Evaluation of potential liver donors: limits imposed by donor variables in liver transplantation

A comparative prospective study of two available solutions for kidney and liver preservation

BACKGROUND

Viaspan (University of Wisconsin [UW]) solution is the gold standard for abdominal organ preservation. Celsior (CEL) is an extracellular-type, low-potassium, low-viscosity solution, initially used for heart and lung preservation. We have performed a prospective multicenter study to compare the role of these cold-storage solutions on kidney and liver recovery after transplantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From March 15, 2000 to December 31, 2001, 441 (172 CEL and 269 UW) renal transplants (RT) and 175 (79 CEL and 96 UW) liver transplants (LT) were included in the study.

RESULTS

Perfusate volume used was significantly lower in the UW group, being 4,732 +/- 796 mL versus 5,826 + 834 mL in the CEL group (P < 0.001). In LT, median total bilirubin serum levels were significantly higher at 5 and 7 posttransplant days in the UW group (90.6 and 92.3 micromol/L, respectively) as compared with CEL (51.3 and 63.4 micromol/L, respectively). After LT, primary nonfunction (PNF) rates in the CEL and UW groups were 3.8% and 4.2% (P = NS) respectively, with 1-year graft and patient survival being 83.3% versus 85.4% (P = NS) and 89.9% versus 90.6% (P = NS). After RT, delayed graft function (DGF) rates were 23.2% and 22.7% (P = NS), respectively; PNF rates were 1.9% and 1.7% (P = NS) respectively, with 1-year graft and patient survival being 92.3% versus 94.2% (P = NS) and 99.4% versus 97.7% (P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

CEL solution was shown to be as effective as UW in both liver and kidney preservation. In LT patients, biliary function recovery is significantly better in the CEL group. CEL solution represents an efficacious option in multiorgan harvesting.

A simple scoring system to evaluate the effects of cold ischemia on marginal liver donors

BACKGROUND

Exactly what constitutes a marginal donor remains ill defined. The authors set out to create a scoring system that objectively classifies a donor as marginal or nonmarginal and to define what the maximum acceptable preservation period is for the marginal liver to minimize early graft dysfunction.

METHODS

The authors performed an analysis on data collected prospectively of 397 cadaveric liver transplants. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on donor, recipient, and perioperative factors with relation to early allograft dysfunction. A score was developed that classified donors into marginal and nonmarginal populations, and the influence of cold ischemia was determined for each group.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis-determined donor age and steatosis (moderate to severe) were independent predictors of deranged function. This enabled the authors to produce a scoring system to differentiate marginal donors with respect to risk of early allograft dysfunction as follows: Formula=(20.06xsteatosis)+(0.44xdonor age), cutoff 23.1. In the marginal group, the cutoff value of cold ischemia time was 12.6 hr.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors developed a scoring system that classified an organ as marginal or nonmarginal depending on the donor age and degree of steatosis. Marginal livers have a strong risk of developing early allograft dysfunction with increasing cold ischemia times and should be transplanted within 12 hr. Cold ischemia time was not found to be an important factor in the development of early allograft dysfunction in nonmarginal donors.