Coinfection of hepatitis C virus in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection

Parasite interactions in natural populations: insights from longitudinal data

The physiological and immunological state of an animal can be influenced by current infections and infection history. Consequently, both ongoing and previous infections can affect host susceptibility to another parasite, the biology of the subsequent infection (e.g. infection length) and the impact of infection on host morbidity (pathology). In natural populations, most animals will be infected by a succession of different parasites throughout the course of their lives, with probably frequent concomitant infections. The relative timing of different infections experienced by a host (i.e. the sequence of infection events), and the effects on factors such as host susceptibility and host survival, can only be derived from longitudinal data on individual hosts. Here we review some of the evidence for the impact of co-infection on host susceptibility, infection biology and pathology focusing on insights obtained from both longitudinal studies in humans and experiments that explicitly consider the sequence of infection. We then consider the challenges posed by longitudinal infection data collected from natural populations of animals. We illustrate their usefulness using our data of microparasite infections associated with field vole (Microtus agrestis) populations to examine impacts on susceptibility and infection length. Our primary aim is to describe an analytical approach that can be used on such data to identify interactions among the parasites. The preliminary analyses presented here indicate both synergistic and antagonistic interactions between microparasites within this community and emphasise that such interactions could have significant impacts on host-parasite fitness and dynamics.

Hepatitis B virus/hepatitis C virus coinfection: epidemiology, clinical features, viral interactions and treatment

Because of the shared modes of transmission, hepatitis B virus (HBV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection is not uncommon in highly endemic areas and among subjects with a high risk of parenteral infections. The worldwide prevalence of HBV/HCV coinfection is unknown and might be underestimated with the phenomenon of silent (occult) HBV infection. HCV superinfection in patients with chronic HBV infection was the most common clinical features of coinfection in Asia-Pacific countries. Further, most, but not all, clinical observations suggested that interference between the two viruses was more frequently characterized by an inhibition of HBV replication exerted by HCV. However, longitudinal follow-up studies have demonstrated that the virological patterns in coinfection cases are widely divergent and have dynamic profiles over time. As compared with monoinfected patients, HBV/HCV coinfected persons tend to have more severe liver injury, a higher probability of liver cirrhosis and hepatic decompensation, and a higher incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Detailed serological and virological evaluations are required for coinfected patients before initiation of antiviral therapy. Previous studies demonstrated that HBV/HCV coinfected patients responded poorly to interferon (IFN) monotherapy. Currently, for patients with dominant HCV infection and low level HBV viremia (<10(4) IU/mL), IFN or pegylated IFN plus ribavirin can achieve comparable sustained virus response as expected with HCV monoinfection. However, phenomenon of reciprocal viral interference can happen, and resultant "flare" of hepatitis activity may cause liver function deterioration. For coinfected patients with dually-active HBV/HCV, the optimal regimen for therapy remains unclear although adding oral nucleos(t)ide analogs to pegylated IFN and ribavirin seems a reasonable empiric option.

Clinical features and outcome of chronic viral hepatitis with acute exacerbation in patients with concurrent infections of hepatitis B and C virus

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Studies have shown that concurrent infection of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus may be associated with severe forms of chronic liver disease or with rapid progression. However, very little is known about the role and course of concurrent HBV and HCV infection in patients with acute viral hepatitis.

METHODS

This study retrospectively compared the clinical features of 83 patients diagnosed with HBV- or HCV-related chronic hepatitis with acute exacerbation (12 with concurrent HBV and HCV infection, 46 with HBV infection alone, and 25 with HCV infection alone) encountered at Chia-Yi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan, between January 2003 and December 2005.

RESULTS

The clinical course of chronic hepatitis with acute exacerbation in patients with concurrent HBV and HCV infection is similar to patients with single HBV infection, and more severe than patients with single HCV infection, evidenced by increased hepatic decompensation (P = 0.05), failure (P = 0.036), and mortality (P = 0.036). Elevated serum HCVRNA-negative percentage in HBVDNA-positive patients and low serum HBVDNA concentrations in HCVRNA-positive patients imply reciprocal interference of HBV and HCV in patients with concurrent HBV and HCV infections during acute-phase hepatitis. In patients with concurrent HBV and HCV infection, the mortality rate for detectable HBVDNA patients seemed higher than that for undetectable HBVDNA patients, although it did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.066).

CONCLUSIONS

Virus interference existed in chronic hepatitis with acute exacerbation patients with concurrent HBV and HCV infections. Clinical outcome for patients positive for serum HBVDNA was much worse than those negative for serum HBVDNA. When chronic hepatitis with acute exacerbation occurs in patients with concurrent HBV and HCV infection, aggressive management should be investigated and antiviral therapy targeting of HBV infection should be administered early.

Virological Pattern in Plasma, Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells and Liver Tissue and Clinical Outcome in Chronic Hepatitis B and C virus Coinfection

Background

We aim to evaluate in chronic hepatitis B virus–hepatitis C virus (HBV–HCV) coinfection the interplay of these viruses in liver tissue, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), and plasma and to analyze the effect on disease course and response to treatment.

Methods

We enrolled 19 patients with chronic HBV–HCV coinfection, 20 with chronic HCV and 20 with chronic HBV infection at their first liver biopsy, all were naive for antiviral therapy. The patients’ plasma, PBMC and liver biopsy samples were tested for HBV DNA and/or HCV RNA by real-time PCR, according to the presence/absence of hepatitis B surface antigen and antibodies against HCV in the serum.

Results

Contemporary presence of HBV DNA and HCV RNA was rare in plasma (5.3% of cases) and PBMC (10.6%), but frequent in liver tissue (52.6%). Of 10 cases circulating only HCV RNA and treated with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin for 12 months, two showed a sustained response, and eight cleared HCV RNA but became HBV-DNA-positive in plasma; these eight had detectable HBV DNA in liver at baseline. One patient, who was plasma HBV-DNA-positive/HCV-RNA-negative at baseline, showed a sustained response after 18 months of PEG-IFN treatment; another, who was plasma HBV-DNA/HCV-RNA-positive at baseline, cleared only HCV RNA during 12 months of PEG-IFN plus ribavirin treatment. Seven cases remained untreated.

Conclusion

Despite a reciprocal inhibition in plasma, HBV and HCV frequently coexist in liver tissue, a condition to be taken into consideration when deciding therapy.

Prevalence of occult hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infections in Turkish hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Although their exact prevalence is not known, HBV and HCV viral infections and occult viral hepatitis are frequent in these patients. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of occult HBV and HCV infections in maintenance hemodialysis patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and eighty-eight end-stage renal disease patients on maintenance hemodialysis (100 male, mean age 49+/-29 [16-80] years, and mean duration of hemodialysis 98+/-66 [12-228] months) were enrolled in this study. Serological markers for HBV and HCV were determined with immunoenzymatic assay (ELISA) by using commercial diagnostic kits (Access and BioRad, Beckman-Coulter). HCV-RNA (Cobas Amplicor HCV kit) and HBV-DNA (Artus GmbH HBV kit) were determined quantitatively by polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

Among the patients screened, 25 (13.3%) had HBV infection alone and 38 (20.2%) had HCV infection alone, while seven (3.7%) had dual infection of both viruses. Serological markers for occult hepatitis B and occult hepatitis C were positive in five (2.7%) and nine (4.8%) of the patients, respectively. Isolated anti-HBc was positive in 12 (6.4%) of all patients, three (7.9%) of the patients with anti-HCV and two (40%) of the patients with occult hepatitis B. Isolated anti-HBc positivity was more frequent in patients with occult hepatitis B than in those without (40% [2/5] vs. 5.5% [10/183], p=0.002). None of the patients with HCV had occult hepatitis B.

CONCLUSIONS

Both occult and non-occult forms of HCV infection are more prevalent than HBV infection in hemodialysis patients. Especially the patients with isolated anti-HBc positivity should be tested for probable occult hepatitis B infection.

Comparison of liver histopathology between chronic hepatitis C patients and chronic hepatitis B and C-coinfected patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to compare the histological characteristics of livers between chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients with and without hepatitis B virus (HBV) coinfection.

METHODS

A total of 336 CHC patients (male/female: 204/132, mean age: 46.1 +/- 11.7 years) were enrolled in the study; 32 patients (9.8%) were positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). The histological characteristics of livers were described according to the Knodell and Scheuer scoring system.

RESULTS

The proportion of non-intralobular necrosis (score 0) was significantly lower and the mean intralobular necrosis score was higher among CHC patients with HBV coinfection than those without coinfection (43.8% vs 64.5%; 0.84 +/- 1.05 vs 0.53 +/- 0.89). The epidemiological and virological parameters, and other histological scores (periportal necrosis, portal inflammation, total necroinflammation and fibrosis) were not significantly different between these two groups.

CONCLUSION

Chronic hepatitis C patients with HBV coinfection tend to have more severe intralobular necrosis than those with isolated HCV infection.

Significance of hepatitis B virus surface antigen, hepatitis C virus expression in hepatocellular carcinoma and pericarcinomatous tissues

AIM: To investigate the correlation between hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis C virus (HCV) expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the HAI score of the noncancerous region of the liver and the serum Alpha fetoprotein (AFP) level.

METHODS: The patterns of HBsAg and HCV in 100 cases of HCC and their surrounding liver tissues were studied on paraffin-embedded sections with immuno-histochemistry, the histological status was determined by one pathologist and one surgeon simultaneously using the hepatitis activity index (HAI) score, and AFP was detected by radioimmunity. The study included 100 consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for HCC. Based on HBsAg and HCV expression, the patients were classified into 4 groups: patients positive for HBsAg (HBsAg group), patients positive for HCV (HCV group), patients negative for both HCV and HBsAg (NBNC group) and patients positive for both HBsAg and HCV (BC group).

RESULTS: The BC group had significantly higher HAI scores than the other three groups. (BC > HCV > HBsAg > NBNC). HBV and HCV virus infection was positively correlated with HAI (r_s = 0.39, P = 0.0001). The positive rate of AFP (85.7%) and the value of AFP (541.2 ng/mL) in the group with HBV and HCV co-infection were the highest among the four groups. The positive rate (53.3%) of AFP and the value of AFP ( 53.3 ng/mL) in the group with none-infection of HBV and HCV were the lowest. HBV and HCV virus infection was positively correlated with AFP(r_s = 0.38, P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION: The AFP increase in patients with liver cancer was positively correlated with the infection of HBV and HCV. The serum AFP elevation by the infection of HBV and HCV is one of mechanisms which lead to hepatocarcinogenesis, and the antivirus intervening treatment of hepatitis is significant for the prognosis of liver cancer. From our Spearman’s rank correlation analysis, we can conclude that the severity of virally induced inflammation is correlated with HBsAg and HCV expression in HCC tissues and noncancerous tissues. Prior co-infection of HBV in HCV patients may be an adverse risk factor for intrahepatic inflammation.

The prevalence of HIV, HBV and HCV among Filipino blood donors and overseas work visa applicants

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to estimate the prevalence of HIV, HBV and HCV among the general population of the Philippines using data sources outside of the limited existing active surveillance network.

METHODS

We analysed aggregate HIV, HBV and HCV test results for hospital-based blood donors (BDs) and overseas Filipino worker candidates (OFWCs) that had been reported from licensed laboratories to the National STD/AIDS Cooperative Central Laboratory in Manila between 2002 and 2004.

FINDINGS

From over 144 000 blood-screening results, the HIV prevalence was 0.006% in BDs and 0.001% in OFWCs; that of HBV was 4.2% in both groups; and that of HCV was 0.3% in BDs and 0.9% in OFWCs. Males were at increased risk of both HBV and HCV; among OFWCs, younger women were at increased risk. Laboratories that tested sequentially but stopped testing after the first positive result were far less likely to detect HCV, indicating that sequential testing protocols may underestimate HCV and HIV prevalence. OFWCs were at low risk of HIV, and the risk of testing positive for these viruses was not increased among OFWCs applying for a repeated work visa, compared with first time-applicants.

CONCLUSION

Based on these data, we conclude that HIV is rare in the Philippines. In contrast with prior reports, we found no evidence that OFWCs constitute a high-risk group for HIV. Further research is needed to understand why younger women are at increased risk of acquiring HBV.

High prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection and genotype distribution among general population, blood donors and risk groups

The prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the general population and in various high risk groups in south India was assessed. A total of 258 out of 3589 (7.1%) subjects (both general and risk groups) tested positive for HCV RNA by RT-PCR, while the third generation ELISA detected only 6.1% (221/3589). This suggests that a number of cases go unreported, as screening of blood and blood products is done primarily by ELISA. Among 124 chronic renal failure (CRF) patients with a history of renal transplant or haemodialysis, 37% were found to be positive for HCV RNA by RT-PCR. We also found a significantly higher rate of transmission of HCV among people exposed to tattooing (2.8%) and pilgrims (5.8%) (slashing a cultural practice in one sect of Muslims). In addition, our studies also reveal a high prevalence of HCV infection (44%) among patients with Lichen planus. The most prevalent genotype observed in our population was 1b (43.4%) followed by 3b (30.2%). The other genotype 1a was observed in 16.6% of patients followed by 3a observed in 3.4% of the patients. Our findings suggest that HCV may be the major cause of post-transplant hepatitis in Indian patients with CRF and indicate the necessity for stringent screening procedures for these viral infections.

Interaction between hepatitis B and C viruses in hepatocellular carcinogenesis

Although hepatitis B (HBV) and C viruses (HCV) are, individually, major causes of hepatocellular carcinoma, the interaction, if any, between the carcinogenic effects of the two viruses is uncertain. Equal numbers of published studies have reported no risk interaction or a synergistic risk interaction. These conflicting results are explained by the rarity of concurrent infection with HBV and HCV in individuals without clinically evident liver disease, which severely limits the ability to accurately estimate the hepatocarcinogenic risk of dual infection compared with that of either infection alone. In an attempt to circumvent this difficulty, two meta-analyses have been performed, one based on studies published from a number of countries and the other on studies confined to Chinese patients. Both analyses concluded that a synergistic carcinogenic interaction existed between the two viruses and that the increased risk was super-additive but not multiplicative. If confirmed, this risk interaction will occur against a background of negative confounding effects on viral replication between HBV and HCV, which may be reciprocal. The mechanisms responsible for the carcinogenic interaction between the viruses are unknown. One possibility is that the increased incidence of cirrhosis with concurrent HBV and HCV infections acts as an even more potent tumour promoter than occurs with either virus alone. Synergism between the direct hepatocarcinogenic effects of the two viruses is another possible mechanism, but proof will have to await a fuller understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms involved with the individual viruses.

High prevalence of dual or triple infection of hepatitis B, C, and delta viruses among patients with chronic liver disease in Mongolia

Mongolia is known for its high endemicity for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and hepatitis delta virus (HDV) infections among apparently healthy individuals. However, there are little or no data on the prevalence and genotype distribution of HBV, HCV, and HDV among patients with chronic liver disease in Mongolia. Therefore, serum samples obtained in 2004 from 207 patients (age, mean+/-standard deviation, 51.0+/-11.9 years) including those with chronic hepatitis (n=90), liver cirrhosis (n=41), and hepatocellular carcinoma (n=76) were tested for serological and molecular markers of HBV, HCV, and HDV infections. Of the 207 patients, 144 (69.6%), 106 (51.2%), and 117 (56.5%) tested positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and/or HBV DNA, HCV RNA, and HDV RNA, respectively. Collectively, 172 patients (83.1%) were viremic for one or more of these viruses, including dual viremia of HBV/HDV (26.6%) or HBV/HCV (7.7%) and triple HBV/HCV/HDV viremia (30.0%). Of note, triple ongoing infection was significantly more frequent among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma than among those with chronic hepatitis (63.2% vs. 14.4%, P<0.0001). One hundred sixty patients (77.3%) had a history of blood transfusion and/or surgery. The distribution of HBV genotypes among the 116 HBV-viremic patients was: A (0.9%), B (0.9%), C (6.0%), D (88.8%), and C plus D (3.4%). All 117 HDV isolates were classified into genotype I. The 106 HCV RNA-positive samples were typed as genotype 1b (92.5%), 2a (0.9%), or 1b plus 2a (6.6%); mixed infection of two distinct HCV genotypes was found exclusively in the patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Does hepatitis C virus affect the reactivation of hepatitis B virus following renal transplantation?

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is endemic in Taiwan. Transplantation followed by long-term immunosuppressive medications may precipitate HBV reactivation. Interference of hepatitis C virus (HCV) with HBV gene expression and replication has been confirmed in many studies involving non-transplant populations. This study investigates the incidence of HBV reactivation following renal transplantation and compares the clinical outcome, especially the liver outcome, of patients with or without HCV co-infection.

METHODS

Fifty-one of 512 renal transplant recipients were positive for hepatitis B surface antigen before surgery, and were followed for 81.6+/-7.5 (4-120) months. Seventeen of 51 patients acquired HCV before transplantation and six patients acquired HCV after renal transplantation.

RESULTS

At the end of this assessment, we had 28 patients who suffered HBV reactivation and another 23 patients who suffered no HBV reactivation. Initially, we found a significant difference of HCV carriage (P<0.05) between patients with (seven out of 28 or 25%) or without (21 out of 23 or 91.3%) HBV reactivation. Further inspection showed that 21 of the 28 patients without HCV co-infection and seven of the 23 patients with HCV co-infection suffered HBV reactivation. After comparison, we found a lower incidence of HBV reactivation in patients with HCV co-infection than in patients without HCV co-infection (P<0.05). In contrast to the latter, we found that patients with HCV co-infection suffering HBV reactivation tended to have a late onset of HBV reactivation (P<0.05). Otherwise, there was no difference in hepatitis severity, in terms of peak alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin levels and hepatitis reactivation-related death, between these two groups of patients. Finally, a multivariable analysis also revealed that HCV carriage was indeed an independent variable leading to the reduced incidence of HBV reactivation in patients with HCV co-infection.

CONCLUSION

HCV might affect the reactivation of HBV by decreasing the incidence or delaying the onset of HBV reactivation in renal transplant recipients carrying both HBV and HCV.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) dual infection

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections account for a substantial proportion of liver diseases worldwide. Because the two hepatotropic viruses share same modes of transmission, coinfection with the two viruses is not uncommon, especially in areas with a high prevalence of HBV infection and among people at high risk for parenteral infection. Patients with dual HBV and HCV infection have more severe liver disease, and are at an increased risk for progression to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Treatment of viral hepatitis due to dual HBV/HCV infection represents a challenge.

Longitudinal evaluation reveals a complex spectrum of virological profiles in hepatitis B virus/hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection is often associated with severe forms of liver disease. However, comprehensive studies are lacking, and scant information is available regarding the virological behavior over time in coinfected patients. This study enrolled 133 untreated HBV/HCV-positive patients (male/female = 102/31; median age 51 years [range: 22-83 years]) who were longitudinally followed up for 1 year with bimonthly evaluation of HBV/HCV viremia levels and liver biochemistry. Thirty of these patients had triple infection with hepatitis Delta virus (HDV), while 103 patients were HDV-negative. In the HDV-negative group, active infection with both HBV and HCV was revealed in 24 cases, inactive infection by both viruses was seen in 15 cases, active HBV/inactive HCV was seen in 15 cases, and inactive HBV/active HCV was seen in 49 cases. However, 32 subjects (31%) presented dynamic virological profiles characterized by fluctuation of HBV and/or HCV viremia levels that at different time points were over or under the cutoff limits. Consequently, a correct diagnosis could be performed in these subjects only by serially repeating the virological tests 1 year apart. Similarly, 15 of the 30 HDV-positive subjects showed active HBV and/or HCV infection, with fluctuating virological patterns in 8 cases. In conclusion, this study showed that the virological patterns in HBV/HCV coinfection are widely divergent and have dynamic profiles. A careful longitudinal evaluation of the viremia levels of both viruses is essential for making a correct diagnosis and tailoring the appropriate therapeutic schedule in coinfected patients.

Natural history and treatment of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus coinfection

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection is not uncommon as a result of similar routes of infection. Patients who are coinfected represent a unique group with diverse serologic profiles. Combined chronic hepatitis B and C leads to more severe liver disease and an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Furthermore, coinfected patients represent a treatment challenge. No standard recommendations exist for treatment of viral hepatitis due to dual HBV/HCV infection, and therefore treatment must be individualized based on patient variables such as serologic and virologic profiles, patient's prior exposure to antiviral treatment, and the presence of other parenterally transmitted viruses such as hepatitis D virus and human immunodeficiency virus. The natural history and treatment of patients with HBV and HCV coinfection is reviewed.

Viral hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in the world. The incidence of HCC varies considerably with the geographic area because of differences in the major causative factors. Chronic hepatitis B and C, mostly in the cirrhotic stage, are responsible for the great majority of cases of HCC worldwide. The geographic areas at the highest risk are South-East Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, here hepatitis B is highly endemic and is the main cause of HCC. In areas with an intermediate rate of HCC such as Southern Europe and Japan, hepatitis C is the predominant cause, whereas in low rate areas such as Northern Europe and the USA, HCC is often related to other factors as alcoholic liver disease. There is a rising incidence in HCC in developed countries during the last two decades, due to the increasing rate of hepatitis C infection and improvement of the clinical management of cirrhosis.

METHODS

This article reviews the literature on hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The Medline search was carried out using these key words and articles were selected on epidemiology, risk factors, screening, and prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma.

RESULTS

Screening of patients with advanced chronic hepatitis B and C with hepatic ultrasound and determination of serum alfa-fetoprotein may improve the detection of HCC, but further studies are needed whether screening improves clinical outcome. Hepatitis B and C viruses (HBV/HCV) can be implicated in the development of HCC in an indirect way, through induction of chronic inflammation, or directly by means of viral proteins or, in the case of HBV, by creation of mutations by integration into the genome of the hepatocyte.

CONCLUSION

The most effective tool to prevent HCC is avoidance of the risk factors such as viral infection. For HBV, a very effective vaccine is available. Preliminary data from Taiwan indicate a protective effect of universal vaccination on the development of HCC. Vaccination against HBV should therefore be a health priority. In patients with chronic hepatitis B or C, interferon-alfa treatment in a noncirrhotic stage is protective for HCC development in responders, probably by prevention of cirrhosis development. When cirrhosis is already present, the protective effect is less clear. For cirrhosis due to hepatitis B, a protective effect was demonstrated in Oriental, but not in European patients. For cirrhosis due to hepatitis C, interferon-alfa treatment showed to be protective in some studies, especially in Japan with a high incidence of HCC in untreated patients. Virological, but also merely biochemical response, seems to be associated with a lower risk of development of HCC. As most studies are not randomized controlled trials, no definitive conclusions on the long-term effects of interferon-alfa in HBV or HCV cirrhosis can be established. Especially in hepatitis C, prospective studies should be performed using the more potent reference treatments for cirrhotics, namely the combination of peginterferon and ribavirin.

Combination therapy with interferon-alpha and ribavirin in patients with dual hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infection

BACKGROUND

Patients with dual hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have responded poorly to interferon (IFN) monotherapy. The purpose of the present paper was to assess the effect of combined IFN-alpha and ribavirin therapy in patients infected with both hepatitis B and C.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients received 3 or 5 MU IFN-alpha-2b thrice weekly and oral ribavirin (800-1200 mg/day) for 24 weeks. All patients had positive hepatitis B surface antigen, antibody to HCV, and HCV-RNA. Before treatment, one patient had positive hepatitis B e antigen. Eighteen patients had positive HBV-DNA tested by Amplicor (Cobas Amplicor Monitor, Roche Diagnostics, Branchburg, NJ, USA), with a mean HBV-DNA level of 3.1 +/- 0.9 log copies/mL. Another 72 patients with HCV infection alone served as controls.

RESULTS

Adverse events led to withdrawal in three patients receiving 5 MU IFN. Based on an intent-to-treat analysis, the biochemical response and serum HCV clearance rate at the end of 48 weeks follow up was similar in patients with dual infection and HCV infection alone (56% vs 72%; and 69% vs 71%, respectively). There was no significant difference in sustained HCV clearance rate between the 3-MU group (n = 13) and the 5-MU group (n = 23; 85% vs 61%). At the end of 48 weeks follow up, two (11%) of 18 pretreatment viremic patients had negative serum HBV-DNA (<200 copies/mL), while eight of those without pretreatment viremia had re-occurrence of HBV-DNA.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with IFN-alpha and ribavirin was effective in achieving sustained HCV clearance in patients with dual HBV and HCV infection, comparable to those with hepatitis C infection alone. Combination therapy using 3 MU IFN-alpha seemed as effective as 5 MU, and was well tolerated in the study population. However, large-scale control trials are necessary to clarify these findings.

Prevalence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C viral infections in Indian patients with chronic renal failure

The present study reports prevalence of posttransplant hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in 256 patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) and with a history of either renal transplant or hemodialysis. Out of 256 patients 138 had renal transplant and 118 were on maintenance hemodialysis. Among the patients screened, 7% had HBV infection alone, 46% were infected with HCV alone, while 37.10% were found to have co-infection of both the viruses. Our findings implicate these viruses as the major cause of posttransplant hepatitis in Indian patients with CRF and indicate implementation of stringent screening procedures for these two viral infections.

Low-level hepatitis C viremia and humoral immune response to NS4 in chronic hepatitis B virus-hepatitis C virus coinfection

BACKGROUND

There is a limited amount of published data on the interference of hepatitis B virus (HBV) on hepatitis C virus (HCV). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of concurrent HBV infection on serum titers of HCV RNA and HCV antibody profiles in chronic HCV infection.

METHODS

The clinical and virological profiles (serum titers of HCV RNA, HCV genotypes and antibody profiles) of 25 patients with chronic HBV-HCV coinfection were compared with those of 25 age- and sex-matched patients with HCV infection alone.

RESULTS

Among the 25 patients with HBV-HCV coinfection, only 3 were found hepatitis Be antigen (HBeAg) and HBV DNA positive by hybridization assays, and the other 11 were found HBV DNA positive by polymerase chain reaction. Genotype 1b was dominant in both HBV-HCV coinfection and HCV infection alone (64% versus 84%, P > 0.1). Patients with HBV-HCV coinfection had significantly lower alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) levels and inflammatory scores but higher fibrosis scores than those with HCV infection alone. Serum titers of HCV RNA were significantly lower in HBV-HCV coinfection than in HCV infection alone. The frequency and relative intensity of antibody response to core, E2/NS1, NS3, and NS5 showed no significant difference between the two groups, but antibody response to NS4 was diminished significantly in HBV-HCV coinfection.

CONCLUSIONS

In HBV-HCV coinfection, serum levels of HBV DNA are usually low or undetectable. Concurrent HBV infection, however, could interfere with HCV replication and suppress antibody response to NS4. The biological significance of selective inhibition of humoral immune response to NS4 in HBV-HCV coinfection should be further studied.

Hepatitis B virus infection: co-infection with hepatitis C virus, hepatitis D virus, and human immunodeficiency virus

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) shares routes of transmission, namely exchange of infected body fluids, sharing of contaminated needles, and blood transfusion, with other hepatotropic viruses, such as hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis D virus (HDV) and with systemic retroviral infections, such as the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Thus, many HBV infected patients are co-infected with other viral pathogens. Co-infection appears to increase the risk of progression of liver disease and may have important ramifications on choice of antiviral medication and treatment regimen. This article reviews the current knowledge of co-infection of HBV with HCV, HDV, and HIV.

Genotypic dominance and novel recombinations in HBV genotype B and C co-infected intravenous drug users

Pathogenic differences among hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes have been documented. However, the interaction between different HBV genotypes remains unclear. Herein, we chose HBV genotypes B (HBV/B) and C (HBV/C) co-infected intravenous drug users to study this issue. HBV genotype was determined in 40 HBsAg, anti-HCV, and anti-HDV co-positive intravenous drug users by using genotype-specific primers. The distribution of HBV genotype was as follows: HBV genotype B alone in 29 (72.5%); HBV genotype C alone in 4 (10.0%); and mixed HBV genotype B and HBV genotype C in 7 (17.5%). The interaction between HBV genotype B and HBV genotype C within the same individual was further studied in the seven intravenous drug users with HBV genotype B and HBV genotype C co-infection. By direct sequencing of the pre-S region, only HBV genotype B was detected. When 10-21 clones of the pre-S region were propagated from each intravenous drug user and sequenced, most of the clones were HBV genotype B. Novel recombinations between HBV genotype B and HBV genotype C occurred in four clones (M7-5, M1-10, M1-21, and M1-24) from two intravenous drug users (M7 and M1). The recombination breakpoints were estimated at nucleotide 3120-3171 for M7-5, at nucleotide 3060-3191 for M1-10, and at nucleotide 2910-2950 for M1-21 and M1-24 by SimPlot program. The recombination sites of these HBV/pre-S C-B and B-C recombinants may be within the pre-S1 region. The results in this study suggest that HBV/B is the dominant strain in HBV genotypes B and C co-infected intravenous drug users in Taiwan, and recombinations between different HBV genotype are not unusual. The impact of recombination on the evolution of HBV and their clinical significance remains to be studied.

Acute hepatitis B and C virus coinfection: a virological and clinical study of 3 cases

We report the virological interaction in, clinical presentation of, and course of disease observed in 3 male injection drug users with acute hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection. In all 3 cases, HBV infection presented first and quickly resolved. Diagnosis of acute HBV/HCV coinfection requires a long follow-up period with careful observation.

Virological profiles in patients with chronic hepatitis C and overt or occult HBV infection

OBJECTIVES

The virological profiles of hepatitis B and C viruses (HBV and HCV) and their interplay in cases of coinfection are undefined. A suppressed and occult HBV infection may occur in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) negative patients with chronic hepatitis C. The HCV core protein is able to inhibit HBV "in vitro," and serines at positions 99 and 116 are essential for such inhibition. We aimed to assess the HBV and HCV virological profiles in cases of coinfection and to evaluate the relationship between HCV core gene variability and HBV activity.

METHODS

Eighty-two anti-HCV positive patients were examined: 35 cases were HBsAg positive, 24 were HBsAg negative with "occult" HBV infection, and 23 were HBV negative. HBV and HCV viremia levels were evaluated in all cases. HCV genomic region coding for the aminoacid sequence 99-116 of core protein was amplified and sequenced in all HCV RNA positive cases. The entire core gene was amplified and sequenced in three randomly selected cases.

RESULTS

Serum HCV RNA was detected in all cases but 13, all HBsAg positive individuals; HCV viremia levels of the other 22 HBsAg positive subjects were similar to those detected in HBsAg negative patients with or without occult HBV infection. Among the 35 HBsAg positive patients both HBV DNA and HCV RNA were detected in five cases, HCV RNA alone in 17, and HBV DNA alone in six, whereas seven cases had undetectable levels of both viruses. Sequencing analyses showed that the HCV core gene was highly preserved in all patients.

CONCLUSION

A wide spectrum of HCV and HBV virological patterns may occur in a case of coinfection. HCV core variability is not related to HBV activity "in vivo."

Hepatitis C virus superinfection in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Because hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) have the same transmission routes, dual infection may occur and even persist in the same patient. The reported series on seroprevalence of HCV indicate that HCV is found in more than 10% of HBV-infected patients worldwide. HCV superinfection in patients with chronic HBV infection tends to cause severe and progressive liver disease that is resistant to interferon therapy. Paradoxically, HCV exerts a suppressive effect on HBV and may enhance seroclearance of HBV antigens, or even usurp the role of HBV as the agent for continuing hepatitis. In view of the complex dynamism of viral interaction, the importance of HCV assay and the necessity of monitoring patients with chronic HBV infection in clinical studies cannot be overemphasized. The basic mechanisms that regulate the viral interactions largely remain to be investigated.

High doses of alpha-interferon are required in chronic hepatitis due to coinfection with hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus: long term results of a prospective randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

Coinfection with hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) viruses is associated with a more severe liver disease, increased frequency in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma, and resistance to interferon (IFN) therapy when performed with the standard dosages used in single infections. In the attempt to verify whether the outcome of IFN therapy in patients with hepatitis B and hepatitis C coinfection can be improved, we have planned a prospective, randomized trial with medium to high dosages of interferon three times a week for 6 months.

METHODS

Thirty patients with HBV-HCV coinfection, and chronic hepatitis were randomized to receive either 6 or 9 MU alpha-interferon three times a week for 6 months. Patients were HBsAg positive, anti-HBe positive, HBV DNA negative by dot blot (6/30 positive by polymerase chain reaction), and anti-HCV-positive, HCV RNA positive. Pretreatment and posttreatment liver biopsies were performed.

RESULTS

Five patients treated with 9 MU IFN consistently cleared HCV RNA and HBV DNA, whereas none of those treated with 6 MU reacted in a similar fashion (p = 0.045). Responders showed significant improvement of histological activity index in comparison with nonresponders (mean Ishak score pretreatment versus posttreatment p = 0.002). Long term follow-up showed that none of the patients treated with high doses developed cirrhosis whereas 4/14 treated with low doses did develop cirrhosis.

CONCLUSION

Even though the percentage was not very high, the sustained response, the striking histological improvement, and the lack of development of cirrhosis achieved in these patients, indicate that with HBV-HCV coinfection, a trial with high doses of interferon is strongly recommended.

Influence of hepatitis C virus on the profiles of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are the most common causes of chronic liver disease, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The influence of HCV infection on the clinicopathological and virological profiles of chronic HBV infection was investigated.

METHODS

A total of 100 chronic HBV carriers with histopathological diagnoses by liver biopsy were studied. Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and anti-HCV antibody were tested. Serum HCV-RNA was detected by using a nested reverse transcription-PCR assay. A branched DNA (bDNA) assay was used to detect HBV-DNA and quantitate the serum levels.

RESULTS

Eighteen (18%) of 100 patients were positive for anti-HCV and HCV-RNA. Patients with concurrent HCV and HBV infection were significantly older than those without HCV infection (P < 0.05). The positive rates of HBeAg and HBV-DNA as well as the serum levels of HBV-DNA in patients with concurrent HCV and HBV infection were significantly lower than those without concurrent HCV and HBV infection (P < 0.01, P < 0.05, and P < 0.001, respectively). By using multivariate analysis, the factors of seroconversion of HBeAg and decreasing level of HBV-DNA were significantly correlated to concurrent HCV and HBV infection in chronic HBV carriers. The factors of increasing age and concurrent HCV and HBV infection were significantly correlated to seroconversion of HBeAg.

CONCLUSIONS

The concurrent HCV and HBV infection in chronic HBV carriers might result in a suppression of HBV replication that presented with a lower level of serum HBV-DNA and HBeAg seroconversion. Nevertheless, neither more obvious increase in biochemical parameters nor histopathological progression to more advanced liver diseases was observed.

Co-infection by serologically-silent hepatitis B virus may contribute to poor interferon response in patients with chronic hepatitis C by down-regulation of type-I interferon receptor gene expression in the liver

Intrahepatic mRNA levels of type-I interferon (IFN) receptor genes have been shown to correlate with the clinical efficacy of IFN therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Recently, co-infection by serologically-silent hepatitis B virus (HBV) has been assumed to be associated with the poor IFN response in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the co-infection of serologically-silent HBV and type-I IFN receptor gene expression in the liver of patients with chronic hepatitis C. The intrahepatic mRNA levels of IFNAR2, one of the two subunits of the type-I IFN receptor, were quantified and compared with both the prevalence of HBV DNA and the hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype in 45 patients with chronic hepatitis C, who were negative for hepatitis B surface antigen. Co-infection, as evaluated by a nested polymerase chain reaction, was present in 22 patients (48.9%), with dominance of the HCV genotype 1b (65.2%) over genotype 2a (31.8%). Co-infection was associated with lower IFNAR2 mRNA levels, higher levels of serum HCV RNA, and a poor IFN response, regardless of the HCV genotype. The findings suggest the possibility that co-infection by serologically-silent HBV is one of the factors that can lead to an unfavorable IFN response in chronic hepatitis C by down-regulation of IFN receptor gene expression in the liver.

Occult hepatitis B virus infection

Many studies have shown that hepatitis B virus infection may also occur in hepatitis B surface antigen-negative patients. This occult infection has been identified both in patients with cryptogenic liver disease and in patients with hepatitis C virus-related chronic hepatitis, and much evidence suggests that it may be a risk factor of hepatocellular carcinoma development. However several aspects of this occult infection remain unclear such as its prevalence and the factor(s) involved in the lack of circulating hepatitis B surface antigen. Moreover, it is uncertain whether the occult hepatitis B virus infection may contribute to chronic liver damage, considering that it is usually associated with a suppressed viral replication. Evidence and hypotheses concerning this fascinating field of bio-medical research are reviewed.

Virologic and clinical expressions of reciprocal inhibitory effect of hepatitis B, C, and delta viruses in patients with chronic hepatitis

We studied 648 hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)- and/or anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive patients to evaluate the virologic and clinical characteristics of multiple hepatitis viral infection. We defined as Case B-C an HBsAg/anti-HCV positive patient and as Case b-C an anti-HCV/anti-HBc-positive, HBsAg/anti-HBs-negative patient. For each Case B-C we scheduled as Control-B an HBsAg positive and anti-HCV negative patient and as Control-C an HBsAg/anti-HBs/anti-hepatitis B core antigen (HBc)-negative and anti-HCV-positive patient. Control group C was used as the control also for Case group b-C. Serum HBV DNA by molecular hybridization was found more frequently in Control group B (54% of 161 patients) than in Case group B-C (35.7% of 84, P <.01). The prevalence of HBV wild type was similar in Case group B-C (14. 3%) and in Control group B (17.4%), whereas the e-minus strain was less frequent in Case group B-C (10.7% vs. 33%; P <.01). HBV DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was detected in 40.8% of 71 patients in Case group b-C. HCV RNA was detected more frequently in Control group C (90.7% of 130 patients) than in Case group B-C (65.2% of 69, P <.0001). Moderate or severe chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis were more frequent in Case group B-C (62.9% of 65 patients) than in Control group B (46.7% of 90, P <.05) or C (40.8% of 98, P <.005), and in Case group b-C (71.1% of 76) than in Control group C. Thus, in multiple hepatitis we observed a reciprocal inhibition of the viral genomes and a more severe liver disease. In Case group b-C, serum HBV DNA was frequent and the clinical presentation was severe.

Impact of acute hepatitis B virus superinfection on chronic hepatitis C virus infection

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) dual infection is not uncommon, but the impact of acute HBV superinfection in patients with chronic HCV infection is still unknown. Two patients with well documented chronic HCV infection were hospitalized for acute hepatitis, which was serologically confirmed to be acute HBV superinfection. One patient who was seropositive for both HBV-DNA and HCV-RNA upon admission died of hepatic failure. The other became seronegative for HCV-RNA and recovered with alanine aminotransferase normalization, seroclearance of HBsAg, and antibodies to HCV. These findings confirm that acute superinfection in patients with chronic hepatitis may increase the risk for severe hepatitis, and suggest that HBV as the newcomer may suppress the pre-existing HCV. Together with the earlier observation that acute HCV superinfection suppresses pre-existing HBV, it seems that the timing or sequence of infection is a factor influencing the outcome of viral interactions.

Hepatitis C virus infection: co-infection with HIV and HBV

Hepatitis C shares common routes of infection with hepatitis B (HBV) and the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). It is, therefore, not surprising to find that some patients with HCV are co-infected with either HIV and/or HBV. Until recently, the effects of HIV on HCV infection have not been investigated--sadly patients with HIV died long before their liver disease became problematic. However, the development of successful therapies for HIV have led to dramatic improvements in life expectancy for patients infected with this virus and in these patients, with well controlled HIV, it is becoming clear that hepatitis C may lead to the early onset of advanced liver disease. The optimal treatment for these patients is unknown but it seems likely that combination antiviral therapy will be required. The effects of HBV on HCV are also beginning to be investigated and, again, it is clear that co-infection leads to more aggressive liver disease with the two viruses interacting in poorly defined ways to increase the rate of hepatic fibrosis. Management of combined HCV/HBV infection is still under investigation and will probably involve combination therapy.

Clinical and virologic outcomes of hepatitis B and C viral coinfection after liver transplantation: effect of viral hepatitis D

Hepatitis B (HBV) and C viral (HCV) dual-infection-associated liver disease is an uncommon indication for liver transplantation. The clinical and virologic outcomes in such patients have not been well studied. We retrospectively studied 13 patients with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibody to HCV positivity who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) and survived at least 30 days post-OLT. Antibody to hepatitis delta virus (HDV) was negative in 8 patients (group I) and positive in 5 patients (group II). Eleven of the 13 patients received standard hepatitis B immune prophylaxis, and they all remained HBsAg negative. All group I patients were HCV RNA positive after transplantation; in contrast, all group II patients were HCV RNA negative. Serum alanine aminotransferase levels were elevated in 88% (7 of 8) of the patients in group I compared with 20% (1 of 5 patients) in group II. None of the patients had graft loss from chronic rejection or recurrent hepatitis. Three patients had unsuspected hepatocellular carcinoma in the explant. We conclude that among liver transplant recipients with HBV and HCV coinfection, HDV infection is associated with the suppression of HCV replication and mild inflammatory activity after OLT.

Replication status and histological features of patients with triple (B, C, D) and dual (B, C) hepatic infections

In patients with multiple hepatotropic viral infections (B and C, or B, C and D), the reciprocal influence of each virus remains controversial. The aims of this study were twofold: first, to determine the impact of multiple infection on the replication status of B, C and D viruses and on histological features; and second, to compare patients with multiple infection to patients infected only with the hepatitis C virus (HCV). We retrospectively included 50 patients with multiple infection and 50 control HCV patients, who were matched on independent factors associated with fibrosis, such as age, gender, alcohol consumption and duration of infection. The replication status of hepatitis B virus (HBV), HCV and hepatitis D virus (HDV), and histological lesions, were determined. In patients with multiple infection, HCV RNA was present less frequently (44% vs 98%, P < 0.001) and the prevalence of cirrhosis was higher (35% vs 8%, P < 0.001). Among patients with triple infection (n = 16), HBV replication was observed in 25%, HCV RNA was detectable in only two (P < 0.0001) and HCV viremia was significantly lower than in the matched HCV patients (0 vs 54.7, P < 0.0001). Among patients with dual infection (n = 34), HCV RNA was present less frequently in those with serological markers of active HBV infection than in those without (30% vs 79%, P = 0.01). Hence, multiple infection is associated with a decrease of HCV replication. Cirrhosis seems to be more frequently observed in patients with multiple infection. In patients with triple infection, serum HCV RNA and markers of HBV replication were absent in 80%, suggesting that HDV acts as a dominant virus. In patients with dual infection, HBV and HCV exert an alternative, dominant replication.

Occult hepatitis B virus infection in patients with chronic hepatitis C liver disease

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections in patients who lack detectable hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) are called occult infections. Although such infections have been identified in patients with chronic hepatitis C liver disease, their prevalence and clinical significance are not known.

METHODS

With the polymerase chain reaction, we searched for HBV DNA in liver and serum samples from 200 HBsAg-negative patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease (147 with chronic hepatitis, 48 with cirrhosis, and 5 with minimal histologic changes). One hundred of the patients had detectable antibodies to the HBV core antigen (anti-HBc); 100 were negative for all HBV markers. Eighty-three were treated with interferon alfa. We also studied 50 patients with liver disease who were negative both for HBsAg and for HCV markers. In six patients found to have occult HBV infection, we evaluated possible genomic rearrangements through cloning or direct sequencing procedures.

RESULTS

Sixty-six of the 200 patients with chronic hepatitis C liver disease (33 percent) had HBV sequences, as did 7 of the 50 patients with liver disease unrelated to hepatitis C (14 percent, P=0.01). Among the 66 patients, 46 were anti-HBc-positive and 20 were negative for all HBV markers (P<0.001). Twenty-two of these 66 patients (33 percent) had cirrhosis, as compared with 26 of the 134 patients with hepatitis C infection but no HBV sequences (19 percent, P=0.04). HBV sequences were detected in 26 of the 55 patients in whom interferon therapy was ineffective and 7 of the 28 patients in whom interferon therapy was effective (P=0.06). None of the sequenced HBV genomes had changes known to interfere with viral activity and gene expression.

CONCLUSIONS

Occult hepatitis B infection occurs frequently in patients with chronic hepatitis C liver disease and may have clinical significance.

Low-level viremia and intracellular expression of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in HBsAg carriers with concurrent hepatitis C virus infection

Assays of hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication and antigen expression in HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers with concurrent hepatitis C or D virus (HCV or HDV) infection revealed that HCV and HDV can suppress HBV replication but that HCV also substantially suppresses HBV surface protein expression. HBsAg carriers with concurrent HCV infection thus have low-level viremia and intracellular HBsAg.

Histological changes of concurrent hepatitis C virus infection in asymptomatic hepatitis B virus patients

In chimpanzees and in vitro cell culture studies, hepatitis C infection has been shown to suppress hepatitis B virus expression. In addition, hepatitis C infection can cause much more severe liver disease in patients chronically infected with hepatitis B virus. The aims of the present study were to determine the prevalence of hepatitis C infection in asymptomatic chronic hepatitis B Hong Kong Chinese patients and the histological changes and hepatic expression of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus. Five hundred and seventy-one Hong Kong Chinese asymptomatic chronic hepatitis B patients were studied. Only four (0.7%) were hepatitis C virus antibody positive; they were also all positive for hepatitis C viral RNA in serum by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Portal lymphoid aggregates and bile duct damage was noted in the liver sections of three of the four patients. Hepatic expression of hepatitis B surface antigen was detected in three patients; none had detectable hepatitis B core antigen. By branched DNA assay, serum hepatitis B DNA could not be detected in any of the four patients, but three had hepatitis C RNA. By in situ RT-PCR, hepatitis C RNA was detected in the cytoplasm of three of the four patients. These findings suggest that hepatitis C coinfection in asymptomatic chronic hepatitis B patients is uncommon in Hong Kong Chinese and active hepatitis B viral replication is absent in these patients.

Characteristics of patients with dual infection by hepatitis B and C viruses

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The purpose of this study was to compare the epidemiological, biochemical, virological and histological characteristics of patients with chronic hepatitis B and C with those of patients suffering from chronic hepatitis C alone.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients with chronic hepatitis C, who were anti-HCV positive and HBs antigen positive, were studied and subdivided into two groups according to the presence or absence of HBV DNA replication. They were compared to 69 age- and sex-matched patients with chronic hepatitis who were anti-HCV positive and HBs antigen negative. All patients were HCV RNA positive by PCR, anti-HIV negative and anti-HDV negative. HBV DNA and HCV RNA were detected in serum by means of a branched DNA assay and PCR. The HCV serotypes were determined by the Chiron Riba HCV serotyping SIA technique. The histological characteristics included the Knodell score.

RESULTS

Epidemiological, biochemical and virological parameters were not different between the two groups. Only the prevalence of cirrhosis was greater in chronic hepatitis B and C patients than in patients with chronic hepatitis C alone (p = 0.01). Among chronic hepatitis B and C patients, HCV RNA level was significantly lower in HBV DNA positive than in HBV DNA negative patients (p = 0.01). Indeed, histological lesions were more severe in HBV DNA positive than in HBV DNA negative patients, including prevalence of cirrhosis (p = 0.01), Knodell score (p = 0.05) and, among the latter, piecemeal necrosis (p = 0.01) and fibrosis (p = 0.05). The characteristics of patients with dual infection did not differ according to the mode of contamination and duration of HBV disease, except for a shorter duration in patients contaminated by drug abuse than in other patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that HBV DNA replication inhibits HCV RNA replication in patients with chronic active hepatitis B and C but increases the severity of histological lesions.

Treatment of HCV: approach to difficult cases

The treatment of patients with HCV in itself represents a challenge for the treating physicians, but is particularly difficult in special situations where experience is limited. In patients with normal aminotransferases or an incomplete response to IFN, the safety of IFN administration is not the major issue, but one should consider the limited effectiveness of the therapy. In other patients, such as those with concomitant autoimmune hepatitis, an immunosuppressed state or a major psychiatric illness, IFN can be administered but may be associated with serious risks. In these cases, IFN should be used under strictly supervised circumstances and only by physicians with considerable familiarity with the drug. After needle stick exposures, IFN may prevent progression of acute infection to chronic hepatitis. Finally, in patients with well-established cirrhosis, IFN treatment may prevent decomposition or the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. In each of these categories, treatment must be tailored to the individual case based on good clinical judgment. It is hoped that greater experience, newer therapies, and a better understanding of the natural history of HCV infection will simplify the treatment of these cases that currently present difficult management problems.

Response of patients with dual hepatitis B virus and C virus infection to interferon therapy

Patients with dual infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and delta virus (HDV) responded poorly to interferon (IFN) therapy. Little is known about the effect of IFN therapy in patients with HBV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) dual infection. The patients in two randomized controlled trials with chronic HBV infection were retrospectively assayed for HCV markers. The HBV responses to IFN therapy in patients with and without HCV markers were compared. An open trial was conducted in 4 patients who had lost their serum HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) but had continuing HCV viremia and hepatitis. Of the 15 patients seropositive for HCV marker(s), only 1 (6.7%) responded with seroclearance of HBV DNA and HBV e antigen, as compared with 46 (28%) of 164 HCV-negative patients (p = 0.058). Icteric hepatitis developed in 1 patient on emergence of serum HCV RNA in association with seroclearance of HBV DNA. In contrast, good response was demonstrated in 3 of the 4 patients who had lost serum HBsAg before therapy. The results suggest that IFN therapy is not only of limited value in patients with dual infection with HBV and HCV but also has a potential risk of severe hepatitis if the clearance of one virus removes its suppressive effect on and facilitates the emergence of the other. However, patients with continuing HCV hepatitis after termination of the chronic HBsAg carrier state responded well to IFN therapy.

Viral replication in patients with concomitant hepatitis B and C virus infections

The aim of this study was to assess the implications of dual infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV). The HBV and HCV status in 100 patients with chronic hepatitis was analysed. HBV DNA was studied using liquid hybridization and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). HCV viremia was measured using qualitative and quantitative PCR. The HCV genotype was determined by PCR. Patients were divided into three groups according to their HCV-RNA and HBsAg status: group I consisted of 40 patients with chronic hepatitis caused by HBV; group II, 40 patients with chronic hepatitis caused by HCV; and group III, 20 patients infected with both viruses. The HBV-DNA level was higher in group I than in group III (66.4 vs. 11.5 pg/ml; p < 0.05). Quantification of HCV viremia revealed mean values of 36.9 copies x 10(5)/ml in group II and 5.5 copies/ml x 10(5) in group III (p < 0.05). The mean aminotransferase level and histological activity were higher in group III. HCV genotype lb was the predominant type. The data suggest that there is reciprocal inhibition of viral replication in patients with dual HBV and HCV infection. Liver disease appears to be more severe in patients with chronic hepatitis B and C.

The occurrence of hepatitis B and C viruses in Pakistani patients with chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma

To study the occurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Pakistan, blood samples from 105 sequential patients with biopsy-proven CLD (n = 82) and HCC (n = 23) were tested for HBV and HCV markers. Of the 105, 87 (83%) had evidence of hepatitis B exposure, 58 (55%) were positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), 23 (22%) had hepatitis C antibodies and 25 (24%) had detectable HCV RNA. Significantly more patients with HCC had evidence of HBV exposure in the absence of HCV markers (49/82 vs. 20/23, odds ratio 4.49, 95% CI 1.17-25.16). The proportion of patients positive for HBsAg with no HCV markers was also significantly higher in the HCC group (34/82 vs. 18/23, odds ratio 5.08, 95% CI 1.59-18.96). There were more patients with only HCV markers in the CLD group than the HCC group but the difference was not statistically significant (19/82 vs. 1/23, odds ratio 6.63, 95% CI 0.93-288.01). A modified non-isotopic restriction fragment length polymorphism study on PCR products was used to investigate the epidemiology of HCV genotypes in Pakistan. Due to depletion of the initial samples, a second series of specimens collected one year afterwards was used. Fifteen out of 40 samples had amplifiable product and all were identified as type 3. A commercial serological typing method on the same samples also confirmed that type 3 was the predominant HCV genotype in Pakistan.

Transfusion-transmitted disease

Many patients with haemophilia are infected with viruses, due to treatment with blood products--particularly from large pool clotting factor concentrates before 1985. AIDS in haemophilic patients was first described in 1982 and it has significantly reduced the life expectancy of these patients. Although no new sero-conversions have occurred since 1986, management of HIV in haemophilia remains a clinical challenge. Transfusion-associated hepatitis was recognized in 1943, and it is now an important complication of haemophilia treatment. Vaccination against HAV is recommended. Intensively-treated older haemophilic patients usually have serological evidence of HBV infection. HBV transmission has been stopped, but hepatitis B vaccination is still practised, because HDV requires HBV for propagation. Many patients are infected with HCV: before 1985 almost all patients who received clotting factor concentrate developed non-A, non-B hepatitis, now recognized as HCV. Treatment strategies are being developed for HCV in haemophilic patients. Parvo virus can be transmitted by clotting factor concentrate; it is very resistant to sterilization processes, transmission causing severe illness even in immuno-competent individuals. New blood-borne viruses responsible for sero-negative hepatitis include: GBV-A, B and C, and HGV. Although there is no link between CJD and haemophilia, there is concern about possible blood product transmission.

Independent and additive effect modification of hepatitis C and B viruses infection on the development of chronic hepatitis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

This study aimed to assess the effects and interaction between hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infection on the development of chronic hepatitis.

METHODS

Anti-HCV and HBsAg were detected in 125 histology-proven chronic hepatitis and 250 sex-matched and age-matched healthy controls.

RESULTS

The prevalences of anti-HCV (24.8%) and HBsAg (68.0%) in patients were higher than in controls (2.4% and 18.0%, respectively; each p < 0.0001). Univariate analysis showed that anti-HCV and HBsAg were strongly associated with the development of chronic hepatitis. Calculation of synergy index and Mantel extension test for trend indicated that there was additive effect modification between HCV and HBV. Multivariate analysis indicated that anti-HCV (odds ratio, 46.1; 95% confidence interval, 9.1-233.2) and HBsAg (odds ratio, 25.8; 95% confidence interval (9.3-67.2) were independent risk factors of chronic hepatitis. The population-attributable risk was estimated as 15.6% for anti-HCV alone, 52.4% for HBsAg alone and 6.8% for both anti-HCV and HBsAg. The frequency of chronic active hepatitis in patients with anti-HCV alone (100%) was higher than in patients with HBsAg alone (75%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

HCV and HBV infections are risk factors of chronic hepatitis. They act independently and probably with additive effect modification.

Hepatitis C genotypes in patients with dual hepatitis B and C virus infection

In patients with chronic hepatitis B and C virus (HBV, HCV) infection, an inverse relationship in the replicative activity of the two viruses has been reported. In the present study the genotype of HCV was evaluated in 34 consecutive cases found with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and anti-HCV in the serum, in order to identify its possible influence in determining the pattern of HBV/HCV interaction. Nineteen patients were HCV-RNA positive and could be genotyped: 8 were infected by HCV-1 (3 by HCV-1a and 5 by HCV-1b), 10 by HCV-2, and only 1 by HCV-3. Among these, 3 were HBV-DNA positive, compared to 10 of 15 HCV-RNA-negative patients (P = 0.003), and all 3 were coinfected with HCV-2. Mean alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were similar between patients infected with HCV-1 and HCV-2. Among 7 patients with cirrhosis 5 were infected by HCV-2, while 6 of 12 of those without cirrhosis had HCV-1 infection. In conclusion, HBV replication was inhibited more efficiently by HCV-1 than by HCV-2. Cirrhosis was frequently found in patients with dual HBV and HCV-2 infection.