Prognostic factors in patients progressing after cisplatin-based chemotherapy for malignant non-seminomatous germ cell tumours

Evidence-based pragmatic guidelines for the follow-up of testicular cancer: optimising the detection of relapse

Testicular germ cell tumours (TGCTs) are the most common cause of cancer in men between the ages of 15 and 40 years, and, overall, the majority of patients should expect to be cured. The European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group has provided clear guidelines for the primary treatment of both seminoma and nonseminomatous germ cell tumours. There is, however, no international consensus on how best to follow patients after their initial management. This must promptly and reliably identify relapses without causing further harm. The standardising of follow-up would result in optimising risk-benefit ratios for individual patients, while ensuring economic use of resources. We have identified the seven common scenarios in managing seminomas and nonseminomas of the various stages and discuss the pertinent issues around relapse and follow-up. We review the available literature and present our comprehensive TGCT follow-up guidelines. Our protocols provide a pragmatic, easily accessible user-friendly basis for other centres to use or to adapt to suit their needs. Furthermore, this should enable future trials to address specific issues around follow-up giving meaningful and useful results.

Salvage chemotherapy after failure of first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic testicular cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Because of the small number of relapsed patients, their prognostic variability and the complexity of second-line therapy, randomized studies are largely lacking and treatment recommendations for patients with relapse after first-line chemotherapy are derived from retrospective series or phase II studies. This review summarizes the existing evidence including several recently published larger studies on the use of high-dose chemotherapy in these patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with unfavorable features such as incomplete response to first-line therapy, cisplatin refractoriness, multiple relapses or advanced stage at initial diagnosis have been shown to benefit from salvage high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support. Long-term survival rates of up to 60% have been reported after salvage high-dose chemotherapy for these patients. The treatment for patients relapsing after complete remission to first-line therapy, cisplatin-sensitive disease and gonadal primary remains controversial. Excellent long-term event-free survival rates of up to 80% have been reported after both conventional and high-dose chemotherapy. Surgery remains an important part of any salvage strategy.

SUMMARY

The prognosis of patients relapsing after first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy has improved with multimodality therapy including conventional and high-dose chemotherapy, surgery and radiation. The treatment of these patients requires a close cooperation of experienced medical oncologists, urologists and radiation oncologists.

Testis tumors: what is new?

Germ-cell tumors (GCTs) are extraordinary chemosensitive neoplasms that resemble the model for the cure of cancer even in metastatic disease. Nonetheless, a small portion of patients does not achieve a long-lasting complete response and new efforts are then required in order to further improve their healing rate.

This paper summarizes what is new about the management of these tumors through dedicated sections about biology, prognosis and treatment. Special interest is then focused on the Italian reality and how it participates to the advances made by the International community.

GAMEC--a new intensive protocol for untreated poor prognosis and relapsed or refractory germ cell tumours

There is no consensus as to the management of untreated poor prognosis or relapsed/refractory germ cell tumours. We have studied an intensive cisplatin-based regimen that incorporates high-dose methotrexate (HD MTX) and actinomycin-D and etoposide every 14 days (GAMEC). Sixty-two patients were enrolled in a phase 2 study including 27 who were untreated (IGCCCG, poor prognosis) and 35 with progression despite conventional platinum based chemotherapy. The pharmacokinetics of the drugs were correlated with standard outcome measures. Twenty of the untreated patients were progression free following GAMEC and appropriate surgery, as were 18 individuals in the pretreated group. None of the established prognostic factors for therapy for pretreated patients could identify a poor-prognosis group. Five out of nine late relapses to prior chemotherapy were progression free following GAMEC and appropriate surgery. All patients had at least one episode of febrile neutropenia and there were five (8%) treatment-related deaths. PK values were not predictive of efficacy or toxicity, although the dose intensity in the pretreated group of patients, especially of HD MTX, was significantly correlated with progression-free survival (PFS). GAMEC is a novel intensive regimen for this group of patients producing encouraging responses, although with significant toxicity. For those in whom it fails, further therapy is still possible with durable responses being seen.

Single Versus Sequential High-Dose Chemotherapy in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Germ Cell Tumors: A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group

Purpose

To compare single versus sequential high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) as first or subsequent salvage treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory germ cell tumors (GCTs).

Patients and Methods

Between November 1999 and November 2004, 230 patients were planned to be recruited in a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial comparing one cycle of cisplatin 100 mg/m2, etoposide 375 mg/m2, and ifosfamide 6 g/m2 (VIP) plus three cycles of high-dose carboplatin 1,500 mg/m2 and etoposide 1,500 mg/m2 (CE; arm A) versus three cycles of VIP plus one cycle of high-dose carboplatin 2,200 mg/m2, etoposide 1,800 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 6,400 mg/m2 (CEC; arm B).

Results

The study was stopped prematurely after recruitment of 216 patients as a result of excess treatment-related mortality in arm B. One hundred eleven (51%) of 216 patients were randomly assigned to sequential HDCT, and 105 (47%) of 216 patients were randomly assigned to single HDCT. Five (2%) of 216 patients had to be excluded because of non-GCT histologies at review. With a median follow-up time of 36 months, 109 (52%) of 211 patients were alive, and 91 (43%) of 211 patients were progression free. At 1 year, event-free, progression-free, and overall survival rates were 40%, 53%, and 80%, respectively, in arm A compared with 37%, 49%, and 61%, respectively, in arm B (P > .05 for all comparisons). Treatment-related deaths, mainly as a result of sepsis and cardiac toxicity, were less frequent in arm A (four of 108 patients, 4%) compared with arm B (16 of 103 patients, 16%; P < .01).

Conclusion

We found no difference in survival probabilities between single HDCT using CE and sequential HDCT using CEC. Sequential HDCT was better tolerated and resulted in fewer treatment-related deaths.

Management of Recurrent Testicular Germ Cell Tumors

Although front-line chemotherapy cures most men with testicular germ cell tumors, salvage therapy is still important in a small but significant minority. Second-line conventional-dose or high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue may cure 25%-50% of patients. New chemotherapeutic agents, including the taxanes gemcitabine and oxaliplatin, have added to the therapeutic armamentarium. Salvage surgical resection has an important role in selected patients. Cisplatin-refractory patients have a poor prognosis with current therapy, and novel chemotherapeutic and biologic agents need to be discovered for such patients.

Advances in the treatment of testicular cancer

Testicular cancer is the most common solid tumour in young men, and the treatment of testicular germ cell tumours (TGCT) has been called a success story of medical oncology, germ cell cancer being regarded as the "model of a curable neoplasm". Even with metastatic disease, high cure rates can be achieved: the overall 5-year survival for all stages of TGCT is approximately 80%. Today, elaborate systems for prognostic evaluation for gonadal and extragonadal germ cell tumours facilitate the choice of the most appropriate therapy for individual patients. In doing so, the ultimate goal of treatment is tumour-free survival for any patient with TGCT. This goal has already been reached for >99% of the patients with early-stage tumours, as well as for the majority of patients with advanced disease (56% of patients with metastases are considered to have a good prognosis at the time of diagnosis; the 5-year survival rate for this group is 90%). However, patients with 'intermediate' or 'poor' prognosis at the time of diagnosis, as well as patients with relapsed disease after cisplatin-containing therapy, still have an unsatisfactorily low 5-year survival rate after standard therapy with PEB (cisplatin, etoposide, bleomycin) of only 80%, 45-55% and 20-25%, respectively.Therefore, our goals must be (i) to limit acute and chronic toxicity by avoiding overtreatment for patients with localised disease and/or good prognosis with advanced disease; and (ii) to identify patients with poor prognosis and treat them in specialised centres, where not only is optimal interdisciplinary care available but new treatment strategies are being applied. For example, tandem high-dose chemotherapy regimens might be effective in achieving higher cure rates in these patients.

[Chemotherapy of testicular cancer]

Platinum-based polychemotherapy has increased the cure rate in testicular cancer dramatically: at first, chemotherapy was mainly used in advanced disease. Recently it has also become common in low-stage disease, though other therapeutic options are equivalent. Risk factors might help to find the right decision. The success of treatment in patients with metastatic disease results from the combination of chemotherapy and secondary surgery. High-dose chemotherapy for patients with poor prognosis or recurrent disease is being evaluated in clinical trials. Concerning the success in these stages prognostic factors are of special importance. Patients with advanced-stage nonseminoma need residual tumor resection after chemotherapy if no complete remission could be achieved. The therapist should be aware of the indication for and schedule of chemotherapy, its side effects, and supportive care.

Recent advances in the treatment of testicular cancer

Testicular cancer is remarkable because it is curable by combination cytotoxic chemotherapy even when widely disseminated. Treatment is defined by widely accepted staging and prognostic factors. Three cycles of bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin has been defined as the current optimum treatment in good prognosis metastatic disease, curing 90-95% of patients. Outcomes are less impressive for patients in intermediate and poor prognostic categories. A number of different approaches, including introduction of new agents and dose intensification, are being investigated to improve outcomes in these patients. Data developed over the last few years have identified increased risks of second malignancy and cardiovascular disease in long-term survivors. This has led to re-evaluation of strategies to manage Stage I patients. In particular, the use of radiotherapy in Stage I seminoma and the need for adjuvant therapy in Stage I nonseminoma are being re-examined. It is anticipated that advances in imaging and prognostic factors will facilitate this process.

The management of poor-prognosis, non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours

Despite a high cure rate in men with testicular cancer, some men in the poor-prognosis group have a less favourable outcome. Poor-prognosis non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours (NSGCT) are defined as those with high tumour markers, non-pulmonary visceral metastases or a mediastinal primary site at presentation. When treated with standard chemotherapy regimens, such as bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP), cure rates of less than 50% have been achieved in an international pooled analysis. Some strategies aimed at improving results include the use of multi-agent regimens (e.g. POMB/ACE), intensive-induction chemotherapy (e.g. CBOP/BEP), new chemotherapy drugs, such as ifosfamide, gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, paclitaxel, high-dose chemotherapy, including autotransplantation. To date, no schedule has been proven to be better than standard BEP in randomised trials. We will review the published data relating to first-line and salvage treatment of poor-prognosis NSGCT. To advance the management of this disease, physicians treating poor-prognosis disease are urged to support multi-centre trials, such as the recently launched MRC TE23 study comparing BEP and CBOP/BEP.

Pattern of Relapse after First Line Treatment of Advanced Stage Germ-Cell Tumors

OBJECTIVES

We performed a retrospective analysis of first relapses after cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced germ-cell tumors, in order to better define the appropriate follow-up.

METHODS

These patients were treated between 1986 and 1998 in two institutions. They were either followed after first-line chemotherapy at the same center or referred for relapse.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients relapsed (17.5% of the total number of patients treated in the same time period). Thirty-five (36.4%) patients had serum tumor marker levels (AFP, hCG and LDH) normal values. Sites of relapse were: abdominal in 47 (49%) patients, thoracic in 17 (17.7%), thoraco-abdominal in 15 (15.6%), and brain in 8 (8.3). Seven (7.3%) patients had elevated markers only, 1 (1%) had isolated supra-clavicular lymph node, 1 (1%) had bone metastasis only. Eighty-two patients (85%) relapsed during the first 18 months of follow-up. All patients with brain metastases at relapse and those who obtained sCR after chemotherapy relapsed within 8 months of follow-up. Sixteen patients underwent resection of growing teratoma.

CONCLUSIONS

These results allow to recommend extensive follow-up during the first two years after response to first line treatment. It includes marker level determination and whole body CT scan and less intensive work-up there after.

Brain metastasis from non-seminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis: indications for aggressive treatment

Brain metastases from non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs) are rare and mainly occur in young men whose clinical condition is unimpaired. The records of 15 patients with brain metastasis from non-seminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis, who had been surgically treated between 1984 and 1998, were retrospectively reviewed. All of the patients had undergone surgery plus whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), and chemotherapy based on cisplatin. On admission they had a median age of 33 years and their mean Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) score was >70. Mean survival was 37.7 months. Eight patients had a survival period longer than 5 years. Five patients belonged to radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) class I; all of them survived. There was a significant difference in survival time between patients in whom the brain metastasis was present at diagnosis (six survivors at 5 years; mean survival 53 months) and patients in whom the brain metastasis occurred during or after chemotherapy (two survivors at 5 years; mean survival 24 months) (P = 0.04). The presence of a trophoblastic component at histopathological analysis of the metastasis negatively influenced survival at univariate analysis. Multiple brain metastasis proved to be a significant risk factor at both univariate and multivariate analysis, while a metastatic residue with a diameter less than 2 cm after surgery did not negatively affect survival in our series. Prognosis is worst in patients with multiple brain metastases, in whom brain involvement occurred during or after cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Considering that these metastases are often both radiosensitive and chemosensitive, and mainly affect young men that are in very good clinical condition, we advocate aggressive treatment with surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy. This is mandatory in patients with large metastases (diameter >3 cm).

The management and outcome of patients with germ-cell tumours treated in the Edinburgh Cancer Centre between 1988 and 2002

AIMS

The aim of this retrospective analysis was to review the outcome of patients with germ-cell tumours treated in the Edinburgh Cancer Centre over the past 15 years, and to see whether there had been any changes over three 5-year cohorts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients referred with gonadal and extra-gonadal primary germ-cell tumours, between 1988 and 2002, were identified from the departmental database, and survival by stage and prognostic group was analysed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of patients with stage I seminoma has significantly increased. The good prognosis of patients with early stage disease is confirmed, with the outcome for some groups of patients being better than expected. There is a non-significant trend to improved results over the three 5-year cohorts. The outcome for patients with stage IV seminoma is worse than would be expected, but numbers are small. The poor prognosis of patients with non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours who fall into the International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCC) poor-prognostic group is confirmed. Failure of patients with metastatic non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours to achieve a complete response to initial therapy is shown to be a poor prognostic indicator.

Recent Advances in Conventional-Dose Salvage Chemotherapy in Patients with Cisplatin-Resistant or Refractory Testicular Germ Cell Tumors

Testicular germ cell tumors represent the most frequent malignancy in young males aged 20-35 years. Despite the considerably high cure rates provided by platinum-based chemotherapy, 20-30% of cases with advanced disease do not achieve a long-term disease-free survival with first-line chemotherapy. These patients are candidates for conventional-dose or high-dose salvage chemotherapy. The current conventional-dose salvage regimens of reference are the vinblastine-ifosfamide-cisplatin or etoposide-ifosfamide-cisplatin combinations, which are expected to cure approximately 25% of non-seminomatous germ-cell tumour patients. Paclitaxel has also been proved effective both as monotherapy in heavily-pretreated cases and as part of first-line salvage regimens; the combination of paclitaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin, followed or not by high-dose chemotherapy, induced a favorable long-term disease-free survival rate, especially in patients with good prognosis. Newer cytotoxic drugs, such as gemcitabine and oxaliplatin have also been proved effective, while other agents, such as temozolamide, or targeted therapies, such as trastuzumab in cases over-expressing HER2/neu (20% of relapsing germ-cell tumors) are currently under evaluation. Seminomas have generally a better prognosis than non-seminomatous tumors and salvage therapy is expected to cure about 50% of all cases.

A phase II trial of TIP (paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin) given as second-line (post-BEP) salvage chemotherapy for patients with metastatic germ cell cancer: a medical research council trial

This phase II trial describes the use of TIP chemotherapy (paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin) as salvage for patients with metastatic germ cell cancer (GCC) who have failed initial BEP (bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin) chemotherapy. Patients with first relapse following BEP for metastatic GCC, confirmed by biopsy or sequentially rising markers, received four courses of TIP (paclitaxel 175 mg m⁻² day 1, followed on days 1–5 by ifosfamide 1 g m⁻² intravenously (i.v.) and cisplatin 20 mg² i.v.) at 3-weekly intervals. The primary outcome measure was response to TIP. In all, 51 patients were registered, of whom 43 were eligible for response assessment. Eight achieved complete remission (CR) and 18 a partial remission with negative markers (PR^−ve); favourable response rate (FRR=CR+PR^−ve) 60%, 95% CI (44–75%); survival at 1 year was 70% (56–84%) and failure-free survival 36% (22–50%). In the group of 26 patients meeting the ‘good-risk’ criteria described by the Memorial Hospital, the FRR was 73% (52–88%) compared with 41% (18–67%) for the 17 ‘poor-risk’ patients. These results are inferior to those previously reported for TIP in a single-centre study when it was given more intensively, at higher dose and with growth factor support. Nonetheless, TIP as described here can cure a substantial proportion of patients.

Second-line high-dose chemotherapy in patients with mediastinal and retroperitoneal primary non-seminomatous germ cell tumors: the EBMT experience

BACKGROUND

Results of second-line chemotherapy in patients with extragonadal non-seminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) appear inferior to results in testicular NSGCT. Patients with retroperitoneal NSGCT achieve a comparable long-term survival rate of 30%, but the salvage rates of patients with mediastinal primary are less than 10%. We conducted a retrospective analysis on patients with mediastinal and retroperitoneal NSGCT treated with second-line high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) registered with the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1987 and 1999, 59 registered patients with retroperitoneal (n=37) and mediastinal (n=22) primary NSGCT, median age 28 years (range 18-60), were treated with second-line HDCT. All had received cisplatin-containing chemotherapy as first-line treatment.

RESULTS

Toxic death occurred in three cases (5%). With a median follow-up of 58 months (range 14-114), 18/59 patients (30%) continue to be disease-free. Of three patients who had a disease recurrence after HDCT, one patient achieved a disease-free status with further chemotherapy and surgery. In total, 19 patients (32%) are currently disease-free. Sixteen of 37 patients (43%) with retroperitoneal NSGCT, and three of 22 patients (14%) with mediastinal NSGCT are currently alive and disease-free.

CONCLUSIONS

Second-line HDCT might represent a possible option for patients with retroperitoneal primary NSGCT. New salvage strategies are needed for patients with mediastinal NSGCT.

[Therapy for recurrent testicular cancer]

In the case of an insufficient response to primary treatment or a tumor relapse, regardless of an initially complete remission, conventional as well as high dose chemotherapy regimens are available as salvage therapy for metastatic germ cell tumors. A multimodal approach should include the radiation of simultaneously occurring brain metastases as well as the surgical resection of residual tumour masses still detectable after completion of chemotherapy. Nowadays, an attempt is made to adjust the salvage modality selected to the individual situation according to a risk stratification of patients. However, a recurrence-free survival of 50% is worse when compared with that observed after primary chemotherapy. Salvage therapy should be reserved for specialized centres due to the increased complexity of a salvage approach and a significantly increased therapy-induced morbidity.

[Chemotherapy for germ cell cancer]

Chemotherapy for germ cell cancer is usually indicated in patients who present with metastatic disease, suffer relapses, or progress after their initial treatment. Rarely is chemotherapy needed in the palliative treatment of refractory patients. However, more recently chemotherapy has been demonstrated to benefit also patients with early stages of seminoma as well as nonseminoma. Therefore, the most recent European consensus guidelines on treatment and diagnosis of germ cell cancer list chemotherapy as an alternative treatment option in the early tumor stages I and II. The application of chemotherapy represents a challenge for both patients and the treating physician who must be experienced with a broad array of chemotherapy regimens and competent in their application. Particularly the treatment of patients with advanced tumor stages requires good clinical skills on the part of the treating oncologist. If excessive toxicity is to be avoided and a curative treatment option maintained, overtreatment as well as undertreatment are notorious pitfalls.

[Interdisciplinary cooperation in the treatment of complex patients with advanced testicular germ cell tumor]

Testicular germ cell tumors represent the classic example of a curable solid cancer even in the metastatic stage. Cure rates are as high as 95% and 80-85% in patients with good and intermediate prognosis; even in patients with poor prognosis cure rates of 50% have been achieved by interdisciplinary collaboration of all specialties involved in the management of testis cancer. Standardization of diagnosis and therapy should be further optimized due to the recently published interdisciplinary national and European guidelines. Besides realization of standardized guidelines, treatment of patients with extensive primary disease or recurrent germ cell tumors following standard therapy requires comprehensive knowledge in conservative and surgical management, which is basically only available at specialized cancer centers. Patients with complex findings, especially if associated with a poor prognosis according to IGCCCG, should be referred to specialized tertiary referral centers at a very early stage, since the cure rates depend not only on the consideration of guidelines but also on the expertise of the attending oncologist and surgeon. When treating these patients, one has to consider that inadequately administered chemotherapy (dosage, length of cycles, number of cycles) cannot be compensated for by surgery and that inadequately performed retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy or residual tumor resection cannot be compensated for by chemotherapy. In any case, suboptimal primary therapy will result in inferior cure rates and an unnecessarily increased mortality rate.

Testicular tumours (nonseminomatous)

In view of the excellent results of multimodal therapy for nonseminoma testicular tumours, with chemotherapy and surgery, attempts have been made to reduce the side-effects of treatment in patients with a good prognosis, while maintaining efficacy. It is now generally accepted that surveillance after orchidectomy is suitable in patients with low-risk stage I disease. Nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection as a primary treatment is a good alternative to primary chemotherapy in low-stage disease, i.e. high-risk stage I and stage IIa-b, enabling chemotherapy to be reduced by at least half, and decreasing the long-term side-effects of chemotherapy, especially cardiovascular, neuro-, nephro- and pulmonary toxicity. However, in patients with advanced disease and a poor prognosis, conventional chemotherapy is more likely to fail, and improving the treatment results by new schedules of chemotherapy (although more toxic) remains the main goal.

European consensus on diagnosis and treatment of germ cell cancer: a report of the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group (EGCCCG)

Germ cell tumour is the most frequent malignant tumour type in young men with a 100% rise in the incidence every 20 years. Despite this, the high sensitivity of germ cell tumours to platinum-based chemotherapy, together with radiation and surgical measures, leads to the high cure rate of > or = 99% in early stages and 90%, 75-80% and 50% in advanced disease with 'good', 'intermediate' and 'poor' prognostic criteria (IGCCCG classification), respectively. The high cure rate in patients with limited metastatic disease allows the reduction of overall treatment load, and therefore less acute and long-term toxicity, e.g. organ sparing surgery for specific cases, reduced dose and treatment volume of irradiation or substitution of node dissection by surveillance or adjuvant chemotherapy according to the presence or absence of vascular invasion. Thus, different treatment options according to prognostic factors including histology, stage and patient factors and possibilities of the treating centre as well may be used to define the treatment strategy which is definitively chosen for an individual patient. However, this strategy of reduction of treatment load as well as the treatment itself require very high expertise of the treating physician with careful management and follow-up and thorough cooperation by the patient as well to maintain the high rate for cure. Treatment decisions must be based on the available evidence which has been the basis for this consensus guideline delivering a clear proposal for diagnostic and treatment measures in each stage of gonadal and extragonadal germ cell tumour and individual clinical situations. Since this guideline is based on the highest evidence level available today, a deviation from these proposals should be a rare and justified exception.

Current aspects of high-dose chemotherapy in germ-cell tumors

The optimal treatment in patients with 'poor prognosis' germ-cell tumors (GCT) according to the 'International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group' (IGCCCG)--classification and in patients with refractory or relapsed disease after cisplatin-based chemotherapy remains controversial. It is well known that the majority of these patients will suffer systemic relapses after primary or salvage treatment and most of them will ultimately die of their disease. Therefore, the optimizing of the standard treatment is clearly desirable. The question of using conventional-dose or high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in this high-risk patients is under discussion. However, HDCT as primary treatment in 'poor prognosis' patients and as first- or subsequent salvage therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory GCT remains to be a relevant curative option. Prognostic factors have recently been recognized to aid in this decision.

Improved prognosis of patients with intermediate- and poor-risk nonseminomatous germ cell tumours by optimizing combined treatment

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether the optimal use of combined treatment with chemotherapy and appropriately timed surgical intervention by a specialized team might improve the outcome for patients with poor- and intermediate-prognosis (International Germ Cell Consensus Classification, IGCCC) nonseminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCTs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1984 and 1998, 47 patients with intermediate (16) and poor prognosis (31) NSGCT were treated; 43 had a testicular and four a retroperitoneal primary.

RESULTS

Of the 47 patients only seven (15%) had a complete radiological response after primary chemotherapy; 36 (77%) required surgery after chemotherapy (29 para-aortic lymphadenectomy, 13 resection of pulmonary metastases, two each excision of supraclavicular and retrocrural lymph nodes and one resection of brain metastases; 13 required surgery at more than one site). There was no surgical mortality, with postoperative wound pain the commonest morbidity. On pathology, the resected masses were mature teratoma in 13, necrosis in 12 and malignant disease in 11 patients, the resection being complete in 30. There were microscopically positive margins in the other six patients, all but one having viable residual cancer. Of the 47 patients, 18 needed treatment for relapse, with four having surgery for growing mature teratoma, six chemotherapy plus surgery and eight salvage chemotherapy alone. Of 31 patients, 22 (71%) with a poor and 13 of 16 with an intermediate prognosis were alive at a median (range) follow-up of 94 (41-171) months; of all 47, 34 (72%) remain in complete remission. Ten patients died from disease progression. The presence of residual malignant disease at the resection margin was significantly associated with poorer survival (hazard ratio 7.21, P = 0.0016). Prognostic factors, e.g. number of involved sites, IGCCC group and viable tumour in resected masses, were not significant. The 5-year overall and relapse-free survival (95% confidence interval) was 81 (69-93)% and 57 (43-71)%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The optimal delivery and timing of chemotherapy and surgical resection by a specialist team of oncologists, urological and cardiothoracic surgeons is critical in treating poor-risk NSGCT and might be responsible for improving the outcome of these patients. The detection of residual malignant disease after chemotherapy by positron emission tomography should be investigated to identify those who might benefit from further systemic treatment before complete surgical resection.

High-dose versus conventional-dose chemotherapy as first-salvage treatment in patients with non-seminomatous germ-cell tumors: a matched-pair analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with conventional-dose chemotherapy (CDCT) as first-salvage treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory non-seminomatous germ-cell tumors (NSGCT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and ninety-three patients with relapsed or refractory NSGCT, between 1981 and 1995, were identified from two large databases. In 74 of these, intensification of first-salvage treatment by HDCT was planned. Patients were matched based on primary tumor location, response to first-line treatment, duration of this response and serum levels of the tumor markers, human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). Multivariate analyses were performed using event-free survival and overall survival as primary endpoints.

RESULTS

Full matches on all five factors were found for 38 pairs of patients; for a further 17 pairs, matches on at least four factors could be identified. Hazard ratios in favor of HDCT were obtained between 0.72 and 0.84 [confidence interval (CI) 0.59-1.01] for event-free survival and between 0.77 and 0.83 (CI 0.60-0.99) for overall survival, depending on the type of analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The current analysis suggests a benefit from HDCT, with an estimated absolute improvement in event-free survival of between 6 and 12% and in overall survival of between 9 and 11% at 2 years. This benefit is lower than expected from previous phase I/II studies.

Clinical use of tumor markers in childhood malignancies

Tumor markers are developmentally regulated proteins or carbohydrate molecules, which are expressed in specific tissues in the fetus during certain developmental periods. With malignant transformation, these molecules are reexpressed in neoplastic tissues. Some developmental or metabolic disorders can also lead to the expression of tumor marker genes, hereditary tyrosinaemia and ataxia teleangiectasia associating with elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein are examples of such conditions. In pediatric malignancies, the most common markers in clinical use are alpha-fetoprotein in liver and yolk sac tumors, chorionic gonadotropin in germ cell tumors, and catecholamines and neuron specific enolase in neuroblastoma. Several other molecules including carbohydrate antigens CA 19-9 and CA 125 may also have a role in the diagnosis and follow-up of distinct types of childhood malignancies. The non-specificity of several markers, such as tissue polypeptide antigen and sialic acid, greatly hampers their clinical use. In this review we will discuss the biology and current knowledge on the use of serum and urine tumor markers. We also highlight the putative future use of these molecules in cancer diagnosis and therapy, including the use of monoclonal antibodies directed against these antigens.

Chemotherapy in patients with metastatic or relapsed germ-cell tumours

The optimal treatment in patients with poor prognosis germ-cell tumours (GCT), according to the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) classification, and in patients with refractory or relapsed disease after cisplatin-based chemotherapy is controversial. As the majority of patients will suffer systemic relapses, chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment. However, the question of whether or not to use conventional-dose or high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in these patients arises. Prognostic factors have recently been recognised to aid in this decision. However, reliable data on chemotherapy as primary treatment in poor prognosis patients and as the first-salvage attempt in patients with relapsed or refractory GCT are lacking. This report reviews the recent developments in first-line and salvage HDCT strategies and discusses the role of predictive factors for treatment outcome.

Second-line chemotherapy in patients with relapsed extragonadal nonseminomatous germ cell tumors: results of an international multicenter analysis

PURPOSE

Relapsed extragonadal germ cell tumors patients (EGGCT) are treated with identical salvage chemotherapy regimens, as are patients with metastatic testicular cancer. This investigation evaluates the results of second-line chemotherapy in nonseminomatous EGGCT and tries to identify prognostic factors for survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 142 patients treated at eleven European and American centers between 1975 and 1996. All had received cisplatin-containing regimens as induction treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven of 142 patients (19%) were long-term disease-free, 11% with primary mediastinal and 30% of patients with primary retroperitoneal disease. Median follow-up since start of salvage treatment was 11 months (range, 1 to 157) for all patients and 45 months (range, 6 to 157) for surviving patients. Forty-eight patients (34%) received high dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplant at relapse, and 10 of these patients (21%) are continuously disease-free. Primary mediastinal location (P =.003), sensitivity to cisplatin (P =.003), elevated beta-HCG at relapse (P: =.04), and normal LDH at diagnosis (P =.01) were shown to be significant negative prognostic factors for overall survival in univariate; mediastinal location [relative risk ratios (HR) = 1.9; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.2 to 3.0] and sensitivity to cisplatin [HR = 2.4; 95% CI, 1.1 to 5.2] were significant negative prognostic factors in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Although current salvage strategies will cure between 20% and 50% of recurrent metastatic testicular cancer, relapsed nonseminomatous EGGCT patients appear to have an inferior survival rate, in particular in case of primary mediastinal location. Mediastinal primary tumor and inadequate response to cisplatin-based induction chemotherapy have been identified as independent negative prognostic factors, both associated with an approximately two-fold higher risk for failure of salvage treatment.

Prognostic parameters for the management of advanced testis tumours

The need for prognostic parameters in testicular germ cell tumours is sometimes questioned based on an overall cure rate of more than 80% of the patients regardless of tumour stage. However, the trend for an earlier and more accurate diagnosis amenable to curative treatment as well as the high effectiveness of standard Cisplatinum containing chemotherapy has masked the continuing need for intensifying therapy in patients with adverse risk factors. This intense treatment is often associated with worrysome morbidity and the assessment of prognostic factors, stage by stage, is warranted on which patient at risk can be identified and treated accordingly. Traditional prognostic factors, on which most classification systems are based, include large tumour volume, the presence of liver, bone or brain metastasis, grossly elevated tumour markers and an extragonadal primary site, particularly in the mediastinum. Novel prognostic factors are either (1) independent from the patient and his disease, (2) inherent on the patient's characteristics or (3) based on tumour biology. Clearly, the infrastructure and the experience of the treating uro-oncology unit (see 1) is decisive for treatment outcomes, and -at least-'difficult to treat' patients should be referred to properly resourced cancer centres. Patients with higher socio-economic status, willing to travel and well educated enough to be worried about their diseases status apparently gain access to expert centres more easily (see 2), translating into an upgrade on prognosis. Finally, biologic factors (see 3) such as beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin or MAGE epitopes in seminoma or the percentage of embryonal carcinoma components orvascular invasion mayor may not inversely influence the prognosis and need further assessment in prospective trials. However, the search for even better (molecular) biologic factors is speeding up because more complex treatment decisions such as in advanced testicular cancers rely on a more precise determination of prognosis, enabling a more tailored selection of individualized therapeutic options.

Improving the outcome of salvage treatment for non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT)

Between 1991-96, 41 patients were treated in this unit for relapsed non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT). Twenty-eight patients had raised markers at relapse: 17 required salvage chemotherapy and post-chemotherapy surgery, 11 only chemotherapy. In addition 9 patients received high dose chemotherapy. Overall 16/28 patients (57%) requiring chemotherapy remain alive, 14 (50%) disease free. Of the 17 patients treated with chemotherapy and surgery: 12 remain alive, 10 (59%) with no evaluable disease. Only 4/11 (36%) patients treated with chemotherapy alone remain alive, all in complete remission (CR). For relapse with raised markers, univariate analysis suggests that less than CR to induction therapy, resulting in the presence of residual disease is the most important predictor of poor outcome (P<0.001). All of the 13 patients relapsing with normal markers remain alive, having been primarily treated surgically. Overall these results indicate an improving outlook for relapsed NSGCT.

Current opinion in germ cell cancer 2000

Despite its relative rarity compared with the common adult cancers, scientific and clinical interest in germ cell cancer is increasing. From the point of view of epidemiology, the controversy about the relative importance of intrauterine versus postpubertal risk factors has continued. Evidence to support the importance of intrauterine factors comes from reports from Norway, Canada, and the US, confirming the Danish observation that the rising incidence of germ cell cancer is linked to a birth cohort effect; evidence in support of the importance of postpubertal risk comes from three case/control studies demonstrating increased risk linked to postpubertal exposures such as pesticides, plastics, electromagnetic radiation, trauma, and infections. There has been increasing interest in human endogenous retrovirus K10 as a possible factor explaining genetic susceptibility and providing a linkage between the two groups of risk factors. In cytogenetics, progress was reported in identifying the deletion point of the suspected tumor suppressor gene responsible for the i12p marker chromosome abnormality and development of FISH probes for diagnostic purposes. In molecular biology, the importance of DNA repair deficiency in normal germ cells as a factor in the exquisite chemosensitivity of germ cell cancer has been high-lighted by a report demonstrating a low level of the xeroderma pigmentosa group A (XPA) protein and induction of resistance in vitro by adding XPA. In the clinic, progress in positron emission tomography scanning and laparoscopic lymph node staging are leading to changes in outlook on management of stage 1 cases and patients with small residual masses postchemotherapy. Salvage chemotherapy regimens integrating dose dense and vertical dose intensification strategies reported 60% progression-free survival. New drugs such as gemcitabine demonstrated continued therapeutic potential for chemotherapy in these tumors. A report demonstrating the inadequacies of hormone replacement after bilateral orchidectomy and a report of the first child born after testis-conserving therapy highlight the need for more attention to testis conservation as a quality of life issue. With the cure rates so high, the need for central referral is once again debated both for stage 1 and metastatic disease. With new ways of defining poor risk stage 1 patients and reports on impact of experience highlighting the worse outcome of patients treated in centers treating small numbers, views on this issue remain clearcut.

A multi-center prospective phase II study of high-dose chemotherapy in germ-cell cancer patients relapsing from complete remission

PURPOSE

To prospectively determine the efficacy of repeated high-dose alkylating chemotherapy to salvage patients with germ-cell tumors who relapsed after adequate first-line chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with germ-cell cancers relapsing from a first, second or third complete remission induced by chemotherapy were offered to participate in a Dutch national prospective trial with broad entry criteria. The salvage treatment began with a conventional dose of ifosfamide (4 g/m2 on day 1) and etoposide (100 mg/m2 on days 1, 2 and 3) followed by daily s.c. administration of G-CSF (10 micrograms/kg) until peripheral blood progenitor cells had been harvested. Immediately after bone marrow recovery, an intermediate dose chemotherapy course of carboplatin (target AUC: 10 mg.ml-1 min on day 1) and etoposide (500 mg/m2 on days 1, 3 and 5) was given with G-CSF daily s.c. After bone marrow recovery, two subsequent courses of high-dose 'CTC' chemotherapy were given, each containing cyclophosphamide (6 g/m2), thiotepa (480 mg/m2) and carboplatin (target AUC: 20 mg.ml-1 min). The high-dose chemotherapy was administered as 30-60-minute infusions, divided over 4 days and the stem-cell transplants were given 48-72 hours after the last chemotherapy infusion. Whenever possible, residual masses were resected at the end of treatment.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were treated between January 1994 and October 1997. The toxicity of the treatment was manageable. Second CTC courses were administered in 25 patients and were associated with hemorrhagic cystitis and veno-occlusive disease in 3 and 4 patients, respectively. One patient who had recently undergone a partial hepatectomy, died of veno-occlusive disease. At the time of analysis, the median follow-up of the surviving patients was 37 months (range 12-56 months). The median progression-free survival for all patients was 44 months, and the median overall survival has not been reached. According to the internationally accepted criteria for predicting the outcome of salvage chemotherapy in germ-cell cancer (Beyer et al. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 2638-45), 30 patients had 'good risk' criteria. Of these, 29 received high-dose chemotherapy. Of this group, the salvage rate at two years was 65% (95% confidence interval: 49.5%-85.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Over half of the germ-cell cancer patients relapsing from a chemotherapy-induced complete remission can be salvaged by a treatment strategy that incorporates high-dose chemotherapy, even when treatment is given in a multi-center setting. These data confirm the international prognostic model proposed by Beyer et al. in a prospectively studied, independent patient group and provide further evidence that high-dose therapy has a role in the salvage setting of patients with germ-cell cancer.