1
|
Taylor KJ, Amdal CD, Bjordal K, Astrup GL, Herlofson BB, Duprez F, Gama RR, Jacinto A, Hammerlid E, Scricciolo M, Jansen F, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Fanetti G, Guntinas-Lichius O, Inhestern J, Dragan T, Fabian A, Boehm A, Wöhner U, Kiyota N, Krüger M, Bonomo P, Pinto M, Nuyts S, Silva JC, Stromberger C, Specenier P, Tramacere F, Bushnak A, Perotti P, Plath M, Paderno A, Stempler N, Kouri M, Grégoire V, Singer S. Long-term health-related quality of life in head and neck cancer survivors: A large multinational study. Int J Cancer 2024; 154:1772-1785. [PMID: 38312044 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients suffer from a range of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) issues, but little is known about their long-term HRQoL. This study explored associations between treatment group and HRQoL at least 5 years' post-diagnosis in HNC survivors. In an international cross-sectional study, HNC survivors completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life core questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) and its HNC module (EORTC-QLQ-H&N35). Meaningful HRQoL differences were examined between five treatment groups: (a) surgery, (b) radiotherapy, (c) chemo-radiotherapy, (d) radiotherapy ± chemotherapy and neck dissection and (e) any other surgery (meaning any tumour surgery that is not a neck dissection) and radiotherapy ± chemotherapy. Twenty-six sites in 11 countries enrolled 1105 survivors. They had a median time since diagnosis of 8 years, a mean age of 66 years and 71% were male. After adjusting for age, sex, tumour site and UICC stage, there was evidence for meaningful differences (10 points or more) in HRQoL between treatment groups in seven domains (Fatigue, Mouth Pain, Swallowing, Senses, Opening Mouth, Dry Mouth and Sticky Saliva). Survivors who had single-modality treatment had better or equal HRQoL in every domain compared to survivors with multimodal treatment, with the largest differences for Dry Mouth and Sticky Saliva. For Global Quality of Life, Physical and Social Functioning, Constipation, Dyspnoea and Financial Difficulties, at least some treatment groups had better outcomes compared to a general population. Our data suggest that multimodal treatment is associated with worse HRQoL in the long-term compared to single modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine J Taylor
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University Medical Centre Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Cecilie D Amdal
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Research Support Service, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kristin Bjordal
- Research Support Service, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Guro L Astrup
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bente B Herlofson
- University of Oslo, Faculty of Dentistry, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Fréderic Duprez
- Department of Radiotherapy-Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences-Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ricardo R Gama
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | - Alexandre Jacinto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | - Eva Hammerlid
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | - Femke Jansen
- Department Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw
- Department Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Giuseppe Fanetti
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | | | - Johanna Inhestern
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Oberhavelkliniken Hennigsdorf, Hennigsdorf, Germany
| | - Tatiana Dragan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Head and Neck Unit, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alexander Fabian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Andreas Boehm
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, St. Georg Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Ulrike Wöhner
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, St. Georg Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Naomi Kiyota
- Cancer Center, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Maximilian Krüger
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - Plastic Surgery, University Medical Centre Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Pierluigi Bonomo
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Monica Pinto
- Rehabilitation Medicine Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Sandra Nuyts
- Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joaquim Castro Silva
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil Do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pol Specenier
- Department of Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | | | - Ayman Bushnak
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Gießen und Marburg, Giessen, Germany
| | - Pietro Perotti
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, "S. Chiara" Hospital, Azienda Provinciale Per I Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy
| | - Michaela Plath
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alberto Paderno
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Noa Stempler
- Oral Medicine Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Maria Kouri
- Dental Oncology Unit, Department of Oral Medicine and Pathology and Hospital Dentistry, Dental School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Vincent Grégoire
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | - Susanne Singer
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University Medical Centre Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rühle A, Weymann M, Behrens M, Marschner S, Haderlein M, Fabian A, Senger C, Dickstein DR, Kraft J, von der Grün J, Chen E, Aquino-Michaels T, Domschikowski J, Bickel A, Altay-Langguth A, Kalinauskaite G, Lewitzki V, Bonomi M, Blakaj DM, Jhawar SR, Baliga S, Barve R, Ferentinos K, Zamboglou C, Schnellhardt S, Haehl E, Spohn SKB, Kuhnt T, Zöller D, Guckenberger M, Budach V, Belka C, Bakst R, Mayer A, Schmidberger H, Grosu AL, Balermpas P, Stromberger C, Nicolay NH. A Multicenter Evaluation of Different Chemotherapy Regimens in Older Adults With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Definitive Chemoradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:1282-1293. [PMID: 37914144 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The number of older adults with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is increasing, and treatment of these patients is challenging. Although cisplatin-based chemotherapy concomitantly with radiation therapy is considered the standard regimen for patients with locoregionally advanced HNSCC, there is substantial real-world heterogeneity regarding concomitant chemotherapy in older patients with HNSCC. METHODS AND MATERIALS The SENIOR study is an international multicenter cohort study including older patients (≥65 years) with HNSCC treated with definitive radiation therapy at 13 academic centers in the United States and Europe. Patients with concomitant chemoradiation were analyzed regarding overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) via Kaplan-Meier analyses. Fine-Gray competing risk regressions were performed regarding the incidence of locoregional failures and distant metastases. RESULTS Six hundred ninety-seven patients with a median age of 71 years were included in this analysis. Single-agent cisplatin was the most common chemotherapy regimen (n = 310; 44%), followed by cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (n = 137; 20%), carboplatin (n = 73; 10%), and mitomycin C plus 5-fluorouracil (n = 64; 9%). Carboplatin-based regimens were associated with diminished PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39 [1.03-1.89]; P < .05) and a higher incidence of locoregional failures (subdistribution HR, 1.54 [1.00-2.38]; P = .05) compared with single-agent cisplatin, whereas OS (HR, 1.15 [0.80-1.65]; P = .46) was comparable. There were no oncological differences between single-agent and multiagent cisplatin regimens (all P > .05). The median cumulative dose of cisplatin was 180 mg/m2 (IQR, 120-200 mg/m2). Cumulative cisplatin doses ≥200 mg/m2 were associated with increased OS (HR, 0.71 [0.53-0.95]; P = .02), increased PFS (HR, 0.66 [0.51-0.87]; P = .003), and lower incidence of locoregional failures (subdistribution HR, 0.50 [0.31-0.80]; P = .004). Higher cumulative cisplatin doses remained an independent prognostic variable in the multivariate regression analysis for OS (HR, 0.996 [0.993-0.999]; P = .009). CONCLUSIONS Single-agent cisplatin can be considered in the standard chemotherapy regimen for older patients with HNSCC who can tolerate cisplatin. Cumulative cisplatin doses are prognostically relevant in older patients with HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Maria Weymann
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Max Behrens
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Marschner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marlen Haderlein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexander Fabian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Carolin Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel R Dickstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Johannes Kraft
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jens von der Grün
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Frankfurt, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Eric Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Todd Aquino-Michaels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Justus Domschikowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Amanda Bickel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alev Altay-Langguth
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Frankfurt, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Goda Kalinauskaite
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Victor Lewitzki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Marcelo Bonomi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Dukagjin M Blakaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Sachin R Jhawar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Sujith Baliga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Rahul Barve
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Konstantinos Ferentinos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University of Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University of Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Sören Schnellhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany
| | - Erik Haehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Simon K B Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Kuhnt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Daniela Zöller
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Richard Bakst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Arnulf Mayer
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Roohani S, Alberti Y, Mirwald M, Ehret F, Stromberger C, Roohani SF, Bender K, Flörcken A, Märdian S, Zips D, Kaul D. Meningeal Solitary Fibrous Tumor: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study. Sarcoma 2024; 2024:8846018. [PMID: 38274845 PMCID: PMC10807944 DOI: 10.1155/2024/8846018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Meningeal solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) are rare, malignant, mesenchymal tumors of the central nervous system. While surgical gross total resection is widely accepted as a positive prognostic factor for local control (LC), the role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) remains controversial. We sought to report our institutional experience with a particular focus on outcomes after PORT. Materials and Methods In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, 20 patients with the primary diagnosis of histopathologically confirmed meningeal SFT were analyzed. Data on patient characteristics, imaging, treatment modalities, histopathology, and oncological outcomes were collected. LC and overall survival (OS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Results The median follow-up time was 95.8 months. After surgery only, 9 out of 11 patients (81.8%) developed a local recurrence while, after surgery and PORT, 3 out of 9 patients (33.33%) showed local failure. The 5- and 10-year LC rates were 50.5% and 40.4% in the surgery-only group and 80% at both time points in the surgery with the PORT group. In the surgery-only group, 4 out of 11 patients (36.4%) died, and 4 out of 9 patients (44.4%) died in the surgery and PORT group. OS rates after 5 and 10 years were 88.9% and 66.7% in the surgery-only group and 88.9% and 76.2% in the surgery with PORT group. Conclusions Our findings suggest that PORT may improve LC in patients with meningeal SFT. The low incidence of meningeal SFT impedes prospective studies and requires further international collaborative efforts to exploit retrospective datasets and molecular analysis to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siyer Roohani
- Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Junior Clinician Scientist Program, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin 10117, Germany
- Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Berlin, Germany
| | - Yasemin Alberti
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Maximilian Mirwald
- Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany
| | - Felix Ehret
- Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany
- Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Berlin, Germany
| | - Soleiman Fabris Roohani
- Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany
| | - Katja Bender
- Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany
| | - Anne Flörcken
- Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Berlin, Germany
- Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany
| | - Sven Märdian
- Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany
- Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Berlin, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany
- Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Taylor KJ, Amdal CD, Bjordal K, Astrup GL, Herlofson BB, Duprez F, Gama RR, Jacinto A, Hammerlid E, Scricciolo M, Jansen F, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Fanetti G, Guntinas-Lichius O, Inhestern J, Dragan T, Fabian A, Boehm A, Wöhner U, Kiyota N, Krüger M, Bonomo P, Pinto M, Nuyts S, Silva JC, Stromberger C, Tramacere F, Bushnak A, Perotti P, Plath M, Paderno A, Stempler N, Kouri M, Singer S. Serious Long-Term Effects of Head and Neck Cancer from the Survivors' Point of View. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11060906. [PMID: 36981562 PMCID: PMC10048748 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11060906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The long-term problems of head and neck cancer survivors (HNCS) are not well known. In a cross-sectional international study aimed at exploring the long-term quality of life in this population, 1114 HNCS were asked to state their two most serious long-term effects. A clinician recorded the responses during face-to-face appointments. A list of 15 example problems was provided, but a free text field was also available. A total of 1033 survivors responded to the question. The most frequent problems were 'dry mouth' (DM) (n = 476; 46%), 'difficulty swallowing/eating' (DSE) (n = 408; 40%), 'hoarseness/difficulty speaking' (HDS) (n = 169; 16%), and 'pain in the head and neck' (PHN) (n = 142; 14%). A total of 5% reported no problems. Logistic regression adjusted for age, gender, treatment, and tumor stage and site showed increased odds of reporting DM and DSE for chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) alone compared to surgery alone (odds ratio (OR): 4.7, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.5-9.0; OR: 2.1, CI: 1.1-3.9), but decreased odds for HDS and PHN (OR: 0.3, CI: 0.1-0.6; OR: 0.2, CI: 0.1-0.5). Survivors with UICC stage IV at diagnosis compared to stage I had increased odds of reporting HDS (OR: 1.9, CI: 1.2-3.0). Laryngeal cancer survivors had reduced odds compared to oropharynx cancer survivors of reporting DM (OR: 0.4, CI: 0.3-0.6) but increased odds of HDS (OR: 7.2, CI: 4.3-12.3). This study provides evidence of the serious long-term problems among HNCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine J Taylor
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University Medical Centre Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Cecilie D Amdal
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, 0372 Oslo, Norway
- Research Support Service, Oslo University Hospital 0372 Oslo, Norway
| | - Kristin Bjordal
- Research Support Service, Oslo University Hospital 0372 Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0372 Oslo, Norway
| | - Guro L Astrup
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, 0372 Oslo, Norway
| | - Bente B Herlofson
- Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, 0455 Oslo, Norway
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Oslo University Hospital, 0372 Oslo, Norway
| | - Fréderic Duprez
- Department of Radiotherapy-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences-Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ricardo R Gama
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos 14784-400, SP, Brazil
| | - Alexandre Jacinto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos 14784-400, SP, Brazil
| | - Eva Hammerlid
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Melissa Scricciolo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale dell'Angelo, 30174 Venice, Italy
| | - Femke Jansen
- Department Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw
- Department Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7-9, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Giuseppe Fanetti
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy
| | | | - Johanna Inhestern
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Oberhavelkliniken Hennigsdorf, 16761 Hennigsdorf, Germany
| | - Tatiana Dragan
- Head and Neck Unit, Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alexander Fabian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 24105 Kiel, Germany
| | - Andreas Boehm
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, St. Georg Hospital, 04129 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Ulrike Wöhner
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, St. Georg Hospital, 04129 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Naomi Kiyota
- Cancer Center, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe 650-0017, Japan
| | - Maximilian Krüger
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Plastic Surgery, University Medical Centre Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Pierluigi Bonomo
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Monica Pinto
- Rehabilitation Medicine Unit, Strategic Health Services Department, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Sandra Nuyts
- Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joaquim C Silva
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil do Porto, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, 10178 Berlin, Germany
| | - Francesco Tramacere
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Locale, 72100 Brindisi, Italy
| | - Ayman Bushnak
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Gießen und Marburg, 35392 Giessen, Germany
| | - Pietro Perotti
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, "S. Chiara" Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), 38122 Trento, Italy
| | - Michaela Plath
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alberto Paderno
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Noa Stempler
- Oral Medicine Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan 5262000, Israel
| | - Maria Kouri
- Dental Oncology Unit, Department of Oral Medicine and Pathology and Hospital Dentistry, Dental School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Susanne Singer
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University Medical Centre Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Graessle R, Stromberger C, Beck M, Heiland M, Hofmann VM, Olze H, Dommerich S, Gauger U, Piwonski I, Coordes A. Subgroup Analysis of Overall Survival among Smoking and Non-Smoking Elderly Patients with HNSCC. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15061842. [PMID: 36980728 PMCID: PMC10046679 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Smoking is a leading cause of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, non-smokers are also affected by HNSCC, and the prognostic factors applicable to older non-smokers with HNSCC are largely unknown. The aim of this study was to determine predictors of overall survival (OS) in patients both with and without a smoking history aged 70 and over at initial diagnosis. Retrospective data of patients aged ≥70 (initial diagnoses 2004–2018) were examined. Evaluated predictors included tumour stage, biological age, health and therapy. A total of 688 patients (520 smokers, 168 non-smokers) were included with a median age of 74. The 5-year OS was 39.6%. Non-smokers had significantly improved OS compared to smokers (52.0% versus 36.0%, p < 0.001). Disease-free survival (DFS) differed significantly between both groups (hazard ratio = 1.3; 95%CI 1.04–1.626). TNM stage and the recommended therapies (curative versus palliative) were comparable. The proportion of p16-positive oropharyngeal carcinomas was significantly higher in non-smokers (76.7% versus 43.8%, p < 0.001). Smokers were significantly more likely to be men (p < 0.001), drinkers (p < 0.001), and have poorer health status (Karnofsky performance status, KPS, p = 0.023). They were also more likely to have additional tumours (p = 0.012) and lower treatment adherence (p = 0.038). Important predictors of OS identified in both groups, were, among others, alcohol abuse, KPS, Charlson comorbidity index, site of primary tumour, UICC stage and treatment received. Elderly non-smokers are also affected by HNSCC, however, both OS and DFS are increased compared to smokers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphaela Graessle
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiooncology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcus Beck
- Department of Radiooncology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Max Heiland
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Veit M. Hofmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Heidi Olze
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Steffen Dommerich
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Ulrich Gauger
- Private Statistical Consultant, 10437 Berlin, Germany
| | - Iris Piwonski
- Department of Pathology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Annekatrin Coordes
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Centre Ruppin Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School, 16816 Neuruppin, Germany
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Joint Faculty of the University of Potsdam, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg and Brandenburg Medical School, 14476 Potsdam, Germany
- Correspondence: or ; Tel.: +49-30-450-555-002
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rühle A, Marschner S, Haderlein M, Fabian A, Weymann M, Behrens M, Senger C, Dickstein DR, Kraft J, von der Grün J, Chen E, Aquino-Michaels T, Domschikowski J, Bickel A, Altay-Langguth A, Kalinauskaite G, Lewitzki V, Ferentinos K, Zamboglou C, Schnellhardt S, Haehl E, Spohn SK, Gkika E, Zöller D, Guckenberger M, Budach V, Belka C, Bakst R, Mayer A, Schmidberger H, Grosu AL, Balermpas P, Stromberger C, Nicolay NH. Evaluation of Concomitant Systemic Treatment in Older Adults With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Definitive Radiotherapy. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e230090. [PMID: 36808242 PMCID: PMC9941890 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The number of older adults with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is increasing, and these patients are underrepresented in clinical trials. It is unclear whether the addition of chemotherapy or cetuximab to radiotherapy is associated with improved survival in older adults with HNSCC. OBJECTIVE To examine whether the addition of chemotherapy or cetuximab to definitive radiotherapy is associated with improved survival in patients with locoregionally advanced (LA) HNSCC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The Special Care Patterns for Elderly HNSCC Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy (SENIOR) study is an international, multicenter cohort study including older adults (≥65 years) with LA-HNSCCs of the oral cavity, oropharynx/hypopharynx, or larynx treated with definitive radiotherapy, either alone or with concomitant systemic treatment, between January 2005 and December 2019 at 12 academic centers in the US and Europe. Data analysis was conducted from June 4 to August 10, 2022. INTERVENTIONS All patients underwent definitive radiotherapy alone or with concomitant systemic treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival and locoregional failure rate. RESULTS Among the 1044 patients (734 men [70.3%]; median [IQR] age, 73 [69-78] years) included in this study, 234 patients (22.4%) were treated with radiotherapy alone and 810 patients (77.6%) received concomitant systemic treatment with chemotherapy (677 [64.8%]) or cetuximab (133 [12.7%]). Using inverse probability weighting to attribute for selection bias, chemoradiation was associated with longer overall survival than radiotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.48-0.77; P < .001), whereas cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy was not (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.70-1.27; P = .70). Progression-free survival was also longer after the addition of chemotherapy (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.52-0.81; P < .001), while the locoregional failure rate was not significantly different (subhazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.30-1.26; P = .19). The survival benefit of the chemoradiation group was present in patients up to age 80 years (65-69 years: HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33-0.82; 70-79 years: HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.85), but was absent in patients aged 80 years or older (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.56-1.41). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study of older adults with LA- HNSCC, chemoradiation, but not cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy, was associated with longer survival compared with radiotherapy alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg–Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Marschner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- DKTK Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marlen Haderlein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexander Fabian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Maria Weymann
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Max Behrens
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Carolin Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Germany, Berlin, Germany
- DKTK Partner Site Berlin, DKFZ, Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel R. Dickstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Johannes Kraft
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jens von der Grün
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- DKTK Partner Site Frankfurt, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Eric Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Todd Aquino-Michaels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Justus Domschikowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Amanda Bickel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alev Altay-Langguth
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- DKTK Partner Site Frankfurt, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Goda Kalinauskaite
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Germany, Berlin, Germany
- DKTK Partner Site Berlin, DKFZ, Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Victor Lewitzki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Konstantinos Ferentinos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University of Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg–Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University of Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Sören Schnellhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Erik Haehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- DKTK Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Simon K.B. Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg–Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg–Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniela Zöller
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Germany, Berlin, Germany
- DKTK Partner Site Berlin, DKFZ, Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- DKTK Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Richard Bakst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Arnulf Mayer
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- DKTK Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- DKTK Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg–Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Germany, Berlin, Germany
- DKTK Partner Site Berlin, DKFZ, Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils H. Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg–Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wiegand S, Wichmann G, Vogt J, Vogel K, Franke A, Kuhnt T, Lordick F, Scheuble AM, Hambsch P, Brossart P, Bauernfeind FG, Kaftan H, Maschmeyer G, Paland M, Münter M, Lewitzki V, Rotter N, Stromberger C, Beck M, Dommerich S, Gauler TC, Hapke G, Guntinas-Lichius O, Schröder U, Görner M, Hautmann MG, Steger F, Tamaskovics B, Schmiedeknecht A, Dietz A. Postoperative adjuvant radiochemotherapy with cisplatin versus adjuvant radiochemotherapy with cisplatin and pembrolizumab in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma- the study protocol of the Adrisk trial. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1128176. [PMID: 37025596 PMCID: PMC10071022 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1128176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Most of the patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are diagnosed with locally advanced disease. Standards of care for curative-intent treatment of this patient group are either surgery and adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy (aRCT) or definitive chemoradiation. Despite these treatments, especially pathologically intermediate and high-risk HNSCC often recur. The ADRISK trial investigates in locally advanced HNSCC and intermediate and high risk after up-front surgery if the addition of pembrolizumab to aRCT with cisplatin improves event-free sur-vival compared to aRCT alone. ADRISK is a prospective, randomized controlled investiga-tor-initiated (IIT)-phase II multicenter trial within the German Interdisciplinary Study Group of German Cancer Society (IAG-KHT). Patients with primary resectable stage III and IV HNSCC of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx and larynx with pathologic high (R1, extracapsular nodal extension) or intermediate risk (R0 <5 mm; N≥2) after surgery will be eligible. Two hun-dred forty patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to either standard aRCT with cisplatin (standard arm) or aRCT with cisplatin + pembrolizumab (200 mg iv, in 3-week cycle, max. 12 months) (interventional arm). Endpoints are event-free and overall survival. Recruitment started in August 2018 and is ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Wiegand
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
- *Correspondence: Susanne Wiegand,
| | - Gunnar Wichmann
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jeannette Vogt
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Kathrin Vogel
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Annegret Franke
- Clinical Trial Centre Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Thomas Kuhnt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Florian Lordick
- University Cancer Center Leipzig, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Anne-Marie Scheuble
- University Cancer Center Leipzig, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Peter Hambsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Peter Brossart
- Department of Oncology, Hematology, Immuno-Oncology, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Franz Georg Bauernfeind
- Department of Oncology, Hematology, Immuno-Oncology, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Holger Kaftan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Helios-Klinikum Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
| | - Georg Maschmeyer
- Department of Haematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, Ernst Von Bergmann Clinic, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Matthias Paland
- Department of Haematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, Ernst Von Bergmann Clinic, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Marc Münter
- Institute of Radiotherapy, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Victor Lewitzki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Nicole Rotter
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité, Berlin, Germany
- Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcus Beck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Christoph Gauler
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Gunnar Hapke
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Marienkrankenhaus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Ursula Schröder
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Martin Görner
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Klinikum Bielefeld Mitte, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Matthias G. Hautmann
- Department for Radiotherapy, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Felix Steger
- Department for Radiotherapy, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Bálint Tamaskovics
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Dietz
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Loebel F, Pontoriero A, Kluge A, Iatì G, Acker G, Kufeld M, Cacciola A, Pergolizzi S, Vinci S, Lillo S, Xu R, Stromberger C, Budach V, Vajkoczy P, Senger C, Conti A. Image-guided robotic radiosurgery for the treatment of arteriovenous malformations. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0266744. [PMID: 36137082 PMCID: PMC9499208 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are challenging lesions, often requiring multimodal interventions; however, data on the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery for cerebral AVMs are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results following robotic radiosurgery, alone or in combination with endovascular treatment, and to investigate factors associated with obliteration and complications in patients with AVM. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and imaging characteristics of 123 patients with AVMs of all Spetzler-Martin grades treated at two institutions by robotic radiosurgery in single-fraction doses (CyberKnife). Embolization was performed before radiosurgery in a subset of patients to attempt to downgrade the lesions. Factors associated with AVM obliteration and complications (toxicity) were identified via univariate and multivariate analyses. Results The median follow-up time was 48.1 months (range, 3.6–123 months). Five patients were lost to follow-up. The obliteration rate in the 59 patients with a follow-up period exceeding four years was 72.8%. Complete obliteration and partial remission were achieved in 67 (56.8%) and 31 (26.3%) cases, respectively, whereas no change was observed in 20 cases (17.8%). Embolization was performed in 54/123 cases (43.9%). Complete and partial obliteration were achieved in 29 (55.7%) and 14 (26.9%) embolized patients, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the factors associated with obliteration were age (p = .018) and the Spetzler-Martin grade (p = .041). Treatment-induced toxicity (radiation necrosis and/or edema) was observed in 15 cases (12.7%), rebleeding occurred in three cases (2.5%), and the rate of mortality associated with rebleeding was 1.7%. Conclusions CyberKnife radiosurgery is a valid approach for treating AVMs of all Spetzler-Martin-grades, with satisfactory obliteration rates, low toxicity, and a relatively rare incidence of rebleeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Loebel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | | | - Anne Kluge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Iatì
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Gueliz Acker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Kufeld
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alberto Cacciola
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | | | - Sergio Vinci
- Department of Neuroradiology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Sara Lillo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Ran Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carolin Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alfredo Conti
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- IRCCS ISNB-Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Stahler A, Heinrich K, Stintzing S, Jelas I, Pratschke J, Schöning W, Angele M, D'Haese J, Gebauer B, Seidensticker M, Streitparth F, Kunz W, Corradini S, Stromberger C, Vehling-Kaiser U, Zhang D, Kurreck A, Alig A, Modest D, Heinemann V. 443TiP Impact of a centralized tumour board on secondary intervention rate in patients with RAS mutant metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line treatment with FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (FIRE-7, AIO-KRK-0120). Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.1864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
10
|
Zschaeck S, Weingärtner J, Lombardo E, Marschner S, Hajiyianni M, Beck M, Zips D, Li Y, Lin Q, Amthauer H, Troost EGC, van den Hoff J, Budach V, Kotzerke J, Ferentinos K, Karagiannis E, Kaul D, Gregoire V, Holzgreve A, Albert NL, Nikulin P, Bachmann M, Kopka K, Krause M, Baumann M, Kazmierska J, Cegla P, Cholewinski W, Strouthos I, Zöphel K, Majchrzak E, Landry G, Belka C, Stromberger C, Hofheinz F. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography of Head and Neck Cancer: Location and HPV Specific Parameters for Potential Treatment Individualization. Front Oncol 2022; 12:870319. [PMID: 35756665 PMCID: PMC9213669 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.870319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is utilized for staging and treatment planning of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). Some older publications on the prognostic relevance showed inconclusive results, most probably due to small study sizes. This study evaluates the prognostic and potentially predictive value of FDG-PET in a large multi-center analysis. Methods Original analysis of individual FDG-PET and patient data from 16 international centers (8 institutional datasets, 8 public repositories) with 1104 patients. All patients received curative intent radiotherapy/chemoradiation (CRT) and pre-treatment FDG-PET imaging. Primary tumors were semi-automatically delineated for calculation of SUVmax, SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). Cox regression analyses were performed for event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), loco-regional control (LRC) and freedom from distant metastases (FFDM). Results FDG-PET parameters were associated with patient outcome in the whole cohort regarding clinical endpoints (EFS, OS, LRC, FFDM), in uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Several previously published cut-off values were successfully validated. Subgroup analyses identified tumor- and human papillomavirus (HPV) specific parameters. In HPV positive oropharynx cancer (OPC) SUVmax was well suited to identify patients with excellent LRC for organ preservation. Patients with SUVmax of 14 or less were unlikely to develop loco-regional recurrence after definitive CRT. In contrast FDG PET parameters deliver only limited prognostic information in laryngeal cancer. Conclusion FDG-PET parameters bear considerable prognostic value in HNSCC and potential predictive value in subgroups of patients, especially regarding treatment de-intensification and organ-preservation. The potential predictive value needs further validation in appropriate control groups. Further research on advanced imaging approaches including radiomics or artificial intelligence methods should implement the identified cut-off values as benchmark routine imaging parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Julian Weingärtner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Elia Lombardo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Marschner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marina Hajiyianni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcus Beck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Yimin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Qin Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg van den Hoff
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Konstantinos Ferentinos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Efstratios Karagiannis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vincent Gregoire
- Radiation Oncology Department, Leon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Germany
| | - Pavel Nikulin
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Bachmann
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Klaus Kopka
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joanna Kazmierska
- Electroradiology Department, University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.,Radiotherapy Department II, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Paulina Cegla
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Witold Cholewinski
- Electroradiology Department, University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Iosif Strouthos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Ewa Majchrzak
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Hofheinz
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Glas HH, Kraeima J, Tribius S, Leusink FKJ, Rendenbach C, Heiland M, Stromberger C, Rashad A, Fuller CD, Mohamed ASR, Lai SY, Witjes MJH. Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Isodose Radiation Volumes in Cases of Severe Mandibular Osteoradionecrosis for the Prediction of Recurrence after Segmental Resection. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12050834. [PMID: 35629256 PMCID: PMC9143211 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12050834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Pre-operative margin planning for the segmental resection of affected bone in mandibular osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is difficult. The aim of this study was to identify a possible relation between the received RT dose, exposed bone volume and the progression of ORN after segmental mandibular resection. Method: Patients diagnosed with grade 3-4 ORN for which a segmental resection was performed were included in the study. Three-dimensional reconstructions of RT isodose volumes were fused with postoperative imaging. The primary outcome was the recurrence of ORN after segmental resection. Subsequently, RT exposed mandibular bone volumes were calculated and the location of the bone cuts relative to the isodose volumes were assessed. Results: Five out of thirty-three patients developed recurrent ORN after segmental mandibular resection. All cases with recurrent ORN were resected inside an isodose volume of ≥56 Gy. The absolute mandibular volume radiated with 56 Gy was significantly smaller in the recurrent group (10.9 mL vs. 30.7 mL, p = 0.006), as was the proportion of the mandible radiated with 56 Gy (23% vs. 45%, p = 0.013). Conclusion: The volume of radiated bone was not predictive for risk of progression. The finding that recurrent ORN occurred with bone resection margins within the 56 Gy isodose volume suggests that this could serve as a starting point for the pre-operative planning of reducing the risk of ORN recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haye H. Glas
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713GZ Groningen, The Netherlands; (J.K.); (M.J.H.W.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-(0)50-361-25-61
| | - Joep Kraeima
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713GZ Groningen, The Netherlands; (J.K.); (M.J.H.W.)
| | - Silke Tribius
- Hermann-Holthusen-Institute for Radiation Oncology, Asklepios Hospital St. Georg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany;
| | - Frank K. J. Leusink
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, 1100DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Carsten Rendenbach
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité–Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 12203 Berlin, Germany; (C.R.); (M.H.)
| | - Max Heiland
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité–Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 12203 Berlin, Germany; (C.R.); (M.H.)
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, Charité–Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 12203 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Ashkan Rashad
- Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, 52074 Aachen, Germany;
| | - Clifton D. Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (C.D.F.); (A.S.R.M.); (S.Y.L.)
| | - Abdallah S. R. Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (C.D.F.); (A.S.R.M.); (S.Y.L.)
| | - Stephen Y. Lai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (C.D.F.); (A.S.R.M.); (S.Y.L.)
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Max J. H. Witjes
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713GZ Groningen, The Netherlands; (J.K.); (M.J.H.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Doll C, Steffen C, Beck-Broichsitter B, Richter M, Neumann K, Pohrt A, Lohneis P, Lehmann A, Heiland M, Stromberger C, Coordes A, Johrens K, Raguse JD. The Prognostic Significance of p16 and its Role as a Surrogate Marker for Human Papilloma Virus in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Analysis of 281 Cases. Anticancer Res 2022; 42:2405-2413. [PMID: 35489745 DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Revised: 03/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM This study analyzed the expression of p16 in a large cohort of patients suffering from oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) who received initial surgical therapy in order to evaluate the prognostic significance of p16 expression and to analyze its value as a surrogate marker to determine human papilloma virus (HPV) status. MATERIALS AND METHODS Immunohistochemical staining of p16 was performed on tissue microarrays. Different expression levels of p16 (>25%; >50%; ≥70%) with a moderate to strong intensity were correlated with the clinical outcome. HPV DNA was analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RESULTS A total of 281 patients were included in this study. The p16 expression obtained using the abovementioned three different cutoffs did not significantly influence 5-year overall survival (OS) (p=0.23; p=0.45; p=0.23) nor recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p=0.79; p=0.45; p=0.142). In univariate Cox regression analysis, the p16 expression level was not a risk factor for OS (HR=0.637; 95%CI=0.271-1.5; p=0.300) and RFS (HR=0.74; 95%CI=0.339-1.61; p=0.449). A total of 17 patients (6.0%) were p16 positive with a cutoff ≥70%. HPV DNA was found in 4/11 of these cases by PCR, resulting in a positive predictive value of 0.36. In patients receiving adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy, a significantly (p=0.042) longer OS was observed in patients with p16 expression greater than 25% vs. ≤25%. CONCLUSION In comparison with OPSCC, (strong) p16 positivity is rare in OSCC; however, in patients receiving primary surgery with adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy, p16 expression is associated with a higher survival rate. In conjunction with prior studies, p16 does not seem to be a reliable surrogate marker for HPV infection in OSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Doll
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin, Germany;
| | - Claudius Steffen
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Benedicta Beck-Broichsitter
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin, Germany.,Katharinenhospital Stuttgart, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Maximilian Richter
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Konrad Neumann
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anne Pohrt
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Philipp Lohneis
- Institute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Annika Lehmann
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Max Heiland
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annekatrin Coordes
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Korinna Johrens
- Institute of Pathology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jan-Dirk Raguse
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Fachklinik Hornheide, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Beckmann MW, Stübs FA, Koch MC, Mallmann P, Dannecker C, Dietl A, Sevnina A, Mergel F, Lotz L, Hack CC, Ehret A, Gantert D, Martignoni F, Cieslik JP, Menke J, Ortmann O, Stromberger C, Oechsle K, Hornemann B, Mumm F, Grimm C, Sturdza A, Wight E, Loessl K, Golatta M, Hagen V, Dauelsberg T, Diel I, Münstedt K, Merz E, Vordermark D, Lindel K, Wittekind C, Küppers V, Lellé R, Neis K, Griesser H, Pöschel B, Steiner M, Freitag U, Gilster T, Schmittel A, Friedrich M, Haase H, Gebhardt M, Kiesel L, Reinhardt M, Kreißl M, Kloke M, Horn LC, Wiedemann R, Marnitz S, Letsch A, Zraik I, Mangold B, Möckel J, Alt C, Wimberger P, Hillemanns P, Paradies K, Mustea A, Denschlag D, Henscher U, Tholen R, Wesselmann S, Fehm T. Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Cervical Cancer. Guideline of the DGGG, DKG and DKH (S3-Level, AWMF Registry No. 032/033OL, May 2021) – Part 1 with Recommendations
on Epidemiology, Screening, Diagnostics and Therapy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2022; 82:139-180. [DOI: 10.1055/a-1671-2158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Aim This update of the interdisciplinary S3 guideline on the Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Cervical Cancer (AWMF Registry No. 032/033OL) was published in March 2021. This
updated guideline was funded by German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe) as part of the German Guideline Program in Oncology. The guideline was coordinated by the German Society of
Gynecology and Obstetrics (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, DGGG) and the Working Group on Gynecological Oncology (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische
Onkologie, AGO) of the German Cancer Society (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, DKG).
Method The process of updating the S3 guideline dating from 2014 was based on an appraisal of the available evidence using the criteria of evidence-based medicine, adaptations of
existing evidence-based national and international guidelines or – if evidence was lacking – on a consensus of the specialists involved in compiling the update. After an initial review of
the current literature was carried out according to a prescribed algorithm, several areas were identified which, in contrast to the predecessor version from September 2014, required new
recommendations or statements which took account of more recently published literature and the appraisal of the new evidence.
Recommendations The short version of this guideline consists of recommendations and statements on the epidemiology, screening, diagnostic workup and therapy of patients with cervical
cancer. The most important new aspects included in this updated guideline include the newly published FIGO classification of 2018, the radical open surgery approach for cervical cancers up
to FIGO stage IB1, and use of the sentinel lymph node technique for tumors ≤ 2 cm. Other changes include the use of PET-CT, new options in radiotherapy (e.g., intensity-modulated
radiotherapy, image-guided adaptive brachytherapy), and drug therapies to treat recurrence or metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias W. Beckmann
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Frederik A. Stübs
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Martin C. Koch
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | - Anna Dietl
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anna Sevnina
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Franziska Mergel
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Laura Lotz
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carolin C. Hack
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anne Ehret
- Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Frauenklinik, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Daniel Gantert
- Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Frauenklinik, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | | | - Jan Menke
- SHG-Kliniken Völklingen, Klinik für Radiologie, Völklingen, Germany
| | - Olaf Ortmann
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Tumorzentren, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Karin Oechsle
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Beate Hornemann
- Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Psychoonkologischer Dienst, Dresden, Germany
| | - Friederike Mumm
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III und Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC München LMU), Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, München, Germany
| | - Christoph Grimm
- Abteilung für allgemeine Gynäkologie und gynäkologische Onkologie, Gynecologic Cancer Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Austria
| | - Alina Sturdza
- Universitätsklinikum AKH-Wien, Klinik für Radioonkologie, Wien, Austria
| | - Edward Wight
- Universitätsspital Basel, Frauenklinik, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Kristina Loessl
- Universitätsklinik Bern, Klinik für Radio-Onkologie, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael Golatta
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Frauenklinik, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volker Hagen
- St. Johannes Hospital Dortmund, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Timm Dauelsberg
- Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Klinik für Onkologische Rehabilitation, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ingo Diel
- Praxisklinik am Rosengarten, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - Eberhard Merz
- Zentrum für Ultraschalldiagnostik und Pränatalmedizin Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Dirk Vordermark
- Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Katja Lindel
- Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | | | | | - Ralph Lellé
- Universitätsklinikum Münster, Frauenklinik, Münster, Germany
| | - Klaus Neis
- Frauenärzte am Staden, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ludwig Kiesel
- Universitätsklinikum Münster, Frauenklinik, Münster, Germany
| | - Michael Reinhardt
- Pius Hospital Oldenburg, Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Michael Kreißl
- Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Marianne Kloke
- Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Klinik für Palliativmedizin, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Regina Wiedemann
- Fliedner Fachhochschule Düsseldorf, Pflegewissenschaft, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz
- Universitätsklinikum Köln, Klinik für Radioonkologie, Cyberknife- und Strahlentherapie, Köln, Germany
| | - Anne Letsch
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Kiel, Germany
| | - Isabella Zraik
- Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Klinik für Urologie, Essen, Germany
| | | | | | - Céline Alt
- Wolfgarten Radiologie Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany
| | - Peter Hillemanns
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Frauenklinik, Hannover, Germany
| | - Kerstin Paradies
- Konferenz onkologischer Kranken- und Kinderkrankenpflege (KOK), Germany
| | | | | | - Ulla Henscher
- Deutscher Verband für Physiotherapie (ZVK) e. V., Germany
| | - Reina Tholen
- Deutscher Verband für Physiotherapie (ZVK) e. V., Germany
| | | | - Tanja Fehm
- Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Frauenklinik, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fehm T, Stübs FA, Koch MC, Mallmann P, Dannecker C, Dietl A, Sevnina A, Mergel F, Lotz L, Ehret A, Gantert D, Martignoni F, Cieslik JP, Menke J, Ortmann O, Stromberger C, Oechsle K, Hornemann B, Mumm F, Grimm C, Sturdza A, Wight E, Loessl K, Golatta M, Hagen V, Dauelsberg T, Diel I, Münstedt K, Merz E, Vordermark D, Lindel K, Wittekind C, Küppers V, Lellé R, Neis K, Griesser H, Pöschel B, Steiner M, Freitag U, Gilster T, Schmittel A, Friedrich M, Haase H, Gebhardt M, Kiesel L, Reinhardt M, Kreißl M, Kloke M, Horn LC, Wiedemann R, Marnitz S, Letsch A, Zraik I, Mangold B, Möckel J, Alt C, Wimberger P, Hillemanns P, Paradies K, Mustea A, Denschlag D, Henscher U, Tholen R, Wesselmann S, Beckmann MW. Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Cervical Cancer. Guideline of the DGGG, DKG and DKH (S3-Level, AWMF Registry No. 032/033OL, May 2021) – Part 2 with Recommendations
on Psycho-oncology, Rehabilitation, Follow-up, Recurrence, Palliative Therapy and Healthcare Facilities. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2022; 82:181-205. [DOI: 10.1055/a-1671-2446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Aim This is an update of the interdisciplinary S3-guideline on the Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Cervical Cancer (AWMF Registry No. 032/033OL), published in March 2021. The
work on the updated guideline was funded by German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe) as part of the German Guideline Program in Oncology. The guideline was coordinated by the German
Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, DGGG) and the Working Group on Gynecological Oncology (Arbeitsgemeinschaft
Gynäkologische Onkologie, AGO) of the German Cancer Society (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, DKG).
Method The process used to update the 2014 S3-guideline was based on an appraisal of the available evidence using the criteria of evidence-based medicine, adaptations of existing
evidence-based national and international guidelines or – if evidence was lacking – on the consensus of the specialists involved in compiling the update. After an initial review of the
current literature was carried out according to a prescribed algorithm, several areas were identified which, in contrast to the predecessor version from September 2014, required new
recommendations or statements which would take account of more recently published literature and the recent appraisal of new evidence.
Recommendations The short version of this guideline consists of recommendations and statements on palliative therapy and follow-up of patients with cervical cancer. The most
important aspects included in this updated guideline are the new FIGO classification published in 2018, the radical open surgery approach used to treat cervical cancer up to FIGO stage IB1,
and the use of the sentinel lymph node technique for tumors ≤ 2 cm. Other changes include the use of PET-CT, new options in radiotherapy (e.g., intensity-modulated radiotherapy, image-guided
adaptive brachytherapy), and drug therapies to treat recurrence or metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja Fehm
- Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Frederik A. Stübs
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Martin C. Koch
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | - Anna Dietl
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anna Sevnina
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Franziska Mergel
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Laura Lotz
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anne Ehret
- Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Jan Menke
- SHG-Kliniken Völklingen, Klinik für Radiologie, Völklingen, Germany
| | - Olaf Ortmann
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Tumorzentren, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Karin Oechsle
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Beate Hornemann
- Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Psychoonkologischer Dienst, Dresden, Germany
| | - Friederike Mumm
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III und Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC München LMU), Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, München, Germany
| | - Christoph Grimm
- Abteilung für allgemeine Gynäkologie und gynäkologische Onkologie, Gynecologic Cancer Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Austria
| | - Alina Sturdza
- Universitätsklinikum AKH-Wien, Klinik für Radioonkologie, Wien, Austria
| | - Edward Wight
- Universitätsspital Basel, Frauenklinik, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Kristina Loessl
- Universitätsklinik Bern, Klinik für Radio-Onkologie, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael Golatta
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Frauenklinik, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volker Hagen
- St. Johannes Hospital Dortmund, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Timm Dauelsberg
- Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Klinik für Onkologische Rehabilitation, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ingo Diel
- Praxisklinik am Rosengarten, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - Eberhard Merz
- Zentrum für Ultraschalldiagnostik und Pränatalmedizin Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Dirk Vordermark
- Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Katja Lindel
- Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | | | | | - Ralph Lellé
- Universitätsklinikum Münster, Frauenklinik, Münster, Germany
| | - Klaus Neis
- Frauenärzte am Staden, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ludwig Kiesel
- Universitätsklinikum Münster, Frauenklinik, Münster, Germany
| | - Michael Reinhardt
- Pius Hospital Oldenburg, Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Michael Kreißl
- Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Marianne Kloke
- Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Klinik für Palliativmedizin, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Regina Wiedemann
- Fliedner Fachhochschule Düsseldorf, Pflegewissenschaft, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz
- Universitätsklinikum Köln, Klinik für Radioonkologie, Cyberknife- und Strahlentherapie, Köln, Germany
| | - Anne Letsch
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Kiel, Germany
| | - Isabella Zraik
- Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Klinik für Urologie, Essen, Germany
| | | | | | - Céline Alt
- Wolfgarten Radiologie Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany
| | - Peter Hillemanns
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Frauenklinik, Hannover, Germany
| | - Kerstin Paradies
- Konferenz onkologischer Kranken- und Kinderkrankenpflege (KOK), Germany
| | | | | | - Ulla Henscher
- Hochtaunus Kliniken, Frauenklinik, Bad Homburg, Germany
| | - Reina Tholen
- Deutscher Verband für Physiotherapie (ZVK) e. V., Germany
| | | | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Steffen C, Piwonski I, Heiland M, Stromberger C, Kofla G, Doll C, Coordes A, Beck-Broichsitter B. Influence of Tumor Site on Survival in Young Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:969-980. [PMID: 35200581 PMCID: PMC8870694 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29020082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The number of patients under the age of 45 diagnosed with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) is increasing, probably due to the incidence of oropharyngeal cancers. Comparisons of HNSCC in young and old patients regarding tumor site and survival in sample sizes of relevance are rarely published. The aim of the study was to analyze the differences in survival between age groups dependent on tumor site and the influence of oropharyngeal cancers on the rising rates of HNSCC in the young. The records of 4466 patients diagnosed with HNSCC were reviewed retrospectively. Patients younger than 45 years were divided further into four subgroups for specific age differences in the young. The influences of patient and clinicopathological characteristics on survival were assessed using Kaplan–Meier analyses. Among the patient cohort, 4.8% were younger than 45 years. Overall survival (OS) in these patients was better, with a 5-year OS of 66.1% (vs. 46.4%), while relapse-free survival (RFS) was better in the older patient population, with a 5-year RFS of 74.9% (vs. 68.1%). Decreased RFS in the young was found for advanced tumor stages and tumor sited at the larynx. Hypopharynx and advanced stages were independent risk factors for OS under 45 years. Overall, 44.4% of all HNSCC in patients under 30 years were nasopharyngeal cancers, and incidence decreased with age. The incidence of oropharyngeal cancers increased significantly with age. Better OS in the young may be explained by lower tumor and disease stages, whereas oropharyngeal tumors and HPV were not found to cause rising rates of HNSCC. Laryngeal malignancies in young patients might be related to an increased malignant potential and should, consequently, be treated as such.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudius Steffen
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.H.); (C.D.); (B.B.-B.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-30-450-655083; Fax: +49-30-450-555901
| | - Iris Piwonski
- Department of Pathology, Campus Mitte, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Max Heiland
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.H.); (C.D.); (B.B.-B.)
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiooncology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Grzegorz Kofla
- Department of Oncology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Christian Doll
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.H.); (C.D.); (B.B.-B.)
| | - Annekatrin Coordes
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Campus Virchow-Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Benedicta Beck-Broichsitter
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.H.); (C.D.); (B.B.-B.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ehrhardt V, Heuberger J, Heufelder J, Weber A, Kourkafas G, Bundesmann J, Denker A, Ghadjar P, Stromberger C, Budach V, Sigal M. FLASH IRRADIATION WITH PROTONS OF HUMAN COLON ORGANOIDS: A NEW APPROACH TO STUDY NORMAL TISSUE SPARING. Phys Med 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s1120-1797(22)01644-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
|
17
|
Rühle A, Stromberger C, Haehl E, Senger C, Falkenstein A, Stoian R, Zamboglou C, Knopf A, Budach V, Grosu A, Nicolay N. Development and External Validation of a Prognostic Classifier for Elderly Head-and-Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing (Chemo)radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.1110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
18
|
Amler AK, Schlauch D, Tüzüner S, Thomas A, Neckel N, Tinhofer I, Heiland M, Lauster R, Kloke L, Stromberger C, Nahles S. Pilot investigation on the dose-dependent impact of irradiation on primary human alveolar osteoblasts in vitro. Sci Rep 2021; 11:19833. [PMID: 34615948 PMCID: PMC8494843 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-99323-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma can lead to long-term complications like osteoradionecrosis, resulting in severe impairment of the jawbone. Current standard procedures require a 6-month wait after irradiation before dental reconstruction can begin. A comprehensive characterization of the irradiation-induced molecular and functional changes in bone cells could allow the development of novel strategies for an earlier successful dental reconstruction in patients treated by radiotherapy. The impact of ionizing radiation on the bone-forming alveolar osteoblasts remains however elusive, as previous studies have relied on animal-based models and fetal or animal-derived cell lines. This study presents the first in vitro data obtained from primary human alveolar osteoblasts. Primary human alveolar osteoblasts were isolated from healthy donors and expanded. After X-ray irradiation with 2, 6 and 10 Gy, cells were cultivated under osteogenic conditions and analyzed regarding their proliferation, mineralization, and expression of marker genes and proteins. Proliferation of osteoblasts decreased in a dose-dependent manner. While cells recovered from irradiation with 2 Gy, application of 6 and 10 Gy doses not only led to a permanent impairment of proliferation, but also resulted in altered cell morphology and a disturbed structure of the extracellular matrix as demonstrated by immunostaining of collagen I and fibronectin. Following irradiation with any of the examined doses, a decrease of marker gene expression levels was observed for most of the investigated genes, revealing interindividual differences. Primary human alveolar osteoblasts presented a considerably changed phenotype after irradiation, depending on the dose administered. Mechanisms for these findings need to be further investigated. This could facilitate improved patient care by re-evaluating current standard procedures and investigating faster and safer reconstruction concepts, thus improving quality of life and social integrity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna-Klara Amler
- Cellbricks GmbH, Berlin, Germany. .,Department of Medical Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Domenic Schlauch
- Cellbricks GmbH, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Medical Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Selin Tüzüner
- Cellbricks GmbH, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Medical Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexander Thomas
- Cellbricks GmbH, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Medical Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Norbert Neckel
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ingeborg Tinhofer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Max Heiland
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Roland Lauster
- Department of Medical Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Susanne Nahles
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kord M, Kluge A, Kufeld M, Kalinauskaite G, Loebel F, Stromberger C, Budach V, Gebauer B, Acker G, Senger C. Risks and Benefits of Fiducial Marker Placement in Tumor Lesions for Robotic Radiosurgery: Technical Outcomes of 357 Implantations. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13194838. [PMID: 34638321 PMCID: PMC8508340 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Revised: 09/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Robotic radiosurgery (RRS) allows for the accurate treatment of primary tumors or metastases with high single doses. However, organ motion during or between fractions can lead to imprecise irradiation. We sought to evaluate the risks and advantages of fiducial marker (FM) implantation regarding clinical complications, marker migration, and motion amplitude. Complications were most common in Synchrony®-tracked lesions affected by respiratory motion, particularly lung lesions. Pneumothoraces and pulmonary bleeding were the most common complications. An increased complication rate was associated with concomitant biopsy sampling and FM implantation. Most FM migration observed in this study occurred after CT-guided placements and clinical FM insertions. The largest motion amplitudes were observed in hepatic and lower lung lobe lesions. This study highlights the benefits of marker implantation, especially in lesions with a large motion amplitude, including hepatic lesions and lesions of the lower lobe of the lung located >100.0 mm from the spine. Abstract Fiducial markers (FM) inserted into tumors increase the precision of irradiation during robotic radiosurgery (RRS). This retrospective study evaluated the clinical complications, marker migration, and motion amplitude of FM implantations by analyzing 288 cancer patients (58% men; 63.1 ± 13.0 years) who underwent 357 FM implantations prior to RRS with CyberKnife, between 2011 and 2019. Complications were classified according to the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) guidelines. The radial motion amplitude was calculated for tumors that moved with respiration. A total of 725 gold FM was inserted. SIR-rated complications occurred in 17.9% of all procedures. Most complications (32.0%, 62/194 implantations) were observed in Synchrony®-tracked lesions affected by respiratory motion, particularly in pulmonary lesions (46.9% 52/111 implantations). Concurrent biopsy sampling was associated with a higher complication rate (p = 0.001). FM migration occurred in 3.6% after CT-guided and clinical FM implantations. The largest motion amplitudes were observed in hepatic (20.5 ± 11.0 mm) and lower lung lobe (15.4 ± 10.5 mm) lesions. This study increases the awareness of the risks of FM placement, especially in thoracic lesions affected by respiratory motion. Considering the maximum motion amplitude, FM placement remains essential in hepatic and lower lung lobe lesions located >100.0 mm from the spine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melina Kord
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (A.K.); (G.K.); (C.S.); (V.B.)
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (F.L.); (G.A.)
| | - Anne Kluge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (A.K.); (G.K.); (C.S.); (V.B.)
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (F.L.); (G.A.)
| | - Markus Kufeld
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (F.L.); (G.A.)
| | - Goda Kalinauskaite
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (A.K.); (G.K.); (C.S.); (V.B.)
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (F.L.); (G.A.)
| | - Franziska Loebel
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (F.L.); (G.A.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (A.K.); (G.K.); (C.S.); (V.B.)
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (F.L.); (G.A.)
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (A.K.); (G.K.); (C.S.); (V.B.)
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (F.L.); (G.A.)
| | - Bernhard Gebauer
- Department of Radiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Gueliz Acker
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (F.L.); (G.A.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Acadamy, Clinician Scientist Program, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Carolin Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (A.K.); (G.K.); (C.S.); (V.B.)
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (M.K.); (F.L.); (G.A.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-30-450-557221
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rühle A, Stromberger C, Haehl E, Senger C, Falkenstein A, Stoian R, Zamboglou C, Knopf A, Grosu A, Nicolay N. PO-1014 Prognosis classifier for elderly head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma patients. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)07465-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
21
|
John C, Dal Bello R, Andratschke N, Guckenberger M, Boda-Heggemann J, Gkika E, Mantel F, Specht H, Stromberger C, Zehentmayr F, Blanck O, Balermpas P. PD-0872 Second In-field course of stereotactic body radiotherapy for thoracic tumors: a multicentre analysis. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)07151-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
22
|
Gruen A, Exner S, Kühl JS, von Stackelberg A, Budach V, Stromberger C, Boehmer D. Total body irradiation as part of conditioning regimens in childhood leukemia-long-term outcome, toxicity, and secondary malignancies. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 198:33-38. [PMID: 34282476 PMCID: PMC8760188 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01810-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Background Total body irradiation (TBI) is an established part of conditioning regimens prior to stem cell transplantation in childhood leukemia but is associated with long-term toxicity. We retrospectively analyzed survival, long-term toxicity, and secondary malignancies in a pooled cohort of pediatric patients (pts.) treated with the same TBI regimen. Methods Analyzed were 109 pts. treated between September 1996 and November 2015. Conditioning treatment according to EBMT guidelines and the ALL SCTped 2012 FORUM trial consisted of chemotherapy (CT) and TBI with 2 Gy b.i.d. on 3 consecutive days to a total dose of 12 Gy. Median follow-up was 97.9 months (2–228 months). Results Overall survival (OS) in our cohort at 2, 5, and 10 years was 86.1, 75.5, and 63.0%, respectively. Median survival was not reached. Long-term toxicity developed in 47 pts. After chronically abnormal liver and kidney parameters in 31 and 7 pts., respectively, growth retardation was the most frequent finding as seen in 13 pts. Secondary malignancies were rare (n = 3). Conclusion TBI-containing conditioning regimens in pediatric stem cell transplantation (SCT) are highly effective. Efforts to replace TBI- with CT-containing regimens have only been successful in subgroups of pts. Although we could show long-term toxicity in 43% of pts., overall survival was 63% at 10 years. Still, long-term effects such as growth retardation can permanently impact the pts.’ quality of life and functioning. Along with new substances, efforts should be undertaken to optimize TBI techniques and accompany the treatment by systematic follow-up programs beyond 5 years to improve detection of rare events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arne Gruen
- Department for Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Clinic, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Sebastian Exner
- Strahlenzentrum Hamburg MVZ, Langenhorner Chaussee 369, 22419, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jörn-Sven Kühl
- Department for Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Hemostaseology, University Clinic Leipzig, Liebigstraße 22, Haus 7, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Arend von Stackelberg
- Department for Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department for Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Clinic, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department for Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Clinic, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dirk Boehmer
- Department for Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Clinic, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Alotaibi M, Valova V, HÄnsel T, Stromberger C, Kofla G, Olze H, Piwonski I, Albers A, Ochsenreither S, Coordes A. Impact of Smoking on the Survival of Patients With High-risk HPV-positive HNSCC: A Meta-analysis. In Vivo 2021; 35:1017-1026. [PMID: 33622897 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2020] [Revised: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM High risk Human papillomavirus (hr-HPV) and smoking are independant risk factors for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). While hr-HPV+ HNSCC has a better prognosis than smoking-associated HNSCC no systematic data are yet available about the combined risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a meta-analysis to assess the overall survival of HNSCC patients relative to the hr-HPV and smoking status. A literature review up to November 2019 was conducted in PubMed and Cochrane Library using the search terms 'HPV, Smoking and HNSCC'. RESULTS Nine out of 748 articles were included, 1,436 out of 2,080 patients were hr-HPV+ The prevalence of hr-HPV+ smokers was 36%. The meta-analysis showed a significantly better 5-year overall survival for HPV+ non-smokers compared to smokers with risk ratio of 1.94 (95% confidence intervaI=1.46-2.58). CONCLUSION Smoking is a negative prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with hr-HPV+ HNSCC and should thus be an important part of staging and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moonef Alotaibi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (CVK and CCM), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,King Fahad Medical City, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Valeria Valova
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (CVK and CCM), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Toni HÄnsel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (CVK and CCM), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiooncology (CVK), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Grzegorz Kofla
- Department of Oncology (CVK), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Heidi Olze
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (CVK and CCM), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Iris Piwonski
- Institute of Pathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Albers
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology (CBF), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Ochsenreither
- Department of Oncology (CBF), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annekatrin Coordes
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (CVK and CCM), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Senger C, Kluge A, Kord M, Zimmermann Z, Conti A, Kufeld M, Kreimeier A, Loebel F, Stromberger C, Budach V, Vajkoczy P, Acker G. Effectiveness and Safety of Robotic Radiosurgery for Optic Nerve Sheath Meningiomas: A Single Institution Series. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13092165. [PMID: 33946405 PMCID: PMC8125730 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13092165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Optic nerve sheath meningiomas (ONSM) are a rare subtype of meningioma. Only four retrospective studies with 3–21 patients have been published on the treatment of ONSM by radiosurgery. This study represents the largest published series on robotic radiosurgery to date, treating 25 patients with 27 ONSM lesions. Furthermore, hypofractionated radiosurgical treatment proves to be a safe alternative to surgery and fractionated stereotactic radiation with an overall local tumor control rate of 96.0% and stable or improved visual acuity in 90.0% and 10.0% of patients, respectively. We believe that our study makes a significant contribution to the literature, as our results indicate that robotic radiosurgery is a safe and effective treatment for the management of ONSM and offers a potential treatment option that would improve patient care and clinical outcomes. Abstract The role of robotic radiosurgery (RRS) in the treatment of optic nerve sheath meningiomas (ONSM) remains controversial and it is only performed in specialized institutions due to tight dose constraints. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of RRS in the management of ONSM. Twenty-five patients with 27 ONSM lesions who underwent RRS using the Cyberknife (CK) system were retrospectively analyzed (median age, 47.9 years; 84.0% women). Multisession RRS was used with 4–5 fractions with a cumulative dose of 20.0–25.0 Gy in 84.0% of patients and a single fraction at a dose of 14.0–15.0 Gy in 16% of patients. Prior to RRS, seven (28%) patients experienced blindness on the lesion side. In those patients with preserved vision prior to radiosurgery, the visual acuity remained the same in 90.0% and improved in 10.0% of the patients. Overall local tumor control was 96.0% (mean follow-up period; 37.4 ± 27.2 months). Neither patient age, previous surgery, or the period from the initial diagnosis to RRS showed a dependency on visual acuity before or after radiosurgery. RRS is a safe and effective treatment for the management of ONSM. Hypofractionation of radiosurgery in patients with preserved vision before CK treatment results in stable or improved vision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (A.K.); (M.K.); (A.K.); (C.S.); (V.B.)
- Charité Cyberknife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (Z.Z.); (A.C.); (M.K.); (F.L.); (P.V.); (G.A.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-30-450-557221
| | - Anne Kluge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (A.K.); (M.K.); (A.K.); (C.S.); (V.B.)
- Charité Cyberknife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (Z.Z.); (A.C.); (M.K.); (F.L.); (P.V.); (G.A.)
| | - Melina Kord
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (A.K.); (M.K.); (A.K.); (C.S.); (V.B.)
- Charité Cyberknife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (Z.Z.); (A.C.); (M.K.); (F.L.); (P.V.); (G.A.)
| | - Zoe Zimmermann
- Charité Cyberknife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (Z.Z.); (A.C.); (M.K.); (F.L.); (P.V.); (G.A.)
| | - Alfredo Conti
- Charité Cyberknife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (Z.Z.); (A.C.); (M.K.); (F.L.); (P.V.); (G.A.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Alma Mater Studiorum-Università di Bologna, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Neuromotorie (DIBINEM), Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna (BO), Italy
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna (BO), Italy
| | - Markus Kufeld
- Charité Cyberknife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (Z.Z.); (A.C.); (M.K.); (F.L.); (P.V.); (G.A.)
| | - Anita Kreimeier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (A.K.); (M.K.); (A.K.); (C.S.); (V.B.)
- Charité Cyberknife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (Z.Z.); (A.C.); (M.K.); (F.L.); (P.V.); (G.A.)
| | - Franziska Loebel
- Charité Cyberknife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (Z.Z.); (A.C.); (M.K.); (F.L.); (P.V.); (G.A.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (A.K.); (M.K.); (A.K.); (C.S.); (V.B.)
- Charité Cyberknife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (Z.Z.); (A.C.); (M.K.); (F.L.); (P.V.); (G.A.)
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (A.K.); (M.K.); (A.K.); (C.S.); (V.B.)
- Charité Cyberknife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (Z.Z.); (A.C.); (M.K.); (F.L.); (P.V.); (G.A.)
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Charité Cyberknife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (Z.Z.); (A.C.); (M.K.); (F.L.); (P.V.); (G.A.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Gueliz Acker
- Charité Cyberknife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (Z.Z.); (A.C.); (M.K.); (F.L.); (P.V.); (G.A.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Acadamy, Clinician Scientist Program, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ghadjar P, Stritter W, von Mackensen I, Mehrhof F, Foucré C, Ehrhardt VH, Beck M, Gebert P, Kalinauskaite G, Luchte JS, Stromberger C, Budach V, Eggert A, Seifert G. External application of liver compresses to reduce fatigue in patients with metastatic cancer undergoing radiation therapy, a randomized clinical trial. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:76. [PMID: 33874968 PMCID: PMC8054395 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01757-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver compresses are frequently used in integrative medicine as supportive therapy during cancer treatment in order to reduce fatigue. We performed a pilot study to test whether the external application of yarrow liver compresses impacts fatigue in patients with metastatic cancer undergoing radiation therapy. METHODS A randomized prospective pilot trial was performed including patients with brain metastasis or bone metastasis of solid tumors. Patients underwent either palliative radiation therapy (RT) of the metastatic lesions (control group) over two weeks or the same RT with additional external application of yarrow liver compresses once daily during RT. The primary objective was improvement on the general fatigue subscale of the multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI-20) at the end of treatment, where a mean difference of two points is considered clinically relevant. Secondary objectives included psychological distress, quality of life and qualitative analysis with self-established visual analogue scales (VAS). Mean differences in general fatigue at the end of treatment compared to baseline were analyzed using the ANCOVA test. RESULTS From 09/2017 to 08/2019 a total of 39 patients were randomized. Due to drop outs 24 patients (12 per group) were available for analysis. Patients in the intervention group received a mean number of 10.5 (range, 7-14) applications of yarrow liver compresses. The mean improvement at the end of therapy on the general fatigue subscale of the MFI-20 was 2 points in favor of the intervention group (p = 0.13), and all other MFI-20 subscales showed at least a trend towards improvement in favor of the intervention group. Likewise, psychological distress and VAS data was improved, the latter reaching statistical significance for the symptoms fatigue, tension and lack of drive. Major toxicities were not observed. CONCLUSIONS External application of liver compresses appears to reduce fatigue within a clinical relevant range in patients with metastatic cancer undergoing radiation therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN, ICTRP DRKS00012999.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pirus Ghadjar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Wiebke Stritter
- Division of Oncology and Hematology, Department of Pediatrics, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Irina von Mackensen
- Division of Oncology and Hematology, Department of Pediatrics, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Mehrhof
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Clara Foucré
- Division of Oncology and Hematology, Department of Pediatrics, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vincent H Ehrhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcus Beck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pimrapat Gebert
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Goda Kalinauskaite
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jacqueline S Luchte
- Division of Oncology and Hematology, Department of Pediatrics, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Angelika Eggert
- Division of Oncology and Hematology, Department of Pediatrics, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Georg Seifert
- Division of Oncology and Hematology, Department of Pediatrics, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine, Department of Paediatrics, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Boeker R, Stromberger C, Heiland M, Beck-Broichsitter B, Hofmann VM, Neumann K, Ochsenreither S, Olze H, Dommerich S, Piwonski I, Coordes A. Carcinoma of Unknown Primary and the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Head and Neck Cancer. Laryngoscope 2021; 131:E2534-E2542. [PMID: 33734438 DOI: 10.1002/lary.29499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Revised: 02/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Head and Neck Cancer, the classification for carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) changed in addition to oropharyngeal carcinomas. The current classification considers extranodal extension (ENE), determination of p16 (surrogate marker for human papillomavirus), and detection of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the new classification on the prognosis of p16-positive and p16-negative CUP and the impact of EBV proof. METHODS Clinical and pathological data from patients with CUP of the head and neck between 2009 and 2018 were evaluated. The 7th (UICC7) and 8th (UICC8) edition of the Union for International Cancer Control staging system were applied and compared. RESULTS There were 97 patients treated, 26.8% women and 73.2% men. The average age at initial diagnosis was 64.6 years. Of which, 58.8% had a documented history of smoking, 37.1% were positive for p16, 4.1% were positive for EBV, and 66% had ENE. Most of the patients were at stage III/IVa (78.4% according to UICC7). According to UICC8, p16+ patients were mainly at stage I (86.1%), and p16- at stage IVb (56.1%). P16 status (P = .002), ENE (P = .001), nodal category (TNM7, P < .001), UICC stage (TNM7, P < .001) and UICC stage (TNM8, P < .001) had a significant impact on survival in the univariate analysis. The 8th TNM classification resulted in a downstaging of p16-positive CUP syndromes and an upstaging of p16-negative syndromes. CONCLUSION The 8th TNM classification shows the lower UICC stage in p16-positive CUP syndromes. The prognostic significance for survival has improved from the 7th to the 8th TNM classification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE USING THE 2011 OCEBM: Level 3. Laryngoscope, 131:E2534-E2542, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Boeker
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiooncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Max Heiland
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Benedicta Beck-Broichsitter
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Veit M Hofmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Konrad Neumann
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute for Biometrics and Clinical Epidemiology, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Ochsenreither
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.,Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berlin, Germany
| | - Heidi Olze
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Steffen Dommerich
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Iris Piwonski
- Department of Pathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annekatrin Coordes
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wust P, Beck M, Dabrowski R, Neumann O, Zschaeck S, Kaul D, Modest DP, Stromberger C, Gebauer B, Ghadjar P. Radiotherapeutic treatment options for oligotopic malignant liver lesions. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:51. [PMID: 33726751 PMCID: PMC7970808 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01779-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Several radiotherapeutic approaches for patients with oligotopic malignant liver lesions unfit for surgical resection exist. The most advanced competitive techniques are high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy, Cyberknife, volume-modulated-arc therapy (VMAT) and Tomotherapy. We evaluated the optimal technique by a planning study for a single ablative dose with different lesion sizes.
Methods We compared dose distributions of HDR-brachytherapy with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy using the Cyberknife, VMAT or Tomotherapy. Tumor-control-probabilities (TCP), normal-tissue-complication-probabilities (NTCP) were determined in a theoretical framework applying a single dose of 20 Gy (demanding 95% coverage) for intrahepatic lesions of 1–5 cm in size. We evaluated therapeutic ratios by TCP (mean dose in the lesion) relative to high-dose (conformality) or low-dose liver exposition in dependency on the lesion size for each technique. In addition, we considered treatment times and accuracy (clinical target volume vs planning target volume). Results HDR-brachtherapy has the highest therapeutic ratios with respect to high-dose as well as low-dose liver exposition even for extended lesions, and the Cyberknife being suited second best. However, for lesions ≥ 3 cm diameter the therapeutic ratios of all ablative techniques are increasingly converging, and better tolerance and shorter treatment times of noninvasive external techniques become more important. On the other hand, mean tumor doses of HDR-brachytherapy of near 60 Gy are unattainable by the other techniques gaining only 22–34 Gy, and the conformality of HDR-brachytherapy is still rather good for lesions ≥ 3 cm diameter. Conclusions HDR-brachytherapy is by far the most effective technique to treat intrahepatic lesions by a single fraction, but sparing of the surroundings declines with increasing lesion size and approaches the benchmarks of external beam radiosurgery techniques. External beam radiotherapy has the advantage to use suitable fractionation schedules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Wust
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcus Beck
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Robert Dabrowski
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Oliver Neumann
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Anna-Louisa-Karsch-Straße 2, 10178, Berlin, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dominik P Modest
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Medical Oncology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernhard Gebauer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pirus Ghadjar
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Beck M, Ghadjar P, Mehrhof F, Zips D, Paulsen F, Wegener D, Burock S, Kaul D, Stromberger C, Nadobny J, Ott OJ, Fietkau R, Budach V, Wust P, Müller AC, Zschaeck S. Salvage-Radiation Therapy and Regional Hyperthermia for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy (Results of the Planned Interim Analysis). Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13051133. [PMID: 33800872 PMCID: PMC7961934 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13051133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Several efforts like dose-escalated salvage radiation therapy and the use of androgen deprivation therapy aimed to improve the postoperative treatment in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after prostatectomy. However, the oncological outcome is still not satisfactory. Hyperthermia is well-known to improve the efficacy of radiation therapy, whereas only limited data for postoperative therapy in prostate cancer are available. Thus, we conducted a prospective multicenter non-randomized Phase-II-Trial (HTProstate) investigating the implementation of combined salvage radiation therapy and regional hyperthermia in case of biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy with the aim to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and oncological outcome of this approach. The results of our planned interim analysis (n = 50) met the criteria of safety (only one patient with acute grade 3 hyperthermia-specific toxicity), showed feasibility of planned radiation and hyperthermia therapy, no significant changes in quality of life and promising short-term prostate-specific antigen response. Late toxicity and robust oncological outcome data will be reported after completion of the trial. Abstract Efforts to improve the outcome of prostate cancer (PC) patients after radical prostatectomy (RP) include adjuvant or salvage radiation therapy (SRT), but still up to 50% of patients develop a disease progression after radiotherapy (RT). Regional hyperthermia (HT) is well-known to improve tumor sensitivity to RT in several entities. Here we report on a planned interim analysis of tolerability and feasibility after recruitment of the first 50 patients of a trial combining SRT and HT. We conducted a prospective multicenter non-randomized Phase-II-Trial (HTProstate-NCT04159051) investigating the implementation of combined moderate-dose escalated SRT (70 Gy in 35 fractions) and locoregional deep HT (7–10 HT sessions). The primary endpoints were the rate of acute genitourinary (GU), gastrointestinal (GI), and HT-related toxicities, completed HT sessions (≥7), and SRT applications per protocol (≥95% of patients). The two-step design included a planned interim analysis for acute GU-, GI- and HT-specific toxicities to ensure patients’ safety. Between November 2016 and December 2019, 52 patients entered into the trial. After 50 patients completed therapy and three months of follow-up, we performed the planned interim analysis. 10% of patients developed acute grade 2 GU and 4% grade 2 GI toxicities. No grade ≥3 GU or GI toxicities occurred. HT-specific symptoms grade 2 and 3 were observed in 4% and 2% of all patients. Thus, the pre-specified criteria for safety and continuation of recruitment were met. Moreover, ≥7 HT treatments were applicable, indicating the combination of SRT + HT to be feasible. Evaluation of early QoL showed no significant changes. With its observed low rate of GU and GI toxicities, moderate and manageable rates of HT-specific symptoms, and good feasibility, the combined SRT + HT seems to be a promising treatment approach for biochemical recurrence after RP in PC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus Beck
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (P.G.); (F.M.); (D.K.); (C.S.); (J.N.); (V.B.); (P.W.); (S.Z.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-30-450-627-343; Fax: +49-30-450-7527343
| | - Pirus Ghadjar
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (P.G.); (F.M.); (D.K.); (C.S.); (J.N.); (V.B.); (P.W.); (S.Z.)
| | - Felix Mehrhof
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (P.G.); (F.M.); (D.K.); (C.S.); (J.N.); (V.B.); (P.W.); (S.Z.)
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (D.Z.); (F.P.); (D.W.); (A.-C.M.)
| | - Frank Paulsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (D.Z.); (F.P.); (D.W.); (A.-C.M.)
| | - Daniel Wegener
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (D.Z.); (F.P.); (D.W.); (A.-C.M.)
| | - Susen Burock
- Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
| | - David Kaul
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (P.G.); (F.M.); (D.K.); (C.S.); (J.N.); (V.B.); (P.W.); (S.Z.)
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (P.G.); (F.M.); (D.K.); (C.S.); (J.N.); (V.B.); (P.W.); (S.Z.)
| | - Jacek Nadobny
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (P.G.); (F.M.); (D.K.); (C.S.); (J.N.); (V.B.); (P.W.); (S.Z.)
| | - Oliver J. Ott
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (O.J.O.); (R.F.)
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (O.J.O.); (R.F.)
| | - Volker Budach
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (P.G.); (F.M.); (D.K.); (C.S.); (J.N.); (V.B.); (P.W.); (S.Z.)
| | - Peter Wust
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (P.G.); (F.M.); (D.K.); (C.S.); (J.N.); (V.B.); (P.W.); (S.Z.)
| | - Arndt-Christian Müller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (D.Z.); (F.P.); (D.W.); (A.-C.M.)
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (P.G.); (F.M.); (D.K.); (C.S.); (J.N.); (V.B.); (P.W.); (S.Z.)
- Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Stromberger C, Yedikat B, Coordes A, Tinhofer I, Kalinauskaite G, Budach V, Zschaeck S, Raguse JD, Kofla G, Heiland M, Stsefanenka A, Beck-Broichsitter B, Dommerich S, Senger C, Beck M. Prognostic Factors Predict Oncological Outcome in Older Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Undergoing Chemoradiation Treatment. Front Oncol 2021; 10:566318. [PMID: 33708616 PMCID: PMC7942196 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.566318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Older patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) represent a challenging group, as frailty and comorbidities need to be considered. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of curative and palliative (chemo) radiation ([C]RT) with regard to basic geriatric screening in older patients. Methods This study included HNC patients aged ≥70 years who were treated with curative or palliative (C)RT. Clinicopathological data including Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and treatment data were analyzed as predictors of overall survival (OS). Results A total of 271 patients (median age, 74 years) were enrolled. The majority had UICC stage III/IV (90%) and underwent curative treatment (85.2%). A total of 144 (53.1%) patients received definitive and 87 (32.1%) had adjuvant (C)RT. Overall, 40 patients (14.8%) received palliative (C)RT. Median follow-up duration (curative setting) was 87 months, and the 2- and 5-year OS rates were 57.8 and 35.9%, respectively. Median OS was significantly different for age ≤75 vs. >75 years, CCI <6 vs. ≥6, KPS ≥70 vs. <70%, Tx/T1/T2 vs. T3/T4, and adjuvant vs. definitive (C)RT, respectively. Age 70–75 years (p = 0.004), fewer comorbidities when CCI < 6 (p = 0.014), good KPS ≥ 70% (p = 0.001), and adjuvant (C)RT (p = 0.008) independently predicted longer survival. Palliative RT resulted in a median OS of 4 months. Conclusion Older age, lower KPS, higher CCI, and definitive (C)RT are indicators of worse survival in older patients with HNC treated curatively. Without a comprehensive geriatric assessment in patients aged >75 years, the KPS and CCI can be useful tools to account for “fitness, vulnerability or frailty” to help in treatment decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Berna Yedikat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Annekatrin Coordes
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ingeborg Tinhofer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Goda Kalinauskaite
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan-Dirk Raguse
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Grzegorz Kofla
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Max Heiland
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Aksana Stsefanenka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Benedicta Beck-Broichsitter
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Steffen Dommerich
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carolin Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcus Beck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Haase K, Piwonski I, Stromberger C, Thieme N, Heiland M, Beck-Broichsitter B, Hofmann VM, Kofla G, Sander S, Keilholz U, Neumann K, Stölzel K, Olze H, Arens P, Dommerich S, Coordes A. Incidence and survival of HNSCC patients living with HIV compared with HIV-negative HNSCC patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 278:3941-3953. [PMID: 33492419 PMCID: PMC8382606 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06573-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The aim was to analyze the incidence and survival of patients living with HIV (PLWH) with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and to compare with a control group of HIV-negative HNSCC patients. Methods Clinicopathological data and predictors for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were investigated (2009–2019). Results 50 of 5151 HNSCC patients (0.97%) were PLWH, and 76% were smokers. Age ≤ 60 years, HIV-PCR ≤ 50 copies, CD4 cells ≤ 200/mm3, cART treatment, T and UICC classification, oral cavity and nasal/paranasal sinuses, and therapy were significantly associated with OS in univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, only age and HIV-PCR independently predicted OS. The OS of the 50 PLWH was not significantly altered compared with the 5101 HIV-negative controls. However, OS and DFS were significantly inferior in advanced tumor stages of PLWH compared with an age-matched control group of 150 HIV-negative patients. Conclusions PLWH were diagnosed with HNSCC at a significantly younger age compared to HIV-negative patients. Taking into account patient age at initial diagnosis, both OS and DFS rates in PLWH are significantly worse compared with a matched control group of HIV-negative patients in advanced tumor stages UICC III/IV. The prognosis (OS) is improved when taking cART treatment, the HIV viral load is undetectable and CD4 count is high. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-020-06573-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Haase
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Iris Piwonski
- Department of Pathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiooncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nadine Thieme
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Max Heiland
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Benedicta Beck-Broichsitter
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Veit M Hofmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Grzegorz Kofla
- Department of Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Steffen Sander
- Clinical Cancer Registry, Charité Comprehensive Center (CCCC), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ullrich Keilholz
- Department of Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Konrad Neumann
- Institute for Biometrics and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Katharina Stölzel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Heidi Olze
- Department of Pathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Philipp Arens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Steffen Dommerich
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annekatrin Coordes
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Neckel N, Wagendorf P, Sachse C, Stromberger C, Vach K, Heiland M, Nahles S. Influence of implant-specific radiation doses on peri-implant hard and soft tissue: An observational pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2020; 32:249-261. [PMID: 33278849 DOI: 10.1111/clr.13696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2020] [Revised: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of real implant-bed-specific radiation doses on peri-implant tissue health in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients after radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Specific radiation doses in the area of 81 implants, in 15 irradiated HNC patients, were analyzed by matching data from the radiotherapy planning system with those of three-dimensional follow-up scans after implantation. Peri-implant bone resorption was measured radiographically after 1 and 3 years, and peri-implant tissue health was evaluated clinically. Individual parameters, such as age, gender, and localization, regarding the implant-specific radiation dose distribution were analyzed statistically. RESULTS The mean implant-bed-specific radiation dose was high, with 45.95 Gy to the mandible and 29.02 Gy to the maxilla, but significantly lower than the mean total dose to the tumor bed. Peri-implant bone resorption correlated with local inflammation and plaque. After 1 year, women temporarily showed significantly more bone loss than men and implant-specific radiation dose had a significant impact on peri-implant bone loss after 3 years. CONCLUSIONS The presented method is a feasible option to define precise implant-bed-specific radiation doses for research or treatment planning purposes. Implant-based dental restoration after radiotherapy is a relatively safe procedure, but a negative radiation dose-dependent long-term effect on peri-implant bone resorption calls for interdisciplinary cooperation between surgeons and radio-oncologists to define high-risk areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Neckel
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pia Wagendorf
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Claudia Sachse
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kirstin Vach
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Max Heiland
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Susanne Nahles
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Rühle A, Stromberger C, Haehl E, Senger C, David H, Stoian R, Zamboglou C, Knopf A, Budach V, Grosu AL, Nicolay NH. Development and validation of a novel prognostic score for elderly head-and-neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Radiother Oncol 2020; 154:276-282. [PMID: 33245947 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.11.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2020] [Revised: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To establish a clinically feasible prognostic score and nomogram based on easily accessible clinical data that will aid decision-making in elderly head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS 284 elderly HNSCC patients (≥65 years) undergoing curative (chemo)radiotherapy were included for the development of a score predicting overall survival (OS) based on the beta regression coefficients from significant parameters in a multivariate Cox regression analysis with p < 0.1 as inclusion criterion. A second, external cohort of 217 elderly HNSCC patients receiving (chemo)radiotherapy was used for validation. Using the aggregated data (n = 501), a nomogram was developed to predict 2- and 4-year OS. RESULTS Karnofsky Performance Status (HR = 2.654; p < 0.001), Charlson Comorbidity Index (HR = 2.598; p < 0.001) and baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) level (HR = 1.634; p = 0.068) were prognostic for OS in the multivariate analysis. An OS score based on beta regression coefficients was created, in which reduced performance status, increased comorbidity burden and increased CRP levels were included, leading to 3 distinct survival groups. The median OS for the 3 groups amounted to 107, 28 and 6 months, respectively (p < 0.001). The developed score was able to significantly differentiate between a favorable (median OS = 130 months), intermediate (29 months) and unfavorable prognosis (9 months) also in the external validation cohort (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION We propose a novel, validated prognostic score based on easily accessible clinical data allowing stratification between prognostic groups of elderly HNSCC patients receiving (chemo)radiotherapy. The derived nomogram for the prediction of 2-year and 4-year OS may aid decision-making for this vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Germany; Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, Germany
| | - Erik Haehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Germany; Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hélène David
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Raluca Stoian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Knopf
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Germany; Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Rogasch J, Beck M, Stromberger C, Hofheinz F, Ghadjar P, Wust P, Budach V, Amthauer H, Tinhofer I, Furth C, Walter-Rittel TC, Zschaeck S. PET measured hypoxia and MRI parameters in re-irradiated head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: findings of a prospective pilot study. F1000Res 2020; 9:1350. [PMID: 33796277 PMCID: PMC7970429 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.27303.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Tumor hypoxia measured by dedicated tracers like [
18F]fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) is a well-established prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) treated with definitive chemoradiation (CRT). However, prevalence and characteristics of positron emission tomography (PET) measured hypoxia in patients with relapse after previous irradiation is missing. Here we report imaging findings of a prospective pilot study in HNSCC patients treated with re-irradiation. Methods: In 8 patients with recurrent HNSCC, diagnosed at a median of 18 months after initial radiotherapy/CRT, [
18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/CT (n=8) and FMISO-PET/MRI (n=7) or FMISO-PET/CT (n=1) were performed. Static FMISO-PET was performed after 180 min. MRI sequences in PET/MRI included diffusion-weighted imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and contrast enhanced T1w imaging (StarVIBE). Lesions (primary tumor recurrence, 4; cervical lymph node, 1; both, 3) were delineated on FDG-PET and FMISO-PET data using a background-adapted threshold-based method. SUV
max and SUV
mean in FDG- and FMISO-PET were derived, as well as maximum tumor-to-muscle ratio (TMR
max) and hypoxic volume with 1.6-fold muscle SUV
mean (HV
1.6) in FMISO-PET. Intensity of lesional contrast enhancement was rated relative to contralateral normal tissue. Average ADC values were derived from a 2D region of interest in the tumor. Results: In FMISO-PET, median TMR
max was 1.7 (range: 1.1-1.8). Median HV
1.6 was 0.05 ml (range: 0-7.3 ml). Only in 2/8 patients, HV
1.6 was ≥1.0 ml. In FDG-PET, median SUV
max was 9.3 (range: 5.0-20.1). On contrast enhanced imaging four lesions showed decreased and four lesions increased contrast enhancement compared to non-pathologic reference tissue. Median average ADC was 1,060 ×10
6 mm
2/s (range: 840-1,400 ×10
6 mm
2/s). Conclusions: This pilot study implies that hypoxia detectable by FMISO-PET may not be as prevalent as expected among loco-regional recurrent, HPV negative HNSCC. ADC values were only mildly reduced, and contrast enhancement was variable. The results require confirmation in larger sample sizes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Rogasch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcus Beck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Pirus Ghadjar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Wust
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ingeborg Tinhofer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thula C Walter-Rittel
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kalinauskaite G, Senger C, Kluge A, Furth C, Kufeld M, Tinhofer I, Budach V, Beck M, Hochreiter A, Grün A, Stromberger C. 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT-based radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0240892. [PMID: 33085712 PMCID: PMC7577453 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains the standard therapy for patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC). Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT)-based stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is emerging as an alternative option to postpone starting ADT and its associated side effects including the development of drug resistance. The aim of this study was to determine progression free-survival (PFS) and treatment failure free-survival (TFFS) after PSMA-PET/CT-based SBRT in OMPC patients. The efficacy and safety of single fraction radiosurgery (SFRS) and ADT delay were investigated. Methods Patients with ≤5 metastases from OMPC, with/without ADT treated with PSMA-PET/CT-based SBRT were retrospectively analyzed. PFS and TFFS were primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints were local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and ADT-free survival (ADTFS). Results Fifty patients with a total of 75 metastases detected by PSMA-PET/CT were analyzed. At the time of SBRT, 70% of patients were castration-sensitive. Overall, 80% of metastases were treated with SFRS (median dose 20 Gy, range: 16–25). After median follow-up of 34 months (range: 5–70) median PFS and TFFS were 12 months (range: 2–63) and 14 months (range: 2–70), respectively. Thirty-two (64%) patients had repeat oligometastatic disease. Twenty-four (48%) patients with progression underwent second SBRT course. Two-year LC after SFRS was 96%. Grade 1 and 2 toxicity occurred in 3 (6%) and 1 (2%) patients, respectively. ADTFS and OS rates at 2-years were 60.5% and 100%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, TFFS significantly improved in patients with time to first metastasis (TTM) >36 months (p = 0.01) and PSA before SBRT ≤1 ng/ml (p = 0.03). Conclusion For patients with OMPC, SBRT might be used as an alternative to ADT. This way, the start/escalation of palliative ADT and its side effects can be deferred. Metastases treated with PSMA-PET/CT-based SFRS reached excellent LC with minimal toxicity. Low PSA levels and longer TTM predict elongated TFFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Goda Kalinauskaite
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Berlin, Germany
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Departments of Radiation Oncology and Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Carolin Senger
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Berlin, Germany
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Departments of Radiation Oncology and Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anne Kluge
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Berlin, Germany
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Departments of Radiation Oncology and Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Kufeld
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Departments of Radiation Oncology and Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ingeborg Tinhofer
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Berlin, Germany
- The Translational Radiooncology and Radiobiology Research Laboratory, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Berlin, Germany
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Departments of Radiation Oncology and Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcus Beck
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Berlin, Germany
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Departments of Radiation Oncology and Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexandra Hochreiter
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Berlin, Germany
| | - Arne Grün
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Berlin, Germany
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Departments of Radiation Oncology and Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Berlin, Germany
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Departments of Radiation Oncology and Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Acker G, Hashemi SM, Fuellhase J, Kluge A, Conti A, Kufeld M, Kreimeier A, Loebel F, Kord M, Sladek D, Stromberger C, Budach V, Vajkoczy P, Senger C. Efficacy and safety of CyberKnife radiosurgery in elderly patients with brain metastases: a retrospective clinical evaluation. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:225. [PMID: 32993672 PMCID: PMC7523070 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01655-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been increasingly applied for up to 10 brain metastases instead of whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) to achieve local tumor control while reducing neurotoxicity. Furthermore, brain-metastasis incidence is rising due to the increasing survival of patients with cancer. Our aim was to analyze the efficacy and safety of CyberKnife (CK) radiosurgery for elderly patients. Methods We retrospectively identified all patients with brain metastases ≥ 65 years old treated with CK-SRS at our institution since 2011 and analyzed data of primary diseases, multimodality treatments, and local therapy effect based on imaging follow-up and treatment safety. Kaplan–Meier analysis for local progression-free interval and overall survival were performed. Results We identified 97 patients (233 lesions) fulfilling the criteria at the first CK-SRS. The mean age was 73.2 ± 5.8 (range: 65.0–87.0) years. Overall, 13.4% of the patients were > 80 years old. The three most frequent primary cancers were lung (40.2%), kidney (22.7%), and malignant melanoma (15.5%). In 38.5% (47/122 treatments) multiple brain metastases were treated with the CK-SRS, with up to eight lesions in one session. The median planning target volume (PTV) was 1.05 (range: 0.01–19.80) cm3. A single fraction was applied in 92.3% of the lesions with a median prescription dose of 19 (range: 12–21) Gy. The estimated overall survivals at 3-, 6-, and 12 months after SRS were 79, 55, and 23%, respectively. The estimated local tumor progression-free intervals at 6-, 12-, 24-, 36-, and 72 months after SRS were 99.2, 89.0, 67.2, 64.6, and 64.6%, respectively. Older age and female sex were predictive factors of local progression. The Karnofsky performance score remained stable in 97.9% of the patients; only one patient developed a neurological deficit after SRS of a cerebellar lesion (ataxia, CTCAE Grade 2). Conclusions SRS is a safe and efficient option for the treatment of elderly patients with brain metastases with good local control rates without the side effects of WBRT. Older age and female sex seem to be predictive factors of local progression. Prospective studies are warranted to clarify the role of SRS treatment for elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gueliz Acker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. .,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Anna-Louisa-Karsch-Str. 2, 10178, Berlin, Germany. .,Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Seyed-Morteza Hashemi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Josch Fuellhase
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anne Kluge
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alfredo Conti
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.,Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Neurosurgery, Biomedical and Neuromotor sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Markus Kufeld
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anita Kreimeier
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Franziska Loebel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.,Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Melina Kord
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Diana Sladek
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.,Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carolin Senger
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Morgenthaler J, Köhler C, Budach V, Sehouli J, Stromberger C, Besserer A, Trommer M, Baues C, Marnitz S. Long-term results of robotic radiosurgery for non brachytherapy patients with cervical cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 197:474-486. [PMID: 32970164 PMCID: PMC8154829 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01685-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Consolidation brachytherapy is a critical treatment component for cervical cancer patients undergoing primary chemoradiation. Some patients are unsuitable for brachytherapy for a variety of reasons. The use of alternatives (LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery or external beam boosts) compromise oncologic results in cervical cancer patients. Thus, we evaluated the value of brachytherapy-like doses prescriptions using robotic radiosurgery (CyberKnife®, CR, Acuuray, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). METHODS From 06/2011 to 06/2015, 31 patients (median age 53 years; range 30-77 years) with histologically proven FIGO stages IB-IVB cervical cancer underwent primary chemoradiation. All patients were either not suitable for intracervical brachytherapy for a variety of reasons or refused the brachytherapy. To achieve an adequate dose within the tumor, a CK boost was applied after fiducial implantation. In 29 patients, a dose of either five times 6 Gy or five times 5 Gy was prescribed to the target volume. Two patients received three times 5 Gy. The target dose was prescribed to the 70% isodose. Treatment toxicity was documented once weekly regarding vaginal mucositis, bladder, and bowel irritation according to CTCAE v. 4.03. If possible 3 months after completion of treatment intracervical curettage was performed to exclude residual tumor and the patients were followed up clinically. Sparing of organs at risk (OAR) and outcome in terms of local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed. RESULTS Of the 31 patients, 30 have completed CK boost therapy. The median follow-up time was 40 months (range 5-84 months). General treatment tolerability was good. Except for 1 patient, who had diarrhea grade 3, no treatment related side effects above grade 2 were reported. Sparing of OAR was excellent. The 1‑, 3‑, and 5‑year OS rates were 89, 60, and 57% respectively across all stages. Seven patients showed progression (28%), only two of them with local relapse (8%), resulting in an LC rate of 92% after 3 and 5 years. Mean PFS was 41 months (range 2-84 months). Patients with local recurrence had PFS of 5 and 8 months. Five patients developed distant metastases. Fifteen patients (48%) underwent intracervical curettage 3 months after completion of treatment of which 14 (93%) had complete pathologic response. CONCLUSION Brachytherapy remains the standard of care for patients diagnosed with cervical cancer and indication for primary chemoradiation. In terms of local control, CyberKnife®-based boost concepts provide excellent local control. It can be an alternative for patients who cannot receive adequate brachytherapy. Distant relapse still remains a challenge in this context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janis Morgenthaler
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany. .,Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Köln Bonn), Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany.
| | - Christhardt Köhler
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Asklepios Clinic Hamburg Altona, Paul-Ehrlich-Straße 1, Hamburg, 22763, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Campus Virchow-Clinic, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology, Campus Virchow-Clinic, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Campus Virchow-Clinic, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany
| | - Angela Besserer
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Campus Virchow-Clinic, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany
| | - Maike Trommer
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Köln Bonn), Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Köln Bonn), Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Köln Bonn), Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Grün A, Kuhnt T, Schlomm T, Olze H, Budach V, Stromberger C. Repeat Radiation for Local Recurrence of Head and Neck Tumors and in Prostate Cancer. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2020; 117:167-174. [PMID: 32295696 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Revised: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent advances in diagnostic methods and in radiotherapy now increasingly enable repeat radiotherapy with curative intent for the treatment of previously irradiated lesions. In this review, we present data on oncological outcomes and on acute and late sequelae, as far as these are currently known, in patients with head and neck tumors (HNT) or prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent repeat radiotherapy after prior radiotherapy with curative intent. METHODS This review is based on clinical series with over 20 patients that were published between May 1998 and April 2018 (HNT) or between October 1998 and October 2018 (PCa) and were retrieved by a search in the PubMed database. RESULTS Most of the clinical series retrieved were retrospective and uncontrolled. There were 16 studies that included 2678 patients with recurrent head and neck tumors, and 8 that included 245 patients with recurrent prostate cancer. In patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, intensity-modulated radio - therapy (IMRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) yielded three-year survival rates of 47-57% but also produced substantial acute and late adverse effects. Most of the studies concerning recurrent PCa involved small patient groups. In these studies, repeat radiotherapy with SBRT yielded tumor control rates of 40-80% after 11-24 months of follow-up, with only mild acute toxicity. CONCLUSION Although no comparative studies are available, it seems that modern external beam radiotherapy techniques can be used for repeat radiotherapy of locally recurrent head and neck tumors with curative intent after careful patient selection. Repeat radiotherapy of PCa must still be considered experimental, but initial results from small-scale trials are encouraging. The long-term adverse effects cannot yet be accessed. Patients should be selected by an interdisciplinary tumor board. This type of treatment is generally carried out in a specialized center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arne Grün
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin,Campus Virchow-Klinikum; Charité CyberKnife Center Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin,Campus Virchow-Klinikum; Klinik für Strahlentherapie Universitätsklinikum Leipzig; Department of Urology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Department of Otolaryngology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin,Campus Virchow-Klinikum
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Zschaeck S, Li Y, Lin Q, Beck M, Amthauer H, Bauersachs L, Hajiyianni M, Rogasch J, Ehrhardt VH, Kalinauskaite G, Weingärtner J, Hartmann V, van den Hoff J, Budach V, Stromberger C, Hofheinz F. Prognostic value of baseline [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography parameters MTV, TLG and asphericity in an international multicenter cohort of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0236841. [PMID: 32730364 PMCID: PMC7392321 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) parameters have shown prognostic value in nasopharyngeal carcinomas (NPC), mostly in monocenter studies. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic impact of standard and novel PET parameters in a multicenter cohort of patients. Methods The established PET parameters metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as well as the novel parameter tumor asphericity (ASP) were evaluated in a retrospective multicenter cohort of 114 NPC patients with FDG-PET staging, treated with (chemo)radiation at 8 international institutions. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis with respect to overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), distant metastases-free survival (FFDM), and locoregional control (LRC) was performed for clinical and PET parameters. Results When analyzing metric PET parameters, ASP showed a significant association with EFS (p = 0.035) and a trend for OS (p = 0.058). MTV was significantly associated with EFS (p = 0.026), OS (p = 0.008) and LRC (p = 0.012) and TLG with LRC (p = 0.019). TLG and MTV showed a very high correlation (Spearman’s rho = 0.95), therefore TLG was subesequently not further analysed. Optimal cutoff values for defining high and low risk groups were determined by maximization of the p-value in univariate Cox regression considering all possible cutoff values. Generation of stable cutoff values was feasible for MTV (p<0.001), ASP (p = 0.023) and combination of both (MTV+ASP = occurrence of one or both risk factors, p<0.001) for OS and for MTV regarding the endpoints OS (p<0.001) and LRC (p<0.001). In multivariable Cox (age >55 years + one binarized PET parameter), MTV >11.1ml (hazard ratio (HR): 3.57, p<0.001) and ASP > 14.4% (HR: 3.2, p = 0.031) remained prognostic for OS. MTV additionally remained prognostic for LRC (HR: 4.86 p<0.001) and EFS (HR: 2.51 p = 0.004). Bootstrapping analyses showed that a combination of high MTV and ASP improved prognostic value for OS compared to each single variable significantly (p = 0.005 and p = 0.04, respectively). When using the cohort from China (n = 57 patients) for establishment of prognostic parameters and all other patients for validation (n = 57 patients), MTV could be successfully validated as prognostic parameter regarding OS, EFS and LRC (all p-values <0.05 for both cohorts). Conclusions In this analysis, PET parameters were associated with outcome of NPC patients. MTV showed a robust association with OS, EFS and LRC. Our data suggest that combination of MTV and ASP may potentially further improve the risk stratification of NPC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zschaeck
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Yimin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Qin Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
- * E-mail:
| | - Marcus Beck
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Laura Bauersachs
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marina Hajiyianni
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julian Rogasch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vincent H. Ehrhardt
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Goda Kalinauskaite
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julian Weingärtner
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vivian Hartmann
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jörg van den Hoff
- Department of Positron Emission Tomography, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Charité –Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Hofheinz
- Department of Positron Emission Tomography, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bußmann L, Laban S, Wittekindt C, Stromberger C, Tribius S, Möckelmann N, Böttcher A, Betz CS, Klussmann JP, Budach V, Muenscher A, Busch CJ. Comparative effectiveness trial of transoral head and neck surgery followed by adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy versus primary radiochemotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer (TopROC). BMC Cancer 2020; 20:701. [PMID: 32727416 PMCID: PMC7389683 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07127-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For loco-regionally advanced, but transorally resectable oropharyngeal cancer (OPSCC), the current standard of care includes surgical resection and risk-adapted adjuvant (chemo) radiotherapy, or definite chemoradiation with or without salvage surgery. While transoral surgery for OPSCC has increased over the last decade for example in the United States due to transoral robotic surgery, this treatment approach has a long history in Germany. In contrast to Anglo-Saxon countries, transoral surgical approaches have been used frequently in Germany to treat patients with oro-, hypopharyngeal and laryngeal cancer. Transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) has had a long tradition since its introduction in the early 70s. To date, the different therapeutic approaches to transorally resectable OPSCC have not been directly compared to each other in a randomized trial concerning disease control and survival. The goal of this study is to compare initial transoral surgery to definitive chemoradiation for resectable OPSCC, especially with regards to local and regional control. METHODS TopROC is a prospective, two-arm, open label, multicenter, randomized, and controlled comparative effectiveness study. Eligible patients are ≥18 years old with treatment-naïve, histologically proven OPSCC (T1, N2a-c, M0; T2, N1-2c, M0; T3, N0-2c, M0 UICC vers. 7) which are amenable to transoral resection. Two hundred eighty patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to surgical treatment (arm A) or chemoradiation (arm B). Standard of care treatment will be performed according to daily routine practice. Arm A consists of transoral surgical resection with neck dissection followed by risk-adapted adjuvant therapy. Patients treated in arm B receive standard chemoradiation, residual tumor may be subject to salvage surgery. Follow-up visits for 3 years are planned. Primary endpoint is time to local or locoregional failure (LRF). Secondary endpoints include overall and disease free survival, toxicity, and patient reported outcomes. Approximately 20 centers will be involved in Germany. This trial is supported by the German Cancer Aid and accompanied by a scientific support program. DISCUSSION This study will shed light on an urgently-needed randomized comparison of the strategy of primary chemoradiation vs. primary surgical approach. As a comparative effectiveness trial, it is designed to provide data based on two established regimens in daily clinical routine. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03691441 Registered 1 October 2018 - Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Bußmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Simon Laban
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Claus Wittekindt
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Gießen, Gießen, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Silke Tribius
- Hermann-Holthusen-Institut for Radiation Oncology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nikolaus Möckelmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Arne Böttcher
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Stephan Betz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jens Peter Klussmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Adrian Muenscher
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Chia-Jung Busch
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Klinghammer KF, Gauler TC, Stromberger C, Kofla G, de Wit M, Gollrad J, Rauer I, Martus P, Tinhofer I, Budach V, Keilholz U, Burock S. DURTRERAD: A phase II open-label study evaluating feasibility and efficacy of durvalumab (D) and durvalumab and tremelimumab (DT) in combination with radiotherapy (RT) in non-resectable locally advanced HPV-negative HNSCC—Results of the preplanned feasibility interim analysis. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.6574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
6574 Background: DURTRERAD is a randomized phase II study evaluating feasibility and efficacy of durvalumab (anti-PD-L1) vs. durvalumab and tremelimumab (anti-CTLA-4) in combination with radiotherapy as primary treatment for locally advanced HPV negative HNSCC. (NCT03624231). Concurrent chemo-RT with a platinum-based regimen is considered the standard treatment, although efficacy and long-term toxicity are not satisfactory. Combining immunotherapy with RT might result in improved efficacy with limited long-term toxicity. Methods: The phase II study planned to enroll 120 pts, 60 pts (1:1) in each treatment arm. Treatment with DT (1500mg/75 mg, arm DT),or D (1500mg, arm D) both in combination with RT (70Gy) was considered to be feasible if less than 10% of the patients treated will discontinue treatment due to on-treatment toxicities. A first interim analysis for feasibility and efficacy was planned after randomisation of 20 patients. Results: So far 23 patients have been screened, 16 patients have been randomised and started their allocated treatment, 10 in arm D and 6 in arm DT. Of 10 patients in arm D 1 patient stopped infusional treatment due to immune related toxicity. Out of 6 patients in the DT arm, however, 5 patients stopped treatment due to treatment related AEs, 2 pts due to immune related toxicity with one Grade 5 AE. Three patients stopped due to non-immune related AE. The grade 5 AE prompted the interim analysis, which revealed non-feasibility as well as safety-issues of the DT+radiotherapy combination . As a result, the DT arm was prematurely terminated. Conclusions: Even though in the recurrent/metastatic setting DT was not associated with increased toxicity, DT in combination with RT was not feasible in our poor prognostic, vulnerable patient cohort of advanced HPV negative unresectable HNSCC, warranting early disclosure of these results. No increase in toxicity was observed in the D monotherapy arm, and the trial continued with D monotherapy in combination with RT. Clinical trial information: NCT03624231 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas Christoph Gauler
- Department of Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen of the University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Peter Martus
- Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biometrics, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Inge Tinhofer
- Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core Center Heidelberg and DKTK Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Hochreiter A, Kelly JR, Young MR, Litkouhi B, Black JD, Stromberger C, Higgins S, Schwartz PE, Damast S. Outcomes and relapse patterns of stage IB grade 2 or 3 endometrial cancer treated with adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019; 30:48-55. [DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Revised: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
IntroductionRisk factors for pelvic recurrence in early stage endometrial cancer are poorly understood. We sought to describe outcomes, patterns of failure, and risk factors for recurrence among patients with grade 2–3 endometrial cancer with deep myometrial invasion who were treated with vaginal brachytherapy as sole adjuvant therapy after hysterectomy and lymph node dissection.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the records of stage I patients with grade 2–3 endometrioid histology and ≥50% myometrial invasion treated at an academic institution from January 2005 to December 2017. Only patients with endometrioid histology were included. Mixed histologies, including papillary serous or clear cell components, were excluded. Further exclusion criteria were International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB grade 1 patients, follow-up time less than 3 months, receipt of pelvic irradiation or any form of systemic therapy (chemotherapy, aromatase inhibitor). Overall survival, disease-free survival, and pelvic recurrence-free survival were calculated with Kaplan–Meier methods. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to analyze factors associated with overall survival and disease-free survival.ResultsAmong 131 consecutive patients identified, 111 (85%) patients met the inclusion criteria. The majority (98.2%) underwent lymph node dissection with ≥10 lymph nodes removed in 78.9%. With a median follow-up of 36 months (IQR 12–70 months), the 3-year overall survival, disease-free survival, and pelvic recurrence-free survival were 89.6%, 90.1%, and 92.8%, respectively. Histologic grade 3, older age, and lymphovascular invasion were not associated with inferior outcomes; however, lower uterine segment involvement (p=0.031), tumor size >4 cm (p=0.024), and <10 lymph nodes removed (p=0.032) were associated with reduced disease-free survival on multivariable analysis. Pelvic recurrence occurred in 12 (11%) patients, most often in the setting of synchronous distant disease (n=9), and was significantly more likely with lower uterine segment involvement.ConclusionAmong patients with stage IB grade 2–3 endometrial cancer treated with vaginal brachytherapy, the risk factors for recurrence (larger tumor size and lower uterine segment involvement) in conjunction with established risk factors (high grade, ≥50% myometrial invasion, and lymphovascular invasion) may identify a group of high-risk patients who might benefit from pelvic radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
42
|
Hochreiter A, Kelly J, Young M, Litkouhi B, Black J, Stromberger C, Higgins S, Schwartz P, Damast S. Outcomes of FIGO 2009 stage IB grade 2 or 3 endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma treated with adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy following comprehensive surgical staging. Gynecol Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.04.674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
43
|
Busch CJ, Laban S, Wittekindt C, Stromberger C, Tribius S, Betz CS, Klußmann JP, Budach V, Muenscher A. Comparative effectiveness trial of transoral head and neck surgery followed by adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy versus primary radiochemotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer (TopROC). J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.tps6093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS6093 Background: For locally advanced, transorally resectable oropharyngeal cancer (OPSCC), both, surgical resection and risk-adapted adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy or definite chemoradiotherapy with or without salvage surgery are considered the current standard of care. To date, these two different therapeutic approaches for transorally resectable OPSCC have not been compared head to head in a randomized trial yet. The goal of this study is to compare primary transoral surgery followed by adjuvant treatment with definitive chemoradiation for resectable OPSCC, especially with regards to loco-regional control as well as organ function. Methods: TopROC is a prospective, two-arm, open label, multicenter, randomized controlled comparative effectiveness study. Eligible pts. are ≥18 years old with treatment-naïve, histologically proven OPSCC (T1, N2a-c, M0; T2, N1-2c, M0; T3, N0-2c, M0 TNM 7th ed.) which are amenable to transoral resection, ECOG PS ≤2 and no distant metastasis. p16 immunohistochemistry by local pathology or FFPE tissue must be available for central diagnostic. 280 pts. will be randomly assigned (1:1) to surgical treatment (arm A) or chemoradiation (arm B). Standard of care treatment will be done according to daily clinical practice. Arm A consists of transoral surgical resection with neck dissection followed by risk-adapted adjuvant (chemo)radiation. Pts. treated in arm B receive standard chemoradiation, residual tumor may be subject to salvage surgery. Follow-up visits are planned until three years after treatment. Primary endpoint is time to local or locoregional failure or death from any cause (LRF). Secondary endpoints include overall and disease-free survival, toxicity, patient reported outcomes and cost-effectiveness analysis. Approximately 20 centers will be involved in Germany. This trial is supported by the German Cancer Aid and accompanied by a large scientific support program. Recruitment started in January 2018. Clinical trial information: NCT03691441.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Jung Busch
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Simon Laban
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Claus Wittekindt
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Gießen, Gießen, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Dpts. for Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Silke Tribius
- Hermann-Holthusen-Institut for Radiation Oncology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Stephan Betz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jens Peter Klußmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core Center Heidelberg and DKTK Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Adrian Muenscher
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Grün A, Kawgan-Kagan M, Kaul D, Badakhshi H, Stromberger C, Budach V, Böhmer D. Impact of bladder volume on acute genitourinary toxicity in intensity modulated radiotherapy for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2018; 195:517-525. [PMID: 30443682 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-018-1398-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2018] [Accepted: 10/31/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To evaluate the effect of changes in bladder volume during high-dose intensity-modulated-radiotherapy (IMRT) of prostate cancer on acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity and prospectively evaluate a simple biofeedback technique for reproducible bladder filling with the aim of reducing acute GU toxicity. METHODS One hundred ninety-three patients were trained via a biofeedback mechanism to maintain a partially filled bladder with a reproducible volume of 200-300 cc at planning CT and subsequently at each fraction of radiotherapy. We prospectively analyzed whether and to what extent the patients' ability to maintain a certain bladder filling influenced the degree of acute GU toxicity and whether cut-off values could be differentiated. RESULTS We demonstrated that the ability to reach a reproducible bladder volume above a threshold volume of 180 cc and maintain that volume via biofeedback throughout treatment predicts for a decrease in acute GU toxicity during curative high-dose IMRT of the prostate. Patients who were not able to reach a partial bladder filling to that cut-off value and were not able to maintain a partially filled bladder throughout treatment had a significantly higher risk of developing ≥grade 2 GU acute toxicity. CONCLUSION Our results support the hypothesis that a biofeedback training for the patient is an easy-to-apply, useful, and cost-effective tool for reducing acute GU toxicity in high-dose IMRT of the prostate. Patients who are not able to reach and maintain a certain bladder volume during planning and treatment-two independent risk factors-might need special consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arne Grün
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow-Clinic, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Michael Kawgan-Kagan
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Schwanebecker Chaussee 50, 13125, Berlin, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow-Clinic, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Harun Badakhshi
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Ernst-von-Bergmann Klinikum, Charlottenstraße 72, 14467, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow-Clinic, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow-Clinic, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dirk Böhmer
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Häußler SM, Stromberger C, Olze H, Seifert G, Knopke S, Böttcher A. Head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma in children: a 20-year retrospective study at a tertiary referral center. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2017; 144:371-379. [PMID: 29143871 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-017-2544-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2017] [Accepted: 11/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to assess rhabdomyosarcomas (RMS) of the head and neck in pediatric patients with regard to clinical presentation, treatment, and survival. METHODS Data were retrospectively obtained from patient charts with regard to RMS of the head and neck diagnosed between 1996 and 2016 at a tertiary referral center. Clinical course, treatment modalities, and side effects were analyzed. Survival analysis was carried out using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Twenty-eight patients (17 male, 11 female) with a mean age at diagnosis of 6.8 ± 5.0 years have been included. Fourteen patients (50%) presented with painless swelling in the head and neck region and nine patients (32.1%) presented with cranial nerve deficit at initial diagnosis. The location of the majority of rhabdomyosarcomas was orbital (N = 9; 32.1%), followed by parapharyngeal (n = 4; 14.2%) and sinonasal (n = 3; 10.7%). All patients (n = 28; 100%) received polychemotherapy, additional adjuvant radiation therapy was carried out in 24 patients (85.7%), and surgery was performed in 12 cases (42.9%). The 5-year overall survival was 91.3%, and median progression-free survival was 46 ± 67.4 months. Common side effects resulting from chemotherapy and radiation therapy included neutropenia, mucositis, nausea and vomiting, and radiodermatitis, long-term side effects included microsomia and facial mutilation. CONCLUSION Multimodality treatment of rhabdomyosarcomas of the head and neck in pediatric patients may lead to a 5-year overall survival of up to 91.3%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Marie Häußler
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenbuger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Heidi Olze
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenbuger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Georg Seifert
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Oncology and Hematology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Steffen Knopke
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenbuger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Arne Böttcher
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Thieme A, Stromberger C, Ghadjar P, Grün A, Zschaek S, Budach V. PO-0641: A novel voxel based homogeneity index: clinical implications for WBRT. Radiother Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(17)31078-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
47
|
Tinhofer I, Stenzinger A, Eder T, Konschak R, Niehr F, Endris V, Distel L, Hautmann MG, Mandic R, Stromberger C, Weichert W, Budach V. Targeted next-generation sequencing identifies molecular subgroups in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with distinct outcome after concurrent chemoradiation. Ann Oncol 2016; 27:2262-2268. [PMID: 27681865 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2016] [Revised: 08/31/2016] [Accepted: 09/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Based on epidemiological (HPV status, smoking habits) and clinical risk factors (T/N stage), three subgroups of patients suffering from locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma with significantly different outcome after concurrent chemoradiation (cCRTX) can be distinguished. Mutational profiling by targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) might further improve risk stratification. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx and hypopharynx who had been enrolled in a randomized phase III trial (ARO-0401) comparing two regimens of cCRTX and from whom archival tumor specimens were available were included. The HPV status was determined by p16 immunostaining and detection of HPV DNA. Targeted NGS covering 45 genes frequently altered in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) was applied for detection of non-synonymous somatic and germline mutations. Interference of mutational profiles with cCRTX efficacy was determined. RESULTS The prognostic value of the 'Ang' risk model could be confirmed in the total biomarker study cohort (N = 175) as well as the patient subgroup for which mutational profiles could be established (N = 97). Mutations in genes involved in phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK), and p53 signaling pathways were significantly enriched in the low- (N = 7), intermediate- (N = 20), and high-risk group (N = 70), respectively. Mutations in TP53 identified a subgroup of high-risk patients with dismal outcome after cCRTX. No prognostic relevance was observed for mutations in PI3K and RTK signaling pathways in the low- and intermediate-risk groups, respectively. Mutated NOTCH1 and two functional KDR germline variants (rs2305948, rs1870377) were associated with improved outcome in all risk groups. All genetic markers (TP53, NOTCH1, KDR) remained independent prognosticators of OS in the multivariate model. CONCLUSION A potential of targeted NGS for risk classification of SCCHN cases beyond HPV status and clinical factors was demonstrated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Tinhofer
- Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charite University Hospital, Berlin .,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Berlin
| | - A Stenzinger
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Pathology, Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - T Eder
- Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charite University Hospital, Berlin.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Berlin
| | - R Konschak
- Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charite University Hospital, Berlin.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Berlin
| | - F Niehr
- Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charite University Hospital, Berlin.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Berlin
| | - V Endris
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - L Distel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen
| | - M G Hautmann
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Regensburg
| | - R Mandic
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospital Giessen-Marburg, Marburg
| | - C Stromberger
- Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charite University Hospital, Berlin
| | - W Weichert
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany.,Institute of Pathology, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Munich, Germany
| | - V Budach
- Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charite University Hospital, Berlin
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Ghadjar P, Pöttgen C, Joos D, Hayoz S, Baumann M, Bodis S, Budach W, Studer G, Stromberger C, Zimmermann F, Kaul D, Plasswilm L, Olze H, Bernier J, Wust P, Aebersold DM, Budach V. Haemoglobin and creatinine values as prognostic factors for outcome of concurrent radiochemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancers. Strahlenther Onkol 2016; 192:552-60. [DOI: 10.1007/s00066-016-0999-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2016] [Accepted: 05/10/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
49
|
Stromberger C, Knecht R, Raguse JD, Keilholz U, Tribius S, Busch CJ, Koelbl O, Hautmann M, Schreiber A, Gruen A, Becker ET, Tinhofer I, Budach V. Standard or split TPF induction chemotherapy followed by bioradiation: ICRAT randomized phase II study. J Clin Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.6035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Stromberger
- Dpts. for Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rainald Knecht
- Dpt. of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jan D Raguse
- Clinic for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ulrich Keilholz
- Department for Hemato-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité-University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Chia-Jung Busch
- Dpt. of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Koelbl
- Dpt. for Radiation Oncology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Hautmann
- University of Regensburg, Department of Radiotherapy, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - Arne Gruen
- Dpts. for Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eva-Tessina Becker
- Dpt. for Otorhinolaryngology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Inge Tinhofer
- Dept. of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charité Unversity Hospital and German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg (DKFZ)/German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charite University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Stromberger C, Ghadjar P, Marnitz S, Thieme AH, Jahn U, Raguse JD, Karaj-Rossbacher E, Böttcher A, Jamil B, Budach V. Comparative treatment planning study on sequential vs. simultaneous integrated boost in head and neck cancer patients: Differences in dose distributions and potential implications for clinical practice. Strahlenther Onkol 2016; 192:17-24. [PMID: 26462675 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-015-0913-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2015] [Accepted: 09/25/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
AIM The purpose of this work was to compare sequential (SeqB) versus simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) radiotherapy plans delivered with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for patients with locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (HNSCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS SeqB and SIB plans using VMAT for 10 HNSCC patients given definitive chemoradiation were generated and analysed for differences in dose distribution, coverage, conformity and homogeneity to the planning target volumes (PTV) 1-3 and sparing of organs at risk (OAR). RESULTS The mean delineated volumes ± standard deviations were 137.7 ± 44.8, 351.3 ± 83.9 and 895.6 ± 120.5 cm3 for PTV1-3. The mean volumes encompassed by the corresponding 95 % isodoses were 281 (+ 110 %) ± 73.4, 712.2 (+ 115 %) ± 146.4 and 1381.1 (+ 54 %) ± 217.3 cm3 with SeqB and 138.2 (+ 7 %) ± 40.1, 380.4 (+ 11 %) ± 91.9 and 1057.3 (+ 21 %) ± 161.4 cm3 with SIB for PTV1-3, respectively. Both strategies achieved excellent PTV coverage. SeqB provided significantly better coverage of PTV1 and 3, worse conformity for PTV1-3 and a higher mean dose than prescribed (111-115 %) to PTV2 and 3 (p ≤ 0.007). Both strategies provided satisfactory OAR sparing. CONCLUSION This study showed significant dosimetric differences with potential clinical relevance between two VMAT boost strategies regarding coverage, conformity and dose to the PTVs. SIB might cause less toxicity. A clinical phase III/IV trial endorsed by the German Head and Neck Clinical Trials Group (IAG-KHT) will evaluate differences in acute/late toxicity as well as in locoregional recurrences between the two boost techniques.
Collapse
|