Characterization of the peroxisomal cycling receptor, Pex5p, using a cell-free in vitro import system

Identification of Pex5pM, and retarded maturation of 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase and acyl-CoA oxidase in CHO cells expressing mutant Pex5p isoforms

Recently, we isolated CHO cells, termed SK32 cells, that express mutant Pex5p (G432R), and showed mislocalization of catalase in the cytosol, but peroxisomal localization of 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase (thiolase) in the mutant cells [Ito, R. et al. (2001) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 288, 321-327]. While analyzing the mutant cells, we found a novel Pex5p isoform (Pex5pM), which was shorter by seven amino acids than Pex5pL and longer by 30 amino acids than Pex5pS. Similar levels of mRNA syntheses for the PEX5 gene were observed in both the wild type and mutant cells, but the protein levels of Pex5p isoforms were markedly reduced in the mutant cells cultured at 37 degrees C and only slightly discernible at 30 degrees C, suggesting that they could be rapidly degraded. Furthermore, we characterized the peroxisomal localization of thiolase and acyl-CoA oxidase (Aox) in SK32 cells. The proteins in the organelle fraction were protected from proteinase K-digestion in the mutant cells, indicating that they were translocated inside peroxisomes. However, the conversion of Aox from component A to components B and C was completely prevented at both 30 and 37 degrees C, and the precursor form of thiolase was partially processed to the mature one in a temperature-sensitive manner. Transformed SK32 cells stably expressing one of the wild type Pex5p isoforms were isolated, and then the maturation steps for thiolase and Aox were examined. Pex5pM and S restored the processing of the two enzymes, but Pex5pL did not. In addition, Pex5pL prevented the maturation of thiolase observed at 30 degrees C. These results indicate that (i) the novel Pex5pM is functional and (ii) a seven amino acids-insertion, which is present in the L isoform but absent in the M isoform, plays some role in the process of maturation of thiolase and Aox.

Properties of the ubiquitin-pex5p thiol ester conjugate

Pex5p, the peroxisomal protein cycling receptor, binds newly synthesized peroxisomal matrix proteins in the cytosol and promotes their translocation across the organelle membrane. During its transient passage through the membrane, Pex5p is monoubiquitinated at a conserved cysteine residue, a requisite for its subsequent ATP-dependent export back into the cytosol. Here we describe the properties of the soluble and membrane-bound monoubiquitinated Pex5p species (Ub-Pex5p). Our data suggest that 1) Ub-Pex5p is deubiquitinated by a combination of context-dependent enzymatic and nonenzymatic mechanisms; 2) soluble Ub-Pex5p retains the capacity to interact with the peroxisomal import machinery in a cargo-dependent manner; and 3) substitution of the conserved cysteine residue of Pex5p by a lysine results in a quite functional protein both in vitro and in vivo. Additionally, we show that MG132, a proteasome inhibitor, blocks the import of a peroxisomal reporter protein in vivo.

Members of the E2D (UbcH5) family mediate the ubiquitination of the conserved cysteine of Pex5p, the peroxisomal import receptor

According to current models of peroxisomal biogenesis, newly synthesized peroxisomal matrix proteins are transported into the organelle by Pex5p. Pex5p recognizes these proteins in the cytosol, mediates their membrane translocation, and is exported back into the cytosol in an ATP-dependent manner. We have previously shown that export of Pex5p is preceded by (and requires) monoubiquitination of a conserved cysteine residue present at its N terminus. In yeasts, and probably also in plants, ubiquitination of Pex5p is mediated by a specialized ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, Pex4p. In mammals, the identity of this enzyme has remained unknown for many years. Here, we provide evidence suggesting that E2D1/2/3 (UbcH5a/b/c) are the mammalian functional counterparts of yeast/plant Pex4p. The mechanistic implications of these findings are discussed.

Comparison of the PTS1- and Rab8b-binding properties of Pex5p and Pex5Rp/TRIP8b

Tetratricopeptide (TPR)-domain proteins are involved in various cellular processes. The TPR domain is known to be responsible for interaction with other proteins commonly recognizing sequence motifs at the C-termini. One such TPR-protein, TRIP8b, was originally identified in rat as an interaction partner of Rab8b, and its human orthologue as a protein related to the peroxisomal targeting signal 1 (PTS1) receptor Pex5p (Pex5Rp). Somewhat later, the mouse orthologue was reported to bind the hyperpolarization-activated, cyclic nucleotide-regulated HCN channels, and, very recently, the rat orthologue was shown to interact with latrophilin 1, the calcium-independent receptor of alpha-latrotoxin. Here we employed various methodological approaches to investigate and compare the binding specificities of the human PTS1 receptor Pex5p and the related protein Pex5Rp/TRIP8b towards a subset of targets, including Rab8b and various C-termini resembling PTS1. The results show that the TPR domains of Pex5p and Pex5Rp/TRIP8b have distinct but overlapping substrate specificities. This suggests that selectivity in the recognition of substrates by the TPR domains of Pex5p and Pex5Rp/TRIP8b is a matter of considerable complexity, and that no single determinant appears to be sufficient in unambiguously defining a binding target for either protein. This idea is further corroborated by our observations that changes in the surrounding residues or the conformational state of one of the binding partners can profoundly alter their binding activities. The implications of these findings for the possible peroxisome-related functions of Pex5Rp/TRIP8b are discussed.

The AAA peroxins Pex1p and Pex6p function as dislocases for the ubiquitinated peroxisomal import receptor Pex5p

The discovery of the peroxisomal ATPase Pex1p triggered the beginning of the research on AAA (ATPase associated with various cellular activities) proteins and the genetic dissection of peroxisome biogenesis. Peroxisomes are virtually ubiquitous organelles, which are connected to diverse cellular functions. The highly diverse and adaptive character of peroxisomes is accomplished by modulation of their enzyme content, which is mediated by dynamically operating protein-import machineries. The import of matrix proteins into the peroxisomal lumen has been described as the ATP-consuming step, but the corresponding reaction, as well as the ATPase responsible, had been obscure for nearly 15 years. Recent work using yeast and human fibroblast cells has identified the peroxisomal AAA proteins Pex1p and Pex6p as mechano-enzymes and core components of a complex which dislocates the cycling import receptor Pex5p from the peroxisomal membrane back to the cytosol. This AAA-mediated process is regulated by the ubiquitination status of the receptor. Pex4p [Ubc10p (ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme 10)]-catalysed mono-ubiquitination of Pex5p primes the receptor for recycling, thereby enabling further rounds of matrix protein import, whereas Ubc4p-catalysed polyubiquitination targets Pex5p to proteasomal degradation.

Ubiquitination of Mammalian Pex5p, the Peroxisomal Import Receptor

Protein translocation across the peroxisomal membrane requires the concerted action of numerous peroxins. One central component of this machinery is Pex5p, the cycling receptor for matrix proteins. Pex5p recognizes newly synthesized proteins in the cytosol and promotes their translocation across the peroxisomal membrane. After this translocation step, Pex5p is recycled back into the cytosol to start a new protein transport cycle. Here, we show that mammalian Pex5p is ubiquitinated at the peroxisomal membrane. Two different types of ubiquitination were detected, one of which is thiol-sensitive, involves Cys(11) of Pex5p, and is necessary for the export of the receptor back into the cytosol. Together with mechanistic data recently described for yeast Pex5p, these findings provide strong evidence for the existence of Pex4p- and Pex22p-like proteins in mammals.

Functional characterization of two missense mutations in Pex5p - C11S and N526K

Most newly synthesized peroxisomal proteins are targeted to the organelle by Pex5p, the peroxisomal cycling receptor. Pex5p interacts with these proteins in the cytosol, transports them to the peroxisomal docking/translocation machinery and promotes their translocation across the organelle membrane. Finally, Pex5p is recycled back to the cytosol in order to catalyse additional rounds of transportation. Although several properties of this protein sorting pathway have been recently uncovered, we are still far from comprehending many of its basic principles. Here, we describe the mechanistic implications of two single-amino acid substitutions in Pex5p. The first mutation characterized, Cys11Ser, blocks the recycling of Pex5p back into the cytosol at the step in which stage 2 Pex5p is converted into stage 3 Pex5p. The mutation Asn526Lys, previously described in a child with neonatal adrenoleukodystrophy and shown to abolish the PTS1-binding capacity of Pex5p, results in a Pex5p protein exhibiting import capacity. Protease assays suggest that the Asn526Lys mutation causes conformational alterations at the N-terminal half of Pex5p mimicking the ones induced by binding of a PTS1-containing peptide to the normal peroxin. The implications of these findings on the mechanism of protein translocation across the peroxisomal membrane are discussed.

The import competence of a peroxisomal membrane protein is determined by Pex19p before the docking step

Biogenesis of the mammalian peroxisomal membrane requires the action of Pex3p and Pex16p, two proteins present in the organelle membrane, and Pex19p, a protein that displays a dual subcellular distribution (peroxisomal and cytosolic). Pex19p interacts with most peroxisomal intrinsic membrane proteins, but whether this property reflects its role as an import receptor for this class of proteins or a chaperone-like function in the assembly/disassembly of peroxisomal membrane proteins has been the subject of much controversy. Here, we describe an in vitro system particularly suited to address this issue. It is shown that insertion of a reporter protein into the peroxisomal membrane is a Pex3p-dependent process that does not require ATP/GTP hydrolysis. The system can be programmed with recombinant versions of Pex19p, allowing us to demonstrate that Pex19p-cargo protein complexes formed in the absence of peroxisomes are the substrates for the peroxisomal docking/insertion machinery. Data suggesting that cargo-loaded Pex19p displays a much higher affinity for Pex3p than Pex19p alone are also provided. These results suggest that soluble Pex19p participates in the targeting of newly synthesized peroxisomal membrane proteins to the organelle membrane and support the existence of a cargo-induced peroxisomal targeting mechanism for Pex19p.

Pex14p, more than just a docking protein

After binding newly synthesized peroxisomal matrix proteins in the cytosol, the second task of Pex5p, the peroxisomal cycling receptor, is to carry these proteins to the peroxisomal membrane. Defining the nature of the events that occur at this membrane system and which ultimately result in the translocation of the cargo proteins into the matrix of the organelle and in the recycling of Pex5p back to the cytosol, is one of the major goals of the research in this field. Presently, it is generally accepted that all these steps are promoted by a large protein complex embedded in the peroxisomal membrane. This docking/translocation machinery or importomer, as it is often called, comprises many different peroxins of which one of the best characterized is Pex14p. Here, we review data regarding this membrane peroxin with emphasis on the interactions that it establishes with Pex5p. The available evidence suggests that the key to understand how folded proteins are capable of passing an apparently impermeable membrane may largely reside in this pair of peroxins.

Uniqueness of the mechanism of protein import into the peroxisome matrix: transport of folded, co-factor-bound and oligomeric proteins by shuttling receptors

Based on earlier suggestions that peroxisomes may have arisen from endosymbionts that later lost their DNA, it was expected that protein transport into this organelle would have parallels to systems found in other organelles of endosymbiont origin, such as mitochondria and chloroplasts. This review highlights three features of peroxisomal matrix protein import that make it unique in comparison with these other subcellular compartments - the ability of this organelle to transport folded, co-factor-bound and oligomeric proteins, the dynamics of the import receptors during the matrix protein import cycle and the existence of a peroxisomal quality-control pathway, which insures that the peroxisome membrane is cleared of cargo-free receptors.

The return of the peroxisome

Of the classical compartments of eukaryotic cells, peroxisomes were the last to be discovered. They are small, single-membrane-bound vesicles involved in cellular metabolism, most notably the β-oxidation of fatty acids. Characterization of their properties and behavior has progressed rather slowly. However, during the past few years, peroxisomes have entered the limelight as a result of several breakthroughs. These include the observations that they are not autonomously multiplying organelles but are derived from the endoplasmic reticulum, and that partitioning of peroxisomes to progeny cells is an active and well-controlled process. In addition, we are discovering more and more proteins that are not only dedicated to peroxisomes but also serve other organelles.

Shuttling mechanism of peroxisome targeting signal type 1 receptor Pex5: ATP-independent import and ATP-dependent export

Peroxisomal matrix proteins are posttranslationally imported into peroxisomes with the peroxisome-targeting signal 1 receptor, Pex5. The longer isoform of Pex5, Pex5L, also transports Pex7-PTS2 protein complexes. After unloading the cargoes, Pex5 returns to the cytosol. To address molecular mechanisms underlying Pex5 functions, we constructed a cell-free Pex5 translocation system with a postnuclear supernatant fraction from CHO cell lines. In assays using the wild-type CHO-K1 cell fraction, (35)S-labeled Pex5 was specifically imported into and exported from peroxisomes with multiple rounds. (35)S-Pex5 import was also evident using peroxisomes isolated from rat liver. ATP was not required for (35)S-Pex5 import but was indispensable for export. (35)S-Pex5 was imported neither to peroxisome remnants from RING peroxin-deficient cell mutants nor to those from pex14 cells lacking a Pex5-docking site. In contrast, (35)S-Pex5 was imported into the peroxisome remnants of PEX1-, PEX6-, and PEX26-defective cell mutants, including those from patients with peroxisome biogenesis disorders, from which, however, (35)S-Pex5 was not exported, thereby indicating that Pex1 and Pex6 of the AAA ATPase family and their recruiter, Pex26, were essential for Pex5 export. Moreover, we analyzed the (35)S-Pex5-associated complexes on peroxisomal membranes by blue-native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. (35)S-Pex5 was in two distinct, 500- and 800-kDa complexes comprising different sets of peroxins, such as Pex14 and Pex2, implying that Pex5 transited between the subcomplexes. Together, results indicated that Pex5 most likely enters peroxisomes, changes its interacting partners, and then exits using ATP energy.

The N-terminal half of the peroxisomal cycling receptor Pex5p is a natively unfolded domain

Targeting of most newly synthesised peroxisomal matrix proteins to the organelle requires Pex5p, the so-called PTS1 receptor. According to current models of peroxisomal biogenesis, Pex5p interacts with these proteins in the cytosol, transports them to the peroxisomal membrane and catalyses their translocation across the membrane. Presently, our knowledge on the structural details behind the interaction of Pex5p with the cargo proteins is reasonably complete. In contrast, information regarding the structure of the Pex5p N-terminal half (a region containing its peroxisomal targeting domain) is still limited. We have recently observed that the Stokes radius of this Pex5p domain is anomalously large, suggesting that this portion of the protein is either a structured elongated domain or that it adopts a low compactness conformation. Here, we address this issue using a combination of biophysical and biochemical approaches. Our results indicate that the N-terminal half of Pex5p is best described as a natively unfolded pre-molten globule-like domain. The implications of these findings on the mechanism of protein import into the peroxisome are discussed.

Peroxisome protein import: some answers, more questions

Recent advances in the study of plant peroxisomes are shedding new light on the importance of these organelles for plant development, and are revealing similarities and differences in peroxisome protein import pathways between plants, animals and fungi. For example, the import of matrix proteins that carry the PTS1 and PTS2 targeting signals is coupled in plants as it is in mammals, whereas these import pathways are separate in fungi. The expression of a human peroxisomal ATPase partially rescues the equivalent Arabidopsis mutant. Ubiquitination might play a role in receptor recycling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and exciting progress is being made through studies of the targeting of membrane proteins.

Yeast Pex14p Possesses Two Functionally Distinct Pex5p and One Pex7p Binding Sites

Current evidence favors a cycling receptor model for the import of peroxisomal matrix proteins. The yeast Pex14 protein together with Pex13p and Pex17p form the docking subcomplex at the peroxisomal membrane and interact in this cycle with both soluble import receptors Pex5p and Pex7p. In a first step of a structure-function analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pex14p, we mapped its binding sites with both receptors. Using the yeast two-hybrid system and pull-down assays, we showed that Pex5p directly interacts with two separate regions of ScPex14p, amino acid residues 1-58 and 235-308. The latter binding site at the C terminus of ScPex14p overlaps with a binding site of Pex7p at amino acid residues 235-325. The functional assessment of these two binding sites of ScPex14p with the peroxisomal targeting signal receptors indicates that they have distinct roles. Deletion of the N-terminal 58 amino acids caused a partial defect of matrix protein import in pex14delta cells expressing the Pex14-(59-341)-p fragment; however, it did not lead to a pex phenotype. In contrast, truncation of the C-terminal 106 amino acids of ScPex14p completely blocked this process. On the basis of these and other published data, we propose that the C terminus of Pex14p contains the actual docking site and discuss the possibility that the N terminus could be involved in a Pex5p-Pex14p association inside the peroxisomal membrane.

Alternative splicing suggests extended function of PEX26 in peroxisome biogenesis

Matsumoto and colleagues recently identified PEX26 as the gene responsible for complementation group 8 of the peroxisome biogenesis disorders and showed that it encodes an integral peroxisomal membrane protein with a single C-terminal transmembrane domain and a cytosolic N-terminus that interacts with the PEX1/PEX6 heterodimer through direct binding to the latter. They proposed that PEX26 functions as the peroxisomal docking factor for the PEX1/PEX6 heterodimer. Here, we identify new PEX26 disease alleles, localize the PEX6-binding domain to the N-terminal half of the protein (aa 29-174), and show that, at the cellular level, PEX26 deficiency impairs peroxisomal import of both PTS1- and PTS2-targeted matrix proteins. Also, we find that PEX26 undergoes alternative splicing to produce several splice forms--including one, PEX26- delta ex5, that maintains frame and encodes an isoform lacking the transmembrane domain of full-length PEX26 (PEX26-FL). Despite its cytosolic location, PEX26- delta ex5 rescues peroxisome biogenesis in PEX26-deficient cells as efficiently as does PEX26-FL. To test our observation that a peroxisomal location is not required for PEX26 function, we made a chimeric protein (PEX26-Mito) with PEX26 as its N-terminus and the targeting segment of a mitochondrial outer membrane protein (OMP25) at its C-terminus. We found PEX26-Mito localized to the mitochondria and directed all detectable PEX6 and a fraction of PEX1 to this extraperoxisomal location; yet PEX26-Mito retains the full ability to rescue peroxisome biogenesis in PEX26-deficient cells. On the basis of these observations, we suggest that a peroxisomal localization of PEX26 and PEX6 is not required for their function and that the interaction of PEX6 with PEX1 is dynamic. This model predicts that, once activated in an extraperoxisomal location, PEX1 moves to the peroxisome and completes the function of the PEX1/6 heterodimer.

Identification of a novel, intraperoxisomal pex14-binding site in pex13: association of pex13 with the docking complex is essential for peroxisomal matrix protein import

The peroxisomal docking complex is a key component of the import machinery for matrix proteins. The core protein of this complex, Pex14, is thought to represent the initial docking site for the import receptors Pex5 and Pex7. Associated with this complex is a fraction of Pex13, another essential component of the import machinery. Here we demonstrate that Pex13 directly binds Pex14 not only via its SH3 domain but also via a novel intraperoxisomal site. Furthermore, we demonstrate that Pex5 also contributes to the association of Pex13 with Pex14. Peroxisome function was affected only mildly by mutations within the novel Pex14 interaction site of Pex13 or by the non-Pex13-interacting mutant Pex5(W204A). However, when these constructs were tested in combination, PTS1-dependent import and growth on oleic acid were severely compromised. When the SH3 domain-mediated interaction of Pex13 with Pex14 was blocked on top of that, PTS2-dependent matrix protein import was completely compromised and Pex13 was no longer copurified with the docking complex. We conclude that the association of Pex13 with Pex14 is an essential step in peroxisomal protein import that is enabled by two direct interactions and by one that is mediated by Pex5, a result which indicates a novel, receptor-independent function of Pex5.

Pex5p, the peroxisomal cycling receptor, is a monomeric non-globular protein

In mammals, targeting of newly synthesized peroxisomal matrix proteins to the organelle requires Pex5p, the peroxisomal cycling receptor. Pex5p is a multidomain protein involved in a complex network of transient protein-protein interactions. Besides interacting directly with most peroxisomal proteins en route to the organelle, Pex5p has also binding domains for several components of the peroxisomal docking/translocation machinery. However, our knowledge of how binding of a cargo protein to Pex5p influences its properties is still rather limited. Here, we describe a protease assay particularly useful for identifying and characterizing protein-protein interactions involving human Pex5p. Binding of a PTS1-containing peptide/protein to Pex5p as well as the interaction of this peroxin with the Src homology domain 3 of Pex13p could be easily demonstrated using this assay. To address the possible effects of these Pex5p-interacting peptides/proteins on the assumed quaternary structure of Pex5p, we have analyzed the hydrodynamic properties of human Pex5p using size exclusion chromatography, sucrose gradient centrifugation, and sedimentation equilibrium centrifugation. Our results show that Pex5p is a monomeric protein with an abnormal shape. The implications of these findings on current models of protein translocation across the peroxisomal membrane are discussed.

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae peroxisomal import receptor Pex5p is monoubiquitinated in wild type cells

Pex5p is a mobile receptor for peroxisomal targeting signal type I-containing proteins that cycles between the cytoplasm and the peroxisome. Here we show that Pex5p is a stable protein that is monoubiquitinated in wild type cells. By making use of mutants defective in vacuolar or proteasomal degradation we demonstrate that monoubiquitinated Pex5p is not a breakdown intermediate of either system. Monoubiquitinated Pex5p is localized to peroxisomes, and ubiquitination requires the presence of functional docking and RING finger complexes, which suggests that it is a late event in peroxisomal matrix protein import. In pex1, pex4, pex6, pex15, and pex22 mutants, all of which are blocked in the terminal steps of peroxisomal matrix protein import, polyubiquitinated forms of Pex5p accumulate, ubiquitination being dependent on the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Ubc4p. However, Ubc4p is not required for Pex5p ubiquitination in wild type cells, and cells lacking Ubc4p are not affected in peroxisome biogenesis. These results indicate that Pex5p monoubiquitination in wild type cells serves to regulate rather than to degrade Pex5p, which is supported by the observed stability of Pex5p. We propose that Pex5p monoubiquitination in wild type cells is required for the recycling of Pex5p from the peroxisome, whereas Ubc4p-mediated polyubiquitination of Pex5p in mutants blocked in the terminal steps of peroxisomal matrix protein import may function as a disposal mechanism for Pex5p when it gets stuck in the import pathway.

The N terminus of the peroxisomal cycling receptor, Pex5p, is required for redirecting the peroxisome-associated peroxin back to the cytosol

Most newly synthesized peroxisomal matrix proteins are transported to the organelle by Pex5p, a remarkable multidomain protein involved in an intricate network of transient protein-protein interactions. Presently, our knowledge regarding the structure/function of amino acid residues 118 to the very last residue of mammalian Pex5p is quite vast. Indeed, the cargo-protein receptor domain as well as the binding sites for several peroxins have all been mapped to this region of Pex5p. In contrast, structural/functional data regarding the first 117 amino acid residues of Pex5p are still scarce. Here we show that a truncated Pex5p lacking the first 110 amino acid residues (DeltaN110-Pex5p) displays exactly the peroxisomal import properties of the full-length peroxin implying that this N-terminal domain is involved neither in cargo-protein binding nor in the docking/translocation step of the Pex5p-cargo protein complex at the peroxisomal membrane. However, the ATP-dependent export step of DeltaN110-Pex5p from the peroxisomal membrane is completely blocked, a phenomenon that was also observed for a Pex5p version lacking just the first 17 amino acid residues but not for a truncated protein comprising amino acid residues 1-324 of Pex5p. By exploring the unique properties of DeltaN110-Pex5p, the effect of temperature on the import/export kinetics of Pex5p was characterized. Our data indicate that the export step of Pex5p from the peroxisomal compartment (in contrast with its insertion into the organelle membrane) is highly dependent on the temperature.

The energetics of Pex5p-mediated peroxisomal protein import

Most newly synthesized peroxisomal matrix proteins are targeted to the organelle by Pex5p, the peroxisomal cycling receptor. According to current models of peroxisomal biogenesis, Pex5p interacts with cargo proteins in the cytosol and transports them to the peroxisomal membrane. After delivering the passenger protein into the peroxisomal matrix, Pex5p returns to the cytosol to catalyze additional rounds of transportation. Obviously, such cyclic pathway must require energy, and indeed, data confirming this need are already available. However, the exact step(s) of this cycle where energy input is necessary remains unclear. Here, we present data suggesting that insertion of Pex5p into the peroxisomal membrane does not require ATP hydrolysis. This observation raises the possibility that at the peroxisomal membrane ATP is needed predominantly (if not exclusively) downstream of the protein translocation step to reset the Pex5p-mediated transport system.

PEROXISOMEBIOGENESISDISORDERS

The peroxisome biogenesis disorders (PBDs) comprise 12 autosomal recessive complementation groups (CGs). The multisystem clinical phenotype varies widely in severity and results from disturbances in both development and metabolic homeostasis. Progress over the last several years has lead to identification of the genes responsible for all of these disorders and to a much improved understanding of the biogenesis and function of the peroxisome. Increasing availability of mouse models for these disorders offers hope for a better understanding of their pathophysiology and for development of therapies that might especially benefit patients at the milder end of the clinical phenotype.

Insertion of Pex5p into the peroxisomal membrane is cargo protein-dependent

It is now generally accepted that Pex5p, the receptor for most peroxisomal matrix proteins, cycles between the cytosol and the peroxisomal compartment. According to current models of peroxisomal biogenesis, this intracellular trafficking of Pex5p is coupled to the transport of newly synthesized peroxisomal proteins into the organelle matrix. However, direct evidence supporting this hypothesis was never provided. Here, using an in vitro peroxisomal import system, we show that insertion of Pex5p into the peroxisomal membrane requires the presence of cargo proteins. Strikingly the peroxisomal docking/translocation machinery is also able to catalyze the membrane insertion of a Pex5p truncated molecule lacking any known cargo-binding domain. These results suggest that the cytosol/peroxisomal cycle in which Pex5p is involved is directly or indirectly regulated by Pex5p itself and not by the peroxisomal docking/translocation machinery.