ACR-ACNM-ARS-ASTRO-SNMMI Practice Parameter for the Performance of Therapy With Radiopharmaceuticals

OBJECTIVES

This practice parameter was revised collaboratively by the American College of Radiology (ACR), the American College of Nuclear Medicine, the American Radium Society, the American Society for Radiation Oncology, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. The document is intended to serve as a resource for appropriately trained and licensed physicians who perform therapeutic procedures with unsealed sources, referred to in the document using the more inclusive terminology of radiopharmaceuticals, for which a written directive is required for authorized users under NRC 10 CFR 35.300.

METHODS

This practice parameter was developed according to the process described under the heading The Process for Developing ACR Practice Parameters and Technical Standards on the ACR website ( https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards ) by the Committee on Practice Parameters-Radiation Oncology of the ACR Commission on Radiation Oncology in collaboration with the American Radium Society.

RESULTS

This practice parameter addresses the overall role of the applicable physician-authorized user, Qualified Medical Physicist, and other specialized personnel involved in the delivery of radiopharmaceutical therapy. Therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals include those administered as elemental radioactive isotopes (radionuclides) or the radioactive element incorporated into a targeting molecule (ligand) by one or more chemical bonds. This document provides guidance regarding general principles of radionuclide therapies and indications of various alpha, beta, gamma, and mixed emission agents with references to several recent practice parameters on new and commonly performed radiopharmaceutical therapies.

CONCLUSION

This document addresses clinical circumstances, elements of available agents, and the qualifications and responsibilities of various members of the radiation care team, specifications of consultation and other clinical documentation, post-therapy follow-up, radiation safety precautions, elements of quality control and improvement programs, infection control, and patient education to ensure optimal patient care and safety when utilizing radiopharmaceuticals.

Beyond Average: α-Particle Distribution and Dose Heterogeneity in Bone Metastatic Prostate Cancer

α-particle emitters are emerging as a potent modality for disseminated cancer therapy because of their high linear energy transfer and localized absorbed dose profile. Despite great interest and pharmaceutical development, there is scant information on the distribution of these agents at the scale of the α-particle pathlength. We sought to determine the distribution of clinically approved [223Ra]RaCl2 in bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer at this resolution, for the first time to our knowledge, to inform activity distribution and dose at the near-cell scale. Methods: Biopsy specimens and blood were collected from 7 patients 24 h after administration. 223Ra activity in each sample was recorded, and the microstructure of biopsy specimens was analyzed by micro-CT. Quantitative autoradiography and histopathology were segmented and registered with an automated procedure. Activity distributions by tissue compartment and dosimetry calculations based on the MIRD formalism were performed. Results: We revealed the activity distribution differences across and within patient samples at the macro- and microscopic scales. Microdistribution analysis confirmed localized high-activity regions in a background of low-activity tissue. We evaluated heterogeneous α-particle emission distribution concentrated at bone-tissue interfaces and calculated spatially nonuniform absorbed-dose profiles. Conclusion: Primary patient data of radiopharmaceutical therapy distribution at the small scale revealed that 223Ra uptake is nonuniform. Dose estimates present both opportunities and challenges to enhance patient outcomes and are a first step toward personalized treatment approaches and improved understanding of α-particle radiopharmaceutical therapies.

CT-based online adaptive radiotherapy improves target coverage and organ at risk (OAR) avoidance in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer

Introduction

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment modality for clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa). Online daily adaptive radiotherapy (ART) could potentially improve the therapeutic ratio of prostate SBRT by accounting for inter-fraction variation in target and OAR volumes. To our knowledge, no group has evaluated the clinical utility of a novel AI-augmented CT-based ART system for prostate SBRT. In this study we hypothesized that adaptive prostate SBRT plans would result in improved target coverage and lower dose to OARs in comparison to unadapted treatment plans.

Methods

Seven patients with favorable intermediate to oligometastatic PCa treated with 5-fx prostate adaptive SBRT were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were treated with 3625 cGy to the prostate and seminal vesicles. 6 patients additionally received 2500 cGy to the pelvic nodes, 5 patients underwent a boost to 4000 cGy to the prostate. For each fraction, a CBCT was acquired and OARs (rectum, bladder, bowel, sigmoid, femurs) were segmented/deformed using AI. CTVs were rigidly registered. Volumes were adjusted manually and PTV expansions added. Adaptive treatment plans were developed based on the contoured targets and OARs and dose to these volumes for the adapted vs. initial plans were compared for each fraction. V100 and the D0.03 cc between scheduled and adapted treatment plans were compared using a Student's t-test, with significance threshold of P < 0.05.

Results

Seven patients completed 35 Fx's of adaptive RT. Daily adaptation resulted in a statistically significant mean improvement in PTV V100 for all targets: [21.4 % ± 4.3 % for PTV 4000 (p < 0.0001); 8.7 % ± 1.1 % for PTV 3625 (p < 0.0001); and 11.5 % ± 3.1 % for PTV 2500 (p = 0.0013)]. Mean rectal D0.03 was significantly reduced by 38.8 cGy ± 5.95 cGy (p < 0.0001) per fraction (194 cGy/5 fractions) compared to the initial plans. There was a modest increase in bladder dose of 10.9 cGy ± 4.93 cGy per fraction (p = 0.0424) for the adaptive plans. The adaptive plans met bladder constraints for every fraction. There were no statistically significant differences between sigmoid or bowel dose for adapted vs. initial plans. No patients experienced acute CTCAE grade ≥ 3 GI/GU adverse events (median F/U 9.5 months). All statistically significant differences were maintained in the presence and absence of rectal hydrogel spacer (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

CT-based online adaptive SBRT resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in PTV coverage and D0.03 cc dose to the rectum. A trial evaluating CT adaptive whole-pelvis prostate SBRT is underway.

The Importance of Quality Assurance in Radiation Oncology Clinical Trials

Clinical trials have been the center of progress in modern medicine. In oncology, we are fortunate to have a structure in place through the National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN). The NCTN provides the infrastructure and a forum for scientific discussion to develop clinical concepts for trial design. The NCTN also provides a network group structure to administer trials for successful trial management and outcome analyses. There are many important aspects to trial design and conduct. Modern trials need to ensure appropriate trial conduct and secure data management processes. Of equal importance is the quality assurance of a clinical trial. If progress is to be made in oncology clinical medicine, investigators and patient care providers of service need to feel secure that trial data is complete, accurate, and well-controlled in order to be confident in trial analysis and move trial outcome results into daily practice. As our technology has matured, so has our need to apply technology in a uniform manner for appropriate interpretation of trial outcomes. In this article, we review the importance of quality assurance in clinical trials involving radiation therapy. We will include important aspects of institution and investigator credentialing for participation as well as ongoing processes to ensure that each trial is being managed in a compliant manner. We will provide examples of the importance of complete datasets to ensure study interpretation. We will describe how successful strategies for quality assurance in the past will support new initiatives moving forward.

Genomic Classifier Performance in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Results From NRG Oncology/RTOG 0126 Randomized Phase 3 Trial

PURPOSE

Intermediate-risk prostate cancer is a heterogeneous disease state with diverse treatment options. The 22-gene Decipher genomic classifier (GC) retrospectively has shown to improve risk stratification in these patients. We assessed the performance of the GC in men with intermediate-risk disease enrolled in NRG Oncology/RTOG 01-26 with updated follow-up.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

After National Cancer Institute approval, biopsy slides were collected from NRG Oncology/RTOG 01-26, a randomized phase 3 trial of men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer randomized to 70.2 Gy versus 79.2 Gy of radiation therapy without androgen deprivation therapy. RNA was extracted from the highest-grade tumor foci to generate the locked 22-gene GC model. The primary endpoint for this ancillary project was disease progression (composite of biochemical failure, local failure, distant metastasis, prostate cancer-specific mortality, and use of salvage therapy). Individual endpoints were also assessed. Fine-Gray or cause-specific Cox multivariable models were constructed adjusting for randomization arm and trial stratification factors.

RESULTS

Two-hundred fifteen patient samples passed quality control for analysis. The median follow-up was 12.8 years (range, 2.4-17.7). On multivariable analysis, the 22-gene GC (per 0.1 unit) was independently prognostic for disease progression (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.26; P = .04), biochemical failure (sHR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.10-1.37; P < .001), distant metastasis (sHR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.06-1.55; P = .01), and prostate cancer-specific mortality (sHR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.20-1.76; P < .001). Ten-year distant metastasis in GC low-risk patients was 4% compared with 16% for GC high-risk patients. In patients with lower GC scores, the 10-year difference in metastasis-free survival rate between arms was -7%, compared with 21% for higher GC patients (P-interaction = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the first validation of a biopsy-based gene expression classifier, assessing both its prognostic and predictive value, using data from a randomized phase 3 trial of intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Decipher improves risk stratification and can aid in treatment decision-making in men with intermediate-risk disease.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Staging of Renal Cell Carcinoma: 2022 Update

Renal cell carcinoma is a complex group of highly heterogenous renal tumors demonstrating variable biological behavior. Pretreatment imaging of renal cell carcinoma involves accurate assessment of the primary tumor, presence of nodal, and distant metastases. CT and MRI are the key imaging modalities used in the staging of renal cell carcinoma. Important imaging features that impact treatment include tumor extension into renal sinus and perinephric fat, involvement of pelvicalyceal system, infiltration into adrenal gland, involvement of renal vein and inferior vena cava, as well as the presence of metastatic adenopathy and distant metastases. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Consensus Quality Measures and Dose Constraints for Prostate Cancer From the Veterans Affairs Radiation Oncology Quality Surveillance Program and American Society for Radiation Oncology Expert Panel

PURPOSE

There are no agreed upon measures to comprehensively determine the quality of radiation oncology (RO) care delivered for prostate cancer. Consequently, it is difficult to assess the implementation of scientific advances and adherence to best practices in routine clinical practice. To address this need, the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) National Radiation Oncology Program established the VA Radiation Oncology Quality Surveillance (VA ROQS) Program to develop clinical quality measures to assess the quality of RO care delivered to Veterans with cancer. This article reports the prostate cancer consensus measures.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The VA ROQS Program contracted with the American Society for Radiation Oncology to commission a Blue Ribbon Panel of prostate cancer experts to develop a set of evidence-based measures and performance expectations. From February to June 2021, the panel developed quality, aspirational, and surveillance measures for (1) initial consultation and workup, (2) simulation, treatment planning, and delivery, and (3) follow-up. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) constraints to be used as quality measures for definitive and post-prostatectomy radiation therapy were selected. The panel also identified the optimal Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0 (CTCAE V5.0), toxicity terms to assess in follow-up.

RESULTS

Eighteen prostate-specific measures were developed (13 quality, 2 aspirational, and 3 surveillance). DVH metrics tailored to conventional, moderately hypofractionated, and ultrahypofractionated regimens were identified. Decision trees to determine performance for each measure were developed. Eighteen CTCAE V5.0 terms were selected in the sexual, urinary, and gastrointestinal domains as highest priority for assessment during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This set of measures and DVH constraints serves as a tool for assessing the comprehensive quality of RO care for prostate cancer. These measures will be used for ongoing quality surveillance and improvement among veterans receiving care across VA and community sites. These measures can also be applied to clinical settings outside of those serving veterans.

Quality improvements in radiation oncology clinical trials

Clinical trials have become the primary mechanism to validate process improvements in oncology clinical practice. Over the past two decades there have been considerable process improvements in the practice of radiation oncology within the structure of a modern department using advanced technology for patient care. Treatment planning is accomplished with volume definition including fusion of multiple series of diagnostic images into volumetric planning studies to optimize the definition of tumor and define the relationship of tumor to normal tissue. Daily treatment is validated by multiple tools of image guidance. Computer planning has been optimized and supported by the increasing use of artificial intelligence in treatment planning. Informatics technology has improved, and departments have become geographically transparent integrated through informatics bridges creating an economy of scale for the planning and execution of advanced technology radiation therapy. This serves to provide consistency in department habits and improve quality of patient care. Improvements in normal tissue sparing have further improved tolerance of treatment and allowed radiation oncologists to increase both daily and total dose to target. Radiation oncologists need to define a priori dose volume constraints to normal tissue as well as define how image guidance will be applied to each radiation treatment. These process improvements have enhanced the utility of radiation therapy in patient care and have made radiation therapy an attractive option for care in multiple primary disease settings. In this chapter we review how these changes have been applied to clinical practice and incorporated into clinical trials. We will discuss how the changes in clinical practice have improved the quality of clinical trials in radiation therapy. We will also identify what gaps remain and need to be addressed to offer further improvements in radiation oncology clinical trials and patient care.

Remote Global Radiation Oncology Education and Training: A Pathway to Increase Access to High-Quality Radiation Therapy Services in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Purpose

There is a vital need to train radiation therapy professionals in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to develop sustainable cancer treatment capacity and infrastructure. LMICs have started to introduce intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), which is the standard of care in high-income countries, because of improved outcomes and reduced toxicities. This work reports the efficacy of a complementary asynchronous plus synchronous virtual-training approach on improving radiation therapy professions' self-confidence levels and evaluating participants' attitudes toward asynchronous and synchronous didactic hands-on learning in 3 LMICs.

Methods and Materials

Training was provided to 37 participants from Uganda, Guatemala, and Mongolia, which included 4 theoretical lectures, 4 hands-on sessions, and 8 self-guided online videos. The 36-day training focused on IMRT contouring, site-specific target/organ definition, planning/optimization, and quality assurance. Participants completed pre- and postsession confidence surveys on a 0 to 10 scale, which was converted to a 5-point Likert rating scale to evaluate the training outcomes. The pros and cons of the 3 different training formats were compared.

Results

The participants included 15 (40.5%) radiation oncologists, 11 (29.7%) medical physicists, 6 (16.2%) radiation therapists, and 5 (13.5%) dosimetrists. Approximately 50% had more than 10 years of radiation therapy experience, 70.8% had no formal IMRT training, and only 25% had IMRT at their institutions. The average experience and confidence levels in using IMRT at baseline were 3.2 and 2.9, which increased to 5.2 and 4.9 (P < .001) after the theoretical training. After the hands-on training, the experience and confidence levels further improved to 5.4 and 5.5 (P < .001). After the self-guided training, the confidence levels increased further to 6.9 (P < .01). Among the 3 different training sessions, hands-on trainings (58.3%) were most helpful for the development of participants' IMRT skills, followed by theoretical sessions with 25%.

Conclusions

After completing the training sessions, Uganda and Mongolia started IMRT treatments. Remote training provides an excellent and feasible e-learning platform to train radiation therapy professionals in LMICs. The training program improved the IMRT confidence levels and treatment delivery. The hands-on trainings were most preferred.

Association of Brachytherapy Boost with Overall Survival for Gleason 9-10 Prostate Cancer: The Impact of Primary versus Secondary Pattern 5

PURPOSE

The addition of a brachytherapy (BT) boost to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) reduces recurrence risk in men with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) and may reduce PCa-mortality for Gleason grade group 5 (GG5). Whether the extent of pattern five, a risk factor for distant metastases, impacts the benefit of a BT boost is unclear.

METHODS

Men with localized GG5 PCa treated with (1) EBRT or (2) EBRT+BT between 2010 and 2016 were identified in the National Cancer Database. EBRT monotherapy group received conventionally fractionated (1.8-2.0 Gy per fraction) ≥74 Gy or moderately hypofractionated (2.5-3.0 Gy per fraction) ≥60 Gy. EBRT + BT group received conventionally fractionated ≥45 Gy or moderately hypofractionated ≥37.5 Gy, and either LDR or HDR BT. All patients received concomitant ADT; none received chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or surgery. OS was compared using Kaplan-Meier, log-rank test, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards in the overall cohort, followed by subgroups based on primary versus secondary pattern 5. Propensity score- and exact-matching was used to corroborate results.

RESULTS

A total of 8260 men were eligible: EBRT alone (89%) versus EBRT + BT (11%). 5-year OS for EBRT versus EBRT + BT was 76.3% and 85.0%, respectively (p = 0.002; multivariable adjusted HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.65-0.98; p = 0.04). These results remained consistent after propensity score and exact matching. The OS advantage of a BT boost was more prominent in men with Gleason 4 + 5 PCa (p = 0.001) and not observed in men with Gleason 5 + 5 or 5 + 4 PCa.

CONCLUSIONS

Extent of pattern five may be useful in appropriately selecting men for EBRT+BT and should be considered as a pre-randomization stratification variable for future clinical trial design.

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Bladder Cancer, Version 2.2022

The NCCN Guidelines for Bladder Cancer provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up of patients with bladder cancer and other urinary tract cancers (upper tract tumors, urothelial carcinoma of the prostate, primary carcinoma of the urethra). These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel discussion behind recent important updates to the guidelines regarding the treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, including how to treat in the event of a bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) shortage; new roles for immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-muscle invasive, muscle-invasive, and metastatic bladder cancer; and the addition of antibody-drug conjugates for metastatic bladder cancer.

Lutetium-177 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Therapy: A Practical Review

Prostate-specific membrane antigen is a transmembrane protein found predominately on prostate epithelium and is expressed at high levels in prostate cancer. In this review, we discuss the background, clinical data, patient selection, side effects, and necessary resources to deliver lutetium-177 prostate-specific membrane antigen in the research setting, or as standard of care if approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Targeted radionuclide therapeutics require understanding of fundamental principles of radiobiology and physics, and radiation oncologists and medical physicists are well-suited to play an integral role in their delivery and treatment response monitoring as key components of a multidisciplinary care team.

QOL-13. Impact of hearing loss on neuropsychological functioning in children treated for medulloblastoma: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group (COG)

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: We prospectively examined neuropsychological outcomes and ototoxicity in children with average-risk medulloblastoma. METHODS: Eligible patients included those treated on COG protocol ACNS0331 who completed audiograms at end of therapy or one-year off-therapy, and neuropsychological assessments between 2- and 5-years post-diagnosis. Conventional pure-tone audiometric evaluations (0.25-8kHz) were assigned an ototoxicity grade based on the International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP) grading scale. Grade for the better hearing ear was used for analyses. Participants were divided into two groups: SIOP grade≥3 hearing loss (HL) versus SIOP grade<3. Cutoff score of 60 on BASC-2 was used to dichotomize parent-reported anxiety and depression scores as ‘low’ or ‘high’. RESULTS: Data were available for 113 children (66% male; 86% white), aged 3.0-18.5 at diagnosis (Mean=9.1). One-quarter (24.8%, n=28) had at least moderate HL (≥ SIOP grade 2), and 12.3% (n=14) had severe HL (≥ SIOP grade 3). After controlling for radiation exposure and age, children with severe HL showed significantly higher levels of anxiety (OR=5.9, 95%CI 1.3-26.0, p=0.0195) and borderline differences in depression (OR=4.0, 95%CI 1.0-16.5, p=0.0563), but no differences in cognitive functioning when compared to other participants. When moderate and severe HL were combined in exploratory analyses, significantly greater anxiety (OR=9.0, 95%CI 2.1-37.4, p=.0027) and depression (OR=4.6, 95%CI 1.3-15.7, p=.0165) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Survivors of pediatric medulloblastoma with moderate to severe HL evidenced greater psychosocial, but not neurocognitive, difficulties compared to those with no or mild HL. It may be that modern treatment protocols generally preserve cognitive functioning such that associations between HL and cognitive impairment are no longer significant. It is also possible that neurocognitive risk associated with HL may not manifest until survivors are further from diagnosis. In contrast, survivors with HL may be at greater risk for negative psychosocial adjustment, suggesting that increased monitoring of mental health outcomes is warranted.

An Adaptive Low-Rank Modeling-Based Active Learning Method for Medical Image Annotation

Active learning is an effective solution to interactively select a limited number of informative examples and use them to train a learning algorithm that can achieve its optimal performance for specific tasks. It is suitable for medical image applications in which unlabeled data are abundant but manual annotation could be very time-consuming and expensive. However, designing an effective active learning strategy for informative example selection is a challenging task, due to the intrinsic presence of noise in medical images, the large number of images, and the variety of imaging modalities. In this study, a novel low-rank modeling-based multi-label active learning (LRMMAL) method is developed to address these challenges and select informative examples for training a classifier to achieve the optimal performance. The proposed method independently quantifies image noise and integrates it with other measures to guide a pool-based sampling process to determine the most informative examples for training a classifier. In addition, an automatic adaptive cross entropy-based parameter determination scheme is proposed for further optimizing the example sampling strategy. Experimental results on varied medical image datasets and comparisons with other state-of-the-art multi-label active learning methods illustrate the superior performance of the proposed method.

Efficacy of Carboplatin and Isotretinoin in Children With High-risk Medulloblastoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial From the Children's Oncology Group

Importance

Brain tumors are the leading cause of disease-related death in children. Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant embryonal brain tumor, and strategies to increase survival are needed.

Objective

To evaluate therapy intensification with carboplatin as a radiosensitizer and isotretinoin as a proapoptotic agent in children with high-risk medulloblastoma in a randomized clinical trial and, with a correlative biology study, facilitate planned subgroup analysis according to World Health Organization consensus molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A randomized clinical phase 3 trial was conducted from March 2007 to September 2018. Analysis was completed in September 2020. Patients aged 3 to 21 years with newly diagnosed high-risk medulloblastoma from Children's Oncology Group institutions within the US, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand were included. High-risk features included metastasis, residual disease, or diffuse anaplasia.

Interventions

Patients were randomized to receive 36-Gy craniospinal radiation therapy and weekly vincristine with or without daily carboplatin followed by 6 cycles of maintenance chemotherapy with cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, and vincristine with or without 12 cycles of isotretinoin during and following maintenance.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary clinical trial end point was event-free survival, using the log-rank test to compare arms. The primary biology study end point was molecular subgroup classification by DNA methylation array.

Results

Of 294 patients with medulloblastoma, 261 were evaluable after central radiologic and pathologic review; median age, 8.6 years (range, 3.3-21.2); 183 (70%) male; 189 (72%) with metastatic disease; 58 (22%) with diffuse anaplasia; and 14 (5%) with greater than 1.5-cm2 residual disease. For all participants, the 5-year event-free survival was 62.9% (95% CI, 55.6%-70.2%) and overall survival was 73.4% (95% CI, 66.7%-80.1%). Isotretinoin randomization was closed early owing to futility. Five-year event-free survival was 66.4% (95% CI, 56.4%-76.4%) with carboplatin vs 59.2% (95% CI, 48.8%-69.6%) without carboplatin (P = .11), with the effect exclusively observed in group 3 subgroup patients: 73.2% (95% CI, 56.9%-89.5%) with carboplatin vs 53.7% (95% CI, 35.3%-72.1%) without (P = .047). Five-year overall survival differed by molecular subgroup (P = .006): WNT pathway activated, 100% (95% CI, 100%-100%); SHH pathway activated, 53.6% (95% CI, 33.0%-74.2%); group 3, 73.7% (95% CI, 61.9%-85.5%); and group 4, 76.9% (95% CI, 67.3%-86.5%).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial, therapy intensification with carboplatin improved event-free survival by 19% at 5 years for children with high-risk group 3 medulloblastoma. These findings further support the value of an integrated clinical and molecular risk stratification for medulloblastoma.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00392327.

Abstract 110: Colon Cancer in Patients under 50 in Guatemala: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study

Purpose: Describing and comparing clinico-pathological characteristics of younger (&lt;50 years) versus older (≥50 years) colon cancer patients treated at the Guatemalan Liga Nacional Contra el Cáncer e Institute of Cancer (Liga-INCAN).

Methods: This IRB-approved single-institution retrospective cohort study reviewed the medical and pathological records of patients ≥18 years diagnosed with colon cancer at the Liga-INCAN, the largest specialized oncologic hospital in Guatemala, from 2013-2019. Continuous data are presented as mean and standard deviation, categorical data as frequency and percentage. Subjects were categorized into two groups, younger group (&lt;50 years) and older group (≥50 years). Statistical analyses were performed with Chi-squared, Fisher's exact test, and Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results: Among 123 patients, 34.74% were &lt;50 and 65.26% ≥50 years. Most of patients in the younger group were male 68.83% in comparison to the older group where most were female (p&lt;0.01), patients resided in the rural area 60.47% vs 50.0% respectively (p=0.18). BMI index in younger patients was below 25 in 56.1% vs 50.64% (p=0.30). Patients &lt;50 years old were diagnosed at earlier stages (I and II) 39.54% vs 22.5% when compared with ≥50 years old patients (p&lt;0.05), tumors were more common in the left compared to the right colon in younger patients (58.14% vs 50.0%), the difference was not significant (p=0.15). Histopathological features did not show significant differences, most tumors were adenocarcinomas for both groups, but signet ring cell carcinomas were more frequent in the younger than in older patients (9.30% vs 1.25%).

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that Guatemalan patients diagnosed with colon cancer younger than fifty years old are more frequently male and are diagnosed at earlier stages compared to older patients. Although, histopathological characteristics did not show significant differences, further studies are needed to understand how these impact the prognosis of the patients in the different age groups.

Funding: None

Citation Format: Angel Velarde, Alba Kihn-Alarcón, Hiram Gay, Jeff Michalski, Edgar Ruiz, Hugo Geoffrey, Vicky de Falla, Javier Figueroa, Kirk Douglas Najera, Carlos García, Kevin Ma, Ana Salazar, Abigail Zamorano, Sonia Dávila, Jacaranda van Rheenen. Colon Cancer in Patients under 50 in Guatemala: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 9th Annual Symposium on Global Cancer Research; Global Cancer Research and Control: Looking Back and Charting a Path Forward; 2021 Mar 10-11. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2021;30(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 110.

MR-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for Bladder Cancer

Radiotherapy has an important role in the curative and palliative treatment settings for bladder cancer. As a target for radiotherapy the bladder presents a number of technical challenges. These include poor tumor visualization and the variability in bladder size and position both between and during treatment delivery. Evidence favors the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an important means of tumor visualization and local staging. The availability of hybrid systems incorporating both MRI scanning capabilities with the linear accelerator (MR-Linac) offers opportunity for in-room and real-time MRI scanning with ability of plan adaption at each fraction while the patient is on the treatment couch. This has a number of potential advantages for bladder cancer patients. In this article, we examine the technical challenges of bladder radiotherapy and explore how magnetic resonance (MR) guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) could be leveraged with the aim of improving bladder cancer patient outcomes. However, before routine clinical implementation robust evidence base to establish whether MRgRT translates into improved patient outcomes should be ascertained.

Longitudinal predictive ability of mapping algorithms: Secondary analysis of NRG Oncology/RTOG 0415

60

Background: Mapping algorithms informing economic evaluations are often derived using baseline data from clinical trials. It is unclear if these algorithms can predict health utilities accurately in post-intervention data. Thus, this study examines the longitudinal predictive ability of mapping algorithms derived from baseline trial data and explores the factors associated with prediction errors. Methods: This methodological study utilized data from an international, multicenter, randomized controlled trial of patients with low-risk prostate cancer (PC), conducted by NRG Oncology (NCT00331773). In addition to patient demographic and clinical data, this study utilized PRO data collected at baseline and 6, 12 and 24 months post-intervention. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire measures health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) and has four domains (urinary, sexual, hormonal, and bowel) and two subdomains per domain (function and bother); EuroQOL-5D-3L (EQ5D) captures health utilities. Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression models were used to map EPIC scores to EQ5D utilities in the baseline data through 5-fold cross-validation. Predictive performance was tested in the post-intervention data; predicted and reported utilities were compared using t-tests, and the absolute prediction error was modeled using fixed effects, as a function of baseline demographic and clinical covariates, as well as observed and predicted EQ5D utilities. Results: A total of 267 (199) patients had complete EQ5D and EPIC domain (or subdomain) data at baseline and all subsequent assessments. In the EPIC domain sample, mean ± standard deviation observed EQ5D utility was 0.90±0.13 at baseline, 0.92±0.11 at 6 months, 0.90±0.13 at 12 months and 0.89±0.14 at 24 months. Mean absolute differences (MDs) between reported and predicted were lower for models using EPIC subdomain data compared to EPIC domain data, and generally decreased as the time of assessment increased. The mapping functions over-predicted utilities for patients in perfect health while the prediction errors were increasingly negative for lower reported EQ5D scores. According to the fixed effects model for EPIC domain data, lower observed and predicted baseline EQ5D scores, and time of assessment were significant predictors of the absolute prediction error; for EPIC subdomain data, lower observed and predicted baseline EQ5D scores, hormonal bother and function, and bowel function significantly predicted the absolute prediction error. Conclusions: This study is the first to demonstrate the longitudinal validity of EPIC questionnaire, and builds upon existing research on longitudinal validity of mapping functions. The low MDs in prediction errors in post-intervention data indicate that the mapping functions are sensitive to treatment effect, thereby increasing confidence in their use in economic evaluations in PC.

Spatially fractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (Lattice) for large tumors

Purpose

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has demonstrated clinical benefits for patients with metastatic and/or unresectable cancer. Technical considerations of treatment delivery and nearby organs at risk can limit the use of SBRT in large tumors or those in unfavorable locations. Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) may address this limitation because this technique can deliver high-dose radiation to discrete subvolume vertices inside a tumor target while restricting the remainder of the target to a safer lower dose. Indeed, SFRT, such as GRID, has been used to treat large tumors with reported dramatic tumor response and minimal side effects. Lattice is a modern approach to SFRT delivered with arc-based therapy, which may allow for safe, high-quality SBRT for large and/or deep tumors.

Methods and Materials

Herein, we report the results of a dosimetry and quality assurance feasibility study of Lattice SBRT in 11 patients with 12 tumor targets, each ≥10 cm in an axial dimension. Prior computed tomography simulation scans were used to generate volumetric modulated arc therapy Lattice SBRT plans that were then delivered on clinically available Linacs. Quality assurance testing included external portal imaging device and ion chamber analyses.

Results

All generated plans met the standard SBRT dose constraints, such as those from the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 101. Additionally, we provide a step-by-step approach to generate and deliver Lattice SBRT plans using commercially available treatment technology.

Conclusions

Lattice SBRT is currently being tested in a prospective trial for patients with metastatic cancer who need palliation of large tumors (NCT04553471, NCT04133415).

MBCL-16. EFFICACY OF CARBOPLATIN GIVEN CONCOMITANTLY WITH RADIATION AND ISOTRETINOIN AS A PRO-APOPTOTIC AGENT IN MAINTENANCE THERAPY IN HIGH-RISK MEDULLOBLASTOMA: A REPORT FROM THE CHILDREN’S ONCOLOGY GROUP

BACKGROUND

Metastasis, residual disease, and diffuse anaplasia are high-risk features in medulloblastoma.

METHODS

This was a randomized phase 3 study. Patients age 3–21 years with high-risk medulloblastoma received (+/-) daily carboplatin with 36Gy craniospinal radiation and weekly Vincristine followed by six cycles of maintenance chemotherapy with Cisplatin, Cyclophosphamide and Vincristine (+/) 12 cycles of isotretinoin during and following maintenance. The primary endpoint was event-free survival, with exact log-rank test to compare arms. Retrospective molecular analysis included DNA methylation and exome sequencing.

RESULTS

Of 294 medulloblastoma patients enrolled, 261 were eligible by central review of radiology and pathology, median age 8.6 years (range 3.3–21.2), 70% male, 189 (72%) with metastatic disease, 58 (22%) with diffuse anaplasia, 14 (5%) with &gt;1.5cm2 residual disease. The 5-year EFS and OS for all subjects was 63%+4 and 73%+3, respectively. Isotretinoin randomization was closed due to futility. 5-year EFS was 66 + 5 with carboplatin versus 59 + 5 without (p=0.11), with effect exclusively observed in Group 3 subtype: 73%+8 with carboplatin versus 54%+9 without (p&lt;0.05). Overall survival differed by molecular subgroup (p=0.006): WNT 100%, SHH 54%+11, Group 3 74%+6, Group 4 77%+5 at 5 years. MYC amplification or isochromosome 17 were unfavorable in Group 3 (p=0.029). Chromosome 11 loss or chromosome 17 gain were favorable in group 4 (p&lt;0.001). No survival difference was observed with TP53 mutation in SHH subtype in this high-risk cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapy intensification with carboplatin improved survival for high-risk group 3 medulloblastoma. These findings further support an integrated clinical and molecular risk stratification for medulloblastoma.

RONC-27. PROTON THERAPY REDUCES DOSE TO CRITICAL CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STRUCTURES IN MEDULLOBLASTOMA: A DOSIMETRIC ANALYSIS OF CHILDREN’S ONCOLOGY GROUP (COG) ACNS0331

BACKGROUND

Recently published data demonstrated proton therapy (PRT) significantly reduced cognitive decline relative to photons for pediatric medulloblastoma. These findings imply that reductions in dose to critical CNS structures during the boost phase may account for better outcomes over time. Here, we examine differences in dosimetric data for medulloblastoma patients treated on ACNS0331 with photon (Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy, 3D-Conformal Radiation Therapy) vs PRT to identify potential structures responsible for cognitive benefit.

METHODS

COG ACNS0331 was a randomized trial examining the impact of reduced craniospinal irradiation (CSI) dose (standard vs low dose, in patients aged 3–7) and volume (whole posterior fossa vs involved field) in pediatric medulloblastoma patients. We identified 136 patients (IMRT=95, 3DCRT=28, Proton=13) enrolled on ACNS0331 with complete radiation and imaging data and re-contoured 10 critical brain structures to calculate dose.

RESULTS

Proton therapy significantly reduced the dose to critical structures. For example, temporal lobe mean dose and V30 were 30Gy/38% (PRT), 40Gy/89% (IMRT), 41Gy/84% (3DCRT)), hippocampi mean dose were 51 Gy (IMRT), 52 Gy (3DCRT), and 44Gy (PRT) and cochlear mean dose were 43 Gy (IMRT), 49 Gy (3DCRT), and 31Gy (PRT). Dose to several other critical structures were also significantly reduced including the whole brain, supratentorium, cerebellum, and pituitary.

CONCLUSIONS

Proton therapy greatly reduces dose to critical CNS structures when compared to IMRT or 3DCRT. Further studies are needed to correlate dose reductions in these structures with improved cognitive outcomes.

QOL-20. IMPACT OF RADIATION DOSE AND VOLUME ON MEMORY FUNCTIONING IN CHILDREN WITH MEDULLOBLASTOMA: A REPORT FROM CHILDREN’S ONCOLOGY GROUP (COG) ACNS0331

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

We examined longitudinal verbal and visual memory functioning in children treated for medulloblastoma on COG protocol ACNS0331.

METHODS

Children with medulloblastoma participated in neuropsychological testing at three timepoints over a 6-year period. Children aged 3–7 years were randomized to receive craniospinal irradiation (CSI) of either 23.4Gy (standard dose; SDCSI) or 18Gy (lower dose; LDCSI). Children aged 8+ received SDCSI. All children were also randomized to receive either a reduced radiation boost to the involved field (IFRT) or a standard boost to the whole posterior fossa (PFRT). Memory functioning was evaluated an average of 0.67(T1), 2.95(T2), and 4.90(T3) years post-diagnosis.

RESULTS

Of 464 eligible patients enrolled on ACNS0331, 354 (76%; 65.3% male, 83.1% white) completed some neuropsychological testing. Mean age at diagnosis was 9.1 years (range=3–19). Verbal and visual short-term memory and learning were broadly within the average range for the overall sample at all three timepoints. However, a large percentage of children exhibited scores ≥1SD below the mean on tasks of verbal learning both immediately (43.4%) and after a delay (40.7%) at T3. In addition, 58.6% of children randomized to SDCSI exhibited impairment in verbal learning after a delay compared to 34.8% of children randomized to LDSCI, and 35.0% of those aged ≥8 at diagnosis receiving SDCSI.

CONCLUSIONS

Younger children receiving SDCSI have particularly high rates of memory impairment five years after diagnosis of medulloblastoma. Limiting CSI dose and/or volume in young children treated for this diagnosis may improve outcomes for memory functioning.

MBCL-15. IMPACT OF MOLECULAR SUBGROUPS ON OUTCOMES FOLLOWING RADIATION TREATMENT RANDOMIZATIONS FOR AVERAGE RISK MEDULLOBLASTOMA: A PLANNED ANALYSIS OF CHILDREN’S ONCOLOGY GROUP (COG) ACNS0331

The COG conducted a randomized trial for average-risk medulloblastoma (AR-MB). Patients age 3–21 years were randomized to a radiation boost to the whole posterior fossa (PFRT) or an involved field volume (IFRT) after receiving CSI. Patients age 3–7 years were also randomized to standard dose CSI (23.4Gy, SDCSI) or low dose CSI (18Gy, LDCSI). 464 evaluable patients were available to compare PFRT vs. IFRT and 226 for SDCSI vs. LDCSI. 380 cases had sufficient tissue for DNA methylation-based molecular classification: 362 confirmed medulloblastoma; 6 non-medulloblastoma; 12 inconclusive. Molecular subgrouping confirmed the following representation amongst the evaluable cohort: 156 Group 4 (43.1%), 76 Group 3 (21.0%), 66 SHH (18.2%), 64 WNT (17.7%). Five-year event-free survival (EFS) estimates were 82.5±2.7% and 80.5±2.7% for IFRT and PFRT, respectively (p=0.44). Five-year EFS estimates were 71.4±4.4% and 82.9±3.7% for LDCSI and SDCSI, respectively (p=0.028). EFS distributions differed significantly by subgroup (p&lt;0.0001). Group 3 had the worst outcome, while WNT had the best outcome. There was a significant difference in EFS by RT group among SHH patients; SHH patients receiving IFRT arm had better EFS compared to PFRT (p=0.018). There was a significant difference in EFS distributions by CSI group in Group 4 patients; young Group 4 patients treated with SDCSI had better EFS compared to LDCSI (p=0.047). As previously reported, IFRT is noninferior to PFRT in all patients with AR-MB but LDCSI is worse than SDCSI in younger children. Significant differences in outcome by study randomization and molecular subgroup are observed.

Prostate Radiotherapy With Adjuvant Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) Improves Metastasis-Free Survival Compared to Neoadjuvant ADT: An Individual Patient Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

There remains a lack of clarity regarding the influence of sequencing of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiotherapy (RT) on outcomes in prostate cancer (PCa). Herein, we evaluate the optimal sequencing of ADT with prostate-directed RT in localized PCa.

METHODS

MEDLINE (1966-2018), Embase (1982-2018), ClinicalTrials.gov, and conference proceedings (1990-2018) were searched to identify randomized trials evaluating the sequencing, but not duration, of ADT with RT. Two randomized phase III trials were identified, and individual patient data were obtained: Ottawa 0101 and NRG Oncology's Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413. Ottawa 0101 randomly assigned patients to neoadjuvant or concurrent versus concurrent or adjuvant short-term ADT. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413, a 2 × 2 factorial trial, included a random assignment of neoadjuvant or concurrent versus adjuvant short-term ADT. The neoadjuvant or concurrent ADT arms of both trials were combined into the neoadjuvant group, and the arms receiving adjuvant ADT were combined into the adjuvant group. The primary end point of this meta-analysis was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 14.9 years. Overall, 1,065 patients were included (531 neoadjuvant and 534 adjuvant). PFS was significantly improved in the adjuvant group (15-year PFS, 29% v 36%, hazard ratio [HR], 1.25 [95% CI, 1.07 to 1.47], P = .01). Biochemical failure (subdistribution HR [sHR], 1.37 [95% CI, 1.12 to 1.68], P = .002), distant metastasis (sHR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.95], P = .04), and metastasis-free survival (HR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.37], P = .050) were all significantly improved in the adjuvant group. There were no differences in late grade ≥ 3 gastrointestinal (2% v 3%, P = .33) or genitourinary toxicity (5% v 5%, P = .76) between groups.

CONCLUSION

The sequencing of ADT with prostate-directed RT has significant association with long-term PFS and MFS in localized PCa. Our findings favor use of an adjuvant over a neoadjuvant approach, without any increase in long-term toxicity.

Long-Term Results of NRG Oncology/RTOG 0321: A Phase II Trial of Combined High Dose Rate Brachytherapy and External Beam Radiation Therapy for Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate

PURPOSE

To report the long-term outcome of patients with prostate cancer treated with external beam radiation therapy and high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy from a prospective multi-institutional trial conducted by NRG Oncology/RTOG.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with clinically localized (T1c-T3b) prostate cancer without prior history of transurethral resection of prostate or hip prosthesis were eligible for this study. All patients were treated with a combination of 45 Gy in 25 fractions from external beam radiation therapy and one HDR implant delivering 19 Gy in 2 fractions. Adverse events (AE) were collected using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3. Cumulative incidence was used to estimate time to severe late gastrointestinal (GI)/genitourinary (GU) toxicity, biochemical failure, disease-specific mortality, local failure, and distant failure. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-nine patients were enrolled from July 2004 to May 2006. AE data was available for 115 patients. Patients were National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) intermediate to very high risk. The median age was 68, T1c-T2c 91%, T3a-T3b 9%, PSA ≤10 70%, PSA >10 to ≤20 30%, GS 6 10%, GS 7 72%, and GS 8 to 10 18%. Forty-three percent of patients received hormonal therapy. At a median follow-up time of 10 years, there were 6 (5%) patients with grade 3 GI and GU treatment-related AEs, and no late grade 4 to 5 GI and GU AEs. At 5 and 10 years, the rate of late grade 3 gastrointestinal and genitourinary AEs was 4% and 5%, respectively. Five- and 10-year overall survival rates were 95% and 76%. Biochemical failure rates per Phoenix definition at 5 and 10 years were 14% and 23%. The 10-year rate of disease-specific mortality was 6%. At 5 and 10 years, the rates of distant failure were 4% and 8%, respectively. The rates of local failure at 5 and 10 years were 2% at both time points.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined modality treatment using HDR prostate brachytherapy leads to excellent long-term clinical outcomes in this prospective multi-institutional trial.

Single Institutional Experience on Cutaneous Manifestation of Adult T-cell Leukemia/Lymphoma - Potential Diagnostic Pitfall

Introduction/Objective

Adult T-cell Leukemia/Lymphoma (ATLL) is an aggressive peripheral T-cell neoplasm caused by the human T-cell lymphotropic virus-1 (HTLV1). Approximately half of the patients diagnosed with ATLL have heterogeneous cutaneous manifestations and 1/3 of those patients have skin changes e.g. rashes, papules, and nodules at initial presentation. There is clinical and morphologic overlap between ATLL and other cutaneous T-cell neoplasms such as Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma/mycosis fungoides (CTCL/MF) which could pose a potential diagnostic challenge.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted using PathNet system to search for HTLV1 positive ATLL patients. Clinicopathologic features of the patients with cutaneous involvement were analyzed.

Results

Total 31 patients with ATLL were identified. Nine patients (29%, median 54.5 years, range 47-67 years, male: female ratio 2:7) showed skin manifestations, and the cutaneous involvement with ATLL was confirmed by skin biopsy. Five (55.5%, 5/9) cases were initially misdiagnosed as CTCL/MF. Among the 5 patients, 2 presented with skin rash or diffuse erythematous patch/plaque before developing generalized lymphadenopathy or overt circulating atypical lymphocytosis; 2 developed severe pruritic rash with erythematous skin changes resembling Sezary syndrome; and 1 patient had folliculotrophic MF diagnosed 12 years before. Notably, atypical lymphocytosis (0.46- 41.19/µL) occurred in 3 of the 4 remaining cases. In addition, eight of the 9 patients displayed a variable level of CD3+/CD4+/ CD25strong+ abnormal T-cells on flow cytometry. A low-level bone marrow involvement (2-10%) was found in 8 of 9 cases. Elevated calcium levels were identified in 3 of 9 cases (33%). There were 7 of 8 patients (87.5%) who developed generalized lymphadenopathy when diagnosis of ATLL was rendered.

Conclusion

In patients with cutaneous manifestations, features including hypercalcemia, atypical lymphocytosis, lymphadenopathy, CD3/CD4/strong CD25 coexpression, and bone marrow involvement should prompt a test for HTLV1. Early diagnosis of ATLL can initiate proper treatment and improve patient clinical outcomes.

Implementing a Novel Remote Physician Treatment Coverage Practice for Adaptive Radiation Therapy During the Coronavirus Pandemic

PURPOSE

The 2019 coronavirus disease pandemic has placed an increased importance on physical distancing to minimize the risk of transmission in radiation oncology departments. The pandemic has also increased the use of hypofractionated treatment schedules where magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiation therapy (ART) can aid in dose escalation. This specialized technique requires increased staffing in close proximity, and thus the need for novel coverage practices to increase physical distancing while still providing specialty care.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A remote-physician ART coverage practice was developed and described using commercially available software products. Our remote-physician coverage practice provided control to the physician to contour and review of the images and plans. The time from completion of image registration to the beginning of treatment was recorded for 20 fractions before remote-physician ART coverage and 14 fractions after implementation of remote-physician ART coverage. Visual quality was calculated using cross-correlation between the treatment delivery and remote-physician computer screens.

RESULTS

For the 14 fractions after implementation, the average time from image registration to the beginning of treatment was 24.9 ± 6.1 minutes. In comparison, the 20 fractions analyzed without remote coverage had an average time of 29.2 ± 9.8 minutes. The correlation between the console and remote-physician screens was R = .95.

CONCLUSIONS

Our novel remote-physician ART coverage practice is secure, interactive, timely, and of high visual quality. When using remote physicians for ART, our department was able to increase physical distancing to lower the risk of virus transmission while providing specialty care to patients in need.

AR enhancer and locus genomic alterations as cell-free DNA biomarkers of primary resistance to AR-directed treatment of metastatic prostate cancer

5529

Background: Predicting primary resistance to androgen receptor (AR)-directed therapies is critical for personalizing treatment of metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa). Analyses of liquid biopsies are potential tools but remained underutilized due to limited sensitivity. We developed a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) assay (EnhanceAR-Seq) to monitor genomic alterations in mPCa including AR enhancer duplication, a resistance marker recently discovered in ~81% of mPCa patients. Here we show that applying EnhanceAR-Seq to plasma cfDNA to monitor alterations of AR gene and enhancer ( AR/enhancer) predicted primary resistance with high sensitivity and outperformed the clinically validated CTC AR-V7 assay. Methods: Forty mPCa patients were prospectively enrolled at the Washington University School of Medicine Siteman Cancer Center with plasma cfDNA analyzed by EnhanceAR-Seq. Twenty-five of them also had the Oncotype DX AR-V7 Nucleus Detect CTC assay performed at a similar timepoint at the discretion of the treating oncologist. All patients received AR-directed therapy (eg. abiraterone, enzalutamide) and underwent standard-of-care clinical and laboratory follow-up. Primary resistance was defined as PSA progression, change of treatment or death within 4 months of treatment initiation, or radiographic progression within 6 months. Results: Median clinical follow up after diagnosis was 50 months. EnhanceAR-Seq detected alterations targeting AR/enhancer in 18 patients (45%), TP53 in 8 patients (20%), and PTEN in 6 patients (15%). We found that AR/enhancer alterations (copy gain, tandem duplication, and point mutation) in cfDNA were strongly predictive of primary resistance to AR-directed therapy (PPV = 100%, Sens. = 89%). Our assay outperformed the CTC AR-V7 assay, which was positive in only two patients (PPV = 50%, Sens. = 6%). Furthermore, patients with AR/enhancer alterations had significantly worse progression-free survival (P = 0.0015; HR = 11.5) and overall survival (P = 0.0002; HR = 6.8). Finally, serial cell-free DNA analysis of 10 patients showed that AR/enhancer copy number gain was maintained or acquired in 5 of 6 AR-resistant cases, and neutrality maintained in 4 of 4 AR-sensitive cases. Conclusions: cfDNA-based AR/enhancer locus genomic alterations could potentially be used to predict primary resistance to AR-directed therapy with higher sensitivity than the clinically validated CTC AR-V7 assay, be used for serial timepoint monitoring and guiding personalized clinical decision-making.

Bladder Cancer, Version 3.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

This selection from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Bladder Cancer focuses on the clinical presentation and workup of suspected bladder cancer, treatment of non-muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer, and treatment of metastatic urothelial bladder cancer because important updates have recently been made to these sections. Some important updates include recommendations for optimal treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the event of a bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) shortage and details about biomarker testing for advanced or metastatic disease. The systemic therapy recommendations for second-line or subsequent therapies have also been revised. Treatment and management of muscle-invasive, nonmetastatic disease is covered in the complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for Bladder Cancer available at NCCN.org. Additional topics covered in the complete version include treatment of nonurothelial histologies and recommendations for nonbladder urinary tract cancers such as upper tract urothelial carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma of the prostate, and primary carcinoma of the urethra.

A methodological comparison of mapping algorithms to obtain health utilities derived using cross-sectional and longitudinal data: Secondary analysis of NRG/RTOG 0415

55

Background: To compare the predictive ability of health utility mapping algorithms derived using cross-sectional and longitudinal data specific to the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC). Methods: This mapping study utilized data from an international, multicenter, randomized controlled trial of patients with low-risk prostate cancer conducted by NRG Oncology (NCT00331773). Health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) data were collected using EPIC, and health utilities were obtained using EuroQOL-5D (EQ5D) at baseline and 6, 12 and 24 months post-intervention. Data were split into an estimation sample (70%) and a validation sample (30%). Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression models were estimated using baseline cross-sectional data as well as pooled data from all assessment periods. Random effects (RE) specifications that explicitly model the longitudinal nature of the data were also estimated. Candidate models were selected based on root mean square error (RMSE). Results: A total of 196 (147) patients in the estimation sample had complete EQ5D and EPIC domain (subdomain) data at all time points. OLS models using combined data outperformed the counter-part RE models as well as OLS models using baseline data in the five-fold cross-validation. Addition of covariates to the models resulted in improved predictive ability. In the external validation, when only EPIC domain/ subdomain data are available, the OLS model using combined data predicted EQ5D utilities better than the counterpart RE model and OLS model using baseline data (RMSE=0.121108 & 0.111345). OLS model using baseline data outperformed other model types for algorithms with EPIC domains and demographics (RMSE=0.121757), while RE models outperformed the other two model types for algorithms with EPIC subdomains and demographic data, (0.112782) and for algorithms with EPIC domains/ subdomains, demographics, and clinical covariates (RMSE=0.123589 & 0.163093). Conclusions: While algorithms using pooled data outperformed other model types in internal validation, RE models showed better predictive ability in external validation for algorithms with covariates. Clinical trial information: NCT00331773.

VA-Radiation Oncology Quality Surveillance Program

PURPOSE

We sought to develop a quality surveillance program for approximately 15,000 US veterans treated at the 40 radiation oncology facilities at the Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals each year.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

State-of-the-art technologies were used with the goal to improve clinical outcomes while providing the best possible care to veterans. To measure quality of care and service rendered to veterans, the Veterans Health Administration established the VA Radiation Oncology Quality Surveillance program. The program carries forward the American College of Radiology Quality Research in Radiation Oncology project methodology of assessing the wide variation in practice pattern and quality of care in radiation therapy by developing clinical quality measures (QM) used as quality indices. These QM data provide feedback to physicians by identifying areas for improvement in the process of care and identifying the adoption of evidence-based recommendations for radiation therapy.

RESULTS

Disease-site expert panels organized by the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) defined quality measures and established scoring criteria for prostate cancer (intermediate and high risk), non-small cell lung cancer (IIIA/B stage), and small cell lung cancer (limited stage) case presentations. Data elements for 1567 patients from the 40 VA radiation oncology practices were abstracted from the electronic medical records and treatment management and planning systems. Overall, the 1567 assessed cases passed 82.4% of all QM. Pass rates for QM for the 773 lung and 794 prostate cases were 78.0% and 87.2%, respectively. Marked variations, however, were noted in the pass rates for QM when tumor site, clinical pathway, or performing centers were separately examined.

CONCLUSIONS

The peer-review protected VA-Radiation Oncology Surveillance program based on clinical quality measures allows providers to compare their clinical practice to peers and to make meaningful adjustments in their personal patterns of care unobtrusively.

Crystal structure, vibrational and optic properties of 2-N-methylamino-3-methylpyridine N-oxide - Its X-ray and spectroscopic studies as well as DFT quantum chemical calculations

The crystal and molecular structure and physicochemical properties of 2-N-methylamino-3-methylpyridine N-oxide (MA3MPO) have been studied. MA3MPO was synthesized from 2-amino-3-methylpyridine by several steps to form colorless crystals suitable for crystallographic analysis. The data reveal that MA3MPO crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n. The studied compound contains a nearly flat triply substituted pyridine skeleton whose structure is stabilized by an intramolecular N–H⋅⋅⋅O hydrogen bond. The N-oxide molecules are connected together by weak C–H⋯O hydrogen bonds, an acceptor of which is the oxygen atom from the N-oxide group. This leads to creation of two-dimensional network of hydrogen bonds. Its IR, Raman, UV–Vis and luminescence spectra have been measured and analyzed on the basis of DFT and NBO quantum chemical calculations in which the B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) approach was applied. The distribution of the electron levels in the studied compound has been analyzed in terms of the possibility of its participation in the ligand-to-lanthanide ion energy transfer.

•

The 2-N-methylamino-3-methylpyridine N-oxide (MA3MPO) was synthesized and characterized.

•

The studied compound structure is stabilized by an intramolecular N–H⋯O hydrogen bond.

•

The molecules are connected together by weak C–H⋯O hydrogen bonds.

•

The amino group plays the role of effective hydrogen-bond donor but the N-oxide group is a hydrogen-bond acceptor.

•

X-ray, IR, Raman and DFT methods recognized the existence of the intramolecular N–H⋯O hydrogen bond in the studied compound.

National Cancer Institute Workshop on Proton Therapy for Children: Considerations Regarding Brainstem Injury

PURPOSE

Proton therapy can allow for superior avoidance of normal tissues. A widespread consensus has been reached that proton therapy should be used for patients with curable pediatric brain tumor to avoid critical central nervous system structures. Brainstem necrosis is a potentially devastating, but rare, complication of radiation. Recent reports of brainstem necrosis after proton therapy have raised concerns over the potential biological differences among radiation modalities. We have summarized findings from the National Cancer Institute Workshop on Proton Therapy for Children convened in May 2016 to examine brainstem injury.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-seven physicians, physicists, and researchers from 17 institutions with expertise met to discuss this issue. The definition of brainstem injury, imaging of this entity, clinical experience with photons and photons, and potential biological differences among these radiation modalities were thoroughly discussed and reviewed. The 3 largest US pediatric proton therapy centers collectively summarized the incidence of symptomatic brainstem injury and physics details (planning, dosimetry, delivery) for 671 children with focal posterior fossa tumors treated with protons from 2006 to 2016.

RESULTS

The average rate of symptomatic brainstem toxicity from the 3 largest US pediatric proton centers was 2.38%. The actuarial rate of grade ≥2 brainstem toxicity was successfully reduced from 12.7% to 0% at 1 center after adopting modified radiation guidelines. Guidelines for treatment planning and current consensus brainstem constraints for proton therapy are presented. The current knowledge regarding linear energy transfer (LET) and its relationship to relative biological effectiveness (RBE) are defined. We review the current state of LET-based planning.

CONCLUSIONS

Brainstem injury is a rare complication of radiation therapy for both photons and protons. Substantial dosimetric data have been collected for brainstem injury after proton therapy, and established guidelines to allow for safe delivery of proton radiation have been defined. Increased capability exists to incorporate LET optimization; however, further research is needed to fully explore the capabilities of LET- and RBE-based planning.

Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Radiotherapy (MRIgRT): A 4.5-Year Clinical Experience

AIMS

Magnetic resonance image-guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT) has been clinically implemented since 2014. This technology offers improved soft-tissue visualisation, daily imaging, and intra-fraction real-time imaging without added radiation exposure, and the opportunity for adaptive radiotherapy (ART) to adjust for anatomical changes. Here we share the longest single-institution experience with MRIgRT, focusing on trends and changes in use over the past 4.5 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analysed clinical information, including patient demographics, treatment dates, disease sites, dose/fractionation, and clinical trial enrolment for all patients treated at our institution using MRIgRT on a commercially available, integrated 0.35 T MRI, tri-cobalt-60 device from 2014 to 2018. For each patient, factors including disease site, clinical rationale for MRIgRT use, use of ART, and proportion of fractions adapted were summated and compared between individual years of use (2014-2018) to identify shifts in institutional practice patterns.

RESULTS

Six hundred and forty-two patients were treated with 666 unique treatment courses using MRIgRT at our institution between 2014 and 2018. Breast cancer was the most common disease, with use of cine MRI gating being a particularly important indication, followed by abdominal sites, where the need for cine gating and use of ART drove MRIgRT use. One hundred and ninety patients were treated using ART in 1550 fractions, 67.6% (1050) of which were adapted. ART was primarily used in cancers of the abdomen. Over time, breast and gastrointestinal cancers became increasingly dominant for MRIgRT use, hypofractionated treatment courses became more popular, and gastrointestinal cancers became the principal focus of ART.

DISCUSSION

MRIgRT is widely applicable within the field of radiation oncology and new clinical uses continue to emerge. At our institution to date, applications such as ART for gastrointestinal cancers and accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) for breast cancer have become dominant indications, although this is likely to continue to evolve.

Stereotactic MR-Guided Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy (SMART) for Ultracentral Thorax Malignancies: Results of a Phase 1 Trial

Purpose

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective treatment for oligometastatic or unresectable primary malignancies, although target proximity to organs at risk (OARs) within the ultracentral thorax (UCT) limits safe delivery of an ablative dose. Stereotactic magnetic resonance (MR)–guided online adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) may improve the therapeutic ratio using reoptimization to account for daily variation in target and OAR anatomy. This study assessed the feasibility of UCT SMART and characterized dosimetric and clinical outcomes in patients treated for UCT lesions on a prospective phase 1 trial.

Methods and Materials

Five patients with oligometastatic (n = 4) or unresectable primary (n = 1) UCT malignancies underwent SMART. Initial plans prescribed 50 Gy in 5 fractions with goal 95% planning target volume (PTV) coverage by 95% of prescription, subject to strict OAR constraints. Daily real-time online adaptive plans were created as needed to preserve hard OAR constraints, escalate PTV dose, or both, based on daily setup MR image set anatomy. Treatment times, patient outcomes, and dosimetric comparisons were prospectively recorded.

Results

All initial and daily adaptive plans met strict OAR constraints based on simulation and daily setup MR imaging anatomy, respectively. Four of the 5 patients received ≥1 adapted fraction. Ten of the 25 total delivered fractions were adapted. A total of 30% of plan adaptations were performed to improve PTV coverage; 70% were for reversal of ≥1 OAR violation. Local control by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors was 100% at 3 and 6 months. No grade ≥3 acute (within 6 months of radiation completion) treatment-related toxicities were identified.

Conclusions

SMART may allow PTV coverage improvement and/or OAR sparing compared with nonadaptive SBRT and may widen the therapeutic index of UCT SBRT. In this small prospective cohort, we found that SMART was clinically deliverable to 100% of patients, although treatment delivery times surpassed our predefined, timing-based feasibility endpoint. This technique is well tolerated, offering excellent local control with no identified acute grade ≥3 toxicity.