1
|
Wood BE, Hess P, Lustig‐Yaeger J, Gallagher B, Korwan D, Rich N, Stenborg G, Thernisien A, Qadri SN, Santiago F, Peralta J, Arney GN, Izenberg NR, Vourlidas A, Linton MG, Howard RA, Raouafi NE. Parker Solar Probe Imaging of the Night Side of Venus. Geophys Res Lett 2022; 49:e2021GL096302. [PMID: 35864851 PMCID: PMC9286398 DOI: 10.1029/2021gl096302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
We present images of Venus from the Wide-Field Imager for Parker Solar Probe (WISPR) telescope on board the Parker Solar Probe (PSP) spacecraft, obtained during PSP's third and fourth flybys of Venus on 2020 July 11 and 2021 February 20, respectively. Thermal emission from the surface is observed on the night side, representing the shortest wavelength observations of this emission ever, the first detection of the Venusian surface by an optical telescope observing below 0.8 μm. Consistent with previous observations at 1 μm, the cooler highland areas are fainter than the surrounding lowlands. The irradiances measured by WISPR are consistent with model predictions assuming a surface temperature of T = 735 K. In addition to the thermal emission, the WISPR images also show bright nightglow emission at the limb, and we compare the WISPR intensities with previous spectroscopic measurements of the molecular oxygen nightglow lines from Venus Express.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian E. Wood
- Naval Research LaboratorySpace Science DivisionWashingtonDCUSA
| | - Phillip Hess
- Naval Research LaboratorySpace Science DivisionWashingtonDCUSA
| | | | | | - Daniel Korwan
- Naval Research LaboratoryRemote Sensing DivisionWashingtonDCUSA
| | - Nathan Rich
- Naval Research LaboratorySpace Science DivisionWashingtonDCUSA
| | | | | | - Syed N. Qadri
- Naval Research LaboratoryRemote Sensing DivisionWashingtonDCUSA
| | | | | | | | - Noam R. Izenberg
- The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics LaboratoryLaurelMDUSA
| | | | - Mark G. Linton
- Naval Research LaboratorySpace Science DivisionWashingtonDCUSA
| | | | - Nour E. Raouafi
- The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics LaboratoryLaurelMDUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schwieterman EW, Kiang NY, Parenteau MN, Harman CE, DasSarma S, Fisher TM, Arney GN, Hartnett HE, Reinhard CT, Olson SL, Meadows VS, Cockell CS, Walker SI, Grenfell JL, Hegde S, Rugheimer S, Hu R, Lyons TW. Exoplanet Biosignatures: A Review of Remotely Detectable Signs of Life. Astrobiology 2018; 18:663-708. [PMID: 29727196 PMCID: PMC6016574 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2017.1729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2017] [Accepted: 12/10/2017] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
In the coming years and decades, advanced space- and ground-based observatories will allow an unprecedented opportunity to probe the atmospheres and surfaces of potentially habitable exoplanets for signatures of life. Life on Earth, through its gaseous products and reflectance and scattering properties, has left its fingerprint on the spectrum of our planet. Aided by the universality of the laws of physics and chemistry, we turn to Earth's biosphere, both in the present and through geologic time, for analog signatures that will aid in the search for life elsewhere. Considering the insights gained from modern and ancient Earth, and the broader array of hypothetical exoplanet possibilities, we have compiled a comprehensive overview of our current understanding of potential exoplanet biosignatures, including gaseous, surface, and temporal biosignatures. We additionally survey biogenic spectral features that are well known in the specialist literature but have not yet been robustly vetted in the context of exoplanet biosignatures. We briefly review advances in assessing biosignature plausibility, including novel methods for determining chemical disequilibrium from remotely obtainable data and assessment tools for determining the minimum biomass required to maintain short-lived biogenic gases as atmospheric signatures. We focus particularly on advances made since the seminal review by Des Marais et al. The purpose of this work is not to propose new biosignature strategies, a goal left to companion articles in this series, but to review the current literature, draw meaningful connections between seemingly disparate areas, and clear the way for a path forward. Key Words: Exoplanets-Biosignatures-Habitability markers-Photosynthesis-Planetary surfaces-Atmospheres-Spectroscopy-Cryptic biospheres-False positives. Astrobiology 18, 663-708.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward W. Schwieterman
- Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California
- NASA Postdoctoral Program, Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, Maryland
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Alternative Earths Team, Riverside, California
- Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, Washington
| | - Nancy Y. Kiang
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, New York
| | - Mary N. Parenteau
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Ames Research Center, Exobiology Branch, Mountain View, California
| | - Chester E. Harman
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, New York
- Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Shiladitya DasSarma
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Institute of Marine and Environmental Technology, University System of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Theresa M. Fisher
- School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
| | - Giada N. Arney
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington
- Planetary Systems Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland
| | - Hilairy E. Hartnett
- School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
- School of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
| | - Christopher T. Reinhard
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Alternative Earths Team, Riverside, California
- School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Stephanie L. Olson
- Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Alternative Earths Team, Riverside, California
| | - Victoria S. Meadows
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington
- Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Charles S. Cockell
- University of Edinburgh School of Physics and Astronomy, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- UK Centre for Astrobiology, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Sara I. Walker
- Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, Washington
- School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
- Beyond Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
- ASU-Santa Fe Institute Center for Biosocial Complex Systems, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
| | - John Lee Grenfell
- Institut für Planetenforschung (PF), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft und Raumfahrt (DLR), Berlin, Germany
| | - Siddharth Hegde
- Carl Sagan Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
- Cornell Center for Astrophysics and Planetary Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
| | - Sarah Rugheimer
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, United Kingdom
| | - Renyu Hu
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California
- Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California
| | - Timothy W. Lyons
- Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Alternative Earths Team, Riverside, California
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Meadows VS, Reinhard CT, Arney GN, Parenteau MN, Schwieterman EW, Domagal-Goldman SD, Lincowski AP, Stapelfeldt KR, Rauer H, DasSarma S, Hegde S, Narita N, Deitrick R, Lustig-Yaeger J, Lyons TW, Siegler N, Grenfell JL. Exoplanet Biosignatures: Understanding Oxygen as a Biosignature in the Context of Its Environment. Astrobiology 2018; 18:630-662. [PMID: 29746149 PMCID: PMC6014580 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2017.1727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2017] [Accepted: 12/15/2017] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
We describe how environmental context can help determine whether oxygen (O2) detected in extrasolar planetary observations is more likely to have a biological source. Here we provide an in-depth, interdisciplinary example of O2 biosignature identification and observation, which serves as the prototype for the development of a general framework for biosignature assessment. Photosynthetically generated O2 is a potentially strong biosignature, and at high abundance, it was originally thought to be an unambiguous indicator for life. However, as a biosignature, O2 faces two major challenges: (1) it was only present at high abundance for a relatively short period of Earth's history and (2) we now know of several potential planetary mechanisms that can generate abundant O2 without life being present. Consequently, our ability to interpret both the presence and absence of O2 in an exoplanetary spectrum relies on understanding the environmental context. Here we examine the coevolution of life with the early Earth's environment to identify how the interplay of sources and sinks may have suppressed O2 release into the atmosphere for several billion years, producing a false negative for biologically generated O2. These studies suggest that planetary characteristics that may enhance false negatives should be considered when selecting targets for biosignature searches. We review the most recent knowledge of false positives for O2, planetary processes that may generate abundant atmospheric O2 without a biosphere. We provide examples of how future photometric, spectroscopic, and time-dependent observations of O2 and other aspects of the planetary environment can be used to rule out false positives and thereby increase our confidence that any observed O2 is indeed a biosignature. These insights will guide and inform the development of future exoplanet characterization missions. Key Words: Biosignatures-Oxygenic photosynthesis-Exoplanets-Planetary atmospheres. Astrobiology 18, 630-662.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria S. Meadows
- Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington
| | - Christopher T. Reinhard
- School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Alternative Earths Team, Riverside, California
| | - Giada N. Arney
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington
- Planetary Systems Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland
| | - Mary N. Parenteau
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Ames Research Center, Exobiology Branch, Mountain View, California
| | - Edward W. Schwieterman
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Alternative Earths Team, Riverside, California
- Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California
- NASA Postdoctoral Program, Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, Maryland
- Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, Washington
| | - Shawn D. Domagal-Goldman
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington
- Planetary Environments Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland
| | - Andrew P. Lincowski
- Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington
| | - Karl R. Stapelfeldt
- NASA Exoplanet Exploration Program, Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California
| | - Heike Rauer
- German Aerospace Center, Institute of Planetary Research, Extrasolar Planets and Atmospheres, Berlin, Germany
| | - Shiladitya DasSarma
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
- Institute of Marine and Environmental Technology, University System of Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Siddharth Hegde
- Carl Sagan Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
- Cornell Center for Astrophysics and Planetary Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
| | - Norio Narita
- Department of Astronomy, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Astrobiology Center, NINS, Tokyo, Japan
- National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, NINS, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Russell Deitrick
- Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jacob Lustig-Yaeger
- Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, Seattle, Washington
| | - Timothy W. Lyons
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, Alternative Earths Team, Riverside, California
- Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California
| | - Nicholas Siegler
- NASA Exoplanet Exploration Program, Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California
| | - J. Lee Grenfell
- German Aerospace Center, Institute of Planetary Research, Extrasolar Planets and Atmospheres, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Meadows VS, Arney GN, Schwieterman EW, Lustig-Yaeger J, Lincowski AP, Robinson T, Domagal-Goldman SD, Deitrick R, Barnes RK, Fleming DP, Luger R, Driscoll PE, Quinn TR, Crisp D. The Habitability of Proxima Centauri b: Environmental States and Observational Discriminants. Astrobiology 2018; 18:133-189. [PMID: 29431479 PMCID: PMC5820795 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2016.1589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2016] [Accepted: 09/04/2017] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Proxima Centauri b provides an unprecedented opportunity to understand the evolution and nature of terrestrial planets orbiting M dwarfs. Although Proxima Cen b orbits within its star's habitable zone, multiple plausible evolutionary paths could have generated different environments that may or may not be habitable. Here, we use 1-D coupled climate-photochemical models to generate self-consistent atmospheres for several evolutionary scenarios, including high-O2, high-CO2, and more Earth-like atmospheres, with both oxic and anoxic compositions. We show that these modeled environments can be habitable or uninhabitable at Proxima Cen b's position in the habitable zone. We use radiative transfer models to generate synthetic spectra and thermal phase curves for these simulated environments, and use instrument models to explore our ability to discriminate between possible planetary states. These results are applicable not only to Proxima Cen b but to other terrestrial planets orbiting M dwarfs. Thermal phase curves may provide the first constraint on the existence of an atmosphere. We find that James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) observations longward of 10 μm could characterize atmospheric heat transport and molecular composition. Detection of ocean glint is unlikely with JWST but may be within the reach of larger-aperture telescopes. Direct imaging spectra may detect O4 absorption, which is diagnostic of massive water loss and O2 retention, rather than a photosynthetic biosphere. Similarly, strong CO2 and CO bands at wavelengths shortward of 2.5 μm would indicate a CO2-dominated atmosphere. If the planet is habitable and volatile-rich, direct imaging will be the best means of detecting habitability. Earth-like planets with microbial biospheres may be identified by the presence of CH4-which has a longer atmospheric lifetime under Proxima Centauri's incident UV-and either photosynthetically produced O2 or a hydrocarbon haze layer. Key Words: Planetary habitability and biosignatures-Planetary atmospheres-Exoplanets-Spectroscopic biosignatures-Planetary science-Proxima Centauri b. Astrobiology 18, 133-189.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria S. Meadows
- Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Astrobiology Institute—Virtual Planetary Laboratory Lead Team, USA
| | - Giada N. Arney
- Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Astrobiology Institute—Virtual Planetary Laboratory Lead Team, USA
- Planetary Systems Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland
| | - Edward W. Schwieterman
- Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Astrobiology Institute—Virtual Planetary Laboratory Lead Team, USA
- NASA Postdoctoral Program, Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, Maryland
- Department of Earth Sciences, University of California at Riverside, Riverside, California
| | - Jacob Lustig-Yaeger
- Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Astrobiology Institute—Virtual Planetary Laboratory Lead Team, USA
| | - Andrew P. Lincowski
- Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Astrobiology Institute—Virtual Planetary Laboratory Lead Team, USA
| | - Tyler Robinson
- NASA Astrobiology Institute—Virtual Planetary Laboratory Lead Team, USA
- Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, California
| | - Shawn D. Domagal-Goldman
- NASA Astrobiology Institute—Virtual Planetary Laboratory Lead Team, USA
- Planetary Environments Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland
| | - Russell Deitrick
- Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Astrobiology Institute—Virtual Planetary Laboratory Lead Team, USA
| | - Rory K. Barnes
- Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Astrobiology Institute—Virtual Planetary Laboratory Lead Team, USA
| | - David P. Fleming
- Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Astrobiology Institute—Virtual Planetary Laboratory Lead Team, USA
| | - Rodrigo Luger
- Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Astrobiology Institute—Virtual Planetary Laboratory Lead Team, USA
| | - Peter E. Driscoll
- NASA Astrobiology Institute—Virtual Planetary Laboratory Lead Team, USA
- Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, DC
| | - Thomas R. Quinn
- Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- NASA Astrobiology Institute—Virtual Planetary Laboratory Lead Team, USA
| | - David Crisp
- NASA Astrobiology Institute—Virtual Planetary Laboratory Lead Team, USA
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schwieterman EW, Meadows VS, Domagal-Goldman SD, Deming D, Arney GN, Luger R, Harman CE, Misra A, Barnes R. IDENTIFYING PLANETARY BIOSIGNATURE IMPOSTORS: SPECTRAL FEATURES OF CO AND O 4 RESULTING FROM ABIOTIC O 2/O 3 PRODUCTION. Astrophys J Lett 2016; Volume 819:L34. [PMID: 30147857 PMCID: PMC6108182 DOI: 10.3847/2041-8205/819/1/l13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
O2 and O3 have been long considered the most robust individual biosignature gases in a planetary atmosphere, yet multiple mechanisms that may produce them in the absence of life have been described. However, these abiotic planetary mechanisms modify the environment in potentially identifiable ways. Here we briefly discuss two of the most detectable spectral discriminants for abiotic O2/O3: CO and O4. We produce the first explicit self-consistent simulations of these spectral discriminants as they may be seen by James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). If JWST-NIRISS and/or NIRSpec observe CO (2.35, 4.6 μm) in conjunction with CO2 (1.6, 2.0, 4.3 μm) in the transmission spectrum of a terrestrial planet it could indicate robust CO2 photolysis and suggest that a future detection of O2 or O3 might not be biogenic. Strong O4 bands seen in transmission at 1.06 and 1.27 μm could be diagnostic of a post-runaway O2-dominated atmosphere from massive H-escape. We find that for these false positive scenarios, CO at 2.35 μm, CO2 at 2.0 and 4.3 μm, and O4 at 1.27 μm are all stronger features in transmission than O2/O3 and could be detected with S/Ns ≳ 3 for an Earth-size planet orbiting a nearby M dwarf star with as few as 10 transits, assuming photon-limited noise. O4 bands could also be sought in UV/VIS/NIR reflected light (at 0.345, 0.36, 0.38, 0.445, 0.475, 0.53, 0.57, 0.63, 1.06, and 1.27 μm) by a next generation direct-imaging telescope such as LUVOIR/HDST or HabEx and would indicate an oxygen atmosphere too massive to be biologically produced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward W Schwieterman
- Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
- NASA Astrobiology Institute's Virtual Planetary Laboratory, Seattle, WA 981195, USA
- Astrobiology Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Victoria S Meadows
- Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
- NASA Astrobiology Institute's Virtual Planetary Laboratory, Seattle, WA 981195, USA
- Astrobiology Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Shawn D Domagal-Goldman
- NASA Astrobiology Institute's Virtual Planetary Laboratory, Seattle, WA 981195, USA
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
| | - Drake Deming
- NASA Astrobiology Institute's Virtual Planetary Laboratory, Seattle, WA 981195, USA
- Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
| | - Giada N Arney
- Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
- NASA Astrobiology Institute's Virtual Planetary Laboratory, Seattle, WA 981195, USA
- Astrobiology Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Rodrigo Luger
- Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
- NASA Astrobiology Institute's Virtual Planetary Laboratory, Seattle, WA 981195, USA
- Astrobiology Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Chester E Harman
- NASA Astrobiology Institute's Virtual Planetary Laboratory, Seattle, WA 981195, USA
- Geosciences Department, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
- Pennsylvania State Astrobiology Research Center, 2217 Earth and Engineering Sciences Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA
- Center for Exoplanets and Habitable Worlds, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
| | - Amit Misra
- Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
- NASA Astrobiology Institute's Virtual Planetary Laboratory, Seattle, WA 981195, USA
- Astrobiology Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Rory Barnes
- Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
- NASA Astrobiology Institute's Virtual Planetary Laboratory, Seattle, WA 981195, USA
- Astrobiology Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| |
Collapse
|