51
|
Bramer WM, Giustini D, Kramer BMR. Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study. Syst Rev 2016; 5:39. [PMID: 26932789 PMCID: PMC4772334 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-016-0215-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2015] [Accepted: 02/20/2016] [Indexed: 03/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previously, we reported on the low recall of Google Scholar (GS) for systematic review (SR) searching. Here, we test our conclusions further in a prospective study by comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of SR search strategies previously performed in Embase, MEDLINE, and GS. METHODS The original search results from Embase and MEDLINE and the first 1000 results of GS for librarian-mediated SR searches were recorded. Once the inclusion-exclusion process for the resulting SR was complete, search results from all three databases were screened for the SR's included references. All three databases were then searched post hoc for included references not found in the original search results. RESULTS We checked 4795 included references from 120 SRs against the original search results. Coverage of GS was high (97.2 %) but marginally lower than Embase and MEDLINE combined (97.5 %). MEDLINE on its own achieved 92.3 % coverage. Total recall of Embase/MEDLINE combined was 81.6 % for all included references, compared to GS at 72.8 % and MEDLINE alone at 72.6 %. However, only 46.4 % of the included references were among the downloadable first 1000 references in GS. When examining data for each SR, the traditional databases' recall was better than GS, even when taking into account included references listed beyond the first 1000 search results. Finally, precision of the first 1000 references of GS is comparable to searches in Embase and MEDLINE combined. CONCLUSIONS Although overall coverage and recall of GS are high for many searches, the database does not achieve full coverage as some researchers found in previous research. Further, being able to view only the first 1000 records in GS severely reduces its recall percentages. If GS would enable the browsing of records beyond the first 1000, its recall would increase but not sufficiently to be used alone in SR searching. Time needed to screen results would also increase considerably. These results support our assertion that neither GS nor one of the other databases investigated, is on its own, an acceptable database to support systematic review searching.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wichor M Bramer
- Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Medical Library, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Dean Giustini
- The University of British Columbia, UBC Biomedical Branch Library, Gordon and Leslie Diamond Health Care Centre, 2775 Laurel Street, Floor 2, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1 M9, Canada.
| | - Bianca M R Kramer
- Utrecht University Library, PO Box 80125, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Grams ME, Sang Y, Levey AS, Matsushita K, Ballew S, Chang AR, Chow EK, Kasiske BL, Kovesdy CP, Nadkarni GN, Shalev V, Segev DL, Coresh J, Lentine KL, Garg AX. Kidney-Failure Risk Projection for the Living Kidney-Donor Candidate. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:411-21. [PMID: 26544982 PMCID: PMC4758367 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1510491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 302] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evaluation of candidates to serve as living kidney donors relies on screening for individual risk factors for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). To support an empirical approach to donor selection, we developed a tool that simultaneously incorporates multiple health characteristics to estimate a person's probable long-term risk of ESRD if that person does not donate a kidney. METHODS We used risk associations from a meta-analysis of seven general population cohorts, calibrated to the population-level incidence of ESRD and mortality in the United States, to project the estimated long-term incidence of ESRD among persons who do not donate a kidney, according to 10 demographic and health characteristics. We then compared 15-year projections with the observed risk among 52,998 living kidney donors in the United States. RESULTS A total of 4,933,314 participants from seven cohorts were followed for a median of 4 to 16 years. For a 40-year-old person with health characteristics that were similar to those of age-matched kidney donors, the 15-year projections of the risk of ESRD in the absence of donation varied according to race and sex; the risk was 0.24% among black men, 0.15% among black women, 0.06% among white men, and 0.04% among white women. Risk projections were higher in the presence of a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, higher albuminuria, hypertension, current or former smoking, diabetes, and obesity. In the model-based lifetime projections, the risk of ESRD was highest among persons in the youngest age group, particularly among young blacks. The 15-year observed risks after donation among kidney donors in the United States were 3.5 to 5.3 times as high as the projected risks in the absence of donation. CONCLUSIONS Multiple demographic and health characteristics may be used together to estimate the projected long-term risk of ESRD among living kidney-donor candidates and to inform acceptance criteria for kidney donors. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan E. Grams
- Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Yingying Sang
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Andrew S. Levey
- Division of Nephrology at Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kunihiro Matsushita
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shoshana Ballew
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alex R. Chang
- Division of Nephrology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Eric K.H. Chow
- Departments of Surgery and Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Bertram L. Kasiske
- Department of Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Csaba P. Kovesdy
- Memphis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Memphis, TN, USA
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Girish N. Nadkarni
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Varda Shalev
- Medical Division, Maccabi Healthcare Services and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Dorry L. Segev
- Departments of Surgery and Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Josef Coresh
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Krista L. Lentine
- Centers for Abdominal Transplantation and Outcomes Research, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Amit X. Garg
- Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Janki S, Klop KWJ, Kimenai HJAN, van de Wetering J, Weimar W, Massey EK, Dehghan A, Rizopoulos D, Völzke H, Hofman A, Ijzermans JNM. LOng-term follow-up after liVE kidney donation (LOVE) study: a longitudinal comparison study protocol. BMC Nephrol 2016; 17:14. [PMID: 26830198 PMCID: PMC4736233 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-016-0227-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2016] [Accepted: 01/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The benefits of live donor kidney transplantation must be balanced against the potential harm to the donor. Well-designed prospective studies are needed to study the long-term consequences of kidney donation. Methods The “LOng-term follow-up after liVE kidney donation” (LOVE) study is a single center longitudinal cohort study on long-term consequences after living kidney donation. We will study individuals who have donated a kidney from 1981 through 2010 in the Erasmus University Medical Center in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. In this time period, 1092 individuals donated a kidney and contact information is available for all individuals. Each participating donor will be matched (1:4) to non-donors derived from the population-based cohort studies of the Rotterdam Study and the Study of Health in Pomerania. Matching will be based on baseline age, gender, BMI, ethnicity, kidney function, blood pressure, pre-existing co-morbidity, smoking, the use of alcohol and highest education degree. Follow-up data is collected on kidney function, kidney-related comorbidity, mortality, quality of life and psychological outcomes in all participants. Discussion This study will provide evidence on the long-term consequences of live kidney donation for the donor compared to matched non-donors and evaluate the current donor eligibility criteria. Trial registration Dutch Trial Register NTR3795.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiromani Janki
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Karel W J Klop
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Hendrikus J A N Kimenai
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Jacqueline van de Wetering
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus University Medical Center, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Willem Weimar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus University Medical Center, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Emma K Massey
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus University Medical Center, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Abbas Dehghan
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Dimitris Rizopoulos
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus University Medical Center, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Henry Völzke
- Ernst Moritz Arndt University Greifswald, Institute for Community Medicine, Walther-Rathenau-Straße 48, D-17475, Greifswald, Germany.
| | - Albert Hofman
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Jan N M Ijzermans
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Taler SJ, Textor SC. Living Kidney Donor Criteria Based on Blood Pressure, Body Mass Index, and Glucose: Age-Stratified Decision-Making in the Absence of Hard Data. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-016-0091-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
55
|
Sutherland AI, IJzermans JNM, Forsythe JLR, Dor FJMF. Kidney and liver transplantation in the elderly. Br J Surg 2015; 103:e62-72. [PMID: 26662845 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2015] [Accepted: 10/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transplant surgery is facing a shortage of deceased donor organs. In response, the criteria for organ donation have been extended, and an increasing number of organs from older donors are being used. For recipients, the benefits of transplantation are great, and the growing ageing population has led to increasing numbers of elderly patients being accepted for transplantation. METHODS The literature was reviewed to investigate the impact of age of donors and recipients in abdominal organ transplantation, and to highlight aspects of the fine balance in donor and recipient selection and screening, as well as allocation policies fair to young and old alike. RESULTS Overall, kidney and liver transplantation from older deceased donors have good outcomes, but are not as good as those from younger donors. Careful donor selection based on risk indices, and potentially biomarkers, special allocation schemes to match elderly donors with elderly recipients, and vigorous recipient selection, allows good outcomes with increasing age of both donors and recipients. The results of live kidney donation have been excellent for donor and recipient, and there is a trend towards inclusion of older donors. Future strategies, including personalized immunosuppression for older recipients as well as machine preservation and reconditioning of donor organs, are promising ways to improve the outcome of transplantation between older donors and older recipients. CONCLUSION Kidney and liver transplantation in the elderly is a clinical reality. Outcomes are good, but can be optimized by using strategies that modify donor risk factors and recipient co-morbidities, and personalized approaches to organ allocation and immunosuppression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A I Sutherland
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Transplant Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - J N M IJzermans
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J L R Forsythe
- Transplant Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - F J M F Dor
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Yoon YE, Choi KH, Kim KH, Yang SC, Han WK. Clinical assessment of lipid profiles in live kidney donors. Transplant Proc 2015; 47:584-7. [PMID: 25891691 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.12.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2014] [Accepted: 12/31/2014] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Abnormal serum lipid profiles are an issue in chronic kidney disease (CKD), but the clinical ramifications of dyslipidemia in live kidney donors are unclear. Thus, we explored the relationship between serum lipids and residual renal function in living donors post-nephrectomy. METHODS Charts of living donors who underwent nephrectomy between January 2010 and March 2013 were reviewed, targeting those with 6-month follow-up examinations at minimum. Altogether, 282 donors were studied, examining total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels assayed before donation by standard techniques. Median follow-up time was 14 months. The relationship between postoperative renal function and allograft biopsy results was assessed. Recursive partitioning was applied to identify optimal cut-off points for each parameter. RESULTS Median (interquartile range) serum TC, TG, LDL, and HDL levels were 183 (161-205) mg/dL, 86 (63-131) mg/dL, 108 (92-128) mg/dL, and 53 (44-62) mg/dL, respectively. The glomerular filtration rate at last follow-up was associated with TC (r = -0.187; P = .002) and LDL (r = -0.172; P = .005) levels, but showed no correlation with TG and HDL. Root nodes of TC and LDL determinations in recursive partitioning were 170.5 mg/dL and 80.5 mg/dL, respectively, serving as thresholds for further evaluation. On logistic regression analysis, the likelihood of CKD (glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) at last follow-up was greater in donors with elevated TC and LDL levels (odds ratio = 1.96 and 3.33; P = .021 and .029, respectively). CONCLUSION Kidney donors with serum TC and LDL elevations require close observation, given their demonstrable predisposition to CKD after donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y E Yoon
- Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - K H Choi
- Department of Urology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam-si, Korea
| | - K H Kim
- Department of Urology, Ewha Women's University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - S C Yang
- Department of Urology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam-si, Korea
| | - W K Han
- Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Janki S, Verver D, Klop KWJ, Friedman AL, Peters TG, Ratner LE, Ijzermans JNM, Dor FJMF. Vascular management during live donor nephrectomy: an online survey among transplant surgeons. Am J Transplant 2015; 15:1701-7. [PMID: 25833120 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2014] [Revised: 11/30/2014] [Accepted: 11/30/2014] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
In 2006, a survey from the American Society of Transplant Surgeons disclosed significant and sometimes fatal hemorrhagic events in live donor nephrectomies (LDN) related to failure of clips, leading to the contraindication of the Weck® Hem-o-lok® clip for control of the renal artery during LDN. A survey regarding vascular control techniques, their perceived safety ratings and their failures was sent to 645 European Society for Organ Transplantation members who profiled their profession as "surgeon" and selected "kidney" as organ type. Two hundred forty-three (41%) members responded, of whom 171 (63.3%) independently perform LDN. Their responses were analyzed. For arterial and venous vascular control, the GIA™ and TA™stapler are used most frequently, and were rated the safest. Of the 121 reported hemorrhagic events, slippage and dislodgement of clips occurred at least 58 times, while stapler malfunction occurred at least 40 times. One donor death from hemorrhage related to clip dysfunction was reported. Hemorrhagic complications of LDN with fatal and non-fatal outcomes still occur. Strikingly, many surgeons do not use the vascular closing technique that they consider most safe. Failure of non-transfixion techniques is associated with greater risks for the donor. Control of major vessels in LDN must employ transfixion techniques for optimal donor safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Janki
- Division of HPB & Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D Verver
- Division of HPB & Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K W J Klop
- Division of HPB & Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - T G Peters
- Department of Surgery, University of Florida Health Sciences Center, Jacksonville, FL
| | - L E Ratner
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - J N M Ijzermans
- Division of HPB & Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F J M F Dor
- Division of HPB & Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
|
59
|
Rodrigue JR, Kazley AS, Mandelbrot DA, Hays R, LaPointe Rudow D, Baliga P. Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: Overcoming Disparities in Live Kidney Donation in the US--Recommendations from a Consensus Conference. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2015; 10:1687-95. [PMID: 25883072 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.00700115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Despite its superior outcomes relative to chronic dialysis and deceased donor kidney transplantation, live donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is less likely to occur in minorities, older adults, and poor patients than in those who are white, younger, and have higher household income. In addition, there is considerable geographic variability in LDKT rates. Concomitantly, in recent years, the rate of living kidney donation (LKD) has stopped increasing and is declining, after decades of consistent growth. Particularly noteworthy is the decline in LKD among black, younger, male, and lower-income adults. The Live Donor Community of Practice within the American Society of Transplantation, with financial support from 10 other organizations, held a Consensus Conference on Best Practices in Live Kidney Donation in June 2014. The purpose of this meeting was to identify LKD best practices and knowledge gaps that might influence LDKT, with a focus on patient and donor education, evaluation efficiencies, disparities, and systemic barriers to LKD. In this article, we discuss trends in LDKT/LKD and emerging novel strategies for attenuating disparities, and we offer specific recommendations for future clinical practice, education, research, and policy from the Consensus Conference Workgroup focused on disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James R Rodrigue
- Transplant Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Abby Swanson Kazley
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Didier A Mandelbrot
- Transplant Center, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin; and
| | - Rebecca Hays
- Transplant Center, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin; and
| | - Dianne LaPointe Rudow
- Recanati Miller Transplantation Institute, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Prabhakar Baliga
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina;
| | | |
Collapse
|
60
|
Garg AX, Nevis IF, McArthur E, Sontrop JM, Koval JJ, Lam NN, Hildebrand AM, Reese PP, Storsley L, Gill JS, Segev DL, Habbous S, Bugeja A, Knoll GA, Dipchand C, Monroy-Cuadros M, Lentine KL. Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia in living kidney donors. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:124-33. [PMID: 25397608 PMCID: PMC4362716 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1408932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 185] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Young women wishing to become living kidney donors frequently ask whether nephrectomy will affect their future pregnancies. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of living kidney donors involving 85 women (131 pregnancies after cohort entry) who were matched in a 1:6 ratio with 510 healthy nondonors from the general population (788 pregnancies after cohort entry). Kidney donations occurred between 1992 and 2009 in Ontario, Canada, with follow-up through linked health care databases until March 2013. Donors and nondonors were matched with respect to age, year of cohort entry, residency (urban or rural), income, number of pregnancies before cohort entry, and the time to the first pregnancy after cohort entry. The primary outcome was a hospital diagnosis of gestational hypertension or preeclampsia. Secondary outcomes were each component of the primary outcome examined separately and other maternal and fetal outcomes. RESULTS Gestational hypertension or preeclampsia was more common among living kidney donors than among nondonors (occurring in 15 of 131 pregnancies [11%] vs. 38 of 788 pregnancies [5%]; odds ratio for donors, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 5.0; P=0.01). Each component of the primary outcome was also more common among donors (odds ratio, 2.5 for gestational hypertension and 2.4 for preeclampsia). There were no significant differences between donors and nondonors with respect to rates of preterm birth (8% and 7%, respectively) or low birth weight (6% and 4%, respectively). There were no reports of maternal death, stillbirth, or neonatal death among the donors. Most women had uncomplicated pregnancies after donation. CONCLUSIONS Gestational hypertension or preeclampsia was more likely to be diagnosed in kidney donors than in matched nondonors with similar indicators of baseline health. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit X Garg
- The authors' affiliations are provided in the Appendix
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|