A randomized clinical trial comparing primary overlap with approximation repair of third-degree obstetric tears

Immediate or delayed repair of obstetric anal sphincter tears-a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate if an 8- to 12-hour time delay of primary repair affects anal incontinence at 1-year follow up.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

University hospital in Sweden.

POPULATION

A total of 165 women diagnosed with a third- to fourth-degree perineal tear.

METHODS

The participants were randomised to immediate or delayed (8- to 12-hour delay) end-to-end repair; 78 were allocated to immediate operation and 87 to a delayed repair. An incontinence and pelvic floor symptom questionnaire was completed by the participants at baseline and at 6- and 12-month follow up.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Anal incontinence measured by the validated Pescatori incontinence score.

RESULTS

A total of 161 (98%) and 155 (94%) women completed the two follow-up questionnaires. There was no significant difference in anal incontinence between the groups. There were no significant differences in pelvic floor symptoms between the groups. A multivariate proportional odds model revealed that increasing maternal age was significantly associated with both increased symptoms of faecal urgency and inability to discriminate flatus from faeces.

CONCLUSION

Delayed repair provided the same functional outcome at 1-year follow up. Delaying the repair should thus not be recommended routinely, but can be an alternative under special circumstances when appropriate surgical expertise is not readily available.

Diagnosis and management of obstetric anal sphincter injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to outline optimum practice in diagnosis and management of obstetric anal sphincter injury. The review focuses briefly on prevention of the problem before outlining diagnosis of sphincter injury as well as immediate and long-term management of patients who have sustained such injuries.

RECENT FINDINGS

Increasing vigilance is vital in order that sphincter injury is not overlooked; immediate radiological assessment may play a role in diagnosis. Optimum anal sphincter repair should be followed by oral laxative administration to maintain sphincter integrity. Biofeedback physiotherapy and sacral nerve stimulation show great promise in treatment of persistent symptoms. Optimum mode of delivery in future pregnancies is not clearly defined, and decisions should be individualized.

SUMMARY

Because obstetric injury to the anal sphincter mechanism cannot always be prevented, efforts must focus on limiting its occurrence, documenting its severity and providing optimum therapy to women who have sustained it. Management includes routine postnatal review of at-risk women and antenatal assessment in future pregnancies to limit deterioration in continence after future deliveries.

[What are the risk factors of anal incontinence after vaginal delivery?]

Fecal incontinence is one of the most feared complications of vaginal delivery. It may be the consequence of sphincter tears, of pudendal neuropathy, or of a combination of the two. Fecal incontinence occurs immediately following 13-54% of vaginal deliveries but its persistence in the mid and long term is poorly known. The incidence of perineal tear with anal sphincteric defect varies from 1-9% and the incidence of unrecognized sphincter injury may be as high as 18-35%. Half the women who undergo primary anal sphincter repair have short or long term continence problems. Pudendal neuropathy is caused by nerve stretch during pushing in the second stage of labor and descent of the fetal head; it may occur even with the first delivery. Risk factors for sphincter injury and pudendal neuropathy include forceps delivery, large neonatal size, and prolonged second stage of labor. The risk of fecal incontinence must be considered even during the first pregnancy. Routine episiotomy does not prevent sphincter injury and may even predispose to it. Pudendal neuropathy following delivery may lead to delayed fecal incontinence abetted by postmenopausal hormonal deficiency and tissue senescence. The possible benefit of early episiotomy for women at high risk of sphincter injury must be evaluated by prospective studies.

Primary repair of advanced obstetric anal sphincter tears: should it be performed by the overlapping sphincteroplasty technique?

Advanced obstetric anal sphincter tears are often associated with a high incidence of fecal and flatus incontinence. We aimed to assess the clinical outcome of these repairs when done by the overlapping sphincteroplasty technique with reconstruction of the internal anal sphincter and perineum. Between August 2005 and December 2006, all grades 3 and 4 obstetric anal sphincter tears in our department were repaired by a reconstructive pelvic surgeon, primarily using the overlapping sphincteroplasty technique with reconstruction of the internal anal sphincter and perineum. All women were followed every 6 months using the Colorectal Anal Distress Inventory and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire, a physical examination of the anal sphincter, anal manometry, and transperineal anal sonography. There were 3,478 deliveries of which 22 (0.63%) anal sphincter tears were repaired in women aged 22-41 years. Two women were diagnosed with Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists grade 3a, eight with grade 3b, nine with grade 3c, and three with grade 4 anal sphincter tears. Postoperatively, 21 patients attended the outpatient clinic, with an average follow-up time of 9.2+/-1.4 months. Only two women (9.5%) complained of flatus incontinence and fecal urgency and had mildly decreased anal sphincter squeeze pressure and a small sonographic anal sphincter defect. None of the women complained of fecal incontinence. Two women (9.5%) reported on transient perineal pain and one (4.8%) on transient dyspareunia. All other women were asymptomatic and had normal anal manometry and sonographic evaluation. Repair of obstetric anal sphincter tears using the overlapping sphincteroplasty technique with reconstruction of the internal anal sphincter and perineum seems to carry favorable clinical outcome and reduced risk for anal incontinence, perineal pain, and sexual dysfunction.

Treatment of experimental injury of anal sphincters with primary surgical repair and injection of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells

PURPOSE

Sphincter injury is a common cause of anal incontinence. Surgical repair remains the operation of choice; however, the outcome often is poor. We investigated the ability of injected bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells to enhance sphincter healing after injury and primary repair in a preclinical model.

METHODS

Twenty-four inbred Wistar Furth rats were divided into three groups. As a control, Group A underwent sham operation. Group B had sphincterotomy and repair of both anal sphincters plus saline injections. The study group (Group C) underwent sphincterotomy and repair followed by intrasphincteric injections of syngenic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. A further group (Group D) of outbred Wistar rats treated with mesenchymal stem cells and immunosuppressive therapy also was evaluated. At 30 days, histologic and morphometric analysis and in vitro contractility testing was performed.

RESULTS

A significant decrease of muscle tissue was observed at the site of repair after sphincter injury. However, in Groups C and D, histologic examination demonstrated new muscle fibers and morphometric analysis revealed a significantly greater muscle area fraction than in Group B (P < 0.05). Moreover, mesenchymal stem cells injection improved contractility of sphincters strips compared with Group B (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found between Groups C and D.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experimental model, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells injection improved muscle regeneration and increased contractile function of anal sphincters after injury and repair. Therefore, mesenchymal stem cells may represent an attractive tool for treating anal sphincter lesions in humans. Investigations into the biologic basis of this phenomenon should increase our knowledge on underlying mechanisms involved in sphincter repair.

Overlap technique improves results of primary surgery after obstetric anal sphincter tear

PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate prospectively the results of the overlap technique in primary sphincter reconstruction after obstetric tear.

METHODS

Obstetric tears in 44 women were operated on with primary overlap reconstruction. These women were investigated six to nine months after the operation. Results were compared with those of a historical control group of 52 women whose obstetric sphincter rupture had been treated with the end-to-end technique.

RESULTS

The overlap group had significantly more incontinence symptoms after delivery and repair of the sphincter tear than before delivery (P < 0.0001); however, their incontinence symptoms were significantly fewer than those of the end-to-end group (P = 0.004). The prevalence of persistent rupture of the external anal sphincter was significantly lower in the overlap group (6/44, 13.6 percent) than in the end-to-end group (39/52, 75 percent; P < 0.0001). Internal anal sphincter rupture occurred in 5 patients (11.4 percent) in the overlap group and in 40 patients (76.9 percent) in the end-to-end group (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The overlap technique should be adopted as the method of choice for primary sphincter repair after obstetric tear.

Obstetric anal sphincter injury: incidence, risk factors, and management

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Obstetric sphincter damage is the most common cause of fecal incontinence in women. This review aimed to survey the literature, and reach a consensus, on its incidence, risk factors, and management.

METHOD

This systematic review identified relevant studies from the following sources: Medline, Cochrane database, cross referencing from identified articles, conference abstracts and proceedings, and guidelines published by the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (United Kingdom), Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (United Kingdom), and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

RESULTS

A total of 451 articles and abstracts were reviewed. There was a wide variation in the reported incidence of anal sphincter muscle injury from childbirth, with the true incidence likely to be approximately 11% of postpartum women. Risk factors for injury included instrumental delivery, prolonged second stage of labor, birth weight greater than 4 kg, fetal occipitoposterior presentation, and episiotomy. First vaginal delivery, induction of labor, epidural anesthesia, early pushing, and active restraint of the fetal head during delivery may be associated with an increased risk of sphincter trauma. The majority of sphincter tears can be identified clinically by a suitably trained clinician. In those with recognized tears at the time of delivery repair should be performed using long-term absorbable sutures. Patients presenting later with fecal incontinence may be managed successfully using antidiarrheal drugs and biofeedback. In those who fail conservative treatment, and who have a substantial sphincter disruption, elective repair may be attempted. The results of primary and elective repair may deteriorate with time. Sacral nerve stimulation may be an appropriate alternative treatment modality.

CONCLUSIONS

Obstetric anal sphincter damage, and related fecal incontinence, are common. Risk factors for such trauma are well recognized, and should allow for reduction of injury by proactive management. Improved classification, recognition, and follow-up of at-risk patients should facilitate improved outcome. Further studies are required to determine optimal long-term management.

Delivery method, anal sphincter tears and fecal incontinence: new information on a persistent problem

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the risk factors for anal sphincter tears during vaginal delivery and their association with fecal incontinence symptoms.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent evidence links sphincter tears with fecal incontinence, which has a significant negative impact on quality of life. The Childbirth and Pelvic Symptoms cohort study reported that the incidence and severity of fecal incontinence was increased in primiparous women experiencing a sphincter tear. Risk factors for tear included forceps, occiput posterior, vacuum delivery, prolonged second stage of labor and epidural. Using cesarean delivery to prevent fecal incontinence has not been justified, but the confluence of these risk factors in the context of labor management may be important in deciding on earlier intervention with cesarean delivery. Internal anal sphincter defects impact fecal incontinence, highlighting the identification and repair of the internal anal sphincter for future research and clinical applications. Routine episiotomy (or instrumentation) is not warranted, and there is no clear advantage to mediolateral episiotomy or overlapping sphincter repair. Postpartum ultrasound of the sphincter complex may have an emerging role.

SUMMARY

The modifiable risk factors of routine episotomy and instrumented delivery are associated with sphincter tear; definitive recommendations for labor management remain unclear in preventing fecal incontinence.

Correlation between anal sphincter defects and anal incontinence following obstetric sphincter tears: assessment using scoring systems for sonographic classification of defects

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there is a correlation between the sonographic extent of anal sphincter defects revealed by three-dimensional endoanal sonography (EAUS) and the degree of anal incontinence following primary repair of obstetric sphincter tears.

METHODS

This was a follow-up study of women who had suffered anal sphincter tearing during vaginal delivery at Aalesund Hospital between January 2002 and July 2004. Incontinence was assessed by St Mark's score. The anal canal was assessed with three-dimensional endoanal sonography (EAUS). Sphincter defects were classified according to the Starck score and our new EAUS defect score. The EAUS images were interpreted by an observer blinded to other patient data.

RESULTS

Sixty-one women were included in this study. Incontinence was reported by 32 (52%) women at a median of 21 (range, 9-35) months after delivery. Three-dimensional EAUS datasets were obtained in 55 women. There was a significant correlation between St Mark's score and our EAUS defect score (P = 0.034), and correlation approached but did not reach significance between St Mark's score and the Starck score (P = 0.053). There was a strong correlation between our EAUS defect score and the Starck score (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a positive correlation between the extent of sphincter defects and the degree of anal incontinence following primary repair of obstetric sphincter tears. Our findings highlight the importance of adequate reconstruction of the anal sphincters during primary repair.

Risk factors for sonographic internal anal sphincter gaps 6-12 months after delivery complicated by anal sphincter tear

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to identify risk factors for internal anal sphincter (IAS) gaps on postpartum endoanal ultrasound in women with obstetric anal sphincter tear.

STUDY DESIGN

This prospective study included 106 women from the Childbirth and Pelvic Symptoms Imaging Supplementary Study who had third- or fourth-degree perineal laceration at delivery and endoanal ultrasound 6-12 months postpartum. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact and t tests and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Mean (+/- SD) age was 27.7 (+/- 6.2) years. Seventy-nine women (76%) were white and 22 (21%) black. Thirty-seven (35%) had sonographic IAS gaps. Risk factors for gaps included fourth- vs third-degree perineal laceration (odds ratio [OR] 15.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.8, 50) and episiotomy (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.2, 9.1). Black race (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.05, 0.96) was protective.

CONCLUSION

In women with obstetric anal sphincter repairs, fourth-degree tears and episiotomy are associated with more frequent sonographic IAS gaps.

Elective Cesarean Delivery: The Pelvic Perspective

Elective cesarean delivery, or cesarean delivery on maternal request, was the focus of a recent State-of-the-Science Conference sponsored by the National Institutes of Health. On the basis of the information from comprehensive literature review and expert speakers, the panelists determined that weak-quality evidence supported elective cesarean delivery over planned vaginal delivery for urinary incontinence, although the duration of effect is not clear. For other maternal outcomes related to pelvic floor function, including pelvic organ prolapse, fecal incontinence and other anorectal symptoms, and sexual function, weak-quality evidence did not favor either route of delivery.

Surgery for faecal incontinence in adults

BACKGROUND

Faecal incontinence is a debilitating problem with significant medical, social and economic implications. Treatment options include conservative, non-surgical interventions (e.g. pelvic floor muscle training, biofeedback, drugs, sacral nerve stimulation) and surgical procedures. A surgical procedure may be aimed at correcting an obvious mechanical defect, or augmenting a functionally deficient but structurally intact sphincter complex or replace an absent/non-functioning sphincter.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of surgical techniques for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults who do not have rectal prolapse. Our aim was firstly to compare surgical management with non-surgical management and secondly, to compare the various surgical techniques.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Trials Register (31 January 2006), the Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Group trials register (31 January 2006), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2006, Issue 1), PubMed (1 January 1950 to 31 January 2006) and EMBASE (1 January 1998 to 31 January 2006) were undertaken. The British Journal of Surgery (January 1995 to May 2006) Colorectal Diseases (January 2000-May 2006) and the Diseases of the Colon and Rectum (January 1995 to May 2006) were specifically handsearched. The proceedings of the Association of Coloproctology meeting held from 1999 to 2006 were perused. Reference lists of all relevant articles were searched for further trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised or quasi-randomised trials of surgery in the management of adult faecal incontinence (other than surgery for rectal prolapse).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently selected studies from the literature searches, assessed the methodological quality of eligible trials and extracted data. The three primary outcome measures were: change or deterioration in incontinence, failure to achieve full continence, and the presence of faecal urgency.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine trials were included with a total sample size of 264 participants. Two trials included a group managed non-surgically. One trial compared levatorplasty with anal plug stimulation, one compared artificial bowel sphincter with best supportive care; numbers were small in both trials. The artificial bowel sphincter insertion was followed by significant improvements in at least one primary outcome but with high rates of significant morbidity. Seven studies compared different surgical interventions. These included anterior levatorplasty versus postanal repair, anterior levatorplasty versus total pelvic floor repair, total pelvic floor versus postanal repair, end to end versus overlap sphincter repair, overlap repair with or without a defunctioning stoma or with or without biofeedback, total pelvic floor repair versus repair plus internal sphincter plication and neosphincter formation versus total pelvic floor repair. Only one comparison had more that one trial (total pelvic floor versus postanal repair-44 participants) and no comparison showed any statistically significant difference in primary outcome measures, with wide confidence intervals.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Despite more studies being included in this update, the continued small number of relevant trials identified together with their small sample sizes and other methodological weaknesses continue to limit the usefulness of this review for guiding practice. It was impossible to identify or refute clinically important differences between the alternative surgical procedures. Larger rigorous trials are still needed. However, it should be recognised that the optimal treatment regime may be a complex combination of various surgical and non-surgical therapies.

Postpartum Genitourinary Changes

Genitourinary changes following childbirth and pregnancy are common, and include urinary and anal incontinence, pelvic pain, sexual dysfunction, and pelvic organ prolapse. At present, it is unclear whether or not these changes are a result of the pregnancy itself or the mode of delivery (cesarean section or vaginal birth). In this article, the authors aim to describe genitourinary postpartum pelvic floor changes, and review the literature regarding the impact of pregnancy or childbirth on these changes. Data is needed that compare the effects of pregnancy alone, cesarean delivery (labored and unlabored), and vaginal birth, so that physicians can better advise patients about the postpartum genitourinary tract changes they might expect.

Endoanal ultrasound findings and fecal incontinence symptoms in women with and without recognized anal sphincter tears

OBJECTIVE

To estimate whether endoanal ultrasound findings are more prevalent in primiparous women with a history of anal sphincter tear than in women without this history and whether the findings are associated with fecal incontinence symptoms.

METHODS

A total of 251 primiparous women at seven clinical sites underwent standardized ultrasound assessment of the internal and external anal sphincter 6-12 months after delivery. Participants were women in the three cohorts of the Childbirth and Pelvic Symptoms Study: 1) women with clinically evident third- or fourth-degree tear at vaginal delivery (n=106); 2) no tear at vaginal delivery (n=106); and 3) cesarean delivery without labor (n=39). Women completed the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index to assess fecal incontinence symptoms.

RESULTS

Thirty-five percent of the sphincter tear group exhibited internal sphincter gaps compared with 3% of vaginal controls (odds ratio [OR] 18.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.5-62.1) and 10% of cesarean controls. External sphincter gaps were identified in 51% of the tear group compared with 31% of vaginal controls (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-4.0) and 28% of cesarean controls. In the tear group, fecal incontinence severity was greater in those with internal sphincter gaps compared with those with no internal sphincter gaps (Fecal Incontinence Severity Index score 6.6+/-8.3 compared with 3.3+/-6.1, P=.02), as well as in those with external sphincter gaps (6.1+/-8.4 compared with 2.7+/-5.0, P=.01), and greatest in those with both internal and external sphincter gaps compared with at least one gap not present (7.2+/-8.1 compared with 3.4+/-6.4, P=.003).

CONCLUSION

Anal sphincter gaps detected by ultrasonography are prevalent in postpartum primiparous women with a history of sphincter tear and are associated with fecal incontinence severity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II-2.

Sexual function, quality of life, and severity of anal incontinence after anal sphincteroplasty

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the severity of anal incontinence and its impact on quality of life and sexual function in women after anal sphincteroplasty.

STUDY DESIGN

Eighty-six women who underwent anal sphincteroplasty during the years 1993 to 2004 were mailed validated survey instruments to evaluate continence status, health-related quality of life, and sexual functioning. Demographic and perioperative data were obtained from patient charts.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up time of 5.6 +/- 3.0 years, 6 women (11%) were totally continent; 8 women (15%) were incontinent of flatus only, and 41 women (75%) were incontinent of liquid and/or solid stool. Sexual function scores were not correlated with continence scores; 24% vs 4% of subjects who had undergone an overlapping sphincteroplasty versus an end-to-end sphincteroplasty reported pain during intercourse (P = .04).

CONCLUSION

Anal continence rates 5 years after anal sphincteroplasty are disappointing, adversely impact quality of life, yet do not appear to relate to sexual function.

Chart Documentation of Informed Consent for Operative Vaginal Delivery: Is It Adequate?

OBJECTIVES

To determine the documentation frequency of informed consent for women undergoing a trial of nonemergent instrumental delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective chart review of instrumented vaginal deliveries from 1992 to 2005 was performed. Cases were identified from a Labor and Delivery database and hospital records were reviewed for documentation of associated risks, general consent for the procedure, indication, and option of cesarean delivery (CD).

RESULTS

Three hundred forty six charts were reviewed: 246 were excluded for an emergency delivery (19%), misclassification (25%), or lost notes (27%). In the remaining 100 cases, 61% had a general consent for instrumented vaginal delivery. Documentation of any maternal or neonatal risks was found in 3% and 0%, respectively. The option of a cesarean delivery was documented in 22% of the cases. When comparing 5-year time intervals before and after 2000, there was no increased frequency in documentation of maternal or neonatal risks.

CONCLUSIONS

Documentation of informed consent for instrumented vaginal delivery is inconsistent and should be improved.

Fecal and urinary incontinence in primiparous women

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively investigate the relationship between anal sphincter tears and postpartum fecal and urinary incontinence.

METHODS

The Childbirth and Pelvic Symptoms study was a prospective cohort study performed by the Pelvic Floor Disorders Network to estimate the prevalence of postpartum fecal and urinary incontinence in primiparous women: 407 with clinically recognized anal sphincter tears during vaginal delivery, 390 without recognized sphincter tears (vaginal controls), and 124 delivered by cesarean before labor. Women were recruited postpartum while hospitalized and interviewed by telephone 6 weeks and 6 months postpartum. We assessed fecal and urinary incontinence symptoms using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index and the Medical, Epidemiological, and Social Aspects of Aging Questionnaire, respectively. Odds ratios were adjusted for age, race, and clinical site.

RESULTS

Compared with the vaginal control group, women in the sphincter tear cohort reported more fecal incontinence (6 weeks, 26.6% versus 11.2%; adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-4.3; 6 months, 17.0% versus 8.2%; AOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-3.2), more fecal urgency and flatal incontinence, and greater fecal incontinence severity at both times. Urinary incontinence prevalence did not differ between the sphincter tear and vaginal control groups. Six months postpartum, 22.9% of women delivered by cesarean reported urinary incontinence, whereas 7.6% reported fecal incontinence.

CONCLUSION

Women with clinically recognized anal sphincter tears are more than twice as likely to report postpartum fecal incontinence than women without sphincter tears. Cesarean delivery before labor is not entirely protective against pelvic floor disorders.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II-3.

Methods of repair for obstetric anal sphincter injury

BACKGROUND

Anal sphincter injury during childbirth - obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) - is associated with significant maternal morbidity including perineal pain, dyspareunia and anal incontinence. Anal incontinence affects women psychologically and physically. Many do not seek medical attention because of embarrassment. The two recognised methods for the repair of damaged external anal sphincter (EAS): are end-to-end (approximation) repair and overlap repair.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of overlap repair versus end-to-end repair following OASIS in reducing subsequent anal incontinence, perineal pain, dyspareunia and improving quality of life.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 January 2006), MEDLINE (January 1966 to 31 January 2006), EMBASE (January 1974 to 31 January 2006), SciSearch (January 1974 to 31 January 2006) and conference proceedings of obstetrics and gynaecology, surgery and coloproctology.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing different techniques of immediate primary repair of EAS following OASIS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trial quality was assessed independently by all authors.

MAIN RESULTS

Three eligible trials, of grade A quality, involving 279 women, were included. There was considerable heterogeneity in the outcome measures, time points and reported results. Meta-analyses showed that there was no statistically significant difference in perineal pain (relative risk (RR) 0.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.00 to 1.45, one trial, 52 women), dyspareunia (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.11 to 3.39, one trial, 52 women), flatus incontinence (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.26 to 3.31, one trial, 52 women) and faecal incontinence (RR 0.07, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.21, one trial, 52 women) between the two repair techniques at 12 months but showed a statistically significantly lower incidence in faecal urgency (RR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.86, one trial, 52 women) and lower anal incontinence score (weighted mean difference -1.70, 95% CI -3.03 to -0.37) in the overlap group. Overlap technique was also associated with a statistically significant lower risk of deterioration of anal incontinence symptoms over 12 months (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.79, one trial, 41 women). There was no significant difference in quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The limited data available show that compared to immediate primary end-to-end repair of OASIS, early primary overlap repair appears to be associated with lower risks for faecal urgency and anal incontinence symptoms. As the experience of the surgeon is not addressed in the three studies reviewed, it woudl be inappropriate to recommend one type of repair in favour of another.

Repair techniques for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare one-year outcomes of primary overlap versus end-to-end repair of the external anal sphincter after acute obstetric anal sphincter injury.

METHODS

Women who sustained third-degree (3b = greater than 50% external anal sphincter thickness, 3c = internal sphincter injury) or fourth-degree (including anorectal epithelium) perineal tears were randomly allocated to either immediate primary overlap or end-to-end repair. They were prospectively followed up for 12 months postrepair with serial questionnaires. The primary outcome was fecal incontinence at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were fecal urgency, flatus incontinence, perineal pain, dyspareunia, quality of life, and improvement of anal incontinence symptoms.

RESULTS

Thirty-two women were randomized to each group. At 12 months, 24% (6/25) in the end-to-end and none in the overlap group reported fecal incontinence (P = .009, relative risk [RR] 0.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.00-1.21, number needed to treat 4.2). Fecal urgency at 12 months was reported by 32% (8/25) in the end-to-end and 3.7% (1/27) in the overlap group (P = .02, RR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.86, number needed to treat 3.6). There were no significant differences in dyspareunia and quality of life between the groups. At 12 months, 20% (5/25) reported perineal pain in the end-to-end and none in the overlap group (P = .04, RR 0.08, 95% CI 0.00-1.45, number needed to treat 5). During 12 months, 16% (4/25) in the end-to-end and none in the overlap group reported deterioration of defecatory symptoms (P = .01).

CONCLUSION

Primary overlap repair of the external anal sphincter is associated with a significantly lower incidence of fecal incontinence, urgency, and perineal pain. When symptoms do develop, they appear to remain unchanged or deteriorate in the end-to-end group but improve in the overlap group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Short-term and long-term effects of obstetric anal sphincter injury and their management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

During the past decade increasing attention has focused on the problem of obstetric anal sphincter damage. Although risk factors are now well known, the effects of such damage have received less study. This review focuses on the early and long-term problems that may arise subsequent to anal sphincter injury following childbirth and assesses therapeutic options.

RECENT FINDINGS

Up to 25% of women experience altered faecal continence after vaginal delivery, with 4% having persistent symptoms. In those women who have sustained a recognized tear to the sphincter, the quality of primary repair is crucial. Nevertheless, evidence clearly supporting the superiority of overlap over approximation repair is still lacking. The importance of pudendal nerve damage in the aetiology of postpartum faecal incontinence is gaining increasing attention. Augmented biofeedback physiotherapy is the gold standard for treatment of women with such injury, whereas sacral nerve stimulation represents a newer treatment option.

SUMMARY

The short-term and long-term effects of obstetric anal sphincter injury warrant increased attention, because with increasing longevity more women are surviving into their 80s and the prevalence of faecal incontinence in this population will increase if measures are not taken to address the problem. Prevention of such injury is not always possible and management options must be further explored. Adequate primary treatment of third-degree tears is of paramount importance.

How to repair an anal sphincter injury after vaginal delivery: results of a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare two surgical techniques and two types of suture material for anal sphincter repair after childbirth-related injury.

DESIGN

Factorial randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Tertiary referral maternity unit.

POPULATION

Women with an anal sphincter injury sustained during childbirth.

METHOD

Women were randomised into four groups: overlap repair with polyglactin (Vicryl); end-to-end repair with polyglactin (Vicryl); overlap repair with polydioxanone (PDS); and end-to-end repair with PDS. All repairs were completed as a primary procedure by staff trained in both methods.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Suture-related morbidity at six weeks. Bowel symptoms at 3, 6 and 12 months. Anorectal physiology at three months. Quality of life scores at 3 and 12 months.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty women (1.5% of deliveries) were eligible and 112 (75%) were randomised. One hundred and three (92%) attended follow up visit at 6 weeks, 89 (80%) at 3 months, 79 (71%) at 6 months and 60 (54%) at 12 months. At six weeks, there was no difference in suture-related morbidity between groups (P=0.11) and 70% patients were completely asymptomatic. Incidence of bowel symptoms and quality of life disturbances were low, with no differences between the four groups.

CONCLUSION

Obstetric anal sphincter repair carried out by appropriately trained staff is associated with low morbidity, irrespective of the suture material and repair method used.

Textbook Recommendations for Preventing and Treating Perineal Injury at Vaginal Delivery

OBJECTIVE

To assess general obstetrics textbooks regarding the quality and quantity of information about perineal injury at vaginal delivery.

METHODS

An obstetrics and gynecology resident, a perinatologist, and a urogynecologist evaluated 7 obstetrics textbooks by using a standardized abstraction form that delineated descriptions of anatomy and physiology, episiotomy use, and perineal trauma prevention and repair.

RESULTS

Two textbooks briefly described anal sphincter anatomy, but none provided a detailed discussion of the relative contribution of anatomic components to continence. Four textbooks discussed the evidence for and against midline or mediolateral episiotomy, and 6 advised against routine episiotomy. Six textbooks described grading lacerations, but only one described detailed repair techniques for all grades. Two textbooks discussed techniques to reduce perineal trauma at the time of delivery. Only one textbook discussed the need to reapproximate the normal anal sphincter anatomy during perineal repair.

CONCLUSION

Although most textbooks accurately reflect current literature regarding routine episiotomy, there is limited discussion of advantages and disadvantages of various types of episiotomy and little offered regarding prevention and repair of perineal trauma at delivery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Risk scoring system for prediction of obstetric anal sphincter injury

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to begin the process of developing an antenatal risk scoring system, as a first step towards examining whether elective Caesarean section for women at high risk of injury could be an effective and acceptable intervention.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary maternity unit in the UK.

POPULATION

One hundred and twenty-three women who sustained an obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) and 123 controls without OASI.

METHODS

Case notes of women with a third or fourth degree tear between 1997 and 1999 were examined for risk factors. Controls matched for age and week of delivery were identified from the maternity record database and case records reviewed for the presence of risk factors. Unweighted and weighted risk scores were produced using odds ratios, and compared between cases and controls. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis of the risk scores was performed to discriminate between cases and controls and to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of each scoring system.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each risk factor. Sensitivity and specificity from ROC curves for weighted and unweighted risk score.

RESULTS

Among the cases there were more nulliparous women (OR 1.77; CI 1.05-2.99) and a trend towards more women with an episiotomy (OR 1.57; CI 0.99-2.47). Among women with sphincter injury, trends towards more epidurals (OR 1.64; CI 0.97-2.75), and more babies weighing more than 4000 g among (OR 1.45; CI 0.85-2.49) were noted. The median unweighted risk score was 2 for cases and 2 for controls (P= 0.05), while the weighted risk score was 2.1 and 1.37 (P= 0.03), respectively. The ROC curves approximated to a straight line demonstrating very poor discrimination between cases and controls.

CONCLUSION

The predictive test performed poorly, suggesting that the risk factors identified do not exert a large enough effect in a cohort of this size.

Differences in outcomes after third- versus fourth-degree perineal laceration repair: a prospective study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes after third- versus fourth-degree laceration repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Fifty-six primiparous women who sustained a third- or fourth-degree tear were enrolled at delivery and demographic and obstetric data were collected. At 6 weeks' postpartum, subjects completed a bowel function questionnaire and endoanal ultrasonography was performed. Fisher exact test and chi-square were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine women with third- and 17 with fourth-degree tears were enrolled. Subjects with fourth- were more likely to report bowel symptoms (59% vs 28%, P = .03), and to demonstrate persistent combined defects of the internal (IAS) and external anal sphincter (EAS) (48% vs 8%, P = .002) than third-degree tears. Combined defects were associated with the highest risk of bowel symptoms (OR 18.7, 95% CI 3-101, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Bowel symptoms were more common after fourth- than third-degree repair, and may be secondary to higher rates of combined defects of the IAS and EAS.

Is it possible to predict or prevent third degree tears?

OBJECTIVES

This paper reviews the causes anal sphincter injury during vaginal delivery. It emphasises that they are not usually the result of poor obstetric care. The role of the colorectal surgeon in their management is discussed.

METHODS

Medline was searched using the key words third degree tears, pregnancy, risk factors, prevention and recurrence risk. A hand search of journals and located articles was made. Two hundred and twenty three papers were identified, 84 are referenced.

RESULTS

The reported incidence of anal sphincter tears is usually between 0.5% and 2.5% of vaginal deliveries. Maternal factors such as parity and age and obstetric factors such as mode of presentation, the use of forceps and the size of the baby all influence the incidence of sphincter tears. Predicting tears in individual women is inaccurate and midwifery practices can do little to prevent them. Reducing pelvic floor morbidity by increasing the caesarean section rate would require that a large number of caesarean sections be done to prevent a small number of tears. The recognition of perineal trauma is improved by training. Accurate apposition of the sphincters with antibiotic cover and post-operative laxatives are the important technical aspects of the repair. Colorectal follow up helps to identify those women with symptoms and allows advice about the advisability of subsequent vaginal deliveries. A previous third degree tears increases the risk of a subsequent one, although the overall risk remains low. A second vaginal delivery after a third degree tear that has resulted in a functional deficit predisposes to worsening function. When there is no residual anatomical defect and no functional loss, there is no evidence of increased risk of incontinence following another vaginal delivery.

CONCLUSION

Vaginal delivery will continue to be the main method of delivery and will continue to generate a low incidence of pelvic floor morbidity. The management of injury to the anal sphincter is facilitated by close co-operation between obstetricians and colorectal surgeons.

Fecal incontinence: a review of prevalence and obstetric risk factors

Anal incontinence (AI) is a significant problem that causes social and hygienic inconvenience. The true prevalence of AI is difficult to estimate due to inconsistencies in research methods, but larger studies suggest a rate of 2-6% for incontinence to stool. There is a significant association between sonographically detected anal sphincter defects and symptoms of AI. The intrapartum factors most consistently associated with a higher risk of AI include: forceps delivery, third or fourth degree tears, and length of the second stage of labor. Fetal weight of > 4,000 g is also associated with AI. Repair of the sphincter can be performed in either an overlapping or an end-to-end fashion, with similar results for both methods. The role of cesarean delivery for the prevention of AI remains unclear, and further study should be devoted to this question.

Episiotomy and Vaginal Trauma

The era of routine episiotomy is gradually ending. Previously perceived benefits gradually have been disproved as evidence-based scientific clinical studies have shown the detrimental effects of episiotomy; however, circumstances always will exist in which prudent clinical judgment may dictate the necessity for an episiotomy. In most of these situations, however, an episiotomy often can be avoided. Perhaps more hospital perinatal review committees should evaluate episiotomy rates and strive to convince their staff to reduce their rates. We can learn to be more patient and allow the natural forces of labor to gradually stretch the perineum. In reviewing the extensive volume of published literature on episiotomy and perineal-vaginal trauma, the best advice lies in the dictum "Don't just do something, sit there!"

Primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter laceration: a randomized trial of two surgical techniques

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to compare surgical techniques for the primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter lacerations.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients with complete third- or fourth-degree lacerations were recruited and randomly assigned to either an end-to-end or overlapping repair. Data collection included demographic data, obstetric history, and intrapartum events. Postpartum, women completed incontinence questionnaires and underwent physical and ultrasound examinations. To detect a 36% difference between groups with an alpha = .05 and beta = .20, 30 patients were required. Data were analyzed with Student t test and chi2 analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-one women were randomly assigned; 23 to an end-to-end and 18 to an overlapping repair. Twenty-seven percent of women underwent episiotomy and 61% operative vaginal delivery. Follow-up was limited to 26 of 41 patients. On physical examination, 3 patients had a separated anal sphincter. On ultrasound, overall 85% of patients had intact sphincters, with no difference between groups (all P > .05). Forty-two percent of women complained of anorectal symptoms with no differences between groups (all P > .28).

CONCLUSION

We found no difference in anal incontinence symptoms, physical examination, or translabial ultrasonography findings between the 2 groups. Incontinence symptoms were common in both groups.

Anal incontinence after obstetric sphincter tears: outcome of anatomic primary repairs

PURPOSE

Obstetric sphincter tears lead to anal incontinence in 40 to 60 percent of affected women. Primary repair is usually performed without identifying the internal anal sphincter. Since 1999 digestive surgeons have participated in the primary repair of such tears at our hospital. The intention was to perform separate repair of the internal and external anal sphincter in cases of combined tears to achieve a lower incontinence rate than is usually reported after conventional primary repair. The aim of the present study was to evaluate our results after anatomic primary repair.

METHOD

A follow-up study was undertaken after all primary repairs performed in 1999 and 2000. It included anal ultrasonography manometry and an assessment of incontinence (Wexner score).

RESULTS

A total of 74 women sustained obstetric sphincter tears during the study period, and 71 (96 percent) were assessed after a median of 27 months (range, 14-39 months). Nine women declined investigation with ultrasonography/manometry. Incontinence was present in 22 women (31 percent), of whom 17 had gas incontinence only. The symptoms were mild (Wexner score 1-2) in 11 women (50 percent). None of 17 women with normal ultrasonography results were incontinent versus 20 of 45 with pathologic ultrasonographic results (P = 0.001). The mean sphincter length, squeeze pressure, and resting pressure were significantly higher in women with Wexner scores of 0-2 vs. women with a score of more than 2. Sphincter length was inversely correlated with the degree of incontinence (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The incontinence rate after anatomic primary repair is low compared with the last decade's reported results after conventional primary repair. A short anal sphincter after repair is associated with a poorer outcome.

Sexual function following sphincteroplasty for women with third- and fourth-degree perineal tears

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to evaluate sexual function following anal sphincteroplasty in women with third and fourth degree perineal tears secondary to birth trauma

METHODS

Our study was performed using a retrospective cohort design in a group of women (n = 32) who had experienced either third-degree or fourth-degree perineal tears during labor and then elected to undergo sphincteroplasty for fecal incontinence. We surveyed our patients with a questionnaire that was developed by the Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center at Harvard Medica School and was previously used to survey women with obstetric injuries. Self-reported presphincteroplasty and post sphincteroplasty degree of physical sensation, sexual satisfaction, and likelihood of achieving orgasm were measured Also measured were libido, partner satisfaction, and presence of emotional or physical inability to engage in sexual behavior.

RESULTS

Our results reaffirmed the findings of the Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center's study that sexual function is compromised in women with third and fourth-degree perineal tears. For our patients with this degree of perineal tearing who underwent sphincteroplasty after primary repair, our survey showed consistent improvement in several parameters of sexual function. After sphincteroplasty, physical sensation was higher/much higher in 40 percent, sexual satisfaction was better/much better in 33.3 percent, and 28.6 percent of the patients were more/much more likely to reach orgasm. Libido was improved in 37.5 percent of the study population, and 20 percent reported increased partner satisfaction. Before surgery, 23.5 percent of patients were physically and 31.2 percent emotionally unable to participate in sexual activity because of fear of incontinence or intimacy; after surgery only 6.3 percent were physically unable and 0 percent were emotionally unable to engage in sexual activity. The response rate for our study was 18/32 (56 percent).

CONCLUSIONS

Anal sphincteroplasty for the treatment of incontinence in women with third- and fourth-degree perineal tears improves physical and emotional sexual well-being and function.

Anal incontinence after obstetric sphincter tears: incidence in a Norwegian county

BACKGROUND

Anal sphincter tears during vaginal delivery are a major cause of anal incontinence. We wanted to assess the incidence in a Norwegian county where primary repairs are performed in four hospitals using similar per- and postoperative protocol for the treatment of such injuries.

METHODS

A postal questionnaire was distributed to all women who underwent primary repair of obstetric sphincter tears in the years 1999 and 2000 in the county of Möre and Romsdal. Symptoms of incontinence and fecal urgency were recorded. Incontinence was assessed using the Pescatori score system.

RESULTS

Clinically detected sphincter tears occurred in 180 of 5123 vaginal deliveries (3.5%). The questionnaire was returned by 156 women (87%). Six women were excluded. Median follow-up was 25 months (range 4-39). Incontinence was reported by 88 women (59%), restricted to flatus incontinence in 53 cases (35%). Fecal urgency without incontinence was reported by 14 women (9%). Sixty-three women (42%) reported de novo moderate to severe symptoms. There was no difference in outcome whether the sphincter injury was partial or complete. Mean Pescatori score was 3.7 in women who felt disabled compared with 2.9 in women who did not feel disabled by their incontinence (P < 0.001). Of 29 women who felt disabled, only three had sought medical attention. Fifty-eight women (39%) had received no information about the sphincter tear before discharge.

CONCLUSION

Anal incontinence is common after both partial and complete obstetric sphincter tears. Information before discharge is deficient, and women avoid seeking medical attention when incontinence develops.

Elective cesarean section to prevent anal incontinence and brachial plexus injuries associated with macrosomia?a decision analysis

Our aim was to determine the cost-effectiveness of a policy of elective C-section for macrosomic infants to prevent maternal anal incontinence, urinary incontinence, and newborn brachial plexus injuries. We used a decision analytic model to compare the standard of care with a policy whereby all primigravid patients in the United States would undergo an ultrasound at 39 weeks gestation, followed by an elective C-section for any fetus estimated at > or =4500 g. The following clinical consequences were considered crucial to the analysis: brachial plexus injury to the newborn; maternal anal and urinary incontinence; emergency hysterectomy; hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion; and maternal mortality. Our outcome measures included (1) number of brachial plexus injuries or cases of incontinence averted, (2) incremental monetary cost per 100,000 deliveries, (3) expected quality of life of the mother and her child, and (4) "quality-adjusted life years" (QALY) associated with the two policies. For every 100,000 deliveries, the policy of elective C-section resulted in 16.6 fewer permanent brachial plexus injuries, 185.7 fewer cases of anal incontinence, and cost savings of $3,211,000. Therefore, this policy would prevent one case of anal incontinence for every 539 elective C-sections performed. The expected quality of life associated with the elective C-section policy was also greater (quality of life score 0.923 vs 0.917 on a scale from 0.0 to 1.0 and 53.6 QALY vs 53.2). A policy whereby primigravid patients in the United States have a 39 week ultrasound-estimated fetal weight followed by C-section for any fetuses > or =4500 g appears cost effective. However, the monetary costs in our analysis were sensitive to the probability estimates of urinary incontinence following C-section and vaginal delivery and the cost estimates for urinary incontinence, vaginal delivery, and C-section.

Incontinences urinaires et anales post-obstétricales : facteurs de risque et prévention

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to review the available data on urinary and fecal incontinence and their association with maternal as well as fetal per partum characteristics.

METHOD

A Pubmed (Medline search performed between 1999 and 2003 using "urinary incontinence and delivery" and "fecal incontinence and delivery" identified 501 relevant papers. Most of them are retrospective analyses whereas few are randomized controlled trials (RCT).

RESULTS

Two studies performed with computer-stored databases analyzed the risk factors of incontinence among 2,886,126 deliveries. Primiparity, birthweight over 4000 g and all types of assisted vaginal deliveries significantly increased the risk of anal sphincter damage. Results concerning the effect of episiotomy are conflicting. Controlled randomized trials have shown that pelvic floor muscle training during pregnancy as well as planned cesarean section significantly and moderately decrease the risk of urinary incontinence. The only RCT available has shown that planned cesarean section did not reduce significantly incontinence of flatus. Finally the only trial that compare surgical techniques used to repair the anal sphincter did not show any significant difference.

CONCLUSION

Risk factors for anal sphincter damage during delivery are well known. RCT focusing on how to prevent and how to cure fecal as well as urinary incontinence are urgently needed.

Anal sphincter function and integrity after primary repair of third‐degree tear: uncontrolled prospective analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present paper was to determine the anatomical integrity and functional effect of a tear to the anal sphincter in women after vaginal delivery.

METHODS

A prospective review of third- and fourth-degree vaginal tears over a 3 year period at Lyell McEwin and Queen Elizabeth Hospitals, Adelaide. Obstetric details were obtained from the records. All were counselled by a continence advisor and offered consultation with a colorectal surgeon. The integrity of the anal sphincter was assessed by endoanal ultrasound.

RESULTS

During the study period there were 6875 vaginal deliveries. There were 89 women (1.3%) who had a third- or fourth-degree tear. Fifty-one (57%) agreed to participate. Primiparity (67%), episiotomy (49%), forceps delivery (29%) and instrumental delivery were common in women sustaining a tear. Symptoms of anal incontinence (mild) or faecal urgency were described in 23 women (45%). Except for three women with an anovaginal fistula none required surgery for the management of faecal incontinence. A sphincter defect was seen in 27 women (53%) on endoanal ultrasound. The presence or absence of a sphincter defect was not significantly associated with symptoms but a trend was suggested (chi2=3.21; P=0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Third-degree tear after vaginal delivery was a significant intrapartum event, yet associated only with minimal symptoms (excluding patients with anovaginal fistula) even in the presence of a sphincter defect on anal ultrasound.

The perspective of a gynecologist on treatment-related research for fecal incontinence in women

Fecal incontinence affects between 1% and 16% of women, with prevalence increasing with age. The most common cause of fecal incontinence in otherwise healthy women is damage to the anal sphincter(s) during childbirth. As such, the most important tool in the "treatment" of fecal incontinence is its prevention, which should be the first research priority for gynecologists. Routine midline (median) episiotomy has no place in modern obstetrics; when episiotomy must be performed for obstetric indications, use of mediolateral episiotomy should result in fewer anal sphincter injuries than use of midline episiotomy. Additional research questions that gynecologists hope to address are as follows. (1) When anal sphincter injury occurs at delivery, what is the most effective method of repair? Even when repair is performed, women frequently have symptoms of altered bowel function ranging from fecal urgency to frank fecal incontinence. (2) Is it possible to improve the relatively poor results of a strictly surgical repair? Does pelvic muscle rehabilitation (performed either after vaginal delivery or after secondary repair remote from delivery) add significantly to the outcome of women after anal sphincteroplasty? (3) Another more general research priority is to understand the shared and independent factors in the pathophysiology of fecal and urinary incontinence so as to identify modifiable risk factors in women.

Postpartum flatal and Fecal Incontinence Quality-of-Life Scale: a disease- and population-specific measure

Using various recruiting methods, the authors identified 10 women who suffer from flatal and/or fecal incontinence subsequent to one or more previous vaginal deliveries. Each of these women participated in an individual in-depth 1-hour interview assessing symptom frequency, severity, and impact on quality of life. Participants also completed the Fecal Incontinence Quality-of-Life Scale and evaluated how well this scale captured their experiences. The authors used qualitative analyses to generate themes from the interviews and modified the existing scale, adding new items and themes to capture this population's particular symptom experience. This scale is being evaluated in the context of a surgical clinical trial comparing two techniques for repairing anal sphincter lacerations from delivery.

Anal sphincter disruption at vaginal delivery: is recurrence predictable?

OBJECTIVE

We prospectively evaluated the risk of recurrence of anal sphincter disruption ("third degree tear") at next vaginal delivery and whether this complication was predictable by antepartum anal functional assessment.

STUDY DESIGN

Among 20,111 consecutive vaginal deliveries, where midline episiotomy was not performed, 342 (1.7%) third degree tears occurred, significantly more often in primiparae (2.9%) than multiparae (0.8%; P<0.001), all of whom underwent postpartum anal manometry and endosonography. Similar testing was performed antepartum and postpartum in 56 of 342 women who delivered again during the study period.

RESULTS

Eleven of 56 women were delivered by caesarean in next pregnancy. Third degree tears recurred in 2 (4.4%) of 45 women at next vaginal delivery. Both recurrent injuries occurred in asymptomatic women with normal antepartum manometry and following spontaneous deliveries and were satisfactorily repaired.

CONCLUSION

Although anal sphincter injury was increased five-fold at next delivery, compared with all multiparae, 95% of women delivering vaginally after previous third degree tear did not sustain further overt sphincter damage. Recurrence was not predictable using pre-delivery anal physiology testing.

Obstetric perineal injury: risk factors and strategies for prevention

Fecal incontinence due to anal sphincter injury is the most important consequence of perineal trauma at vaginal delivery and may be of muscular or neurological origin. The risk of sphincter injury is increased at first delivery and in association with instrumental assistance, prolonged second stage, occipito-posterior position, and midline episiotomy, but is not predictable in individual cases. Injury can be prevented or minimized by enhancing uterine contractility during first labors, optimizing perineal repair technique, and by appropriate postnatal assessment of symptomatic women.

A randomised clinical trial comparing the effects of delayed versus immediate pushing with epidural analgesia on mode of delivery and faecal continence

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of delayed vs immediate pushing in second stage of labour with epidural analgesia on delivery outcome, postpartum faecal continence and postpartum anal sphincter and pudendal nerve function.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomised, controlled trial.Tertiary referral maternity teaching hospital.

POPULATION

One hundred and seventy nulliparous women randomised at full dilatation to immediate or delayed pushing.

METHODS

A total of 178 nulliparous women, all with continuous epidural analgesia, were randomised at full cervical dilatation, but before the fetal head had reached the pelvic floor, to either immediate pushing or 1 hour delayed pushing. Labour outcome was analysed and all women underwent postpartum assessment of anal sphincter function, including anal manometry. Those women who had a normal delivery underwent neurophysiology studies, while those women who had an instrumental delivery underwent endoanal ultrasound.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mode of delivery; altered faecal continence.

RESULTS

Ninety women were randomised to immediate pushing and 88 to delayed pushing. The spontaneous delivery rate was 56% (50/90) in the immediate pushing group and 52% (46/88) in the delayed pushing group. Mean duration of labour for the immediate pushing group was 427 minutes compared with 480 minutes for the delayed pushing group (P = 0.005). Eighty-four percent (76/90) of women in the immediate pushing group received oxytocin to augment labour, 21/76 (28%) in the second stage only. Eighty-one percent (71/88) of women in the delayed pushing group received oxytocin to augment labour, 22/71 (31%) in the second stage only. Fetal outcome did not differ between the two groups. Episiotomy rates were 73% and 69% in the immediate pushing and delayed pushing groups, respectively. 26% (23/90) of the immediate pushing group and 38% (33/88) of the delayed pushing group complained of altered faecal continence after delivery (NS). Manometry, ultrasound and neurophysiology studies did not differ significantly between the two groups. Overall, 55% of women after instrumental delivery had endosonographic evidence of damage to the external anal sphincter, while 36% of women after spontaneous delivery had abnormal neurophysiology studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of instrumental delivery were similar following immediate and delayed pushing, in association with epidural analgesia. Delayed pushing prolonged labour by 1 hour but did not result in significantly higher rates of altered continence or anal sphincter injury, when compared with immediate pushing.

Informed consent and birth: protecting the pelvic floor and ourselves

The controversy over elective cesarean versus vaginal birth with regard to pelvic floor trauma has left many caregivers and patients confused. With the growing evidence to support the development of fecal incontinence as a result of childbirth, we believe that it is imperative to reevaluate modern obstetric practices both for the patient's benefit and for our medical-legal protection. Our attention and energy need to be focused on good informed consent regarding these risks along with improved postpartum surveillance for injury.