Effects of omeprazole versus placebo in treatment of noncardiac chest pain and gastroesophageal reflux

Review article: oesophageal spasm - diagnosis and management

Oesophageal spasm is a common empiric diagnosis clinically applied to patients with unexplained chest pain. In contrast it is an uncommon manometric abnormality found in patients presenting with chest pain and/or dysphagia and diagnosed by >or=20% simultaneous oesophageal contractions during standardized motility testing. Using Medline we searched for diagnostic criteria and treatment options for oesophageal spasm. While the aetiology of this condition is unclear, studies suggest the culprit being a defect in the nitric oxide pathway. Well-known radiographic patterns have low sensitivities and specificities to identify intermittent simultaneous contractions. Recognizing that simultaneous contractions may result from gastro-oesophageal reflux this diagnosis should be investigated or treated first. Studies have documented improvements with proton-pump inhibitors, nitrates, calcium-channel blockers and tricyclic antidepressants or serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Small case series reported benefits after botulinium toxin injections, dilatations and myotomies. Uncertainties persist regarding the optimal management of oesophageal spasm and recommendations are based on controlled studies with small numbers of patients or on case series. Acid suppression, muscle relaxants and visceral analgetics should be tried first. Botulinium toxin injections should be reserved for patients who do not respond. Pneumatic dilatations or myotomies represent rather heroic approaches for non-responding patients.

Chest pain in general practice: incidence, comorbidity and mortality

BACKGROUND

Chest pain is a common symptom that presents the primary care physician with a complex diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.

AIMS

To evaluate the natural history and management of patients diagnosed with chest pain of unspecified type or origin in primary care.

DESIGN

Population-based case-control study.

METHODS

The study included 13,740 patients with a first diagnosis of unspecified chest pain and 20,000 age- and sex-matched controls identified from the UK General Practice Research Database. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using unconditional logistic regression. Risk estimates were adjusted for age, sex and number of physician visits.

RESULTS

The incidence of a new diagnosis of chest pain was 15.5 per 1000 person-years and increased with age, particularly in men. The risk of a chest pain diagnosis was greatest in patients with prior diagnoses of coronary heart disease (OR: 7.1; 95% CI: 6.1-8.2) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (OR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.7-2.3). In the year after diagnosis, chest pain patients were more likely than controls to be newly diagnosed with coronary heart disease (OR: 14.9; 95% CI: 12.7-17.4) and heart failure (OR: 4.7; 95% CI: 3.6-6.1). A new diagnosis of chest pain was associated with an increased risk of death in the following year (RR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.9-2.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Some causes of chest pain are underdiagnosed in primary care. This is of particular consequence for the minority of chest pain patients with cardiac disease.

Supra-oesophageal manifestations of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

The extra-oesophageal signs that are most commonly related to gastro-oesophageal reflux include chest pain, asthma, chronic cough, posterior laryngitis and dental erosions. It is characteristic to find in such patients a poor presence of symptoms and endoscopic and pH-metric findings that are common in typical reflux. The therapeutic response to antisecretory drugs has become the most cost-effective tool for the diagnosis and treatment of this condition. Both the evidence available and expert agreement in consensus conferences support the use of proton pump inhibitors with doubled standard doses for at least 12 weeks in most cases. While an acceptable response is achieved with this significant acid inhibition, there are still questions to be answered in these and other aspects, such as the true prevalence, path physiology and diagnosis of this condition. It is therefore necessary and increasingly useful to create multidisciplinary teams with the aim to improve and promote understanding and the care of patients suffering from these supra-oesophageal symptoms caused by gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Proton pump inhibitors for patients with coronary artery disease associated with reduced chest pain, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations

BACKGROUND

Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) presenting to an emergency department (ED) with chest pain are likely to undergo hospitalization as clinicians attempt to elucidate the etiology.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy is associated with reduced chest pain events and evaluations in patients with CAD.

METHODS

A patient population from a veterans medical center with documented CAD was identified retrospectively, and chest pain episodes, ED visits, and hospitalizations for chest pain were prospectively followed over 2 years. Comparison of patient outcomes between PPI (+PPI) and nonuse of PPI therapy (-PPI) was determined.

RESULTS

Of 415 male patients, average age 73.4 years, 23% utilized a PPI and 77% did not. Proton pump inhibitor therapy was associated with reduced chest pain episodes (11.8 vs. 26.2%, p = 0.002), ED visits (12.3 vs. 24.3%, p = 0.044), and hospitalizations (12.8 vs. 23.9%, p = 0.086). Relative reductions were 55, 49, and 46%, respectively, after 2 years. Numbers of adverse events were also decreased in the +PPI group of patients: 70% fewer occurrences of chest pain (p = 0.002, relative risk [RR] = 3.3), 55% fewer ED visits (p = 0.049, RR = 2.2), and 53% fewer hospitalizations (p = 0.064, RR = 2.1). By multivariate analysis, PPI therapy independently predicted reduced prevalence of patients experiencing chest pain, ED visits, or hospitalizations (odds ratio [OR] = 0.09 [0.04-0.21]; 0.15 [0.06-0.40]; 0.14 [0.05-0.40]; all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Proton pump inhibitor therapy for male patients with CAD from a veterans medical center was associated with reduced prevalence of chest pain, ED visits, and hospitalizations for chest pain and reduced incidence of these events.

Chest pain from gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with coronary artery disease

Management of patients with coronary artery disease is a major challenge for physicians, patients, and the healthcare system. Chest pain experienced by patients with coronary disease can be of noncardiac origin, and symptoms frequently related to gastroesophageal etiologies. The distal esophagus and the heart share a common afferent nerve supply, suggesting that location and radiation of perceived pain may be identical. In addition, there is substantial overlap between the prevalence of coronary disease and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Many physicians, including cardiologists, prescribe acid-reducing therapy to coronary patients. However, no prospective, randomized studies to date have evaluated the potential benefit of such treatments to prevent chest pain symptoms for these patients. We review the studies on noncardiac chest pain demonstrating reflux in patients with and without coronary disease. Also, the association of reflux with exertional chest pain and cardiac syndrome X is discussed. A rationale is presented for prevention of noncardiac chest pain in coronary patients, and the potential role of acid-suppressive therapy in managing these patients is discussed.

Beyond heartburn: a systematic review of the extra-oesophageal spectrum of reflux-induced disease

BACKGROUND

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a chronic condition affecting up to one-quarter of the Western population. GORD is characterized by heartburn and acid regurgitation, but is reported to be associated with a spectrum of extra-oesophageal symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review was to critically evaluate postulated extra-oesophageal symptoms of GORD.

METHODS

Extra-oesophageal symptoms were identified from population-based studies evaluating their association with GORD (either defined as heartburn and/or acid regurgitation, or diagnosed in general practice). The response of these symptoms to acid-suppressive therapy was investigated using randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. Pathogenic mechanisms were evaluated using clinical and preclinical studies.

RESULTS

An association between GORD and symptoms or a diagnosis of chest pain/angina, cough, sinusitis and gall-bladder disease was evident from three eligible population-based studies of GORD. Randomized placebo-controlled studies (n=20) showed that acid-suppressive therapy provides symptomatic relief of chest pain, asthma and, potentially, chronic cough and laryngitis. Mechanistic models, based on direct physical damage by refluxate or vagally mediated reflexes, support a causal role for GORD in chest pain and respiratory symptoms, but not in gall-bladder disease.

CONCLUSION

GORD is likely to play a causal role in chest pain and possibly asthma, chronic cough and laryngitis. Further investigation is desirable, particularly for other potential extra-oesophageal manifestations of GORD such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, sinusitis, bronchitis and otitis. Acid-suppressive therapy is likely to benefit patients with non-cardiac chest pain, but further placebo-controlled studies are needed for other symptoms comprising the extra-oesophageal spectrum of GORD.

Histamine-2 receptor antagonists at night improve gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms for patients on proton pump inhibitor therapy

While night-time symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are common, considerable controversy exists regarding the use of histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2Ras) for night-time reflux control. Some studies have suggested possible tolerance to H2RA while others have suggested that long-term efficacy of gastric acid control can be maintained with night-time H2RA use. The aim of this study was to identify if GERD patients have sustained symptom improvement with long-term use of night-time H2RA. Records of 56 consecutive GERD patients on twice daily proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and night-time H2RA therapy were reviewed. During a phone interview patients were asked a 5-item questionnaire, which included overall assessment of symptoms, night-time symptoms, sleep disturbance, duration and frequency of therapy. Of the 56 patients, 39 (31 women, mean age 56) completed the questionnaire (15 were not reached and 2 did not recall enough information). All respondents had taken night-time H2RA for at least 1 month (28/39 patients with > 6 months duration) with 33/39 patients taking H2RAs every night. The addition of H2RA led to an improvement in overall symptoms in 28/39 (72%) patients, improvement in night-time reflux symptoms in 25/34 (74%) patients and improvement of GERD-associated sleep disturbance in 18/27 (67%) patients. Five (13%) patients had stopped the H2RA on their own, stating that its efficacy waned after 1 month. Our results suggest that the majority of patients report persistent improvement in GERD symptoms from night-time H2RA use and that possible clinically important tolerance to H2RAs occurs in a small number of patients. Further prospective, placebo-controlled studies may help confirm that there is a role for night-time H2RAs in GERD symptom control.

[Role of esophageal provocative tests in the investigation of patients with chest pain of undetermined origin]

BACKGROUND

Traditional methods employed in esophageal investigation of patients with chest pain of undetermined origin includes upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry and pH monitoring. These methods many times disclose abnormalities that can only be enrolled as the possible cause of chest pain. Provocative tests can reproduce pain in the laboratory, establishing its esophageal origin.

OBJECTIVES

Determine the positivity of acid perfusion test, edrophonium and balloon distension in patients with chest pain of undetermined origin and compare with results of traditional exams, establishing the gain for the diagnosis of esophageal pain.

RESULTS

Forty patients with chest pain of undetermined origin (normal coronary angiography), 80% female, mean age of 54.7 years were submitted to traditional exams and provocative tests. Upper endoscopy disclosed erosive esophagitis in two (5%) and peptic ulcer in one (2.5%), esophageal manometry was abnormal in 60%. pH monitoring was abnormal in 14 (35%) with a positive symptom index in 7. Chest pain was considered of proved esophageal origin by traditional exams in 7 (17.5%) patients with a positive symptom index and of probable esophageal origin in 19 (47.5%) being 8 with gastroesophageal reflux disease and 11 abnormal esophageal motility. In 14 (35%) an esophageal origin could not be demonstrated. The acid perfusion test was positive in 10 (25%), edrophonium test in 8 (20%) and balloon distension test in 15 (37.5%) and at least one provocative test was positive in 23 (57.5%) patients. The introduction of provocative tests allowed the diagnosis of proved esophageal pain in 12 of 19 (63.1%) patients with probable esophageal pain and in 6 of 14 (42.8%) with normal or inconclusive traditional exams what represented a diagnostic gain of 45% (18/40). Two patients had negative provocative tests and a positive symptom index, making a total of 25 (62.5%) patients with proved esophageal pain.

The effect of a therapeutic trial of high-dose rabeprazole on symptom response of patients with non-cardiac chest pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic trials with high-dose lansoprazole and omeprazole have been shown to be sensitive clinical tools for diagnosing patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-related non-cardiac chest pain.

AIM

To determine the clinical value of a therapeutic trial of high-dose rabeprazole over 7 days in detecting patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-related non-cardiac chest pain.

METHODS

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Patients referred by a cardiologist after a comprehensive cardiac work-up were enrolled into the study. Oesophageal mucosal disease was determined by upper endoscopy and 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring assessed acid exposure. Patients were then randomized to either placebo or rabeprazole 20 mg am and 20 mg pm for 7 days. After a washout period of 1 week, patients crossed over to the other arm of the study for an additional 7 days. Patients completed a daily diary assessing severity and frequency of chest pain throughout the baseline, treatment and wash-out periods. The rabeprazole therapeutic trial was considered as a diagnostic tool, if chest pain scores improved > or =50% from baseline.

RESULTS

Of the 35 patients enrolled, 16 (46%) were diagnosed as gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-positive and 19 (54%) as gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-negative. Of the gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-positive patients, 12 of 16 (75%) had a significant symptom improvement on rabeprazole when compared with 3 of 16 (19%) on placebo (P = 0.029). Of the gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-negative group, only two of 19 (11%) improved significantly on the medication and four of 19 (21%) on placebo (P = 0.6599). The calculated sensitivity and specificity of the rabeprazole therapeutic trial was 75% and 90%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A rabeprazole therapeutic trial is highly sensitive and specific for diagnosing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-related non-cardiac chest pain patients.

Proton-pump inhibitor use by coronary artery disease patients is associated with fewer chest pain episodes, emergency department visits and hospitalizations

BACKGROUND

Patients with coronary artery disease presenting to an emergency department with chest pain are likely to undergo hospitalization in an attempt to elucidate its aetiology.

AIM

To examine whether coronary artery disease patients receiving proton-pump inhibitor therapy are associated with fewer chest pain events and evaluations.

METHODS

A veteran patient population with documented coronary artery disease was identified, and chest pain episodes, emergency department visits and hospitalizations for chest pain were followed over 2 years. Patient outcomes between proton-pump inhibitor use and non-use of proton-pump inhibitor therapy were compared.

RESULTS

In 415 male patients, 23% utilized a proton-pump inhibitor and 77% did not. Proton-pump inhibitor therapy was associated with fewer chest pain episodes (12% vs. 26%, P = 0.002), emergency department visits, (12% vs. 24%, P = 0.044) and hospitalizations (13% vs. 24%, P = 0.086). The incidence of adverse events was decreased in the proton-pump inhibitor group: 70% fewer chest pain episodes (P = 0.002, RR = 3.3), 55% fewer emergency department visits (P = 0.049, RR = 2.2) and 53% fewer hospitalizations (P = 0.064, RR = 2.1). By multivariate analysis, proton-pump inhibitor therapy independently predicted a reduced prevalence of patients experiencing chest pain, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations [OR = 0.09 (0.04-0.21); 0.15 (0.06-0.40); 0.14 (0.05-0.40); all P < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

Proton-pump inhibitor therapy for veteran coronary artery disease patients is associated with fewer chest pain episodes, emergency department visits and hospitalizations for chest pain.

Diagnostic and therapeutic use of proton pump inhibitors in non-cardiac chest pain: a metaanalysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess (i) the efficacy of short-term proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) and (ii) the performance of an empirical short-term treatment with PPI (PPI test) to establish a diagnosis of abnormal acid reflux in NCCP.

METHODS

Metaanalysis of English language studies identified by searching MEDLINE (1966-May 2004), EMBASE (1980-May 2004), Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and abstract books from major gastroenterology meetings (1993-2004). For the metaanalysis of PPI efficacy in NCCP, we selected randomized controlled trials (parallel group and crossover designs) comparing PPI therapy with placebo. For the metaanalysis of PPI test performance, we selected uncontrolled studies comparing the test with a standard reference.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included in the PPI efficacy analysis. The pooled risk ratio for continued chest pain after PPI therapy was 0.54 (95% CI 0.41-0.71). The overall number needed to treat was 3 (95% CI 2-4). The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio for the PPI test versus 24-h pH monitoring and endoscopy were 80%, 74%, and 13.83 (95% CI 5.48-34.91), respectively. All studies were small and there was evidence of publication bias or other small study effects.

CONCLUSION

PPI therapy reduces symptoms in NCCP and may be useful as a diagnostic test in identifying abnormal esophageal acid reflux.

Dysphagia in aging

Dysphagia is a common problem in older patients and is becoming a larger health care problem as the populations of the United States and other developed countries rapidly age. Changes in physiology with aging are seen in the upper esophageal sphincter and pharyngeal region in both symptomatic and asymptomatic older individuals. Age related changes in the esophageal body and lower esophageal sphincter are more difficult to identify, while esophageal sensation certainly is blunted with age. Stroke, Parkinson's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Zenker's diverticula, and several other motility and structural disorders may cause oropharyngeal dysphagia in an older patient. Esophageal dysphagia can also be caused by both disorders of motility (achalasia, diffuse esophageal spasm, scleroderma and others) and structure (malignancy, strictures, rings, external compression, and others). Many of these disorders have an increased prevalence in older patients and should be sought with an appropriate diagnostic evaluation in older patients. The treatment of dysphagia in older patients is similar to that in younger patients, but more invasive therapies such as surgery may not be possible in some older patients making less aggressive medical and endoscopic therapy more attractive.

Functional chest pain: nociception and visceral hyperalgesia

Functional chest pain is a common, yet poorly understood entity. The focus of this review is to explore the evolving research and clinical approaches with a particular emphasis on the sensory or afferent neuronal dysfunction of the esophagus as a key player in the manifestation of this pain syndrome. Although once regarded as a psychologic or esophageal motility disorder, recent advances have shown that many of these patients have visceral hyperalgesia. Whether visceral hypersensitivity is a central or peripheral perturbation of the gut-brain axis remains debatable. Response to empirical therapy with high-dose proton pump inhibitors, upper endoscopy, or prolonged recording of esophageal pH may identify gastroesophageal reflux disease as a source of chest pain. Esophageal balloon distension study can serve as a useful test for identifying hypersensitivity. Newer techniques, including functional magnetic resonance imaging, magnetoencephalogram, and cortical evoked potentials, are being investigated. High doses of proton pump inhibitors and low doses of tricyclic antidepressants or trazadone remain the mainstay of therapy, although several new approaches including theophylline have been shown to be beneficial.

The role of pH monitoring in extraesophageal gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is linked to several extraesophageal disease states including laryngitis, asthma, chronic cough, and noncardiac chest pain (NCCP). Although 24-hour pH monitoring is considered the "gold standard" in the diagnosis of typical GERD, it is also increasingly used in establishing the diagnosis of GERD in patients with extraesophageal symptoms. The clinical utility of pH monitoring in this patient population, however, remains controversial. In this article, the authors examine the role of pH monitoring in laryngitis, asthma, chronic cough, and NCCP.

Motor and sensory function of the esophagus: revelations through ultrasound imaging

Catheter based high frequency intraluminal ultrasound (HFIUS) imaging is a powerful tool to study esophageal sensory and motor function and dysfunction in vivo in humans. It has provided a number of important insights into the longitudinal muscle function of the esophagus. Based on the ultrasound images and intraluminal pressure recordings, it is clear that there is synchrony in the timing as well as the amplitude of contraction between the circular and the longitudinal muscle layers of the esophagus in normal subjects. On the other hand, in patients with spastic disorders of the esophagus, there is an asynchrony of contraction related to the timing and amplitude of contraction of the two muscle layers during peristalsis. Achalasia, diffuse esophageal spasm, and nutcracker esophagus (spastic motor disorders of the esophagus) are associated with hypertrophy of the circular as well as longitudinal muscle layers. A sustained contraction of the longitudinal muscle of the esophagus is temporally related to chest pain and heartburn and may very well be the cause of symptoms. Longitudinal muscle function of the esophagus can be studied in vivo in humans using dynamic ultrasound imaging. Longitudinal muscle dysfunction appears to be important in the motor and sensory disorders of the esophagus.

Sensory and motor function of the esophagus: lessons from ultrasound imaging

Catheter-based high-frequency intraluminal ultrasound imaging is a powerful tool to study esophageal sensory and motor function and dysfunction in vivo in humans. It can be combined with manometry, pH, and impedance measurement techniques to determine the relationships between different physiologic parameters. High-frequency intraluminal ultrasound imaging has provided a number of important insights regarding the longitudinal muscle function of the esophagus. On the basis of the ultrasound images and intraluminal pressure recordings, it seems that there is synchrony in the timing and the amplitude of contraction between the circular and longitudinal muscle layers. A sustained contraction of the longitudinal muscle layer is temporally related to esophageal chest pain and heartburn. The biomechanics of the esophageal wall and its relationship to sensory and motor function can be studied in humans in vivo by using high-frequency intraluminal ultrasound much more precisely than has previously been possible. Achalasia, diffuse esophageal spasm, and nutcracker esophagus are associated with hypertrophy of circular and longitudinal muscle layers. Finally, high-frequency intraluminal ultrasound imaging is the only technique that can detect reflux-related distention of the esophagus and its role in esophageal symptoms. Future approaches to display and quantify ultrasound image data are discussed. The principles of high-frequency intraluminal ultrasound described here are also applicable to study of the motor and sensory function of the other regions of the gastrointestinal tract.

Review article: gastro-oesophageal reflux disease -- how wide is its span?

Symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease are highly prevalent in Western countries; however, it is less certain how many individuals with heartburn have clinically relevant disease. Although the prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in Asia is substantially lower, the incidence may be increasing. How much of this increase is explained by the increasing recognition of heartburn in clinical practice, dietary changes and increasing obesity, or the eradication of Helicobacter pylori, remains unclear. There has been speculation that endoscopy-negative reflux disease represents a separate entity from reflux oesophagitis (as defined by the Los Angeles classification), but the evidence that might support this proposal is unconvincing. Patients with chronic reflux symptoms have a higher risk of Barrett's oesophagus, and the increased risk of developing oesophageal adenocarcinoma in individuals with a long history of heartburn is also well documented, but whether this always occurs via Barrett's oesophagus is debatable. Moreover, treatment with standard-dose antisecretory therapies and anti-reflux surgery seems unlikely, based on current evidence, to reduce the cancer risk in patients with Barrett's oesophagus. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease has also been implicated in an increasing array of other conditions, but arguably in these settings it is often over-diagnosed.

Patients with chest pain and occult gastroesophageal reflux demonstrate visceral pain hypersensitivity which may be partially responsive to acid suppression

OBJECTIVES

Mechanisms of chest pain in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are poorly understood. The recent demonstration in healthy subjects that lower esophageal acid exposure induces pain hypersensitivity within the non-acid-exposed upper esophagus (secondary allodynia) raises the possibility that an increase in spinal neuronal excitability (i.e., central sensitization) contributes to chest pain in GERD. The aim of this study was to determine whether in patients with unexplained chest pain, acid reflux contributes to esophageal pain hypersensitivity.

METHODS

In 14 patients with chest pain and GERD and 8 healthy volunteers, electrical pain thresholds (PT) were recorded from the upper esophagus before, and then repeatedly for 90 min after either hydrochloric acid (0.15 M) or saline (0.15 M) infusion into the lower esophagus. Six patients underwent a repeat study after 6 wk of high-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy.

RESULTS

GERD patients had lower resting upper esophageal PT than in healthy subjects (40.8 +/- 9 mA and 70.4 +/- 11 mA, respectively; p= 0.018). Acid infusion reduced PT in the non-acid-exposed upper esophagus in healthy subjects, but not in the patients (area under curve [AUC] - 304 +/- 333 and 786 +/- 464; p= 0.03, respectively). Following PPI therapy, resting PT increased (34.65 +/- 13.4 to 40.5 +/- 12.5 mA; p= 0.03), and a reduction in PT now occurred in acid infusion (AUC - 369 +/- 321; p= 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with unexplained chest pain and occult GERD have esophageal pain hypersensitivity that is PPI responsive. The increase in resting PT and secondary allodynia only following PPI therapy suggests that pain hypersensitivity in these GERD patients may partially be the result of central sensitization.

Sensory testing of the esophagus

Originally, sensory testing of the esophagus included the acid perfusion test and the edrophonium test, which were developed to assess patients with non-cardiac chest pain. In the last 2 decades interest in functional esophageal disorders has increased and thus further understanding of the underlying mechanisms of esophageal pain required development of new sensory testing techniques. Balloon distension using a computerized electronic device, electrical stimulation and impedance planimetry have generated important information about esophageal sensory thresholds for pain in different disease states. Intraluminal ultrasonography has been used to determine the physiologic changes of the muscle wall of the esophagus during perception of typical esophageal symptoms. Central evaluation of patients undergoing esophageal stimulation has recently been introduced to assess cerebral activation in different esophageal disorders. However, many studies using esophageal sensory testing are afflicted with significant design flaws, making interpretation of the results very difficult. This is primarily due to lack of recognition of factors that can modulate esophageal sensation.

Extraesophageal and atypical manifestations of GERD

Extraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are essentially complications of GERD that primarily involve organs that are in proximity to the esophagus. Non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) is an atypical manifestation of GERD, because symptoms originate in essence from the esophagus. In both atypical and extraesophageal manifestation of GERD frequent heartburn is uncommon and lack of GERD symptoms is not unusual. Esophageal mucosal injury is rarely present making upper endoscopy a low-yield procedure in both conditions. While association with GERD has been commonly reported, the extent of causality remains unknown. In NCCP, the usefulness of the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) test in diagnosing GERD-related NCCP has been established. Similar value in extraesophageal manifestations of GERD has been proposed, but rarely studied. While treatment of extraesophageal manifestations of GERD remains a challenge, PPIs in at least double the standard dose, should be considered for the initial therapy. Properly designed therapeutic studies are still lacking as well as the exact role of antireflux surgery in this patient population.

The effect of an empirical trial of high-dose lansoprazole on symptom response of patients with non-cardiac chest pain--a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial

BACKGROUND

Empirical trial with high-dose omeprazole has been shown to be a sensitive tool for diagnosing patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-related non-cardiac chest pain.

AIM

To determine the clinical value of an empirical trial of high-dose lansoprazole in detecting patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-related non-cardiac chest pain.

METHODS

Patients who were referred by a cardiologist after a comprehensive evaluation, with at least three episodes per week of unexplained chest pain as the predominant symptom, were enrolled into the study. Oesophageal mucosal disease was determined by upper endoscopy followed by 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring to assess acid exposure. Patients were then randomized to either placebo or lansoprazole 60 mg am and 30 mg pm for 7 days. After a washout period of 1 week, patients crossed over to the other arm of the study for an additional 7 days. Patients completed a daily diary assessing severity and frequency of chest pain as the predominant symptom throughout the baseline treatment and washout periods. The lansoprazole empirical trial was considered diagnostic if chest pain score improved > or =50% than baseline.

RESULTS

Of the 40 patients with non-cardiac chest pain that were enrolled, 18 (45%) had erosive oesophagitis and/or abnormal pH test (gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-positive) and 22 (55%) had both tests negative (gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-negative). Of the gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-positive patients, 14 (78%) had significantly higher symptom improvement on lansoprazole than on placebo (22%) (P = 0.0143). Of the gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-negative group, two (9.1%) markedly improved on the medication and eight (36.3%) on placebo (P = 0.75). The sensitivity and specificity of the lansoprazole empirical trial was 78 and 80%, respectively. By day 2, 12 (85.7%) of the gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-related non-cardiac chest pain responders had either complete or almost complete symptom resolution.

CONCLUSIONS

The lansoprazole empirical trial is highly sensitive and specific for diagnosing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-related non-cardiac chest pain patients. The trial enables diagnosing most of the responders within the first 2 days and thus a shorter duration of therapy may be considered in a subset of non-cardiac chest pain patients.

Treatment of spastic esophageal motility disorders

Treatment of spastic motility disorders continues to be challenging. Therapeutic options remain limited due in part to our lack of understanding of the pathophysiology and significance of these disorders. Furthermore, most of therapeutic trials to date are hampered by the poorly designed nature of the study, including the small size of the trials and the lack of placebo arm. Most of the available information suggests that there seems to be an important dissociation between symptoms (chest pain/dysphagia) and esophageal dysmotility. Drug treatment aimed at visceral sensitivity seems more effective in relieving symptoms than spasmolytic medications. Recent trials with Botox, nitric oxide derivatives, and SSRIs offer promising results. Rigorous study design that includes large placebo-controlled trials is needed in this area.

Noncardiac chest pain: an Asian view

NCCP is a common condition in Asia. The diagnostic approach of NCCP in Asians is similar to the Western population. GERD is the most common etiology. PPI therapy is an attractive alternative to other invasive diagnostic tests for NCCP and is equally effective for the Asian population.

Evaluation of symptom index in identifying gastroesophageal reflux disease-related noncardiac chest pain

BACKGROUND

Symptom index (SI), which represents the percentage of perceived gastroesophageal reflux-related symptoms that correlate with esophageal acid reflux events (pH <4), has been suggested as a measure to improve diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux (GER)-related noncardiac chest pain (NCCP). Because no study has evaluated the value of the symptom index in NCCP patients, data to support this claim have yet to be elucidated.

AIM

To evaluate the value of SI in identifying gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-related NCCP patients.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in this study were referred by a cardiologist after a comprehensive work-up excluded a cardiac cause for their chest pain. All patients underwent upper endoscopy to determine esophageal inflammation and 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring to assess esophageal acid exposure. Patients were instructed to record all chest pain episodes during the pH test. Patients with a positive SI (> or =50%) underwent the proton pump inhibitors (PPI) test, which is a therapeutic trial using a short course of high dose PPI.

RESULTS

A total of 94 patients with NCCP were included in this study. Forty-seven (50%) had either a positive upper endoscopy or an abnormal pH test and were considered GERD-Positive. Forty-seven patients (50%) had both tests negative and were considered GERD-Negative. Total number of reflux episodes and percent total, supine and upright time pH less than 4, were significantly higher in the GERD-Positive group as compared with the GERD-Negative group (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, P = 0.0045, and P < 0.0001 respectively). Only 9 (19.1%) patients in the GERD-Positive group and 5 (10.6%) patients in the GERD-Negative group had a positive SI (p = ns). Eight (89%) out of the 9 patients who had a positive SI in the GERD-Positive group and 2 (40%) out of 5 patients in the GERD-Negative group responded to the PPI test.

CONCLUSION

Positive SI is relatively uncommon in NCCP patients, regardless if GERD is present or absent. Hence, symptom index provides very little improvement in diagnosing GERD-related NCCP.

Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic condition requiring long-term treatment. Simple lifestyle modifications are the first methods employed by patients and, because of their low cost and simplicity, should be continued even when more potent therapies are initiated. Potent acid-suppressive therapy is currently the most important and successful medical therapy. Whereas healing of the esophageal mucosa is achieved with a single dose of any proton pump inhibitor (PPI) in more than 80% of cases, symptoms are more difficult to control. Patients with persistent symptoms on therapy should be tested (preferably with combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH) for association of symptoms with acid, nonacid, or no GER. Long-term follow-up studies indicate that PPIs are efficacious, tolerable, and safe medication. So far, promotility agents have shown limited efficacy, and their side-effect profile outweighs their benefits. Antireflux surgery in carefully selected patients (ie, young, typical GERD symptoms, abnormal pH study, and good response to PPI) is as effective as PPI therapy and should be offered to these patients as an alternative to medication. Still, patients should be informed about the risks of antireflux surgery (ie, risk of postoperative dysphagia; decreased ability to belch, possibly leading to bloating; increased flatulence). Endoscopic antireflux procedures are recommended only in selected patients and given the relative short experience with these techniques, patients treated with endoscopic procedures should be enrolled in a rigorous follow-up program.

Nutcracker oesophagus: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study of the effects of lansoprazole

BACKGROUND

Nutcracker oesophagus is characterized by high-amplitude oesophageal contractions. Recent data have shown a high prevalence of gastro-oesophageal acid reflux in patients with nutcracker oesophagus and, in open-label trials, patients seemed to benefit from acid suppression. Therefore, it has been suggested that non-cardiac chest pain in patients with nutcracker oesophagus may be related to reflux rather than to the motor abnormality itself.

AIMS

To investigate the effect of intensive acid-suppressive treatment on chest pain in patients with nutcracker oesophagus.

METHODS

Nineteen patients with nutcracker oesophagus received lansoprazole or placebo in a double-blind, randomized, cross-over study.

RESULTS

Significant reductions in pain intensity (P < 0.006) and pain duration (P < 0.05) were registered during the study. The magnitude of symptom relief achieved with lansoprazole did not differ significantly from that achieved with placebo. The motility pattern did not change during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

This study does not prove that acid-suppressive therapy is effective for pain relief in nutcracker oesophagus. As the amelioration of pain was not accompanied by any change in the nutcracker oesophagus pattern, it is unlikely that the high-amplitude oesophageal contractions are the cause of pain. Thus, the possible role of acid in the pathophysiology of pain in nutcracker oesophagus needs further study.

Noncardiac chest pain: evaluation and treatment

Noncardiac chest pain is a heterogeneous condition for which diagnosis and treatment are challenging. Research is needed to streamline evaluation to minimize unnecessary invasive testing and costs. Chest pain clinics to assess chest pain patients are popular in the United States and may be of value in reassuring patients and reducing presentation to hospital; however, recently this has been contended [111]. Options for the effective treatment of NCCP are dependent on the risk of an adverse outcome and the cost-effectiveness of the management algorithm that is followed. Most (64%) of those presenting to the emergency department with chest pain are classified as having NCCP [112,113]. GERD is probably the most important cause and application of a test of acid suppression with a high-dose PPI for 1 to 2 weeks seems to be a useful diagnostic tool. In those patients with GERD-related NCCP, short-term and potentially long-term therapy with a PPI (commonly higher than standard dose) is required to alleviate symptoms. Esophageal dysmotility is relatively uncommon in patients with NCCP and evaluation by esophageal manometry might be limited to rule out achalasia. Chest wall syndromes are common but probably often missed. Many patients with NCCP have psychologic or psychiatric abnormalities, as either the cause or an effect of the chest pain, but diagnosis here depends on techniques not applied easily in the acute situation. Pain modulators seem to offer significant improvement in chest pain symptoms for non-GERD-related NCCP. Finally, trials of management strategies to deal with this problem are required urgently, because the earlier discharge of patients with NCCP may exacerbate the problem. Fig. 2 provides a flow chart for diagnosis and treatment of NCCP.

Symptomatic response to lansoprazole predicts abnormal acid reflux in endoscopy-negative patients with non-cardiac chest pain

AIM

To determine whether symptomatic response to lansoprazole predicts abnormal acid reflux in endoscopy-negative patients with non-cardiac chest pain.

METHODS

Patients who complained of chest pain, but had normal coronary angiography, were asked to undergo upper endoscopy. Those without gastric and oesophageal lesions were recruited for 24-h ambulatory oesophageal pH monitoring, and were randomly given lansoprazole 30 mg or placebo, both daily for 4 weeks. Chest pain symptoms were recorded before and 1 month after treatment on a locally validated questionnaire. The symptom score was calculated by multiplying the severity and frequency of the symptom, and symptom improvement was defined as > 50% reduction in symptom score.

RESULTS

Overall, 68 patients, 36 on lansoprazole and 32 on placebo, completed the trial. The symptom score was reduced significantly in both groups (P < 0.001). In the lansoprazole group, more patients with than without abnormal reflux showed symptom improvement (92% vs. 33%; odds ratio = 22; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-201.8; chi2 = 10.9; P = 0.001), giving a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of 92%, 67%, 58%, 94% and 75%, respectively. In the placebo group, the rates of symptom improvement were similar between those with and without abnormal reflux (33% vs. 35%, P = N.S.).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with lansoprazole is a useful test in diagnosing endoscopy-negative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in Chinese patients with non-cardiac chest pain.

Overview of medical therapy for gastroesophageal disease

The last twenty years have seen an evolution of much improved strategies in the medical treatment of GERD. Current therapy is targeted at acid suppression, to deal with consequences of mucosal injury and afford resolution of symptoms. Given their modest efficacy, there is no longer much support for initial treatment with H2RAs. PPIs have been shown to provide the highest levels of symptom relief and esophageal healing, in addition to preventing relapse and complications. With this class of agents, the clinician is able to prescribe a drug that is as highly effective as surgery for the purpose intended, without worrying about long term sequelae of acid suppression. It appears that patients with extraesophageal GERD must be treated with higher doses of pharmacologic therapy, principally with the PPIs, for longer periods of time to achieve complete relief of symptoms when compared to patients with heartburn and erosive esophagitis. There is still no clear consensus as to whether aggressive acid suppression alters the natural history of Barrett's esophagus. Based on their initial success, it appears that the next generation of evolving medical therapies will continue to play an important role in the management of GERD. The outcome from medical therapy is the standard against which the results of the novel endoscopy anti-reflux treatments will be measured.

Treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Therapeutic modalities for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) continue to evolve despite the introduction of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), the most successful antireflux class of drugs. On-demand modalities such as antacids and alginates as well as histamine type-2 receptor antagonists continue to be popular with GERD patients who seek temporary relief of symptoms. The PPIs have revolutionized the treatment of patients with severe erosive esophagitis, complications of GERD, and atypical or extraesophageal manifestations of GERD. Antireflux surgery, commonly performed via laparoscopy, remains popular among patients who do not wish to take medications long term. In addition, the recent introduction of various endoscopic techniques offers GERD patients a long-term solution with less morbidity and lower cost than antireflux surgery.

Pharmacologic Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

The burden of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) results from its widespread prevalence and the unfavorable impact of its symptoms on well-being and quality of life. Whereas abnormalities of the antireflux barrier (lower esophageal sphincter) are important in the pathophysiology of GERD, pharmacologic therapy for GERD is based on suppression of acid, which is responsible for the majority of the symptoms and for epithelial damage. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the agents of choice for achieving the goals of medical therapy in GERD, which include symptom relief, improvement in quality of life, and healing and prevention of mucosal injury. As a class, these drugs are extremely safe. The newest PPI, esomeprazole, brings a statistically significant increase in healing of mucosal injury and symptom relief in patients with erosive esophagitis, compared with omeprazole and lansoprazole. This article reviews the role of medical therapy in the short- and long-term management of symptomatic patients with or without erosive esophagitis, including extraesophageal presentations, GERD during pregnancy, and Barrett's esophagus. Management of refractory patients is addressed.

Treatment of chest pain in patients with noncardiac, nonreflux, nonachalasia spastic esophageal motor disorders using botulinum toxin injection into the gastroesophageal junction

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine if botulinum toxin injection in the gastroesophageal junction improves symptoms in patients with noncardiac chest pain with a spastic esophageal motility disorder.

METHODS

Twenty-nine noncardiac chest pain patients with nonachalasia, nonreflux-related spastic esophageal motility disorders were enrolled in this open label trial of botulinum toxin injection at the gastroesophageal junction. Chest pain was the major complaint in all patients. Symptoms of chest pain, dysphagia, regurgitation, and heartburn were scored before and 1 month after botulinum toxin injection. A response to botulinum toxin was defined as at least a 50% reduction in the symptom score with a possible total chest pain score of 4. The duration of response was defined as the time period, between the time of injection and the point in time, at which the severity of the symptoms returned to the preinjection score.

RESULTS

Seventy-two percent of the patients responded with at least 50% reduction in chest pain. In these responders, there was a 79% reduction in the mean chest pain score from a preinjection score of 3.7 to a postinjection score of 0.78 (p < 0.0001). The mean duration of the response for chest pain in these patients was 7.3+/-4.1 months (range 1-18 months). There was also a significant reduction in the mean regurgitation score, dysphagia score, and total symptom score (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Botulinum toxin injection at the gastroesophageal junction leads to significant symptomatic improvement in patients with spastic esophageal motility disorders whose major complaint is chest pain.

Chest pain of esophageal origin

Chest pain of esophageal origin is the most common atypical/extraesophageal manifestation of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We are increasingly recognizing the important role of the cardiologist in making the diagnosis. Studies continue to focus on the mechanisms of pain in this challenging group of patients. Factors that determine the development and persistence of visceral hypersensitivity are currently under investigation. Invasive diagnostic studies have been replaced by therapeutic trials or empirical therapies. Proton pump inhibitors have been demonstrated to be the most effective treatment for GERD-related noncardiac chest pain (NCCP). Pain modulators remain the primary therapy for non-GERD-related NCCP. Sertraline is the first selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor to demonstrate a significant improvement in chest pain symptoms.

Review article: the burden of illness of non-cardiac chest pain

BACKGROUND

Non-cardiac chest pain is a common condition affecting approximately one-quarter of the population during their lifetime, but the long-term economic costs of non-cardiac chest pain are poorly defined.

METHODS

A MEDLINE and Current Contents search was performed from 1991 to 2002 using specific keywords. All major articles on the subject of non-cardiac chest pain in this period were reviewed and their reference lists searched.

RESULTS

Limited studies suggest that the majority of those with non-cardiac chest pain do not consult a doctor regarding their symptoms; the drivers of health care seeking are not known. The impact on the quality of life in consulters can be severe, with as many as 36% reporting much lower quality of life levels. The diagnosis of non-cardiac chest pain can be difficult due to the heterogeneous nature of the condition, with significant overlap of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, chest wall syndromes and psychiatric disease, which may drive up the costs of management. The prognosis appears to be good, but there are conflicting results in long-term studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The costs of non-cardiac chest pain to the health care system are likely to be large and represent a significant proportion of each Western country's health care budget. Further studies are required to determine methods of reducing health care costs.

Pharmacologic management of gastroesophageal reflux disease

The burden of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) results from its widespread prevalence and the unfavorable impact of its symptoms on well-being and quality of life. Whereas abnormalities of the antireflux barrier (lower esophageal sphincter) are important in the pathophysiology of GERD, pharmacologic therapy for GERD is based on suppression of acid, which is responsible for the majority of the symptoms and for epithelial damage. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the agents of choice for achieving the goals of medical therapy in GERD, which include symptom relief, improvement in quality of life, and healing and prevention of mucosal injury. As a class, these drugs are extremely safe. The newest PPI, esomeprazole, brings a statistically significant increase in healing of mucosal injury and symptom relief in patients with erosive esophagitis, compared with omeprazole and lansoprazole. This article reviews the role of medical therapy in the short- and long-term management of symptomatic patients with or without erosive esophagitis, including extraesophageal presentations, GERD during pregnancy, and Barrett's esophagus. Management of refractory patients is addressed.

Use of antisecretory agents as a trial of therapy

Dyspepsia is a common clinical condition, and its diagnostic evaluation and treatment result in the expenditure of enormous healthcare resources each year. Studies indicate that the omeprazole test is the most sensitive and cost effective test for diagnosing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) in patients with extra-oesophageal or more "classic" symptoms suggestive of GORD. Studies also indicate that a therapeutic trial of omeprazole in patients with dyspepsia results in greater symptom improvement and lower costs than treatment with less potent acid suppression.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and chest pain. Results of laparoscopic antireflux surgery

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic fundoplication cures heartburn and regurgitation in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) but its effect on the chest pain that is also experienced by some patients is less clear. Confusion stems from the fact that it is difficult to determine preoperatively whether the chest pain is actually caused by the reflux. Therefore, we designed a study in patients with GERD and chest pain that would assess the value of pH monitoring in establishing a correlation between the symptom and the disease, the predictive value of pH monitoring on the results of surgical treatment, and the outcome of laparoscopic fundoplication on chest pain in patients with GERD.

METHODS

Of 487 patients who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication for GERD at our institution between October 1992 and July 2000, 165 (34%) complained of chest pain in addition to heartburn and regurgitation. Their symptoms had been present for an average of 118 months. The pH monitoring tracings were analyzed for a correlation between episodes of reflux and chest pain. The mean length of follow-up was 13 months.

RESULTS

Among the 165 patients with chest pain, the relationship between pain and reflux during pH monitoring was as follows: 39 patients (group A) experienced no chest pain during the study; in 28 patients (group B), chest pain correlated with reflux in <40% of instances; in 98 patients (group C), chest pain correlated with reflux in ?40% of instances. Chest pain improved postoperatively in 65% of group A patients, 79% of group B patients, and 96% of group C patients (group C vs A and B: p <0.05). Heartburn and regurgitation resolved or improved in 97% and 95% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that pH monitoring helped to identify a relationship between chest pain and reflux; and when the two coincided, the chest pain was relieved by antireflux surgery.

Noncardiac chest pain

GOALS

Review of research directions in the etiology, evaluation, and treatment of patients with noncardiac chest pain. The author proposes a combined practical approach to noncardiac chest pain that incorporates these findings, which is useful in a clinical practice setting.

BACKGROUND

Several major schools of thought have emerged in the etiology of noncardiac chest pain: acid reflux, motor disorder, altered pain threshold/hypersensitivity, and association with psychiatric dysfunction. There is significant overlap among these. Occult gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is more common than motor disorders and is found in 30% to 40% of these patients; a subset has hypersensitivity, with a normal pH profile. Esophageal motility testing and endoscopy have a more limited role than 24-hour pH testing. Impedance planimetry and balloon sensory provocative testing remain research tools. Provocative testing with hydrochloric acid or edrophonium is less helpful than pH monitoring. Gastroesophageal reflux disease-induced chest pain requires high-dose long-term proton pump inhibitors (PPIs): at least 4 to 8 weeks. Psychotropics are superior to placebo, both in patients with and without psychiatric dysfunction.

RESULTS

The author found combined PPIs and psychotropics helpful in patients with esophageal hypersensitivity and GERD, although supporting data is scant.

CONCLUSIONS

A brief 1-week high-dose PPI challenge, i.e., omeprazole test, may be cost-effective in a primary care setting. However, this approach may not be useful in a referral setting, where pH data and diary assessment of associated symptoms provide useful management help. A behavioral model approach, with early emphasis on patient education, integrated with physiologic data helps the most.

Oesophageal motility disorders

Oesophageal motility disorders comprise various abnormal manometric patterns which usually present with dysphagia or chest pain. Some, such as achalasia, are diseases with a well defined pathology, characteristic manometric features, and good response to treatments directed at the pathophysiological abnormalities. Other disorders, such as diffuse oesophageal spasm and hypercontracting oesophagus, have no well defined pathology and could represent a range of motility changes associated with subtle neuropathic changes, gastro-oesophageal reflux, and anxiety states. Although manometric patterns have been defined for these disorders, the relation with symptoms is poorly defined and the response to medical or surgical therapy unpredictable. Hypocontracting oesophagus is generally caused by weak musculature commonly associated with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Secondary oesophageal motility disorders can be caused by collagen vascular diseases, diabetes, Chagas' disease, amyloidosis, alcoholism, myxo-oedema, multiple sclerosis, idiopathic pseudo-obstruction, or the ageing process.

Bedtime H2 blockers improve nocturnal gastric acid control in GERD patients on proton pump inhibitors

AIM

Proton pump inhibitors taken twice daily before meals (proton pump inhibitor b.d. AC) effectively controls daytime gastric pH; however, nocturnal gastric acid breakthrough (NAB) occurs in more than 75% of patients. Adding an H2-blocker at bedtime decreases NAB in normal subjects. The efficacy of this regimen has not been evaluated in GERD patients. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of proton pump inhibitor b.d., both with and without bedtime H2-blocker on intragastric pH and the occurrence of NAB in GERD patients.

METHODS

Prolonged ambulatory pH studies in GERD patients were reviewed. Group A: 60 patients (mean age 53 years, male 30) taking either omeprazole 20 mg or lansoprazole 30 mg b.d. Group B: 45 patients (mean age 49 years, male 23) on proton pump inhibitor b.d. (omeprazole 20 mg or lansoprazole 30 mg) plus an H2-blocker at bedtime (ranitidine 300 mg, famotidine 40 mg or nizatidine 300 mg). Eleven patients were evaluated during treatment with both regimens (group C). The percentage time of nocturnal and daytime intragastric pH > 4 and per cent of patients with gastric NAB were analysed. In the patients with NAB, its duration and associated oesophageal acid exposure also were analysed.

RESULTS

Median percentage time intragastric pH > 4 overnight was 51% in group A, compared to 96% in group B (P < 0.0001). Median percentage daytime pH > 4 was 73% in group A and 79.8% in group B (P=0.14). Median percentage time intragastric pH >p 4 overnight increased from 54.6% without H2RA to 96.5% after adding bedtime H2RA (P=0.0013) in group C patients. NAB occurred in 82% patients in group A and 40% in group B (P < 0.0001). The mean duration of oesophageal acid exposure during NAB was significantly shorter in group B (18 +/- 6 min) than in group A (42 +/- 9 min, P=0.04).

SUMMARY

Adding a bedtime H2-blocker to the treatment enhanced nocturnal gastric pH control and decreased NAB compared to the proton pump inhibitor b.d. regimen. A bedtime H2-blocker also decreased oesophageal acid exposure during NAB.

CONCLUSION

Adding a bedtime H2-blocker to a proton pump inhibitor b.d. regimen should be considered in patients who require continued nocturnal gastric acid control whilst taking proton pump inhibitor b.d.

Functional chest pain of esophageal origin: hyperalgesia or motor dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

Many patients with functional (noncardiac) chest pain exhibit both hypersensitivity and motor dysfunction of the esophageal wall. We aimed to determine whether the sensory or motor dysfunction plays an important role in the pathogenesis of chest pain.

METHODS

We performed graded balloon distentions of the esophagus using impedance planimetry in 16 consecutive patients with chest pain and otherwise normal cardiac and esophageal evaluations and in 13 healthy controls. In those patients who experienced chest pain with balloon distention, the test was repeated after atropine was given. Sensory and biomechanical parameters were measured.

RESULTS

Balloon distention reproduced typical chest pain in 13/16 patients (81%) and at lower (p < 0.01) sensory thresholds than controls. Pain was reproduced in all 13 patients and at lower (p < 0.05) sensory thresholds after atropine. Also, after atropine, the esophageal cross-sectional area and wall tension increased (p < 0.05), the tension/strain association shifted to the right (p < 0.05), and reactivity decreased (p < 0.002) relative to results before atropine or in healthy controls (i.e., the esophageal wall relaxed and became more deformable).

CONCLUSIONS

Even after relaxing the esophageal wall, most patients experienced chest pain and at lower sensory thresholds. Hence, hyperalgesia rather than motor dysfunction appears to be the predominant mechanism for functional chest pain of esophageal origin.

Chest pain of esophageal origin

Chest pain of esophageal origin or noncardiac chest pain is reported by at least a fifth of the general population. Recent literature focused on further understanding mechanisms of chest pain in subset of patients with functional chest pain of presumed esophageal origin. Studies have demonstrated concurrent visceral and somatic pain hypersensitivity, and amplified secondary allodynia, in patients with noncardiac chest pain (NCCP), suggesting central sensitization. Other studies have demonstrated abnormal cerebral processing of intraesophageal stimuli. However, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has remained the most common esophageal cause of NCCP. The introduction of the proton pump inhibitor test, a highly sensitive and cost-effective diagnostic strategy, simplified our diagnostic approach toward patients with GERD-related NCCP. For patients with positive proton-pump-inhibitor test results, long-term treatment with antireflux medication is warranted. For patients with non-GERD-related NCCP, pain modulators remain the cornerstone of therapy.

A critical approach to noncardiac chest pain: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment

Approximately 30% of coronary angiograms performed in this country are negative for significant coronary artery disease. These patients are classified as having noncardiac or unexplained chest pain (UCP). Despite the good overall prognosis, this condition has significant morbidity and costs. The pathophysiology of this condition is likely caused by overlapping cardiac, esophageal, and psychiatric abnormalities with visceral hyperalgesia playing a central role. Gastroenterologists are often consulted in the evaluation of these patients because esophageal disorders are among the most common conditions associated with UCP. However, clinical symptoms are unreliable in differentiating between esophageal and cardiac causes of UCP. Gastroesophageal reflux disease, not esophageal motility disorders, is the most common esophageal disorder present in patients with UCP. The most useful diagnostic test in the evaluation of UCP is 24-h pH monitoring. An initial empiric trial of high-dose acid suppression is the most cost-effective intervention in the management of these patients. A clinical algorithm is suggested for the evaluation and treatment of UCP.

Prior sensitization of esophageal mucosa by acid reflux predisposes to reflux-induced chest pain

Esophageal acid exposure is believed to be a major source of unexplained chest pain; but, individual episodes of reflux in pH study are not consistently associated with chest pain. Our aim was to discover whether prior sensitization of esophageal mucosa by acid reflux predisposes to reflux-induced chest pain. Ambulatory pH studies of patients referred to our laboratory from January 1991 to November 1996 with noncardiac chest pain was reviewed. We compared the frequency of esophageal acid exposure in the 30 minutes preceding chest pain episodes with a positive symptom/reflux association (+SRA) to reflux with the frequency of acid exposure in the 30 minutes preceding those chest pain episodes that were not associated with reflux negative symptom/reflux association (-SRA). We analyzed the time esophageal pH <4, symptom index (SI) defined as percentage of chest pain episodes associated with reflux in the preceding 5 minutes, and amount of reflux in the 30 minutes preceding each chest pain episode. Of 104 patients, 52 had chest pain during their pH study, 10 had high SI (> or =50%), and 42 had low SI (<50%). Those with a high SI were significantly more likely to have an abnormal pH study (p = 0.015). Chest pain associated with reflux in proceeding 5 minutes (+SRA) was strongly associated (p < 0.002) with additional reflux episodes in the preceding 25-minute period. Chest pain related to reflux is associated with sensitization of the esophageal mucosa by prior reflux events.

Functional Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)

Lack of endoscopic esophagitis does not exclude gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Ambulatory pH testing is also an imperfect standard, and patients with both a normal endoscopy and a normal pH test may still have symptoms produced by acid reflux. A therapeutic trial of acid suppression is often the best approach to these patients. Ideally, therapeutic trials should use a medication with a high degree of efficacy in the treatment of GERD to avoid a false-negative test. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the best currently available medical therapy for all forms of GERD. If the patient does not respond to a once daily PPI, options include increasing the dose of PPIs, and, perhaps, adding another class of agent or studying the patient with an ambulatory pH test. Patients with a negative endoscopy, negative pH test. and those who do not respond to an adequate trial of acid suppression are unlikely to benefit from antireflux surgery.