Clusters of mutations from transient hypermutability

Too many mutants with multiple mutations

It has recently become clear that the classical notion of the random nature of mutation does not hold for the distribution of mutations among genes: most collections of mutants contain more isolates with two or more mutations than predicted by the mutant frequency on the assumption of a random distribution of mutations. Excesses of multiples are seen in a wide range of organisms, including riboviruses, DNA viruses, prokaryotes, yeasts, and higher eukaryotic cell lines and tissues. In addition, such excesses are produced by DNA polymerases in vitro. These "multiples" appear to be generated by transient, localized hypermutation rather than by heritable mutator mutations. The components of multiples are sometimes scattered at random and sometimes display an excess of smaller distances between mutations. As yet, almost nothing is known about the mechanisms that generate multiples, but such mutations have the capacity to accelerate those evolutionary pathways that require multiple mutations where the individual mutations are neutral or deleterious. Examples that impinge on human health may include carcinogenesis and the adaptation of microbial pathogens as they move between individual hosts.

Mutation as a stress response and the regulation of evolvability

Our concept of a stable genome is evolving to one in which genomes are plastic and responsive to environmental changes. Growing evidence shows that a variety of environmental stresses induce genomic instability in bacteria, yeast, and human cancer cells, generating occasional fitter mutants and potentially accelerating adaptive evolution. The emerging molecular mechanisms of stress-induced mutagenesis vary but share telling common components that underscore two common themes. The first is the regulation of mutagenesis in time by cellular stress responses, which promote random mutations specifically when cells are poorly adapted to their environments, i.e., when they are stressed. A second theme is the possible restriction of random mutagenesis in genomic space, achieved via coupling of mutation-generating machinery to local events such as DNA-break repair or transcription. Such localization may minimize accumulation of deleterious mutations in the genomes of rare fitter mutants, and promote local concerted evolution. Although mutagenesis induced by stresses other than direct damage to DNA was previously controversial, evidence for the existence of various stress-induced mutagenesis programs is now overwhelming and widespread. Such mechanisms probably fuel evolution of microbial pathogenesis and antibiotic-resistance, and tumor progression and chemotherapy resistance, all of which occur under stress, driven by mutations. The emerging commonalities in stress-induced-mutation mechanisms provide hope for new therapeutic interventions for all of these processes.

Evidence for mutation showers

Mutants in the Big Blue transgenic mouse system show spontaneous clustered multiple mutations with unexpectedly high frequency, consistent with chronocoordinate events. We tested the prediction that the multiple mutations seen within the lacI mutation target sometimes occur in the context of chronocoordinate multiple mutations spanning multiple kilobases (mutation showers). Additional sequencing of mutants was performed in regions immediately flanking the lacI region (total of 10.7 kb). Nineteen additional mutations were found outside the lacI region ("ectomutations") from 10 mutants containing two or more lacI mutations, whereas only one ectomutation was found in 130 mutants with a single mutation (P < 0.0001). The mutation showers had an average of approximately one mutation per 3 kb. Four mutants showed closely spaced double mutations in the new sequence, and analysis of the spacing between these mutations revealed significant clustering (P = 0.0098). To determine the extent of the mutation showers, regions (8.5 kb total) remote from the lacI region (approximately 16-17 kb away) were sequenced. Only two additional ectomutations were found in these remote regions, consistent with mutation showers that generally do not extend more than approximately 30 kb. We conclude that mutation showers exist and that they constitute at least 0.2% and possibly 1% or more of mutational events observed in this system. The existence of mutation showers has implications for oncogenesis and evolution, raising the possibilities of "cancer in an instant" and "introns as sponges to reduce the deleterious impact of mutation showers."

Double de novo mutations ofELA2 in cyclic and severe congenital neutropenia

Heterozygous mutations of ELA2, encoding the protease neutrophil elastase (NE), cause either autosomal dominant cyclic neutropenia or severe congenital neutropenia (SCN). Three hypotheses have been proposed for how allelic mutations produce these different disorders: 1) disruption of proteolytic activity; 2) mislocalization of the protein; or 3) destabilization of the protein resulting in induction of the unfolded protein response. As with other dominant diseases with reduced reproductive fitness, sporadic cases can result from new mutations not inherited from either parent. Here we report an exceptional genetic phenomenon in which both a cyclic neutropenia patient and an SCN patient each possess two new ELA2 mutations. Because of the rarity of the phenomenon, we investigated the origins of the mutations and found that both arise nonmosaically and in cis from the paternally-inherited allele. Moreover, these cases offer a unique opportunity to investigate molecular pathways distinguishing these two forms of hereditary neutropenia. We have characterized the mutants separately and in combination, with respect to their effects on proteolysis, subcellular trafficking, and induction of the unfolded protein response. Each pair of mutations acts more or less additively to produce equivalent net effects on reducing proteolytic activity and induction of the unfolded protein response, yet each has different and somewhat opposing effects on disturbing subcellular localization, thus offering support for a role for protein mistrafficking as a disease mechanism.

Interruption of cell transformation and cancer formation

A review of the results of X-ray and chemical carcinogen induction of transformation of mouse cells supports a two-step epigenetic model of transformation. According to this model, exposure induces an epigenetic regulatory alteration that makes the cells hypermutable so that when the cell population inheriting this alteration becomes sufficiently large, the second step, a mutation to the transformant phenotype, becomes increasingly likely. The epigenetic alteration in X-ray-exposed mouse cells has been demonstrated to be reversible by brief exposure to certain protease inhibitors. If the rodent cell experiments constitute a valid system for studying human cancer, then this two-step model may herald rich opportunities for preventing and perhaps even treating cancer in humans.