Definition of Barrett's esophagus: time for a rethink--is intestinal metaplasia dead?

Advanced precancerous lesions in the lower oesophageal mucosa: high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma in Barrett's oesophagus

Adenocarcinoma developed in Barrett's oesophagus is a tumour with an increasing incidence and still a poor prognosis. The only marker that can be used for surveillance remains dysplasia (intraepithelial neoplasia), especially when it is high-grade, that precedes intramucosal carcinoma. New forms of dysplasia have been described in complement to the classical intestinal type (foveolar dysplasia, basal crypt dysplasia). High-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma are diagnosed on biopsies taken during endoscopy. Standard endoscopy is now challenged by various techniques that represent recent major technical improvements (chromoendoscopy, virtual chromoendoscopy, optical frequency domain imaging, confocal laser endomicroscopy). In numerous cases, high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma can be treated by endoscopic procedures, allowing a precise histopathological diagnosis on the resected specimen (endoscopic mucosal resection, submucosal endoscopic dissection) or destroying the neoplastic tissue. Radiofrequency ablation is currently considered as the best available technique for treatment of flat high grade dysplasia and for eradication of residual Barrett's mucosa after focal endoscopic mucosal resection.

Differences in the Characteristics of Barrett's Esophagus and Barrett's Adenocarcinoma between the United States and Japan

In Europe and the United States, the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma has increased 6-fold in the last 25 years and currently accounts for more than 50% of all esophageal cancers. Barrett's esophagus is the source of Barrett's adenocarcinoma and is characterized by the replacement of squamous epithelium with columnar epithelium in the lower esophagus due to chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Even though the prevalence of GERD has recently been increasing in Japan as well as in Europe and the United States, the clinical situation of Barrett's esophagus and Barrett's adenocarcinoma differs from that in Western countries. In this paper, we focus on specific differences in the background factors and pathophysiology of these lesions.

GERD-Barrett-Adenocarcinoma: Do We Have Suitable Prognostic and Predictive Molecular Markers?

Due to unfavorable lifestyle habits (unhealthy diet and tobacco abuse) the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in western countries is increasing. The GERD-Barrett-Adenocarcinoma sequence currently lacks well-defined diagnostic, progressive, predictive, and prognostic biomarkers (i) providing an appropriate screening method identifying the presence of the disease, (ii) estimating the risk of evolving cancer, that is, the progression from Barrett's esophagus (BE) to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), (iii) predicting the response to therapy, and (iv) indicating an overall survival—prognosis for EAC patients. Based on histomorphological findings, detailed screening and therapeutic guidelines have been elaborated, although epidemiological studies could not support the postulated increasing progression rates of GERD to BE and EAC. Additionally, proposed predictive and prognostic markers are rather heterogeneous by nature, lack substantial proofs, and currently do not allow stratification of GERD patients for progression, outcome, and therapeutic effectiveness in clinical practice. The aim of this paper is to discuss the current knowledge regarding the GERD-BE-EAC sequence mainly focusing on the disputable and ambiguous status of proposed biomarkers to identify promising and reliable markers in order to provide more detailed insights into pathophysiological mechanisms and thus to improve prognostic and predictive therapeutic approaches.

[Screening for adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus: yes or no, when and how?]

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the main recognized risk factor for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). The incidence of this cancer and its associated mortality has increased in developed countries during the last few years. Detection of EAC at earlier stages could potentially improve survival dramatically in these patients, which is especially important as mortality from EAC remains high despite the available treatments. Therefore, endoscopic surveillance is an attractive option for patients with Barrett's esophagus. Consequently, periodic endoscopic surveillance is recommended by all the International Gastroenterology Societies in an attempt to detect EAC at an early and potentially curable stage. Currently, the frequency of endoscopic surveillance and its need in Barrett's esophagus with low-grade dysplasia or without dysplasia are under discussion. This review presents the available evidence in order to assist clinicians in the decision-making process.

Prevalence and predictors of columnar lined esophagus in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients undergoing upper endoscopy

OBJECTIVES

Chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a risk factor for Barrett's esophagus (BE), the most important surrogate marker for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). The need to document the presence of intestinal metaplasia in esophageal biopsies from a columnar lined esophagus (CLE) to diagnose BE is debated. The objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the prevalence and risk factors of CLE in a large cohort of GERD patients undergoing upper endoscopy.

METHODS

Consecutive patients presenting to the endoscopy unit at a tertiary referral center for their index upper endoscopy for evaluation of GERD symptoms were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Patients were asked to complete a validated GERD questionnaire that documents the onset of GERD symptoms (heartburn and acid regurgitation) and grades the frequency and severity of symptoms experienced over the past year. Demographic information, body mass index, and use of aspirin/nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs were recorded. Endoscopic details including length of CLE, presence and size of hiatal hernia were noted. Patients with CLE (cases) were compared with those without CLE (controls) using Fischer's exact test and t-test. All factors that were statistically significant (P<0.05) were then entered into stepwise logistic regression to evaluate for independent predictors of CLE.

RESULTS

A total of 1058 patients with GERD symptoms were prospectively enrolled. On index endoscopy, the prevalence of CLE was 23.3%, whereas of CLE with documented intestinal metaplasia was 14.1%. On univariate analysis, male gender, Caucasian race, heartburn duration of >5 years, presence and size of hiatal hernia were significantly associated with the presence of CLE compared with controls (P<0.05). On multivariate analysis, heartburn duration >5 years (odds ratio (OR): 1.50, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07-2.09, P=0.01), Caucasian race (OR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.42-4.03, P=0.001), and hiatal hernia (OR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.50-2.87, P<0.01) were found to be independent predictors for CLE. CLE length was significantly associated with the presence of intestinal metaplasia (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

If BE is defined by the presence of CLE alone on upper endoscopy, up to 25% of GERD patients are diagnosed with this lesion. Enrolling all these patients in surveillance programs would have significant ramifications on health-care resources.

Effects of dropping the requirement for goblet cells from the diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The 2011 American Gastroenterological Association diagnostic criteria for Barrett's esophagus (BE) require the presence of goblet cells in biopsy specimens of columnar mucosa within the esophagus. In other countries, patients can be diagnosed with BE based on evidence of columnar epithelium, regardless of the presence of goblet cells. We examined the effects that a broader criteria would have on diagnoses of patients with endoscopically suspected BE. We also compared the clinical outcomes of patients with and without goblet cells in esophageal biopsy samples.

METHODS

We analyzed the University of Chicago Medical Center database to identify 690 patients with no previous history of BE who underwent endoscopic biopsy analysis for BE from 1987 to 2008. We collected endoscopy reports, histology results, and chart reviews.

RESULTS

Of biopsy specimens analyzed, samples from 258 patients contained goblet cells and 379 did not (53 of the biopsy samples contained only squamous mucosa). Patients whose biopsy samples contained goblet cells had longer endoscopic columnar segments (mean, 4.6 cm) and more biopsy specimens taken (mean, 5 biopsy specimens) than those without (mean length, 1.6 cm; mean, 4 biopsy specimens). Of patients whose biopsy specimens did not contain goblet cells, 35% underwent additional endoscopy; goblet cells continued to be absent in 88% of these (mean follow-up time, 5.8 y; 2.8 additional procedures; mean total biopsy specimens, 12). Goblet cells were identified in only 19% of all patients with columnar mucosa less than 2 cm. No patient without goblet cells developed adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Decreasing the requirement for goblet cells would increase the diagnosis of BE by 147%. Among patients with short columnar segments, subsequent endoscopy generally does not reveal goblet cells, so the columnar mucosa might represent proximal stomach. Decreasing the requirement for goblet cells would cause many patients to be inaccurately labeled as BE.

Barrett esophagus: what a mouse model can teach us about human disease

The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is rapidly rising in the western world and accounts for 2% of all cancer-related deaths. The precursor lesion for EAC is Barrett esophagus (BE), which is strongly associated with gastresophageal reflux disease. A major limitation to the study of EAC has been the absence of tractable and genetically modifiable preclinical models of BE. A mouse model of BE and EAC that resembles human disease could provide novel insights into the origins and molecular pathogenesis of BE. In addition, validated animal models could help stratify BE patients given the limited predictive power of current standard endoscopic measures and clinical assessment. Here, we review the findings from recently developed mouse models of BE and EAC and their impact on clinical decision making, surveillance programs and therapeutic options. The data, taken together, suggest potential origins of BE from the gastric cardia, a role of bile acid and hypergatrinemia for carcinogenesis, a growing importance for columnar-like epithelium and a critical role for Notch signaling.

Diagnosis and management of Barrett’s metaplasia: What’s new

Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is a complication of gastroesophageal reflux disease, and a premalignant lesion for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Observational studies suggest that endoscopic surveillance is associated with the detection of dysplasia and EAC at an early stage along with improved survival, but controversies still remain. The management of patients with BE involves endoscopic surveillance, preventive and clinical measures for cancer, and endoscopic and surgical approaches to treatment. Deciding upon the most appropriate treatment is a challenge. This study presents the results and the effectiveness of these practices.

Barrett's esophagus: A review of diagnostic criteria, clinical surveillance practices and new developments

Barrett's esophagus is defined by metaplastic glandular changes to the distal esophagus and is linked to an increased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Controversy exists whether the definition should be limited to intestinal type glands with goblet cells or should be expanded to include non-goblet cell columnar epithelium. Barrett's esophagus may be asymptomatic in a large proportion of the population but screening should be considered for those with certain clinical findings. The diagnosis of Barrett's should be based on the combination of careful endoscopic evaluation and histologic review of the biopsy material. Continued surveillance biopsies may be necessary in cases of indeterminate or low grade dysplasia. Clinical follow-up of patients with high grade dysplasia should be tailored to the individual patient. Development of newer endoscopy techniques including chemoendoscopy, chromoendoscopy and use of biomarkers on frozen tissue have shown some promise of identifying patients at risk for malignancy.

Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of confocal laser endomicroscopy assessment of residual metaplasia after mucosal ablation or resection of GI neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic ablation is an accepted standard for neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus (BE). Eradication of all glandular mucosa in the distal esophagus cannot be reliably determined at endoscopy.

OBJECTIVE

To assess if use of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) in addition to high-definition white light (HDWL) could aid in determination of residual BE.

DESIGN

Prospective, multicenter, randomized, clinical trial.

SETTING

Academic medical centers.

PATIENTS

Patients with Barrett's esophagus undergoing ablation.

INTERVENTION

After an initial attempt at ablation, patients were followed-up either with HDWL endoscopy or HDWL plus pCLE, with treatment of residual metaplasia or neoplasia based on endoscopic findings and pCLE used to avoid overtreatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The proportion of optimally treated patients, defined as those with residual BE who were treated and had complete ablation plus those without BE who were not treated and had no evidence of disease at follow-up.

RESULTS

The study was halted at the planned interim analysis based on a priori criteria. After enrollment was halted, all patients who had been randomized were followed to study completion. Among the 119 patients with follow-up, there was no difference in the proportion of patients achieving optimal outcomes in the two groups (15/57, 26% for HDWL; 17/62, 27% with HDWL + pCLE). Other outcomes were similar in the two groups.

LIMITATIONS

The study was closed after the interim analysis due to low conditional power resulting from lack of difference between groups as well as higher-than-expected residual Barrett's esophagus in both arms.

CONCLUSION

This study yields no evidence that the addition of pCLE to HDWL imaging for detection of residual Barrett's esophagus or neoplasia can provide improved treatment.

[Barrett's esophagus. An update]

Barrett's esophagus (BE), a well-known complication of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), constitutes a precancerous condition for adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus. The so-called Barrett's carcinoma shows increasing incidences in countries of the western hemisphere; new data, however, indicate that the rise in incidence is not quite as dramatic as previously assumed. The definition of BE is currently changing: despite good reasons for a purely endoscopic definition of BE, goblet cells are still mandatory for this diagnosis in Germany and the USA. Dysplastic changes in the epithelium are the most important risk factor for the development of Barrett's adenocarcinoma and recently dysplasia was subclassified into a more frequent adenomatous (intestinal) and a non-adenomatous (gastric-foveolar) types. The gold standard for diagnosing dysplasia is still H&E staining. The histological diagnosis of dysplasia is still encumbered by a significant interobserver variability, especially regarding the differentiation between low grade dysplasia and inflammatory/reactive changes and the discrimination between high grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. Current data, however, show much higher interobserver agreement in endoscopic resection specimens than in biopsies. Nevertheless, the histological diagnosis of dysplasia should be corroborated by an external second opinion because of its clinical consequences. In endoscopic resections of early Barrett's adenocarcinoma, the pathological report has to include a risk stratification for the likelihood of lymphogenic metastases.

Columnar-lined oesophagus without intestinal metaplasia: results from a cohort with a mean follow-up of 7 years

BACKGROUND

The definition of Barrett's oesophagus lacks consensus, particularly the requirement of intestinal metaplasia for diagnosis. Scarce information exists on the prevalence and natural history of columnar-lined oesophagus without intestinal metaplasia.

AIM

To evaluate the demographics and natural history of columnar-lined oesophagus without intestinal metaplasia ≥ 2 cm in length.

METHODS

Patients with columnar-lined oesophagus ≥ 2 cm in length and no intestinal metaplasia in biopsy specimens from two consecutive endoscopies with at least a 1-year interval were prospectively followed. A cohort of Barrett's oesophagus patients was used as a control.

RESULTS

Columnar-lined oesophagus without intestinal metaplasia (n = 15) had a similar gender distribution, reflux symptoms prevalence and length as those of Barrett's oesophagus (n = 205). Patients were significantly younger (28.6 vs. 60 years, P < 0.0001) and accounted for 48% of patients aged <40 years in the two cohorts, but only 1% of those aged >40 years (P < 0.001). Patient distribution in both cohorts in 5 age brackets (0-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, and >50 years) was significantly different, except for patients aged 40-49 years. Intestinal metaplasia was documented in 60% of the cohort after a mean follow-up of 7.1 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Columnar-lined oesophagus without intestinal metaplasia ≥ 2 cm is infrequent in the setting of a systematic biopsy protocol, is associated with a younger age in comparison with Barrett's oesophagus, and appears to be an intermediate step between squamous and intestinal lining of the oesophagus.

Consensus statements for management of Barrett's dysplasia and early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma, based on a Delphi process

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) is increasingly common among patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE). We aimed to provide consensus recommendations based on the medical literature that clinicians could use to manage patients with BE and low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia (HGD), or early-stage EA.

METHODS

We performed an international, multidisciplinary, systematic, evidence-based review of different management strategies for patients with BE and dysplasia or early-stage EA. We used a Delphi process to develop consensus statements. The results of literature searches were screened using a unique, interactive, Web-based data-sifting platform; we used 11,904 papers to inform the choice of statements selected. An a priori threshold of 80% agreement was used to establish consensus for each statement.

RESULTS

Eighty-one of the 91 statements achieved consensus despite generally low quality of evidence, including 8 clinical statements: (1) specimens from endoscopic resection are better than biopsies for staging lesions, (2) it is important to carefully map the size of the dysplastic areas, (3) patients that receive ablative or surgical therapy require endoscopic follow-up, (4) high-resolution endoscopy is necessary for accurate diagnosis, (5) endoscopic therapy for HGD is preferred to surveillance, (6) endoscopic therapy for HGD is preferred to surgery, (7) the combination of endoscopic resection and radiofrequency ablation is the most effective therapy, and (8) after endoscopic removal of lesions from patients with HGD, all areas of BE should be ablated.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a data-sifting platform and used the Delphi process to create evidence-based consensus statements for the management of patients with BE and early-stage EA. This approach identified important clinical features of the diseases and areas for future studies.

Natural history of Barrett's esophagus

The natural history of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is difficult to quantify because, by definition, it should describe the course of the condition if left untreated. Pragmatically, we assume that patients with BE will receive symptomatic treatment with acid suppression, usually a proton pump inhibitor, to treat their heartburn. This paper describes the development of complications of stricture, ulcer, dysplasia and adenocarcinoma from this standpoint. Controversies over the definition of BE and its implications in clinical practice are presented. The presence of intestinal metaplasia and its relevance to cancer risk is discussed, and the need to measure the extent of the Barrett’s epithelium (long and short segments) using the Prague guidelines is emphasized. Guidelines and international consensus over the diagnosis and management of BE are being regularly updated. The need for expert consensus is important due to the lack of randomized trials in this area. After searching the literature, we have tried to collate the important studies regarding progression of Barrett’s to dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. No therapeutic studies yet reported show a clear reduction in the development of cancer in BE. The effect of pharmacological and surgical intervention on the natural history of Barrett’s is a subject of ongoing research, including the Barrett’s Oesophagus Surveillance Study and the aspirin and esomeprazole cancer chemoprevention trial with interesting results. The geographical variation and the wide range of outcomes highlight the difficulty of providing an individualized risk profile to patients with BE. Future studies on the interaction of genome wide abnormalities in Barrett’s and their interaction with environmental factors may allow individualization of the risk of cancer developing in BE.

Endoscopic therapies for Barrett's-associated dysplasia: a new paradigm for a new decade

The emergence of endoscopic therapies for Barrett's esophagus (BE)-associated dysplasia has significantly altered the management of this complex disease. Over the past decade, there has been a paradigm shift from that of pure surveillance to a more therapeutic approach in eradicating dysplastic BE. This strategy includes less invasive options than esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia and early eradication of confirmed low-grade dysplasia. Although multiple modalities exist for endoscopic therapy, endoscopic mucosal resection coupled with radiofrequency ablation appears to be the most effective therapy, with minimal complications. Recent advances in endoscopic eradication therapies for dysplastic BE have fueled excitement for a significant weapon against the rising incidence of esophageal cancer.

Endotherapy for Barrett's esophagus

Endotherapy is now the mainstay of therapy for Barrett's associated neoplasia. The approach should begin with confirmation of neoplasia by a gastrointestinal pathologist, patient counseling, and appropriate endoscopic work up. Detailed examination with high-resolution white light endoscopy is the most important tool for detection of neoplasia. Further validation studies are needed for many enhanced imaging modalities before being recommended as part of the standard work up and assessment of patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE). Endoscopic mucosal resection is required for any visible lesion in the setting of dysplasia for accurate histological diagnosis. The remainder of the epithelium may be treated with resection or ablative therapy, followed by adequate surveillance. Patients with nondysplastic Barrett's require further risk stratification before incorporation of ablative therapy for this population. The future will fortify the endoscopic role in Barrett's with validation trials for endoscopic assessment, further long-term results for each of the treatment modalities, potential risk stratification for patients with BE, and improved guidelines for surveillance after therapy.

Barrett's Esophagus: Emerging Knowledge and Management Strategies

The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has increased exponentially in the last 3 decades. Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the only known precursor of EAC. Patients with BE have a greater than 40 folds higher risk of EAC compared with the general population. Recent years have witnessed a revolution in the clinical and molecular research related to BE. However, several aspects of this condition remain controversial. Data regarding the true prevalence of BE have varied widely. Recent studies have suggested a lower incidence of EAC in nondysplastic BE (NDBE) than previously reported. There is paucity of prospective data showing a survival benefit of screening or surveillance for BE. Furthermore, the ever-increasing emphasis on healthcare cost containment has called for reexamination of the screening and surveillance strategies for BE. There is a need for identification of reliable clinical predictors or molecular biomarkers to risk-stratify patients who might benefit the most from screening or surveillance for BE. Finally, new therapies have emerged for the management of dysplastic BE. In this paper, we highlight the key areas of controversy and uncertainty surrounding BE. The paper discusses, in detail, the current literature about the molecular pathogenesis, biomarkers, histopathological diagnosis, and management strategies for BE.

Barrett's esophagus. Practical issues for daily routine diagnosis

Most clinicians and researchers agree that Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a precancerous condition which, however, is not easily defined. Whether goblet cells must be present or not is a matter of debate and definitions vary worldwide. Although the use of the term "columnar metaplasia" tends to circumvent these issues, it can also be subdivided into those with and without goblet cells. There is some evidence that Barrett's esophagus results from a multistep process in which goblet cells are a secondary event. Hence, Barrett's adenocarcinoma has recently been shown to originate from areas lacking goblet cells. The histological diagnosis of neoplasia is often hampered by marked interobserver variation. New endoscopic techniques allow for local resections of neoplasia with curative intent. Pathologists should know which pieces of information gastroenterologists need for management options: surveillance versus therapy such as endoscopic resection with or endoscopic ablation without histological specimen. The most important information for gastroenterologists is whether there is neoplasia or not; if any, they need to know the grade (low grade, high grade, carcinoma) and risk factors (vessel permeation, poor differentiation, resection complete in case of endoscopic resection, depth of infiltration).

Math1/Atoh1 contributes to intestinalization of esophageal keratinocytes by inducing the expression of Muc2 and Keratin-20

BACKGROUND

Esophageal intestinal metaplasia, also known as Barrett's esophagus, is the replacement of the normal epithelium with one that resembles the intestine morphologically. Generally, this includes intestinal mucin-secreting goblet cells. Barrett's esophagus is an important risk factor for adenocarcinoma development. In-vitro models for Barrett's esophagus have not, to date, focused on the induction of goblet cells in Barrett's epithelium.

AIMS

To explore the contribution of Math1/Atoh1 to induction of Barrett's esophagus and intestinal mucin-secreting goblet cells from normal human esophageal epithelium.

METHODS

We explored the level and pattern of Math1/Atoh1 mRNA and protein expression in human Barrett's esophagus. Then, using retroviral-mediated gene expression, we induced Math1 mRNA and protein expression in a human esophageal keratinocyte cell line. We evaluated the effects of this ectopic Math1 expression on cell proliferation and gene expression patterns in cells cultured under two-dimensional and three-dimensional tissue-engineering conditions.

RESULTS

Math1/Atoh1 mRNA and protein are detected in human Barrett's esophagus specimens, but the mRNA levels vary substantially. In the keratinocyte expression studies, we observed that Math1/Atoh1 ectopic expression significantly reduced cell proliferation and altered cell morphology. Moreover, Math1/Atoh1 expression is associated with a more intestinalized gene expression pattern that is distinct from that reported in after studies using other intestinal transcription factors. Most significantly, we observe the induction of the Barrett's esophagus markers Mucin-2 and Keratin-20 with Math1/Atoh1 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that ectopic Math1/Atoh1 expression makes unique contributions to intestinalization of the esophageal epithelium in Barrett's esophagus.

Bile acid and inflammation activate gastric cardia stem cells in a mouse model of Barrett-like metaplasia

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) arises from Barrett esophagus (BE), intestinal-like columnar metaplasia linked to reflux esophagitis. In a transgenic mouse model of BE, esophageal overexpression of interleukin-1β phenocopies human pathology with evolution of esophagitis, Barrett-like metaplasia and EAC. Histopathology and gene signatures closely resembled human BE, with upregulation of TFF2, Bmp4, Cdx2, Notch1, and IL-6. The development of BE and EAC was accelerated by exposure to bile acids and/or nitrosamines, and inhibited by IL-6 deficiency. Lgr5(+) gastric cardia stem cells present in BE were able to lineage trace the early BE lesion. Our data suggest that BE and EAC arise from gastric progenitors due to a tumor-promoting IL-1β-IL-6 signaling cascade and Dll1-dependent Notch signaling.

Barrett's esophagus: prevalence-incidence and etiology-origins

Although the prevalence of Barrett's esophagus (BE) is rising no data exist for racial minorities on prevalence in the general population. Minorities have a lower prevalence than Caucasians, and yet age, smoking, abdominal obesity, and Helicobacter pylori are all risk factors. Metabolic changes induced by adipocytokines and the apparently strong association between obesity, central adiposity, and BE may lead to reconsideration of some aspects of the natural history of BE. There is lack of experimental evidence on acid sensitivity and BE, which is hyposensitive compared to esophageal reflux disease. Reactive nitrogen and oxygen species lead to impaired expression of tumor suppressor genes, which can lead to cancer development; thus, antioxidants may be protective. Gastroesophageal reflux disease may be considered an immune-mediated disease starting at the submucosal layer; the cytokine profile of the mucosal immune response may explain the different outcome of gastroesophageal reflux.

MUC2 is a highly specific marker of goblet cell metaplasia in the distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction

Currently, the American College of Gastroenterology requires identification of goblet cells in mucosal biopsies from the esophagus to diagnose Barrett esophagus (BE). Identification of goblet cells in mucosal biopsies is fraught with limitations such as sampling and interpretation error. One previous study by our group suggested that MUC2 expression in esophageal nongoblet columnar cells represents a late biochemical reaction in the conversion of mucinous columnar cells to goblet cells in BE. We conducted this study to evaluate the prevalence, sensitivity, and specificity of MUC2 positivity in nongoblet columnar epithelium for detection of goblet cells in the distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) region. We also sought to identify associations between MUC2 positivity and clinical and endoscopic risk factors for BE. This analysis utilized mucosal biopsies of the distal esophagus or GEJ from 100 patients who participated in a community clinic-based study of patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease evaluated prospectively in the western part of Washington state. We randomly selected 50 patients who had columnar epithelium with goblet cells, representing the study group and 50 patients without goblet cells, representing the comparison group. Immunohistochemistry for MUC2 was performed on samples in a blinded manner without knowledge of the clinical or endoscopic features of the patients. The presence of staining was noted in both goblet and nongoblet epithelium, both close to and distant from the mucosa with goblet cells, when the latter were present. All study patients showed MUC2 positivity in goblet cells. MUC2 was present in nongoblet columnar epithelium in 78% of study patients with goblet cells, but in only 4% of controls without goblet cells (P<0.0001) (sensitivity, 78%; specificity, 96% for goblet cell metaplasia). MUC2 was significantly more common in nongoblet columnar cells close to, rather than distant from, the mucosa with goblet cells (P<0.00001). Finally, MUC2 was significantly associated with endoscopic evidence of columnar metaplasia in the distal esophagus, and with known risk factors for BE, such as older age, white race, frequent heartburn, and elevated body mass index. We conclude that goblet cells likely develop from a field of MUC2-positive mucinous columnar cells, and as such, MUC2 represents a late event in the development of goblet cells. MUC2 staining in nongoblet columnar cells is a reasonably sensitive and highly specific marker for goblet cells in the distal esophagus and GEJ, and its presence is predictive of endoscopic columnar metaplasia of the esophagus, even in patients without goblet cells.

What the gastroenterologist needs to know about the histology of Barrett's esophagus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to provide clinicians with an up-to-date summary of the terminology, classification, biological characteristics, and limitations of pathology regarding Barrett's esophagus and associated neoplastic precursor lesions in order to optimize decision making when evaluating patients with this disorder.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review summarizes some of the advancements and controversies regarding the definition and diagnostic criteria for Barrett's esophagus, difficulties that arise when trying to differentiate esophageal versus gastric epithelium in gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) biopsies, the histology and biology of nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus including columnar metaplasia without goblet cells, and the limitations and diagnostic variability in interpretation of conventional and nonconventional types of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

SUMMARY

The definition of Barrett's esophagus is controversial, particularly with regard to the need to identify goblet cells in esophageal biopsies. In most cases, morphologic evaluation of GEJ biopsies cannot help distinguish whether the columnar epithelium comes from the distal esophagus versus the proximal stomach. Metaplastic esophageal columnar epithelium that does not contain goblet cells nevertheless is biologically intestinalized, shows molecular abnormalities, and has been shown to be at risk for progression to cancer, but the magnitude of that risk is unknown. Interobserver agreement on the presence, grade, and type of dysplasia remains moderate at best, particularly in light of the recent recognition of nonconventional types of dysplasia, such as foveolar, serrated, and early crypt dysplasia, which make interpretation difficult. Close cooperation between clinicians and pathologists is essential in order to ensure proper interpretation of biopsy results and to provide optimal surveillance and treatment decisions.

Inter-endoscopist agreement in diagnosis of Barrett's oesophagus

OBJECTIVE

To assess how interpretation of abnormalities at the oesophago-gastric junction (OGJ) when making a diagnosis of Barrett's oesophagus (BO) varies between endoscopists and to examine the impact of the endoscopy experience on these decisions.

DESIGN/SETTING

Members of the Irish Society of Gastroenterology who regularly perform gastroscopy were invited to participate in a web based image assessment study.

INTERVENTIONS

Questions were posed to ascertain level of endoscopy experience, and participants were asked to indicate the presence or absence of BO in 12 endoscopic images of the OGJ.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome was overall level of agreement in responses and relationship to endoscopy experience.

RESULTS

The responses of 65 clinicians regularly performing gastroscopy were analysed. In 3/12 images, showing typical long segment BO, there was a strong consensus on the endoscopic diagnosis (>95% agreement). However, agreement was fair to poor (κ for multiple raters, 0.31) on the presence or absence of short BO segments at endoscopy. Minimal differences were observed between experienced endoscopists (individuals with >10 years' endoscopy experience) and less experienced counterparts in the threshold for BO diagnosis. Inter-endoscopist agreement overall was not significantly better within the more experienced group.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates low interobserver agreement in endoscopic diagnosis of (short segment) BO, even among experienced endoscopists. Given the costs associated with endoscopic surveillance of BO, prompt efforts to promote consensus diagnosis and improve agreement are required as an important quality improvement measure in this area.

Risk of malignant progression in Barrett's esophagus patients: results from a large population-based study

BACKGROUND

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a premalignant lesion that predisposes to esophageal adenocarcinoma. However, the reported incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with BE varies widely. We examined the risk of malignant progression in patients with BE using data from the Northern Ireland Barrett's esophagus Register (NIBR), one of the largest population-based registries of BE worldwide, which includes every adult diagnosed with BE in Northern Ireland between 1993 and 2005.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We followed 8522 patients with BE, defined as columnar lined epithelium of the esophagus with or without specialized intestinal metaplasia (SIM), until the end of 2008. Patients with incident adenocarcinomas of the esophagus or gastric cardia or with high-grade dysplasia of the esophagus were identified by matching the NIBR with the Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, and deaths were identified by matching with records from the Registrar General's Office. Incidence of cancer outcomes or high-grade dysplasia was calculated as events per 100 person-years (% per year) of follow-up, and Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine incidence by age, sex, length of BE segment, presence of SIM, macroscopic BE, or low-grade dysplasia. All P values were from two-sided tests.

RESULTS

After a mean of 7.0 years of follow-up, 79 patients were diagnosed with esophageal cancer, 16 with cancer of the gastric cardia, and 36 with high-grade dysplasia. In the entire cohort, incidence of esophageal or gastric cardia cancer or high-grade dysplasia combined was 0.22% per year (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.19% to 0.26%). SIM was found in 46.0% of patients. In patients with SIM, the combined incidence was 0.38% per year (95% CI = 0.31 to 0.46%). The risk of cancer was statistically significantly elevated in patients with vs without SIM at index biopsy (0.38% per year vs 0.07% per year; hazard ratio [HR] = 3.54, 95% CI = 2.09 to 6.00, P < .001), in men compared with women (0.28% per year vs 0.13% per year; HR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.41 to 3.16, P < .001), and in patients with low-grade dysplasia compared with no dysplasia (1.40% per year vs 0.17% per year; HR = 5.67, 95% CI = 3.77 to 8.53, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

We found the risk of malignant progression among patients with BE to be lower than previously reported, suggesting that currently recommended surveillance strategies may not be cost-effective.

The minimal incubation period from the onset of Barrett's oesophagus to symptomatic adenocarcinoma

Background:

The interval between the onset of Barrett's oesophagus (BO) and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) can be termed the incubation period. However, the unrecorded onset of BO precludes its direct observation.

Methods:

Determining the range of intervals between BO diagnosis and OAC within the longest observational BO follow-up study. Exclusion criteria were presence of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or OAC at baseline, death within <2 years of BO diagnosis, oesophagectomy without HGD/OAC and loss to follow-up. A total of 133 patients (M/F 73/60) were taken into account.

Results:

In 1967 person years of follow-up there were 13 cases of HGD/OAC, (0.66% p.a.; 95% CI 0.58–0.74), 96 patients died without HGD/OAC and 24 survived without HGD/OAC. The mean intervals between BO diagnosis and either HGD/OAC, death or end of follow-up were 10.8, 12.6 and 25.5 years, respectively, and the mean ages at endpoint were 72.5, 80.0 and 68.3 years, respectively. The survivors without HGD/OAC had a lower age at BO diagnosis (mean 42.8 vs 61.2 and 67.4 years, P<0.001). Baseline presence of low-grade dysplasia was associated with progression to HGD/OAC (log rank P<0.001).

Conclusion:

The Rotterdam BO follow-up cohort revealed a long incubation period between onset of BO and development of HGD/OAC, in patients without HGD/OAC at baseline as illustrated by 24 patients diagnosed with BO at a young age and followed for a mean period of 25.5 years. Their tumour-free survival established a minimum incubation period, suggesting a true incubation period of three decades or more.

Outcomes of Barrett's oesophagus related to systemic sclerosis: a 3-year EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research prospective follow-up study

OBJECTIVE

Barrett's oesophagus (BE) is the major risk factor for oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). SSc is associated with an increased risk of BE related to chronic reflux. The aim of this study is to determine the outcomes of BE and estimate the EAC risk in SSc patients over a 3-year prospective study.

METHODS

SSc patients were recruited through EUSTAR network centres. Inclusion criterion was a recent histological finding of BE. The patients were then prospectively followed and, as recommended, a second oesophageal endoscopy was performed according to the presence of BE-related dysplasia at baseline.

RESULTS

A total of 50 SSc patients with BE (40 without and 10 with dysplasia) were included and 46 completed the follow-up (138 patient-years). During the 3-year follow-up, 4 of the 46 BE patients (3% per year) were diagnosed with high-grade dysplasia/EAC, of which one developed cardial EAC. EAC incidence in the BE subgroup with dysplasia increased to 4% per year compared with the absence of EAC cases in the BE subgroup without dysplasia at baseline.

CONCLUSION

Our results, in accordance with previous published data suggesting an increased risk of EAC or cardial adenocarcinoma in SSc, highlight the need for accurate follow-up of BE SSc patients at risk of developing adenocarcinoma.

Microscopic esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus: the histology report

Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common digestive disease in industrialized countries (Europe and North America) and is associated with microscopic changes in the squamous epithelium. However, biopsy is not presently included in the routine diagnostic flow chart of GERD. In contrast, esophageal biopsy is mandatory when diagnosing Barrett's esophagus. High quality histology reports are necessary to provide information on diagnosis and can also be important for research and epidemiological studies. It has been evident for decades that pathology reports vary between institutions and even within a single institution. Standardization of reporting is the best way to ensure that information necessary for patient management is included in pathology reports. This paper details the histological criteria for diagnosing GERD-associated microscopic esophagitis, other forms of esophagitis with specific features and columnar metaplasia in the lower esophagus (Barrett's esophagus). It provides a detailed description of appropriate sampling criteria, individual lesions and how they contribute to the histology report.

Barrett's esophagus: A historical perspective, an update on core practicalities and predictions on future evolutions of management

Interpretation of exploding knowledge about Barrett's esophagus is impaired by use of several conflicting definitions. Because any histological type of esophageal columnar metaplasia carries risk for esophageal adenocarcinoma, the diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus should no longer require demonstration of intestinal-type metaplasia. Endoscopic recognition and grading of Barrett's esophagus remains a significant source of ambiguity. Reflux disease is a key factor for development of Barrett's esophagus, but other factors must underlie its development, since it occurs in only a minority of reflux disease patients. Neither antireflux surgery nor proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy has major impacts on cancer risk. Within a year, a major trial should indicate whether low-dose aspirin usefully reduces cancer risk. The best referral centers have transformed the accuracy of screening and surveillance for early curable esophageal adenocarcinoma by use of enhanced and novel endoscopic imaging, visually-guided, rather than blind biopsies and by partnership with expert pathologists. General endoscopists now need to upgrade their skills and equipment so that they can rely mainly on visual targeting of biopsies on mucosal areas of concern in their surveillance practice. General pathologists need to greatly improve their interpretation of biopsies. Endoscopic therapy now achieves very high rates of cure of high-grade dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma with minimal morbidity and risk. Such results will only be achieved by skilled interventional endoscopists. Esophagectomy should now be mainly restricted to patients whose cancer has extended into and beyond the submucosa. Weighing risks and benefits in the management of Barrett's esophagus is difficult, as is the process of adequately informing patients about their specific cancer risk.

Barrett's esophagus: Clinical issues

Barrett's esophagus has been defined conceptually as the condition in which any extent of metaplastic columnar epithelium that predisposes to cancer development replaces the stratified squamous epithelium that normally lines the distal esophagus. The condition develops as a consequence of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Barrett's metaplasia has clinical importance primarily because of its malignant predisposition, and virtually all of the contentious clinical issues in Barrett's esophagus are related in some way to its cancer risk. This article considers some key clinical issues that impact the management of patients with Barrett's esophagus.

Barrett's esophagus surveillance: When, how often, does it work?

Barrett's esophagus is a well-known risk factor for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Current practice guidelines recommend endoscopic surveillance of patients with Barrett's esophagus in an attempt to detect cancer at an early and potentially curable stage. This review addresses the rationale behind surveillance and criteria for inclusion of patients in surveillance programs as well as the appropriate technique and intervals that should be used. This work addresses other key topics in Barrett's esophagus surveillance, including the efficacy of surveillance programs, physician compliance with surveillance guidelines, cost-effectiveness of surveillance programs, and areas for future research.

Biomarkers in Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: Predictors of progression and prognosis

Barrett’s esophagus is a well-known premalignant lesion of the lower esophagus that is characterized by intestinal metaplasia of the squamous epithelium. It is clinically important due to the increased risk (0.5% per annum) of progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA), which has a poor outcome unless diagnosed early. The current clinical management of Barrett’s esophagus is hampered by the lack of accurate predictors of progression. In addition, when patients develop EA, the current staging modalities are limited in stratifying patients into different prognostic groups in order to guide the optimal therapy for an individual patient. Biomarkers have the potential to improve radically the clinical management of patients with Barrett’s esophagus and EA but have not yet entered mainstream clinical practice. This is in contrast to other cancers like breast and prostate for which biomarkers are utilized routinely to inform clinical decisions. This review aims to highlight the most promising predictive and prognostic biomarkers in Barrett’s esophagus and EA and to discuss what is required to move the field forward towards clinical application.

A national study of Helicobactor pylori infection in gastric biopsy specimens

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We investigated whether infection with Helicobacter pylori and signs of chronic active gastritis and intestinal metaplasia in gastric biopsy samples were inversely associated with Barrett's metaplasia.

METHODS

We studied gastric biopsy samples from 78,985 unique patients. Histologic findings were correlated with sociodemographic patient characteristics using multivariate logistic regression to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

H pylori infection, chronic active gastritis, and intestinal metaplasia had similar epidemiologic patterns. The presence of each, based on histology analyses, was significantly associated with that of the others. They were also characterized by similar geographic distributions within the United States. All 3 disorders were more common among men and among Medicaid patients (compared with those with other insurance) and were inversely associated with Barrett's metaplasia (less frequent in patients with Barrett's metaplasia).

CONCLUSIONS

H pylori infection and associated disorders, such as chronic active gastritis and intestinal metaplasia, are inversely associated with Barrett's metaplasia.

Diagnostic challenges in the pathologic evaluation of Barrett esophagus

CONTEXT

Barrett esophagus represents an unstable epithelium resulting from chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Patients with Barrett esophagus routinely undergo endoscopic examination to detect dysplasia and early carcinoma. Although appropriate classification of Barrett esophagus and neoplasia is usually straightforward, persistent esophageal inflammation may induce epithelial changes that mimic, or mask, dysplasia. Recent data also indicate that specific molecular changes occur in nondysplastic Barrett mucosa and herald the development of dysplasia and/or carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE

To describe problematic aspects of biopsy interpretation in tissue samples of the gastroesophageal junction and distal esophagus, including the diagnostic criteria for Barrett esophagus, the importance of the gastric cardia, and pitfalls to the diagnosis of dysplasia. Ancillary studies that have recently emerged as potential adjuncts to the evaluation of patients with Barrett esophagus will be briefly discussed.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive review of the relevant literature indexed in PubMed (National Library of Medicine) was performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Barrett esophagus is currently defined as the presence of intestinal metaplasia in samples obtained from an endoscopically evident abnormality in the distal esophagus. Diagnosis and grading of dysplasia in mucosal biopsies remain the most reliable method to assess risk for neoplastic progression, but its classification may be hindered by superimposed inflammatory changes and suffers from considerable interobserver variability. Therefore, immunohistochemical studies and molecular assessment for TP53, CDKN2A , and DNA content abnormalities have emerged as potential adjuncts to the detection of dysplasia.

Controversies in the diagnosis of Barrett esophagus and Barrett-related dysplasia: one pathologist's perspective

CONTEXT

athologists frequently assess esophageal biopsy specimens to “rule out Barrett esophagus,” as well as to assess for the presence or absence of dysplasia.

OBJECTIVE

To review some of the recent controversies in the diagnosis of Barrett esophagus and Barrett-related dysplasia.

DATA SOURCES

Sources were the author's experience and review of the English literature from 1978 to 2009.

CONCLUSIONS

Although goblet cells are required by the American College of Gastroenterology to confirm a diagnosis of Barrett esophagus, this definition might expand to include columnar-lined esophagus without goblet cells. The recognition of dysplasia in Barrett esophagus remains a difficult task for the surgical pathologist, with difficulties in distinguishing reactive epithelium from dysplasia, low-grade dysplasia from high-grade dysplasia, and even high-grade dysplasia from intramucosal adenocarcinoma.

The case for endoscopic treatment of non-dysplastic and low-grade dysplastic Barrett's esophagus

Non-dysplastic mucosa (ND-) in Barrett's esophagus (BE) shows clonal molecular aberrations, loss of cell cycle control, and other features of "neoplasia." These changes occur prior to morphologic expression of neoplasia (dysplasia). Morphologic evaluation of dysplasia is fraught with error, and, as a result, often leads to false-negative and false-positive diagnoses. Early "crypt dysplasia" is difficult to detect, and is often missed in routine biopsy specimens. Some studies show substantial progression rates of low-grade dysplasia (LGD), and crypt dysplasia, to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Dysplasia, even when fully developed, may, in certain circumstances, be difficult to differentiate from non-dysplastic (regenerating) BE. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a safe and effective method for removing mucosa at risk of cancer. Given the difficulties of dysplasia assessment in mucosal biopsies, and the molecular characteristics of ND-BE, this technique should be considered for treatment of all BE patients, including those with ND or LGD. Post-ablation neo-squamous epithelium reveals no molecular abnormalities, and is biologically stable. Given that prospective randomized controlled trials of ablative therapy for ND-BE aiming at reducing EAC incidence and mortality are unlikely to be completed in the near future, endoscopic ablation is a valid management option. The success of RFA in achieving safe, uniform, reliable, and predictable elimination of BE allows surgeons to combine fundoplication with RFA. Currently, there is no type of treatment for dysplastic or non-dysplastic BE that achieves a complete response in 100% of patients, eliminates all risk of developing cancer, results in zero adverse events, is less expensive in terms of absolute costs than surveillance, is durable for 20+ years, or eliminates the need for surveillance. Regardless, RFA shows established safety, efficacy, durability, and cost-effective profiles that should be considered in the management of patients with non-dysplastic or low-grade dysplastic BE.

Foveolar type dysplasia in Barrett esophagus

Adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus and esophagogastric junction is increasing in incidence in Western countries. A metaplasia (Barrett esophagus)-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence induced by gastroesophageal reflux disease is established. Two patterns of Barrett dysplasias have been described-adenomatous (type 1) and non-adenomatous (type 2 or foveolar/hyperplastic type). Interestingly, little is known about non-adenomatous dysplasia. Esophagogastrectomy cases from 41 patients with glandular dysplasia with and without associated invasive adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus were evaluated for expression of MUC2, MUC5AC, CDX2, villin, Ki67 and p53. Results were correlated with sub-classification of the dysplasia into morphologic patterns of adenomatous vs foveolar vs hybrid type. In addition, clinicopathological parameters including the presence and extent of background intestinal metaplasia were also evaluated. Foveolar type dysplasia was present in 46% of the cases and thus, was more common than adenomatous type or hybrid type (both approximately 27%) dysplasia. Immunohistochemistry confirmed the histological stratification in all cases. Foveolar type dysplasia commonly expressed MUC5AC (P<0.12) but was consistently negative for markers of intestinal differentiation, MUC2, CDX2 and villin (all P<0.01). By contrast, adenomatous type dysplasia frequently displayed intestinal differentiation markers (all P<0.0001) Hybrid-type dysplasia was similar to adenomatous type dysplasia in showing expression of intestinal differentiation markers (P<0.01) and therefore could not be sustained as a separate category. In conclusion, our study provides evidence for a non intestinal pathway to neoplastic development in Barrett esophagus, that is, gastric metaplasia-foveolar dysplasia-adenocarcinoma.

History, molecular mechanisms, and endoscopic treatment of Barrett's esophagus

This report is an adjunct to the American Gastroenterological Association Institute's medical position statement and technical review on the management of Barrett's esophagus, which will be published in the near future. Those documents will consider a number of broad questions on the diagnosis, clinical features, and management of patients with Barrett's esophagus, and the reader is referred to the technical review for an in-depth discussion of those topics. In this report, we review historical, molecular, and endoscopic therapeutic aspects of Barrett's esophagus that are of interest to clinicians and researchers.

Cdx genes, inflammation, and the pathogenesis of intestinal metaplasia

Intestinal metaplasia (IM) is a biologically interesting and clinically relevant condition in which one differentiated type of epithelium is replaced by another that is morphologically similar to normal intestinal epithelium. Two classic examples of this are gastric IM and Barrett's esophagus (BE). In both, a chronic inflammatory microenvironment, provoked either by Helicobacter pylori infection of the stomach or acid and bile reflux into the esophagus, precedes the metaplasia. The Caudal-related homeodomain transcription factors Cdx1 and Cdx2 are critical regulators of the normal intestinal epithelial cell phenotype. Ectopic expression of Cdx1 and Cdx2 occurs in both gastric IM as well as in BE. This expression precedes the onset of the metaplasia and implies a causal role for these factors in this process. We review the observations regarding the role of chronic inflammation and the Cdx transcription factors in the pathogenesis of gastric IM and BE.