Evidence for a role for IL-5 and eotaxin in activating and recruiting eosinophils in drug-induced cutaneous eruptions

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis: report of 12 cases and literature review

BACKGROUND

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis is an acute pustular eruption occurring after infection and/or drug ingestion, with spontaneous cure after a single eruption.

AIM

To communicate a series of cases of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on cases of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, observed between 1993 and 2006 at the Dermatology Department, Hospital General de Occidente, Jalisco, Mexico.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were included, with a predominance of male patients and a mean age of 28 years. The most common cause was drugs, detected in 83% of cases, and most of these were a result of anticonvulsants and antimicobials. The most frequent symptoms were itching, present in all cases, and fever, present in 92% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis is considered to be a distinct clinical and histopathologic entity. Because of its self-resolving character, early recognition can help to avoid unnecessary diagnostic studies and treatments.

Up-regulation of CCL17, CCL22 and CCR4 in drug-induced maculopapular exanthema

BACKGROUND

Maculopapular exanthema has been reported to be the most frequently drug-induced cutaneous reaction. Although T lymphocytes are involved in the pathomechanism of this disease, little is know about the recruitment of these cells to the skin.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work is to study the role of the chemokines TARC/CCL17 and MDC/CCL22 in the lymphocyte trafficking to affected skin in drug-induced exanthemas.

METHODS

Real-time PCR was performed to quantify gene expression levels of CCL17, CCL22 and their receptor CCR4 in lesional skin biopsies and in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients. CCL27 and CCL22 proteins were detected in the skin by immunochemistry. Protein expression of CCR4 was determined by flow cytometry in peripheral blood lymphocytes. Functional migration assays to CCL17 and CCL22 were assessed to compare the migratory responses of peripheral blood lymphocytes from patients and healthy subjects.

RESULTS

CCL17 and CCL22 were up-regulated in maculopapular exanthema-affected skin. CCR4 mRNA levels and protein expression were increased in peripheral blood mononuclear cells during the acute phase of the disease. The increased expression of the receptor was consistent with a higher response of peripheral blood lymphocytes to CCL17 and CCL22 compared with the migratory response in healthy donors.

CONCLUSION

TARC/CCL17 and MDC/CCL22 might cooperate in attracting T lymphocytes to skin in drug-induced maculopapular exanthemas.

Immunological principles of T-cell-mediated adverse drug reactions in skin

Drug hypersensitivity reactions in skin are an immune-mediated phenomenon associated with significant patient mortality and morbidity. Antigen-specific T cells, which have been isolated from the peripheral circulation and target organs of hypersensitive patients, are thought to propagate and regulate the development of clinical symptoms. The investigation of clinical cases with respect to the basic cellular and chemical mechanisms that underpin drug hypersensitivity has resulted in: i) the need to redress some aspects of present immunological dogma; and ii) additional fundamental immunological questions. Thus, the aim of this review article is to summarise present opinion on how and why drugs initiate a pathogenic T-cell response in a small section of the population and subsequently reflect on gaps in basic immunology and where future research might lead.

Involvement of drug-specific T cells in acute drug-induced interstitial nephritis

Drug-induced interstitial nephritis can be caused by a plethora of drugs and is characterized by a sudden impairment of renal function, mild proteinuria, and sterile pyuria. For investigation of the possible pathomechanism of this disease, drug-specific T cells were analyzed, their function was characterized, and these in vitro findings were correlated to histopathologic changes that were observed in kidney biopsy specimens. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from three patients showed a proliferative response to only one of the administered drugs, namely flucloxacillin, penicillin G, and disulfiram, respectively. The in vitro analysis of the flucloxacillin-reactive cells showed an oligoclonal immune response with an outgrowth of T cells bearing the T cell receptor Vbeta9 and Vbeta21.3. Moreover, flucloxacillin-specific T cell clones could be generated from peripheral blood, they expressed CD4 and the alphabeta-T cell receptor, and showed a heterogeneous cytokine secretion pattern with no clear commitment to either a Th1- or Th2-type response. The immunohistochemistry of kidney biopsies of these patients revealed cell infiltrations that consisted mostly of T cells (CD4+ and/or CD8+). An augmented presence of IL-5, eosinophils, neutrophils, CD68+ cells, and IL-12 was observed. In agreement with negative cytotoxicity assays, no cytotoxicity-related molecules such as Fas and perforin were detected by immunohistochemistry. The data indicate that drug-specific T cells are activated locally and orchestrate a local inflammation via secretion of various cytokines, the type of which depends on the cytokine pattern secreted and which probably is responsible for the renal damage.

Monitoring the acute phase response in non-immediate allergic drug reactions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this article is to evaluate the advantages of monitoring the immunological response of non-immediate allergic drug reactions in parallel with the affected tissues, skin and peripheral blood, in order to improve our understanding of the immunological response.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several studies have shown that in the skin and peripheral blood, the agents that take part in the development of the immunological reaction express a number of markers that parallel the evolution of the disease process. These markers include cytokines, chemokines, and cytotoxic factors, as well as many other markers involved in such mechanisms as drug metabolism and signal transduction.

SUMMARY

Monitoring the acute phase response to a drug in the skin with parallel studies in the blood provides clues that increase our understanding of the underlying pathological mechanisms in adverse reactions to drugs with an immunological basis. This approach, together with molecular biology techniques such as microarrays and genomic studies may be useful in future, in better characterizing the clinical subtype and prognosis of nonimmediate allergic drug reactions and generating targeted treatment regimens.

The role of T cells in drug reaction

T cells are major protagonists of immune-mediated adverse drug eruptions. Immunohistochemical observation as well as isolation and functional characterization of T cells infiltrating the affected tissues provided new insights into the pathomechanisms of the diverse clinical manifestations of drug hypersensitivity, and permitted the recognition of T cell-mediated cytotoxicity against drug-loaded resident cells as a major mechanism of tissue damage.

Immune response to xenobiotics in the skin: from contact sensitivity to drug allergy

Skin is the most frequent target of adverse drug reactions. These cutaneous drug reactions (CDRs) show varied clinical manifestations ranging from mildly discomforting rashes to life-threatening Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis. Most CDRs appear to be immune mediated, although the mechanism by which they are initiated remains unclear. In this review, current knowledge of the mechanisms by which xenobiotics provoke immune responses in the skin after epicutaneous administration and how similar reactions may occur after systemic routes are summarised. This review also discusses a variety of genetic or environmental factors that may determine the susceptibility of individuals towards immune responses in skin following drug exposure.

Different patterns of cytokines, ECP and immunoglobulin profiles at two adverse drug reactions in a patient

OBJECTIVES

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (HS) is a rare but life-threatening disease. We experienced carbamazepine-induced HS in a 14-year-old boy, who had cefaclor-induced cutaneous eruptions 15 months later. To clarify the mechanisms of HS and the differences between two diseases we studied this case in detail.

METHODS

We investigated the associated viral agents by polymerase chain reaction and the specific antibodies. We also studied the mechanism of diseases by measuring chemical mediators including cytokines, ECP and immunoglobulins.

RESULTS

The patient was diagnosed as having carbamazepine-induced HS associated with reactivation of human herpesvirus 6 based on the clinical course and laboratory data including drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation tests. Similarly, the diagnosis of cefaclor-induced eruption without any viral reactivation was made. Serum levels of IFN-gamma, IL-6, TNF-alpha, IL-5 and ECP were increased significantly at HS but mildly at cefaclor-induced eruptions. Furthermore, we detected transient hypogammaglobulinemia only at HS.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report of anticonvulsant-induced HS followed by antibiotic-induced eruptions in a patient. In addition, we demonstrated difference in serum levels of inflammatory cytokines, immunoglobulins, activated eosinophils and viral reactivation between these diseases. This case would contribute to the understanding of the pathophysiology of adverse drug reactions including HS.

T Cell-Regulated Neutrophilic Inflammation in Autoinflammatory Diseases

Previous studies of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, a peculiar drug hypersensitivity reaction, suggested that CXCL8-producing T cells regulate sterile, polymorphonuclear neutrophil-rich skin inflammations. In this study, we test the hypothesis of whether CXCL8-producing T cells are present in autoinflammatory diseases like pustular psoriasis and Behçet's disease. Immunohistochemistry of normal skin revealed few CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, few CXCL8+ cells, and no neutrophilic infiltration, whereas in acute exacerbations of atopic dermatitis, numerous CD4+ T cells but few CD8+ T cells, neutrophils, or CXCL8+ cells were detected. In contrast, a pronounced infiltration of neutrophils and of predominantly CD4+ T cells was observed in skin biopsies from pustular psoriasis, Behçet's disease, and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, with infiltrating T cells strongly positive for CXCL8 and the chemokine receptor CCR6. Skin-derived T cell clones from pustular skin reactions were positive for CCR6 but negative for CCR8 and secreted high amounts of CXCL8 and GM-CSF, often together with IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha after in vitro stimulation. Moreover, some skin-derived T cell clones from Behçet's disease and from pustular psoriasis predominantly produced CXCL8 and GM-CSF, but failed to secrete IL-5 and IFN-gamma. These cells might represent a particular subset as they differ from both Th1 as well as Th2 T cells and are associated with a unique, neutrophil-rich sterile inflammation. Our findings suggest that CXCL8/GM-CSF-producing T cells may orchestrate neutrophil-rich pathologies of chronic autoinflammatory diseases like pustular psoriasis and Behçet's disease.

Drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms vs toxic epidermal necrolysis: the dilemma of classification

According to contemporary vernacular, when the cutaneous manifestations of drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic signs (DRESS) syndrome are those of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) or toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), the condition is defined as "DRESS syndrome with severe cutaneous reactions". In this article, we have presented arguments for and against including patients with skin lesions of the SJS/TEN syndromes who also have fever (practically all of the patients) and internal organ involvement (most of the patients) under the definition of DRESS syndrome. After weighing the arguments for and against this alteration of definition, we conclude that it makes more sense for patients with SJS/TEN to be classified as such and not be lumped together under the misleading label of DRESS syndrome.

Histopathology of drug-induced exanthems: is there a role in diagnosis of drug allergy?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cutaneous eruptions are among the most common adverse drug reactions and may often represent a challenging diagnostic problem. This review focuses on histopathological and immunohistochemical findings of drug-induced maculo-papular exanthems and discusses the value of skin biopsies and consequent histopathological examination in the diagnosis of these reactions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Data from immunohistological studies indicate that CD4+ T cells expressing cytotoxic granule proteins such as perforin and granzyme B are critically involved in the pathogenesis and contribute to the generation of typical histopathological features of drug-induced maculo-papular exanthems, i.e. an interface dermatitis with vacuolar alteration and some apoptotic basal keratinocytes. In addition, an upregulation of both type 1 (i.e. IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha) and type 2 (i.e. IL-5) cytokines has been reported. IL-5 together with other chemokines (i.e. eotaxin/CCL-11) provides an explanation for tissue eosinophilia, which may be suggestive of a drug eruption if present.

SUMMARY

There are no absolute histological or immunohistological criteria for the diagnosis of drug-induced maculo-papular exanthems and even if the observed histological changes are compatible with a drug-induced eruption, biopsy may not definitely exclude alternative causes since there is considerable overlap with features seen in other entities. In mild cases with no severe signs or symptoms and a clear temporal relationship, clinical information and the morphologic pattern of skin lesions are often sufficient for diagnosis. However, in complex and severe cases or when the precise morphology is unclear, histopathological findings may provide some clues and assist in reaching a correct diagnosis.

Diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity: lymphocyte transformation test and cytokines

For all types of allergic reactions including immediate type of reactions, types II and III reactions as well as delayed-type reactions the recognition of the antigen by specifically sensitized T-lymphocytes is a prerequisite. Evidences for the key role of T-lymphocytes in the pathophysiology of allergic drug reactions are positive patch test reactions and the LTT. The proliferative response that can be measured by means of the incorporation of 3H-thymidine during DNA synthesis can be expressed as stimulation index (SI) which is the relation between the cell proliferation with antigen compared without antigen. In addition drug-specific activation of PBMC consistently resulted in IL-5 expression and secretion. The sensitivity of the LTT for the detection of drug sensitization could be improved up to 92% by the measurement of released interleukin-5. The expression and secretion of other cytokines such as IFN-gamma and IL-10 was less consistently and had a diagnostic sensitivity of 36 and 50%, respectively. Microarrays are a promising new technical platform to look for better markers which can be used as a read out in the LTT and other similar assays and to study pharmacological interactions between drugs including cytokines such as interferons and the immune system.

Clinical heterogeneity of drug hypersensitivity

Skin is the most frequent target of drug reactions that are reported, may be because they are easily detected. Most (probably more than 90%) are related to drug hypersensitivity, i.e. an individually tailored, unexpected effect mediated by a drug specific activation of the immune response. The clinical presentation of "drug eruptions" is highly variable, from the most common transient and benign erythema that occurs 6-9 days after the introduction of a new drug in 1 to 3 % of users to the most severe forms, that fortunately affect less than 1/10,000 users. Even though there are some overlapping or unclassifiable cases, it is important for clinicians to recognize and categorize severe cutaneous adverse reactions/SCAR (bullous fixed drug eruptions/bFDE, acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis/AGEP, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/DRESS, Stevens-Johnson syndrome/SJS, toxic epidermal necrolysis/TEN). First they must suspect rapidly that an unusual eruption with high fever and severe constitutional symptoms is caused by a medication and not by an infection. Second they have to look for involvement of organs that differ according to the type of reaction. Third they can determine a prognosis, the mortality rate being virtually 0 for bFDE, 5% for AGEP, 10% for "hypersensitivity syndrome"/DRESS and 25% for SJS or TEN. In addition if some medications are "usual suspects" for all types (e.g. anticonvulsants), some other are more specific of a given pattern (pristinamycine, hydroxychloroquine, diltiazem for AGEP, minocycline for DRESS, anti-infectious sulfonamides, allopurinol for epidermal necrolysis). The "phenotypic" diversity of the final expression drug reactions can be explained by the engagement of a variety of cytokines and inflammatory cells and by regulatory mechanisms. For example, memory cytotoxic T-Cells are key effectors in both localized blisters of bFDE and in extensive blisters of epidermal necrolysis.

Drug-induced exanthems

Cutaneous adverse reactions to drugs can comprise a broad spectrum of clinical and histopathological features. Recent evidence from immunohistological and functional studies of drug-reactive T cells suggest that distinct T-cell functions may be responsible for this broad spectrum of different clinical reactions. Maculopapular exanthems represent the most commonly encountered cutaneous drug eruption. Previous studies on maculopapular exanthems indicate that drug-specific CD4+ T cells expressing cytotoxic granule proteins such as perforin and granzyme B are critically involved in killing activated keratinocytes. These cells are particularly found at the dermo-epidermal junction and may contribute to the generation of vacuolar alteration and destruction of basal keratinocytes, which are typical found in drug-induced maculopapular exanthems. In contrast to maculopapular exanthems, the preferential activation of drug-specific cytotoxic CD8+ T cells may lead to more severe reactions like bullous drug eruptions. Furthermore, activation of drug-specific T with distinct cytokine and chemokines profiles may also explain the different clinical features of drug-induced exanthems. IL-5 and eotaxin are upregulated in maculopapular exanthems and explain the eosinophilia often found in these reactions.

Characterization of the T-cell response in a patient with phenindione hypersensitivity

The oral anticoagulant phenindione [2-phenyl-1H-indene-1,3(2H)-dione] is associated with hypersensitivity reactions in 1.5 to 3% of patients, the pathogenesis of which is unclear. We describe a patient who developed a severe hypersensitivity reaction that involved both the skin and lungs. A lymphocyte transformation test showed proliferation of T-cells from the hypersensitive patient, but not from four controls on exposure to phenindione in vitro. Drug-specific T-cell clones were generated and characterized in terms of their phenotype, functionality, and mechanism of antigen presentation. Forty-three human leukocyte antigen class II restricted CD4(+) alphabeta T-cell clones were identified. T-cell activation resulted in the secretion of interferon-gamma and interleukin-5. Five of seven clones proliferated with phenindione alone, whereas two clones also proliferated with 2-phenylindene. Certain T-cell clones were also stimulated by R- and S-warfarin; computer modeling revealed that warfarin can adopt a phenindione-like structure. Phenindione was presented to T-cells via two pathways: first, bound directly to major histocompatibility complex and second, bound to a processed peptide. Our data show that CD4(+) T-cells are involved in the pathophysiology of phenindione hypersensitivity. There may be cross-sensitivity with warfarin in some phenindione hypersensitive patients.

The role of human mast cell-derived cytokines in eosinophil biology

Eosinophil-mediated diseases, such as allergic asthma, eosinophilic fasciitis, and certain hypersensitivity pulmonary disorders, are characterized by eosinophil infiltration and tissue injury. Mast cells and T cells often colocalize to these areas. Recent data suggest that mast cells can contribute to eosinophil-mediated inflammatory responses. Activation of mast cells can occur by antigen and immunoglobulin E (IgE) via the high-affinity receptor (FcepsilonRI) for IgE. The liberation of proteases, leukotrienes, lipid mediators, and histamine can contribute to tissue inflammation and allow recruitment of eosinophils to tissue. In addition, the synthesis and expression of a plethora of cytokines and chemokines (such as granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor [GM-CSF], interleukin-1 [IL-1], IL-3, IL-5, tumor necrosis factor-alpha [TNF-alpha], and the chemokines IL-8, regulated upon activation normal T cell expressed and secreted [RANTES], monocyte chemotactic protein-1 [MCP-1], and eotaxin) by mast cells can influence eosinophil biology. Stem cell factor (SCF)-c-kit, cytokine-cytokine receptor, and chemokine-chemokine receptor (CCR3) interactions leading to nuclear factor kappaB (NF-kappaB), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) expression, and other signaling pathways can modulate eosinophil function. Eosinophil hematopoiesis, activation, survival, and elaboration of mediators can all be regulated thus by mast cells in tissue. Moreover, because eosinophils can secrete SCF, eosinophils can regulate mast cell function in a paracrine manner. This two-way interaction between eosinophils and mast cells can pave the way for chronic inflammatory responses in a variety of human diseases. This review summarizes this pivotal interaction between human mast cells and eosinophils.

The immunological and clinical spectrum of delayed drug-induced exanthems

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Drug-induced exanthems are the most common manifestations of drug hypersensitivity and are observed in as much as 2-3% of hospitalized patients. Here we summarize new concepts of the immune mechanisms underlying various forms of drug-induced exanthems.

RECENT FINDINGS

Alpha-betaTCR+, CD4 and CD8+ T cells are involved in different drug hypersensitivity reactions. Their function determines the clinical picture. In maculopapular, bullous and pustular exanthems cytotoxic T cells are involved, while a high IL-5 and eotaxin production by tissue cells is frequently found in maculopapular and occasionally in bullous and in pustular exanthems. High IL-8 (CXCL-8) and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor production by T cells is a hallmark of pustular drug exanthems. In the most severe and potentially life-threatening forms of exanthems (Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis) cytotoxic CD8+ T cells with natural killer cell markers can be found in the blister fluid.

SUMMARY

These findings are the basis for a new subclassification of delayed, type IV hypersensitivity reactions into type IVa (T helper type 1 cells, e.g. tuberculin reaction and contact dermatitis), IVb (T helper type 2 cells, maculopapular exanthem with eosinophilia), IVc (cytotoxic T cells, contact dermatitis, maculopapular and bullous exanthem), and IVd reactions (CXCL-8/granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor-producing T cells and neutrophil attraction, pustular exanthems), by which, in most reactions, various mechanisms occur together but one reaction dominates the clinical picture.

Immune mechanism of drug hypersensitivity

Drug hypersensitivity reactions can lead to a great variety of different diseases. The main cause is a specific interaction of antibodies or T cells with a drug. In addition to the hapten concept, some drugs can bind directly to T-cell receptors and stimulate them. Based on recent investigation on different exanthemas, an extended classification of the Gell and Coombs type IV reaction is proposed.

The lymphocyte transformation test in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity

Diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity is difficult, as an enormous amount of different drugs can elicit various immune-mediated diseases with distinct pathomechanism. The lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) measures the proliferation of T cells to a drug in vitro--from which one concludes to a previous in vivo reaction due to a sensitization. This concept of the LTT has been confirmed by the generation of drug-specific T-cell clones and the finding that drugs can directly interact with the T-cell receptor, without previous metabolism or need to bind to proteins. In this review, technical aspects and usefulness of this test for the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity are discussed. The main advantage of this test is its applicability with many different drugs in different immune reactions, as drug-specific T cell are almost always involved in drug hypersensitivity reactions. Its main disadvantages are that an in vitro proliferation of T cells to a drug is difficult to transfer to the clinical situation and that the test per se is rather cumbersome and technically demanding. In addition, its sensitivity is limited (for beta-lactam allergy it is in the range of 60-70%), - although at least in our hands - it is higher than of other tests for drug hypersensitivity diagnosis. Consequently, drug hypersensitivity diagnosis needs to rely on a combination of history and different tests, as none of the single tests available has per se a sufficiently good sensitivity. Within this setting, the LTT has proven to be a useful test for the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions and helped to better understand these reactions. Further work on the simplification of this test and systematic evaluation of its sensitivity and specificity in some main groups of drugs are necessary to make this test more widely available.

Involvement of CCL27-CCR10 interactions in drug-induced cutaneous reactions

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced skin reactions, including toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome, are severe bullous cutaneous diseases of uncertain etiology, although cytotoxic T cells seem to be involved. Cutaneous T cell-attracting chemokine (CTACK/CCL27) is selectively expressed in skin and attracts CCR10-expressing cells. Exclusive CTACK expression by keratinocytes suggests its involvement in inflammatory skin diseases.

OBJECTIVE

We addressed whether CTACK/CCL27 production by the epidermis and CCR10+ lymphocytes are involved in toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome.

METHODS

We measured CTACK expression by epidermal cells in 2 patients with drug-induced bullous skin reactions and compared it to lesional skin from several drug-induced exanthemas. In parallel we measured CCR10 mRNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from the patients during the course of the disease and in lymphocytes infiltrating the skin.

RESULTS

CTACK expression levels in skin biopsies from the 2 patients with drug-induced bullous reactions were higher than those found in healthy subjects or in other drug-induced exanthemas. CCR10 mRNA levels were also elevated in peripheral blood lymphocytes and in lesional skin during the acute phase of the disease. Moreover, resolution was associated with a return to baseline of both CTACK and CCR10 receptor expression.

CONCLUSION

CTACK-CCR10 interactions may be involved in the selective recruitment to the skin of cytotoxic lymphocytes in toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome, as well as in less severe drug-induced cutaneous diseases.

Drug hypersensitivity reactions in skin: understanding mechanisms and the development of diagnostic and predictive tests

Cutaneous manifestations of drug hypersensitivity can be serious and potentially life threatening and may prevent effective drug therapy. T cells play an important role in the pathology of drug hypersensitivity reactions. Classical studies suggest that T-cell activation requires drug bioactivation, covalent binding to protein and antigen processing to stimulate an immune response. Recent studies have shown that drugs can also be presented to T cells in the absence of antigen processing and drug metabolism. In this article, sulfamethoxazole is used as a paradigm to describe the chemical mechanisms involved in the initiation and maintenance of an aberrant drug antigen specific T-cell response. Presentation of the same drug to different individuals can cause a variety of skin diseases. Such reactions have been classified according to the phenotype and functionality of the T-cell response. This review summarises the different forms of cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions and describes how T-cell clones generated from hypersensitive patients have been used to study the cellular mechanisms of anticonvulsant hypersensitivity. Potential uses of in vitro cell culture assays for patient diagnosis and drug evaluation are also discussed.

Progress in the understanding of the pathology and pathogenesis of cutaneous drug eruptions : implications for management

Cutaneous drug eruptions are among the most common adverse reactions to drug therapy. The etiology may reflect immunologic or nonimmunologic mechanisms, the former encompassing all of the classic Gell and Combs immune mechanisms. Cumulative and synergistic effects of drugs include those interactions of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors reflecting the alteration by one drug of the effective serum concentration of another and the functions of drugs and their metabolites that interact to evoke cutaneous and systemic adverse reactions. Recent observations include the role of concurrent infection with lymphotropic viruses and drug effects that, through the enhancement of lymphoid blast transformation and/or lymphocyte survival and the contribution of intercurrent systemic connective tissue disease syndromes, promote enhanced lymphocyte longevity and the acquisition of progressively broadening autoantibody specificities. The latter are particularly opposite to drug-induced lupus erythematosus and to drug reactions in the setting of HIV infection. Specific common types of cutaneous drug eruptions will be discussed in this review. Successful management of cutaneous drug eruptions relies upon the prompt discontinuation of the causative medication; most drug eruptions have a good prognosis after this is accomplished. Oral or topical corticosteroids can be administered to aid in the resolution of some types of eruptions. Antihistamines or anti-inflammatory agents may also be administered for some eruptions.

Carbamazepine-induced hypersensitivity syndrome associated with transient hypogammaglobulinaemia and reactivation of human herpesvirus 6 infection demonstrated by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (HS) is a rare but severe disease with multiorgan failure. Many different precipitating factors have been reported, but the pathophysiology of HS remains unknown. However, the association of the human herpesvirus (HHV) family, particularly of HHV-6, has recently been reported in patients with HS. We report a 14-year-old boy who was diagnosed as having carbamazepine-induced HS based on the clinical course, laboratory data and results of drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation tests. In addition, the reactivation of HHV-6 was demonstrated by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and by significantly increased levels of the specific antibody in his paired sera. Furthermore, transient hypogammaglobulinaemia was detected in the early stage of the disease. In addition, serum levels of interferon-gamma, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-5 and eosinophil cationic protein, which were increased on admission, decreased dramatically after steroid therapy. This is the first report of carbamazepine-induced HS associated with reactivation of HHV-6, transient hypogammaglobulinaemia, increased serum levels of inflammatory cytokines and activated eosinophils. This case might contribute to the understanding of the pathophysiology of HS.

Characterization of drug-specific T cells in lamotrigine hypersensitivity

BACKGROUND

Lamotrigine is associated with hypersensitivity reactions, which are most commonly characterized by skin rash. An immune etiology has been postulated, though the nature of this is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to characterize the role of T cells in lamotrigine hypersensitivity.

METHODS

A lymphocyte transformation test was performed on 4 hypersensitive patients. Lymphocytes from 3 of 4 lamotrigine-hypersensitive patients proliferated when stimulated with lamotrigine. T-cell clones were generated from one patient to further characterize the nature of the T-cell involvement. Cells were characterized in terms of their phenotype, functionality, and mechanisms of antigen presentation and cytotoxicity.

RESULTS

Of the 44 drug-specific T-cell clones generated, most were CD4(+) with occasional CD8(+) cells. All clones expressed the alphabeta T-cell receptor; several Vbeta 5.1(+) or 9(+) T-cell clones were generated. All clones also expressed the skin-homing receptor cutaneous lymphocyte antigen. Lamotrigine-stimulated T cells were cytotoxic and secreted perforin, IFN-gamma, IL-5, and macrophage inflammatory protein 1alpha, macrophage inflammatory protein 1beta, RANTES, and I-309. Lamotrigine was present on HLA-DR and HLA-DQ by antigen-presenting cells in the absence of drug metabolism and processing. The T-cell receptor of certain clones could accommodate analogs of lamotrigine, but no cross-reactivity was seen with other anticonvulsants.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data provide evidence that T cells are involved in the pathogenesis of some lamotrigine-hypersensitivity reactions. The identification of drug-specific cells that express cutaneous lymphocyte antigen and type 1 cytokines after T-cell receptor activation is consistent with the clinical symptoms. Furthermore, identification of large numbers of Vbeta 5.1(+) T cells suggests that polymorphisms within T-cell receptor genes might act as determinants of susceptibility.

Hypersensitivity reactions to carbamazepine: characterization of the specificity, phenotype, and cytokine profile of drug-specific T cell clones

Administration of carbamazepine (CBZ) causes hypersensitivity reactions clinically characterized by skin involvement, eosinophilia, and systemic symptoms. These reactions have an immune etiology; however, the role of T cells is not well defined. The aim of this study was to characterize the specificity, phenotype, and cytokine profile of CBZ-specific T cells derived from hypersensitive individuals. Proliferation of blood lymphocytes was measured using the lymphocyte transformation test. CBZ-specific T cell clones were generated by serial dilution and characterized in terms of their cluster of differentiation and T cell receptor V beta phenotype. Proliferation, cytotoxicity, and cytokine secretion were measured by [(3)H]thymidine incorporation, (51)Cr release, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively. HLA blocking antibodies were used to study the involvement of antigen-presenting cells. The specificity of the drug T cell receptor interaction was studied using CBZ metabolites and other structurally related compounds. Lymphocytes from hypersensitive patients (stimulation index: 32.1 +/- 24.2 [10 microg ml(-1)]) but not control patients (stimulation index: 1.2 +/- 0.4 [10 microg ml(-1)]) proliferated upon stimulation with CBZ. Of 44 CBZ-specific T cell clones generated, 10 were selected for further analysis. All 10 clones were either CD4+ or CD4+/CD8+, expressed the alpha beta T cell receptor, secreted IFN-gamma, and were cytotoxic. T-cell recognition of CBZ was dependent on the presence of HLA class II (DR/DQ)-matched antigen-presenting cells. The T cell receptor of certain clones could accommodate some CBZ metabolites, but no cross-reactivity was seen with other anticonvulsants or structural analogs. These studies characterize drug-specific T cells in CBZ-hypersensitive patients that are phenotypically different from T cells involved in other serious cutaneous adverse drug reactions.

10. Drug allergy

Adverse drug reactions are common, but only 6% to 10% are immunologically mediated. Unlike most adverse drug reactions, allergic drug reactions are unpredictable. Whereas some drug-induced allergic reactions may be easily classified into one of the four Gell and Coombs hypersensitivity categories, many others that appear to have an immunologic component cannot be classified because of our lack of mechanistic information. Theoretically, any drug can induce an immune response. However, some drugs are more likely to elicit clinically relevant immune responses than are others. Drugs in this category include antimicrobial drugs, anticonvulsants, chemotherapeutic agents, heparin, insulin, protamine, and biologic response modifiers. After a drug-disease connection is established, it must be determined whether the reaction was immunologically mediated. Subsequently, confirmatory tests, if available, should be used to determine the allergic status of the patient. If these tests are not available, a graded challenge or desensitization may be considered, depending on the type of clinical reaction previously demonstrated and the need for drug readministration. Education of the patient and primary care physician is an important component of patient management.

Deciphering the immune pathomechanism of cutaneous drug reactions

The present peptide fragments to T-cells in the context of MHC molecules. Small chemical compounds are thought to acquire immunogenicity by covalent binding to proteins or peptides. This requires chemical reactivity of the compound or its metabolite. We recently elaborated a new pathway of drug presentation to T-cells, namely that even chemically nonreactive drugs like sulfamethoxazole (SMX) can be recognized in an MHC dependent way by T-cell receptors. This concept of "noncovalent drug presentation" is based on the finding that glutaraldehyde fixed cells could present chemically nonreactive drugs like sulfamethoxazole or lidocaine; and that the drug binding to MHC-peptide complexes is rather labile, as the drug can be washed away--in contrast to covalently binding drugs. Our data show that drugs can bind in a pharmacological way to immune-receptors like MHC or TCR, and that this labile binding is sufficient to elicit an immune response. This drug-presentation may occur in the skin and lead to different symptoms, dependent on the function of the reactive T-cell.

Mechanistic perspectives on sulfonamide-induced cutaneous drug reactions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Idiosyncratic drug reactions continue to limit the therapeutic utility of sulfonamide drugs because of their associated morbidity and mortality. Cutaneous reactions are the predominant reasons for withdrawal of such drugs from use in patients. As a consequence of the recognized metabolic and immunologic capability of the skin, an understanding of the pathogenic role of this tissue in the development of sulfonamide-induced cutaneous drug reactions may provide insight into the mechanisms and risk factors for these and other adverse drug events.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the present review we discuss currently available mechanistic information, including issues related to drug bioactivation and adduct formation, immunoresponsiveness, and immune dysregulation, for the development of sulfonamide-induced (delayed-type) cutaneous drug reactions. The potential application of findings from several related areas of research are also discussed within the context of the pathogenesis of these cutaneous reactions.

SUMMARY

Despite progress, numerous unresolved issues support the testing of novel hypotheses, the search for additional risk factors, and the need for a global approach, including links between laboratory and clinical paradigms. These issues must be addressed if we are to gain an understanding of the mechanistic bases for these cutaneous drug reactions.

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, a clue to neutrophil-mediated inflammatory processes orchestrated by T cells

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Circumstantial evidence exists that certain neutrophilic inflammatory processes are regulated by T cells, but how this occurs is not well understood. The present review presents data on how T cells may directly orchestrate a neutrophilic inflammation by specific release of the neutrophil-attracting chemokine CXCL8 (formerly known as interleukin-8).

RECENT FINDINGS

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is an uncommon cutaneous eruption that is most often provoked by drugs, by acute infections with enteroviruses, or by mercury. It is characterized by acute, extensive formation of nonfollicular sterile pustules on an erythematous background, fever and elevated numbers of blood neutrophils. Involvement of T cells in drug-induced AGEP was suggested by positive patch tests and lymphocyte transformation tests. Moreover, drug-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells could be isolated and propagated in vitro from patch test sites and blood from AGEP patients. Their main characteristic is a high level of CXCL8 production.

SUMMARY

T cells are involved even in some neutrophil-rich inflammatory responses, and they may orchestrate the immune reaction directly by high CXCL8 production or indirectly via interleukin-17 production, which induces CXCL8 production in various cell types. AGEP serves as a valuable model for characterizing T cells with a particular function--namely production of CXCL8--leading to neutrophilic inflammation. It is tempting to speculate that elucidation of this pathomechanism will help to improve our understanding of similar neutrophilic eruptions (e.g. pustular psoriasis) and may reveal new targets for pharmacotherapeutic interventions in such diseases.

Cellular and molecular pathophysiology of cutaneous drug reactions

Hypersensitivity reactions to drugs can cause a variety of skin diseases like maculopapular, bullous and pustular eruptions. In recent years increasing evidence indicates the important role of T cells in these drug-induced skin diseases. Analysis of such drug-specific T cell clones has revealed that drugs can be recognized by alpha beta-T cell receptors, not only if bound covalently to peptides, but also if the drug binds in a rather labile way to the presenting major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-peptide. This presentation is sufficient to stimulate T cells. In maculopapular exanthema (MPE), histopathological analysis typically shows a dominant T cell infiltration together with a vacuolar interface dermatitis. Immunohistochemical studies demonstrate the presence of cytotoxic CD4+ and to a lesser degree of CD8+ T cells, which contain perforin and granzyme B. They are close to keratinocytes that show signs of cell destruction. Expression of Fas ligand is barely detectable, suggesting that cytotoxic granule exocytosis may be the dominant pathway leading to keratinocyte cell damage. While in MPE, the killing of cells seems to be predominantly mediated by CD4+ T cells, patients with bullous skin disease show a strong CD8+ T cell migration to the epidermis. This is probably due to a preferential presentation of the drug by MHC class I molecules, and a more extensive killing of cells that present drugs on MHC class I molecules. This might lead to bullous skin diseases. In addition to the presence of cytotoxic T cells, drug-specific T cells also orchestrate the inflammatory skin reaction through the release and induction of various cytokines [i.e. interleukin (IL)-5, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interferon-gamma] and chemokines (RANTES, eotaxin or IL-8). The increased expression of these mediators seems to contribute to the generation of tissue and blood eosinophilia, a hallmark of many drug-induced allergic reactions. However, in acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (a peculiar form of drug allergy), neutrophils represent the predominant cell type within pustules, probably due to their recruitment by IL-8 secreting drug specific T cells and keratinocytes.

Determination of interleukin-5 secretion from drug-specific activated ex vivo peripheral blood mononuclear cells as a test system for the in vitro detection of drug sensitization

BACKGROUND

In vitro detection of drug sensitization is still limited. The lymphocyte transformation test, which determines drug-specific proliferation, is the only in vitro test for detecting drug sensitization at the cellular level irrespective of the reaction's clinical phenotype. Accumulation of eosinophils following IL-5 secretion from drug-specific stimulated T cells is a characteristic histological feature of drug-induced skin eruptions.

OBJECTIVE

We determined whether in vitro drug-specific activation of ex vivo peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 10 patients with drug-induced maculopapular exanthems and three patients with severe skin reactions results in secretion of IL-5, IL-10 or IFN-gamma and assessed the sensitivity and specificity of drug-specific IL-5 secretion as a test system compared with the lymphocyte transformation test and patch tests. Furthermore, the subsets of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells involved in drug-specific proliferation, IL-5 secretion and mRNA expression were examined in three patients.

METHODS

Drug-specific proliferation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in the lymphocyte transformation test was investigated by 3H-thymidine uptake, and culture supernatants taken after 5 days were analysed for IL-5, IL-10 and IFN-gamma concentrations by ELISA technique. IL-5 mRNA expression was determined by RT-PCR.

RESULTS

Drug-specific activation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells consistently resulted in IL-5 and to a lesser extent in IL-10 and IFN-gamma secretion. The sensitivities of the patch test, lymphocyte transformation test and assessment of drug-specific IL-5 secretion for the detection of drug sensitization were 55%, 75% and 92%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest a role for the determination of drug-specific IL-5 secretion by ex vivo peripheral blood mononuclear cells for the in vitro detection of drug-sensitization in drug-induced maculopapular exanthems.

T cells in drug allergy

In recent years, increasing evidence has indicated an important role for T cells in various drug-induced diseases. A detailed analysis of patients with various drug allergies revealed the existence of drug-specific T cells in the circulation or in eluate from skin infiltration in bullous, pustular, and maculopapular drug eruptions. The drug-specific T cells use the ab-T cell receptor CD4+ or CD8+ and react with drugs acting as haptens (covalently bound to larger molecules, such as penicillins), but also recognize drugs if they are bound only in a labile way to major histocompatibility complex molecules (noncovalent drug presentation). Functional analysis revealed a predominant IL-5 production by drug-specific CD4+ T cells in maculopapular exanthema (MPE) and bullous skin diseases, while patients with acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis have a peculiar T cell subset secreting high amounts of IL-8. Moreover, in MPE CD4+, perforin+ T cells were found in vitro and in immunohistology that had cytotoxic potential and killed keratinocytes in vitro and in vivo.

Drug metabolism, danger signals, and drug-induced hypersensitivity

One of the most difficult challenges for the practicing allergist/immunologist today is that of evaluating and managing patients who present with histories of drug-induced reactions. Adverse drug reactions are heterogeneous, and a single drug can often cause a multitude of reactions. Because the mechanisms responsible for many of these reactions are not known, they can be, and often are, difficult to classify. Moreover, for those that have features consistent with immune-mediated mechanisms, our diagnostic tools remain limited, because little is known about the relevant immunogenic determinants of most drugs. Despite these challenges, management approaches must be devised for patients who present with histories of drug-induced disease. Simply telling such a patient to avoid all drugs that have been associated with previous adverse events leaves both the patient and the referring physician frustrated. The initial part of this review focuses on exciting current research that is furthering our understanding of the mechanisms responsible for drug-induced reactions. Because it will take time to translate this new information into clinical practice, the latter part of the review focuses on ways to evaluate and manage patients who present with drug-induced reactions using the tools and the knowledge that are currently available.

T-cell involvement in drug-induced acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is an uncommon eruption most often provoked by drugs, by acute infections with enteroviruses, or by mercury. It is characterized by acute, extensive formation of nonfollicular sterile pustules on erythematous background, fever, and peripheral blood leukocytosis. We present clinical and immunological data on four patients with this disease, which is caused by different drugs. An involvement of T cells could be implied by positive skin patch tests and lymphocyte transformation tests. Immunohistochemistry revealed a massive cell infiltrate consisting of neutrophils in pustules and T cells in the dermis and epidermis. Expression of the potent neutrophil-attracting chemokine IL-8 was elevated in keratinocytes and infiltrating mononuclear cells. Drug-specific T cells were generated from the blood and skin of three patients, and phenotypic characterization showed a heterogeneous distribution of CD4/CD8 phenotype and of T-cell receptor Vbeta-expression. Analysis of cytokine/chemokine profiles revealed that IL-8 is produced significantly more by drug-specific T cells from patients with AGEP compared with drug-specific T cells from patients that had non-AGEP exanthemas. In conclusion, our data demonstrate the involvement of drug-specific T cells in the pathomechanism of this rather rare and peculiar form of drug allergy. In addition, they indicate that even in some neutrophil-rich inflammatory responses specific T cells are engaged and might orchestrate the immune reaction.