1
|
Bostel T, Akbaba S, Wollschläger D, Mayer A, Nikolaidou E, Murnik M, Kirste S, Rühle A, Grosu AL, Debus J, Fottner C, Moehler M, Grimminger P, Schmidberger H, Nicolay NH. Chemoradiotherapy in geriatric patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: Multi-center analysis on the value of standard treatment in the elderly. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1063670. [PMID: 36937445 PMCID: PMC10022427 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1063670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose To evaluate the tolerability and outcomes of chemoradiation in elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Materials and methods This multi-center retrospective analysis included 161 patients with SCC of the esophagus with a median age of 73 years (range 65-89 years) treated with definitive or neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy between 2010 and 2019 at 3 large comprehensive cancer centers in Germany. Locoregional control (LRC), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-associated toxicities were analyzed, and parameters determining patient outcomes and treatment tolerance were assessed. Results The delivery of radiotherapy without dose reduction was possible in 149 patients (93%). In 134 patients (83%), concomitant chemotherapy was initially prescribed; however, during the course of therapy, 41% of these patients (n = 55) required chemotherapy de-escalation due to treatment-related toxicities. Fifty-two patients (32%) experienced higher-grade acute toxicities, and 22 patients (14%) higher-grade late toxicities. The 2-year LRC, DMFS, PFS, and OS rates amounted to 67.5%, 33.8%, 31.4%, and 40.4%, respectively. Upon multivariate analysis, full-dose concomitant chemotherapy (vs. no or modified chemotherapy) was associated with significantly better DMFS (p=0.005), PFS (p=0.005) and OS (p=0.001). Furthermore, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by tumor resection (vs. definitive chemoradiotherapy or definitive radiotherapy alone) significantly improved PFS (p=0.043) and OS (p=0.049). We could not identify any clinico-pathological factor that was significantly associated with LRC. Furthermore, definitive (chemo)radiotherapy, brachytherapy boost and stent implantation were significantly associated with higher-grade acute toxicities (p<0.001, p=0.002 and p=0.04, respectively). The incidence of higher-grade late toxicities was also significantly associated with the choice of therapy, with a higher risk for late toxicities when treatment was switched from neoadjuvant to definitive (chemo)radiotherapy compared to primary definitive (chemo)radiotherapy (p<0.001). Conclusions Chemoradiation with full-dose and unmodified concurrent chemotherapy has a favorable prognostic impact in elderly ESCC patients; however, about half of the analyzed patients required omission or adjustment of chemotherapy due to comorbidities or toxicities. Therefore, the identification of potential predictive factors for safe administration of concurrent chemotherapy in elderly ESCC patients requires further exploration to optimize treatment in this vulnerable patient cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- *Correspondence: Tilman Bostel,
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Wollschläger
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Arnulf Mayer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eirini Nikolaidou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Murnik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg – Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg – Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg – Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg – Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Fottner
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Markus Moehler
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter Grimminger
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils Henrik Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg – Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung - DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum - DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Adeberg S, Sauer C, Lambert L, Regnery S, Windisch P, Zaoui K, Freudlsperger C, Moratin J, Farnia B, Nikendei C, Krauss J, Ehrenthal JC, El Shafie R, Hörner-Rieber J, König L, Akbaba S, Lang K, Held T, Rieken S, Debus J, Friederich HC, Maatouk I. Screening and Psycho-Oncological Support for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer and Brain Malignancies Before Radiotherapy With Mask Fixation: Results of a Feasibility Study. Front Psychol 2021; 12:760024. [PMID: 34975651 PMCID: PMC8716729 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.760024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
This single-center, single-arm trial investigates the feasibility of a psycho-oncological care program, which aims to reduce psychological distress and improve compliance with radiotherapy with mask fixation in patients with head and neck cancer or brain malignancies. The care program comprised (1) a screening/needs assessment and (2) the provision of a psycho-oncological intervention using imaginative stabilization techniques for distressed patients (distress due to anxiety ≥5) or in a case of subjective interest in the psycho-oncological intervention. Another allocation path to the intervention was directly through the radiation oncologist in charge who classified the patient as: in need of support to tolerate the immobilization device. Of a total of 1,020 screened patients, 257 (25.2%) patients indicated a distress ≥5 and 141 (13.8%) patients reported panic attacks. 25% of the patients reported a subjective interest in psycho-oncological support. A total of 35 patients received the psycho-oncological intervention, of which 74% were assigned by radiation oncologists. In this small patient cohort, no significant pre-post effects in terms of depression, anxiety, distress, and quality of life (mental and physical component scores) could be detected. Our results indicate a good feasibility (interdisciplinary workflow and cooperation, allocation by physicians in charge) of the psycho-oncological care program for this cohort of patients before radiotherapy with mask fixation. The screening results underline the high psychological distress and demand for psycho-oncological support. However, since the utilization of our intervention was low, future studies should reduce the barriers and improve compliance to psycho-oncological services by these patients.Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.drks.de/drks_web/setLocale_EN.do #DRKS00013493
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Adeberg
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), UKHD and DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christina Sauer
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lena Lambert
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Regnery
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), UKHD and DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Paul Windisch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Karim Zaoui
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Freudlsperger
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Julius Moratin
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Farnia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Christoph Nikendei
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Krauss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Rami El Shafie
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), UKHD and DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), UKHD and DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), UKHD and DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sati Akbaba
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), UKHD and DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), UKHD and DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Held
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), UKHD and DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Goettingen University Hospital, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), UKHD and DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hans-Christoph Friederich
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Imad Maatouk
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Section of Psychosomatic Medicine, Psychotherapy and Psychooncology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Julius-Maximilian University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- *Correspondence: Imad Maatouk,
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bostel T, Akbaba S, Wollschläger D, Klodt T, Oebel L, Mayer A, Drabke S, Sprave T, Debus J, Förster R, Rief H, Rühle A, Grosu AL, Schmidberger H, Nicolay NH. Comparative Analyses of Two Established Scores to Assess the Stability of Spinal Bone Metastases Before and After Palliative Radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2021; 11:753768. [PMID: 34737961 PMCID: PMC8562722 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.753768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose To compare two validated spinal instability scores regarding the stabilizing effects and skeletal-related events (SREs) of palliative radiotherapy (RT) in patients with spinal bone metastases (SBM). Materials and Methods Two hundred eighty-two osteolytic SBM of lung or breast cancer patients were analyzed for stability before and following RT based on the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) or the Taneichi score. Score concordance was quantified by absolute agreement and Cohen’s kappa coefficient. SREs were defined as fractures or local progression after RT. OS was quantified as the time between the start of RT and death from any cause. Results At 3 and 6 months after RT, 35 and 50% of initially unstable SBM were re-stabilized according to SINS in patients still alive. Corresponding Taneichi score-based stabilization proportions were 25 and 46%, respectively. Comparison of both stability scores showed high absolute agreement for all time-points (range 71–78%, kappa range 0.35–0.44). SRE occurred more frequently in initially unstable SBM compared to stable SBM according to SINS (14 vs. 5%), but no such association could be shown for the Taneichi-based instability criterion. Poor general condition of patients was negatively associated with SINS-measured re-stabilization after 6 months, but no predictive factor for re-stabilization could be found for the Taneichi score. Conclusions Despite the relatively high agreement between both stabilization scores, the SINS should be considered the standard for future studies on the stabilization effects of RT in SBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Wollschläger
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Tristan Klodt
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laura Oebel
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arnulf Mayer
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sophia Drabke
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja Sprave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Robert Förster
- Institute of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, University of Zurich, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Harald Rief
- Radiation Therapy Practice Bonn-Rhein-Sieg, Bad Godesberg site, Bonn, Germany
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lang K, Akbaba S, Held T, El Shafie R, Farnia B, Bougatf N, Bernhardt D, Freudlsperger C, Plinkert PK, Rieken S, Debus J, Adeberg S. Retrospective analysis of outcome and toxicity after postoperative radiotherapy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the lip. Tumori 2021; 108:125-133. [PMID: 33641520 PMCID: PMC8984927 DOI: 10.1177/0300891621996805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background: Carcinomas of the lips are a relatively common malignancy of the head and
neck region, accounting for roughly one quarter of all oral cavity cancers.
Compared to other oral cancer sites, this location has a favorable
prognosis, with 5-year survival rates between 85% and 95%. This study
summarizes our institutional experience in utilizing postoperative radiation
for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the upper and/or lower lip
following incomplete surgical resection or positive lymph node involvement
with extracapsular extension. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients at the
University Hospital of Heidelberg between 2005 and 2018 treated with
postoperative radiotherapy of the upper and lower lip. Nineteen patients
were identified with a median age at diagnosis of 67 years (range, 41–95
years), with 58% male and 42% female patients. Fourteen patients (73.7%)
underwent neck dissection, with 5 (35.7%) found to have extracapsular
extension (ECE) and positive resection margin (R1/2), 2 (14.3%) only ECE,
and 7 (50.0%) with only R1/2. All patients received a median cumulative dose
of 66.0 Gy (range, 60.0–70.0 Gy) in a median of 2.0 Gy per fraction (range,
1.8–2.2 Gy). Results: Median follow-up was 5.2 years. The median progression-free survival (PFS)
was 3.9 years (range, 0.2–12.4 years), local disease-free survival (LDFS)
was 4 years (range, 1–12 years) and overall survival (OS) was 5.2 years
(range, 0.2–12.4 years). The 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for OS, PFS, and
LDFS were 61.4%, 85.7%, and 100.0%, respectively. At last follow-up, 13
patients (68.4%) were still alive. Although no patient developed
locoregional relapse, two patients developed distant relapse at a median of
15 months after radiotherapy. There was a statistically significant
improvement in OS in patients treated with higher radiotherapy doses
(>60.0 Gy, p = 0.044) compared to lower radiotherapy
doses. PFS was significantly improved among patients who had N0 disease,
with a negative resection margin, without ECE, and who were treated with
intensity-modulated radiotherapy to doses >60.0 Gy. No grade 3/4 toxicity
was detected; the most common grade 1/2 toxicities included dermatitis (n =
11, 57.9%), oral mucositis (n = 8, 42.1%), and dysphagia (n = 8, 42.1%). Conclusion: Our results demonstrate excellent local control and OS with acceptable
toxicity when utilizing postoperative radiotherapy in patients with squamous
cell carcinoma of the upper and lower lip, despite unfavorable
characteristics (advanced T or N stage and/or ECE).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rami El Shafie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Farnia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Nina Bougatf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Freudlsperger
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter K Plinkert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Foerster R, Zwahlen DR, Buchali A, Tang H, Schroeder C, Windisch P, Vu E, Akbaba S, Bostel T, Sprave T, Zamboglou C, Zilli T, Stelmes JJ, Telkhade T, Murthy V. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13040759. [PMID: 33673077 PMCID: PMC7918664 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Revised: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy (RT) is an established, potentially curative treatment option for all risk constellations of localized prostate cancer (PCA). Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and dose-escalated RT can further improve outcome in high-risk (HR) PCA. In recent years, shorter RT schedules based on hypofractionated RT have shown equal outcome. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a highly conformal RT technique enabling ultra-hypofractionation which has been shown to be safe and efficient in patients with low- and intermediate-risk PCA. There is a paucity of data on the role of SBRT in HR PCA. In particular, the need for pelvic elective nodal irradiation (ENI) needs to be addressed. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to analyze the available data on observed toxicities, ADT prescription practice, and oncological outcome to shed more light on the value of SBRT in HR PCA. METHODS We searched the PubMed and Embase electronic databases for the terms "prostate cancer" AND "stereotactic" AND "radiotherapy" in June 2020. We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. RESULTS After a rigorous selection process, we identified 18 individual studies meeting all selection criteria for further analyses. Five additional studies were included because their content was judged as relevant. Three trials have reported on prostate SBRT including pelvic nodes; 2 with ENI and 1 with positive pelvic nodes only. The remaining studies investigated SBRT of the prostate only. Grade 2+ acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity was between 12% and 46.7% in the studies investigating pelvic nodes irradiation and ranged from 0% to 89% in the prostate only studies. Grade 2+ chronic GU toxicity was between 7% and 60% vs. 2% and 56.7%. Acute gastrointestinal (GI) grade 2+ toxicity was between 0% to 4% and 0% to 18% for studies with and without pelvic nodes irradiation, respectively. Chronic GI grade 2+ toxicity rates were between 4% and 50.1% vs. 0% and 40%. SBRT of prostate and positive pelvic nodes only showed similar toxicity rates as SBRT for the prostate only. Among the trials that reported on ADT use, the majority of HR PCA patients underwent ADT for at least 2 months; mostly neoadjuvant and concurrent. Biochemical control rates ranged from 82% to 100% after 2 years and 56% to 100% after 3 years. Only a few studies reported longer follow-up data. CONCLUSION At this point, SBRT with or without pelvic ENI cannot be considered the standard of care in HR PCA, due to missing level 1 evidence. Treatment may be offered to selected patients at specialized centers with access to high-precision RT. While concomitant ADT is the current standard of care, the necessary duration of ADT in combination with SBRT remains unclear. Ideally, all eligible patients should be enrolled in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Foerster
- Institute for Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland; (D.R.Z.); (H.T.); (C.S.); (P.W.)
- Medical Faculty, University of Zurich (UZH), 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +41-52-266-31-40
| | - Daniel Rudolf Zwahlen
- Institute for Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland; (D.R.Z.); (H.T.); (C.S.); (P.W.)
- Medical Faculty, University of Zurich (UZH), 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Andre Buchali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruppiner Kliniken GmbH, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB), 16816 Neuruppin, Germany;
| | - Hongjian Tang
- Institute for Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland; (D.R.Z.); (H.T.); (C.S.); (P.W.)
| | - Christina Schroeder
- Institute for Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland; (D.R.Z.); (H.T.); (C.S.); (P.W.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruppiner Kliniken GmbH, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB), 16816 Neuruppin, Germany;
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), ETH Domain, 5232 Villingen, Switzerland
| | - Paul Windisch
- Institute for Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland; (D.R.Z.); (H.T.); (C.S.); (P.W.)
| | - Erwin Vu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen (KSSG), 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland;
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (S.A.); (T.B.)
| | - Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (S.A.); (T.B.)
| | - Tanja Sprave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (T.S.); (C.Z.)
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (T.S.); (C.Z.)
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Geneva (HUG), 1205 Geneva, Switzerland;
| | - Jean-Jacques Stelmes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncological Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Cantonal Hospitals (EOC), 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland;
| | - Tejshri Telkhade
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital and Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai 400012, India; (T.T.); (V.M.)
| | - Vedang Murthy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital and Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai 400012, India; (T.T.); (V.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Akbaba S, Rühle A, Rothhaar S, Zamboglou C, Gkika E, Foerster R, Oebel L, Klodt T, Schmidberger H, Grosu AL, Debus J, Bostel T, Nicolay NH. Treatment outcomes of elderly salivary gland cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy - Results from a large multicenter analysis. Radiother Oncol 2020; 156:266-274. [PMID: 33359662 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.12.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Revised: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To evaluate oncological outcomes and treatment-related toxicities of elderly salivary gland cancer patients undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Local/locoregional control (LRC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of elderly patients ≥ 65 years with primary salivary gland cancers undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy between 2005 and 2020 at three tertiary cancer centers were calculated. The impact of clinicopathological and treatment parameters on outcomes were analyzed, and acute and chronic toxicities were quantified. RESULTS 288 elderly salivary gland cancer patients were included in this multicenter analysis, and their median LRC, PFS and OS amounted to 113, 39 and 75 months, respectively. Age, performance status, comorbidities, definitive vs. adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy as well as locally/locoregionally advanced cancers and distant metastases correlated with reduced outcomes in elderly salivary gland patients. Patients receiving dose-escalated radiotherapy (total doses > 70 GyEQD2) with carbon ion boost radiation resulted in improved LRC, but no improvements in PFS or OS. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy did not improve treatment outcomes in elderly salivary gland carcinoma patients. Radiotherapy of elderly salivary gland cancer patients resulted in moderate higher-grade toxicities despite dose escalation with 70 (24.3%) and 48 patients (16.7%) experiencing acute and chronic grade 3 toxicities, respectively. No grade 4/5 toxicities were observed in this patient cohort. CONCLUSION Data from the largest multicenter analysis of elderly salivary gland cancer patients undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy demonstrate favorable LRC and tolerable toxicity rates. Decision-making for these vulnerable patients should be based on patient performance rather than chronological patient age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sofie Rothhaar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Robert Foerster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Laura Oebel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tristan Klodt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hoegen P, Lang C, Akbaba S, Häring P, Splinter M, Miltner A, Bachmann M, Stahl-Arnsberger C, Brechter T, El Shafie RA, Weykamp F, König L, Debus J, Hörner-Rieber J. Cone-Beam-CT Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Enables Quality Assurance and Superior Sparing of Healthy Lung. Front Oncol 2020; 10:564857. [PMID: 33363005 PMCID: PMC7756078 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.564857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the potential of cone-beam-CT (CB-CT) guided adaptive radiotherapy (ART) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for sparing of surrounding organs-at-risk (OAR). Materials and Methods In 10 patients with locally advanced NSCLC, daily CB-CT imaging was acquired during radio- (n = 4) or radiochemotherapy (n = 6) for simulation of ART. Patients were treated with conventionally fractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with total doses of 60–66 Gy (pPlan) (311 fraction CB-CTs). OAR were segmented on every daily CB-CT and the tumor volumes were modified weekly depending on tumor changes. Doses actually delivered were recalculated on daily images (dPlan), and voxel-wise dose accumulation was performed using a deformable registration algorithm. For simulation of ART, treatment plans were adapted using the new contours and re-optimized weekly (aPlan). Results CB-CT showed continuous tumor regression of 1.1 ± 0.4% per day, leading to a residual gross tumor volume (GTV) of 65.3 ± 13.4% after 6 weeks of radiotherapy (p = 0.005). Corresponding PTVs decreased to 83.7 ± 7.8% (p = 0.005). In the actually delivered plans (dPlan), both conformity (p = 0.005) and homogeneity (p = 0.059) indices were impaired compared to the initial plans (pPlan). This resulted in higher actual lung doses than planned: V20Gy was 34.6 ± 6.8% instead of 32.8 ± 4.9% (p = 0.066), mean lung dose was 19.0 ± 3.1 Gy instead of 17.9 ± 2.5 Gy (p = 0.013). The generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) of the lung was 18.9 ± 3.1 Gy instead of 17.8 ± 2.5 Gy (p = 0.013), leading to an increased lung normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of 15.2 ± 13.9% instead of 9.6 ± 7.3% (p = 0.017). Weekly plan adaptation enabled decreased lung V20Gy of 31.6 ± 6.2% (−3.0%, p = 0.007), decreased mean lung dose of 17.7 ± 2.9 Gy (−1.3 Gy, p = 0.005), and decreased lung gEUD of 17.6 ± 2.9 Gy (−1.3 Gy, p = 0.005). Thus, resulting lung NTCP was reduced to 10.0 ± 9.5% (−5.2%, p = 0.005). Target volume coverage represented by conformity and homogeneity indices could be improved by weekly plan adaptation (CI: p = 0.007, HI: p = 0.114) and reached levels of the initial plan (CI: p = 0.721, HI: p = 0.333). Conclusion IGRT with CB-CT detects continuous GTV and PTV changes. CB-CT-guided ART for locally advanced NSCLC is feasible and enables superior sparing of healthy lung at high levels of plan conformity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Hoegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Clemens Lang
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Medical Physics in Radiotherapy, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Mainz University Hospital, Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter Häring
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Medical Physics in Radiotherapy, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mona Splinter
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Medical Physics in Radiotherapy, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Annette Miltner
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marion Bachmann
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Brechter
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rami A El Shafie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Akbaba S, Bostel T, Lang K, Bahadir S, Lipman D, Schmidberger H, Matthias C, Rotter N, Knopf A, Freudlsperger C, Plinkert P, Debus J, Adeberg S. Large German Multicenter Experience on the Treatment Outcome of 207 Patients With Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Major Salivary Glands. Front Oncol 2020; 10:593379. [PMID: 33262950 PMCID: PMC7686540 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.593379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introdution We aimed to evaluate treatment outcome of combined radiotherapy (RT) including photon intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and carbon ion boost for adenoid cystic carcinomas (ACCs) of the major salivary glands, the currently available largest German collective for this cohort. Materials and Methods Overall, 207 patients who were irradiated with combined RT between 2009 and 2019 at Heidelberg University Hospital were analyzed retrospectively for local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier estimates. The majority of patients received postoperative RT (n=176/207, 85%) after previous surgery in large German hospitals mainly Mainz, Freiburg, Mannheim and Heidelberg University Hospitals and 15% received primary RT (n=31/207). Results After a median follow-up time of 50 months, 84% of the patients were still alive (n=174/207). Disease progression occurred in 32% of the patients (n=66/207) while local recurrence was diagnosed in 12% (n=25/207), and distant relapse in 27% (n=56/207). Estimated 5-year LC, PFS and OS rates were 84%, 56% and 83% for OS, respectively. In multivariate analysis, we could identify two prognostic subgroups: one subgroup resulting in decreased LC, PFS and OS rates and another subgroup having an additional survival disadvantage in PFS and OS. Patients with a macroscopic tumor disease (yes vs. no; p<0.001 for LC, p=0.010 for PFS and p=0.040 for OS) treated in a definitive setting (vs. postoperative setting; p=0.001 for LC, p=0.006 for PFS, p=0.049 for OS) and tumors of upper T stage (T1-4; p=0.004 for LC, p<0.001 for PFS, p<0.001 for OS) showed significantly more local relapses and a decreased PFS and OS. Upper Age (p<0.001 for both PFS and OS), lower Karnofsky Performance Score (<80% vs. ≥80%; p<0.001 for both PFS and OS) and solid histology (vs. non-solid; p=0.049 for PFS and p=0.003 for OS) were in addition associated with worse survival outcome. Toxicity was moderate with 18% late grade 2 and 3 toxicity. Conclusions Combined RT results in superior LC rates compared to photon data with moderate toxicity. In multivariate analysis, upper T stage, the existence of a macroscopic tumor before RT and definitive RT setting were identified as major prognostic factors affecting LC negatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Suzan Bahadir
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiology, Koru Hospitals-Yuksek Ihtisas University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Djoeri Lipman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Isala Hospital Zwolle, Zwolle, Netherlands
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Christoph Matthias
- Department of Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Nicole Rotter
- Department of Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Andreas Knopf
- Department of Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Christian Freudlsperger
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Plinkert
- Department of Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pollul G, Bostel T, Grossmann S, Akbaba S, Karle H, Stockinger M, Schmidberger H. Pediatric craniospinal irradiation with a short partial-arc VMAT technique for medulloblastoma tumors in dosimetric comparison. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:256. [PMID: 33153495 PMCID: PMC7643335 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01690-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to contrast four different irradiation methods for pediatric medulloblastoma tumors in a dosimetric comparison regarding planning target volume (PTV) coverage and sparing of organs at risk (OARs). Methods In sum 24 treatment plans for 6 pediatric patients were realized. Besides the clinical standard of a 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) treatment plan taken as a reference, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans (“VMAT_AVD” vs. “noAVD” vs. “FullArc”) were optimized and calculated for each patient. For the thoracic and abdominal region, the short partial-arc VMAT_AVD technique uses an arc setup with reduced arc-length by 100°, using posterior and lateral beam entries. The noAVD uses a half 180° (posterior to lateral directions) and the FullArc uses a full 360° arc setup arrangement. The prescription dose was set to 35.2 Gy. Results We identified a more conformal dose coverage for PTVs and a better sparing of OARs with used VMAT methods. For VMAT_AVD mean dose reductions in organs at risk can be realized, from 16 to 6.6 Gy, from 27.1 to 8.7 Gy and from 8.0 to 1.9 Gy for the heart, the thyroid and the gonads respectively, compared to the 3D-CRT treatment method. In addition we have found out a superiority of VMAT_AVD compared to the noAVD and FullArc trials with lower exposure to low-dose radiation to the lungs and breasts. Conclusions With the short partial-arc VMAT_AVD technique, dose exposures to radiosensitive OARS like the heart, the thyroid or the gonads can be reduced and therefore, maybe the occurrence of late sequelae is less likely. Furthermore the PTV conformity is increased. The advantages of the VMAT_AVD have to be weighed against the potentially risks induced by an increased low dose exposure compared to the 3D-CRT method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerhard Pollul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sascha Grossmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heiko Karle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Marcus Stockinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bostel T, Mattke M, Nicolay N, Welzel T, Wollschläger D, Akbaba S, Sprave T, Debus J, Uhl M. PO-0909: High-dose carbon-ion based radiotherapy of primary and recurrent sacrococcygeal chordomas. Radiother Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)00926-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
11
|
Akbaba S, Bostel T, Hoerner-Rieber J, Nicolay N, Forster T, Held T, Lang K, Adeberg S, Debus J. OC-0572: Treatment outcome of 207 patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma of the major salivary glands. Radiother Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)00594-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
12
|
Hoegen P, Lang C, Akbaba S, Häring P, Splinter M, Miltner A, Bachmann M, Stahl-Arnsberger C, Brechter T, Bernhardt D, Klüter S, Syed M, Weykamp F, König L, Debus J, Hörner-Rieber J. PO-1652: In silico trial of cone-beam-CT guided adaptive planning for radiotherapy of locally advanced NSCLC. Radiother Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)01670-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
13
|
Held T, Harrabi S, Lang K, Akbaba S, Windisch P, Bernhardt D, Rieken S, Herfarth K, Debus J, Adeberg S. PO-0816: Organs at Risk in Re-Irradiation of Head and Neck Cancer: An Individual Risk-Benefit Tradeoff. Radiother Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)00833-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
14
|
Bostel T, Mattke M, Nicolay NH, Welzel T, Wollschläger D, Akbaba S, Mayer A, Sprave T, Debus J, Uhl M. High-dose carbon-ion based radiotherapy of primary and recurrent sacrococcygeal chordomas: long-term clinical results of a single particle therapy center. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:206. [PMID: 32831113 PMCID: PMC7447564 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01647-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to analyze the oncological long-term results and late toxicity of carbon ion-based radiotherapy (RT) of patients with sacral chordoma and to identify potential prognostic factors for local control (LC) and overall survival (OS). METHODS A total of 68 patients with sacral chordoma treated at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center were included in this study. Of these 52 patients (77%) received a primary RT and 16 patients (23%) received a RT in a recurrent situation. All patients were treated with carbon ion RT (CIRT), either in combination with photons (n = 22; 32%) or as a monotherapy (n = 46; 68%), with a median radiation dose of 66 Gy RBE (range 60-74 Gy). In 40 patients (59%), RT was performed in the postoperative situation. Postoperative care included regular MRI scans. Local progression was defined as an enlargement of the maximum tumor diameter by 10% or a new tumor growth within the planning target volume (PTV). LC and OS were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Furthermore, the relevance of various prognostic factors for LC and OS was assessed by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS The median follow-up period was 60 months (range 1.3-97.4 months). The 5-year rates for LC, progression-free survival, metastasis-free survival and OS were 53, 53, 52 and 74%, respectively. Local recurrence was observed in 31 patients (46%), occurring after a median follow-up time of 25 months (range 2.5-73.1 months). Only 10% of local recurrences occurred later than 5 years after RT. Statistical analysis showed that RT in the relapse situation corresponded to inferior LC rates compared to the primary situation, while other factors such as the GTV, radiation dose (EQD2) and treatment approach (CIRT alone vs. CIRT combined with photons) were insignificant. For OS after RT, patient age and PTV size proved to be significant predictors. The incidence of late toxicity ≥ III° according to CTCAE v5.0 was 21%. Sacral insufficiency fractures occurred in 49% of patients (maximum III°: 16%) and were thus by far the most frequent late side effect in our analysis. Radiogenic damage to the peripheral nerves, intestinal tract and skin was observed in only 9% (≥ III°: 5%), 3% (all II°) and 9% (all I°) of patients. CONCLUSION Our analysis showed only moderate long-term LC rates after carbon ion-based RT, with sacral chordomas having a particularly poor prognosis in the recurrent situation. Therefore, future studies should evaluate the safety and effectiveness of further dose escalation and hypofractionation of RT in sacral chordoma and weight potential benefits of dose escalation against side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. .,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Matthias Mattke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils Henrik Nicolay
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Strasse 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Welzel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Wollschläger
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Arnulf Mayer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Tanja Sprave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Strasse 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Uhl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bostel T, Rühle A, Rackwitz T, Mayer A, Klodt T, Oebel L, Förster R, Schlampp I, Wollschläger D, Rief H, Sprave T, Debus J, Grosu AL, Schmidberger H, Akbaba S, Nicolay NH. The Role of Palliative Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Spinal Bone Metastases from Head and Neck Tumors-A Multicenter Analysis of a Rare Event. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12071950. [PMID: 32708389 PMCID: PMC7409283 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12071950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
This retrospective multi-center analysis aimed to assess the clinical response and stabilizing effects of palliative radiotherapy (RT) for spinal bone metastases (SBM) in head and neck cancer (HNC), and to establish potential predictive factors for stability and overall survival (OS). Patients included in this analysis were treated at the University Hospitals of Mainz, Freiburg, and Heidelberg between 2001 and 2019. Clinical information was taken from the medical records. The stability of affected vertebral bodies was assessed according to the validated spine instability neoplastic score (SINS) based on CT-imaging before RT, as well as 3 and 6 months after RT. OS was quantified as the time between the start of palliative RT and death from any cause or last follow-up. Potential predictive factors for stability and OS were analyzed using generalized estimating equations and Cox regression for time-varying covariates to take into account multiple observations per patient. The mean follow-up time of 66 included patients after the first palliative RT was 8.1 months (range 0.3–85.0 months). The majority of patients (70%; n = 46) had squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) originating from the pharynx, larynx and oral cavity, while most of the remaining patients (26%; n = 17) suffered from salivary glands tumors. A total of 95 target volumes including 178 SBM were evaluated that received a total of 81 irradiation series. In patients with more than one metastasis per irradiated region, only the most critical bone metastasis was analyzed according to the SINS system. Prior to RT, pain and neurologic deficits were present in 76% (n = 72) and 22% (n = 21) of irradiated lesions, respectively, and 68% of the irradiated lesions (n = 65) were assessed as unstable or potentially unstable prior to RT. SBM-related pain symptoms and neurologic deficits responded to RT in 63% and 47% of the treated lesions, respectively. Among patients still alive at 3 and 6 months after RT with potentially unstable or unstable SBM, a shift to a better stability class according to the SINS was observed in 20% and 33% of the irradiated SBM, respectively. Pathological fractures of SBM were frequently detected before the start of irradiation (43%; n = 41), but after RT, new fractures or increasing vertebral body sintering within the irradiated region occurred rarely (8%; n = 8). A pathological fracture before RT was negatively associated with stabilization 6 months after RT (OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.02–0.49, p = 0.004), while a Karnofsky performance score (KPS) ≥ 70% was associated positively with a stabilization effect through irradiation (OR 6.09, 95% CI 1.68–22.05, p = 0.006). Mean OS following first palliative RT was 10.7 months, and the KPS (≥70% vs. <70%) was shown to be a strong predictive factor for OS after RT (HR 0.197, 95% CI 0.11–0.35, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in OS between patients with SCC and non-SCC. Palliative RT in symptomatic SBM of HNC provides sufficient symptom relief in the majority of patients, while only about one third of initially unstable SBM show re-stabilization after RT. Since patients in our multi-center cohort exhibited very limited OS, fractionation schemes should be determined depending on the patients’ performance status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (A.M.); (T.K.); (L.O.); (H.S.); (S.A.)
- Correspondence: (T.B.); (A.R.)
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Strasse 3, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (T.S.); (A.-L.G.); (N.H.N.)
- Correspondence: (T.B.); (A.R.)
| | - Tilmann Rackwitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (T.R.); (I.S.); (J.D.)
| | - Arnulf Mayer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (A.M.); (T.K.); (L.O.); (H.S.); (S.A.)
| | - Tristan Klodt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (A.M.); (T.K.); (L.O.); (H.S.); (S.A.)
| | - Laura Oebel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (A.M.); (T.K.); (L.O.); (H.S.); (S.A.)
| | - Robert Förster
- Institute of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, University of Zurich, Brauerstrasse 15, 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland;
| | - Ingmar Schlampp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (T.R.); (I.S.); (J.D.)
| | - Daniel Wollschläger
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany;
| | - Harald Rief
- Radiotherapy Bonn-Rhein-Sieg, 53115 Bonn, Germany;
| | - Tanja Sprave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Strasse 3, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (T.S.); (A.-L.G.); (N.H.N.)
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (T.R.); (I.S.); (J.D.)
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Strasse 3, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (T.S.); (A.-L.G.); (N.H.N.)
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (A.M.); (T.K.); (L.O.); (H.S.); (S.A.)
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (A.M.); (T.K.); (L.O.); (H.S.); (S.A.)
| | - Nils Henrik Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Strasse 3, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (T.S.); (A.-L.G.); (N.H.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Weykamp F, König L, Seidensaal K, Forster T, Hoegen P, Akbaba S, Mende S, Welte SE, Deutsch TM, Schneeweiss A, Debus J, Hörner-Rieber J. Extracranial Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Oligometastatic or Oligoprogressive Breast Cancer. Front Oncol 2020; 10:987. [PMID: 32676455 PMCID: PMC7333735 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose/Objective: Oligometastatic disease (OMD) and oligoprogressive disease (OPD) describe tumor states with a limited metastasization. In contrast to other disease states, treatment of OMD or OPD has not yet become common for breast cancer. We sought to understand the outcomes and toxicities of this treatment paradigm. Material/Methods: We retrospectively analyzed female breast cancer patients with OMD (≤3 metastases) or OPD (1 progressive lesion) who received stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for their respective extracranial metastatic lesions between 01/2002 and 07/2019. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test being used for evaluation of significance. Cox regression was used to detect prognostic outcome factors. Toxicity was evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v. 5.0). Results: Forty-six patients (70% OMD; 30% OPD) with 58 lesions met criteria for inclusion. The majority of treatments (34 out of 58; 58.6%) were delivered from 2017 to 2018. Treatment sites were bone, liver, lung [n = 19 (33%) for each site], and adrenal gland [n = 1 (1%)]. Median biologically effective dose (BED at α/β = 10) was 81.6 Gy (range: 45–112.5 Gy) and median planning target volume was 36.60 mL (range: 3.76–311.00 mL). At 2 years, local control (LC) was 89%, distant control (DC) was 44%, progression free survival (PFS) was 17% and overall survival (OS) was 62%. Multivariate analysis identified the diagnosis of a solitary metastasis as an independent prognostic factor for superior DC (HR = 0.186, CI [0.055; 0.626], p = 0.007) and PFS (HR = 0.363, CI [0.152; 0.863], p = 0.022). OS was independently inferior for patients treated at a higher age (HR = 5.788, CI [1.077; 31.119] p = 0.041). Nine (15.5%) grade I° and one (1.7%) grade II° toxicities were recorded, with no grade III° or higher toxicities. Conclusion: Extracranial SBRT in breast cancer patients with OMD or OPD was well-tolerated with excellent LC. SBRT should especially be offered to younger OMD and OPD breast cancer patients with only one metastasis. The increase in utilization since 2017 points toward a growing acceptance of SBRT for OMD and OPD in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katharina Seidensaal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Forster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Mende
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan E Welte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas M Deutsch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Forster T, Jäkel C, Akbaba S, Krug D, Krempien R, Uhl M, Häfner MF, König L, Koerber SA, Harrabi S, Bernhardt D, Behnisch R, Krisam J, Hennigs A, Sohn C, Heil J, Debus J, Hörner-Rieber J. Fatigue following radiotherapy of low-risk early breast cancer - a randomized controlled trial of intraoperative electron radiotherapy versus standard hypofractionated whole-breast radiotherapy: the COSMOPOLITAN trial (NCT03838419). Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:134. [PMID: 32487184 PMCID: PMC7268450 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01581-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fatigue is one of the most common and distressing side-effects of breast cancer radiotherapy. According to current guidelines, accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) may be considered as an alternative treatment option for women with early-stage low-risk breast cancer. One method for APBI is single-dose intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) applied directly to the tumor bed during breast conserving surgery (BCS). The COSMOPOLITAN trial therefore aims to analyze the intensity of fatigue following single-shot IORT with electrons (IOERT) compared to conventional hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (WBI) in low risk early breast cancer patients. METHODS This trial is conducted as a multicenter, prospective, randomized, two-arm phase II study comparing the intensity of fatigue in early-stage breast cancer (cT1cN0cM0, tumor size < 2,5 cm, ER pos. Her2neu neg., age > 50 years) treated either with WBI or APBI after BCS. Secondary outcomes investigated are tumor control, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), acute and chronic toxicity, quality of life (QoL) and cosmesis. A total of 202 patients will be randomized into two arms: Patients in arm A will receive WBI (40.05 Gy, 15 fractions) after surgical resection, while patients in arm B will receive IOERT (21 Gy to the 90%-isodose) during BCS. Fatigue will be assessed 12 weeks post surgery with the help of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale. DISCUSSION The present trial aims to evaluate treatment response to compare single-shot intraoperative electron APBI to conventional WBI following BCS in early-stage low risk breast cancer patients. Fatigue is selected as the primary, patient-reported endpoint due its major clinical relevance. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study is prospectively registered on February 12th, 2019: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03838419. "Intraoperative Electron Radiotherapy for Low-risk Early Breast Cancer (COSMOPOLITAN)". STUDY STATUS Ongoing study. Start of recruitment was December 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Forster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cornelia Jäkel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Robert Krempien
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Helios Hospital Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Uhl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Felix Häfner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Alexander Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rouven Behnisch
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johannes Krisam
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andre Hennigs
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christof Sohn
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany. .,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany. .,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lang K, ElShafie RA, Akbaba S, Koschny R, Bougatf N, Bernhardt D, Welte SE, Adeberg S, Häfner M, Kargus S, Plinkert PK, Debus J, Rieken S. Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Treated with Radiotherapy. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:127-136. [PMID: 32021429 PMCID: PMC6955619 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s218432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and aim The primary aim of our study was to evaluate percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement depending on body weight and body mass index in patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC). A secondary aim was to evaluate the course of weight change following PEG placement. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 186 patients with HNC undergoing radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) at our institution between January 2010 and August 2017. Initial weight and nutritional intake were analyzed prior to RT initiation and then followed throughout treatment until completion. Based on these data, the indication of PEG placement was determined. Medical records were also reviewed to analyze PEG-related acute toxicities. Results A total of 186 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients were most commonly male (n=123, 66.1%) with squamous cell carcinoma (n=164, 88.2%). Patients who had dysphagia prior to treatment initiation as well as patients with a BMI <18.5 kg/m2 needed PEG placement earlier during the treatment course. Low-grade toxicities related to PEG insertion were observed in 10.7% patients, with peristomal pain and redness adjacent to the PEG tube insertion site being most common. High-grade toxicities, such as peritonitis and organ injury, were found in 4.9% of patients. Conclusion Underweight patients and those with preexisting dysphagia should be closely screened during RT for weight loss and decreased oral intake. For weight loss greater than 4.5% during the treatment of HNC, early PEG-tube placement should be considered. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings, and delineate a scoring system for timing of PEG use (prophylactic vs reactive) as well as assess the quality of life in patients with HNC who receive PEG placement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rami A ElShafie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ronald Koschny
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nina Bougatf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Stefan E Welte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Matthias Häfner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Steffen Kargus
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Peter K Plinkert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Adeberg S, Akbaba S, Lang K, Held T, Verma V, Nikoghosyan A, Bernhardt D, Münter M, Freier K, Plinkert P, Hauswald H, Herfarth K, Rieken S, Debus J, Jensen AD. The Phase 1/2 ACCEPT Trial: Concurrent Cetuximab and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy with Carbon Ion Boost for Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 106:167-173. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.09.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2019] [Revised: 08/13/2019] [Accepted: 09/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
20
|
Adeberg S, Windisch P, Ehret F, Baur M, Akbaba S, Held T, Bernhardt D, Haefner MF, Krauss J, Kargus S, Freudlsperger C, Plinkert P, Flechtenmacher C, Herfarth K, Debus J, Rieken S. Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) With Carbon Ion Boost in the Multimodal Treatment of Salivary Duct Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2019; 9:1420. [PMID: 31921675 PMCID: PMC6932999 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 11/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: To assess outcomes and treatment related toxicity following intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and a Carbon Ion Radiotherapy (CIRT) boost for salivary duct carcinoma (SDC). Methods: Twenty-eight consecutive patients with SDC who underwent a postoperative (82%) or definitive (18%) radiation therapy between 2010 and 2017 were assessed in this retrospective single-center analysis. CIRT boost was delivered with median 18 Gy(RBE) in 6 daily fractions, followed by an TomoTherapy®-based IMRT (median 54 Gy in 27 daily fractions). Treatment-related acute toxicity was assessed according to CTCAE Version 4. Results: Tumors were most commonly located in the major salivary glands (n = 25; 89%); 23 patients (82%) received previous surgery (R0: 30%; R1: 57%; R2: 4%; RX: 19%). Median follow-up was 30 months. Four patients (14%) experienced a local relapse and 3 (11%) developed locoregional recurrence. The two-year local control (LC) and locoregional control (LRC) was 96 and 93%, respectively. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 27 months, metastasis-free survival (MFS) was 69 months, and overall survival (OS) was 93 months. Acute grade 3 toxicity occurred in 11 patients (mucositis, dermatitis, xerostomia; n = 2 each (7%) were the most common) and 2 osteonecroses of the mandibular (grade 3) occurred. No patients experienced grade ≥4 toxicities. Conclusions: Multimodal therapy approaches with surgery followed by IMRT and CIRT boost for SDC leads to good local and locoregional disease control. However, the frequent occurrence of distant metastases limits the prognosis and requires optimization of adjuvant systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Paul Windisch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Ehret
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Melissa Baur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias F Haefner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Steffen Kargus
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Freudlsperger
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Plinkert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Held T, Harrabi SB, Lang K, Akbaba S, Windisch P, Bernhardt D, Rieken S, Herfarth K, Debus J, Adeberg S. Dose-Limiting Organs at Risk in Carbon Ion Re-Irradiation of Head and Neck Malignancies: An Individual Risk-Benefit Tradeoff. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11122016. [PMID: 31847167 PMCID: PMC6966577 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11122016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2019] [Revised: 12/03/2019] [Accepted: 12/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Carbon ion re-irradiation (CIR) was evaluated to investigate treatment planning and the consequences of individual risk-benefit evaluations concerning dose-limiting organs at risk (OAR). Methods: A total of 115 consecutive patients with recurrent head and neck cancer (HNC) were analyzed after initial radiotherapy and CIR at the same anatomical site. Toxicities were evaluated in line with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.03. Results: The median maximum cumulative equivalent doses applied in fractions of 2 Gy (EQD2) to the brainstem, optic chiasm, ipsilateral optic nerve, and spinal cord were 56.8 Gy (range 0.94-103.9), 51.4 Gy (range 0-120.3 Gy), 63.6 Gy (range 0-146.1 Gy), and 28.8 Gy (range 0.2-87.7 Gy). The median follow up after CIR was 24.0 months (range 2.5-72.0 months). The cumulative rates of acute and late severe (≥grade III) side effects after CIR were 1.8% and 14.3%. Conclusion: In recurrent HNC, an individual risk-benefit tradeoff is frequently inevitable due to unfavorable location of tumors in close proximity to vital OAR. There are uncertainties about the dose tolerance of OAR after CIR, which warrant increased awareness about the potential treatment toxicity and further studies on heavy ion re-irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Held
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (T.H.); (S.B.H.); (S.A.); (D.B.); (S.R.); (K.H.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi B. Harrabi
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (T.H.); (S.B.H.); (S.A.); (D.B.); (S.R.); (K.H.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (T.H.); (S.B.H.); (S.A.); (D.B.); (S.R.); (K.H.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (T.H.); (S.B.H.); (S.A.); (D.B.); (S.R.); (K.H.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Paul Windisch
- University Hospital of Zurich, Department of Radiation Oncology, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (T.H.); (S.B.H.); (S.A.); (D.B.); (S.R.); (K.H.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (T.H.); (S.B.H.); (S.A.); (D.B.); (S.R.); (K.H.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (T.H.); (S.B.H.); (S.A.); (D.B.); (S.R.); (K.H.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (T.H.); (S.B.H.); (S.A.); (D.B.); (S.R.); (K.H.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (T.H.); (S.B.H.); (S.A.); (D.B.); (S.R.); (K.H.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Held T, Windisch P, Akbaba S, Lang K, Farnia B, Liermann J, Bernhardt D, Plinkert P, Freudlsperger C, Rieken S, Herfarth K, Debus J, Adeberg S. Rare entities in head-and-neck cancer: salvage re-irradiation with carbon ions. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:202. [PMID: 31718670 PMCID: PMC6852923 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1406-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2019] [Accepted: 10/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The objective of this investigation is to evaluate the outcomes and toxicity of carbon-ion re-irradiation (CIR) in patients with rare head and neck cancers (HNC). There is a paucity of data regarding treatment approaches in this patient cohort, which we aim to address in this work. Methods Thirty-two (n = 32) consecutive patients with uncommon HNC treated between 2010 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed in terms of clinical outcomes, patterns of failure, and toxicity. Results Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) was the most common histology (22%). Patients received a median cumulative dose equivalent in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) after CIR of 128.6 Gy (range, 105.8–146.5 Gy). The local and distant control rates 1 year after CIR were 66 and 72%. No serious acute or late toxicity (≥ grade 3) after CIR was observed. Conclusions CIR may represent an effective and safe treatment alternative to palliative systemic therapies in these rare indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Paul Windisch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Farnia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Jakob Liermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Plinkert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Freudlsperger
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany. .,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany. .,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany. .,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Akbaba S, Heusel A, Mock A, Held T, Lang K, Hoerner-Rieber J, Forster T, Katayama S, Kargus S, Rieken S, Plinkert P, Herfarth K, Debus J, Adeberg S. The impact of age on the outcome of patients treated with radiotherapy for mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of the salivary glands in the head and neck: A 15-year single-center experience. Oral Oncol 2019; 97:115-123. [PMID: 31494395 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Revised: 08/02/2019] [Accepted: 08/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Data regarding treatment and survival outcome of patients with mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the head and neck are limited to case reports and case series. As a consequence of lacking evidence, treatment guidelines do not exist. We aimed to analyze the effect of modern radiotherapy in form of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) either with simultaneously integrated boost or carbon ion boost on local control and survival for a relatively large patient collective. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patient records of 62 consecutive patients treated with postoperative (n = 53, 85%) or definitive (n = 9, 15%) radiotherapy between 2004 and 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates for overall survival (OS), distant progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC) and locoregional control (LRC) were statistically calculated and prognostic factors were identified using the log-rank test. Toxicity was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). RESULTS The median follow-up was 47 months (range, 4-188 months). The 3-year OS, DPFS, LC and LRC, estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves, were 82%, 87%, 89% and 92%, the estimated 5-year OS, DPFS, LC and LRC were 78%, 87%, 84% and 88%, respectively. In univariate analysis, age >56 years (vs. age ≤56 years) was identified as the only independent negative prognostic factor for decreased OS (HR = 1.078; 95%-CI = 1.029-1.130; p = 0.001), DPFS (HR = 1.055; 95%-CI = 1.000-1.114; p = 0.051) and LC (HR = 1.087; 95%-CI = 1.022-1.157; p = 0.008). Treatment was well tolerated without any grade ≥4 toxicity. Acute and late grade 3 toxicities were rare with 16% acute (n = 10) and 13% late toxicities (n = 8). CONCLUSION Radiotherapy with intensity modulated radiotherapy including either simultaneously integrated photon boost or active raster-scanning carbon ion boost for mucoepidermoid carcinomas of the head and neck resulted in excellent survival outcome and locoregional control with moderate toxicity. However, patients older than 56 years seem to have a disadvantage in all calculated endpoints (OS, DPFS, LRC) due to frequent local and distant relapses. CONDENSED ABSTRACT Modern radiotherapy with intensity modulated radiotherapy including either a simultaneously integrated photon boost or carbon ion boost for mucoepidermoid carcinoma results in excellent survival outcome and locoregional control with moderate toxicity. The 5-year OS, DPFS, LC and LRC, estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves, were 89%, 75%, 84% and 80%, respectively. Patients older than 56 years seem to have a disadvantage in all calculated endpoints (OS, DPFS, LRC).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Astrid Heusel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Andreas Mock
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Juliane Hoerner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Tobias Forster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Sonja Katayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Steffen Kargus
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Peter Plinkert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Akbaba S, Mock A, Hoerner-Rieber J, Held T, Katayama S, Forster T, Freudlsperger C, Rieken S, Herfarth K, Plinkert P, Debus J, Adeberg S. Treatment Outcome of a Combined Dose-Escalated Treatment Regime With Helical TomoTherapy® and Active Raster-Scanning Carbon Ion Boost for Adenocarcinomas of the Head and Neck. Front Oncol 2019; 9:755. [PMID: 31475108 PMCID: PMC6705231 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Data regarding treatment and survival outcome of patients with adenocarcinoma of the head and neck are limited to case reports and case series. As a consequence of lacking evidence, treatment guidelines do not exist. We aimed to analyze the effect of a bimodal irradiation regime with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and carbon ion boost on local control (LC) and survival in adenocarcinoma patients for a large patient collective. Materials and Methods: Patient records of eighty consecutive patients treated between 2009 and 2018 were analyzed retrospectively and Kaplan-Meier estimates for LC, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared among patients with salivary gland adenocarcinoma (SGAC), salivary duct adenocarcinoma (SDAC), and intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (ITAC) according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Prognostic factors were identified using the log-rank test and cox-regression modeling. Toxicity was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Results: Median follow-up was 41 months. The 3-year and estimated 5-year Kaplan-Meier rates for all patients were 83 and 75% for LC, 74 and 50% for OS and 60 and 53% for PFS, respectively. While bimodal RT for ITAC resulted in a significantly decreased 3-year LC rate of 50 vs. 93% for each SGAC and SDAC (p < 0.01), no statistical significant survival differences could be identified across the three groups regarding OS (p = 0.08) and PFS (p = 0.063). 3-year OS was 88% for SGAC, 78% for SDAC and 67% for ITAC and 3-year PFS was 72% for SGAC, 53% for SDAC and 44% for ITAC, respectively. Nevertheless, in subgroup analysis, OS for ITAC was significantly worse compared to SGAC (p = 0.024). In multivariate analysis, bilateral tumor side (vs. unilateral) solely could be identified as independent negative prognostic factor for LC (p < 0.01). Treatment was well-tolerated with 21% acute (n = 17) and 25% (n = 20) late grade ≥3 toxicities. Conclusion: Radiotherapy including active raster-scanning carbon ion boost for relatively radio resistant adenocarcinomas of the head and neck resulted in favorable survival outcome for salivary gland and salivary duct adenocarcinomas with moderate toxicity. However, local control and prognosis for bilateral intestinal-type adenocarcinomas (ITAC) seem to remain low even after dose-escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Mock
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hoerner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sonja Katayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Forster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Freudlsperger
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Plinkert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Held T, Windisch P, Akbaba S, Lang K, El Shafie R, Bernhardt D, Plinkert P, Kargus S, Rieken S, Herfarth K, Debus J, Adeberg S. Carbon Ion Reirradiation for Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer: A Single-Institutional Experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:803-811. [PMID: 31349059 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.07.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Revised: 06/29/2019] [Accepted: 07/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to assess the feasibility of carbon ion reirradiation (CIR) for recurrent head and neck cancer (HNC). METHODS AND MATERIALS This retrospective study included 229 patients with recurrent HNC who were treated with CIR between 2010 and 2017. We assessed progression-free survival, overall survival, pattern of failure, and toxicity. Of the primary tumors, 54.1% were adenoid cystic carcinomas, 26.2% were squamous cell carcinomas, 8.3% were adenocarcinomas, and 11.4% were other tumor entities. RESULTS The median radiation therapy interval was 3.9 years (range, 0.3-46.5 years), and patients received a median dose of 51 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]; range, 30-66 Gy [RBE]) in 3 Gy (RBE) fractions. The median cumulative lifetime dose after CIR was 132.8 Gy (range, 88.8-155.0 Gy). The median local progression-free survival after CIR was 24.2 months (95% confidence interval, 19.4-29.0 months), and the median overall survival was 26.1 months (95% confidence interval, 21.9-30.3 months). Serious acute toxicity (grade ≥3) after CIR included laryngeal edema, grade 4 (n = 2; 0.9%); dysphagia, grade 3 (n = 3; 1.3%); fistula, grade 3 (n = 1; 0.4%); and impaired hearing, grade 3 (n = 1; 0.4%). Late toxicities of grades 3 or higher (n = 18; 14.5%) included central nervous system necrosis, grades 4/3 (n = 1; 0.8%/n = 5; 4.0%); optic nerve disorder, grades 4/3 (n = 2; 1.6%/n = 2; 1.6%); impaired hearing, grade 3 (n = 5; 4.0%), osteonecrosis, grade 3 (n = 1; 0.8%); and carotid blowout, grade 4 (n = 1; 0.8%). CONCLUSIONS In patients with locally recurrent HNC, CIR was a feasible, effective treatment with acceptable toxicity and good local control. Thus, CIR represented a valuable alternative to surgical salvage and palliative chemotherapy in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Held
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Paul Windisch
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rami El Shafie
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Plinkert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Steffen Kargus
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bostel T, Förster R, Schlampp I, Sprave T, Akbaba S, Wollschläger D, Debus J, Mayer A, Schmidberger H, Rief H, Nicolay NH. Stability and survival analysis of elderly patients with osteolytic spinal bone metastases after palliative radiotherapy : Results from a large multicenter cohort. Strahlenther Onkol 2019; 195:1074-1085. [PMID: 31240346 PMCID: PMC6867989 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-019-01482-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the stability and fracture rates of osteolytic spinal bone metastases (SBM) in elderly patients following palliative radiotherapy (RT) and to derive prognostic factors for stability and survival. Methods A total of 322 patients aged at least 70 years received palliative RT at two major German academic medical centers or at the German Cancer Research Center. Stability assessment was based on the validated Taneichi score prior to RT and at 3 and 6 months after RT. The survival time following RT was assessed, and prognostic factors for stability and survival were analyzed. Results Prior to RT, 183 patients (57%) exhibited unstable SBM and 68 patients (21%) pathological fractures. At 3 and 6 months after RT, significant recalcification and stabilization were evident in 19% (23/118) and 40% (31/78) of surviving patients, respectively. Only 17 patients (5%) experienced new pathological fractures following RT. Tumor histology was found to significantly influence stabilization rates with only breast cancer patients exhibiting increased stabilization compared to patients with other histologies. The median survival time and 6‑month survival rates following RT were 5.4 months (95% confidence interval 4.4–7.2 months) and 48%, respectively. The patients’ performance status was found to be the strongest predictor for survival after RT in this patient cohort; further factors demonstrating a significant association with survival were the application of systemic treatment, the number of SBM and the primary tumor histology. To analyze the influence of age on survival after RT, study patients were stratified into 3 age groups (i.e., 70–74 years, 75–79 years, and ≥80 years). The subgroup of patients aged at least 80 years showed a strong trend towards a worse survival time following RT compared to younger patients (i.e., 6‑month survival rate 39% vs. 51%; p = 0.06, log-rank test). Conclusions Prognostic factors influencing overall survival such as performance status and histology should guide the choice for palliative RT for SBM. Strongly hypofractionated RT regimes may be advisable for most elderly patients considering the overall poor prognosis in order to reduce hospitalization times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Robert Förster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, Raemistraße 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ingmar Schlampp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja Sprave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Wollschläger
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arnulf Mayer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Harald Rief
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils Henrik Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Straße 3, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Akbaba S, Oelmann-Avendano JT, Krug D, Arians N, Bostel T, Hoerner-Rieber J, Nicolay NH, Debus J, Lindel K, Foerster R. The impact of vaginal dilator use on vaginal stenosis and sexual quality of life in women treated with adjuvant radiotherapy for endometrial cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2019; 195:902-912. [PMID: 30997541 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-019-01466-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2018] [Accepted: 03/29/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite a lack of evidence and low compliance, current guidelines recommend the use of a vaginal dilator (VD) after pelvic radiotherapy (RT). We analyzed the effect of VD on vaginal stenosis (VS) and its influence on sexual quality of life (QoL) in women treated with adjuvant RT for endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS Between 2014 and 2015, 56 consecutive patients were instructed to use a VD after completion of treatment. The maximum diameter of the comfortably introducible VD was measured before and at 1 year after treatment. The degree of VS was evaluated clinically, and sexual QoL was assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) sexual functioning items before RT, during RT, at 6 weeks, and at 1 year after RT. RESULTS One year after RT, mean VD diameter had decreased by 2.7 ± 3.2 mm (p < 0.001) and 36 patients (64.3%) had clinical VS (grade I-III). A larger decrease in VD diameter correlated with a higher degree of clinical VS (p < 0.001). VD use (p = 0.81), RT modality (p = 0.68), and adjuvant ChT (p = 0.87) had no influence on VD diameter. Sexual activity decreased during RT and increased beyond pre-RT values 1 year after RT (p < 0.001). Sexual enjoyment decreased continuously during and after completion of RT (p = 0.013) and was influenced negatively by a higher degree of clinical VS (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION Almost two thirds of patients developed clinical VS 1 year after adjuvant RT for EC, and sexual enjoyment was substantially reduced by VS. The use of a VD after RT may not serve to prevent sexual impairments and VS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan T Oelmann-Avendano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Strasse 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Nathalie Arians
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Juliane Hoerner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Freiburg University Medical Center, Robert-Koch-Strasse 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katja Lindel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Staedtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Moltkestrasse 90, 76133, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Robert Foerster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Akbaba S, Ahmed D, Mock A, Lang K, Held T, Herfarth K, Rieken S, Plinkert P, Debus J, Adeberg S. OC-0391 Treatment outcome of 265 patients with sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC). Radiother Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(19)30811-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
29
|
Bostel T, Förster R, Schlampp I, Sprave T, Akbaba S, Wollschläger D, Debus J, Schmidberger H, Rief H, Nicolay N. EP-1652 Stability and survival of elderly patients after palliative radiotherapy of spinal bone metastases. Radiother Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(19)32072-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
30
|
Akbaba S, Held T, Lang K, Forster T, Federspil P, Herfarth K, Häfner M, Plinkert P, Rieken S, Debus J, Adeberg S. Bimodal Radiotherapy with Active Raster-Scanning Carbon Ion Radiotherapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in High-Risk Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Results in Excellent Local Control. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11030379. [PMID: 30884910 PMCID: PMC6468442 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11030379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Revised: 03/06/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: In this analysis, we aimed to present the first results of carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT), which is known for its conformal dose distribution and increased biological effectiveness in the treatment of high-risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed twenty-six consecutive patients who had been treated at our center with CIRT for high-risk NPC between 2009 and 2018. Carbon ion (C12) boost was applied in a bimodal setting combined with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) base plan. The median cumulative total dose was 74 Gy (RBE), and patients with inoperable (n = 17, 65%) or incompletely resected (n = 7, 27%) tumors were included in the analysis. Overall, 81% received concomitant chemotherapy (n = 21). Results: The median follow-up time was 40 months (range 10–97 months) for all patients. At the last follow-up, 92% of the patients were still alive. We could identify excellent tumor response with complete tumor remission (CR) in 60% (n = 15/25), partial tumor remission (PR) in 20% (n = 5/25), and stable disease (SD) in 12% (n = 3/25) of the patients according to the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria. Despite unfavorable tumor characteristics, only one patient showed a locally in-field recurrence after 56 months (4%) and another patient a locoregional recurrence in the unilateral cervical lymph nodes after 21 months (4%). The 2-year local control (LC), distant progression-free survival (DPFS), and overall survival (OS) were 95%, 93%, and 100% and the estimated 5-year LC, DPFS, and OS were 90%, 86%, and 86%, respectively. Overall, treatment was tolerated well with 20% acute and 16% chronic grade 3 side effects. No toxicity greater than grade 3 occurred. Conclusion: Bimodal radiotherapy including IMRT and active raster-scanning CIRT for high-risk nasopharyngeal cancer is a safe treatment method resulting in moderate toxicity and excellent local control. A larger patient number and longer follow-up time would be necessary to strengthen the current findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Tobias Forster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Philippe Federspil
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Matthias Häfner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Peter Plinkert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Akbaba S, Held T, Lang K, Herfarth K, Hoerner-Rieber J, Plinkert P, Auffarth G, Rieken S, Debus J, Adeberg S. PO-172 Carbon ion radiotherapy in active raster- scanned technique for malignant lacrimal gland tumors. Radiother Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(19)30338-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
32
|
Adeberg S, Jensen A, Akbaba S, Katayama S, Verma V, Bernhardt D, Nikoghosyan A, Abollahi A, Plinkert P, Rieken S, Muenter M, Juergen D. PO-169 The Phase l/ll ACCEPT Trial: Cetuximab and IMRT with Carbon Ion Boost for Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(19)30335-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
33
|
Akbaba S, Held T, Lang K, Hoerner-Rieber J, Zaoui K, Forster T, Rieken S, Plinkert P, Debus J, Adeberg S. Salvage radiotherapy for recurrent hypopharyngeal and laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) after first-line treatment with surgery alone: a 10-year single-centre experience. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:34. [PMID: 30782197 PMCID: PMC6381740 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1238-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2018] [Accepted: 02/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Salvage surgery of recurrent hypopharyngeal and laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) results in limited local control and survival rates. As a result of recent technological progress, radiotherapy (RT) has become a valuable, potentially curative therapeutic option. Thus, we aimed to determine prognostic factors for survival outcome in order to optimize patient selection for salvage radiotherapy after failure of first-line treatment with surgery alone in this special patient cohort. Methods Seventy-five patients (85% male, median age of 64 years) underwent salvage RT in a secondary setting for recurrent hypopharyngeal or laryngeal SCC after prior surgery alone between 2007 and 2017. On average, patients were treated with one prior surgery (range 1–4 surgeries). Median time between surgery and salvage RT was 7 months (range 1–47 months) for initially advanced tumors (T3/4, N+, extracapsular spread) and 18 months (range 5–333 months) for initially early stage tumors. The majority of patients received concomitant chemotherapy (n = 48; 64%) or other kind of systemic treatment concurrent to radiotherapy (n = 10; 13%). Results Median follow-up was 41 months (range 3–120 months). Overall, fifteen patients were diagnosed with local failure (all were in-field) at last follow-up (20%). Median time to recurrence was 35 months (range 3–120 months) and 3-year local progression-free survival (LPFS) was 75%, respectively. Dose-escalated RT with 70.4 Gy applied in 2.1 Gy or 2.2 Gy fractions corresponding an EQD2 > 70 Gy (p = 0.032) and the use of concomitant cisplatin weekly chemotherapy (p = 0.006) had a significant positive impact on LPFS. 3-year OS and DPFS were 76 and 85%, respectively. No toxicity-related deaths occurred. Reported grade > 3 side effects were rare (n = 4/70, 6%). Conclusion Salvage radiotherapy resulted in excellent local control rates while radiation dose and the use of cisplatin weekly chemotherapy were identified as prognostic factors for LPFS. Nevertheless, patient selection for curative salvage treatment remains challenging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hoerner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Karim Zaoui
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Forster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Plinkert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Akbaba S, Lang K, Bulut OC, Held T, Rieken S, Plinkert P, Jensen A, Herfarth K, Debus J, Adeberg S. The role of organ‐ and function‐preserving radiotherapy in the treatment of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the larynx. Head Neck 2019; 41:2208-2214. [DOI: 10.1002/hed.25678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2018] [Revised: 01/02/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospital Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO) Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion‐Beam Therapy Center (HIT) Heidelberg Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospital Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO) Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion‐Beam Therapy Center (HIT) Heidelberg Germany
| | - Olcay Cem Bulut
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity Hospital Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospital Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO) Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion‐Beam Therapy Center (HIT) Heidelberg Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospital Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO) Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion‐Beam Therapy Center (HIT) Heidelberg Germany
| | - Peter Plinkert
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity Hospital Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany
| | - Alexandra Jensen
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospital Giessen Gießen Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospital Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO) Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion‐Beam Therapy Center (HIT) Heidelberg Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospital Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO) Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion‐Beam Therapy Center (HIT) Heidelberg Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospital Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO) Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion‐Beam Therapy Center (HIT) Heidelberg Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Akbaba S, Lang K, Held T, Herfarth K, Rieber J, Plinkert P, Auffarth GU, Rieken S, Debus J, Adeberg S. Carbon-ion radiotherapy in accelerated hypofractionated active raster-scanning technique for malignant lacrimal gland tumors: feasibility and safety. Cancer Manag Res 2019; 11:1155-1166. [PMID: 30774443 PMCID: PMC6362930 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s190051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction We evaluated treatment outcomes of CIRT in an active raster-scanning technique alone or in combination with IMRT for lacrimal gland tumors. Methods A total of 24 patients who received CIRT for a malignant lacrimal gland tumor at the HIT between 2009 and 2018 were analyzed retrospectively for LC, OS, and distant progression-free survival (DPFS) using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Toxicity was assessed according to the CTCAE version 5. Results Median follow-up was 30 months and overall median LC, OS, and DPFS 24 months, 36 months, and 31 months, respectively. Two-year LC, OS, and DPFS of 93%, 96%, and 87% with CIRT was achieved for all patients. Local failure occurred only in patients with ACC and after a median follow-up of 30 months after the completion of RT (n=5, 21%; P=0.09). We identified a significant negative impact of a macroscopic tumor disease, which was diagnosed on planning CT or MRI before RT, on LC (P=0.026). In contrast, perineural spread (P=0.661), T stage (P=0.552), and resection margins in operated patients (P=0.069) had no significant impact on LC. No grade ≥3 acute or grade >3 chronic toxicity occurred. Late grade 3 side effects were identified in form of a wound-healing disorder 3 months after RT in one patient and temporal lobe necrosis 6 months after RT in another (n=2, 8%). Conclusion Accelerated hypofractionated active raster-scanning CIRT for relative radio-resistant malignant lacrimal gland tumors results in adequate LC rates and moderate acute and late toxicity. Nevertheless, LC for ACC histology remains challenging and risk factors for local recurrence are still unclear. Further follow-up is necessary to evaluate long-term clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Juliane Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Peter Plinkert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Gerd U Auffarth
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Akbaba S, Lang K, Held T, Bulut OC, Mattke M, Uhl M, Jensen A, Plinkert P, Rieken S, Herfarth K, Debus J, Adeberg S. Accelerated Hypofractionated Active Raster-Scanned Carbon Ion Radiotherapy (CIRT) for Laryngeal Malignancies: Feasibility and Safety. Cancers (Basel) 2018; 10:cancers10100388. [PMID: 30340397 PMCID: PMC6211114 DOI: 10.3390/cancers10100388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2018] [Revised: 10/15/2018] [Accepted: 10/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: The authors present the first results of active raster-scanned carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for radioresistant laryngeal malignancies regarding efficacy and toxicity. (2) Methods: 15 patients with laryngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC; n = 8; 53.3%) or chondrosarcoma (CS; n = 7; 46.7%) who underwent radiotherapy with carbon ions (C12) at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT) between 2013 and 2018 were identified retrospectively and analyzed for local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and distant progression-free survival using the Kaplan–Meier method. CIRT was applied either alone (n = 7, 46.7%) or in combination with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) (n = 8, 53.3%). The toxicity was assessed according to the Common Toxicity Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03. (3). Results: the median follow-up was 24 months (range 5–61 months). Overall, the therapy was tolerated very well. No grade >3 acute and chronic toxicity could be identified. The most reported acute grade 3 side effects were acute dysphagia (n = 2; 13%) and acute odynophagia (n = 3; 20%), making supportive nutrition via gastric tube (n = 2; 13.3%) and via high caloric drinks (n = 1; 6.7%) necessary due to swallowing problems (n = 4; 27%). Overall, chronic grade 3 toxicity in the form of chronic hoarseness occurred in 7% of the patients (n = 1; 7%). At the last follow-up, all the patients were alive. No local or locoregional recurrence could be identified. Only one patient with laryngeal ACC developed lung metastases three years after the first diagnosis. (4) Conclusions: the accelerated hypofractionated active raster-scanned carbon ion radiotherapy for radioresistant laryngeal malignancies is feasible in practice with excellent local control rates and moderate acute and late toxicity. Further follow-ups are necessary to evaluate the long-term clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Olcay Cem Bulut
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Matthias Mattke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Matthias Uhl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Alexandra Jensen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Giessen, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
| | - Peter Plinkert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Bostel T, Nicolay NH, Welzel T, Bruckner T, Mattke M, Akbaba S, Sprave T, Debus J, Uhl M. Sacral insufficiency fractures after high-dose carbon-ion based radiotherapy of sacral chordomas. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:154. [PMID: 30139357 PMCID: PMC6108137 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1095-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2018] [Accepted: 08/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to analyse the frequency and clinical relevance of sacral insufficiency fractures (SIFs) after high-dose carbon-ion based irradiation of sacral chordomas. Methods A total of 56 patients were included in this retrospective study. Twenty one patients (37%) were treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT), and 35 patients (63%) received postoperative RT using carbon ions, either in combination with photons or as single-modality treatment (median radiation dose 66 Gy RBE, range 60–74 Gy). Follow-up examinations including MRI of the pelvis were performed at 3-monthly intervals in the first year and consecutively at 6-monthly intervals. Median follow-up was 35.5 months (range 2–83). Results SIFs were diagnosed in 29 patients (52%) after a median follow-up of 11 months (range 1–62 months). Most sacral fractures (79%) occurred within 2 years after RT. For the overall study population, the fracture-free survival probability amounted to values of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.53–0.79) after 1 year, 0.46 (95% CI, 0.31–0.60) after 2 years, and 0.31 (95% CI, 0.16–0.47) after 5 years. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference regarding the fracture rates between patients who received an operation and postoperative RT and patients treated with definitive RT. About one third of the patients with SIFs (34%; 10 of 29 patients) had associated clinical symptoms, most notably pain. All patients with symptomatic fractures required strong analgesics and often intensive pain management. Conclusions Sacral fractures after high-dose carbon ion-based RT of sacral chordomas were shown to be a considerable radiogenic late effect, affecting about half of the treated patients. However, only one third of these fractures were clinically symptomatic requiring regular medical care and pain therapy. Further hazard factor analysis in the future with larger patient numbers will possibly enable the identification of high-risk patients for developing SIFs with the ultimate goal to prevent symptomatic fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld, 280, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Research in Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld, 280, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Nils Henrik Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld, 280, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Research in Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld, 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Welzel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Research in Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld, 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Bruckner
- Department of Medical Biometry, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Mattke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Research in Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld, 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Research in Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld, 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja Sprave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Research in Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld, 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld, 280, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Research in Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld, 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Uhl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Research in Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld, 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Akbaba S, Foerster R, Nicolay NH, Arians N, Bostel T, Debus J, Hauswald H. Linear accelerator-based stereotactic fractionated photon radiotherapy as an eye-conserving treatment for uveal melanoma. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:140. [PMID: 30071857 PMCID: PMC6090919 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1088-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2018] [Accepted: 07/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this retrospective analysis is to analyze clinical outcome, visual acuity and enucleation rates after linear accelerator-based stereotactic fractionated photon radiotherapy for primary uveal melanoma. Methods Twenty-four patients with primary uveal melanoma treated at the Department of Radiation and Oncology of the University Hospital Heidelberg between 1991 and 2015 were analyzed regarding survival and treatment-related toxicity including eye- and sight-preservation. Results Photon radiotherapy (RT) offered good overall local control rates with a local progression-free survival (LPFS) of 82% after 5 years and a median LPFS of 5.5 years at a median follow-up time of 5.2 years. Gender had a significant impact on LPFS yielding a mean LPFS of 8.1 years for women and 8.7 years for men (p = 0.04). Of all local progressions, 80% occurred within the first 5 years after RT. In one case, enucleation as final therapy option was necessary. Enucleation-free survival (EFS) was related to the radiotherapy dose (p < 0.0001). Thus, higher prescribed doses led to a significantly higher enucleation rate. T-stage had no significant impact on EFS, but affected the enucleation rate (p = 0.01). The overall survival (OS) rate was 100% after 2 years and 70% after 5 years with a median OS of 5.75 years. Age (p = 0.046), T stage (p = 0.019), local control rate (p = 0.041) and the time between diagnosis and the first radiation session (p = 0.01) had a significant effect on OS. Applied biologically effective dose (BED) did not significantly influence OS or PFS. A 2-year sight preservation rate of 75% could be achieved. In all patients, irradiation could be applied safely without any interruptions due to side effects. Six significant late toxicities with consequential blindness could be observed, making a secondary enucleation necessary in four patients. An impairment of visual acuity due to chronic optic nerve atrophy was identified in five patients within 2 years after treatment. Conclusions Linear accelerator-based stereotactic fractionated photon radiotherapy is an effective method in the treatment of uveal melanoma with excellent local control rates and a 2-year vision retention rate comparable to brachytherapy (BRT) or proton beam radiotherapy, even available in small centers and easy to implement. Interdisciplinary decision making is necessary to guarantee best treatment for every patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Robert Foerster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nils Henrik Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nathalie Arians
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Henrik Hauswald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Arians N, Lindel K, Krisam J, Herfarth K, Krug D, Akbaba S, Oelmann-Avendano J, Debus J. Prospective phase-II-study evaluating postoperative radiotherapy of cervical and endometrial cancer patients using protons - the APROVE-trial. Radiat Oncol 2017; 12:188. [PMID: 29179751 PMCID: PMC5704365 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0926-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2017] [Accepted: 11/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognosis for patients with cervical or endometrial cancer has improved over the last decades. Thus, reducing therapy-related toxicity and impact on quality of life have become more and more important. With the development of new radiotherapy techniques like IMRT (Intensity-modulated radiotherapy) the incidence of acute and chronic toxicities has already been reduced. Nevertheless, rates of complications requiring medical treatment range from 0.7-8% according to literature. 7.7% of patients develop severe complications after 5 years with an increasing risk for complications of 0.3%/year. Particularly, the volume of the small and large bowel receiving low doses (15 Gy) has been shown to be a predictive factor for the development of higher bowel toxicity. With the introduction of proton therapy into clinical practice, there are new opportunities for optimization of organ at risk-sparing thus possibly reducing toxicity. METHODS/DESIGN The APROVE study is a prospective single-center one-arm phase-II-study. Patients with cervical or endometrial cancer after surgical resection who have an indication for postoperative pelvic radiotherapy will be treated with proton therapy instead of the commonly used photon radiation. A total of 25 patients will be included in this trial. Patients will receive a dose of 45-50.4 GyE in 1.8 GyE fractions 5-6 times per week using active raster-scanning pencil beam proton radiation. Platinum-based chemotherapy can be administered if indicated. For treatment planning, rectum, sigma, large and small bowel, bladder and femoral heads are defined as organs at risk. The CTV is defined according to the RTOG consensus guidelines. DISCUSSION The primary endpoint of the study is the evaluation of safety and treatment tolerability of pelvic radiation using protons defined as the lack of any CTC AE Grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Secondary endpoints are clinical symptoms and toxicity, quality of life and progression-free survival. The aim is to explore the potential of proton therapy as a new method for adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy to decrease the dose to the bowel, rectum and bladder thus reducing acute and chronic toxicity and improving quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov , ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03184350 , registered 09 June 2017, enrolment of the first participant 19 June 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Arians
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy-Center, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Institute for Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - K Lindel
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department Department for Radiation Oncology, Municipal Hospital Karlsruhe gGmbH, Moltkestraße 90, 76133, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - J Krisam
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy-Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - K Herfarth
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy-Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - D Krug
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy-Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - S Akbaba
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy-Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Oelmann-Avendano
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy-Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Debus
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy-Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Arians N, Nachtigall T, Reuschenbach M, Akbaba S, Foerster R, Debus J, Lindel K. Prognostic Factors and Impact of HPV/ p16 ink4a Status on Survival in Vulvar Cancer Patients Treated with Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
41
|
Gundogdu RH, Oduncu M, Bozkirli BO, Yazicioglu MO, Akbaba S. Does thromboprophylaxis cause bleeding after laparoscopic cholecystectomy? BRATISL MED J 2017; 118:156-159. [PMID: 28319411 DOI: 10.4149/bll_2017_031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study reports the results of a single center experience on the use of pharmacological venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. BACKGROUND The prevention of VTE is of crucial importance in surgical practice. However, the severity of thromboembolism risk and the necessity of thromboprophylaxis for laparoscopic cholecystectomy is still being debated. METHODS The data of the patients, who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelitiasis in a single center between the years 2005 and 2015 were analysed retrospectively for incidents of symptomatic VTE and bleeding complications. Fisher Exact Test was used to compare the outcomes of the patients who did and did not receive thromboprophylaxis. RESULTS Of the 1485 patients who were included in the study, 307 (20.67 %) having a low VTE risk, did not receive any thromboprophylaxis; while 1178 (79.33 %) with a medium, high or a very high risk received VTE prophylaxis. A bleeding complication occurred in 14 (1.18 %) patients receiving prophylaxis and in 2 (0.65 %) patients not receiving prophylaxis (p = 0.548). No patients in this study experienced clinically symptomatic VTE. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this study indicate that the selective use of thromboprophylaxis does not significantly increase the risk of bleeding after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and probably decreases the incidence of symptomatic thrombotic complications (Ref. 18) Keywords: laparoscopic cholecystectomy, bleeding, venous thromboemboly, prophylaxis, low molecular weight heparin.
Collapse
|
42
|
Bozkirli B, Gundogdu R, Akbaba S, Sayin T, Ersoy P. PP187-MON WHAT DO TURKISH SURGEONS DO IN THE PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD? Clin Nutr 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/s0261-5614(13)60498-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
43
|
Akbaba S, Ersoy E, Gundogdu H, Yasar U. Is a routine preoperative rectosigmoidoscopy necessary in patients with bilateral inguinal hernia? BRATISL MED J 2012; 113:604-6. [PMID: 23094899 DOI: 10.4149/bll_2012_135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the association between bilateral inguinal hernias and colorectal cancers. PURPOSE Inguinal hernias are one of the most common subjects in surgical practice and have been known to be associated with some other pathologies since 1831. Although there are some series in literature reporting the association of colorectal cancers with inguinal hernias, it is still controversial to perform colorectal diagnostic tools in hernia patients. Colorectal cancers are particularly accused to be in association with synchronous bilateral hernias as they increase the intra-abdominal pressure. METHODS Rectosigmoidoscopy was performed in 110 consecutive bilateral hernia patients and the results were recorded prospectively. Patients having colorectal diseases were excluded. RESULTS There were no pathologies in 87 (%79,1) rectosigmoidoscopies, while benign pathologies (hemorrhoids, polyps and diverticulitis) were diagnosed in 23 (%20,9). CONCLUSIONS It has not been proved yet that colorectal cancers increase the incidence of bilateral inguinal hernias. The incidence of benign pathologies in our series was similar to that of same age population without hernia. As a conclusion of this study we believe that rectosigmoidoscopy is not necessary for synchronous bilateral hernias unless the patient has any complaints or risk factors. Colorectal screening tools are performed when the clinical findings or the story of the patient support colorectal cancers) (Tab. 1, Ref. 25).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Akbaba
- Ataturk Research and Educational Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|