Substrate polypeptide presents a load on the apical domains of the chaperonin GroEL

An expanded conformation of single-ring GroEL-GroES complex encapsulates an 86 kDa substrate

Electron cryomicroscopy reveals an unprecedented conformation of the single-ring mutant of GroEL (SR398) bound to GroES in the presence of Mg-ATP. This conformation exhibits a considerable expansion of the folding cavity, with approximately 80% more volume than the X-ray structure of the equivalent cis cavity in the GroEL-GroES-(ADP)(7) complex. This expanded conformation can encapsulate an 86 kDa heterodimeric (alphabeta) assembly intermediate of mitochondrial branched-chain alpha-ketoacid dehydrogenase, the largest substrate ever observed to be cis encapsulated. The SR398-GroES-Mg-ATP complex is found to exist as a mixture of standard and expanded conformations, regardless of the absence or presence of the substrate. However, the presence of even a small substrate causes a pronounced bias toward the expanded conformation. Encapsulation of the large assembly intermediate is supported by a series of electron cryomicroscopy studies as well as the protection of both alpha and beta subunits of the substrate from tryptic digestion.

GroEL-mediated protein folding: making the impossible, possible

Protein folding is a spontaneous process that is essential for life, yet the concentrated and complex interior of a cell is an inherently hostile environment for the efficient folding of many proteins. Some proteins-constrained by sequence, topology, size, and function-simply cannot fold by themselves and are instead prone to misfolding and aggregation. This problem is so deeply entrenched that a specialized family of proteins, known as molecular chaperones, evolved to assist in protein folding. Here we examine one essential class of molecular chaperones, the large, oligomeric, and energy utilizing chaperonins or Hsp60s. The bacterial chaperonin GroEL, along with its co-chaperonin GroES, is probably the best-studied example of this family of protein-folding machine. In this review, we examine some of the general properties of proteins that do not fold well in the absence of GroEL and then consider how folding of these proteins is enhanced by GroEL and GroES. Recent experimental and theoretical studies suggest that chaperonins like GroEL and GroES employ a combination of protein isolation, unfolding, and conformational restriction to drive protein folding under conditions where it is otherwise not possible.

Fast-scanning atomic force microscopy reveals the ATP/ADP-dependent conformational changes of GroEL

In order to fold non-native proteins, chaperonin GroEL undergoes numerous conformational changes and GroES binding in the ATP-dependent reaction cycle. We constructed the real-time three-dimensional-observation system at high resolution using a newly developed fast-scanning atomic force microscope. Using this system, we visualized the GroES binding to and dissociation from individual GroEL with a lifetime of 6 s (k=0.17 s(-1)). We also caught ATP/ADP-induced open-closed conformational changes of individual GroEL in the absence of qGroES and substrate proteins. Namely, the ATP/ADP-bound GroEL can change its conformation 'from closed to open' without additional ATP hydrolysis. Furthermore, the lifetime of open conformation in the presence of ADP ( approximately 1.0 s) was apparently lower than those of ATP and ATP-analogs (2-3 s), meaning that ADP-bound open-form is structurally less stable than ATP-bound open-form. These results indicate that GroEL has at least two distinct open-conformations in the presence of nucleotide; ATP-bound prehydrolysis open-form and ADP-bound open-form, and the ATP hydrolysis in open-form destabilizes its open-conformation and induces the 'from open to closed' conformational change of GroEL.

Probing the sequence of conformationally induced polarity changes in the molecular chaperonin GroEL with fluorescence spectroscopy

Hydrophobic interactions play a major role in binding non-native substrate proteins in the central cavity of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL. The sequence of local conformational changes by which GroEL and its cofactor GroES assist protein folding can be explored using the polarity-sensitive fluorescence probe Nile Red. A specific single-cysteine mutant of GroEL (Cys261), whose cysteine is located inside the central cavity at the apical region of the protein, was covalently labeled with synthetically prepared Nile Red maleimide (NR). Bulk fluorescence spectra of Cys261-NR were measured to examine the effects of binding of the stringent substrate, malate dehydrogenase (MDH), GroES, and nucleotide on the local environment of the probe. After binding denatured substrate, the fluorescence intensity increased by 32 +/- 7%, suggesting enhanced hydrophobicity at the position of the label. On the other hand, in the presence of ATP, the fluorescence intensity decreased by 13 +/- 3%, implying increased local polarity. To explore the sequence of local polarity changes, substrate, GroES, and various nucleotides were added in different orders; the resulting changes in emission intensity provide insight into the sequence of conformational changes occurring during GroEL-mediated protein folding.

Elucidation of steps in the capture of a protein substrate for efficient encapsulation by GroE

We have identified five structural rearrangements in GroEL induced by the ordered binding of ATP and GroES. The first discernable rearrangement (designated T --> R(1)) is a rapid, cooperative transition that appears not to be functionally communicated to the apical domain. In the second (R(1) --> R(2)) step, a state is formed that binds GroES weakly in a rapid, diffusion-limited process. However, a second optical signal, carried by a protein substrate bound to GroEL, responds neither to formation of the R(2) state nor to the binding of GroES. This result strongly implies that the substrate protein remains bound to the inner walls of the initially formed GroEL.GroES cavity, and is not yet displaced from its sites of interaction with GroEL. In the next rearrangement (R(2).GroES --> R(3).GroES) the strength of interaction between GroEL and GroES is greatly enhanced, and there is a large and coincident loss of fluorescence-signal intensity in the labeled protein substrate, indicating that there is either a displacement from its binding sites on GroEL or at least a significant change of environment. These results are consistent with a mechanism in which the shift in orientation of GroEL apical domains between that seen in the apo-protein and stable GroEL.GroES complexes is highly ordered, and transient conformational intermediates permit the association of GroES before the displacement of bound polypeptide. This ensures efficient encapsulation of the polypeptide within the GroEL central cavity underneath GroES.

Residues in substrate proteins that interact with GroEL in the capture process are buried in the native state

We have used a bioinformatic approach to predict the natural substrate proteins for the Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL based on two simple criteria. Natural substrate proteins should contain binding motifs similar in sequence to the mobile loop peptide of GroES that displaces the binding motif during the chaperonin cycle. Secondly, each substrate protein should contain multiple copies of the binding motif so that the chaperonin can perform "work" on the substrate protein. To validate these criteria, we have used a database of 252 proteins that have been experimentally shown to interact with the chaperonin machinery in vivo. More than 80% are identified by these criteria. The binding motifs of all 79 proteins in the database with a known three-dimensional structure are buried (<50% solvent-accessible surface area) in the native state. Our results show that the binding motifs are inaccessible in the native state but become solvent-exposed in unfolded state, thus enabling GroEL to distinguish between unfolded and native states. The structures of the binding motif in the native states of the substrate proteins include alpha-helices, beta-strands, and random coils. The diversity of secondary structures implies that there are large and varied conformational transitions in the recognition motifs after their displacement by the mobile loops of GroES.

An expanded protein folding cage in the GroEL-gp31 complex

Bacteriophage T4 produces a GroES analogue, gp31, which cooperates with the Escherichia coli GroEL to fold its major coat protein gp23. We have used cryo-electron microscopy and image processing to obtain three-dimensional structures of the E.coli chaperonin GroEL complexed with gp31, in the presence of both ATP and ADP. The GroEL-gp31-ADP map has a resolution of 8.2 A, which allows accurate fitting of the GroEL and gp31 crystal structures. Comparison of this fitted structure with that of the GroEL-GroES-ADP structure previously determined by cryo-electron microscopy shows that the folding cage is expanded. The enlarged volume for folding is consistent with the size of the bacteriophage coat protein gp23, which is the major substrate of GroEL-gp31 chaperonin complex. At 56 kDa, gp23 is close to the maximum size limit of a polypeptide that is thought to fit inside the GroEL-GroES folding cage.

Multiple Structural Transitions of the GroEL Subunit Are Sensitive to Intermolecular Interactions with Cochaperonin and Refolding Polypeptide

In this study we attempted to determine the specific roles of the numerous conformational changes that are observed in the bacterial chaperonin GroEL, by performing stopped-flow experiments on GroEL R231W in the presence of a refolding substrate protein. The apparent rate of one kinetic phase was decreased by approximately 25% in the presence of prebound unfolded malate dehydrogenase while another phase was suppressed completely under the same conditions, reflecting different effects of the unfolded protein on multiple structural transitions within GroEL. The addition of cochaperonin GroES counteracts the effect of the bound substrate protein in the former case, but had no effect on the latter, more extensive suppression. Using a chemically modified form of GroEL R231W which is incapable of releasing substrate proteins at low temperatures, we identified a conformational transition that is implicated in the release of substrate proteins. Parts of the actual process of substrate protein release were also observed through fluorescence resonance energy transfer experiments involving GroEL and labeled substrate protein. Analysis of the energy transfer data revealed an interesting relationship between substrate protein displacement and a specific structural transition in the GroEL apical domain.

Electron Paramagnetic Resonance and Fluorescence Studies of the Conformation of Aspartate Aminotransferase Bound to GroEL

The interaction of the precursor to mitochondrial aspartate aminotransferase (pmAAT) with GroEL has been studied by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and fluorescence spectroscopy. In the native protein, the spin probe was immobilized when attached to Cys166 at the domain interface, but was fully mobile when introduced at Cys(-19) in the N-terminal presequence peptide. Unfolding of the protein resulted in a highly mobile EPR spectrum for probes introduced at either site. However, the nitroxide group in GroEL-bound pmAAT showed either intermediate or high mobility depending on the spin probe used. Power saturation experiments indicated that the accessibility of the nitroxide side chain to Ni(EDDA) in the GroEL-pmAAT complex was higher than in the native state when in position 166 but lower when at position -19. Similar results were obtained in fluorescence quenching experiments. These data suggest that GroEL binds partly folded states of pmAAT with the presequence peptide probably in direct contact with GroEL. GroES and ATP, but not AMP-PNP or ADP, support refolding of pmAAT. During refolding, the rate of recovery of the native spectroscopic properties of labeled Cys166 is nearly identical to the rate-limiting reactivation step. Thus, correct docking of the large and small domains of pmAAT may be a key structural event in the regain of catalytic activity.

Allosteric regulation of chaperonins

Chaperonins are molecular machines that facilitate protein folding by undergoing energy (ATP)-dependent movements that are coordinated in time and space by complex allosteric regulation. Recently, progress has been made in describing the various functional (allosteric) states of these machines, the pathways by which they interconvert, and the coupling between allosteric transitions and protein folding reactions. However, various mechanistic issues remain to be resolved.

Chaperonin GroEL meets the substrate protein as a "load" of the rings

Chaperonin GroEL is an essential molecular chaperone that assists protein folding in the cell. With the aid of cochaperonin GroES and ATP, double ring-shaped GroEL encapsulates non-native substrate proteins inside the cavity of the GroEL-ES complex. Although extensive studies have revealed the outline of GroEL mechanism over the past decade, central questions remain: What are the in vivo substrate proteins? How does GroEL encapsulate the substrates inside the cavity in spite of an apparent entropic difficulty? Is the folding inside the GroEL-ES cavity the same as bulk spontaneous folding? In this review I summarize the recent progress on in vivo and in vitro aspects of GroEL. In particular, emerging evidence shows that the substrate protein itself influences the chaperonin GroEL structure and reaction cycle. Finally I propose the mechanistic similarity between GroEL and kinesin, a molecular motor that moves along a microtubule in an ATP-dependent manner.

Biochemical coupling of the two nucleotide binding domains of ClpB: covalent linkage is not a prerequisite for chaperone activity

ClpB cooperates with the DnaK chaperone system in the reactivation of protein from aggregates and is a member of the ATPases associated with a variety of cellular activities (AAA+) protein family. The underlying disaggregation reaction is dependent on ATP hydrolysis at both AAA cassettes of ClpB but the role of each AAA cassette in the reaction cycle is largely unknown. Here we analyze the activity of the separately expressed and purified nucleotide binding domains of ClpB from Thermus thermophilus. The two fragments show different biochemical properties: the first construct is inactive in ATPase activity assays and binds nucleotides weakly, the second construct has a very high ATPase activity and interacts tightly with nucleotides. Both individual fragments have lost their chaperone function and are not able to form large oligomers. When combined in solution, however, the two fragments form a stable heterodimer with oligomerization capacities equivalent to wild-type ClpB. This non-covalent complex regains activity in reactivating protein aggregates in cooperation with the DnaK chaperone system. Upon complex formation the ATPase activity of fragment 2 is reduced to a level similar to wild-type ClpB. Hence functional ClpB can be reassembled from its isolated AAA cassettes showing that covalent linkage of these domains is not a prerequisite for the chaperone activity. The observation that the intrinsically high ATPase activity of AAA2 is suppressed by AAA1 allows a hypothetical assignment of their mechanistic function. Whereas the energy gained upon ATP hydrolysis at the AAA2 is likely to drive a conformational change of the structure of ClpB, AAA1 might function as a regulator of the chaperone cycle.

The unusual chaperonins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Heat shock proteins (Hsps), also known as molecular chaperones, are a diverse set of proteins that mediate the correct folding, assembly, transport and degradation of other proteins. In addition, Hsps have been shown to play a variety of important roles in immunity, thereby representing prominent antigens in the humoral and cellular immune response. Chaperonins form a sub-group of molecular chaperones that are found in all domains of life. Chaperonins in all bacteria are encoded by the essential groEL and groES genes, also called cpn60 and cpn10 arranged on the bicistronic groESL operon. Interestingly, Mycobacterium tuberculosis contains two copies of the cpn60 genes. The existence of a duplicate set of cpn60 genes in M. tuberculosis, however, has been perplexing. Cpn10 and Cpn60s of M. tuberculosis have been shown to be highly antigenic in nature, eliciting strong B- and T-cell immune responses. Recent work has shown intriguing structural, biochemical and signaling properties of the M. tuberculosis chaperonins. This review details the recent developments in the study of the M. tuberculosis chaperonins.

No evidence for a forced-unfolding mechanism during ATP/GroES binding to substrate-bound GroEL: no observable protection of metastable Rubisco intermediate or GroEL-bound Rubisco from tritium exchange

In tritium-hydrogen exchange experiments, the large GroEL substrate Rubisco was unfolded and exchanged in urea/acid/tritiated water, then diluted into either protic buffer or protic buffer containing GroEL. The respective Rubisco metastable folding intermediate or Rubisco-GroEL binary complex was then separated from residual tritium after varying times of exchange by centrifugation through P-10 or G-25 resin. No significant tritium was recovered in either case, in contrast to an earlier report. Thus, although the earlier-proposed forced unfolding mechanism for the action of GroEL on a bound polypeptide, occurring during ATP/GroES binding, remains an attractive hypothesis, the data here do not provide any indication that it is involved in the folding of Rubisco.