence of metastases. The model accurately predicted the effect of whole-brain irradiation given 3 weeks after cell injection but substantially underestimated its effect when delivered 5 days after cell injection. The model further demonstrated that delaying whole-brain irradiation until the development of gross disease introduces a dose threshold that must be reached before a reduction in incidence can be realized. CONCLUSIONS Our computational model of mouse brain metastasis and PCI correlated strongly with our experiments with unirradiated mice. The results further suggest that early treatment of subclinical disease is more effective than irradiating established disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel L Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bisrat G Debeb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Howard D Thames
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Wendy A Woodward
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chadha AS, Liu G, Arora HK, Thames HD, Krishnan S. Splenic radiation during pancreatic cancer radiotherapy: Are we throwing the baby out with the bath water? J Clin Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.4_suppl.354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
354 Background: Lymphopenia is commonly seen following chemoradiation and is associated with a poor prognosis. We conducted this study to determine if the severity of lymphopenia is dependent on the radiation dose and the fractional volume of spleen irradiated unintentionally during definitive chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Methods: 177 patients with LAPC were treated with induction chemotherapy (FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine- based regimens) followed by chemoradiation (CRT; median 50.4 Gy with concurrent capecitabine) from 1/2006 to 12/2012. Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) was recorded at baseline, prior to CRT and 2-10 weeks after the end of CRT. Splenic dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters were reported as mean splenic dose (MSD) and the percentage of splenic volume receiving at least 5 Gy (V5), 10 Gy (V10), 15 Gy (V15) and 20 Gy (V20) dose. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Cox model and multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the development of post CRT severe lymphopenia (ALC < 0.5 K/UL) using baseline and treatment factors. Results: Median post-CRT ALC (0.68 K/UL, range 0.13 to 2.72) was significantly lower than both baseline (1.42 K/UL, range 0.34- 3.97; p < 0.0001) and pre-CRT ALC (1.32 K/UL, range 0.36- 4.82; p < 0.0001). Post-CRT ALC < 0.5 K/UL was associated with inferior OS on univariate (16.8 vs. 21.2 months, p = 0.004) and multivariate analysis (HR = 1.9, p = 0.002).The MSD was 8.8 Gy and log MSD showed a significant negative correlation (r = -0.18, p = 0.02) with post-CRT ALC. Median V5, V10, V15 and V20 were 34%, 21%, 13% and 8% respectively. Median V10 (32.6 vs. 16%, p = 0.04), V15 (23.2 vs. 9.5%, p = 0.03) and V20 (15.4 vs. 4.6%, p = 0.02) were significantly higher in patients with severe lymphopenia. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, baseline lymphopenia (ALC < 1 K/UL; p = 0.003, OR = 4.6) and MSD (p = 0.03, OR = 7.3) were independent predictors for the development of severe post-CRT lymphopenia. Conclusions: LAPC patients receiving high MSD during CRT are at increased risk of developing severe lymphopenia, which is an independent predictor of poor OS. Routine assessment of splenic DVHs prior to acceptance of treatment plans may minimize this risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Guan Liu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Howard D Thames
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sunil Krishnan
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Linge A, Löck S, Gudziol V, Nowak A, Lohaus F, von Neubeck C, Jütz M, Abdollahi A, Debus J, Tinhofer I, Budach V, Sak A, Stuschke M, Balermpas P, Rödel C, Avlar M, Grosu AL, Bayer C, Belka C, Pigorsch S, Combs SE, Welz S, Zips D, Buchholz F, Aust DE, Baretton GB, Thames HD, Dubrovska A, Alsner J, Overgaard J, Baumann M, Krause M. Low Cancer Stem Cell Marker Expression and Low Hypoxia Identify Good Prognosis Subgroups in HPV(-) HNSCC after Postoperative Radiochemotherapy: A Multicenter Study of the DKTK-ROG. Clin Cancer Res 2016; 22:2639-49. [PMID: 26755529 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-1990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2015] [Accepted: 12/11/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the impact of hypoxia-induced gene expression and cancer stem cell (CSC) marker expression on outcome of postoperative cisplatin-based radiochemotherapy (PORT-C) in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Expression of the CSC markers CD44, MET, and SLC3A2, and hypoxia gene signatures were analyzed in the resected primary tumors using RT-PCR and nanoString technology in a multicenter retrospective cohort of 195 patients. CD44 protein expression was further analyzed in tissue microarrays. Primary endpoint was locoregional tumor control. RESULTS Univariate analysis showed that hypoxia-induced gene expression was significantly associated with a high risk of locoregional recurrence using the 15-gene signature (P = 0.010) or the 26-gene signature (P = 0.002). In multivariate analyses, in patients with HPV16 DNA-negative but not with HPV16 DNA-positive tumors the effect of hypoxia-induced genes on locoregional control was apparent (15-gene signature: HR 4.54, P = 0.006; 26-gene signature: HR 10.27, P = 0.024). Furthermore, MET, SLC3A2, CD44, and CD44 protein showed an association with locoregional tumor control in multivariate analyses (MET: HR 3.71, P = 0.016; SLC3A2: HR 8.54, P = 0.037; CD44: HR 3.36, P = 0.054; CD44 protein n/a because of no event in the CD44-negative group) in the HPV16 DNA-negative subgroup. CONCLUSIONS We have shown for the first time that high hypoxia-induced gene expression and high CSC marker expression levels correlate with tumor recurrence after PORT-C in patients with HPV16 DNA-negative HNSCC. After validation in a currently ongoing prospective trial, these parameters may help to further stratify patients for individualized treatment de-escalation or intensification strategies. Clin Cancer Res; 22(11); 2639-49. ©2016 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annett Linge
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany. Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Volker Gudziol
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Alexander Nowak
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Fabian Lohaus
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany. Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Cläre von Neubeck
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany. OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Martin Jütz
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany. Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany. National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. Translational Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany. Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany. National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Inge Tinhofer
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany. Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany. Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ali Sak
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany. Department of Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Stuschke
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany. Department of Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Frankfurt, Germany. Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Claus Rödel
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Frankfurt, Germany. Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Melanie Avlar
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Freiburg, Germany. Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Study Section, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Freiburg, Germany. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christine Bayer
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany. Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffi Pigorsch
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany. Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany. Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Welz
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Tübingen, Germany. Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Tübingen, Germany. Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Frank Buchholz
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany. University Cancer Center (UCC), Medical Systems Biology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Daniela E Aust
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany. Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. Tumor- and Normal Tissue Bank, University Cancer Center (UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Gustavo B Baretton
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany. Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. Tumor- and Normal Tissue Bank, University Cancer Center (UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Howard D Thames
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Anna Dubrovska
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany. OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jan Alsner
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Jens Overgaard
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Michael Baumann
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany. Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology, Dresden, Germany. National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany. Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology, Dresden, Germany. National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tao R, Krishnan S, Bhosale PR, Javle MM, Aloia TA, Shroff RT, Kaseb AO, Bishop AJ, Swanick CW, Koay EJ, Thames HD, Hong TS, Das P, Crane CH. Ablative Radiotherapy Doses Lead to a Substantial Prolongation of Survival in Patients With Inoperable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Retrospective Dose Response Analysis. J Clin Oncol 2015; 34:219-26. [PMID: 26503201 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.61.3778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 177] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Standard therapies for localized inoperable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) are ineffective. Advances in radiotherapy (RT) techniques and image guidance have enabled ablative doses to be delivered to large liver tumors. This study evaluated the effects of RT dose escalation in the treatment of IHCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seventy-nine consecutive patients with inoperable IHCC were identified and treated with definitive RT from 2002 to 2014. At diagnosis, the median tumor size was 7.9 cm (range, 2.2 to 17 cm). Seventy patients (89%) received systemic chemotherapy before RT. RT doses were 35 to 100 Gy (median, 58.05 Gy) in three to 30 fractions for a median biologic equivalent dose (BED) of 80.5 Gy (range, 43.75 to 180 Gy). RESULTS Median follow-up time for patients alive at time of analysis was 33 months (range, 11 to 93 months). Median overall survival (OS) time after diagnosis was 30 months; 3-year OS rate was 44%. Radiation dose was the single most important prognostic factor; higher doses correlated with an improved local control (LC) rate and OS. The 3-year OS rate for patients receiving BED greater than 80.5 Gy was 73% versus 38% for those receiving lower doses (P = .017); 3-year LC rate was significantly higher (78%) after a BED greater than 80.5 Gy than after lower doses (45%, P = .04). BED as a continuous variable significantly affected LC (P = .009) and OS (P = .004). There were no significant treatment-related toxicities. CONCLUSION Delivery of higher doses of RT improves LC and OS in inoperable IHCC. A BED greater than 80.5 Gy seems to be an ablative dose of RT for large IHCCs, with long-term survival rates that compare favorably with resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randa Tao
- Randa Tao, Sunil Krishnan, Priya R. Bhosale, Milind M. Javle, Thomas A. Aloia, Rachna T. Shroff, Ahmed O. Kaseb, Andrew J. Bishop, Cameron W. Swanick, Eugene J. Koay, Howard D. Thames, Prajnan Das, and Christopher H. Crane, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Theodore S. Hong, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Sunil Krishnan
- Randa Tao, Sunil Krishnan, Priya R. Bhosale, Milind M. Javle, Thomas A. Aloia, Rachna T. Shroff, Ahmed O. Kaseb, Andrew J. Bishop, Cameron W. Swanick, Eugene J. Koay, Howard D. Thames, Prajnan Das, and Christopher H. Crane, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Theodore S. Hong, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Priya R Bhosale
- Randa Tao, Sunil Krishnan, Priya R. Bhosale, Milind M. Javle, Thomas A. Aloia, Rachna T. Shroff, Ahmed O. Kaseb, Andrew J. Bishop, Cameron W. Swanick, Eugene J. Koay, Howard D. Thames, Prajnan Das, and Christopher H. Crane, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Theodore S. Hong, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Milind M Javle
- Randa Tao, Sunil Krishnan, Priya R. Bhosale, Milind M. Javle, Thomas A. Aloia, Rachna T. Shroff, Ahmed O. Kaseb, Andrew J. Bishop, Cameron W. Swanick, Eugene J. Koay, Howard D. Thames, Prajnan Das, and Christopher H. Crane, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Theodore S. Hong, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Thomas A Aloia
- Randa Tao, Sunil Krishnan, Priya R. Bhosale, Milind M. Javle, Thomas A. Aloia, Rachna T. Shroff, Ahmed O. Kaseb, Andrew J. Bishop, Cameron W. Swanick, Eugene J. Koay, Howard D. Thames, Prajnan Das, and Christopher H. Crane, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Theodore S. Hong, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Rachna T Shroff
- Randa Tao, Sunil Krishnan, Priya R. Bhosale, Milind M. Javle, Thomas A. Aloia, Rachna T. Shroff, Ahmed O. Kaseb, Andrew J. Bishop, Cameron W. Swanick, Eugene J. Koay, Howard D. Thames, Prajnan Das, and Christopher H. Crane, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Theodore S. Hong, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ahmed O Kaseb
- Randa Tao, Sunil Krishnan, Priya R. Bhosale, Milind M. Javle, Thomas A. Aloia, Rachna T. Shroff, Ahmed O. Kaseb, Andrew J. Bishop, Cameron W. Swanick, Eugene J. Koay, Howard D. Thames, Prajnan Das, and Christopher H. Crane, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Theodore S. Hong, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Andrew J Bishop
- Randa Tao, Sunil Krishnan, Priya R. Bhosale, Milind M. Javle, Thomas A. Aloia, Rachna T. Shroff, Ahmed O. Kaseb, Andrew J. Bishop, Cameron W. Swanick, Eugene J. Koay, Howard D. Thames, Prajnan Das, and Christopher H. Crane, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Theodore S. Hong, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Cameron W Swanick
- Randa Tao, Sunil Krishnan, Priya R. Bhosale, Milind M. Javle, Thomas A. Aloia, Rachna T. Shroff, Ahmed O. Kaseb, Andrew J. Bishop, Cameron W. Swanick, Eugene J. Koay, Howard D. Thames, Prajnan Das, and Christopher H. Crane, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Theodore S. Hong, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Eugene J Koay
- Randa Tao, Sunil Krishnan, Priya R. Bhosale, Milind M. Javle, Thomas A. Aloia, Rachna T. Shroff, Ahmed O. Kaseb, Andrew J. Bishop, Cameron W. Swanick, Eugene J. Koay, Howard D. Thames, Prajnan Das, and Christopher H. Crane, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Theodore S. Hong, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Howard D Thames
- Randa Tao, Sunil Krishnan, Priya R. Bhosale, Milind M. Javle, Thomas A. Aloia, Rachna T. Shroff, Ahmed O. Kaseb, Andrew J. Bishop, Cameron W. Swanick, Eugene J. Koay, Howard D. Thames, Prajnan Das, and Christopher H. Crane, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Theodore S. Hong, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Theodore S Hong
- Randa Tao, Sunil Krishnan, Priya R. Bhosale, Milind M. Javle, Thomas A. Aloia, Rachna T. Shroff, Ahmed O. Kaseb, Andrew J. Bishop, Cameron W. Swanick, Eugene J. Koay, Howard D. Thames, Prajnan Das, and Christopher H. Crane, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Theodore S. Hong, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Prajnan Das
- Randa Tao, Sunil Krishnan, Priya R. Bhosale, Milind M. Javle, Thomas A. Aloia, Rachna T. Shroff, Ahmed O. Kaseb, Andrew J. Bishop, Cameron W. Swanick, Eugene J. Koay, Howard D. Thames, Prajnan Das, and Christopher H. Crane, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Theodore S. Hong, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Christopher H Crane
- Randa Tao, Sunil Krishnan, Priya R. Bhosale, Milind M. Javle, Thomas A. Aloia, Rachna T. Shroff, Ahmed O. Kaseb, Andrew J. Bishop, Cameron W. Swanick, Eugene J. Koay, Howard D. Thames, Prajnan Das, and Christopher H. Crane, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Theodore S. Hong, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Rosenthal DI, Fuller CD, Peters LJ, Thames HD. Final Report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 9003: Provocative, but Limited Conclusions From Exploratory Analyses. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 92:715-7. [PMID: 26104925 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.02.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2014] [Revised: 02/18/2015] [Accepted: 02/26/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Lester J Peters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Howard D Thames
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
|
25
|
Affiliation(s)
- H D Thames
- Division of Biomathematics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lohaus F, Linge A, Tinhofer I, Budach V, Gkika E, Stuschke M, Balermpas P, Rödel C, Avlar M, Grosu AL, Abdollahi A, Debus J, Bayer C, Belka C, Pigorsch S, Combs SE, Mönnich D, Zips D, von Neubeck C, Baretton GB, Löck S, Thames HD, Krause M, Baumann M. Corrigendum to “HPV16 DNA status is a strong prognosticator of loco-regional control after postoperative radiochemotherapy of locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma: Results from a multicentre explorative study of the German Cancer Consortium Radiation Oncology Group (DKTK-ROG)” [Radiother. Oncol. 113 (2014) 317–323]. Radiother Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
27
|
Lohaus F, Linge A, Tinhofer I, Budach V, Gkika E, Stuschke M, Balermpas P, Rödel C, Avlar M, Grosu AL, Abdollahi A, Debus J, Bayer C, Belka C, Pigorsch S, Combs SE, Mönnich D, Zips D, von Neubeck C, Baretton GB, Löck S, Thames HD, Krause M, Baumann M. HPV16 DNA status is a strong prognosticator of loco-regional control after postoperative radiochemotherapy of locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma: results from a multicentre explorative study of the German Cancer Consortium Radiation Oncology Group (DKTK-ROG). Radiother Oncol 2014; 113:317-23. [PMID: 25480095 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2014] [Revised: 10/29/2014] [Accepted: 11/08/2014] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the impact of HPV status in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), who received surgery and cisplatin-based postoperative radiochemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS For 221 patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx, oropharynx or oral cavity treated at the 8 partner sites of the German Cancer Consortium, the impact of HPV DNA, p16 overexpression and p53 expression on outcome were retrospectively analysed. The primary endpoint was loco-regional tumour control; secondary endpoints were distant metastases and overall survival. RESULTS In the total patient population, univariate analyses revealed a significant impact of HPV16 DNA positivity, p16 overexpression, p53 positivity and tumour site on loco-regional tumour control. Multivariate analysis stratified for tumour site showed that positive HPV 16 DNA status correlated with loco-regional tumour control in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma (p=0.02) but not in the oral cavity carcinoma group. Multivariate evaluation of the secondary endpoints in the total population revealed a significant association of HPV16 DNA positivity with overall survival (p<0.01) but not with distant metastases. CONCLUSIONS HPV16 DNA status appears to be a strong prognosticator of loco-regional tumour control after postoperative cisplatin-based radiochemotherapy of locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma and is now being explored in a prospective validation trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Lohaus
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner sites: Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Annett Linge
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner sites: Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Inge Tinhofer
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner sites: Berlin, Germany; Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner sites: Berlin, Germany; Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner sites: Essen, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Stuschke
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner sites: Essen, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Claus Rödel
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner sites: Frankfurt, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Melanie Avlar
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner sites: Freiburg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Study Section, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner sites: Freiburg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner sites: Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany; Translational Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner sites: Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany
| | - Christine Bayer
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner sites: Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner sites: Munich, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffi Pigorsch
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner sites: Munich, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner sites: Munich, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München, Germany
| | - David Mönnich
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner sites: Tübingen, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner sites: Tübingen, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Germany
| | - Cläre von Neubeck
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner sites: Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Gustavo B Baretton
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner sites: Dresden, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; Tumor- and Normal Tissue Bank, Universitäts KrebsCentrum (UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Howard D Thames
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Mechthild Krause
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner sites: Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; Institute of Radiooncology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner sites: Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; Institute of Radiooncology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Sheu T, Molkentine J, Transtrum MK, Buchholz TA, Withers HR, Thames HD, Mason KA. Use of the LQ model with large fraction sizes results in underestimation of isoeffect doses. Radiother Oncol 2013; 109:21-5. [PMID: 24060173 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.08.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2013] [Revised: 08/15/2013] [Accepted: 08/17/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To test the appropriateness of the linear-quadratic (LQ) model to describe survival of jejunal crypt clonogens after split doses with variable (small 1-6 Gy, large 8-13 Gy) first dose, as a model of its appropriateness for both small and large fraction sizes. METHODS C3Hf/KamLaw mice were exposed to whole body irradiation using 300 kVp X-rays at a dose rate of 1.84 Gy/min, and the number of viable jejunal crypts was determined using the microcolony assay. 14 Gy total dose was split into unequal first and second fractions separated by 4 h. Data were analyzed using the LQ model, the lethal potentially lethal (LPL) model, and a repair-saturation (RS) model. RESULTS Cell kill was greater in the group receiving the larger fraction first, creating an asymmetry in the plot of survival vs size of first dose, as opposed to the prediction of the LQ model of a symmetric response. There was a significant difference in the estimated βs (higher β after larger first doses), but no significant difference in the αs, when large doses were given first vs small doses first. This difference results in underestimation (based on present data by approximately 8%) of isoeffect doses using LQ model parameters based on small fraction sizes. While the LPL model also predicted a symmetric response inconsistent with the data, the RS model results were consistent with the observed asymmetry. CONCLUSION The LQ model underestimates doses for isoeffective crypt-cell survival with large fraction sizes (in the present setting, >9 Gy).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommy Sheu
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Koch U, Höhne K, von Neubeck C, Thames HD, Yaromina A, Dahm-Daphi J, Baumann M, Krause M. Residual γH2AX foci predict local tumour control after radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2013; 108:434-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2013] [Revised: 06/19/2013] [Accepted: 06/21/2013] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
30
|
Soliman M, Yaromina A, Appold S, Zips D, Reiffenstuhl C, Schreiber A, Thames HD, Krause M, Baumann M. GTV differentially impacts locoregional control of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after different fractionation schedules: Subgroup analysis of the prospective randomized CHARTWEL trial. Radiother Oncol 2013; 106:299-304. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2012] [Revised: 12/10/2012] [Accepted: 12/10/2012] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
31
|
Hunter NR, Valdecanas D, Liao Z, Milas L, Thames HD, Mason KA. Mitigation and Treatment of Radiation-Induced Thoracic Injury With a Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitor, Celecoxib. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013; 85:472-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.04.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2012] [Revised: 04/12/2012] [Accepted: 04/14/2012] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
32
|
Helbig L, Yaromina A, Sriramareddy SN, Böke S, Koi L, Thames HD, Baumann M, Zips D. Prognostic value of HIF-1α expression during fractionated irradiation. Strahlenther Onkol 2012; 188:1031-7. [PMID: 23053140 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-012-0150-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2012] [Accepted: 04/18/2012] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Hypoxia and reoxygenation are important determinants of outcome after radiotherapy. HIF-1α is a key molecule involved in cellular response to hypoxia. HIF-1α expression levels have been shown to change after irradiation. The objective of the present study was to explore the prognostic value of HIF-1α expression during fractionated irradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Six human squamous cell carcinoma models xenografted in nude mice were analysed. Tumours were excised after 3, 5 and 10 fractions. HIF-1α expression was quantified by western blot. For comparative analysis, previously published data on local tumour control data and pimonidazole hypoxic fraction was used. RESULTS HIF-1α expression in untreated tumours exhibited intertumoural heterogeneity and did not correlate with pimonidazole hypoxic fraction. During fractionated irradiation the majority of tumour models exhibited a decrease in HIF-1α expression, whereas in UT-SCC-5 no change was observed. Neither kinetics nor expression levels during fractionated irradiation correlated with local tumour control. CONCLUSION Our data do not support the use of HIF-1α determined during treatment as a biomarker to predict outcome after fractionated irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Helbig
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology/ OncoRay National Center for Radiation Research, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Menegakis A, Eicheler W, Yaromina A, Thames HD, Krause M, Baumann M. Residual DNA double strand breaks in perfused but not in unperfused areas determine different radiosensitivity of tumours. Radiother Oncol 2011; 100:137-44. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2011] [Revised: 06/30/2011] [Accepted: 07/02/2011] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
34
|
Zips D, Böke S, Kroeber T, Meinzer A, Brüchner K, Thames HD, Baumann M, Yaromina A. Prognostic Value of Radiobiological Hypoxia during Fractionated Irradiation for Local Tumor Control. Strahlenther Onkol 2011; 187:306-10. [DOI: 10.1007/s00066-011-2210-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2010] [Accepted: 02/21/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
35
|
Tucker SL, Thames HD, Michalski JM, Bosch WR, Mohan R, Winter K, Cox JD, Purdy JA, Dong L. Estimation of α/β for late rectal toxicity based on RTOG 94-06. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 81:600-5. [PMID: 21377288 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2010] [Revised: 10/27/2010] [Accepted: 11/16/2010] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To estimate α/β, the parameter ratio from the linear-quadratic (LQ) model, for Grade ≥2 late rectal toxicity among patients treated on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) protocol 94-06; and to determine whether correcting the rectal dose-volume histogram (DVH) for differences in dose per fraction, based on the LQ model, significantly improves the fit to these data of the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) normal-tissue complication probability (NTCP) model. METHODS AND MATERIALS The generalized LKB model was fitted to the Grade ≥2 late rectal toxicity data in two ways: by using DVHs representing physical dose to rectum, and by using a modified approach in which dose bins in the rectal DVH were corrected for differences in dose per fraction using the LQ model, with α/β estimated as an additional unknown parameter. The analysis included only patients treated with the same treatment plan throughout radiotherapy, so that the dose per fraction to each voxel of rectum could be determined from the DVH. The likelihood ratio test was used to assess whether the fit of the LQ-corrected model was significantly better than the fit of the LKB model based on physical doses to rectum. RESULTS The analysis included 509 of the 1,084 patients enrolled on RTOG 94-06. The estimate of α/β from the LQ-corrected LKB model was 4.8 Gy, with 68% confidence interval 0.6 Gy to 46 Gy. The fit was not significantly different from the fit of the LKB model based on physical dose to rectum (p = 0.236). CONCLUSIONS The estimated fractionation sensitivity for Grade ≥2 late rectal toxicity is consistent with values of α/β for rectum found previously in human beings and in rodents. However, the confidence interval is large, and there is no evidence that LQ correction of the rectal DVH significantly changes the fit or predictions of the LKB model for this endpoint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan L Tucker
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230-1402, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Tucker SL, Dong L, Bosch WR, Michalski J, Winter K, Mohan R, Purdy JA, Kuban D, Lee AK, Cheung MR, Thames HD, Cox JD. Late rectal toxicity on RTOG 94-06: analysis using a mixture Lyman model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 78:1253-60. [PMID: 20598811 PMCID: PMC2963659 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2009] [Revised: 01/19/2010] [Accepted: 01/25/2010] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To estimate the parameters of the Lyman normal-tissue complication probability model using censored time-to-event data for Grade ≥2 late rectal toxicity among patients treated on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94-06, a dose-escalation trial designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS The Lyman normal-tissue complication probability model was fitted to data from 1,010 of the 1,084 patients accrued on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94-06 using an approach that accounts for censored observations. Separate fits were obtained using dose-volume histograms for whole rectum and dose-wall histograms for rectal wall. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 7.2 years, the crude incidence of Grade ≥2 late rectal toxicity was 15% (n = 148). The parameters of the Lyman model fitted to dose-volume histograms data, with 95% profile-likelihood confidence intervals, were TD(50) = 79.1 Gy (75.3 Gy, 84.3 Gy), m = 0.146 (0.107, 0.225), and n = 0.077 (0.041, 0.156). The fit based on dose-wall histogram data was not significantly different. Patients with cardiovascular disease had a significantly higher incidence of late rectal toxicity (p = 0.015), corresponding to a dose-modifying factor of 5.3%. No significant association with late rectal toxicity was found for diabetes, hypertension, rectal volume, rectal length, neoadjuvant hormone therapy, or prescribed dose per fraction (1.8 Gy vs. 2 Gy). CONCLUSIONS These results, based on a large cohort of patients from a multi-institutional trial, are expected to be widely representative of the ability of the Lyman model to describe the long-term risk of Grade ≥2 late rectal toxicity after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan L Tucker
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230-1402, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Thames HD, Kuban D, Levy LB, Horwitz EM, Kupelian P, Martinez A, Michalski J, Pisansky T, Sandler H, Shipley W, Zelefsky M, Zietman A. The role of overall treatment time in the outcome of radiotherapy of prostate cancer: An analysis of biochemical failure in 4839 men treated between 1987 and 1995. Radiother Oncol 2010; 96:6-12. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2009] [Revised: 03/15/2010] [Accepted: 03/29/2010] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
38
|
Liu J, Powell KL, Thames HD, MacLeod MC. Detoxication of sulfur half-mustards by nucleophilic scavengers: robust activity of thiopurines. Chem Res Toxicol 2010; 23:488-96. [PMID: 20050632 DOI: 10.1021/tx900190j] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Sulfur mustard (bis-(2-chloroethyl)sulfide) has been used in chemical warfare since World War I and is well known as an acutely toxic vesicant. It has been implicated as a carcinogen after chronic low-level exposure and is known to form interstrand cross-links in DNA. Sulfur and nitrogen mustards are currently of interest as potential chemical threat agents for terrorists because of ease of synthesis. Sulfur mustard and monofunctional analogues (half-mustards, 2-[chloroethyl] alkyl sulfides) react as electrophiles, damaging cellular macromolecules, and thus are potentially subject to scavenging by nucleophilic agents. We have determined rate constants for the reaction of four purine derivatives that contain nucleophilic thiol moieties with several sulfur-half-mustards. Three of these compounds, 2,6-dithiopurine, 2,6-dithiouric acid, and 9-methyl-6-mercaptopurine, exhibit facile reaction with the electrophilic mustard compounds. At near neutral pH, these thiopurines are much better nucleophilic scavengers of mustard electrophiles than other low molecular weight thiols such as N-acetyl cysteine and glutathione. Progress curves calculated by numerical integration techniques indicate that equimolar concentrations of thiopurine provide significant reductions in the overall exposure to the episulfonium ions, which are the major reactive, electrophiles produced when sulfur mustards are dissolved in aqueous solution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinyun Liu
- Department of Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, Texas 78957, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Menegakis A, Yaromina A, Eicheler W, Dörfler A, Beuthien-Baumann B, Thames HD, Baumann M, Krause M. Prediction of clonogenic cell survival curves based on the number of residual DNA double strand breaks measured by gammaH2AX staining. Int J Radiat Biol 2009; 85:1032-41. [PMID: 19895280 DOI: 10.3109/09553000903242149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the potential of using the residual phosphorylation of histone H2AX (gammaH2AX) after irradiation as a marker of radiosensitivity in vitro. MATERIAL AND METHODS Confluent cell cultures of FaDu and SKX human squamous cell carcinoma lines were irradiated with graded single doses. Twenty-four hours after irradiation cells were seeded for standard colony forming assay (CFA). In parallel, staining for gammaH2AX was performed to visualise the residual foci. RESULTS In the CFA, FaDu showed a higher radioresistance than SKX. After analysis of the residual foci data, we constructed 'predicted' survival curves using two different methods. First, the proportion of nuclei with <3 foci was found to correlate closely with the observed surviving fraction (SF) in FaDu, with a slight overestimation of the true SF in SKX. Second, there was a strong linear correlation of the mean number of residual foci and observed -lnSF. Based on regression analysis, we calculated the SF for both cell lines based on the mean number of residual gammaH2AX foci. This second approach again led to a good correlation of predicted and observed SF values in FaDu and a (slight) overestimation in SKX. CONCLUSION In the two cell lines investigated the mean number of residual foci of gammaH2AX can be used to predict differences in the radiation dose response relationship in vitro.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apostolos Menegakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, OncoRay-Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Torres MA, Jhingran A, Thames HD, Levenback CF, Bodurka DC, Ramondetta LM, Eifel PJ. Concurrent chemoradiation in the routine management of patients with cervical cancer: does marital status matter? Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009; 19:1107-12. [PMID: 19820377 DOI: 10.1111/igc.0b013e3181a83d3e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between marital status and outcome in women treated with concurrent chemoradiation (CT-RT) for locally advanced cervical cancer. METHODS We reviewed the records of all women who received CT-RT for squamous or adenocarcinomas of the cervix at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1998 and 2005. Patients with extrapelvic disease, prior hysterectomy, concurrent second malignancies, or prior pelvic radiation therapy or chemotherapy were excluded. All patients received external beam and intracavitary radiation therapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin or cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Of 226 women, 117 were married (MPs; median follow-up, 41 months) and 109 were single, divorced, or separated (SPs; median follow-up, 42 months). RESULTS The SPs were more likely to be African American (P < 0.001), be medically indigent (P < 0.001), and have used illicit drugs (P = 0.01). Married patients were more likely to have traveled to Houston for care; SPs were more likely to be permanent residents of Houston (61% vs 29.1%, P < 0.001). The SPs more often presented with tumors of 6.0 cm or more (P = 0.01) and stage II to IVA disease (P = 0.02). There were no other significant between-group differences in patient or tumor characteristics or CT-RT compliance. At 3 years, there were no significant between-group differences in disease-specific (80% in MPs vs 78% in SPs, P = 0.61) or pelvic relapse-free survival rates (88% in MPs vs 86% in SPs, P = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS Despite patient and tumor characteristics traditionally associated with poorer outcomes, SPs do not have significantly poorer treatment completion rates or outcomes after CT-RT. Further studies are needed to determine whether these trends hold true in other practice settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mylin A Torres
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Hessel F, Petersen C, Zips D, Krause M, Pfitzmann D, Thames HD, Baumann M. Impact of increased cell loss on the repopulation rate during fractionated irradiation in human FaDu squamous cell carcinoma growing in nude mice. Int J Radiat Biol 2009; 79:479-86. [PMID: 14530155 DOI: 10.1080/0955300031000107871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the impact of increased necrotic cell loss on the repopulation rate of clonogenic cells during fractionated irradiation in human FaDu squamous cell carcinoma in nude mice. MATERIALS AND METHODS FaDu tumours were transplanted into pre-irradiated subcutaneous tissues. This manoeuvre has previously been shown to result in a clear-cut tumour bed effect, i.e. tumours grow at a slower rate compared with control tumours. This tumour bed effect was caused by an increased necrotic cell loss with a constant cell production rate. After increasing numbers of 3-Gy fractions (time intervals 24 or 48 h), graded top-up doses were given to determine the dose required to control 50% of the tumours (TCD50). All irradiations were given under clamp hypoxia. RESULTS With increasing numbers of daily fractions, the top-up TCD50 decreased from 37.9 Gy (95% CI: 31; 45) after single dose irradiation to 14.1 Gy (8; 20) after irradiation with 15 fractions in 15 days. Irradiation with 18 daily 3-Gy fractions controlled more than 50% of the tumours without a top-up dose. After irradiation with six fractions every second day, the top-up TCD50 decreased to 26.9 Gy (22; 32). No further decrease of the TCD50 was observed after 12 and 18 irradiations every second day. Assuming a constant increase of TCD50 with time, the calculated doubling time of the clonogenic tumour cells (Tclon) was 7.8 days (4.4; 11.3). The Tclon calculated for FaDu tumours growing in pre-irradiated tissues was significantly longer (p=0.0004) than the Tclon of 5.1 days (3.7; 6.5) determined under the same assumptions in a previous study for FaDu tumours growing in normal subcutaneous tissues. CONCLUSIONS Increased necrotic cell loss by pre-irradiation of the tumour bed resulted in longer clonogen doubling times during fractionated radiotherapy of human FaDu squamous cell carcinoma. This implies that a decreased necrotic cell loss might be the link between reoxygenation and repopulation demonstrated previously in the same tumour model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Hessel
- Clinic of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Hessel F, Krause M, Helm A, Petersen C, Grenman R, Thames HD, Baumann M. Differentiation status of human squamous cell carcinoma xenografts does not appear to correlate with the repopulation capacity of clonogenic tumour cells during fractionated irradiation. Int J Radiat Biol 2009; 80:719-27. [PMID: 15799617 DOI: 10.1080/095530003400017812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the magnitude and kinetics of repopulation in a moderately well differentiated UT-SCC-14 human squamous cell carcinoma [hSCC] in nude mice. This question is of interest because clinical data indicate a higher repopulation capacity in those SCC that have preserved characteristics of differentiation, which appears to be in contrast to results on FaDu and GL hSCC previously reported from this laboratory. METHODS AND MATERIALS UT-SCC-14 tumours were transplanted subcutaneously into the right hind leg of NMRI nu/nu mice. Fractionated radiation treatments were delivered, either under clamped hypoxia at 5.4 Gy/fraction or under ambient conditions (consistent with an OER of 2.7). Tumours were irradiated every day, every 2nd day, or every 3rd day with 6, 12 or 18 fractions. 1, 2 or 3 days after the last fraction, graded top-up-doses under clamped conditions were given for the purpose of estimating the 50% tumour control dose (TCD50). A total of 22 TCD50 assays were performed and analysed using maximum likelihood techniques. RESULTS The data demonstrate a slow but significant repopulation of clonogenic cells during fractionated irradiation of UT-SCC-14 hSCC. The results under hypoxic conditions are consistent with a constant repopulation rate, with a clonogenic doubling time (Tclon) of 15.6 days (95% CI: 9.7, 21.4). This contrasts with ambient conditions where Tclon was 68.5 days (95% CI: 124, 161). Both Tclon values are longer than the 6-day volume doubling time of untreated tumours. CONCLUSIONS Less pronounced repopulation for irradiation under ambient compared to clamped hypoxic conditions might be explained by preferential survival of hypoxic and therefore non-proliferating clonogenic cells. Taken together with previous studies on poorly differentiated FaDu and moderately well differentiated GL hSCC, the results are consistent with considerable variability in the magnitude and kinetics of repopulation in different experimental squamous cell carcinomas, and with a relationship between reoxygenation and repopulation during fractionated irradiation. The differentiation status of hSCC growing in nude mice does not to appear to correlate with the proliferative capacity of clonogenic tumour cells during treatment. The results do not support the hypothesis gained from clinical data of higher repopulation in well-differentiated tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Hessel
- Clinic of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Dual interpretations are different radiobiological mechanisms that explain theoretically the same observed results. Radiobiological interpretations of the time factor are most frequently based on changes in total dose that produce a given effect. If this dose is increased by different mechanisms (e.g. increasing overall time and decreasing dose per fraction) at the same time, proposals for altered fractionation schemes based on the choice of one or the other mechanism, in principle, can lead to erroneous predictions of outcome. This is especially the case when the analyses are based on retrospective clinical data, where the influence of patient selection is unknown. Examples of dual interpretations taken from the literature on head and neck, melanoma and prostate cancer are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H D Thames
- Department of Biomathematics, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Liao ZX, Komaki RR, Thames HD, Liu HH, Tucker SL, Mohan R, Martel MK, Wei X, Yang K, Kim ES, Blumenschein G, Hong WK, Cox JD. Influence of technologic advances on outcomes in patients with unresectable, locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 76:775-81. [PMID: 19515503 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 206] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2008] [Revised: 11/15/2008] [Accepted: 02/17/2009] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In 2004, our institution began using four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) simulation and then intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) (4DCT/IMRT) instead of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) for the standard treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This retrospective study compares disease outcomes and toxicity in patients treated with concomitant chemotherapy and either 4DCT/IMRT or 3DCRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 496 NSCLC patients have been treated at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1999 and 2006 with concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Among these, 318 were treated with CT/3DCRT and 91 with 4DCT/IMRT. Both groups received a median dose of 63 Gy. Disease end points were locoregional progression (LRP), distant metastasis (DM), and overall survival (OS). Disease covariates were gross tumor volume (GTV), nodal status, and histology. The toxicity end point was Grade >or=3 radiation pneumonitis; toxicity covariates were GTV, smoking status, and dosimetric factors. Data were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS Mean follow-up times in the 4DCT/IMRT and CT/3DCRT groups were 1.3 (range, 0.1-3.2) and 2.1 (range, 0.1-7.9) years, respectively. The hazard ratios for 4DCT/IMRT were <1 for all disease end points; the difference was significant only for OS. The toxicity rate was significantly lower in the IMRT/4DCT group than in the CT/3DCRT group. V20 was significantly higher in the 3DCRT group and was a significant factor in determining toxicity. Freedom from DM was nearly identical in both groups. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with 4DCT/IMRT was at least as good as that with 3DCRT in terms of the rates of freedom from LRP and DM. There was a significant reduction in toxicity and a significant improvement in OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhongxing X Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Wang A, Arantes S, Yan L, Kiguchi K, McArthur MJ, Sahin A, Thames HD, Aldaz CM, Macleod MC. The transcription factor ATF3 acts as an oncogene in mouse mammary tumorigenesis. BMC Cancer 2008; 8:268. [PMID: 18808719 PMCID: PMC2564979 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2008] [Accepted: 09/22/2008] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Overexpression of the bZip transcription factor, ATF3, in basal epithelial cells of transgenic mice under the control of the bovine cytokeratin-5 (CK5) promoter has previously been shown to induce epidermal hyperplasia, hair follicle anomalies and neoplastic lesions of the oral mucosa including squamous cell carcinomas. CK5 is known to be expressed in myoepithelial cells of the mammary gland, suggesting the possibility that transgenic BK5.ATF3 mice may exhibit mammary gland phenotypes. Methods Mammary glands from nulliparous mice in our BK5.ATF3 colony, both non-transgenic and transgenic, were examined for anomalies by histopathology and immunohistochemistry. Nulliparous and biparous female mice were observed for possible mammary tumor development, and suspicious masses were analyzed by histopathology and immunohistochemistry. Human breast tumor samples, as well as normal breast tissue, were similarly analyzed for ATF3 expression. Results Transgenic BK5.ATF3 mice expressed nuclear ATF3 in the basal layer of the mammary ductal epithelium, and often developed squamous metaplastic lesions in one or more mammary glands by 25 weeks of age. No progression to malignancy was seen in nulliparous BK5.ATF3 or non-transgenic mice held for 16 months. However, biparous BK5.ATF3 mice developed mammary carcinomas with squamous metaplasia between 6 months and one year of age, reaching an incidence of 67%. Cytokeratin expression in the tumors was profoundly disturbed, including expression of CK5 and CK8 (characteristic of basal and luminal cells, respectively) throughout the epithelial component of the tumors, CK6 (potentially a stem cell marker), CK10 (a marker of interfollicular epidermal differentiation), and mIRSa2 and mIRSa3.1 (markers of the inner root sheath of hair follicles). Immunohistochemical studies indicated that a subset of human breast tumors exhibit high levels of nuclear ATF3 expression. Conclusion Overexpression of ATF3 in CK5-expressing cells of the murine mammary gland results in the development of squamous metaplastic lesions in nulliparous females, and in mammary tumors in biparous mice, suggesting that ATF3 acts as a mammary oncogene. A subset of human breast tumors expresses high levels of ATF3, suggesting that ATF3 may play an oncogenic role in human breast tumorigenesis, and therefore may be useful as either a biomarker or therapeutic target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aijin Wang
- Department of Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, TX, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Torres MA, Jhingran A, Thames HD, Levenback CF, Bodurka DC, Ramondetta LM, Eifel PJ. Comparison of Treatment Tolerance and Outcomes in Patients With Cervical Cancer Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in a Prospective Randomized Trial or With Standard Treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 70:118-25. [PMID: 17869451 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2007] [Revised: 05/01/2007] [Accepted: 05/23/2007] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the treatment and outcomes of cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT) in a multi-institutional trial or as standard care. PATIENTS AND METHODS We reviewed the records of 302 patients treated with CT-RT for locoregionally confined, intact cervical cancer between 1990 and 2005. Of the 302 patients, 76 were treated using cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (C/F) on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 90-01 (CT-RT(90-01)); 226 underwent CT-RT as standard care with either C/F [CT-RT(SC(C/F)); n = 115] or weekly cisplatin [CT-RT(SC(WC)); n = 111). RESULTS The CT-RT(90-01) patients more often had tumors >or=6 cm and were less often diabetic than were the CT-RT(SC) patients. The CT-RT(SC(WC)) patients were more likely than the CT-RT(SC(C/F)) patients to be >or=60 years old or to have Stage III-IV disease. During treatment, CT-RT(SC(C/F)) patients experienced more Grade 2-3 neutropenia and were, therefore, less likely to receive 200 mg/m(2) cisplatin than were either CT-RT(SC(WC)) or CT-RT(90-01) patients (52% vs. 77% vs. 85%, respectively; p <0.001). At 5 years, the disease-specific survival rates were greater for patients treated with C/F [CT-RT(SC(C/F)), 75%; CT-RT(90-01), 79%] than for those treated with CT-RT(SC(WC)) (58%; p = 0.02). On multivariate analysis, C/F chemotherapy, cisplatin dose >or=200 mg/m(2), Stage I-II disease, and negative pelvic lymph nodes were independent predictors of improved disease-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS Even within a large comprehensive cancer center, the high rates of chemotherapy completion achieved on a multi-institutional trial can be difficult to reproduce in standard practice. Although C/F toxicity was greater in the standard care patients, their outcomes were similar to those of patients treated with C/F on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 90-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mylin A Torres
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Truong PT, Woodward WA, Thames HD, Ragaz J, Olivotto IA, Buchholz TA. The Ratio of Positive to Excised Nodes Identifies High-risk Subsets and Reduces Inter-Institutional Differences in Locoregional Recurrence Risk Estimates in Breast Cancer Patients With 1–3 Positive Nodes: An Analysis of Prospective Data From British Columbia and the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 68:59-65. [PMID: 17321065 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2006] [Accepted: 12/01/2006] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the power of the nodal ratio (NR) of positive/excised nodes in predicting postmastectomy locoregional recurrence (LRR) in patients with 1-3 positive nodes (N+) and in identifying cohorts at similar risk across independent data sets. METHODS AND MATERIALS Data from 82 patients with 1-3 N+ treated without postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in the British Columbia (BC) randomized trial were compared with data from 462 patients treated without PMRT in prospective chemotherapy trials at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC). Kaplan-Meier LRR curves were compared between centers using the absolute number of N+ and nodal ratios. RESULTS The median number of excised nodes was 10 in BC and 16 in MDACC (p < 0.001). Examining LRR by number of N+, the 10-year LRR rate for patients with 1-3 N+ was higher in BC compared with MDACC (21.5% vs. 12.6%; p = 0.02). However, when examining LRR using NR, no differences were found between institutions. In patients with NR < or = 0.20, the 10-year LRR rate was 17.7% BC vs. 10.9% MDACC (p = 0.27). In patients with NR > or = 0.20, the 10-year LRR rate was 28.7% BC vs. 22.7% MDACC (p = 0.32). On Cox regression analysis, NR was a stronger prognostic factor compared with number of N +. CONCLUSIONS In patients with 1-3 N+, evaluating nodal positivity using NR reduced inter-institutional differences in LRR estimates that may exist due to variations in numbers of nodes excised. Nodal ratio >0.20 was associated with LRR >20%, warranting PMRT consideration. Nodal ratio may be useful for extrapolating data from prospective trials to clinical practices in which axillary staging extent vary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline T Truong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency - Vancouver Island Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, Victoria, BC, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Wu Q, Gaddis SS, MacLeod MC, Walborg EF, Thames HD, DiGiovanni J, Vasquez KM. High-affinity triplex-forming oligonucleotide target sequences in mammalian genomes. Mol Carcinog 2007; 46:15-23. [PMID: 17013831 DOI: 10.1002/mc.20261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Site-specific recognition of duplex DNA by triplex-forming oligonucleotides (TFOs) provides a promising approach to manipulate mammalian genomes. A prerequisite for successful gene targeting using this approach is that the targeted gene must contain specific, high-affinity TFO target sequences (TTS). To date, TTS have been identified and characterized in only approximately 37 human or rodent genes, limiting the application of triplex-directed gene targeting. We searched the complete human and mouse genomes using an algorithm designed to identify high-affinity TTS. The resulting data set contains 1.9 million potential TTS for each species. We found that 97.8% of known human and 95.2% of known mouse genes have at least one potential high-affinity TTS in the promoter and/or transcribed gene regions. Importantly, 86.5% of known human and 83% of the known mouse genes have at least one TTS that is unique to that gene. Thus, it is possible to target the majority of human and mouse genes with specific TFOs. We found substantially more potential TTS in the promoter sequences than in the transcribed gene sequences or intergenic sequences in both genomes. We selected 12 mouse genes and 2 human genes critical for cell signaling, proliferation, and/or carcinogenesis, identified potential TTS in each, and determined TFO binding affinities to these sites in vitro. We identified at least one high-affinity, specific TFO binding site within each of these genes. Using this information, many genes involved in mammalian cell proliferation and carcinogenesis can now be targeted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Wu
- Department of Carcinogenesis, Science Park-Research Division, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, Texas, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Thames HD, Kuban DA. In Reply to Drs. Pickles and Williams. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
50
|
Yaromina A, Zips D, Thames HD, Eicheler W, Krause M, Rosner A, Haase M, Petersen C, Raleigh JA, Quennet V, Walenta S, Mueller-Klieser W, Baumann M. Pimonidazole labelling and response to fractionated irradiation of five human squamous cell carcinoma (hSCC) lines in nude mice: The need for a multivariate approach in biomarker studies. Radiother Oncol 2006; 81:122-9. [PMID: 16956683 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2006] [Revised: 07/24/2006] [Accepted: 08/11/2006] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the influence on local control after fractionated radiotherapy of hypoxia measured in unirradiated tumours using the hypoxic marker Pimonidazole, using multivariate approaches. MATERIAL AND METHODS Five human squamous cell carcinoma lines (FaDu, UT-SCC-15, UT-SCC-14, XF354, and UT-SCC-5) were transplanted subcutaneously into the right hind-leg of NMRI nude mice. Histological material was collected from 60 unirradiated tumours after injection of Pimonidazole. The relative hypoxic area within the viable tumour area (Pimonidazole hypoxic fraction, pHF) was determined in seven serial 10 microm cross-sections per tumour by fluorescence microscopy and computerized image analysis. Local tumour control was evaluated in a total of 399 irradiated tumours at 120 days after 30 fractions given within 6 weeks with total doses between 30 and 115 Gy. RESULTS Tumour lines showed pronounced heterogeneity in both pHF and TCD50. Mean pHF values varied between 5% and 37%, TCD50 values between 47 and 130 Gy. A Cox Proportional Hazards model of time to recurrence with two covariates, dose and pHF, yielded significant contributions of both parameters on local control (p < 0.005) but violated the proportional hazards assumption, suggesting that other factors also influence tumour control. Introduction of histological grade as an example of a confounding factor into the model improved the fit significantly. Local control rates decreased with increasing pHF and this effect was more pronounced at higher doses. CONCLUSIONS This study confirms that tumour hypoxia measured using Pimonidazole in untreated tumours is a significant determinant of local control after fractionated irradiation. The data support the use of multivariate approaches for the evaluation of a single prognostic biomarker such as Pimonidazole, and more generally, suggest that they are required to establish accurate prognostic factors for tumour response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ala Yaromina
- Department of Radiation Oncology - Centre for Radiation Research in Oncology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, University of Technology Dresden, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|