A79 PROVINCIAL DATA IN ALBERTA REVEAL A CLEAR NEED TO ADDRESS OVERPRESCRIBING OF PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS

Background

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most commonly prescribed drugs in Canada. They are effective for several upper GI-disorders, have a very favorable safety profile and therefore there are few barriers to prescribing. Concern about overuse of PPIs has been growing. Many patients do not need long term treatment. Patients starting PPI should receive short term therapy (e.g. 8 weeks) and if they respond the need for long term therapy needs to be determined. The usual starting dose is once a day for most indications. Evidence suggests a lack of ongoing indication for PPI in 40–55% of primary care patients.There are economic implications of overuse of PPIs. Public drug spending on PPIs in Canada totaled $288.3 million of $13.5 billion spent in 2017.

Aims

To analyze prescribing data for all PPI prescriptions in Alberta for the years 2017–18 and 2018–19 and 2019–2020, to document number of prescriptions >60 days, the number of new versus repeat prescriptions, proportion of new prescriptions at a greater than 1x daily dose, the proportion of prescriptions written by primary care physicians and to estimate the number of prescriptions targetted for deprescribing.

Methods

Data were obtained anonymously from the Pharmaceutical Information Network (PIN) database from community based pharmacies in Alberta. PPIs were identified using DIN numbers. Prescribed dose and duration were obtained, as well as data on repeat prescriptions. The number of prescriptions that could be targeted for deprescribing was also estimated.

Results

The results are shown in table 1. More than 10% of the population receives a prescription each year. Of these 25–31% were new prescriptions and 69–75% were refills. The percentage of patients who were prescribed PPIs for more than 60 days was 26–28%. Furthermore, 23% of all prescriptions had a defined daily dosage greater than the recommended standard dose of once a day therapy for most indications.75% of all prescriptions are written by family physicians.

Conclusions

Prescription rates of PPIs are very high in Alberta and 75% of patients are on longer term therapy. There likely is significant overprescribing of PPIs, estimated to be up to 40% of patients filling PPI prescriptions in Alberta. This represents a significant avoidable medication and system burden and patient costs. The starting dose of new prescriptions is also high, despite the fact that for most indications the daily dose should be 1x a day. A 20% reduction in prescribing would save at least $ 9 million in Alberta. A deprescribing project has been initiated by the Digestive Health Strategic Clinical Network, a multi-stakeholder network, which addresses important GI issues in Alberta.

Funding Agencies

None

A111 THE CANADA-GLOBAL RATING SCALE: USE OF AN INNOVATION LEARNING COLLABORATIVE METHODOLOGY TO GUIDE PROVINCIAL IMPLEMENTATION IN ALBERTA

Background

The Canada-Global Rating Scale (C-GRS) is a web-based, patient centered endoscopy quality improvement tool. It assesses the quality of the services an endoscopy unit provides in two dimensions: clinical quality and the quality of the patient experience. It also allows each endoscopy unit to choose priority areas for future QI activities. Scores are submitted twice a year to a centralized website by the local endoscopy site’s C-GRS working group.

Uptake of the C-GRS in Alberta has been historically poor with only 22/50 sites submitting a C-GRS survey in 2016. A provincial C-GRS project team was formed in 2018 to spearhead provincial implementation of the C-GRS. Alberta Health Services approved a C-GRS policy in 2020 mandating regular use of the C-GRS in all provincial endoscopy units.

Aims

The purpose of this project is to describe a process of focused C-GRS implementation using Innovation Learning Collaborative (ILC) methodology.

Methods

An ILC is a process meant to drive clinical pathway practice changes to achieve system-wide improvements. Inter-professional teams meet at least three times over a 12–18 month period at Learning Sessions to share successes, learnings, resources and data. A balanced scorecard (Figure 1) is used to track C-GRS progression and regression. Action Period meetings are held in between the Learning Sessions to help build collaboration and support the teams.

Results

The first of three in-person ILC Learning Sessions was successfully held on November 29, 2019. 37 out of 50 sites in Alberta attended. Each site committed to working on up to 6 C-GRS descriptors during the course of the ILC. An updated scorecard is provided after each C-GRS cycle. An average of 25 sites attended Action Period meetings to report on progress and to share learnings with other sites. 44 endoscopy sites submitted a follow-up C-GRS survey in the spring 2020 cycle (an increase of 22 from 2016). 84% of sites demonstrated improvement with the average number of items improved at 5.1

Conclusions

Use of ILC methodology with a balanced scorecard approach can achieve system level improvement within a relatively short time frame.

Funding Agencies

None

Clinical trial design in adult reflux disease: a methodological workshop

BACKGROUND

The development of well-tolerated acid suppressant drugs has stimulated substantial growth in the number of trials assessing therapy options for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

AIM

To develop consensus statements to inform clinical trial design in adult patients with GERD.

METHODS

Draft statements were developed employing a systematic literature review. A modified Delphi process including three rounds of voting was used to reach consensus. Between voting, statements were revised based on feedback from the Working Group and additional literature reviews. The final vote was at a face-to-face meeting that included discussion time. Voting was conducted using a six-point scale.

RESULTS

At the last vote, 93% of the final 102 statements achieved consensus (defined a priori as being supported by >or=75% of the votes). The Working Group strongly supported the development of validated patient-reported outcome instruments. Symptom assessments carried out by the investigator were considered unacceptable. There was agreement that exclusion from clinical trials should be minimized to improve generalizability, that prospective evaluation ideally requires electronic timed/dated methods and that endoscopists should be blinded to patient symptom status.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the consensus statements will improve the quality and comparability of trials, and make them compatible with regulatory requirements.

One-week triple therapy with esomeprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole provides effective eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection

AIM

To compare the eradication rates of treatment with esomeprazole, metronidazole and clarithromycin (EMC) vs. omeprazole, metronidazole and clarithromycin (OMC), given for 7 days. OMC treatment was followed by 3 weeks of treatment with 20 mg omeprazole alone; the EMC group received placebo.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, controlled study was conducted in 36 Canadian centres. Patients had a minimum 3-month history of dyspepsia, with or without a previous history of peptic ulcer disease, and were Helicobacter pylori positive by urea breath test. The eradication of H. pylori was determined by two negative breath tests performed at least 4 and 8 weeks following the completion of treatment.

RESULTS

The intention-to-treat and per protocol populations consisted of 379 and 339 patients, respectively. The success rates of EMC/placebo were 76% (144/190) by intention-to-treat and 80% (138/172) by per protocol analysis; for OMC/omeprazole, the rates were 72% (137/189) and 75% (125/167), respectively. The difference between the two treatment groups was not significant. Treatment was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

A 7-day regimen of esomeprazole, metronidazole and clarithromycin is effective and well tolerated for the eradication of H. pylori infection.

One-week triple therapy with esomeprazole provides effective eradication of Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer disease

BACKGROUND

Esomeprazole is the first proton pump inhibitor to be developed as an optical isomer for the treatment of acid-related diseases.

METHODS

Four hundred and forty eight duodenal ulcer patients with Helicobacter pylori infection, confirmed by 13C-urea breath test (UBT), and no current ulcer, were randomised to double-blind treatment with esomeprazole 20 mg twice daily (b.d.) (n=224) or omeprazole 20 mg b.d. (n=224), in combination with amoxicillin 1 g b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. for 1 week (EAC and OAC, respectively). A negative UBT at both 4 and 8 weeks after completing therapy indicated successful H. pylori eradication.

RESULTS

Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis comprised 400 patients (EAC, n=204; OAC, n=196) and per protocol (PP) analysis 377 patients (EAC, n=192; OAC, n=185). Eradication rates (95% confidence intervals) for ITT and PP populations were: EAC, 90% (85-94%) and 91% (86-94%); OAC, 88% (82-92%) and 91% (86-95%). Between-group differences in eradication rates were not statistically significant. Both regimens were well tolerated, with an adverse event profile and frequency typical of proton pump inhibitor plus antibiotic combination therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Esomeprazole-based triple therapy for 1 week is highly effective in eradicating H. pylori infection in duodenal ulcer disease, offers comparable efficacy to omeprazole-based therapy, and is well tolerated.

Bismuth-based triple therapy with bismuth subcitrate, metronidazole and tetracycline in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori: a randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the rate of Helicobacter pylori eradication following bismuth-based triple therapy with colloidal bismuth subcitrate, tetracycline hydrochloride and metronidazole.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and eleven patients were randomly assigned, in a two to one ratio, to colloidal bismuth subcitrate 120 mg qid plus metronidazole 250 mg qid plus tetracycline 500 mg qid (Gastrostat), or matching placebo tablets and capsules for 14 days. Presence or absence of H pylori was documented by histology at entry and at least 28 days after treatment. Patients had dyspeptic symptoms with or without a history of peptic ulcer. Patients with any previous attempt(s) at eradication of H pylori, who used bismuth, antibiotics, H2 receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors in the previous four weeks were excluded.

RESULTS

Fifty-three of 59 (90%) patients on bismuth-based treatment and only one of 35 (3%) on placebo achieved eradication by per protocol analysis. Fifty-three of 65 (82%) patients on bismuth-based treatment achieved eradication, while only two of 34 (5%) achieved eradication on placebo by intention to treat analysis. Eradication rates for bismuth-based treatment across sites ranged from 83% to 100%. Only two patients in the bismuth-based treatment group (4%) and one in the placebo group (3%) discontinued treatment because of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Colloidal bismuth subcitrate plus metronidazole plus tetracycline, given in the doses studied for 14 days, is safe and highly effective against H pylori infection and would be appropriate as a first-line therapy for eradication.

Novel diagnostic tests to detect Helicobacter pylori infection: A pediatric perspective

Because of the widespread problem of Helicobacter pylori infections, there is an increased need for rapid, reliable and inexpensive diagnostic tests. Five recently developed tests that offer potential advantages because they are less invasive or permit easier acquisition of samples than available tests are assessed. The tests assessed are whole blood, saliva and urine assays that measure systemic antibody response to H pylori, stool tests that measure H pylori antigens and string tests that recover H pylori organisms.

Canadian Helicobacter Study Group Consensus Conference on the Approach to Helicobacter pylori Infection in Children and Adolescents

Gastric infection with Helicobacter pylori is common in both children and adults, but children are considerably less susceptible to peptic ulcers and other pathological sequelae. As a result, the risk to benefit ratio of diagnostic studies and therapeutic regimens for H pylori in adults are likely different from those in pediatric populations. These guidelines for the management of pediatric H pylori infection, developed by the Canadian Helicobacter Study Group, are designed to identify when the diagnosis and treatment of H pylori may improve patient care. Given the low prevalence of this infection in Canada, it is important to recognize that indiscriminate testing and treatment programs in children are not recommended, and indeed may threaten the optimal care of children. Diagnostic tests should be employed judiciously and be reserved for children who are most likely to derive measurable benefit, such as those likely to have peptic ulcer disease. At this time a test and treat strategy in children cannot be considered prudent, evidence based or cost effective. It is appropriate to limit diagnosis and treatment to children and adolescents in whom H pylori has been identified during endoscopic investigation.

The MACH2 study: role of omeprazole in eradication of Helicobacter pylori with 1-week triple therapies

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The role of omeprazole in triple therapy and the impact of Helicobacter pylori resistance on treatment outcome are not established. This study investigated the role of omeprazole and influence of primary H. pylori resistance on eradication and development of secondary resistance.

METHODS

Patients (n = 539) with a history of duodenal ulcer and a positive H. pylori screening test result were randomized into 4 groups. OAC group received 20 mg omeprazole, 1000 mg amoxicillin, and 500 mg clarithromycin; OMC group received 20 mg omeprazole, 400 mg metronidazole, and 250 mg clarithromycin; and AC (amoxicillin, 1000 mg, and clarithromycin, 500 mg) and MC (metronidazole, 400 mg, and clarithromycin, 250 mg) groups received no omeprazole. All doses were administered twice daily for 1 week. H. pylori status was assessed before and after therapy by 13C-urea breath test. Susceptibility testing was performed at entry and in patients with persistent infection after therapy.

RESULTS

Eradication (intention to treat [n = 514]/per protocol [n = 449]) was 94%/95% for OAC, 26%/25% for AC (P < 0.001), 87%/91% for OMC, and 69%/72% for MC (P < 0.001). Primary resistance was 27% for metronidazole, 3% for clarithromycin, and 0% for amoxicillin. Eradication in primary metronidazole-susceptible/-resistant strains was 95%/76% for OMC and 86%/43% for MC. Secondary metronidazole and clarithromycin resistance each developed in 12 patients: 8 treated with omeprazole and 16 without omeprazole.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of omeprazole achieves high eradication rates, reduces the impact of primary resistance, and may decrease the risk of secondary resistance compared with regimens containing only two antibiotics.