Comparative effects of long-acting beta2-agonists, leukotriene receptor antagonists, and a 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor on exercise-induced asthma

Pharmacology of airway inflammation in asthma and COPD

The current asthma therapies are not cures and symptoms return soon after treatment is stopped even after long term treatment. Although inhaled glucocorticoids are highly effective in controlling airway inflammation in asthma, they are ineffective in the small group of patients with glucocorticoid-dependent and -resistant asthma. With very few exceptions, COPD is caused by tobacco smoking, and smoking cessation is the only truly effective treatment of COPD available. Current pharmacological treatment of COPD is unsatisfactory, as it does not significantly influence the severity of the disease or its natural course. Glucocorticoids are scarcely effective in COPD patients without concomitant asthma. Bronchodilators improves symptoms and quality of life, in COPD patients, but, with the exception of tiotropium, they do not significantly influence the natural course of the disease. Theophylline is the only drug which has been demonstrated to have a significant effect on airway inflammation in patients with COPD. Here we review the pharmacology of currently used antiinflammatory therapies for asthma and COPD and their proposed mechanisms of action. Recent understanding of disease mechanisms in severe steroid-dependent and -resistant asthma and in COPD, has lead to the development of novel compounds, which are in various stages of clinical development. We review the current status of some of these new potential drugs.

Benefit-risk assessment of antileukotrienes in the management of asthma

Antileukotrienes are a relatively new class of anti-asthma drugs that either block leukotriene synthesis (5-lipoxygenase inhibitors) like zileuton, or antagonise the most relevant of their receptors (the cysteinyl leukotriene 1 receptor [CysLT1]) like montelukast, zafirlukast or pranlukast. Hence, their major effect is an anti-inflammatory one. With the exception of pranlukast, the other antileukotrienes have been studied and marketed in the US and Europe for long enough to establish that they are useful drugs in the management of asthma. Their effects, significantly better than placebo, seem more pronounced in subjective measurements (i.e. symptoms scores or quality-of-life tests) than in objective parameters (i.e. forced expiratory volume in 1 second or peak expiratory flow rate). Also, there is some evidence that these drugs work better in some subsets of patients with certain genetic polymorphisms - probably related to their leukotriene metabolism - or patients with certain asthma characteristics. There are a small number of comparative studies only, and with regard to long-term asthma control differences between the agents have not been evaluated. Nevertheless, their overall effect appears comparable with sodium cromoglycate (cromolyn sodium) or theophylline, but significantly less than low-dose inhaled corticosteroids. Antileukotrienes have been shown to have a degree of corticosteroid-sparing effect, but salmeterol appears to perform better as an add-on drug. Montelukast is probably the most useful antileukotriene for continuous treatment of exercise-induced asthma, performing as well as salmeterol without inducing any tolerance. All antileukotrienes are taken orally; their frequency of administration is quite different ranging from four times daily (zileuton) to once daily (montelukast). Antileukotrienes are well tolerated drugs, even though zileuton intake has been related to transitional liver enzyme elevations in some cases. Also Churg-Strauss syndrome (a systemic vasculitis), has been described in small numbers of patients taking CysLT1 antagonists. It is quite probable that this disease appears as a consequence of an 'unmasking' effect when corticosteroid dosages are reduced in patients with severe asthma once CysLT1 antagonists are introduced, but more data are needed to definitely establish the mechanism behind this effect. Overall, however, the benefits of antileukotrienes in the treatment of asthma greatly outweigh their risks.

Review of exercise-induced asthma

PURPOSE

The purpose of this manuscript is to review the recent literature on exercise-induced asthma (EIA) and summarize the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of this condition.

METHOD

A review of the English language medical literature was performed to obtain articles on EIA.

RESULTS

The pathophysiology of EIA is not fully understood, but there are two theories: 1) the hyperosmolar theory and 2) the airway rewarming theory. In addition, there have been data to show that airway inflammation is present in some elite athletes, especially in cold weather sports. The diagnosis of EIA is usually straightforward in most patients, but a number of patients may have atypical symptoms and may be more difficult to diagnose. They may well need exercise testing or eucapnic voluntary ventilation testing. Most people respond to treatment with an inhaled beta agonist and or cromolyn before exercise, but some patients will also need other medications, including daily medications such as inhaled steroids. When treatment does not control the problem, then further diagnostic evaluation should be done to rule out conditions other than EIA, such as vocal cord dysfunction or cardiac or pulmonary problems.

CONCLUSIONS

EIA is a condition that may occur in schoolchildren in gym class and also in Olympic athletes. The diagnosis and treatment is usually fairly straightforward, but at times it may be challenging. However, all patients should be followed to make sure that the correct diagnosis is made and to make sure that treatment is effective.

Activity-induced asthma

Exercise is the most common trigger of persistent childhood asthma. The history for EIA can be complicated by the lack of perception of significant airway obstruction during exercise. One must carefully identify those children with EIA from the group of children who report low level of activity because of lack of interest or because they are out of shape. Baseline spirometry of children with persistent asthma is frequently normal. Spirometry is important to identify those children with EIA who underrecognize their disease, but normal results should not be used as evidence of absence of disease. Formal exercise testing should be considered when the diagnosis is unclear or if there seems to be a lack of bronchoprotection with inhaled albuterol. The goal of treatment of EIA should be the attainment of a normal activity level for children and adolescents. Identification of the limits imposed by EIA and establishment of goals of therapy with the child and family should be the initial action. Inactivity or reduced exertion, in the presence of this diagnosis. should not be accepted. Therapy for EIA starts with control of the underlying persistent asthma. Inhaled corticosteroids are the most effective initial treatment of both EIA and persistent asthma in children and adolescents. Exercise-induced asthma is a common aspect of a prevalent disease that warrants proper diagnosis and treatment. With appropriate therapy, children with EIA should be able to participate in sports and maintain normal activity. They should strive to compete in the same playing field as their peers and have the same goals as those children and athletes who do not have exercise-induced asthma.

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children: montelukast attenuates the immediate-phase and late-phase responses

BACKGROUND

Montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, attenuates exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. We and others have shown that there is a late-phase response 3 to 8 hours after exercise in a subset of asthmatic patients.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the protective effect of montelukast on immediate-phase and late-phase responses after exercise challenges.

METHODS

Twenty-two atopic asthmatic children aged 7 to 16 years with reproducible exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (minimum of 15% decrease of FEV(1) from baseline) were enrolled in this placebo-controlled crossover study. Exercise challenges were performed while breathing cold dry air, and FEV(1) measurements were taken up to 480 minutes after exercise. Patients underwent exercise challenges on a screening day and 1 week after placebo treatment. Subsequently, after a week with no treatment, pulmonary function was assessed after breathing dry cold air (control day). Finally, an exercise challenge was carried out after a week of treatment with montelukast.

RESULTS

Reproducible late-phase reactions occurred in 5 of 22 patients, which correlated with the extent of the immediate response (P <.05). After 1 week of treatment with montelukast, a significant decrease of immediate responses was observed. Montelukast treatment compared with placebo was associated with a lower mean maximum decrease of FEV(1) (mean +/- SEM: 17.3% +/- 2.4% and 35.1% +/- 2.6%, respectively), decrease of the area above the curve (267.8% +/- 42.7%/min and 868.0% +/- 103.8%/min, respectively), and shorter time for recovery (6.9 +/- 1.1 minutes and 30.9 +/- 4.0 minutes, respectively; P <.05). Treatment with montelukast also abolished late-phase responses.

CONCLUSION

Once daily treatment with oral montelukast attenuated the immediate-phase response and abolished the late-phase response induced by means of exercise challenge in asthmatic children.

Time efficacy of a single dose of montelukast on exercise-induced asthma in children

The aim of this study was to evaluate the timing of onset and the duration of action of a single oral-dose treatment with montelukast in comparison to placebo on exercise-induced asthma (EIA) in asthmatic children. Nineteen children (7-13 years) with stable asthma were evaluated. Patients undertook three consecutive treadmill exercise tests, respectively, 2, 12 and 24 h after a single-dose administration. A double-blind randomized, single-dose, placebo-controlled, crossover design was used. To assess bronchoconstriction after the exercise challenge, the maximal percentage fall in FEV1 (DeltaFEV1) from the baseline value was considered. Two hours after dosing, DeltaFEV1 was -15.33 +/- 2.93 for placebo and -13.33 +/- 2.03 for montelukast. At 12 h, DeltaFEV1 was -18.69 +/- 2.83 for placebo, -9.78 +/- 1.85 for montelukast (p < 0.005). No difference was observed between placebo (DeltaFEV1-10.21 +/- 2.07) and montelukast (DeltaFEV1-9.10 +/- 2.02) at 24 h. Analysis of the degree of protection showed a significant efficacy of montelukast (p = 0.02) in comparison with placebo only at 12 h. Montelukast showed a significant protective effect 12 h after dosing, but no effect after 2 and 24 h. In mild asthmatics, the timing of administration of single dosage before exercise should be strictly considered in order to obtain the drug protective effects.

Exercise-induced asthma: diagnosis and management

OBJECTIVE

To review the diagnosis and management of exercise-induced asthma (EIA).

DATA SOURCES

Computer-assisted literature searches on MEDLINE for articles, abstracts, and other relevant data on exercise-induced asthma

STUDY SELECTION

Published articles, abstracts, and conference proceedings were selected.

RESULTS

EIA is seen in 40 to 90% of asthmatic patients. Exercise can be the sole trigger or be one of multiple triggers of asthma exacerbations. A good history and physical examination can diagnose most cases of EIA. Spirometry can confirm the diagnosis. Exercise testing may be necessary in certain cases. Prevention through both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic measures is the key to EIA management. Inhaled beta-agonists remain the medications of choice for EIA prophylaxis. Inhaled cromolyn and antileukotrienes are alternatives. Good long-term control of asthma with anti-inflammatory medications such as inhaled steroids will also decrease the incidence of EIA.

CONCLUSIONS

Early diagnosis and proper preventive and maintenance therapy can reduce episodes of EIA and enable patients to continue to engage in sports and lead an active life.

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

Exercise-induced asthma, or more appropriately, exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), occurs in 80 to 90% of individuals with asthma and in approximately 11% of the general population without asthma. EIB is characterised by post-exercise airways obstruction resulting in reductions in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) of greater than 10% compared with pre-exercise values. The mechanism of EIB remains elusive, although both cooling and drying of airways play prominent roles. Cold, dry inhaled air during exercise or voluntary hyperventilation is the most potent stimulus for EIB. Inflammatory mediators play central roles in causing the post-exercise airways obstruction. Diagnosis of EIB requires the use of an exercise test. The exercise can be a field or laboratory based test, but should be of relatively high intensity (80 to 90% of maximal heart rate) and duration (at least 5 to 8 minutes). Pre- and post-exercise pulmonary function should be compared, and post exercise pulmonary function determined over 20 to 30 minutes for characterisation of EIB. A pre- to post-exercise drop in FEV(1) of greater than 10% is abnormal. Approaches to treatment of EIB include both nonpharmacological and pharmacological strategies. A light exercise warm up prior to moderate to heavy exercise reduces the severity of EIB. More recently, studies have supported a role for dietary salt as a modifier of the severity of EIB, suggesting that salt restrictive diets should reduce symptoms of EIB. Short acting, inhaled beta(2)-agonists constitute the most used prophylactic treatment for EIB. However, antileukotriene agents are emerging as effective, well tolerated, long-term treatments for EIB.

Exercise-induced asthma in children

Exercise-induced asthma (EIA) is a relatively common problem in children, but may not be recognized because children either do not report their symptoms, or avoid activities that cause it. Clarifying the diagnosis of EIA, in particular separating EIA from other causes of exertional dyspnea, is essential. Treating EIA in children is challenging because of the nature of their physical activities, which are often not planned, and may be prolonged. Keeping children active is an important goal to ensure healthy physical and social development. Many children with EIA are well managed with an inhaled short-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist before exercise or if symptoms develop. The approach to more troublesome EIA depends on whether the child has persistent asthma and requires better prevention, or the EIA is an isolated clinical problem. The options for treatment also depend on the timing, frequency, and duration of activity that induces EIA. Options include the addition of a cromone, a leukotriene modifier, an inhaled corticosteroid, or switching to use a long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist. The use of warm-up exercises has been shown to be helpful by using the refractory period but is not practical for most children with EIA. A final consideration for successful management of EIA in children is that the delivery of medication needs to be age-appropriate.

Exercise-induced bronchospasm in the elite athlete

The term exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) describes the acute transient airway narrowing that occurs during and most often after exercise in 10 to 50% of elite athletes, depending upon the sport examined. Although multiple factors are unquestionably involved in the EIB response, airway drying caused by a high exercise-ventilation rate is primary in most cases. The severity of this reaction reflects the allergic predisposition of the athlete, the water content of the inspired air, the type and concentration of air pollutants inspired, and the intensity (or ventilation rate) of the exercise. The highest prevalence of EIB is seen in winter-sport populations, where athletes are chronically exposed to cold dry air and/or environmental pollutants found in indoor ice arenas. When airway surface liquid lost during the natural warming and humidification process of respiration is not replenished at a rate equal to the loss, the ensuing osmolarity change stimulates the release of inflammatory mediators and results in bronchospasm; this cascade of events is exacerbated by airway inflammation and airway remodelling. The acute EIB response is characterised by airway smooth muscle contraction, membrane swelling, and/or mucus plug formation. Evidence suggests that histamine, leukotrienes and prostanoids are likely mediators for this response. Although the presence of symptoms and a basic physical examination are marginally effective, objective measures of lung function should be used for accurate and reliable diagnosis of EIB. Diagnosis should include baseline spirometry, followed by an appropriate bronchial provocation test. To date, the best test to confirm EIB may simply be standard pulmonary function testing before and after high-intensity dry air exercise. A 10% post-challenge fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second is used as diagnostic criteria. The goal of medical intervention is to limit EIB exacerbation and allow the athlete to train and compete symptom free. This is attempted through daily controller medications such as inhaled corticosteroids or by the prophylactic use of medications before exercise. In many cases, EIB is difficult to control. These and other data suggest that EIB in the elite athlete is in contrast with classic asthma.

Leukotriene modifiers

Leukotrienes (LTs) are 5-lipoxygenase products formed from arachidonic acid metabolism. There is compelling evidence that LTs play an important role in the pathogenesis of asthma. LTs affect vascular permeability, mucus production, and smooth muscle constriction, and may contribute to airway remodeling. In mild-to-moderate asthma, LT modifiers improve measures of airflow limitation and quality of life and reduce the frequency of asthma exacerbations and the need for short-acting bronchodilator therapy. In moderate-to-severe asthma, an LT modifier in combination with an inhaled corticosteroid results in improvements in lung function and asthma control over that achieved with an inhaled corticosteroid alone. LT modifiers are effective in the treatment of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and aspirin-induced asthma. There are few adverse effects of LT modifiers.

Pharmacokinetic profile of zafirlukast

Zafirlukast is a cysteinyl leukotriene type 1 receptor antagonist that causes bronchodilation and has anti-inflammatory properties. Clinical efficacy has been demonstrated when using oral doses of 20 to 40 mg twice daily. The pharmacokinetics of zafirlukast are best described by a two-compartment model. Maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) were achieved 3 hours after a single oral dose of 20 or 40 mg to healthy volunteers. The absolute bioavailability of zafirlukast is unknown. However, coadministration of zafirlukast with food reduces bioavailability by approximately 40%. The drug binds to plasma proteins (>99%), predominantly to albumin, and has a mean terminal elimination half-life of approximately 10 hours in both healthy volunteers and patients with asthma. Zafirlukast undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism. Hydroxylation by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 is the major biotransformation pathway. The metabolites of zafirlukast contribute little to its overall activity. Zafirlukast is mainly eliminated in the faeces, while urinary excretion accounts for <10% of an orally administered dose. Because of its primarily hepatic metabolism, the clearance of zafirlukast is reduced in patients with hepatic impairment. In patients with stable alcoholic cirrhosis, Cmax and area under the plasma concentration-time curve for zafirlukast were increased by 50 to 60% compared with healthy volunteers. Asymptomatic elevations of serum liver enzymes have been reported with high dosages of zafirlukast (80 mg twice daily), returning to normal after cessation of the drug. Inhibition of the CYP2C9 and CYP3A isoenzymes by zafirlukast has been reported in vitro. Zafirlukast interacts with warfarin and produces a clinically significant increase in the prothrombin time, but it does not alter the pharmacokinetics of terfenadine carboxylate, the active metabolite of terfenadine. Plasma concentrations of zafirlukast decreased when the drug was administered concomitantly with erythromycin, terfenadine or theophylline, and increased when it was coadministered with aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid). Theophylline metabolism is unchanged in most cases by zafirlukast, but there is a report of one patient with increased theophylline plasma concentrations when zafirlukast was coadministered. Recently, cases of Churg-Strauss syndrome have been described in patients with asthma receiving zafirlukast treatment. This occurrence in patients being withdrawn from corticosteroid therapy while receiving zafirlukast has been attributed to a previously undiagnosed presence of this syndrome in these patients.

The Role of Leukotriene Modifiers in the Management of Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction

Objective

To review the use of leukotriene modifiers in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB).

Data Source

A MEDLINE search (1966–March 2001) identified pertinent English-language publications on EIB in humans.

Study Selection

Selection of prospective clinical studies was limited to those that focused on prevention of EIB with leukotriene modifiers, including both leukotriene receptor antagonists and 5-lipoxygenase inhibitors.

Data Synthesis

Leukotriene modifiers have been shown to attenuate EIB in patients with mild to intermittent, stable asthma from exacerbations after exercise, especially those with a predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) >80% and who did not require corticosteroids. Extrapolation to patients with more severe forms of asthma cannot be made because of the lack of currently available data in these types of patients. Children may benefit from the oral dosage forms of leukotriene modifiers if they have difficulty using a metered-dose inhaler. The current literature supports a lack of a tolerance effect with leukotriene modifiers, as opposed to tachyphylaxis seen with beta2-adrenergic drugs after repeated dosing. As many as 25% of EIB patients will not respond to therapy with leukotriene modifiers. Montelukast has the greatest volume of data and the most positive benefits of the available leukotriene modifiers.

Conclusions

Evidence supports the use of leukotriene modifiers for protection of EIB in patients with stable, mild to intermittent asthma with a predicted FEV1 ≥80% if beta-agonists are intolerable or ineffective. Potential benefits include the lack of a tolerance effect, the long duration of action exhibited by some leukotriene modifiers, and the availability of a tablet form. Beta2-adrenergic drugs should remain the first-line therapy for EIB; however, leukotriene modifiers may provide a valuable alternative in those few who cannot use short-acting beta-agonists. Long-term safety studies of leukotriene modifiers in children and the elderly with EIB are necessary before widespread use can be advocated in the pediatric and geriatric populations.

Antileukotrienes in clinical development for asthma

Asthma is a serious world health problem characterised by a chronic inflammatory disorder of the airways. Asthma attacks, or exacerbations, are episodic but airway inflammation is chronically present. Thus, this disorder requires long-term management. The goals of asthma management include prevention steps for long-term control, action steps to stop attacks, recognising deteriorating asthma, how to treat deteriorating asthma, how and when to seek medical attention and education. In order to achieve the best therapeutic choice, a stepwise approach should be adopted. In recent years, much progress regarding the characterisation of leukotrienes (LTs) has been achieved. These substances are important products of action of the 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO) enzyme on arachidonic acid (AA) and it has been established that the leukotrienes are key mediators of both allergy and inflammation. Consequently, the important role of the cysteinyl-leukotrienes (Cys-LTs) in the pathophysiology of bronchial asthma has been suggested. Pharmacological support for the role of Cys-LTs in asthma has been observed using inhibitors of 5-LO and specific LT receptor antagonists. In the clinical setting, the LT receptor, which plays the most important role, is the Cys-LT1 receptor. The antagonists of this receptor have proven an effective therapy in chronic asthmatics, agonist antigens and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and in aspirin-intolerant asthmatics. These drugs provide a new approach in asthmatic therapy and therefore may facilitate the compliance of daily therapy.

Inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis attenuates thermally induced asthma

To determine whether the inhibition of nitric oxide (NO) synthesis attenuates thermally induced obstruction, we had 10 asthmatic volunteers perform isocapnic hyperventilation with frigid air after inhaling 1 mg of N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) or isotonic saline in a blinded fashion. The challenges were identical in all respects, and there were no differences in baseline lung function [1-s forced expiratory volume (FEV(1)); saline 2.8 +/- 0.3 liters, L-NMMA 2.9 +/- 0.3 liters; P = 0.41] or prechallenge fractional concentration of nitric oxide in the exhaled air (FENO) [saline 23 +/- 6 parts/billion (ppb), L-NMMA 18 +/- 4 ppb; P = 0.51]. Neither treatment had any impact on the FEV(1), pulse, or blood pressure. After L-NMMA, FENO fell significantly (P < 0.0001), the stimulus-response curves shifted to the right, and the minute ventilation required to reduce the FEV(1) 20% rose 53.5% over control (P = 0.02). The results of this study demonstrate that NO generated from the airways of asthmatic individuals may play an important role in the pathogenesis of thermally induced asthma.

Fexofenadine decreases sensitivity to and montelukast improves recovery from inhaled mannitol

We studied, separately, the effects of the histamine antagonist, fexofenadine hydrochloride, and the leukotriene antagonist, montelukast sodium, and their placebos on airway sensitivity to and recovery from inhaled mannitol in subjects with asthma. Two 180-mg doses of fexofenadine were taken over 14 h, and three 10-mg doses of montelukast over 36 h, with the last dose 5 h before challenge. Fexofenadine reduced sensitivity to mannitol and the PD(15) was (mean [95% confidence interval] 138 [95, 201]) mg versus placebo (51 [25, 106] mg) (p < 0.001). The final percent reduction in FEV(1) with fexofenadine was 20.8 +/- 5.4% and not different from placebo (20.1 +/- 5.3%) (p = 0.7); however, recovery was slower with fexofenadine compared with placebo (p < 0.001). By contrast, montelukast had no effect on sensitivity to mannitol and the PD(15) was 71 [36, 144] mg versus placebo (87 [51, 148] mg (p = 0.35). The total dose of mannitol delivered and the final percent reduction in FEV(1) with montelukast were 171 +/- 142 mg and 21 +/- 4% and for placebo were 182 +/- 144 mg and 20 +/- 5% (p = 0.35, p = 0.59, respectively). However, recovery of FEV(1) to baseline was faster with montelukast, with the area under the percent reduction FEV(1)-versus-time curve reduced (220 +/- 121% change.min) compared with placebo (513 +/- 182% change.min) (p < 0.001). We conclude that whereas histamine is important for the initial airway response, leukotrienes are important in sustaining the airway response to inhaled mannitol.

Fc epsilon ri-mediated activation of transcription factors in antigen-presenting cells

Professional antigen-presenting cells (APC) such as monocytes and dendritic cells (DC) bearing high-affinity IgE receptors (Fc epsilon RI) efficiently present IgE-bound antigens to T cells. Fc epsilon RI expression is upregulated on APC from atopic donors, especially in inflamed tissues. These data suggest a pathophysiological concept of an IgE-mediated delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction in atopic diseases. However, Fc epsilon RI ligation also leads to the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines and other molecules involved in inflammatory reactions. The investigation of transcription factors mediating these effects has only recently commenced. In general, members of the NF-kappa B family are known to regulate APC function and differentiation, with the RelB subunit being especially important in DC generation. In addition, Ikaros and PU.1 have also been shown to be essential factors for DC differentiation, whereas Oct-2 is upregulated by differentiation towards macrophages. Recently, Fc epsilon RI has been demonstrated to induce NF-kappa B activation via I kappa B-alpha serine phosphorylation and degradation in monocytes and DC. Inhibitors of NF-kappa B activation such as N-acetylcysteine or N-tosyl-L-phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone can suppress Fc epsilon RI-induced TNF-alpha and MCP-1 release. Interestingly, in human epidermal Langerhans' cells (LC), NF-kappa B activation can only be observed when large amounts of Fc epsilon RI are present. In addition, the composition of NF-kappa B complexes differs between monocytes, monocyte-derived DC and LC, suggesting a cell type-specific regulation. Moreover, the transcription factor NFAT is induced upon Fc epsilon RI ligation in human APC. The elucidation of further transcription factors involved in Fc epsilon RI signaling in APC should contribute to the employment of new inhibition strategies for the treatment of atopic and other inflammatory diseases.

Antileukotrienes in asthma: present situation

Leukotrienes are key mediators in asthma. Over the last 5 years, several antileukotrienes, including three receptor antagonists (montelukast, pranlukast and zafirlukast) and one 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor (zileuton), have been marketed and, to date, this class of drugs is being used widely. Still, their definite place in the asthma treatment algorithm is not yet established. These novel drugs have not yet all been evaluated in the same depth, but they have all been shown to possess anti-inflammatory properties and to be effective in chronic asthma treatment. Zafirlukast and montelukast are particularly efficacious in exercise-induced asthma and zileuton appears valuable for treating aspirin-intolerant asthmatics. Clinical comparisons to other anti-asthma drugs are still sparse. The corticosteroid-sparing effect of antileukotrienes is fairly well established except for zileuton, even though this drug has been evaluated most thoroughly in terms of its anti-inflammatory effects. Montelukast is the antileukotriene most extensively evaluated in children and zafirlukast has recently been approved for use in children in the USA, although not yet in Europe. Therapeutic regimes are quite variable depending on the drug, but all of the antileukotrienes marketed to date are taken orally; hence, compliance is usually greater than that with inhaled medication. Response to antileukotrienes appears to depend on the individual patients' characteristics, in particular on genetic polymorphisms related to leukotriene metabolism. All drugs of this class are well tolerated and only in the case of zileuton is there potential for hepatic adverse effects. The diagnosis of Churg-Strauss syndrome made among patients taking antileukotrienes seems to be more related to the withdrawal of corticosteroids than to the antileukotrienes themselves.