1
|
Kaul D, Ehret F, Roohani S, Jendrach M, Buthut M, Acker G, Anwar M, Zips D, Heppner F, Prüss H. Radiation Therapy in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:23-41. [PMID: 38042449 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.11.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 11/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pathophysiological hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease (AD) include extracellular amyloid plaques and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles. Recent studies also demonstrated a role of neuroinflammation in the progression of the disease. Clinical trials and animal studies using low-dose radiation therapy (LDRT) have shown therapeutic potential for AD. This systematic review summarizes the current evidence on the use of LDRT for the treatment of AD, outlines potential mechanisms of action, and discusses current challenges in the planning of future trials. METHODS AND MATERIALS A systematic review of human and animal studies as well as registered clinical trials describing outcomes for RT in the treatment of AD was conducted. We followed the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles published until July 1, 2023, were included. RESULTS The initial search yielded 993 articles. After the removal of duplicates and ineligible publications, a total of 16 (12 animal, 4 human) studies were included. Various dose regimens were utilized in both animal and human trials. The results revealed that LDRT reduced the number of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, and it has a role in the regulation of genes and protein expression involved in the pathological progression of AD. LDRT has demonstrated reduced astro- and microgliosis, anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects, and an alleviation of symptoms of cognitive deficits in animal models. Most studies in humans suggested improvements in cognition and behavior. None of the trials or studies described significant (>grade 2) toxicity. CONCLUSIONS Preclinical studies, animal studies, and early clinical trials in humans have shown a promising role for LDRT in the treatment of AD pathologies, although the underlying mechanisms are yet to be fully explored. Phase I/II/III trials are needed to assess the long-term safety, efficacy, and optimal treatment parameters of LDRT in AD treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Felix Ehret
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Junior Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin, Germany
| | - Siyer Roohani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Junior Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marina Jendrach
- Department of Neuropathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maria Buthut
- Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Güliz Acker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Muneeba Anwar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Frank Heppner
- Department of Neuropathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Harald Prüss
- Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Martin D, Rödel F, Hehlgans S, Looso M, Ziegler PK, Fleischmann M, Diefenhardt M, Fries L, Kalinauskaite G, Tinhofer I, Zips D, Gani C, Rödel C, Fokas E. Inflammatory pathways confer resistance to chemoradiotherapy in anal squamous cell carcinoma. NPJ Precis Oncol 2024; 8:93. [PMID: 38653773 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-024-00585-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) is associated with immunosuppression and infection with human papillomavirus (HPV). Response to standard chemoradiotherapy (CRT) varies considerably. A comprehensive molecular characterization of CRT resistance is lacking, and little is known about the interplay between tumor immune contexture, host immunity, and immunosuppressive and/or immune activating effects of CRT. Patients with localized ASCC, treated with CRT at three different sites of the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) were included. Patient cohorts for molecular analysis included baseline formalin fixed paraffin embedded biopsies for immunohistochemistry (n = 130), baseline RNA sequencing (n = 98), peripheral blood immune profiling (n = 47), and serum cytokine measurement (n = 35). Gene set enrichment analysis showed that pathways for IFNγ, IFNα, inflammatory response, TNFα signaling via NF-κB, and EMT were significantly enriched in poor responders (all p < 0.001). Expression of interferon-induced transmembrane protein 1 (IFITM1), both on mRNA and protein levels, was associated with reduced Freedom from locoregional failure (FFLF, p = 0.037) and freedom from distant metastasis (FFDM, p = 0.014). An increase of PD-L1 expression on CD4+ T-cells (p < 0.001) and an increase in HLA-DR expression on T-cells (p < 0.001) was observed in the peripheral blood after CRT. Elevated levels of regulatory T-cells and CXCL2 were associated with reduced FFLF (p = 0.0044 and p = 0.004, respectively). Inflammatory pathways in tissue in line with elevated levels of regulatory T-cells and CXCL2 in peripheral blood are associated with resistance to CRT. To counteract this resistance mechanism, the RADIANCE randomized phase-2 trial currently tests the addition of the immune checkpoint inhibitor durvalumab to standard CRT in locally advanced ASCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Martin
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, A Partnership between DKFZ and University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - F Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, A Partnership between DKFZ and University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - S Hehlgans
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - M Looso
- Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bioinformatics Core Unit, Bad Nauheim, Germany
| | - P K Ziegler
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, A Partnership between DKFZ and University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - M Fleischmann
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, A Partnership between DKFZ and University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - M Diefenhardt
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, A Partnership between DKFZ and University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - L Fries
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - G Kalinauskaite
- Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, A Partnership between DKFZ and Charité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - I Tinhofer
- Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, A Partnership between DKFZ and Charité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - D Zips
- Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, A Partnership between DKFZ and Charité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - C Gani
- Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, University Hospital Tübingen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, A Partnership between DKFZ and University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - C Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, A Partnership between DKFZ and University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - E Fokas
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, A Partnership between DKFZ and University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Roohani S, Ehret F, Beck M, Veltsista DP, Nadobny J, Zschaeck S, Abdel-Rahman S, Eckert F, Flörcken A, Issels RD, Klöck S, Krempien R, Lindner LH, Notter M, Ott OJ, Pink D, Potkrajcic V, Reichardt P, Riesterer O, Spałek MJ, Stutz E, Wessalowski R, Zilli T, Zips D, Ghadjar P, Kaul D. Regional hyperthermia for soft tissue sarcoma - a survey on current practice, controversies and consensus among 12 European centers. Int J Hyperthermia 2024; 41:2342348. [PMID: 38653548 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2024.2342348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze the current practice of regional hyperthermia (RHT) for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) at 12 European centers to provide an overview, find consensuses and identify controversies necessary for future guidelines and clinical trials. METHODS In this cross-sectional survey study, a 27-item questionnaire assessing clinical subjects and procedural details on RHT for STS was distributed to 12 European cancer centers for RHT. RESULTS We have identified seven controversies and five consensus points. Of 12 centers, 6 offer both, RHT with chemotherapy (CTX) or with radiotherapy (RT). Two centers only offer RHT with CTX and four centers only offer RHT with RT. All 12 centers apply RHT for localized, high-risk STS of the extremities, trunk wall and retroperitoneum. However, eight centers also use RHT in metastatic STS, five in palliative STS, eight for superficial STS and six for low-grade STS. Pretherapeutic imaging for RHT treatment planning is used by 10 centers, 9 centers set 40-43 °C as the intratumoral target temperature, and all centers use skin detectors or probes in body orifices for thermometry. DISCUSSION There is disagreement regarding the integration of RHT in contemporary interdisciplinary care of STS patients. Many clinical controversies exist that require a standardized consensus guideline and innovative study ideas. At the same time, our data has shown that existing guidelines and decades of experience with the technique of RHT have mostly standardized procedural aspects. CONCLUSIONS The provided results may serve as a basis for future guidelines and inform future clinical trials for RHT in STS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siyer Roohani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité (Junior) Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Ehret
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marcus Beck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Danai P Veltsista
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jacek Nadobny
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité (Junior) Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sultan Abdel-Rahman
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Franziska Eckert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, AKH, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Anne Flörcken
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rolf D Issels
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephan Klöck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lindenhofspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Robert Krempien
- Clinic for Radiotherapy, HELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
- MSB Medical School Berlin, Fakultät für Medizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lars H Lindner
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus Notter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lindenhofspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Oliver J Ott
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Daniel Pink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Helios Klinikum Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
- Cinic for Internal Medicine C - Haematology and Oncology, Stem Cell Transplantation and Palliative Care, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Vlatko Potkrajcic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Peter Reichardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, and Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Oliver Riesterer
- Center for Radiation Oncology KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Mateusz Jacek Spałek
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Radiotherapy I, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Emanuel Stutz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Rüdiger Wessalowski
- Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Facoltà di Scienze Biomediche, Università Della Svizzera Italiana (USI), Lugano, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pirus Ghadjar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Straube C, Combs SE, Bernhardt D, Gempt J, Meyer B, Zimmer C, Schmidt-Graf F, Vajkoczy P, Grün A, Ehret F, Zips D, Kaul D. Adjuvant re-irradiation vs. no early re-irradiation of resected recurrent glioblastoma: pooled comparative cohort analysis from two tertiary centers. J Neurooncol 2024:10.1007/s11060-024-04633-2. [PMID: 38520571 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04633-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal management strategy for recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) remains uncertain, and the impact of re-irradiation (Re-RT) on overall survival (OS) is still a matter of debate. This study included patients who achieved gross total resection (GTR) after a second surgery after recurrence, following the GlioCave criteria. METHODS Inclusion criteria include being 18 years or older, having histologically confirmed locally recurrent IDHwt or IDH unknown GBM, achieving MRI-proven GTR after the second surgery, having a Karnofsky performance status of at least 60% after the second surgery, having a minimum interval of 6 months between the first radiotherapy and the second surgery, and a maximum of 8 weeks from second surgery to the start of Re-RT. RESULTS A total of 44 patients have met the inclusion criteria. The median OS after the second surgery was 14 months. All patients underwent standard treatment after initial diagnosis, including maximum safe resection, adjuvant radiochemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. Re-RT did not significantly impact OS. However, MGMT promoter methylation status and a longer interval (> 12 months) between treatments were associated with better OS. Multivariate analysis revealed the MGMT status as the only significant predictor of OS. CONCLUSION Factors such as MGMT promoter methylation status and treatment interval play crucial roles in determining patient outcomes after second surgery. Personalized treatment strategies should consider these factors to optimize the management of rGBM. Prospective research is needed to define the value of re-RT after second surgery and to inform decision making in this situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Straube
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany.
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Gempt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Zimmer
- Department of Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Friederike Schmidt-Graf
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Arne Grün
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Ehret
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fink CA, Wegener D, Sauer LD, Lentz-Hommertgen A, Liermann J, Müller AC, Zips D, Debus J, Herfarth K, Koerber SA. Pelvic Irradiation for Node-Positive Prostate Cancer After Prostatectomy: Long-Term Results of the Prospective PLATIN-4 and PLATIN-5 Trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:1011-1017. [PMID: 37863242 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE After radical prostatectomy (RP), adjuvant or salvage radiation treatment in node-positive prostate cancer is offered to prevent systemic disease. Prospective long-term survival and toxicity data on patients with radiation for nodal disease are still scarce. This study evaluates safety and feasibility of salvage radiation therapy to the pelvic lymph nodes in node-positive prostate cancer after RP. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 2009 and 2018, 78 patients with lymph node recurrence after RP (PLATIN-4 trial) or after RP and prostate bed radiation therapy (PLATIN-5 trial) were treated with salvage pelvic lymph node radiation therapy with boost to the involved nodes as field abutment (PLATIN-5) and boost to the prostate bed (PLATIN-4). Androgen deprivation therapy was started 2 months before radiation and recommended for 24 months. The primary endpoint was safety and feasibility of the intensity modulated radiation therapy-image guided radiation therapy technique based on the rate of treatment discontinuations and incidence of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3+ toxicity. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS No treatment discontinuations were reported in either trial. Median overall survival was not reached in PLATIN-4 and was 117 months in PLATIN-5. Median progression-free survival was 66 months in PLATIN-4 and 39 months in PLATIN-5. Late grade 3+ genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities were observed in 4% of patients at 24 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Salvage radiation therapy to the prostate bed and pelvic lymphatic drainage combined with long-term androgen deprivation therapy is a curative treatment option for patients with node-positive prostate cancer after RP, with excellent in-field disease control. Pelvic lymph node radiation therapy as field abutment after prostate bed radiation therapy is feasible with long-term survival and no high-grade toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph A Fink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Daniel Wegener
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Lukas D Sauer
- University of Heidelberg, Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Adriane Lentz-Hommertgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Liermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan A Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Barmherzige Brueder Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Koerber SA, Höcht S, Aebersold D, Albrecht C, Boehmer D, Ganswindt U, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Hölscher T, Mueller AC, Niehoff P, Peeken JC, Pinkawa M, Polat B, Spohn SKB, Wolf F, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Wiegel T. Prostate cancer and elective nodal radiation therapy for cN0 and pN0-a never ending story? : Recommendations from the prostate cancer expert panel of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO). Strahlenther Onkol 2024; 200:181-187. [PMID: 38273135 PMCID: PMC10876748 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02193-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
For prostate cancer, the role of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) for cN0 or pN0 patients has been under discussion for years. Considering the recent publications of randomized controlled trials, the prostate cancer expert panel of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) aimed to discuss and summarize the current literature. Modern trials have been recently published for both treatment-naïve patients (POP-RT trial) and patients after surgery (SPPORT trial). Although there are more reliable data to date, we identified several limitations currently complicating the definitions of general recommendations. For patients with cN0 (conventional or PSMA-PET staging) undergoing definitive radiotherapy, only men with high-risk factors for nodal involvement (e.g., cT3a, GS ≥ 8, PSA ≥ 20 ng/ml) seem to benefit from ENI. For biochemical relapse in the postoperative situation (pN0) and no PSMA imaging, ENI may be added to patients with risk factors according to the SPPORT trial (e.g., GS ≥ 8; PSA > 0.7 ng/ml). If PSMA-PET/CT is negative, ENI may be offered for selected men with high-risk factors as an individual treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S A Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Barmherzige Brüder Hospital Regensburg, Prüfeninger Straße 86, 93049, Regensburg, Germany.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - S Höcht
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ernst von Bergmann Hospital Potsdam, Charlottenstraße 72, 14467, Potsdam, Germany
| | - D Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital-Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstraße 4, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - C Albrecht
- Nordstrahl Radiation Oncology Unit, Nürnberg North Hospital, Prof.-Ernst-Nathan-Str. 1, 90149, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - D Boehmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - U Ganswindt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - N-S Schmidt-Hegemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - T Hölscher
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fiedlerstraße 19, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - A-C Mueller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, RKH Hospital Ludwigsburg, Posilipostraße 4, 71640, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - P Niehoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sana Hospital Offenbach, Starkenburgring 66, 63069, Offenbach, Germany
| | - J C Peeken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - M Pinkawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Robert Janker Klinik, Villenstraße 8, 53129, Bonn, Germany
| | - B Polat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - S K B Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Straße 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - F Wolf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - C Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Straße 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
- German Oncology Center, 1, Nikis Avenue, Agios Athanasios, 4108, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - D Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - T Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ehret F, Zühlke O, Schweizer L, Kahn J, Csapo-Schmidt C, Roohani S, Zips D, Capper D, Adeberg S, Abdollahi A, Knoll M, Kaul D. Validation of a methylation-based signature for subventricular zone involvement in glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 2024; 167:89-97. [PMID: 38376766 PMCID: PMC10978677 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04570-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Glioblastomas (GBM) with subventricular zone (SVZ) contact have previously been associated with a specific epigenetic fingerprint. We aim to validate a reported bulk methylation signature to determine SVZ contact. METHODS Methylation array analysis was performed on IDHwt GBM patients treated at our institution. The v11b4 classifier was used to ensure the inclusion of only receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) I, II, and mesenchymal (MES) subtypes. Methylation-based assignment (SVZM ±) was performed using hierarchical cluster analysis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (T1ce) was independently reviewed for SVZ contact by three experienced readers. RESULTS Sixty-five of 70 samples were classified as RTK I, II, and MES. Full T1ce MRI-based rater consensus was observed in 54 cases, which were retained for further analysis. Epigenetic SVZM classification and SVZ were strongly associated (OR: 15.0, p = 0.003). Thirteen of fourteen differential CpGs were located in the previously described differentially methylated LRBA/MAB21L2 locus. SVZ + tumors were linked to shorter OS (hazard ratio (HR): 3.80, p = 0.02) than SVZM + at earlier time points (time-dependency of SVZM, p < 0.05). Considering the SVZ consensus as the ground truth, SVZM classification yields a sensitivity of 96.6%, specificity of 36.0%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 63.6%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 90.0%. CONCLUSION Herein, we validated the specific epigenetic signature in GBM in the vicinity of the SVZ and highlighted the importance of methylation of a part of the LRBA/MAB21L2 gene locus. Whether SVZM can replace MRI-based SVZ assignment as a prognostic and diagnostic tool will require prospective studies of large, homogeneous cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Ehret
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Oliver Zühlke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Leonille Schweizer
- Institute of Neurology (Edinger Institute), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Johannes Kahn
- Department of Radiology, Health and Medical University, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Christoph Csapo-Schmidt
- Department of Neuroradiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Siyer Roohani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Junior Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Capper
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neuropathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Marburg/Gießen, Marburg, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Knoll
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fink CA, Wegener D, Sauer LD, Jäkel C, Zips D, Debus J, Herfarth K, Koerber SA. Whole-pelvic irradiation with boost to involved nodes and prostate in node-positive prostate cancer-long-term data from the prospective PLATIN-2 trial. Strahlenther Onkol 2024; 200:202-207. [PMID: 37640867 PMCID: PMC10876493 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02129-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Node-positive prostate cancer is a potentially curable disease. Definitive radiotherapy to the prostate and lymphatic drainage is an effective treatment option but prospective long-term outcome data are scarce. Thus, the current study aimed to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of definitive radiation therapy for men with prostate cancer and nodal metastases using modern irradiation techniques. METHODS A total of 40 treatment-naïve men with node-positive prostate cancer were allocated to the trial. All patients received definitive radiation therapy at two German university hospitals between 2009 and 2018. Radiation was delivered as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with 51 Gy to the lymphatic drainage with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) up to 61.2 Gy to involved nodes and 76.5 Gy to the prostate in 34 fractions. Feasibility and safety, overall and progression-free survival, toxicity, and quality of life measurements were analyzed. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 79 months, median overall survival was 107 months and progression-free survival was 78 months. Based on imaging follow-up, no infield relapse was reported during the first 24 months of follow-up. There were 3 (8%) potentially treatment-related grade 3 toxicities. Common iliac node involvement was associated with a higher risk of progression (HR 15.8; 95% CI 2.1-119.8; p = 0.007). CONCLUSION Definitive radiation to the lymphatic drainage with SIB to the involved nodes and prostate is a safe and effective treatment approach for patients with treatment-naïve, node-positive prostate cancer with excellent infield tumor control rates and tolerable toxicity. Location rather than number of involved nodes is a major risk factor for progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C A Fink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, INF 400, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiooncology (HIRO), INF 400, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- INF 460, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - D Wegener
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - L D Sauer
- University of Heidelberg, INF 130.3, Institute of Medical Biometry (IMBI), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Jäkel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, INF 400, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiooncology (HIRO), INF 400, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - D Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - J Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, INF 400, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiooncology (HIRO), INF 400, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- INF 460, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit, INF 280, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- INF 450, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - K Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, INF 400, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiooncology (HIRO), INF 400, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- INF 460, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit, INF 280, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - S A Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, INF 400, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiooncology (HIRO), INF 400, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- INF 460, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Barmherzige Brueder Hospital Regensburg, Pruefeninger Straße 86, 93049, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Habrich J, Boeke S, Fritz V, Koerner E, Nikolaou K, Schick F, Gani C, Zips D, Thorwarth D. Reproducibility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck cancer assessed on a 1.5 T MR-Linac and comparison to parallel measurements on a 3 T diagnostic scanner. Radiother Oncol 2024; 191:110046. [PMID: 38070687 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Before quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) acquired with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used for interventional trials in radiotherapy (RT), technical validation of these QIBs is necessary. The aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, derived from diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI, in head and neck cancer using a 1.5 T MR-Linac (MRL) by comparison to a 3 T diagnostic scanner (DS). MATERIAL AND METHODS DW-MRIs were acquired on MRL and DS for 15 head and neck cancer patients before RT and in week 2 and rigidly registered to the planning computed tomography. Mean ADC values were calculated for submandibular (SG) and parotid (PG) glands as well as target volumes (TV, gross tumor volume and lymph nodes), which were delineated based on computed tomography. Mean absolute ADC differences as well as within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for all volumes of interest. RESULTS A total of 23 datasets were analyzed. Mean ADC difference (DS-MRL) for SG, PG and TV resulted in 142, 254 and 93·10-6 mm2/s. wCVs/ICCs, comparing MRL and DS, were determined as 13.7 %/0.26, 24.4 %/0.23 and 16.1 %/0.73 for SG, PG and TV, respectively. CONCLUSION ADC values, measured on the 1.5 T MRL, showed reasonable reproducibility with an ADC underestimation in contrast to the DS. This ADC shift must be validated in further experiments and considered for future translation of QIB candidates from DS to MRL for response adaptive RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Habrich
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Simon Boeke
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Victor Fritz
- Section for Experimental Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Elisa Koerner
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Konstantin Nikolaou
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Fritz Schick
- Section for Experimental Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Linge A, Patil S, Grosser M, Lohaus F, Gurtner K, Kemper M, Gudziol V, Haim D, Nowak A, Tinhofer I, Zips D, Guberina M, Stuschke M, Balermpas P, Rödel C, Schäfer H, Grosu AL, Abdollahi A, Debus J, Ganswindt U, Belka C, Pigorsch S, Combs SE, Boeke S, Gani C, Jöhrens K, Baretton GB, Löck S, Baumann M, Krause M. The value of subcutaneous xenografts for individualised radiotherapy in HNSCC: Robust gene signature correlates with radiotherapy outcome in patients and xenografts. Radiother Oncol 2024; 191:110055. [PMID: 38109944 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the robustness of prognostic biomarkers and molecular tumour subtypes developed for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) on cell-line derived HNSCC xenograft models, and to develop a novel biomarker signature by combining xenograft and patient datasets. MATERIALS AND METHODS Mice bearing xenografts (n = 59) of ten HNSCC cell lines and a retrospective, multicentre patient cohort (n = 242) of the German Cancer Consortium-Radiation Oncology Group (DKTK-ROG) were included. All patients received postoperative radiochemotherapy (PORT-C). Gene expression analysis was conducted using GeneChip Human Transcriptome Arrays. Xenografts were stratified based on their molecular subtypes and previously established gene classifiers. The dose to control 50 % of tumours (TCD50) was compared between these groups. Using differential gene expression analyses combining xenograft and patient data, a gene signature was developed to define risk groups for the primary endpoint loco-regional control (LRC). RESULTS Tumours of mesenchymal subtype were characterized by a higher TCD50 (xenografts, p < 0.001) and lower LRC (patients, p < 0.001) compared to the other subtypes. Similar to previously published patient data, hypoxia- and radioresistance-related gene signatures were associated with high TCD50 values. A 2-gene signature (FN1, SERPINE1) was developed that was prognostic for TCD50 (xenografts, p < 0.001) and for patient outcome in independent validation (LRC: p = 0.007). CONCLUSION Genetic prognosticators of outcome for patients after PORT-C and subcutaneous xenografts after primary clinically relevant irradiation show similarity. The identified robust 2-gene signature may help to guide patient stratification, after prospective validation. Thus, xenografts remain a valuable resource for translational research towards the development of individualized radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annett Linge
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.
| | - Shivaprasad Patil
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Marianne Grosser
- Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Fabian Lohaus
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Kristin Gurtner
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Max Kemper
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Volker Gudziol
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Dominik Haim
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Alexander Nowak
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Inge Tinhofer
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, Germany; Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, Germany; Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| | - Maja Guberina
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Stuschke
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Frankfurt, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Claus Rödel
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Frankfurt, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Henning Schäfer
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Freiburg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Freiburg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany; Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany; Translational Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany; Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany
| | - Ute Ganswindt
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Group Personalized Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Steffi Pigorsch
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Germany; Department of RadioOncology, Technische Universität München, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Germany; Department of RadioOncology, Technische Universität München, Germany; Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institut für Innovative Radiotherapie (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Simon Boeke
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Germany
| | - Korinna Jöhrens
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Gustavo B Baretton
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; Tumour- and Normal Tissue Bank, University Cancer Centre (UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Radiooncology/Radiobiology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Früh A, Bodnar B, Nachbar M, Gradhand J, Kalinauskaite G, Rubarth K, Truckenmueller P, Kaul D, Zips D, Vajkoczy P, Senger C, Acker G. Robotic stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial meningiomas in elderly patients: assessment of treatment efficacy and safety. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1329696. [PMID: 38347835 PMCID: PMC10860398 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1329696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been increasingly used to treat intracranial pathologies in elderly patients. The treatment efficiency of SRS has been demonstrated in meningiomas, with excellent local control. We aimed to analyze the safety of robotic SRS in elderly patients with meningiomas. Methods We searched for patients with suspected WHO °I meningioma ≥ 60 years old, who underwent CyberKnife (CK) SRS from January 2011 to December 2021. Tumor localization was categorized using the "CLASS" algorithmic scale. Tumor response was evaluated using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria for meningiomas. Adverse effects were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 and a cox regression was performed to investigate possible predictors. Results We identified 82 patients with 102 CK-treated lesions that matched the criteria for the first SRS. The median age was 70 [IQR 64-75] years, and 24.3% of the patients were aged > 75 years. Multiple lesions (up to six) were treated in 14.1% of the SRS-sessions. A previous surgery was performed in 57.3% of lesions, with a median time interval of 41 [IQR 10 - 58] months between the initial surgical procedure and the SRS treatment. In 47.9% of cases, CLASS 3 meningiomas at high-risk locations were irradiated. Single fraction radiosurgery was applied to 62.5% of the lesions, while in the remaining cases multi-session SRS with three to five fractions was used. During the median follow-up period of 15.9 months, lesion size progression was observed in 3 cases. Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) declined by ≥ 20 points in four patients. Adverse effects occurred in 13 patients, while only four patients had CTCAE ≥2 toxicities. Hereby only one of these toxicities was persistent. The occurrence of complications was independent of age, planned target volume (PTV), high-risk localization, and surgery before SRS. Conclusion The data indicates that SRS is a safe, efficient, and convenient treatment modality for elderly patients with meningioma, even at high-risk locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anton Früh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health Charité Junior Digital Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health Biomedical Innovation Academy, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bohdan Bodnar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcel Nachbar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julia Gradhand
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Goda Kalinauskaite
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rubarth
- Insitute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Insitute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Truckenmueller
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carolin Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Güliz Acker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Roohani S, Alberti Y, Mirwald M, Ehret F, Stromberger C, Roohani SF, Bender K, Flörcken A, Märdian S, Zips D, Kaul D. Meningeal Solitary Fibrous Tumor: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study. Sarcoma 2024; 2024:8846018. [PMID: 38274845 PMCID: PMC10807944 DOI: 10.1155/2024/8846018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Meningeal solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) are rare, malignant, mesenchymal tumors of the central nervous system. While surgical gross total resection is widely accepted as a positive prognostic factor for local control (LC), the role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) remains controversial. We sought to report our institutional experience with a particular focus on outcomes after PORT. Materials and Methods In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, 20 patients with the primary diagnosis of histopathologically confirmed meningeal SFT were analyzed. Data on patient characteristics, imaging, treatment modalities, histopathology, and oncological outcomes were collected. LC and overall survival (OS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Results The median follow-up time was 95.8 months. After surgery only, 9 out of 11 patients (81.8%) developed a local recurrence while, after surgery and PORT, 3 out of 9 patients (33.33%) showed local failure. The 5- and 10-year LC rates were 50.5% and 40.4% in the surgery-only group and 80% at both time points in the surgery with the PORT group. In the surgery-only group, 4 out of 11 patients (36.4%) died, and 4 out of 9 patients (44.4%) died in the surgery and PORT group. OS rates after 5 and 10 years were 88.9% and 66.7% in the surgery-only group and 88.9% and 76.2% in the surgery with PORT group. Conclusions Our findings suggest that PORT may improve LC in patients with meningeal SFT. The low incidence of meningeal SFT impedes prospective studies and requires further international collaborative efforts to exploit retrospective datasets and molecular analysis to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siyer Roohani
- Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Junior Clinician Scientist Program, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin 10117, Germany
- Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Berlin, Germany
| | - Yasemin Alberti
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Maximilian Mirwald
- Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany
| | - Felix Ehret
- Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany
- Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Berlin, Germany
| | - Soleiman Fabris Roohani
- Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany
| | - Katja Bender
- Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany
| | - Anne Flörcken
- Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Berlin, Germany
- Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany
| | - Sven Märdian
- Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany
- Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Berlin, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany
- Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tengler B, Künzel LA, Hagmüller M, Mönnich D, Boeke S, Wegener D, Gani C, Zips D, Thorwarth D. Full daily re-optimization improves plan quality during online adaptive radiotherapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 29:100534. [PMID: 38298884 PMCID: PMC10827578 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Daily online treatment plan adaptation requires a fast workflow and planning process. Current online planning consists of adaptation of a predefined reference plan, which might be suboptimal in cases of large anatomic changes. The aim of this study was to investigate plan quality differences between the current online re-planning approach and a complete re-optimization. Material and methods Magnetic resonance linear accelerator reference plans for ten prostate cancer patients were automatically generated using particle swarm optimization (PSO). Adapted plans were created for each fraction using (1) the current re-planning approach and (2) full PSO re-optimization and evaluated overall compliance with institutional dose-volume criteria compared to (3) clinically delivered fractions. Relative volume differences between reference and daily anatomy were assessed for planning target volumes (PTV60, PTV57.6), rectum and bladder and correlated with dose-volume results. Results The PSO approach showed significantly higher adherence to dose-volume criteria than the reference approach and clinical fractions (p < 0.001). In 74 % of PSO plans at most one criterion failed compared to 56 % in the reference approach and 41 % in clinical plans. A fair correlation between PTV60 D98% and relative bladder volume change was observed for the reference approach. Bladder volume reductions larger than 50 % compared to the reference plan recurrently decreased PTV60 D98% below 56 Gy. Conclusion Complete re-optimization maintained target coverage and organs at risk sparing even after large anatomic variations. Re-planning based on daily magnetic resonance imaging was sufficient for small variations, while large variations led to decreasing target coverage and organ-at-risk sparing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Tengler
- Section for Biomedical Physics. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Luise A. Künzel
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Markus Hagmüller
- Section for Biomedical Physics. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - David Mönnich
- Section for Biomedical Physics. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Simon Boeke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Wegener
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Low D, Zips D. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Radiation Therapy: Overview. Semin Radiat Oncol 2024; 34:1-3. [PMID: 38105084 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Low
- Medical Physics Research and Innovation Radiation Oncology, Radiological Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA..
| | - Daniel Zips
- Charité Clinic for Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mehrhof F, Hüttemeister J, Tanacli R, Bock M, Bögner M, Schoenrath F, Falk V, Zips D, Hindricks G, Gerds-Li JH, Hohendanner F. Cardiac radiotherapy transiently alters left ventricular electrical properties and induces cardiomyocyte-specific ventricular substrate changes in heart failure. Europace 2023; 26:euae005. [PMID: 38193546 PMCID: PMC10803027 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
AIMS Ongoing clinical trials investigate the therapeutic value of stereotactic cardiac radioablation (cRA) in heart failure patients with ventricular tachycardia. Animal data indicate an effect on local cardiac conduction properties. However, the exact mechanism of cRA in patients remains elusive. Aim of the current study was to investigate in vivo and in vitro myocardial properties in heart failure and ventricular tachycardia upon cRA. METHODS AND RESULTS High-density 3D electroanatomic mapping in sinus rhythm was performed in a patient with a left ventricular assist device and repeated ventricular tachycardia episodes upon several catheter-based endocardial radio-frequency ablation attempts. Subsequent to electroanatomic mapping and cRA of the left ventricular septum, two additional high-density electroanatomic maps were obtained at 2- and 4-month post-cRA. Myocardial tissue samples were collected from the left ventricular septum during 4-month post-cRA from the irradiated and borderzone regions. In addition, we performed molecular biology and mitochondrial density measurements of tissue and isolated cardiomyocytes. Local voltage was altered in the irradiated region of the left ventricular septum during follow-up. No change of local voltage was observed in the control (i.e. borderzone) region upon irradiation. Interestingly, local activation time was significantly shortened upon irradiation (2-month post-cRA), a process that was reversible (4-month post-cRA). Molecular biology unveiled an increased expression of voltage-dependent sodium channels in the irradiated region as compared with the borderzone, while Connexin43 and transforming growth factor beta were unchanged (4-month post-cRA). Moreover, mitochondrial density was decreased in the irradiated region as compared with the borderzone. CONCLUSION Our study supports the notion of transiently altered cardiac conduction potentially related to structural and functional cellular changes as an underlying mechanism of cRA in patients with ventricular tachycardia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Mehrhof
- Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Judith Hüttemeister
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Augustenburger Platz 1, Germany, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Radu Tanacli
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Augustenburger Platz 1, Germany, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Bock
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Augustenburger Platz 1, Germany, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Bögner
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Augustenburger Platz 1, Germany, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Schoenrath
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site, Berlin, Germany
- Klinik für Herz-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volkmar Falk
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site, Berlin, Germany
- Klinik für Herz-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany
- Translational Cardiovascular Technologies, Institute of Translational Medicine, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gerhard Hindricks
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Augustenburger Platz 1, Germany, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jin-Hong Gerds-Li
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Augustenburger Platz 1, Germany, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Hohendanner
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Augustenburger Platz 1, Germany, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kossmann MRP, Ehret F, Roohani S, Winter SF, Ghadjar P, Acker G, Senger C, Schmid S, Zips D, Kaul D. Histopathologically confirmed radiation-induced damage of the brain - an in-depth analysis of radiation parameters and spatio-temporal occurrence. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:198. [PMID: 38087368 PMCID: PMC10717523 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02385-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation-induced damage (RID) after radiotherapy (RT) of primary brain tumors and metastases can be challenging to clinico-radiographically distinguish from tumor progression. RID includes pseudoprogression and radiation necrosis; the latter being irreversible and often associated with severe symptoms. While histopathology constitutes the diagnostic gold standard, biopsy-controlled clinical studies investigating RID remain limited. Whether certain brain areas are potentially more vulnerable to RID remains an area of active investigation. Here, we analyze histopathologically confirmed cases of RID in relation to the temporal and spatial dose distribution. METHODS Histopathologically confirmed cases of RID after photon-based RT for primary or secondary central nervous system malignancies were included. Demographic, clinical, and dosimetric data were collected from patient records and treatment planning systems. We calculated the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD22) and the biologically effective dose (BED2) for normal brain tissue (α/β ratio of 2 Gy) and analyzed the spatial and temporal distribution using frequency maps. RESULTS Thirty-three patients were identified. High-grade glioma patients (n = 18) mostly received one normofractionated RT series (median cumulative EQD22 60 Gy) to a large planning target volume (PTV) (median 203.9 ccm) before diagnosis of RID. Despite the low EQD22 and BED2, three patients with an accelerated hyperfractionated RT developed RID. In contrast, brain metastases patients (n = 15; 16 RID lesions) were often treated with two or more RT courses and with radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic RT, resulting in a higher cumulative EQD22 (median 162.4 Gy), to a small PTV (median 6.7 ccm). All (n = 34) RID lesions occurred within the PTV of at least one of the preceding RT courses. RID in the high-grade glioma group showed a frontotemporal distribution pattern, whereas, in metastatic patients, RID was observed throughout the brain with highest density in the parietal lobe. The cumulative EQD22 was significantly lower in RID lesions that involved the subventricular zone (SVZ) than in lesions without SVZ involvement (median 60 Gy vs. 141 Gy, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Accelerated hyperfractionated RT can lead to RID despite computationally low EQD22 and BED2 in high-grade glioma patients. The anatomical location of RID corresponded to the general tumor distribution of gliomas and metastases. The SVZ might be a particularly vulnerable area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario R P Kossmann
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Pius-Hospital Oldenburg, Georgstr. 12, 26121, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Felix Ehret
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Siyer Roohani
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian F Winter
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Pirus Ghadjar
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Güliz Acker
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Neurosurgery, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carolin Senger
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Simone Schmid
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Neuropathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Roohani S, Claßen NM, Ehret F, Jarosch A, Dziodzio T, Flörcken A, Märdian S, Zips D, Kaul D. The role of radiotherapy in the management of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: a single-center retrospective cohort study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:17739-17747. [PMID: 37924493 PMCID: PMC10725397 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05449-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study sought to investigate the role of radiotherapy (RT) in addition to surgery for oncological outcomes in patients with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST). METHODS In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, histopathologically confirmed MPNST were analyzed. Local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with LC, OS, and DMFS. RESULTS We included 57 patients with a median follow-up of 20.0 months. Most MPNSTs were located deeply (87.5%), were larger than 5 cm (55.8%), and had high-grade histology (78.7%). Seventeen patients received surgery only, and 25 patients received surgery and pre- or postoperative RT. Median LC, OS, and DMFS after surgery only were 8.7, 25.5, and 22.0 months; after surgery with RT, the median LC was not reached, while the median OS and DMFS were 111.5 and 69.9 months. Multivariable Cox regression of LC revealed a negative influence of patients presenting with local disease recurrence compared to patients presenting with an initial primary diagnosis of localized MPNST (hazard ratio: 8.86, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS The addition of RT to wide surgical excision appears to have a beneficial effect on LC. Local disease recurrence at presentation is an adverse prognostic factor for developing subsequent local recurrences. Future clinical and translational studies are warranted to identify molecular targets and find effective perioperative combination therapies with RT to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siyer Roohani
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité (Junior) Clinician Scientist Program, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Noa Marie Claßen
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Ehret
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Armin Jarosch
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Germany
| | - Tomasz Dziodzio
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité (Junior) Clinician Scientist Program, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anne Flörcken
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Germany
| | - Sven Märdian
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zschaeck S, Klinger B, van den Hoff J, Cegla P, Apostolova I, Kreissl MC, Cholewiński W, Kukuk E, Strobel H, Amthauer H, Blüthgen N, Zips D, Hofheinz F. Combination of tumor asphericity and an extracellular matrix-related prognostic gene signature in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Sci Rep 2023; 13:20840. [PMID: 38012155 PMCID: PMC10681996 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-46405-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
One important aim of precision oncology is a personalized treatment of patients. This can be achieved by various biomarkers, especially imaging parameters and gene expression signatures are commonly used. So far, combination approaches are sparse. The aim of the study was to independently validate the prognostic value of the novel positron emission tomography (PET) parameter tumor asphericity (ASP) in non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and to investigate associations between published gene expression profiles and ASP. This was a retrospective evaluation of PET imaging and gene expression data from three public databases and two institutional datasets. The whole cohort comprised 253 NSCLC patients, all treated with curative intent surgery. Clinical parameters, standard PET parameters and ASP were evaluated in all patients. Additional gene expression data were available for 120 patients. Univariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for the primary endpoint progression-free survival (PFS) and additional endpoints. Furthermore, multivariate cox regression testing was performed including clinically significant parameters, ASP, and the extracellular matrix-related prognostic gene signature (EPPI). In the whole cohort, a significant association with PFS was observed for ASP (p < 0.001) and EPPI (p = 0.012). Upon multivariate testing, EPPI remained significantly associated with PFS (p = 0.018) in the subgroup of patients with additional gene expression data, while ASP was significantly associated with PFS in the whole cohort (p = 0.012). In stage II patients, ASP was significantly associated with PFS (p = 0.009), and a previously published cutoff value for ASP (19.5%) was successfully validated (p = 0.008). In patients with additional gene expression data, EPPI showed a significant association with PFS, too (p = 0.033). The exploratory combination of ASP and EPPI showed that the combinatory approach has potential to further improve patient stratification compared to the use of only one parameter. We report the first successful validation of EPPI and ASP in stage II NSCLC patients. The combination of both parameters seems to be a very promising approach for improvement of risk stratification in a group of patients with urgent need for a more personalized treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bertram Klinger
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178, Berlin, Germany
- Computational Modelling in Medicine, Instiute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jörg van den Hoff
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
| | - Paulina Cegla
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Ivayla Apostolova
- Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto Von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Michael C Kreissl
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto Von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Witold Cholewiński
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Emily Kukuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Helen Strobel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto Von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nils Blüthgen
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178, Berlin, Germany
- Computational Modelling in Medicine, Instiute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Hofheinz
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Eckert F, Ganser K, Bender B, Schittenhelm J, Skardelly M, Behling F, Tabatabai G, Hoffmann E, Zips D, Huber SM, Paulsen F. Potential of pre-operative MRI features in glioblastoma to predict for molecular stem cell subtype and patient overall survival. Radiother Oncol 2023; 188:109865. [PMID: 37619660 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
AIM OF THE STUDY A molecular signature based on 10 mRNA abundances that characterizes the mesenchymal-to-proneural phenotype of glioblastoma stem(like) cells (GSCs) enriched in primary culture has been previously established. As this phenotype has been proposed to be prognostic for disease outcome the present study aims to identify features of the preoperative MR imaging that may predict the GSC phenotype of individual tumors. MATERIAL/METHODS Molecular mesenchymal-to-proneural mRNA signatures and intrinsic radioresistance (SF4, survival fraction at 4 Gy) of primary GSC-enriched cultures were associated with survival data and pre-operative MR imaging of the corresponding glioblastoma patients of a prospective cohort (n = 24). The analyzed imaging parameters comprised linear vectors derived from tumor volume, necrotic volume and edema as contoured manually. RESULTS A necrosis/tumor vector ratio and to a weaker extent the product of this ratio and the edema vector were identified to correlate with the mesenchymal-to-proneural mRNA signature and the SF4 of the patient-derived GSC cultures. Importantly, both parameter combinations were predictive for overall survival of the whole patient cohort. Moreover, the combination of necrosis/tumor vector ratio and edema vector differed significantly between uni- and multifocally recurring tumors. CONCLUSION Features of the preoperative MR images may reflect the molecular signature of the GSC population and might be used in the future as a prognostic factor and for treatment stratification especially in the MGMT promotor-unmethylated sub-cohort of glioblastoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Eckert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Germany; Medical University Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Katrin Ganser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Benjamin Bender
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jens Schittenhelm
- Department of Pathology and Neuropathology, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marco Skardelly
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tübingen, Germany; Centre for Neurooncology, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Felix Behling
- Centre for Neurooncology, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Elgin Hoffmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephan M Huber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Frank Paulsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Starke S, Zwanenburg A, Leger K, Lohaus F, Linge A, Kalinauskaite G, Tinhofer I, Guberina N, Guberina M, Balermpas P, von der Grün J, Ganswindt U, Belka C, Peeken JC, Combs SE, Boeke S, Zips D, Richter C, Troost EGC, Krause M, Baumann M, Löck S. Multitask Learning with Convolutional Neural Networks and Vision Transformers Can Improve Outcome Prediction for Head and Neck Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4897. [PMID: 37835591 PMCID: PMC10571894 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Neural-network-based outcome predictions may enable further treatment personalization of patients with head and neck cancer. The development of neural networks can prove challenging when a limited number of cases is available. Therefore, we investigated whether multitask learning strategies, implemented through the simultaneous optimization of two distinct outcome objectives (multi-outcome) and combined with a tumor segmentation task, can lead to improved performance of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and vision transformers (ViTs). Model training was conducted on two distinct multicenter datasets for the endpoints loco-regional control (LRC) and progression-free survival (PFS), respectively. The first dataset consisted of pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) imaging for 290 patients and the second dataset contained combined positron emission tomography (PET)/CT data of 224 patients. Discriminative performance was assessed by the concordance index (C-index). Risk stratification was evaluated using log-rank tests. Across both datasets, CNN and ViT model ensembles achieved similar results. Multitask approaches showed favorable performance in most investigations. Multi-outcome CNN models trained with segmentation loss were identified as the optimal strategy across cohorts. On the PET/CT dataset, an ensemble of multi-outcome CNNs trained with segmentation loss achieved the best discrimination (C-index: 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22-0.36) and successfully stratified patients into groups with low and high risk of disease progression (p=0.003). On the CT dataset, ensembles of multi-outcome CNNs and of single-outcome ViTs trained with segmentation loss performed best (C-index: 0.26 and 0.26, CI: 0.18-0.34 and 0.18-0.35, respectively), both with significant risk stratification for LRC in independent validation (p=0.002 and p=0.011). Further validation of the developed multitask-learning models is planned based on a prospective validation study, which has recently completed recruitment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Starke
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden–Rossendorf, Department of Information Services and Computing, 01328 Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden–Rossendorf, 01309 Dresden, Germany; (A.Z.); (K.L.); (F.L.); (A.L.); (C.R.); (E.G.C.T.); (M.K.); (M.B.); (S.L.)
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Dresden, 01309 Dresden, Germany
| | - Alex Zwanenburg
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden–Rossendorf, 01309 Dresden, Germany; (A.Z.); (K.L.); (F.L.); (A.L.); (C.R.); (E.G.C.T.); (M.K.); (M.B.); (S.L.)
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Dresden, 01309 Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden–Rossendorf (HZDR), 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Karoline Leger
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden–Rossendorf, 01309 Dresden, Germany; (A.Z.); (K.L.); (F.L.); (A.L.); (C.R.); (E.G.C.T.); (M.K.); (M.B.); (S.L.)
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Dresden, 01309 Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden–Rossendorf (HZDR), 01307 Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01309 Dresden, Germany
| | - Fabian Lohaus
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden–Rossendorf, 01309 Dresden, Germany; (A.Z.); (K.L.); (F.L.); (A.L.); (C.R.); (E.G.C.T.); (M.K.); (M.B.); (S.L.)
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Dresden, 01309 Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden–Rossendorf (HZDR), 01307 Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01309 Dresden, Germany
| | - Annett Linge
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden–Rossendorf, 01309 Dresden, Germany; (A.Z.); (K.L.); (F.L.); (A.L.); (C.R.); (E.G.C.T.); (M.K.); (M.B.); (S.L.)
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Dresden, 01309 Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden–Rossendorf (HZDR), 01307 Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01309 Dresden, Germany
| | - Goda Kalinauskaite
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (G.K.); (I.T.)
- Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charité University Hospital, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Inge Tinhofer
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (G.K.); (I.T.)
- Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charité University Hospital, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Nika Guberina
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany (M.G.)
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Maja Guberina
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany (M.G.)
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Frankfurt, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany; (P.B.); (J.v.d.G.)
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Jens von der Grün
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Frankfurt, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany; (P.B.); (J.v.d.G.)
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Ute Ganswindt
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany; (U.G.); (C.B.); (J.C.P.); (S.E.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, 80336 Munich, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Group, Personalized Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Claus Belka
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany; (U.G.); (C.B.); (J.C.P.); (S.E.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, 80336 Munich, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Group, Personalized Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Jan C. Peeken
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany; (U.G.); (C.B.); (J.C.P.); (S.E.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany; (U.G.); (C.B.); (J.C.P.); (S.E.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Simon Boeke
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (S.B.); (D.Z.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (S.B.); (D.Z.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christian Richter
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden–Rossendorf, 01309 Dresden, Germany; (A.Z.); (K.L.); (F.L.); (A.L.); (C.R.); (E.G.C.T.); (M.K.); (M.B.); (S.L.)
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Dresden, 01309 Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01309 Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden–Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology—OncoRay, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| | - Esther G. C. Troost
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden–Rossendorf, 01309 Dresden, Germany; (A.Z.); (K.L.); (F.L.); (A.L.); (C.R.); (E.G.C.T.); (M.K.); (M.B.); (S.L.)
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Dresden, 01309 Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden–Rossendorf (HZDR), 01307 Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01309 Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden–Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology—OncoRay, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden–Rossendorf, 01309 Dresden, Germany; (A.Z.); (K.L.); (F.L.); (A.L.); (C.R.); (E.G.C.T.); (M.K.); (M.B.); (S.L.)
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Dresden, 01309 Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden–Rossendorf (HZDR), 01307 Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01309 Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden–Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology—OncoRay, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden–Rossendorf, 01309 Dresden, Germany; (A.Z.); (K.L.); (F.L.); (A.L.); (C.R.); (E.G.C.T.); (M.K.); (M.B.); (S.L.)
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01309 Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division Radiooncology/Radiobiology, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center DKFZ, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden–Rossendorf, 01309 Dresden, Germany; (A.Z.); (K.L.); (F.L.); (A.L.); (C.R.); (E.G.C.T.); (M.K.); (M.B.); (S.L.)
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Dresden, 01309 Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01309 Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Clasen K, Nachbar M, Gatidis S, Zips D, Thorwarth D, Welz S. Impact of MRI on target volume definition in head and neck cancer patients. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:148. [PMID: 37674171 PMCID: PMC10483850 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02326-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Target volume definition for curative radiochemotherapy in head and neck cancer is crucial since the predominant recurrence pattern is local. Additional diagnostic imaging like MRI is increasingly used, yet it is usually hampered by different patient positioning compared to radiotherapy. In this study, we investigated the impact of diagnostic MRI in treatment position for target volume delineation. METHODS We prospectively analyzed patients who were suitable and agreed to undergo an MRI in treatment position with immobilization devices prior to radiotherapy planning from 2017 to 2019. Target volume delineation for the primary tumor was first performed using all available information except for the MRI and subsequently with additional consideration of the co-registered MRI. The derived volumes were compared by subjective visual judgment and by quantitative mathematical methods. RESULTS Sixteen patients were included and underwent the planning CT, MRI and subsequent definitive radiochemotherapy. In 69% of the patients, there were visually relevant changes to the gross tumor volume (GTV) by use of the MRI. In 44%, the GTV_MRI would not have been covered completely by the planning target volume (PTV) of the CT-only contour. Yet, median Hausdorff und DSI values did not reflect these differences. The 3-year local control rate was 94%. CONCLUSIONS Adding a diagnostic MRI in RT treatment position is feasible and results in relevant changes in target volumes in the majority of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerstin Clasen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Marcel Nachbar
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sergios Gatidis
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Stefan Welz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Marienhospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ehret F, Wolfgang J, Allwohn L, Onken J, Wasilewski D, Roohani S, Oertel J, Zips D, Kaul D. Outcomes of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Wild Type Glioblastoma after Re-irradiation. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 42:100653. [PMID: 37502699 PMCID: PMC10369398 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Glioblastomas (GBM) are the most common malignant primary brain tumors in adults and have a dismal prognosis. Patients frequently suffer from local tumor recurrences, with limited therapeutic options. Re-irradiation represents a possible intervention, but given the recent 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification of central nervous system tumors, studies in isocitrate dehydrogenase wild type (IDH-wt) cohorts undergoing a second course of radiotherapy remain limited. Herein, we sought to describe our institutional experience and outcomes after GBM IDH-wt re-irradiation. Materials and Methods GBM patients with confirmed IDH-wt status undergoing re-irradiation were included in this single-center, retrospective analysis. Results A total of 88 patients were analyzed. The median clinical and radiographic follow-up periods were 4.6 months and 4.4 months, respectively. Most patients had a Karnofsky performance status of at least 80% (n = 57). The median biologically effective dose and 2 Gy equivalent dose (EQD2) for re-irradiations, assuming an α/β ratio of 10 Gy for GBM, were 51.4 and 42.8 Gy, respectively. In total, 71 deaths were recorded. The median overall survival (OS) was 8.0 months. Multivariable Cox regression of OS revealed a positive influence of gross total resection vs. biopsy or no resection (hazard ratio: 0.43, p = 0.02). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.9 months. The multivariable Cox regression for PFS did not detect any significant factors. No clear evidence of radiation necrosis was recorded during the available follow-up. However, only a minority (n = 4) of patients underwent surgery after re-irradiation, none showing histopathological proof of radiation necrosis. Conclusion The prognosis for recurrent IDH-wt GBM after re-irradiation is poor. Patients who are amenable and able to undergo re-resection may have a favorable OS. A second course of radiotherapy with a moderate cumulative EQD2 and small- to medium-sized planning target volumes appeared safe regarding the occurrence of radiation necrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Ehret
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin, Germany
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Josy Wolfgang
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Luisa Allwohn
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julia Onken
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Neurosurgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - David Wasilewski
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Neurosurgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Siyer Roohani
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin, Germany
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joachim Oertel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Saarland University Hospital, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin, Germany
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin, Germany
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gruen A, Tegel K, Kluge A, Budach V, Zips D, Boehmer D. PSMA PET-based stereotactic body radiotherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after definitive first-line therapy. Prostate 2023; 83:1298-1305. [PMID: 37394721 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET-computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allow the detection and localization of exclusively local prostate-cancer-recurrences after definitive first-line therapy. PSMA-based early detection of circumscribed local recurrences followed by hypofractionated high-precision stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) might yield long-term disease control at moderate rates of adverse effects. METHODS Retrospective analysis of 35 patients treated for locally recurrent prostate cancer between November 2012 and December 2021 with PSMA PET- and MRI-based robotic SBRT. RESULTS Thirty-five patients treated with local prostate cancer recurrence post surgery, post surgery, and adjuvant/salvage radiotherapy (RT) and after definitive RT. All but one patients had fractionated SBRT in 3-5 fractions. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 52.2 months for all patients and 52.2 months in the radical prostatectomy (RPE) group, 31.2 months in the RPE + RT group and not reached in the RT group. The most common event was increased urinary frequency grade 1-2. 54.3% of all patients had no acute and 79.4% no late toxicity during follow-up. DISCUSSION Our PFS of 52.2 months (RPE), 31.2 months (RPE + RT) and not reached (RT) compares favorably with published data. This method constitutes a valid alternative to morbidity-prone invasive approaches or palliative systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arne Gruen
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Campus Virchow-Klinik, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universitaet Berlin, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Katharina Tegel
- Department for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Evangelisches Waldkrankenhaus Spandau Krankenhausbetriebs gGmbH, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anne Kluge
- MVZ Leipzig Strahlentherapie, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Daniel Zips
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universitaet Berlin, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dirk Boehmer
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universitaet Berlin, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Koi L, Bitto V, Weise C, Möbius L, Linge A, Löck S, Yaromina A, Besso MJ, Valentini C, Pfeifer M, Overgaard J, Zips D, Kurth I, Krause M, Baumann M. Prognostic biomarkers for the response to the radiosensitizer nimorazole combined with RCTx: a pre-clinical trial in HNSCC xenografts. J Transl Med 2023; 21:576. [PMID: 37633930 PMCID: PMC10464469 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04439-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumor hypoxia is associated with resistance to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), nimorazole, an oxygen mimic, combined with radiotherapy (RT) enabled to improve loco-regional control (LRC) in some patients with hypoxic tumors but it is unknown whether this holds also for radiochemotherapy (RCTx). Here, we investigated the impact of nimorazole combined with RCTx in HNSCC xenografts and explored molecular biomarkers for its targeted use. METHODS Irradiations were performed with 30 fractions in 6 weeks combined with weekly cisplatin. Nimorazole was applied before each fraction, beginning with the first or after ten fractions. Effect of RCTx with or without addition of nimorazole was quantified as permanent local control after irradiation. For histological evaluation and targeted gene expression analysis, tumors were excised untreated or after ten fractions. Using quantitative image analysis, micromilieu parameters were determined. RESULTS Nimorazole combined with RCTx significantly improved permanent local control in two tumor models, and showed a potential improvement in two additional models. In these four models, pimonidazole hypoxic volume (pHV) was significantly reduced after ten fractions of RCTx alone. Our results suggest that nimorazole combined with RCTx might improve TCR compared to RCTx alone if hypoxia is decreased during the course of RCTx but further experiments are warranted to verify this association. Differential gene expression analysis revealed 12 genes as potential for RCTx response. When evaluated in patients with HNSCC who were treated with primary RCTx, these genes were predictive for LRC. CONCLUSIONS Nimorazole combined with RCTx improved local tumor control in some but not in all HNSCC xenografts. We identified prognostic biomarkers with the potential for translation to patients with HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia Koi
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Verena Bitto
- Division of Applied Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Division of Radiooncology / Radiobiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- HIDSS4Health - Helmholtz Information and Data Science School for Health, Karlsruhe/Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Corina Weise
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Lisa Möbius
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Annett Linge
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ala Yaromina
- The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - María José Besso
- Division of Radiooncology / Radiobiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Chiara Valentini
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Manuel Pfeifer
- Institute of Legal Medicine, Medizinische Fakultät, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jens Overgaard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Daniel Zips
- Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ina Kurth
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Division of Radiooncology / Radiobiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Division of Radiooncology / Radiobiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tawk B, Rein K, Schwager C, Knoll M, Wirkner U, Hörner-Rieber J, Liermann J, Kurth I, Balermpas P, Rödel C, Linge A, Löck S, Lohaus F, Tinhofer I, Krause M, Stuschke M, Grosu AL, Zips D, Combs SE, Belka C, Stenzinger A, Herold-Mende C, Baumann M, Schirmacher P, Debus J, Abdollahi A. DNA-Methylome-Based Tumor Hypoxia Classifier Identifies HPV-Negative Head and Neck Cancer Patients at Risk for Locoregional Recurrence after Primary Radiochemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:3051-3064. [PMID: 37058257 PMCID: PMC10425733 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-3790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Tumor hypoxia is a paradigmatic negative prognosticator of treatment resistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The lack of robust and reliable hypoxia classifiers limits the adaptation of stratified therapies. We hypothesized that the tumor DNA methylation landscape might indicate epigenetic reprogramming induced by chronic intratumoral hypoxia. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN A DNA-methylome-based tumor hypoxia classifier (Hypoxia-M) was trained in the TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas)-HNSCC cohort based on matched assignments using gene expression-based signatures of hypoxia (Hypoxia-GES). Hypoxia-M was validated in a multicenter DKTK-ROG trial consisting of human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative patients with HNSCC treated with primary radiochemotherapy (RCHT). RESULTS Although hypoxia-GES failed to stratify patients in the DKTK-ROG, Hypoxia-M was independently prognostic for local recurrence (HR, 4.3; P = 0.001) and overall survival (HR, 2.34; P = 0.03) but not distant metastasis after RCHT in both cohorts. Hypoxia-M status was inversely associated with CD8 T-cell infiltration in both cohorts. Hypoxia-M was further prognostic in the TCGA-PanCancer cohort (HR, 1.83; P = 0.04), underscoring the breadth of this classifier for predicting tumor hypoxia status. CONCLUSIONS Our findings highlight an unexplored avenue for DNA methylation-based classifiers as biomarkers of tumoral hypoxia for identifying high-risk features in patients with HNSCC tumors. See related commentary by Heft Neal and Brenner, p. 2954.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bouchra Tawk
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katrin Rein
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Schwager
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Knoll
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ute Wirkner
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Liermann
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ina Kurth
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site, Frankfurt, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Claus Rödel
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site, Frankfurt, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Annett Linge
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz Association and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden – Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Fabian Lohaus
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz Association and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden – Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Ingeborg Tinhofer
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mechtild Krause
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz Association and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden – Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Martin Stuschke
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Anca Ligia Grosu
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tuebingen, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Germany
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Research Unit Radiation Cytogenetics, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health GmbH, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christel Herold-Mende
- Division of Experimental Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Schirmacher
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Acker G, Nachbar M, Soffried N, Bodnar B, Janas A, Krantchev K, Kalinauskaite G, Kluge A, Shultz D, Conti A, Kaul D, Zips D, Vajkoczy P, Senger C. Corrigendum: What if: a retrospective reconstruction of resection cavity stereotactic radiosurgery to mimic neoadjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1213759. [PMID: 37621687 PMCID: PMC10446757 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1213759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1056330.].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gueliz Acker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Academy, Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcel Nachbar
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Nina Soffried
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Bohdan Bodnar
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Anastasia Janas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Kiril Krantchev
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Goda Kalinauskaite
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Anne Kluge
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - David Shultz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alfredo Conti
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Carolin Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bergengruen PM, Hernaíz Driever P, Budach V, Zips D, Grün A. Second course of re-irradiation in pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma : A case study. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:773-777. [PMID: 36862153 PMCID: PMC10361911 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02057-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Concomitant chemoradiation followed by repeat (dose-deescalated) irradiation has become standard of care in treating childhood diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) during first line treatment and at first progression. Progression after re-irradiation (re-RT) is in most cases symptomatic and either treated systemically with chemotherapy or new innovative approaches including targeted therapy. Alternatively, the patient receives best supportive care. Data on second re-irradiation in DIPG patients with second progression and good performance status are sparse. This is a case report of second short-term re-irradiation to shed further light on this option. METHODS Retrospective case report of a 6-year-old boy with DIPG receiving a second course of re-irradiation (with 21.6 Gy) as part of an individual multimodal approach in a patient with very low symptom burden. RESULTS The second course of re-irradiation was feasible and well tolerated. No acute neurological symptoms or radiation-induced toxicity occurred. Overall survival was 24 months after initial diagnosis. CONCLUSION A second course of re-irradiation can be an additional tool in patients with progressive disease after first- and second-line irradiation. It is unclear whether and to what extent it contributes to progression-free survival prolongation and if-since our patient was asymptomatic-progression-associated neurological deficits can be alleviated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula Maria Bergengruen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pablo Hernaíz Driever
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Arne Grün
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Boeke S, Winter RM, Leibfarth S, Krueger MA, Bowden G, Cotton J, Pichler BJ, Zips D, Thorwarth D. Machine learning identifies multi-parametric functional PET/MR imaging cluster to predict radiation resistance in preclinical head and neck cancer models. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:3084-3096. [PMID: 37148296 PMCID: PMC10382355 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06254-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Tumor hypoxia and other microenvironmental factors are key determinants of treatment resistance. Hypoxia positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are established prognostic imaging modalities to identify radiation resistance in head-and-neck cancer (HNC). The aim of this preclinical study was to develop a multi-parametric imaging parameter specifically for focal radiotherapy (RT) dose escalation using HNC xenografts of different radiation sensitivities. METHODS A total of eight human HNC xenograft models were implanted into 68 immunodeficient mice. Combined PET/MRI using dynamic [18F]-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) hypoxia PET, diffusion-weighted (DW), and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI was carried out before and after fractionated RT (10 × 2 Gy). Imaging data were analyzed on voxel-basis using principal component (PC) analysis for dynamic data and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) for DW-MRI. A data- and hypothesis-driven machine learning model was trained to identify clusters of high-risk subvolumes (HRSs) from multi-dimensional (1-5D) pre-clinical imaging data before and after RT. The stratification potential of each 1D to 5D model with respect to radiation sensitivity was evaluated using Cohen's d-score and compared to classical features such as mean/peak/maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmean/peak/max) and tumor-to-muscle-ratios (TMRpeak/max) as well as minimum/valley/maximum/mean ADC. RESULTS Complete 5D imaging data were available for 42 animals. The final preclinical model for HRS identification at baseline yielding the highest stratification potential was defined in 3D imaging space based on ADC and two FMISO PCs ([Formula: see text]). In 1D imaging space, only clusters of ADC revealed significant stratification potential ([Formula: see text]). Among all classical features, only ADCvalley showed significant correlation to radiation resistance ([Formula: see text]). After 2 weeks of RT, FMISO_c1 showed significant correlation to radiation resistance ([Formula: see text]). CONCLUSION A quantitative imaging metric was described in a preclinical study indicating that radiation-resistant subvolumes in HNC may be detected by clusters of ADC and FMISO using combined PET/MRI which are potential targets for future functional image-guided RT dose-painting approaches and require clinical validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Boeke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - René M Winter
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sara Leibfarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marcel A Krueger
- Werner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Gregory Bowden
- Werner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jonathan Cotton
- Werner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Bernd J Pichler
- Werner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence iFIT (EXC 2180) "Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Roohani S, Loskutov J, Heufelder J, Ehret F, Wedeken L, Regenbrecht M, Sauer R, Zips D, Denker A, Joussen AM, Regenbrecht CRA, Kaul D. Photon and Proton irradiation in Patient-derived, Three-Dimensional Soft Tissue Sarcoma Models. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:577. [PMID: 37349697 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11013-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite their heterogeneity, the current standard preoperative radiotherapy regimen for localized high-grade soft tissue sarcoma (STS) follows a one fits all approach for all STS subtypes. Sarcoma patient-derived three-dimensional cell culture models represent an innovative tool to overcome challenges in clinical research enabling reproducible subtype-specific research on STS. In this pilot study, we present our methodology and preliminary results using STS patient-derived 3D cell cultures that were exposed to different doses of photon and proton radiation. Our aim was: (i) to establish a reproducible method for irradiation of STS patient-derived 3D cell cultures and (ii) to explore the differences in tumor cell viability of two different STS subtypes exposed to increasing doses of photon and proton radiation at different time points. METHODS Two patient-derived cell cultures of untreated localized high-grade STS (an undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) and a pleomorphic liposarcoma (PLS)) were exposed to a single fraction of photon or proton irradiation using doses of 0 Gy (sham irradiation), 2 Gy, 4 Gy, 8 Gy and 16 Gy. Cell viability was measured and compared to sham irradiation at two different time points (four and eight days after irradiation). RESULTS The proportion of viable tumor cells four days after photon irradiation for UPS vs. PLS were significantly different with 85% vs. 65% (4 Gy), 80% vs. 50% (8 Gy) and 70% vs. 35% (16 Gy). Proton irradiation led to similar diverging viability curves between UPS vs. PLS four days after irradiation with 90% vs. 75% (4 Gy), 85% vs. 45% (8 Gy) and 80% vs. 35% (16 Gy). Photon and proton radiation displayed only minor differences in cell-killing properties within each cell culture (UPS and PLS). The cell-killing effect of radiation sustained at eight days after irradiation in both cell cultures. CONCLUSIONS Pronounced differences in radiosensitivity are evident among UPS and PLS 3D patient-derived sarcoma cell cultures which may reflect the clinical heterogeneity. Photon and proton radiation showed similar dose-dependent cell-killing effectiveness in both 3D cell cultures. Patient-derived 3D STS cell cultures may represent a valuable tool to enable translational studies towards individualized subtype-specific radiotherapy in patients with STS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siyer Roohani
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Jürgen Loskutov
- CELLphenomics GmbH, Robert-Rössle-Str. 10, 13125, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jens Heufelder
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, BerlinProtonen am Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin, 14109, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Ophthalmology, 12200, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Ehret
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lena Wedeken
- CELLphenomics GmbH, Robert-Rössle-Str. 10, 13125, Berlin, Germany
| | - Manuela Regenbrecht
- CELLphenomics GmbH, Robert-Rössle-Str. 10, 13125, Berlin, Germany
- Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Schwanebecker Chaussee 50, 13125, Berlin, Germany
- ASC Oncology GmbH, Robert-Rössle-Str. 10, 13125, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rica Sauer
- Institute of Pathology, Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Walterhöferstr. 11, 14165, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrea Denker
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, 14109, Berlin, Germany
| | - Antonia M Joussen
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Ophthalmology, 12200, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian R A Regenbrecht
- CELLphenomics GmbH, Robert-Rössle-Str. 10, 13125, Berlin, Germany
- ASC Oncology GmbH, Robert-Rössle-Str. 10, 13125, Berlin, Germany
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Regnery S, de Colle C, Eze C, Corradini S, Thieke C, Sedlaczek O, Schlemmer HP, Dinkel J, Seith F, Kopp-Schneider A, Gillmann C, Renkamp CK, Landry G, Thorwarth D, Zips D, Belka C, Jäkel O, Debus J, Hörner-Rieber J. Correction : Pulmonary magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiotherapy of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: the PUMA trial. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:99. [PMID: 37291628 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02294-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Regnery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Chiara de Colle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Chukwuka Eze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Thieke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Oliver Sedlaczek
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Julien Dinkel
- Department of Radiology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ferdinand Seith
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Clarissa Gillmann
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Katharina Renkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Almansour H, Schick F, Nachbar M, Afat S, Fritz V, Thorwarth D, Zips D, Bertram F, Müller AC, Nikolaou K, Othman AE, Wegener D. Longitudinal monitoring of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) in patients with prostate cancer undergoing MR-guided radiotherapy on an MR-Linac at 1.5 T: a prospective feasibility study. Radiol Oncol 2023; 57:184-190. [PMID: 37341194 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2023-0020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hybrid MRI linear accelerators (MR-Linac) might enable individualized online adaptation of radiotherapy using quantitative MRI sequences as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). The purpose of this study was to investigate the dynamics of lesion apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in patients with prostate cancer undergoing MR-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) on a 1.5T MR-Linac. The ADC values at a diagnostic 3T MRI scanner were used as the reference standard. PATIENTS AND AND METHODS In this prospective single-center study, patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer who underwent both an MRI exam at a 3T scanner (MRI3T) and an exam at a 1.5T MR-Linac (MRL) at baseline and during radiotherapy were included. Lesion ADC values were measured by a radiologist and a radiation oncologist on the slice with the largest lesion. ADC values were compared before vs. during radiotherapy (during the second week) on both systems via paired t-tests. Furthermore, Pearson correlation coefficient and inter-reader agreement were computed. RESULTS A total of nine male patients aged 67 ± 6 years [range 60 - 67 years] were included. In seven patients, the cancerous lesion was in the peripheral zone, and in two patients the lesion was in the transition zone. Inter-reader reliability regarding lesion ADC measurement was excellent with an intraclass correlation coefficient of (ICC) > 0.90 both at baseline and during radiotherapy. Thus, the results of the first reader will be reported. In both systems, there was a statistically significant elevation of lesion ADC during radiotherapy (mean MRL-ADC at baseline was 0.97 ± 0.18 × 10-3 mm2/s vs. mean MRL-ADC during radiotherapy 1.38 ± 0.3 × 10-3 mm2/s, yielding a mean lesion ADC elevation of 0.41 ± 0.20 × 10-3 mm2/s, p < 0.001). Mean MRI3T-ADC at baseline was 0.78 ± 0.165 × 10-3 mm2/s vs. mean MRI3T-ADC during radiotherapy 0.99 ± 0.175 × 10-3 mm2/s, yielding a mean lesion ADC elevation of 0.21 ± 0.96 × 10-3 mm2/s p < 0.001). The absolute ADC values from MRL were consistently significantly higher than those from MRI3T at baseline and during radiotherapy (p < = 0.001). However, there was a strong positive correlation between MRL-ADC and MRI3T-ADC at baseline (r = 0.798, p = 0.01) and during radiotherapy (r = 0.863, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Lesion ADC as measured on MRL increased significantly during radiotherapy and ADC measurements of lesions on both systems showed similar dynamics. This indicates that lesion ADC as measured on the MRL may be used as a biomarker for evaluation of treatment response. In contrast, absolute ADC values as calculated by the algorithm of the manufacturer of the MRL showed systematic deviations from values obtained on a diagnostic 3T MRI system. These preliminary findings are promising but need large-scale validation. Once validated, lesion ADC on MRL might be used for real-time assessment of tumor response in patients with prostate cancer undergoing MR-guided radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haidara Almansour
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Fritz Schick
- Section for Experimental Radiology, Department of Radiology, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Marcel Nachbar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Saif Afat
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Victor Fritz
- Section for Experimental Radiology, Department of Radiology, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tuebingen and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tuebingen and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Felix Bertram
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Arndt-Christian Müller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, RKH Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - Konstantin Nikolaou
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence iFIT (EXC 2180) "Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Ahmed E Othman
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Daniel Wegener
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Nachbar M, Lo Russo M, Gani C, Boeke S, Wegener D, Paulsen F, Zips D, Roque T, Paragios N, Thorwarth D. Automatic AI-based contouring of prostate MRI for online adaptive radiotherapy. Z Med Phys 2023:S0939-3889(23)00053-3. [PMID: 37263911 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) online plan adaptation accounts for tumor volume changes, interfraction motion and thus allows daily sparing of relevant organs at risk. Due to the high interfraction variability of bladder and rectum, patients with tumors in the pelvic region may strongly benefit from adaptive MRgRT. Currently, fast automatic annotation of anatomical structures is not available within the online MRgRT workflow. Therefore, the aim of this study was to train and validate a fast, accurate deep learning model for automatic MRI segmentation at the MR-Linac for future implementation in a clinical MRgRT workflow. MATERIALS AND METHODS For a total of 47 patients, T2w MRI data were acquired on a 1.5 T MR-Linac (Unity, Elekta) on five different days. Prostate, seminal vesicles, rectum, anal canal, bladder, penile bulb, body and bony structures were manually annotated. These training data consisting of 232 data sets in total was used for the generation of a deep learning based autocontouring model and validated on 20 unseen T2w-MRIs. For quantitative evaluation the validation set was contoured by a radiation oncologist as gold standard contours (GSC) and compared in MATLAB to the automatic contours (AIC). For the evaluation, dice similarity coefficients (DSC), and 95% Hausdorff distances (95% HD), added path length (APL) and surface DSC (sDSC) were calculated in a caudal-cranial window of ± 4 cm with respect to the prostate ends. For qualitative evaluation, five radiation oncologists scored the AIC on the possible usage within an online adaptive workflow as follows: (1) no modifications needed, (2) minor adjustments needed, (3) major adjustments/ multiple minor adjustments needed, (4) not usable. RESULTS The quantitative evaluation revealed a maximum median 95% HD of 6.9 mm for the rectum and minimum median 95% HD of 2.7 mm for the bladder. Maximal and minimal median DSC were detected for bladder with 0.97 and for penile bulb with 0.73, respectively. Using a tolerance level of 3 mm, the highest and lowest sDSC were determined for rectum (0.94) and anal canal (0.68), respectively. Qualitative evaluation resulted in a mean score of 1.2 for AICs over all organs and patients across all expert ratings. For the different autocontoured structures, the highest mean score of 1.0 was observed for anal canal, sacrum, femur left and right, and pelvis left, whereas for prostate the lowest mean score of 2.0 was detected. In total, 80% of the contours were rated be clinically acceptable, 16% to require minor and 4% major adjustments for online adaptive MRgRT. CONCLUSION In this study, an AI-based autocontouring was successfully trained for online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy on the 1.5 T MR-Linac system. The developed model can automatically generate contours accepted by physicians (80%) or only with the need of minor corrections (16%) for the irradiation of primary prostate on the clinically employed sequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcel Nachbar
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Monica Lo Russo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Simon Boeke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Wegener
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Frank Paulsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Nikos Paragios
- TheraPanacea, Paris, France; CentraleSupelec, University of Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Regnery S, de Colle C, Eze C, Corradini S, Thieke C, Sedlaczek O, Schlemmer HP, Dinkel J, Seith F, Kopp-Schneider A, Gillmann C, Renkamp CK, Landry G, Thorwarth D, Zips D, Belka C, Jäkel O, Debus J, Hörner-Rieber J. Pulmonary magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiotherapy of locally advanced: the PUMA trial. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:74. [PMID: 37143154 PMCID: PMC10161406 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02258-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with locally-advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) are often ineligible for surgery, so that definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) represents the treatment of choice. Nevertheless, long-term tumor control is often not achieved. Intensification of radiotherapy (RT) to improve locoregional tumor control is limited by the detrimental effect of higher radiation exposure of thoracic organs-at-risk (OAR). This narrow therapeutic ratio may be expanded by exploiting the advantages of magnetic resonance (MR) linear accelerators, mainly the online adaptation of the treatment plan to the current anatomy based on daily acquired MR images. However, MR-guidance is both labor-intensive and increases treatment times, which raises the question of its clinical feasibility to treat LA-NSCLC. Therefore, the PUMA trial was designed as a prospective, multicenter phase I trial to demonstrate the clinical feasibility of MR-guided online adaptive RT in LA-NSCLC. METHODS Thirty patients with LA-NSCLC in stage III A-C will be accrued at three German university hospitals to receive MR-guided online adaptive RT at two different MR-linac systems (MRIdian Linac®, View Ray Inc. and Elekta Unity®, Elekta AB) with concurrent chemotherapy. Conventionally fractioned RT with isotoxic dose escalation up to 70 Gy is applied. Online plan adaptation is performed once weekly or in case of major anatomical changes. Patients are followed-up by thoracic CT- and MR-imaging for 24 months after treatment. The primary endpoint is twofold: (1) successfully completed online adapted fractions, (2) on-table time. Main secondary endpoints include adaptation frequency, toxicity, local tumor control, progression-free and overall survival. DISCUSSION PUMA aims to demonstrate the clinical feasibility of MR-guided online adaptive RT of LA-NSCLC. If successful, PUMA will be followed by a clinical phase II trial that further investigates the clinical benefits of this approach. Moreover, PUMA is part of a large multidisciplinary project to develop MR-guidance techniques. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05237453 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Regnery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Chiara de Colle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Chukwuka Eze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Thieke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Oliver Sedlaczek
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Julien Dinkel
- Department of Radiology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ferdinand Seith
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Clarissa Gillmann
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Katharina Renkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Mehrhof F, Bergengruen P, Gerds-Li JH, Jahn A, Kluge AK, Parwani A, Zips D, Boldt LH, Schönrath F. Cardiac radioablation of incessant ventricular tachycardia in patients with terminal heart failure under permanent left ventricular assist device therapy-description of two cases. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:511-519. [PMID: 36750509 PMCID: PMC10133058 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02045-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cardiac radioablation (cRA) using a stereotactic single-session radioablative approach has recently been described as a possible treatment option for patients with otherwise untreatable recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT). There is very limited experience in cRA for patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy. We present clinical experiences of two patients treated with cRA for incessant VT under long-term LVAD therapy. METHODS Two male patients (54 and 61 years old) with terminal heart failure under LVAD therapy (both patients for 8 years) showed incessant VT despite extensive antiarrhythmic drug therapy and repeated catheter ablation. cRA with a single dose of 25 Gy was applied as a last resort strategy under compassionate use in both patients following an electroanatomical mapping procedure. RESULTS Both patients displayed ongoing VT during and after the cRA procedure. Repeated attempts at post-procedural rhythm conversion failed in both patients; however, one patient was hemodynamically stabilized and could be discharged home for several months before falling prey to a fatal bleeding complication. The second patient initially stabilized for a few days following cRA before renewed acceleration of running VT required bilateral ablation of the stellate ganglion; the patient died 50 days later. No immediate side effects of cRA were detected in either patient. CONCLUSION cRA might serve as a last resort strategy for patients with terminal heart failure undergoing LVAD therapy and displaying incessant VT. Intermediate- and long-term outcomes of these seriously ill patients often remain poor; therefore, best supportive care strategies should also be evaluated as long as no clear beneficial effects of cRA procedures can be shown. For patients treated with cRA under running ventricular rhythm abnormality, strategies for post-procedural generation of stabilized rhythm have to be established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Mehrhof
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Paula Bergengruen
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jin-Hong Gerds-Li
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, German Heart Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrea Jahn
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, German Heart Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anne Kathrin Kluge
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Abdul Parwani
- Department for Cardiology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Leif-Hendrik Boldt
- Department for Cardiology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Schönrath
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, German Heart Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research) Partnersite Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Allwohn L, Wolfgang J, Onken J, Wasilewski D, Roohani S, Zips D, Ehret F, Kaul D. Treating oligodendroglioma – An analysis of a homogeneous 1p/19q-codeleted and isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant patient cohort. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 41:100626. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023] Open
|
36
|
Acker G, Nachbar M, Soffried N, Bodnar B, Janas A, Krantchev K, Kalinauskaite G, Kluge A, Shultz D, Conti A, Kaul D, Zips D, Vajkoczy P, Senger C. What if: A retrospective reconstruction of resection cavity stereotactic radiosurgery to mimic neoadjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1056330. [PMID: 37007157 PMCID: PMC10062706 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1056330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Neoadjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (NaSRS) of brain metastases has gained importance, but it is not routinely performed. While awaiting the results of prospective studies, we aimed to analyze the changes in the volume of brain metastases irradiated pre- and postoperatively and the resulting dosimetric effects on normal brain tissue (NBT). Methods We identified patients treated with SRS at our institution to compare hypothetical preoperative gross tumor and planning target volumes (pre-GTV and pre-PTV) with original postoperative resection cavity volumes (post-GTV and post-PTV) as well as with a standardized-hypothetical PTV with 2.0 mm margin. We used Pearson correlation to assess the association between the GTV and PTV changes with the pre-GTV. A multiple linear regression analysis was established to predict the GTV change. Hypothetical planning for the selected cases was created to assess the volume effect on the NBT exposure. We performed a literature review on NaSRS and searched for ongoing prospective trials. Results We included 30 patients in the analysis. The pre-/post-GTV and pre-/post-PTV did not differ significantly. We observed a negative correlation between pre-GTV and GTV-change, which was also a predictor of volume change in the regression analysis, in terms of a larger volume change for a smaller pre-GTV. In total, 62.5% of cases with an enlargement greater than 5.0 cm3 were smaller tumors (pre-GTV < 15.0 cm3), whereas larger tumors greater than 25.0 cm3 showed only a decrease in post-GTV. Hypothetical planning for the selected cases to evaluate the volume effect resulted in a median NBT exposure of only 67.6% (range: 33.2-84.5%) relative to the dose received by the NBT in the postoperative SRS setting. Nine published studies and twenty ongoing studies are listed as an overview. Conclusion Patients with smaller brain metastases may have a higher risk of volume increase when irradiated postoperatively. Target volume delineation is of great importance because the PTV directly affects the exposure of NBT, but it is a challenge when contouring resection cavities. Further studies should identify patients at risk of relevant volume increase to be preferably treated with NaSRS in routine practice. Ongoing clinical trials will evaluate additional benefits of NaSRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gueliz Acker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Academy, Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcel Nachbar
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Nina Soffried
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Bohdan Bodnar
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Anastasia Janas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Kiril Krantchev
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Goda Kalinauskaite
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Anne Kluge
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - David Shultz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alfredo Conti
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Carolin Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Issels RD, Boeck S, Pelzer U, Mansmann U, Ghadjar P, Lindner LH, Albertsmeier M, Angele MK, Schmidt M, Xu Y, Bahra M, Pratschke J, Schoenberg M, Thasler WE, Salat C, Stoetzer OJ, Knoefel WT, Graf D, Wessalowski R, Keitel-Anselmino V, Koenigsrainer A, Bitzer M, Zips D, Bamberg M, Fietkau R, Ott O, Kawecki M, Wyrwicz L, Rutkowski P, Rentsch M, Ababei J, Reichardt P, Rigamonti M, Weber B, Abdel-Rahman S, Tschoep-Lechner K, Jauch KW, Bruns CJ, Oettle H, von Bergwelt-Baildon M, Heinemann V, Werner J. Regional hyperthermia with cisplatin added to gemcitabine versus gemcitabine in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: The HEAT randomised clinical trial. Eur J Cancer 2023; 181:155-165. [PMID: 36657324 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regional hyperthermia (RHT) with cisplatin added to gemcitabine showed efficacy in gemcitabine-pre-treated patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. We conducted a randomised clinical trial to investigate RHT with cisplatin added to gemcitabine (GPH) compared with gemcitabine (G) in the adjuvant setting of resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. METHODS This randomised, multicentre, open-label trial randomly assigned patients to either GPH (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on day 1, 15 and cisplatin 25 mg/m2 with RHT on day 2, 3 and 15,16) or to G (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on day 1,8,15), four-weekly over six cycles. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary end-point. Secondary end-points included overall survival (OS) and safety. RESULTS A total of 117 eligible patients (median age, 63 years) were randomly allocated to treatment (57 GPH; 60 G). With a follow-up time of 56.6 months, the median DFS was 12.7 compared to 11.2 months for GPH and G, respectively (p = 0.394). Median post-recurrence survival was significantly prolonged in the GPH-group (15.3 versus 9.8 months; p = 0.031). Median OS reached 33.2 versus 25.2 months (p = 0.099) with 5-year survival rates of 28.4% versus 18.7%. Excluding eight patients who received additional capecitabine in the G-arm (investigators choice), median OS favoured GPH (p = 0.052). Adverse events CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) grade ≥3 occurred in 61.5% (GPH) versus 63.6% (G) of patients. Two patients in the G-group died because of treatment-related toxic effects. CONCLUSIONS The randomised controlled Hyperthermia European Adjuvant Trial study failed to demonstrate a significant difference in DFS. However, it suggests a difference in post-recurrence survival and a trend for improved OS. CLINICALTRIALS gov, number NCT01077427.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rolf D Issels
- Ludwig Maximilians University LMU University Hospital Munich, Germany.
| | - Stefan Boeck
- Ludwig Maximilians University LMU University Hospital Munich, Germany
| | - Uwe Pelzer
- Charite University Hospital Berlin, Germany
| | - Ulrich Mansmann
- Ludwig Maximilian University Munich Institute of Medical Data Processing Biometrics and Epidemiology, Germany
| | | | - Lars H Lindner
- Ludwig Maximilians University LMU University Hospital Munich, Germany
| | | | - Martin K Angele
- Ludwig Maximilians University LMU University Hospital Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Schmidt
- Ludwig Maximilian University Munich Institute of Medical Data Processing Biometrics and Epidemiology, Germany
| | - Yujun Xu
- Ludwig Maximilian University Munich Institute of Medical Data Processing Biometrics and Epidemiology, Germany
| | - Marcus Bahra
- Academic Hospital Waldfriede of the Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Christoph Salat
- Medical Center for Hematology and Oncology München GmbH, Germany
| | | | | | - Dirk Graf
- Rheinland Hospital Group Grevenbroich St Elizabeth Hospital, Grevenbroich, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Maciej Kawecki
- Maria Skłodowska Curie Memorial Cancer Centre, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Lucjan Wyrwicz
- Maria Skłodowska Curie Memorial Cancer Centre, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Maria Skłodowska Curie Memorial Cancer Centre, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Karl-Walter Jauch
- Ludwig Maximilians University LMU University Hospital Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Volker Heinemann
- Ludwig Maximilians University LMU University Hospital Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Werner
- Ludwig Maximilians University LMU University Hospital Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
De-Colle C, Kirby A, Russell N, Shaitelman S, Currey A, Donovan E, Hahn E, Han K, Anandadas C, Mahmood F, Lorenzen E, van den Bongard D, Groot Koerkamp M, Houweling A, Nachbar M, Thorwarth D, Zips D. Adaptive radiotherapy for breast cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 39:100564. [PMID: 36632056 PMCID: PMC9826896 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.100564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Research in the field of local and locoregional breast cancer radiotherapy aims to maintain excellent oncological outcomes while reducing treatment-related toxicity. Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) considers variations in target and organs at risk (OARs) anatomy occurring during the treatment course and integrates these in re-optimized treatment plans. Exploiting ART routinely in clinic may result in smaller target volumes and better OAR sparing, which may lead to reduction of acute as well as late toxicities. In this review MR-guided and CT-guided ART for breast cancer patients according to different clinical scenarios (neoadjuvant and adjuvant partial breast irradiation, whole breast, chest wall and regional nodal irradiation) are reviewed and their advantages as well as challenging aspects discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. De-Colle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - A. Kirby
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - N. Russell
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - S.F. Shaitelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - A. Currey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - E. Donovan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre - Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - E. Hahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - K. Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - C.N. Anandadas
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - F. Mahmood
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - E.L. Lorenzen
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - M.L. Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - A.C. Houweling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - M. Nachbar
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology. University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - D. Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology. University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - D. Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Roohani S, Ehret F, Kobus M, Flörcken A, Märdian S, Rau D, Wittenberg S, Jarosch A, Öllinger R, Zips D, Kaul D. Patterns of Failure in High-grade Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Extremities and Trunk Wall after Pre- or Postoperative Radiotherapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101224. [DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
|
40
|
Scharl S, Gartner L, Boehmer DHG, Siegmann A, Zips D, Thamm R, Wiegel T. Effect of undetectable PSA following SRT for biochemical recurrence on BPFS, FFM, and OS. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
367 Background: Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) alone or in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the only curative treatment option for patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer. An undetectable post SRT PSA in patients without ADT (<0.1 ng/ml) has been shown retrospectively to correlate significantly with long-term freedom from progression, metastasis free survival and overall survival. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the predictive power of a post SRT-nadir <0.1 ng/ml extends to all subgroups of SRT patients. Methods: Between 1998 and 2018, 698 patients (all pN0/cN0) with persisting PSA or increasing PSA out of the undetectable range (<0.1 ng/ ml) of two German university hospitals received SRT alone without ADT. Exclusion criteria were distant metastases and/or ADT in the interval between RP and/or in combination with SRT. ADT before RP was allowed. All patients received 3D-conformal or intensity-modulated SRT to a median dose of 70.2 Gy. The impact of post-SRT nadir <0.1 ng/ml on biochemical progression free survival (BPFS), freedom from metastases (FFM) and on overall survival (OS) was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis. 9 subgroups with at least 30 patients per group were analyzed separately (pT2 + R0, pT3 + R0, pT3 + R1, pT2 + Gleason Score ≤ 7, pT3 + Gleason Score ≤ 7, pT3 + Gleason Score ≥ 8, pT3 + Gleason Score ≥ 7 + R1, pT3 + Gleason Score ≥ 7 + pre-SRT-PSA-Wert ≤1,0 ng/ ml and pT2/3 + Gleason Score ≥ 8 + pre-SRT-PSA-Wert ≤1,0 ng/ ml). Results: Median follow-up was 5.6 years. Median PSA before SRT was 0.30 ng/ ml. A post SRT PSA <0.1ng/ml was achieved by 76.6% of patients. In univariate analysis of the entire cohort, post SRT PSA <0.1 ng/ ml was a significant predictor of BPFS (p<0.001), FFM (p<0.001) and OS (p=0.01). Regarding univariate analysis of the subgroups, post SRT PSA <0.1ng/ml was a significant predictor of BPFS in all subgroups (p<0.001), FFM in 6 subgroups (p<0.001 to p=0.03) and for OS in 3 subgroups (p<0.001 to p=0.02). In multivariate analysis of the entire cohort, post-SRT PSA <0.1ng/ml was an independent predictor for BPFS (HR: 7.25, 95%-CI: 5.36-9.81, p<0.001), FFM (HR: 4.21, 95%-CI: 2.00-8.84, p=0.002) and OS (HR: 2.59, 95%-CI: 1.28-5.23, p=0.008). Conclusions: Achieving an undetectable PSA after SRT is an independent predictor of BPFS, FFM and OS. This effect is present in subgroups with favorable (pT2+Gleason score ≤ 7) as well as in those with unfavorable characteristics (pT3+ Gleason score >8). Our findings indicate that ADT could be withheld in a proportion of patients that are candidates for ADT based on their risk factors but achieve an undetectable PSA after SRT. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Scharl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Luca Gartner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany, Ulm, Germany
| | | | | | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charite Berlin, Germany, Berlin, Germany
| | - Reinhard Thamm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany, Ulm, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Uder L, Nachbar M, Butzer S, Boldt J, Baumeister S, Bitzer M, Königsrainer A, Seufferlein T, Hoffmann R, Gatidis S, Nikolaou K, Zips D, Thorwarth D, Gani C, Boeke S. Local control and patient reported outcomes after online MR guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver metastases. Front Oncol 2023; 12:1095633. [PMID: 36727060 PMCID: PMC9885175 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1095633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is used to treat liver metastases with the intention of ablation. High local control rates were shown. Magnetic resonance imaging guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) provides the opportunity of a marker-less liver SBRT treatment due to the high soft tissue contrast. We report herein on one of the largest cohorts of patients treated with online MRgRT of liver metastases focusing on oncological outcome, toxicity, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), quality of life. Material and methods Patients treated for liver metastases with online MR-guided SBRT at a 1,5 T MR-Linac (Unity, Elekta, Crawley, UK) between March 2019 and December 2021 were included in this prospective study. UK SABR guidelines were used for organs at risk constraints. Oncological endpoints such as survival parameters (overall survival, progression-free survival) and local control as well as patient reported acceptance and quality of life data (EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire) were assessed. For toxicity scoring the Common Toxicity Criteria Version 5 were used. Results A total of 51 patients with 74 metastases were treated with a median of five fractions. The median applied BED GTV D98 was 84,1 Gy. Median follow-up was 15 months. Local control of the irradiated liver metastasis after 12 months was 89,6%, local control of the liver was 40,3%. Overall survival (OS) after 12 months was 85.1%. Progression free survival (PFS) after 12 months was 22,4%. Local control of the irradiated liver lesion was 100% after three years when a BED ≥100 Gy was reached. The number of treated lesions did not impact local control neither of the treated or of the hepatic control. Patient acceptance of online MRgSBRT was high. There were no acute grade ≥ 3 toxicities. Quality of life data showed no significant difference comparing baseline and follow-up data. Conclusion Online MR guided radiotherapy is a noninvasive, well-tolerated and effective treatment for liver metastases. Further prospective trials with the goal to define patients who actually benefit most from an online adaptive workflow are currently ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Uder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany,*Correspondence: Laura Uder,
| | - Marcel Nachbar
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sarah Butzer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jessica Boldt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sabrina Baumeister
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Michael Bitzer
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Alfred Königsrainer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Seufferlein
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital Medical Center, Ulm, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Hoffmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology , University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sergios Gatidis
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology , University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Konstantin Nikolaou
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology , University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany,Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Simon Boeke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Renovanz M, Kurz SC, Rieger J, Walter B, Becker H, Hille H, Bombach P, Rieger D, Grosse L, Häusser L, Skardelly M, Merk DJ, Paulsen F, Hoffmann E, Gani C, Neumann M, Beschorner R, Rieß O, Roggia C, Schroeder C, Ossowski S, Armeanu-Ebinger S, Gschwind A, Biskup S, Schulze M, Fend F, Singer S, Zender L, Lengerke C, Brucker SY, Engler T, Forschner A, Stenzl A, Kohlbacher O, Nahnsen S, Gabernet G, Fillinger S, Bender B, Ernemann U, Öner Ö, Beha J, Malek HS, Möller Y, Ruhm K, Tatagiba M, Schittenhelm J, Bitzer M, Malek N, Zips D, Tabatabai G. Clinical outcome of biomarker-guided therapies in adult patients with tumors of the nervous system. Neurooncol Adv 2023; 5:vdad012. [PMID: 36915613 PMCID: PMC10007909 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdad012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The clinical utility of molecular profiling and targeted therapies for neuro-oncology patients outside of clinical trials is not established. We aimed at investigating feasibility and clinical utility of molecular profiling and targeted therapy in adult patients with advanced tumors in the nervous system within a prospective observational study. Methods molecular tumor board (MTB)@ZPM (NCT03503149) is a prospective observational precision medicine study for patients with advanced tumors. After inclusion of patients, we performed comprehensive molecular profiling, formulated ranked biomarker-guided therapy recommendations based on consensus by the MTB, and collected prospective clinical outcome data. Results Here, we present initial data of 661 adult patients with tumors of the nervous system enrolled by December 31, 2021. Of these, 408 patients were presented at the MTB. Molecular-instructed therapy recommendations could be made in 380/408 (93.1%) cases and were prioritized by evidence levels. Therapies were initiated in 86/380 (22.6%) cases until data cutoff. We observed a progression-free survival ratio >1.3 in 31.3% of patients. Conclusions Our study supports the clinical utility of biomarker-guided therapies for neuro-oncology patients and indicates clinical benefit in a subset of patients. Our data might inform future clinical trials, translational studies, and even clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjam Renovanz
- Department of Neurology and Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany.,Department of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sylvia C Kurz
- Department of Neurology and Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany
| | - Johannes Rieger
- Department of Neurology and Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany
| | - Bianca Walter
- Department of Neurology and Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Hannes Becker
- Department of Neurology and Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany.,Department of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Hanni Hille
- Department of Neurology and Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Paula Bombach
- Department of Neurology and Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany.,Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - David Rieger
- Department of Neurology and Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany
| | - Lucia Grosse
- Department of Neurology and Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany
| | - Lara Häusser
- Department of Neurology and Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ partner site Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marco Skardelly
- Department of Neurology and Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel J Merk
- Department of Neurology and Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Frank Paulsen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany.,Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Elgin Hoffmann
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany.,Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany.,Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ partner site Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Manuela Neumann
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany.,Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Department of Neuropathology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ partner site Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Rudi Beschorner
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany.,Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Department of Neuropathology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ partner site Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Olaf Rieß
- Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Cluster of Excellence (EXC 2180) "Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ partner site Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Cristiana Roggia
- Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christopher Schroeder
- Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Stephan Ossowski
- Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sorin Armeanu-Ebinger
- Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Axel Gschwind
- Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Saskia Biskup
- Center for Genomics and Transcriptomics (CeGaT) & Center for Human Genetics Tübingen, Germany.,Cluster of Excellence (EXC 2180) "Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Martin Schulze
- Center for Genomics and Transcriptomics (CeGaT) & Center for Human Genetics Tübingen, Germany
| | - Falko Fend
- Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Department of Pathology and Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Cluster of Excellence (EXC 2180) "Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ partner site Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Stephan Singer
- Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Department of Pathology and Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Cluster of Excellence (EXC 2180) "Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ partner site Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Lars Zender
- Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Department of Medical Oncology and Pneumology (Internal Medicine VIII), Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Cluster of Excellence (EXC 2180) "Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ partner site Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Claudia Lengerke
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ partner site Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sara Yvonne Brucker
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ partner site Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Tobias Engler
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ partner site Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andrea Forschner
- Department of Dermatology and Center for Dermato-Oncology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ partner site Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Arnulf Stenzl
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ partner site Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Oliver Kohlbacher
- Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Institute for Translational Bioinformatics, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ partner site Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sven Nahnsen
- Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Quantitative Biology Center (QBiC), Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Department of Medical Oncology and Pneumology (Internal Medicine VIII), Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Cluster of Excellence (EXC 2180) "Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ partner site Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Gisela Gabernet
- Quantitative Biology Center (QBiC), Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sven Fillinger
- Quantitative Biology Center (QBiC), Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Benjamin Bender
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany.,Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Ulrike Ernemann
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany.,Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Öznur Öner
- Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Janina Beha
- Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Holly Sundberg Malek
- Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Yvonne Möller
- Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Kristina Ruhm
- Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marcos Tatagiba
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany.,Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Department of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jens Schittenhelm
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany.,Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Department of Neuropathology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ partner site Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Michael Bitzer
- Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine I, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Cluster of Excellence (EXC 2180) "Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ partner site Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Nisar Malek
- Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine I, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Cluster of Excellence (EXC 2180) "Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ partner site Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany.,Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ partner site Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Ghazaleh Tabatabai
- Department of Neurology and Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany.,Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.,Cluster of Excellence (EXC 2180) "Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ partner site Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Veltsista PD, Oberacker E, Ademaj A, Corradini S, Eckert F, Flörcken A, Kaul D, Lindner LH, Issels R, Ott OJ, Pink D, Potkrajcic V, Reichardt P, Roohani S, Spalek MJ, Riesterer O, Zips D, Ghadjar P. Hyperthermia in the treatment of high-risk soft tissue sarcomas: a systematic review. Int J Hyperthermia 2023; 40:2236337. [PMID: 37468132 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2023.2236337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The therapy of high-risk soft tissue sarcomas (STS) remains an interdisciplinary challenge. Regional hyperthermia (RHT) sparked interest as it has been shown to improve overall survival when added to perioperative chemotherapy (CTX). However, questions arise on how RHT should be optimally integrated into current multi-modal therapies. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a systematic literature review according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies written in English and focused mainly on radiative RHT and superficial hyperthermia were evaluated and included. Studies including patients below the age of 18, with metastatic disease or review articles, were excluded. RESULTS We identified 15 clinical reports from 1990 until July 2022. Three articles combined RHT + CTX, and twelve focused on combined RHT + radiotherapy (RT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Most treatments were based on invasive thermometry, and less on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based, noninvasive thermometry for STS of the extremities. Perioperative chemotherapy was used for the combination of RHT and CTX, mostly Ifosfamide-based. The effectiveness of RT appeared to be increased by RHT, especially with two RHT sessions/week. The trimodal simultaneous approach of neoadjuvant RHT and CRT was also feasible. No significant toxicity of RHT was reported. CONCLUSIONS The gathered data strengthen the beneficial role of RHT in the multimodal setting. Further expert consensus and clinical trials are required to determine the optimal integration of RHT in treating STS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eva Oberacker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Adela Ademaj
- Kantonsspital Aarau, Centre for Radiation Oncology KSA-KSB, Aarau, Switzerland
- Doctoral Clinical Science Program, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München, Germany
| | - Franziska Eckert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna/AKH, Vienna, Austria
| | - Anne Flörcken
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lars H Lindner
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München, Germany
| | - Rolf Issels
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München, Germany
| | - Oliver J Ott
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Daniel Pink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Helios Klinikum Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
- Clinic for Internal Medicine C - Haematology and Oncology, Stem Cell Transplantation and Palliative Care, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Vlatko Potkrajcic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Peter Reichardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Helios Hospital Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Siyer Roohani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mateusz Jacek Spalek
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Oliver Riesterer
- Kantonsspital Aarau, Centre for Radiation Oncology KSA-KSB, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pirus Ghadjar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Lo Russo M, Nachbar M, Barry A, Bhide S, Chang A, Hall W, Intven M, Marijnen C, Peters F, Minsky B, Romesser PB, Sarkar R, Tan A, Boeke S, Wegener D, Butzer S, Boldt J, Gatidis S, Nikolaou K, Thorwarth D, Zips D, Gani C. Impact of endorectal filling on interobserver variability of MRI based rectal primary tumor delineation. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 38:1-5. [PMID: 36299279 PMCID: PMC9589000 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy allows for the reduction of safety margins in dose escalated treatment of rectal tumors. With the use of smaller margins, precise tumor delineation becomes more critical. In the present study we investigated the impact of rectal ultrasound gel filling on interobserver variability in delineation of primary rectal tumor volumes. Methods Six patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were scanned on a 1.5 T MRI-Linac without (MRI_e) and with application of 100 cc of ultrasound gel transanally (MRI_f). Eight international radiation oncologists expert in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancers delineated the gross tumor volume (GTV) on both MRI scans. MRI_f scans were provided to the participating centers after MRI_e scans had been returned. Interobserver variability was analyzed by either comparing the observers' delineations with a reference delineation (approach 1) and by building all possible pairs between observers (approach 2). Dice Similarity Index (DICE) and 95 % Hausdorff-Distance (95 %HD) were calculated. Results Rectal ultrasound gel filling was well tolerated by all patients. Overall, interobserver agreement was superior in MRI_f scans based on median DICE (0.81 vs 0.74, p < 0.005 for approach 1 and 0.76 vs 0.64, p < 0.0001 for approach 2) and 95 %HD (6.9 mm vs 4.2 mm for approach 1, p = 0.04 and 8.9 mm vs 6.1 mm, p = 0.04 for approach 2). Delineated median tumor volumes and inter-quartile ranges were 26.99 cc [18.01-50.34 cc] in MRI_e and 44.20 [19.72-61.59 cc] in MRI_f scans respectively, p = 0.012. Conclusions Although limited by the small number of patients, in this study the application of rectal ultrasound gel resulted in higher interobserver agreement in rectal GTV delineation. The endorectal gel filling might be a useful tool for future dose escalation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Lo Russo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marcel Nachbar
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany
| | - Aisling Barry
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shree Bhide
- Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and the Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Amy Chang
- Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - William Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Martijn Intven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Corrie Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Femke Peters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bruce Minsky
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paul B. Romesser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Reith Sarkar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Simon Boeke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Wegener
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sarah Butzer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jessica Boldt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sergios Gatidis
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Konstantin Nikolaou
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Potkrajcic V, Kolbenschlag J, Sachsenmaier S, Daigeler A, Ladurner R, Golf A, Gani C, Zips D, Paulsen F, Eckert F. Postoperative complications and oncologic outcomes after multimodal therapy of localized high risk soft tissue sarcoma. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:210. [PMID: 36544149 PMCID: PMC9768905 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02166-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standard therapy for localized high-risk soft tissue sarcoma includes surgical resection and neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation therapy (± chemotherapy and locoregional hyperthermia). No difference in oncologic outcomes for patients treated with neoadjuvant and adjuvant radiation therapy was reported, whereas side effect profiles differ. The aim of this analysis was to analyse oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications in patients treated with multimodal treatment. METHODS Oncologic outcomes and major wound complications (MWC, subclassified as wound healing disorder, infection, abscess, fistula, seroma and hematoma) were evaluated in 74 patients with localized high-risk soft tissue sarcoma of extremities and trunk undergoing multimodal treatment, and also separately for the subgroup of lower extremity tumors. Clinical factors and treatment modalities (especially neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant radiotherapy) were evaluated regarding their prognostic value and impact on postoperative wound complications. RESULTS Oncologic outcomes were dependent on number of high risk features (tumor size, depth to superficial fascia and grading), but not on therapy sequencing (however with higher risk patients in the neoadjuvant group). Different risk factors influenced different subclasses of wound healing complications. Slightly higher MWC-rates were observed in patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy, compared to adjuvant radiotherapy, although only with a trend to statistical significance (31.8% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.059). However, except for wound infections, no significant difference for other subclasses of postoperative complications was observed between neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy. Diabetes was confirmed as a major risk factor for immune-related wound complications. CONCLUSION Rates of major wound complications in this cohort are comparable to published data, higher rates of wound infections were observed after neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Tumor localization, patient age and diabetes seem to be major risk factors. The number of risk factors for high risk soft tissue sarcoma seem to influence DMFS. Neoadjuvant treatment increases the risk only for wound infection treated with oral or intravenous antibiotic therapy and appears to be a safe option at an experienced tertiary center in absence of other risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vlatko Potkrajcic
- grid.10392.390000 0001 2190 1447Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jonas Kolbenschlag
- grid.10392.390000 0001 2190 1447Department of Hand, Plastic, Reconstructive and Burn Surgery, BG Unfallklinik, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Schnarrenbergstraße 95, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Saskia Sachsenmaier
- grid.10392.390000 0001 2190 1447Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Adrien Daigeler
- grid.10392.390000 0001 2190 1447Department of Hand, Plastic, Reconstructive and Burn Surgery, BG Unfallklinik, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Schnarrenbergstraße 95, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Ruth Ladurner
- grid.10392.390000 0001 2190 1447Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Hoppe Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Alexander Golf
- grid.10392.390000 0001 2190 1447Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Oncology and Pulmonology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Otfried-Müller-Straße 14, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- grid.10392.390000 0001 2190 1447Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- grid.10392.390000 0001 2190 1447Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany ,grid.7497.d0000 0004 0492 0584German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partnersite Tuebingen, Heidelberg, Germany ,grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité University Hospital, Charitépl. 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Paulsen
- grid.10392.390000 0001 2190 1447Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Franziska Eckert
- grid.10392.390000 0001 2190 1447Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany ,grid.22937.3d0000 0000 9259 8492Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Roohani S, Ehret F, Perez E, Capper D, Jarosch A, Flörcken A, Märdian S, Zips D, Kaul D. Sarcoma classification by DNA methylation profiling in clinical everyday life: the Charité experience. Clin Epigenetics 2022; 14:149. [PMID: 36380356 PMCID: PMC9667620 DOI: 10.1186/s13148-022-01365-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of rare malignant tumors with more than 100 subtypes. Accurate diagnosis remains challenging due to a lack of characteristic molecular or histomorphological hallmarks. A DNA methylation-based tumor profiling classifier for sarcomas (known as sarcoma classifier) from the German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum) is now employed in selected cases to guide tumor classification and treatment decisions at our institution. Data on the usage of the classifier in daily clinical routine are lacking. METHODS In this single-center experience, we describe the clinical course of five sarcoma cases undergoing thorough pathological and reference pathological examination as well as DNA methylation-based profiling and their impact on subsequent treatment decisions. We collected data on the clinical course, DNA methylation analysis, histopathology, radiological imaging, and next-generation sequencing. RESULTS Five clinical cases involving DNA methylation-based profiling in 2021 at our institution were included. All patients' DNA methylation profiles were successfully matched to a methylation profile cluster of the sarcoma classifier's dataset. In three patients, the classifier reassured diagnosis or aided in finding the correct diagnosis in light of contradictory data and differential diagnoses. In two patients with intracranial tumors, the classifier changed the diagnosis to a novel diagnostic tumor group. CONCLUSIONS The sarcoma classifier is a valuable diagnostic tool that should be used after comprehensive clinical and histopathological evaluation. It may help to reassure the histopathological diagnosis or indicate the need for thorough reassessment in cases where it contradicts previous findings. However, certain limitations (non-classifiable cases, misclassifications, unclear degree of sample purity for analysis and others) currently preclude wide clinical application. The current sarcoma classifier is therefore not yet ready for a broad clinical routine. With further refinements, this promising tool may be implemented in daily clinical practice in selected cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siyer Roohani
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Ehret
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany ,grid.484013.a0000 0004 6879 971XBerlin Institute of Health at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany ,grid.7497.d0000 0004 0492 0584Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eilís Perez
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Department of Neuropathology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt‑Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - David Capper
- grid.7497.d0000 0004 0492 0584Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany ,grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Department of Neuropathology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt‑Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Armin Jarosch
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Institute of Pathology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Anne Flörcken
- grid.7497.d0000 0004 0492 0584Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany ,grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Sven Märdian
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Centre for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany ,grid.7497.d0000 0004 0492 0584Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany ,grid.7497.d0000 0004 0492 0584Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Renovanz M, Bombach P, Grosse L, Rieger J, Skardelly M, Rieger D, Hille H, Volkmer S, Dörner L, Kurz S, Hippler M, Paulsen F, Öner Ö, Ruhm K, Beha J, Sundberg-Malek H, Möller Y, Tatagiba M, Wallwiener M, Eckert N, Escher P, Pfeiffer N, Forschner A, Bauer A, Zips D, Bitzer M, Malek N, Gani C, Tabatabai G. QOL-23. TOWARDS PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME ASSESSMENT IN THE MOLECULAR TUMOR BOARD – CANCER PATIENTS UNDER TARGETED THERAPY: APP-BASED ASSESSMENT OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES (TRACE). Neuro Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac209.950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Comprehensive genomic profiling and biomarker-based therapeutic strategies are currently used in clinical trials and in innovative health care systems including the center for personalized medicine network. Systematic assessments of patient-reported outcomes are warranted to gain insight into the perspective of patients and their relatives during biomarker-based therapies. In the present study, we focused on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), psychosocial situation, and physical symptoms in patients treated at the Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen. First, we retrospectively evaluated symptom burden of n=265 (neuro-)oncological patients in the Molecular Tumor Board (MTB). Sixty percent of patients reported at least 1 neurological symptom, and psychosocial burden/unmet needs were high (overall 156/265; 59%, patients with malignant tumors n=86/106; 81%, Fisher’s exact, p < 0.0001). We therefore developed an app by 14 expert rounds and pretesting including validated assessments of HRoL, symptom und psychological burden and tested it in a pilot study. We conducted a structured interview with users 3 months afterwards to assess the app’s usability and feasibility. The interview was transcribed and analyzed according to a qualitative content analysis. So far, a total of 10 patients and caregivers have been enrolled in this pilot study. They reported that (i) the app is compatible with their daily routine (median 9.3, range 0-10), that (ii) they are more aware of their health status, which was rated as positive, and that (iii) completing app-based questionnaires was easier compared to paper questionnaires. Two patients reported technical problems, which were resolved timely. The pilot study proved feasibility and acceptance of the app. The app might optimize symptom burden assessment, adapted to the patients’ profiles. The next step is to prospectively compare HRQoL before and after start of targeted therapy in a multicenter study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjam Renovanz
- Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research , Tübingen , Germany
| | - Paula Bombach
- Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research , Tübingen , Germany
| | - Lucia Grosse
- Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research , Tübingen , Germany
| | - Johannes Rieger
- Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen , Tübingen , Germany
| | - Marco Skardelly
- Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, USA
| | - David Rieger
- Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen , Tübingen , Germany
| | - Hanni Hille
- Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, USA
| | - Sebastian Volkmer
- Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen , Tübingen , Germany
| | - Lorenz Dörner
- Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen , Tübingen , Germany
| | - Sylvia Kurz
- Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen , Tübingen , Germany
| | - Melina Hippler
- Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen , Tübingen , Germany
| | - Frank Paulsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen , Tübingen , Germany
| | - Öznur Öner
- Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, University Hospital Tübingen , Tübingen , Germany
| | - Kristina Ruhm
- Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, University Hospital Tübingen , Tübingen , Germany
| | - Janina Beha
- Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, University Hospital Tübingen , Tübingen , Germany
| | - Holly Sundberg-Malek
- Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, University Hospital Tübingen , Tübingen , Germany
| | - Yvonne Möller
- Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen, University Hospital Tübingen , Tübingen , Germany
| | - Marcos Tatagiba
- Department of Neurosurgery University Hospital Tübingen , Tuebingen , Germany
| | - Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg , Heidelberg , Germany
| | - Nils Eckert
- Eckert & Partner - IT Consulting , Stuttgart , Germany
| | - Pascal Escher
- Methods in Medical Informatics, Department of Computer Science, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen , Tübingen , Germany
| | - Nico Pfeiffer
- Methods in Medical Informatics, Department of Computer Science, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen , Tübingen , Germany
| | - Andrea Forschner
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tübingen, , Tübingen , Germany
| | - Armin Bauer
- Department of Women’s Health, University Hospital Tübingen , Tübingen , Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen , Tübingen , Germany
| | - Michael Bitzer
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Tübingen , Tübingen , Germany
| | - Nisar Malek
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Tübingen , Tübingen , Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen , Tübingen , Germany
| | - Ghazaleh Tabatabai
- Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research , Tübingen , Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Boeke S, Uder L, Ehlers J, Butzer S, Baumeister S, Boldt J, Nachbar M, Lo Russo M, Mönnich D, Nikolaou K, Zips D, Thorwarth D, Gani C. Online MR guided dose escalated radiotherapy for organ preservation in distal rectal cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 37:153-156. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
|
49
|
Marinescu IM, Rogg M, Spohn S, von Büren M, Kamps M, Jilg CA, Fountzila E, Papadopoulou K, Ceci L, Bettermann A, Ruf J, Benndorf M, Adebahr S, Zips D, Grosu AL, Schell C, Zamboglou C. Ex vivo γH2AX assay for tumor radiosensitivity in primary prostate cancer patients and correlation with clinical parameters. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:163. [PMID: 36199143 PMCID: PMC9533509 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02131-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Backround Accurate surrogate parameters for radio resistance are warranted for individualized radiotherapy (RT) concepts in prostate cancer (PCa). The purpose of this study was to assess intertumoral heterogeneity in terms of radio resistance using an ex-vivo γH2AX assay after irradiation of prostate biopsy cores and to investigate its correlation with clinical features of respective patients as well as imaging and genomic features of tumor areas.
Methods Twenty one patients with histologically-proven PCa and pre-therapeutic multiparametric resonance imaging and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography were included in the study. Biopsy cores were collected from 26 PCa foci. Residual γH2AX foci were counted 24 h after ex-vivo irradiation (with 0 and 4 Gy) of biopsy specimen and served as a surrogate for radio resistance. Clinical, genomic (next generation sequencing) and imaging features were collected and their association with the radio resistance was studied. Results In total 18 PCa lesions from 16 patients were included in the final analysis. The median γH2AX foci value per PCa lesion was 3.12. According to this, the patients were divided into two groups (radio sensitive vs. radio resistant) with significant differences in foci number (p < 0.0001). The patients in the radio sensitive group had significantly higher prostate specific antigen serum concentration (p = 0.015), tumor areas in the radio sensitive group had higher SUV (standardized uptake values in PSMA PET)-max and -mean values (p = 0.0037, p = 0.028) and lower ADC (apparent diffusion coefficient-mean values, p = 0.049). All later parameters had significant (p < 0.05) correlations in Pearson’s test. One patient in the radio sensitive group displayed a previously not reported loss of function frameshift mutation in the NBN gene (c.654_658delAAAAC) that introduces a premature termination codon and results in a truncated protein. Conclusion In this pilot study, significant differences in intertumoral radio resistance were observed and clinical as well as imaging parameters may be applied for their prediction. After further prospective validation in larger patient cohorts these finding may lead to individual RT dose prescription for PCa patients in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioana M Marinescu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Manuel Rogg
- Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Simon Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Moritz von Büren
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Marius Kamps
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Cordula A Jilg
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Elena Fountzila
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, Euromedica General Clinic of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.,Greece and European University Cyprus, Engomi, Cyprus
| | - Kyriaki Papadopoulou
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Lara Ceci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Alisa Bettermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Juri Ruf
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Benndorf
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sonja Adebahr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Schell
- Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Freiburg, Germany.,Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Tumorbank Comprehensive Cancer Center Freiburg, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Wegener D, Aebersold DM, Grimm MO, Hammerer P, Froehner M, Graefen M, Boehmer D, Zips D, Wiegel T. Postoperative Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer: Adjuvant versus Early Salvage. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10092256. [PMID: 36140357 PMCID: PMC9496034 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10092256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Revised: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Results of three randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) and early salvage radiotherapy (eSRT) of prostate carcinoma and a subsequent meta-analysis of the individual patient data from these RCTs were recently published. The results suggest that early eSRT is as effective and potentially less toxic than ART. Therefore, eSRT should be considered the standard of care. However, due to limitations in the RCTs, ART remains a valid treatment option in patients with the combination of high-risk features such as Gleason Score (GS) 8–10, positive surgical margins (R1) and pathological T-stage 3 or 4 (pT3/4). This article provides a critical appraisal of the RCTs and the rationale for recommendations adopted in the current national guidelines regarding patients with high-risk features after radical prostatectomy (RP): ART should be offered in case of pT3/pT4 and R1 and Gleason Score 8–10; ART can be offered in case of pT3/pT4 and R0 and Gleason Score 8–10 as well as in case of multifocal R1 (including pT2) and Gleason Score 8–10. In any case, the alternative treatment option of eSRT in case of rising PSA should be discussed with the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Wegener
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-070-7129-86143
| | - Daniel M. Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marc-Oliver Grimm
- Department of Urology, Jena University Hospital, 07743 Jena, Germany
| | - Peter Hammerer
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Michael Froehner
- Department of Urology, Zeisigwaldkliniken Bethanien Chemnitz, 09130 Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini Clinic, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Boehmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tuebingen, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|