Long-term results with radiotherapy for Stage I-II follicular lymphomas

Early stage follicular lymphoma: what is the clinical impact of the first-line treatment strategy?

BACKGROUND

Less than 20% of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) present with Ann Arbor Stage I or II disease at diagnosis. Numerous therapeutic options exist, however radiation therapy is considered the standard of care for early-stage disease based on single-institution or retrospective series. Our aim was to revisit the outcome of patients with localized FL in the rituximab era.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed the characteristics and outcomes of 145 early-stage FL patients, who were retrospectively divided into six groups according to their initial treatment: watchful waiting (WW), chemotherapy alone (CT), radiotherapy alone (RT), combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy (RT-CT), rituximab alone (Ri), and immunochemotherapy (Ri-CT).

RESULTS

Of the 145 patients, 84 (57.9%) had stage I disease and 61 (42.1%) stage II. The complete response (CR) rate varied from 57% for the Ri group to 95% for the RT-CT group. Overall survival (OS) at 7.5 y of patients treated after 2000 was better than that of those treated prior to 2000. OS did not significantly differ from one treatment to another. In contrast, a significant difference was found for progression-free survival (PFS) at 7.5 y, which favored Ri-CT (60%) therapy versus the others (p=0.00135).

CONCLUSION

Delayed therapy initiation was associated with a similar OS than that observed in patients receiving immediate intervention. The "watchful waiting" strategy may thus be proposed as first-line therapy, similar to stage III and IV FL patients with a low tumor burden. However, when treatment is required, immunochemotherapy appears to be the best option.

Early stage W.H.O. grade I and II follicular lymphoma treated with radiation therapy alone

Objectives

This retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate the outcome of patients with stage I or II (limited stage), grade I–II follicular non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (FL) treated with radiation therapy (RT) alone as initial management.

Methods

Patients with stage I or II and pathologically confirmed WHO grade I or II FL treated initially with RT alone between 1982 and 2008 were identified from a population based cancer registry.

Results

Forty patients with a mean age 61.3 years at diagnosis were identified. The median follow up was 6.9 years from the end of radiation therapy. Stage was I (n = 26) and II (n = 14). None had B symptoms. The Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) was low risk in 26 patients and intermediate risk in 5. Doses ranged from 15 Gy to 48 Gy, with a median dose of 35 Gy. All patients achieved a complete clinical response (CR). 5 and 10 year overall survival (OS) was 86% and 59%, progression free survival (PFS) 67% and 54%. Age ≥60 at diagnosis was associated with reduced OS, p = 0.029, but did not affect PFS. No other clinical features including grade or FLIPI were significant for outcomes. Local failure was uncommon occurring in 8% (3/40) although this was 21% (3/14) of all recurrences.

Conclusions

OS and PFS outcomes for radiation alone in limited stage low grade FL patients from this single institution study are consistent with previously published data. No predictors were prognostic for PFS. A dose of ≤35 Gy may be appropriate. In this highly selected homogeneous group the FLIPI loses discriminating ability. Local control is excellent, and a majority of patients are free of disease after 5 years.

Therapy of newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma

Newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma is relatively common and can be effectively treated with several differing approaches. Although the disease is often considered incurable, it is highly responsive to therapy when indicated. This review discusses the indications for treatment, risk stratification systems, treatment options with supporting clinical trial data, and expected therapeutic outcomes in newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma.

Early stage follicular lymphoma, current management and controversies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this article, we focus on the epidemiology, outcomes, and treatment options of early stage follicular lymphoma.

RECENT FINDINGS

Radiation therapy has been the predominant treatment for patients with early stage follicular lymphoma for decades. It is associated with a 10-year progression-free survival of 45-60%, thought to represent cures in this otherwise incurable disease with conventional modalities. Limiting the radiation field and dose does not diminish outcomes. On the contrary, the addition of chemotherapy does not benefit this patient population as a whole. The use of polymerase chain reaction for Bcl-2 gene rearrangements to detect molecular disease, however, may identify patients with early occult disseminated disease, who are at risk for relapse and would benefit from the addition of systemic therapy. For patients in whom radiation would be too toxic or prefer to not have radiation, observation is a reasonable alternative and a proportion of patients observed do not require therapy for a number of years. Despite the potential cures achieved by radiation therapy, a minority of patients in the United States receive such therapy; the majority are instead observed or treated with chemoimmunotherapy.

SUMMARY

Patients with early stage follicular lymphoma enjoy excellent outcomes following definitive radiation therapy, many of whom may even be cured. The addition of other therapies has not enhanced cure rates but identifying patients at greatest risk for disease relapse may change this paradigm. Despite the proven success of radiation, the majority of early stage follicular lymphoma patients in the United States do not receive radiation.

Initial management strategies for follicular lymphoma

Follicular lymphoma (FL) can vary markedly in its initial presentation, and no single standard approach for its initial management has been adopted. Available options for the initial management of FL include watchful waiting, radiation, single-agent rituximab and combination of rituximab and chemotherapy with strategies segregated for patients who have low and high tumor burden disease based on established criteria. However, marked debate occurs regarding the role of watchful waiting in the modern era for low tumor burden, asymptomatic patients, the optimal timing of rituximab, the selection of chemotherapy regimen to partner with rituximab in high tumor burden patients, and strategies for the management of relapsed disease. We provide an evidence-based discussion on these and other issues regarding the management of FL, and propose a mathematical modeling approach for addressing some of these questions.

Bendamustine for patients with indolent B cell lymphoid malignancies including chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

BACKGROUND

Indolent B cell lymphoid malignancies include follicular lymphoma, small lymphocytic lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma and marginal zone lymphomas. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is a lymphoid malignancy similar to small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) in its leukaemic phase.Indolent lymphoid malignancies including CLL are characterised by slow growth, a high initial response rate and a relapsing and progressive disease course. Advanced-stage indolent B cell lymphoid malignancies are often incurable. If symptoms or progressive disease occur, chemotherapy plus rituximab is indicated. No chemotherapy regimen has been shown to improve overall survival compared to a different regimen.Bendamustine is efficacious in the treatment of patients with indolent B cell lymphoid malignancies. A number of randomised controlled trials have examined the effect of bendamustine compared to other chemotherapy regimens in these patients. Improved disease control with no survival benefit is shown.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of bendamustine therapy for patients with indolent B cell lymphoid malignancies including CLL.

SEARCH METHODS

We electronically searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 2), MEDLINE (1966 to May 2012), EMBASE (1974 to November 2011), LILACS (1982 to May 2012), databases of ongoing trials (accessed 30 April 2012) and relevant conference proceedings. We searched references of identified trials and contacted the first author of each included trial.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials that compared a bendamustine-containing regimen to other chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently appraised the quality of each trial and extracted data from included trials. We estimated and pooled hazard ratios (HR) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We included five trials randomising 1343 adult patients in the systematic review. Allocation and blinding were unclear in three trials and adequate in two. Incomplete outcome data and selective reporting were adequate in all trials. Trials varied in the type of lymphoid malignancy, bendamustine regimen and the comparator regimen. In the three trials that included patients with follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma and other indolent lymphomas the comparator treatment was cyclophosphamide, a combination of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and prednisone, and fludarabine. Two trials included only patients with CLL and compared bendamustine to chlorambucil, and to fludarabine. We did not conduct a meta-analysis due to the clinical heterogeneity among trials. Bendamustine had no statistically significant effect on the overall survival of patients with indolent B cell lymphoid malignancies in any of the included trials (trials of moderate quality). Progression-free survival was statistically significantly improved with bendamustine treatment compared to other chemotherapy in three of the four trials that reported on it. One trial demonstrated a non statistically significant improvement of PFS. The risk of grade 3 or 4 adverse events was similar when bendamustine was compared to CHOP and fludarabine, and higher when compared to chlorambucil. Compared to chlorambucil quality of life was unaffected by bendamustine treatment (one trial, no meta-analysis).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

As none of the currently available chemotherapeutic protocols for induction therapy in indolent B cell lymphoid malignancies confer a survival benefit and due to the improved progression-free survival in each of the included trials, and a similar rate of grade 3 or 4 adverse events, bendamustine may be considered for the treatment of patients with indolent B cell lymphoid malignancies. However, the unclear effect on survival and the higher rate of adverse events compared to chlorambucil in patients with CLL/SLL does not support the use of bendamustine for these patients.The effect of bendamustine combined with rituximab should be evaluated in randomised clinical trials with more homogenous populations and outcomes for specific subgroups of patients by type of lymphoma should be reported. Any future trial should evaluate the effect of bendamustine on quality of life.

Effectiveness of first-line management strategies for stage I follicular lymphoma: analysis of the National LymphoCare Study

PURPOSE

The optimal management of stage I follicular lymphoma, according to consensus guidelines, is based on uncontrolled experiences of select institutions. Diverse treatment approaches are used despite guidelines that recommend radiation therapy (XRT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed outcomes of patients with stage I follicular lymphoma enrolled onto the National LymphoCare database.

RESULTS

Of 471 patients with stage I follicular lymphoma, 206 patients underwent rigorous staging as defined by both a bone marrow aspirate and biopsy and an imaging study (a computed tomography [CT] scan of the whole body, a positron emission tomography [PET]/CT scan, or both). Rigorously staged patients had superior progression-free survival (PFS) compared with nonrigorously staged patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.63). Treatments given to rigorously staged patients were rituximab/chemotherapy (R-chemo; 28%), XRT (27%), observation (17%), systemic therapy + XRT (13%), rituximab monotherapy (12%), and other (3%). With a median follow-up of 57 months for PFS, there were 44 progression events (in 21% of patients) for rigorously staged patients. For these patients, PFS was significantly improved with either R-chemo or systemic therapy + XRT compared with patients receiving XRT alone after adjustment for histology, LDH, and the presence of B symptoms. There were no differences in overall survival.

CONCLUSION

In this largest, prospectively enrolled group of patients with stage I follicular lymphoma, variable treatment approaches resulted in similar excellent outcomes, which challenges the paradigm that XRT should be standard for this presentation.

Radiotherapy alone for stage I-III low grade follicular lymphoma: long-term outcome and comparison of extended field and total nodal irradiation

BACKGROUND

To analyze long-term results of radiotherapy alone for stage I-III low grade follicular lymphoma and to compare outcome after extended field irradiation (EFI) and total nodal irradiation (TNI).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1982 and 2007, 107 patients were treated with radiotherapy alone for low grade follicular lymphoma at Ann Arbor stage I (n = 50), II (n = 36) and III (n = 21); 48 and 59 patients were treated with EFI and TNI, respectively. The median total dose in the first treatment series of the diaphragmatic side with larger lymphoma burden was 38 Gy (25 Gy - 50 Gy) and after an interval of median 30 days, a total dose of 28 Gy (12.6 Gy - 45 Gy) was given in the second treatment series completing TNI.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 14 years for living patients, 10-years and 15-years overall survival (OS) were 64% and 50%, respectively. Survival was not significantly different between stages I, II and III. TNI and EFI resulted in 15-years OS of 65% and 34% but patients treated with TNI were younger, had better performance status and higher stage of disease compared to patients treated with EFI. In multivariate analysis, only age at diagnosis (p < 0.001, relative risk [RR] 1.06) and Karnofsky performance status (p = 0.04, RR = 0.96) were significantly correlated with OS. Freedom from progression (FFP) was 58% and 56% after 10-years and 15-years, respectively. Recurrences outside the irradiated volume were significantly reduced after TNI compared to EFI; however, increased rates of in-field recurrences and extra-nodal out-of-field recurrence counterbalanced this effect resulting in no significant difference in FFP between TNI and EFI. In univariate analysis, FFP was significantly improved in stage I compared to stage II but no differences were observed between stages I/II and stage III. In multivariate analysis no patient or treatment parameter was correlated with FFP. Acute toxicity was significantly increased after TNI compared to EFI with a trend to increased late toxicity as well.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy alone for stage I and II follicular lymphoma resulted in long-term OS with high rates of disease control; no benefit of TNI over EFI was observed. For stage III follicular lymphoma, TNI achieved promising OS and FFP and should be considered as a potentially curative treatment option.

Radiotherapy in stage I-III follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Retrospective analysis of a series of 50 patients

PURPOSE

The goal of this work was to analyze the response rate and outcome of patients with stage I-III follicular lymphoma (FL) treated with radiotherapy (RT) alone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The records of 50 consecutive patients with stage I-III FL treated with RT alone at our department from 1988-2009 were analyzed. The median age was 60 years (range 32-80 years) with a median follow-up duration of 8 years (range 4-11 years). Clinical staging was performed according to the Ann Arbor system. Stage I: 30 patients (60%), stage II: 15 patients (30%), stage III: 5 patients (10%). Thirty-two patients (64%) presented with nodal disease, 14 patients (28%) presented with disease in extranodal sites, and 4 patients (8%) had nodal and extranodal involvement. The RT field encompassed only the involved Ann Arbor nodal regions (involved-field RT) in 26 patients (52%), mantle and whole abdominopelvic fields in 6 patients (12%), mantle field in 10 patients (20%), whole abdominopelvic fields in 5 patients (10%), and a so-called mini-mantle in 3 patients (6%). The total RT dose ranged from 26-56 Gy (median 40 Gy) in daily fractions of 1.2-2.5 Gy.

RESULTS

Complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR) were observed in 39 (76%) and 9 (20%) patients, respectively. Only 2 of 8 patients (25%) with tumor bulk > 5 cm reached CR, whereas 37 of 42 patients (88%) with a maximum lymphoma diameter < 5 cm achieved CR (p = 0.0001). The median overall survival (OS) and median event-free survival (EFS) were 18 years (CI 95% 10-26 years) and 7 years (6-8 years), respectively. The 2-, 5-, and 10-year OS were 96 ± 3%, 90 ± 5%, and 70 ± 9%, respectively. The 2-, 5-, and 10-year EFS were 90 ± 5%, 70 ± 7%, and 38 ± 9%, respectively. Fifteen patients developed a recurrence outside the radiation field (30%) and 4 patients developed an in-field recurrence (8%). All in-field recurrences were observed in regions without clinical (macroscopic) involvement, which were irradiated with a dose of ≤ 26 Gy. Pretreatment maximum lymphoma diameter < 5 cm (p = 0.039) and complete remission after RT (p = 0.021) were significantly associated with a better OS in the univariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

RT is a curative option in the treatment of limited stage FL. If RT of microscopically uninvolved area is necessary, a reduction in the radiation dose should be carefully weighed against the risk of in-field recurrences.

Outcomes of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with Bexxar with or without external-beam radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and toxicity of external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to sites of bulky lymphadenopathy in patients with chemotherapy-refractory low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) immediately before receiving Bexxar (tositumomab and (131)I) vs. in patients receiving Bexxar alone for nonbulky disease.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Nineteen patients with chemotherapy-refractory NHL were treated with Bexxar at our institution (University of Florida, Gainesville, FL) from 2005 to 2008. Seventeen patients had Grade 1-2 follicular lymphoma. Ten patients received a median of 20 Gy in 10 fractions to the areas of clinical involvement, immediately followed by Bexxar (EBRT + Bexxar); 9 patients received Bexxar alone. The median tumor sizes before EBRT + Bexxar and Bexxar alone were 4.8 cm and 3.3 cm, respectively. All 5 patients with a tumor diameter >5 cm were treated with EBRT + Bexxar. A univariate analysis of prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) was performed.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 2.3 years for all patients and 3.1 years for 12 patients alive at last follow-up. Of all patients, 79% had a partial or complete response; 4 of the 8 responders in the EBRT + Bexxar group achieved a durable response of over 2 years, including 3 of the 5 with tumors >5 cm. Three of 9 patients treated with Bexxar alone achieved a durable response over 2 years. Actuarial estimates of 3-year overall survival and PFS for EBRT + Bexxar and Bexxar alone were 69% and 38% and 62% and 33%, respectively. The median time to recurrence after EBRT + Bexxar and Bexxar alone was 9 months. Having fewer than 4 involved lymph-node regions was associated with superior PFS at 3 years (63% vs. 18%). There was no Grade 4 or 5 complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding EBRT immediately before Bexxar produced PFS equivalent to that with Bexxar alone, despite bulkier disease. Hematologic toxicity was not worsened. EBRT combined with Bexxar adds a safe and effective therapeutic treatment for managing recurrent low-grade follicular NHL.

Treatment strategies in limited stage follicular NHL

Limited stage (I-II) follicular lymphoma is an uncommon entity, since most patients with this disease have generalized adenopathy (stage III) or bone marrow involvement (stage IV). Although patients who present with stage III-IV disease often are considered to be incurable, ~50% of patients with limited disease will enjoy long-term freedom-from progression, usually following treatment with radiation therapy. Relapse among these patients is uncommon after 10 years and exceedingly rare after 15 years. Radiation treatment is generally restricted to the involved nodal region(s) with modest (~5 cm.) extension proximally and distally. Radiation dose is generally 30 Gy, but may be boosted slightly (36 Gy total) in the presence of bulky disease. Randomized clinical trials have been insufficiently powered to define the value of any additional treatment beyond radiation therapy, although single arm studies suggest a benefit to the addition of chemotherapy. There have been no reported experiences with chemo-immunotherapy or radioimmunotherapy. Patients should be monitored during follow up to identify transformation to a more aggressive lymphoma.

Primary follicular lymphoma of the duodenum is a distinct mucosal/submucosal variant of follicular lymphoma: a retrospective study of 63 cases

PURPOSE

Small series with limited follow-up have suggested primary follicular lymphoma of the duodenum (FL-D) to be an indolent disease. We report our experience on a large series of patients followed for a median time period of longer than 6 years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study comprised 63 patients with primary FL-D defined as stage I disease. Endoscopy and detailed pathologic work-up was performed at diagnosis and at restaging to monitor the behavior of the neoplastic process.

RESULTS

Histologically, all 63 patients had FL, low grade (1 to 2). Duodenal endosonography demonstrated lesions confined to mucosa/submucosa in 19 of 20 patients. At an overall median follow-up of 77 months (range, 12 to 177 months), only two untreated patients had developed nodal disease, the remaining 61 patients never experienced extrasmall intestinal disease and large cell transformation did not occur at all. Among 24 patients followed by watch and wait strategy, seven showed spontaneous complete regression and 17 had stable disease; radiotherapy resulted in complete regression in all 19 patients; anti-CD20 antibody monotherapy achieved complete regression in four patients and stable disease in one patient. Various chemotherapy protocols in eight patients caused complete regression in all of them, but local relapses occurred in three. No patients required surgery or died of disease.

CONCLUSION

These findings characterize primary FL-D as a remarkably indolent FL variant, which, even left untreated, does not develop tumorous growth, very rarely disseminates (two of 63 patients) and does not transform to high grade disease. A watch and wait approach appears to be the most sensible strategy.

Long-term outcomes for patients with limited stage follicular lymphoma: involved regional radiotherapy versus involved node radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Given the indolent behavior of follicular lymphoma (FL), it is controversial whether limited stage FL can be cured using radiotherapy (RT). Furthermore, the optimal RT field size is unclear. The authors of this report investigated the long-term outcomes of patients with limited stage FL who received RT alone and studied the impact of reducing the RT field size from involved regional RT (IRRT) to involved node RT with margins up to 5 cm (INRT<or=5 cm).

METHODS

Eligible patients had limited stage, grade 1 through 3A FL diagnosed between 1986 and 2006 and treated were with curative-intent RT alone. IRRT encompassed the involved lymph node group plus>or=1 adjacent, uninvolved lymph node group(s). INRT<or=5 cm covered the involved lymph node(s) with margins<or=5 cm.

RESULTS

In total, 237 patients were identified (median follow-up, 7.3 years) and included 48% men, 54% aged>60 years, stage IA disease in 76% of patients, elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in 7% of patients, grade 3A tumors in 12% of patients, and lymph node size>or=5 cm in 19% of patients. The 2 RT groups were IRRT (142 patients; 60%) and INRT<or=5 cm (95 patients; 40%). At 10 years, the progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 49%, and the overall survival (OS) rate was 66%. Only 2 patients developed recurrent disease beyond 10 years. The most common pattern of first failure was a distant recurrence only, which developed in 38% of patients who received IRRT and in 32% of patients who received INRT<or=5 cm. After INRT<or=5 cm, 1% of patients had a regional-only recurrence. Significant risk factors for PFS were lymph nodes>or=5 cm (P=.008) and male gender (P=.042). Risk factors for OS were age>60 years (P<.001), elevated LDH (P=.007), lymph nodes>or=5 cm (P=.016), and grade 3A tumors (P=.036). RT field size did not have an impact on PFS or OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Disease recurrence after 10 years was uncommon in patients who had limited stage FL, suggesting that a cure is possible. Reducing RT fields to INRT<or=5 cm did not compromise long-term outcomes.

Prognostic Factors in Follicular Lymphoma

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is one of the most common types of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. It is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage, for which many treatment options exist, however, no curative standard therapy has been identified. The outcome is highly variable with a median survival of approximately 10 years. The life expectancy of patients with FL has been extended with the use of rituximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the CD20 antigen on FL cells, but there remains a group of patients who fail to respond to chemoimmunotherapy and die early of their disease. Transformation of FL to an aggressive histology is an important event with high morbidity and mortality. The Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index has become the clinically useful prognostic tool, but gives only a rough estimate of expected outcome. There is a need for useful biomarkers for prediction of the disease course of single patients to individualize therapy, especially in the new era of chemoimmunotherapy.

Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in the elderly

The expansion of older population segments and the continuous increase in the incidence of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) makes this group of neoplasms an important and growing problem. Older NHL patients have increased risk of therapy-related toxicity as a result of age-related physiological changes and frequent co-morbidities. A functional assessment of the elderly patient is necessary to determine the likelihood of tolerating and responding to therapy. The comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is one multidisciplinary tool that has been applied successfully to older cancer patients and aids in identification of subjects who will or will not benefit from anti-neoplastic treatment. Although indolent lymphomas present more frequently at advanced stage, randomized trials do not show better outcomes with early therapy, supporting close observation until specific therapeutic indications arise. Use of the monoclonal antibody rituximab as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy improves survival and has become the standard of care in first-line treatment. Radioimmunoconjugates, bendamustine, and other monoclonal antibodies as well as novel targeted agents also are active against indolent lymphomas. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is an aggressive but potentially curable disease. Several trials performed exclusively in elderly patients have demonstrated improved response rates and survival with the addition of rituximab to CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin [adriamycin], vincristine, prednisone) chemotherapy in the front-line setting. Salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous haematopoietic cell transplant (autoHCT) has been shown to have better failure-free and overall survival in randomized trials involving younger patients. Highly selected individuals up to age 70 years may attain long-term survival benefit from autoHCT, although transplant-related mortality is higher than in younger patients.

Follicular lymphoma: managing an indolent malignancy

Follicular lymphoma is by far the most common indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma worldwide. Management is complicated by difficulty in accurately predicting individual outcomes and judging whether, when and how best to intervene. This article illustrates key issues in the management of this fascinating and enigmatic disease.

Usefulness of double balloon enteroscopy and video capsule endoscopy for the diagnosis and management of primary follicular lymphoma of the gastrointestinal tract in its early stages

AIM

The aim of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of double balloon enteroscopy (DBE) and video capsule endoscopy (VCE) in patients with primary follicular lymphoma (FL) of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Furthermore, we estimate the effectiveness of chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) including rituximab for them.

METHODS

Thirteen consecutive patients who were diagnosed of having FL in the duodenum between July 2005 and September 2008 were studied. All patients were given the conventional staging examinations, including total enteroscopy using DBE and/or VCE procedures. Chemotherapy was performed after written informed consent. Response assessment was performed every 6-12 months. The median follow-up period was 30.2 months.

RESULTS

FL was diagnosed in each patient as low grade (grade 1, n = 7; 2, n = 6) and, in all but 4 patients, localized lymphoma (stage I, n = 8; II(1), n = 1; II(2), n = 4). DBE revealed multifocal lesions in the jejunum in 10 of the patients, and in the ileum in 6. VCE showed similar findings in the jejunum in the recent 2 patients. Eleven of 13 patients finally received chemotherapy, and all of them achieved complete regression. They showed no evidence of recurrence after that.

CONCLUSION

Total examination of the small intestine using DBE should be performed before treatment to choose a suitable treatment procedure for primary FL of the GI tract. On the other hand, VCE is useful for screening and following the small intestine in the patients with it. Chemotherapy is effective to achieve complete regression of primary FL of the GI tract.

Medical management update: Non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Lymphoma is a heterogeneous malignancy of the lymphatic system characterized by proliferation of lymphoid cells or their precursors. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is associated with significant morbidity and is the seventh leading cause of death in the United States. Manifestations of NHL as well as complications of the disease and its management are frequently encountered in the head and neck region and often require specific treatment and modifications in the provision of oral health care. The purpose of this article is to review current concepts of the pathophysiology, as well as medical and oral health care management of NHL.

Follicular lymphoma: clinical features and treatment

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the second most common subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) in the Western world, constituting up to 22% of the total cases of NHL. This article describes the clinical characteristics of FL, its prognostic indicators, and its clinical course, including transformation to an aggressive lymphoma. Primary management and therapies for recurrent FL are detailed.

Overview of lymphoma diagnosis and management

The malignant lymphomas, including both Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), represent a diverse group of diseases that arise from a clonal proliferation of lymphocytes. Each of the more than 30 unique types of lymphoma is a disease with a distinct natural history. This biologic heterogeneity gives rise to marked differences among the lymphomas with respect to epidemiology, pathologic characteristics, clinical presentation, and optimal management. This article emphasizes the principles of diagnosis, including appropriate pathologic evaluation and staging considerations, and focuses on the clinical presentation, staging, and optimal management strategies for the most common types of lymphoma.

Response to low-dose involved-field radiotherapy in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to analyze response to palliative low-dose involved-field radiotherapy (LD-IF-RT) (two 2-Gy fractions), explore factors predicting for response, and determine the time course to subsequent treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-three patients with advanced or recurrent indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) received LD-IF-RT to 43 sites. Response was assessed by physical examination and radiographic studies. Median follow-up for individual sites was 14 months. Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate prognostic factors for response and in-field progression.

RESULTS

Overall response was 95%. Thirty-six sites (84%) had a complete response (CR), five sites (12%) had a partial response, and two sites (5%) had progressive disease. The CR rate of head and neck sites was significantly higher than that of pelvic and/or inguinofemoral sites (95% versus 64%, P = 0.04). The CR rate was significantly higher for sites < or =40 mm than for sites >40 mm (90% versus 56%, P = 0.04). Ten sites (23%) had in-field progression diagnosed at a median of 9 months. Sixteen patients (48%) received systemic treatment at a median of 8 months. Fourteen patients (42%) did not require additional treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

LD-IF-RT for selected NHL subtypes has excellent local CR and in-field control rates and may postpone the need for systemic therapy.

Follicular lymphomas

Follicular lymphomas constitute approximately 30% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas. These lymphomas are characterized by at least partially follicular growth pattern, but diffuse areas may be present. The proportions of follicular or diffuse areas vary also from case to case, which seems to be associated with prognosis. Follicular lymphomas should not be divided into distinct subtypes, but rather shows a continuous gradation in the number of large cells. On the bases of this grading, three groups have been defined: grades 1-3. There is a consensus that grade 3 follicular lymphomas, namely grade 3b, should be discriminated from lower-grade cases. The cells of follicular lymphomas express surface immunoglobulin, more frequently IgM+/-IgD>IgG>IgA, B-cell-associated antigens, CD10+/-; they are CD5-, CD23-/+, CD43-, and CD11c-. Follicular lymphomas express bcl-2 proteins, which is useful in distinguishing reactive from neoplastic follicles. t(14;18) is present in 70-95% of follicular lymphomas, involving rearrangement of bcl-2 gene. Clinical behavior of follicular lymphomas is heterogeneous and differs according to the histologic grade and extension of disease. Moreover, the evaluation of these malignancies is conditioned by therapeutic decision, which is also determined by main prognostic factors. The International Prognostic Index for aggressive lymphomas is not optimal for follicular lymphomas. Conversely, the Italian Lymphoma Intergroup Index and, more recently, the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI), designed in pre-rituximab era, seem to correlate well with outcome. Several active therapeutic approaches from the "wait and watch" strategy to the allogeneic transplantation are available for management of patients with follicular lymphoma. Therapeutic decision is mostly conditioned by patient's characteristics, stage, histologic grade, tumor burden, and risk-predicting factors.

Impact of [18f] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography on staging and management of early-stage follicular non-hodgkin lymphoma

PURPOSE

Accurate staging is critical to select patients with early-stage (I-II) follicular lymphoma (ESFL) suitable for involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) and to define the radiotherapy portal. We evaluated the impact of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET on staging, treatment, and outcome for patients with ESFL on conventional staging.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-two patients with untreated ESFL (World Health Organization Grade I-IIIa, or "low grade") following a minimum of physical examination, computerized tomography, and bone marrow examination (conventional assessment) and who had staging PET from June 1997 to June 2006 were studied retrospectively. Stage allocation was based on routine imaging reports. Disease sites, stage, and management plan were recorded based on conventional assessment or conventional assessment plus PET.

RESULTS

FDG avidity was demonstrated in 97% of patients in whom disease was evident on conventional assessment after biopsy. PET findings suggested a change of stage or management in 19 patients: 13 (31%) who were upstaged to Stage III-IV, altering ideal management from IFRT to systemic therapy, and 6 (14%) who had the involved field enlarged, including 4 upstaged from Stage I to II. Of these 19 cases, PET findings were considered true positive in 8 patients, indeterminate in 10, and false positive in only 1 patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm that ESFL is usually FDG-avid. In routine practice, PET has the potential to upstage and thereby alter management in a high proportion of patients with apparent ESFL.

Follicular lymphoma: today's treatments and tomorrow's targets

Over the past two decades, the incidence of follicular lymphoma has increased. Contemporary treatments include combinations of chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies, radioimmunotherapy, new targeted agents and stem-cell transplantation. Prognostic tools are becoming more important in helping clinicians and patients decide on the most appropriate therapeutic regimens. Gene expression profiling and biomarkers are promising additions to this armamentarium. When patients do require therapy, the addition of rituximab to chemotherapy seems to improve remission duration and may improve overall survival. Radioimmunotherapy capitalises on the capacity to target radiation directly to malignant cells, and is currently approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma. Further investigation is needed to clarify the role of stem-cell transplantation in follicular lymphoma. Only well-designed clinical trials can provide answers to the many questions that remain regarding the optimal treatment and sequence of treatments for patients with follicular lymphoma.

Low-grade non-hodgkin lymphomas

The most common low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphomas are of B-cell origin. This review will focus on follicular lymphomas and extranodal marginal zone lymphomas, also known as mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphomas. These are radiation-sensitive lymphomas. Moderate doses (30-35 Gy) for these stage I and II low-grade lymphomas result in long-term local control and possible cure. Involved-field radiation therapy is the standard approach and produces minimal morbidity. However, a significant proportion of patients relapse with systemic disease outside of radiation fields. For follicular lymphoma, this occurs in approximately 50% of patients after 15 years and for nongastric MALT lymphoma 30% to 40% after 10 years. Patients with relapsed disease are not curable with chemotherapy, but the disease often remains indolent and prolonged survival is observed. For gastric MALT lymphomas associated with Helicobacter pylori but which did not respond to antibiotic therapy, radiation treatment is indicated and almost always curative. For localized MALT lymphomas not related to microorganisms, radiation therapy is the initial standard therapy regardless of anatomic location. Patients with stage III and IV low-grade lymphoma and local symptoms are often successfully palliated with a low dose regimen of 2 x 2 Gy (total dose 4 Gy).

How I treat indolent lymphoma

Despite advances in treatment, there was little evidence until recently that this led to improvement in the survival of patients with indolent lymphoma, with patients continuing to have an unremitting course of relapse of disease. There appears to have been a change in the natural history of these diseases with the introduction of chemoimmunotherapy that may finally result in improvements in survival. With so many agents available for the treatment of indolent lymphomas, questions that have to be addressed include the following: is there still a role for a "watch-and-wait" approach in asymptomatic patients or should they be treated at diagnosis, what are the optimal first-line and salvage treatments, what is the role of maintenance therapy, and is there any role for stem cell transplantation in these diseases? No established treatment of choice has yet emerged, and many of these questions remain unresolved. It is highly likely that our treatment approaches will continue to evolve as the results of ongoing clinical trials are released and that improvement in outcome will result from identification of therapies that target the underlying pathophysiology of the diseases.

Current management of follicular lymphomas

After decades of stagnation, the prognosis of patients with follicular lymphomas (FL) has changed substantially within the last few years due to new and effective therapeutic modalities. These include myeloablative therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in younger patients in first remission, which showed a significant prolongation of remission duration in three prospective randomised trials while the impact on overall survival still needs to be determined. Adding the anti-CD 20 antibody Rituximab to conventional chemotherapy resulted in a significant increase in remission rate, remission duration and, in two of four currently available prospective randomised studies, even in a longer overall survival. A prolongation of remission duration was also seen when Rituximab was given as maintenance after cytoreductive therapy including Rituximab. Radio-immunotherapy (RIT) with radioisotopes coupled to monoclonal antibodies produced encouraging data in several phase II studies. New therapeutic perspectives have also emerged from increasing insights into the biology of the disease that unravel molecular targets for novel agents, some of which have entered clinical evaluation already.

Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index

Although numerous treatment approaches are proposed for patients with follicular lymphoma, criteria to help in choosing a treatment for a given patient and for comparing trial results are lacking. Several retrospective studies have analyzed prognostic factors, but their conclusions rely on limited numbers of patients treated during long periods, and their results are discordant. The Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index was designed from the data recorded over 8 years of nearly 5000 patients registered worldwide. Five factors are used (age, Ann Arbor stage, number of nodal sites, serum lactate dehydrogenase level, and hemoglobin level) to build a three-category index. This index, together with new biologic markers such as gene profiling and proteomics, could help provide an optimal treatment option for patients with follicular lymphoma.

Current controversies in follicular lymphoma

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is characterized by its responsiveness to initial therapy, a pattern of repeated relapses, and a tendency for histologic progression to a process resembling diffuse, large B-cell lymphoma. Treatment decisions are complicated by the many effective options now available including combinations of conventional chemotherapy and monoclonal antibody, radioimmunotherapy, new targeted agents, and autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation. For selected patients, "watch and wait" or involved field irradiation may still be the most appropriate strategy. When therapy is required, a combination of rituximab and conventional chemotherapy results in improved outcomes compared to chemotherapy alone. Radioimmunotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy is an attractive strategy for patients with relapsed disease and may prove to be appropriate first line therapy. The role of stem cell transplant in FL requires further investigation. Novel agents with varied mechanisms of action continue to be developed. Enrollment of patients into clinical trials designed to address the many unanswered questions in FL is essential to improving clinical outcomes.

Follicular lymphoma in early stages: high risk of relapse and usefulness of the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index to predict the outcome of patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) in advanced stages are currently deemed incurable with standard treatments. However, FL is considered to be eradicable in the small group of patients presenting with localized disease. The objective of this study was to analyze the clinical features and the outcome of a series of patients with FL in early stages with a long follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 48 patients (25m/23f; median age: 50 yr) diagnosed consecutively with FL in Ann Arbor stage I (25 cases) or II (23) at a single institution with a median follow-up of 9.5 yr were included in the study. Main biological and clinical characteristics at diagnosis, including Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) were analyzed; treatment and response were assessed and analyzed for prognosis.

RESULTS

The histologic subtypes were: FL type I, 20 cases (42%); type II, 24 (50%); type III, three (6%); and unclassifiable, one (2%). Distribution according to FLIPI was: low risk (36 cases) and intermediate risk (five cases). Treatment mainly consisted of combination chemotherapy (CHOP in 34 cases) plus involved-field radiotherapy in 26 cases. Forty patients (89%) achieved a complete response (CR), three (7%) a partial response, and two (4%) were non-responders; the remaining three patients did not receive therapy. No initial variable predicted CR achievement. About 57% of the patients in CR eventually relapsed with a relapse risk of 46% at 10 yr. Intermediate-risk FLIPI predicted failure-free survival. Histologic transformation was observed in six patients with a 10-yr risk of transformation of 13%. Twelve patients died during follow-up, in two cases as a result of unrelated causes. Overall survival (OS) at 10 yr was 79%. The FLIPI was the sole variable predicting OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the majority of patients with localized FL achieve CR, the risk of relapse is high. The FLIPI is of prognostic value in these patients.

Controversies in Follicular Lymphoma: “Who, What, When, Where, and Why?” (Not Necessarily in That Order!)

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common subtype of indolent lymphoma. Specific “facts” about FL that were generated by past research and have been passed down as dogma to a majority of practicing oncologists over the past 20 to 30 years that need to be revisited, include: (1) do not initiate therapy soon after diagnosis in asymptomatic, advanced-stage patients since it does not change outcome; (2) initiate therapy with single-agent oral alkylators when intervention needed and “save” more aggressive combination chemotherapy for “later” since the standard chemotherapy regimen used did not seem to impact survival; (3) FL is an incurable disease and palliation of symptoms was an acceptable approach to the expected pattern of repeated relapses; (4) transformation of FL is independent of the type or timing of therapies received by a patient; (5) median overall survival (OS) for FL patients is 8–10 years. Although the heterogeneity of FL will never change, we are developing the scientific tools to identify and better understand the biologic and genetic features associated with its clinical variability. In the current exciting era of targeted therapies (e.g., rituximab, radioimmunoconjugates) and novel treatment approaches demonstrating an improvement in treatment outcomes (e.g., disease-free survival and OS), our old beliefs and historically accepted dogma need to be retested and revitalized. The optimal combination(s) of old and new agents and the optimal timing of when to initiate and how to sequence specific therapies will require data from well-designed clinical trials that should include important correlative laboratory studies.

Les traitements par les radiations ionisantes dans les lymphomes. Indications actuelles et futures

Presently, radiotherapy is rarely an upfront treatment in patients with lymphomas. The modern evolution of radiation treatment calls for the development of therapeutic niches in which radiotherapy remains absolutely necessary. The development of new imaging techniques and their use in radiation planning systems along with new sophisticated radiation delivery techniques such as IMRT and respiratory gating should permit an increased accuracy an increased accuracy in the treatment of tumor masses and a decrease in late normal tissue complications.