Audiologic management of auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder in children: a systematic review of the literature

Auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) and cochlear implantation

We discuss issues related to cochlear implantation in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD). We describe the varied nature of this disease category including the numerous potential causes of auditory neuropathy. The most prevalent etiology for infants with ANSD is associated with prolonged neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) stay. We discuss the potential contribution of cochlear hypoxia to this etiology. The second part of this review describes in detail our own experience at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, with cochlear implantation of children diagnosed with ANSD. We outline the detection, diagnosis, and referral routes for our patients. We provide an overview of our "standard operation procedures" regarding candidacy, and discuss some of the special considerations that need to be applied to children with ANSD. This includes decisions to implant children with better audiometric thresholds that are standard in non-ANSD patients, concerns about the possibility of spontaneous remission and the appropriate timing of implantation. Finally we review an extensive published literature in outcomes after cochlear implantation (CI) in ANSD. This is not a systematic review but rather an exercise to distill out some important reoccurring themes and the general consensus of opinion to date. Our conclusion is that the hearing loss category ANSD, together with its numerous co-morbidities, is far too heterogeneous to make definitive statements about prognosis with CI.

Pathophysiological mechanisms and functional hearing consequences of auditory neuropathy

The effects of inner ear abnormality on audibility have been explored since the early 20th century when sound detection measures were first used to define and quantify 'hearing loss'. The development in the 1970s of objective measures of cochlear hair cell function (cochlear microphonics, otoacoustic emissions, summating potentials) and auditory nerve/brainstem activity (auditory brainstem responses) have made it possible to distinguish both synaptic and auditory nerve disorders from sensory receptor loss. This distinction is critically important when considering aetiology and management. In this review we address the clinical and pathophysiological features of auditory neuropathy that distinguish site(s) of dysfunction. We describe the diagnostic criteria for: (i) presynaptic disorders affecting inner hair cells and ribbon synapses; (ii) postsynaptic disorders affecting unmyelinated auditory nerve dendrites; (iii) postsynaptic disorders affecting auditory ganglion cells and their myelinated axons and dendrites; and (iv) central neural pathway disorders affecting the auditory brainstem. We review data and principles to identify treatment options for affected patients and explore their benefits as a function of site of lesion.

Auditory Neuropathy/Dys-Synchrony Disorder: Diagnosis and Management

Auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony disorder affects neural responses, either directly or indirectly. Patients may demonstrate good ability to detect sound, but have significant difficulty listening in noise. Clinical auditory physiologic measures are used to characterize cochlear, eighth nerve, and brainstem function, and are needed to accurately identify this disorder. Cochlear implants provide benefit to many patients, and some patients derive benefit from amplification. This disorder can be identified and managed in infants, may have later onset, may be a part of a syndrome, and may include fluctuation in hearing ability.

Cortical development and neuroplasticity in Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder

Cortical development is dependent to a large extent on stimulus-driven input. Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder (ANSD) is a recently described form of hearing impairment where neural dys-synchrony is the predominant characteristic. Children with ANSD provide a unique platform to examine the effects of asynchronous and degraded afferent stimulation on cortical auditory neuroplasticity and behavioral processing of sound. In this review, we describe patterns of auditory cortical maturation in children with ANSD. The disruption of cortical maturation that leads to these various patterns includes high levels of intra-individual cortical variability and deficits in cortical phase synchronization of oscillatory neural responses. These neurodevelopmental changes, which are constrained by sensitive periods for central auditory maturation, are correlated with behavioral outcomes for children with ANSD. Overall, we hypothesize that patterns of cortical development in children with ANSD appear to be markers of the severity of the underlying neural dys-synchrony, providing prognostic indicators of success of clinical intervention with amplification and/or electrical stimulation. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled <Auditory Synaptology>.

Determination of benefits of cochlear implantation in children with auditory neuropathy

Background

Auditory neuropathy (AN) is a recently recognized hearing disorder characterized by intact outer hair cell function, disrupted auditory nerve synchronization and poor speech perception and recognition. Cochlear implants (CIs) are currently the most promising intervention for improving hearing and speech in individuals with AN. Although previous studies have shown optimistic results, there was large variability concerning benefits of CIs among individuals with AN. The data indicate that different criteria are needed to evaluate the benefit of CIs in these children compared to those with sensorineural hearing loss. We hypothesized that a hierarchic assessment would be more appropriate to evaluate the benefits of cochlear implantation in AN individuals.

Methods

Eight prelingual children with AN who received unilateral CIs were included in this study. Hearing sensitivity and speech recognition were evaluated pre- and postoperatively within each subject. The efficacy of cochlear implantation was assessed using a stepwise hierarchic evaluation for achieving: (1) effective audibility, (2) improved speech recognition, (3) effective speech, and (4) effective communication.

Results

The postoperative hearing and speech performance varied among the subjects. According to the hierarchic assessment, all eight subjects approached the primary level of effective audibility, with an average implanted hearing threshold of 43.8 ± 10.2 dB HL. Five subjects (62.5%) attained the level of improved speech recognition, one (12.5%) reached the level of effective speech, and none of the subjects (0.0%) achieved effective communication.

Conclusion

CIs benefit prelingual children with AN to varying extents. A hierarchic evaluation provides a more suitable method to determine the benefits that AN individuals will likely receive from cochlear implantation.

Auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony: a retrospective analysis of 15 cases

Introduction Auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony (AN/AD) comprises a spectrum of pathology affecting the auditory pathways anywhere from the inner hair cells to the brainstem. It is characterized by an absent or atypical auditory brainstem response (ABR) with preservation of the cochlear microphonics and/or otoacoustic emissions (OAEs). Objective Retrospective analysis of patients with AN/AD. Methods Fifteen patients with AN/AD were included in this study and their records were retrospectively investigated. Results Possible etiology of AN/AD was neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in three patients, family history of hearing loss in three patients, consanguineous marriage in two patients, head trauma in two patients, mental motor retardation in one patient, cerebrovascular disease in one patient, and there was no apparent cause in three patients. Conclusion Otolaryngologists should keep in mind the diagnosis of AN/AD especially in patients complaining of difficulty in hearing and speech and audiological evidence of disassociation between pure tone and speech audiometry. ABR and OAE testing is recommended in these patients for AN/AD diagnosis.

Parents' perspectives on the dilemmas with intervention for infants with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder: A qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

This paper explores parental experiences of choices surrounding auditory management and language and communication development for infants and children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) in the light of the heterogeneity of condition, a poor evidence base for best outcomes in relation to management options, and the scarcity of data rooted in parent and family experience.

DESIGN

Qualitative narrative study.

STUDY SAMPLE

Twenty-five parents of 21 children (aged four months to six years) identified with ANSD through the newborn hearing screening programme.

RESULTS

Families identify barriers to early management due to conflicting expert opinions and ANSD-specific challenges with diagnosis and prognosis in infants, and share their accounts on their own evaluations of intervention benefit in their children.

CONCLUSIONS

The results are of relevance to the clinicians and other professionals involved in early intervention, management, and support of infants with ANSD.

Cochlear implantation in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorders

AIM

To present the outcomes of cochlear implantation (CI) in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorders (ANSD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The pre- and post-CI hearing outcomes in children with ANSD were retrospectively evaluated. Performance was assessed with categories of auditory performance (CAP) and the Manchester spoken language development scale (MSLDS).

RESULTS

Full data were available in 27 implanted children with ANSD with average age at implantation 35.4 months (range 19-68 months). Nine children were implanted bilaterally, while 13 were bimodal. The pre-CI CAP and MSLDS scores were 2.5 (range 0-5) and 2.5 (range 0-6), while the post-CI scores 5.8 (range 2-9) and 7.7 (range 3-10), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the outcome of CI in children with ANSD might vary, it is favourable in most of the cases. CI seems a justified hearing rehabilitation option for children with ANSD and limited benefits from conventional hearing aids.

Auditory neuropathy

Neural disorders of the auditory nerve are associated with particular disorders of auditory perceptions dependent on processing of acoustic temporal cues. These include: (1) speech perception; (2) localizing a sound's origin in space; and (3) identifying sounds in background noise. Auditory neuropathy (AN) is a consequence of: (1) presynaptic disorders affecting inner hair cell ribbon synapses; (2) postsynaptic disorders of auditory nerve dendrites; and (3) postsynaptic disorders of auditory nerve axons. The etiologies of these disorders are diverse, similar to other cranial or peripheral neuropathies. The pathologies cause attenuated and dyssynchronous auditory nerve discharges. Therapies and management of patients with AN are reviewed.

Does parental experience of the diagnosis and intervention process differ for children with auditory neuropathy?

OBJECTIVES

This study compared parental experience of the audiological diagnosis and intervention process in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder and sensory neural hearing loss.

METHODS

A matched group survey was used with parents of children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) matched with a control group of parents and children with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). The two groups were matched in terms of the child's gender, age, amplifications used, social background and utilisation of private or public health care sectors. An interview questionnaire, consisting of 45 questions in six categories (1. biographic information, 2. experiences of audiological diagnosis, 3. hearing aid benefit, 4. parental experience of the rehabilitation decision making process, 5. parental needs for emotional support and 6. parental needs for information) using a 5-point Likert scale for categories 2-7, was administered by the same audiologist.

RESULTS

Children with ANSD experienced a significantly longer waiting period from diagnosis to hearing aid fitting (p=0.025) and/or cochlear implantation (p=0.036). Parents of children with ANSD reported significantly different experiences of the diagnostic process (p=0.001) with poorer understanding of the diagnosis and reporting insufficient time allowed for asking questions. During the rehabilitation decision-making process 47% of parents with ANSD children (vs. 0% of parents with SNHL children) reported receiving conflicting information. Parents of children with ANSD were also less likely to recommend hearing aids to other parents. Information needs were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents of children with ANSD have different experiences and greater uncertainty during the diagnostic and rehabilitation process. Providing regular consultation and structured timelines through the diagnostic process and decision-making process may facilitate this process with less uncertainty.

Psychoacoustic Characteristics of Tinnitus in Individuals with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder

The study aimed at understanding the psychoacoustic characteristics of tinnitus in individuals with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD). It attempts to assess the pitch and intensity of loudness of tinnitus matched by individuals with ANSD. Fifty individuals who were diagnosed as having auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder were included in the study. Tinnitus evaluation was carried out where the individuals matched the frequency and intensity of loudness of the tinnitus. The results of the study shows that pitch matched by majority of patients with ANSD is predominantly low pitched (<1000 Hz). The frequency of tinnitus matched by the patients with ANSD also correlated with the degree of maximal hearing loss. The intensity of loudness of the tinnitus was around 10-15 dB higher than their threshold in majority of the patients considered in the study. There was a weak negative correlation for the matched frequency and intensity of loudness. The results of the study suggest that majority of individuals with low frequency hearing loss had low pitched tinnitus. Thus, there could be discordant damage between outer and inner hair cells, abnormal firing of auditory nerve in individuals with ANSD which can lead to tinnitus. Thus, it can help to understand the physiology of tinnitus in individuals with ANSD.

NRT test in auditory neuropathy patients with cochlear implants

CONCLUSION

In patients with auditory neuropathy (AN), waveforms of neural response telemetry (NRT) could be present, showing characteristics of low incidence, low differentiation, and large variation.

OBJECTIVE

To study the characteristics of NRT in AN patients who had received cochlear implants (CIs).

METHODS

NRT data for seven AN patients who had received Nucleus CIs were retrospectively analyzed. Twenty-one CI implantees with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) were included as the control group. The incidence of electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs), threshold of wave N1, and amplitude of N1-P2 in the AN group were analyzed and compared between groups.

RESULTS

The intraoperative incidence of valid ECAPs in the AN group was 42.9%, and the postoperative incidence was 66.7%, both of which were lower than those in the SNHL group, which were 95.2% and 100%, respectively. NRT in the AN group showed larger variation and lower differentiation than in the SNHL group. Wilcoxon's non-parametric test results indicated no significant difference between AN and SNHL groups in either the threshold of ECAP or N1-P2 amplitude.

Vestibular function in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder

OBJECTIVE

Children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) account for about 10% of paediatric patients referred for cochlear implantation. Vestibulopathy may be associated with ANSD, and may have implications when formulating management plans in this patient group. We wanted to determine the incidence and predictive factors for vestibulopathy in this patient group to guide vestibular testing in this patient population, and give insight to the aetiology of ANSD.

METHODS

We reviewed the outcomes of vestibular function testing in a cohort of paediatric patients with ANSD.

RESULTS

Probable or definite vestibulopathy was seen in 42% of patients who were tested. Vestibulopathy was associated with medical co-morbidities, but was not associated with imaging findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Vestibulopathy is relatively prevalent in this patient group, and should be considered when planning the investigation and management of children with ANSD.

Outcomes of early- and late-identified children at 3 years of age: findings from a prospective population-based study

OBJECTIVE

To address the question of whether, on a population level, early detection and amplification improve outcomes of children with hearing impairment.

DESIGN

All families of children who were born between 2002 and 2007, and who presented for hearing services below 3 years of age at Australian Hearing pediatric centers in New South Wales, Victoria, and Southern Queensland were invited to participate in a prospective study on outcomes. Children's speech, language, functional, and social outcomes were assessed at 3 years of age, using a battery of age-appropriate tests. Demographic information relating to the child, family, and educational intervention was solicited through the use of custom-designed questionnaires. Audiological data were collected from the national database of Australian Hearing and records held at educational intervention agencies for children. Regression analysis was used to investigate the effects of each of 15 predictor variables, including age of amplification, on outcomes.

RESULTS

Four hundred and fifty-one children enrolled in the study, 56% of whom received their first hearing aid fitting before 6 months of age. On the basis of clinical records, 44 children (10%) were diagnosed with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder. There were 107 children (24%) reported to have additional disabilities. At 3 years of age, 317 children (70%) were hearing aid users and 134 children (30%) used cochlear implants. On the basis of parent reports, about 71% used an aural/oral mode of communication, and about 79% used English as the spoken language at home. Children's performance scores on standardized tests administered at 3 years of age were used in a factor analysis to derive a global development factor score. On average, the global score of hearing-impaired children was more than 1 SD below the mean of normal-hearing children at the same age. Regression analysis revealed that five factors, including female gender, absence of additional disabilities, less severe hearing loss, higher maternal education, and (for children with cochlear implants) earlier age of switch-on were associated with better outcomes at the 5% significance level. Whereas the effect of age of hearing aid fitting on child outcomes was weak, a younger age at cochlear implant switch-on was significantly associated with better outcomes for children with cochlear implants at 3 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS

Fifty-six percent of the 451 children were fitted with hearing aids before 6 months of age. At 3 years of age, 134 children used cochlear implants and the remaining children used hearing aids. On average, outcomes were well below population norms. Significant predictors of child outcomes include: presence/absence of additional disabilities, severity of hearing loss, gender, maternal education, together with age of switch-on for children with cochlear implants.

A case of auditory neuropathy with recovery of normal hearing

Newborn hearing screening test is very important in the early diagnosis of childhood hearing loss because it affects language development. Auditory neuropathy is a spectrum disorder characterized by abnormal auditory brainstem response but preserved otoacoustic emission and cochlear microphonics. In general, auditory neuropathy patients have poor word discrimination and variable patterns of pure tone audiometry. We report on a patient with auditory neuropathy diagnosed at 16 months of age and started wearing hearing aids, but showed normal pure tone and speech audiometric findings 3 years later. Close follow-up for patients with auditory neuropathy is recommended.

Language Outcomes Using Hearing Aids in Children with Auditory Dys-Synchrony

There is a considerable debate on the use of hearing aid in children with auditory dys-synchrony (AD). To current date there are no similar Studies which show the effect of acoustic amplification on outcomes on speech and language development in children with AD are found in the literature. Thus, in the present study three children diagnosed to have AD were recruited and subjected to hearing aid trial and fitting based on the late latency response thresholds. Ranging from 7 months to 41 months of intervention period, each child's language age was reassessed and compared with that of their pre-therapy language age. The comparison showed a good improvement in receptive age, though the children had moderate to severe degree of hearing loss. But their expressive age was significantly delayed irrespective of their age of identification and duration of intervention. Thus the delay in expression with a good amount of improvement in reception can be a characteristic of an AD child with amplification.

Preliminary performance of cochlear implants in post-lingual patients with auditory neuropathy

CONCLUSIONS

Auditory restoration can be obtained by using cochlear implants (CIs) in post-lingual patients with auditory neuropathy (AN). However, improvements in postoperative speech recognition for these patients varied.

OBJECTIVES

The primary purpose of this study was to assess the postoperative performances of two post-lingual AN patients after receiving CIs.

METHODS

Two post-lingual AN patients received unilateral CIs and the efficacy of the implants was then evaluated. One patient was female with bilateral mid-severe hearing loss and received an implant at age 28 years. The second patient was male with severe hearing loss and he received an implant at age 15 years. The postoperative performance for both patients was evaluated.

RESULTS

After using the CI for 6 months, the hearing ability of both subjects was improved by the CI with an average post-implant threshold of 35 dB and 44 dB, respectively. The woman made significant progress in speech recognition with an open-set spondee recognition score of 55% and sentence recognition in quiet score of 90%. Sentence recognition in noise scores were 94% (SNR = +10 dB), 88% (SNR = +5 dB), and 80% (SNR = 0 dB). The boy achieved improved recognition scores for monosyllables (40%) and disyllables (26%), but poor sentence recognition both in quiet (0%) and in noise (0%).

Impact of the presence of auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) on outcomes of children at three years of age

OBJECTIVE

To determine the influence of the presence of auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) on speech, language, and psycho-social development of children at three years of age.

DESIGN

A population-based, longitudinal study was performed on outcomes of children with hearing impairment (LOCHI) in Australia. The demographic characteristics of the children were described, and their developmental outcomes were evaluated at three years of age. Performance of children with ANSD was compared with that of children without ANSD in the LOCHI study.

STUDY SAMPLE

There were 47 children with ANSD in the study sample.

RESULTS

Sixty-four percent of children with ANSD have hearing sensitivity loss ranging from mild to severe degree, and the remaining have profound hearing loss. At three years, 27 children used hearing aids, 19 used cochlear implants, and one child did not use any hearing device. Thirty percent of children have disabilities in addition to hearing loss. On average, there were no significant differences in performance level between children with and without ANSD. Also, the variability of scores was not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in performance levels or variability between children with and without ANSD, both for children who use hearing aids, and children who use cochlear implants.

Inter-trial coherence as a marker of cortical phase synchrony in children with sensorineural hearing loss and auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder fitted with hearing aids and cochlear implants

OBJECTIVE

Although brainstem dys-synchrony is a hallmark of children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD), little is known about how the lack of neural synchrony manifests at more central levels. We used time-frequency single-trial EEG analyses (i.e., inter-trial coherence; ITC), to examine cortical phase synchrony in children with normal hearing (NH), sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and ANSD.

METHODS

Single trial time-frequency analyses were performed on cortical auditory evoked responses from 41 NH children, 91 children with ANSD and 50 children with SNHL. The latter two groups included children who received intervention via hearing aids and cochlear implants. ITC measures were compared between groups as a function of hearing loss, intervention type, and cortical maturational status.

RESULTS

In children with SNHL, ITC decreased as severity of hearing loss increased. Children with ANSD revealed lower levels of ITC relative to children with NH or SNHL, regardless of intervention. Children with ANSD who received cochlear implants showed significant improvements in ITC with increasing experience with their implants.

CONCLUSIONS

Cortical phase coherence is significantly reduced as a result of both severe-to-profound SNHL and ANSD.

SIGNIFICANCE

ITC provides a window into the brain oscillations underlying the averaged cortical auditory evoked response. Our results provide a first description of deficits in cortical phase synchrony in children with SNHL and ANSD.

Identification of novel OTOF compound heterozygous mutations by targeted next-generation sequencing in a Chinese patient with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder

OBJECTIVES

The molecular causes of auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) are not well known. Identification of the pathogenic mutations underlying nonsyndromic ANSD is difficult because of its extremely heterogeneous trait. The aim of the present study was to identify the genetic etiology of a single Chinese patient diagnosed with congenital ANSD by targeted next-generation sequencing.

METHODS

Targeted next-generation sequencing of 79 known deafness genes was performed in a child that was clinically diagnosed with ANSD and received cochlear implantation. Candidate pathogenic variants were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Post-implantation outcome were evaluated in a 40 months span.

RESULTS

Novel compound heterozygous mutations p.R1583H/p.Q1883X in OTOF were identified as the pathogenic cause of the patient, correlated with a good post-implantation outcome in terms of sound detection and communication skills.

CONCLUSION

Targeted next-generation sequencing is effective for molecular diagnosis of ANSD and may provide important information for clinical management of this disease.

OTOF mutation screening in Japanese severe to profound recessive hearing loss patients

BACKGROUND

Auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) is a unique form of hearing loss that involves absence or severe abnormality of auditory brainstem response (ABR), but also the presence of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs). However, with age, the OAEs disappear, making it difficult to distinguish this condition from other nonsyndromic hearing loss. Therefore, the frequency of ANSD may be underestimated. The aim of this study was to determine what portion of nonsyndromic hearing loss is caused by mutations of OTOF, the major responsible gene for nonsyndromic ANSD.

METHODS

We screened 160 unrelated Japanese with severe to profound recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss (ARNSHL) without GJB2 or SLC26A4 mutations, and 192 controls with normal hearing.

RESULTS

We identified five pathogenic OTOF mutations (p.D398E, p.Y474X, p.N727S, p.R1856Q and p.R1939Q) and six novel, possibly pathogenic variants (p.D450E, p.W717X, p.S1368X, p.R1583H, p.V1778I, and p.E1803A).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that OTOF mutations accounted for 3.2-7.3% of severe to profound ARNSHL patients in Japan. OTOF mutations are thus a frequent cause in the Japanese deafness population and mutation screening should be considered regardless of the presence/absence of OAEs.

Cochlear implantation in unique pediatric populations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the last decade, the selection criteria for cochlear implantation have expanded to include children with special auditory, otologic, and medical problems. Included within this expanded group of candidates are those children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder, cochleovestibular malformations, cochlear nerve deficiency, associated syndromes, as well as multiple medical and developmental disorders. Definitive indications for cochlear implantation in these unique pediatric populations are in evolution. This review will provide an overview of managing and habilitating hearing loss within these populations with specific focus on cochlear implantation as a treatment option.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cochlear implants have been successfully implanted in children within unique populations with variable results. Evaluation for cochlear implant candidacy includes the core components of a full medical, audiologic, and speech and language evaluations. When considering candidacy in these children, additional aspects to consider include disorder-specific surgical considerations and child/caregiver counseling regarding reasonable postimplantation outcome expectations.

SUMMARY

Cochlear implants are accepted as the standard of care for improving hearing and speech development in children with severe-to-profound hearing loss. However, children with sensorineural hearing loss who meet established audiologic criteria for cochlear implantation may have unique audiologic, medical, and anatomic characteristics that necessitate special consideration regarding cochlear implantation candidacy and outcome. Individualized preoperative candidacy and counseling, surgical evaluation, and reasonable postoperative outcome expectations should be taken into account in the management of these children.

Cochlear Implantation versus Hearing Amplification in Patients with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder

Objective

Patients with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) exhibit altered neural synchrony in response to auditory stimuli. Cochlear implantation (CI) is thought to improve neural synchrony in response to auditory stimuli and improve speech perception relative to conventional hearing amplification (HA).

Study Design

Retrospective review.

Setting

Tertiary otologic practice.

Subjects and Methods

Subjects included patients with ANSD treated at Vanderbilt University from 1999 to 2011. Sixteen patients underwent CI, and 10 received binaural HAs. Pretreatment performance was assessed through speech reception thresholds and parent questionnaire (Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale [IT-MAIS]). Posttreatment outcomes were assessed using IT-MAIS and closed-/open-set speech perception scores.

Results

Two HA users underwent neuromaturation and were excluded from further analysis. For the remaining patients, median duration of device use was 48 months. All CI patients had a prior binaural HA trial with failure of auditory skills development. Median available pretreatment IT-MAIS score was 13 and 30 for CI and HA groups, respectively (rank sum test, P = .32). Posttreatment, 6 of 16 CI patients and 4 of 8 HA patients achieved open-set speech perception scores ≥60%. No differences between groups were found in posttreatment IT-MAIS scores (rank sum test, P = .11) or the percentage of patients achieving the above levels of open-set speech perception (Fisher exact test, P = .67).

Conclusions

A wide range of speech perception outcomes are observed in ANSD patients. In our ANSD population, patients who exhibited failure of auditory skills development with HAs were able to achieve comparable overall speech perception outcomes after CI relative to those who continued to make appropriate auditory progress with HAs alone.

Prediction of cochlear implant performance by genetic mutation: the spiral ganglion hypothesis

BACKGROUND

Up to 7% of patients with severe-to-profound deafness do not benefit from cochlear implantation. Given the high surgical implantation and clinical management cost of cochlear implantation (>$1 million lifetime cost), prospective identification of the worst performers would reduce unnecessary procedures and healthcare costs. Because cochlear implants bypass the membranous labyrinth but rely on the spiral ganglion for functionality, we hypothesize that cochlear implant (CI) performance is dictated in part by the anatomic location of the cochlear pathology that underlies the hearing loss. As a corollary, we hypothesize that because genetic testing can identify sites of cochlear pathology, it may be useful in predicting CI performance.

METHODS

29 adult CI recipients with idiopathic adult-onset severe-to-profound hearing loss were studied. DNA samples were subjected to solution-based sequence capture and massively parallel sequencing using the OtoSCOPE(®) platform. The cohort was divided into three CI performance groups (good, intermediate, poor) and genetic causes of deafness were correlated with audiometric data to determine whether there was a gene-specific impact on CI performance.

RESULTS

The genetic cause of deafness was determined in 3/29 (10%) individuals. The two poor performers segregated mutations in TMPRSS3, a gene expressed in the spiral ganglion, while the good performer segregated mutations in LOXHD1, a gene expressed in the membranous labyrinth. Comprehensive literature review identified other good performers with mutations in membranous labyrinth-expressed genes; poor performance was associated with spiral ganglion-expressed genes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support the underlying hypothesis that mutations in genes preferentially expressed in the spiral ganglion portend poor CI performance while mutations in genes expressed in the membranous labyrinth portend good CI performance. Although the low mutation rate in known deafness genes in this cohort likely relates to the ascertainment characteristics (postlingual hearing loss in adult CI recipients), these data suggest that genetic testing should be implemented as part of the CI evaluation to test this association prospectively.

An evidence-based systematic review of frequency lowering in hearing aids for school-age children with hearing loss

PURPOSE

We developed 1 clinical question for this review, which addressed the comparison of hearing aids using frequency lowering compared to conventional processing amplification for outcomes of audibility, speech recognition, speech and language, and self- or parent-report for children with hearing loss.

METHOD

We systematically searched 26 databases for studies addressing a clinical question and meeting all inclusion criteria. We evaluated studies for methodological quality and reported or calculated effect sizes when possible.

RESULTS

The literature search resulted in the inclusion of 5 studies. We implemented several different frequency-lowering strategies across studies; 2 studies used nonlinear frequency compression, 2 used frequency transposition, and 1 used frequency compression with dynamic consonant boost.

CONCLUSIONS

Whereas methodological limitations of the included studies preclude the formulation of strong conclusions, findings were generally positive across frequency-lowering strategies and outcomes. Additional high-quality research is needed in this area.

An evidence-based systematic review of directional microphones and digital noise reduction hearing aids in school-age children with hearing loss

PURPOSE

The purpose of this evidence-based systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of digital noise reduction and directional microphones for outcome measures of audibility, speech recognition, speech and language, and self- or parent-report in pediatric hearing aid users.

METHOD

The authors searched 26 databases for experimental studies published after 1980 addressing one or more clinical questions and meeting all inclusion criteria. The authors evaluated studies for methodological quality and reported or calculated p values and effect sizes when possible.

RESULTS

A systematic search of the literature resulted in the inclusion of 4 digital noise reduction and 7 directional microphone studies (in 9 journal articles) that addressed speech recognition, speech and language, and/or self- or parent-report outcomes. No digital noise reduction or directional microphone studies addressed audibility outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of a moderate level of evidence, digital noise reduction was not found to improve or degrade speech understanding. Additional research is needed before conclusions can be drawn regarding the impact of digital noise reduction on important speech, language, hearing, and satisfaction outcomes. Moderate evidence also indicates that directional microphones resulted in improved speech recognition in controlled optimal settings; however, additional research is needed to determine the effectiveness of directional microphones in actual everyday listening environments.

An evidence-based systematic review of amplitude compression in hearing aids for school-age children with hearing loss

PURPOSE

Two clinical questions were developed: one addressing the comparison of linear amplification with compression limiting to linear amplification with peak clipping, and the second comparing wide dynamic range compression with linear amplification for outcomes of audibility, speech recognition, speech and language, and self- or parent report in children with hearing loss.

METHOD

Twenty-six databases were systematically searched for studies addressing a clinical question and meeting all inclusion criteria. Studies were evaluated for methodological quality, and effect sizes were reported or calculated when possible.

RESULTS

The literature search resulted in the inclusion of 8 studies. All 8 studies included comparisons of wide dynamic range compression to linear amplification, and 2 of the 8 studies provided comparisons of compression limiting versus peak clipping.

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate evidence from the included studies demonstrated that audibility was improved and speech recognition was either maintained or improved with wide dynamic range compression as compared with linear amplification. No significant differences were observed between compression limiting and peak clipping on outcomes (i.e., speech recognition and self-/parent report) reported across the 2 studies. Preference ratings appear to be influenced by participant characteristics and environmental factors. Further research is needed before conclusions can confidently be drawn.