1
|
Honecker F, Aparicio J, Berney D, Beyer J, Bokemeyer C, Cathomas R, Clarke N, Cohn-Cedermark G, Daugaard G, Dieckmann KP, Fizazi K, Fosså S, Germa-Lluch JR, Giannatempo P, Gietema JA, Gillessen S, Haugnes HS, Heidenreich A, Hemminki K, Huddart R, Jewett MAS, Joly F, Lauritsen J, Lorch A, Necchi A, Nicolai N, Oing C, Oldenburg J, Ondruš D, Papachristofilou A, Powles T, Sohaib A, Ståhl O, Tandstad T, Toner G, Horwich A. ESMO Consensus Conference on testicular germ cell cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2019; 29:1658-1686. [PMID: 30113631 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 179] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) consensus conference on testicular cancer was held on 3-5 November 2016 in Paris, France. The conference included a multidisciplinary panel of 36 leading experts in the diagnosis and treatment of testicular cancer (34 panel members attended the conference; an additional two panel members [CB and K-PD] participated in all preparatory work and subsequent manuscript development). The aim of the conference was to develop detailed recommendations on topics relating to testicular cancer that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) and where the available level of evidence is insufficient. The main topics identified for discussion related to: (1) diagnostic work-up and patient assessment; (2) stage I disease; (3) stage II-III disease; (4) post-chemotherapy surgery, salvage chemotherapy, salvage and desperation surgery and special topics; and (5) survivorship and follow-up schemes. The experts addressed questions relating to one of the five topics within five working groups. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel. A consensus vote was obtained following whole-panel discussions, and the consensus recommendations were then further developed in post-meeting discussions in written form. This manuscript presents the results of the expert panel discussions, including the consensus recommendations and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation. All participants approved the final manuscript.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Honecker
- Tumor and Breast Center ZeTuP, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section Pneumology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum, University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - J Aparicio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - D Berney
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - J Beyer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - C Bokemeyer
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section Pneumology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum, University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - R Cathomas
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - N Clarke
- Department of Surgery, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - G Cohn-Cedermark
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - G Daugaard
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - K-P Dieckmann
- Department of Urology, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | - K Fizazi
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - S Fosså
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - J R Germa-Lluch
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Barcelona University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Giannatempo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - J A Gietema
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - S Gillessen
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - H S Haugnes
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, UIT - The Arctic University, Tromsø, Norway
| | - A Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-assisted and Specialised Urologic Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - K Hemminki
- Department of Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - R Huddart
- Department of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
| | - M A S Jewett
- Departments of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - F Joly
- Department of Urology-Gynaecology, Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - J Lauritsen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - A Lorch
- Department of Urology, Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Heinrich-Heine University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - A Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - N Nicolai
- Department of Surgery, Urology and Testis Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - C Oing
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section Pneumology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum, University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - J Oldenburg
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - D Ondruš
- 1st Department of Oncology, St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Comenius University Faculty of Medicine, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - A Papachristofilou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - T Powles
- Department of Medical Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - A Sohaib
- Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
| | - O Ståhl
- Department of Oncology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - T Tandstad
- The Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - G Toner
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A Horwich
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Maroto P, Huddart R, Garcia del Muro X, Horwich A, Paz Ares L, Aparicio J, Germa-Lluch JR. Brief report: phase II multicenter study of temozolomide in patients with cisplatin-resistant germ cell tumors. Oncology 2011; 80:219-22. [PMID: 21734411 DOI: 10.1159/000329041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2010] [Accepted: 04/11/2011] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the activity and toxicity of temozolomide in a phase II multicenter trial in patients diagnosed with relapsed or cisplatin-refractory germ cell tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS During a recruitment period of 30 months, 20 patients received temozolomide 150 mg/m(2)/day p.o. for 5 days every 4 weeks, escalating to 200 mg/m(2)/day if grade II toxicity was not observed in the first cycle. Eligibility criteria were tumor progression or relapse after previous cisplatin and ifosfamide-containing chemotherapy, creatinine clearance of >40 ml/min, and a performance status of 0-2. RESULTS The median age was 38 years (range 27-56). Seventeen patients had nonseminomatous tumors, and 3 had seminomatous tumors. Six of the patients had extragonadal primary tumors (3 retroperitoneal and 3 mediastinal). The median number of prior cisplatin-containing cycles was 11 (range 7-20). Eight patients received prior high-dose chemotherapy and 14 were refractory or absolutely refractory to cisplatin. A total of 45 cycles were administered. Two partial responses lasting 9 and 3.5 months (overall response rate 10%, 95% CI 1.2-31.7) were observed. One of these responses was seen in a patient with a cisplatin-refractory tumor that had previously been treated with high-dose chemotherapy. The median time to progression and the median overall survival were 1.5 and 3.1 months, respectively. Grade III hematological toxicity consisted of thrombocytopenia in 2 patients and anemia in 1 patient. No grade IV toxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS Temozolomide had some activity in heavily pretreated patients resistant to cisplatin-based chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Maroto
- Hospital Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain. jmaroto @ santpau.cat
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schmoll HJ, Souchon R, Krege S, Albers P, Beyer J, Kollmannsberger C, Fossa SD, Skakkebaek NE, de Wit R, Fizazi K, Droz JP, Pizzocaro G, Daugaard G, de Mulder PHM, Horwich A, Oliver T, Huddart R, Rosti G, Paz Ares L, Pont O, Hartmann JT, Aass N, Algaba F, Bamberg M, Bodrogi I, Bokemeyer C, Classen J, Clemm S, Culine S, de Wit M, Derigs HG, Dieckmann KP, Flasshove M, Garcia del Muro X, Gerl A, Germa-Lluch JR, Hartmann M, Heidenreich A, Hoeltl W, Joffe J, Jones W, Kaiser G, Klepp O, Kliesch S, Kisbenedek L, Koehrmann KU, Kuczyk M, Laguna MP, Leiva O, Loy V, Mason MD, Mead GM, Mueller RP, Nicolai N, Oosterhof GON, Pottek T, Rick O, Schmidberger H, Sedlmayer F, Siegert W, Studer U, Tjulandin S, von der Maase H, Walz P, Weinknecht S, Weissbach L, Winter E, Wittekind C. European consensus on diagnosis and treatment of germ cell cancer: a report of the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group (EGCCCG). Ann Oncol 2004; 15:1377-99. [PMID: 15319245 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdh301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 380] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Germ cell tumour is the most frequent malignant tumour type in young men with a 100% rise in the incidence every 20 years. Despite this, the high sensitivity of germ cell tumours to platinum-based chemotherapy, together with radiation and surgical measures, leads to the high cure rate of > or = 99% in early stages and 90%, 75-80% and 50% in advanced disease with 'good', 'intermediate' and 'poor' prognostic criteria (IGCCCG classification), respectively. The high cure rate in patients with limited metastatic disease allows the reduction of overall treatment load, and therefore less acute and long-term toxicity, e.g. organ sparing surgery for specific cases, reduced dose and treatment volume of irradiation or substitution of node dissection by surveillance or adjuvant chemotherapy according to the presence or absence of vascular invasion. Thus, different treatment options according to prognostic factors including histology, stage and patient factors and possibilities of the treating centre as well may be used to define the treatment strategy which is definitively chosen for an individual patient. However, this strategy of reduction of treatment load as well as the treatment itself require very high expertise of the treating physician with careful management and follow-up and thorough cooperation by the patient as well to maintain the high rate for cure. Treatment decisions must be based on the available evidence which has been the basis for this consensus guideline delivering a clear proposal for diagnostic and treatment measures in each stage of gonadal and extragonadal germ cell tumour and individual clinical situations. Since this guideline is based on the highest evidence level available today, a deviation from these proposals should be a rare and justified exception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H J Schmoll
- European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group, Martin-Luther-University, Department of Hematology/Oncology, Halle, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Izquierdo MA, Van der Valk P, Van Ark-Otte J, Rubio G, Germa-Lluch JR, Ueda R, Scheper RJ, Takahashi T, Giaccone G. Differential expression of the c-kit proto-oncogene in germ cell tumours. J Pathol 1995; 177:253-8. [PMID: 8551387 DOI: 10.1002/path.1711770307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
The c-kit proto-oncogene product and its ligand stem cell factor play an important role in haematopoiesis, spermatogenesis, and melanogenesis. Using an anti-c-kit antiserum raised against a synthetic peptide, we studied the immunohistochemical expression of the c-kit gene product in 60 germ cell tumours (GCTs) (53 testicular, 7 extragonadal), derived from primary GCTs in 45 cases and metastatic tumours in 15 cases. Twenty-eight out of 28 seminomas showed c-kit membranous staining in the majority of cells. A similar pattern of expression was seen in intratubular germ cell neoplasia. Nine out of 29 (32 per cent) non-seminomas displayed cytoplasmic, but not membranous, c-kit immunoreactivity in occasional cells. In three mixed GCTs, c-kit expression was limited to the seminoma component. In normal testis, c-kit expression was observed in some basal tubular cells, corresponding to undifferentiated spermatogonia. These results suggest a role for c-kit in the oncogenesis of GCT, where down-regulation of c-kit might be a critical step during progression from seminomas to non-seminomas. Immunohistochemical analysis of c-kit should be considered as a diagnostic aid for GCT and in particular may be helpful in the identification of certain extragonadal seminomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Izquierdo
- Department of Pathology, Free University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|