Pupil size and quality of vision after LASIK

Effect of preoperative pupil size on quality of vision after wavefront-guided LASIK

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of preoperative pupil size on quality of vision after wavefront-guided LASIK.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred two eyes.

INTERVENTION

LASIK for mild to moderate myopia or astigmatism (preoperative manifest spherical equivalent, -3.99±1.42 diopters).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Questionnaires evaluating specific visual symptoms before and after surgery. Each eye was evaluated before surgery, and 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Pupils were stratified according to size: small (≤5.5 mm), medium (5.6-6.4 mm), or large (≥6.5 mm). Mesopic pupil size and preoperative and postoperative variables were evaluated using an analysis of variance. A regression model was also performed to determine the correlation between mean spherical equivalent and cylinder and visual symptoms.

RESULTS

In the early postoperative period, there was no difference between the 3 groups with regard to any of the symptoms. At the final 12-month postoperative visit, patients with medium pupils experienced less glare at night than small pupils (P = 0.02), medium pupils had less halos than small or large pupils (P = 0.001 and P = 0.02, respectively), and medium pupils experienced greater satisfaction in visual improvement than small pupils (P = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Twelve months after wavefront-guided LASIK surgery, large pupil size does not positively correlate with any postoperative visual symptoms.

Correlation of aberrometry, contrast sensitivity, and subjective symptoms with quality of vision after LASIK

PURPOSE

To compare which parameter category (wavefront data, psychophysical data, or subjective symptoms) predicts best subjective quality of vision after LASIK.

METHODS

Twenty-eight eyes (15 patients) were included. Twenty-three eyes (12 patients) underwent uneventful LASIK; 5 eyes (3 patients) were symptomatic eyes treated with myopic LASIK elsewhere. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -4.79+/-1.92 diopters (D) (range: -1.63 to -7.13 D); mean patient age was 36.6+/-7.4 years (range: 18 to 48 years). All examinations were performed 1 month postoperatively. The wavefront error was described with Zernike polynomials (6-mm pupil). Psychophysical tests included high-contrast visual acuity and contrast sensitivity with and without glare at 167 cd/m(-2), 1.67 cd/m(-2), and 0.167 cd/m(-2) with best spectacle correction. Correspondingly, overall subjective quality of vision and frequency of visual symptoms (glare, halos, starbursts, ghosting, blur) were assessed for three lighting conditions (photopic, high-mesopic, and low-mesopic) using a questionnaire with a visual analog scale. For each parameter category and each lighting condition, a multiple stepwise backwards regression model with the overall quality of vision item value as dependent was applied.

RESULTS

Under all lighting conditions, subjective symptom scores predicted subjective quality of vision best (adjusted R2=0.83-0.92) with blur as the main predictor throughout all conditions. Psychophysical tests did not significantly predict postoperative subjective quality of vision. The adjusted R2 for the Zernike coefficients was highest for low-mesopic (0.56) and lowest for photopic conditions (0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Different parameter categories for the description of optical quality did not predict subjective quality of vision after LASIK equally. Subjective symptom scores had the highest predictability, whereas psychophysical tests with spectacle correction had no predictability. The latter probably do not reflect all dimensions of subjective quality of vision.

Efficacy of brimonidine tartrate 0.2% ophthalmic solution in reducing halos after laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE

To quantitatively evaluate the effect of brimonidine tartrate 0.2% (Alphagan) on halo and pupil size in patients who had symptomatic night-vision difficulties after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

SETTING

Nune Eye Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

METHODS

This study comprised 28 eyes of 14 patients with symptomatic night-vision difficulties after LASIK. Pupil diameter was measured with a Colvard pupillometer (Oasis Medical, Inc.). Quantitative analysis of halos was performed by measuring the area using a new computerized method. Pupil size and halo size were evaluated under scotopic and normal room light conditions. Alphagan was administered, and the effect was measured after 30 minutes and 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant correlation between pupil size and halo size (r = 0.527; P<.0001; slope = 691.6 pixel/mm). Pupil size and halo size decreased significantly 30 minutes after Alphagan instillation under both luminance conditions (all P< .0001). Under normal room light, the pupil and halo remained decreased until the last measurement at 24 hours. Under scotopic conditions, the pupil returned to its preinstillation size at 24 hours while the halo remained decreased. The maximum effect on halos was observed after 6 hours, when the mean reduction over preinstillation size was 28.2% and 29.1% under normal room light conditions and scotopic conditions, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Alphagan effectively reduced halo size and pupil size in postoperative LASIK patients with night-vision symptoms.

Wavefront-guided LASIK for the correction of primary myopia and astigmatism a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

OBJECTIVE

To describe wavefront-guided (WFG) LASIK for the primary treatment of low to moderate levels of myopia and astigmatism and to examine the evidence on the safety and effectiveness of the procedure in comparison with conventional LASIK.

METHODS

Literature searches conducted in 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007 retrieved 209 unique references from the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases. The panel selected 65 articles to review, and of these, chose 45 articles that they considered to be of sufficient clinical relevance to submit to the panel methodologist for review. During the review and preparation of this assessment, an additional 2 articles were included. A level I rating was assigned to properly conducted, well-designed, randomized clinical trials; a level II rating was assigned to well-designed cohort and case-controlled studies; and a level III rating was assigned to case series, case reports, and poorly designed prospective and retrospective studies. In addition, studies that were conducted by laser manufacturers before device approval (premarket approval) were reviewed as a separate category of evidence.

RESULTS

The assessment describes studies reporting results of WFG LASIK clinical trials, comparative trials, or both of WFG and conventional LASIK that were rated level II and level III. There were no studies rated as level I evidence. Four premarket approval studies conducted by 4 laser manufacturers were included in the assessment. The assessment did not compare study results or laser platforms because there were many variables, including the amount of follow-up, the use of different microkeratomes, and the level of preoperative myopia and astigmatism.

CONCLUSIONS

There is substantial level II and level III evidence that WFG LASIK is safe and effective for the correction of primary myopia or primary myopia and astigmatism and that there is a high level of patient satisfaction. Microkeratome and flap-related complications are not common but can occur with WFG LASIK, just as with conventional LASIK. The WFG procedure seems to have similar or better refractive accuracy and uncorrected visual acuity outcomes compared with conventional LASIK. Likewise, there is evidence of improved contrast sensitivity and fewer visual symptoms, such as glare and halos at night, compared with conventional LASIK. Even though the procedure is designed to measure and treat both lower- and higher-order aberrations (HOAs), the latter are generally increased after WFG LASIK. The reasons for the increase in HOA are likely multifactorial, but the increase typically is less than that induced by conventional LASIK. No long-term assessment of WFG LASIK was possible because of the relatively short follow-up (12 months or fewer) of most of the studies reviewed.

[The influence of shine duration on glare in pseudophakic persons]

INTRODUCTION

Glare can be defined as unpleasant sensation caused by a relatively strong source of light, which results in unpleasantness, discomfort and the lowering of optimal vision characteristics. It has been demonstrated that different factors influence the glare in pseudophakic subjects: opacity in vision media, the brightness of the pupil and the design of intraocular lenses.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to examine the influence of shine duration on glare in pseudophakic persons.

METHOD

We studied 152 eyes of 98 pseudophakic persons, aged from 50 to 70 years, with good vision acuity (0.8 and more) after final correction for far and near vision. The examination was conducted on the device Niktomat (Rodenstock Instrumente GMBH, Munchen-Hamburg) under the conditions of short and long shine. The source of light of 0.35 lux intensity, under the angle of 3 degrees, lightened the pupil for ten seconds in the first test, and continually in the second test.

RESULTS

In the observed group, during a direct short ten-second shine, the sign on the screen with the contrast of 30% was seen by 140 eyes (92.1%), and in the control group the sign was seen by 88 eyes (97.8%). Under the direct continuous shine, normal findings were confirmed in 40 eyes (26.3%) of the observed group, and in 83 eyes (92.2%) of the control group.

CONCLUSION

In the observed pseudophakic persons, the duration of shine was found to be in correlation with glare.

Functional outcomes after implantation of Tecnis ZM900 and Array SA40 multifocal intraocular lenses

PURPOSE

To evaluate the functional outcome after implantation of the Tecnis ZM900 multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) (AMO) and the Array SA40 multifocal IOL (AMO).

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Bundesknappschaft s Hospital, Sulzbach, and the Department of Ophthalmology, Marienhospital, Aachen, Germany.

METHODS

In a prospective comparative 2-center trial, Tecnis ZM900 and the Array SA40 multifocal IOLs were bilaterally implanted in 50 patients (50 eyes Tecnis, 50 eyes Array) by 1 surgeon at each center. The following parameters were assessed 30 to 60 days and 120 to 180 days after surgery in both eyes: refraction, pupil size, uncorrected and best corrected visual acuities for distance and near at different contrast levels, and photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity at different spatial frequencies. Patient satisfaction (spectacle independence, photic phenomena, overall satisfaction) was assessed by a questionnaire.

RESULTS

The main differences between the 2 multifocal IOLs were the better uncorrected near visual acuity (P<.001), distance-corrected near visual acuity (P<.001), the mesopic contrast sensitivity at high spatial frequencies (P<.05) as well as greater independence from spectacles in patients with the Tecnis multifocal IOL, resulting in higher levels of patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

The aspherical diffractive Tecnis multifocal IOL gave better outcomes than the Array multifocal IOL.

Analysis of the visual and refractive outcome following laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) retreatment over a four-year follow-up period

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and refractive stability following LASIK retreatment over a four-year follow-up period.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 60 eyes of 52 patients underwent LASIK retreatment for residual refractive errors after LASIK. Retreatment was performed by lifting the original flap followed by laser ablation of the stromal bed. The main outcome measures at the latest follow-up visit were efficacy, predictability, safety and stability. The mean follow-up time after retreatment was 22.3 +/- 10.5 (range 12-48 months).

RESULTS

The baseline mean spherical equivalent (SE) was -4.85 +/- 2.57 dioptres (D) (range +2.25 to -11.75 D). At the latest follow-up visit, the uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 6/9 or better in 88% of the eyes, the mean SE was -0.33 +/- 0.8 D (-2.50 to +2.25 D), and 77% of the eyes were within +/-0.50 D of target refraction. None of the patients lost lines of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and 25 eyes (41%) gained one or more lines. Three eyes (5%) developed peripheral epithelial in-growth and none of the patients had corneal ectasias or retinal complications.

CONCLUSION

LASIK retreatment is a safe and effective procedure for correcting residual refractive errors after LASIK. After retreatment, the visual and refractive outcome remained stable during the four-year follow-up period of the study.

High-order aberrations and preoperative associated factors

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine which preoperative factors are associated with the presence of high-order aberrations.

METHODS

A total of 93 eyes of 52 subjects were evaluated preoperatively between 1 January and 31 March 2003, using a Hartmann-Shack-based aberrometer. Age, gender, cycloplegic refraction, pupil size, keratometry readings, anterior chamber depth, white-to-white tests, intraocular pressure and basic secretion tests were evaluated.

RESULTS

Factors associated with high-order aberrations included age > or = 40 years (mean 4.39 +/- 2.95 microm; p = 0.03, Mann-Whitney test), higher keratometry values (44.96 +/- 1.57 D) (r = 0.447, p < 0.001, Spearman's correlation coefficient), higher degrees of myopia (> or = - 6.1 D) (p < 0.001, Kruskall-Wallis test) and increasing pupil size (p < 0.001, anova). Other factors including anterior chamber depth, white-to-white results, intraocular pressure and basic secretion test results did not correlate with the presence of high-order aberrations preoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Ocular wavefront aberrations varied greatly from subject to subject. Treatment should be customized for each laser based on patient characteristics in order to ensure the optimal treatment profile for the aberration.

Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability of Pupil Diameter Measurement During 24 Hours Using the Colvard Pupillometer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the inter- and intraobserver agreement of pupil size diameter measurements determined using the Colvard pupillometer.

METHODS

The eyes of 69 patients were examined (T1) using the Colvard pupillometer under mesopic and scotopic conditions by two examiners and repeated 1 hour (T2) and 24 hours (T3) later. The limits of agreement (mean difference between measurements +/- 2 standard deviations) were calculated for measurements between examiners (inter-examiner agreement) and between different time points measured by the same examiner (intra-examiner agreement).

RESULTS

At T1, there was a 99% and a 97% chance of two different examiners producing readings within 0.5 mm under mesopic and scotopic conditions, respectively. There was a 15% chance and a 9% chance of finding a pupil difference > 0.5 mm over 1 hour under mesopic and scotopic conditions, respectively. For mesopic and scotopic measurements taken 24 hours apart, there was a 31% chance and a 21% chance, respectively, of finding a difference > 0.5 mm by the same examiner.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed high interobserver agreement under scotopic conditions, with 98% of measurements between two examiners falling within 0.5 mm, but substantial variability in pupil diameter measurements over 24 hours. These results suggest that serial office measurements may be necessary to establish the true range of pupil size.

Higher Order Aberrations and Relative Risk of Symptoms After LASIK

PURPOSE

To understand what level of higher order aberrations increases the relative risk of visual symptoms in patients after myopic LASIK.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective comparative analysis of 103 eyes of 62 patients divided in two groups, matched for age, gender, pupil size, and spherical equivalent refraction. The symptomatic group comprised 36 eyes of 24 patients after conventional LASIK with different laser systems evaluated in our referral clinic and the asymptomatic control group consisted of 67 eyes of 38 patients following LADARVision CustomCornea wavefront LASIK. Comparative analysis was performed for uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), contrast sensitivity, refractive cylinder, and higher order aberrations. Wavefront analysis was performed with the LADARWave aberrometer at 6.5-mm analysis for all eyes.

RESULTS

Blurring of vision was the most common symptom (41.6%) followed by double image (19.4%), halo (16.7%), and fluctuation in vision (13.9%) in symptomatic patients. A statistically significant difference was noted in UCVA (P = .001), BSCVA (P = .001), contrast sensitivity (P < .001), and manifest cylinder (P = .001) in the two groups. The percentage difference between the symptomatic and control group mean root-mean-square (RMS) values ranged from 157% to 206% or 1.57 to 2.06 times greater.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with visual symptoms after LASIK have significantly lower visual acuity and contrast sensitivity and higher mean RMS values for higher order aberrations than patients without symptoms. Root-mean-square values of greater than two times the normal after-LASIK population for any given laser platform may increase the relative risk of symptoms.

Principles of disability glare measurement: an ophthalmological perspective

Disability glare describes the loss of retinal image contrast as a result of intraocular light scatter, or straylight. It has increasingly important modern implications such as with cataract and refractive surgery or high-intensity lighting. However, its measurement has proven difficult despite many varying approaches. This article aims to explain the principles and problems associated with glare testing that are important for assessment and use of glare measures. After defining disability glare, this article discusses the importance of its measurement to current clinical practice. It explains the principles and mechanisms that underlie disability glare and its measurement. Finally, some examples of available glare tests are described to illustrate the principles discussed.

Comparison of 2 multiple-measurement infrared pupillometers to determine scotopic pupil diameter

PURPOSE

To compare a monocular and a binocular multiple-measurement digital infrared pupillometers for measuring scotopic pupil diameter.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA.

METHODS

Scotopic pupil size was measured after 1 minute of dark adaptation in 42 eyes of 21 volunteers. Measurements were taken twice each with 2 multiple-measurement digital infrared pupillometers, the monocular pupillometer (Neuroptics, Inc.), and the binocular pupillometer (P2000D, Procyon, Ltd.) Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and limits of agreement (LOA) were used to measure repeatability and agreement of measures with each instrument and between instruments. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare variability of measurements within each instrument.

RESULTS

The mean scotopic pupil size was 4.79 mm +/- 0.95 (SD) with the Procyon and 4.86 +/- 0.93 mm with the Neuroptics. Repeatability and agreement tests for the Procyon measures showed the following: ICC, 0.954; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.916-0.975; LOA, -0.60 to 0.56; range, 1.16. The Wilcoxon signed rank test of variability gave a Z score of -2.53 (P = .01, 2 tailed). The repeated measures testing with the Neuroptics pupillometer showed the following: ICC, 0.985; 95% CI, 0.972-0.992; LOA, -0.39 to 0.26; range, 0.64; Z score, -1.15 (P = .25, 2-tailed). Repeatability and agreement tests for measures between instruments showed the following: ICC, 0.954; 95% CI, 0.916-0.975; LOA, -0.60 to 0.50; range 1.11.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a high repeatability and agreement in scotopic pupil diameter for repeated measures within each device and measurements between the devices. Differences in variability in scotopic pupil diameter evaluated by the Wilcoxon signed rank test were significant only with the Procyon pupillometer.

Twelve-year Follow-up of Photorefractive Keratectomy for Low to Moderate Myopia

PURPOSE

To evaluate long-term safety and stability in a group of myopic patients who underwent photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) > or =12 years ago.

METHODS

Myopic PRK was performed on 120 eyes of 80 patients using the Summit UV200 excimer laser with a 5-mm ablation zone. Of the original group, most of whom were followed for > or =2 years (mean 2.6 +/- 1.7 years), 34 patients (58 eyes) returned at 12 years (mean 12.7 +/- 0.79 years) and had refractive stability, refractive predictability, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), corneal haze, and subjective patient symptoms, such as glare/halos, recorded.

RESULTS

Preoperative mean refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) ranged from -1.75 to -7.25 diopters (D) and astigmatism from 0.00 to 1.50 D. All eyes underwent a change in manifest refraction over 12 years. At 2 years, MRSE was -0.27 +/- 0.55 D and at 12 years was -0.58 +/- 0.72 D. In 87.9% of eyes, the level of preoperative BSCVA was maintained or improved, whereas 34.5% of eyes gained one line, and 12.1% lost one line of BSCVA. Uncorrected visual acuity > or = 20/20 was noted in 67% of eyes, whereas 62.1% were within +/- 0.50 D of emmetropia. Trace haze was noted in 17.2% of eyes at 12 years. One patient had a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, but this was unlikely due to the PRK procedure. With respect to the small optical zone, 14 (41.1%) patients had night visual problems, particularly halos, which were severe in 2.7%. All patients questioned stated they would have the procedure done again.

CONCLUSIONS

Photorefractive keratectomy with the Summit UV200 excimer laser effectively reduced myopia and showed good refractive stability from year 2 to 12 with good patient satisfaction.

Comparison of two pupillometers in determining pupil size for refractive surgery

PURPOSE

To compare a handheld and a digital pupillometer in determining pupil size in a population of refractive surgery candidates (group 1) and after implantation of an Artisan phakic intraocular lens (PIOL) for correction of myopia (group 2).

METHODS

Pupil size was measured with the Colvard and Procyon pupillometers in 121 eyes in group 1 and 83 eyes in group 2. Pupil sizes measured with the Colvard device were compared with the scotopic, mesopic-low and mesopic-high measurements taken with the Procyon pupillometer in both groups. Analysis of comparison between pupil measurements was performed according to methods described by Bland and Altman.

RESULTS

The mean Colvard scotopic pupil diameter, scotopic, mesopic-low and mesopic-high Procyon pupil diameters were 5.86 +/- 0.81 mm, 6.42 +/- 0.88 mm, 5.55 +/- 0.95 mm and 4.21 +/- 0.73 mm in group 1 and 5.32 +/- 0.67 mm, 6.14 +/- 0.81 mm, 5.33 +/- 0.78 mm and 4.02 +/- 0.55 mm in group 2, respectively. The Colvard diameter compared most favourably with the Procyon mesopic-low diameter (group 2; p = 0.78).

CONCLUSIONS

Measurements of pupil diameter with the Colvard pupillometer correlated best with measurements taken by the Procyon pupillometer under standardized mesopic-low light conditions. We believe that digital binocular infrared pupillometry is advantageous for obtaining standardized measurements of pupil size.

The relationship between anterior corneal aberrations and contrast sensitivity in conventional LASIK

PURPOSE

To evaluate the changes of anterior corneal aberrations before and after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and to assess the correlation between contrast sensitivity and anterior corneal aberrations.

METHODS

Right eyes of 51 patients including 6 males and 45 females undergoing conventional LASIK from September 2000 to July 2003 were enrolled. The calculation of anterior corneal aberrations before and after LASIK was obtained by analyzing the corneal topography from TMS-1 by using VOL-CT Version 6.23 software. Contrast sensitivity was measured after LASIK with an MCT 8000 under daytime and nighttime settings and with glare conditions. The differences of the Zernike coefficients and root mean square (RMS) of anterior corneal aberrations before and after LASIK were analyzed. The changes of contrast sensitivity at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 cpd were added separately for daytime and nighttime contrast sensitivity with and without glare after LASIK and were correlated with the changes of anterior corneal aberrations.

RESULTS

Vertical coma, RMS of coma-like RMS of spherical-like, RMS of trefoil-like and RMS of higher-order anterior corneal aberrations increased significantly after LASIK surgery. There were no significant correlations between the changes of anterior corneal aberrations and the changes of contrast sensitivity at daytime and nighttime, with and without glare. Contrast sensitivity at daytime and nighttime decreased at each spatial frequency after LASIK.

CONCLUSIONS

LASIK surgery induces changes of the anterior corneal aberrations. However, changes in anterior corneal aberrations did not correlate with the changes of contrast sensitivity at daytime and nighttime, with and without glare.

Efficacy of Measuring Visual Performance of LASIK Patients under Photopic and Mesopic Conditions

Introduction: The aim of the study was to compare the visual performance of LASIK eyes measured using high-contrast logMAR letter charts under bright (photopic) and dim (mesopic) conditions. Materials and Methods: A total of 46 subjects (35 ± 8 years of age) undergoing LASIK procedures were recruited for the study. The best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) of each subject was measured using the high-contrast ETDRS logMAR chart under photopic and mesopic conditions at 3 visits: preoperative (Pre), 1 month postoperative (Post1) and 3 months postoperative (Post3). The differences in logMAR scores for the right eyes only were analysed for the Pre-Post1 (n = 46), Pre-Post3 (n = 18) and Post1-Post3 (n = 16) comparisons. Results: The logMAR scores of subjects were worse at the 1-month postoperative visit than preoperatively, and improvement in visual performance was seen at the 3-month postoperative visit. These changes in visual performance became more evident under mesopic conditions. The means and standard errors of the differences in logMAR scores for the Pre-Post3 (0.097 ± 0.020) were slightly larger than those of the Pre-Post1 (-0.067 ± 0.019) and Post1-Post3 (0.031 ± 0.012) comparisons. Under mesopic conditions, the visual performance of the subjects was statistically significant for the 3 comparisons, but not under photopic conditions. Conclusion: High-contrast logMAR chart performed under mesopic conditions has the potential to replace visual acuity measured under photopic conditions in providing more reliable representation of postoperative visual outcomes of LASIK eyes. Eye doctors should consider performing this vision test routinely to gauge the success of LASIK surgery. Key words: Contrast sensitivity, logMAR chart, Visual acuity

Correction of high myopia with the PRL phakic intraocular lens

PURPOSE

To assess the predictability, efficacy, safety, and complications of the PRL (CIBA Vision) phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) in the correction of high myopia.

SETTING

Clínica Oftalmológica Pasteur, Santiago, Chile.

METHODS

This prospective study comprised 53 eyes of 39 patients who received a PRL pIOL. The spherical equivalent (SE), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), efficacy index (postoperative UCVA/preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity [BSCVA]), safety index (BSCVA/preoperative BSCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), iridocorneal angle, and distance between the crystalline lens and PRL were prospectively assessed during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 39 years. The mean power of the implanted pIOL was -12.73 diopters (D) +/- 2.87 (SD) (range -20.00 to -7.00 D), for a preoperative SE of -17.27 +/- 4.58 D (range -31.50 to -8.75 D). The mean preoperative BSCVA was 0.50 +/- 0.70 (logMAR equivalent), and the mean follow-up was 8 +/- 9.4 months. The mean postoperative SE was -0.23 +/- 1.05 D; 71.2% of eyes were within +/-1.00 D. Sixty percent of patients had UCVA of 20/40 or better, and 88.2% of patients had BSCVA of 20/40 or better. Ninety-two percent maintained or gained 1 or more lines of BSCVA; 5.7% lost more than 1 line. There was no significant change in IOP (P = .40), and the mean distance between the crystalline lens and pIOL was 370 microm (ultrasound) and 604 microm (optical coherence tomography). Late complications included 1 case each of retinal detachment and lens subluxation.

CONCLUSIONS

Although PRL implantation in high myopia was predictable and effective, retinal detachment and IOL subluxations occurred. Other posterior chamber pIOLs should be used until the complications associated with the PRL pIOL are resolved.

Pupil size and corneal laser surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The role of scotopic pupil size as a factor in predicting night vision complaints is controversial. This review summarizes reports in the literature, some that have found and some that have failed to find a correlation with scotopic pupil size and night vision complaints.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pupil-measuring devices are discussed along with informed consent issues and reports showing that wavefront aberrations increase with increasing pupil size. A new objective measuring device (Larson) showed a correlation with postoperative starbursts and pupil size and a decrease in starbursts with wavefront-guided treatments compared with conventional excimer laser treatments. Cortical adaptation allows many patients to adapt to their new night vision. Treatment options for those who remain symptomatic include drops to reduce pupil size and wavefront-guided retreatments.

SUMMARY

Reports in the literature are conflicting, and refractive surgeons would be wise to inform their patients that large scotopic pupil size is a potential risk factor for night vision complaints. By doing this they will follow the recommendations in recent patient information brochures of both VISX (Santa Clara, California) and Alcon (Orlando, Florida) and on the United States Food and Drug Administration web site.

Factors affecting the change in lower-order and higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia with the Zyoptix 3.1 system

PURPOSE

To identify factors that affect the change in lower- and higher-order wavefront aberrations after myopic wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (wg-LASIK).

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

METHODS

Sixty myopic eyes of 32 patients were treated with wg-LASIK (Zyoptix version 3.1, Bausch & Lomb) and had an uneventful follow-up of 12 months. Wavefront errors were measured preoperatively and 12 months after LASIK and were computed for pupil diameters (PDs) of 3.5 mm and 6.0 mm. Multiple stepwise regression analysis was performed to assess the influence of patient age, spherical equivalent (SE), sphere, cylinder, optical zone (OZ) diameter, and the preoperative individual Zernike coefficients on lower- and higher-order aberration (HOA) change.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative SE was -5.59 diopters (D) +/- 2.20 (SD) (range -1.00 to -9.50 D); the mean OZ diameter was 6.70 +/- 0.68 mm (range 5.6 to 8.1 mm). Reduction in almost all Zernike coefficients was influenced significantly by the preoperative amount of the individual coefficient. The effect varied among the coefficients and was lower with the 6.0 mm PD. With the 3.5 mm PD, age, SE, sphere, cylinder, and OZ diameter did not have a significant effect on individual Zernike coefficients. With the 6.0 mm PD, SE and OZ diameter had a significant effect on the induction of Z4(0); the OZ diameter also had an effect on the induction of coma root mean square.

CONCLUSIONS

Three groups of factors influenced the change in HOAs: The negative correlation with the magnitude of preoperative HOA values reflected the effect of the wavefront-guided algorithm. The SE and OZ diameter affected the inadvertent induction of spherical aberrations. Randomly acting effects such as decentration or flap creation, which were not included in the model, affected the induction of HOAs, particularly coma-like terms.

Functional outcome and patient satisfaction after Artisan phakic intraocular lens implantation for the correction of myopia

PURPOSE

To determine patient satisfaction after Artisan phakic intraocular lens (PIOL) implantation to correct myopia.

DESIGN

Non-comparative prospective case series.

METHODS

One hundred twenty eyes of 60 patients who had undergone Artisan PIOL implantation to correct myopia were analyzed. A validated questionnaire that consisted of 66 satisfaction items were self-administered by patients 12 months after surgery. Clinical parameters (PIOL decentration, the difference between pupil size and PIOL optical zone, and optical aberrations) were measured. Main outcome measures of satisfaction scale scores (global satisfaction, quality of uncorrected and corrected vision, night vision, glare, day and night driving) were analyzed. Correlations with clinical parameters were obtained.

RESULTS

After surgery, 98.3% of patients were satisfied, and 73.3% of patients considered their night vision to be the same or better; 44.1% of patients reported more bothersome glare. The night vision score correlated with spheric aberration (r = -0.303; P = .020). The glare score correlated with the difference between scotopic pupil size and PIOL optical zone (r = -0.280; P = .030) and vertical coma (r = -0.337; P = .009). The night driving score correlated with postoperative spheric equivalent (r = 0.375; P = .009), total root mean square aberrations (r = -0.337; P = .017), higher order root mean square aberrations (r = -0.313; P = .027), and vertical coma (r = -0.297; P = .036).

CONCLUSION

Overall satisfaction after Artisan PIOL implantation for myopia is excellent. The quality of night vision and night driving were related to scotopic pupil size, individual higher order aberrations, and residual refractive error.

[Optical quality after refractive corneal surgery]

Correction of myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism within its indicated margin by means of refractive corneal surgical procedures such as LASIK and surface ablation (e.g. PRK) is one of the standard procedures in ophthalmology. Now that advances in the fields of surgical techniques and the technical devices employed have further progressed in terms of safety and predictability, research also focuses on optical quality. "Optical quality" is not a clearly defined parameter, but can be captured indirectly by means of directly measured data. One has to start with the anatomical properties of the eye, which determine the optical images on the retinal level. The quality of the retinal image influences the eye's function, i.e. acuity and contrast perception. Finally, there is the subjective perception of the image we receive. "Optical quality" as such is reflected by the patient's evaluation of this image perception. Three phenomena are especially responsible for deterioration of the quality of the retinal image: diffraction, aberrations and dispersion. Some of the methods for measuring optical quality are subjective questionnaires, functional testing procedures for measuring visual acuity and contrast sensitivity, optical measuring procedures for the determination of optical quality, as well as biomicroscopy, aberrometry and corneal topography for assessing anatomical changes.

Avoidance, recognition, and management of LASIK complications

PURPOSE

To provide important concepts of the latest developments in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) complication avoidance, recognition, and management.

DESIGN

A perspective.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search and review of a total of 816 publications that discussed LASIK complications from 1992 to 2005 was conducted.

RESULTS

The risk of visually threatening complications is inherent in any ophthalmologic surgical procedure. Not only does LASIK require the use of several complex medical devices, but there can be significant human variation in response to this surgical intervention. As a result, many potential complications can occur after LASIK. The risk of many complications can be mitigated by appropriate patient selection and preoperative, surgical, and postoperative care. Unforeseen complications will occur, despite meticulous planning, and must be managed. Important current developments in the avoidance, recognition, and management of LASIK complications are reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

Complications as a result of LASIK can threaten vision and may cause debilitating symptoms in an otherwise healthy eye. Advancing our understanding of the prevention and management of the complications of LASIK is an endeavor that must be continued as long as refractive surgery is performed.

Wavefront-guided Enhancements Using the WaveLight Excimer Laser in Symptomatic Eyes Previously Treated With LASIK

PURPOSE

To describe our clinical experience in wavefront-guided LASIK enhancements using the WaveLight ALLEGRETTO system (WaveLight Technologie AG, Erlangen, Germany) for symptomatic eyes previously treated with standard LASIK.

METHODS

Twenty-six eyes of 20 patients with residual myopia, hyperopia, or mixed astigmatism and/or night vision symptoms after primary standard LASIK were considered for wavefront-guided customized retreatment using the WaveLight ALLEGRETTO WAVE 200 Hz excimer laser system (model 106). Preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), uncorrected visual acuity, topography with the ALLEGRETTO Topolyzer, wavefront analysis using the ALLEGRETTO WAVE Tscherning Analyzer, and contrast sensitivity were compared to postoperative (enhancement) measurements.

RESULTS

Twenty-two of the original 26 eyes underwent wavefront-guided enhancement, 4 were excluded because they did not meet wavefront-guided treatment inclusion guidelines of this study. Mean follow-up was 8 months (range: 6 to 13 months, standard deviation [SD] 2). All patients were within +/- 0.50 diopters (manifest refraction) of intended postoperative refraction. The mean preoperative BSCVA improved from 20/25 (SD +/- 0.12) to 20/18 (SD +/- 0.1) postoperatively. All patients gained at least one line of BSCVA, and a maximum of three lines. There was no loss of BSCVA in any patient. The total amount of high order aberrations (RMSH) decreased from an average of 1.04 (SD +/- 0.22) to 0.46 (SD +/- 0.14) microm. Patients also had a mean improvement in low contrast sensitivity of 59%.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this small series, customized wavefront-guided enhancements using the WaveLight ALLEGRETTO system in patients who underwent previous LASIK appear to be safe and effective in correcting residual refractive error, reducing high order aberrations, and improving visual symptoms when reliable and reproducible measurements are achieved.

Evaluation of Pupil Dynamics After Implantation of Artisan Phakic Intraocular Lenses

PURPOSE

To compare pre- and postoperative horizontal and vertical pupil diameters after horizontal Artisan phakic intraocular lens (PIOL) (Ophtec BV, Groningen, The Netherlands) implantation for correction of myopia.

METHODS

The pre- and postoperative scotopic pupil diameters measured by the Colvard pupillometer (Oasis Medical, Glendora, Calif) were compared in 71 eyes after Artisan PIOL implantation (Artisan Colvard group). Analysis of pupil shape (vertical vs horizontal diameter, V/H ratio) after horizontal Artisan PIOL implantation was performed with the Procyon pupillometer (Procyon Instruments Ltd, London, United Kingdom) in 121 eyes (Artisan Procyon group) under scotopic, mesopic-low, and mesopic-high conditions and compared to an age- and refraction-matched control group of 121 eyes of refractive surgery candidates (Procyon control group).

RESULTS

After horizontal Artisan PIOL implantation, the mean horizontal pupil diameter decreased from 6.231 +/- 0.70 mm preoperatively to 5.34 +/- 0.68 mm postoperatively in the Artisan Colvard group (P < .01). The mean horizontal scotopic diameter was 5.60 +/- 0.66 mm, the mesopic-low diameter was 4.94 +/- 0.71 mm, and the mesopic-high diameter was 3.98 +/- 0.54 mm for the Artisan Procyon group. The mean horizontal scotopic diameter was 6.29 +/- 0.91 mm, the mesopic-low diameter was 5.40 +/- 0.96 mm, and the mesopic-high diameter was 4.16 +/- 0.80 mm in the Procyon control group. A significant increase was noted in V/H ratio under scotopic, mesopic-low, and mesopic-high conditions from 1.02, 1.02, and 1.01, respectively, in the Procyon control group to 1.17, 1.12, and 1.06, respectively, in the Artisan Procyon group (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Horizontal pupil size was significantly decreased after horizontal Artisan PIOL implantation and might be attributed to a mechanical restriction of the iris in the horizontal meridian.

Visual experience and patient satisfaction with wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE

To determine the correlation between patient perception and clinical measurements after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

SETTING

Multicenter clinical trial.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis of clinical study results in 274 eyes, wavefront-guided LASIK procedures were performed in 274 myopic-astigmatic eyes at 6 sites. Comprehensive evaluations of vision and ocular health were conducted preoperatively and for 6 months postoperatively. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were measured, and questionnaires were administered. Questionnaire responses were compared with clinical measurements.

RESULTS

The overall distribution shifted toward "more satisfied." The "very satisfied" population increased by as much as 70% in all areas. There was no significant change in frequency of visual symptoms. Patients were more expressive about visual decline than visual improvement. Perception of changes in vision appeared to be related to mesopic contrast sensitivity and mesopic contrast sensitivity under glare. Mesopic pupil diameter was not a major predictor of patient satisfaction. Contact lens wearers were more satisfied with postoperative vision than were spectacle wearers. Men were more likely to report visual symptoms and to complain about night vision, although their changes were the same as those of the women. Residual refractive error was a major predictor for most questionnaire items.

CONCLUSION

Most patients were as satisfied or more satisfied with their postoperative uncorrected visual acuity than with their preoperative best corrected visual acuity. By continuing to minimize postoperative refractive error through the use of nomograms and improved technology, visual complaints such as night glare and halo could be diminished or even eliminated. The study shows that subjective experience affected satisfaction with results. Some dissatisfaction might be mitigated by being sure patients are educated and have realistic expectations before surgery.

Pupil measurement using the Colvard pupillometer and a standard pupil card with a cobalt blue filter penlight

PURPOSE

To compare scotopic pupil measurements obtained with a Colvard pupillometer with measurements taken with a printed pupil gauge and penlight with a cobalt blue filter attachment in mesopic and scotopic luminance.

SETTING

The Illinois Eye Institute, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

METHODS

Pupil measurements were taken of both eyes of 38 patients (76 eyes). Any subject presenting with anterior segment disease, fixed or dilated pupils, iris abnormalities, or a history of eye disease or eye trauma was excluded. At a mesopic luminance of 2.11 foot-candles, pupil measurements were taken with a Bernell pupil card and penlight with a cobalt blue filter attachment. At a scotopic luminance of less than 2.00 foot-candles, pupil measurements were taken with the Bernell card system and the Colvard pupillometer.

RESULTS

In mesopic luminance, the mean pupil diameter was 5.17 mm (range 3.0 to 7.5 mm) with the Bernell card method. The mean difference between the Colvard in scotopic luminance and the Bernell card system in mesopic luminance was -0.04 mm (P = .0831). In scotopic luminance, the mean pupil diameter was 6.32 mm (range 4.0 to 8.0 mm) with the Bernell card method and 5.13 mm (range 3.0 to 7.5 mm) with the Colvard pupillometer, with a mean difference of -1.18 mm (P<.0001). The limits of agreement between the mesopic Bernell card system and the Colvard pupillometer were small (-0.32 to 0.24), whereas the limits of agreement between the scotopic measurements of both techniques were large (-2.18 to -0.18).

CONCLUSIONS

Under both illuminance conditions, the Bernell card system with the cobalt filter measured a larger pupil size than the Colvard pupillometer. The measurement differences between the techniques were most pronounced at the lower illumination. The limits of agreement were larger under the lower illumination, indicating more variation between techniques. This study suggests that the Bernell card system with cobalt illumination provides a generous measurement of the pupil size compared with the Colvard pupillometer, which makes it an appropriate and cost-effective screening tool for refractive surgery evaluation.

Influence of pupil and optical zone diameter on higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided myopic LASIK

PURPOSE

To investigate the influence of pupil and optical zone (OZ) diameter on higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after myopic wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

METHODS

Twenty-seven myopic eyes of 19 patients were included. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent was -6.86 diopters (D) +/- 1.24 (SD) (range -4.25 to -9.5 D); the mean planned OZ diameter was 6.26 +/- 0.45 mm (range 5.7 to 7.1 mm). All patients had uneventful wavefront-guided LASIK (Zyoptix version 3.1, Bausch & Lomb) and an uncomplicated follow-up of 12 months. Wavefront measurements were performed with a Hartmann-Shack sensor in maximum mydriasis preoperatively and 12 months after LASIK. Wavefront errors were computed for pupil diameters (PDs) of 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, and 7.0 mm for the individual OZ diameter and for the individual mydriatic PD (7.93 +/- 0.46 mm). The impact of the relationship between pupil diameter and OZ diameter (fractional clearance [FC]) on HOA was described and quantified using curvilinear regression with a 4th-order polynomial fit.

RESULTS

There was a reproducible relationship between FC and the amount of induced HOA. The change in HOA root mean square and primary spherical aberration (Z(4)0) was significantly correlated with FC. If the OZ was 16.5% larger than the pupil (FC = 1.17), only half the amount of HOA was expected to be induced than if the OZ equaled the pupil. In contrast, an OZ that was 9% smaller than the pupil (FC = 0.91) resulted in an HOA induction 50% higher than at FC = 1.

CONCLUSION

The OZ zone to pupil ratio (fractional clearance) had a significant impact on HOA induction after wavefront-guided LASIK.

Functional outcomes and patient satisfaction after laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of myopia

PURPOSE

To determine subjective patient satisfaction and self-perceived quality of vision after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

METHODS

A validated questionnaire consisting of 66 items was self-administered by 142 consecutive patients. Seven scales covering a specific aspect of quality of vision were formulated. Aspects included global satisfaction, quality of uncorrected and corrected vision, quality of night vision, glare, daytime driving, and night driving. Main outcome measures were responses to individual questions and scale scores, and correlations with clinical parameters including refractive outcome, uncorrected visual acuity, best corrected visual acuity, ablation depth, and scotopic pupil-optical zone disparity were obtained.

RESULTS

The mean score for the overall satisfaction was 4.1 +/- 0.71 (SD) (scale 0 to 5.0). A total of 92.2% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with their surgery, 93.6% considered their main goal of surgery achieved, and 92.3% would choose to have LASIK surgery again. Satisfaction with uncorrected vision was 3.03 +/- 0.71. The mean score for glare was 3.0 +/- 0.9. At night, glare from lights was believed to be more important than before surgery by 47.2%. Glare from oncoming car headlights after surgery was reported by 58.4% and was believed to be more bothersome for night driving than before surgery by 52.8%. Night driving was rated more difficult than before surgery by 39.4%, whereas 59.3% had less difficulty driving at night. There was a significant correlation between the uncorrected vision score and the postoperative spherical equivalent (r = 0.245) and postoperative astigmatism (r = 0.265). There was no correlation between the glare or night vision scores and the degree of correction, the amount of ablation depth, or the disparity between the scotopic pupil and the optical zone.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-perceived uncorrected vision after LASIK surgery for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism appears to be very good and is related to the postoperative residual error. Although the majority of patients postoperatively experienced glare, particularly with driving at night, this was not related to the pupil-optical zone disparity or degree of correction.

Topography-guided Custom Retreatments in 27 Symptomatic Eyes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the use of topography-guided ablations for refractive irregularities induced by previous surgery.

METHODS

This prospective, non-comparative trial comprised 27 symptomatic eyes with a history of LASIK for myopia that underwent topography-guided treatment with the ALLEGRETTO WAVE system. Pre- and postoperative refraction, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), corneal asphericity (Q value), low contrast sensitivity, and patient's subjective assessment of improvement were measured.

RESULTS

Preoperative data were sphere -0.84 +/- 1.37 diopters (D), cylinder -1.55 +/- 0.78 D, UCVA 20/49 +/- 0.22, BSCVA 20/32 +/- 0.15, and Q value 1.46 +/- 0.79. Postoperative data at mean 6-month follow-up were: sphere -0.61 +/- 0.81 D, cylinder -0.53 +/- 0.58 D, UCVA 20/25 +/- 0.21 (P < .01), BSCVA 20/21 +/- 0.14 (P < .001), and Q value 1.07 +/- 0.89. Contrast sensitivity scores improved by 70%. No loss of BSCVA occurred in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Topography-guided treatments may be effective in correcting the quality of vision. It should be viewed as a possible two-step procedure due to spherical adjustment that may change refraction unpredictably.

Pharmacological management of night vision disturbances after refractive surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of diluted aceclidine eyedrops in reducing night vision disturbances after refractive surgery.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano-Milano, Italy.

METHODS

This double-masked randomized clinical trial included 30 patients (60 eyes) with chronic night vision disturbance after refractive surgery. Patients were randomly allocated to receive (1) placebo, (2) aceclidine 0.016%, or (3) aceclidine 0.032%. Drugs were administered once or twice daily. Anterior segment, haze, uncorrected visual acuity, best corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, corneal maps, and scotopic pupil size were determined at baseline and at follow-up examinations (15 and 30 days after inclusion). Halos and double vision 4-step scales were built to determine subjective grading of night vision disturbance, and the root mean square (RMS) was calculated to determine objective changes in night vision disturbance.

RESULTS

The effect of diluted aceclidine started about 15 minutes after instillation and lasted for about 5 hours. No difference between the 2 dilutions could be found. Thirty-nine of 40 treated eyes showed a reduction in night vision disturbance. The mean reduction in halos and double vision grading was 1.42 +/- 0.5 (SD) and 1.14 +/- 0.4, respectively. A mean decrease in pupil size of 2.5 mm was measured. Thirty minutes after the instillation of diluted aceclidine, the topography-derived wavefront error showed a statistically significant reduction in RMS values (total, spherical, astigmatic, coma, and higher order), which was maintained for 5 hours. A transitory conjunctival hyperemia was the only side effect reported.

CONCLUSION

Diluted aceclidine seemed to be an effective and safe treatment for night vision disturbance following refractive surgery.

Six-month variability of the dark-adapted pupil diameter

PURPOSE

To determine the individual variability of the dark-adapted pupil diameter over 6 months using a standardized dark-adaptation protocol.

SETTING

Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA.

METHODS

This prospective observational cohort study comprised volunteers with no history of ocular disease, surgery, or injury other than requirement for refractive correction. The right eye was tested. A standardized dark-adaptation protocol was used that controlled for accommodation and patient alertness. Infrared, still digital photographs were taken after 10 minutes of dark adaptation at 1 lux and were analyzed using digital image software. Testing was performed at baseline in the afternoon, at 3 months in the afternoon, and at 6 months in the morning. Lifestyle factors such as diet and exercise were not controlled.

RESULTS

Mean intersession differences were 0.04 mm (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.68-0.146), 0.15 mm (95% CI: -0.001-0.297), and 0.09 mm (95% CI: -0.048-0.236) for baseline-3 month, baseline-6 month, and 3 month-6 month comparisons, respectively. None of these differences was significantly different from zero (P>.05, 2-tailed Student t tests). The likelihood that the mean intersession difference was >.25 mm was negligible for all comparisons (P=.9996, .9099, and .9829 respectively, 1-tailed Student t tests).

CONCLUSION

When a consistent dark-adaptation protocol that controls for alertness and accommodation is used, normal young individuals showed no significant variation in the dark-adapted pupil diameter over a 6-month period.

Improved Safety in Contemporary LASIK

PURPOSE

To examine the risk of serious visual loss in contemporary LASIK.

DESIGN

Retrospective, noncomparative, consecutive case series combined with a structured literature review and comparison with historical controls.

PARTICIPANTS

One thousand consecutive cases of LASIK performed from January 2000 to January 2004 by 1 surgeon. One thousand nine hundred eighty-two cases with 6-month review data in postmillennial Food and Drug Administration (FDA) trials of LASIK for myopia and astigmatism and 5203 patients with 6 month review data in similar premillennial FDA trials.

METHODS

LASIK was performed with the Hansatome microkeratome and a VISX Star (S2, S3, or S4) laser. There were 899 myopic treatments (spherical equivalent < or =-10.5 diopters [D]; average -4.2 D; standard deviations [SD] D = 1.9 D; astigmatism < or =4.75 D), 87 hyperopic treatments (spherical equivalent < or =+4.25 D; average +2.4 D; SD = 0.9 D; astigmatism < or =3.5 D), and 14 treatments for mixed astigmatism (< or =4.5 D). Outcome data were obtained from a review of case notes and compared with historical data from FDA trials.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Best-spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) preoperatively and at final review was compared in our case series with reference to the United Kingdom driving standard (BSCVA> or =20/30). Subsidiary outcome measures included duration of follow-up, intraoperative, and postoperative complication rates. Six-month postoperative data on standard safety criteria (numbers of patients losing > or =2 lines BSCVA, BSCVA <20/40, and final BSCVA <20/25 for patients with preoperative BSCVA > or =20/20) were examined in FDA trials.

RESULTS

In our clinical series, no case with a preoperative BSCVA of 20/20 or better had a final BSCVA of <20/30 at final review (97.5% confidence interval [CI], 0%-0.37%); 4 eyes had a BSCVA <20/25 (0.41%; 95%CI, 0.11%-1.02%). The median interval between surgery and final review was 2 months (range, 1-45 months). In FDA studies recruiting pre-2000, 1.4% of patients lost > or =2 lines of BSCVA versus 0.6% in postmillennial studies (P = 0.005); 0.45% of patients in premillennial studies lost BSCVA to <20/40 compared with no patients in postmillennial studies (P = 0.001); and 1.68% of patients in premillennial studies with a preoperative BSCVA > or =20/20 had a postoperative BSCVA <20/25 compared with 0.16% in postmillennial studies (P< or =0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with premillennial results, the risk of visual loss is significantly reduced in contemporary LASIK.