Chronic dialysis patients have high risk for pulmonary embolism

Risk Factors for Upper Extremity Venous Thrombosis Associated with Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters

Purpose

To identify clinically important risk factors associated with upper extremity venous thrombosis following peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC).

Methods

A retrospective case control study of 400 consecutive patients with and without upper extremity venous thrombosis post-PICC insertion was performed. Patient data included demographics, body mass index (BMI), ethnicity, site of insertion, size and lumen of catheter, internal length, infusate, and co-morbidities, such as diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and renal failure. Additional risk factors analyzed were active cancer, any history of cancer, recent trauma, smoking, a history of prior deep vein thrombosis, and recent surgery, defined as surgery within three months prior to PICC insertion.

Results

The prevalence of trauma, renal failure, and infusion with antibiotics and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) was higher among patients exhibiting upper extremity venous thrombosis (UEVT), when compared to controls. Patients developing UEVT were also more likely to have PICC line placement in a basilic vein and less likely to have brachial vein placement (P<.001). Left-sided PICC line sites also posed a greater risk (P=.026). The rate of standard DVT prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin and unfractionated heparin and the use of warfarin was similar in both groups. Average length of hospital stay was almost double among patients developing UEVT, 19.5 days, when compared to patients undergoing PICC line insertion without thrombosis, 10.8 days (t=6.98, P<.001).

Conclusions

In multivariate analysis, trauma, renal failure, left-sided catheters, basilic placement, TPN, and infusion with antibiotics, specifically vancomycin, were significant risk factors for UEVT associated with PICC insertion. Prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin, unfractionated heparin or use of warfarin did not prevent the development of venous thrombosis in patients with PICCs. Length of hospital stay and cost are markedly increased in patients who develop PICC-associated upper extremity venous thrombosis.

Progressive Increase of Inflammatory Biomarkers in Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has reached epidemic levels. It is a multisystem disease associated with elevated systemic inflammatory and hypercoagulable states. Most concerning are the cardiovascular risks associated with all stages of kidney disease. It is difficult to assess kidney disease stage progression and cardiovascular risk with current indicators such as estimated glomerular filtration rate and conventional cardiovascular risk factors. However, the use of biomarkers to assess the underlying pathological disease state may bridge the gap. This study evaluated biomarkers of inflammation including C-reactive protein, d-dimer, neuron-specific enolase, neutrophil gelatinase–associated lipocalin, tumor necrosis factor receptor I, and thrombomodulin in 3 groups of patients: CKD stages 2-4, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and age-matched controls. The study demonstrated a statistically significant progressive upregulation in mean concentration of all markers when comparing controls to CKD and ESRD. Therefore, biomarkers may be able to evaluate the inflammatory state in kidney disease and potentially predict the cardiovascular risk.

Pulmonary embolism in patients with CKD and ESRD

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

CKD and ESRD are growing burdens. It is unclear whether these conditions affect pulmonary embolism (PE) risk, given that they affect both procoagulant and anticoagulant factors. This study examined the frequency and associated outcomes of PE in CKD and ESRD.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to estimate the frequency and outcomes of PE in adults with CKD and ESRD. Hospitalizations for the principal diagnosis of PE and presence of CKD or ESRD were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. Data from the annual US Census and US Renal Data System reports were used to calculate the number of adults with CKD, ESRD, and normal kidney function (NKF) as well as the annual incidence of PE in each group. Logistic regression modeling was used to compare in-hospital mortality among persons admitted for PE who had ESRD or CKD to those without these conditions.

RESULTS

The annual frequency of PE was 527 per 100,000, 204 per 100,000, and 66 per 100,000 persons with ESRD, CKD, and NKF, respectively. In-hospital mortality was higher for persons with ESRD and CKD (P<0.001) compared with persons with NKF. Median length of stay was longer by 1 day in CKD and 2 days in ESRD than among those with NKF.

CONCLUSIONS

Persons with CKD and ESRD are more likely to have PE than persons with NKF. Once they have PE, they are more likely to die in the hospital.

Chronic Kidney Disease and Atrial Fibrillation: A Contemporary Overview

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with substantial cardiovascular morbidity, including myocardial infarction, heart failure and stroke. Similar to CKD, atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent arrhythmia that increases risk for both stroke and overall mortality. Recent studies demonstrate that both prevalence and incidence of AF is higher in patient with versus without renal impairment and risk for developing AF increases as renal function worsens. Potential mechanisms for the higher burden of AF in CKD patients include but are not limited to augmented sympathetic tone, activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and myocardial remodeling. Similar to the general population, AF confers an increased risk for both stroke and overall mortality in the CKD population. The safety and efficacy of antithrombotic therapy across the spectrum of CKD remains unknown, however, as patients with advanced renal failure are frequently excluded from randomized trials. While treatment with vitamin K antagonists appears to reduce ischemic complications without significant bleeding harm in patients with mild to moderate CKD and AF, the risk benefit ratio of anticoagulation among thosewith advanced renal failure on dialysis requires further investigation. Prospective, randomized trials are war ranted to define the impact of antithrombotic therapy on reducing stroke risk in patients with both AF and CKD.

Venous and arterial thrombosis in dialysis patients

Whether the risk of both venous and arterial thrombosis is increased in dialysis patients as compared to the general population is unknown. In addition, it is unknown which subgroups are at highest risk. Furthermore, it is unknown whether having a history of venous thrombosis or arterial thrombosis prior to dialysis treatment increases mortality risk. A total of 455 dialysis patients were followed for objectively verified symptomatic thrombotic events between January 1997 and June 2009. The incidence rates in dialysis patients as compared to the general population was 5.6-fold (95% CI 3.1-8.9) increased for venous thrombosis, 11.9-fold (95% CI 9.3-14.9) increased for myocardial infarction, and 8.4-fold (95% CI 5.7-11.5) increased for ischaemic stroke. The combination of haemodialysis, lowest tertile of albumin, history of venous thrombosis, and malignancy was associated with subsequent venous thrombosis. Increased age, renal vascular disease, diabetes, high cholesterol levels, history of venous thrombosis, and history of arterial thrombosis were associated with subsequent arterial thrombosis. The all-cause mortality risk was 1.9-fold (95% CI 1.1-3.3) increased for patients with a history of venous thrombosis and 1.9-fold (95% CI 1.4-2.6) increased for patients with a history of arterial thrombosis. A potential limitation of this study was that in some risk categories associations with venous thrombosis did not reach statistical significance due to small numbers. In conclusion, dialysis patients have clearly elevated risks of venous thrombosis and arterial thrombosis and occurrence of venous thrombosis or arterial thrombosis prior to the start of dialysis is associated with an increased mortality risk.

Aspirin is beneficial in hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease: a post-hoc subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the benefit and risk associated with antiplatelet therapy in the chronic kidney disease (CKD) population.

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular and possibly bleeding risks are elevated in patients with CKD. The balance of benefit and harm associated with antiplatelet therapy remains uncertain.

METHODS

The HOT (Hypertension Optimal Treatment) study randomly assigned participants with diastolic hypertension to aspirin (75 mg) or placebo. Study treatment effects were calculated using univariate proportional hazards regression models stratified by baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with trends tested by adding interaction terms. End points included major cardiovascular events, total mortality, and major bleeding.

RESULTS

The study included 18,597 participants treated for 3.8 years. Baseline eGFR was < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) in 3,619 participants. Major cardiovascular events were reduced by 9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -9% to 24%), 15% (95% CI: -17% to 39%), and 66% (95% CI: 33% to 83%) for patients with baseline eGFR of ≥ 60, 45 to 59, and < 45 ml/min/1.73 m(2), respectively (p trend = 0.03). Total mortality was reduced by 0% (95% CI: -20% to 17%), 11% (95% CI: -31% to 40%), and 49% (95% CI: 6% to 73%), respectively (p trend = 0.04). Major bleeding events were nonsignificantly greater with lower eGFR (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.52 [95% CI: 1.11 to 2.08], HR: 1.70 [95% CI: 0.74 to 3.88], and HR: 2.81 [95% CI: 0.92 to 8.84], respectively; p trend = 0.30). Among every 1,000 persons with eGFR < 45 ml/min/1.73 m(2) treated for 3.8 years, 76 major cardiovascular events and 54 all-cause deaths will be prevented while 27 excess major bleeds will occur.

CONCLUSIONS

Aspirin therapy produces greater absolute reduction in major cardiovascular events and mortality in hypertensive patients with CKD than with normal kidney function. An increased risk of major bleeding appears to be outweighed by the substantial benefits.

Systemic anticoagulation considerations in chronic kidney disease

Anticoagulation therapy is commonly required in patients with chronic kidney disease for treatment or prevention of thromboembolic disorders. Anticoagulant management plans can involve use of a single agent, or in some cases, a combination of agents to meet both short- and long-term goals. Systemic anticoagulation in the setting of renal insufficiency poses unique challenges secondary to renal failure-associated hypercoagulable conditions and increased risks for bleeding. Evidence supporting dosing regimens and monitoring approaches in the setting of severe renal impairment or hemodialysis is limited because this population is typically excluded in clinical trials. This review explores concepts of systemic anticoagulation in the chronic kidney disease setting with warfarin, unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, fondaparinux, direct thrombin inhibitors, and anticoagulants in advanced stages of development. Potential strategies for anticoagulant reversal are also briefly described.

Complement anaphylatoxin C5a contributes to hemodialysis-associated thrombosis

Thrombosis is a common complication of end-stage renal disease, particularly in patients on hemodialysis. Although substantial progress has been made in preventing thrombotic complications in various other groups of patients, the mechanisms of thrombosis during hemodialysis require clarification. In this report, we demonstrate that complement activation triggered by hemodialysis biomaterials, and the subsequent generation of the complement anaphylatoxin C5a, results in the expression of functionally active tissue factor (TF) in peripheral blood neutrophils. Because TF is a key initiator of coagulation in vivo, we postulate that the recurring complement activation that occurs during long-term hemodialysis contributes to thrombosis in dialyzed end-stage renal disease patients. Furthermore, we found that complement contributed to the induction of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, which has been implicated in the pathogenesis of thrombosis in patients treated with the recombinant form of this molecule. Importantly, the inhibition of complement activation attenuated the TF expression and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor induction in blood passing through a hemodialysis circuit, suggesting that the complement system could become a new therapeutic target for preventing thrombosis in patients with chronic renal failure who are maintained on hemodialysis.

Clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of cinacalcet hydrochloride

Cinacalcet hydrochloride (cinacalcet) is a calcimimetic approved for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) receiving dialysis and for the treatment of hypercalcaemia in patients with parathyroid carcinoma. Following oral administration, peak plasma concentrations of cinacalcet occur within 2-6 hours. The absolute bioavailability is 20-25%, and administration of cinacalcet with low- or high-fat meals increases exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity [AUC(infinity)]) 1.5- to 1.8-fold. Cinacalcet has no significant interaction with calcium carbonate or sevelamer hydrochloride, phosphate binders commonly used in the treatment of patients with CKD receiving dialysis. The terminal elimination half-life is 30-40 hours, and steady-state concentrations are achieved within 7 days. The pharmacokinetics of cinacalcet are dose proportional over the dose range of 30-180 mg. The pharmacokinetic profile of cinacalcet is not notably affected by varying degrees of renal impairment. The pharmacokinetics of cinacalcet are comparable between healthy subjects, patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism with reduced renal function (including those patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism receiving dialysis). Additionally, the pharmacokinetics of cinacalcet are similar in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism receiving haemodialysis and patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism receiving peritoneal dialysis. Mild hepatic impairment does not affect the pharmacokinetics of cinacalcet, whereas moderate or severe hepatic impairment increases the exposure (AUC(infinity)) by approximately 2- and 4-fold, respectively. Age, sex, bodyweight and race do not notably affect the pharmacokinetics of cinacalcet. Cinacalcet is extensively metabolized by multiple hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes (primarily 3A4, 2D6 and 1A2) with <1% of the parent drug excreted in the urine. Dose adjustments of cinacalcet may be necessary, and parathyroid hormone (PTH) and serum calcium concentrations should be closely monitored if a patient initiates or discontinues therapy with a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor (e.g. ketoconazole, erythromycin, itraconazole). Cinacalcet is a strong inhibitor of CYP2D6; therefore, dose adjustment of concomitant medications that are predominantly metabolized by CYP2D6 and have a narrow therapeutic index (e.g. flecainide, vinblastine, thioridazine and most tricyclic antidepressants) may be required. Cinacalcet does not appreciably inhibit or induce the activities of CYP3A4, 1A2, 2C9 or 2C19. An inverse relationship exists between plasma PTH and cinacalcet concentrations. PTH concentrations are greatest before dose administration when the cinacalcet concentration is lowest (24 hours after the previous day's dose). Nadir PTH levels occur approximately 2-3 hours after dosing.

Chronic kidney disease and venous thromboembolism: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is increased with severe kidney disease, but whether less-severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) increases the risk of VTE is less certain.

METHODS

We studied this in a prospective cohort of 10 700 whites and African Americans, aged 53-75 years, attending Visit 4 (1996-98) of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values were estimated from prediction equations based on serum creatinine (eGFR(creat)) or cystatin C (eGFR(cys)). Normal kidney function was defined as eGFR ≥90 ml/min/1.73 m(2), mildly decreased kidney function as eGFR between 60 and 89 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and Stage 3 to 4 CKD as eGFR between 15 and 59 ml/min/1.73 m(2). VTE occurrence (n = 228) was ascertained over a median of 8.3 years.

RESULTS

For eGFR(cys), the age-, race- and sex-adjusted hazard ratios of total VTE were 1.0, 1.40 and 1.94 (P trend = 0.003) for normal kidney function, mildly impaired kidney function and Stage 3 to 4 CKD, respectively. These respective hazard ratios were moderately attenuated to 1.0, 1.26 and 1.60 (P trend = 0.04) with adjustment for hormone replacement therapy, diabetes and body mass index. Associations between CKD based on eGFR(cys) and VTE were slightly stronger for idiopathic VTE than for secondary VTE. In contrast, CKD based on eGFR(creat) was not associated with total VTE occurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Stage 3 to 4 CKD, based on eGFR(cys) but not eGFR(creat), was associated with an approximately 1.6-fold increased risk of VTE.

Chronic kidney disease and venous thromboembolism: epidemiology and mechanisms

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

An estimated 13% of Americans have kidney disease. We sought to describe the association of kidney disease with risk of venous thromboembolism and discuss possible mechanisms explaining this association.

RECENT FINDINGS

All severities of kidney disease appear to increase the risk of venous thromboembolism. In the general population the risk associated with mild to moderate kidney disease is 1.3-2-fold increased, and present even for microalbuminuria, although stage 1 chronic kidney disease itself has not been studied. End-stage renal disease is also associated with a 2.3-fold increased risk, compared to the general population. Although data are limited, risk increases after kidney transplant and with nephrotic syndrome as well.

SUMMARY

Rates of kidney disease are increasing rapidly in the population and kidney disease is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism. An improved understanding of mechanisms linking kidney disease with venous thromboembolism will allow further study of best prevention efforts.

Oral anticoagulant therapy in hemodialysis patients: do the benefits outweigh the risks?

Managing oral anticoagulation may be difficult in hemodialysis patients because the antithrombotic effect can be counterbalanced by an increased risk of hemorrhagic complications. There is insufficient evidence to recommend the routine use of warfarin for thrombosis prophylaxis of the vascular access in all patients. If a decision for anticoagulation is made, dosing warfarin to a "therapeutic" level is suggested, although the most appropriate target INR range remains unclear. Many hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation have multiple risk factors for stroke and generally benefit from warfarin, with careful and frequent laboratory monitoring. Treatment with standard dose warfarin is also recommended in patients with venous thromboembolism provided that patients do not have contraindications to anticoagulation. For those with such contraindications, placement of an inferior vena cava filter is suggested. These recommendations are limited by the almost complete lack of data in dialysis patients. Sound randomized evidence of efficacy and harm for anticoagulation in these patients will likely never be available. Knowledge of the risk of bleeding and thrombosis in anticoagulated and nonanticoagulated dialysis patients could be provided by feasible, well-designed cohort studies.

What is so bad about a hemoglobin level of 12 to 13 g/dL for chronic kidney disease patients anyway?

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) clearly indicate a possible cardiovascular morbidity and mortality risk when deliberately targeting a normal hemoglobin (Hb) concentration of 13 to 15 g/dL. By contrast, observational studies point to greater hospitalization and mortality at Hb levels <11 g/dL. There are no direct data to help us determine where, within this broad range, the optimal Hb lies. In RCTs and observational studies, significant confounding from the interrelationships of anemia and epoetin resistance occurs in patients with a serious illness. Patients with comorbidities such as malnutrition and inflammatory processes are more resistant to epoetin and, invariably, require greater cumulative epoetin doses. The effect of a higher erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) dose on increasing mortality has been noted repeatedly in post hoc analyses of RCTs. It is therefore too simplistic to solely attribute the outcomes achieved in RCTs to "target Hb." We discuss various mechanisms for potential harm at higher Hb levels as opposed to those that may be obtained from higher epoetin doses. For the individual patient, the therapeutic decision should center on what Hb is most appropriate at a "safe" ESA dose. Consequently, an Hb of 12 to 13 g/dL may be totally appropriate in some patient populations.

Beyond anemia: the clinical impact of the physiologic effects of erythropoietin

Although we have known that oxygen tension affects erythrocyte production since the 19th century, we have only recently begun to understand many subtleties of erythropoietin (EPO) physiology. EPO administration has allowed hundreds of thousands of patients to avoid transfusions. With the beneficial effects so apparent a detailed understanding of the full clinical physiology of this plasma factor seemed less important. However, the unanticipated increase in mortality found in recent randomized studies is prompting a reassessment of this view. We will review what is known about the physiology of this plasma factor that, it is now clear, is more than just an erythrocyte production factor.

Atrial fibrillation in end-stage renal disease

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Recent studies indicate that atrial fibrillation (AF) is prevalent among ESRD patients while it adversely affects the clinical outcome. Despite these considerations, AF management in this population is problematic. Notably, most ESRD patients with AF are deprived of the benefits of anticoagulation therapy because of the fear of hemorrhagic complications. This article provides a concise and critical overview of the complex pathophysiology, epidemiology, and discusses the clinical issues regarding the emerging association between ESRD and AF.

Venous thromboembolism and bleeding in critically ill patients with severe renal insufficiency receiving dalteparin thromboprophylaxis: prevalence, incidence and risk factors

BACKGROUND

Critically ill patients with renal insufficiency are predisposed to both deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and bleeding. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence, incidence and predictors of DVT and the incidence of bleeding in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with estimated creatinine clearance <30 ml/min.

METHODS

In a multicenter, open-label, prospective cohort study of critically ill patients with severe acute or chronic renal insufficiency or dialysis receiving subcutaneous dalteparin 5,000 IU once daily, we estimated the prevalence of proximal DVT by screening compression venous ultrasound of the lower limbs within 48 hours of ICU admission. DVT incidence was assessed on twice-weekly ultrasound testing. We estimated the incidence of major and minor bleeding by daily clinical assessments. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to identify independent predictors of both DVT and major bleeding.

RESULTS

Of 156 patients with a mean (standard deviation) creatinine clearance of 18.9 (6.5) ml/min, 18 had DVT or pulmonary embolism within 48 hours of ICU admission, died or were discharged before ultrasound testing - leaving 138 evaluable patients who received at least one dose of dalteparin. The median duration of dalteparin administration was 7 days (interquartile range, 4 to 12 days). DVT developed in seven patients (5.1%; 95% confidence interval, 2.5 to 10.1). The only independent risk factor for DVT was an elevated baseline Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (hazard ratio for 10-point increase, 2.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 4.91). Major bleeding developed in 10 patients (7.2%; 95% confidence interval, 4.0 to 12.8), all with trough anti-activated factor X levels </= 0.18 IU/ml. Independent risk factors for major bleeding were aspirin use (hazard ratio, 6.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.35 to 29.4) and a high International Normalized Ratio (hazard ratio for 0.5-unit increase, 1.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 2.66).

CONCLUSION

In ICU patients with renal insufficiency, the incidence of DVT and major bleeding are considerable but appear related to patient comorbidities rather than to an inadequate or excessive anticoagulant from thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin.

Chronic kidney disease increases risk for venous thromboembolism

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality, but its association with incident venous thromboembolism (VTE) in non-dialysis-dependent patients has not been evaluated in a community-based population. With the use of data from the Longitudinal Investigation of Thromboembolism Etiology (LITE) study, 19,073 middle-aged and elderly adults were categorized on the basis of estimated GFR, and cystatin C (available in 4734 participants) was divided into quintiles. During a mean follow-up time of 11.8 yr, 413 participants developed VTE. Compared with participants with normal kidney function, relative risk for VTE was 1.28 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02 to 1.59) for those with mildly decreased kidney function and 2.09 (95% CI 1.47 to 2.96) for those with stage 3/4 CKD, when adjusted for age, gender, race, and center. After additional adjustment for cardiovascular disease risk factors, an increased risk for VTE was still observed in participants with stage 3/4 CKD, with a multivariable adjusted relative risk of 1.71 (95% CI 1.18 to 2.49). There was no significant association between cystatin C and VTE. In conclusion, middle-aged and elderly patients with CKD (stages 3 through 4) are at increased risk for incident VTE, suggesting that VTE prophylaxis may be particularly important in this population.

Essentials of anticoagulation in hemodialysis

Numerous acquired hemostatic abnormalities have been identified in renal insufficiency. Hemodialysis procedures add to these disturbances as they repetitively imply turbulent blood flow, high shear stress, and contact of blood to artificial surfaces. This nonphysiological environment leads to activation of platelets, leukocytes, and the coagulation cascade, resulting in fouling of the membrane and ultimately in clotting of fibers and the whole hemodialyzer. Anticoagulation in hemodialysis is targeted to prevent this activation of coagulation during the procedure. Most agents inhibit the plasmatic coagulation cascade. Still commonly used is unfractionated heparin, followed by low-molecular-weight heparin preparations with distinct advantages. Immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia constitutes a potentially life-threatening complication of heparin therapy requiring immediate switch to nonheparin alternative anticoagulants. Danaparoid, lepirudin, and argatroban are currently being used for alternative anticoagulation, all of which possess both advantages and limitations. In the past, empirical strategies reducing or avoiding heparin were applied for patients at bleeding risk, whereas nowadays regional citrate anticoagulation is increasingly used to prevent bleeding by allowing procedures without any systemic anticoagulation. Avoidance of clotting within the whole hemodialyzer circuit is not granted. Specific knowledge of the mechanisms of coagulation, the targets of the anticoagulants in use, and their respective characteristics constitutes the basis for individualized anticoagulation aimed at achieving full patency of the circuit throughout the procedure. Patency of the circuit is an important prerequisite for optimal hemodialysis quality.

The treatment of venous thromboembolism in special populations

Anticoagulant therapy for the typical venous thromboembolism patient is straightforward with predictably favorable outcomes. However, for certain patients with venous thromboembolism, there remains uncertainty and controversy about optimal treatment. These controversial areas include venous thromboembolism patients with: heparin resistance, renal insufficiency, morbid obesity, cancer, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, recurrent thrombosis despite appropriate anticoagulation, and patients with unprovoked VTE who may or may not benefit from thrombophilia testing. This review summarizes the current data for these special patient populations with venous thromboembolism and provides our recommendations for management.

A patient with an uncommon etiology of intradialytic hypotension

Hemodialysis is associated with various complications, the most common being intradialytic hypotension (IDH). In the majority of cases, IDH is easily corrected and does not represent a life-threatening condition. We present a patient in whom IDH was unresponsive to various corrective strategies. A new mitral valve regurgitant lesion was diagnosed that eventually led to the patient's demise. Unusual etiologies of IDH need to be considered, particularly in instances where routine therapeutic measures are ineffective.

Thromboembolism and anticoagulant management in hemodialysis patients: A practical guide to clinical management

The need for anticoagulation in dialysis patients is common and the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and atrial fibrillation in this population is high. While direct data are lacking on the management of anticoagulation in dialysis patients, careful weighing of risks and benefits on the basis of evidence from other populations is crucial. VTE should be managed with adjusted dose warfarin for most patients. Placement of an inferior vena cava filter is a reasonable option for those patients with unacceptable bleeding risks. Studies are ongoing to assess the safety of some low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH), which may potentially be useful for long-term anticoagulation in hemodialysis patients. In atrial fibrillation the available data on risk of bleeding, risk of stroke, and patient preferences should all be taken into account when considering long-term anticoagulation. We have constructed an evidence model to help quantitate the risks and benefits for an individual patient. The impact of dialysis on risk of bleeding is such that the risk of bleeding will outweigh the benefit in many patients, and anticoagulation will not be used: in some of these patients aspirin therapy may be an alternative. Finally, in the area of prevention of graft and access thrombosis, some randomized controlled trials are available, but none have to date shown benefit from anticoagulation for primary or secondary prevention of thrombosis, and the risk of bleeding in these studies was high.

Deep venous thrombosis in medical-surgical critically ill patients: prevalence, incidence, and risk factors

OBJECTIVE

Critically ill patients may be at high risk of venous thromboembolism. The objective was to determine the prevalence, incidence, and risk factors for proximal lower extremity deep venous thrombosis among critically ill medical-surgical patients.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort.

SETTING

Closed university-affiliated intensive care unit.

PATIENTS

We enrolled consecutive patients > or =18 yrs of age expected to be in intensive care unit for > or =72 hrs. Exclusion criteria were an admitting diagnosis of trauma, orthopedic surgery, pregnancy, and life support withdrawal.

INTERVENTIONS

Interventions included bilateral lower extremity compression ultrasound within 48 hrs of intensive care unit admission, twice weekly, and if venous thromboembolism was clinically suspected. Thromboprophylaxis was protocol directed and universal. We recorded deep venous thrombosis risk factors at baseline and daily, using multivariate regression analysis to determine independent predictors. Patients were followed to hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Among 261 patients with a mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of 25.5 (+/-8.4), the prevalence of deep venous thrombosis was 2.7% (95% confidence interval 1.1-5.5) on intensive care unit admission, and the incidence was 9.6% (95% confidence interval 6.3-13.8) over the intensive care unit stay. We identified four independent risk factors for intensive care unit-acquired deep venous thrombosis: personal or family history of venous thromboembolism (hazard ratio 4.0, 95% confidence interval 1.5-10.3), end-stage renal failure (hazard ratio 3.7, 95% confidence interval 1.2-11.1), platelet transfusion (hazard ratio 3.2, 95% confidence interval 1.2-8.4), and vasopressor use (hazard ratio 2.8, 95% confidence interval 1.1-7.2). Patients with deep venous thrombosis had a longer duration of mechanical ventilation (p = .03), intensive care unit stay (p = .005), and hospitalization (p < .001) than patients without deep venous thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite universal thromboprophylaxis, medical-surgical critically ill patients remain at risk for lower extremity deep venous thrombosis. Further research is needed to evaluate the risks and benefits of more intense venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.

Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy

This article discusses the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and is part of the Seventh American College of Chest Physicians Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence-Based Guidelines. Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, burden, and costs. Grade 2 suggests that individual patients' values may lead to different choices (for a full understanding of the grading see Guyatt et al, CHEST 2004; 126:179S-187S). Among the key recommendations in this chapter are the following. We recommend against the use of aspirin alone as thromboprophylaxis for any patient group (Grade 1A). For moderate-risk general surgery patients, we recommend prophylaxis with low-dose unfractionated heparin (LDUH) (5,000 U bid) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) [< or = 3,400 U once daily] (both Grade 1A). For higher risk general surgery patients, we recommend thromboprophylaxis with LDUH (5,000 U tid) or LMWH (> 3,400 U daily) [both Grade 1A]. For high-risk general surgery patients with multiple risk factors, we recommend combining pharmacologic methods (LDUH three times daily or LMWH, > 3,400 U daily) with the use of graduated compression stockings and/or intermittent pneumatic compression devices (Grade 1C+). We recommend that thromboprophylaxis be used in all patients undergoing major gynecologic surgery (Grade 1A) or major, open urologic procedures, and we recommend prophylaxis with LDUH two times or three times daily (Grade 1A). For patients undergoing elective total hip or knee arthroplasty, we recommend one of the following three anticoagulant agents: LMWH, fondaparinux, or adjusted-dose vitamin K antagonist (VKA) [international normalized ratio (INR) target, 2.5; range, 2.0 to 3.0] (all Grade 1A). For patients undergoing hip fracture surgery (HFS), we recommend the routine use of fondaparinux (Grade 1A), LMWH (Grade 1C+), VKA (target INR, 2.5; range, 2.0 to 3.0) [Grade 2B], or LDUH (Grade 1B). We recommend that patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty, or HFS receive thromboprophylaxis for at least 10 days (Grade 1A). We recommend that all trauma patients with at least one risk factor for VTE receive thromboprophylaxis (Grade 1A). In acutely ill medical patients who have been admitted to the hospital with congestive heart failure or severe respiratory disease, or who are confined to bed and have one or more additional risk factors, we recommend prophylaxis with LDUH (Grade 1A) or LMWH (Grade 1A). We recommend, on admission to the intensive care unit, all patients be assessed for their risk of VTE. Accordingly, most patients should receive thromboprophylaxis (Grade 1A).

Pulmonary Hypertension Among End-Stage Renal Failure Patients Following Hemodialysis Access Thrombectomy

PURPOSE

Percutaneous hemodialysis thrombectomy causes subclinical pulmonary emboli without short-term clinical consequence; the long-term effects on the pulmonary arterial vasculature are unknown. We compared the prevalence of pulmonary hypertension between patients who underwent one or more hemodialysis access thrombectomy procedures with controls without prior thrombectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was performed. Cases (n = 88) had undergone one or more hemodialysis graft thrombectomy procedures, with subsequent echocardiography during routine investigation of comorbid cardiovascular disease. Cases were compared with controls without end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (n = 100, group 1), and controls with ESRD but no prior thrombectomy procedures (n = 117, group 2). The presence and velocity of tricuspid regurgitation on echocardiography was used to determine the prevalence and grade of pulmonary hypertension; these were compared between cases and controls using the chi-square test and logistic regression.

RESULTS

The prevalence of pulmonary hypertension among cases was 52% (46/88), consisting of mild, moderate and severe in 26% (n = 23), 10% (n = 9) and 16% (n = 14), respectively. Prevalence of pulmonary hypertension among group 1 controls was 26% (26/100), consisting of mild, moderate and severe pulmonary hypertension in 14%, 5% and 7%, respectively. Cases had 2.7 times greater odds of having pulmonary hypertension than group 1 controls (p = 0.002). The prevalence of pulmonary hypertension among group 2 controls was 42% (49/117), consisting of mild, moderate and severe pulmonary arterial hypertension in 25% (n = 49), 10% (n = 12) and 4% (n = 5), respectively. Cases were slightly more likely to have pulmonary hypertension than group 2 controls (OR = 1.5), although this failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.14).

CONCLUSION

Prior hemodialysis access thrombectomy does not appear to be a risk factor for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Patients with ESRD are more likely to have pulmonary hypertension.

Cardiovascular risk in stage 4 and 5 nephropathy

Severity of heart disease of almost all types, as well as mortality risk associated with heart disease, increases in step with severity of kidney disease, although not necessarily in a linear fashion. Heart failure is more common and just as lethal as ischemic heart disease in patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD). The incidence of nonfatal heart disease in dialysis and transplant populations has now been described in detail. Although standard risk factors for heart disease that are more common among patients with CKD than in the general population do not adequately explain the greatly increased risk of heart disease in patients with severe CKD, neither do as yet identified "nontraditional" risk factors. However, in addition to the factors not common in the general population, such as anemia, hyperphosphatemia, and markers of systemic inflammation, patients with CKD in the modern era may also exhibit excessive thrombotic tendencies. Screening for heart disease in this population relies mainly on dobutamine stress echocardiography or nuclear scintigraphy. The role of electron beam CT (EBCT) scanning is currently controversial. The indications for coronary angiography are the same for patients with CKD as for the general population, but patients with CKD are at greatly increased risk for contrast-associated nephropathy, the least controversial preventive therapy, which consists of isotonic saline and N-acetylcysteine. Finally, patients with CKD do not currently receive adequate medical therapy for prevention and treatment of heart disease.

Early renal insufficiency and late venous thromboembolism after renal transplantation in the united states

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the most common preventable cause of death in hospitalized patients. Patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) may be at increased risk for PE in comparison to the general population. Whether severe CKD is associated with increased risk for late venous thromboembolism (VTE) in a population of renal transplant recipients has not been determined.

METHODS

Using the US Renal Data System database, we studied 28,924 patients receiving a kidney transplant from January 1, 1996, to July 31, 2000, with Medicare as primary payer, followed up until December 31, 2000. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate the association of transplant recipient estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula) less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (versus >30 mL/min/1.73 m2) 1 year after renal transplantation with Medicare claims for VTE (either deep-venous thrombosis or PE/infarction) 1.5 to 3 years after renal transplantation.

RESULTS

The rate of VTE occurring 1.5 to 3 years after transplantation was 2.9 episodes/1,000 person-years. eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 versus higher at the end of the first year after renal transplantation was associated with significantly increased risk for later VTE (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.08 to 3.89).

CONCLUSION

Patients with severe CKD after renal transplantation should be regarded as high risk for late VTE, which is a potentially preventable cause of death in this population.

Sirolimus does not increase the risk for postoperative thromboembolic events among renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) tends to occur in greater frequency among cyclosporine (CsA)-treated renal-transplant recipients. Because administration of sirolimus may increase the whole-blood concentrations of CsA, we sought to assess the impact of the combination regimen on the incidence, predisposing factors, and consequences of postoperative DVT, transplant renal-vein or artery thrombosis, and pulmonary embolus.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated two cohorts of renal transplant recipients: CsA/prednisone (Pred)+/-azathioprine (n=136, group A) or sirolimus+CsA+Pred (n=354, group B) using Fisher's exact t and chi-square tests, as well as Kaplan-Meier analyses, odds ratios, and multiple logistic regression methods.

RESULTS

The 7 of 136 (5.1%) incidence of thrombotic events in group A was similar to the 20 of 354 (5.6%) incidence in group B (P=0.513; NS) and occurred no more frequently ipsilateral to the transplant. Although the occurrence of an acute-rejection episode was not associated with the DVT diagnosis, all affected patients displayed elevated serum creatinine (Scr) values, which remained slightly higher than baseline following recovery (group A 1.63+/-1.22-1.95+/-0.93 mg/dL; group B 1.70+/-1.11-2.01+/-0.88 mg/dL). Renal biopsies failed to show evidence of intrarenal coagulopathy. No patient lost a graft as a complication of DVT, nor did these events produce other lasting adverse effects. Patients in the sirolimus group showed a strong correlation between the occurrence of DVT and the previous existence of an ipsilateral or contralateral lymphocele.

CONCLUSION

Addition of sirolimus to a CsA+Pred regimen does not increase the incidence of postoperative thrombotic events among renal transplant recipients.

Thrombosis in end-stage renal disease

Although renal failure has classically been associated with a bleeding tendency, thrombotic events are common among patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). A variety of thrombosis-favoring hematologic alterations have been demonstrated in these patients. In addition, "nontraditional" risk factors for thrombosis, such as hyperhomocysteinemia, endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and malnutrition, are present in a significant proportion of chronic dialysis patients. Hemodialysis (HD) vascular access thrombosis, ischemic heart disease, and renal allograft thrombosis are well-recognized complications in these patients. Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are viewed as rare in chronic dialysis patients, but recent studies suggest that this perception should be reconsidered. Several ESRD treatment factors such as recombinant erythropoietin (EPO) administration, dialyzer bioincompatibility, and calcineurin inhibitor administration may have prothrombotic effects. In this article we review the pathogenesis and clinical manifestations of thrombosis in ESRD and evaluate the evidence that chronic renal failure or its management predisposes to thrombotic events.

Hospitalized nephrolithiasis after renal transplantation in the United States

The national incidence of and risk factors for hospitalized nephrolithiasis (NEP) in renal transplant (RT) recipients has not been reported. We conducted a historical cohort study of 42 096 RT recipients in the United States Renal Data System between 1 July 1994 and 30 June 1998. The 1-year incidence of NEP (ICD-9 codes 592.x) after RT in 1997 was compared to the rate of NEP in the general population using the National Hospital Discharge Survey. Associations with time to hospitalizations for a primary diagnosis of nephrolithiasis were assessed by Cox Regression. NEP was uncommon after RT (104 cases per 100 000 person years in 1997). However, females, but not males, had a statistically significant increased risk of NEP compared to the general population (rate ratio for females, 2.84, 95% confidence interval, 2.35-3.58). Kidney stones were more common than ureteral stones, and percutaneous procedures were more common than ureteroscopy or extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). The only risk factor identified for NEP was renal failure due to stone disease (only one case). NEP was uncommon after RT, but was still more common than in the general population. We identified differences in the presentation and management of NEP after RT in comparison to the general population.

Atrial fibrillation in chronic dialysis patients in the United States: risk factors for hospitalization and mortality

BACKGROUND

The incidence and risk factors for hospitalized atrial fibrillation have not been previously assessed in a national population of dialysis patients.

METHODS

We analyzed the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Study (DMMS) Wave II in a historical cohort study of hospitalized atrial fibrillation. Data from 3374 patients who started dialysis in 1996 with valid follow-up times were available for analysis, censored at the time of renal transplantation and followed until November 2000. Cox Regression analysis was used to model factors associated with time to first hospitalization for atrial fibrillation (ICD9 code 427.31x) adjusted for comorbidities, demographic factors, baseline laboratory values, blood pressures, dialysis modality, and cardioprotective medications.

RESULTS

The incidence density of atrial fibrillation was 12.5/1000 person years. Factors associated with atrial fibrillation were older age (> or = 71 years vs. <48 years), extremes (both high and low) of pre-dialysis systolic blood pressure, dialysis modality (hemodialysis vs. peritoneal dialysis), and digoxin use. Baseline use of coumadin was associated with reduced mortality in patients later hospitalized for atrial fibrillation.

CONCLUSIONS

Dialysis patients had a high incidence of atrial fibrillation. This risk was largely segregated among those with established risk factors for atrial fibrillation, and hemodialysis patients. Use of coumadin was associated with improved survival among patients later hospitalized for atrial fibrillation.