51
|
Zou Y, Duke JL, Ferriola D, Luo Q, Wasserman J, Mosbruger TL, Luo W, Cai L, Zou K, Tairis N, Damianos G, Pagkrati I, Kukuruga D, Huang Y, Monos DS. Genomic characterization of MICA gene using multiple next generation sequencing platforms: A validation study. HLA 2020; 96:430-444. [PMID: 32681760 PMCID: PMC7589345 DOI: 10.1111/tan.13998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
We have developed a protocol regarding the genomic characterization of the MICA gene by next generation sequencing (NGS). The amplicon includes the full length of the gene and is about 13 kb. A total of 156 samples were included in the study. Ninety‐seven of these samples were previously characterized at MICA by legacy methods (Sanger or sequence specific oligonucleotide) and were used to evaluate the accuracy, precision, specificity, and sensitivity of the assay. An additional 59 DNA samples of unknown ethnicity volunteers from the United States were only genotyped by NGS. Samples were chosen to contain a diverse set of alleles. Our NGS approach included a first round of sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform and a second round of sequencing on the MinION platform by Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT), on selected samples for the purpose of either characterizing new alleles or setting phase among multiple polymorphisms to resolve ambiguities or generate complete sequence for alleles that were only partially reported in the IMGT/HLA database. Complete consensus sequences were generated for every allele sequenced with ONT, extending from the 5′ untranslated region (UTR) to the 3′ UTR of the MICA gene. Thirty‐two MICA sequences were submitted to the IMGT/HLA database including either new alleles or filling up the gaps (exonic, intronic and/or UTRs) of already reported alleles. Some of the challenges associated with the characterization of these samples are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yizhou Zou
- Department of Immunology, Central South University Xiangya School of Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Jamie L Duke
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Deborah Ferriola
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Qizhi Luo
- Department of Immunology, Central South University Xiangya School of Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Jenna Wasserman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Timothy L Mosbruger
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Weiguang Luo
- Department of Immunology, Central South University Xiangya School of Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Liang Cai
- Department of Immunology, Central South University Xiangya School of Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Kevin Zou
- Department of Immunology, Central South University Xiangya School of Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Nikolaos Tairis
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Georgios Damianos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ioanna Pagkrati
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Debra Kukuruga
- Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Yanping Huang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Dimitri S Monos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Baranwal AK, Bhat DK, Goswami S, Agarwal SK, Kaur G, Mehra N. Clinical relevance of major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related molecule A (MICA) antibodies in live donor renal transplantation - Indian Experience. Scand J Immunol 2020; 92:e12923. [PMID: 32593197 DOI: 10.1111/sji.12923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Revised: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejections (AMR) in the absence of circulating anti-HLA-DSA have highlighted the role of non-HLA antibodies, particularly those directed against endothelial cells. Of these, MICA (major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related molecule A) antibodies are the most notable and important because of their potential in promoting graft rejections. Limited studies have focused on the impact of MICA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) on graft outcome as compared to those that are not donor-specific (NDSA). We evaluated pre- and post-transplant sera at POD 7, 30, 90, 180 and the time of biopsy from 206 consecutive primary live donor renal transplant recipients for anti-MICA and anti-HLA antibodies using single antigen bead assay on a Luminex platform. Recipients who developed MICA antibodies and their donors were phenotyped for MICA alleles. For the purpose of antibody analysis, patients were categorized into three major groups: biopsy-proven AMR, acute cellular rejection (ACR) and those with no rejection episodes (NRE). During the mean follow-up period of 17.37 ± 6.88 months, 16 of the 206 recipients developed AMR, while ACR was observed in only 13 cases. A quarter (25%) of the AMR cases had anti-MICA antibodies as compared to 7.7% of those experiencing ACR and 6.2% of the NRE group. Allelic typing revealed that all MICA Ab +ve AMR cases were due to the presence of donor-specific antibodies. MICA-DSA even in the absence of HLA-DSA was significantly associated with AMR but not with ACR when compared with the NRE group (P = <.01).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajay Kumar Baranwal
- Department of Transplant Immunology and Immunogenetics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.,Department of Pathology, Command Hospital, Pune, India
| | - Deepali K Bhat
- Department of Transplant Immunology and Immunogenetics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.,Cellular & Molecular Therapeutic Branch, NHLBI, National Institute of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sanjeev Goswami
- Department of Transplant Immunology and Immunogenetics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Sanjay Kumar Agarwal
- Department of Nephrology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Gurvinder Kaur
- Department of Transplant Immunology and Immunogenetics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.,Laboratory Oncology, Dr BR Ambedkar Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Narinder Mehra
- Department of Transplant Immunology and Immunogenetics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.,National Chair, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Abstract
The role of anti-HLA antibodies in solid organ rejection is well established and these antibodies are routinely monitored both in patients in the waiting list and in the post-transplant setting. More recently, the presence of other antibodies directed towards non-HLA antigens, or the so-called minor histocompatibility antigens, has drawn the attention of the transplant community; however, their possible involvement in the graft outcome remains uncertain. These antibodies have been described to possibly have a role in rejection and allograft failure. This review focuses on the most studied non-HLA antibodies and their association with different clinical outcomes considered in solid organ transplantation with the aim of clarifying their clinical implication and potential relevance for routine testing.
Collapse
|
54
|
Delbos F, Blouin L, Bruno B, Crocchiolo R, Desoutter J, Detrait M, Nguyen-Lejarre KT, Giannoli C, Lemarié C, Renac V, Yakoub-Agha I, Dubois V. [Relevance of antibodies in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Antibodies anti-HLA, anti-platelets, anti-granulocytes, anti-erythrocytes and anti-MICA. Guidelines from the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC)]. Bull Cancer 2020; 107:S159-S169. [PMID: 32540096 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2020.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Revised: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
The presence of allo-antibodies in the serum of a recipient awaiting hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) may have an impact on transfusion efficiency and/or donor choice, especially in the absence of an identical sibling donor. Prior to transplantation, donor specific anti-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) antibodies (DSA) have a recognized effect on transplant outcome, correlated with the increasing MFI value and with the ability of such antibody to fix the complement fraction. Anti-platelet antibodies (anti-HLA class I and anti-HPA [Human Platelet Antigen]) are better involved in transfusion inefficiency and can be responsible for refractory status. ABO incompatibilities require a specific treatment of the graft in presence of high titer to avoid hemolytic adverse effects. Investigations of these antibodies should be carried out on a regular basis in order to establish appropriate transfusion recommendation, select an alternative donor when possible or adapt the source of cells. After transplantation, in case of delayed recovery or graft rejection, long term aplasia, persistent mixed chimerism or late release, and after elimination of the main clinical causes, a biological assessment targeted on the different type of antibodies will have to be performed in order to orient towards the cause or the appropriate therapy. Further studies should be carried out to determine the impact of anti-MICA antibodies and recipient specific anti-HLA antibodies, on the outcome of the transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florent Delbos
- EFS Centre Pays de la Loire, laboratoire HLA, 34, rue Jean-Monnet, 44000 Nantes, France
| | - Laura Blouin
- CHU Pellegrin, laboratoire immunologie et immunogénétique, place Amélie-Raba-Leon, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France
| | | | - Roberto Crocchiolo
- ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milano, Italie
| | - Judith Desoutter
- CHU Amiens Picardie, service d'hématologie biologique, secteur d'histocompatibilité, 80054 Amiens cedex 1, France
| | - Marie Detrait
- Service d'hématologie et de transplantation médullaire, CHRU de Nancy, institut Louis-Mathieu, hôpitaux de Brabois, rue du Morvan, 54500 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Khan Tien Nguyen-Lejarre
- EFS Bourgogne Franche-Comté, laboratoire d'immunogénétique, 8, rue du Dr-JFX-Girod, 25020 Besançon cedex, France
| | - Catherine Giannoli
- EFS Auvergne Rhône Alpes, laboratoire HLA/HPA, 111, rue Elisée-Reclus, 69150 Décines, France
| | - Claude Lemarié
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, département de biologie du cancer, Marseille, France; Inserm CBT1409 centre d'investigations cliniques en biothérapie, Marseille, France
| | - Virginie Renac
- EFS Bretagne, laboratoire d'immunogénétique et histocompatibilité immunologie plaquettaire, rue Pierre-Jean-Gineste, 35000 Rennes, France
| | | | - Valérie Dubois
- EFS Auvergne Rhône Alpes, laboratoire HLA/HPA, 111, rue Elisée-Reclus, 69150 Décines, France.
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection continues to hinder long-term survival of solid organ allografts. Natural antibodies (Nabs) with polyreactive and autoreactive properties have recently emerged as potential contributors to antibody-mediated graft rejection. This review discusses Nabs, their functions in health and disease, their significance in rejection following kidney, heart, and lung transplantation, and their implication in serum reactivity to key antigens associated with rejection. Finally, potential effector mechanisms of Nabs in the context of transplantation are explored.
Collapse
|
56
|
Kummer L, Zaradzki M, Vijayan V, Arif R, Weigand MA, Immenschuh S, Wagner AH, Larmann J. Vascular Signaling in Allogenic Solid Organ Transplantation - The Role of Endothelial Cells. Front Physiol 2020; 11:443. [PMID: 32457653 PMCID: PMC7227440 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 04/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Graft rejection remains the major obstacle after vascularized solid organ transplantation. Endothelial cells, which form the interface between the transplanted graft and the host’s immunity, are the first target for host immune cells. During acute cellular rejection endothelial cells are directly attacked by HLA I and II-recognizing NK cells, macrophages, and T cells, and activation of the complement system leads to endothelial cell lysis. The established forms of immunosuppressive therapy provide effective treatment options, but the treatment of chronic rejection of solid organs remains challenging. Chronic rejection is mainly based on production of donor-specific antibodies that induce endothelial cell activation—a condition which phenotypically resembles chronic inflammation. Activated endothelial cells produce chemokines, and expression of adhesion molecules increases. Due to this pro-inflammatory microenvironment, leukocytes are recruited and transmigrate from the bloodstream across the endothelial monolayer into the vessel wall. This mononuclear infiltrate is a hallmark of transplant vasculopathy. Furthermore, expression profiles of different cytokines serve as clinical markers for the patient’s outcome. Besides their effects on immune cells, activated endothelial cells support the migration and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells. In turn, muscle cell recruitment leads to neointima formation followed by reduction in organ perfusion and eventually results in tissue injury. Activation of endothelial cells involves antibody ligation to the surface of endothelial cells. Subsequently, intracellular signaling pathways are initiated. These signaling cascades may serve as targets to prevent or treat adverse effects in antibody-activated endothelial cells. Preventive or therapeutic strategies for chronic rejection can be investigated in sophisticated mouse models of transplant vasculopathy, mimicking interactions between immune cells and endothelium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Kummer
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marcin Zaradzki
- Institute of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vijith Vijayan
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Rawa Arif
- Institute of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus A Weigand
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Immenschuh
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Andreas H Wagner
- Institute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan Larmann
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Etta P. Testing for donor-specific antibodies in renal transplantation: Indian perspective. INDIAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION 2020. [DOI: 10.4103/ijot.ijot_17_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
58
|
Farouk S, Zhang Z, Menon MC. Non-HLA donor-recipient mismatches in kidney transplantation-A stone left unturned. Am J Transplant 2020; 20:19-24. [PMID: 31550409 PMCID: PMC7898079 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2019] [Revised: 08/28/2019] [Accepted: 09/17/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
In kidney transplantation, short-term allograft survival has improved due to improvements in acute rejection episodes without corresponding improvements in long-term survival. Although current organ allocation algorithms take into account human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching to reduce antidonor alloimmune responses, it is likely that genomic variation at non-HLA loci (ie, non-HLA donor-recipient [D-R] pair mismatches) play a role in the "non-self" responses and ultimately affect long-term allograft survival. Existing data from both animal models and human studies suggest an association between non-HLA D-R mismatches and kidney allograft outcomes. In this minireview, we examine existing and emerging data and discuss putative mechanisms on the role of non-HLA D-R mismatches on long-term allograft outcomes in kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samira Farouk
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY,Recanati-Miller transplant institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY
| | - Zhongyang Zhang
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY,Icahn Institute for Data Science and Genomic Technology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY
| | - Madhav C Menon
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY,Recanati-Miller transplant institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Reindl-Schwaighofer R, Heinzel A, Gualdoni GA, Mesnard L, Claas FHJ, Oberbauer R. Novel insights into non-HLA alloimmunity in kidney transplantation. Transpl Int 2019; 33:5-17. [PMID: 31650645 PMCID: PMC6972536 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2019] [Revised: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 10/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Recognition of non‐self structures on donor cells represents the main immunological barrier in solid organ transplantation. The human leukocyte antigens (HLA) are considered the most important non‐self (allo)antigens in transplantation. Long‐term graft attrition is mainly caused by the formation of alloreactive antibodies that are directed against non‐self structures (i.e., epitopes) on cell surface proteins. Recently published data provided evidence for a similar importance of non‐HLA mismatches between donors and recipients in acute rejection as well as long‐term kidney allograft survival. These data suggest a broader concept of immunological non‐self that goes beyond HLA incompatibility and expands the current concept of polymorphic non‐self epitopes on cell surface molecules from HLA to non‐HLA targets. Amino acid substitutions caused by single nucleotide variants in protein‐coding genes or complete loss of gene expression represent the basis for polymorphic residues in both HLA and non‐HLA molecules. To better understand these novel insights in non‐HLA alloimmunity, we will first review basic principles of the alloimmune response with a focus on the HLA epitope concept in donor‐specific antibody formation before discussing key publications on non‐HLA antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman Reindl-Schwaighofer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Heinzel
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Guido A Gualdoni
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Laurent Mesnard
- Sorbonne Université, Urgences Néphrologiques et Transplantation Rénale, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - Frans H J Claas
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Rainer Oberbauer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Koenig A, Chen CC, Marçais A, Barba T, Mathias V, Sicard A, Rabeyrin M, Racapé M, Duong-Van-Huyen JP, Bruneval P, Loupy A, Dussurgey S, Ducreux S, Meas-Yedid V, Olivo-Marin JC, Paidassi H, Guillemain R, Taupin JL, Callemeyn J, Morelon E, Nicoletti A, Charreau B, Dubois V, Naesens M, Walzer T, Defrance T, Thaunat O. Missing self triggers NK cell-mediated chronic vascular rejection of solid organ transplants. Nat Commun 2019; 10:5350. [PMID: 31767837 PMCID: PMC6877588 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13113-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Current doctrine is that microvascular inflammation (MVI) triggered by a transplant -recipient antibody response against alloantigens (antibody-mediated rejection) is the main cause of graft failure. Here, we show that histological lesions are not mediated by antibodies in approximately half the participants in a cohort of 129 renal recipients with MVI on graft biopsy. Genetic analysis of these patients shows a higher prevalence of mismatches between donor HLA I and recipient inhibitory killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs). Human in vitro models and transplantation of β2-microglobulin-deficient hearts into wild-type mice demonstrates that the inability of graft endothelial cells to provide HLA I-mediated inhibitory signals to recipient circulating NK cells triggers their activation, which in turn promotes endothelial damage. Missing self-induced NK cell activation is mTORC1-dependent and the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin can prevent the development of this type of chronic vascular rejection. ‘Missing self’ is a mode of natural killer (NK) cell activation aimed to detect the lack of HLA-I molecules on infected or neoplastic cells. Here, the authors show that mismatch between donor HLA-I and cognate receptors on recipient NK cells mediates microvascular inflammation-associated graft rejection, a pathology that is preventable by mTOR inhibition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Koenig
- CIRI, INSERM U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, CNRS UMR5308, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Univ. Lyon, 21, avenue Tony Garnier, 69007, Lyon, France.,Hospices Civils de Lyon, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Department of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, 5, place d'Arsonval, 69003, Lyon, France.,Lyon-Est Medical Faculty, Claude Bernard University (Lyon 1), 8, avenue Rockfeller, 69373, Lyon, France
| | - Chien-Chia Chen
- CIRI, INSERM U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, CNRS UMR5308, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Univ. Lyon, 21, avenue Tony Garnier, 69007, Lyon, France
| | - Antoine Marçais
- CIRI, INSERM U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, CNRS UMR5308, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Univ. Lyon, 21, avenue Tony Garnier, 69007, Lyon, France
| | - Thomas Barba
- CIRI, INSERM U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, CNRS UMR5308, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Univ. Lyon, 21, avenue Tony Garnier, 69007, Lyon, France.,Hospices Civils de Lyon, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Department of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, 5, place d'Arsonval, 69003, Lyon, France.,Lyon-Est Medical Faculty, Claude Bernard University (Lyon 1), 8, avenue Rockfeller, 69373, Lyon, France
| | - Virginie Mathias
- CIRI, INSERM U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, CNRS UMR5308, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Univ. Lyon, 21, avenue Tony Garnier, 69007, Lyon, France.,French National Blood Service (EFS), HLA Laboratory, 111, rue Elisée-Reclus, 69153, Décines-Charpieu, France
| | - Antoine Sicard
- CIRI, INSERM U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, CNRS UMR5308, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Univ. Lyon, 21, avenue Tony Garnier, 69007, Lyon, France.,Hospices Civils de Lyon, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Department of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, 5, place d'Arsonval, 69003, Lyon, France.,Lyon-Est Medical Faculty, Claude Bernard University (Lyon 1), 8, avenue Rockfeller, 69373, Lyon, France
| | - Maud Rabeyrin
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Pathology, 59, boulevard Pinel, 69500, Bron, France
| | - Maud Racapé
- Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, Paris Descartes University, 12, rue de l'Ecole de Médecine, 75006, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Paul Duong-Van-Huyen
- Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, Paris Descartes University, 12, rue de l'Ecole de Médecine, 75006, Paris, France
| | - Patrick Bruneval
- Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, Paris Descartes University, 12, rue de l'Ecole de Médecine, 75006, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Loupy
- Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, Paris Descartes University, 12, rue de l'Ecole de Médecine, 75006, Paris, France
| | - Sébastien Dussurgey
- SFR Biosciences (UMS3444/CNRS, US8/Inserm, ENS de Lyon, UCBL), 50, avenue Tony-Garnier, 69007, Lyon, France
| | - Stéphanie Ducreux
- CIRI, INSERM U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, CNRS UMR5308, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Univ. Lyon, 21, avenue Tony Garnier, 69007, Lyon, France.,French National Blood Service (EFS), HLA Laboratory, 111, rue Elisée-Reclus, 69153, Décines-Charpieu, France
| | - Vannary Meas-Yedid
- Unité d'Analyse d'Images Biologiques, Pasteur Institut, 25-28, rue du Docteur-Roux, 75015, Paris, France
| | | | - Héléna Paidassi
- CIRI, INSERM U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, CNRS UMR5308, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Univ. Lyon, 21, avenue Tony Garnier, 69007, Lyon, France
| | - Romain Guillemain
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Georges Pompidou Hospital, Cardiology and Heart Transplant Department, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Luc Taupin
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Immunology and HLA Laboratory, Saint-Louis Hospital, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010, Paris, France.,French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (Inserm) Unit 1160, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010, Paris, France.,Paris Diderot University, 5, rue Thomas-Mann, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Jasper Callemeyn
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, Box 7003, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Emmanuel Morelon
- CIRI, INSERM U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, CNRS UMR5308, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Univ. Lyon, 21, avenue Tony Garnier, 69007, Lyon, France.,Hospices Civils de Lyon, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Department of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, 5, place d'Arsonval, 69003, Lyon, France.,Lyon-Est Medical Faculty, Claude Bernard University (Lyon 1), 8, avenue Rockfeller, 69373, Lyon, France
| | - Antonino Nicoletti
- Paris Diderot University, 5, rue Thomas-Mann, 75013, Paris, France.,French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (Inserm) Unit 1148, Laboratory of Vascular Translational Science, 46, rue Henri-Huchard, 75018, Paris, France
| | - Béatrice Charreau
- French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (Inserm) UMR1064, 30, boulevard Jean-Monnet, 44093, Nantes Cedex 01, France
| | - Valérie Dubois
- CIRI, INSERM U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, CNRS UMR5308, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Univ. Lyon, 21, avenue Tony Garnier, 69007, Lyon, France.,French National Blood Service (EFS), HLA Laboratory, 111, rue Elisée-Reclus, 69153, Décines-Charpieu, France
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, Box 7003, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thierry Walzer
- CIRI, INSERM U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, CNRS UMR5308, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Univ. Lyon, 21, avenue Tony Garnier, 69007, Lyon, France
| | - Thierry Defrance
- CIRI, INSERM U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, CNRS UMR5308, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Univ. Lyon, 21, avenue Tony Garnier, 69007, Lyon, France
| | - Olivier Thaunat
- CIRI, INSERM U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, CNRS UMR5308, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Univ. Lyon, 21, avenue Tony Garnier, 69007, Lyon, France. .,Hospices Civils de Lyon, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Department of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, 5, place d'Arsonval, 69003, Lyon, France. .,Lyon-Est Medical Faculty, Claude Bernard University (Lyon 1), 8, avenue Rockfeller, 69373, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Leung VWY, Pilon SJ, Fiset PO, Sandal S. A case report on lipofuscin deposition in a graft biopsy two years after kidney transplantation: an insignificant bystander or a pathogenic benefactor? BMC Nephrol 2019; 20:376. [PMID: 31623557 PMCID: PMC6798339 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-019-1569-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2019] [Accepted: 09/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Lipofuscin deposition is a characteristic manifestation of aging. There is very limited literature in humans and in animals describing these deposits in native kidneys. Overall, it is thought to be non-pathogenic and successful transplants from a donor with lipofuscin deposits have been reported. We present the case of a patient who underwent a kidney transplant and a for-cause biopsy post-transplantation incidentally revealed lipofuscin deposition. Case presentation A 48-year old gentleman with a past medical history of diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, and ischemic and then hemorrhagic cardiovascular accident underwent a successful kidney transplant. His donor was an expanded criteria donor with no major past medical history. Post-transplant course was complicated by delayed graft function requiring one dialysis treatment for hyperkalemia. After that he had an uneventful course and achieved a baseline creatinine of 1.2 mg/dL, with no proteinuria. On a routine 19-month follow-up he was noted to have proteinuria and an antibody against the major-histocompatibility-complex class I-related chain A. A graft biopsy revealed acute antibody-mediated rejection and impressive lipofuscin deposition. He was subsequently treated with an antibody-mediated rejection protocol that included high dose steroids, Rituximab, plasmapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulin, but responded poorly to this regimen. A 6-month follow up biopsy continued to show lipofuscin deposition, with similar microvascular injury scores and 12-months later his creatinine remained stable but his proteinuria worsened. Patient was struggling with recurrent infectious episodes requiring hospitalizations and thus no further diagnostic or therapeutic treatments were pursued. Conclusions Lipofuscin deposition has been reported in solid organ transplants but the significance and cause are not well understood. Several physiologic and some pathologic causes to these deposits have been reported including age, diabetes, medications and a genetic syndrome. We propose that immunologic causes such as rejection in the presence of other risk factors could potentiate the oxidative stress leading to excessive lipofuscin deposition in kidney transplants. In the case of our patient, we conclude that these deposits were likely recipient-derived, and postulate that the cumulative burden of inflammation from rejection, and underlying medical conditions led to increased lipofuscin deposition. We speculate them to be an innocent bystander.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivian W Y Leung
- Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, 1001 boul Decarie, Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Sarah-Jeanne Pilon
- Department of Pathology, McGill University Health Centre, 1001 boul Decarie, Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Pierre O Fiset
- Department of Pathology, McGill University Health Centre, 1001 boul Decarie, Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Shaifali Sandal
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, 1001 boul Decarie, Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3J1, Canada. .,Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, 1001 boul Decariel, Montrea, Quebec, H4A 3J1, Canada. .,Royal Victoria Hospital Glen Site, D05-7176, 1001 boul Decarie, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Thurman JM, Panzer SE, Le Quintrec M. The role of complement in antibody mediated transplant rejection. Mol Immunol 2019; 112:240-246. [PMID: 31195225 PMCID: PMC6646053 DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2019.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2019] [Revised: 05/23/2019] [Accepted: 06/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Antibody mediated transplant rejection (AMR) is a major cause of long-term allograft failure, and currently available treatments are of limited efficacy for treating the disease. AMR is caused by donor specific antibodies (DSA) that bind to antigens within the transplanted organ. DSA usually activate the classical pathway of complement within the allograft, and complement activation is believed to be an important cause of tissue injury in AMR. Several new clinical assays may improve our ability to identify patients at risk of AMR. Complement inhibitory drugs have also been tested in selected patients and in small series. Better understanding of the role of complement activation in the pathogenesis of AMR will likely improve our ability to diagnose the disease and to develop novel treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua M Thurman
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Sarah E Panzer
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Moglie Le Quintrec
- Department of Nephrology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Compelling scientific and clinical evidence that non-HLA specific antibodies impact graft outcome independently and in concert with donor HLA specific antibodies. Hum Immunol 2019; 80:555-560. [PMID: 31279533 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2019.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
64
|
Anglicheau D, Delville M, Lamarthee B. Non anti-HLA antibodies and acute rejection: A critical viewpoint. Nephrol Ther 2019; 15 Suppl 1:S53-S59. [PMID: 30981396 DOI: 10.1016/j.nephro.2019.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
In solid organ transplantation, the deleterious effect of antibodies directed against donor HLA antigens, whether preformed or de novo, is well established. Anti-HLA antibodies have been associated not only with the risk of antibody-mediated rejection but also with late graft dysfunction and are now considered to be the leading cause of allograft loss after renal transplantation. In addition to HLA antibodies, the possible involvement of non-HLA antibodies targeting donor endothelial cells has long been the subject of intense research. The purpose of this review is to discuss current knowledge and remaining issues related to the involvement of non-HLA antibodies in solid organ transplantation. More specifically, the clinical data underlying the hypothesis of the role of non-HLA antibodies will be discussed, as well as the different techniques for antibody detection, their clinical relevance and their antigenic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dany Anglicheau
- Service de néphrologie et transplantation rénale adulte, hôpital Necker-Enfants-Malades, 149, rue de Sèvres, 75015 Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité, 12, rue de l'École-de-Médecine, 75006 Paris, France; Inserm, U1151, 149, rue de Sèvres, 75015 Paris, France.
| | - Marianne Delville
- Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité, 12, rue de l'École-de-Médecine, 75006 Paris, France; Service de biothérapie, hôpital Necker-Enfants-Malades, 149, rue de Sèvres, 75015 Paris, France; Inserm, U1163, 24, boulevard de Montparnasse, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Baptiste Lamarthee
- Service de néphrologie et transplantation rénale adulte, hôpital Necker-Enfants-Malades, 149, rue de Sèvres, 75015 Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité, 12, rue de l'École-de-Médecine, 75006 Paris, France; Inserm, U1151, 149, rue de Sèvres, 75015 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Delville M, Lamarthée B, Pagie S, See SB, Rabant M, Burger C, Gatault P, Giral M, Thaunat O, Arzouk N, Hertig A, Hazzan M, Matignon M, Mariat C, Caillard S, Kamar N, Sayegh J, Westeel PF, Garrouste C, Ladrière M, Vuiblet V, Rivalan J, Merville P, Bertrand D, Le Moine A, Duong Van Huyen JP, Cesbron A, Cagnard N, Alibeu O, Satchell SC, Legendre C, Zorn E, Taupin JL, Charreau B, Anglicheau D. Early Acute Microvascular Kidney Transplant Rejection in the Absence of Anti-HLA Antibodies Is Associated with Preformed IgG Antibodies against Diverse Glomerular Endothelial Cell Antigens. J Am Soc Nephrol 2019; 30:692-709. [PMID: 30850439 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2018080868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2018] [Accepted: 01/31/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although anti-HLA antibodies (Abs) cause most antibody-mediated rejections of renal allografts, non-anti-HLA Abs have also been postulated to contribute. A better understanding of such Abs in rejection is needed. METHODS We conducted a nationwide study to identify kidney transplant recipients without anti-HLA donor-specific Abs who experienced acute graft dysfunction within 3 months after transplantation and showed evidence of microvascular injury, called acute microvascular rejection (AMVR). We developed a crossmatch assay to assess serum reactivity to human microvascular endothelial cells, and used a combination of transcriptomic and proteomic approaches to identify non-HLA Abs. RESULTS We identified a highly selected cohort of 38 patients with early acute AMVR. Biopsy specimens revealed intense microvascular inflammation and the presence of vasculitis (in 60.5%), interstitial hemorrhages (31.6%), or thrombotic microangiopathy (15.8%). Serum samples collected at the time of transplant showed that previously proposed anti-endothelial cell Abs-angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1R), endothelin-1 type A and natural polyreactive Abs-did not increase significantly among patients with AMVR compared with a control group of stable kidney transplant recipients. However, 26% of the tested AMVR samples were positive for AT1R Abs when a threshold of 10 IU/ml was used. The crossmatch assay identified a common IgG response that was specifically directed against constitutively expressed antigens of microvascular glomerular cells in patients with AMVR. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses identified new targets of non-HLA Abs, with little redundancy among individuals. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that preformed IgG Abs targeting non-HLA antigens expressed on glomerular endothelial cells are associated with early AMVR, and that in vitro cell-based assays are needed to improve risk assessments before transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Delville
- French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Unit 1163 and.,Department of Biotherapy, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.,Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité University, Paris, France
| | | | - Sylvain Pagie
- Center for Research in Transplantation and Immunology, French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1064, Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU) Centre Européen des Sciences de la Transplantation et de l'Immunothérapie (CESTI), Laboratoire d'excellence (LabEx) Immunotherapy Graft Oncology (IGO), LabEx Transplantex, Nantes, France.,Nantes Universtity, Nantes, France
| | - Sarah B See
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Marion Rabant
- Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité University, Paris, France.,Department of Renal Pathology, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Carole Burger
- Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité University, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Gatault
- Service de Néphrologie-Hypertension, Transplantation et Dialyses, University Hospital, Tours, France.,Equipe d'Accueil EA4245, Transplantation, Immunologie et Inflammation (T2I), University of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Magali Giral
- Nantes University Hospital, Institut de Transplantation-Urologie-Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes, France
| | - Olivier Thaunat
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Department of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology.,INSERM Unit 1111, Lyon, France.,Claude Berna Saint-Etienne University Hospital rd University (Lyon 1), Lyon, France
| | - Nadia Arzouk
- Department of Urology, Nephrology and Kidney transplantation, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Hertig
- Sorbonne University, Paris, France.,Urgences Néphrologiques et Transplantation Rénale, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Marc Hazzan
- Department of Nephrology, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France.,Lille University, Lille, France.,French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 995, Lille, France
| | - Marie Matignon
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Groupe Hospitalier Henri-Mondor/Albert-Chenevier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Créteil, France.,Paris-Est-Créteil University (UPEC), Créteil, France.,Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), Equipe 21, French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Unit 955, Créteil, France
| | - Christophe Mariat
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, Saint-Etienne University Hospital, Saint-Etienne, France.,Jean Monnet University, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Sophie Caillard
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Strasbourg, France.,French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) S1109, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Nassim Kamar
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France.,French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Unit 1043, Institut Fédératif de Recherche Biomédicale de Toulouse (IFR-BMT), Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse, France
| | - Johnny Sayegh
- Angers University, Angers, France.,Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
| | | | - Cyril Garrouste
- Department of Nephrology, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Marc Ladrière
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France
| | - Vincent Vuiblet
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Reims University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - Joseph Rivalan
- Department of Nephrology, Pontchaillou University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Pierre Merville
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation, Dialysis and Apheresis, Pellegrin University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.,Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique-Unité Mixte de Recherche (CNRS-UMR) 5164 Immuno ConcEpT, , Bordeaux, France.,Bordeaux University, Bordeaux, France
| | - Dominique Bertrand
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Alain Le Moine
- Erasme Hospital, Nephrology Dialysis and Transplantation Department, Bruxelles, Belgium.,Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean-Paul Duong Van Huyen
- Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité University, Paris, France.,Department of Renal Pathology, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Anne Cesbron
- HLA Laboratory, Etablissement Français du Sang (EFS) Centre Pays de la Loire, Nantes, France
| | - Nicolas Cagnard
- Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité University, Paris, France.,Bioinformatics, Structure Fédérative de Recherche Necker, French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) US24/ Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) UMS3633, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Alibeu
- Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité University, Paris, France.,Genomics Core Facility, Institut Imagine-Structure Fédérative de Recherche Necker, French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Unit 1163 and INSERM US24/ Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) UMS3633, Paris, France
| | - Simon C Satchell
- Bristol Renal, Bristol Heart Institute, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Great Britain
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité University, Paris, France.,Necker-Enfants Malades Institute, French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Unit 1151, Paris, France.,Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, RTRS Centaure; LabEx Transplantex, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Emmanuel Zorn
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Jean-Luc Taupin
- Immunology and Histocompatibility Laboratory, Saint-Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.,French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Unit 1160, LabEx Transplantex, Paris France; and.,University Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - Béatrice Charreau
- Center for Research in Transplantation and Immunology, French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1064, Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU) Centre Européen des Sciences de la Transplantation et de l'Immunothérapie (CESTI), Laboratoire d'excellence (LabEx) Immunotherapy Graft Oncology (IGO), LabEx Transplantex, Nantes, France.,Nantes Universtity, Nantes, France
| | - Dany Anglicheau
- Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité University, Paris, France; .,Necker-Enfants Malades Institute, French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Unit 1151, Paris, France.,Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, RTRS Centaure; LabEx Transplantex, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Reindl-Schwaighofer R, Heinzel A, Kainz A, van Setten J, Jelencsics K, Hu K, Loza BL, Kammer M, Heinze G, Hruba P, Koňaříková A, Viklicky O, Boehmig GA, Eskandary F, Fischer G, Claas F, Tan JC, Albert TJ, Patel J, Keating B, Oberbauer R. Contribution of non-HLA incompatibility between donor and recipient to kidney allograft survival: genome-wide analysis in a prospective cohort. Lancet 2019; 393:910-917. [PMID: 30773281 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32473-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2018] [Revised: 09/18/2018] [Accepted: 09/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The introduction of HLA matching of donors and recipients was a breakthrough in kidney transplantation. However, half of all transplanted kidneys still fail within 15 years after transplantation. Epidemiological data suggest a fundamental role of non-HLA alloimmunity. METHODS We genotyped 477 pairs of deceased donors and first kidney transplant recipients with stable graft function at three months that were transplanted between Dec 1, 2005, and April 30, 2015. Genome-wide genetic mismatches in non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) were calculated to identify incompatibilities in transmembrane and secreted proteins. We estimated the association between nsSNP mismatch and graft loss in a Cox proportional hazard model, adjusting for HLA mismatch and clinical covariates. Customised peptide arrays were generated to screen for antibodies against genotype-derived mismatched epitopes in 25 patients with biopsy-confirmed chronic antibody-mediated rejection. FINDINGS 59 268 nsSNPs affecting a transmembrane or secreted protein were analysed. The median number of nsSNP mismatches in immune-accessible transmembrane and secreted proteins between donors and recipients was 1892 (IQR 1850-1936). The degree of nsSNP mismatch was independently associated with graft loss in a multivariable model adjusted for HLA eplet mismatch (HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DP, HLA-DQ, and HLA-DR). Each increase by a unit of one IQR had an HR of 1·68 (95% CI 1·17-2·41, p=0·005). 5-year death censored graft survival was 98% in the quartile with the lowest mismatch, 91% in the second quartile, 89% in the third quartile, and 82% in the highest quartile (p=0·003, log-rank test). Customised peptide arrays verified a donor-specific alloimmune response to genetically predicted mismatched epitopes. INTERPRETATION Genetic mismatch of non-HLA haplotypes coding for transmembrane or secreted proteins is associated with an increased risk of functional graft loss independently of HLA incompatibility. As in HLA alloimmunity, donor-specific alloantibodies can be identified against genotype derived non-HLA epitopes. FUNDING Austrian Science Fund, WWTF (Vienna Science and Technology Fund), and Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andreas Heinzel
- Department of Nephrology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexander Kainz
- Department of Nephrology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jessica van Setten
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Kira Jelencsics
- Department of Nephrology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Karin Hu
- Department of Nephrology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bao-Li Loza
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael Kammer
- Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Georg Heinze
- Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Petra Hruba
- Transplant Laboratory, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Alena Koňaříková
- Department of Nephrology, Transplant Center, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ondrej Viklicky
- Transplant Laboratory, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Nephrology, Transplant Center, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Georg A Boehmig
- Department of Nephrology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Farsad Eskandary
- Department of Nephrology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gottfried Fischer
- Department of Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Frans Claas
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Brendan Keating
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rainer Oberbauer
- Department of Nephrology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Abstract
After more than 6 decades of clinical practice, the transplant community continues to research noninvasive biomarkers of solid organ injury to help improve patient care. In this review, we discuss the clinical usefulness of selective biomarkers and how they are processed at the laboratory. In addition, we organize these biomarkers based on specific aims and introduce innovative markers currently under investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Choi
- Transplantation Research Center, Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Albana Bano
- Transplantation Research Center, Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Jamil Azzi
- Transplantation Research Center, Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Alzahrani M, Qahtani Z, Harbi H, Kebasi S, Essa O, Al Attas R. Virtual Crossmatch: Reality of Perception. Transplant Proc 2019; 51:488-491. [PMID: 30879574 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Results of 773 actual flow crossmatches (aFXMs) and virtual flow crossmatches (vFXMs) performed for living and deceased donor kidney transplantation in our center were analyzed retrospectively and evaluated for their concordance. Prediction of vFXMs was based on antibody identification using single antigen bead assay and locally established mean fluorescence intensity cutoff point compared with donor HLA antigens. The vast majority of aFXMs were in concordance with vFXMs with an overall concordance of 97%. Twenty-three predicted to be negative showed positive aFXMs; 12 of them had 0% calculated panel-reactive antibody, and 11 were found in patients with multiple non-donor-specific HLA antibodies. Three predicted positive vFXMs yielded negative aFXMs; 2 of them had allele-specific antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: vFXMs based on precise characterization of antibody specificities detected by single antigen bead assay using our cutoff point accurately predicted FXMs in the majority of patients and can be used safely to allocate kidney offers without performing physical crossmatches in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Alzahrani
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetic Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Fahad Specialist Hospital-Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Z Qahtani
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetic Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Fahad Specialist Hospital-Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - H Harbi
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetic Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Fahad Specialist Hospital-Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - S Kebasi
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetic Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Fahad Specialist Hospital-Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - O Essa
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetic Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Fahad Specialist Hospital-Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - R Al Attas
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetic Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Fahad Specialist Hospital-Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Min JW, Lee H, Choi BS, Park CW, Yang CW, Kim YS, Choi YJ, Oh EJ, Chung BH. Clinical Impact of Pre-transplant Antibodies Against Angiotensin II Type I Receptor and Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I-Related Chain A in Kidney Transplant Patients. Ann Lab Med 2018; 38:450-457. [PMID: 29797816 PMCID: PMC5973920 DOI: 10.3343/alm.2018.38.5.450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2017] [Revised: 11/27/2017] [Accepted: 05/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Evidence of antibody-mediated injury in the absence of donor-specific HLA antibodies (HLA-DSA) has recently emerged, suggesting a role of antibodies in targeting non-HLA antigens expressed on renal allograft tissue. However, the clinical significance of pre-transplant non-HLA antibodies remains unclear. We compared the histological and clinical impact of pre-transplant HLA-DSA and non-HLA antibodies, especially angiotensin II type I receptor (anti-AT1R) and MHC class I-related chain A (anti-MICA), in kidney transplant patients. Methods Pre-transplant HLA-DSA, anti-AT1R, and anti-MICA were retrospectively examined in 359 kidney transplant patients to determine the effect of each antibody on allograft survival and clinical characteristics. Results Pre-transplant HLA-DSA, anti-AT1R, and anti-MICA were detected in 37 (10.3%), 174 (48.5%), and 50 patients (13.9%), respectively. Post-transplant antibody-mediated rejection was associated with a pre-transplant HLA-DSA (+) status only. The development of microvascular inflammation (MVI) was associated with pre-transplant HLA-DSA (P=0.001) and anti-AT1R (P=0.036). Anti-AT1R (+) patients had significantly lower allograft survival compared with anti-AT1R (−) patients (P=0.042). Only pre-transplant anti-AT1R positivity was an independent risk factor for allograft failure (hazard ratio 4.824, confidence interval 1.017–24.888; P=0.038). MVI was the most common histological feature of allograft failure in patients with pre-transplant anti-AT1R. Conclusions Pre-transplant anti-AT1R is an important risk factor for allograft failure, which may be mediated by MVI induction in the allograft tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Won Min
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Hyeyoung Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Laboratory Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University International St. Mary's Hospital, Incheon, Korea
| | - Bum Soon Choi
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Cheol Whee Park
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chul Woo Yang
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Soo Kim
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yeong Jin Choi
- Department of Hospital Pathology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Jee Oh
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Byung Ha Chung
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Rohn H, Tomoya Michita R, Schwich E, Dolff S, Gäckler A, Trilling M, Le-Trilling VTK, Wilde B, Korth J, Heinemann FM, Horn PA, Kribben A, Witzke O, Rebmann V. The Donor Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Chain-Related Molecule A Allele rs2596538 G Predicts Cytomegalovirus Viremia in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Front Immunol 2018; 9:917. [PMID: 29867932 PMCID: PMC5953334 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2018] [Accepted: 04/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The interaction of major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related protein A (MICA) and its cognate activating receptor natural killer (NK) group 2 member D (NKG2D) receptor plays a significant role in viral immune control. In the context of kidney transplantation (KTx), cytomegalovirus (CMV) frequently causes severe complications. Hypothesizing that functional polymorphisms of the MICA/NKG2D axis might affect antiviral NK and T cell responses to CMV, we explored the association of the MICA-129 Met/Val single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) (affecting the binding affinity of MICA with the NKG2D receptor), the MICA rs2596538 G/A SNP (influencing MICA transcription), and the NKG2D rs1049174 G/C SNP (determining the cytotoxic potential of effector cells) with the clinical outcome of CMV during the first year after KTx in a cohort of 181 kidney donor-recipients pairs. Univariate analyses identified the donor MICA rs2596538 G allele status as a protective prognostic determinant for CMV disease. In addition to the well-known prognostic factors CMV high-risk sero-status of patients and the application of lymphocyte-depleting drugs, the donor MICA rs2596538 G allele carrier status was confirmed by multivariate analyses as novel-independent factor predicting the development of CMV infection/disease during the first year after KTx. The results of our study emphasize the clinical importance of the MICA/NKG2D axis in CMV control in KTx and point out that the potential MICA transcription in the donor allograft is of clinically relevant importance for CMV immune control in this allogeneic situation. Furthermore, they provide substantial evidence that the donor MICA rs2596538 G allele carrier status is a promising genetic marker predicting CMV viremia after KTx. Thus, in the kidney transplant setting, donor MICA rs2596538 G may help to allow the future development of personal CMV approaches within a genetically predisposed patient cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hana Rohn
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Rafael Tomoya Michita
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Esther Schwich
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Dolff
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Anja Gäckler
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Mirko Trilling
- Institute for Virology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Benjamin Wilde
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Johannes Korth
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Falko M Heinemann
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Peter A Horn
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Andreas Kribben
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Oliver Witzke
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Vera Rebmann
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Daugs A, Lehmann N, Eroglu D, Meinke MC, Markhoff A, Bloch O. In VitroDetection System to Evaluate the Immunogenic Potential of Xenografts. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2018; 24:280-288. [DOI: 10.1089/ten.tec.2017.0532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Aila Daugs
- Auto Tissue Berlin GmbH, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Martina C. Meinke
- Center of Experimental and Applied Cutaneous Physiology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
72
|
Yang J, Claas FHJ, Eikmans M. Genome-wide association studies in kidney transplantation: Advantages and constraints. Transpl Immunol 2018; 49:1-4. [PMID: 29704558 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2018.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Since the discovery of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system, the role of HLA molecules in the field of transplantation has been appreciated: better matching leads to better graft function. Since then, the association of other genetic polymorphisms with clinical outcome has been investigated in many studies. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) represent a powerful tool to identify causal genetic variants, by simultaneously analyzing millions of single nucleotide polymorphisms scattered across the genome. GWAS in transplantation may indeed be useful to reveal novel markers that may potentially be involved in the mechanism of allograft rejection and graft failure. However, the relevance of GWAS for risk stratification or donor selection for an individual patient is limited as is already reflected by the fact that many parameters, significant in one study, cannot be confirmed in another one.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianxin Yang
- Dept. of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frans H J Claas
- Dept. of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Eikmans
- Dept. of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Chowdhry M, Makroo RN, Singh M, Kumar M, Thakur Y, Sharma V. Role of Anti-MICA Antibodies in Graft Survival of Renal Transplant Recipients of India. J Immunol Res 2018; 2018:3434050. [PMID: 29850626 PMCID: PMC5907422 DOI: 10.1155/2018/3434050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2017] [Revised: 11/27/2017] [Accepted: 12/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The MIC (MHC class I chain-related) genes are a group of nonclassical MHC genes, located in the MHC class 1 region of chromosome 6. The aim of the present study was to find the prevalence of MHC class 1 chain-related (MICA) alloantibodies in patients undergoing live-related donor renal transplantation and its role in short-term graft survival. The role of blood transfusion in the formation of these antibodies was also studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS Pretransplant samples of patients undergoing renal allograft transplantation were tested for anti-MICA antibodies. Association of various demographics, HLA-A + B + DRB1 mismatches, anti-HLA antibody screen, and anti-MICA antibodies was assessed using Pearson's chi-square test. RESULTS Out of 646 serum samples, 94 (14.6%) were positive and 552 (85.4%) were negative for anti-MICA antibodies. Patients with anti-MICA antibody had a graft survival 89.3% as compared to 94.7% in patients without anti-MICA antibody (P < 0.05). The hazard ratio for all patients was 3.0701 (P < 0.05). Out of the 340 patients with no HLA antibodies, the presence of anti-MICA antibodies without any HLA antibodies (n = 43) was associated with poor outcome in the patients (hazard ratio of 2.768, P < 0.05). The presence of MICA antibodies with HLA antibodies did not decrease the graft survival (hazards ratio of 1.3750, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION Preformed MICA antibodies independently increase the risk of kidney rejection and therefore recommend that guidelines should be formed for mandatory testing of these antibodies prior to renal transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohit Chowdhry
- Transplant Immunology, Sarita Vihar, Delhi Mathura Road, Molecular Biology and Transfusion Medicine Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India
| | - R. N. Makroo
- Transplant Immunology, Sarita Vihar, Delhi Mathura Road, Molecular Biology and Transfusion Medicine Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India
| | - Mandhata Singh
- Transplant Immunology, Sarita Vihar, Delhi Mathura Road, Molecular Biology and Transfusion Medicine Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India
| | - Manoj Kumar
- Transplant Immunology, Sarita Vihar, Delhi Mathura Road, Molecular Biology and Transfusion Medicine Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India
| | - Yogita Thakur
- Transplant Immunology, Sarita Vihar, Delhi Mathura Road, Molecular Biology and Transfusion Medicine Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India
| | - Vandana Sharma
- Transplant Immunology, Sarita Vihar, Delhi Mathura Road, Molecular Biology and Transfusion Medicine Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Alelign T, Ahmed MM, Bobosha K, Tadesse Y, Howe R, Petros B. Kidney Transplantation: The Challenge of Human Leukocyte Antigen and Its Therapeutic Strategies. J Immunol Res 2018; 2018:5986740. [PMID: 29693023 PMCID: PMC5859822 DOI: 10.1155/2018/5986740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2017] [Revised: 11/30/2017] [Accepted: 12/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Kidney transplantation remains the treatment of choice for end-stage renal failure. When the immune system of the recipient recognizes the transplanted kidney as a foreign object, graft rejection occurs. As part of the host immune defense mechanism, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) is a major challenge for graft rejection in transplantation therapy. The impact of HLA mismatches between the donor and the potential recipient prolongs the time for renal transplantation therapy, tethered to dialysis, latter reduces graft survival, and increases mortality. The formation of pretransplant alloantibodies against HLA class I and II molecules can be sensitized through exposures to blood transfusions, prior transplants, and pregnancy. These preformed HLA antibodies are associated with rejection in kidney transplantation. On the other hand, the development of de novo antibodies may increase the risk for acute and chronic rejections. Allograft rejection results from a complex interplay involving both the innate and the adaptive immune systems. Thus, further insights into the mechanisms of tissue rejection and the risk of HLA sensitization is crucial in developing new therapies that may blunt the immune system against transplanted organs. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to highlight facts about HLA and its sensitization, various mechanisms of allograft rejection, the current immunosuppressive approaches, and the directions for future therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tilahun Alelign
- College of Natural Sciences, Department of Microbial, Cellular and Molecular Biology, Addis Ababa University, P.O. Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- Department of Biology, Debre Berhan University, P.O. Box 445, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia
- Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Momina M. Ahmed
- St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College and Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Kidist Bobosha
- Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Yewondwossen Tadesse
- School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Rawleigh Howe
- Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Beyene Petros
- College of Natural Sciences, Department of Microbial, Cellular and Molecular Biology, Addis Ababa University, P.O. Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
Geneugelijk K, Spierings E. Matching donor and recipient based on predicted indirectly recognizable human leucocyte antigen epitopes. Int J Immunogenet 2018; 45:41-53. [PMID: 29464898 DOI: 10.1111/iji.12359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2017] [Revised: 12/21/2017] [Accepted: 02/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
The predicted indirectly recognizable human leucocyte antigen (HLA) epitopes (PIRCHE) algorithm is a novel in silico algorithm to determine donor-recipient compatibility. The PIRCHE algorithm determines donor-recipient compatibility by counting the number of mismatched HLA-derived epitopes that are involved in indirect T-cell alloimmune responses; these epitopes are designated as PIRCHE. Over the last few years, the PIRCHE algorithm has been investigated in both hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and solid organ transplantation. This review describes the theory of the algorithm, its application in transplantation, and highlights the future perspectives on the clinical application of the PIRCHE algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Geneugelijk
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - E Spierings
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Abstract
Donor-specific antibodies have become an established biomarker predicting antibody-mediated rejection. Antibody-mediated rejection is the leading cause of graft loss after kidney transplant. There are several phenotypes of antibody-mediated rejection along post-transplant course that are determined by the timing and extent of humoral response and the various characteristics of donor-specific antibodies, such as antigen classes, specificity, antibody strength, IgG subclasses, and complement binding capacity. Preformed donor-specific antibodies in sensitized patients can trigger hyperacute rejection, accelerated acute rejection, and early acute antibody-mediated rejection. De novo donor-specific antibodies are associated with late acute antibody-mediated rejection, chronic antibody-mediated rejection, and transplant glomerulopathy. The pathogeneses of antibody-mediated rejection include not only complement-dependent cytotoxicity, but also complement-independent pathways of antibody-mediated cellular cytotoxicity and direct endothelial activation and proliferation. The novel assay for complement binding capacity has improved our ability to predict antibody-mediated rejection phenotypes. C1q binding donor-specific antibodies are closely associated with acute antibody-mediated rejection, more severe graft injuries, and early graft failure, whereas C1q nonbinding donor-specific antibodies correlate with subclinical or chronic antibody-mediated rejection and late graft loss. IgG subclasses have various abilities to activate complement and recruit effector cells through the Fc receptor. Complement binding IgG3 donor-specific antibodies are frequently associated with acute antibody-mediated rejection and severe graft injury, whereas noncomplement binding IgG4 donor-specific antibodies are more correlated with subclinical or chronic antibody-mediated rejection and transplant glomerulopathy. Our in-depth knowledge of complex characteristics of donor-specific antibodies can stratify the patient's immunologic risk, can predict distinct phenotypes of antibody-mediated rejection, and hopefully, will guide our clinical practice to improve the transplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rubin Zhang
- Section of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Alloimmune-induced intragraft lymphoid neogenesis promotes B-cell tolerance breakdown that accelerates chronic rejection. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2017; 21:368-74. [PMID: 27258579 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has emerged as a leading cause of allograft loss in solid organ transplantation. A better understanding of AMR immunopathology is a prerequisite to improve its management. RECENT FINDINGS The prevalent dogma considers that AMR is the consequence of a thymo-dependent B-cell response against donor-specific polymorphic antigens (mainly mismatched human leukocyte antigen molecules).Nevertheless, antibodies directed against nonpolymorphic antigens expressed by the graft are also generated during chronic rejection and can contribute to allograft destruction. This implies that a breakdown of self-tolerance occurs during chronic rejection. Accumulating evidence suggests that this event occurs inside the ectopic 'tertiary' lymphoid tissue that develops within rejected allografts.Thus, AMR should be viewed as a complex interplay between allo- and autoimmune humoral responses. SUMMARY The interplay between allo- and autoimmune humoral responses in chronic rejection highlights several unmet medical issues like better diagnosis tools are needed to screen recipients for nonhuman leukocyte antigen alloantibodies and autoantibodies, therapeutic strategies shall aim at blocking the response against alloantigens but also the breakdown of self-tolerance that occurs within tertiary lymphoid tissue.
Collapse
|
78
|
Affiliation(s)
- Arjun Chakraborty
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Minnie Sarwal
- Director of Precision Transplant Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
|
80
|
Weng PL, Alejos JC, Halnon N, Zhang Q, Reed EF, Tsai-Chambers E. Long-term outcomes of simultaneous heart and kidney transplantation in pediatric recipients. Pediatr Transplant 2017; 21:10.1111/petr.13023. [PMID: 28727227 PMCID: PMC5638697 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Pediatric sHKTx has become an effective therapy for patients with combined cardiac and renal failure. Often, these patients develop human leukocyte antigen antibodies from their previous allografts and are therefore more difficult to re-transplant. We describe the largest case series of a predominantly sensitized pediatric sHKTx with emphasis on medical management and patient outcomes. Demographics, clinical characteristics, antibody, and biopsy data were retrospectively collected from University of California, Los Angeles database and correlated with short- and long-term patient and allograft outcomes of all sHKTx performed between 2002 and 2015. We identified seven pediatric patients who underwent sHKTx at our center. Mean age at time of sHKTx was 13.7 years and 85.7% were re-graft patients. 57.1% were sensitized with cPRA >50% and another 57.1% had preformed donor-specific antibody. Five-year renal allograft survival and patient survival was 85.7% for both end-points. The remaining six patients are all alive (mean follow-up 78.5 months) with good kidney and heart function. sHKTx in a population with increased immunological risk can be associated with good long-term outcomes and offers potential guidance to the pediatric transplant community where data are limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia L. Weng
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Mattel Children's Hospital UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Juan Carlos Alejos
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Mattel Children's Hospital UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nancy Halnon
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Mattel Children's Hospital UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Qiuheng Zhang
- UCLA Immunogenetics Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Elaine F. Reed
- UCLA Immunogenetics Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Eileen Tsai-Chambers
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
Gates KV, Pereira NL, Griffiths LG. Cardiac Non-Human Leukocyte Antigen Identification: Techniques and Troubles. Front Immunol 2017; 8:1332. [PMID: 29093713 PMCID: PMC5651233 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2017] [Accepted: 10/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Historically efforts have focused on the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) as the major cause for acute and chronic rejection following cardiac transplantation. However, rising evidence indicates that non-HLA antibodies can be both primary initiators and modifiers of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). The purpose of this review is to assess currently available technologies for non-HLA identification and leveraging such responses toward antibody quantification. Several techniques have been used to identify antigenic determinants of recipient graft-specific non-HLA humoral immune responses, but each comes with its own set of benefits and caveats. Improving our ability to detect non-HLA humoral immune response will aid in our understanding of the underlying antigenic determinants of AMR and CAV, as well as improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine V Gates
- Department of Veterinary Medicine and Epidemiology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.,Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Naveen L Pereira
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Leigh G Griffiths
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Yacoub R, Nadkarni GN, Cravedi P, He JC, Delaney VB, Kent R, Chauhan KN, Coca SG, Florman SS, Heeger PS, Murphy B, Menon MC. Analysis of OPTN/UNOS registry suggests the number of HLA matches and not mismatches is a stronger independent predictor of kidney transplant survival. Kidney Int 2017; 93:482-490. [PMID: 28965746 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2017] [Revised: 06/20/2017] [Accepted: 07/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
HLA matching and mismatching, while inversely related, are not exact opposites. Here we determined the independent effects of HLA matching and mismatching on outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplant recipients. The United Network for Organ Sharing database (1995-2012) was utilized and analyzed for delayed graft function, one-year acute rejection, and death-censored graft survival using combined multivariable models including HLA matching and mismatching. Sensitivity analyses were performed using the subgroup of deceased donor kidney transplant patients after 2003 with more uniform HLA nomenclature and resampling analyses using bootstrapping on complete data available from 96,236 recipients. Individually, both HLA matching and mismatching showed significant associations with graft survival. Adjusting the model to take into account both matching and mismatching simultaneously, the degree of HLA mismatching lost significance while matching continued to have a significant prediction for delayed graft function, the one-year acute rejection rate, and graft survival. Sensitivity analyses and bootstrapping showed similar results for all studied outcomes. Thus, analysis of this large cohort demonstrates the apparent greater association of HLA matching over HLA mismatching on both early allograft events as well as graft survival. Future analyses should preferentially utilize HLA matching as a covariate over mismatching for accurately reflecting impact on graft outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rabi Yacoub
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Girish N Nadkarni
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Paolo Cravedi
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - John Cijiang He
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Veronica B Delaney
- Recanati-Miller Transplant Institutes, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Rebecca Kent
- Recanati-Miller Transplant Institutes, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kinsuk N Chauhan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Steven G Coca
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sander S Florman
- Recanati-Miller Transplant Institutes, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Peter S Heeger
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA; Recanati-Miller Transplant Institutes, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Barbara Murphy
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Madhav C Menon
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA; Recanati-Miller Transplant Institutes, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Reindl-Schwaighofer R, Heinzel A, Signorini L, Thaunat O, Oberbauer R. Mechanisms underlying human genetic diversity: consequence for antigraft antibody responses. Transpl Int 2017; 31:239-250. [DOI: 10.1111/tri.13059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2017] [Revised: 07/28/2017] [Accepted: 08/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Roman Reindl-Schwaighofer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis; Department of Internal Medicine III; Medical University of Vienna; Vienna Austria
| | - Andreas Heinzel
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis; Department of Internal Medicine III; Medical University of Vienna; Vienna Austria
| | - Lorenzo Signorini
- Renal and Dialysis Unit; Department of Medicine; University of Verona; Verona Italy
| | - Olivier Thaunat
- Hospices Civils de Lyon; Hôpital Edouard Herriot; Service de Transplantation; Néphrologie et Immunologie Clinique; INSERM U1111; Université Lyon-I; Lyon France
| | - Rainer Oberbauer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis; Department of Internal Medicine III; Medical University of Vienna; Vienna Austria
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Pearl MH, Zhang Q, Palma Diaz MF, Grotts J, Rossetti M, Elashoff D, Gjertson DW, Weng P, Reed EF, Tsai Chambers E. Angiotensin II Type 1 receptor antibodies are associated with inflammatory cytokines and poor clinical outcomes in pediatric kidney transplantation. Kidney Int 2017; 93:260-269. [PMID: 28927645 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.06.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2017] [Revised: 06/20/2017] [Accepted: 06/30/2017] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) antibody has been linked to poor allograft outcomes in adult kidney transplantation. However, its clinical consequences in children are unknown. To study this, we examined the relationship of AT1R antibody with clinical outcomes, biopsy findings, inflammatory cytokines, and HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in a cohort of pediatric renal transplant recipients. Sixty-five patients were longitudinally monitored for AT1R antibody, HLA DSA, IL-8, TNF-α, IL-1β, IFN-γ, IL-17, and IL-6, renal dysfunction, hypertension, rejection, and allograft loss during the first two years post transplantation. AT1R antibody was positive in 38 of the 65 of children but was not associated with HLA DSA. AT1R antibody was associated with renal allograft loss (odds ratio of 13.1 [95% confidence interval 1.48-1728]), the presence of glomerulitis or arteritis, and significantly higher TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-8 levels, but not rejection or hypertension. AT1R antibody was associated with significantly greater declines in eGFR in patients both with and without rejection. Furthermore, in patients without rejection, AT1R antibody was a significant risk factor for worsening eGFR over the two-year follow-up period. Thus, AT1R antibody is associated with vascular inflammation in the allograft, progressive decline in eGFR, and allograft loss. AT1R antibody and inflammatory cytokines may identify those at risk for renal vascular inflammation and lead to early biopsy and intervention in pediatric kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan H Pearl
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
| | - Qiuheng Zhang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Miguel Fernando Palma Diaz
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jonathan Grotts
- Department of Medicine Statistics Core, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Maura Rossetti
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - David Elashoff
- Department of Medicine Statistics Core, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - David W Gjertson
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Patricia Weng
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Elaine F Reed
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Eileen Tsai Chambers
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA; Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
85
|
Garg N, Samaniego MD, Clark D, Djamali A. Defining the phenotype of antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation: Advances in diagnosis of antibody injury. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2017; 31:257-267. [PMID: 28882367 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2017.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2017] [Revised: 08/08/2017] [Accepted: 08/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The diagnostic criteria for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) are constantly evolving in light of the evidence. Inclusion of C4d-negative ABMR has been one of the major advances in the Banff Classification in recent years. Currently Banff 2015 classification requires evidence of donor specific antibodies (DSA), interaction between DSA and the endothelium, and acute tissue injury (in the form of microvasculature injury (MVI); acute thrombotic microangiopathy; or acute tubular injury in the absence of other apparent cause). In this article we review not only the ABMR phenotypes acknowledged in the most recent Banff classification, but also the phenotypes related to novel pathogenic antibodies (non-HLA DSA, antibody isoforms and subclasses, complement-binding functionality) and molecular diagnostic tools (gene transcripts, metabolites, small proteins, cytokines, and donor-derived cell-free DNA). These novel tools are also being considered for the prognosis and monitoring of treatment response. We propose that improved classification of ABMR based on underlying pathogenic mechanisms and outcomes will be an important step in identifying patient-centered therapies to extend graft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neetika Garg
- Department of Medicine, Nephrology Division, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705, United States.
| | - Milagros D Samaniego
- Department of Medicine, Nephrology Division, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States
| | - Dana Clark
- Department of Medicine, Nephrology Division, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705, United States
| | - Arjang Djamali
- Department of Medicine, Nephrology Division, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705, United States
| |
Collapse
|
86
|
Cozzi E, Colpo A, De Silvestro G. The mechanisms of rejection in solid organ transplantation. Transfus Apher Sci 2017; 56:498-505. [PMID: 28916402 DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2017.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Organ transplantation represents the preferred treatment option for many patients in terminal organ failure. The half-life of transplanted organs, however, is still far from being satisfactory with the vast majority of the organs failing within the first two decades following transplantation. At this stage, it has become apparent that rejection (prevalently mediated by humoral events) remains the primary cause of graft loss after the first year. In this light, studies are underway to better comprehend the immune events underlying graft rejection and novel immunosuppressive strategies are being explored. In this context, therapeutic apheresis techniques, that include therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), immunoadsorption (IA) and extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP), represent an important adjunct in the current immunosuppressive armamentarium. This article briefly reviews our current understanding of the immune process underlying rejection of a solid organ transplant and describes the principal areas of application of therapeutic apheresis techniques in transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuele Cozzi
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, Transplant Immunology Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padova, Italy; CORIT (Consortium for Research in Organ Transplantation), Padova, Italy.
| | - Anna Colpo
- Department of Transfusion Medicine, Padua University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
87
|
Behnam Sani K, Sawitzki B. Immune monitoring as prerequisite for transplantation tolerance trials. Clin Exp Immunol 2017; 189:158-170. [PMID: 28518214 DOI: 10.1111/cei.12988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/09/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Ever since its first application in clinical medicine, scientists have been urged to induce tolerance towards foreign allogeneic transplants and thus avoid rejection by the recipient's immune system. This would circumvent chronic use of immunosuppressive drugs (IS) and thus avoid development of IS-induced side effects, which are contributing to the still unsatisfactory long-term graft and patient survival after solid organ transplantation. Although manifold strategies of tolerance induction have been described in preclinical models, only three therapeutic approaches have been utilized successfully in a still small number of patients. These approaches are based on (i) IS withdrawal in spontaneous operational tolerant (SOT) patients, (ii) induction of a mixed chimerism and (iii) adoptive transfer of regulatory cells. Results of clinical trials utilizing these approaches show that tolerance induction does not work in all patients. Thus, there is a need for reliable biomarkers, which can be used for patient selection and post-therapeutic immune monitoring of safety, success and failure. In this review, we summarize recent achievements in the identification and validation of such immunological assays and biomarkers, focusing mainly on kidney and liver transplantation. From the published findings so far, it has become clear that indicative biomarkers may vary between different therapeutic approaches applied and organs transplanted. Also, patient numbers studied so far are very small. This is the main reason why nearly all described parameters lack validation and reproducibility testing in large clinical trials, and are therefore not yet suitable for clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Behnam Sani
- Institute of Medical Immunology, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - B Sawitzki
- Institute of Medical Immunology, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Marinaki S, Skalioti C, Boletis J. Glomerular Diseases and Renal Transplantation: Pathogenic Pathways and Evolution of Therapeutic Interventions. Transplant Proc 2017; 49:243-252. [PMID: 28219579 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.11.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2016] [Accepted: 11/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Glomerular diseases and renal transplantation are the main fields of nephrology in which the immune system plays a prevalent role. Glomerular diseases have traditionally been attributed to auto-immune conditions, whereas allograft rejection has been considered an allo-immune response. However, common immunopathologic mechanisms that include Toll-like receptors, complement and B-cell activation, as well as genetic and infectious factors appear to be involved in the pathogenesis of both entities. Novel therapeutic regimens directed against specific targets of the immune system show promising results in glomerulopathies as well as in renal transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Marinaki
- Nephrology Department and Renal Transplantation Unit, Laiko Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - C Skalioti
- Nephrology Department and Renal Transplantation Unit, Laiko Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - J Boletis
- Nephrology Department and Renal Transplantation Unit, Laiko Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Yamakawa RH, Saito PK, Gelmini GF, da Silva JS, Bicalho MDG, Borelli SD. MICA diversity and linkage disequilibrium with HLA-B alleles in renal-transplant candidates in southern Brazil. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0176072. [PMID: 28419176 PMCID: PMC5395226 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2016] [Accepted: 04/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I chain-related gene A (MICA) is located centromerically to the human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B. The short distance between these loci in the MHC indicates the presence of linkage disequilibrium (LD). Similarly to the HLA, the MICA is highly polymorphic, and this polymorphism has not been well documented in different populations. In this study, we estimated the allelic frequencies of MICA and the linkage disequilibrium with HLA-B alleles in 346 renal-transplant candidates in southern Brazil. MICA and HLA were typed using the polymerase chain reaction-sequence-specific primer method (PCR-SSO), combined with the Luminex technology. A total of 19 MICA allele groups were identified. The most frequent allele groups were MICA*008 (21.6%), MICA*002 (17.0%) and MICA*004 (14.8%). The most common haplotypes were MICA*009-B*51 (7.8%), MICA*004-B*44 (6.06%) and MICA*002-B*35 (5.63%). As expected from the proximity of the MICA and HLA-B loci, most haplotypes showed strong LD. Renal patients and healthy subjects in the same region of Brazil showed statistically significant differences in their MICA polymorphisms. The MICA*027 allele group was more frequent in renal patients (Pc = 0.018, OR: 3.421, 95% CI: 1.516–7.722), while the MICA*019 allele group was more frequent in healthy subjects (Pc = 0.001, OR: 0.027, 95% CI: 0.002–0.469). This study provided information on the distribution of MICA polymorphisms and linkage disequilibrium with HLA-B alleles in Brazilian renal-transplant candidates. This information should help to determine the mechanisms of susceptibility to different diseases in patients with chronic kidney disease, and to elucidate the mechanisms involved in allograft rejection associated with MICA polymorphisms in a Brazilian population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Haruki Yamakawa
- Department of Basic Health Science, Universidade Estadual de Maringá – Maringá, Paraná, Brazil
| | - Patrícia Keiko Saito
- Department of Basic Health Science, Universidade Estadual de Maringá – Maringá, Paraná, Brazil
| | - Geórgia Fernanda Gelmini
- Laboratório de Imunogenética e Histocompatibilidade, Department of Genetics, Universidade Federal do Paraná – Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
| | - José Samuel da Silva
- Laboratório de Imunogenética e Histocompatibilidade, Department of Genetics, Universidade Federal do Paraná – Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
| | - Maria da Graça Bicalho
- Laboratório de Imunogenética e Histocompatibilidade, Department of Genetics, Universidade Federal do Paraná – Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
| | - Sueli Donizete Borelli
- Department of Basic Health Science, Universidade Estadual de Maringá – Maringá, Paraná, Brazil
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
90
|
Zhang X, Reinsmoen NL. Impact of Non-Human Leukocyte Antigen-Specific Antibodies in Kidney and Heart Transplantation. Front Immunol 2017; 8:434. [PMID: 28450866 PMCID: PMC5389972 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2016] [Accepted: 03/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The presence of donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-specific antibodies has been shown to be associated with graft loss and decreased patient survival, but it is not uncommon that donor-specific HLA antibodies are absent in patients with biopsy-proven antibody-mediated rejection. In this review, we focus on the latest findings on antibodies against non-HLA antigens in kidney and heart transplantation. These non-HLA antigens include myosin, vimentin, Kα1 tubulin, collagen, and angiotensin II type 1 receptor. It is suggested that the detrimental effects of HLA antibodies and non-HLA antibodies synergize together to impact graft outcome. Injury of graft by HLA antibodies can cause the exposure of neo-antigens which in turn stimulate the production of antibodies against non-HLA antigens. On the other hand, the presence of non-HLA antibodies may increase the risk for a patient to develop HLA-specific antibodies. These findings indicate it is imperative to stratify the patient’s immunologic risk by assessing both HLA and non-HLA antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaohai Zhang
- HLA and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nancy L Reinsmoen
- HLA and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
91
|
Pinelli DF, Friedewald JJ, Haarberg KMK, Radhakrishnan SL, Zitzner JR, Hanshew WE, Tambur AR. Assessing the potential of angiotensin II type 1 receptor and donor specific anti-endothelial cell antibodies to predict long-term kidney graft outcome. Hum Immunol 2017; 78:421-427. [PMID: 28372986 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2017.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2016] [Revised: 03/27/2017] [Accepted: 03/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Endothelial cell antigens have been reported as potential targets for antibodies in the context of organ transplantation, leading to increased risk for graft failure. Serum samples from 142 consecutive living donor kidney recipients were tested for the presence of antibodies to angiotensin II - type 1 receptor (AT1R), donor endothelial cells, and donor HLA. Graft survival was monitored for five years post-transplant, and secondary outcomes, including biopsy-proven rejection, proteinuria, biopsy-proven vasculopathy, and renal function based on serum creatinine were also assessed for the first two to three years. AT1R antibody levels were positive (>17U/mL) in 11.3%, 18.8% and 8.1% of patients pre-transplant, post-transplant and at time of indication biopsy, respectively. XM-ONE assay was positive in 17.6% of patients pre-transplant (7 IgG+; 15 IgM+; 3 IgG+/IgM+). Overall, 4 patients experienced antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), 31 borderline cellular rejection (BCR), 19 cellular rejection (CR) and 3 mixed AMR and CR within the first 24months. While pre-existing and de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies were associated with graft failure and many secondary outcomes, no statistical association was found for either anti-endothelial or anti-AT1R antibodies, indicating that these tests may not be the best predictors of graft outcome in living donor renal transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David F Pinelli
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Division of Transplant Surgery, 303 E Chicago Ave, Tarry Building Suite 11-763, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
| | - John J Friedewald
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Division of Transplant Surgery, 303 E Chicago Ave, Tarry Building Suite 11-763, Chicago, IL 60611, USA; Northwestern University, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, 251 East Huron Street, Galter Suite 3-150, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
| | - Kelley M K Haarberg
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Division of Transplant Surgery, 303 E Chicago Ave, Tarry Building Suite 11-763, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
| | - Shree L Radhakrishnan
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Division of Transplant Surgery, 303 E Chicago Ave, Tarry Building Suite 11-763, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
| | - Jennifer R Zitzner
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Division of Transplant Surgery, 303 E Chicago Ave, Tarry Building Suite 11-763, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
| | - Wendy E Hanshew
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Division of Transplant Surgery, 303 E Chicago Ave, Tarry Building Suite 11-763, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
| | - Anat R Tambur
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Division of Transplant Surgery, 303 E Chicago Ave, Tarry Building Suite 11-763, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
92
|
Carapito R, Aouadi I, Ilias W, Bahram S. Natural Killer Group 2, Member D/NKG2D Ligands in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Front Immunol 2017; 8:368. [PMID: 28396673 PMCID: PMC5366881 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2017] [Accepted: 03/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Natural killer group 2, member D (NKG2D) is an invariant activatory receptor present on subsets of natural killer and T lymphocytes. It stimulates the cytolytic effector response upon engagement of its various stress-induced ligands NKG2D ligands (NKG2DL). Malignant transformation and conditioning treatment prior to hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are stress factors leading to the activation of the NKG2D/NKG2DL signaling in clinical settings. In the context of HCT, NKG2D-bearing cells can kill both tumor and healthy cells expressing NKG2DL. The NKG2D/NKG2DL engagement has therefore a key role in the regulation of one of the most salient issues in allogeneic HCT, i.e., maintaining a balance between graft-vs.-leukemia effect and graft-vs.-host disease. The present review summarizes the current state of our knowledge pertaining to the role of the NKG2D and NKG2DL in HCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphael Carapito
- ImmunoRhumatologie Moléculaire, INSERM UMR_S1109, LabEx TRANSPLANTEX, Centre de Recherche d'Immunologie et d'Hématologie, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France; Laboratoire International Associé (LIA) INSERM, Strasbourg (France) - Nagano (Japan), Strasbourg, France; Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (FHU) OMICARE, Strasbourg, France; Laboratoire Central d'Immunologie, Pôle de Biologie, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Ismail Aouadi
- ImmunoRhumatologie Moléculaire, INSERM UMR_S1109, LabEx TRANSPLANTEX, Centre de Recherche d'Immunologie et d'Hématologie, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France; Laboratoire International Associé (LIA) INSERM, Strasbourg (France) - Nagano (Japan), Strasbourg, France; Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (FHU) OMICARE, Strasbourg, France
| | - Wassila Ilias
- ImmunoRhumatologie Moléculaire, INSERM UMR_S1109, LabEx TRANSPLANTEX, Centre de Recherche d'Immunologie et d'Hématologie, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France; Laboratoire International Associé (LIA) INSERM, Strasbourg (France) - Nagano (Japan), Strasbourg, France; Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (FHU) OMICARE, Strasbourg, France
| | - Seiamak Bahram
- ImmunoRhumatologie Moléculaire, INSERM UMR_S1109, LabEx TRANSPLANTEX, Centre de Recherche d'Immunologie et d'Hématologie, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France; Laboratoire International Associé (LIA) INSERM, Strasbourg (France) - Nagano (Japan), Strasbourg, France; Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (FHU) OMICARE, Strasbourg, France; Laboratoire Central d'Immunologie, Pôle de Biologie, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
93
|
Abstract
Ever since the discovery of the major histocompatibility complex, scientific and clinical understanding in the field of transplantation has been advanced through genetic and genomic studies. Candidate-gene approaches and recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have enabled a deeper understanding of the complex interplay of the donor-recipient interactions that lead to transplant tolerance or rejection. Genetic analysis in transplantation, when linked to demographic and clinical outcomes, has the potential to drive personalized medicine by enabling individualized risk stratification and immunosuppression through the identification of variants associated with immune-mediated complications, post-transplant disease or alterations in drug-metabolizing genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Y C Yang
- Division of Transplant Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, California 94143, USA
| | - Minnie M Sarwal
- Division of Transplant Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, California 94143, USA
| |
Collapse
|
94
|
Baranwal AK, Mehra NK. Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Chain-Related A (MICA) Molecules: Relevance in Solid Organ Transplantation. Front Immunol 2017; 8:182. [PMID: 28293239 PMCID: PMC5329007 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2016] [Accepted: 02/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
An ever growing number of reports on graft rejection and/or failure even with good HLA matches have highlighted an important role of non-HLA antigens in influencing allograft immunity. The list of non-HLA antigens that have been implicated in graft rejection in different types of organ transplantation has already grown long. Of these, the Major Histocompatibility Complex class I chain-related molecule A (MICA) is one of the most polymorphic and extensively studied non-HLA antigenic targets especially in the kidney transplantation. Humoral response to MICA antigens has repeatedly been associated with lower graft survival and an increased risk of acute and chronic rejection following kidney and liver transplantation with few studies showing conflicting results. Although there are clear indications of MICA antibodies being associated with adverse graft outcome, a definitive consensus on this relationship has not been arrived yet. Furthermore, only a few studies have dealt with the impact of MICA donor-specific antibodies as compared to those that are not donor specific on graft outcome. In addition to the membrane bound form, a soluble isoform of MICA (sMICA), which has the potential to engage the natural killer cell-activating receptor NKG2D resulting in endocytosis and degradation of receptor–ligand interaction complex leading to suppression of NKG2D-mediated host innate immunity, has been a subject of intense discussion. Most studies on sMICA have been directed toward understanding their influence on tumor growth, with limited literature focusing its role in transplant biology. Furthermore, a unique dimorphism (methionine to valine) at position 129 in the α2 domain categorizes MICA alleles into strong (MICA-129 met) and weak (MICA-129 val) binders of NKG2D receptor depending on whether they have methionine or valine at this position. Although the implications of MICA 129 dimorphism have been highlighted in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, its role in solid organ transplantation is yet to be explored. This review summarizes the currently available information on MICA antibodies, soluble MICA, and MICA-129 dimorphism in a setting of solid organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Narinder K Mehra
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences , New Delhi, Delhi , India
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
Risti M, Bicalho MDG. MICA and NKG2D: Is There an Impact on Kidney Transplant Outcome? Front Immunol 2017; 8:179. [PMID: 28289413 PMCID: PMC5326783 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2016] [Accepted: 02/07/2017] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
This paper aims to present an overview of MICA and natural killer group 2 member D (NKG2D) genetic and functional interactions and their impact on kidney transplant outcome. Organ transplantation has gone from what can accurately be called a “clinical experiment” to a routine and reliable practice, which has proven to be clinically relevant, life-saving and cost-effective when compared with non-transplantation management strategies of both chronic and acute end-stage organ failures. The kidney is the most frequently transplanted organ in the world (transplant-observatory1). The two treatment options for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are dialysis and/or transplantation. Compared with dialysis, transplantation is associated with significant improvements in quality of life and overall longevity. A strong relationship exists between allograft loss and human leukocyte antigens (HLA) antibodies (Abs). HLA Abs are not the only factor involved in graft loss, as multiple studies have shown that non-HLA antigens are also involved, even when a patient has a good HLA matche and receives standard immunosuppressive therapy. A deeper understanding of other biomarkers is therefore important, as it is likely to lead to better monitoring (and consequent success) of organ transplants. The objective is to fill the void left by extensive reviews that do not often dive this deep into the importance of MICA and NKG2D in allograft acceptance and their partnership in the immune response. There are few papers that explore the relationship between these two protagonists when it comes to kidney transplantation. This is especially true for the role of NKG2D in kidney transplantation. These reasons give a special importance to this review, which aims to be a helpful tool in the hands of researchers in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matilde Risti
- LIGH - Immunogenetics and Histocompatibility Laboratory, Federal University of Paraná , Curitiba , Brazil
| | - Maria da Graça Bicalho
- LIGH - Immunogenetics and Histocompatibility Laboratory, Federal University of Paraná , Curitiba , Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
96
|
Analysis of Sera of Recipients with Allograft Rejection Indicates That Keratin 1 Is the Target of Anti-Endothelial Antibodies. J Immunol Res 2017; 2017:8679841. [PMID: 28265584 PMCID: PMC5318619 DOI: 10.1155/2017/8679841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2016] [Accepted: 01/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECAs) are usually directed against the surface antigens on the vascular endothelial cells. Clinical studies suggest a pathogenic role for nonhuman leukocyte antigen in antibody-mediated rejection; however, the antigens on the donor vascular endothelium that serve as the first-line targets for an immune response during allograft rejection have not been fully identified. Here, we used immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry to identify antigens from the sera of kidney transplant recipients who were experiencing antibody-mediated rejection. Keratin 1 (KRT1) was identified as a novel antigenic target expressed on endothelial cells. To validate our finding, we produced recombinant proteins representing the three most common alleles of KRT1. The serum used for immunoprecipitation showed a strong reaction to KRT1 recombinants in western blot and ELISA. In the kidney transplant cohort, more AECA-positive recipients than AECA-negative recipients had KRT1 antibodies (32.2% versus 11.9%, p = 0.002). Sera from 255 renal recipients were tested by ELISA. Of the 77 recipients with deteriorating graft function (serum creatinine > 120 μmol/L), 23 had anti-KRT1 antibodies. KRT1-IgG positivity was, therefore, associated with a higher risk of kidney transplant rejection (29.9% (23/77) versus 16.9% (30/178), p = 0.0187). A better understanding of this antigenic target will improve long-term allograft survival.
Collapse
|
97
|
Endothelial Cells in Antibody-Mediated Rejection of Kidney Transplantation: Pathogenesis Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications. J Immunol Res 2017; 2017:8746303. [PMID: 28255564 PMCID: PMC5309424 DOI: 10.1155/2017/8746303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2016] [Accepted: 12/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has been identified as a main obstacle for stable immune tolerance and long survival of kidney allografts. In spite of new insights into the underlying mechanisms of AMR, accurate diagnosis and efficient treatment are still challenges in clinical practice. Endothelium is the first barrier between recipients' immune systems and grafts in vascularized organ transplants. Considering that endothelial cells express a number of antigens that can be attacked by various allo- and autoantibodies, endothelial cells act as main targets for the recipients' humoral immune responses. Importantly, emerging evidence has shown that endothelial cells in transplants could also initiate protective mechanisms in response to immune injuries. A better understanding of the role of endothelial cells during the pathogenesis of AMR might provide novel therapeutic targets. In the present review, we summarize the antigens expressed by endothelial cells and also discuss the activation and accommodation of endothelial cells as well as their clinical implications. Collectively, the progress discussed in this review indicates endothelial cells as promising targets to improve current diagnosis and therapeutic regimens for AMR.
Collapse
|
98
|
Jani V, Ingulli E, Mekeel K, Morris GP. Root cause analysis of limitations of virtual crossmatch for kidney allocation to highly-sensitized patients. Hum Immunol 2017; 78:72-79. [DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2016.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2016] [Revised: 11/11/2016] [Accepted: 11/14/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
99
|
Menon MC, Murphy B, Heeger PS. Moving Biomarkers toward Clinical Implementation in Kidney Transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol 2017; 28:735-747. [PMID: 28062570 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2016080858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Long-term kidney transplant outcomes remain suboptimal, delineating an unmet medical need. Although current immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients is effective, dosing is conventionally adjusted empirically on the basis of time after transplant or altered in response to detection of kidney dysfunction, histologic evidence of allograft damage, or infection. Such strategies tend to detect allograft rejection after significant injury has already occurred, fail to detect chronic subclinical inflammation that can negatively affect graft survival, and ignore specific risks and immune mechanisms that differentially contribute to allograft damage among transplant recipients. Assays and biomarkers that reliably quantify and/or predict the risk of allograft injury have the potential to overcome these deficits and thereby, aid clinicians in optimizing immunosuppressive regimens. Herein, we review the data on candidate biomarkers that we contend have the highest potential to become clinically useful surrogates in kidney transplant recipients, including functional T cell assays, urinary gene and protein assays, peripheral blood cell gene expression profiles, and allograft gene expression profiles. We identify barriers to clinical biomarker adoption in the transplant field and suggest strategies for moving biomarker-based individualization of transplant care from a research hypothesis to clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madhav C Menon
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Translational Transplant Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Barbara Murphy
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Translational Transplant Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Peter S Heeger
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Translational Transplant Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
100
|
Halloran PF, Famulski KS, Chang J. A Probabilistic Approach to Histologic Diagnosis of Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplant Biopsies. Am J Transplant 2017; 17:129-139. [PMID: 27340822 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2016] [Revised: 06/07/2016] [Accepted: 06/08/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Histologic diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in kidney transplant biopsies uses lesion score cutoffs such as 0 versus >0 rather than actual scores and requires donor-specific antibody (DSA); however, cutoffs lose information, and DSA is not always reliable. Using microarray-derived molecular ABMR scores as a histology-independent estimate of ABMR in 703 biopsies, we reassessed criteria for ABMR to determine relative importance of various lesions, the utility of equations using actual scores rather than cutoffs, and the potential for diagnosing ABMR when DSA is unknown or negative. We confirmed that the important features for ABMR diagnosis were peritubular capillaritis (ptc), glomerulitis (g), glomerular double contours, DSA and C4d staining, but we questioned some features: arterial fibrosis, vasculitis, acute tubular injury, and sum of ptc+g scores. Regression equations using lesion scores predicted molecular ABMR more accurately than score cutoffs (area under the curve 0.85-0.86 vs. 0.75). DSA positivity improved accuracy, but regression equations predicted ABMR with moderate accuracy when DSA was unknown. Some biopsies without detectable DSA had high probability of ABMR by regression, although most had HLA antibody. We concluded that regression equations using lesion scores plus DSA maximized diagnostic accuracy and can estimate probable ABMR when DSA is unknown or undetectable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P F Halloran
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplant Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - K S Famulski
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - J Chang
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|