1
|
Rühle A, Weymann M, Behrens M, Marschner S, Haderlein M, Fabian A, Senger C, Dickstein DR, Kraft J, von der Grün J, Chen E, Aquino-Michaels T, Domschikowski J, Bickel A, Altay-Langguth A, Kalinauskaite G, Lewitzki V, Bonomi M, Blakaj DM, Jhawar SR, Baliga S, Barve R, Ferentinos K, Zamboglou C, Schnellhardt S, Haehl E, Spohn SKB, Kuhnt T, Zöller D, Guckenberger M, Budach V, Belka C, Bakst R, Mayer A, Schmidberger H, Grosu AL, Balermpas P, Stromberger C, Nicolay NH. A Multicenter Evaluation of Different Chemotherapy Regimens in Older Adults With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Definitive Chemoradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:1282-1293. [PMID: 37914144 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The number of older adults with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is increasing, and treatment of these patients is challenging. Although cisplatin-based chemotherapy concomitantly with radiation therapy is considered the standard regimen for patients with locoregionally advanced HNSCC, there is substantial real-world heterogeneity regarding concomitant chemotherapy in older patients with HNSCC. METHODS AND MATERIALS The SENIOR study is an international multicenter cohort study including older patients (≥65 years) with HNSCC treated with definitive radiation therapy at 13 academic centers in the United States and Europe. Patients with concomitant chemoradiation were analyzed regarding overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) via Kaplan-Meier analyses. Fine-Gray competing risk regressions were performed regarding the incidence of locoregional failures and distant metastases. RESULTS Six hundred ninety-seven patients with a median age of 71 years were included in this analysis. Single-agent cisplatin was the most common chemotherapy regimen (n = 310; 44%), followed by cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (n = 137; 20%), carboplatin (n = 73; 10%), and mitomycin C plus 5-fluorouracil (n = 64; 9%). Carboplatin-based regimens were associated with diminished PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39 [1.03-1.89]; P < .05) and a higher incidence of locoregional failures (subdistribution HR, 1.54 [1.00-2.38]; P = .05) compared with single-agent cisplatin, whereas OS (HR, 1.15 [0.80-1.65]; P = .46) was comparable. There were no oncological differences between single-agent and multiagent cisplatin regimens (all P > .05). The median cumulative dose of cisplatin was 180 mg/m2 (IQR, 120-200 mg/m2). Cumulative cisplatin doses ≥200 mg/m2 were associated with increased OS (HR, 0.71 [0.53-0.95]; P = .02), increased PFS (HR, 0.66 [0.51-0.87]; P = .003), and lower incidence of locoregional failures (subdistribution HR, 0.50 [0.31-0.80]; P = .004). Higher cumulative cisplatin doses remained an independent prognostic variable in the multivariate regression analysis for OS (HR, 0.996 [0.993-0.999]; P = .009). CONCLUSIONS Single-agent cisplatin can be considered in the standard chemotherapy regimen for older patients with HNSCC who can tolerate cisplatin. Cumulative cisplatin doses are prognostically relevant in older patients with HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Maria Weymann
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Max Behrens
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Marschner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marlen Haderlein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexander Fabian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Carolin Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel R Dickstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Johannes Kraft
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jens von der Grün
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Frankfurt, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Eric Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Todd Aquino-Michaels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Justus Domschikowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Amanda Bickel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alev Altay-Langguth
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Frankfurt, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Goda Kalinauskaite
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Victor Lewitzki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Marcelo Bonomi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Dukagjin M Blakaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Sachin R Jhawar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Sujith Baliga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Rahul Barve
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Konstantinos Ferentinos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University of Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University of Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Sören Schnellhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany
| | - Erik Haehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Simon K B Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Kuhnt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Daniela Zöller
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Richard Bakst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Arnulf Mayer
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bostel T, Nikolaidou E, Wollschläger D, Mayer A, Kaufmann J, Hopprich A, Rühle A, Grosu AL, Debus J, Fottner C, Moehler M, Grimminger P, Schmidberger H, Nicolay NH. Multicenter analysis on the value of standard (chemo)radiotherapy in elderly patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:28. [PMID: 38433231 PMCID: PMC10910868 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02414-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the tolerability and oncological results of chemoradiation in elderly patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. METHODS This multi-center retrospective analysis included 86 elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (median age 73 years; range 65-92 years) treated with definitive or neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy. The treatment was performed at 3 large comprehensive cancer centers in Germany from 2006 to 2020. Locoregional control (LRC), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-associated toxicities according to CTCAE criteria v5.0 were analyzed, and parameters potentially relevant to patient outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS Thirty-three patients (38%) were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery, while the remaining patients received definitive (chemo)radiation. The delivery of radiotherapy without dose reduction was possible in 80 patients (93%). In 66 patients (77%), concomitant chemotherapy was initially prescribed; however, during the course of therapy, 48% of patients (n = 32) required chemotherapy de-escalation due to treatment-related toxicities and comorbidities. Twenty-nine patients (34%) experienced higher-grade acute toxicities and 14 patients (16%) higher-grade late toxicities. The 2-year LRC, DMFS, PFS, and OS amounted to 72%, 49%, 46%, and 52%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery was shown to be associated with significantly better PFS (p = 0.006), DMFS (p = 0.006), and OS (p = 0.004) compared with all non-surgical treatments (pooled definitive radiotherapy and chemoradiation). No such advantage was seen over definitive chemoradiation. The majority of patients with neoadjuvant therapy received standard chemoradiotherapy without dose reduction (n = 24/33, 73%). In contrast, concurrent chemotherapy was only possible in 62% of patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy (n = 33/53), and most of these patients required dose-reduction or modification of chemotherapy (n = 23/33, 70%). CONCLUSIONS In our analysis, omission of chemotherapy or adjustment of chemotherapy dose during definitive radiotherapy was necessary for the overwhelming majority of elderly esophageal cancer patients not eligible for surgery, and hence resulted in reduced PFS and OS. Therefore, optimization of non-surgical approaches and the identification of potential predictive factors for safe administration of concurrent chemotherapy in elderly patients with (gastro)esophageal adenocarcinoma is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Radiological Institute Dr. Von Essen, Koblenz, Germany.
| | - Eirini Nikolaidou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Wollschläger
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Arnulf Mayer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Justus Kaufmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anne Hopprich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
- Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Fottner
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Markus Moehler
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter Grimminger
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils Henrik Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
- Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oebel L, Mayer A, Kaufmann J, Wollschläger D, Hagemann J, Krüger M, Schmidberger H. Is bilateral radiotherapy necessary for patients with unilateral squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary of the head and neck region? Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100713. [PMID: 38192301 PMCID: PMC10772399 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose Squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary (SCC-CUP) of the head and neck region remains a clinical challenge, with uncertainty surrounding the necessity of contralateral irradiation of cervical lymphatic drainage in cases of unilateral involvement. Materials and Methods A retrospective study was conducted at the Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, on a cohort of 50 patients with unilateral SCC-CUP of the head and neck region treated between 2005 and 2019. 30 patients received bilateral and 20 received unilateral cervical radiotherapy. The majority (n = 38, 76 %) were treated with modern IMRT/ VMAT (Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy/ Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy) techniques. Results After a median follow-up of 64.5 months, locoregional recurrences occurred in 26 % of cases (n = 13/50), all of which were ipsilateral and predominantly within the volume of the previous irradiated CTV (clinical target volume) (85 %, n = 11/13). No patient treated unilaterally developed a contralateral recurrence in the neck. After 3 years, we observed 7 locoregional recurrences in the bilateral irradiated group (n = 7/30, 23 %), and 5 locoregional recurrences in the unilateral irradiated group (n = 5/20, 25 %). After 3 years, 12 patients had died in the bilateral irradiated group (n = 12/30, 40 %), and 7 in the unilateral irradiated group (n = 7/20, 35 %). 7 Patients showed distant metastases after 3 years in the bilateral irradiated group (n = 7/30, 23 %), and 2 in the unilateral irradiated group (n = 2/20, 10 %). Locoregional control (LRC) at 5 years was 66.2 % in the bilaterally irradiated group, and 70.0 % in the unilaterally irradiated group. Overall survival (OS) was 52.6 % (bilateral) and 64.0 % (unilateral). Distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) was 74.7 % (bilateral) and 84.4 % (unilateral). No significant differences were observed in OS (p = 0.37), LRC (p = 0.91), and DMFS (p = 0.91) between the groups.Acute toxicity ≥ °2 accordingly CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events) was high with 97% while late toxicity ≥ °2 was moderate with 31%. There was no statistically significant difference between the group of unilateral and bilateral irradiated patients. Conclusion These data suggest that contralateral cervical irradiation may be of limited benefit in patients with SCC-CUP, as recurrences occured ipsilaterally, and predominantly within the area of prior irradiation. Unilateral irradiation seems to be adequate for carefully selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Oebel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Arnulf Mayer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Justus Kaufmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Daniel Wollschläger
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Jan Hagemann
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Maximilian Krüger
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Scholz-Kreisel P, Becker C, Kaiser M, Mahmoudpour SH, Voigt M, Ressing M, Blettner M, Calaminus G, Baust K, Scholtes C, Zimmermann M, Zeissig SR, Schmidberger H, Karle H, Meyer-Oldenburg S, Kaatsch P, Spix C. Subsequent primary neoplasms after childhood cancer therapy - design and description of the German nested case-control study STATT-SCAR. Cancer Causes Control 2024; 35:33-41. [PMID: 37530985 PMCID: PMC10764383 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01760-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Subsequent primary neoplasms (SPN) are among the most severe late effects and the second most frequent cause of death in childhood cancer patients. In this paper we introduce method and properties of the STATT-SCAR study (Second Tumor After Tumor Therapy, Second Cancer After Radiotherapy), which is a joint nested matched case-control study to evaluate the impact of chemotherapy (STATT) as well as radiotherapy (SCAR) on the risk of developing a SPN. METHODS Based on the cohort of the German childhood cancer registry (GCCR), we selected patients diagnosed with a first neoplasm before age 15 or younger between 1980 and 2014. We selected those with a SPN at least half a year after the first neoplasm, and matched up to four controls to each case. Therapy data were acquired from various sources, including clinical study centers and treating hospitals. To analyze the impact of radiotherapy, organ doses were estimated by using reconstructed treatment plans. The effect of chemotherapy was analyzed using substance groups summarized after isotoxic dose conversion. RESULTS 1244 cases with a SPN were identified and matched with 4976 controls. Treatment data were acquired for 83% of all match groups (one case and at least one control). Based on preliminary analyses, 98% of all patients received chemotherapy and 54% of all patients were treated with radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Based on our data, detailed analyses of dose response relationships and treatment element combinations are possible, leading to a deeper insight into SPN risks after cancer treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study is registered at the German clinical trial register (DRKS) under number DRKS00017847 [45].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Scholz-Kreisel
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
- Federal Offices for Radiation Protection, Neuherberg, Germany.
| | - Cornelia Becker
- German Childhood Cancer Registry (GCCR) Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology at the Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Melanie Kaiser
- German Childhood Cancer Registry (GCCR) Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology at the Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Seyed Hamidreza Mahmoudpour
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Mathias Voigt
- German Childhood Cancer Registry (GCCR) Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology at the Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Meike Ressing
- German Childhood Cancer Registry (GCCR) Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology at the Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Maria Blettner
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Gabriele Calaminus
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Katja Baust
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Cathy Scholtes
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Martin Zimmermann
- Department for Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Children's Hospital, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Sylke Ruth Zeissig
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry (ICE-B), University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- Regional Centre Würzburg, Bavarian Cancer Registry, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department for Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heiko Karle
- Department for Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sarah Meyer-Oldenburg
- Department for Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter Kaatsch
- German Childhood Cancer Registry (GCCR) Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology at the Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Claudia Spix
- German Childhood Cancer Registry (GCCR) Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology at the Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zahnreich S, El Guerzyfy S, Kaufmann J, Schmidberger H. The cGAS/STING/IFN-1 Response in Squamous Head and Neck Cancer Cells after Genotoxic Challenges and Abrogation of the ATR-Chk1 and Fanconi Anemia Axis. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:14900. [PMID: 37834346 PMCID: PMC10573837 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241914900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) are often refractory to platinum-based radiochemotherapy and new immuno-oncological strategies. To stimulate immunogenic antitumor responses in HNSCC patients, we investigated the cGAS/STING/IFN-1 signaling pathway after genotoxic treatments and concomitant abrogation of the DNA damage response (DDR). For this purpose, FaDu and UM-SCC1 cells were exposed to X-rays or cisplatin and treated with an ATR or Chk1 inhibitor, or by Fanconi anemia gene A knockout (FANCA ko). We assessed clonogenic survival, cell cycle regulation, micronuclei, free cytosolic double-stranded DNA, and the protein expression and activity of the cGAS/STING/IFN-1 pathway and related players. Cell survival, regulation of G2/M arrest, and formation of rupture-prone cGAS-positive micronuclei after genotoxic treatments were most affected by ATR inhibition and FANCA ko. In UM-SCC-1 cells only, 8 Gy X-rays promoted IFN-1 expression unaltered by abrogation of the DDR or concomitant increased TREX1 expression. At a higher dose of 20 Gy, this effect was observed only for concurrent Chk1- or ATR-inhibition. FANCA ko or cisplatin treatment was ineffective in this regard. Our observations open new perspectives for the enhancement of cGAS/STING/IFN-1-mediated antitumor immune response in HNSCC by hypofractionated or stereotactic radiotherapy concepts in multimodal settings with immuno-oncological strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zahnreich
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg, University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany (H.S.)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Oertel M, Hering D, Kittel C, Nacke N, Kröger K, Kriz J, Fuchs M, Baues C, Vordermark D, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Herfarth KK, Lukas P, Schmidberger H, Marnitz-Schulze S, Borchmann P, Engert A, Haverkamp U, Eich HTT. Quality Analysis of Radiation Therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma in the HD 16/17 Trials: A Final Report By the Reference Radiation Oncology Panel of the German Hodgkin Study Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:S62. [PMID: 37784540 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) The HD 16 and 17 trials by the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) have evaluated the use of consolidative radiotherapy (RT) in early-favorable and -unfavorable stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), respectively (1, 2). Quality of RT planning and execution is pivotal for treatment outcome in HL with protocol violations jeopardizing prognosis (3). Consequently, the present work aims at a decisive analysis of quality and dosimetry in the modern era. MATERIALS/METHODS Random samples of 100 involved-field RT (IFRT) plans in HD16 and 176 plans in HD17 (134 involved-node RT (INRT) and 42 IFRT) were selected for analysis. Evaluation was performed systematically by the reference radiation oncology panel using pre-chemotherapy imaging, recommendation by the reference radiation oncology and RT planning imaging and graded as "correct", "minor" or "major deviation", respectively. RT doses to the target volume and organs at risks (OAR) were analyzed using dose-volume histograms. RESULTS Median RT doses were 20 Gy (19.8 Gy-21.6 Gy) in HD16 and 30 Gy in HD17 (IFRT: 18-30.6 Gy, INRT: 14 Gy-40 Gy). Overall, 84.0%, 69.0%, and 76.1% of RT series in HD16, the IFRT-group of HD17 and the INRT-group of HD17, respectively, were planned correctly. The main reason for major deviation was an insufficient coverage of an involved region (11 %-14.3 %). There was no significant difference in quality between IFRT and INRT in HD17 (p = 0.418 for any deviations; p = 0.466 for major deviations). In comparison to previous GHSG studies in the respective stages, a significant increase in correct RT-series (p<0.001) and decrease in major deviations (p<0.001) occurred. However, doses to OAR varied individually with median values of 4.3 Gy (0.2 Gy-9.2 Gy), 4.7 Gy (0.2 Gy-15.2 Gy) and 3.8 Gy (0.0 Gy-16.0 Gy) for mean doses to the right lung, left lung and heart in HD16, respectively. Correspondingly, values were 9.8 Gy (0.3 Gy-20.0 Gy), 10.5 Gy (0.2 Gy-26.5 Gy) and 13.1 Gy (0.5 Gy-30.4 Gy) for mean doses to the right lung, left lung and heart in HD17, respectively. The size of the planning target volume decreased significantly with INRT compared to IFRT (median values: 1163.1 ml vs. 1464.3 ml; p = 0.043). However, only some OAR-parameters (V25 of the right and left lung, respectively, thyroid and spinal cord) showed significant differences between INRT and IFRT in HD17. The use of intensity-modulated techniques in HD 17 resulted in an increase in V5 and V10 of the lungs with a concomitant decrease in V20-V30. CONCLUSION Quality of RT in the planning and treatment of HL has improved significantly with the latest GHSG study generation. Future analyses will focus on a further individualization of treatment fields. LITERATURE
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Oertel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - D Hering
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - C Kittel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - N Nacke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - K Kröger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - J Kriz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Alexianer Clemenshospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - M Fuchs
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - C Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology and CyberKnife Center, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - D Vordermark
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - R Engenhart-Cabillic
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Giessen-Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - K K Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - P Lukas
- Department of Radiooncology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - H Schmidberger
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - S Marnitz-Schulze
- Department of Radiation Oncology and CyberKnife Center, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - P Borchmann
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - A Engert
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - U Haverkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - H T T Eich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Thurner L, Ziepert M, Berdel C, Schmidt C, Borchmann P, Kaddu-Mulindwa D, Viardot A, Witzens-Harig M, Dierlamm J, Haenel M, Metzner B, Wulf G, Lengfelder E, Keller UB, Frickhofen N, Nickelsen M, Gaska T, Griesinger F, Mahlberg R, Marks R, Shpilberg O, Lindemann HW, Soekler M, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Kiehl M, Roemer E, Bentz M, Krammer-Steiner B, Trappe R, de Nully Brown P, Federico M, Merli F, Engelhard M, Glass B, Schmitz N, Truemper L, Bewarder M, Hartmann F, Murawski N, Stilgenbauer S, Rosenwald A, Altmann B, Schmidberger H, Fleckenstein J, Loeffler M, Poeschel V, Held G. Radiation and Dose-densification of R-CHOP in Aggressive B-cell Lymphoma With Intermediate Prognosis: The UNFOLDER Study. Hemasphere 2023; 7:e904. [PMID: 37427146 PMCID: PMC10325769 DOI: 10.1097/hs9.0000000000000904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
UNFOLDER (Unfavorable Young Low-Risk Densification of R-Chemo Regimens) is an international phase-3 trial in patients 18-60 years with aggressive B-cell lymphoma and intermediate prognosis defined by age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) of 0 and bulky disease (≥7.5 cm) or aaIPI of 1. In a 2 × 2 factorial design patients were randomized to 6× R-CHOP-14 or 6× R-CHOP-21 (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prediso[lo]ne) and to consolidation radiotherapy to extralymphatic and bulky disease or observation. Response was assessed according to the standardized response criteria published in 1999, not including F-18 fluordesoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET). Primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). A total of 695 of 700 patients were eligible for the intention-to-treat analysis. Totally 467 patients qualified for radiotherapy of whom 305 patients were randomized to receive radiotherapy (R-CHOP-21: 155; R-CHOP-14: 150) and 162 to observation (R-CHOP-21: 81, R-CHOP-14: 81). Two hundred twenty-eight patients not qualifying for radiotherapy were randomized for R-CHOP-14 versus R-CHOP-21. After a median observation of 66 months 3-year EFS was superior in the radiotherapy-arm versus observation-arm (84% versus 68%; P = 0.0012), due to a lower rate of partial responses (PR) (2% versus 11%). PR often triggered additional treatment, mostly radiotherapy. No significant difference was observed in progression-free survival (PFS) (89% versus 81%; P = 0.22) and overall survival (OS) (93% versus 93%; P = 0.51). Comparing R-CHOP-14 and R-CHOP-21 EFS, PFS and OS were not different. Patients randomized to radiotherapy had a superior EFS, largely due to a lower PR rate requiring less additional treatment (NCT00278408, EUDRACT 2005-005218-19).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenz Thurner
- Department of Internal Medicine 1 (Oncology, Hematology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology), Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Marita Ziepert
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christian Berdel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | | | - Peter Borchmann
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| | - Dominic Kaddu-Mulindwa
- Department of Internal Medicine 1 (Oncology, Hematology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology), Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Andreas Viardot
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Judith Dierlamm
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mathias Haenel
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Küchwald Hospital Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Bernd Metzner
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Clinic, Klinikum Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Gerald Wulf
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Georg August University of Goettingen, Germany
| | - Eva Lengfelder
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Mannheim, Germany
| | - Ulrich B. Keller
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München, Munich, Germany
| | - Norbert Frickhofen
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Helios Dr. Horst-Schmidt-Kliniken, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | | | - Tobias Gaska
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Brüderkrankenhaus St. Josef, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Frank Griesinger
- Department of Internal Oncology, Pius-Hospital, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Rolf Mahlberg
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromaerinnen, Trier, Germany
| | - Reinhard Marks
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ofer Shpilberg
- Department of Hematology, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah-Tiqwa, Israel
| | | | - Martin Soekler
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | - Michael Kiehl
- Department of Internal Medicine, Klinikum Frankfurt (Oder), Germany
| | - Eva Roemer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nephrology, Diabeteology, Hematoloy, Internal Oncology and Internal Intensive Medical Care, Klinikum Idar-Oberstein, Germany
| | - Martin Bentz
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Städtisches Klinikum, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | | | - Ralf Trappe
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Evang. Diakonie-Krankenhaus gGmbH, Bremen, Germany
| | | | - Massimo Federico
- CHIMOMO Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | | | | - Bertram Glass
- Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany
| | - Norbert Schmitz
- Department of Medicine A, Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital Münster, Germany
| | - Lorenz Truemper
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Georg August University of Goettingen, Germany
| | - Moritz Bewarder
- Department of Internal Medicine 1 (Oncology, Hematology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology), Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Frank Hartmann
- Department of Internal Medicine 1 (Oncology, Hematology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology), Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Niels Murawski
- Department of Internal Medicine 1 (Oncology, Hematology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology), Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Stephan Stilgenbauer
- Department of Internal Medicine 1 (Oncology, Hematology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology), Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Andreas Rosenwald
- Institute of Pathology, University of Wuerzburg, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Germany
| | - Bettina Altmann
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University Leipzig, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jochen Fleckenstein
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Markus Loeffler
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University Leipzig, Germany
| | - Viola Poeschel
- Department of Internal Medicine 1 (Oncology, Hematology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology), Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Gerhard Held
- Department of Internal Medicine 1, Westpfalz-Klinikum, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Held G, Thurner L, Poeschel V, Ott G, Schmidt C, Christofyllakis K, Viardot A, Borchmann P, Engel-Riedel W, Frickhofen N, Nickelsen M, Shpilberg O, Witzens-Harig M, Griesinger F, Krammer-Steiner B, Neubauer A, de Nully Brown P, Federico M, Glass B, Schmitz N, Wulf G, Truemper L, Bewarder M, Murawski N, Stilgenbauer S, Rosenwald A, Altmann B, Engelhard M, Schmidberger H, Fleckenstein J, Berdel C, Loeffler M, Ziepert M. Radiation and Dose-densification of R-CHOP in Primary Mediastinal B-cell Lymphoma: Subgroup Analysis of the UNFOLDER Trial. Hemasphere 2023; 7:e917. [PMID: 37427145 PMCID: PMC10325764 DOI: 10.1097/hs9.0000000000000917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
UNFOLDER (NCT00278408, EUDRACT 2005-005218-19) is a phase-3 trial in patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma and intermediate prognosis, including primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL). In a 2 × 2 factorial design, patients were randomized to 6× R-CHOP-14 or R-CHOP-21 (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prediso(lo)ne) and to consolidation radiotherapy to extralymphatic/bulky disease or observation. Response was assessed according to the standardized criteria from 1999, which did not include F-18 fluordesoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET) scans. Primary end point was event-free survival (EFS). A subgroup of 131 patients with PMBCLs was included (median age, 34 y; 54% female, 79% elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), 20% LDH >2× upper limit of normal [ULN], and 24% extralymphatic involvement). Eighty-two (R-CHOP-21: 43 and R-CHOP-14: 39) patients were assigned to radiotherapy and 49 (R-CHOP-21: 27, R-CHOP-14: 22) to observation. The 3-year EFS was superior in radiotherapy arm (94% [95% confidence interval (CI), 89-99] versus 78% [95% CI, 66-89]; P = 0.0069), due to a lower rate of partial responses (PRs) (2% versus 10%). PR triggered additional treatment, mostly radiotherapy (n = 5; PR: 4; complete response/unconfirmed complete response: 1). No significant differences were observed in progression-free survival (PFS) (95% [95% CI, 90-100] versus 90% [95% CI, 81-98]; P = 0.25) nor in overall survival (OS) (98% [95% CI, 94-100] versus 96% [95% CI, 90-100]; P = 0.64). Comparing R-CHOP-14 and R-CHOP-21, EFS, PFS, and OS were not different. A prognostic marker for adverse outcome was elevated LDH >2× ULN (EFS: P = 0.016; PFS: P = 0.0049; OS: P = 0.0014). With the limitation of a pre-PET-era trial, the results suggest a benefit of radiotherapy only for patients responding to R-CHOP with PR. PMBCL treated with R-CHOP have a favorable prognosis with a 3-year OS of 97%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerhard Held
- Department of Internal Medicine 1, Westpfalz-Klinikum, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Lorenz Thurner
- Department of Internal Medicine 1 (Oncology, Hematology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology), Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Viola Poeschel
- Department of Internal Medicine 1 (Oncology, Hematology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology), Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - German Ott
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus and Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany
| | | | - Konstantinos Christofyllakis
- Department of Internal Medicine 1 (Oncology, Hematology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology), Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Andreas Viardot
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Norbert Frickhofen
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Helios Dr.Horst-Schmidt-Kliniken, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | | | - Ofer Shpilberg
- Department of Hematology, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah-Tiqwa, Israel
| | | | - Frank Griesinger
- Department of Internal Oncology, Pius-Hospital, Oldenburg, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Neubauer
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, University Hospital Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Massimo Federico
- CHIMOMO Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Bertram Glass
- Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany
| | - Norbert Schmitz
- Department of Medicine A, Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital Münster, Germany
| | - Gerald Wulf
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Georg August University of Goettingen, Germany
| | - Lorenz Truemper
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Georg August University of Goettingen, Germany
| | - Moritz Bewarder
- Department of Internal Medicine 1 (Oncology, Hematology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology), Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Niels Murawski
- Department of Internal Medicine 1 (Oncology, Hematology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology), Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Stephan Stilgenbauer
- Department of Internal Medicine 1 (Oncology, Hematology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology), Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Andreas Rosenwald
- Institute of Pathology, University of Wuerzburg, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Germany
| | - Bettina Altmann
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jochen Fleckenstein
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Christian Berdel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Markus Loeffler
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University Leipzig, Germany
| | - Marita Ziepert
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Oertel M, Hering D, Nacke N, Kittel C, Kröger K, Kriz J, Fuchs M, Baues C, Vordermark D, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Herfarth K, Lukas P, Schmidberger H, Marnitz S, Borchmann P, Engert A, Haverkamp U, Eich HT. Radiation Therapy in the German Hodgkin Study Group HD 16 and HD 17 Trials: Quality Assurance and Dosimetric Analysis for Hodgkin Lymphoma in the Modern Era. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101169. [PMID: 36896214 PMCID: PMC9991533 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Radiation therapy (RT) is an integral part of treatment concepts for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. This analysis reports on RT quality in the recent HD16 and 17 trials of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG). Methods and Materials All RT plans of involved-node radiation therapy (INRT) in HD 17 were requested for analysis, along with 100 and 50 involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT) plans in HD 16 and 17, respectively. A structured assessment regarding field design and protocol adherence was performed by the reference radiation oncology panel of the GHSG. Results Overall, 100 (HD 16) and 176 (HD 17) patients were eligible for analysis. In HD 16, 84% of RT series were evaluated as correct, with significant improvement compared with the predecessor studies (P < .001). In HD 17, 76.1% of INRT cases revealed a correct RT design compared with 69.0% of IFRT-cases, which was superior to previous studies (P < .001). Comparing INRT and IFRT, we found no significant differences in the percentage of any deviation (P = .418) or major deviations (P = .466). Regarding dosimetry, INRT was accompanied by an improvement in thyroid doses. Comparing different RT techniques, we found that intensity-modulated RT showed a reduction of high doses in the lung at the expense of an increased low-dose exposure in HD 17. Conclusions The latest study generation of the GHSG demonstrates an improved quality in RT. A modern INRT design could be established without deterioration in quality. On a conceptual level, an individual consideration of the appropriate RT technique has to be performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Oertel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Dominik Hering
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Nina Nacke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Christopher Kittel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Kai Kröger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Jan Kriz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Alexianer Clemenshospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Michael Fuchs
- Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne, Düsseldorf, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dirk Vordermark
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Rita Engenhart-Cabillic
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Giessen-Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Lukas
- Department of Radiooncology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne, Düsseldorf, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Engert
- Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne, Düsseldorf, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Uwe Haverkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Hans Theodor Eich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Linz VC, Schwanbeck C, Krajnak S, Anic K, Jäkel J, Schwab R, Schmidt M, Schmidberger H, Hasenburg A, Battista MJ. Comparison of cisplatin and mitomycin C/5-FU as radiosensitisers in the treatment of locally advanced vulvar cancer: results of a retrospective, observational, single-institutional cohort study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:1391-1399. [PMID: 35451700 PMCID: PMC10020277 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04006-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We retrospectively investigated the widely used radiosensitisers cisplatin and mitomycin C/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer for outcome and toxicity. METHODS We screened the archive for patients treated with chemoradiation for vulvar cancer diagnosed between 01/2010 and 08/2021 at our institution. The impact of both radiosensitisers on prognosis was compared using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox-regression analysis. RESULTS One hundred and forty-three patients with vulvar cancer were screened. Twenty-nine patients received chemoradiation (mitomycin C/5-FU n = 14; cisplatin n = 12; others n = 3) as a primary, neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment. Median follow-up was 15.5 months. Patients in the cisplatin group were older (mean age 54.4 vs. 70.7; p = 0.004). However, the mitomycin C/5-FU group had more advanced tumour stages. The 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was comparable (44.5% vs. 33.3%; p = 0.932). The 2-year overall survival (OS) showed a numerical but not statistically significant difference in favour of the mitomycin C/5-FU group (59.7% vs. 31.7%; p = 0.37). 64.3% (9 out of 14) patients, who received mitomycin C/5-FU achieved clinical complete response (cCR) compared to 41.7% (5 out of 12) who received cisplatin (p = 0.505). Radiodermatitis was the most common adverse event in both groups (81%) and more severe in the mitomycin C/5-FU cohort. Myelotoxicity was frequently observed in both groups. Eighteen patients received an additional radiation boost with 10.0 (9-16) Gy and showed a significantly prolonged RFS (p = 0.027) and OS (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION Mitomycin C/5-FU may be considered in the treatment of young and healthy patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie Catherine Linz
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Carina Schwanbeck
- Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Slavomir Krajnak
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Katharina Anic
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jörg Jäkel
- Department of Pathology University Medical Center, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Roxana Schwab
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Annette Hasenburg
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Marco Johannes Battista
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Grandt CL, Brackmann LK, Foraita R, Schwarz H, Hummel-Bartenschlager W, Hankeln T, Kraemer C, Zahnreich S, Drees P, Mirsch J, Spix C, Blettner M, Schmidberger H, Binder H, Hess M, Galetzka D, Marini F, Poplawski A, Marron M. Gene expression variability in long-term survivors of childhood cancer and cancer-free controls in response to ionizing irradiation. Mol Med 2023; 29:41. [PMID: 36997855 PMCID: PMC10061869 DOI: 10.1186/s10020-023-00629-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Differential expression analysis is usually adjusted for variation. However, most studies that examined the expression variability (EV) have used computations affected by low expression levels and did not examine healthy tissue. This study aims to calculate and characterize an unbiased EV in primary fibroblasts of childhood cancer survivors and cancer-free controls (N0) in response to ionizing radiation. METHODS Human skin fibroblasts of 52 donors with a first primary neoplasm in childhood (N1), 52 donors with at least one second primary neoplasm (N2 +), as well as 52 N0 were obtained from the KiKme case-control study and exposed to a high (2 Gray) and a low dose (0.05 Gray) of X-rays and sham- irradiation (0 Gray). Genes were then classified as hypo-, non-, or hyper-variable per donor group and radiation treatment, and then examined for over-represented functional signatures. RESULTS We found 22 genes with considerable EV differences between donor groups, of which 11 genes were associated with response to ionizing radiation, stress, and DNA repair. The largest number of genes exclusive to one donor group and variability classification combination were all detected in N0: hypo-variable genes after 0 Gray (n = 49), 0.05 Gray (n = 41), and 2 Gray (n = 38), as well as hyper-variable genes after any dose (n = 43). While after 2 Gray positive regulation of cell cycle was hypo-variable in N0, (regulation of) fibroblast proliferation was over-represented in hyper-variable genes of N1 and N2+. In N2+, 30 genes were uniquely classified as hyper-variable after the low dose and were associated with the ERK1/ERK2 cascade. For N1, no exclusive gene sets with functions related to the radiation response were detected in our data. CONCLUSION N2+ showed high degrees of variability in pathways for the cell fate decision after genotoxic insults that may lead to the transfer and multiplication of DNA-damage via proliferation, where apoptosis and removal of the damaged genome would have been appropriate. Such a deficiency could potentially lead to a higher vulnerability towards side effects of exposure to high doses of ionizing radiation, but following low-dose applications employed in diagnostics, as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caine Lucas Grandt
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Achterstr. 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
- Faculty of Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
| | - Lara Kim Brackmann
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Achterstr. 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Ronja Foraita
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Achterstr. 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Heike Schwarz
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Achterstr. 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Hankeln
- Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Molecular Genetics and Genome Analysis, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Christiane Kraemer
- Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Molecular Genetics and Genome Analysis, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zahnreich
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Philipp Drees
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Johanna Mirsch
- Radiation Biology and DNA Repair, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Claudia Spix
- Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology, German Childhood Cancer Registry, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Maria Blettner
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), Center of the Johannes, University Medical, Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Harald Binder
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Moritz Hess
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Danuta Galetzka
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Federico Marini
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), Center of the Johannes, University Medical, Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Alicia Poplawski
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), Center of the Johannes, University Medical, Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Manuela Marron
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Achterstr. 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zahnreich S, Yusifli K, Poplawski A, Eckhard LS, Mirsch J, Hankeln T, Galetzka D, Marron M, Scholz-Kreisel P, Spix C, Schmidberger H. Replication stress drives chromosomal instability in fibroblasts of childhood cancer survivors with second primary neoplasms. DNA Repair (Amst) 2023; 122:103435. [PMID: 36549044 DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2022.103435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
New development and optimization of oncologic strategies are steadily increasing the number of long-term cancer survivors being at risk of developing second primary neoplasms (SPNs) as a late consequence of genotoxic cancer therapies with the highest risk among former childhood cancer patients. Since risk factors and predictive biomarkers for therapy-associated SPN remain unknown, we examined the sensitivity to mild replication stress as a driver of genomic instability and carcinogenesis in fibroblasts from 23 long-term survivors of a pediatric first primary neoplasm (FPN), 22 patients with the same FPN and a subsequent SPN, and 22 controls with no neoplasm (NN) using the cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) assay. Mild replication stress was induced with the DNA-polymerase inhibitor aphidicolin (APH). Fibroblasts from patients with the DNA repair deficiency syndromes Bloom, Seckel, and Fanconi anemia served as positive controls and for validation of the CBMN assay supplemented by analysis of chromosomal aberrations, DNA repair foci (γH2AX/53BP1), and cell cycle regulation. APH treatment resulted in G2/M arrest and underestimation of cytogenetic damage beyond G2, which could be overcome by inhibition of Chk1. Basal micronuclei were significantly increased in DNA repair deficiency syndromes but comparable between NN, FPN, and SPN donors. After APH-induced replication stress, the average yield of micronuclei was significantly elevated in SPN donors compared to FPN (p = 0.013) as well as NN (p = 0.03) donors but substantially lower than for DNA repair deficiency syndromes. Our findings suggest that mild impairment of the response to replication stress induced by genotoxic impacts of DNA-damaging cancer therapies promotes genomic instability in a subset of long-term cancer survivors and may drive the development of an SPN. Our study provides a basis for detailed mechanistic studies as well as predictive bioassays for clinical surveillance, to identify cancer patients at high risk for SPNs at first diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zahnreich
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany.
| | - Kamran Yusifli
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
| | - Alicia Poplawski
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
| | - Lukas Stefan Eckhard
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
| | - Johanna Mirsch
- Radiation Biology and DNA Repair, Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Thomas Hankeln
- Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Molecular Genetics and Genome Analysis, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
| | - Danuta Galetzka
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
| | - Manuela Marron
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Germany
| | - Peter Scholz-Kreisel
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany; Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Munich (Neuherberg), Germany
| | - Claudia Spix
- German Childhood Cancer Registry, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rühle A, Marschner S, Haderlein M, Fabian A, Weymann M, Behrens M, Senger C, Dickstein DR, Kraft J, von der Grün J, Chen E, Aquino-Michaels T, Domschikowski J, Bickel A, Altay-Langguth A, Kalinauskaite G, Lewitzki V, Ferentinos K, Zamboglou C, Schnellhardt S, Haehl E, Spohn SK, Gkika E, Zöller D, Guckenberger M, Budach V, Belka C, Bakst R, Mayer A, Schmidberger H, Grosu AL, Balermpas P, Stromberger C, Nicolay NH. Evaluation of Concomitant Systemic Treatment in Older Adults With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Definitive Radiotherapy. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e230090. [PMID: 36808242 PMCID: PMC9941890 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The number of older adults with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is increasing, and these patients are underrepresented in clinical trials. It is unclear whether the addition of chemotherapy or cetuximab to radiotherapy is associated with improved survival in older adults with HNSCC. OBJECTIVE To examine whether the addition of chemotherapy or cetuximab to definitive radiotherapy is associated with improved survival in patients with locoregionally advanced (LA) HNSCC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The Special Care Patterns for Elderly HNSCC Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy (SENIOR) study is an international, multicenter cohort study including older adults (≥65 years) with LA-HNSCCs of the oral cavity, oropharynx/hypopharynx, or larynx treated with definitive radiotherapy, either alone or with concomitant systemic treatment, between January 2005 and December 2019 at 12 academic centers in the US and Europe. Data analysis was conducted from June 4 to August 10, 2022. INTERVENTIONS All patients underwent definitive radiotherapy alone or with concomitant systemic treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival and locoregional failure rate. RESULTS Among the 1044 patients (734 men [70.3%]; median [IQR] age, 73 [69-78] years) included in this study, 234 patients (22.4%) were treated with radiotherapy alone and 810 patients (77.6%) received concomitant systemic treatment with chemotherapy (677 [64.8%]) or cetuximab (133 [12.7%]). Using inverse probability weighting to attribute for selection bias, chemoradiation was associated with longer overall survival than radiotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.48-0.77; P < .001), whereas cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy was not (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.70-1.27; P = .70). Progression-free survival was also longer after the addition of chemotherapy (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.52-0.81; P < .001), while the locoregional failure rate was not significantly different (subhazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.30-1.26; P = .19). The survival benefit of the chemoradiation group was present in patients up to age 80 years (65-69 years: HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33-0.82; 70-79 years: HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.85), but was absent in patients aged 80 years or older (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.56-1.41). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study of older adults with LA- HNSCC, chemoradiation, but not cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy, was associated with longer survival compared with radiotherapy alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg–Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Marschner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- DKTK Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marlen Haderlein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexander Fabian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Maria Weymann
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Max Behrens
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Carolin Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Germany, Berlin, Germany
- DKTK Partner Site Berlin, DKFZ, Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel R. Dickstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Johannes Kraft
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jens von der Grün
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- DKTK Partner Site Frankfurt, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Eric Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Todd Aquino-Michaels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Justus Domschikowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Amanda Bickel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alev Altay-Langguth
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- DKTK Partner Site Frankfurt, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Goda Kalinauskaite
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Germany, Berlin, Germany
- DKTK Partner Site Berlin, DKFZ, Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Victor Lewitzki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Konstantinos Ferentinos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University of Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg–Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University of Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Sören Schnellhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Erik Haehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- DKTK Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Simon K.B. Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg–Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg–Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniela Zöller
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Germany, Berlin, Germany
- DKTK Partner Site Berlin, DKFZ, Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- DKTK Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Richard Bakst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Arnulf Mayer
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- DKTK Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- DKTK Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg–Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Germany, Berlin, Germany
- DKTK Partner Site Berlin, DKFZ, Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils H. Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg–Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Haist M, Kaufmann J, Kur IM, Zimmer S, Grabbe S, Schmidberger H, Weigert A, Mayer A. Response to primary chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma is determined by the degree of cytotoxic T cell infiltration within tumor cell aggregates. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1070203. [PMID: 37187729 PMCID: PMC10175951 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1070203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Effective anti-tumor immune responses are mediated by T cells and require organized, spatially coordinated interactions within the tumor microenvironment (TME). Understanding coordinated T-cell-behavior and deciphering mechanisms of radiotherapy resistance mediated by tumor stem cells will advance risk stratification of oropharyngeal cancer (OPSCC) patients treated with primary chemoradiotherapy (RCTx). Methods To determine the role of CD8 T cells (CTL) and tumor stem cells for response to RCTx, we employed multiplex immunofluorescence stains on pre-treatment biopsy specimens from 86 advanced OPSCC patients and correlated these quantitative data with clinical parameters. Multiplex stains were analyzed at the single-cell level using QuPath and spatial coordination of immune cells within the TME was explored using the R-package Spatstat. Results Our observations demonstrate that a strong CTL-infiltration into the epithelial tumor compartment (HR for overall survival, OS: 0.35; p<0.001) and the expression of PD-L1 on CTL (HR: 0.36; p<0.001) were both associated with a significantly better response and survival upon RCTx. As expected, p16 expression was a strong predictor of improved OS (HR: 0.38; p=0.002) and correlated with overall CTL infiltration (r: 0.358, p<0.001). By contrast, tumor cell proliferative activity, expression of the tumor stem cell marker CD271 and overall CTL infiltration, regardless of the affected compartment, were not associated with response or survival. Conclusion In this study, we could demonstrate the clinical relevance of the spatial organization and the phenotype of CD8 T cells within the TME. In particular, we found that the infiltration of CD8 T cells specifically into the tumor cell compartment was an independent predictive marker for response to chemoradiotherapy, which was strongly associated with p16 expression. Meanwhile, tumor cell proliferation and the expression of stem cell markers showed no independent prognostic effect for patients with primary RCTx and thus requires further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Haist
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes-Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- *Correspondence: Maximilian Haist,
| | - Justus Kaufmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Ivan-Maximiliano Kur
- Institute of Biochemistry I, Faculty of Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Stefanie Zimmer
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Stephan Grabbe
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes-Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andreas Weigert
- Institute of Biochemistry I, Faculty of Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Arnulf Mayer
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Brackmann LK, Foraita R, Schwarz H, Poplawski A, Hankeln T, Galetzka D, Zahnreich S, Spix C, Blettner M, Schmidberger H, Marron M. Self-administered questionnaire assessing childhood cancer treatments and associated risks for adverse health outcomes - The KiKme study. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1150629. [PMID: 37124517 PMCID: PMC10147395 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1150629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) are at particularly high risk for therapy-related late sequelae, with secondary primary neoplasms (SPN) being the most detrimental. Since there is no standardized questionnaire for retrospective assessment of associations between prior cancer treatments and late health effects, we developed a self-administered questionnaire and validated it in a cohort of CCS. Methods CCS of a first primary neoplasm (FPN, N=340) only or with a subsequent SPN (N=101) were asked whether they had received cancer therapies. Self-reports were compared to participants' medical records on cancer therapies from hospitals and clinical studies (N=242). Cohen's Kappa (κ) was used to measure their agreement and logistic regression was used to identify factors influencing the concordance. Associations between exposure to cancer therapies and late health effects (overweight/obesity, diseases of the lipid metabolism and the thyroid gland, cardiovascular diseases, occurrence of SPN) were analyzed in all participants by applying generalized linear mixed models to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Results For CCS of SPN, a perfect agreement was found between self-reports and medical records for chemotherapy (CT, κ=1.0) while the accordance for radiotherapy (RT) was lower but still substantial (κ=0.8). For the CCS of FPN the accordance was less precise (CT: κ=0.7, RT: κ=0.3). Cancer status, tumors of the central nervous system, sex, age at recruitment, vocational training, follow-up time, and comorbidities had no impact on agreement. CCS with exposure to CT were found to be less often overweight or obese compared to those without CT (OR=0.6 (95%CI 0.39; 0.91)). However, they were found to suffer more likely from thyroid diseases excluding thyroid cancers (OR=9.91 (95%CI 4.0; 24.57)) and hypercholesterolemia (OR=4.45 (95%CI 1.5; 13.23)). All other analyses did not show an association. Conclusion Our new questionnaire proved reliable for retrospective assessment of exposure to CT and RT in CCS of SPN. For the CCS of FPN, self-reported RT was very imprecise and should not be used for further analyses. We revealed an association between late health outcomes occurring as hypercholesterolemia and thyroid diseases, excluding thyroid cancer, and the use of CT for the treatment of childhood cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Kim Brackmann
- Epidemiological Methods and Etiological Research, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
- Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
- *Correspondence: Manuela Marron, ; Lara Kim Brackmann,
| | - Ronja Foraita
- Biometry and Data Management, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Heike Schwarz
- Epidemiological Methods and Etiological Research, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Alicia Poplawski
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Thomas Hankeln
- Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Molecular Genetics and Genome Analysis, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Danuta Galetzka
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zahnreich
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Claudia Spix
- German Childhood Cancer Registry, Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology (EpiKiK), Institute for Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Maria Blettner
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Manuela Marron
- Epidemiological Methods and Etiological Research, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
- *Correspondence: Manuela Marron, ; Lara Kim Brackmann,
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bostel T, Akbaba S, Wollschläger D, Mayer A, Nikolaidou E, Murnik M, Kirste S, Rühle A, Grosu AL, Debus J, Fottner C, Moehler M, Grimminger P, Schmidberger H, Nicolay NH. Chemoradiotherapy in geriatric patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: Multi-center analysis on the value of standard treatment in the elderly. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1063670. [PMID: 36937445 PMCID: PMC10022427 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1063670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose To evaluate the tolerability and outcomes of chemoradiation in elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Materials and methods This multi-center retrospective analysis included 161 patients with SCC of the esophagus with a median age of 73 years (range 65-89 years) treated with definitive or neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy between 2010 and 2019 at 3 large comprehensive cancer centers in Germany. Locoregional control (LRC), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-associated toxicities were analyzed, and parameters determining patient outcomes and treatment tolerance were assessed. Results The delivery of radiotherapy without dose reduction was possible in 149 patients (93%). In 134 patients (83%), concomitant chemotherapy was initially prescribed; however, during the course of therapy, 41% of these patients (n = 55) required chemotherapy de-escalation due to treatment-related toxicities. Fifty-two patients (32%) experienced higher-grade acute toxicities, and 22 patients (14%) higher-grade late toxicities. The 2-year LRC, DMFS, PFS, and OS rates amounted to 67.5%, 33.8%, 31.4%, and 40.4%, respectively. Upon multivariate analysis, full-dose concomitant chemotherapy (vs. no or modified chemotherapy) was associated with significantly better DMFS (p=0.005), PFS (p=0.005) and OS (p=0.001). Furthermore, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by tumor resection (vs. definitive chemoradiotherapy or definitive radiotherapy alone) significantly improved PFS (p=0.043) and OS (p=0.049). We could not identify any clinico-pathological factor that was significantly associated with LRC. Furthermore, definitive (chemo)radiotherapy, brachytherapy boost and stent implantation were significantly associated with higher-grade acute toxicities (p<0.001, p=0.002 and p=0.04, respectively). The incidence of higher-grade late toxicities was also significantly associated with the choice of therapy, with a higher risk for late toxicities when treatment was switched from neoadjuvant to definitive (chemo)radiotherapy compared to primary definitive (chemo)radiotherapy (p<0.001). Conclusions Chemoradiation with full-dose and unmodified concurrent chemotherapy has a favorable prognostic impact in elderly ESCC patients; however, about half of the analyzed patients required omission or adjustment of chemotherapy due to comorbidities or toxicities. Therefore, the identification of potential predictive factors for safe administration of concurrent chemotherapy in elderly ESCC patients requires further exploration to optimize treatment in this vulnerable patient cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- *Correspondence: Tilman Bostel,
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Wollschläger
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Arnulf Mayer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eirini Nikolaidou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Murnik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg – Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg – Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg – Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg – Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Fottner
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Markus Moehler
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter Grimminger
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils Henrik Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg – Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Oertel M, Berdel C, Held G, Herfarth K, Schmidberger H, Ernst M, Lenz G, Borchmann P, Eich HT. The new German evidence-based guideline on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma-key aspects for radiation oncologists. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:115-120. [PMID: 36598520 PMCID: PMC9877084 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-02035-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Diffuse large B‑cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive lymphoma subtype treated successfully with immunochemotherapy. However, there are conflicting data on the role and impact of consolidative radiation therapy (RT). The publication of the national evidence-based guideline on DLBCL prompted us to review relevant passages on radiation oncology. METHODS The following article reviews the evidence and recommendations given in the current German evidence-based guideline on DLBCL regarding RT and summarizes pivotal aspects. Additional literature is presented to provide a comprehensive background for the published recommendations. RESULTS RT shall be administered to all patients with localized positron emission tomography(PET)-positive residues after completion of immunochemotherapy and should use a dose of 30-40 Gray in normofractionation. For RT planning, PET information before and after immunochemotherapy shall be used, with either a PET-CT in the RT treatment position or an image fusion to the planning CT. Conformal techniques shall be used for target volume coverage, with a risk-benefit evaluation for the individual patient. Additionally, RT may be used in the treatment context of various subtypes of DLBCL as well as in the recurrent or refractory treatment situation. CONCLUSION RT remains an integral part of the treatment repertoire of DLBCL. With the use of PET-guided treatment, RT is indicated for patients with metabolically active tumors. In the context of the ongoing development of targeted therapies, new RT indications may evolve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Oertel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, building A1, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Christian Berdel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany
| | - Gerhard Held
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Westpfalz-Klinikum, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Moritz Ernst
- Evidence-based Oncology, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Georg Lenz
- Department of Medicine A, Hematology, Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hans Theodor Eich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, building A1, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Grandt CL, Brackmann LK, Poplawski A, Schwarz H, Marini F, Hankeln T, Galetzka D, Zahnreich S, Mirsch J, Spix C, Blettner M, Schmidberger H, Marron M. Identification of lncRNAs involved in response to ionizing radiation in fibroblasts of long-term survivors of childhood cancer and cancer-free controls. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1158176. [PMID: 37182169 PMCID: PMC10174438 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1158176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Long non-coding ribonucleic acids (lncRNAs) are involved in the cellular damage response following exposure to ionizing radiation as applied in radiotherapy. However, the role of lncRNAs in radiation response concerning intrinsic susceptibility to late effects of radiation exposure has not been examined in general or in long-term survivors of childhood cancer with and without potentially radiotherapy-related second primary cancers, in particular. Methods Primary skin fibroblasts (n=52 each) of long-term childhood cancer survivors with a first primary cancer only (N1), at least one second primary neoplasm (N2+), as well as tumor-free controls (N0) from the KiKme case-control study were matched by sex, age, and additionally by year of diagnosis and entity of the first primary cancer. Fibroblasts were exposed to 0.05 and 2 Gray (Gy) X-rays. Differentially expressed lncRNAs were identified with and without interaction terms for donor group and dose. Weighted co-expression networks of lncRNA and mRNA were constructed using WGCNA. Resulting gene sets (modules) were correlated to the radiation doses and analyzed for biological function. Results After irradiation with 0.05Gy, few lncRNAs were differentially expressed (N0: AC004801.4; N1: PCCA-DT, AF129075.3, LINC00691, AL158206.1; N2+: LINC02315). In reaction to 2 Gy, the number of differentially expressed lncRNAs was higher (N0: 152, N1: 169, N2+: 146). After 2 Gy, AL109976.1 and AL158206.1 were prominently upregulated in all donor groups. The co-expression analysis identified two modules containing lncRNAs that were associated with 2 Gy (module1: 102 mRNAs and 4 lncRNAs: AL158206.1, AL109976.1, AC092171.5, TYMSOS, associated with p53-mediated reaction to DNA damage; module2: 390 mRNAs, 7 lncRNAs: AC004943.2, AC012073.1, AC026401.3, AC092718.4, MIR31HG, STXBP5-AS1, TMPO-AS1, associated with cell cycle regulation). Discussion For the first time, we identified the lncRNAs AL158206.1 and AL109976.1 as involved in the radiation response in primary fibroblasts by differential expression analysis. The co-expression analysis revealed a role of these lncRNAs in the DNA damage response and cell cycle regulation post-IR. These transcripts may be targets in cancer therapy against radiosensitivity, as well as provide grounds for the identification of at-risk patients for immediate adverse reactions in healthy tissues. With this work we deliver a broad basis and new leads for the examination of lncRNAs in the radiation response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caine Lucas Grandt
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
- Faculty of Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
- *Correspondence: Caine Lucas Grandt,
| | - Lara Kim Brackmann
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Alicia Poplawski
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heike Schwarz
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Federico Marini
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Thomas Hankeln
- Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Molecular Genetics and Genome Analysis, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Danuta Galetzka
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zahnreich
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Johanna Mirsch
- Radiation Biology and DNA Repair, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Claudia Spix
- Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology, German Childhood Cancer Registry, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Maria Blettner
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Manuela Marron
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Brackmann LK, Foraita R, Schwarz H, Galetzka D, Zahnreich S, Hankeln T, Löbrich M, Poplawski A, Grabow D, Blettner M, Schmidberger H, Marron M. Late health effects and changes in lifestyle factors after cancer in childhood with and without subsequent second primary cancers – the KiKme case-control study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1037276. [PMID: 36324589 PMCID: PMC9618813 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1037276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Improved treatments for childhood cancer result in a growing number of long-term childhood cancer survivors (CCS). The diagnosis and the prevalence of comorbidities may, however, influence their lifestyle later in life. Nonetheless, little is known about differences in late effects between CCS of a first primary neoplasm (FPN) in childhood and subsequent second primary neoplasms (SPN) and their impact on lifestyle. Therefore, we aim to investigate associations between the occurrence of FPN or SPN and various diseases and lifestyle in the later life of CCS. Methods CCS of SPN (n=101) or FPN (n=340) and cancer-free controls (n=150) were matched by age and sex, and CCS additionally by year and entity of FPN. All participants completed a self-administered questionnaire on anthropometric and socio-economic factors, medical history, health status, and lifestyle. Mean time between FPN diagnosis and interview was 27.3 years for SPN and 26.2 years for FPN CCS. To confirm results from others and to generate new hypotheses on late effects of childhood cancer as well as CCS´ lifestyles, generalized linear mixed models were applied. Results CCS were found to suffer more likely from diseases compared to cancer-free controls. In detail, associations with cancer status were observed for hypercholesterinemia and thyroid diseases. Moreover, CCS were more likely to take regular medication compared to controls. A similar association was observed for CCS of SPN compared to CCS of FPN. In contrast to controls, CCS rarely exercise more than 5 hours per week, consumed fewer soft and alcoholic drinks, and were less likely to be current, former, or passive smokers. Additionally, they were less likely overweight or obese. All other exploratory analyses performed on cardiovascular, chronic lung, inflammatory bone, allergic, and infectious diseases, as well as on a calculated health-score revealed no association with tumor status. Conclusion CCS were more affected by pathologic conditions and may consequently take more medication, particularly among CCS of SPN. The observed higher disease burden is likely related to the received cancer therapy. To reduce the burden of long-term adverse health effects in CCS, improving cancer therapies should therefore be in focus of research in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Kim Brackmann
- Epidemiological Methods and Etiological Research, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
- Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Ronja Foraita
- Biometry and Data Management, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Heike Schwarz
- Epidemiological Methods and Etiological Research, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Danuta Galetzka
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zahnreich
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Thomas Hankeln
- Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Molecular Genetics and Genome Analysis, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Markus Löbrich
- Radiation Biology and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) Repair, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Alicia Poplawski
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Desiree Grabow
- German Childhood Cancer Registry, Institute for Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Maria Blettner
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Manuela Marron
- Epidemiological Methods and Etiological Research, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
- *Correspondence: Manuela Marron,
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Oertel M, Hering D, Nacke N, Kittel C, Kröger K, Kriz J, Fuchs M, Baues C, Vordermark D, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Herfarth K, Lukas P, Schmidberger H, Marnitz S, Borchmann P, Engert A, Haverkamp U, Eich HT. P092: Estimating the dosimetric benefit of involved-node radiotherapy in comparison to involved-field radiotherapy - implications from the GHSG HD 17 trial. Hemasphere 2022. [PMCID: PMC9621491 DOI: 10.1097/01.hs9.0000890936.73031.da] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Oertel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Dominik Hering
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Nina Nacke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Christopher Kittel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Kai Kröger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Jan Kriz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Alexianer Clemenshospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Michael Fuchs
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dirk Vordermark
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Rita Engenhart-Cabillic
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Giessen-Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Lukas
- Department of Radiooncology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Engert
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Uwe Haverkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Hans Theodor Eich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Baaken D, Merzenich H, Schmidt M, Bekes I, Schwentner L, Janni W, Wöckel A, Mayr M, Mose S, Merz T, Ghilescu V, Renner J, Bartkowiak D, Wiegel T, Blettner M, Schmidberger H, Wollschläger D. A nested case-control study on radiation dose-response for cardiac events in breast cancer patients in Germany. Breast 2022; 65:1-7. [PMID: 35716531 PMCID: PMC9207715 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Previous studies with the majority of breast cancer (BC) patients treated up to 2000 provided evidence that radiation dose to the heart from radiotherapy (RT) was linearly associated with increasing risk for long-term cardiac disease. RT techniques changed substantially over time. This study aimed to investigate the dose-dependent cardiac risk in German BC patients treated with more contemporary RT. Methods In a cohort of 11,982 BC patients diagnosed in 1998–2008, we identified 494 women treated with 3D-conformal RT who subsequently developed a cardiac event. Within a nested case-control approach, these cases were matched to 988 controls. Controls were patients without a cardiac event after RT until the index date of the corresponding case. Separate multivariable conditional logistic regression models were used to assess the association of radiation to the complete heart and to the left anterior heart wall (LAHW) with cardiac events. Results Mean dose to the heart for cases with left-sided BC was 4.27 Gy and 1.64 Gy for cases with right-sided BC. For controls, corresponding values were 4.31 Gy and 1.66 Gy, respectively. The odds ratio (OR) per 1 Gy increase in dose to the complete heart was 0.99 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.94–1.05, P = .72). The OR per 1 Gy increase in LAHW dose was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.98–1.01, P = .68). Conclusions Contrary to previous studies, our study provided no evidence that radiation dose to the heart from 3D-conformal RT for BC patients treated between 1998 and 2008 was associated with risk of cardiac events. Dose-response analysis on cardiac late effects in irradiated breast cancer patients. Nested case-control study with individual retrospective heart dosimetry. Included 494 cases and 988 controls treated in 1998–2008 in Germany. No association for cardiac late effects of 3D-conformal radiotherapy observed. No association for the complete heart and left anterior heart wall observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Baaken
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, 55101, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Hiltrud Merzenich
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, 55101, Mainz, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 55101, Mainz, Germany
| | - Inga Bekes
- University Hospital Ulm, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| | - Lukas Schwentner
- University Hospital Ulm, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- University Hospital Ulm, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- University Hospital Ulm, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 89075, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital Würzburg, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Manfred Mayr
- Strahlentherapie Süd am Klinikum Kaufbeuren, 87600, Kaufbeuren, Germany
| | - Stephan Mose
- Schwarzwald-Baar Klinikum, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, 78052, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany
| | - Thomas Merz
- Kliniken Landkreis Heidenheim gGmbH, Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, 89522, Heidenheim, Germany
| | - Voica Ghilescu
- Kliniken Landkreis Heidenheim gGmbH, Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, 89522, Heidenheim, Germany
| | - Jona Renner
- University Hospital Ulm, Department of Radiation Oncology, 89081, Ulm, Germany
| | - Detlef Bartkowiak
- University Hospital Ulm, Department of Radiation Oncology, 89081, Ulm, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- University Hospital Ulm, Department of Radiation Oncology, 89081, Ulm, Germany
| | - Maria Blettner
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, 55101, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, 55101, Mainz, Germany
| | - Daniel Wollschläger
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, 55101, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Weide R, Thomalla J, van Roye C, Chakupurakal G, Heymanns J, Köppler H, Feiten S, Nickel JA, Schmidberger H, Theobald M, Lutz C. Curricular course for medical students at a hematology and oncology specialty practice, 2010-2022. GMS J Med Educ 2022; 39:Doc40. [PMID: 36310886 PMCID: PMC9585415 DOI: 10.3205/zma001561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Aim: For several years now, medical students have also been taught general practice at academic medical teaching practices. Specialty practices have not yet been included in the curricular education. Since 1998, we have conducted a block seminar in hematology twice per semester for eighth-semester medical students. This block seminar was offered from 1998-2001 to students at the Philipps University in Marburg and since 2001 to students at the Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz. Since 2010 our block seminar has been part of the curriculum at the Johannes Gutenberg University. Method: Standardized course evaluation by students who had attended our block seminar between January 2010 and March 2022. Courses that were held virtually due to corona were not included in the analysis. The questionnaire used to evaluate courses in the medical degree program at the Johannes Gutenberg University served as the evaluation instrument. Results: Since 1998 more than 1,000 students have attended our seminar. The systematic evaluation of the course by 500 students who participated in the curricular, classroom-based seminar sessions since 2010 shows that the highest ratings possible are given for practical relevance, learning atmosphere, teaching and effectiveness. Conclusion: High quality in teaching curricular courses to medical students at a specialty practice is possible. Insights into the possibilities connected with working in the outpatient setting at a medical practice broadens students' experience. This teaching format facilitates external university instructors in terms of teaching and, at the same time, relieves the university in terms of staff and financial budget.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rudolf Weide
- Praxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Koblenz, Germany
| | - Jörg Thomalla
- Praxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Koblenz, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Stefan Feiten
- Institut für Versorgungsforschung in der Onkologie, Koblenz, Germany
| | | | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Matthias Theobald
- Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Grandt CL, Brackmann LK, Poplawski A, Schwarz H, Hummel-Bartenschlager W, Hankeln T, Kraemer C, Marini F, Zahnreich S, Schmitt I, Drees P, Mirsch J, Grabow D, Schmidberger H, Binder H, Hess M, Galetzka D, Marron M. Radiation-response in primary fibroblasts of long-term survivors of childhood cancer with and without second primary neoplasms: the KiKme study. Mol Med 2022; 28:105. [PMID: 36068491 PMCID: PMC9450413 DOI: 10.1186/s10020-022-00520-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The etiology and most risk factors for a sporadic first primary neoplasm in childhood or subsequent second primary neoplasms are still unknown. One established causal factor for therapy-associated second primary neoplasms is the exposure to ionizing radiation during radiation therapy as a mainstay of cancer treatment. Second primary neoplasms occur in 8% of all cancer survivors within 30 years after the first diagnosis in Germany, but the underlying factors for intrinsic susceptibilities have not yet been clarified. Thus, the purpose of this nested case–control study was the investigation and comparison of gene expression and affected pathways in primary fibroblasts of childhood cancer survivors with a first primary neoplasm only or with at least one subsequent second primary neoplasm, and controls without neoplasms after exposure to a low and a high dose of ionizing radiation. Methods Primary fibroblasts were obtained from skin biopsies from 52 adult donors with a first primary neoplasm in childhood (N1), 52 with at least one additional primary neoplasm (N2+), as well as 52 without cancer (N0) from the KiKme study. Cultured fibroblasts were exposed to a high [2 Gray (Gy)] and a low dose (0.05 Gy) of X-rays. Messenger ribonucleic acid was extracted 4 h after exposure and Illumina-sequenced. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were computed using limma for R, selected at a false discovery rate level of 0.05, and further analyzed for pathway enrichment (right-tailed Fisher’s Exact Test) and (in-) activation (z ≥|2|) using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Results After 0.05 Gy, least DEGs were found in N0 (n = 236), compared to N1 (n = 653) and N2+ (n = 694). The top DEGs with regard to the adjusted p-value were upregulated in fibroblasts across all donor groups (SESN1, MDM2, CDKN1A, TIGAR, BTG2, BLOC1S2, PPM1D, PHLDB3, FBXO22, AEN, TRIAP1, and POLH). Here, we observed activation of p53 Signaling in N0 and to a lesser extent in N1, but not in N2+. Only in N0, DNA (excision-) repair (involved genes: CDKN1A, PPM1D, and DDB2) was predicted to be a downstream function, while molecular networks in N2+ were associated with cancer, as well as injury and abnormalities (among others, downregulation of MSH6, CCNE2, and CHUK). After 2 Gy, the number of DEGs was similar in fibroblasts of all donor groups and genes with the highest absolute log2 fold-change were upregulated throughout (CDKN1A, TIGAR, HSPA4L, MDM2, BLOC1SD2, PPM1D, SESN1, BTG2, FBXO22, PCNA, and TRIAP1). Here, the p53 Signaling-Pathway was activated in fibroblasts of all donor groups. The Mitotic Roles of Polo Like Kinase-Pathway was inactivated in N1 and N2+. Molecular Mechanisms of Cancer were affected in fibroblasts of all donor groups. P53 was predicted to be an upstream regulator in fibroblasts of all donor groups and E2F1 in N1 and N2+. Results of the downstream analysis were senescence in N0 and N2+, transformation of cells in N0, and no significant effects in N1. Seven genes were differentially expressed in reaction to 2 Gy dependent on the donor group (LINC00601, COBLL1, SESN2, BIN3, TNFRSF10A, EEF1AKNMT, and BTG2). Conclusion Our results show dose-dependent differences in the radiation response between N1/N2+ and N0. While mechanisms against genotoxic stress were activated to the same extent after a high dose in all groups, the radiation response was impaired after a low dose in N1/N2+, suggesting an increased risk for adverse effects including carcinogenesis, particularly in N2+. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10020-022-00520-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caine Lucas Grandt
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology, BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany.,Faculty of Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Lara Kim Brackmann
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology, BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Alicia Poplawski
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heike Schwarz
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology, BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Hankeln
- Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Molecular Genetics and Genome Analysis, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Christiane Kraemer
- Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Molecular Genetics and Genome Analysis, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Federico Marini
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zahnreich
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Iris Schmitt
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Philipp Drees
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Johanna Mirsch
- Radiation Biology and DNA Repair, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Desiree Grabow
- Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology, German Childhood Cancer Registry, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Harald Binder
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Moritz Hess
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Danuta Galetzka
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Manuela Marron
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology, BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Eberhardt W, Poettgen C, Gauler T, Schulte C, Friedel G, Kopp HG, Fischer B, Schmidberger H, Kimmich M, Budach W, Cordes S, Metzenmacher M, de Los Rios RH, Spengler W, De Ruysscher D, Belka C, Welter S, Brintrup DL, Guberina M, Oezkan F, Darwiche K, Schuler M, Jöckel KH, Aigner C, Stamatis G, Stuschke M. MA06.08 Long-term Survival and Competing Risks of Death in the ESPATUE Randomized Phase-III Trial in Stage III NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.07.110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
25
|
Galetzka D, Böck J, Wagner L, Dittrich M, Sinizyn O, Ludwig M, Rossmann H, Spix C, Radsak M, Scholz-Kreisel P, Mirsch J, Linke M, Brenner W, Marron M, Poplawski A, Haaf T, Schmidberger H, Prawitt D. Hypermethylation of RAD9A intron 2 in childhood cancer patients, leukemia and tumor cell lines suggest a role for oncogenic transformation. EXCLI J 2022; 21:117-143. [PMID: 35221838 PMCID: PMC8859646 DOI: 10.17179/excli2021-4482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Most childhood cancers occur sporadically and cannot be explained by an inherited mutation or an unhealthy lifestyle. However, risk factors might trigger the oncogenic transformation of cells. Among other regulatory signals, hypermethylation of RAD9A intron 2 is responsible for the increased expression of RAD9A protein, which may play a role in oncogenic transformation. Here, we analyzed the RAD9A intron 2 methylation in primary fibroblasts of 20 patients with primary cancer in childhood and second primary cancer (2N) later in life, 20 matched patients with only one primary cancer in childhood (1N) and 20 matched cancer-free controls (0N), using bisulfite pyrosequencing and deep bisulfite sequencing (DBS). Four 1N patients and one 2N patient displayed elevated mean methylation levels (≥ 10 %) of RAD9A. DBS revealed ≥ 2 % hypermethylated alleles of RAD9A, indicative for constitutive mosaic epimutations. Bone marrow samples of NHL and AML tumor patients (n=74), EBV (Epstein Barr Virus) lymphoblasts (n=6), tumor cell lines (n=5) and FaDu subclones (n=13) were analyzed to substantiate our findings. We find a broad spectrum of tumor entities with an aberrant methylation of RAD9A. We detected a significant difference in mean methylation of RAD9A for NHL versus AML patients (p ≤0.025). Molecular karyotyping of AML samples during therapy with hypermethylated RAD9A showed an evolving duplication of 1.8 kb on Chr16p13.3 including the PKD1 gene. Radiation, colony formation assays, cell proliferation, PCR and molecular karyotyping SNP-array experiments using generated FaDu subclones suggest that hypermethylation of RAD9A intron 2 is associated with genomic imbalances in regions with tumor-relevant genes and survival of the cells. In conclusion, this is the very first study of RAD9A intron 2 methylation in childhood cancer and Leukemia. RAD9A epimutations may have an impact on leukemia and tumorigenesis and can potentially serve as a biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danuta Galetzka
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Centre, Mainz, Germany
| | - Julia Böck
- Institute of Human Genetics, Julius Maximilians University, Würzburg, Germany.,Institute of Pathology, Julius Maximilians University, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Lukas Wagner
- Center for Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Centre, Mainz, Germany
| | - Marcus Dittrich
- Bioinformatics Department, Julius Maximilians University, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Olesja Sinizyn
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Centre, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Heidi Rossmann
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Centre, Mainz, Germany
| | - Claudia Spix
- Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Centre, Mainz, Germany
| | - Markus Radsak
- Department of Hematology, University Medical Centre, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Johanna Mirsch
- Radiation Biology and DNA Repair, Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Matthias Linke
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Centre, Mainz, Germany
| | - Walburgis Brenner
- Department of Obstetrics and Women's Health, University Medical Centre, Mainz, Germany
| | - Manuela Marron
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Alicia Poplawski
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Centre, Mainz, Germany
| | - Thomas Haaf
- Institute of Human Genetics, Julius Maximilians University, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Centre, Mainz, Germany
| | - Dirk Prawitt
- Center for Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Centre, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Stockinger M, Karle H, Rennau H, Sebb S, Wolf U, Remmele J, Bührdel S, Bartkowiak D, Blettner M, Schmidberger H, Wollschläger D. Heart atlas for retrospective cardiac dosimetry: a multi-institutional study on interobserver contouring variations and their dosimetric impact. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:241. [PMID: 34930360 PMCID: PMC8691015 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01965-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cardiac effects after breast cancer radiation therapy potentially affect more patients as survival improves. The heart's heterogeneous radiation exposure and composition of functional structures call for establishing individual relationships between structure dose and specific late effects. However, valid dosimetry requires reliable contouring which is challenging for small volumes based on older, lower-quality computed tomography imaging. We developed a heart atlas for robust heart contouring in retrospective epidemiologic studies. METHODS AND MATERIALS The atlas defined the complete heart and geometric surrogate volumes for six cardiac structures: aortic valve, pulmonary valve, all deeper structures combined, myocardium, left anterior myocardium, and right anterior myocardium. We collected treatment planning records from 16 patients from 4 hospitals including dose calculations for 3D conformal tangential field radiation therapy for left-sided breast cancer. Six observers each contoured all patients. We assessed spatial contouring agreement and corresponding dosimetric variability. RESULTS Contouring agreement for the complete heart was high with a mean Jaccard similarity coefficient (JSC) of 89%, a volume coefficient of variation (CV) of 5.2%, and a mean dose CV of 4.2%. The left (right) anterior myocardium had acceptable agreement with 63% (58%) JSC, 9.8% (11.5%) volume CV, and 11.9% (8.0%) mean dose CV. Dosimetric agreement for the deep structures and aortic valve was good despite higher spatial variation. Low spatial agreement for the pulmonary valve translated to poor dosimetric agreement. CONCLUSIONS For the purpose of retrospective dosimetry based on older imaging, geometric surrogate volumes for cardiac organs at risk can yield better contouring agreement than anatomical definitions, but retain limitations for small structures like the pulmonary valve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus Stockinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heiko Karle
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Hannes Rennau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Rostock, Südring 75, 18059, Rostock, Germany
| | - Sabine Sebb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Rostock, Südring 75, 18059, Rostock, Germany
| | - Ulrich Wolf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, Stephanstraße 9a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Julia Remmele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, Stephanstraße 9a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Sandra Bührdel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany
| | - Detlef Bartkowiak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany
| | - Maria Blettner
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Str. 69, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Daniel Wollschläger
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Str. 69, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Marron M, Brackmann LK, Schwarz H, Hummel-Bartenschlager W, Zahnreich S, Galetzka D, Schmitt I, Grad C, Drees P, Hopf J, Mirsch J, Scholz-Kreisel P, Kaatsch P, Poplawski A, Hess M, Binder H, Hankeln T, Blettner M, Schmidberger H. Identification of Genetic Predispositions Related to Ionizing Radiation in Primary Human Skin Fibroblasts From Survivors of Childhood and Second Primary Cancer as Well as Cancer-Free Controls: Protocol for the Nested Case-Control Study KiKme. JMIR Res Protoc 2021; 10:e32395. [PMID: 34762066 PMCID: PMC8663494 DOI: 10.2196/32395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Revised: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Therapy for a first primary neoplasm (FPN) in childhood with high doses of ionizing radiation is an established risk factor for second primary neoplasms (SPN). An association between exposure to low doses and childhood cancer is also suggested; however, results are inconsistent. As only subgroups of children with FPNs develop SPNs, an interaction between radiation, genetic, and other risk factors is presumed to influence cancer development. OBJECTIVE Therefore, the population-based, nested case-control study KiKme aims to identify differences in genetic predisposition and radiation response between childhood cancer survivors with and without SPNs as well as cancer-free controls. METHODS We conducted a population-based, nested case-control study KiKme. Besides questionnaire information, skin biopsies and saliva samples are available. By measuring individual reactions to different exposures to radiation (eg, 0.05 and 2 Gray) in normal somatic cells of the same person, our design enables us to create several exposure scenarios for the same person simultaneously and measure several different molecular markers (eg, DNA, messenger RNA, long noncoding RNA, copy number variation). RESULTS Since 2013, 101 of 247 invited SPN patients, 340 of 1729 invited FPN patients, and 150 of 246 invited cancer-free controls were recruited and matched by age and sex. Childhood cancer patients were additionally matched by tumor morphology, year of diagnosis, and age at diagnosis. Participants reported on lifestyle, socioeconomical, and anthropometric factors, as well as on medical radiation history, health, and family history of diseases (n=556). Primary human fibroblasts from skin biopsies of the participants were cultivated (n=499) and cryopreserved (n=3886). DNA was extracted from fibroblasts (n=488) and saliva (n=510). CONCLUSIONS This molecular-epidemiological study is the first to combine observational epidemiological research with standardized experimental components in primary human skin fibroblasts to identify genetic predispositions related to ionizing radiation in childhood and SPNs. In the future, fibroblasts of the participants will be used for standardized irradiation experiments, which will inform analysis of the case-control study and vice versa. Differences between participants will be identified using several molecular markers. With its innovative combination of experimental and observational components, this new study will provide valuable data to forward research on radiation-related risk factors in childhood cancer and SPNs. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/32395.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuela Marron
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Lara Kim Brackmann
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Heike Schwarz
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | | | - Sebastian Zahnreich
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Danuta Galetzka
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Iris Schmitt
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Christian Grad
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Philipp Drees
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Johannes Hopf
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Johanna Mirsch
- Radiation Biology and DNA Repair, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Peter Scholz-Kreisel
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter Kaatsch
- German Childhood Cancer Registry, Institute for Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Alicia Poplawski
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Moritz Hess
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Harald Binder
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Hankeln
- Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Molecular Genetics and Genome Analysis, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Maria Blettner
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Guhlich M, Hubert L, Mergler CPN, Rave-Fraenk M, Dröge LH, Leu M, Schmidberger H, Rieken S, Hille A, Schirmer MA. Identification of Risk Loci for Radiotoxicity in Prostate Cancer by Comprehensive Genotyping of TGFB1 and TGFBR1. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13215585. [PMID: 34771749 PMCID: PMC8582951 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13215585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic variability in transforming growth factor beta pathway (TGFB) was suggested to affect adverse events of radiotherapy. We investigated comprehensive variability in TGFB1 (gene coding for TGFβ1 ligand) and TGFBR1 (TGFβ receptor-1) in relation to radiotoxicity. Prostate cancer patients treated with primary radiotherapy (n = 240) were surveyed for acute and late toxicity. Germline polymorphisms (n = 40) selected to cover the common genetic variability in TGFB1 and TGFBR1 were analyzed in peripheral blood cells. Human lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) were used to evaluate a possible impact of TGFB1 and TGFBR1 genetic polymorphisms to DNA repair capacity following single irradiation with 3 Gy. Upon adjustment for multiplicity testing, rs10512263 in TGFBR1 showed a statistically significant association with acute radiation toxicity. Carriers of the Cytosine (C)-variant allele (n = 35) featured a risk ratio of 2.17 (95%-CI 1.41-3.31) for acute toxicity ≥ °2 compared to Thymine/Thymine (TT)-wild type individuals (n = 205). Reduced DNA repair capacity in the presence of the C-allele of rs10512263 might be a mechanistic explanation as demonstrated in LCLs following irradiation. The risk for late radiotoxicity was increased by carrying at least two risk genotypes at three polymorphic sites, including Leu10Pro in TGFB1. Via comprehensive genotyping of TGFB1 and TGFBR1, promising biomarkers for radiotoxicity in prostate cancer were identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Guhlich
- Clinic of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany; (M.G.); (M.R.-F.); (L.H.D.); (M.L.); (S.R.); (A.H.)
| | - Laura Hubert
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany; (L.H.); (C.P.N.M.)
| | | | - Margret Rave-Fraenk
- Clinic of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany; (M.G.); (M.R.-F.); (L.H.D.); (M.L.); (S.R.); (A.H.)
| | - Leif Hendrik Dröge
- Clinic of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany; (M.G.); (M.R.-F.); (L.H.D.); (M.L.); (S.R.); (A.H.)
| | - Martin Leu
- Clinic of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany; (M.G.); (M.R.-F.); (L.H.D.); (M.L.); (S.R.); (A.H.)
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, 55131 Mainz, Germany;
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Clinic of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany; (M.G.); (M.R.-F.); (L.H.D.); (M.L.); (S.R.); (A.H.)
| | - Andrea Hille
- Clinic of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany; (M.G.); (M.R.-F.); (L.H.D.); (M.L.); (S.R.); (A.H.)
| | - Markus Anton Schirmer
- Clinic of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany; (M.G.); (M.R.-F.); (L.H.D.); (M.L.); (S.R.); (A.H.)
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany; (L.H.); (C.P.N.M.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-551-39-64505
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bostel T, Akbaba S, Wollschläger D, Klodt T, Oebel L, Mayer A, Drabke S, Sprave T, Debus J, Förster R, Rief H, Rühle A, Grosu AL, Schmidberger H, Nicolay NH. Comparative Analyses of Two Established Scores to Assess the Stability of Spinal Bone Metastases Before and After Palliative Radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2021; 11:753768. [PMID: 34737961 PMCID: PMC8562722 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.753768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose To compare two validated spinal instability scores regarding the stabilizing effects and skeletal-related events (SREs) of palliative radiotherapy (RT) in patients with spinal bone metastases (SBM). Materials and Methods Two hundred eighty-two osteolytic SBM of lung or breast cancer patients were analyzed for stability before and following RT based on the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) or the Taneichi score. Score concordance was quantified by absolute agreement and Cohen’s kappa coefficient. SREs were defined as fractures or local progression after RT. OS was quantified as the time between the start of RT and death from any cause. Results At 3 and 6 months after RT, 35 and 50% of initially unstable SBM were re-stabilized according to SINS in patients still alive. Corresponding Taneichi score-based stabilization proportions were 25 and 46%, respectively. Comparison of both stability scores showed high absolute agreement for all time-points (range 71–78%, kappa range 0.35–0.44). SRE occurred more frequently in initially unstable SBM compared to stable SBM according to SINS (14 vs. 5%), but no such association could be shown for the Taneichi-based instability criterion. Poor general condition of patients was negatively associated with SINS-measured re-stabilization after 6 months, but no predictive factor for re-stabilization could be found for the Taneichi score. Conclusions Despite the relatively high agreement between both stabilization scores, the SINS should be considered the standard for future studies on the stabilization effects of RT in SBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Wollschläger
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Tristan Klodt
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laura Oebel
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arnulf Mayer
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sophia Drabke
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja Sprave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Robert Förster
- Institute of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, University of Zurich, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Harald Rief
- Radiation Therapy Practice Bonn-Rhein-Sieg, Bad Godesberg site, Bonn, Germany
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Stoehr F, Müller L, Brady A, Trilla A, Mähringer-Kunz A, Hahn F, Düber C, Becker N, Wörns MA, Chapiro J, Hinrichs JB, Akata D, Ellmann S, Huisman M, Koff D, Brinkmann S, Bamberg F, Zimmermann O, Traikova NI, Marquardt JU, Chang DH, Rengier F, Auer TA, Emrich T, Muehler F, Schmidberger H, Baeßler B, dos Santos DP, Kloeckner R. How COVID-19 kick-started online learning in medical education-The DigiMed study. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0257394. [PMID: 34547031 PMCID: PMC8454930 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to far-reaching restrictions of social and professional life, affecting societies all over the world. To contain the virus, medical schools had to restructure their curriculum by switching to online learning. However, only few medical schools had implemented such novel learning concepts. We aimed to evaluate students' attitudes to online learning to provide a broad scientific basis to guide future development of medical education. METHODS Overall, 3286 medical students from 12 different countries participated in this cross-sectional, web-based study investigating various aspects of online learning in medical education. On a 7-point Likert scale, participants rated the online learning situation during the pandemic at their medical schools, technical and social aspects, and the current and future role of online learning in medical education. RESULTS The majority of medical schools managed the rapid switch to online learning (78%) and most students were satisfied with the quantity (67%) and quality (62%) of the courses. Online learning provided greater flexibility (84%) and led to unchanged or even higher attendance of courses (70%). Possible downsides included motivational problems (42%), insufficient possibilities for interaction with fellow students (67%) and thus the risk of social isolation (64%). The vast majority felt comfortable using the software solutions (80%). Most were convinced that medical education lags behind current capabilities regarding online learning (78%) and estimated the proportion of online learning before the pandemic at only 14%. In order to improve the current curriculum, they wish for a more balanced ratio with at least 40% of online teaching compared to on-site teaching. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the positive attitude of medical students towards online learning. Furthermore, it reveals a considerable discrepancy between what students demand and what the curriculum offers. Thus, the COVID-19 pandemic might be the long-awaited catalyst for a new "online era" in medical education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Stoehr
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Lukas Müller
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Adrian Brady
- Radiology Department, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Antoni Trilla
- Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Aline Mähringer-Kunz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Felix Hahn
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Christoph Düber
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Nicole Becker
- Center for Quality Assurance and Development, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Marcus-Alexander Wörns
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Julius Chapiro
- Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Jan Bernd Hinrichs
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Deniz Akata
- Department of Radiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Altındağ, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Stephan Ellmann
- Institute of Radiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Merel Huisman
- Institute of Radiology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - David Koff
- Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Sebastian Brinkmann
- Department of General, Visceral, Tumor and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Fabian Bamberg
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Jens U. Marquardt
- Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Lübeck, Germany
| | - D.-H. Chang
- Department of Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Rengier
- Department of Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Timo A. Auer
- Department of Radiology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tilman Emrich
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Partner site Rhine-Main, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Bettina Baeßler
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Roman Kloeckner
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Zahnreich S, Schmidberger H. Childhood Cancer: Occurrence, Treatment and Risk of Second Primary Malignancies. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13112607. [PMID: 34073340 PMCID: PMC8198981 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer represents the leading cause of disease-related death and treatment-associated morbidity in children with an increasing trend in recent decades worldwide. Nevertheless, the 5-year survival of childhood cancer patients has been raised impressively to more than 80% during the past decades, primarily attributed to improved diagnostic technologies and multiagent cytotoxic regimens. This strong benefit of more efficient tumor control and prolonged survival is compromised by an increased risk of adverse and fatal late sequelae. Long-term survivors of pediatric tumors are at the utmost risk for non-carcinogenic late effects such as cardiomyopathies, neurotoxicity, or pneumopathies, as well as the development of secondary primary malignancies as the most detrimental consequence of genotoxic chemo- and radiotherapy. Promising approaches to reducing the risk of adverse late effects in childhood cancer survivors include high precision irradiation techniques like proton radiotherapy or non-genotoxic targeted therapies and immune-based treatments. However, to date, these therapies are rarely used to treat pediatric cancer patients and survival rates, as well as incidences of late effects, have changed little over the past two decades in this population. Here we provide an overview of the epidemiology and etiology of childhood cancers, current developments for their treatment, and therapy-related adverse late health consequences with a special focus on second primary malignancies.
Collapse
|
32
|
Kaufmann J, Biscio CAN, Bankhead P, Zimmer S, Schmidberger H, Rubak E, Mayer A. Using the R Package Spatstat to Assess Inhibitory Effects of Microregional Hypoxia on the Infiltration of Cancers of the Head and Neck Region by Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13081924. [PMID: 33923522 PMCID: PMC8072547 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13081924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Revised: 03/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Progress in the field of in situ proteomics allows for the simultaneous detection of multiple biomarkers within one cancer tissue specimen. As a result, biological hypotheses previously only assessable ex vivo can now be studied in human cancer tissue. However, methods for objective analysis have so far been lacking behind. In this study, we established a free, objective, and entirely open-source-based method for the analysis of multiplexed immunofluorescence specimens. This will gain further importance with the availability of more advanced multiplexing methods in the future. Abstract (1) Background: The immune system has physiological antitumor activity, which is partially mediated by cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL). Tumor hypoxia, which is highly prevalent in cancers of the head and neck region, has been hypothesized to inhibit the infiltration of tumors by CTL. In situ data validating this concept have so far been based solely upon the visual assessment of the distribution of CTL. Here, we have established a set of spatial statistical tools to address this problem mathematically and tested their performance. (2) Patients and Methods: We have analyzed regions of interest (ROI) of 22 specimens of cancers of the head and neck region after 4-plex immunofluorescence staining and whole-slide scanning. Single cell-based segmentation was carried out in QuPath. Specimens were analyzed with the endpoints clustering and interactions between CTL, normoxic, and hypoxic tumor areas, both visually and using spatial statistical tools implemented in the R package Spatstat. (3) Results: Visual assessment suggested clustering of CTL in all instances. The visual analysis also suggested an inhibitory effect between hypoxic tumor areas and CTL in a minority of the whole-slide scans (9 of 22, 41%). Conversely, the objective mathematical analysis in Spatstat demonstrated statistically significant inhibitory interactions between hypoxia and CTL accumulation in a substantially higher number of specimens (16 of 22, 73%). It showed a similar trend in all but one of the remaining samples. (4) Conclusion: Our findings provide non-obvious but statistically rigorous evidence of inhibition of CTL infiltration into hypoxic tumor subregions of cancers of the head and neck. Importantly, these shielded sites may be the origin of tumor recurrences. We provide the methodology for the transfer of our statistical approach to similar questions. We discuss why versions of the Kcross and pcf.cross functions may be the methods of choice among the repertoire of statistical tests in Spatstat for this type of analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justus Kaufmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (J.K.); (H.S.)
| | - Christophe A. N. Biscio
- Department of Mathematical Sciences, Aalborg University, Skjernvej 4A, 9220 Aalborg East, Denmark; (C.A.N.B.); (E.R.)
| | - Peter Bankhead
- Edinburgh Pathology, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK;
| | - Stefanie Zimmer
- Institute of Pathology and Tissue Biobank, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, 55131 Mainz, Germany;
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (J.K.); (H.S.)
| | - Ege Rubak
- Department of Mathematical Sciences, Aalborg University, Skjernvej 4A, 9220 Aalborg East, Denmark; (C.A.N.B.); (E.R.)
| | - Arnulf Mayer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (J.K.); (H.S.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-6131-173576
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Zahnreich S, Gebrekidan S, Multhoff G, Vaupel P, Schmidberger H, Mayer A. Oxygen Deprivation Modulates EGFR and PD-L1 in Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and Neck. Front Oncol 2021; 11:623964. [PMID: 33718186 PMCID: PMC7953989 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.623964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abundance and signaling of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are not only genetically determined but are also subject to the traits of the tumor microenvironment, which has hitherto not been clarified completely. We investigated the impact of hypoxia on the EGFR system and on PD-L1 in six HPV negative HNSCC cell lines in vitro and in FaDu xenografts in vivo. Protein levels of EGFR, AKT, pAKT, ERK1/2, pERK1/2, CA IX, cleaved PARP (apoptosis), LC3B (autophagy), and PD-L1 were quantified by western blot after oxygen deprivation or CoCl2, staurosporine, and erlotinib treatment. In FaDu xenograft tumors the expression of EGFR, CA IX andCD34 staining were analyzed. Reduced oxygen supply strongly downregulated EGFR protein levels and signaling in FaDu cells in vitro and in vivo, and a transient downregulation of EGFR signaling was found in three other HNSCC cell lines. PD-L1 was affected by oxygen deprivation in only one HNSCC cell line showing increased protein amounts. The results of this study indicate a significant impact of the traits of the tumor microenvironment on crucial molecular targets of cancer therapies with high clinical relevance for therapy resistance and response in HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zahnreich
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Senayit Gebrekidan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Gabriele Multhoff
- Radiation Immuno-Oncology Project Group, Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Vaupel
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Arnulf Mayer
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kliesch S, Schmidt S, Wilborn D, Aigner C, Albrecht W, Bedke J, Beintker M, Beyersdorff D, Bokemeyer C, Busch J, Classen J, de Wit M, Dieckmann KP, Diemer T, Dieing A, Gockel M, Göckel-Beining B, Hakenberg OW, Heidenreich A, Heinzelbecker J, Herkommer K, Hermanns T, Kaufmann S, Kornmann M, Kotzerke J, Krege S, Kristiansen G, Lorch A, Müller AC, Oechsle K, Ohloff T, Oing C, Otto U, Pfister D, Pichler R, Recken H, Rick O, Rudolph Y, Ruf C, Schirren J, Schmelz H, Schmidberger H, Schrader M, Schweyer S, Seeling S, Souchon R, Winter C, Wittekind C, Zengerling F, Zermann DH, Zillmann R, Albers P. Management of Germ Cell Tumours of the Testes in Adult Patients: German Clinical Practice Guideline, PART II - Recommendations for the Treatment of Advanced, Recurrent, and Refractory Disease and Extragonadal and Sex Cord/Stromal Tumours and for the Management of Follow-Up, Toxicity, Quality of Life, Palliative Care, and Supportive Therapy. Urol Int 2021; 105:181-191. [PMID: 33486494 DOI: 10.1159/000511245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We developed the first German evidence- and consensus-based clinical guideline on diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of germ cell tumours (GCT) of the testes in adult patients. We present the guideline content in 2 separate publications. The present second part summarizes therecommendations for the treatment of advanced disease stages and for the management of follow-up and late effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS An interdisciplinary panel of 42 experts including 1 patient representative developed the guideline content. Clinical recommendations and statements were based on scientific evidence and expert consensus. For this purpose, evidence tables for several review questions, which were based on systematic literature searches (last search in March 2018), were provided. Thirty-one experts, who were entitled to vote, rated the final clinical recommendations and statements. RESULTS Here we present the treatment recommendations separately for patients with metastatic seminoma and non-seminomatous GCT (stages IIA/B and IIC/III), for restaging and treatment of residual masses, and for relapsed and refractory disease stages. The recommendations also cover extragonadal and sex cord/stromal tumours, the management of follow-up and toxicity, quality-of-life aspects, palliative care, and supportive therapy. CONCLUSION Physicians and other medical service providers who are involved in the diagnostics, treatment, and follow-up of GCT (all stages, outpatient and inpatient care as well as rehabilitation) are the users of the present guideline. The guideline also comprises quality indicators for measuring the implementation of the guideline recommendations in routine clinical care; these data will be presented in a future publication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Kliesch
- Centre of Reproductive Medicine and Andrology, Department of Clinical and Surgical Andrology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Stefanie Schmidt
- UroEvidence, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Doris Wilborn
- UroEvidence, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Clemens Aigner
- Ruhrlandklinik, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Walter Albrecht
- Department of Urology, Landesklinikum Mistelbach-Gänserndorf, Mistelbach, Austria
| | - Jens Bedke
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Dirk Beyersdorff
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Bokemeyer
- II. Medical Clinic and Polyclinic, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jonas Busch
- Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johannes Classen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Radiological Oncology, and Palliative Medicine, St. Vincentius-Kliniken, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Maike de Wit
- Clinic for Internal Medicine - Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Medicine, Vivantes Clinic Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Thorsten Diemer
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Urology, Pediatric Urology, and Andrology, University Hospital Gießen, Gießen, Germany
| | - Anette Dieing
- Clinic for Internal Medicine - Hematology and Oncology, Vivantes Clinics Am Urban, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Oliver W Hakenberg
- Urological Clinic and Polyclinic, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Kathleen Herkommer
- Urological Clinic and Polyclinic of the Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Hermanns
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sascha Kaufmann
- Department for Radiooncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marko Kornmann
- Clinic for General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Susanne Krege
- KEM, Protestant Hospital Essen-Mitte, Clinic for Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urological Oncology, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Anja Lorch
- Department of Urology, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Karin Oechsle
- II. Medical Clinic and Polyclinic, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Timur Ohloff
- German Foundation for Young Adults with Cancer, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christoph Oing
- II. Medical Clinic and Polyclinic, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ulrich Otto
- Urological Competence Centre for Rehabilitation, Bad Wildungen, Germany
| | - David Pfister
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Heinrich Recken
- Hamburger Fern-Hochschule Studienzentrum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Oliver Rick
- Klinik Reinhardshöhe GmbH, Bad Wildungen, Germany
| | | | - Christian Ruf
- Department of Urology, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Hans Schmelz
- Department of Urology, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus, Koblenz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Rainer Souchon
- Department for Radiooncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | | | | | - D H Zermann
- Vogtland-Klinik Bad Elster, Bad Elster, Germany
| | | | - Peter Albers
- Department of Urology, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany,
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kliesch S, Schmidt S, Wilborn D, Aigner C, Albrecht W, Bedke J, Beintker M, Beyersdorff D, Bokemeyer C, Busch J, Classen J, de Wit M, Dieckmann KP, Diemer T, Dieing A, Gockel M, Göckel-Beining B, Hakenberg OW, Heidenreich A, Heinzelbecker J, Herkommer K, Hermanns T, Kaufmann S, Kornmann M, Kotzerke J, Krege S, Kristiansen G, Lorch A, Müller AC, Oechsle K, Ohloff T, Oing C, Otto U, Pfister D, Pichler R, Recken H, Rick O, Rudolph Y, Ruf C, Schirren J, Schmelz H, Schmidberger H, Schrader M, Schweyer S, Seeling S, Souchon R, Winter C, Wittekind C, Zengerling F, Zermann DH, Zillmann R, Albers P. Management of Germ Cell Tumours of the Testis in Adult Patients. German Clinical Practice Guideline Part I: Epidemiology, Classification, Diagnosis, Prognosis, Fertility Preservation, and Treatment Recommendations for Localized Stages. Urol Int 2021; 105:169-180. [PMID: 33412555 DOI: 10.1159/000510407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This is the first German evidence- and consensus-based clinical guideline on diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up on germ cell tumours (GCTs) of the testis in adult patients. We present the guideline content in two publications. Part I covers the topic's background, methods, epidemiology, classification systems, diagnostics, prognosis, and treatment recommendations for the localized stages. METHODS An interdisciplinary panel of 42 experts including 1 patient representative developed the guideline content. Clinical recommendations and statements were based on scientific evidence and expert consensus. For this purpose, evidence tables for several review questions, which were based on systematic literature searches (last search was in March 2018) were provided. Thirty-one experts entitled to vote, rated the final clinical recommendations and statements. RESULTS We provide 161 clinical recommendations and statements. We present information on the quality of cancer care and epidemiology and give recommendations for staging and classification as well as for diagnostic procedures. The diagnostic recommendations encompass measures for assessing the primary tumour as well as procedures for the detection of metastases. One chapter addresses prognostic factors. In part I, we separately present the treatment recommendations for germ cell neoplasia in situ, and the organ-confined stages (clinical stage I) of both seminoma and nonseminoma. CONCLUSION Although GCT is a rare tumour entity with excellent survival rates for the localized stages, its management requires an interdisciplinary approach, including several clinical experts. Quality of care is highly related to institutional expertise and can be reassured by established online-based second-opinion boards. There are very few studies on diagnostics with good level of evidence. Treatment of metastatic GCTs must be tailored to the risk according to the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaboration Group classification after careful diagnostic evaluation. An interdisciplinary approach as well as the referral of selected patients to centres with proven experience can help achieve favourable clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Kliesch
- Centre of Reproductive Medicine and Andrology, Department of Clinical and Surgical Andrology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany,
| | | | - Doris Wilborn
- UroEvidence@Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Clemens Aigner
- Ruhrlandklinik at University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Walter Albrecht
- Department of Urology, Landesklinikum Mistelbach-Gänserndorf, Mistelbach, Austria
| | - Jens Bedke
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Dirk Beyersdorff
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Bokemeyer
- II. Medical Clinic and Polyclinic, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jonas Busch
- Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johannes Classen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Radiological Oncology and Palliative Medicine, St. Vincentius-Kliniken, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Maike de Wit
- Clinic for Internal Medicine - Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Vivantes Clinic Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Thorsten Diemer
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Urology, Pediatric Urology and Andrology, University Hospital Gießen, Gießen, Germany
| | - Anette Dieing
- Clinic for Internal Medicine - Hematology and Oncology, Vivantes Clinics Am Urban, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Oliver W Hakenberg
- Urological Clinic and Polyclinic, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Kathleen Herkommer
- Urological Clinic and Polyclinic of the Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Hermanns
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sascha Kaufmann
- Department for Radiooncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marko Kornmann
- Clinic for General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Susanne Krege
- KEM, Protestant Hospital Essen-Mitte, Clinic for Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urological Oncology, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Anja Lorch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Karin Oechsle
- II. Medical Clinic and Polyclinic, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Timur Ohloff
- Advisor, German Foundation for Young Adults with Cancer, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christoph Oing
- II. Medical Clinic and Polyclinic, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ulrich Otto
- Urological Competence Centre for Rehabilitation, Bad Wildungen, Germany
| | - David Pfister
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Heinrich Recken
- HFH, Hamburger Fern-Hochschule Studienzentrum Essen (Distance Learning University, Essen Study Centre), Essen, Germany
| | - Oliver Rick
- Klinik Reinhardshöhe GmbH, Bad Wildungen, Germany
| | | | - Christian Ruf
- Department of Urology, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus (German Federal Armed Forces Hospital), Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Hans Schmelz
- Department of Urology, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus (German Federal Armed Forces Hospital), Koblenz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Rainer Souchon
- Department for Radiooncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Peter Albers
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Akbaba S, Rühle A, Rothhaar S, Zamboglou C, Gkika E, Foerster R, Oebel L, Klodt T, Schmidberger H, Grosu AL, Debus J, Bostel T, Nicolay NH. Treatment outcomes of elderly salivary gland cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy - Results from a large multicenter analysis. Radiother Oncol 2020; 156:266-274. [PMID: 33359662 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.12.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Revised: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To evaluate oncological outcomes and treatment-related toxicities of elderly salivary gland cancer patients undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Local/locoregional control (LRC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of elderly patients ≥ 65 years with primary salivary gland cancers undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy between 2005 and 2020 at three tertiary cancer centers were calculated. The impact of clinicopathological and treatment parameters on outcomes were analyzed, and acute and chronic toxicities were quantified. RESULTS 288 elderly salivary gland cancer patients were included in this multicenter analysis, and their median LRC, PFS and OS amounted to 113, 39 and 75 months, respectively. Age, performance status, comorbidities, definitive vs. adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy as well as locally/locoregionally advanced cancers and distant metastases correlated with reduced outcomes in elderly salivary gland patients. Patients receiving dose-escalated radiotherapy (total doses > 70 GyEQD2) with carbon ion boost radiation resulted in improved LRC, but no improvements in PFS or OS. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy did not improve treatment outcomes in elderly salivary gland carcinoma patients. Radiotherapy of elderly salivary gland cancer patients resulted in moderate higher-grade toxicities despite dose escalation with 70 (24.3%) and 48 patients (16.7%) experiencing acute and chronic grade 3 toxicities, respectively. No grade 4/5 toxicities were observed in this patient cohort. CONCLUSION Data from the largest multicenter analysis of elderly salivary gland cancer patients undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy demonstrate favorable LRC and tolerable toxicity rates. Decision-making for these vulnerable patients should be based on patient performance rather than chronological patient age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sofie Rothhaar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Robert Foerster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Laura Oebel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tristan Klodt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Wiegel T, Albers P, Bartkowiak D, Bussar-Maatz R, Härter M, Kristiansen G, Martus P, Wellek S, Schmidberger H, Grozinger K, Renner P, Schneider F, Burmester M, Stöckle M. Correction to: Results of a randomized trial of treatment modalities in patients with low or early-intermediate risk prostate cancer (PREFERE trial). J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2020; 147:243-244. [PMID: 33346877 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-020-03497-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
| | - Peter Albers
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Detlef Bartkowiak
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Martin Härter
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Peter Martus
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biostatistics, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Stefan Wellek
- Department of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Klaus Grozinger
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Leverkusen, Leverkusen, Germany
| | | | - Fried Schneider
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Lippe Detmold, Detmold, Germany
| | | | - Michael Stöckle
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Homburg/Saar, Homburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Dietzsch S, Placzek F, Pietschmann K, von Bueren AO, Matuschek C, Glück A, Guckenberger M, Budach V, Welzel J, Pöttgen C, Schmidberger H, Heinzelmann F, Paulsen F, Pazos M, Schwarz R, Hornung D, Martini C, Grosu AL, Meyer FM, Jablonska K, Dunst J, Kapp KS, Dieckmann K, Timmermann B, Pietsch T, Warmuth-Metz M, Kwiecien R, Benesch M, Gerber NU, Pfister SM, Clifford SC, von Hoff K, Klagges S, Rutkowski S, Kortmann RD, Mynarek M. MBCL-11. TIME TO RADIOTHERAPY IMPACTS SURVIVAL IN PEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT NON-METASTATIC MEDULLOBLASTOMA TREATED BY UPFRONT RADIOTHERAPY – A REPORT FROM THE HIT 2000 TRIAL. Neuro Oncol 2020. [PMCID: PMC7715814 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate prognostic factors and impact of participation in a randomized trial in non-metastatic medulloblastoma. METHODS AND PATIENTS 382 patients with non-metastatic medulloblastoma aged 4–21 years with primary neurosurgical resections between 2001 and 2011 were enrolled into the HIT 2000 trial and centrally reviewed. Between 2001 and 2006, 176 of these patients participated in the randomized trial HIT-SIOP PNET 4. Three different radiotherapy protocols were applied. Molecular subgroup was available for 157 patients. RESULTS Median follow-up was 6.35 [0.09–13.86] years. The 5-year progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 80.3 % ± 2.1 % and 86.5 % ± 1.8 %, respectively. On univariate analysis, there was no difference in PFS and OS according to radiotherapy protocols or in patients who participated in the HIT-SIOP PNET 4 trial or not, while histology, molecular subgroup and postoperative residual tumor influenced PFS significantly. Time interval between surgery and irradiation (≤48 days vs. ≥49 days) failed the significance level (p=0.052). On multivariate analyses, molecular subgroup (WNT activated vs. Group3 HR 5.49; p=0.014) and time interval between surgery and irradiation (HR 2.2; p=0.018) were confirmed as independent risk factors. CONCLUSION Using a centralized review system, multiprofessional and multiinstitutional collaboration as established for pediatric brain tumor patients in Germany, and risk-stratified therapy, outcome for non-metastatic medulloblastoma treated within HIT-SIOP PNET4 could be maintained outside the randomized trial. Prolonged time to radiotherapy negatively influenced survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Dietzsch
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Felix Placzek
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Klaus Pietschmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chemnitz Municipal Hospital, Chemnitz, Germany
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - André O von Bueren
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Christiane Matuschek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Albrecht Glück
- Radiation Oncology, Munich-Schwabing Municipal Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Zurich Medical Center, Zurich, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Charité School of Medicine and University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jutta Welzel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Pius Hospital Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University of Mainz Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Frank Heinzelmann
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University of Tuebingen Medical Center, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Frank Paulsen
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University of Tuebingen Medical Center, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Montserrat Pazos
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Rudolf Schwarz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Dagmar Hornung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carmen Martini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Frank Michael Meyer
- Radiation Oncology, MVZ medical care center, Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Karolina Jablonska
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Juergen Dunst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Karin S Kapp
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Karin Dieckmann
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Beate Timmermann
- Clinic for Particle Therapy, West German Proton Therapy Centre, University of Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Torsten Pietsch
- Department of Neuropathology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Robert Kwiecien
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Research, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Martin Benesch
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Stefan M Pfister
- Hopp Children′s Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Steven C Clifford
- Wolfson Childhood Cancer Research Centre, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Katja von Hoff
- Department of Paediatric Oncology and Hematology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sabine Klagges
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Stefan Rutkowski
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rolf-Dieter Kortmann
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Martin Mynarek
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Akbaba S, Bostel T, Lang K, Bahadir S, Lipman D, Schmidberger H, Matthias C, Rotter N, Knopf A, Freudlsperger C, Plinkert P, Debus J, Adeberg S. Large German Multicenter Experience on the Treatment Outcome of 207 Patients With Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Major Salivary Glands. Front Oncol 2020; 10:593379. [PMID: 33262950 PMCID: PMC7686540 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.593379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introdution We aimed to evaluate treatment outcome of combined radiotherapy (RT) including photon intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and carbon ion boost for adenoid cystic carcinomas (ACCs) of the major salivary glands, the currently available largest German collective for this cohort. Materials and Methods Overall, 207 patients who were irradiated with combined RT between 2009 and 2019 at Heidelberg University Hospital were analyzed retrospectively for local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier estimates. The majority of patients received postoperative RT (n=176/207, 85%) after previous surgery in large German hospitals mainly Mainz, Freiburg, Mannheim and Heidelberg University Hospitals and 15% received primary RT (n=31/207). Results After a median follow-up time of 50 months, 84% of the patients were still alive (n=174/207). Disease progression occurred in 32% of the patients (n=66/207) while local recurrence was diagnosed in 12% (n=25/207), and distant relapse in 27% (n=56/207). Estimated 5-year LC, PFS and OS rates were 84%, 56% and 83% for OS, respectively. In multivariate analysis, we could identify two prognostic subgroups: one subgroup resulting in decreased LC, PFS and OS rates and another subgroup having an additional survival disadvantage in PFS and OS. Patients with a macroscopic tumor disease (yes vs. no; p<0.001 for LC, p=0.010 for PFS and p=0.040 for OS) treated in a definitive setting (vs. postoperative setting; p=0.001 for LC, p=0.006 for PFS, p=0.049 for OS) and tumors of upper T stage (T1-4; p=0.004 for LC, p<0.001 for PFS, p<0.001 for OS) showed significantly more local relapses and a decreased PFS and OS. Upper Age (p<0.001 for both PFS and OS), lower Karnofsky Performance Score (<80% vs. ≥80%; p<0.001 for both PFS and OS) and solid histology (vs. non-solid; p=0.049 for PFS and p=0.003 for OS) were in addition associated with worse survival outcome. Toxicity was moderate with 18% late grade 2 and 3 toxicity. Conclusions Combined RT results in superior LC rates compared to photon data with moderate toxicity. In multivariate analysis, upper T stage, the existence of a macroscopic tumor before RT and definitive RT setting were identified as major prognostic factors affecting LC negatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Suzan Bahadir
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiology, Koru Hospitals-Yuksek Ihtisas University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Djoeri Lipman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Isala Hospital Zwolle, Zwolle, Netherlands
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Christoph Matthias
- Department of Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Nicole Rotter
- Department of Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Andreas Knopf
- Department of Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Christian Freudlsperger
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Plinkert
- Department of Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Oertel M, Elsayad K, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Reinartz G, Baues C, Schmidberger H, Vordermark D, Marnitz S, Lukas P, Ruebe C, Engert A, Lenz G, Eich HT. Radiation treatment of hemato-oncological patients in times of the COVID-19 pandemic : Expert recommendations from the radiation oncology panels of the German Hodgkin Study Group and the German Lymphoma Alliance. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 196:1096-1102. [PMID: 33125504 PMCID: PMC7596809 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01705-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The coronavirus pandemic is affecting global health systems, endangering daily patient care. Hemato-oncological patients are particularly vulnerable to infection, requiring decisive recommendations on treatment and triage. The aim of this survey amongst experts on radiation therapy (RT) for lymphoma and leukemia is to delineate typical clinical scenarios and to provide counsel for high-quality care. METHODS A multi-item questionnaire containing multiple-choice and free-text questions was developed in a peer-reviewed process and sent to members of the radiation oncology panels of the German Hodgkin Study Group and the German Lymphoma Alliance. Answers were assessed online and analyzed centrally. RESULTS Omission of RT was only considered in a minority of cases if alternative treatment options were available. Hypofractionated regimens and reduced dosages may be used for indolent lymphoma and fractures due to multiple myeloma. Overall, there was a tendency to shorten RT rather than to postpone or omit it. Even in case of critical resource shortage, panelists agreed to start emergency RT for typical indications (intracranial pressure, spinal compression, superior vena cava syndrome) within 24 h. Possible criteria to consider for patient triage are the availability of (systemic) options, the underlying disease dynamic, and the treatment rationale (curative/palliative). CONCLUSION RT for hemato-oncological patients receives high-priority and should be maintained even in later stages of the pandemic. Hypofractionation and shortened treatment schedules are feasible options for well-defined constellations, but have to be discussed in the clinical context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Oertel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1 building A1, 48149, Muenster, Germany
| | - K Elsayad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1 building A1, 48149, Muenster, Germany
| | - R Engenhart-Cabillic
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Giessen-Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - G Reinartz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1 building A1, 48149, Muenster, Germany
| | - C Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - H Schmidberger
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - D Vordermark
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - S Marnitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - P Lukas
- Department of Radiooncology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - C Ruebe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany
| | - A Engert
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - G Lenz
- Department of Medicine A, Hematology, Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - H T Eich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1 building A1, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Pollul G, Bostel T, Grossmann S, Akbaba S, Karle H, Stockinger M, Schmidberger H. Pediatric craniospinal irradiation with a short partial-arc VMAT technique for medulloblastoma tumors in dosimetric comparison. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:256. [PMID: 33153495 PMCID: PMC7643335 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01690-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to contrast four different irradiation methods for pediatric medulloblastoma tumors in a dosimetric comparison regarding planning target volume (PTV) coverage and sparing of organs at risk (OARs). Methods In sum 24 treatment plans for 6 pediatric patients were realized. Besides the clinical standard of a 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) treatment plan taken as a reference, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans (“VMAT_AVD” vs. “noAVD” vs. “FullArc”) were optimized and calculated for each patient. For the thoracic and abdominal region, the short partial-arc VMAT_AVD technique uses an arc setup with reduced arc-length by 100°, using posterior and lateral beam entries. The noAVD uses a half 180° (posterior to lateral directions) and the FullArc uses a full 360° arc setup arrangement. The prescription dose was set to 35.2 Gy. Results We identified a more conformal dose coverage for PTVs and a better sparing of OARs with used VMAT methods. For VMAT_AVD mean dose reductions in organs at risk can be realized, from 16 to 6.6 Gy, from 27.1 to 8.7 Gy and from 8.0 to 1.9 Gy for the heart, the thyroid and the gonads respectively, compared to the 3D-CRT treatment method. In addition we have found out a superiority of VMAT_AVD compared to the noAVD and FullArc trials with lower exposure to low-dose radiation to the lungs and breasts. Conclusions With the short partial-arc VMAT_AVD technique, dose exposures to radiosensitive OARS like the heart, the thyroid or the gonads can be reduced and therefore, maybe the occurrence of late sequelae is less likely. Furthermore the PTV conformity is increased. The advantages of the VMAT_AVD have to be weighed against the potentially risks induced by an increased low dose exposure compared to the 3D-CRT method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerhard Pollul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sascha Grossmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heiko Karle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Marcus Stockinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Dietzsch S, Placzek F, Pietschmann K, von Bueren AO, Matuschek C, Glück A, Guckenberger M, Budach V, Welzel J, Pöttgen C, Schmidberger H, Heinzelmann F, Paulsen F, Escudero MP, Schwarz R, Hornung D, Martini C, Grosu AL, Stueben G, Jablonska K, Dunst J, Stranzl-Lawatsch H, Dieckmann K, Timmermann B, Pietsch T, Warmuth-Metz M, Bison B, Kwiecien R, Benesch M, Gerber NU, Grotzer MA, Pfister SM, Clifford SC, von Hoff K, Klagges S, Rutkowski S, Kortmann RD, Mynarek M. Evaluation of Prognostic Factors and Role of Participation in a Randomized Trial or a Prospective Registry in Pediatric and Adolescent Nonmetastatic Medulloblastoma - A Report From the HIT 2000 Trial. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 5:1158-1169. [PMID: 33305077 PMCID: PMC7718550 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Revised: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose We aimed to compare treatment results in and outside of a randomized trial and to confirm factors influencing outcome in a large retrospective cohort of nonmetastatic medulloblastoma treated in Austria, Switzerland and Germany. Methods and Materials Patients with nonmetastatic medulloblastoma (n = 382) aged 4 to 21 years and primary neurosurgical resection between 2001 and 2011 were assessed. Between 2001 and 2006, 176 of these patients (46.1%) were included in the randomized HIT SIOP PNET 4 trial. From 2001 to 2011 an additional 206 patients were registered to the HIT 2000 study center and underwent the identical central review program. Three different radiation therapy protocols were applied. Genetically defined tumor entity (former molecular subgroup) was available for 157 patients. Results Median follow-up time was 7.3 (range, 0.09-13.86) years. There was no difference between HIT SIOP PNET 4 trial patients and observational patients outside the randomized trial, with 7 years progression-free survival rates (PFS) of 79.5% ± 3.1% versus 78.7% ± 3.1% (P = .62). On univariate analysis, the time interval between surgery and irradiation (≤ 48 days vs ≥ 49 days) showed a strong trend to affect PFS (80.4% ± 2.2% vs 64.6% ± 9.1%; P = .052). Furthermore, histologically and genetically defined tumor entities and the extent of postoperative residual tumor influenced PFS. On multivariate analyses, a genetically defined tumor entity wingless-related integration site-activated vs non-wingless-related integration site/non-SHH, group 3 hazard ratio, 5.49; P = .014) and time interval between surgery and irradiation (hazard ratio, 2.2; P = .018) were confirmed as independent risk factors. Conclusions Using a centralized review program and risk-stratified therapy for all patients registered to the study center, outcome was identical for patients with nonmetastatic medulloblastoma treated on and off the randomized HIT SIOP PNET 4 trial. The prognostic values of prolonged time to RT and genetically defined tumor entity were confirmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Dietzsch
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Felix Placzek
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Klaus Pietschmann
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chemnitz Municipal Hospital, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - André O. von Bueren
- Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Geneva, CANSEARCH Research Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Christiane Matuschek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Albrecht Glück
- Radiation Oncology, Munich-Schwabing Municipal Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Volker Budach
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Charité School of Medicine and University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jutta Welzel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Pius Hospital Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University of Mainz Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Frank Heinzelmann
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University of Tuebingen Medical Center, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Frank Paulsen
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University of Tuebingen Medical Center, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Montserrat Pazos Escudero
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Rudolf Schwarz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Dagmar Hornung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carmen Martini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Georg Stueben
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Karolina Jablonska
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Juergen Dunst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Heidi Stranzl-Lawatsch
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Karin Dieckmann
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Beate Timmermann
- Clinic for Particle Therapy, West German Proton Therapy Centre, University of Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Torsten Pietsch
- Department of Neuropathology, DGNN Brain Tumor Reference Center, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Monika Warmuth-Metz
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Brigitte Bison
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Robert Kwiecien
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Research, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Martin Benesch
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | | | - Stefan M. Pfister
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Steven C. Clifford
- Wolfson Childhood Cancer Research Centre, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Katja von Hoff
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sabine Klagges
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Stefan Rutkowski
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rolf-Dieter Kortmann
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
- Corresponding author: Rolf-Dieter Kortmann, MD
| | - Martin Mynarek
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Zahnreich S, Weber B, Rösch G, Schindler D, Schmidberger H. Compromised repair of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks in Fanconi anemia fibroblasts in G2. DNA Repair (Amst) 2020; 96:102992. [PMID: 33069004 DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2020.102992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Fanconi anemia (FA) is a rare chromosomal instability syndrome with various clinical features and high cancer incidence. Despite being a DNA repair disorder syndrome and a frequently observed clinical hypersensitivity of FA patients towards ionizing radiation, the experimental evidence regarding the efficiency of radiation-induced DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair in FA is very controversial. Here, we performed a thorough analysis of the repair of radiation-induced DSBs in G1 and G2 in FA fibroblasts of complementation groups A, C, D1 (BRCA2), D2, E, F, G and P (SLX4) in comparison to normal human lung and skin fibroblasts. γH2AX, 53BP1, or RPA foci quantification after X-irradiation was combined with cell cycle markers. Cytogenetic analyses were performed on first metaphases after irradiation in G1 and by premature chromosome condensation after exposure in G2. Furthermore, the role of canonical-NHEJ and alternative-NHEJ for the fidelity of the repair of radiation-induced DSBs was examined. In FA fibroblasts, DSB repair was normal in G1 but compromised and more error-prone in the slow repair component of G2 as suggested by higher yields of radiation-induced γH2AX and 53BP1 foci as well as chromatid exchanges. However, RPA foci quantification in G2 indicated proficiency for homology-directed repair of DSBs in FA except for FA D1 (BRCA2). In lung fibroblasts, DSB repair in G1 was conducted with normal kinetics but elevated chromosome exchanges compared to skin fibroblasts. The overall repair of radiation-induced DSBs and the formation of chromosome exchanges in normal and FA fibroblasts in G1 and G2 were governed by canonical-NHEJ with no contribution of alternative-NHEJ. Together, we show impaired repair of radiation-induced DSBs in various FA complementation groups in the slow repair component of G2 that might promote the formation of potentially oncogenic aberrations and clinical radiation hypersensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zahnreich
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg, University Mainz, Germany.
| | - Britta Weber
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg, University Mainz, Germany
| | - Gundula Rösch
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg, University Mainz, Germany
| | - Detlev Schindler
- Institute of Human Genetics, Julius-Maximilians-University, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg, University Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Galetzka D, Müller T, Dittrich M, Endres M, Kartal N, Sinizyn O, Rapp S, Zeller T, Müller C, Hankeln T, Scholz-Kreisel P, Chorzempa H, Mirsch J, Poplawski A, Rossmann H, Spix C, Haaf T, Prawitt D, Marron M, Schmidberger H. Correction to: Molecular karyotyping and gene expression analysis in childhood cancer patients. J Mol Med (Berl) 2020; 98:1657. [PMID: 32978668 DOI: 10.1007/s00109-020-01986-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The correct Author names are presented in this paper.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danuta Galetzka
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Str. 63, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Tobias Müller
- Bioinformatics Department, Julius Maximilians University, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Marcus Dittrich
- Bioinformatics Department, Julius Maximilians University, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Miriam Endres
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Str. 63, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Nergiz Kartal
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Str. 63, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Olesja Sinizyn
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Str. 63, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Steffen Rapp
- Institute of Organismal and Molecular Evolution, Molecular Genetics and Genome Analysis, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.,Preventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine, Center for Cardiology, University Medical Centre, Mainz, Germany
| | - Tanja Zeller
- University Heart & Vascular Center, Clinic for Cardiology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,Dzhk (Deutsches Zentrum für Herzkreislauf-Forschung), Standort Hamburg, Lübeck, Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Müller
- University Heart & Vascular Center, Clinic for Cardiology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,Dzhk (Deutsches Zentrum für Herzkreislauf-Forschung), Standort Hamburg, Lübeck, Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Hankeln
- Institute of Organismal and Molecular Evolution, Molecular Genetics and Genome Analysis, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter Scholz-Kreisel
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Centre, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heather Chorzempa
- Center for Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Centre, Mainz, Germany.,Institute of Human Genetics, Julius Maximilians University, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Johanna Mirsch
- Radiation Biology and DNA Repair, University of Technology, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Alicia Poplawski
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Centre, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heidi Rossmann
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Centre, Mainz, Germany
| | - Claudia Spix
- German Childhood Cancer Registry, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Centre, Mainz, Germany
| | - Thomas Haaf
- Institute of Human Genetics, Julius Maximilians University, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Prawitt
- Center for Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Centre, Mainz, Germany
| | - Manuela Marron
- Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Str. 63, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Zahnreich S, Poplawski A, Hartel C, Eckhard LS, Galetzka D, Hankeln T, Löbrich M, Marron M, Mirsch J, Ritter S, Scholz-Kreisel P, Spix C, Schmidberger H. Spontaneous and Radiation-Induced Chromosome Aberrations in Primary Fibroblasts of Patients With Pediatric First and Second Neoplasms. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1338. [PMID: 32850427 PMCID: PMC7427586 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether former childhood cancer patients who developed a subsequent secondary primary neoplasm (SPN) are characterized by elevated spontaneous chromosomal instability or cellular and chromosomal radiation sensitivity as surrogate markers of compromised DNA repair compared to childhood cancer patients with a first primary neoplasm (FPN) only or tumor-free controls. Primary skin fibroblasts were obtained in a nested case-control study including 23 patients with a pediatric FPN, 22 matched patients with a pediatric FPN and an SPN, and 22 matched tumor-free donors. Clonogenic cell survival and cytogenetic aberrations in Giemsa-stained first metaphases were assessed after X-irradiation in G1 or on prematurely condensed chromosomes of cells irradiated and analyzed in G2. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was applied to investigate spontaneous transmissible aberrations in selected donors. No significant difference in clonogenic survival or the average yield of spontaneous or radiation-induced aberrations was found between the study populations. However, two donors with an SPN showed striking spontaneous chromosomal instability occurring as high rates of numerical and structural aberrations or non-clonal and clonal translocations. No correlation was found between radiation sensitivity and a susceptibility to a pediatric FPN or a treatment-associated SPN. Together, the results of this unique case-control study show genomic stability and normal radiation sensitivity in normal somatic cells of donors with an early and high intrinsic or therapy-associated tumor risk. These findings provide valuable information for future studies on the etiology of sporadic childhood cancer and therapy-related SPN as well as for the establishment of predictive biomarkers based on altered DNA repair processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zahnreich
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Alicia Poplawski
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Carola Hartel
- Department of Biophysics, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Lukas Stefan Eckhard
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Danuta Galetzka
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Thomas Hankeln
- Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Molecular Genetics and Genome Analysis, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Markus Löbrich
- Radiation Biology and DNA Repair, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Manuela Marron
- Department of Epidemiological Methods and Etiologic Research, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Johanna Mirsch
- Radiation Biology and DNA Repair, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Sylvia Ritter
- Department of Biophysics, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Peter Scholz-Kreisel
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Claudia Spix
- German Childhood Cancer Registry, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bostel T, Rühle A, Rackwitz T, Mayer A, Klodt T, Oebel L, Förster R, Schlampp I, Wollschläger D, Rief H, Sprave T, Debus J, Grosu AL, Schmidberger H, Akbaba S, Nicolay NH. The Role of Palliative Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Spinal Bone Metastases from Head and Neck Tumors-A Multicenter Analysis of a Rare Event. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12071950. [PMID: 32708389 PMCID: PMC7409283 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12071950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
This retrospective multi-center analysis aimed to assess the clinical response and stabilizing effects of palliative radiotherapy (RT) for spinal bone metastases (SBM) in head and neck cancer (HNC), and to establish potential predictive factors for stability and overall survival (OS). Patients included in this analysis were treated at the University Hospitals of Mainz, Freiburg, and Heidelberg between 2001 and 2019. Clinical information was taken from the medical records. The stability of affected vertebral bodies was assessed according to the validated spine instability neoplastic score (SINS) based on CT-imaging before RT, as well as 3 and 6 months after RT. OS was quantified as the time between the start of palliative RT and death from any cause or last follow-up. Potential predictive factors for stability and OS were analyzed using generalized estimating equations and Cox regression for time-varying covariates to take into account multiple observations per patient. The mean follow-up time of 66 included patients after the first palliative RT was 8.1 months (range 0.3–85.0 months). The majority of patients (70%; n = 46) had squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) originating from the pharynx, larynx and oral cavity, while most of the remaining patients (26%; n = 17) suffered from salivary glands tumors. A total of 95 target volumes including 178 SBM were evaluated that received a total of 81 irradiation series. In patients with more than one metastasis per irradiated region, only the most critical bone metastasis was analyzed according to the SINS system. Prior to RT, pain and neurologic deficits were present in 76% (n = 72) and 22% (n = 21) of irradiated lesions, respectively, and 68% of the irradiated lesions (n = 65) were assessed as unstable or potentially unstable prior to RT. SBM-related pain symptoms and neurologic deficits responded to RT in 63% and 47% of the treated lesions, respectively. Among patients still alive at 3 and 6 months after RT with potentially unstable or unstable SBM, a shift to a better stability class according to the SINS was observed in 20% and 33% of the irradiated SBM, respectively. Pathological fractures of SBM were frequently detected before the start of irradiation (43%; n = 41), but after RT, new fractures or increasing vertebral body sintering within the irradiated region occurred rarely (8%; n = 8). A pathological fracture before RT was negatively associated with stabilization 6 months after RT (OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.02–0.49, p = 0.004), while a Karnofsky performance score (KPS) ≥ 70% was associated positively with a stabilization effect through irradiation (OR 6.09, 95% CI 1.68–22.05, p = 0.006). Mean OS following first palliative RT was 10.7 months, and the KPS (≥70% vs. <70%) was shown to be a strong predictive factor for OS after RT (HR 0.197, 95% CI 0.11–0.35, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in OS between patients with SCC and non-SCC. Palliative RT in symptomatic SBM of HNC provides sufficient symptom relief in the majority of patients, while only about one third of initially unstable SBM show re-stabilization after RT. Since patients in our multi-center cohort exhibited very limited OS, fractionation schemes should be determined depending on the patients’ performance status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (A.M.); (T.K.); (L.O.); (H.S.); (S.A.)
- Correspondence: (T.B.); (A.R.)
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Strasse 3, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (T.S.); (A.-L.G.); (N.H.N.)
- Correspondence: (T.B.); (A.R.)
| | - Tilmann Rackwitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (T.R.); (I.S.); (J.D.)
| | - Arnulf Mayer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (A.M.); (T.K.); (L.O.); (H.S.); (S.A.)
| | - Tristan Klodt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (A.M.); (T.K.); (L.O.); (H.S.); (S.A.)
| | - Laura Oebel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (A.M.); (T.K.); (L.O.); (H.S.); (S.A.)
| | - Robert Förster
- Institute of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, University of Zurich, Brauerstrasse 15, 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland;
| | - Ingmar Schlampp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (T.R.); (I.S.); (J.D.)
| | - Daniel Wollschläger
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany;
| | - Harald Rief
- Radiotherapy Bonn-Rhein-Sieg, 53115 Bonn, Germany;
| | - Tanja Sprave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Strasse 3, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (T.S.); (A.-L.G.); (N.H.N.)
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (T.R.); (I.S.); (J.D.)
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Strasse 3, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (T.S.); (A.-L.G.); (N.H.N.)
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (A.M.); (T.K.); (L.O.); (H.S.); (S.A.)
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (A.M.); (T.K.); (L.O.); (H.S.); (S.A.)
| | - Nils Henrik Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Strasse 3, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (T.S.); (A.-L.G.); (N.H.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Brackmann LK, Grandt CL, Schwarz H, Schmidtmann I, Hankeln T, Galetzka D, Zahnreich S, Scholz-Kreisel P, Blettner M, Schmidberger H, Marron M. Abstract B60: Exposure assessment among an adult population on radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and other cancer therapies in childhood. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.pedca19-b60] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Childhood cancer therapies are known risk factors for the development of second primary cancers. They are also suggested risk factors for late adverse health effects. Until now, there is no established questionnaire to retrospectively assess exposure to cancer therapies in childhood among adults. Therefore, we aim to validate a new self-administered questionnaire. The study population consists of 438 former childhood cancer patients of the KiKme study. Participants are asked whether they had received cancer therapies and how often and with which dose they were treated. Used medications and affected body regions are inquired. Questionnaire data are used to compute cytotoxic drugs dose of chemotherapy, taking patients’ weight and height into account, and to reconstruct individual organ doses. For validation, self-reports are compared to data of cancer therapies of 178 patients from hospitals and clinical studies. Quality assessment for binary variables are performed by measuring sensitivity and specificity. AUC and ROC curve are used for graphical comparison. The validity is analyzed by the positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Cohen’s Kappa (κ) is used to measure the concordance between the two assessments. Continuous variables are tested for validity by the intraclass correlation coefficient. A Bland-Altman plot is used to consider the patterns of disagreement between the measurements. Influencing factors (e.g., number of neoplasms, sex, sociodemographic factors, comorbidities, time since cancer treatment) on the dichotomous outcome variable “degree of agreement” are analyzed using logistic regression. If the questionnaire is reliable, logistic regression and mixed models will be used to estimate possible risk associations with cancer therapies. A perfect agreement between questionnaire and therapy data was found on whether a chemotherapy was received (κ = 1.00). The agreement for exposure to radiotherapy was lower, but in the upper substantial area (κ = 0.77). For radiotherapy, sensitivity (94%) and PPV (96%) of the questionnaire were at a very high level. Specificity (85%) and NPV (80%) were less precise. The agreement for exposure to radiotherapy was higher in participants with one cancer (κ = 0.82) compared to participants with more than one diagnosis (κ = 0.62). The odds ratios for agreement were 0.5 (0.1; 1.8) for participants with two vs. one diagnosis, 1.3 (0.3; 4.9) for men vs. women, 10.9 (1.7; 71.9) for age over 36.4 years (median) vs. younger participants, 2.2 (0.6; 9.0) for high vs. low education, 0.3 (0.1; 1.4) for over 26.5 years of follow-up (median) vs. less, 2.4 (0.6; 9.5) for existing vs. nonexisting comorbidities. In conclusion, the new developed questionnaire seems to be reliable for the retrospective assessment of binary exposure to cancer therapies in childhood, especially for chemotherapy. However, for radiotherapy older participants showed a significant higher agreement. All other tested variables showed no significant influence.
Citation Format: Lara Kim Brackmann, Caine Lucas Grandt, Heike Schwarz, Irene Schmidtmann, Thomas Hankeln, Danuta Galetzka, Sebastian Zahnreich, Peter Scholz-Kreisel, Maria Blettner, Heinz Schmidberger, Manuela Marron. Exposure assessment among an adult population on radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and other cancer therapies in childhood [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on the Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2019 Sep 17-20; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(14 Suppl):Abstract nr B60.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Kim Brackmann
- 1Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany,
| | - Caine Lucas Grandt
- 1Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany,
| | - Heike Schwarz
- 1Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany,
| | - Irene Schmidtmann
- 2Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Mainz, Germany,
| | - Thomas Hankeln
- 3Institute of Organismal and Molecular Evolution, Mainz, Germany,
| | - Danuta Galetzka
- 4Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Peter Scholz-Kreisel
- 2Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Mainz, Germany,
| | - Maria Blettner
- 2Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Mainz, Germany,
| | | | - Manuela Marron
- 1Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany,
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Rades D, Bartscht T, Hunold P, Schmidberger H, König L, Debus J, Belka C, Homann N, Spillner P, Petersen C, Kuhnt T, Fietkau R, Ridwelski K, Karcher-Kilian K, Kranich A, Männikkö S, Schild SE, Maderer A, Moehler M. Radiochemotherapy with or without cetuximab for unresectable esophageal cancer: final results of a randomized phase 2 trial (LEOPARD-2). Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 196:795-804. [PMID: 32533228 PMCID: PMC7449950 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01646-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of cetuximab when added to radiochemotherapy for unresectable esophageal cancer. Methods This randomized phase 2 trial (clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT01787006) compared radiochemotherapy plus cetuximab (arm A) to radiochemotherapy (arm B) for unresectable esophageal cancer. Primary objective was 2‑year overall survival (OS). Arm A was considered insufficiently active if 2‑year OS was ≤40% (null hypothesis = H0), and promising if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval was >45%. If that lower limit was >40%, H0 was rejected. Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional control (LC), metastases-free survival (MFS), response, and toxicity. The study was terminated early after 74 patients; 68 patients were evaluable. Results Two-year OS was 71% in arm A (95% CI: 55–87%) vs. 53% in arm B (95% CI: 36–71%); H0 was rejected. Median OS was 49.1 vs. 24.1 months (p = 0.147). Hazard ratio (HR) for death was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.30–1.21). At 2 years, PFS was 56% vs. 44%, LC 84% vs. 72%, and MFS 74% vs. 54%. HRs were 0.51 (0.25–1.04) for progression, 0.43 (0.13–1.40) for locoregional failure, and 0.43 (0.17–1.05) for distant metastasis. Overall response was 81% vs. 69% (p = 0.262). Twenty-six and 27 patients, respectively, experienced at least one toxicity grade ≥3 (p = 0.573). A significant difference was found for grade ≥3 allergic reactions (12.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.044). Conclusion Given the limitations of this trial, radiochemotherapy plus cetuximab was feasible. There was a trend towards improved PFS and MFS. Larger studies are required to better define the role of cetuximab for unresectable esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Rades
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
| | - Tobias Bartscht
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Peter Hunold
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johannes-Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximillians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Nils Homann
- Medical Department II, Klinikum Wolfsburg, Wolfsburg, Germany
| | - Patrick Spillner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Cordula Petersen
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Kuhnt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Karsten Ridwelski
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Klinikum Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Kerstin Karcher-Kilian
- Practice for Gastroenterology, Diabetology, Oncology and Hematology Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Anne Kranich
- Gesellschaft für Studienmanagement und Onkologie mbH, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Steven E Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Annett Maderer
- 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Markus Moehler
- 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Held G, Thurner L, Poeschel V, Berdel C, Ott G, Schmidt C, Viardot A, Borchmann P, Shpilberg O, Nickelsen M, Federico M, de Nully Brown P, Murawski N, Trumper LH, Schmidberger H, Ruebe C, Fleckenstein J, Schmitz N, Loeffler M, Ziepert M. Role of radiotherapy and dose-densification of R-CHOP in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma: A subgroup analysis of the unfolder trial of the German Lymphoma Alliance (GLA). J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.8041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
8041 Background: Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is a distinct entity of aggressive lymphoma, which typically presents in young patients (pts) with a bulky mediastinal mass. Therapy is based on R-CHOP or similar regimens, but the role of treatment intensification and consolidative radiotherapy (RT) is controversial, because data from randomized trials are rare. Methods: The UNFOLDER trial included 18-60 year-old pts (aaIPI = 0 with Bulk [≥7.5 cm] or aaIPI = 1) qualifying for radiotherapy to Bulk or extralymphatic involvement (E). Pts were randomized in a 2 x 2 factorial design to 6xR-CHOP-14 or 6x-R-CHOP-21 without RT or with RT (39.6 Gy) to Bulk and E. Primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS), secondary endpoints were progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Response was evaluated by the Internat Standardized Response Criteria, Cheson 1999. Results: 131 PMBCLs were included with a median age of 34 years, 54% were female, 79% had elevated LDH > UNV and 24% had E. 82 pts (R-CHOP-21: 43; R-CHOP-14: 39) were assigned to RT and 49 (R-CHOP-21: 27, R-CHOP-14: 22) to no-RT. 96% (79/82) received RT per protocol and 5 pts in the no-RT arm received unplanned RT (4 after PR and 1 after CR/CRu). Response RT vs no-RT were CR/Cru 94% vs 84%, PR 2% vs 10%, PD 2% vs 4%. 3-year EFS was superior in pts assigned to RT (94% vs. 78%; p = 0.007), mostly due to events caused by initiation of RT (n = 5) in the no-RT arm. In an as treated analysis the difference between the RT and the no-RT arm was not significant (p = 0.136). Regarding PFS and OS no difference between the RT vs no-RT arm was detected (PFS: 95% (95% CI: 90-100) vs 90% (95% CI: 81-98), p = 0.253; OS: 98% (95% CI: 94-100) vs 96% (95% CI: 90-100), p = 0.636). Dose-densification of R-CHOP-21 by R-CHOP-14 did not improve EFS, PFS nor OS. Only 4 pts died. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the largest series of PMBCLs so far, which have been treated in a prospective, randomized trial in the rituximab era. The results reveal no differences between R-CHOP-14 vs R-CHOP-21. Pts assigned to RT had a superior EFS mostly due to a higher PR rate in the no-RT arm triggering RT, with no differences in PFS and OS. The results suggest a benefit of RT only for pts, who are responding to R-CHOP with PR. Testing RT in PET-positive residual tumors in a randomized trial can solve the question, while RT in PET-negative pts is studied in the ongoing randomized IELSG 37 trial. Our results indicate a very favorable 3-year OS of 96% in PMBCL pts treated with R-CHOP. Supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe, Amgen and Roche. Clinical trial information: NCT00278408 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerhard Held
- Department Internal Medicine I, Westpfalzklinikum Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Lorenz Thurner
- Department Internal Medicine I, Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Viola Poeschel
- Department Internal Medicine I, Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Christian Berdel
- Department of Radiooncology, Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - German Ott
- Insitute of Pathology, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Christian Schmidt
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital Grosshadern/LMU, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Peter Borchmann
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ofer Shpilberg
- Institute of Haematology, Assuta Medical Centers, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Massimo Federico
- Dept of Diagnostic, Clinical and Public Health Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Niels Murawski
- Department Internal Medicine I, Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | | | | | - Christian Ruebe
- Department of Radiooncology, Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Jochen Fleckenstein
- Department of Radiooncology, Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Norbert Schmitz
- Department Internal Medicine A, University Medical School, Muenster, Germany
| | - Markus Loeffler
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Marita Ziepert
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Albers P, Wiegel T, Schmidberger H, Bussar-Maatz R, Härter M, Kristiansen G, Martus P, Meisner C, Wellek S, Grozinger K, Renner P, Burmester M, Schneider F, Stöckle M. Termination rates and histological reclassification of active surveillance patients with low- and early intermediate-risk prostate cancer: results of the PREFERE trial. World J Urol 2020; 39:65-72. [PMID: 32189088 PMCID: PMC7858200 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03154-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Active surveillance (AS) strategies for patients with low- and early intermediate-risk prostate cancer are still not consistently defined. Within a controlled randomized trial, active surveillance was compared to other treatment options for patients with prostate cancer. Aim of this analysis was to report on termination rates of patients treated with AS including different grade groups. Methods A randomized trial comparing radical prostatectomy, active surveillance, external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy was performed from 2013 to 2016 and included 345 patients with low- and early intermediate-risk prostate cancer (ISUP grade groups 1 and 2). The trial was prematurely stopped due to slow accrual. A total of 130 patients were treated with active surveillance. Among them, 42 patients were diagnosed with intermediate-risk PCA. Reference pathology and AS quality control were performed throughout. Results After a median follow-up time of 18.8 months, 73 out of the 130 patients (56%) terminated active surveillance. Of these, 56 (77%) patients were histologically reclassified at the time of rebiopsy, including 35% and 60% of the grade group 1 and 2 patients, respectively. No patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at the time of reclassification had radical prostatectomy specimens ≥ grade group 3. Conclusion In this prospectively analyzed subcohort of patients with AS and conventional staging within a randomized trial, the 2-year histological reclassification rates were higher than those previously reported. Active surveillance may not be based on conventional staging alone, and patients with grade group 2 cancers may be recommended for active surveillance in carefully controlled trials only.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Albers
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Martin Härter
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Peter Martus
- Department of Biometry, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christoph Meisner
- Department of Biometry, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Stefan Wellek
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Klaus Grozinger
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Leverkusen, Leverkusen, Germany
| | - Peter Renner
- Department of Urology, Urologisches Zentrum, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | | | - Michael Stöckle
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Homburg/Saar, Homburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|