Transmission of hepatitis B by transplantation of livers from donors positive for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen. The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Liver Transplantation Database

Molecular Mechanisms to Control Post-Transplantation Hepatitis B Recurrence

Hepatitis B often progresses to decompensated liver cirrhosis requiring orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Although newer nucleos(t)ide analogues result in >90% viral and hepatitis activity control, severely decompensated patients still need OLT because of drug-resistant virus, acute exacerbation, or hepatocellular carcinoma. Acute hepatitis B is also an indication for OLT, because it can progress to fatal acute liver failure. After OLT, the hepatitis B recurrence rate is >80% without prevention, while >90% of transplant recipients are clinically controlled with combined hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment. However, long-term HBIG administration is associated with several unresolved issues, including limited availability and extremely high cost; therefore, several treatment protocols with low-dose HBIG, combined with nucleos(t)ide analogues, have been investigated. Another approach is to induce self-producing anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) antibodies using an HBV envelope (HBs) antigen vaccine. Patients who are not HBV carriers, such as those with acutely infected liver failure, are good candidates for vaccination. For chronic HBV carrier liver cirrhosis patients, a successful vaccine response can only be achieved in selected patients, such as those treated with experimentally reduced immunosuppression protocols. The present protocol for post-OLT HBV control and the future prospects of newer treatment strategies are reviewed.

De novo hepatitis B virus infection after pediatric liver transplantations with hepatitis B core antibody-positive donors: a single-center 20-yr experience

DNHB is common in countries with high prevalence of hepatitis B, and therefore, contracting hepatitis B after LT with HBcAb(+) grafts is a major concern. We studied DNHB in 247 children (aged <18 yr) who underwent LT from 1994 to 2013. Sixty-six of 247 recipients received HBcAb(+) donor grafts. The incidence of DNHB was 5.7% (14 of 247 children) and that in HBcAb(+) donor grafts was 19.7% (13 of 66 children). The incidence of DNHB without LAM prophylaxis was 31.3% (nine of 29 children), while that with prophylaxis was 10.8% (four of 37 children). LAM prophylaxis negatively correlated with DNHB by Cox regression analysis (p = 0.028, odds ratio = 0.258). Among 13 DNHB patients with HBcAb(+) donor grafts, eight recovered from DNHB and four showed the emergence of LAM resistance. There was no DNHB-related graft failure. This study showed that HBcAb(+) donor graft was associated with development of DNHB, and use of LAM prophylaxis decreased the incidence of DNHB with HBcAb(+) graft.

Successful active immunization using a hepatitis B virus vaccination protocol for a recipient with hepatitis B core antibody-positive liver graft

INTRODUCTION

Donor shortages occasionally necessitate the use of hepatic allografts from hepatitis B core antibody-positive (HBcAb+) donors, with an attendant risk of post-transplantation hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. The aim of the present study was to develop and evaluate a protocol of active immunization for prevention of post-transplantation de novo HBV infection in patients receiving liver grafts from HBcAb+ donors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ten patients who had received HBcAb+ liver grafts at Shinshu University Hospital between October 1996 and December 2012 were enrolled. All the recipients were negative for HBV serological tests, and HBV-DNA. Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) was given routinely in the peritransplantation and post-transplantation periods, without antiviral drugs. Subcutaneous vaccination with recombinant HBV was given at a dosage of 20 μg in adults and 5 μg in children concomitant with HBIG until acquisition of active immunization. The timing to start HBV vaccination was dependent on the condition of the patient.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period after liver transplantation was 140 months, and the median period after transplantation until the start of vaccination was 7.0 months. Nine patients (90%) acquired active immunity after a median number of 4 (range, 2-13) vaccinations (hepatitis B surface antibody >300 mIU/mL for 1 year, or >100 mIU/mL thereafter), and did not require HBIG administration thereafter. None had any side effects of HBV vaccination or developed hepatitis B infection during the study period. Four fast responders who achieved antibody high titers by active immunization within 9 months received pretransplantation vaccinations, whereas 5 slow responders did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Our vaccination protocol provides a new effective strategy for prevention of de novo hepatitis B infection after liver transplantation in recipients with HBcAb+ liver grafts. Pretransplantation HBV vaccination was helpful for the post-transplantation vaccine response.

Occult hepatitis B virus infection in hemodialysis patients in Japan

Hepatitis B surface antigen is widely used in hepatitis B virus surveillance; patients who test negative for the antigen are judged to be uninfected. However, occult hepatitis B virus infection has been confirmed with hepatitis B virus DNA at low levels in the liver and peripheral blood in patients positive for hepatitis B core antibody or hepatitis B surface antibody, even if they test negative for hepatitis B surface antigen. To investigate the prevalence of occult hepatitis B virus in hemodialysis patients, we performed cross-sectional analysis of 161 hemodialysis patients in two related institutions for hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis B core antibody, and hepatitis B surface antibody. Hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis B core antibody, or hepatitis B surface antibody was present in 45 patients (28.0%). Hepatitis B virus DNA was present in six patients (3.7%), all of whom also tested positive for hepatitis B core antibody. Hepatitis B surface antibody positivity was unrelated in only one of the six patients. Four of the six patients were positive for hepatitis B surface antigen; however, two (1.3%) of these with occult hepatitis B virus infection were found to be hepatitis B surface antigen negative. Occult hepatitis B virus infection may be missed in hepatitis B virus surveillance using hepatitis B surface antigen alone; therefore, routine hepatitis B core antibody screening is necessary. Patients who test positive for hepatitis B core antibody should undergo further hepatitis B virus DNA testing to enable accurate hepatitis B virus screening.

Anti-HBc-positive/HBsAg-negative liver donors pose a higher risk of occult HBV infection but do not cause severe histological damage in liver grafts

BACKGROUND

The use of serum anti-hepatitis B core antibody (HBc)-positive/hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative liver donors for patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver disease (HBRLD) is a promising means of expanding the organ donor pool and does not increase the risk of HBV recurrence. However, whether such donors will compromise the histology of the liver grafts is unclear.

METHODS

Among 84 patients who underwent transplantation for HBRLD and who did not have post-transplant HBV recurrence (non-detectable serum HBsAg and HBV DNA), 19 underwent liver biopsy (eight received anti-HBc-positive/HBsAg-negative liver grafts; 11 received anti-HBc-negative liver grafts) and were included in the study. Intrahepatic total HBV DNA and covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) were detected using real-time polymerase chain reaction; histological characteristics were evaluated with the Batts-Ludwig semi-quantitative scoring system.

RESULT

Of the 19 recipients, nine (47.4%) were positive for intrahepatic HBV DNA; 82.5% (7/8) received grafts from anti-HBc-positive donors and 18.2% (2/11) received grafts from anti-HBc-negative donors (P=0.003). HBV cccDNA was not detectable in the liver grafts of the 19 recipients. Ten patients had mild inflammation and minimal fibrosis in the portal area: four of the eight in the anti-HBc-positive group and six of the 11 in the anti-HBc-negative group (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Anti-HBc-positive/HBsAg-negative donors for HBRLD pose a higher risk of occult HBV infection post-liver transplant but do not cause liver damage. Thus, anti-HBc-positive grafts may be considered an effective and safe means of expanding the pool of liver donors for patients with HBRLD.

Contradictory immune response in post liver transplantation hepatitis B and C

Hepatitis B and C often progress to decompensated liver cirrhosis requiring orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). After OLT, hepatitis B recurrence is clinically controlled with a combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleos(t)ide analogues. Another approach is to induce self-producing anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) antibodies using a HBV envelope antigen vaccine. Patients who had not been HBV carriers such as acutely infected liver failure or who received liver from HBV self-limited donor are good candidate. For chronic HBV carrier patients, a successful response can only be achieved in selected patients such as those treated with experimentally reduced immunosuppression protocols or received an anti-HBV adaptive memory carrying donor liver. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfects transplanted livers at a rate of >90%. HCV reinfected patients show different severities of hepatitis, from mild and slowly progressing to severe and rapidly progressing, possibly resulting from different adaptive immune responses. More than half the patients require interferon treatment, although the success rate is low and carries risks for leukocytopenia and rejection. Managing the immune response has an important role in controlling recurrent hepatitis C. This study aimed to review the adaptive immune response in post-OLT hepatitis B and C.

Hepatitis viruses and liver transplantation: evolving trends in antiviral management

Viral hepatitis is both a leading indication for liver transplant (LT) and an important cause of posttransplant graft loss and mortality. Treatment and prevention of hepatitis B virus in LT recipients, with the observed corresponding improvement in post-LT outcomes, is among the great success stories in transplantation. By comparison, treatment of hepatitis C virus with safe and effective regimens is only just becoming a reality. Chronic hepatitis E virus infection in LT recipients represents a newly described phenomenon that can also lead to graft loss; early diagnosis and treatment may be key in the management of these patients.

Prognostic implications of recipient or donor hepatitis B seropositivity in thoracic transplantation: analysis of 426 hepatitis B surface antigen-positive recipients

BACKGROUND

Prognostic data on survival of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive (HBsAg+) recipients and of hepatitis B core antibody-positive (HBcAb+) donors are limited in the thoracic transplantation (TT) cohort. Improved understanding of risks could potentially expand the recipient and donor pools.

METHODS

Post-hoc analysis of limited-access dataset of the United Network for Organ Sharing database from January 2000-September 2010 was performed. Analyses were performed for all TT, including single and bilateral lung, orthotopic heart, and simultaneous heart-lung transplants. The primary analyzed outcome was overall survival. A Cox proportional multivariate hazards model was used to adjust for significant risk predictors.

RESULTS

Of 24,817 patients included, 426 recipients were HBsAg+, of whom 106 (25%) died during a mean follow-up of 3.6 years. On multivariate analysis, recipient HBsAg+ (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69-1.32; P = 0.80), and donor HBcAb+ (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.68-1.22; P = 0.53) were not associated with increased overall mortality in the entire TT cohort, with similar results for each individual transplant cohort. Unadjusted survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier curves in individual transplant cohorts did not show significant differences between HBsAg+ and HBsAg- recipients. No statistically significant differences were found between causes of mortality in the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

HBsAg+ status of recipients or HBcAb+ status of donors does not significantly affect overall survival of TT recipients. These data add to the scant literature on this subject and could potentially increase the donor and recipient pools.

Use of liver grafts from anti-hepatitis B core-positive donors: a multicenter study in Argentina

Liver transplantation success is limited by the availability of donors. To overcome this limitation, anti-core-positive donors are increasingly being accepted, but underutilization of this resource still occurs. We performed the current study to determine the prevalence of anti-core-positive donors in our region and to describe the management of these donors and their recipients. Between January 2005 and July 2011, the national transplant database included 2,262 registered liver donors among whom 106 (4.7%) were anti-core-positive including 59 (56%) discarded and 47 (44%) implanted organs. A median of 14.5 offers (range 4-60) were rejected before harvesting and implanting the accepted grafts. The only difference between the implanted and the discarded grafts was found for the alanine aminotransferase level, which was higher among the discarded ones (50 ± 59 UI/L vs 25 ± 16, P < .05). Among 40 recipients included in the study, 5 (12.5%) did not receive any prophylaxis; 18 (45%) a nucleos(t)ide analog 11 (25.5%), heptitis B immunoglobulin and nucleos(t)ide analogs and 6 (15%) pretransplant hepatitis B vaccination. Over a mean follow-up of 871 ± 585 days, 4 de novo hepatitis B cases were identified at 545, 720, 748, and 1,080 days posttransplantation. None of these patients had received any prophylaxis. In all cases entecavir successfully controlled viral replication. We believe that better utilization of these donors and careful management of their recipients represent safe strategies to expand the liver donor pool in Argentina.

Changing pattern of donor selection criteria in deceased donor liver transplant: a review of literature

During the last couple of decades, with standardization and progress in surgical techniques, immunosuppression and post liver transplantation patient care, the outcome of liver transplantation has been optimized. However, the principal limitation of transplantation remains access to an allograft. The number of patients who could derive benefit from liver transplantation markedly exceeds the number of available deceased donors. The large gap between the growing list of patients waiting for liver transplantation and the scarcity of donor organs has fueled efforts to maximize existing donor pool and identify new avenues. This article reviews the changing pattern of donor for liver transplantation using grafts from extended criteria donors (elderly donors, steatotic donors, donors with malignancies, donors with viral hepatitis), donation after cardiac death, use of partial grafts (split liver grafts) and other suboptimal donors (hypernatremia, infections, hypotension and inotropic support).

Trends in hepatitis B virus screening at the onset of chemotherapy in a large US cancer center

Background

National organizations recommend screening for hepatitis B virus (HBV) before chemotherapy but differ regarding which patients should be screened. We aimed to determine contemporary screening rates at a cancer center and the possible influence on these rates of publication of national recommendations.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of HBV screening in cancer patients registered during the period from January 2004 through April 2011. Screening was defined as HBsAg and anti-HBc tests ordered around the time of initial chemotherapy. We compared screening rates for 3 periods: January 1, 2004, through December 18, 2008 (Food and Drug Administration and American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases 2007 recommendations); December 19, 2008, through September 30, 2010 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases 2009, Institute of Medicine, and American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations); and October 1, 2010, through April 30, 2011. Logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of screening.

Results

Of 141,877 new patients, 18,688 received chemotherapy, and 3020 (16.2%) were screened. HBV screening rates increased over the 3 time periods (14.8%, 18.2%, 19.9%; P < 0.0001), but <19% of patients with HBV risk factors were screened. Among patients with hematologic malignancies, over 66% were screened, and odds of screening nearly doubled after publication of the recommendations (P < 0.0001). Less than 4% of patients with solid tumors were screened, although odds of screening increased 70% after publication of the recommendations (P = 0.003). Other predictors of screening included younger age, planned rituximab therapy, and known risk factors for HBV infection.

Conclusions

Most patients with solid tumors or HBV risk factors remained unscreened, although screening rates increased after publication of national recommendations. Efforts are needed to increase awareness of the importance of HBV screening before chemotherapy to identify patients who should start antiviral prophylaxis.

Prevalence of HBc-Ab among HBs-Ag negative healthy blood donors in south of Iran

Background:

The risk of infection with transfusion-transmitted viruses, such as Hepatitis B virus (HBV), has been reduced markedly. However, a zero-risk blood supply remains a popular goal. Anti-hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) is considered to be an effective marker for occult HBV infection, and it has served a significant role in improving blood safety. The purpose of this study was to determine the seroprevalence of anti-HBc antibodies among blood donors.

Methods:

During a period of six months in 2012, 1000 blood donors in Bandar Abbas were investigated for the presence of HBV infection markers. We used ELISA for the detection of HBsAg and chemiluminescence for the detection of HBsAb and anti-HBc antibodies.

Results:

The prevalence of positive anti-HBc among the 1000 donors was 8.3%. Almost 2.3% of the donors were reactive for anti-HBc and negative for HBsAg.

Conclusions:

The study showed that more than 2% of healthy blood donors in Bandar Abbas already have been exposed to HBV, although their HBsAg tests were negative. We suggest screening for anti-HBc to improve the safety of the blood supply.

Prophylaxis of hepatitis B infection in solid organ transplant recipients

Rates of transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection from organ donors with HBV markers to recipients along with reactivation of HBV during immunosuppression following transplantation have fallen significantly with the advent of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIg) and effective antiviral therapy. Although the availability of potent antiviral agents and HBIg has highly impacted the survival rate of HBV-infected patients after transplantation, the high cost associated with this practice represents a major financial burden. The availability of potent antivirals with high genetic barrier to resistance and minimal side effects have made it possible to recommend an HBIg-free prophylactic regimen in selected patients with low viral burden prior to transplant. Significant developments over the last two decades in the understanding and treatment of HBV infection necessitate a re-appraisal of the guidelines for prophylaxis of HBV infection in solid organ transplant recipients.

Hepatitis B-core antibody positive donors in liver transplantation and their impact on graft survival: evidence from the Liver Match cohort study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The appropriate allocation of grafts from HBcAb positive donors in liver transplantation is crucial, yet a consensus is still lacking.

METHODS

We evaluated this issue within Liver Match, a prospective observational Italian study. Data from 1437 consecutive, first transplants performed in 2007-2009 using grafts from deceased heart beating donors were analyzed (median follow-up: 1040 days). Of these, 219 (15.2%) were HBcAb positive. Sixty-six HBcAb positive grafts were allocated to HBsAg positive and 153 to HBsAg negative recipients.

RESULTS

329 graft losses occurred (22.9%): 66 (30.1%) among 219 recipients of HBcAb positive grafts, and 263 (21.6%) among 1218 recipients of HBcAb negative grafts. Graft survival was lower in recipients of HBcAb positive compared to HBcAb negative donors, with unadjusted 3-year graft survival of 0.69 (s.e. 0.032) and 0.77 (0.013), respectively (log-rank, p=0.0047). After stratifying for recipient HBsAg status, this difference was only observed among HBsAg negative recipients (log rank, p=0.0007), 3-year graft survival being excellent (0.88, s.e. 0.020) among HBsAg positive recipients, regardless of the HBcAb donor status (log rank, p=0.4478). Graft loss due to de novo HBV hepatitis occurred only in one patient. At Cox regression, hazard ratios for graft loss were: MELD (1.30 per 10 units, p=0.0002), donor HBcAb positivity (1.56, p=0.0015), recipient HBsAg positivity (0.43, p <0.0001), portal vein thrombosis (1.99, p=0.0156), and DRI (1.41 per unit, p=0.0325).

CONCLUSIONS

HBcAb positive donor grafts have better outcomes when transplanted into HBsAg positive than HBsAg negative recipients. These findings suggest that donor HBcAb positivity requires more stringent allocation strategies.

Approach to Intraoperative Consultation for Donor Liver Biopsies

Context.— As demand for organs to treat end-stage liver disease increases, donor livers once deemed only marginally suitable for donation are being considered for transplantation. Pathologists are increasingly being asked to evaluate these livers for acceptability. This article provides guidelines for frozen section evaluation of livers for transplantation.

Objective.— This article concentrates on the histopathologic features of transplant suitability with appropriate clinicopathologic correlation for the practicing pathologist. Recommendations for proper handling and sampling of tissue are discussed. Relative and absolute contraindications as well as artifacts and benign conditions are emphasized.

Data Sources.— Sources include a compilation of the authors' experiences in academic and community liver transplantation centers. In addition, relevant medical literature was reviewed, as well as Web sites specializing in organ transplantation, such as Transplant Pathology Internet Services and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network.

Conclusions.— Malignancy and extensive necrosis in the liver are absolute contraindications to transplantation. Evaluation of macrosteatosis, fibrosis, hepatitis, and necrosis depends on the severity of disease and correlation with the clinical situation. Donor age of greater than 60 years does not preclude transplantation. Artifacts and benign conditions need to be understood to prevent wastage of precious organs and to ensure that an appropriate organ is provided for the recipient.

Hepatitis B-positive donors in renal transplantation: increasing the deceased donor pool

It is reasonable to transplant HbsAg-positive kidneys into recipients who are themselves hepatitis B surface antigen (HbsAg) positive with appropriate antiviral treatment after transplantation. Although there are limited data regarding the hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission risk following transplantation of kidneys from HbsAg-positive donors into HBV-immune recipients, current literature suggests that the risk of chronic infection in the recipient can be prevented by using antiviral agents or by boosting protective anti-HBs titers. The risk of chronic HBV infection following transplantation of kidneys from HbsAg-positive donors for HBV-naive recipients is high but can be minimized by administering lifelong antiviral therapy. Such a policy could be considered in an urgent situation. The most cost-effective antiviral prophylaxis strategy is lifelong lamivudine. Kidneys from HBsAg neg/anti-HBcore pos recipients are associated with a low rate of chronic HBV infection in the recipient and therefore can no longer be regarded as marginal donors. Booster vaccination to achieve protective HBV immunity or lifelong lamivudine therapy should prevent posttransplant HBV infection. Hence, we believe that strategies allowing transplantation of kidneys from donors with HBV can be undertaken safely with careful selection and matching of donors and recipients increasing access to kidney transplantation.

Unexpected distribution of hepatitis B genotypes in patients with kidney disease: comparison with immunocompetent subjects

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has a high prevalence among hemodialysis and renal transplant patients. Data regarding genotype distribution in these populations are scarce and are still under investigation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution of HBV genotypes in end-stage renal disease (ESRD)-patients and renal transplant patients and to compare with the distribution observed in immunocompetent patients from the same geographic region. From a population of 213 patients evaluated initially, 120 patients with detectable HBV-DNA were included in the study and submitted to genotype determination by amplification of S gene by nested PCR followed by sequencing method. Among 41 hemodialysis patients the most frequent genotype was D (83%), followed by genotype A (10%), C (5%), and F (2%). Genotype D was also the most prevalent (73%) among 33 renal transplant patients, followed by genotype A (18%), F (6%), and B (3%). This distribution was similar in these two groups of patients and for the comparative analysis they were considered in the kidney disease group. Compared to immunocompetents, patients with kidney disease (ESRD and renal transplant patients) showed a distinct distribution, with a higher prevalence of genotype D (78% vs. 17%, P < 0.001) whereas genotype A was the most prevalent among immunocompetent patients (70% vs. 14%, P < 0.001). In conclusion, the higher frequency of genotype A in immunocompetent patients and of genotype D in patients with renal disease suggest a higher capacity of environmental transmission or a better adaptability of this genotype in patients with a different pattern of immunologic response.

Renal grafts from anti-hepatitis B core-positive donors: a quantitative review of the literature

BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS

Organ shortage is a major problem in transplantation. The use of organs from hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative and hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)-positive donors could significantly increase the donor pool. However, little information is available about the impact of HBcAb status of renal donors on viral transmission to recipients. To address this issue, the present quantitative review of relevant studies has been performed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electronic databases including Medline, EMBASE, ISI, and Scopus were systematically searched for studies that evaluated risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission through renal transplantation from HBsAg-/HBcAb+ donors. Eligible studies were identified according to predefined criteria. The final outcome was one of HBV markers seroconversion defined as HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb), or HBcAb detection in previously seronegative end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients after transplantation, and without other identified major sources of infection.

RESULTS

Nine studies with 1385 eligible kidney recipients were included. In total, 45 subjects showed seroconversion of HBV markers as follows: HBsAg (n = 4) (0.28%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.006; 0.57), HBcAb (n = 32), HBsAb (n = 5), and either HBcAb or HBsAb (n = 4). The total rate of seroconversion after renal transplantation was calculated to be 3.24% (95% CI: 2.31-4.18).

CONCLUSION

Our review indicates that the risk of HBV transmission from HBcAb-positive kidney donors is extremely low. Therefore, kidneys from these donors can be transplanted safely into ESRD patients.

The detection of occult HBV infection in patients with HBsAg negative pattern by real-time PCR method

AIM

Diagnostic problems may be encountered in Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections by serological tests and HBV DNA can be detectable in plasma and liver tissue while the HBsAg test is negative. This situation can be defined as occult or isolated Anti-HBc infections. Occult HBV infections may be divided into two categories by using hepatitis markers. One of them being that all hepatitis markers are negative and the other situation is having Anti-HBc +/- and Anti-HBs+patterns. These situations can be seen in isolated Anti-HBc cases.

METHOD

In this study, we aimed to detect the ratio of occult HBV infections by investigating HBV DNA in four different groups. These groups are: (1) 20 isolated Anti-HBc positive individuals, (2) 23 individuals naturally immune to HBV infection, (3) 20 individuals with seronegative hepatitis markers and high ALT levels, and (4) 23 vaccinated individuals against HBV. In order to detect HBV DNA the real-time PCR kit (QIAGEN, Artus HBV RG PCR Kit, Germany) with high analytical sensitivity (≤3.8IU/ml) was used.

RESULTS

The reliability of the molecular methods was assessed by increasing the quantitation standards of internal, external and also positive controls. No HBV DNA was detected in any of the 86 individuals consisting of four study groups.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we did not detect occult HBV infection in our four study groups by using a high sensitivity real-time (RT) PCR method, while occult HBV infections with various frequencies were detected in other large, serial international studies in which highly sensitive analytical molecular methods were used. Although we also used a high standard molecular kit to detect occult HBV infections, we suggest that the reason for the absence of detection of occult HBV infections may be due to the small number of cases included in this study. However, it was assumed that the use of a nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) with high analytical sensitivity in blood banks to prevent HBV transmission by blood transfusion is controversial due to both costs and diagnostic efficacy and for this reason we suggest that it will be useful to perform large serial studies regarding occult HBV infections in the future.

Influence of anti-HBc positive organ donor in lung donor selection

INTRODUCTION

The risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission through donor organs with HBsAg(-) and anti-HBc(+) serology has not been extensively studied in lung transplantation. The objectives of this study are to ascertain the influence of the anti-HBc(+) on the acceptance of the lung for transplantation, to comment on the published literature and to suggest an algorithm for action.

METHODS

A survey conducted in the 7 Spanish lung transplantation teams. The updated search of the literature was performed using medical databases from 1994 to February 2012.

RESULTS

All of the teams vaccinate the lung recipients against HBV, although none quantify the anti-HBs titers. When given an anti-HBc(+) donor, 3 teams change their strategy: one does not accept the offer, one selects the receptor from among patients in emergency status and another adds pharmacological prophylaxis. Only 3 publications refer to the serologic evolution of the receptors. At the moment there have been no reported cases of hepatitis B or HBsAg positivity post-transplant, but 4 out of the 50 anti-HBc(-) receptors changed to anti-HBc(+) in the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of anti-HBc in the donor influences the decision to accept a lung donor, although there is little information on its repercussions. To date, there has been no reported case of transmission of HBV, but post-transplant anti-HBc seroconversions have been described, which suggests contact with viral particles. Although rare, an anti-HBc(+) donor can harbor a hidden HBV infection. The risk of infection can be reduced with adequate anti-HBs titers or with appropriate pharmacological measures.

Challenges in Providing Treatment and Care for Viral Hepatitis among Individuals Co-Infected with HIV in Resource-Limited Settings

Hepatitis B and C infections are prevalent among HIV-infected individuals with different epidemiologic profiles, modes of transmission, natural histories, and treatments. Southeast Asian countries are classified as "highly prevalent zones," with a rate of hepatitis B and C coinfection in people living with HIV/AIDS of approximately 3.2-11%. Majority of hepatitis B coinfection is of genotype C. Most of the patients infected with hepatitis C in Thailand have genotype 3 which is significantly related to intravenous drug use whereas, in Vietnam, it is genotype 6. The options for antiretroviral drugs are limited and rely on global funds and research facilities. Only HBV treatment is available for free through the national health scheme. Screening tests for HBV and HCV prior to commencing antiretroviral treatment are low. Insufficient concern on hepatitis-virus-related liver malignancy and long-term hepatic morbidities is noted. Cost-effective HCV treatment can be incorporated into the national health program for those who need it by utilizing data obtained from clinical research studies. For example, patients infected with HCV genotype 2/3 with a certain IL-28B polymorphism can be treated with a shorter course of interferon and ribavirin which can also help reduce costs.

Influence of HBcAb positivity in the organ donor in heart transplantation

OBJECTIVE

There is a significant risk of hepatitis B transmission from HBsAg (-), HBcAb (+) donors in liver transplantation, but there is little information about hepatitis B transmission from HBcAb heart donors. The present study examines the influence of HBcAb presence in relation to heart donor acceptance and offers an update of the published studies.

DESIGN

Survey and medical database update from 1994 to October 2011.

SETTING

Spanish heart transplantation teams.

PATIENTS

Not applicable.

STUDY VARIABLES

Acceptance of heart transplant from an HBcAb (+) organ donor.

RESULTS

Twelve out of 15 surveyed teams were seen to vaccinate against HBV, and two quantify HBsAb titers. Seven teams specifically request donor HBcAb status. If the latter proves positive, two do not accept transplantation, two accept if the donor is also HBsAb (+), one selects the receptor under emergency conditions, and three use drug prophylaxis isolatedly or complementary to the above. Only one case of hepatitis B has been reported in a HBcAb (-) and HBsAb (-) receptor that did not receive prophylactic measures. There have been reports of seroconversion of the HBcAb and HBsAb markers, though with an uncertain etiology.

CONCLUSIONS

HBcAb seropositivity influences acceptance of a heart donor, but agreement is lacking. There is limited information on receptor evolution. To date there has been one reported case of hepatitis B after heart transplant. Although rare, an HBcAb (+) donor can harbor occult HBV infection. The risk of infection can be prevented with appropriate HBsAb titers following vaccination or by pharmacological measures.

Utilization of hepatitis B core antibody-positive donor liver grafts

BACKGROUND

The inclusion of hepatitis B core antibody-positive (HBcAb+) liver donors is a strategy utilized to increase organ availability. This study examined HBcAb+ transplantation practices to identify specific factors influencing outcomes.

METHODS

Twenty-five HBcAb+ liver transplants were identified retrospectively among 868 adult transplants performed between 1 January 1997 and 31 December 2009. Twelve (48%) recipients had hepatitis C and five (20%) had hepatitis B. Patient and donor demographics, preoperative morbidity, transplant data and outcomes were examined. Statistical analysis was completed using Student's t-test or the Kaplan-Meier method. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

There was no difference in age, body mass index or comorbidities between HBcAb+ liver recipients and control subjects. Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores of >30 were significantly more frequent in HBcAb+ liver recipients (32% vs. 15%; P= 0.04). All patients received immunoglobulin and longterm antiviral therapy as prophylaxis against graft hepatitis B resurgence. No patients who received HBcAb+ livers developed hepatitis B infection on follow-up. Overall survival at 30 days, 1 year and 5 years in HBcAb+ liver recipients was 92%, 74% and 74%, respectively, compared with 96%, 89% and 76%, respectively, in the control group (P= not significant, log-rank test). All except one of the deaths in the HBcAb+ liver recipient group occurred within 90 days postoperatively and in patients with MELD scores >30.

CONCLUSIONS

The practice of transplanting HBcAb+ grafts incurs low risk for infection using current methods of prophylaxis. The highest mortality risk was in the early postoperative period, specifically in patients with very high MELD scores. This probably reflects the practice of using positive serology grafts in emergent situations.

Balancing donor and recipient risk factors in liver transplantation: the value of D-MELD with particular reference to HCV recipients

Donor-recipient match is a matter of debate in liver transplantation. D-MELD (donor age × recipient biochemical model for end-stage liver disease [MELD]) and other factors were analyzed on a national Italian database recording 5946 liver transplants. Primary endpoint was to determine factors predictive of 3-year patient survival. D-MELD cutoff predictive of 5-year patient survival <50% (5yrsPS<50%) was investigated. A prognosis calculator was implemented (http://www.D-MELD.com). Differences among D-MELD deciles allowed their regrouping into three D-MELD classes (A < 338, B 338-1628, C >1628). At 3 years, the odds ratio (OR) for death was 2.03 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-2.85) in D-MELD class C versus B. The OR was 0.40 (95% CI, 0.24-0.66) in class A versus class B. Other predictors were hepatitis C virus (HCV; OR = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.11-1.81), hepatitis B virus (HBV; OR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51-0.93), retransplant (OR = 1.82; 95% CI, 1.16-2.87) and low-volume center (OR = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.11-1.99). Cox regressions up to 90 months confirmed results. The hazard ratio was 1.97 (95% CI, 1.59-2.43) for D-MELD class C versus class B and 0.42 (95% CI, 0.29-0.60) for D-MELD class A versus class B. Recipient age, HCV, HBV and retransplant were also significant. The 5yrsPS<50% cutoff was identified only in HCV patients (D-MELD ≥ 1750). The innovative approach offered by D-MELD and covariates is helpful in predicting outcome after liver transplantation, especially in HCV recipients.

Utilization of hepatitis B core antibody-positive donor liver grafts

BACKGROUND

The inclusion of hepatitis B core antibody-positive (HBcAb+) liver donors is a strategy utilized to increase organ availability. This study examined HBcAb+ transplantation practices to identify specific factors influencing outcomes.

METHODS

Twenty-five HBcAb+ liver transplants were identified retrospectively among 868 adult transplants performed between 1 January 1997 and 31 December 2009. Twelve (48%) recipients had hepatitis C and five (20%) had hepatitis B. Patient and donor demographics, preoperative morbidity, transplant data and outcomes were examined. Statistical analysis was completed using Student's t-test or the Kaplan-Meier method. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

There was no difference in age, body mass index or comorbidities between HBcAb+ liver recipients and control subjects. Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores of >30 were significantly more frequent in HBcAb+ liver recipients (32% vs. 15%; P= 0.04). All patients received immunoglobulin and longterm antiviral therapy as prophylaxis against graft hepatitis B resurgence. No patients who received HBcAb+ livers developed hepatitis B infection on follow-up. Overall survival at 30 days, 1 year and 5 years in HBcAb+ liver recipients was 92%, 74% and 74%, respectively, compared with 96%, 89% and 76%, respectively, in the control group (P= not significant, log-rank test). All except one of the deaths in the HBcAb+ liver recipient group occurred within 90 days postoperatively and in patients with MELD scores >30.

CONCLUSIONS

The practice of transplanting HBcAb+ grafts incurs low risk for infection using current methods of prophylaxis. The highest mortality risk was in the early postoperative period, specifically in patients with very high MELD scores. This probably reflects the practice of using positive serology grafts in emergent situations.

De novo activation of HBV with escape mutations from hepatitis B surface antibody after living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

De novo activation of HBV occurs after liver transplantation from hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative and hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc)-positive donors, even under hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) prophylaxis. One reason for the activation of HBV is the emergence of HBV with escape mutations from hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs). The aim of this study is to clarify the clinical features for de novo activation of HBV with anti-HBs escape mutations after liver transplantation.

METHODS

Clinical features of 75 patients who received HBIG prophylaxis >6 months after liver transplantation with liver grafts from anti-HBc-positive donors were retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

Among the 75 recipients, 19 (25%) developed de novo activation of HBV. Of the 19 recipients, the emergence of HBV with anti-HBs escape mutations was confirmed in 7 patients. The rate of de novo activation of HBV with anti-HBs escape mutations was 12% at 5 years. Sequence analysis revealed mutations in the common 'a' determinant region of the surface gene, including G145R, G145A and Q129P, in HBsAg. Administration of entecavir immediately after the occurrence of de novo HBV activation resolved hepatitis and induced clearance of serum HBsAg and HBV DNA in all four patients receiving entecavir.

CONCLUSIONS

Escape mutations from anti-HBs caused de novo activation of HBV under HBIG prophylaxis after liver transplantation. Early administration of entecavir was effective on de novo activation of HBV with anti-HBs escape mutations.

Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Using Hepatitis B Core Antibody-Positive Grafts in Korea, a Hepatitis B-endemic Region

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The exclusion of hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)-positive donors from liver transplants (LTs) due to the risk of transmitting hepatitis B virus (HBV) does not appear to be practical in Korea, where hepatitis B is endemic. This study assessed the risk of de novo HBV infection in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative LT recipients receiving a liver from HBcAb-positive donors.

METHODS

Of 341 adult living donor LTs conducted at our institution between March 2001 and September 2008, 176 donors (51.6%) were HBcAb-positive, and 26 HBcAb-positive grafts were transplanted to HBsAg-negative recipients. The median follow-up time after LT was 41.9 months.

RESULTS

Without anti-HBV prophylaxis, 2 out of 26 (7.7%) HBsAg-negative recipients who received grafts from HBcAb-positive donors developed de novo HBV infection 20 and 85 months after LT. These patients had been negative for all HBV serologic markers before transplantation. In both cases, there were no abnormalities in liver function tests upon diagnosis of de novo HBV infection.

CONCLUSIONS

De novo HBV infection from HBcAb-positive donors after LT does not appear to be of great concern in terms of the number of cases in Korea because high risk patients who are HBV-negative comprise only a small proportion of the recipients. However, HBV-naïve LT recipients still carry the risk of developing de novo HBV infection as in non-HBV endemic areas.

Low prevalence of HBV DNA in the liver allograft from anti-HBc-positive donors: a single-center experience

Allografts from donors positive for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc(+)) can transmit hepatitis B virus (HBV) to the recipients. We aimed to study the prevalence of HBV DNA in liver allografts from anti-HBc(+) donors. Between January 2003 and December 2008, this retrospective study identified 18 patients who received a liver from an anti-HBc(+) donor. Pre- and post-transplantation HBV serology and serum HBV DNA level of the study subjects were reviewed. DNA extracted from liver biopsy tissue was used for PCR assay. Immunohistochemistry was also performed to determine viral protein expression. We observed a low prevalence of HBV DNA in allografts from anti-HBc(+) donors even among patients who did not receive prophylaxis. Only one of 18 patients had detectable HBV DNA in the liver allograft. This recipient was seronegative for HBV before transplantation and did not receive prophylaxis after transplantation, and developed de novo hepatitis B. Of the five patients who were positive for both antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen and anti-HBc before transplantation and did not receive prophylaxis after transplantation, none developed HBV infection. Prophylaxis for HBV is important for seronegative recipients receiving a liver from an anti-HBc(+) donor. Such prophylaxis may not be necessary for recipients who do not have detectable HBV DNA in the liver allograft.

Current use of hepatitis B immune globulin for prevention of de novo hepatitis B in recipients receiving anti-HBc-positive livers

Livers from donors positive for antibody against anti-HBc can potentially transmit de novo hepatitis B (DNH) to their recipients. Despite a good outcome, prophylaxis is usually offered to such recipients. There is no consensus on the standard prophylactic regimen and hence prophylaxis varies among different transplant centres. Nonetheless, hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) is considered the mainstay of such prophylaxis, either alone or in combination with an oral antiviral treatment. We aim to provide a concise review of the current use of HBIG in prevention of DNH. We also address a few important questions regarding HBIG use.

Hepatitis B prophylaxis in hepatitis B-negative recipients transplanted with donor grafts positive for hepatitis B core antibodies

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Use of grafts from hepatitis B (HBV) core antibody (HBcAb(+)) individuals is a routine transplant practice. Herein, we have reported the results of 20 HBV-negative patients transplanted with a HBcAb-positive liver grafts in order to access the efficacy of HBV prophylaxis using immunoglobulin (IE) and antiviral drugs.

METHODS

From January 2004 to December 2009, we performed 168 liver transplantations including 38 HBcAb-positive grafts (22.6%) in 18 cases of HBV-positive recipients and 20 HBV-negative recipients. Histological data obtained from these last 20 grafts during retrieval showed an Ishak 1 score in three and no fibrosis in the other cases. HBV prophylaxis included infusion of 10,000 UI IG during the anhepatic phase and every 24 hours for the first 7 days irrespective of the antibody titer as well as lamivudin (100 mg) administered daily. Once discharged, outpatient management provided modulated IG infusions according to when the antibody titer was lower than 400 UI.

RESULTS

No patient displayed an HBV infection. The overall survival was 80%. Two patients died within the first month after transplantation due to septic complications; one patient succumbed at 24 months after transplantation because of a lymphoproliferative malignancy and another died due to an aggressive hepatitis C virus recurrence at 6 months post transplant.

CONCLUSION

By using appropriate anti-HBV prophylaxis, HBcAb-positive grafts can be used safely for HBcAb-negative recipients.

Liver transplant from Anti-HBc-positive, HBsAg-negative donor into HBsAg-negative recipient: is it safe? A systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

After liver transplant (LT) from Anti-HBc+/HBsAg- donors into HBsAg- recipients, transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) may occur (de novo HBV infection). This study analyzes the incidence of de novo HBV infection in HBsAg- recipients of Anti-HBc+/HBsAg- LT with respect to: (i) the recipients' HBV serology and (ii) the type of preventive therapy adopted.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature using the electronic database Medline.

RESULTS

Five hundred and fifty-two LT in 36 articles were selected. Lamivudine, Hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG), revaccination, and combined therapies were employed in multiple strategies as preventive interventions. Naïve recipients had a high risk of de novo HBV infection, with smaller incidences when HBIG and lamivudine were used, either alone or in association. Vaccinated recipients or those with isolated hepatitis B core antibodies (Anti-HBc) and previous HBV infection had lower risks of viral transmission, additionally reduced by any prophylaxis adoption.

DISCUSSION

LT from Anti-HBc+/HBsAg- donors into HBsAg- recipients is apparently safe, as long as the recipient is vaccinated or presents an isolated Anti-HBc or previous HBV infection and some prophylaxis is employed. Currently lamivudine seems the best alternative; other nucleoside analogs and revaccination strategies should be considered in future studies. Follow-up and preventive therapies should be maintained for five yr or preferably throughout the recipients' life span.

Management of occult hepatitis B virus infection: an update for the clinician

Occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (OBI) is defined by the presence of HBV DNA in the liver tissue of individuals who test negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Patients who have recovered from acute hepatitis B can carry HBV genomes for a long time and show histological patterns of mild necro-inflammation, even fibrosis, years after the resolution of acute hepatitis, without showing any clinical or biochemical evidence of liver disease. At least in conditions of immunocompetence, OBI is inoffensive itself, but when other relevant causes of liver damage are present it might make the course of the liver disease worse. The risk of HBV transmission through transfusion is related to blood donations negative for HBsAg that have been collected during the pre-seroconversion period or during chronic OBI. Use of HBV nucleic acid amplification testing and multivalent anti-HBs antibodies in the HBsAg assays is recommended for detection of true and false OBI, respectively. It is not known if prior hepatitis B immunization with an optimal anti-HBs response in cases of HBV transmission through organ transplantation can effectively modulate or abort the infection. Use of antiviral agents as prophylaxis in patients with serological evidence of past HBV infection prevents reactivation of OBI after transplantation in most cases. Reactivation of OBI has been observed in other conditions that cause immunosuppression, in which antiviral therapy could be delayed until the HBV DNA or HBsAg becomes detectable. OBI might contribute to the progression of liver fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma development in patients with chronic liver disease.

Prophylaxis against de novo hepatitis B for liver transplantation utilizing hep B core (+) donors: does hepatitis B immunoglobulin provide a survival advantage?

Donor liver allografts with positive serology for hepatitis B core antibody [HBc (+)] have been increasingly used for liver transplantation. However, the optimal prophylactic regimen to prevent development of de novo hepatitis B has not been determined. To evaluate this, we screened United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Standard Transplant Analysis and Research (STAR) registry data for adult recipients of HBc (+) organs who were HBsAg (-), and evaluated the effects of using prophylactic anti-viral therapies (HBIG and lamivudine) on patient and graft survival. Out of a total cohort of 958 patients transplanted since 2004, 61 received HBIG alone, 116 received lamivudine alone, 66 both, 509 neither and 206 were missing this information. Based on several multivariable Cox regression models, patients receiving HBIG therapy-only were observed to have a statistically significant (approximately 70%) reduction in risk of mortality compared with patients receiving lamivudine-only therapy [HR=0.29, 95% CI (0.10, 0.86), P=0.026], and a nonstatistically significant reduction in risk of graft failure. However, no graft failures were attributed to de novo hepatitis B, suggesting that any improved graft/patient survival possibly associated with HBIG therapy occurs independently of de novo hepatitis B virus (HBV) reduction. While this study cannot prove that HBIG therapy is protective for graft and patient survival after liver transplantation, these findings do highlight the need to further examine and study prophylactic use in recipients of HBc (+) donors.

Risk of de novo hepatitis in liver recipients from hepatitis-B core antibody-positive grafts - a systematic analysis

SkagenMany transplant programs utilize liver grafts from hepatitis-B core antibody (HBcAb)-positive and hepatitis-B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative donors. However, there is risk for de novo hepatitis B (DNH) in recipients of these grafts. We reviewed 26 studies reporting the rates of DNH in recipients receiving HBcAb-positive liver grafts. Four hundred and sixty-two donor-recipient pairs were included to evaluate the risk of DNH stratified by the recipient's immune status to hepatitis B and type of prophylactic therapy given, if any. The rate of DNH was highest (58%) in the stratum of hepatitis-B (HBV) naïve recipients who did not receive prophylaxis. In HBV naïve recipients, prophylactic therapy (lamivudine and/or hepatitis-B immunoglobulin - HBIG) reduced DNH to 11% (odds ratio [OR] = 11.1, 95% CI 4.98-25, p < 0.0001 for DNH without prophylaxis). Recipients with hepatitis-B surface antibody (HBsAb) positivity had DNH rates of 18% without prophylaxis and 0% with prophylaxis (OR = 9.2, 95% CI 1.1-83.3, p = 0.039). Recipients with both HBsAb and HBcAb positivity had DNH rates of 4% without prophylaxis and 3% with prophylaxis (p = 1.00), while recipients with HBcAb positivity alone had DNH rates of 14% without prophylaxis and 3% with prophylaxis (p = 0.21). There was no significant difference between the types of HBV prophylaxis received whether lamivudine, HBIG or both. However, in the subgroup who received HBIG alone, rates of DNH were higher after cessation of HBIG prophylaxis compared to DNH rates with indefinite HBIG (p = 0.0002). In summary, the risk of DNH is highest for HBV naïve liver recipients from HBcAb-positive donors. Recipients who are HBV naïve as well as those recipients with isolated HBsAb positivity derive significant benefit from HBV prophylaxis after transplantation with a HBcAb-positive graft. The ideal prophylactic regimen for prevention of DNH is unclear, but based on our analysis of the literature, antivirals alone may suffice. More data are needed with the newer antivirals for hepatitis B.

Occult hepatitis B virus infection of donor and recipient origin after liver transplantation despite nucleoside analogue prophylaxis

Liver grafts from donors positive for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) may be used for transplantation in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver disease, and an occult HBV infection may develop from either source. Liver biopsy was performed for 31 patients who remained seronegative for hepatitis B surface antigen for a median of 44.5 months (range = 13.6-126.4 months) and received nucleoside analogue prophylaxis post-transplant. Nineteen of these recipients (61%) had received anti-HBc-positive grafts. Intrahepatic total HBV DNA and covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) levels were quantified, and the sequence was analyzed. Intrahepatic total HBV DNA and cccDNA were detectable in 26 (84%) and 16 (52%) of the 31 recipients, respectively, and they were more common when the donor was positive for anti-HBc (95% versus 67%, P = 0.038). The intrahepatic HBV DNA level correlated with the recipient pretransplant serum HBV DNA level (P = 0.06), and the intrahepatic HBV cccDNA level correlated with the donor intrahepatic HBV cccDNA level (P = 0.06). A phylogenetic analysis of the isolated HBV DNA sequence revealed HBV infections of both donor and recipient origins. In conclusion, an occult HBV infection after liver transplantation can originate from both the donor and recipient despite prolonged nucleoside analogue prophylaxis. The presence of intrahepatic HBV cccDNA is attributable more to the persistence of preexisting intrahepatic HBV cccDNA from a donor with previous exposure.

Management of end-stage liver disease in chronic hepatitis B

The consequences of chronic hepatitis B virus infection include hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis. Effective antiviral therapy in patients with hepatitis B with advanced liver disease with viral suppression and sustained HBeAg seroconversion (where applicable) may abort hepatic decompensation, diminish hepatocellular risk, and reduce the risk of viral recurrence after transplantation. Overt hepatic decompensation is an indication for referral to a transplant center.

Long-term efficacy of nucleoside monotherapy in preventing HBV infection in HBsAg-negative recipients of anti-HBc-positive donor livers

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection occurs in up to 87.5% of HBsAg-negative recipients of anti-HBc-positive donor livers in the absence of HBV prophylaxis. There is no standardized prophylactic regimen to prevent HBV infection in this setting. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term efficacy of nucleoside analogue to prevent HBV infection in this setting.

METHODS

A retrospective study of HBsAg-negative patients receiving liver transplantation (LT) from anti-HBc-positive donors during a 10-year period.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were studied, mean age was 50.2 ± 8.3 years, 40% were men, and 90% were Caucasian. The median MELD score at the time of LT was 18 (12-40). None of the patients received hepatitis B immune globulin. Eighteen patients received nucleoside analogue monotherapy: 10 received lamivudine and 8 received entecavir. None of these 18 patients developed HBV infection after a median follow up of 32 (1-75) months. One patient received a second course of hepatitis B vaccine 50 months after LT with anti-HBs titer above 1,000 mIU/mL. Lamivudine was discontinued and the patient remained HBsAg negative 18 months after withdrawal of lamivudine. Two patients who were anti-HBs positive before LT were not started on HBV prophylaxis after LT; both developed HBV infection after LT.

CONCLUSIONS

Nucleoside monotherapy is sufficient in preventing HBV infection in HBsAg-negative recipients of anti-HBc-positive donor livers. HBV prophylaxis is necessary in anti-HBs-positive recipients of anti-HBc-positive donor livers.

Escape hepatitis B virus mutations in recipients of antibody to hepatitis B core antigen-positive liver grafts receiving hepatitis B immunoglobulins

A variety of prophylactic strategies are used to prevent the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission from antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc)-positive donors. The mechanisms underlying the failure of HBV immunoglobulin monoprophylaxis have been poorly evaluated. Seventy-seven anti-HBc-positive grafts were used in 21 hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive recipients and 56 HBsAg-negative recipients. HBsAg-positive recipients received prophylaxis comprising hepatitis B immunoglobulins (HBIG) and antiviral agents, 45 HBsAg-negative recipients received a modified HBIG regimen, and 11 HBsAg-negative recipients received no prophylaxis. Both donors and recipients were screened for HBsAg, antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs) and anti-HBc in their sera and for HBV DNA in both their sera and liver. S gene mutations were investigated after HBV reinfection. HBV infection occurred in 15 HBsAg-negative recipients (19.4%) at a median interval of 16 months (range = 6-67 months) post-transplant and in none of the HBsAg-positive recipients. HBV infections were observed in 31.6% of HBV-naive recipients and 7.7% of HBV-immune recipients receiving HBIG prophylaxis versus 100% of HBV-naive recipients (P = 0.0068) and 33% of HBV-immune recipients (P = 0.08) with no such prophylaxis. S gene mutations were identified in 9 recipients. In conclusion, priority should be given to using anti-HBc positive grafts for HBsAg-positive or HBV-immune recipients. Our study has confirmed the high risk of HBV transmission to naive recipients. HBIG monoprophylaxis was associated with a significant risk of de novo HBV infection and HBV escape mutations. In these patients, we therefore recommend prophylaxis with lamivudine or new nucleos(t)ides analogues. The potential benefits of HBIG prophylaxis combined with antiviral drugs require further evaluations. Long-term prophylaxis is needed because of the long interval of de novo HBV infection post-transplant in some patients.

The role of anti-core antibody response in the detection of occult hepatitis B virus infection

Occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is characterized by the presence of HBV DNA in serum and/or in the liver of patients negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Occult infection may impact in several different clinical contexts including the risk of HBV transmission with transfusion or transplantation, and endogenous viral reactivation. The gold standard test for detection of occult infection is the amplification of HBV DNA. However, the serological assay for the long-lasting antibody response to the highly immunogenic HBV core antigen (anti-HBc) represents a qualified candidate as a surrogate for DNA amplification, or for increasing overall sensitivity when assessing the risk of occult hepatitis in peripheral blood. The risk of occult hepatitis associated with anti-HBc seropositivity has been demonstrated extensively, and the presence of antibody response to HBc can be considered a sentinel marker of occult HBV infection.