Role of genetic testing in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

The Prognostic Value of Combinations of Genetic Polymorphisms in the ITGB3, ITGA2, and CYP2C19*2 Genes in Predicting Cardiovascular Outcomes After Coronary Bypass Grafting

AIM

To determine if there are any associations between the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs): rs2046934, rs1126643, rs5918, rs6065, rs4244285; rs4986893 and the occurrence of cardiovascular events (CVE) in patients following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 130 CABG patients with stable angina grades II-IV. After CABG 69 of the patients were treated with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) alone, and 61 received dual antiplatelet therapy (ASA+clopidogrel). Platelet function was assessed by light transmission aggregometry with adenosinediphosphate and arachidonic acid. The SNPs were identified by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with electrophoretic detection. The mean follow-up period was equal to 10.9 ± 5.2 months. The primary end point included the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemic stroke.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period 12 CVE were registered: 3 deaths, 6 MI, 3 strokes. Patients with composite mutant alleles of ITGB3+CYP2C19*2 or CYP2C19*2 + ITGA2, and with the mutant allele (*2) of CYP2C19, met end points more often than patients with other gene combinations (wild-type homozygotes, presence of one mutant allele of ITGB3 or ITGA2, the composite of mutant alleles of ITGB3+ITGA2 or ITGB3+ITGA2+CYP2C19*2; hazard ratio = 4, 95% confidence interval: 2.19-7.29, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Carriage of a combination of mutant alleles in multiple genes including ITGB3+CYP2C19*2 or CYP2C19*2 + ITGA2 or CYP2C19*2 are possible predictors of CVE in patients after CABG.

The Daniel K. Inouye College of Pharmacy Scripts: Precision Medicine Through the Use of Pharmacogenomics: Current Status and Barriers to Implementation

The precision medicine initiative brought forth by President Barack Obama in 2015 is an important step on the journey to truly personalized medicine. A broad knowledge and understanding of the implications of the pharmacogenomic literature will be critical to the achievement of this goal. While a great amount of data has been published in the areas of pharmacogenomics and pharmacogenetics, there are still relatively few instances in which the need for clinical intervention can be stated without doubt, and which are widely accepted and practiced by the medical community. As our knowledge base rapidly expands, issues such as insurance reimbursement for genetic testing and education of the health care workforce will be paramount to achieving the goal of precision medicine for all patients.