51
|
Abstract
The habitable zone (HZ) is the circular region around a star(s) where standing bodies of water could exist on the surface of a rocky planet. Space missions employ the HZ to select promising targets for follow-up habitability assessment. The classical HZ definition assumes that the most important greenhouse gases for habitable planets orbiting main-sequence stars are CO2 and H2O. Although the classical HZ is an effective navigational tool, recent HZ formulations demonstrate that it cannot thoroughly capture the diversity of habitable exoplanets. Here, I review the planetary and stellar processes considered in both classical and newer HZ formulations. Supplementing the classical HZ with additional considerations from these newer formulations improves our capability to filter out worlds that are unlikely to host life. Such improved HZ tools will be necessary for current and upcoming missions aiming to detect and characterize potentially habitable exoplanets.
Collapse
|
52
|
Walker SI, Bains W, Cronin L, DasSarma S, Danielache S, Domagal-Goldman S, Kacar B, Kiang NY, Lenardic A, Reinhard CT, Moore W, Schwieterman EW, Shkolnik EL, Smith HB. Exoplanet Biosignatures: Future Directions. ASTROBIOLOGY 2018; 18:779-824. [PMID: 29938538 PMCID: PMC6016573 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2017.1738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2017] [Accepted: 03/13/2018] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
We introduce a Bayesian method for guiding future directions for detection of life on exoplanets. We describe empirical and theoretical work necessary to place constraints on the relevant likelihoods, including those emerging from better understanding stellar environment, planetary climate and geophysics, geochemical cycling, the universalities of physics and chemistry, the contingencies of evolutionary history, the properties of life as an emergent complex system, and the mechanisms driving the emergence of life. We provide examples for how the Bayesian formalism could guide future search strategies, including determining observations to prioritize or deciding between targeted searches or larger lower resolution surveys to generate ensemble statistics and address how a Bayesian methodology could constrain the prior probability of life with or without a positive detection. Key Words: Exoplanets-Biosignatures-Life detection-Bayesian analysis. Astrobiology 18, 779-824.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara I. Walker
- School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
- Beyond Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
- ASU-Santa Fe Institute Center for Biosocial Complex Systems, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
- Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, Washington
| | - William Bains
- EAPS (Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Science), MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Rufus Scientific Ltd., Royston, United Kingdom
| | - Leroy Cronin
- School of Chemistry, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Shiladitya DasSarma
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Marine and Environmental Technology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sebastian Danielache
- Department of Materials and Life Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Sophia University, Tokyo, Japan
- Earth Life Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shawn Domagal-Goldman
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Betul Kacar
- Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Reliving the Past Team, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
- Department of Astronomy and Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Nancy Y. Kiang
- NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, New York
| | - Adrian Lenardic
- Department of Earth Science, Rice University, Houston, Texas
| | - Christopher T. Reinhard
- School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Alternative Earths Team, University of California, Riverside, California
| | - William Moore
- Department of Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Hampton University, Hampton, Virginia
- National Institute of Aerospace, Hampton, Virginia
| | - Edward W. Schwieterman
- Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Alternative Earths Team, University of California, Riverside, California
- Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California
- NASA Postdoctoral Program, Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, Maryland
| | - Evgenya L. Shkolnik
- School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
| | - Harrison B. Smith
- School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Fujii Y, Angerhausen D, Deitrick R, Domagal-Goldman S, Grenfell JL, Hori Y, Kane SR, Pallé E, Rauer H, Siegler N, Stapelfeldt K, Stevenson KB. Exoplanet Biosignatures: Observational Prospects. ASTROBIOLOGY 2018; 18:739-778. [PMID: 29938537 PMCID: PMC6016572 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2017.1733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2017] [Accepted: 03/13/2018] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Exoplanet hunting efforts have revealed the prevalence of exotic worlds with diverse properties, including Earth-sized bodies, which has fueled our endeavor to search for life beyond the Solar System. Accumulating experiences in astrophysical, chemical, and climatological characterization of uninhabitable planets are paving the way to characterization of potentially habitable planets. In this paper, we review our possibilities and limitations in characterizing temperate terrestrial planets with future observational capabilities through the 2030s and beyond, as a basis of a broad range of discussions on how to advance "astrobiology" with exoplanets. We discuss the observability of not only the proposed biosignature candidates themselves but also of more general planetary properties that provide circumstantial evidence, since the evaluation of any biosignature candidate relies on its context. Characterization of temperate Earth-sized planets in the coming years will focus on those around nearby late-type stars. The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) and later 30-meter-class ground-based telescopes will empower their chemical investigations. Spectroscopic studies of potentially habitable planets around solar-type stars will likely require a designated spacecraft mission for direct imaging, leveraging technologies that are already being developed and tested as part of the Wide Field InfraRed Survey Telescope (WFIRST) mission. Successful initial characterization of a few nearby targets will be an important touchstone toward a more detailed scrutiny and a larger survey that are envisioned beyond 2030. The broad outlook this paper presents may help develop new observational techniques to detect relevant features as well as frameworks to diagnose planets based on the observables. Key Words: Exoplanets-Biosignatures-Characterization-Planetary atmospheres-Planetary surfaces. Astrobiology 18, 739-778.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuka Fujii
- NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, New York, USA
- Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Ookayama, Meguro, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daniel Angerhausen
- CSH Fellow for Exoplanetary Astronomy, Center for Space and Habitability (CSH), Universität Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Russell Deitrick
- Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- NASA Astrobiology Institute's Virtual Planetary Laboratory
| | - Shawn Domagal-Goldman
- NASA Astrobiology Institute's Virtual Planetary Laboratory
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
| | - John Lee Grenfell
- Department of Extrasolar Planets and Atmospheres (EPA), Institute of Planetary Research, German Aerospace Centre (DLR), Berlin, Germany
| | - Yasunori Hori
- Astrobiology Center, National Institutes of Natural Sciences (NINS), Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Stephen R. Kane
- Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California, USA
| | - Enric Pallé
- Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
- Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
| | - Heike Rauer
- Department of Extrasolar Planets and Atmospheres (EPA), Institute of Planetary Research, German Aerospace Centre (DLR), Berlin, Germany
- Center for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Berlin Institute of Technology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nicholas Siegler
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
- NASA Exoplanet Exploration Office
| | - Karl Stapelfeldt
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
- NASA Exoplanet Exploration Office
| | | |
Collapse
|
54
|
Catling DC, Krissansen-Totton J, Kiang NY, Crisp D, Robinson TD, DasSarma S, Rushby AJ, Del Genio A, Bains W, Domagal-Goldman S. Exoplanet Biosignatures: A Framework for Their Assessment. ASTROBIOLOGY 2018; 18:709-738. [PMID: 29676932 PMCID: PMC6049621 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2017.1737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2017] [Accepted: 12/05/2017] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Finding life on exoplanets from telescopic observations is an ultimate goal of exoplanet science. Life produces gases and other substances, such as pigments, which can have distinct spectral or photometric signatures. Whether or not life is found with future data must be expressed with probabilities, requiring a framework of biosignature assessment. We present a framework in which we advocate using biogeochemical "Exo-Earth System" models to simulate potential biosignatures in spectra or photometry. Given actual observations, simulations are used to find the Bayesian likelihoods of those data occurring for scenarios with and without life. The latter includes "false positives" wherein abiotic sources mimic biosignatures. Prior knowledge of factors influencing planetary inhabitation, including previous observations, is combined with the likelihoods to give the Bayesian posterior probability of life existing on a given exoplanet. Four components of observation and analysis are necessary. (1) Characterization of stellar (e.g., age and spectrum) and exoplanetary system properties, including "external" exoplanet parameters (e.g., mass and radius), to determine an exoplanet's suitability for life. (2) Characterization of "internal" exoplanet parameters (e.g., climate) to evaluate habitability. (3) Assessment of potential biosignatures within the environmental context (components 1-2), including corroborating evidence. (4) Exclusion of false positives. We propose that resulting posterior Bayesian probabilities of life's existence map to five confidence levels, ranging from "very likely" (90-100%) to "very unlikely" (<10%) inhabited. Key Words: Bayesian statistics-Biosignatures-Drake equation-Exoplanets-Habitability-Planetary science. Astrobiology 18, 709-738.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C. Catling
- Astrobiology Program, Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Virtual Planetary Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Joshua Krissansen-Totton
- Astrobiology Program, Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Virtual Planetary Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Nancy Y. Kiang
- NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, New York
| | - David Crisp
- MS 233-200, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California
| | - Tyler D. Robinson
- Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, California
| | - Shiladitya DasSarma
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, and Institute of Marine and Environmental Technology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | - William Bains
- Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Science, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | | |
Collapse
|
55
|
Schwieterman EW, Kiang NY, Parenteau MN, Harman CE, DasSarma S, Fisher TM, Arney GN, Hartnett HE, Reinhard CT, Olson SL, Meadows VS, Cockell CS, Walker SI, Grenfell JL, Hegde S, Rugheimer S, Hu R, Lyons TW. Exoplanet Biosignatures: A Review of Remotely Detectable Signs of Life. ASTROBIOLOGY 2018; 18:663-708. [PMID: 29727196 PMCID: PMC6016574 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2017.1729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2017] [Accepted: 12/10/2017] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
In the coming years and decades, advanced space- and ground-based observatories will allow an unprecedented opportunity to probe the atmospheres and surfaces of potentially habitable exoplanets for signatures of life. Life on Earth, through its gaseous products and reflectance and scattering properties, has left its fingerprint on the spectrum of our planet. Aided by the universality of the laws of physics and chemistry, we turn to Earth's biosphere, both in the present and through geologic time, for analog signatures that will aid in the search for life elsewhere. Considering the insights gained from modern and ancient Earth, and the broader array of hypothetical exoplanet possibilities, we have compiled a comprehensive overview of our current understanding of potential exoplanet biosignatures, including gaseous, surface, and temporal biosignatures. We additionally survey biogenic spectral features that are well known in the specialist literature but have not yet been robustly vetted in the context of exoplanet biosignatures. We briefly review advances in assessing biosignature plausibility, including novel methods for determining chemical disequilibrium from remotely obtainable data and assessment tools for determining the minimum biomass required to maintain short-lived biogenic gases as atmospheric signatures. We focus particularly on advances made since the seminal review by Des Marais et al. The purpose of this work is not to propose new biosignature strategies, a goal left to companion articles in this series, but to review the current literature, draw meaningful connections between seemingly disparate areas, and clear the way for a path forward. Key Words: Exoplanets-Biosignatures-Habitability markers-Photosynthesis-Planetary surfaces-Atmospheres-Spectroscopy-Cryptic biospheres-False positives. Astrobiology 18, 663-708.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward W. Schwieterman
- Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California
- NASA Postdoctoral Program, Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, Maryland
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Alternative Earths Team, Riverside, California
- Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, Washington
| | - Nancy Y. Kiang
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, New York
| | - Mary N. Parenteau
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Ames Research Center, Exobiology Branch, Mountain View, California
| | - Chester E. Harman
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, New York
- Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Shiladitya DasSarma
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Institute of Marine and Environmental Technology, University System of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Theresa M. Fisher
- School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
| | - Giada N. Arney
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington
- Planetary Systems Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland
| | - Hilairy E. Hartnett
- School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
- School of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
| | - Christopher T. Reinhard
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Alternative Earths Team, Riverside, California
- School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Stephanie L. Olson
- Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Alternative Earths Team, Riverside, California
| | - Victoria S. Meadows
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington
- Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Charles S. Cockell
- University of Edinburgh School of Physics and Astronomy, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- UK Centre for Astrobiology, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Sara I. Walker
- Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, Washington
- School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
- Beyond Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
- ASU-Santa Fe Institute Center for Biosocial Complex Systems, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
| | - John Lee Grenfell
- Institut für Planetenforschung (PF), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft und Raumfahrt (DLR), Berlin, Germany
| | - Siddharth Hegde
- Carl Sagan Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
- Cornell Center for Astrophysics and Planetary Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
| | - Sarah Rugheimer
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, United Kingdom
| | - Renyu Hu
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California
- Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California
| | - Timothy W. Lyons
- Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Alternative Earths Team, Riverside, California
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Kiang NY, Domagal-Goldman S, Parenteau MN, Catling DC, Fujii Y, Meadows VS, Schwieterman EW, Walker SI. Exoplanet Biosignatures: At the Dawn of a New Era of Planetary Observations. ASTROBIOLOGY 2018; 18:619-629. [PMID: 29741918 PMCID: PMC6014570 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2018.1862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2018] [Accepted: 03/23/2018] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
The rapid rate of discoveries of exoplanets has expanded the scope of the science possible for the remote detection of life beyond Earth. The Exoplanet Biosignatures Workshop Without Walls (EBWWW) held in 2016 engaged the international scientific community across diverse scientific disciplines, to assess the state of the science and technology in the search for life on exoplanets, and to identify paths for progress. The workshop activities resulted in five major review papers, which provide (1) an encyclopedic review of known and proposed biosignatures and models used to ascertain them (Schwieterman et al., 2018 in this issue); (2) an in-depth review of O2 as a biosignature, rigorously examining the nuances of false positives and false negatives for evidence of life (Meadows et al., 2018 in this issue); (3) a Bayesian framework to comprehensively organize current understanding to quantify confidence in biosignature assessments (Catling et al., 2018 in this issue); (4) an extension of that Bayesian framework in anticipation of increasing planetary data and novel concepts of biosignatures (Walker et al., 2018 in this issue); and (5) a review of the upcoming telescope capabilities to characterize exoplanets and their environment (Fujii et al., 2018 in this issue). Because of the immense content of these review papers, this summary provides a guide to their complementary scope and highlights salient features. Strong themes that emerged from the workshop were that biosignatures must be interpreted in the context of their environment, and that frameworks must be developed to link diverse forms of scientific understanding of that context to quantify the likelihood that a biosignature has been observed. Models are needed to explore the parameter space where measurements will be widespread but sparse in detail. Given the technological prospects for large ground-based telescopes and space-based observatories, the detection of atmospheric signatures of a few potentially habitable planets may come before 2030. Key Words: Exoplanets-Biosignatures-Remote observation-Spectral imaging-Bayesian analysis. Astrobiology 18, 619-626.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Y. Kiang
- NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), New York, New York, USA
- Nexus for Exoplanet System Science, ROCKE-3D Team, NASA GISS, USA
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Shawn Domagal-Goldman
- Nexus for Exoplanet System Science, ROCKE-3D Team, NASA GISS, USA
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
| | - Mary N. Parenteau
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- NASA Ames Research Center, Exobiology Branch, Mountain View, California, USA
| | - David C. Catling
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Earth and Space Sciences/Astrobiology Program, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Yuka Fujii
- Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Ookayama, Meguro, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Victoria S. Meadows
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Edward W. Schwieterman
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California, USA
- NASA Postdoctoral Program, Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, Maryland, USA
- Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Sara I. Walker
- Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, Washington, USA
- School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
- Beyond Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
- ASU-Santa Fe Institute Center for Biosocial Complex Systems, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|