The Escherichia coli polB locus is identical to dinA, the structural gene for DNA polymerase II. Characterization of Pol II purified from a polB mutant

Answering the Call: Coping with DNA Damage at the Most Inopportune Time

DNA damage incurred during the process of chromosomal replication has a particularly high possibility of resulting in mutagenesis or lethality for the cell. The SOS response of Escherichia coli appears to be well adapted for this particular situation and involves the coordinated up-regulation of genes whose products center upon the tasks of maintaining the integrity of the replication fork when it encounters DNA damage, delaying the replication process (a DNA damage checkpoint), repairing the DNA lesions or allowing replication to occur over these DNA lesions, and then restoring processive replication before the SOS response itself is turned off. Recent advances in the fields of genomics and biochemistry has given a much more comprehensive picture of the timing and coordination of events which allow cells to deal with potentially lethal or mutagenic DNA lesions at the time of chromosomal replication.

Roles of DNA polymerases V and II in SOS-induced error-prone and error-free repair in Escherichia coli

DNA polymerase V, composed of a heterotrimer of the DNA damage-inducible UmuC and UmuD(2)(') proteins, working in conjunction with RecA, single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding protein (SSB), beta sliding clamp, and gamma clamp loading complex, are responsible for most SOS lesion-targeted mutations in Escherichia coli, by catalyzing translesion synthesis (TLS). DNA polymerase II, the product of the damage-inducible polB (dinA ) gene plays a pivotal role in replication-restart, a process that bypasses DNA damage in an error-free manner. Replication-restart takes place almost immediately after the DNA is damaged (approximately 2 min post-UV irradiation), whereas TLS occurs after pol V is induced approximately 50 min later. We discuss recent data for pol V-catalyzed TLS and pol II-catalyzed replication-restart. Specific roles during TLS for pol V and each of its accessory factors have been recently determined. Although the precise molecular mechanism of pol II-dependent replication-restart remains to be elucidated, it has recently been shown to operate in conjunction with RecFOR and PriA proteins.

All three SOS-inducible DNA polymerases (Pol II, Pol IV and Pol V) are involved in induced mutagenesis

Most organisms contain several members of a recently discovered class of DNA polymerases (umuC/dinB superfamily) potentially involved in replication of damaged DNA. In Escherichia coli, only Pol V (umuDC) was known to be essential for base substitution mutagenesis induced by UV light or abasic sites. Here we show that, depending upon the nature of the DNA damage and its sequence context, the two additional SOS-inducible DNA polymerases, Pol II (polB) and Pol IV (dinB), are also involved in error-free and mutagenic translesion synthesis (TLS). For example, bypass of N:-2-acetylaminofluorene (AAF) guanine adducts located within the NAR:I mutation hot spot requires Pol II for -2 frameshifts but Pol V for error-free TLS. On the other hand, error-free and -1 frameshift TLS at a benzo(a)pyrene adduct requires both Pol IV and Pol V. Therefore, in response to the vast diversity of existing DNA damage, the cell uses a pool of 'translesional' DNA polymerases in order to bypass the various DNA lesions.

The Escherichia coli UVM response is accompanied by an SOS-independent error-prone DNA replication activity demonstrable in vitro

UVM is an SOS-independent inducible response characterized by elevated mutagenesis at a site-specific 3, N4-ethenocytosine (epsilonC) residue borne on M13 single-stranded DNA transfected into Escherichia coli cells pretreated with DNA-damaging agents. By constructing and using E. coli strain AM124 (polA polB umuDC dinB lexA1[Ind-]), we show here that the UVM response is manifested in cells deficient for SOS induction, as well as for all four of the 'non-replicative' DNA polymerases, namely DNA polymerase I (polA), II (polB), IV (dinB) and V (umuDC). These results confirm that UVM represents a novel, previously unidentified cellular response to DNA-damaging agents. To address the question as to whether the UVM response is accompanied by an error-prone DNA replication activity, we applied a newly developed in vitro replication assay coupled to an in vitro mutation analysis system. In the assay, circular M13 single-stranded DNA bearing a site-specific lesion is converted to circular double-stranded replicative-form DNA in the presence of cell extracts and nucleotide precursors under conditions that closely mimic M13 replication in vivo. The newly synthesized (minus) DNA strand is selectively amplified by ligation-mediated polymerase chain reaction (LM-PCR), followed by a multiplex sequence analysis to determine the frequency and specificity of mutations. Replication of DNA bearing a site-specific epsilonC lesion by cell extracts from uninduced E. coli AM124 cells results in a mutation frequency of about 13%. Mutation frequency is elevated fivefold (to 58%) in cell extracts from UVM-induced AM124 cells, with C --> A mutations predominating over C --> T mutations, a specificity similar to that observed in vivo. These results, together with previously reported data, suggest that the UVM response is mediated through the induction of a transient error-prone DNA replication activity and that a modification of DNA polymerase III or the expression of a previously unidentified DNA polymerase may account for the UVM phenotype.

Recombinational repair of DNA damage in Escherichia coli and bacteriophage lambda

Although homologous recombination and DNA repair phenomena in bacteria were initially extensively studied without regard to any relationship between the two, it is now appreciated that DNA repair and homologous recombination are related through DNA replication. In Escherichia coli, two-strand DNA damage, generated mostly during replication on a template DNA containing one-strand damage, is repaired by recombination with a homologous intact duplex, usually the sister chromosome. The two major types of two-strand DNA lesions are channeled into two distinct pathways of recombinational repair: daughter-strand gaps are closed by the RecF pathway, while disintegrated replication forks are reestablished by the RecBCD pathway. The phage lambda recombination system is simpler in that its major reaction is to link two double-stranded DNA ends by using overlapping homologous sequences. The remarkable progress in understanding the mechanisms of recombinational repair in E. coli over the last decade is due to the in vitro characterization of the activities of individual recombination proteins. Putting our knowledge about recombinational repair in the broader context of DNA replication will guide future experimentation.

A phenotype for enigmatic DNA polymerase II: a pivotal role for pol II in replication restart in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli

DNA synthesis in Escherichia coli is inhibited transiently after UV irradiation. Induced replisome reactivation or "replication restart" occurs shortly thereafter, allowing cells to complete replication of damaged genomes. At the present time, the molecular mechanism underlying replication restart is not understood. DNA polymerase II (pol II), encoded by the dinA (polB) gene, is induced as part of the global SOS response to DNA damage. Here we show that pol II plays a pivotal role in resuming DNA replication in cells exposed to UV irradiation. There is a 50-min delay in replication restart in mutant cells lacking pol II. Although replication restart appears normal in DeltaumuDC strains containing pol II, the restart process is delayed for >90 min in cells lacking both pol II and UmuD'(2)C. Because of the presence of pol II, a transient replication-restart burst is observed in a "quick-stop" temperature-sensitive pol III mutant (dnaE486) at nonpermissive temperature. However, complete recovery of DNA synthesis requires the concerted action of both pol II and pol III. Our data demonstrate that pol II and UmuD'(2)C act in independent pathways of replication restart, thereby providing a phenotype for pol II in the repair of UV-damaged DNA.

SOS and Mayday: multiple inducible mutagenic pathways in Escherichia coli

Environmental and physiological stress conditions can transiently alter the fidelity of DNA replication. The DNA damage-mediated SOS response in Escherichia coli is the best-known example of such an 'inducible mutagenesis' or 'transient mutator' pathway. Emerging evidence suggests the existence of a number of other stress-inducible pathways that also affect the fidelity of replication. Among the more provocative recent findings are UVM, an SOS-independent damage-inducible mutagenic pathway, and a new recA-dependent but umuD/C-independent pathway that appears to be provoked by translational stress. These findings alter our view of inducible mutagenesis, and anticipate the existence of previously unrecognized links between protein synthesis and DNA replication.