Androgen-specific gene activation via a consensus glucocorticoid response element is determined by interaction with nonreceptor factors

Genes regulated by androgen in the rat ventral prostate

Genes that are regulated by androgen in the prostate were studied in the rat. Four of the less than 10 genes that are down-regulated by androgen in the ventral prostate of a 7-day castrated rat were identified; their mRNAs decayed with identical kinetics. Twenty-five of the estimated 56 genes that are up-regulated by androgen in the castrated prostate have been isolated. The up-regulated genes fall into two kinetic types. Early genes are significantly up-regulated by 6.5 hr whereas the delayed genes respond mainly after 24 hr from the time of androgen replacement. These androgen-response genes are also regulated in the prostate by castration, indicating that these genes could play important roles in androgen-induced regrowth and/or castration-induced regression of the prostate during hormonal manipulation. A survey of the tissue specificity showed that the androgen-response gene expression program in the prostate is mainly prostate-specific. Total RNA Northern blot analysis detects the expression of about 16 up-regulated genes and 3 down-regulated genes in the prostate only. Four up-regulated genes and one down-regulated gene are regulated by androgen in both the prostate and seminal vesicles but not in other organs. The expression of the remaining androgen-response genes is not limited to the prostate but is only responsive to androgen in the prostate. This survey of the androgen-response gene expression program provides insights into the molecular and cellular mechanisms of androgen action in the prostate.

Interaction between the amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions of the rat androgen receptor modulates transcriptional activity and is influenced by nuclear receptor coactivators

Identical N-terminal deletions in the wild-type rat androgen receptor (rAR) and a constitutively active rAR (ARDelta641-902) devoid of the ligand-binding domain (LBD) resulted in dissimilar consequences in transcriptional activation: deletion of residues 149-295 abolished wild-type AR activity, but did not influence that of ARDelta641-902. The activity of the N-terminal transactivation domain is thus controlled by the hormone-occupied LBD, suggesting that the N- and C-terminal regions of rAR communicate. Consistent with this idea, a strong androgen-dependent interaction between the N-terminal region and LBD was demonstrated in a mammalian two-hybrid system using GAL4 and VP16 fusion proteins. This interaction can be direct or indirect. Several nuclear receptor coactivators (CBP, F-SRC-1, SRC-1, and RIP140) that interact with other steroid receptors were tested as potential mediators of the N- and C-terminal interaction of rAR using the mammalian two-hybrid system. CBP or F-SRC-1 not only enhanced AR-mediated transactivation, but also facilitated the androgen-dependent interaction between the N- and C-terminal domains, implying that part of the coactivator-dependent transcriptional activation occurs via this mechanism. In contrast, SRC-1, a coactivator for the progesterone receptor, inhibited both AR-mediated transactivation and interaction between the N and C termini. Recruitment of coregulators may involve AR domains other than the LBD, as F-SRC-1 and CBP enhanced, but SRC-1 repressed, the transcriptional activity of ARDelta641-902. Collectively, interplay between the N-terminal region and LBD of rAR results in the formation of a transactivation complex that includes coregulators and that is mandatory for optimal activation of androgen-induced promoters.

Regulatory capacity of an androgen-specific enhancer of the mouse Slp gene in transgenic mice

Different steroid hormone receptors can activate transcription from the same hormone response element (HRE) in vitro, but in vivo the effects of each hormone on gene activity are distinct. To determine sequences mediating androgen-specific response in a physiological setting, we placed the androgen-responsive mouse sex-limited protein gene (Slp) enhancer before a tkCAT reporter in transgenic mice. The enhancer contains a consensus HRE plus accessory factor binding sites that act in concert to direct transcription in response to androgen. A 160 bp fragment, C'delta2, is responsive to several steroids in transfection; in transgenic mice, this enhancer was active in several tissues of male and female mice, in four of six transgenic lines. In striking contrast, C'delta9, a 120 bp sub-fragment of C'delta2 that responds only to androgen in transfection, showed activity in testes, prostate and kidney, where it was strongly androgen-inducible in females. However, expression was obtained in only one transgenic line. Multimerization of the C'delta9 enhancer conferred expression in prostate, but again in only one line. The greater penetrance of C'delta2 expression was not driven by glucocorticoids, as adrenalectomy had little effect, but may be dependent on the NF-kappaB-like element absent from the C'delta9 fragment. That two transgenic lines showed expression in androgen target sites driven by enhancers that are androgen-specific in vitro suggested that activation of this enhancer, when it could occur, was in response to androgen. The dramatically different behavior of the two related enhancer sequences underscores the importance of chromosomal context to the activity and specificity of regulatory elements.

Ubiquitous transcription factors NF1 and Sp1 are involved in the androgen activation of the mouse vas deferens protein promoter

Transcription of the mouse vas deferens protein (MVDP) gene is stimulated by androgens and we have previously shown that in a 162 bp fragment, located at position -121 to +41, a TGAAGTtccTGTTCT sequence functions as an androgen-dependent enhancer. To determine which factors are involved in the hormonally regulated MVDP gene transcription, we have used DNase I footprinting and band-shift assays to examine in vitro binding of proteins to the enhancer and promoter sequences and have determined the functional significance of the recognized DNA sequences in transient transfection assays. Studies using recombinant proteins such as the DNA binding domain of the androgen receptor (AR-DBD) and Sp1, and crude cellular extracts from T47D and vas deferens epithelial cells (VDEC) showed that in addition to AR-DBD, the transcriptional activators NF1 and Sp1 interact with the -121/+41 fragment in a specific manner. Transient transfection assays revealed that site-directed mutations in the NF1 and Sp1 binding elements strongly reduced (NF1) or abolished (Sp1) androgen induced expression. The results demonstrate that the -121/+41 sequence is a composite site for the androgen receptor mediated transactivation of the MVDP gene.

Activation of the orphan receptor RIP14 by retinoids

Retinoids are crucial regulators of a wide variety of processes in both developing and adult animals. These effects are thought to be mediated by the retinoic acid (RA) receptors and the retinoid X receptors (RXRs). We have identified an additional retinoid-activated receptor that is neither a retinoic acid receptors nor an RXR. RXR-interacting protein 14 (RIP14), a recently described orphan member of the nuclear receptor superfamily, can be activated by either all-trans-RA (tRA) or the synthetic retinoid TTNPB [[E]-4-[2-(5, 6, 7, 8-tetrahydro-5, 5, 8, 8-tetramethyl-2-naphthalenyl)propen-1-yl]benzoic acid].RIP14 binds to DNA as a heterodimer with RXR. In the presence of either tRA or TTNPB, the addition of 9-cis-RA or the RXR-specific agonist LG1069 [4-[1-(3, 5, 5, 8, 8-pentamethyl-5, 6, 7, 8-tertrahydro-2-naphthyl)ethenyl]benzoic acid] results in additional activation. Mutations of the ligand-dependent transcriptional activation functions indicate that TTNPB activates the RIP14 component of the RIP14-RXR heterodimer, that 9-cis-RA and LG1069 activate RXR, and that tRA activates via both RIP14 and RXR. Despite the very effective activation of RIP14 by tRA or TTNPB, relatively high concentrations of these compounds are required, and no evidence for direct binding of either compound was obtained using several approaches. These results suggest that RIP14 is the receptor for an as-yet-unidentified retinoid metabolite.

Androgen-dependent protein interactions within an intron 1 regulatory region of the 20-kDa protein gene

The 20-kDa protein gene is androgen regulated in rat ventral prostate. Intron 1 contains a 130-base pair complex response element (D2) that binds androgen (AR) and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) but transactivates only with AR in transient cotransfection assays in CV1 cells using the reporter vector D2-tkCAT. To better understand the function of this androgen-responsive unit, nuclear protein interactions with D2 were analyzed by DNase I footprinting in ventral prostate nuclei of intact or castrated rats and in vitro with ventral prostate nuclear protein extracts from intact, castrated, and testosterone-treated castrated rats. Multiple androgen-dependent protected regions and hypersensitive sites were identified in the D2 region with both methods. Mobility shift assays with 32P-labeled oligonucleotides spanning D2 revealed specific interactions with ventral prostate nuclear proteins. Four of the D2-protein complexes decreased in intensity within 24 h of castration. UV cross-linking of the androgen-dependent DNA binding proteins identified protein complexes of approximately 140 and 55 kDa. The results demonstrate androgen-dependent nuclear protein-DNA interactions within the complex androgen response element D2.

Determinants of specificity of transactivation by the mineralocorticoid or glucocorticoid receptor

Glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids have distinct in vivo roles despite close structural homology and similarities in vitro. Known mechanisms of specificity focus on factors extrinsic to the receptor; interactions that directly regulate the receptor to confer specificity are less well understood, particularly for the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR). To examine relative MR vs. glucocorticoid receptor (GR) function in a more physiological context, we compared transactivation by GR and MR in the standard experimental fibroblast CV-1 cell line, the renal epithelial LLC-PK1 line, and neuronal medullary raphe RN33B cells. Maximal transactivational activity mediated by MR, relative to that mediated by GR, is enhanced in both of these cell lines and is primarily conferred by an N-terminal-mediated enhancement of the MR response. In addition, the ligand concentration required for maximal transcriptional activity of the GR varies significantly between cell lines. This is independent of binding affinity or 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-mediated inactivation and may contribute to in vivo tissue-specific differences in responses to the GR. Although ligand binding affinity is clearly conferred by the LBD, receptor-specific variations between cell lines in transcriptional sensitivity to ligand appear, rather, to be associated with the N-terminus. These studies demonstrate that the specificity of the MR vs. the GR response may be mediated via unique cellular factors, as well as suggesting a novel means of expanding the cellular response to cortisol.

Differential activity of progesterone and glucocorticoid receptors on mouse mammary tumor virus templates differing in chromatin structure

In vivo, transcription factors interact with promoters having complex nucleoprotein structures. The transiently expressed progesterone receptor (PR) efficiently activates a transfected mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter but is a poor activator of the MMTV promoter when it acquires an ordered chromatin structure as an endogenous, replicating gene. We show that the deficiency in PR activity is not due to insufficient expression of either B or A isoforms or competition between the two types of MMTV templates. Rather, this deficiency reflects an inability to induce the chromatin remodeling event that is required for activation of the replicated MMTV template. To determine whether this characteristic is common to transiently expressed steroid receptors or specific to the PR, we examined the activity of transiently expressed glucocorticoid (GR) receptor. Unlike the PR, the transiently expressed GR is an effective activator of both MMTV templates and efficiently induces the necessary chromatin remodeling event at the replicated template. These results indicate that the GR and PR have unique requirements for activation of promoters with ordered chromatin structure. These differences may provide a mechanism for establishing target gene specificity in vivo for steroid receptors that recognize and bind to identical DNA sequences.

Androgen and glucocorticoid receptor heterodimer formation. A possible mechanism for mutual inhibition of transcriptional activity

The androgen and glucocorticoid hormones elicit divergent and often opposing effects in cells, tissues, and animals. A wide range of physiological and molecular biological evidence suggests that the receptors that mediate these effects, the androgen and glucocorticoid receptors (AR and GR, respectively), influence each other's transcriptional activity. We now show that coexpressed AR and GR indeed do interact at the transcriptional level and that this interaction is correlated with their ability to form heterodimers at a common DNA site, in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, mutants that cannot heterodimerize do not inhibit each other's activity. These observations provide the first evidence that the opposing physiological effects of the androgen and glucocorticoid hormones are due to the direct physical interaction between their receptors at the transcriptional level.

Identification and characterization of a novel androgen response element composed of a direct repeat

Transcriptional regulation by the androgen receptor (AR) requires its binding to hormone response element nucleotide sequences in DNA. A consensus glucocorticoid response element (GRE) can mediate transactivation by AR and other members of the AR/glucocorticoid (GR)/progesterone (PR)/mineralocorticoid (MR) receptor subfamily. We identified putative androgen response element (ARE) sequences by binding of a human AR DNA-binding domain fusion protein to DNA in a random sequence selection assay. A 17-base pair consensus nucleotide sequence, termed IDR17, containing three potential GRE-like core binding sites organized as both inverted and direct repeats, was determined from a pool of degenerate oligonucleotides. IDR17 was active in mediating androgen-dependent induction of reporter gene expression in transient transfection assays. Dissection of the IDR17 sequence revealed an 11-base pair sequence (DR-1), consisting of two potential core binding sites oriented as an overlapping direct repeat, as the most potent ARE. DR-1 demonstrated a strong preference for AR binding and transactivation when compared with GR. To our knowledge, this is the first observation that a direct repeat of GRE-like core motifs functions as a preferred hormone response element within the AR/GR/PR/MR subfamily of nuclear receptors.

Defining a functional androgen responsive element in the 5' far upstream flanking region of the prostate-specific antigen gene

Previously, an androgen responsive element (ARE or promoter ARE) was identified in the proximal promoter region of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) gene. The proximal promoter fragment could mediate androgen induction of expression of a heterologous reporter gene in androgen receptor (AR)-less cells with exogenous AR in co-transfection assays. However, it exerted little androgen inducibility in androgen sensitive human prostate cells, LNCaP, which produce PSA mRNA and protein. In this study, we have identified a second functional ARE (or upstream ARE) approximately 4 kb upstream of the cap site of the PSA transcript. Interestingly, although the AREs are necessary for androgen induction, the DNA sequences surrounding the upstream ARE are also required for androgen induction by the PSA promoter in LNCaP cells. The results indicated that the upstream DNA sequences can cooperate with either ARE to mediate androgen induced gene expression in LNCaP cells.

Involvement of an octamer-like sequence within a crucial region of the androgen-dependent Slp enhancer

Androgen dependence of the mouse sex-limited protein (Slp) gene is conferred by an enhancer encompassing a consensus hormone response element (HRE) and sites for several nonreceptor factors. The footprint IV (FPIV) region of the enhancer plays a key role in hormone- and tissue-specific response, both in vitro and in vivo. We characterized FPIV-binding factors by methylation interference analysis and UV cross-linking of several complexes evident in gel mobility-shift assays. The footprinting analysis revealed that distinct base contacts within the multiple nuclear protein-DNA complexes occurred primarily within a sequence similar to an octamer transcription factor (Oct-1) binding site. With additional data on approximate molecular weights from UV cross-linking, several plausible candidates were tested for their DNA binding and functional activity at FPIV. Oct-like protein binding in gel-shift assays with several cell and tissue extracts was evident using specific competitors and antibodies, but was lower in affinity for FPIV than for an Oct-1 consensus site. Site-directed mutation of the FPIV sequence to a consensus Oct-1 element within the Slp enhancer context increased Oct-1 binding in vitro, but greatly reduced hormonal induction in vivo. This suggested that Oct-1 is not directly involved in response, or alternatively, that Oct-1 bound to the lower-affinity site interacts with neighboring factors significantly differently than Oct-1 bound to a consensus sequence. A sequence overlapping the Oct-like element that was similar to a hepatic nuclear factor-4 (HNF-4) site showed no ability to bind HNF-4 in vitro, nor the related orphan receptor, chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter factor (COUP-TF). Intriguingly, however, expression of COUP-TF in transfection had a dramatic inhibitory effect on response of the androgen-specific enhancer (C' delta9), but did not affect other enhancer configurations that can also be induced by glucocorticoid (C 'delta2). This underscores that, despite extensive sequence identity of C' delta9 and C' delta2, components of the androgen-specific transcription complex differ significantly from that of one that is more generally steroid responsive.

Steroid hormone responsiveness of a family of closely related mouse proviral elements

Regulation of the mouse sex-limited protein (Slp) gene in unusual in that hormone response is conferred by the 5' LTR of an upstream inserted provirus, dubbed the imposon (imp1). In a search for additional genes whose regulation has been affected by retrotransposition events, we isolated two partial proviral elements by stringent screening of a mouse genomic library. One clone (imp2) contained a portion of the envelope gene and a 3' LTR that was nearly identical to the 3' LTR of imp1; this similarity extended to insertion into a B1 repetitive element. The second proviral clone (imp3) contained a 5' LTR and associated coding sequences, but lacked its 3' LTR; the LTR of imp3 differed by 12% from the imp1 sequence. To assess potential hormone response, proviral enhancer regions cloned into reporter vectors were tested in transfection. The imp2 enhancer was similar in behavior to imp1, conferring both androgen and glucocorticoid induction in one fragment context and an androgen-specific response in another. In contrast, the imp3 enhancer allowed high expression in the absence of hormone and was less responsive to steroids in general and androgen in particular. These three proviral elements define a small family of steroid responsive proviruses in the mouse genome, and at least one member has had a lasting impact on an endogenous gene's regulation.

Androgen receptor gene mutations in prostate cancer. Implications for disease progression and therapy

Recent studies indicate that androgen receptors are present in all histological types of prostatic tumours, in relapsed prostatic carcinomas and in tumour metastases, even those obtained from patients in whom endocrine therapy was unsuccessful. Several research groups have asked whether structurally altered androgen receptors might be present in human prostatic tumours. The first androgen receptor mutation in prostate cancer was detected in the tumour cell line LNCaP. The frequency of androgen receptor mutations in primary tumours of the prostate is relatively low. In contrast, a high frequency of mutations has been reported in bone metastases from patients who did not respond to endocrine therapy. This fact may reflect genetic instability in these late tumour stages. Mutant androgen receptors detected in human prostate cancer cells are 'promiscuous receptors'; that is, they are activated not only by synthetic and testicular androgens, but also by adrenal androgens, products of dihydrotestosterone metabolism, estrogenic and progestagenic steroids, and even by nonsteroidal antiandrogens. Interestingly, the nonsteroidal antiandrogens hydroxyflutamide and nilutamide, but not bicalutamide, have been reported to have agonistic effects at mutant androgen receptors. It is speculated that the existence of androgen receptor mutations may explain, at least in part, the 'antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome': a temporary improvement in a subpopulation of prostate cancer patients following cessation of an antiandrogen from a therapeutic protocol. Further studies on androgen receptor alterations in prostate cancer should focus on metastatic specimens obtained from the late stages of this disease.

Delineation of two distinct type 1 activation functions in the androgen receptor amino-terminal domain

Based on the finding that some transcription factors contain multiple transcriptional regulatory activities, we constructed a panel of rat androgen receptor (AR) mutants containing small internal deletions and point mutations within the amino-terminal region of the receptor. Trans-activation assays in CV-1 cells using AR-responsive reporter genes were performed and led to the identification of two noncontiguous trans-activation regions in the AR amino terminus. One of these regions, termed activator function 1a (AF-1a) is a highly-conserved 14-amino acid segment that is predicted to form a beta-turn followed by an acidic amphipathic alpha-helix. Point mutagenesis within AF-1a revealed that two adjacent hydrophobic residues were required for full AR trans-activation function, as arginine substitutions resulted in a 60% reduction in transcriptional activity. A second amino-terminal region was also identified and has been designated AF-1b. Deletion of the 65-amino acid AF-1b segment, which contains numerous glutamate and aspartate residues, caused a 55% decrease in trans-activation function. An AF-1a/AF-1b double mutant retains less than 10% trans-activation function compared with wild-type AR, suggesting that AF-1a and AF-1b may each contribute separately to maximal AR activity. To determine whether AF-1a and AF-1b play a role in AR-mediated trans-repression of AP-1 function, we tested single and double AF-1a/AF-1b mutants in a transient trans-repression assay. Our results showed that neither AF-1a nor AF-1b was required for AP-1 trans-repression, demonstrating that AR-mediated trans-repression and trans-activation are discrete functions.

DNA sequence insertion and evolutionary variation in gene regulation

Current evidence on the long-term evolutionary effect of insertion of sequence elements into gene regions is reviewed, restricted to cases where a sequence derived from a past insertion participates in the regulation of expression of a useful gene. Ten such examples in eukaryotes demonstrate that segments of repetitive DNA or mobile elements have been inserted in the past in gene regions, have been preserved, sometimes modified by selection, and now affect control of transcription of the adjacent gene. Included are only examples in which transcription control was modified by the insert. Several cases in which merely transcription initiation occurred in the insert were set aside. Two of the examples involved the long terminal repeats of mammalian endogenous retroviruses. Another two examples were control of transcription by repeated sequence inserts in sea urchin genomes. There are now six published examples in which Alu sequences were inserted long ago into human gene regions, were modified, and now are central in control/enhancement of transcription. The number of published examples of Alu sequences affecting gene control has grown threefold in the last year and is likely to continue growing. Taken together, all of these examples show that the insertion of sequence elements in the genome has been a significant source of regulatory variation in evolution.

Glucocorticoid and progestin receptors are differently involved in the cooperation with a structural element of the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter

We have previously characterized a regulatory element located between -294 and -200 within the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) long terminal repeat (LTR). This element termed AA element cooperates with the glucocorticoid response elements (GREs) for glucocorticoid activation. Here we show that in a MMTV LTR wild type context, the deletion of this element significantly reduces both glucocorticoid and progestin activation of the promoter. Deletion of the two most distal GREs forces the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and the progestin receptor (PR) to bind the same response elements and results in a dramatic decrease in the inducibility of the MMTV promoter by the two hormones. The simultaneous deletion of the two distal GREs and of the AA element abolishes completely the glucocorticoid-induced activation of the promoter. In contrast it restores a significant level of progestin-induced activation. This different effect of the double deletion on glucocorticoid- and progestin-induced MMTV promoter activation is not cell specific because it is also observed, and is even stronger, when either GR or PR is expressed in the same cell line (NIH 3T3). This is the first description of a mutated MMTV promoter that, although retaining GREs, is activated by progestins and not by glucocorticoids. This suggests a different functional cooperation between protein(s) interacting with the AA element and GR or PR. Cotransfections with constructs containing wild-type or mutated MMTV LTR with either PR lacking its C-terminal domain or GR/PR chimeras in which the N-terminal domains have been exchanged demonstrate that the N-terminal domains of the receptors specify the different behavior of GR and PR regarding the AA element.

Two androgen response regions cooperate in steroid hormone regulated activity of the prostate-specific antigen promoter

Transcription of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) gene is androgen regulated. The PSA promoter contains at position -170 the sequence AGAACAgcaAGTGCT, which is closely related to the ARE (androgen response element) consensus sequence GGTACAnnnTGTTCT. This sequence is a high affinity androgen receptor (AR) binding site and acts as a functional ARE in transfected LNCaP cells. A 35-base pair segment starting at -400 (ARR: androgen response region; GTGGTGCAGGGATCAGGGAGTCTCACAATCTCCTG) cooperates with the ARE in androgen induction of the PSA promoter. A construct with three ARR copies linked to a minimal PSA promoter showed a strong (104-fold) androgen induced activity. The ARR was also able to confer androgen responsiveness to a minimal thymidine kinase promoter. Both AR binding and transcriptional activity resided in a 20-base pair ARR subfragment: CAGGGATCAGGGAGTCTCAC (2S). Mutational analysis indicated that the sequence GGATCAgggAGTCTC in the 2S fragment is a functionally active, low affinity AR binding site. Like AR, the glucocorticoid receptor was able to stimulate PSA promoter activity. Both the ARE and ARR are involved in dexamethasone regulation of the PSA promoter. Both the AR and glucocorticoid receptor were 20-100-fold more active on ARR-PSA and ARR-thymidine kinase promoter constructs in LNCaP cells than in other cell types (COS, HeLa, Hep3B, and T47D cells), indicating (prostate) cell specificity.

Steroid receptor heterodimerization demonstrated in vitro and in vivo

The mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptors (MR and GR, respectively) are members of the intracellular receptor superfamily that bind as homodimers to the same hormone response elements (HREs). Physiological evidence suggests that MR and GR interact with each other in cells that express both receptors, implying that they might directly interact in the regulation of transcription initiation. Indeed, we have found that coexpressed MR and GR interact functionally at the transcriptional level and furthermore that they interact physically through heterodimer formation at a shared HRE in vitro and in vivo. We suggest from these findings that heterodimerization may play an important role in steroid receptor transcriptional regulation.

Specificity of simple hormone response elements in androgen regulated genes

Androgen (AR) and glucocorticoid (GR) receptors recognize a family of 15 base pair partial palindromic hormone response elements (HRE). We have studied receptor interactions with several HREs from androgen regulated genes to determine their potential to mediate a selective androgen response. Synthetic oligonucleotides corresponding to the elements were analysed for receptor binding and steroid dependent transcriptional enhancer activities. Each HRE contained the 3' half-site sequence (5'-TGTNCT-3') of the glucocorticoid response element (GRE) consensus sequence. HREs that countained the 5' half-site GRE consensus sequence (5'-A/GGNACA/G-3') had the strongest and-rogen response element (ARE) and GRE activities. In methylation interference assays, AR and GR interacted with identical base contact sites in the response elements. Two elements that deviated from the GRE consensus sequence by a single optimal base in the 5' half, had reduced ARE activity with no significant change in GRE activity and displayed lower binding of AR than GR in mobility shift assays using purified DNA binding domain peptides. Transfections with AR/GR and GR/AR chimeras containing the N-terminal domain of one receptor linked to the DNA-binding and C-terminal domains of the other suggested that N-terminal domain functions of GR also contributed to the greater GRE than ARE activities of the response elements.

Localization of the glucocorticoid receptor in discrete clusters in the cell nucleus

The cell nucleus is highly organized. Many nuclear functions are localized in discrete domains, suggesting that compartmentalization is an important aspect of the regulation and coordination of nuclear functions. We investigated the subnuclear distribution of the glucocorticoid receptor, a hormone-dependent transcription factor. By immunofluorescent labeling and confocal microscopy we found that after stimulation with the agonist dexamethasone the glucocorticoid receptor is concentrated in 1,000-2,000 clusters in the nucleoplasm. This distribution was observed in several cell types and with three different antibodies against the glucocorticoid receptor. A similar subnuclear distribution of glucocorticoid receptors was found after treatment of cells with the antagonist RU486, suggesting that the association of the glucocorticoid receptor in clusters does not require transformation of the receptor to a state that is able to activate transcription. By dual labeling we found that most dexamethasone-induced receptor clusters do not colocalize with sites of pre-mRNA synthesis. We also show that RNA polymerase II is localized in a large number of clusters in the nucleus. Glucocorticoid receptor clusters did not significantly colocalize with these RNA polymerase II clusters or with domains containing the splicing factor SC-35. Taken together, these results suggest that most clustered glucocorticoid receptor molecules are not directly involved in activation of transcription.

Identification of two transcription activation units in the N-terminal domain of the human androgen receptor

To locate in detail the regions in the human androgen receptor (AR) involved in transcription activation, a series of N-terminal deletions was introduced in the wild type AR and in a constitutively active AR. The different constructs were tested for their capacity to activate transcription. Almost the entire N-terminal domain (residues 1-485) was necessary for full wild type AR activity when cotransfected with the (GRE)2tkCAT reporter in HeLa cells. In contrast, a smaller part of the N-terminal domain (amino acids 360-528) was sufficient for the constitutively active AR to induce transcription of the same (GRE)2tkCAT reporter in HeLa cells. This demonstrates the capacity of the AR to use different regions in the N-terminal domain as transcription activation units (TAUs). To obtain additional information of AR N-terminal TAUs, the GAL4 DNA binding domain was linked to either the entire or parts of the AR N-terminal domain and cotransfected with the (UAS)2tkCAT reporter in HeLa cells. The results confirmed that the first 485 amino acid residues accommodate a transcription activation function. When the chimeric AR-GAL4 constructs were tested on a different reporter ((UAS)5E1bCAT), a small shift in position of the TAU, responsible for full transcription activation, was observed. The data presented show that the size and location of the active TAU in the human AR is variable, being dependent on the promoter context and the presence or absence of the ligand binding domain.

Domains of the human androgen receptor and glucocorticoid receptor involved in binding to the nuclear matrix

Steroid receptors have been reported to bind to the nuclear matrix. The nuclear matrix is operationally defined as the residual nuclear structure that remains after extraction of most of the chromatin and all soluble and loosely bound components. To obtain insight in the molecular mechanism of the interaction of steroid receptors with the nuclear matrix, we studied the binding of several deletion mutants of the human androgen receptor (hAR) and the human glucocorticoid receptor (hGR) to the nuclear matrix. Receptor binding was tested for two different nuclear matrix preparations: complete matrices, in which most matrix proteins are retained during the isolation procedure, and depleted matrices, which consist of only a subset of these proteins. The results show that the C-terminal domain of the hAR binds tightly to both depleted and complete matrices. In addition, at least one other domain of the hAR binds to complete matrices but not to depleted matrices. In contrast to the hAR, the hGR binds only to complete matrices. For this interaction both the DNA-binding domain and the C-terminal domain of the hGR are required, whereas the N-terminal domain is not. We conclude that specific protein domains of the hAR and the hGR are involved in binding to the nuclear matrix. In addition, our results indicate that the hAR and the hGR are attached to the nuclear matrix through different molecular interactions.

Effects of corticosterone and testosterone on pituitary gonadotropin content, secretion, bioactivity and messenger RNA levels in the presence or absence of GnRH in male rats

The effects of corticosterone (B) and testosterone (T) on pituitary and serum bioactive and immunoreactive gonadotropins and on gonadotropin hormone subunit messenger RNA levels were compared in the absence of GnRH. Male rats were implanted with pellets of either cholesterol, B or T. At implantation, 2 and 4 days later half of each group received GnRH antagonist and animals were killed 5 days after implantation. As expected, GnRH antagonist lowered bioactive and immunoreactive serum FSH and LH, pituitary FSH, LHβ and FSHβ mRNA. B treatment alone lowered bioactive and immunoreactive serum FSH and immunoreactive serum LH. B reversed the antagonist effect on bioactive and immunoreactive pituitary FSH and FSHβ mRNA. T alone lowered bioactive and immunoreactive serum FSH and LH levels. T reversed the antagonist effect on bioactive and immunoreactive pituitary FSH. T lowered bioactive and immunoreactive pituitary LH and LHβ mRNA and partially reversed the antagonist effect on FSHβ mRNA. The data suggest that either B or T enhance FSH synthesis by acting directly at the gonadotrope, but that B does not affect LH variables to the same extent as T. The results suggest that in stressed animals, when T levels are reduced, B can substitute for T in sustaining FSH synthesis.

Mouse mammary tumor virus chromatin in human breast cancer cells is constitutively hypersensitive and exhibits steroid hormone-independent loading of transcription factors in vivo

We have stably introduced a reporter gene under the control of the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) long terminal repeat (LTR) into human T47D breast cancer cells to study the action of the progesterone receptor (PR) on transcription from a chromatin template. Unexpectedly, the chromatin organization of the MMTV LTR in these human breast cancer cells differed markedly from what we have observed previously. The region adjacent to the transcription start site (-221 to -75) was found to be constitutively hypersensitive to restriction enzyme cleavage in the absence of hormone. This region is normally encompassed within the second nucleosome of a phased array of six nucleosomes that is assembled when the MMTV LTR is stably maintained in mouse cells. Characteristically, in these rodent cells, the identical DNA sequences show increased restriction enzyme cleavage only in the presence of glucocorticoid. The increased access of restriction enzymes observed in the human PR+ cells was not observed in adjacent nucleosomes and was unaffected by treatment with the progesterone antagonist RU486. In addition, exonuclease III-dependent stops corresponding to the binding sites for nuclear factor 1 and the PR were observed before and after hormone treatment. These results indicate that MMTV chromatin replicated in these cells is organized into a constitutively open architecture and that this open chromatin state is accompanied by hormone-independent loading of a transcription factor complex that is normally excluded from uninduced chromatin.

Molecular mechanisms of androgen action

Androgens directly regulate a vast number of physiological events. These direct androgen effects are mediated by a nuclear receptor that exhibits four major functions or activities: steroid binding, DNA binding, transactivation, and nuclear localization. The SBD consists of a hydrophobic pocket of amino acids that exhibits high-affinity, androgen-specific binding. Based on studies of mutant AR, it appears that a number of different amino acids contribute to the steroid binding characteristics of the AR. The DNA binding domain confers sequence-specific binding to structures called androgen-responsive elements. The specificity of steroid binding and DNA binding provides a crucial basis for androgen-specific regulation of target genes. The nuclear localization signal shares homology with known nuclear localization signals and, coupled with the presence of androgens, is responsible for localizing the AR to the nucleus. The transactivation functions reside mostly in the NH2 terminus but the responsible domains are as yet poorly defined. Though the different domains can act as independent moieties, one domain can clearly alter the behavior of another domain. For instance, the SBD appears to inhibit the transactivating functions until steroid is bound and the amino terminus prevents DNA binding activity until steroid is bound. The relative ease of introducing mutations with polymerase chain reaction technology will facilitate further delineation of critical amino acids and domains responsible for the various activities of the AR. The recent cloning and characterization of AR promoters revealed that the AR genes are driven by a TATA-less promoter characteristics of housekeeping genes. Analysis of transcription rates, mRNA levels, and protein levels indicates that androgens and pkA and pkC pathways modulate expression of AR mRNA and protein. This indicates that the same signal pathways that interact to regulate androgen target genes also regulate the levels of AR in the target tissues. Surprisingly few androgen-regulated genes have been well characterized for the mechanisms by which androgen regulates the gene. The C(3), Slp, probasin, PSA, and hKLK2 genes have provided examples where androgens regulate transcription. Posttranscriptional regulation by androgens has been demonstrated for the SVP1, 2, 3, and 4 and AR genes. The mechanisms underlying posttranscriptional regulation are poorly defined but substantial progress has been made in defining the critical elements that mediate transcriptional effects of androgens. Transcriptional effects are mediated through binding of androgen-AR complexes to specific DNA sequences called AREs. Simple AREs such as those found in C(3) and kallikrein genes tend to be permissive in that GR and PR can also act through the same element.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The stringency and magnitude of androgen-specific gene activation are combinatorial functions of receptor and nonreceptor binding site sequences

The mechanism by which specific hormonal regulation of gene expression is attained in vivo is a paradox in that several of the steroid receptors recognize the same DNA element in vitro. We have characterized a complex enhancer of the mouse sex-limited protein (Slp) gene that is activated exclusively by androgens but not by glucocorticoids in transfection. Potent androgen induction requires both the consensus hormone response element (HRE) and auxiliary elements residing within the 120-bp DNA fragment C' delta 9. Multiple nonreceptor factors are involved in androgen specificity, with respect to both the elevation of androgen receptor activity and the inactivity of glucocorticoid receptor (GR), since clustered base changes at any of several sites reduce or abolish androgen induction and do not increase glucocorticoid response. However, moving the HRE as little as 10 bases away from the rest of the enhancer allows GR to function, suggesting that GR is repressed by juxtaposition to particular factors within the androgen-specific complex. Surprisingly, some sequence variations of the HRE itself, within the context of C' delta 9, alter the stringency of specificity, as well as the magnitude, of hormonal response. These HRE sequence effects on expression correspond in a qualitative manner with receptor binding, i.e., GR shows a threefold difference in affinities for HREs amongst which androgen receptor does not discriminate. Altering the HRE orientation within the enhancer also affects hormonal stringency, increasing glucocorticoid but not androgen response. The effect of these subtle variations suggests that they alter receptor position with respect to other factors. Thus, protein-protein interactions that elicit specific gene regulation are established by the array of DNA elements in a complex enhancer and can be modulated by sequence variations within these elements that may influence selection of precise protein contacts.

The stringency and magnitude of androgen-specific gene activation are combinatorial functions of receptor and nonreceptor binding site sequences

The mechanism by which specific hormonal regulation of gene expression is attained in vivo is a paradox in that several of the steroid receptors recognize the same DNA element in vitro. We have characterized a complex enhancer of the mouse sex-limited protein (Slp) gene that is activated exclusively by androgens but not by glucocorticoids in transfection. Potent androgen induction requires both the consensus hormone response element (HRE) and auxiliary elements residing within the 120-bp DNA fragment C' delta 9. Multiple nonreceptor factors are involved in androgen specificity, with respect to both the elevation of androgen receptor activity and the inactivity of glucocorticoid receptor (GR), since clustered base changes at any of several sites reduce or abolish androgen induction and do not increase glucocorticoid response. However, moving the HRE as little as 10 bases away from the rest of the enhancer allows GR to function, suggesting that GR is repressed by juxtaposition to particular factors within the androgen-specific complex. Surprisingly, some sequence variations of the HRE itself, within the context of C' delta 9, alter the stringency of specificity, as well as the magnitude, of hormonal response. These HRE sequence effects on expression correspond in a qualitative manner with receptor binding, i.e., GR shows a threefold difference in affinities for HREs amongst which androgen receptor does not discriminate. Altering the HRE orientation within the enhancer also affects hormonal stringency, increasing glucocorticoid but not androgen response. The effect of these subtle variations suggests that they alter receptor position with respect to other factors. Thus, protein-protein interactions that elicit specific gene regulation are established by the array of DNA elements in a complex enhancer and can be modulated by sequence variations within these elements that may influence selection of precise protein contacts.

Mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptor activities distinguished by nonreceptor factors at a composite response element

Mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid hormones elicit distinct physiologic responses, yet the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) bind to and activate transcription similarly from a consensus simple hormone response element (HRE). The activities of GR and MR at plfG, a 25-base pair composite response element to which both the steroid receptors and transcription factor AP1 can bind, are analyzed here. Under conditions in which GR represses AP1-stimulated transcription from plfG, MR was inactive. With the use of MR-GR chimeras, a segment of the NH2-terminal region of GR (amino acids 105 to 440) was shown to be required for this repression. Thus, the distinct physiologic effects mediated by MR and GR may be determined by differential interactions of nonreceptor factors with specific receptor domains at composite response elements.