A feasibility trial of narrow band imaging endoscopy in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

New concepts in vocal fold imaging: a review

OBJECTIVE

To review new imaging technology potentially useful in the clinical practice of laryngology.

HYPOTHESIS

Narrow band imaging, iScan (Pentax Medical Company, Montvale, NJ), optical computed tomography, and confocal microscopy have potential value for enhancing diagnosis of laryngeal pathology.

DESIGN

Literature review.

METHODS

Literature search of computer databases including MEDLINE and PubMed.

RESULTS

A review of 50 articles suggests that new imaging technologies may enhance clinical diagnostic capabilities.

CONCLUSION

The probable value of new imaging technologies suggests that further research is needed to refine these technologies and define their clinical efficacy.

Current advances in the diagnosis and treatment of nonerosive reflux disease

Nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) is a distinct pattern of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). It is defined as a subcategory of GERD characterized by troublesome reflux-related symptoms in the absence of esophageal mucosal erosions/breaks at conventional endoscopy. In clinical practice, patients with reflux symptoms and negative endoscopic findings are markedly heterogeneous. The potential explanations for the symptom generation in NERD include microscopic inflammation, visceral hypersensitivity (stress and sleep), and sustained esophageal contractions. The use of 24-hour esophageal impedance and pH monitoring gives further insight into reflux characteristics and symptom association relevant to NERD. The treatment choice of NERD still relies on acid-suppression therapy. Initially, patients can be treated by a proton pump inhibitor (PPI; standard dose, once daily) for 2–4 weeks. If initial treatment fails to elicit adequate symptom control, increasing the PPI dose (standard dose PPI twice daily) is recommended. In patients with poor response to appropriate PPI treatment, 24-hour esophageal impedance and pH monitoring is indicated to differentiate acid-reflux-related NERD, weakly acid-reflux-related NERD (hypersensitive esophagus), nonacid-reflux-related NERD, and functional heartburn. The response is less effective in NERD as compared with erosive esophagitis.

What is the role of endoscopy and oesophageal biopsies in the management of GERD?

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a diagnosis applicable to "all individuals who are exposed to the risk of physical complications from gastroesophageal reflux, or who experience clinically significant impairment of health related well being (quality of life) due to reflux related symptoms, after adequate reassurance of the benign nature of their symptoms". It remains, predominantly, a symptom-based diagnosis, confirmed clinically by a response to acid suppression therapy although it is accompanied by demonstrable increases in acid exposure on esophageal pH-metry and by endoscopic and histological changes. Standard white light endoscopy permits diagnosis of erosive reflux disease (ERD) which, if present, should be graded for severity using the Los Angeles classification system. However, the role of endoscopy in clinical practice is, primarily, to evaluate patients with persistent symptoms, despite medical therapy, or to investigate alarm features and exclude complications such as Barrett' oesophagus which should be assessed using the Prague C & M criteria. Newer endoscopic techniques allow detection of 'minimal change' GERD lesions and Barrett's oesophagus-associated dysplastic or neoplastic lesions; however, none of the newer techniques has been validated for routine clinical practice. There is an increasing recognition that histology in GERD may provide useful diagnostic information, in part to exclude other lesions, such as eosinophilic oesophagitis, intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia or malignancy and, in part, to identify changes, such as basal cell hyperplasia, papillary elongation and, most recently, dilated intercellular spaces, that are consistent with GERD. However, more widespread incorporation of histology into the clinical management of GERD will require a standardized biopsy protocol and efforts to minimise interobserver differences in the identification of GERD-related histological changes.

Overlap of functional dyspepsia and GERD--diagnostic and treatment implications

GERD and functional dyspepsia are the two most prevalent upper gastrointestinal disorders. Gastro-oesophageal reflux is most commonly diagnosed using the cardinal symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation. Patients might also be diagnosed using a questionnaire, after empiric treatment with an acid suppressant, after upper endoscopy or by pH testing. Functional dyspepsia is best diagnosed using symptoms outlined by the Rome committee in conjunction with a normal upper endoscopy. Theoretically, distinguishing these two populations should be easy for all health-care providers. In reality, however, carefully separating out these two populations can be quite difficult, as substantial overlap exists epidemiologically, symptomatically and even diagnostically. This overlap renders precise diagnosis a challenge; given the limited treatment options, the primary goal is to identify those patients who will respond to acid suppressive therapy. Despite the frequency with which functional dyspepsia and GERD overlap, remarkably few studies have investigated this overlap. Most recommendations are based on data derived from separate studies of functional dyspepsia and GERD. A further limitation of existing studies is their failure to differentiate between the various diagnostic categories into which the individual presenting with heartburn might belong.

The efficacy of i-SCAN for detecting reflux esophagitis: a prospective randomized controlled trial

New imaging technologies have been applied in endoscopy to improve the detection and differentiation of subtle mucosal changes using a digital contrast method. Among them, i-SCAN technology is the most recently developed image-enhancing technology. We investigated whether i-SCAN could improve the detection rate of reflux esophagitis. Interobserver agreement between endoscopists was compared with conventional white light (WL) endoscopic examination. We performed a prospective randomized controlled trial. A consecutive series of 514 subjects that underwent an esophagogastroduodenoscopy for health inspection were enrolled and randomized into the i-SCAN group (n = 246) and WL group (n = 268). An esophagogastroduodenoscopy with video recording was used for detecting reflux esophagitis, and reflux esophagitis were categorized by the modified Los Angeles (LA) classification. The total number of reflux esophagitis identified by WL and i-SCAN was 58 (21.7%) and 74 (30.1%), respectively. The diagnostic yield of reflux esophagitis was significantly higher (P = 0.034) in the i-SCAN group (30.1%) as compared to the WL group (21.6%). Using the modified LA classification, the detection rate of minimal changes was significantly higher (P = 0.017) in the i-SCAN group (11.8%) as compared to the WL group (5.6%), but the detection rates of LA-A and LA-B were not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.897 and P = 0.311, respectively). After comparison of the interobserver agreement using randomly selected video clips, the i-SCAN group showed better agreement than the WL group (Kappa value, 0.793 vs. 0.473). Compared to WL endoscopy, applying i-SCAN in daily practice can improve the diagnostic yield of reflux esophagitis by detecting more minimal changes in the squamo-columnar junction of the esophagus and can improve the interobserver agreement of the modified Los Angeles classification.

[The Mexican consensus on gastroesophageal reflux disease. Part I]

BACKGROUND

The changes, advances, and new discoveries regarding different aspects of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have made it necessary to update the Mexican Consensus published in 2002.

AIMS

To elaborate a new Mexican Consensus on GERD.

METHODS

The general project coordinators selected six GERD experts to carry out an extensive review of the literature for the purpose of elaborating statements on the principal aspects of GERD. These were then placed under the consideration of specialists in the study of this disease. Definitive approval by all participants was reached using the modified Delphi method with three rounds of anonymous and iterative voting. The following scale was employed: A- in complete agreement; B- in agreement, but with minor concerns; C- in agreement, but with major concerns; D- in disagreement, but with major concerns; E- in disagreement, but with minor concerns; or F- in complete disagreement. Consensus was declared when 67.00% or more of the participants concurred on a category of agreement (A, B, or C).

RESULTS

A consensus was reached on 160 of the statements upon completion of the voting rounds, with 90.00% concurrence for the majority of them.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2011 Mexican Consensus on Gastroesophageal Disease is a practical and up-to-date consultation tool, providing the opinion of Mexican experts on all the new information available about this disease. It allows there to be homogeneity in diagnostic and therapeutic criteria, all of which serves to benefit our patients.

Managing gastroesophageal reflux disease in children: The role of endoscopy

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a growing problem in the pediatric population and recent advances in diagnostics and therapeutics have improved their management, particularly the use of esophago-gastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Most of the current knowledge is derived from studies in adults; however there are distinct features between infant onset and adult onset GERD. Children are not just little adults and attention must be given to the stages of growth and development and how these stages impact the disease management. Although there is a lack of a gold standard test to diagnose GERD in children, EGD with biopsy is essential to assess the type and severity of tissue damage. To date, the role of endoscopy in adults and children has been to assess the extent of esophagitis and detect metaplastic changes complicating GERD; however the current knowledge points another role for the EGD with biopsy that is to rule out other potential causes of esophagitis in patients with GERD symptoms such as eosinophilic esophagitis. This review highlights special considerations about the role of EGD in the management of children with GERD.

Current trends in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a review

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic disorder of the upper gastrointestinal tract with global distribution. The incidence is on the increase in different parts of the world. In the last 30 to 40 years, research findings have given rise to a more robust understanding of its pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and management. The current definition of GERD (The Montreal definition, 2006) is not only symptom-based and patient-driven, but also encompasses esophageal and extraesophageal manifestations of the disease. The implication is that the disease can be confidently diagnosed based on symptoms alone. Nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) remains the predominant form of GERD. Current thinking is that NERD and erosive reflux disease (ERD) are distinct phenotypes of GERD rather than the old concept which regarded them as components of a disease spectrum. Non erosive reflux disease is a very heterogeneous group with significant overlap with other functional gastrointestinal disorders. There is no gold standard for the diagnosis of GERD. Esophageal pH monitoring and intraluminal impedance monitoring have thrown some light on the heterogeneity of NERD. A substantial proportion of GERD patients continue to have symptoms despite optimal PPI therapy, and this has necessitated research into the development of new drugs. Several safety concerns have been raised about chronic use of proton pump inhibitors but these are yet to be substantiated in controlled studies. The debate about efficacy of long-term medical treatment compared to surgery continues, however, recent data indicate that modern surgical techniques and long-term PPI therapy have comparable efficacy. These and other issues are subjects of further research.

Microalterations of esophagus in patients with non-erosive reflux disease: in-vivo diagnosis by confocal laser endomicroscopy and its relationship with gastroesophageal reflux

OBJECTIVES

Objectively diagnosing non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) is still a challenge. We aimed to evaluate the use of in-vivo confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) to examine the microalterations of the esophagus in patients with NERD and its relationship with reflux episodes monitored by multiple intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH).

METHODS

Patients with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms completed reflux disease questionnaires. NERD was determined by negative gastroscopy. Patients without reflux symptoms were recruited as controls. Pilot clinical study was followed by prospective controlled blinded study. All subjects were examined by white-light mode of the endoscopy followed by the standard CLE mode and then MII-pH monitoring. The microalterations seen on CLE images and the correlation between CLE features and reflux episodes were evaluated, the correlation between CLE and transmission electron microscope (TEM) data was also analyzed.

RESULTS

On CLE images, NERD patients had more intrapapillary capillary loops (IPCLs) per image than did controls (8.29 ± 3.52 vs. 5.69 ± 2.31, P=0.010), as well as the diameter of IPCLs (19.48 ± 3.13 vs. 15.87 ± 2.21 μm, P=0.041) and intercellular spaces of squamous cells (3.40 ± 0.82 vs. 1.90 ± 0.53 μm, P=0.042). The receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that IPCLs number (optimal cutoff >6 per image, area under the curve (AUC) 0.722, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.592-0.853, sensitivity 67.7%, specificity 71.6%), IPCLs diameter (optimal cutoff >17.2 μm, AUC 0.847, 95% CI 0.747-0.947, sensitivity 81%, specificity 76%), and the intercellular spaces of squamous cells (optimal cutoff >2.40 μm, AUC 0.935, 95% CI 0.875-0.995, sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 90.5%) diagnosed NERD with reasonable accuracy. Combined features of dilatation of intercellular space plus increased IPCLs provided 100% specificity in the diagnosis of NERD patients. The intercellular spaces of squamous cells observed on CLE were highly related to that on TEM findings (r=0.75, P<0.001). Multivariate progressive regression analysis showed that acidic reflux, especially in the supine position, was related to the increased number and dilation of IPCLs in the squamous epithelium (β=0.063, t=2.895, P=0.038 and β=0.156, t=1.023, P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

CLE represents a useful and potentially significant improvement over standard endoscopy to examine the microalterations of the esophagus in vivo. Acidic reflux is responsible for the microalterations in the esophagus of patients with NERD.

Prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial evaluating the usefulness of i-SCAN in screening colonoscopy

BACKGROUND

The newly developed i-SCAN application can theoretically maximize the effectiveness of colonoscopy. However, the practical usefulness of the i-SCAN application during screening colonoscopy has not been assessed.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of the i-SCAN application during screening colonoscopy.

DESIGN

A prospective, randomized trial that used a modified, back-to-back colonoscopy.

SETTING

Academic hospital.

PATIENTS

This study involved 389 asymptomatic, consecutive, average-risk patients who underwent screening colonoscopy.

INTERVENTION

The patients were randomized to the first withdrawal with either conventional high-definition white light (HDWL group; n = 119), i-SCAN contrast/surface enhancement (CE/SE) mode (i-SCAN1 group; n = 115), or i-SCAN CE/SE/tone enhancement-colorectal mode (i-SCAN2 group; n = 118). All patients underwent a second examination with HDWL as the criterion standard.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome measurement was the adenoma detection rate and adenoma miss rate. The secondary outcome measurement was the accuracy of the histologic prediction of neoplastic and nonneoplastic polyps.

RESULTS

The adenoma detection rates during the first withdrawal of HDWL, i-SCAN1, and i-SCAN2 were 31.9%, 36.5%, and 33.1%, respectively (P = .742), and the adenoma miss rates of each group were 22.9%, 19.3%, and 15.9%, respectively (P = .513). Based on the multivariate analysis, the application of i-SCAN was not associated with an improvement in adenoma detection and the prevention of missed polyps. However, the prediction of neoplastic and nonneoplastic colorectal lesions was more precise in the i-SCAN2 group compared with the HDWL group (accuracy 79.3% vs 75.5%, P = .029; sensitivity 86.5% vs 72.6%, P = .020; and specificity 91.4% vs 80.6%, P = .040).

LIMITATIONS

Single-center trial.

CONCLUSION

i-SCAN during the screening colonoscopy may fail to improve adenoma detection and the prevention of missed polyps, but i-SCAN appears to be effective for real-time histologic prediction of polyps compared with conventional HDWL colonoscopy. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01417611.).

Update on endoscopic diagnosis, management and surveillance strategies of esophageal diseases

In the last few decades, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy has become the most complementary test for investigation of esophageal diseases. Its accessibility and safety guarantee wide clinical utilization in patients with suspected benign and malignant diseases of the esophagus. Recent technological advances in endoscopic imaging and tissue analysis obtained from the esophagus have been useful to better understand and manage highly relevant diseases such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, eosinophilic esophagitis and esophageal cancer. Using endoscopy to elucidate esophageal disorders in children has been another field of intensive and challenging research. This editorial highlights the latest advances in the endoscopic management of esophageal diseases, and focuses on Barrett's esophagus, esophageal cancer, eosinophilic esophagitis, as well as esophageal disorders in the pediatric population.

Presence of minimal change esophagitis closely correlates with pathological conditions in the stomach

INTRODUCTION

It is suggested that minimal change (grade M) esophagitis is a spectrum of gastric acid reflux disease. We evaluated the clinical significance of grade M esophagitis, including its subtypes (reddish change: MR and whitish change: MW), especially with attempt to pathological conditions in the stomach that relates to gastric acid secretion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using 241 subjects undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy for various indications, we investigated the association between grade M esophagitis with histological and serological severity of gastritis and endoscopic degree of atrophy. We also examined its association with ulcer diseases and various symptoms.

RESULTS

When grade M cases were divided into MR and MW, all MR cases had MW in considerable degrees. Dyspeptic symptoms were more likely to be associated with H. pylori negative grade M cases, while presence of duodenal ulcer and its scar were associated with Helicobacter pylori-positive grade M cases. In all subjects, histological parameters, especially in the corpus, were lower in grade M cases compared to normal appearance. In grade M cases, degree of acute and chronic inflammation, and atrophy in corpus were lowest in cases that have grade MR. Grade M cases were also associated with higher pepsinogen I/II ratio and lower endoscopic atrophy.

CONCLUSIONS

Pathological conditions of the stomach relate to higher gastric acid secretion correlates with grade M esophagitis. In grade M cases, appearance of MR may reflect higher gastric acid secretion or severe acid reflux than cases that have grade MW only.

Effect of acid-suppressive therapy on narrow band imaging findings in gastroesophageal reflux disease: a pilot study

Standard endoscopy is an insensitive test for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Narrow band imaging (NBI) endoscopy enhances visualization of the distal esophagus. NBI patterns like intrapapillary capillary loop (IPCL) dilatation, tortuosity, and increased number; microerosions; increased vascularity at the squamocolumnar junction (SCJ); ridge-villous pattern below the SCJ; and presence of columnar islands in the distal esophagus have been suggested as features of GERD. We evaluated the effect of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy on NBI findings in GERD patients. Patients prospectively underwent NBI upper endoscopy before and after PPI therapy. NBI findings were recorded at each endoscopy. Twenty-one patients with GERD symptoms (mean age 60.0 years; males 90.5%; white 90.5%) were studied. After PPI therapy, there was a significant reduction in the proportion of patients with the following NBI features: IPCL tortuosity (90% vs. 4.8%, P < 0.0001), dilated IPCLs (86% vs. 9.5%, P < 0.0001), and increased vascularity at the SCJ (43% vs. 9.5%, P= 0.0082). PPI led to healing of all microerosions (71% vs. 0%, P < 0.0001) and disappearance of ridge-villous patterns below the SCJ (14% vs. 0%, P < 0.0001). There was no significant change in the proportion of patients with increased numbers of IPCLs pre- and post-PPI therapy (71% vs. 48%, P= 0.09) or columnar islands in the distal esophagus (38% vs. 29%, P= 0.31). In patients with GERD symptoms, NBI features suggestive of GERD respond to PPI; suggesting these features are truly acid-mediated. These findings need to be confirmed by randomized controlled trials.

Application of magnifying narrow-band imaging endoscopy for diagnosis of early gastric cancer and precancerous lesion

Background

Gastric carcinoma is the second commonest cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Early detection and diagnosis of gastric cancer in the stomach is important for improving the prognosis of gastric cancer. This retrospective study was designed to investigate the value of magnifying narrow-band imaging (NBI) in the diagnosis of precancerous lesions and early gastric cancer.

Methods

This study included 122 patients who were diagnosed with early gastric cancer or precancerous gastric lesions by endoscopy. The patients underwent an examination with conventional endoscopy, magnifying NBI, and magnifying chromoendoscopy. Images resolution was evaluated, and the morphology, pit patterns and blood capillary forms of lesions were analyzed. The presence of gastric carcinoma and high grade intraepithelial neoplasia in the biopsy samples was considered as a positive pathological result, which is used to assess accuracy of endoscopic diagnosis.

Results

For image resolution, magnifying NBI and magnifying chromoendoscopy were significantly superior to magnifying conventional endoscopy in morphology, pit pattern and blood capillary form (P < 0.01), and magnifying NBI was significantly superior to magnifying chromoendoscopy in blood capillary form (P < 0.01). IV, V₁, and VI type of gastric pit pattern were detected in 14 cases, 43 cases, and 17 cases in patients with high grade intraepithelial neoplasia, respectively. V₁ and VI type of gastric pit pattern were detected in 9 cases and 39 cases in patients with early gastric cancer, respectively. The presence of irregular minute vessels and variation in the caliber of vessels was found in 109 cases. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate and false negative rate for diagnosis of early gastric cancer and precancerous gastric lesions were 68.9%, 95.1%, 63.1%, 24.5%, and 32.4% for conventional endoscopy, 93.6%, 92.7%, 94.5%, 5.7%, and 6.9% for magnifying NBI, and 91.3%, 88.6%, 93.2%, 13.2%, and 21.48% for magnifying chromoendoscopy, respectively.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that magnifying NBI is superior to conventional endoscopy in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer and precancerous gastric lesions, and can be used for screening early malignancies of the stomach.

Efficacy of I-scan endoscopy in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease with minimal change

Background/Aims

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of i-scans for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease, especially where only minimal change is involved.

Methods

The esophageal mucosa was inspected using an i-scan following conventional white light endoscopy. The examination with iscan was performed under tone enhancement (TE) esophagus (e) mode. Patients with subtle distal esophageal mucosal changes without definite mucosal breaks, such as blurring of Z-line (B), mucosal coarseness (C), hyperemic or purplish discoloration (D), erythema (E), ectopic gastric mucosal islet (I) and mixed type were classified as minimal change.

Results

A total of 156 patients were included. Using i-scan endoscopy, the number of minimal change was found to further increase from 94 (conventional endoscopy; 19B, 9C, 29D, 13E, 5I, 19 mixed type) to 109 (i-scan; 15B, 8C, 29D, 16E, 5I, 36 mixed type). And 14 patients who had single type by conventional endoscopy were converted to mixed type after i-scan. Therefore, 29 of 156 patients were upgraded after i-scan, they were account for 19% (p<0.0001; 95% confidence interval, 0.13 to 0.25).

Conclusions

The use of i-scan endoscopy significantly improves the identification of minimal change and helps to identify more precisely the type of minimal change.

Enhanced endoscopic imaging and gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and GERD-related symptoms are common, and affect 25% to 30% of the general population. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy of the esophagus has been the most widely used modality for the diagnosis and grading of reflux disease. Endoscopic imaging today has evolved beyond the confines of routine white light endoscopy (WLE) to advanced optical imaging with a precise and real time endoscopic diagnosis. These technological advances have helped circumvent the limitation of WLE in reflux disease by a) improved detection of subtle irregularities, b) characterization of anomalies, and c) possible optical biopsies providing real-time diagnosis. This review attempts to define the current status of these newer technologies vis-a-vis the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

The endoscopic diagnosis of nonerosive reflux disease using flexible spectral imaging color enhancement image: a feasibility trial

Nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) is classified into grade M (minimal change, endoscopically; erythema without sharp demarcation, whitish turbidity, and/or invisibility of vessels due to these findings) and grade N (normal) in the modified Los Angeles classification system in Japan. However, the classification of grades M and N NERD is not included in the original Los Angeles system because interobserver agreement for the conventional endoscopic diagnosis of grades M or N NERD is poor. Flexible spectral imaging color enhancement (FICE) is a virtual chromoendoscopy technique that enhances mucosal and vascular visibility. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the endoscopic diagnosis of grades M or N NERD using FICE images is feasible. Between April 2006 and May 2008, 26 NERD patients and 31 controls were enrolled in the present study. First, an experienced endoscopist assessed the color pattern of minimal change in FICE images using conventional endoscopic images and FICE images side-by-side and comparing the proportion of minimal change between the two groups. Second, three blinded endoscopists assessed the presence or absence of minimal change in both groups using conventional endoscopic images and FICE images separately. Intraobserver variability was compared using McNemar's test, and interobserver agreement was described using the kappa value. Minimal changes, such as erythema and whitish turbidity, which were detected using conventional endoscopic images, showed up as navy blue and pink-white, respectively, in color using FICE images in the present FICE mode. The NERD group had a higher proportion of minimal change, compared with the control group (77% and 48%, respectively) (P= 0.033). In all three readers, the detection rates of minimal change using FICE images were greater than those using conventional endoscopic images (P= 0.025, <0.0001, and 0.034 for readers A, B, and C, respectively). The kappa values for all pairs of three readers using FICE images were between 0.683 and 0.812, while those using conventional endoscopic images were between 0.364 and 0.624. Thus, the endoscopic diagnosis of grades M or N NERD using FICE images is feasible and may improve interobserver agreement.

Role of narrow band imaging for diagnosis of early-stage esophagogastric cancer: current consensus of experienced endoscopists in Asia-Pacific region

In Asian countries, squamous cell carcinoma is the most common type of esophageal cancer, and the incidence of gastric cancer remains have plateaued. To synthesize current information and to illustrate its clinical benefit of narrow band imaging (NBI) for diagnosis of superficial esophageal squamous carcinoma (SESCC) and early gastric cancer (EGC), a consensus conference was held by a panel of nine experts from Asian-Pacific countries. The expert's agreement suggested importance of interpretation of both vascular architecture and surface structure of the lesions and proper processor settings for endoscopic images. Zoom endoscopy was not regarded as absolutely necessary for detection of SESCC, but magnifying observation provided valuable information for characterization of detected lesions in the esophagus and the stomach. In general, NBI is useful for detection and characterization of SESCC, whereas it is beneficial mainly for characterization of EGC. Chromoendoscopy was found to be still worthwhile in certain situations, such as determination of the extent of SESCC by Lugol's staining, or detection and delineation of EGC by indigo carmine. NBI could replace chromoendoscopy in routine examination because it is easy to use and adds much information to conventional WLI, but it cannot eliminate chromoendoscopy when we make a final diagnosis for treatment decision-making. Consequently, the benefit of NBI or magnifying NBI is specific for the organ and the purpose of the examination, thus optimum indication and usage should be understood for maximum clinical benefit.

Spectral endoscopic imaging: the multiband system for enhancing the endoscopic surface visualization

In the past few years, newly developed procedures and technologies have improved endoscopic recognition of the gastrointestinal tract. In particular, narrow band imaging, multiband imaging, and contrast enhancement make possible the "real-time," on demand recognition of the gastrointestinal mucosa during the endoscopic examination. These imaging techniques have been designed to enhance visualization of the vascular network and surface texture of the mucosa in an effort to improve tissue characterization, differentiation, and diagnosis. These techniques are considered as potential alternatives to chromoendoscopy because they provide contrast enhancement of tissue surface structures. This review focuses on data published on multiband imaging system. We report the technological basis of the system and speculate on its applications. Therefore, PubMed was searched for articles published up to 31 October 2009 using, in combination, these terms: "multiband imaging," "band imaging," "endoscopy," "high-resolution," "gastrointestinal," "FICE," "magnification," "spectral endoscopic images," "computed virtual chromoendoscopy." The reference list of articles identified in the initial PubMed search was reviewed for further relevant publications. Abstracts of communications presented to the most relevant international meetings and congresses were also included in this review. We did not carry out meta-analyses and reviewed only articles published in English.

[Diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review]

The prevalence of gastoesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been rapidly increased in Korea during last 20 years. However, there has been no systematic review regarding this disease. The aim of this article was to provide a review of available diagnostic modalities for GERD. This review includes proton pump inhibitor (PPI) test, endoscopy, ambulatory pH monitoring, impedance pH monitoring, and esophageal manometry in order to provide a basis for the currently applicable recommendations in the diagnosis of GERD in Korea. With weekly heartburn or acid regurgitation, the prevalence of GERD has been reported as 3.4% to 7.9%, indicating an increase of GERD in Korea. As the prevalence of Barrett's esophagus has been reported to be low, the screening endoscopy for Barrett's esophagus is not recommended. Several recent meta-analyses re-evaluated the value of the PPI test in patients with typical GERD symptoms and non-cardiac chest pain. That is, the PPI test has been proven to be a sensitive tool for diagnosing GERD in patients with non-cardiac chest pain and in some preliminary trials regarding extraesophageal manifestations of GERD. Ambulatory pH monitoring of the esophagus helps to confirm gastroesophageal reflux in patients with persistent symptoms (both typical and atypical) in the absence of esophageal mucosal damage, especially when a trial of acid suppression has failed. Impedance pH test is useful in refractory reflux patients with primary complaints of typical GERD symptoms, but this value has not been proved in patients with non-cardiac chest pain or extraesophageal symptoms. This systematic review is targeted to establish the strategy of GERD diagnosis, which is essential for the current clinical practice.

Advances in diagnostic testing for gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) contributes substantially to morbidity and to costs in the United States health care system. The burden of this disease has resulted in attempts at improving diagnosis and characterizing patients. Numerous research and technical advances have enhanced our understanding of both the utility and limitations of a variety of diagnostic modalities. The purpose of this review is to highlight recent advances in GERD diagnostic testing and to discuss their implications for use in clinical practice. Topics addressed include esophageal pH monitoring, impedance testing, symptom association analyses, narrow-band imaging, and histopathology.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease

GERD is a common chronic gastrointestinal disorder, and its prevalence in Asia is increasing. Classical symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation are common presentations. There is no standard criterion for the diagnosis of GERD, and 24-h pH monitoring lacks sensitivity in NERD. Furthermore, diagnostic studies for gastroesophageal reflux disease have several limitations. A short course of PPI is often used in clinical practice as a diagnostic test for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Elderly patients with GERD usually present with atypical manifestations, and they tend to develop more severe disease. PPI remains the mainstay of treatment for GERD. In a subset of patients who wish to discontinue maintenance treatment, anti-reflux surgery is a therapeutic option.

Detection of gastroesophageal reflux disease: advances in methodology

The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is increasing year by year. Currently, many methods are available for detection of GERD. Traditional detection methods, such as the reflux disease questionnaire and proton pump inhibitor test, are convenient and effective and can be used for primary screening of GERD. Endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and magnification endoscopy have also been used widely in clinical detection of GERD. The usage of narrow-band imaging endoscopy, light-induced fluorescence endoscopy and confocal endoscopy offers new insight into the esophageal appearance of Barrett's esophagus and non-erosive reflux disease. Endoscopic optical coherence tomography and frequency-domain angle-resolved low-coherence interferometry are optical biopsy techniques that will be used gradually in clinical practice. The 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring, bile reflux monitoring, and esophageal manometry are the most commonly used method for monitoring gastroesophageal reflux but can not be used to monitor all reflux events. The 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance measurement and high-resolution manometry can redeem the shortage of the above detections and have been used gradually in clinical diagnosis. In this paper, we review the advances in methodology for detection of GERD.

The diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a highly prevalent condition that imposes a significant economic impact on the US health care system. The utility of commonly used tests for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease has not been adequately reviewed.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature was undertaken to provide an evidence-based approach to the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. EMBASE (1980-December 2008), OVID MEDLINE, and PubMed, (1966-December 2008) were searched using "gastroesophageal reflux" and "adults" with other terms, including medications, diagnostic tests, symptoms, and epidemiologic terms. Studies were limited to human trials, English language, and full articles.

RESULTS

Heartburn is a reasonably sensitive symptom for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease, although it does not reliably predict esophagitis. Standardized questionnaires have limited specificity, whereas the double-contrast barium swallow has a low sensitivity to diagnose gastroesophageal reflux. The role of esophageal manometry is limited to accurate placement of a pH-measuring device. pH testing has reasonable sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The sensitivity of upper endoscopy to diagnose gastroesophageal reflux is lower than that of pH tests.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease remains difficult. In the absence of alarm symptoms, empiric treatment with acid suppression is warranted. pH testing provides valuable information in many patients, although the clinical utility of newer tests needs to be determined. Endoscopy should not be the first test used to diagnose gastroesophageal reflux.

Role of digital chromoendoscopy in detecting minimal change esophageal reflux disease

Endoscopy is a widely used diagnostic tool to detect reflux esophagitis. Although its specificity was reported to be excellent at 90%-95%, its sensitivity was only 50%. Therefore, it is quite difficult to detect these lesions under the standard white light endoscopy especially in patients with minimal change esophageal reflux disease (MERD). In recent years, endoscopic technologies have evolved tremendously; these include high resolution and magnification digital chromoendoscopy. These technologies are useful practically for detecting various subtle lesions along the gastrointestinal tract starting from esophagus to colon. Currently, these technologies can be classified in 2 systems; pre-processed system (NBI, Olympus) and post processed system (FICE and i-SCAN, Fujinon and Pentax respectively). Over a few years, there have been many emerging publications on the benefit of these systems on MERD detection. The overall sensitivities to diagnose MERD were reported as much better than controls. However, large, multi-center and randomized controlled studies comparing these new imaging modalities with the conventional white light chromoendoscopy are warranted to validate its accuracy. Standard, simple and precise endoscopic reading criteria for the identification of MERD are also required.

Nonerosive Reflux Disease (NERD) - An Update

Recognizing nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) as a distinct presentation of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was one of the most important developments in the field of GERD in the last decade. Whilst the definition of NERD has not changed significantly over the years, the disorder accounts for the majority of the GERD patients and those who failed proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment. Recent developments in NERD focused primarily on understanding the pathophysiology and natural history. The introduction of esophageal impedance + pH has led to the assessment of other forms of gastroesophageal reflux in causing NERD. Therapeutic modalities still focus on acid suppression, but there is growing recognition that other therapeutic strategies should be considered in NERD.

[Virtual chromoendoscopy]

Precise endoscopic assessment of gastrointestinal mucosal features is important in order to detect neoplastic lesions at an early stage. Electronic virtual chromoendoscopy markedly improves capillary pattern contrast and is an in vivo method for visualizing microvessel morphological changes in superficial neoplastic lesions. The scientific basis for this technique is that short wavelength light falls within the hemoglobin absorption band, thereby facilitating clearer visualization of vascular structures and pit pattern. Narrow Band Imaging (NBI, Olympus) and Multi-Band Imaging (FICE) are real-time, on-demand endoscopic imaging techniques available with high-definition endoscope. Potential indications include both the detection of premalignant lesions and differentiation between neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions. The ease and readiness of use and the routine availability of virtual chromoendoscopy will probably contribute to its popularity. This does not alleviate the need to better define the role of these techniques in daily endoscopy practice by conducting well-designed prospective studies.

Improving visualization techniques by narrow band imaging and magnification endoscopy

Endoscopy plays an important role in the early detection of gastrointestinal tract neoplasms. Using conventional white light or dye-based image enhanced endoscopy, it has been difficult to assess pre-malignant and early neoplastic lesions precisely. However, narrow band imaging (NBI) dramatically improves the detection of these lesions, particularly in combination with magnifying endoscopy. This allows the endoscopist to accomplish accurate diagnosis. Such enhanced detection of pre-malignant and early neoplastic lesions in the gastrointestinal tract should allow better targeting of biopsy, improved and more appropriate treatment, and thereby contribute to optimal quality of life and patient survival.

Transnasal endoscopy with narrow-band imaging and Lugol staining to screen patients with head and neck cancer whose condition limits oral intubation with standard endoscope (with video)

BACKGROUND

Early detection of esophageal cancer in patients with head and neck cancers may alter treatment planning and improve survival. However, standard endoscopic screening is not feasible for some patients with tumor-related airway compromise or postirradiation trismus.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a novel, sequential approach by integrating ultrathin endoscopy with narrow-band imaging and Lugol chromoendoscopy.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Single center in Taiwan.

PATIENTS

Forty-four consecutive patients with transoral difficulty screened for synchronous or metachronous esophageal cancer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in the detection of mucosal high-grade neoplasia or invasive cancer.

RESULTS

Fifty-four endoscopic interpretations were obtained, and 11 mucosal high-grade neoplasia and 7 invasive cancers were confirmed by histology. The mean examination time was 19.4 minutes (range 7.9-35.2 minutes), and all patients tolerated the procedure well. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (with 95% CI) were 55.6% (95% CI, 33.5%-75.6%), 97.2% (95% CI, 85.8%-99.3%), and 83.3% (95% CI, 71.2%-90.9%), respectively, for standard endoscopy; 88.9% (95% CI, 66.9%-96.6%), 97.2% (95% CI, 85.8%-99.3%), and 94.4% (95% CI, 84.9%-97.9%), respectively, with the adjunct of narrow-band imaging; and 88.9% (95% CI, 66.9%-96.6%), 72.2% (95% CI, 55.9%-84.1%), and 77.8% (95% CI, 64.9%-86.8%), respectively, with the adjunct of Lugol chromoendoscopy. When we integrated all interpretations on the basis of the sequential approach, the estimated probability of false-negative findings was 1.2% (95% CI, 0.1%-4.6%).

LIMITATIONS

Inherent shortcomings of ultrathin endoscopy, such as its resolution, light source, and lack of magnification.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of ultrathin endoscopy in a sequential approach for multimodal detection is feasible in patients with transoral difficulty and substantially increases the detection rate of synchronous or metachronous neoplasms.

The utility of narrow band imaging in improving the endoscopic diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Narrow band imaging (NBI) facilitates mucosal surface evaluation and may improve the endoscopic diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We investigated the utility of NBI in improving the endoscopic diagnosis of GERD when compared with conventional endoscopy.

METHODS

A total of 107 subjects (nonerosive reflux disease [NERD], 36; erosive reflux disease [ERD], 41; controls, 30) were recruited prospectively. The mucosal morphology at the squamocolumnar junction (SCJ) in GERD and controls was visualized using conventional endoscopy and NBI. The main outcome measurements were as follows: (1) The differences in mucosal morphology at the SCJ between conventional endoscopy and NBI; and (2) the differences in mucosal morphology at the SCJ between GERD and controls with NBI.

RESULTS

Micro-erosions, increased vascularity, and pit patterns at the SCJ not seen on conventional endoscopy were well seen with NBI. Compared with controls, ERD and NERD had a significantly higher prevalence of micro-erosions (ERD, 100%; NERD, 52.8%; controls, 23.3%), and increased vascularity (ERD, 95.1%; NERD, 91.7%; controls, 36.7%), but a lower prevalence of round pit pattern (ERD, 4.9%; NERD, 5.6%; controls, 70%). ERD and NERD were similar in terms of increased vascularity and pit patterns. Increased vascularity with absence of round pit pattern was useful to distinguish NERD from controls (sensitivity, 86.1%; specificity, 83.3%). Interobserver agreement was good for increased vascularity (kappa = 0.95) and micro-erosions (kappa = 0.89), but lower for pit pattern (kappa = 0.59).

CONCLUSIONS

NBI enhanced mucosal morphology at the SCJ and appeared useful for improving the endoscopic diagnosis of GERD.

Advances in endoscopic imaging of the esophagus

The introduction of flexible fiberoptic endoscopy in the 1960s was a major step forward in the diagnosis and management of various esophageal disorders. Since then, there has been steady progress in the development of novel gastrointestinal endoscopy techniques. Magnification and high-resolution endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, narrow-band imaging, autofluorescence imaging, and confocal laser endomicroscopy are some of the recent advances that have shown promise in the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma, gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett's esophagus, and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. The purpose of this review is to summarize the recent advances in endoscopic imaging of the esophagus and their practical application for the gastroenterologist.

Potential contribution of novel imaging modalities in non-erosive reflux disease

Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) is the most frequent endoscopic finding in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). Conventional white light endoscopy is an insufficient tool for diagnosing subtle changes of the oesophageal mucosa in patients with NERD. This review will discuss the diagnostic approach and endoscopic features of novel endoscopic imaging techniques such as magnification endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, narrow band imaging (NBI) and confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) for patients with this disorder. Magnification endoscopy alone or in combination with chromoendoscopy offers the chance for an improved detection of subtle findings in NERD. However, subtle changes such as punctuate erythema above the Z-line, pinpoint vessels, triangular indentations and other findings show a substantial inter- and intra-observer variability with unacceptably low kappa values for justifying their use as a diagnostic criterion for NERD. NBI and endomicroscopy are fascinating new tools, but access to these novel modalities in clinical practice is limited and the area to be examined is small, which makes it very time-consuming to examine the entire distal oesophagus. It remains to be proven in crossover, randomised trials that these new imaging modalities may represent a significant improvement over standard endoscopy for the diagnosis of NERD.

The nonerosive reflux disease-gastroesophageal reflux disease controversy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To analyse the concept of nonerosive reflux disease (NERD), examining its evolving definition and its relationship to reflux disease and functional gastrointestinal disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

The advent of the Montreal definition of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and the Rome III definition of functional upper gastrointestinal disorders has refined the concept of NERD. The high prevalence of GERD symptoms and the strong overlap between GERD and irritable bowel syndrome is due to the influence of NERD. Subtle differences exist between patterns of acid exposure in NERD and erosive disease on pH testing. Symptom generation in NERD may be influenced by altered mucosal permeability. Improvements in endoscopic technology demonstrate esophageal mucosal changes in NERD which are not seen in controls. There is a general acknowledgement that the inferior symptomatic response to acid suppression reported in NERD is attributable, at least in part, to contamination of study populations by patients with functional heartburn.

SUMMARY

NERD is common and its definition continues to evolve. For the present, however, this should be considered to be heartburn with and without regurgitation due to gastroesophageal reflux in the absence of esophageal mucosal erosions. Future studies examining treatment response of GERD subgroups must exclude functional heartburn if NERD is to be properly understood.

Clinical trial design in adult reflux disease: a methodological workshop

BACKGROUND

The development of well-tolerated acid suppressant drugs has stimulated substantial growth in the number of trials assessing therapy options for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

AIM

To develop consensus statements to inform clinical trial design in adult patients with GERD.

METHODS

Draft statements were developed employing a systematic literature review. A modified Delphi process including three rounds of voting was used to reach consensus. Between voting, statements were revised based on feedback from the Working Group and additional literature reviews. The final vote was at a face-to-face meeting that included discussion time. Voting was conducted using a six-point scale.

RESULTS

At the last vote, 93% of the final 102 statements achieved consensus (defined a priori as being supported by >or=75% of the votes). The Working Group strongly supported the development of validated patient-reported outcome instruments. Symptom assessments carried out by the investigator were considered unacceptable. There was agreement that exclusion from clinical trials should be minimized to improve generalizability, that prospective evaluation ideally requires electronic timed/dated methods and that endoscopists should be blinded to patient symptom status.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the consensus statements will improve the quality and comparability of trials, and make them compatible with regulatory requirements.

Does magnifying endoscopy improve the diagnosis of erosive esophagitis?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Low-grade erosive esophagitis (i.e. Los Angeles grade A) is the most predominant type of esophagitis in Japan. It is unclear whether all the mucosal breaks detected by conventional endoscopy are indicative of esophageal mucosal erosion. Hospital-based, cross-sectional, cross-over, observational study was assigned to investigate the value of magnifying endoscopy for diagnosis of erosive esophagitis.

METHODS

From August to December 2006, 178 consecutive patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms were enrolled at three university hospitals and one national medical center in western Japan. Before endoscopy, all participants were requested to answer questionnaires concerning their symptoms. Experienced endoscopists performed an endoscopic diagnosis of each patient first with a conventional standard view and then with a magnifying view. Endoscopic diagnostic concordance between conventional and magnifying endoscopic view for erosive esophagitis was calculated. Relationship between a variety of symptoms and erosive esophagitis was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Erosive esophagitis was identified using conventional and magnifying endoscopy in 14.6% and 17.4% of patients, respectively. Eleven false-negative and six false-positive diagnoses using conventional endoscopy occurred among the 178 enrolled patients. The weighted kappa value of diagnostic concordance for erosive esophagitis between the two endoscopic views was 0.76. The prevalence of erosive esophagitis in patients with reflux-, dysmotility-, and ulcer-like symptoms was 20.7%, 24.1%, and 15.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Magnifying endoscopy did not significantly improve the diagnostic sensitivity of erosive esophagitis over non-magnifying, conventional endoscopy. Erosive esophagitis was frequently identified in patients that did not have reflux symptoms.

Symptom evaluation in gastroesophageal reflux disease

The evaluation of the success of therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has thus far been primarily on the basis of the endoscopic evaluation of the ability of drugs to heal esophageal mucosal breaks and to a lesser extent on their ability to decrease the diverse symptoms of acid reflux. However, because most patients with GERD have no visible esophageal lesions using conventional endoscopic methods, this paradigm requires serious reconsideration. As patients with nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) are just as symptomatic as patients with erosions and are no easier to treat the use of endoscopic end points alone, as criteria for determining healing and efficacy of therapy requires reassessment. In addition, the symptoms of GERD are now appreciated to be broad-based, including many extraesophageal symptoms that contribute to the marked reduction in quality of life for GERD patients. For this reason, and because endoscopic criteria cannot be applied to evaluating therapy in NERD, the success of GERD therapy should be judged primarily in terms of diminishment of GERD-related symptoms--a return to the traditional way that patients judge therapeutic success. To objectively determine the success of therapy in GERD, multisymptom GERD questionnaires have been developed. The most promising are those that reflect the numerous types of GERD symptoms, are patient-administered, quantitative, responsive, and have been validated in both NERD and erosive GERD patients. The ReQuest instrument is especially attractive as it records the entire range of GERD symptoms on a daily basis (including also their frequency and intensity) and is responsive to changes with time and with therapy. Symptom-based evaluative tools should greatly aid the objective evaluation of GERD symptoms, monitor precisely how patients respond to therapy and thereby lead to improvements in GERD management.

Narrow band imaging and multiband imaging

NBI and MBI may enhance the diagnosis and characterization of mucosal lesions in the GI tract, particularly as adjunctive techniques to magnification endoscopy. Standardization of image characterization, further image-to-pathology correlation and validation, and the impact of these technologies on patient outcomes are necessary before endorsing the use of NBI and MBI in the routine practice of GI endoscopy.